Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Uploaded by sockpuppet of prolific long-term spammer at enwiki. Self-promotional, zero encyclopedic use. Out of scope. Kinu (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by sockpuppet of prolific long-term spammer at enwiki. Self-promotional, zero encyclopedic use. Out of scope. Kinu (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal, unused picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 07:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD#F10. ~riley (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
it doesn't fit c.c. standard. KodokunaSmile (talk) 11:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a complete fraud!!! This image is taken from my previously uploaded photo. It is NOT OWN WORK, and it is NOT Fort Dumoine! Even though it is in use, we cannot and should not support a blatant hoax, nor would a redirect be suitable. Disciplinary action is necessary for this user and all other historic images uploaded by this user should be scrutinized. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: qualified for speedy deletion as Commons:CSD#G3. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Campanar0
[edit]Photographs in which no information about its origin is provided, like in other files uploaded by User:Campanar0. I have reported as well the most obvious copyvios.
- File:Miguel Abriat Cantó.jpg
- File:Theodor Wisch..jpg
- File:Felix Steiner & Harald Riipalu.jpg
- File:Karl-Adolf Hollidt..jpg
- File:Jesús Aramburu Olarán.jpg
P4K1T0 (talk) 10:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC).
Deleted Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Overview of leukocyte-intrinsic Hippo pathway functions
[edit]We are adding biological pathway images from WikiPathways, and I initially thought users might want different variations of these images grouped into a gallery. But no one is asking for this gallery, and it will make things simpler to just overwrite the existing image if a minor improvement is made. If someone makes a major change, that image can become its own new upload to Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiPathways2wiki (talk • contribs) 23:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted per request of creator. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Source licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license Sealle (talk) 09:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader’s clarification. --Sealle (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:FAILE (artist collaboration)
[edit]No evidence that this artwork falls under a free licence. It doesn't appear to be graffiti, and there's no FOP in the US for artworks such as this.
- File:Faile get acquainted.jpg
- File:Faile It Happens Everyday.jpg
- File:Faile Michael Jackson stencil.jpg
- File:Faile.JPG
-mattbuck (Talk) 20:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- In what way do you think it's not graffiti? // Liftarn (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- To me these look to be in some form of temporary gallery. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- File:Faile Michael Jackson stencil.jpg gives the location as "on a wall, Manhattan". // Liftarn (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- To me these look to be in some form of temporary gallery. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Freedom of panorama. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- I propose thisfile for deletion, due to the fact its not sharp and still we have other photographs of the pond. Juandev (talk) 13:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Kept - INUSE Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
ho sbagliato file Antonio Paratore (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Again (Uploader has been blocked before) danger of copyright violation Carolus (talk) 06:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 12:54, 10 April 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Accidental upload, was trying to upload a non-free version. ErtritK (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:36, 11 März 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Already deleted as File:Bobby Robson More Than A Manager.png --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
It appears not a work of free copyright. --Okstartnow (talk) 07:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 09:23, 26 Juni 2019 UTC: Likely copyright violation, see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal drawing, not used on any wiki. Jean Comtois (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Rehman at 03:07, 20 Mai 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Tms masum (talk) 12:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 20:29, 26 April 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tms masum --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 03:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:20, 23 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 08:19, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55 at 09:58, 12 Februar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy: uploader's request or plain text or screenshots --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 05:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55 at 09:58, 12 Februar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy: uploader's request or plain text or screenshots --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55 at 09:58, 12 Februar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy: uploader's request or plain text or screenshots --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55 at 09:58, 12 Februar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy: uploader's request or plain text or screenshots --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Achim55 at 09:58, 12 Februar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy: uploader's request or plain text or screenshots --Krdbot 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, not educationally useful. Grand-Duc (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 00:25, 4 November 2019 UTC: Files not free, see f.e. requests or https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung/Archiv/2019/11/03&oldid=193734713#Benutzer:HERR_STEFFEN_G._Bundefined96TTCHER_(erl.) --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -WW2Editorhistory (talk) 14:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Uploading it by mistake for the category of the licensing.
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:34, 31 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: copyrighted logo --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: not educationally useful, unused personal selfie. Grand-Duc (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 00:25, 4 November 2019 UTC: Files not free, see f.e. requests or https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung/Archiv/2019/11/03&oldid=193734713#Benutzer:HERR_STEFFEN_G._Bundefined96TTCHER_(erl.) --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ruslan.kuziak (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:59, 18 April 2020 UTC: CSD F7 (file is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format) --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 06:33, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 23:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 01:52, 28 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Janvwirth (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Reason: Complaint of Ms. Wartenpfuhl - I did not haven the right to publish this pic.
Deleted by DaB. at 13:24, 16 April 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mit Birgit-Wartenpfuhl, Bad-Sooden-Allendorf, August 2018.jpg --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 03:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 03:29, 14 Dezember 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - OTRS pending for over 30 days --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Private photo of me that I would like deleted off of Wikimedia as soon as possible. IndeedSir (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 07:58, 19 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hisham Omar.png --Krdbot 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User: sai1820680
[edit]Reasons for deletion request --Sai1820680 (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)uploaded by mistake Sai1820680 (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 13:39, 15 Februar 2019 UTC: spam --Krdbot 19:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Revoke access to any accounts Crystal AREY it's online identity theft 2601:200:4000:CA0:D14C:23BF:D246:E2C0 19:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Lack of COM:EDUSE. Achim (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted as nonsense. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
There is a license for the photograph, but none for the mural. This is a recent work by Joel Bergner. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: withdrawn in favor of a mass request. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
author request HeshamAlmeneif (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Because the image was taken from the Internet. TechExpert2020 (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 21:37, 8 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Commercial packaging --Krdbot 01:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/jenniriveramusic/photos/a.10150960777253924/10150960777978924/?type=3&theater Montgomery (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ymblanter at 17:29, 8 Mai 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jenni Rivera 2011.png: https://www.facebook.com/jenniriveramusic/photos/a.10150960777253924/10150960777978924/?type=3&theater --Krdbot 01:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I was testing the tool and uploaded by mistake. Sorry,new user :) AlbastruMaria (talk) 23:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 07:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This is NOT my work, uploaded the wrong file by mistake, sorry for the mistake, I am new to wikipedia editing AlbastruMaria (talk) 23:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 07:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
cross-wiki vandal, no educational purpose, likely derived from copyright image/objects Bovlb (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 23:57, 8 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 07:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
cross-wiki vandal, no educational purpose, likely derived from copyright image/objects Bovlb (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 23:57, 8 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 07:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deceptive description as there have never been a mayor with such a name, the file's subject most likely out of scope. --Thevolodymyr (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Likely the same problem with the uploader's other upload: File:HlibSirenkoSenator.jpg . --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, whatever Senator is supposed to mean here, it's just another deception. --Thevolodymyr (talk) 07:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; both have been deleted already in 2019 by colleague Jcb. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:PENIS 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted once as "blurred and out of scope". --Herby talk thyme 11:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 12:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda Thanks for reverting his blanking. He's done it on multiple nominations and files. I wasn't going to bother reverting them because it makes him look that much more guilty. And whether it is blanked or not, the history and nomination remains, so it really doesn't change the situation. Quakewoody (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Link does not go to specific Flickr page, image is likely out of project scope. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Quakewoody (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's likely to be a photo of another photo, so there are copyright grounds for deletion as well. --Ahmadtalk 02:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE. This is in use, but only by d:Q85683900, which I haven't deleted yet because Category:Michelangelo Azzariti provides a claim of notability. This is the only image in the category, so once this is deleted, the category can be deleted, and so can the wikidata item DannyS712 (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also, created by a sockpuppet - see d:WD:AN#Report concerning User:Bella Aria --DannyS712 (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
lo dublique Sandra acevedo muñoz (talk) 04:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Inutilisé Paul-Eric Langevin (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Inutilisé 176.159.108.29 16:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: own user space. --Achim (talk) 18:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
falscher Ort, gehört zum Nachbarort nach Densborn (nicht Usch) Thomas Hummel (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kept, file is renamed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22
- 05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
falscher Ort, gehört zum Nachbarort nach Densborn (nicht Usch) Thomas Hummel (talk) 21:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kept. No reason to nominate a file. It will be renamed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22
- 02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason=Duplicate of File:Maddock Alumni Center.jpg |subpage=File:Maddock Alumni Center.jpeg |day=8 |month=May |year=2020 }}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 00:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, my image has been templated for speedy deletion as it is assumed that I have colorized a historical illustration from a book somewhere. However, this is an original work that I created and would like to discuss whether this meets deletion criteria at all. I have been talking with the admin EugeneZelenko and we have been discussing the issue on my talk page as well as his. I provide edited versions of my response here from our discussion. I'm not sure however that I may have fully represented all of his concerns, but the full comments are posted in this section of his talk page, EugeneZelenko, as well as my talk page: wtfiv
My concern is whether it is the image creation process itself which is part of the problem.
The first posts (in response to my request asking why the image was marked for speedy deletion)
[edit]There is no doubt that many of elements are inspired by numerous images depicting scenes and items from the 1615-1630 English colonial era to ensure historical accuracy. Its overall composition- inspired by a number of out-of-copyright works illustrating the colonial era- is a visual dramatization based on the written record by the Virginia Company Court in Jamestown during 1623. However, this image is unique, and solely created by me. I've licensed it so that it is now open to use by all if is at all helpful.
If the term "embossed and cropped" raised the issues, this is just in reference to the iterative process of composition. (Please look at the older images. Most of the constructive iterations are done off-line, but some can be seen in the previous images.)
Comparison of image I used as inspiration for my image
[edit]To clarify my comment on your talk page about Abbey's Hutchinson image serving as my inspiration, I post both images here for comparison.
Description of Working Procedure
[edit]I wrote the following in response to the administrator's request that I post a bigger version of the file to provide further evidence that this is my work, I've outlined my working procedure below.
There is no larger image: For most of the time, I worked in a 600 x 450 pixeled space, which I eventually cropped down to a 570 x 406, then to 570 x 395 space to heighten the pictorial drama (e.g., slightly clipping the dress, the table, and the figure on the left to heighten the dramatic tension by having the figures slightly out of frame). And yes, I built it in black and white before coloring, so could focus on the difficult drawing. After I created the image, I then determined the coloring based on my own sense of dramatic color theory (e.g., Anglican preacher's dark blue on mid-height left, contrasted by a yellow coming from the upper window that creates a Vermeer-like contrast.
The individual elements are constructed from dozen of composite micropieces that I individually work.
If you look carefully at the back wall on the right, my working method is obvious to inspection: I created a single panel for the back wall by creating and merging three textured, rectangular objects (i.e., one for a vertical board, one for a horizontal board, and one for a panel). I then duplicated the resultant panel three times, slightly modifying the distortion of each to break up "too easily observed" sense of repetition. I then arranged them into a fixed-horizon vanish point frame I created that vanishes off-screen to the left to create the sense of walled perspective.
An inspection of Cecily's image history on the upload page serves as another example of my work process. If you look at the history of the images where the final one is posted, you can see my working method in the previous images. After doing further research on Jamestown fashion, I realized that I got both her collar and the sleeves wrong in my original upload. If you examine the image changes, you will see the sleeves are constructed composites of multiple shaped and proportioned rectangles, which are then textured shaded to match the dress, which itself is based on multiple elements. In fact, Cecily herself is constructed of over a dozen separate elements, which were modified and reworked- often pixel by pixel- until they form a single ensemble. I had to create the arms, the heads, the face, and then rework them into a whole: you will find not find anything like the figure of Cecily on the web (or in any book illustration either).Wtfiv (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Discussion?
[edit]In the end, the administrator continues to insist that I attribute the original illustration, but there is no such original from which this composition was derived. But, as mentioned I am wondering if the working process itself is the cause of this problem? If I need to share my work process for constructing the images in this work in more detail, I can. As can be seen, I'd like to retain this image on the commons. Any help and insight would be appreciated.Wtfiv (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep The information provided by Wtfiv convinces me that this is an original image. I don't think additional proof, such as the PSD, is necessary, unless Wtfiv wants to provide it (uploaded somewhere like CommonsArchive, for example, or through COM:OTRS). clpo13(talk) 17:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept per discussion. (non-admin closure).Jonteemil (talk) 07:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Нет места положения Gans Alifan (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 07:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
created by me in error, now at Category:Shift6m MrProperLawAndOrder (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied, as filed by editor on day of creation. --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 04:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promotional, see also Special:DeletedContributions/Ananislam138. --Achim (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:4Cabase1.jpg
- File:2Cabase1.jpg
- File:Cabase1.jpg
- File:Cabase123.jpg
- File:CamellaCabase CV.jpg
- File:Camella Alstom work nya.jpg
- File:Cams id.jpg
- File:Camella HS.jpg
- File:Camella Mama.jpg
- File:Camella Girl Friends.jpg
- File:Camella Graduation.jpg
- File:Camella PICC.jpg
- File:Camella Alstom Work.jpg
- File:Camella Boyet Friends.jpg
- File:Camella Friends.jpg
- File:Camella ELEM.jpg
- File:Camella Family.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate page. Correct file has been uploaded and it is being used in the Mesoamerican Languages wikipedia article. Lexis kernel 215 (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin Uwe Lauer
[edit]Affected:
- File:Dragos Alexandru S.jpg
- File:Dragos Alexandru Sandulache.jpg
- File:Dragos Alexandru sandulache 1.jpg
Out of scope. Failed PR attempt at ro:Sprezza, ro:Dragoș Alexandru Săndulache, and de:Dragoș Alexandru Săndulache. Gikü (talk) 08:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Jean-Noël Herlin Archive Project
[edit]These images are part of the Jean-Noël Herlin Archive project - the artist/collector is still alive - see en:Jean-Noël Herlin - All these images need permission
- File:Image 20 from the Jean-Noël Herlin Archive Project.jpg
- File:Foucault Jean-Noël Herlin.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-471.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-429.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-469.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-453.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-467.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-456.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-459.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-468.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-474.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-462.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-477.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-475.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-470.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-490.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-458.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-457.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-463.jpg
- File:JeanNoelHerlinwebimage-452.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010127.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010157-2.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010078.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010123.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010133.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010156.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010149-2.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010069.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010141-2.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010144.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010068.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010120-2.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010161-3.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010136-2.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010129.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinP1010167.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinIMAG0531.jpg
- File:JeannoelherlinIMAG0509 1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Westley Richards 1812 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Westley Richards Factory, 130 Pritchett Street, Birmingham.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Bournbrook Factory.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Safari Collection in the Showroom.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Seating Area in the Showroom.jpg
- File:Westley Richards 28G Hand Detachable Lock (Droplock) Shotgun.jpg
- File:A selection of Westley Richards exhibition grade guns & rifles.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Ostrich Leather Travel Collection.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Showroom.jpg
- File:Westley Richards 'Africa' .600 Sidelock Double Rifle.jpg
- File:Anson & Deeley Specification.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Factory.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Leather Shop.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Hand Detachable Lock (Droplock) Shotgun 1.jpg
- File:Westley Richards Hand Detachable Lock (Droplock) Shotgun 2.jpg
- File:77A7018-Edit.jpg
- File:Gun-Cleaning-NL-2020-879-Edit-2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Westley Richards 1812 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TUMELO MAZIMBA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:I'm just a silent guy. who like it when people talk around.jpg
- File:Tumza la mellow othanda ucula.jpg
- File:TUMELOW MELLOW.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Doubtful own works.
Yann (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
I worked hard creating Fort Prud'homme where there is nothing on the fort, and retouching the photo of Fort Saint-Louis which I took here in Quebec City at the Musée de la civilisation.--Varing (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete Not really sure about this, as the first file is just a screenshot capture from the Empire Total War video game and, as for the second one, it seems to me as scanned book material (just look on the curves and the slightly darker colors on the right side of the picture...)...--Glorious 93 (talk) 14:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Glorious 93. Yann (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
This uploader has been proven to be unreliable, falsely claiming own work and falsifying data (see above and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fort Dumoine.jpg). These photos are almost certainly not own work: grainy low-res or upsized images (cropped from somewhere else), missing or inconsistent EXIF (7 different cameras!).
I have not nominated the photos taken with Canon PowerShot A520 as they appear higher-res/unmanipulated, but may also need a second look...
- File:Fort Bas de la Rivière.jpg
- File:Fort Miamis.jpg
- File:Fort de La Boulaye.jpg
- File:Fort La Pointe.jpg
- File:Fort Orléans.JPG
- File:Le Prudent.jpg
- File:Église Maliotenam.jpg
- File:Qinzhou 4.jpg
- File:Le Pélican 2.jpg
- File:Le Pélican 1.jpg
- File:La Tuque.jpg
- File:L'Éléphant.JPG
- File:Maison Montcalm.jpg
- File:Place Tian'anmen1.jpg
- File:San Antonio downtown.jpg
- File:Mechanic Falls Station.JPG
- File:Grand Trunk Station, Lewiston.jpg
- File:Lewiston, Maine.JPG
- File:Cathédrale Port-au-Prince.jpg
- File:Notre-Dame de Port-au-Prince.jpg
- File:Churchill Catholic Cathedral.jpg
- File:Fort Caroline.jpg
- File:Fort Sandusky.jpg
- File:Fort Bon Secours.jpg
- File:Val Cartier.jpg
- File:Fort La Reine1.jpg
- File:Sunwah Feb2.jpg
- File:Fort Chambly.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Senegal rappers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Keyzit publishing.jpg
- File:Oothentik Zeus et Faada Freddy.jpg
- File:Oothentik et pape sidy fall.jpg
- File:Week end start.jpg
- File:Rts 1.jpg
- File:Zeus au Flow Up.jpg
- File:Omzo beatz.jpg
- File:Cover de Recto Verso.jpg
- File:Oothentik à 2stv.jpg
- File:Oothentik zeus et Papay Papam.jpg
- File:Le petit Baye Dial Gueye.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imranansari97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pandit manas tiwari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:City of nepal.jpg
- File:Up 65 .jpg
- File:Manas tiwari .jpg
- File:Manas tiwari.jpg
- File:City of ganga.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope Gbawden (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tornado Thunder Basha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حليمة عراسي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:RABEEA CM 19.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 18.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 17.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 16.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 15.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 14.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 13.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 12.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 11.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 10.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 9.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 8.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 7.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM .jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 6.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 5.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 4.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 3.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM 2.jpg
- File:RABEEA CM.jpg
- File:ശൈഖ് മുഹമ്മദ് കാരക്കുന്ന്.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singer Rupesh Choudhary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary r.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary st.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary q.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary p.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary o.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary n.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary m.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary k.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary l.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary j.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary i.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary h.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary giyy.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary g.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary f.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary d.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary e.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary v.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary bki.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary b.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary bhu.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary a.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary phm.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary ph.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary photo v.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh choudhary bvh.jpg
- File:Singer Rupesh Choudhary.jpg
- File:Lockdown ke look.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Justin Mahaboob Basha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Mahaboob Basha Syed.jpg
- File:Nayaz Mahaboob Basha.jpg
- File:Just Mahaboob Basha.jpg
- File:Justin Mahaboob Basha.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused blurry screenshot, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jon N Louis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused tiny images, likely not own work and unusable, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Desmet dave (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works but photos of historical photos and DW, missing permission, and text-only image, out of scope.
- File:Jules Dewaele graf Le Havre.jpg
- File:Jules Dewaele.JPG
- File:Zoon Jules Dewaele.JPG
- File:Kleinzonen Jules Dewaele.JPG
- File:Jules Dewaele, gesneuveld in WOI.JPG
- File:Mededeling overlijden Jules Médart Dewaele.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable hockey player, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armenian Assembly (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, just a text
Sealle (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipe arce (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of Jose Andre likely not own works: inconsistent sizes and qualities, two clearly credited to World Bank Group in EXIF. Rest are logos and promotional images, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:Jose Andre - USA.jpg
- File:Jose Andre.jpg
- File:José André Montaño.png
- File:Jose Andre logo.png
- File:Jose Andre - Piano.jpg
- File:Wall Amerpages.jpg
- File:LogoAmerpages.png
- File:TraficoAmerpages.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. Arghya1999 (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. Arghya1999 (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused. Falls in the scope of G7 as well. --Ahmadtalk 17:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arghya1999 (talk) 09:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File page with no file. --Achim (talk) 19:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a duplicate that I uploaded by error when I was trying to use it for a page. The correct image is now being used in the Mesoamerican Languages wikipedia page. Lexis kernel 215 (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused. Falls in the scope of G7 as well. --Ahmadtalk 18:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be Google maps. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW, Source: https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=2875070 SCP-2000 00:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation - see https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/sanju-samson-stamps-his-class-as-india-a-take-series-4-1/articleshow/71020924.cms Larry Hockett (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 18:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
source file from which this image was extracted is deleted. Gpkp (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused private photo of an insignificant person with insufficient description - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 02:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's likely to be a screenshot, so I think there are copyright concerns, too. --Ahmadtalk 18:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused and insufficiently described map of very low quality - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's likely to be a screenshot (of a game, most probably). --Ahmadtalk 18:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Obviously false author, source, date and license statement. Missing description. ŠJů (talk) 03:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: we have a better version at File:Vrancx Soldiers Plundering.jpg. I think the name is non-descriptive and a redirect is therefore not needed. Apparently, it's in Czech language and means "suffering" (w:cs:Utrpení). --Ahmadtalk 18:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded by accident Asadli.edy (talk) 03:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader's request, unused. I believe it falls in the scope of G7 as well. --Ahmadtalk 18:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded by accident Asadli.edy (talk) 03:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader's request, unused. I believe it falls in the scope of G7 as well. --Ahmadtalk 18:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Fantasy diagram, out of scope. Slashme (talk) 10:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Also please delete File:Oberian Senate.svg and File:Oberian House.svg --Slashme (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Source site doesn't come up, but it seems unlikely that this has a CC license (Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. We can’t connect to the server at shoratehran.ir.) . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I can load the source site successfully, but there is no indication of publication under a free license, and it's unlikely for the city council of Tehran to release its content under a free license. --Ahmadtalk 16:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
This picture is a polygonized aerial image, probably captured from a 3D view in Google Maps. Suspected as copyright violation. Mzaki (talk) 05:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the location giving similar view. --Mzaki (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
This is per curtessy deletion request from ticket:2020050710009101. Unused photo and we have better photos of the same person, even from the same event. I, personally, support this request ( Delete). Ankry (talk) 08:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and ticket --DannyS712 (talk) 09:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
We hold many high-quality images of species-identified shrubs, and there is no realistic educational use for a blurry image of an unidentified shrub. 193.210.230.160 09:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Identification not possible due to low quality. --Achim (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: We already have too much images of such low quality, and lacking description.--ProfessorX (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted sculpture. No FoP in France. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Originally tagged with {{Nld}} but since there have been some discussion and edits regarding the license, turning this to a common deletion request. Apalsola t • c 10:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- And to clarify, Freedom of Panorama is not an issue here, since there is Freedom of Panorama in Finland for buildings. The problem is the license of the photograph itself. ––Apalsola t • c 11:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC
- Keep The uploader added {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} to the file, so the file can be and should be kept. ––Apalsola t • c 14:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the above. I re-added {{FoP-Finland}}. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep now that it has the license added to it. Good photo, glad it's sticking around. -Yupik (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused tiny photo, looks like photo of existing photo. And who are they? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unidentified group of persons in low-resolution image of uncertain origin. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
out of scope. No real educational value. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and the copyright holder of a photo is the person who took it, not the person who appeared in it. Considering the username, I'd say we need OTRS permission for it. It's also small, lacks EXIF data, and is likely to be a screenshot. --Ahmadtalk 22:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF. Very probably taken from the Net without permission. Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. It can probably be considered out of scope as well, though I'm not sure about that. --Ahmadtalk 22:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Low quality, there are better images of people playing volleyball on commons Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's also available here (direct link). If the url is accurate, it was there before being uploaded to Commons. --Ahmadtalk 22:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
AK
LAKE ALAU SITE.jpg
[edit]Reasons for deletion request --Abdullahikaragama (talk) 06:13, 15 June 2019 (UTC) it against my will was publish
Procedural close. File:ABDULLAHI KARAGAMA AT LAKE ALAU SITE.jpg was deleted in 2019, there is no File:LAKE ALAU SITE.jpg, and the other files are placeholder names (the first existed once as a file, the two others not), so nothing to do here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
com:PACKAGING Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: no educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and I think the copyright status is not clear. --Ahmadtalk 07:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
This is an ad. Gikü (talk) 08:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 07:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. w:tr:Cantuğ Özsoy was deleted several times, the photo is small and lacks EXIF data. In addition, this photo looks like a COM:DW to me. The background was apparently added later. --Ahmadtalk 07:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused simple book cover, author Ramapanivada is non-notable. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 07:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Very low quality, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
out of focus photo Mindmatrix 12:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 08:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
out of focus photo Mindmatrix 12:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 08:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 10:19, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
The original owner of this page does not exist anymore. This is a picture that should be removed. 208.87.239.180 12:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photos by non-contributor; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 10:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
This photo is probably copied from this site. Puppe100 (talk) 12:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to the url, the photo was there before being uploaded to Commons. --Ahmadtalk 10:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
From https://www.pablosky.com/en/company/about-pablosky Ytoyoda (talk) 13:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 10:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at http://coriandretrad.free.fr/index.shtml Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 13:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Self promo on wikidata. en.wikipage is not uploader's own userspace Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam / out of scope / previously deleted Quakewoody (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
previously deleted - cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 11:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per CSD G4. I also suggest salting this file to prevent reuploads. --pandakekok9 11:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Salt does no good, as the user has already used different file names. Plus, by not salting, it remains open as a honeypot and is much easier to find. Quakewoody (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. This is self-promotion campaign, uploader is prolific sockmaster. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The cover art is likely not own work. Who is author of the drawing and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I have no idea. All numbers of this periodical mimeographed and organ of the Centro Nazionale di Lingua e Letteratura Russa in Rome had similar drawings (apparently from Russian popular graphics) or pictures. The editor was the no longer existing "Centro di Comunicazione Società Cultura" (CCSC) never mentions the origin of drawings in first pages or smaller ones occasionally inside. This was issue n° 3 of 1990. Gpangelo
- Delete 1990 is too recent to have it in the public domain, and there is no OTRS permission. --Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
The Czech description does not show any relation to the village in whose category the is placed but may show disrespect, as may the author's username; looks like a childish drawing that will probably not ever be used purposefully on WM projects Czeva (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
non-free screenshot? 67.184.0.138 15:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Too many copyrightable elements in this screenshot. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Under copyright Daehan (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
created by me in error, now at Category:Disassembled Shift6m MrProperLawAndOrder (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
wrong creation. --Io Herodotus (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Category is empty, existing category: Category:Merlscheid (Eifel).
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Empty Category, no mor used. --Redarter (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
This category has been created by an unexperienced user and is empty now. Paisagem is Portuguese and means "landscape". It is not suitable at this place.--ProfessorX (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Category created by mistake. Correct name is Category:Paintings of Lake Silvaplana
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
For similar reasons given in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gateway to Freedom International Memorial to the Underground Railroad - Detroit - front.jpg, this picture is likely a COM:DW, which means the copyright of the statue itself also needs to be taken into account. There's no freedom of panorama for publically displayed 3D artwork in the United States; so, unless it can be demonstrated that statue is not under copyright protection, this file needs to be deleted per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dedicated 1994, so not even a chance of PD-no notice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Image quality. Better image file supersedes (File:John_Durrant_Larkin.jpg). Astocker (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Where is it? --E4024 (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Nv8200p (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Probablement tiré du site du BEA. Licence manquante Salsero35 (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Autorisation donnée. Cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:BEA-SBE et https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Bureau_d%27enqu%C3%AAtes_et_d%27analyses_pour_la_s%C3%A9curit%C3%A9_de_l%27aviation_civile . Procédure annulée. Salsero35 (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/57364-a-decorated-glider-guy-right/. Please provide evidence it's a Signal Corps image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio like other files uploaded by User:Campanar0, file source information is not provided. P4K1T0 (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
No longer required. Superior alternative found by another Contributor. MiltonPompeyPO4 (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a rephotograph or other Derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on users upload history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
OOS Unused Personal Photo Viztor (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Used for self promo on en.wiki 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- For an unknown reason, the uploader removed the above sentence. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Deepa87malani (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure USMC takes such unofficial family pictures on their duty. Besides photograph unknown. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Patrick,
- you placed one of the photos I uploaded for deletion. The reason according to you, that this is family picture and it is not probable that USMC held such picture in their archive. That is wrong and I can send :you original description of the photo, which could prove the authenticity of the source (Official USMC photo).
- Here is the picture: Robert E. Cushman, George W. Smith and his wife Nancy.jpg
- Please let me know your e-mail or other way how to send you original. AntonyZ
- Evidence must be provided (e.g. by a link) that picture is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a link to show you got it from a MIL website or to verify the PD status. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1946. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. Vrishchik (talk) 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Vrishchik the work is from 1912. which looks like a safe year for Both India and USA. Do you have the links for the USA publication ? DBigXrayᗙ 10:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: where does this 1912 date come from? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Alexis Jazz the event (a party convention) where this picture was taken happened in 1912.DBigXrayᗙ 21:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: where does this 1912 date come from? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello DBigXray. It's good to hear from you after a long time. Sir, I have found the same (or similar) image here -> https://www.oldindianphotos.in/search?q=Sarojini+Naidu&m=1 also, https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/india-s-congress-party/PgGkW9bdknJWDw?avm=4
As already mentioned, this image is among the LIFE Archives uploaded by Google, and these archives hold the copyright of U.S.A. (see link here): https://artsandculture.google.com/partner/life-photo-collection
If the works from the magazine hold the US license then naturally this image is no exception. Vrishchik (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Need to show how this is PD in the US, in any case it appears to be licensed to Life. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Питерский вечер.jpg. Красный wanna talk? 23:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: You need to demonstrate that it is a copyvio or why it is likely to be. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Image with copyright [1] --Davidpar 22:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of newspapers. Nonsense use of {{PD-text}}.
- File:Kürschnermeister Margenberg, Riesa, erfolgreicher Teilnehmer am Pelzmodellwettbewerb 1984.jpg
- File:Margenbergs Kürschnerei, Riesa, Sieger im Pelzmodellwettbewerb 1988.jpg
- File:Kürschnermeister Peter Margenberg, Riesa Sieger im Pelzmodellwettbewerb der sozialistischen Staaten in Belgrad.jpg
- File:Kürschnermeister Erich Heuschkel, in Oelsnitz, Erzgeb., 1986.jpg
- File:Der Vorsitzende der PGH Modepelz Jörg Hoffmann kandidiert in Leipzig als Kandidat für die Stadtbezirksversammlung.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- All no contents relevant to copyright, only facts. Required as quotes for Wikipedia articles.
- Some of them are cited directly in Wikipedia articles, others serve as general evidence, for example here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Leistungswettbewerb_des_K%C3%BCrschnerhandwerks?uselang=de
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Nonsense PD claims - uploader has taken photographs from internet sites (e.g. File:Hugo Köppe, Bremen (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg is here) and purported they are PD because certain of the subject textiles or labels are PD as simple text (some are unambiguously not PD for that reason - e.g., File:Pelzhaus Münch, Aachen (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg). These are COM:DWs and there are two copyrights: 1) the label or textile and 2) the photograph thereof. Whatever the status of the labels, the photographs themselves have copyrights. These are not slavish copies of 2D works so Bridgman does not apply.
- File:Pelz-Gräfe, Frankfurt am Main (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Fürstner Pelze, Lübeck (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Hugo Köppe, Bremen (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Pelzmoden Dunsbach-Keller, Kassel (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Pelzhaus Münch, Aachen (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Gröblinghoff, Damen-, Herrenmoden, Pelze, Bochum (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:M. H. Heck KG, exclusive Pelzmoden, Alzenau (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
- File:Otto Bennewitz, Kürschner-Fachkunde-Ordner ab 1961 - Zutaten die in der Kürschnerei Verwendung finden (2a Ausschnitt Watteline).jpg
- File:Otto Bennewitz, Kürschner-Fachkunde-Ordner ab 1961 - Zutaten die in der Kürschnerei Verwendung finden (1a, Ausschnitt).jpg
- File:Echt Pelz - Real Fur - Echt Bont - Fourrure veritable (Web-Einähetikett).jpg
- File:Olga Furs, New York (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Paul Ströbel, Nürnberg (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Unbehauen, Nürnberg (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Reissner Modell, Nürnberg, Garmisch, Nürnberg (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Raab & Metz R & M, Nürnberg (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Pelzmodelle C. H. Ströbel, Nürnberg (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg
- File:Pelzmoden Klaus Nickoll, Düsseldorf (Web-Einnähetikett).jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
In den in der Oberkategorie "Furs" zusammengefassten Kategorien wird versucht, sämtliche Aspekte der Pelzbranche so weit möglich flächendeckend, umfangreich und in den historischen Zeitabläufen darzustellen.
In der Kategorie "Fur fashion by year" wird die Pelzmode der jeweiligen Jahre gezeigt, bis in das 15. Jahrhundert fast lückenlos Jahr für Jahr, und davor, soweit Material verfügbar. Das sind bisher etwa 670 Jahre. Inzwischen in mehr als 10.000 Dateien, ob es, wie wahrscheinlich, mehr als 20.000 oder noch mehr sind vermag ich nicht abzuschätzen. Andere den Pelz betreffende Produkte und Dokumente sind in "Furs by year" für über 400 einzelne Jahre dokumentiert.
Orte, in den Kürschner nachweisbar sind, werden mit entsprechenden Dateien in Kategorien wie "Furriers by city" dokumentiert.
Die von Löschanträgen betroffene Kategorie "Fur cloth labels" zum Beispiel zeigt die Arbeiten der Bandweber in Bezug auf die Kürschnereien oder andere Pelzdesigner, zum Vergleich zwischen Ländern, Firmen und in Veränderungen in Bezug auf die jeweilige Entstehungszeit. Für Firmenschriftzüge kennt Commons die Freigabe als "textlogo", die ausdrücklich darauf hinweist, dass der Firmenschriftzug selber trotz allgemeiner Freigabe des Fotos geschützt sein kann. Die Annahme, das die Ablichtung eines Stoffetiketts bereits eine Urheberrechtsverletzung bedeutet, halte ich für übertrieben. Soweit es bildliche Darstellungen enthält, kann man das natürlich so sehen. Eigentlich habe ich diese vermieden, wohl nicht immer, sorry.
Auflistungen von Ehrungen dokumentieren für das Deutsche Reich, Die DDR und die Bundesrepublik beispielsweise den Wikipedia-Artikel "Internationaler Design-Wettbewerb des deutschen Kürschnerhandwerks", insbesondere zur Dokumentation der Jahre, in denen ein Wettbewerb stattgefunden hat.
Indem einzelnen Dateien die Relevanz an sich abgesprochen wird, werden ganze Museen infrage gestellt, die eben solche scheinbar alltäglichen Dinge sammeln - mit sehr viel mehr Aufwand, als die nur digitale Aufbewahrung.
Ich bin überzeugt, dass man die Abschätzung, ob etwas bei Commons aufbewahrenswert ist, weitgehend den jeweiligen Fachleuten überlassen sollte. Letztlich dienen alle Dateien der Dokumentation von mir oder anderen verfassten oder noch nicht geschriebenen Wikipedia-Artikeln.
Für mich bedeutet es, das mein jahrelanges Bemühen um eine möglichst umfangreiche Dokumentation einer Branche ganz plötzlich, unerwartet und erstmals konterkariert wird. Den Frust und die Verbitterung, die bei mir entsteht, können Sie vielleicht erahnen. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of sculpture - German FoP requires permanent installation Эlcobbola talk 18:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploader is the person depicted in the photo. Small, no EXIF, unlikely to be a selfie. OTRS permission needed. Ahmadtalk 23:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Not needed Sije (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Violation of copyrights. Use of media imagery from brazilian soap-opera "Jesus". Minerva97 (talk) 11:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Érico at 23:33, 20 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Violation of copyrights. Use of media imagery from brazilian soap-opera "Jesus". Minerva97 (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Mhhossein at 07:30, 21 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Violation of copyrights. Use of media imagery from brazilian soap-opera "Jesus". --Krdbot 13:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was uploaded without consent. The husband sent a complaint to OTRS today and asked to have the image removed. Although it is edited to make it unidentifiable and it's not a legal problem, it is still not a good idea to present this image when the subject does not wish to publish it. We have a few substitutes in the category and deleting this one will not affect the related articles much. Ben.MQ (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do we actually have a comparable image? I'm not so sure. I agree that the image is not identifiable, and it is widely used. Source is listed as en.wp - do we have any additional information about the image pre-transwikification? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe there are several files in Category:Women_with_breast_implants that can be used instead. I have checked the original uploader on en.wp. He is the doctor who performed the surgery. --Ben.MQ (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- If the closing admin decides to delete, please issue a global replace with one of the substitutes in the a/m category. Regards --Ben.MQ (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe there are several files in Category:Women_with_breast_implants that can be used instead. I have checked the original uploader on en.wp. He is the doctor who performed the surgery. --Ben.MQ (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Commons is full of these type photos already. No educational need for this one. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The husband is the subject? Unless there's some legal issue with wives as chattels that I thought went out in the 19th century, I'd pay a lot more heed to a complaint from the person portrayed than from someone else. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as long as there is no complaint from the woman. Astonishing that a husband should have the right to decide what his wive is allowed to do and what not to. --Saibo (Δ) 00:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please do consider that it is likely that the husband deals with such issues on behalf of the wife - this may be a bit awkward for a lady to ask other people to take down their naked photos (just my personal view). The image is uploaded by their doctor, not the wife.--Ben.MQ (talk) 07:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- And the information provided by the email sender match the profile of the uploader etc. I don't see if it is necessary to email back and say - please let your wife speak to us? This is not a court as we really don't need a distinction between 'I want this image removed' and 'we want this image removed' --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please mention the ticket number - it should be referenced. Well, if the complaint is meant "on behalf" then it is okay. But if it is I do not want my wife to be here then it is not. I think the best (although not that illustrative) replacement would be: File:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't see this comment earlier. The request is at ticket:2011071310011484. I checked the email again and, unfortunately he did use terms such as I instead of mentioning on behalf of her wife. Though I do find it somewhat uncomfortable, I sent an email again to ask for permission from the wife. Hope that will help. --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I received a reply today says wife wishes to take it off --Ben.MQ (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't see this comment earlier. The request is at ticket:2011071310011484. I checked the email again and, unfortunately he did use terms such as I instead of mentioning on behalf of her wife. Though I do find it somewhat uncomfortable, I sent an email again to ask for permission from the wife. Hope that will help. --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please mention the ticket number - it should be referenced. Well, if the complaint is meant "on behalf" then it is okay. But if it is I do not want my wife to be here then it is not. I think the best (although not that illustrative) replacement would be: File:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- And the information provided by the email sender match the profile of the uploader etc. I don't see if it is necessary to email back and say - please let your wife speak to us? This is not a court as we really don't need a distinction between 'I want this image removed' and 'we want this image removed' --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please do consider that it is likely that the husband deals with such issues on behalf of the wife - this may be a bit awkward for a lady to ask other people to take down their naked photos (just my personal view). The image is uploaded by their doctor, not the wife.--Ben.MQ (talk) 07:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The person is not identifiable, the husband is not the subject, the picture is highly in use. I don't see any reason why this photo should be deleted. BTW did the "husband" provided any proof that he indeed is the husband of the subject? It easily can be one more moral troll, abusing trust of our OTRS. Trycatch (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- He did provide some information about the doctor, and I checked the original uploader on enwp (file is now deleted there) and the profile fits what he says. --Ben.MQ (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not identifiable at all and who is this "husband" ? Grim Littlez (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: While I agree with Andy Dingley and Saibo that a complaint from a husband, as opposed to the subject herself, is not particularly compelling, a keep decision on that basis may very well prompt the wife (or the husband claiming to be the wife) to simply file a new complaint with OTRS and we'll be back in the same position. We could go through those motions, but I am not sure what that achieves. At the end of the day, this is a nude photograph of the subject and even though the subject is not identified, this is an image of her breasts and there is reason to believe that hosting it on the Commons unreasonably intrudes into the subject's private life. I think we can all acknowledge that a photo of this kind could be very upsetting to the subject - it is freely licensed and could potentially be used anywhere. While we might be legally entitled to keep it, this is an issue of exercising common decency, as discussed at Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. It's a hard call, but on issues like this we should err on the side of caution. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I closed this discussion a few minutes ago with the above rationale. Upon further reflection, however, I note that while a closing admin may need to make judgment calls in respect of nominations dealing with legal issues like copyright, a closing admin should generally defer to the community consensus where the issue is one of common decency (as I believe it is here). While I think this image should be deleted, I ought not to have been so hasty to close the discussion in these circumstances when the consensus above is leaning towards a keep. So I am changing my close to a delete, on the same grounds I provided above, and will leave it to someone else to close. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Skeezix, and endorse his original closure. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - unless there is reason to doubt the story (OTRS staff would be in a better position to determine that). GreenReaper (talk) 02:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: I globally replaced the usage with [[:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg|this] comparable file Jcb (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 18:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Notice that the file was reviewed by Flickr upload bot and not by the user who triggered it. The review is valid. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Amitie 10g: since when has Flickr upload bot been a reviewer? I can't see anything in the reviewer archives that shows this bot ever held that status. If it was a reviewer, why not put itself down as reviewer rather than Nordela? The answer is that the bot says that Nordela uploaded and reviewed the file which is not something that is supposed to happen. 90.197.113.98 21:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Dear IP address, see the history closer. Nordela just added
{{User:Flickr upload bot/token}}to the page, that triggers Flickr upload bot to:
- Dear IP address, see the history closer. Nordela just added
- Parse the Token and check if belongs to a valid file page at Flickr (if not found, stops)
- Check the license at Flickr, using the Flickr API (if no valid license accepted in Commons found, stops)
- Select the highest resolution available file and get the license, using the Flickr API
- Upload it to Commons and edit the page, replacing
{{User:Flickr upload bot/token}}with{{User:Flickr upload bot/upload}}and add the license found at the Flcikr page, using the MediaWiki API.
- In that order, everything automated without false positives.
- Still in doubt, IP adress? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: thank you for the technical explanation. Could you answer my question? Neither Nordela nor the bot are or have ever been license reviewers. Yet in the source it says {{User:Flickr upload bot/upload|date=19:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)|reviewer=Nordela}} What part of that tells you that Nordela did not review the license? 92.40.248.95 23:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The upload bot will not upload to Commons unless it's freely licensed. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- You can twist this round and round all you wish but neither of you has shown that this bot is/was ever a reviewer in the same way that User:FlickreviewR was. Why do these uploads not need the same level of scrutiny that other Flickr photos do? 92.40.249.247 17:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- The upload bot will not upload to Commons unless it's freely licensed. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: thank you for the technical explanation. Could you answer my question? Neither Nordela nor the bot are or have ever been license reviewers. Yet in the source it says {{User:Flickr upload bot/upload|date=19:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)|reviewer=Nordela}} What part of that tells you that Nordela did not review the license? 92.40.248.95 23:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Still in doubt, IP adress? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Doubts stated by IP adress do not hold water as this file was reviewed by Flickr upload bot and this bot was as much as an image reviewer as the FlickreviewR. Also this is true to all other images nominated to deletion request by IP adress. Tm (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: @Mattbuck: @Tm: How about answering the question with a simple yes/no?
- The bot has never been a Commons reviewer and neither has Nordela. Even worse is that the bot was never approved for Commons. I will withdraw this nomination if any of you can show that the bot was a reviewer at the time of upload or that it was even approved. Do you recall a little rule called COMMONS:EVIDENCE? I've shown why there should be concern about this file. Well the onus is on you guys to show why the file should be kept. 92.40.248.251 15:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: @Mattbuck: @Tm: How about answering the question with a simple yes/no?
- Image appears to be unused. what educational purpose does it serve? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Serve the same educational purpose as millions of unused images of trains, cats, dogs, stars, rivers, military, cars. Do you nominate them to deletion as being unused, as Commons does not delete images as being unused (except user page images). Tm (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment below, which came before your comment here, and which is responsive to your criticism. Your comment that "other crap exists" is hardly persuasive. We're talking about this one image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- I wasnt talking to you, but if you insist this image has enough quality and it has not a single personality rights concerns as this image was taken in nudes a poppin, a public event. Also as i said Commons does not, per policy, delete images because they are unused, except in the single case i stated. Care to prove me wrong?Tm (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment below, which came before your comment here, and which is responsive to your criticism. Your comment that "other crap exists" is hardly persuasive. We're talking about this one image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Serve the same educational purpose as millions of unused images of trains, cats, dogs, stars, rivers, military, cars. Do you nominate them to deletion as being unused, as Commons does not delete images as being unused (except user page images). Tm (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, poor-quality image: obvious smudge on the lens, foreground subjects are inadequately lit, image is badly backlit, somewhat noisy, very soft, probably not reparable. Extraordinarily deep DoF prevents the isolation of any particular subject other than a crowd of people. Facial expressions are distracting. We have many images of crowds of people. There are personality rights concerns with this image as well. Not useable for any realistic educational purpose. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with additional notice of comment by Mendaliv. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Z osobních důvodů Stopka (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In use on hi.wiki. Brianjd (talk) 13:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The uploader has requested deletion of an image containing nudity. While it is in use, it is very easily replaceable - the hi.wp article already has another photo. While it is not our place to make editorial judgments for other projects, I feel we should make a judgment that if someone regrets their choices to upload their naked body, we should be willing to accommodate a takedown request. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality breasts photo, can be replaced by other options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 09:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Wrong pic Steff667 (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Nudity#New uploads and G7. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and Lock forever, Lacks edu value, user req. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lingerie667.jpg Special:ListFiles/Steff667 Taylor 49 (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- It would be absurd to treat breasts in general as lacking educational value, so I oppose locking the name. As for this photo, it's decent and has a pretty good composition, IMO, but since there are so many photos of breasts to choose from and this one is a bit fuzzy in focus, it would be OK to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused flowchart, unreadable and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Page created personal information. Hoş geldiniz menas in Turkish welcome. Sakhalinio (talk) 13:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
There is already an existing copy of this image which was also uploaded by me. Thedarkknightjc (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no oppose votes. The substitution file can be file:Ralph Macchio at the Chiller Theatre Expo in NJ, October 26, 2013 (02).jpg. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
There is already an existing copy of this image which was also uploaded by me. Thedarkknightjc (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no oppose votes, the substitution file can be file:Ralph Macchio at the Chiller Theatre Expo in NJ, October 26, 2013 (01).jpg. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Z osobních důvodů Stopka (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader request; uploaded in 2016; not in use. However, a similar request by the same uploader covers a file that is in use. Can we get an English translation of the request? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianjd (talk • contribs) 13:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The other request I mentioned above resulted in a deletion. On that basis, this file should be deleted as well. Brianjd (talk) 23:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion of unused, replaceable file. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Above treshold of originality, definitely not an "own work" Sam-2727 (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial institute logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:DSR Logo.png
- File:DS9 Logo.png
- File:Jatu 30.png
- File:บทร้องประจำโรงเรียนเทพศิรินทร์ (อโหกุมาร).ogg
- File:NewLogo Debsirin.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Julianruizp
[edit]- File:Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak Piedra de los nukak.jpg
- File:Tarantula muerta en Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg
- File:Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg
Reasons for deletion request because user-requested deletion of recently uploaded file --Julianruizp (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
All of these were deleted by User:Majora last year. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Vittorio Mazzucconi: Alchemicus, 1989 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdinando rossi (talk • contribs) 14:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hallo, doppelt bzw ähnliche Cat von 2012 mit Namen (Studentenhaus Mertonstraße)--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- not needed category --Alabasterstein (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
typo, correct category is Category:Wohnhochhaus Weitblick --Alabasterstein (talk) 05:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please, delete this content! It does not meet basic requirements of Wikimedia Commons. It is published to harm and blackmail person mentioned in it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Office-Innovatis (talk • contribs) 13:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deletion reason: Updated image available Shannonzhou (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo was taken by Nick Wass for the Associated Press (here, for example, is wider crop attributed to him in the Boston Globe in May). The Flickr post which this image is pulled from does not source it to anyone and the Flickr user likely did not have the authority to post it or waive Nick Wass' or the AP's copyright. Denniscabrams (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Peelo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuu67 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Damarla venagalabhupala written Telugu poem Bahulasva Charitam
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please delete, this is a logo of an organization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_Ornithology_Group_of_Sri_Lanka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plkljl100 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
To whom it concerns please delete this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkins34sqn (talk • contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Apologies, I was asked by Toby Sebastian to change to this photo. Just chatting to Ian Wallman now.
Do I need to get Ian to add it?
Thanks
Dave Motion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dapgmotion (talk • contribs) 16:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Demande de suppression du fichier car une meilleure qualité à été uploadée et que le fichier m'appartient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valentin Daunay (talk • contribs) 19:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
versehentlich hochgeladen. Bitte enfernen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs) 07:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
versehentlich hochgeladen. Bitte enfernen.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs) 07:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Copy from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/ledamoter-partier/ledamot/maria-stromkvist_566a8a1c-0625-4f24-9beb-6b6dec928df7?sog-c-vod-riksmote=2016/17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AleWi (talk • contribs) 06:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Direct copy from http://7-themes.com/6911985-tropical-waterfall-pics.html - ~~
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
--delete ASMARNET LOGO on Receptionist.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadang sudarsono (talk • contribs) 19:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Not notable, uploaded as a vandalism by a user blocked on Wikipédia in French (this is his unique contribution). Zetud (talk) 07:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
since my article was deleted off it.wiki, that means this picture is not in commons scope. also, i admit it is not very high quality, please delete it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utabcd (talk • contribs) 08:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete - I uploaded a wrong image. Sorry Elly (talk) 09:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please close this one, this is a mistake of a mistake... I need coffee. Elly (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per nom. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Coolzera (talk) 08:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a copyrighted video game, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2003 Cnbrb (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
THis file is a strict duplicate, from the same source, of File:Benserade - La Mort d’Achille et la dispute des armes.djvu - same source, which is the file used on fr-wikisource. Thanks for deletion. --Hsarrazin (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by RebuildSouthAfrica (talk • contribs) 14:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission.Author banned from spanish wikipedia. Photo used for fraudulent articles creation. --Antur (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please delete. Looks heavily photoshopped, thus fake. --Gereon K. (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Born2bgratis (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It looks like someone made an attack art on some man he hates. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 09:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Magazines or other promotional materials may not be recorded on commons. --Adámoz (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion, magazine cover. --Phyrexian ɸ 17:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a copyrighted video game, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2003 Cnbrb (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused file with little or no educational value. Description not helpful. Out of scope. Sije (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Rights wrong
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Rights are wrong
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Ingame screenshot so not CC licensed. Several others from this 'series' had already been deleted. 2A04:4540:900:5100:8101:6D5:70A0:7FCA 15:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Flickr laundring case, in game screen shots passed as CC-BY4 during bot reviewes. Encik Tekateki (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - I've uploaded this picture without aksing the show person or the photographer. They contacted me to delete it, since the shown person is not a public person. By uploading this picture i've harmed his personal rhights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samira1980 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Facebook metadata, found elsewhere such as https://in-cubadora.org/2018/09/07/jorge-i-dominguez-%C2%B7frank-guiller-el-cristal-con-que-se-mira%C2%B7/ Frank33879 (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Esta Fotografia esta en espacio publico, en la calle Jose Miguel de la Barra - Santiago de Chile , Esta placa esta a simple vista peatonal y vehicular . ver Ubicación de esta fotografia y ese es un lugar público donde se tomo y donde esta la placa respectiva. Un saludo y gracias--Historiadormundo (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This image is taken and slightly modified e.g. from [2]. --Kuebi (talk) 16:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
test — Preceding unsigned comment added by Web84corp (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - I've uploaded this picture without aksing the show person or the photographer. They contacted me to delete it, since the shown person is not a public person. By uploading this picture i've harmed his personal rhights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samira1980 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - I've uploaded this picture without aksing the show person or the photographer. They contacted me to delete it, since the shown person is not a public person. By uploading this picture i've harmed his personal rhights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samira1980 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - I've uploaded this picture without aksing the show person or the photographer. They contacted me to delete it, since the shown person is not a public person. By uploading this picture i've harmed his personal rhights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samira1980 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Taken from Street View SpinnerLaserz (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Wanted to load svg version, i've just missed it. - Estin Giç Giç? 15:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- No need for deletion png is fine, just need rename Pictogram wait positive.svg.png to Pictogram wait positive.png.-- Estin Giç Giç? 17:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Closed: moved without leaving redirect. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
A clip from YouTube. The Channel and Website don't include the CC License HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Close request. As nominator, I request to keep the file. I didn't see the license, has a CC license. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
personen på bild vill inte ha bilden offentligt Insidershit (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please, delete this file because of bad technical quality. --Czyz1 (talk) 11:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This logo is not the actual logo of Santali Wikipedia. -Manik Soren (talk) 13:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Unclear leasing status [3]. --Semenov.m7 (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
A clip from YouTube. The Channel and Website don't include the CC License HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Close request. As nominator, I request to keep the file. I didn't see the license, has a CC license. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- I had initially marked this for speedy deletion, but it was contested. There is no evidence that the church has released this new logo under a Creative Commons license. It may be hosted on other Wikipedia sites as a non-free image, but it may not be on Commons. C.Fred (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
The person you can see in the picture, does not like the way she is represented and she insists on the deletion of the photo. As I am the author, I have nothing against. Fortunately, we are having better ones now. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- File has been deleted by author and person requests. In scope Category:Tatiana Garmash-Roffe we are having better ones --Butko (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
The person you can see in the picture, does not like the way she is represented and she insists on the deletion of the photo. As I am the author, I have nothing against. Fortunately, we are having better ones now. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- File has been deleted by author and person requests. In scope Category:Tatiana Garmash-Roffe we are having better ones --Butko (talk) 06:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
https://www.artmajeur.com/fr/bbendahman/artworks/9605644/la-beaute-de-lalgerie Great11 (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete if you follow the link above, it looks like a pretty clear copyright violation to me. I can't see a date but the artist looks to be still alive.--Headlock0225 (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
[[Category:]]
Kept: malformed, no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hur verifieras rätten att använda logotypen?
- Delete Copyvio. Above threshold of originality, no evidence of permission from copyright holder. Edaen (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request: mistake, wanted create category with same name. -Wikisympathisant (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
clearly copyrighted -Dmartin969 (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Urheberangabe: Internet, in der Bildbeschreibung steht copyright drin. -- sk (talk) 11:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deletion requests/File talk:34 regt sqn 2012.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkins34sqn (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)--Wilkins34sqn (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
To whom it concerns, PLease delete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkins34sqn (talk • contribs) 13:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I don't think I had the proper authority for this photo when I went back and looked at it again. Please delete
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Por favor elimine la foto Graicias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dra Ana G. Kelleyian Manoukian (talk • contribs) 22:58, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This photo is a crop from the Bedoes' video and it should not be on Wikipedia Tashi (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for reviewing the articles and associated images. I'm not 100% on copyright issues around photos of paintings. The painting was made in 1961 and the painter (Orlando Dutton) died in 1962. The painting is owned (since 1976) by the Royal Society of Victoria, who have provided permissions for reproduction under creative commons, but is this enough? LizardDrinkin (talk) 00:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I published this, but the right to publish this image has been revoked. take it down!
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have made a mistake uploading this picture, can someone delete it for me please.HoAHabesha (talk) 23:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This is Post processed version uploaded along with original version by mistake. Original file name with the same file name available. Hence requesting for deletion.
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please delete this
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
please delete. wrong picture quality and rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JW AUT (talk • contribs) 15:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Corrupted upload — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacedout apollo (talk • contribs) 13:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
To whom it concerns, Please delete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkins34sqn (talk • contribs) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
please help me delete the old version of this file. I uploaded it accidentally and cannot have the picture of the woman on the right available to be seen. I am the author of the picture and the most current version which is the correct one. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Softpears (talk • contribs) 19:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This is actually Virginia Grey. Picsofcelebrities was notorious for having lots of mislabeled images on the Internet. ~ ZiggyStarduxt829
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Julianruizp
[edit]- File:Pinturas rupestres en Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg
- File:Pinturas rupestres de los nukak.jpg
- File:Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg
Reasons for deletion request user-requested deletion of recently uploaded file --Julianruizp (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
original source didn't give any permission: http://www.thecatclinic.co.kr/mycat/content/03_01_02.php
Hamish (talk) 09:44, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'd like to withdraw this for an obvious copyvio, thanks.--Hamish (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
The picture is not a professional take. I'm working for Niels Lan Doky and I need to keep his profile updated-Claudio.Copenaghen (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion given. --LexICon (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
APS GANG KA FULL FORM AMAN PARTIK SANTAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by SHOLAY SANTAN (talk • contribs) 10:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I tried a new template, but realized afterwards that my knowledge in this field is not sufficient. --Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk) 13:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Nepal is known as Magical country in the world. Here are a lot of things to do, let’s talk about Historical city Kathmandu. We are in Kathmandu and known as Tourist hub Thamel. Ace vision Nepal is Authorized Travel Company in Nepal. Kathmandu valley offers variety of activities to do for travelers, culturally and naturally. The valley has its own unique natural and cultural importance that makes it stand out with other popular cities in Nepal. We have tried our best to list out some of the top 10 fun things to do in Kathmandu valley, of Nepal. So here are some Tips of Tours and Hike information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AceVisionNepal77 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChutacoackoPlayz(aka SuperFlag) (talk • contribs) 13:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Please delete it. Thank you. Khủng Long (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -lauyulam (talk) 23:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC) speedy delete, U1. User requested deletion in own user space--lauyulam (talk) 23:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
me chamo Luiz Paulo Kenny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpfbom (talk • contribs) 16:20, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Human Penis-001.jpg|2=File:Human Penis-001.jpg|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Arra2827|Arra2827]] ([[User talk:Arra2827|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Very low quality (only 8 kb!), no location data, = unidentifiable, no value MPF (talk) 16:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep in scope, this is one of the earliest uploads to Commons. Multichill (talk) 17:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment - @Multichill: if that's important, I've no objection to its being kept for sentimental reasons. I checked the uploader's uploads and it was uploaded on the same date as File:Eilean donan 2004.jpg, so probably safe to assume it was taken at this location (or close by) in Scotland (and is therefore H. ostralegus). - MPF (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, northern Scotland. The poor quality is due to poor digital cameras at that time. This is the original photo. Lysy (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Lysy: - thanks! Could you perhaps add the location to the file (if you can remember it with any degree of accuracy!) - MPF (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, northern Scotland. The poor quality is due to poor digital cameras at that time. This is the original photo. Lysy (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File already published at [4]. An OTRS ticket would be welcome. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- The photographed guy himself uploaded this photo, I don't understand in this and I don't active usually in wikimedia so I can't help. YairMelamed (talk) 17:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded the photo and I'm the owner of the file, what is the problem exactly? --Onemantribe123 (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Onemantribe123: The problem is that the file has been published elsewhere before, and we are not sure you are the photographer. That's why the contact to OTRS is necessary --Ruthven (msg) 10:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020051010002422 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ben_Aylon_-_One_Man_Tribe.jpg” under ticket:2020051010002422. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 17:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
nonsense, out of scope NNW 20:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marius93RO (talk • contribs) 10:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no such category. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Originally tagged as "copyvio" by @Hungarikusz Firkász: with the statement "This work is not in the public domain in the United States because its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA as it was still copyrighted in its source country on the URAA date (January 1 1996 in most cases but see Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for details). In most cases, it is copyrighted in the U.S. until 95 years after the year in which it was initially published (exceptions are works published after 1977; see Commons:Hirtle chart). Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons. New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted. A review of files is currently underway to verify that this template has been applied correctly to existing files. Files that are copyrighted in the US and that have not been released under a free license will be deleted. If you are the copyright holder of this file, and do not wish to have it hosted on Commons, please contact our designated agent or nominate the file for deletion, explaining the situation."
- Keep Per previous DR : [this 1], and [this 1], where it was stated: according to Commons:URAA-restored copyrights: " "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." see also Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}" and "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices."
- I'm really tired of this sort of nominations but there are people that do not seem to have been notified yet. - Fma12 (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Originally tagged as "copyvio" by @Hungarikusz Firkász: with the statement "This work is not in the public domain in the United States because its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA as it was still copyrighted in its source country on the URAA date (January 1 1996 in most cases but see Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for details). In most cases, it is copyrighted in the U.S. until 95 years after the year in which it was initially published (exceptions are works published after 1977; see Commons:Hirtle chart). Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons. New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted. A review of files is currently underway to verify that this template has been applied correctly to existing files. Files that are copyrighted in the US and that have not been released under a free license will be deleted. If you are the copyright holder of this file, and do not wish to have it hosted on Commons, please contact our designated agent or nominate the file for deletion, explaining the situation."
- Keep Per previous DR : [this 1], and [this 1], where it was stated: according to Commons:URAA-restored copyrights: " "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." see also Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}" and "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices."
- I'm really tired of this sort of nominations but there are people that do not seem to have been notified yet. - Fma12 (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Vladimir Baykov (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I am the author of this file (Chajkovskogo 7) and I'd like to delete it.
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I try to delete my first bad image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScrewsHirsch (talk • contribs) 17:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC) There are the two files need to be deleted in commons and these two pictures won't use them anymore. File:Chery_arrizo_5.jpg (Only In English wikipedia) File:Chery_Arrizo_5_girl_remake.jpg (Only In English wikipedia) And these two pictures will be replaced by this picture. File:Heel_&_Toe_girl.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScrewsHirsch (talk • contribs) 18:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such files. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Appeal: digitally enhanced painting of Christian Baeta Kandymotownie (talk) 01:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Désolée pour mon manque de vigilance, ce fichier est effectivement à supprimer pour respecter le droit d'auteur. C'était ma première fois, je ferai attention désormais ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barb0601 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Page should be deleted to be able to move File:Seal of Culver City, CA.png to the page to satisfy Criterion 4 of the file-moving criteria. Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 19:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose: File:Seal of Culver City, CA.png doesn't exist, and File:Seal of Culver City, California.png is not a flag, and criteria 4 was not intended to force harmonious names only because the topic of the file is similar: see Commons:File renaming#cite_note-4. --Closeapple (talk) 06:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ah I’m brain dead I meant to request the other page 🤦♂️. Sorry for wasting your time. - Fluffy89502 ~ talk 06:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Assanges as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Unsppported licensing materials, see 'Important Notice' of the Hong Kong District Councils. (區議會網站刊登的區議員官方肖像為合理使用影像，無法上傳至維基共享計劃) / Notice: In fact there is a program of the Hong Kong community user group to upload their portraits on Wikipedia with their knowledge, cooperation, and approval. Please note that a request about this image **has been received by OTRS**. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Fung_Ka-lung_portrait.jpg” under ticket:2020010610005337. --廣九直通車 (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS accepted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Happy days are back again - Erik Pevernagie -Ludwig Wittgenstein.jpg license: English The girl in the painting expresses a feeling: "Happy days are back again." We may all have experienced the special paradoxical feeling: (1,376 × 1,375 (1.31 MB)) - 18:44, 14 January 2020
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Art.piano.acting (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC) I put this photo by mistake, it shouldn't be there. Can you erase it ? Thanks.
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:HiKAYE.JPG
[edit]I put this photo by mistake, it shouldn't be there at all. Can you erase it ? Thanks. --2A02:A03F:6AAE:7E00:F50D:8904:5D10:DD8D 20:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Dory Zoughaib Biography
Dory Zoughaib is best known as a Instagram Star. Lebanese Instagram star who has earned over 100,000 followers to his @doryzogheib Instagram account & over 200.000 followers on his TikTok account @doryzogheib . He was born on June 4, 1990 in Lebanon. He is very popular On social media. He first started posting to Instagram in December 2014. His tweets on Twitter @doryzogheib always go viral.
Dory's main profession is "Social media management", he worked with several Artists and Stars during his career.
He is also one of the successful Instagram Influencers. He has ranked on the list of those famous people who were born on June 4, 1990.
Bio/Wiki First Name: Dory Last Name: Zoughaib Profession: Social media specialist Birth Date: June 4th, 1990 Birth Place:Lebanon Zodiac Sign:Gemini — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doryzogheib (talk • contribs) 13:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
zahid dildar (Urdu: میاں محمد نواز شریف, born 10 feburarry 200) is a Pakistani student a
Born into the upper-middle family in abbottabad, zahid is the son of dildar, t — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovelyzahid (talk • contribs) 10:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Nueva Creacion Divina. Abreviada NCD es un grupo musical que radican desde Yajaucu, San Juan Ixcoy, Huehuetenango, Guatemala. El inicio de este grupo fue desde el año 2008. Los primero integrantes de esta banda algunos se mudaron en la union Americana, excepto a el tecladista, Baterista y el vocalista. El vocalista de grupo fue la persona quien tomo esa decision de seguir y sigue marcando la diferencia y producir musica para el pueblo cristiana. El grupo salin en en muchos eventos en diferentes lugares de la localidad. Cinco años despues los nuevos integrantes de la banda sacaron sus primeros discos llamado El Verdadero Amor. Años despues la banda sigue creciendo en una manera tremendo la banda cuenta con herramientas grandes para producir musica en alta calidad.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Wargwarn bbg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heyhey223 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
delete the content as asked no issues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rameshbadoni (talk • contribs) 01:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This user is a "Troll". He is not the type of user you want for this community. Maybe they should be considered to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredSmithOG (talk • contribs) 14:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: we cannot delete users. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I am Vinod Narayanan. a user of wiki media common. I am from Kerala, India.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (of anything). (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete this Wikimedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaxmanJangid (talk • contribs) 02:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no such page. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
mass-delete "Melodifestivalen2019"
[edit]Reasons for deletion request --Janwikifoto (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Need speedy deletion for all files named "Melodifestivalen2019.19e112*.*" uploaded by "Janwikifoto". Reason - forgot to name the files by artist name. All such files have been re-uploaded with correctt artist names. Example File:Melodifestivalen2019.19e112.1090005.jpg has been repleced by File:Margaret.Melodifestivalen2019.19e112.1090005.jpg which is more correct. All files re-uploaded, no need to rename. Individually tagging Duplcate or SPeedyDelete takes "forever", time I do not have. It would be useful to be able to self-rename, or self-delete such uploads. )I do not really care if files are left, but duplicates confuse, and the sooner the wrong names are gone, less likelihood of somebody using them. But I do not really care personally). --Janwikifoto (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Personal data / données personnelles Prawdziwy Mikołajek (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and as CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) and CSD G10 (files created as advertisements). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete personal data from someone who tried several times to create his own article on fr wikipedia : article refused (no notability). Supertoff (talk) 04:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Logo with complex background, above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Source is Website of Bio Agents, sponsor of IMDO, the International Medicine Olympiad - no permission
Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work for this old drawing Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope: unidentified subject. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Source Marsh/IMP Labs - no permission
Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This image was used without the consent of the Guarddogs Motorcycle Club of Oklahoma, and further has been doctored thereby misrepresenting our back patch. There is no Thunderbird displayed under our Top Rocker. Our back patch is a licensed logo and should not be displayed or modified without our consent.
Please remove this image.
For questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Guarddog Hazmat State Vice President Guarddogs Motorcycle Club of Oklahoma — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.225.35.37 (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Accotrding to metadata the image is copyrighted by Sady Pridonia. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm in contact with a uploader. OTRS permission will be sent. --Kaganer (talk) 03:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS confirmation since May 14. --JuTa 15:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Metadata clearly says “ AAP Image/Simon Bullard) NO ARCHIVING, EDITORIAL USE ONLY” Ytoyoda (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, that is the data from the image on the internet. However, I contacted the photographer and he gave me permission to use the photos. I have email chain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGussy1 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @BigGussy1: Please send the email chain to COM:OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757 I have now sent email chain. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGussy1 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
This photo has a shared copyright and therefore needs to be deleted. I am having trouble deleting this however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGussy1 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 12:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and containing FB code. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Lumotypo - only suspicious Google hits. Unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused and unusable tiny images, likely not own works but screengrabs.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juntspodem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: transmission code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MykolaLomako (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, please explain why public domain in RussiaUkraine.
- File:Донсода-Верхнє ОГПУ.jpg
- File:ДонСода-ЧБ.jpg
- File:МикитаХрущов на Азоті-1.jpg
- File:МикитаХрущов на Азоті-3.jpg
- File:ШахтаСкальковський.jpg
- File:ШахтаТомашевська1936р.jpg
- File:Шахта К Скальковский.jpg
- File:Група забойщиків,Лисичанськ.jpg
- File:ШахтаПривільнянська-Тимонов.jpg
- File:ШахтаПривільнянська-Нагорний.jpg
- File:ШахтаПривільнянськ-Південна бригада.jpg
- File:ШахтаПривільнянська-1949.jpg
- File:ГірникиШахтиКорунд,Привілля.jpg
- File:ШахтаДагмара Иваницкаго.jpg
- File:Шахта ім. Войкова Лисичанськ.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: the photos have been taken in the Ukrainian SSR. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MykolaLomako (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:Привілля2009.jpg
- File:Содовикам-2018р1.jpg
- File:Содовикам(2005-04-18).jpg
- File:Воїнам(ш.Мельникова№1-2)-6.jpg
- File:Воїнам(ш.Мельникова№1-2)-3.jpg
- File:Сосюра(2018-06-11).jpg
- File:Рокицький&Лейба(2018-08-19)3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MykolaLomako (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:ГеологічнаМапаЛисичанська1924.jpg
- File:ГенпланЛисичанськ1957.jpg
- File:32Дібровка-Рубежная мапа Боброва.jpg
- File:31цвинтар мапа Боброва.jpg
- File:29Дагмара мапа Боброва.jpg
- File:Мапа М.Ломако Лисичанськ-1926р.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MykolaLomako (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:Капуст.jpg
- File:Капустин2012-09-22-n1.jpg
- File:Капустин2012-09-22-n2.jpg
- File:ГероямГВ-2018-11-18-n5.jpg
- File:ГероямГВ-2018-11-18-n4.jpg
- File:ГероямГВ-2018-11-18-n2.jpg
- File:ГероямГВ-2018-11-18-n3.jpg
- File:ГероямГВ-2018-11-18-n1.jpg
- File:Воин у ДМ 2016-04-14-n2.jpg
- File:Воин у ДМ 2016-04-14-n1.jpg
- File:Афганцям2008-10-31-n2.jpg
- File:Афганцям2008-10-31-n1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
We hold hundreds of high-quality images of Russian apartment buildings, and there is no realistic educational use for a small, watermarked image of a Russian apartment building. 193.210.230.160 12:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Kissa21782 (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is watermarked with the name of a website, so is it copyvio from there? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mateja1 Vucinic1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. All files uploaded from various websites without permission.
Smooth O (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, advertisement, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Stolen from website mentioned in the source, copyrighted. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorised, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
This came out of a family album. There is no reason to believe that the uploader has the right to freely license it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
The uploader Steno55 has the written consent of Mrs. Martha Penzer, daughter of Victor Penzer and Stella Slawin Penzer, to publish it. For verification: martha.a.penzer@gmail.com Stephan . . . User:Steno55 (talk to me)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 04:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of unknown demo, no context, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo (whose grave???), no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Is he notable? No Jorbenski found in Wikidata. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
LIkely not own work. Looks like official photo and EXIF data says "all rights reserved". P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Likely not own works: transmission code and FB in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrikpluhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Ap18pod.jpg
- File:Ap18podmale.jpg
- File:Ap19pod - kopie.jpg
- File:Ap20pod - kopie.jpg
- File:Ap21pod - kopie.jpg
Photomontages of possible crews for cancelled Apollos missions. Sources are official NASA portraits (PD, so it's OK), NASA artist's concepts (I don't know whether they are PD's; see File:Ap19pod - kopie.jpg -> https://images.nasa.gov/details-S71-16101.html, etc.) and fake logos of missions by unknown author and with unknown license (see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nasa Apollo 20 hoax comparison.jpg). --Harold (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrikpluhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Vlajka Spojených států evropských 3.jpg
- File:Vlajka Spojených států evropských.jpg
- File:Vlajka Spojených států evropských 2.jpg
GPinkerton (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello There,
I hope you are fine there at home due to covid-19. Please take care of your self and spread this with all of your known and unknown resources. Actually I want to delete this image due to got a dispute from this person. So please remove this as I don't want to face any legal process.
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raizada.ashish87 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Andrew Soto live.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Fender Stratocaster.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Jackson Guitarist.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Steven Universe.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto and Lacey Johnson.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Arcade Madness.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto and Uli John Roth.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Musician.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto backstage.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Live.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Jackson Guitars.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto King.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto YouTuber.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Guitarist.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Arpeggios Cereal.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto The Power.jpg
- File:Andrew Soto Dragonborn.png
- File:Andrew Soto music.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: is your objection only that there was no permission, or is the promotion on top of that? (i.e. would you want these images deleted if there was permission?) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- If person is not notable, photos are out of Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Background: Hong Kong community user group uploaded the above portraits on Wikipedia under the consent, cooperation, and approval of the District Councilors. OTRS tickets have been submitted and pending for verification.
Files were initially tagged by Assanges as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Unsupported licensing materials, see 'Important Notice' of the Hong Kong District Councils. (區議會網站刊登的區議員官方肖像為合理使用影像，無法上傳至維基共享計劃) / Notice: In fact there is a program of the Hong Kong community user group to upload their portraits on Wikipedia with their knowledge, cooperation, and approval. Please note that a request about this image **has been received by OTRS**. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:Chun Hoi-shing portrait.jpg
- File:Poon Chi-kin portrait.jpg
- File:Wong Man-huen portrait.jpg
- File:Tsui Hiu-kit portrait.jpg
- File:Lam Siu-pan Ben portrait.jpg
- File:Lam Chun portrait.jpg
- File:Kwan Wing-yip portrait.jpg
- File:Ho Kwok-ho portrait.jpg
- File:Fung Ka-lung portrait.jpg
Combined as a single request. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 09:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete I voted for delete was simply the source 1233 given is unfree materials, whether they have councilors' consent or not. As long as the new free source provided, I'm OK with it. Will contact OTRS volunteers shortly for discussions, thanks. --@assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 09:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep, as 1233 contacted to the district councils, they have stated that the photos' copyrights belong to the councilors, making councilors' approvals are valid. --Billytanghh (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Tsui_Hiu-kit_portrait.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020010610000985. --廣九直通車 (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Poon_Chi-kin_portrait.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020010610000985. --廣九直通車 (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete All low resolution photos; direct permission from an official email address is required. The OTRS permission received come from another source, so it's not valid. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by JuTa, except for File:Fung Ka-lung portrait.jpg as OTRS permission was confirmed. --ƏXPLICIT 12:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios of this subject matter. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicates this is a Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 13:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep By the user Darvinsonrojas. I'm going to guess it was his own Facebook. (Username obviously not an imitator based on its long history) Kingsif (talk) 02:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, but the copyright belongs to the photographer. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Toy Story (franchise)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Toy Story Zoetrope, Disney California Adventure 1.jpg
- File:Toy Story Zoetrope, Disney California Adventure 2.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:F&W IMG 20141031 161555723 (15056104104).jpg
- File:F&W IMG 20141031 161621559 (15676054375).jpg
- File:Food & Wine Avatar.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
not fit c.c. standard KodokunaSmile (talk) 12:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- You can find these words "Creative Commons 註明出處授權 (可重複使用)" in the video, which means that everyone can capture images or reuse the video freely without getting any official permission. Also see the same examples: File:張寶兒.jpg, File:蔡思貝.jpg, File:楊怡.jpg -- Lethal Magma (talk) 04:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Lethal Magma: Your comment does not help much; some of us can’t read Chinese. What does it say exactly? Does it say that it is under a Creative Commons licence and, if so, which one? The licences are very different to each other and some are not acceptable on Commons.
- What we do know is that the archived source linked from the file’s description does say it’s been tagged as Creative Commons. On YouTube, that means CC BY 3.0. Waiting for a licence reviewer to confirm this. Brianjd (talk) 06:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Pending licence review, per my previous comment. Brianjd (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The YouTube video is indeed licensed under {{YouTube CC-BY}}, but this channel incorporates so many works from other sources into their videos that it's difficult to discern which are truly their own work and which are the works of others being used without permission. ƏXPLICIT 08:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's not that hard. This is an interview with Karena Lam (also called Lín Jiāxīn, apparently?), an actress, posted on the official YouTube of am730 a Hong Kong newspaper. There are clips from her films mixed in, correct, that's pretty common when you're interviewing an actress, but the interview itself is of her in this white blouse with red flowers. They're clearly taken by am730, the Hong Kong newspaper. --GRuban (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Shehrazxcvbnm123 (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo album selfie. It appears that the uploader wants this one taken down. Acabashi (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
This photo is not free. It is copyrighted "All Rights Reserved" I am the owner of this photo. Here is the original photo album from this event. https://www.flickr.com/photos/allhealthpolicy/albums/72157671444604621/with/28814199752/ 2601:14D:8500:4DF0:8C6:6F9F:674F:4E9D 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- It looks like the license has been changed on flickr. --Achim (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: validly licensed at time of transfer, CC licenses cannot be revoked. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Center man and woman.jpg
[edit]- File:Marking_the_track_section_of_the_Playground_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School_01.jpg
- File:The_Playground_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School.jpg
- File:All_Female_Match_Past_practice_session_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School,_Red_House_01.jpg
- File:100_meters,_Senior_Boys_racing_event_01.jpg
- File:All_Female_Match_Past_practice_session_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School,_Pink_House.jpg
- File:All_Female_Match_Past_practice_session_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School,_Red_House_02.jpg
- File:100_meters,_Junior_Girls_racing_event_01.jpg
- File:100_meters,_Junior_Girls_racing_event_02.jpg
- File:100_meters,_Senior_Boys_racing_event_02.jpg
- File:100_meters,_Junior_Girls_racing_event_03.jpg
- File:A_Female_Athlete._Senior_female_student_as_she_prepares_for_a_200_meters_race.jpg
- File:Senior_male_student_athletes_as_they_prepare_for_a_200_meters_race.jpg
- File:Center_man_and_woman.jpg
- File:Skaters_in_Enugu,_Nigeria.jpg
- File:Senior_Female_Student_Athletes_as_they_embark_on_a_400_meters_relay_race_02.jpg
- File:Marking_the_track_section_of_the_Playground_of_Annunciation_Secondary_School_02.jpg
- File:Senior_Female_Student_Athletes_as_they_embark_on_a_400_meters_relay_race_01.jpg
- File:A_Female_Athlete._Senior_female_student_as_she_prepares_for_a_400_meters_relay_race_03.jpg
- File:A_Female_Athlete._Senior_female_student_as_she_prepares_for_a_400_meters_relay_race_02.jpg
- File:A_Female_Athlete._Senior_female_student_as_she_prepares_for_a_400_meters_relay_race_01.jpg
- File:400_meters_relay_race.jpg
- File:Senior_male_student_athletes_as_they_prepare_for_a_400_meters_relay_race.jpg
- File:Aerial_Football.jpg
- File:A_Male_Athlete._Senior_male_student_as_he_prepares_for_a_400_meters_relay_race.jpg
- File:Sports_Trophies_for_inter-house_sporting_competition_held_in_Annunciation_Secondary_School.jpg
- File:An_all-Female_Cultural_Dance_Troupe,_from_Annunciation_Secondary_School_03.jpg
- File:An_all-Female_Cultural_Dance_Troupe,_from_Annunciation_Secondary_School_02.jpg
- File:Junior_female_student_athletes_as_they_prepare_for_a_200_meters_race.jpg
- File:An_all-Female_Cultural_Dance_Troupe,_from_Annunciation_Secondary_School_01.jpg
- File:A_Female_Athlete._Junior_female_student_as_she_prepares_for_a_200_meters_race.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Arch-Angel Raphael the Artist. I believe they should be deleted because [I want to withdraw the license as the license owner and use it for order purposes]. Arch-Angel Raphael the Artist (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Licenses may not be withdrawn. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unidentified building with no clear educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 00:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete COM:OOS Encik Tekateki (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
A Book cover is copyrighted Clodion (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 20:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Inadvertent upload of non-2d artwork in batch
This seems marginal. It appears public domain given:
- 20th C. (early) probably means before 1930 and definitely before 1950 in curator jargon
- There is no named artist and given the context of comprehensive museum records, it will not be findable even using beyond the legal understanding of "reasonable" research
- The composition is intended to be a 2D pattern, the use of overlaid fabrics is not intended to create a 3D work
So Keep on these grounds. Fæ (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete The above rationalization ignores the fact that the image appears to have created well after the object itself, that the object’s acquisition date is explicitly denoted by the creator, and that the copyright owner, the British Museum, has established specific rules for use.The obvious sockery I will pass over for now. Qwirkle (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete We are taliking about the status of the photo, not the object here, with the key question being is it covered by the US Bridgeman-Corel ruling. As a blouse, the object was clearly created to be three-dimensional when worn, and so not covered by Bridgeman-Corel, but here it is photographed laid more-or-less flat. Potw realized this & so added "Inadvertent upload of non-2d artwork in batch". As we treat coins as 3D, I think the frills etc are enough to make this 3D for our purposes too. A plain flat sheet of textile would be ok, imo. Johnbod (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Even if the image were in the public domain in the US, there is significant doubt as to whether it is in the UK, its country of origin. While it has been licensed for distribution in the UK under a CC BY-NC-SA licence, that licence does not qualify as being "free" under the definition used in Commons policy, which requires the work to be licensed for commercial use. Since Commons Copyright Rules require uploaded images to be free in both the country of origin and the US, and there is significant doubt as to whether it's free in the UK, it should be deleted per the
- COM:PDART says that that is not the concern here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per my original comment (I am nonetheless grateful to Fæ for ensuring that the important issue is properly aired). However, I find the comments "the British Museum, has established specific rules for use" and "...does not qualify as being 'free' under the definition used in Commons policy" to be contrary to Wikimedia Commons policy - if the work were a 2D reproduction, then it would be acceptable here, just like a new digital photograph of The Haywain. This is along-established principle, and one that we must not discard on a casual, per item, basis. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete; it's on the edge, but deleting photos of coins sets the line past this. For the most clear part, that top fringe is not a flat object at all.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- delete too close to 3D, Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle if nothing else --DannyS712 (talk) 12:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 3D photograph under an incompatible license. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
José Lara, who uploaded the photo into Flickr, claimed, that the photo was created in 2002. Seems like it was published in 1997 at https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/gabriel-garcia-marquez-colombia . Maybe the photo violates copyright. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like license laundering. — Racconish 💬 21:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The photo was uploaded first on Prospect Magazine servers in 1997-11-20. Sémhur (talk) 19:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The image was published (possibly) in the years of 1997 and does not meet the requirements in Commons, infringe. He photo violates copyright. (Rolo Mai (talk) 04:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC))
- Keep The image uploaded on Prospect Magazine is not only lower-quality, it could also been uploaded in replacement of a non-free image originally placed in the magazine. The file available here is better than theirs. Also, the supposed upload date is automatically given by WordPress as the article is dated 1997-12, not because it was actually uploaded on that date. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 20:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I shot this photograph myself during a student event in Monterrey, Mexico using a Nikon D100 - I'm happy to produce a contact sheet of other files. I kindly donated the original file to Wikipedia after another user asked me to change the license on the Flick version of the file. --Malvenko (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Typed a blog post with the context behind the photo, where a small preview of the contact sheet is visible; hope this can prove I am the author - Blog post in malvenko.net. --Malvenko (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per detailed explanation by Malvenko. Something to keep in mind, occasionally professional publications will engage in date laundering. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Bagnères de Luchon-Église Notre Dame de l'Assomption-Bannière de la vierge couronnée-20130917..jpg
[edit]and also / igual por / de même pour
Bagnères de Luchon-Église Notre Dame de l'Assomtion-Bannière de procession-20130917..jpg Bagnères de Luchon-Église Notre Dame de l'Assomtion-Bannière de Saint Nicolas-20130917.jpg Bagnères de Luchon-Église Notre Dame de l'Assomtion-Bannière de Saint Roch-20130917.jpg
Merci / Thanks / Muchas gracias .... Daniel Villafruela (talk) 12:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Poor quality of images and if there are higher res pics , vote to use higher res imagesEncik Tekateki (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Replacement at File:Bagnères de Luchon-Église Notre Dame de l'Assomption-Bannière de La Vierge Couronnée-20130920.jpg for example. --MGA73 (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
No longer required. Superior alternative found by another Contributor. MiltonPompeyPO4 (talk) 01:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by I love idol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE: Unidentified locations with no clear educational value.
Mys_721tx (talk) 00:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Can be deleted speedily under the COM:SCOPE Encik Tekateki (talk) 12:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused. Looks like tests. --MGA73 (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
A picture was here since 2014 and still used only in a draft? Is he in scope somehow? E4024 (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, pcp. Own work doubtful. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content. --1989 (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Image has a link to the YouTube channel as a source but I don't see any proof there that it's licensed with the claimed CC license. kyykaarme (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete While he does now have an article on en and de, there isn't any evidence that this is CC licensed, it's just been taken from the YouTube channel's display picture. Ym2X (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
The file was tagged for no permission and deleted by Fitindia. I don't know if I should close this myself so I'll ping them. -kyykaarme (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Architect of the building died in 1980s. Doctor Architect (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- But this file was reviewed by User:FlickreviewR 2 on 2019-07-13 19:03:03 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the Public Domain Mark. If it is not enough? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per updated COM:PDM. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Global logo still undercopyright. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 03:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Delete Images watermark of copyright holder on bottom right Encik Tekateki (talk) 03:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Presumed-nonfree logo, and obviously not own-work because it has a partially-cropped watermark DMacks (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Gikü (talk) 11:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Probably not approved by the Swedish Defense Forces, as it shows a military installation Mkallgren (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2019 (EST)
- This is an intersting question, since it is not a copyright-restiction, but a restriction on photographing and publishing; Q31888556. Pinging Clindberg. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- That is a non-copyright restriction. If the uploader wants to delete in light of that law, we should probably allow that, but otherwise I don't think it's up to us to enforce that particular restriction. If the Swedish government requests deletion, suppose that should be considered too. But Google Maps shows more detail than that, really. Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 02:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Can be undeleted 2083 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: ? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Bc the earliest publication I could find was 1987, and Soviet works not published before 1945 have to wait 95 years after publication (in addition to being PD in Russia) in order to be on Commons because of the URAA since servers are in the US and therefore works must be PD in both CountryofOrigin+US.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- If first published in 1987, then the US copyright expires on 1 January 2048 or 120 years after creation, whichever is later. This assumes that 120 years after creation is earlier than 95 years after publication. See COM:HIRTLE. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Either way it's not eligible for Commons right now.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- If first published in 1987, then the US copyright expires on 1 January 2048 or 120 years after creation, whichever is later. This assumes that 120 years after creation is earlier than 95 years after publication. See COM:HIRTLE. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Bc the earliest publication I could find was 1987, and Soviet works not published before 1945 have to wait 95 years after publication (in addition to being PD in Russia) in order to be on Commons because of the URAA since servers are in the US and therefore works must be PD in both CountryofOrigin+US.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: I vaguely remember something about copyright registrations/renewals and LIFE.. can't quite get it clear. It was something big though. Do you know what I'm talking about? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it was Iwo Jima. I somehow thought it was something else. Well, mystery solved. I guess it really depends on exactly which issue this was published in. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- It looks like all of the 1951 issues of LIFE magazine were renewed, per a search on https://cocatalog.loc.gov . (You can search for a title of "Life", then set search limits of date = 1951, and serials.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- If the image is no longer in copyright in the US (some magazines & images of the era did not have the copyright renewed, as was required at the time), provide info on status. If PD status in US cannot be shown, Delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Subpage for Sunday a Day of Compassion.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbanda1 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Violates COM:EDUSE, also a potential copyright violation -Dmartin969 (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- If as claimed as here [1] , kindly provide Commons:OTRS, otherwise Speedy delete Encik Tekateki (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is in use, so COM:EDUSE doesn't matter. However, the logo might be over COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
References
Deleted: no permission. --ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 19:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 02:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE?
- File:OparNV123.png
- File:Labaoksana123.png
- File:Demchyna123.png
- File:Ganchuk123.png
- File:Емблема кафедри ДІД.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
All images by this contributor except this one has been deleted and contributor has been warned not to upload further copyright violations. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fpmobd Like other uploads from this user this particular image is small sized and lacks EXIF data. Thuresson (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - As this image is COM:INUSE to illustrate politicians of Bangladesh. Keep for this images Encik Tekateki (talk) 04:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Yes the other files were deleted but its a file from 2002. I think that many files from 2002 did not have EXIF data. --MGA73 (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: cropped version of File:At Saidpur Airport.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 10:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Image with copyright by Jesús Diges from EFE news agency --Davidpar 22:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Facebook size, no metadata Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - What do you meant by "Facebook sizes" ? Encik Tekateki (talk) 16:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Encik Tekateki Facebook photos come in particular sizes. The oldest ones are 720x720, and they range upwards from there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- The background was removed from the photo so it is clearly edited. I think that it could be a reason why the metadata was removed. --MGA73 (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. --ƏXPLICIT 10:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook page without valid license. --Voyager (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The link from which this image was taken is no longer active, and the airplane in this image is actually the Junkers Ju 287 V3 and not the Ju 287 V3 because as noted in Horst Lommel's book Junkers Ju 287: The World's First Swept-Wing Jet Aircraft and Manfred Griehl's book Jet Planes of the Third Reich: The Secret Projects, Volume 2, the Junkers Ju 287 V2 had the same airframe as the first Ju 287 prototype, even though it had six jet engines (initially two were to be engine mounted and four were to be wing mounted, but Junkers later decided that all six turbojets be mounted in triple clusters under the wing). Extrapolaris (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extrapolaris (talk • contribs) 01:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Why are these images put up for deletion by a known sockpuppet? [6]--Petebutt (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The image I nominated for deletion comes from a web link that's no longer active. Also, the image was incorrectly labeled Ju 287 V2 when in fact it is of the Ju 287 V3. You can inform Greg Goebel that the image I've nominated for deletion that he created actually depicts the Ju 287 V3 because the V2 had the same airframe as the V1.Extrapolaris (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Kept: link updated. If the subject is misidentified, this can be rectified by editing the image. --ƏXPLICIT 10:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, other images from this camera were found to be copyright violations. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know what the other photos from this camera were/are. But there are no hits on Tineye or Google. --MGA73 (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. --ƏXPLICIT 10:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
درود بر یاران. این لوگو هیچ ایرادی ندارد و بنده مخالف با حذف آن هستم. امیدوارم دوستان نیز پشتیبانی کنند. با سپاس — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaviani.2548 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ƏXPLICIT 09:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1951. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging @Clindberg I'll also try looking at this in a minute, I'm busy doing rollbacks on enwiki.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz
- Pretty sure the 1951 issues were renewed, so Delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Unexploitable picture. The quality is too low. Myloufa (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The file is only a private map (from a private point-of-view selected places in the landscape, put on a screenshot of a public map server), thus out of project scope. --Mmh (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
It's also the only contribution of the user. Apparently, they only needed to upload a private file somewhere. --Mmh (talk) 23:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, i don't see places as a private places, what are secret and can't be published. --janbery (talk) 14:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete. --ƏXPLICIT 09:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Cette Image est à supprimer pour 3 raisons : 1/ c'est un photomontage - 2/ ce photomontage est l'œuvre d'une artiste, Nicolas Moulin, qui n'est manifestement pas la personne qui a téléversé ce fichier, sans doute récupéré sur Internet - 3/ rien n'indique l'origine réelle de ce fichier Piktopia (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- J'ai quand même doute sur cette argumentation, je ne vois pas en quoi il s'agit d'un photomontage. Certes il y a une œuvre proche (baptisé Askiatower) mais ce n'est pas la même. L'image hébergé ici date de 2004, l’œuvre de l'artiste de 2006 apparemment.--Lefringant (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Au temps pour moi, après vérifications je me suis effectivement trompé, le descriptif de la photo la datant de 2007 alors que les métadonnées précisaient 2004, ainsi qu'une forte ressemblance m'ont mis sur mes gardes mais j'ai réagi trop vite !--Piktopia (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 10:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Uddeepta (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Superbrian19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Smaller than Facebook sized files, with no metadata, all on same subject (Playing fields), and with no apparent indication of user's own work.
- File:Estadio San Julian.png
- File:Estadio AFP.jpg
- File:Jose Angulo Sacaba.jpg
- File:Estadio Bermejo.png
- File:Estadio Yotala.png
- File:Estadio Shinahota.png
- File:Estadio Caranavi.png
- File:Estadio Gran Mamore.png
- File:Estadio Aiquile.png
- File:Estadio Yapacani.png
- File:Estadio Bolivar Tembladerani.png
- File:Estadio Quillacollo.png
- File:Estadio Villa 1 de mayo.png
- File:Municipal de Laja.png
- File:Yoyo Zambrano.png
- File:Estadio Serafin Ferreira.png
- File:Estadio Enrique Giese.png
- File:Estadio Manuel Flores Huanuni.png
- File:Estadio de la ACF Edgar Peña.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)7
I'm sorry, but I don't understand the problems on these images, and I think that adressing that they are from "the same subject" is ridiculous. I work on a local sports program show and some of these pictures have been taken personal by me‚‘, or were traspassed by collegues, who aren't really interested on copyright issues and gave me the permission to upload them here, as they don't have a problem with me uploading them to Wikipedia, as I suggest them, they are only to help on illustrate the playing fields on my country, Bolivia. I also don't have any plans of merchandise with them, so yes, in any case, they are, on public domain. Antoher thing is, what is exactly the problem with metadata? Is a heavy thing to discuss, so I will need to receive more specific info about where are the problem related in this topic. I usually tend to modify the images on Photoshop for pixel expanding, since some of them are very old and not taken from HD Cameras. And now they look "Smaller than Facebook sized files". What's up with that? It really seems like putting them into deletion requests is something personal, despite of the advice telling is not to. I really need a lot of help otherwise. --Superbrian19 19:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Superbrian19
- Hi Superbrian19: Commons license that says "own work" really means "this is my own work." If you are borrowing images from other people, they need to send permissions to COM:OTRS for those pictures. Otherwise, as they are not your own work, they can't be licensed as such. Commons only provides free hosting for pictures which are provably public domain. Metadata refers to the camera or scanner make and model or software used to edit images... basically like a history of how the image was created. Images without metadata are often not own work of uploader; just one clue that you uploaded photos - which as you say - really aren't yours. Nothing personal, just Commons policy. Please read COM:L for more information. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- But they have the mark on "this is my own work.". So no work with them on software like Photoshop is allowed? That's stupid. So if they are not going to be allowed to be here, so you can delete them. I will not waste my time collaborating on Commons. So long, SUCKERS!
--Superbrian19 19:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Superbrian19
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Uploads by Elisenda17
[edit]Elisenda17 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- File:Crematorio de la zona blanca.jpg
- File:Zona naranja.jpg
- File:Comida que se encuentra en la zona roja.jpg
- File:Cocina de la zona roja.jpg
- File:Mitsubishi transformado.jpg
- File:Guayaba fruta.jpg
Every other upoad is already tagged as copyright violation. --85.212.178.111 08:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The artist wants to remove this picture from Internet. Gisalbery (talk) 19:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --ƏXPLICIT 03:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a slide at a conference, the slide is prominent in the image and not freely-licensed. It was my mistake for uploading Victorgrigas (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
inadeguato Rominarapisarda (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: user talk pages dont get deleted. --JuTa 21:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Disneyland - Star Wars Galaxy's Edge (Disneyland) 02.jpg
- File:Galaxy's Edge - 48856669548.jpg
- File:Galaxy's Edge - 48857223682.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
- File:Star Wars Galaxy's Edge (Disneyland) - 04.jpg - (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Star Wars Galaxy's Edge (Disneyland) - 04.jpg)
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Quantamixsolutions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING Gbawden (talk) 14:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Part of Category:Mansfield University of Pennsylvania athletics. --Minoraxtalk 08:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Aliza Rajan
[edit]These pictures are being deleted, however Aliza Rajan is one person.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Page doesn't exist. --Minoraxtalk 08:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Reason = I m the owner of this pic I would like to delete this pic because it has some mistake, therefore, I will upload again with proper information and deep detail so kindly delete this picture and also this picture description so I will able to start the new process with exact detail. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by پیر عمر حیات شاہ شیرازی الہاشمی (talk • contribs) 03:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by P199. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, these images I have uploaded for Robert Fioretti were created by me, Benjamin McCulloch, and are owned by the entity in question. I have been paid by the entity, in part, to update his wikipedia page. You guys continue to remove the images I upload. How do we get this to not happen? As far as I can tell I've always revealed that I am the creator of the image but apparently I'm not doing it right. We need to restore these files I've uploaded and update Robert Fioretti's page. The current picture is from when he was battling with cancer 5+ years ago and are not exactly flattering to the way he currently looks, hence why I've been hired to change it as he is currently running for Mayor of Chicago in 2019. Please help.
Thank you, Benjamin McCulloch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennymetalsh5 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
I put up a movie poster, Out of Liberty Liberty.jpg, on the Wikimedia Commons for a webpage about the film.
I wrote the movie. I own a percentage of the film. I put up the image with the same notifications that other movie poster's get when they're put up on wikimedia commons -- I don't know why mine was deleted.
Stephen
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi there,
Im not sure if im doing this correctly, Im writing in hope of having my photos undeleted, many were uploaded at once also. As im the sole owner and person in the pictures,
I can provide a screen shot of me logged into various platforms, accounts claiming i am Rondarb. Hoping all the pictures can be undeleted at once, instead of claiming each individually. What is needed to do so please?
Thanks Rondarb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rondarb (talk • contribs) 21:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Gbawden. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
First, I would like to say that I appreciate all the work you guys do. Thank you.
I had no idea that by submitting the article I was contravening Wikipedia rules. As a consequence I wish to withdraw the article I submitted for consideration.
An explanation in response to Mesmeilleurs Mesmeilleurs’ comment that the article I was intending to attach to Dr Davey’s page is based on one obituary from the SMH is because I wrote the original obituary and Stephen Davey, Dr Davey’s son, added the personal information. One of the reasons I wanted to add the original version is because it has at the beginning an explanation of Australia’s old currency – which by the way I had checked the accuracy with the Reserve Bank of Australia’s official historian Professor Selwyn Cornish. I believe if someone has never used pounds, shillings and pence they possibly haven’t realised that it is not an easy currency to use, and thank goodness Australia changed to the decimal system.
My response to George Ho (Ticket#: 2019072810000864) was as follows:
“I wasn't referring to the photo as being my "own work". The written material or words are mine and when I have quoted someone I have emailed them the full document, and asked and received their permission to quote them.
You're right that the photo has been cropped. It is a Davey family photo which originally included Neil and his wife Maria, as well as a gentleman whose name over time the Daveys had forgotten. The photo was taken by a family friend in a restaurant I was told some time in the 1960s, when I didn't know the Daveys. They later gave me a copy of the photo and gave me permission to use it. The photo was cropped so that the other two people were removed, leaving only Neil in the photo to be used on his Wikipedia page.
I have known Dr and Mrs Davey for many decades as a family friend. I am sad that both Neill and my good friend Maria recently died.”
Thank you, Susan Winning
Deleted: Deleted by P199. --Minoraxtalk 08:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Wrong, mistakes. --Adámoz (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Featured picture candidates/guidelines/cs. --Minoraxtalk 08:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
AquafornoII (talk) 14:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages should not be deleted. --Minoraxtalk 08:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope. And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope. And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
per COM:SCOPE: Mostly text and COM:NOTUSED. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. I don't really see the educational value in this one Sam-2727 (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Spanish Wikipedia page it was used on was speedy deleted. Sam-2727 (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Relatively small, no EXIF, likely to be a crop of another photo, uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations. OTRS permission needed. Ahmadtalk 00:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Quakewoody (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I understand DRs are backlogged. To make things easier for our admins please let us mark with {SD|F10} this kind of clearly unnecessary personal images. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 00:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 08:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mambo Magsaysay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Miguel Decena Jr..jpg
- File:Image KLO.png
- File:Blooming makato.jpg
- File:Joebennew.jpg
- File:Ramon Anselmo Martin Legaspi.jpg
- File:Abencio T. Torres.jpg
- File:Enciong vargas.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete per reason by EugeneZelenko JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. All files taken from various websites without permission.
- File:Почетак цветања кливије.jpg
- File:Расађивање кливије путем бочног изданка.jpg
- File:Klivija мината.jpg
- File:Clivia minata.png
- File:Кливија мината.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio https://gcaptain.com/ensco-to-stack-more-rigs-cut-more-offshore-jobs/ GuillaumeG (talk) 21:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The source is listed as "love life images." This is a group of wedding photographers. If the source is indeed "lovelifeimages," it seems dubious that the file would be freely licensed (particularly under the default license). Sam-2727 (talk) 21:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Likely to be screenshots; OTRS permission and/or evidence that they are free is needed.
Ahmadtalk 23:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
These two screenshots were captured by me from my copies of the movies. They should not be considered violating because they are captured by me through VLC. --Iblish786 (talk) 02:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
In the photo, the ok.ru site mark where the photo was uploaded in the first.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 23:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
And also:
Request by the creator. These files had a small error and have been already replaced. See the deletion request.
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Cette image est exactement la mème que celle ci https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Air_Force_Capt._Elizabeth_Shaw,_an_aircraft_commander_with_the_62nd_Airlift_Wing,_scans_the_runway_for_any_people_or_animals_before_landing_at_Bangui_M%27Poko_International_Airport_in_the_Central_African_140119-F-RN211-560.jpg L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already done. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution files without metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Görögibolya.jpg
- File:Peter Mischinger.jpg
- File:FilipBandzakwhitetie.jpg
- File:Vargaattilaprofesszor.jpg
- File:Kertész András munka közben.jpg
- File:HidasiJuditdrprof.jpg
- File:HidasiJudit1.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakrole.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakleisure.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakonair.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakperformance.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakrehearsal.jpg
- File:Filipbandzakpiano.jpg
- File:Filipbandzak.jpg
- File:ChomskyPleh.JPG
Regasterios (talk) 16:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Görögibolya.jpg” under ticket:2020050610002538. --Regasterios (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Görögibolya.jpg is kept per OTRS permission. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the rest. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Painting still under copyright, not DM. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, please delete. Elly (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yezy blaaz og (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope
Habertix (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused private photo of an insignificant person with insufficient description - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 02:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image with no EXIF . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jane Esther Clarke (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -JdePortes (talk) 11:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -JdePortes (talk) 11:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)duplicate
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -JdePortes (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC) duplicate
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Vladimir Hudobko
[edit]Vladimir Hudobko — Preceding unsigned comment added by Powerfejd (talk • contribs) 14:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katarina10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. All files are taken from various websites without permission.
- File:Capri111.jpg
- File:Capri31.jpg
- File:Capri italy.jpg
- File:Capri6.jpg
- File:100025 plava-pecina.jpg
- File:Capri8.jpg
- File:Capri9.jpg
- File:Capri7.jpg
- File:Capri012.jpg
- File:Capri11.jpg
- File:Капри1.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
این عکس مربوط به ۲ زن ارمنی میباشد و هیچ ارتباطی با آذربایجان و بالازر خانم ندارد https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryPorn/comments/66tle6/two_armenian_women_pose_with_their_rifles_before/ Sahand1342 (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, needs more info to confirm possible PD status. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Something went wrong with upload Wizard. Split seems to have not worked properly. So delete and once gone I'll re-upload (I am original uploader) PsamatheM (talk) 12:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation and unused another project.--Kingbjelica (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyvio (EXIF: Ogun Akgul). --Túrelio (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Blurry - there are better quality images of whales on commons Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
This photo is copied from Google Street View.[7] Puppe100 (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam / out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Together with his cat. --E4024 (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:VAND. the correct signature is File:Elon Musk Signature.png eien20 (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Waxypotato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art, promo photos, poetry. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Amerika (back).jpg
- File:Amerika .jpg
- File:Khudyakov2000.jpg
- File:Katsaveiki2.jpg
- File:20-1 (dragged).tif
- File:5- Henry at his openning at Northon Dodge Center of Russian Art in 1982.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020050810009091 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Amerika_(back).jpg” under ticket:2020050810009091. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Amerika_.jpg” under ticket:2020050810009091. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Katsaveiki2.jpg” under ticket:2020050810009091. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:20-1_(dragged).tif” under ticket:2020050810009091. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept those with OTRS, others deleted. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Expectation Graduation Room Pilot Project Award Ceremony at Sterling High School (21) (30338325992).jpg
[edit]image not created by uploader SecretName101 (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Expectation Graduation Room Pilot Project Award Ceremony at Sterling High School (23) (29824517814).jpg. --Minoraxtalk 13:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
it was a selfie Mayurakrish (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Not an Indian work, the original work was published in U.S.A. in 1943. The source mentioned is also unoriginal. This picture was first published in LIFE magazine, which is based in U.S.A. Vrishchik (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep I suppose you can change the license to PD-US-not renewed. PawełMM (talk) 08:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Info: Including File:Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy in 1943 (cropped).jpg, "wearing" the same DR. --JuTa 01:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)- Keep per PawełMM--5.170.142.55 06:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --JuTa 10:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Opera propria che voglio eliminare Cataldo01 (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: but not after more than 2 years. --JuTa 10:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Deformation of a ferromagnetic material under magnetic force due to rotating permanent magnet.opus
[edit]no sound Estopedist1 (talk) 08:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is no sound because the purpose of the animation is to show the vibration / displacement, not the sound. Besides, there is no sound during the experiment because the field rotates too slowly, so vibration velocity is too small.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazhoid (talk • contribs) 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: but this is a sound file. --JuTa 22:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
the image is fake as it contains the flag of Iran used in stock imagesSpinnerLaserz (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I have uploaded the image to Wiki Commons in 2012 when I did know better about copyright policies. Hence, I claimed the photo to be personal work which is not the case. Also, I can no longer find the original source. – StreetSodatalk 21:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Failed PR attempt at ro:Roman Tighineanu. See also: File:Roman Tighineanu.jpg. Gikü (talk) 08:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Failed PR attempt at ro:Roman Tighineanu. See also: File:Imagine Roman.jpg. Gikü (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Failed self-promo at ro:Pavel Movileanu. Gikü (talk) 08:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Failed promo attempt at ro:Valentin Munteanu (psihiatru). Gikü (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope; this is the CEO of a non-notable company in Romania (ro:TamHomeInc); uploader submitted a bunch of promotional photos. Gikü (talk) 09:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope photo of a non-notable person: ro:Ovidiu Tercu. Gikü (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Logo of a non-notable website (ro:PieseAuto.ro). See also: File:Sigla PieseAuto.png. Gikü (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Logo of a non-notable website (ro:PieseAuto.ro). See also: File:Logo PieseAuto.svg. Gikü (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Logo was updated in 2011. JasonLax (talk) 09:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The later 2011 logo just makes the background a gradient fill; not a big change. No reason to discard the original file. If an article uses this file is incorrectly, then change the article to use the current logo. We keep old flags around, and if being old was a good reason to delete something, then somebody would have deleted me a long time ago. Glrx (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Speedykept. --Leyo 21:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herrn, Ich bin Teil des Global Brand Teams von SAP. Wir moechten Sie freundlich darum bitten die Datei unseres Logos zu loeschen. Ein geschuetzes Logo sollte nicht frei zum Download zur Verfuegung stehen, ausser SAP selbst stellt dieses zur Verfuegung. Falls Sie noch weitere unserer Logos zum Download zur Verfuegung stellen, bitten wir Sie auch diese zu loeschen. Vielen Dank fuer Ihr Verstaendnis. Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Das Global Brand Team LDa97 (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- The SAP logo here is outdated and shouldn't be used in any communications without SAP's permission. Please delete this contribution. The SAP logo shouldn't be offered as download outside the SAP environment.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarTeu (talk • contribs) 08:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Same reasons as above. The de article on SAP describes the evolution of the logo -- something that dewscribes the history of the "Global Brand Teams von SAP". SAP has trademark rights but not copyright. Glrx (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Wrong orientation. Request from original uploader. Morris Schaffer (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: see this edit. --Minoraxtalk 05:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Subject claims this is {{Own work}} but it does not look like a selfie. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from fence art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Viola los derechos de autor, no se puede usar. --ToxicFree (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Podzemnik. --Minoraxtalk 05:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
It is just a duplicate, a lower resolution of Brogieux château et jardin.jpg -- sarang♥사랑 07:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
-
Brogieux château et jardin.jpg -
Roiffieux Brogieux château et jardin.jpg
Kept: redirected to duplicate. --Minoraxtalk 05:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
It is just a duplicate, a lower resolution of Brogieux cour ancienne.jpg -- sarang♥사랑 07:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
-
Brogieux cour ancienne.jpg -
Roiffieux Brogieux cour ancienne.jpg
Kept: redirected to duplicate. --Minoraxtalk 05:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Protect the privacy for the protesters, please delete the old version https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/46/20190623040416%21Protesters_give_Middle_finger_to_the_police_force_in_Police_Headquarter_20190621.jpg -Wpcpey (talk) 04:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: already revdel-ed. --Minoraxtalk 05:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paz.baires (talk • contribs) 15:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanakacaio (talk • contribs) 05:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
there is an updated version available — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogifaun (talk • contribs) 11:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Sipam Logo
[edit]Please delete this logo. I am planning to use another email for wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesipam (talk • contribs) 19:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Minoraxtalk 06:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
This is my Wikimedia Commons User Page. I thought I had one...but maybe not. Now I do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1stCoastal (talk • contribs) 05:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 06:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems like this is a personal image which is not useful in any project. --Velma (talk) 06:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
badly watermarked and definitely not own work Joostik (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Balibeginica (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files uploaded by this user are copyvios from various websites
- File:Tomislav Toma.jpg
- File:Carmenn.jpg
- File:Sant-antoni-fornells-2.jpg
- File:Santjoan2.jpg
- File:Les falles.jpg
- File:Ff93ed8674cc5fa9064c8ed1a92cb467 header.jpg
- File:Foto 3332049 ae38d98b61e5e2cfbd52938ae0308856.jpg
- File:Dia de Sant Jordi.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Varying sizes, no metadata. COM:PCP. --Minoraxtalk 06:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
nonsense, out of scope NNW 20:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nadja Dragojevic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. All files are taken from various websites without permission.
- File:Start!.jpg
- File:Surfovanje.jpg
- File:Talasi-re-6-.jpg
- File:Sport6.jpg
- File:Imagesпп.jpg
- File:Jahtec zpsb4914345.jpg
- File:Slike pp (1).jpg
- File:Slike pp.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Varying sizes, no metadata on most files. COM:PCP. --Minoraxtalk 06:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristina Vilela
[edit]- File:UCP Faculty of Biotechnology.jpg
- File:UCP Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics.jpg
- File:UCP Faculty of Human Sciences.jpg
- File:Professor Isabel Capeloa Gil.jpg
- File:UCP Braga Regional Centre.jpg
- File:UCP Viseu.jpg
- File:UCP Campus Foz (Porto).jpg
- File:UCP Lisboa (Sede).jpg
- File:UCP Logo.png
- File:Centro Regional Porto.jpg
Reasons for deletion request -- Deletion due to copyright violation indication. Cristina Vilela
Kept: OTRS available. --Minoraxtalk 13:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- also file:Vista nocturna de la parte baja de la parroquia el llano.jpg
Blurry photos, out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Author requests deletion.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
The file is an image of crowds at Tiananmen Square in 1976, from Radio Free Asia, claiming the file is in public domain. However, per Template:PD-China, Chinese works enter local public domain after 50 years after published, in which the file is far from local public domain (after 2026). As a result, the file is copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also a notice is that RFA works are not in US public domain, unlike VOA works, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep[8] 1976年4月5日清明节期间在北京天安门广场发生的大规模群众非暴力抗议事件为代表的全国性的非暴力抗议活动。最多时约有200万人参加。（Public Domain） Edison2017 (talk) 02:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Edison2017: 所以人家说啥你就信啥？廣九直通車 (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
{{SD|<G7>}} 隐世高人 (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 07:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Is either too simple to be copyrighted (in which case, change the license) or unverified "self" CC BY 4.0 of something that the uploader does not own. Basically, the question is: is this sufficient complex to be original? Thoughts? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-simple. --ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The image was however no longer available on Flickr, and its copyright status thus undeterminable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: According to https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=%22Freeman%2C%20William%20Henry.%22 then the author lived in 1842-1897. Therefore the engraving is PD so we do not need to see the file on Flickr. --MGA73 (talk) 08:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KaelNirvana (talk · contribs)
[edit]False "own works", commercial images gambling equipment sellers
Tatewaki (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Entrada a la estación Beihai Norte del metro de Pekín.jpg ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 07:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une photo personnelle (de moi en l'occurence) qui n'a aucune valeur éducative. 77.199.87.149 07:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I think the above means OoS. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 23:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Fitindia. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The picture comes from this site. The uploader doesn't have rights to uploading. He wrote the author of the picture is unknown (autor nieznany), so the licence is wrong. Wiktoryn (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The picture comes from this site. The uploader doesn't have rights to uploading. He wrote the author of the picture is unknown (autor nieznany), so the licence is wrong. Wiktoryn (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
must delete some data from the refrigerator Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Per user request, trusted user. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author (Mayte Carrasco?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I'd agree with that. Also, it's unlikely that the portraited person (Mayte Carrasco) is actuayll the author too. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect upload. The author is not as stated. See note in 'Description' I contacted the real author amd she will upload the correct way. Konkordia (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a video screenshot, not an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
ːAgree delete. It looks that the uploader, who gives no adequate evidence of ownership (no EXIF), signed up to Commons and enːWikipedia within the same minute on the same day, just to add this image, so an 'image is being used' ploy won't work. Not just a screenshot but also a probable copyright violation problem. Acabashi (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- also file:The Kiss .jpg
Uploader Asurdam claims to be the photographer Kathy Sherman. This claim needs confirm through OTRS- system. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Old photo, not own work, needs details of photographer and permission Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper source needed for licence determination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work". The artist (Hans Bren) died in 1974, so not public domain either. 217.239.0.98 13:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work". The artist (Hans Bren) died in 1974, so not public domain either. 217.239.0.98 13:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work". The artist (Hans Bren) died in 1974, so not public domain either. 217.239.0.98 13:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work". The artist (Hans Bren) died in 1974, so not public domain either. 217.239.0.98 13:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celestialbod (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. Photos owned by Lita Gaithers Owens.
- File:CDBABY COVER PIC.jpg - Owner Lita Gaithers Owens Los Angeles September 2013
- File:Havana Event.jpg - Owner Lita Gaithers Owens Los Angeles September 2019
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF. Is this actually own work as claimed? . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely, Jim, unlikely. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of file:John Austin (cropped).jpg. Sije (talk) 14:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The source says this is CC0, but the photographer, Bert Verhoeff, is living. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
The picture was cut out from a larger picture. This larger picture is in the public domain. See: https://www.nationaalarchief.nl/onderzoeken/fotocollectie/aba62080-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84 — Preceding unsigned comment added by UPPERK (talk • contribs) 13:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC) See also: https://www.nationaalarchief.nl/en/research/terms-of-use-for-scans-of-documents-maps-and-photos The present picture could be downloaded and is therefore CCO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UPPERK (talk • contribs) 14:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- I added {{Extracted from}}. Nationaal Archief says CC0. --Achim (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - public domain, indeed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per National Archives CC0 release. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Dutch treat: the photographer was member of the Board of the Foundation Pictoright (a Dutch copyright watchdog) from 2008-2012. This adds some extra flavour to the presence of 14,693 of Verhoeff's photos in Wikimedia Commons under a CC-zero license, courtesy of the Dutch National Archives. These photographs form part of the collection of Anefo press photographs, well over 300,000 photos, used >150,000 times onwiki. See also: the GLAM Newsletter, April 2018. Vysotsky (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FaithCharity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
All other uploads by this user were deleted as copyright violations. The image has a small resolution and no EXIF; might be a screenshot of a youtube video like the other deleted uploads. The image should be deleted per the precautionary principle; i doubt the file is the uploaders own work. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soledad Esperanza (talk · contribs)
[edit]All professional, posed photographs. The two about Natalia Jimenez are clearly marked in the EXIF: Author OMAR CRUZ Copyright holder ALL RIGHTS /owner artist photographer
If Soledad Esperanza is actually Omar Cruz, they need to explain exactly how this is to COM:OTRS. And how they own the rights to the other photos as well (which are not marked Omar Cruz, and are taken by different cameras). If they don't own the rights to the photos, we need to delete them as copyright violations.
- File:Paulina Matos.jpg
- File:Natalia Jimenez 190617-3338 Final OC Press Size.jpg
- File:Natalia Jimenez.jpg
- File:Camila 2.png
- File:Camila 1.png
- File:Mario Domm 5.png
- File:Mario Domm 6.png
GRuban (talk) 14:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Canon and Nikon cameras. Some images have an ARR note in the camera metadata. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.\ EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Starkbrian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Joshua Nambangi.jpg
- File:Oroko food.jpg
- File:Oroko Etana.jpg
- File:Oroko Nyangbe1.jpg
- File:Nyangbe-ekpe of the Oroko.jpg
- File:Oroko people .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Clearly an old photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Image has been used for self promotion in WP; his user page in EN:WP is a like an article for a person who is possibly not notable. E4024 (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
No description to believe that it's uploader image Horus (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I placed these picture because I thought it was allowed. ArtZuid asked in their brochure to upload as many pictures as possible on Instagram. Due to user Patrick Rogel, who nominated some pictures in an earlier stage, I asked them if I was allowed to upload the pictures here. After 5 weeks (!) just before the exposition is ended, they let me know it was not allowed. So please remove all pictures in this category. See Ticket:2019091110003915,Ceescamel (talk) 08:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Ik weet niet wat ik nog meer moet doen om die foto's te laten verwijderen. Het verzoek is simpel; alle foto's uit de genoemde categorie verwijderen, vanwege klaarblijkelijke schending auteursrechten. Ik heb dat al verzocht aan Wikimedia zelf, die kan het niet, maar hier zal toch wel een eenvoudige handeling voor zijn. Ik ga niet per foto nog eens een mededeling met reden vermelden, die al bekend is, andere foto's waren nl al verwijderd voordat ik kon reageren,Ceescamel (talk) 08:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I believe that you're right. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Netherlands#Freedom_of_panorama only permanent statues and sculptures qualify for freedom of panorama in Netherlands. All these artworks that you uploaded here were put out during ArtZuid on temporary basis. Also see German interpretation of the difference between "permanent" and "temporary" at Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Permanent_vs_temporary. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I wrongly asked for deletion of this page. can this be repristinated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommaso.sansone91 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: It's back. No reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Category page no longer being used after finding out that R36 WF cars were simply called R36. --Davidng913 (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
File was nominated for speedy deletion, but this is the picture that this Flickr-user uses as his profile picture (probably for nearly seven years) and after I created a Category for his 400+ images here on Commons, I thought for reasons of archive and historical reference it would be nice to have a picture of the photographer too, which to me seems desirable in general. Therefore I oppose deletion. Eissink (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC).
Kept: I agree, we have plenty of images of the user, let's keep the portrait as a historical reference. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
There are several inferior versions of this file in the history. I would like to delete them and upload a new version fron scratch / clean Brook Green (talk) 11:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you want me to delete the history, that would be possible but please upload the version that you like first and then write me and I can delete the previous versions is desirable. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Requested by author. - Joxemai (talk) 07:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry but this is not a valid reason for deletion. The file is in use. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Eight-thousander deaths (to March 2012).png
[edit]Image is taken directly from the Economist article found here - https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2013/05/29/stairway-to-heaven --Kantokano (talk) 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
=== [[:== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description=Superposition of the Veil of Manoppello on a negative of the Shroud of Turin (Table in the Penuel Exhibition in Manoppello, Italy) |Source=Br. Benno-Maria Kehl OFM, Insel Werd, Eschenz, Switzerland |Date=2005 |Author=Sr. Blandina Paschalis Schlömer OSCO, photo taken by Br. Benno Maria Kehl OFM, uploaded by [[User:Rüdiger Sander|Rüdiger Sander]] |Permission=with kind permission by Brother Benno, given August 6, 2006 |other_versions= }} == {{int:license-header}} == {{GFDL|migration=relicense}} [[Category:Shroud of Turin]] [[Category:Manoppello]] [[Category:Retouched pictures]] [[Category:Veil of Veronica]]]] === Das Bild muß gelöscht werden. Es stellt eine Übereinanderlagerung des Turiner Grabtuchs und des Schleiers von Manoppello dar. Der angebliche Lizenzgeber müßte über beide die Linzenzenzvon beiden zugrundeliegenden Bildern verfügen. Ich bezweifle, daß er darüber verfügt. Der hochladende Rüdiger Sander verfügt darüber ebenoswenig. Dazu kommt, daß hier theoriefindend zwei Bilder übereinandergelagert werden. Man kann nun aber das zugehörge Verfahren nicht erkennen. Wurde da etwas vergrößert, verkleinert, gestreckt? Daher ist genau diese Abbildung von vornherein irreführend. Von wissenschaftlicher Seite hat bereits der Kunsthistoriker Erwin Pokorny nachgewiesen, daß die Abbildungen auf beiden Textilien nicht deckungsgleich sind.
The picture must be deleted. It represents a superimposition of the Shroud of Turin and the Manoppello Imag. The alleged licensor would have to have the publishing rights of both (!) of the underlying pictures. I doubt he has them. The person, woh has uploades teh pictures, Rüdiger Sander, also has not these rights. In addition, here the supeimposition is in itself delivering a theory - the theoyr that tehse two textiles have features in common. But you can not recognize the used method. Has something been enlarged, reduced, stretched? Therefore, this picture is misleading right from the start. From a scientific point of view, the art historian Erwin Pokorny has already shown that the illustrations on both textiles are not congruent. -Mr. bobby (talk) 13:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -ArmanMia828 (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC) I uploaded a photo which contains typo error.
Deleted: No permission. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Resolving issue with photographer. Please remove deletion request}} RClark (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mayurakrish (talk) 11:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
File:FILE-ibsbfsu.JPG
[edit]Already got a permission from the school. Please do not delete this file.- Greatconclusion7 (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Kit right arm Segunda Equipacion IDV.png
[edit]- File:Kit right arm Segunda Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit right arm Primera Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit left arm Segunda Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit left Primera Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit body Segunda Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit body Primera Equipacion IDV.png
- File:Kit right arm Segunda Equipación IDV.png
- File:Kit left arm Segunda Equipación IDV.png
- File:Kit body Segunda Equipación IDV.png
- File:Kit right arm Primera Equipación IDV.png
- File:Kit left arm Primera Equipación IDV.png
- File:Kit body Primera Equipación IDV.png
These images were all uploaded by Vallekas1312. I believe they should be deleted because I want to upload them again properly. Vallekas1312 (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Vallekas1312
Deleted: Very small files, nearly unusable. Per nomination also. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Unlike what's claimed, this portrait does not seem to be from the 16th century; the Museu de Marinha (Navy Museum) website lists it as a contemporary work by Alberto Cutileiro (1915-2003), dated 1960. RickMorais (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @RickMorais: I can't find it on the website that you mentioned. Do you have an exact link to it please? --Podzemnik (talk) 00:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik: The link above was an exact link; the website since seems to be having some naviagation issues. For what it's worth, you'll find it if you type its inventory number ("MM.06268") on the search bar, but it only shows the back of the canvas (saying "Alberto Cutileiro fecit, 1960"). RickMorais (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OK, thanks RickMorais. Deleted per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Credited to Tanya Kapitonova: https://www.rug.nl/news/2019/08/alumnus-van-het-jaar_-christiaan-triebert?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The source to this image has been deleted. This map contradicts other maps and cia data too. it should be deleted. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kurdistan_of_Turkey_(CIA).png — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.245.131.94 (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Woaw! Was this DR open since March 2019? We are in November 2020. What surprises me more is that this ridiculously wrong map is being used in WP articles. This would not bring prestige to any WP but I will not move a finger for some of those WPs. Other people who work in Commons and WPs should make an effort to eliminate this crap from their respective WPs. This is worse than funny, simply ridiculous. --E4024 (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Non-factual, unsourced map. Beshogur (talk) 07:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- If it shows a region in Samsun as Kurdish majority -among other absurdities- we can use this file for articles about ethnic humour. :) Delete. --E4024 (talk) 22:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
please note :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/E4024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moalswoo (talk • contribs)
- Now that's wonderful! We already know E4024 - a sockpupppet of E4024. We have to search for other sockpuppets better, says me. --E4024 (talk) 13:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- User:Moalswoo, as we are talking about sockpuppets would you like to say something about an account opened only to edit this issue? --E4024 (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
source
[edit]http://internationalrelations.org/kurds-in-turkey/
Map showing Kurdish majority areas within Turkey, Kurdish Institute of Paris Map, Goran Tek-en, CC 4.0
https://issamkh.com/2017/04/08/the-pkk-and-turkey/
https://www.pressenza.com/2015/06/kurds-a-common-issue-for-iran-turkey/
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1723591/middle-east
https://www.arabnews.com/sites/default/files/userimages/20/p3_gr_kurds.jpg
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/10/1/who-are-the-kurds
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/688d674c860842bc85f9ac2819089d4c_6.jpeg
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-20/distribution-of-kurdish-population-map/10729916?nw=0
https://www.abc.net.au/cm/rimage/6763624-3x2-xlarge.jpg?v=2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moalswoo (talk • contribs)
- Delete map is conflicting with other maps include kurdistan in turkey. And ignores kurdish majority areas in Istanbul and Izmir. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Map clearly is true. All three of these users are Turks and are in line with expansionist and neo-Ottoman propaganda to remove the Kurds from the Turkish political scene. Note the IP edits. It only worked to destroy maps of Kurdistan. According to statistics, more than 6 to 8 million Kurds live in Izmir, Ankara and Istanbul, but they tend to leave everyone in line with the policy of all Turkism by falsifying statistics and history. Originally, Anatolia belongs to the Kurds and Armenians. Turks are just immigrants.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Shadow4dark ------ Username: Shadow4dark Registered: 15:47, 19 September 2015 (5 years ago)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurds_in_Turkey ---- The total number of Kurds in Istanbul is estimated variously from 2 to 3 million
These Turkish users are seeking to remove this map in line with their ethnocentric goals. The sources are quite telling. I do not argue anymore because these people are just looking for Turkism. I have provided enough evidence, and it is clear that managers make fair decisions based on sources and evidence, not because of the ethnic feelings of a few users. Turkey can not continue its racism and occupation forever. Cyprus and Eastern Anatolia and the Mediterranean Sea and Artsakh do not belong to you.Moalswoo (talk) 14:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-bans-kurdish-language-play-in-istanbul/a-55306289
Turkey bans Kurdish-language play in Istanbul
https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/kurds-still-migrating-to-western-turkish-cities-46198
Kurds still migrating to western Turkish cities
https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/1005015.html
situation of Kurds in Western cities
Turkey: Situation of Kurds in western cities such as Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Konya and Mersin; resettlement to these cities (2009 - May 2012) [TUR104096.E]Moalswoo (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- "Anatolia belongs to the Kurds and Armenians. Turks are just immigrants." I know. The Armenian maps show m/l the same areas in this map as "Armenian majority". So we have the question: Are Armenians and Kurds the same people? :) BTW be careful about Greeks, they also say Turkey (sorry "Anatolia and Thrace" :) belongs to them... Now you began to speak about Kurds in western cities while you call Turks immigrants. Then Kurds in... OK, as Turkey does not belong to Turks let's find other examples, say Berlin, Hamburg or Vienna are not counted as inhabitants of those cities? I understand when you said Anatolia belong to this and that that means Kurds cannot live in western cities of Turkey, uhm sorry Anatolia, because of what? Are they Armenian cities? Did the Greeks destroy the Armenian city at Troy? I am very confused. You seem to be a wise person, how old are you? Please continue teaching us eveything about these mongoloid Turks before they lock you or warn me for feeding... Ciao. --E4024 (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the map is quite obviously wrong, but per COM:INUSE it should be kept. I encourage all of you to create a better map. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Very problematic map, and sources. Half of the sources does not show a map, or show the same map. The map is posted by Kurdish Institute of Paris as you can see here. It's POV map, far away from accurate, claiming provinces like Çorum, Yozgat having Kurdish majority, etc. Please consider to check CIA factbook map to see an accurate one. Beshogur (talk) 11:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- The admin that closed the previous discussion noted "the map is quite obviously wrong" (bolded by E4024) but the only supporter of the file (a popped-up SPA) thanked them and left the scene happy. Do not you understand that some people are not interested in the truth but their own agenda? If there are people stupid enough in the world to believe absurdities as propagated by WPs, there is little we can do about it. I could say "delete all Wikipedias" but there are also good things in some WPs, like the Turkish cuisine articles I have made in CA:WP. :) Relax. For you I vote: Speedy delete. Nonsense map. --E4024 (talk) 12:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The file is ineligible for speedy deletion, because it survived a regular deletion request. The file is ineligible for deletion due to this reason at all, because it is used and even in multiple projects. I repeat: please create and upload a better map. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Moalswoo (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Personal attacks removed. [9] Эlcobbola talk 19:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. I exactly agree with what Beshogur and E4024 said. Map does not correspond with reality in Turkey. - Aybeg (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as said above map ignores other places and is wrong Shadow4dark (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Taivo--Balyozxane (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Many times we have deleted files that are in use in WPs. We must have our own way. If we see that something is nonsense, we should not care that it is used anywhere. We are "independent". I remember very well the case of a series of invented flags for the towns or villages of some province of Turkey which were used in NL:WP. (In Turkey these entities do not have flags, less fictional ones invented by some Turkish immigrant in Netherlands.) I got them deleted all after a long struggle here only when -I guess- NL WP admins understood they were in the wrong and stopped interfering here. Anybody remembers the case? Must have been 2016 or 2017... --E4024 (talk) 13:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, The map shows the areas populated by Kurds in Turkey (southeastern parts), which is fairly accurate. It has several references too and has been used within multiple other projects. So, it does not qualify for speedy deletion. The users who think this is inaccurate can prepare a similar file and back it up by references. Pirehelokan (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Take a better look, according this map half of turkey is a kurdistan Shadow4dark (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed I wonder if there are any Turks living in Turkey (looking at several files prepared to show the minorities in the country). E4024 (talk) 10:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome Konli17! Did you open a Commons account almost two years ago, only to participate in this DR? Any help you need about the place please ask me. Cheers. E4024 (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: This nomination, like the one before it, does not present a valid reason for deletion; please read COM:NPOV critically ("A file that is in good faith use on another Wikimedia project is, by that very fact, considered useful for an educational purpose and is not liable to deletion on the grounds that it is 'wrong' in some way.") Indeed, concerns about accuracy and POV are inherently ones of scope; as this file is in use on multiple projects, COM:INUSE precludes its deletion on that basis. As has been explained, the path to deletion is thus: 1) create an alternative map without the alleged inaccuracies; 2) approach the projects currently using this version and persuade them to instead use the new alternative; 3) open a DR with a new rationale that the file is not used and that its having been universally replaced is evidence of being so flawed as not to be useful for an educational purpose. Note that DRs that do not offer new information (i.e., that continue merely to argue about inaccuracies) can be speedily closed as invalid. --Эlcobbola talk 18:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 11:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work": https://twitter.com/BrasilMerli/status/968600083808899072/photo/1 Py4nf (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Hanooz at 14:31, 17 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:CSD#F1, Album cover/Movie poster. --Krdbot 19:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
DW, photo of photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- (transfered) لقد قمت بشراء الصورة و هي صورة قديمة أي قبل 50 سنة _(1970) و قمت بعمل مسح ضوئي لها و نشرها ، كيف لي ان أثبت ذلك ؟
- I bought the picture and it is an old photo, i.e. 50 years ago _ (1970) and I scanned it and published it, how can I prove that?--Jemo2200 (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jemo2200: Then you can't claim {{Own}} work. Photographer has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Image is on sale at https://www.acehtechno.com/product_detail.php?c=%EF%BA%BB%EF%BB%A8%EF%BA%8E%EF%BB%8B%EF%BA%94%20%EF%BA%8D%D9%84%D8%A2%EF%BB%BB%EF%BA%95%20%EF%BA%8D%EF%BB%9F%EF%BB%A4%EF%BB%AE%EF%BA%B3%EF%BB%B4%EF%BB%98%EF%BB%B4%EF%BA%94%20%EF%BB%93%EF%BB%B2%20%EF%BA%8D%EF%BB%9F%EF%BA%A0%EF%BA%B0%EF%BA%8D%EF%BA%8B%EF%BA%AE%20%EF%BA%A3%EF%BA%AE%EF%BB%93%EF%BA%94%20%EF%BB%A3%EF%BB%AC%EF%BA%AA%EF%BA%A9%EF%BA%93%20%EF%BA%91%EF%BA%8E%EF%BB%9F%EF%BA%B0%EF%BB%AD%EF%BA%8D%EF%BB%9D%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1&p=22 --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: large border and watermark in middle of image. And non-notable musical group, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
All files uploaded by this user are taken from various websites without permission.
- File:Divcibare-staza-crni-vrh.jpg
- File:Tornikstaze.jpg
- File:28.02.2013-Stara-planina1.jpg
- File:Stranakop12.jpg
- File:SetWidth250-brezstojkovakucan.jpg
- File:Snowboard beginner1.jpg
- File:Kopaonik2014 0.jpg
- File:Ski-centri-u-srbiji-630x420.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The uploader has the same surname, but he also uploaded an obvious copyvio for another person ad this photo is available elsewhere so we need a proof of authorization, I suppose. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploader response: the author of this photo is my father and has given his permission. Please contact him if any doubt : lucperino@wanadoo.fr or contact@lucperino.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathieu Perino (talk • contribs) 19:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I trust Mathieu that he shot this photograph of his father. However, it is published previously, so an OTRS e-mail would be helpful. --Achim (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
No publishing permission, looks like a scanned image -Czeva (talk) 19:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claims of own work in these group shots, concert pix and flag. All Facebook or smaller sizes, no meta.
- File:Rugby Femenino Capri.jpg
- File:CAPRI en 2010.jpg
- File:Escafandra.jpg
- File:Smitten.jpg
- File:Charlie 3.jpg
- File:Bandera de Posadas (Misiones).jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio : https://www.india.com/travel/articles/5-reasons-to-visit-darjeeling-in-september-2018-3223148/ GuillaumeG (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
According to EXIF data the image is copyrighted by Sady Pridonia. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy Fæ (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not a real user. All edits on his user page. --E4024 (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
In use, plus this DR does not appear on the image page, unless there's something wrong with my browser. --Fæ (talk) 22:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Looking at the history again, it looks like I created this DR by mistake, perhaps pressing the wrong option. My intention was to challenge the speedy as the file is in use rather than opening a DR. As said the DR is not valid right now, as the notice is not on the image page. I'll separately ask for an admin review to take action to either remove this or formalize it as there is a vote. --Fæ (talk) 07:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete COM:CSD# F10. The uploader has no constructive contributions. The image is only used in a personal sandbox on fawiki. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
There are not a permission and its not FOP in Austria K@rl (talk) 08:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP and no permission. The german article was deleted. -K@rl (talk) 08:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
There are not a permission. The german artical was deleted --K@rl (talk) 08:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am writing as the subject of this photo (Britt Davis Broncos.JPG). It is my sincere request that I ask this photo be deleted. I am generally a very discreet person about my tattoos especially in the corporate world. It is my strong belief the image depicting my otherwise discreet tattoos has had a negative impact on my ability to pursue and obtain meaningful employment.
If it's possible to have this photo deleted it would be greatly appreciated and of great benefit to myself.
Thank you, Britt Davis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woosie17 17 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
I would recommend deleting this image, since it's 6 years old and newer photos of this building could be uploaded in its place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeuberC26 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kapelle Manning - Interior
[edit]copyvio, artist born in 1962, no fop
- File:Kapelle Manning Interior 01.JPG
- File:Kapelle Manning Interior 02.jpg
- File:Kapelle Manning Interior 03.jpg
- File:Kapelle Manning Interior 04.jpg
- File:Kapelle Manning Interior 06.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg.: Nachdem du deutsch verstehst, in Österreich ist jede Kirche FOP, da sie öffentlich begehbar ist, im Gegensatz zu Deutschland, bitte informieren. Du kannst aber gern bei anderen schauen siehe Category:Pfarrkirche Aschach an der Donau - Interior von Clemens Holzmeister, ist erst in den 1980er gestorben. Bitte nicht mit D verwechseln, dort ist es anders. --K@rl (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- S.g. Karl, vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! LG Nxr-at (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Just for posterity, all churches in Austria are publicly accessible and therefore fall under the Austrian version of FOP. Braveheart (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
A photo of a signed photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
JOHN LLOYD isn't the author of this photo. He's only uploader on Flickr. Pan Tau (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, low quality photo of a drawing Gbawden (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Unknown licensing. There is a watermark, but I'm not able to find it online so I am not sure about license. Also, the image is unclear which leads to me suspecting it was found on Google Images. 67.184.0.138 14:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dtranparis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Thuan wiki4.jpg
- File:Thuan wiki3.jpg
- File:Thuan wiki2.jpg
- File:Thuan wiki1.jpg
- File:Thuan 5.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Findock logos
[edit]- File:Findeck woodCompositeSystems kopio.jpg
- File:Finchem industry shampoo kopio.png
- File:FindockIncLogo.png
Fiwiki page speedily deleted 10 years ago for being an advertisement, but these files weren't. Unused corporate logos, advertising, no educational value. --Kissa21782 (talk) 15:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChristinaHellwig (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:19750523 Ernennungsurkunde Stadtdirektor.pdf
- File:19710219 Ernennungsurkunde Amtsdirektor II.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
This file is a mostly duplicated picture of File:Harake House.jpg. This version has little bit cropped, resized, and retouched, but is based on essentially same picture including reflections. File:Harake House.jpg should be kept because of better resolution and quality. Mzaki (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
There is no freedom of panorama in France and maybe the photo violates architect's copyright. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 07:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
(Would Taivo actually be a bot?)These are property developer mass-produced houses, no creativity here. They are typical of the 2010s housing estates around Toulouse and not works of art. Olybrius (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)- Keep As per FOP France: "Works without a particular or original character, which are a trivial reproduction of building types largely found across the country, are not protected." Where do you see artistry or originality in these buildings? - Olybrius (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have not seen such buildings in my homeland; here they would be unusual and original. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- I wish some admins were more curious and less paranoid. Just visit that suburb with Street View: here & here. - Olybrius (talk) 21:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have not seen such buildings in my homeland; here they would be unusual and original. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Kept by Jdforrestor. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 11:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- KeepLow quality is not a valid reason for deletion. GeorgHH • talk 15:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete There are many, many better detail pictures of this bridge at Category:Blue Wonder, for instance this file shows about the same detail in much better quality. No need to keep the blurry one. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep FoP applies to photographs of works which might be copyrighted. It is unlikely that this building or building paint-job would attract copyright. Also it would be nice to alert the photographer User:AgnosticPreachersKid about the deletion process. --Jarekt (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above, this is just a photo of a house. Multichill (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Re-nominating. This is a creative mural which would clearly have a copyright in the USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: you know it's bad practice to nominate something that was just kept. @AgnosticPreachersKid, Jarekt, and Ruthven: . Multichill (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is not something I do lightly, but I had just deleted a similar image of the same house. There doesn't seem to me to be any question here -- it's a mural of a watermelon, with seeds, pulp, and rind. I don't see how we can deny its creativity. I note also that you pinged only people on one side of the discussion, so I'll add two, one on each side -- @Nyttend and A1Cafel: . The categories on the two images speak to the fact that others think it is art:
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Isn't this mural a part of the house? See Leicester v. Warner Brothers, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 7 February 2000. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Link. I think so. It isn't just a painting on the side of a house, it covers the whole house on multiple sides, it is the house. I tagged it with {{FoP-US}}. Multichill (talk) 19:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The watermelon is the main part of this image, so this violates {{FoP-US}} and can't be de minimised. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artwork is the main focus of the image and FOP applies. --Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Rimozione per mia volontà, in quanto mia fotografia ProntoDCOBari (talk) 14:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion, in use on 4 projects. --Achim (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
It is not free image of hero of socialist labour Михаил Васильевич Родных, not Sintsov. http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=4865 Venzz (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
This could be out of copyright in the UK if published before 1950, but it will not be out of copyright in the USA until 95 years after creation. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Could someone kindly split and separate the pics so that we can see which are useful and to be kept and which may have problems and must be deleted... E4024 (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Recent changes were COM:NETCOPYVIO and were removed. --1989 (talk) 18:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Requested on OTRS Ticket#2019062210002839. Per courtesy. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is the source of File:رانيا منصور (cropped).jpg, and that file is used on Rania Mansour (Q16297609). By COM:INUSE, File:رانيا منصور (cropped).jpg should be kept so long as Wikidata requires it, and this file should be kept to show the provenance of File:رانيا منصور (cropped).jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 15:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: I note that the source video is still online[10]. --bjh21 (talk) 16:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: her agent contact me, he said the picture is revealing and its hurting her image! WHAT! Lol. she was in interview, and she wore more sexier outfit in the red carpet.--Mojackjutaily (talk) 20:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The person depicted in the image asked again in an Template:OTRS ticket to remove the file because "it's harming her". — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also File:رانيا منصور (cropped).jpg. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- We have another and better image of hers. We can live without this one. --E4024 (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Out of scope it is not. The problem is with Turkish Wikipedia that uses the logo in another file and does not defend it here. I see it a logo without problems that should be kept. SVG thingy is out of my knowledge. --E4024 (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Redundant to File:33569etnospor-konfederasyon-logo-siyah-zemin.pdf. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Trzech Budrysów - bracia Wędziagolscy- Karol, Paweł, Bronisław.jpg
- File:Paweł Wędziagolski.jpg
- File:Bronisław Wędziagolski 1919.jpg
- File:Jaworów Pałac realizacja.jpg
- File:Jaworów Pałac projekt.jpg
- File:Wolna Wszechnica Polska.jpg
- File:Karol Wędziagolski.jpg
- File:Tadeusz Kowalski.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo may be eligible for copyright 67.184.0.138 15:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot may be eligible for copyright. App was developed by a UK company, and UK TOO is very low. 67.184.0.138 15:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Batovka1897 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Exhibit - Marie J Bata Villa Zlin document.pdf
- File:Inzerat Slovácké noviny 1897.jpg
- File:J.A (2).jpg
- File:Sodovkarna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Fomina I. Books.tif
- File:Mir-font.jpg
- File:Ираида Ивановна Фомина (29.05.1906 - 15.09.1964).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Der Radeberger (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of Copyrighted logos. Does not belong here. oknazevad (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Oregon doesn't release its works into the public domain Kingofthedead (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Diagram without context, only used in "User:" namespace, little educational value, out of scope. 193.210.230.160 16:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- The file was originally uploaded to Wikiversity by User:Eml5526.s11.team3.sahin on 2011-04-06 09:12, and so licensed by the uploader. I transferred it here per its license along with many others. It is used on two user pages. The image is 9 years old. I am not using it and it was generated during a course from the University of South Florida. It's probably okay to delete it as out of scope for Commons. --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep seems to be important in Wikiversity as it is used there in a long scientific elaboration.--ProfessorX (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I am requesting deletion of all the photos I uploaded which are in the following category:
Unfortunately, after publishing these photos in good faith, the BBC's copyright department has claimed copyright over all images taken by its staff, even those not taken in the course of their work. --Jwslubbock (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- We apparently have permission in OTRS ticket 2019100110008089. Where is the claim by the BBC? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- even those not taken in the course of their work? Is that even possible?--Roy17 (talk) 20:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Please delete this page. It has more errors than I can list. The page is titled for a ship that changed assignment number and missions a number of times. This page is pretty mixed up. It states the ship was operated by the United States Navy. Never in its life was it operated by the Navy. It was born and it died a United States Coast Guard ship. There are more errors than that, just as huge. Do not post Jean Wycoff Seymour's photos on this page. He was never involved with Courier-410 WTR. That's the ship when it was a training vessel . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courierkid (talk • contribs) 11:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Courierkid: There is no valid reason given here for deletion. If you have an issue with the description page for a category, then write out a rationale for changing things on that category's discussion page rather than nominating the whole category for deletion. The reason it is at the current title is because that is the pennant under which the vessel ended its career, which is a common convention on Commons. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Look at the cloths, hairstyles etc. It is obvious that this image can not have been published before 1925. Creuzbourg (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The file is an image of various Chinese bus tickets, which is published by a public bus company in China, and has no administrative, legislative or judicial purposes, so Template:PD-PRC-exempt used here is invalid. As a result, the file is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I am inclined to believe that a bus ticket counts as an administrative item. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Renominating for deletion: The file is an image of bus tickets in Zhuhai, published by a public bus company in China.
- According to a previous deletion request, an administrative document should have a legally binding effect or objective (such as a mandatory national standard). A bus ticket however, is a contract approving a passenger to use a specified bus service, which isn't really an administrative document.
- When compared to this deletion request, a proof of insurance (also a kind of contract of service) fails the requirements of {{PD-PRC-exempt}}.
As a result, the file should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Also informing related administrator.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- DeleteAlso refer to this undeletion thread, Clindberg stated that government edicts are usually works with legal impact -- the text of laws, or judicial opinions, decrees that people are supposed to follow, treaties, that sort of thing. Apparently a ticket won't have these kind of legal impact.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hard to see much copyrightable in there -- don't think the tickets would qualify for a U.S. copyright. Less sure about China, but I may lean keep on those grounds (though I don't think the given license applies). The photo has a copyright though, PD-scan is also incorrect (it's a photo, not a scan, and there is enough non-2D things to give a copyright to the photo I think). I would restore the original license of {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Original license template restored, as per the opinion of Carl Lindberg.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Underlying work is PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Interior with artwork; no FOP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Cancellazione in quanto mia foto ........ (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
copyrigthed image of blason Clodion (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Since there is a free svg of this dubbious raster, I'd tend to Delete. Kathisma (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Redondant. Trop d'images dans cette page. Desesseintes (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is only one image on that page. On the category page there are many images and that is the purpose of a category. If there are too much images on the Wikipedia page you can make a selection, but not by deleting the original image in Commons. Wouter (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Wouterhagens and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Redondant. trop d'images sur cette page. Desesseintes (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is only one image on that page. On the category page there are many images and that is the purpose of a category. If there are too much images on the Wikipedia page you can make a selection, but not by deleting the original image in Commons. Wouter (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: watermark credit: Delphine Arnould-Balandier 2017 -- Doesn't match uploader name or date, OTRS needed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Redondant. Trop d'images sur cette page. Desesseintes (talk) 16:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is only one image on that page. On the category page there are many images and that is the purpose of a category. If there are too much images on the Wikipedia page you can make a selection, but not by deleting the original image in Commons. Wouter (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: watermark credit: Delphine Arnould. Likely copyvio, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Balandier Franck, romancier.jpg. OTRS needed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 089 - Portrait d'un réligieux catholique sur le mur d'une école maternelle - Bamenda, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Name of the painter is not even mentioned, so very likely OTRS-ticket does not give the assent of the copyright owner. Hansmuller (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is interesting, let's try if we can sort this out. Hansmuller (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the photographer had to go to the hospital some time ago and i am waiting till she gets better enough to react to questions. Hansmuller (talk) 10:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever sorted out. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Clip from a YouTube video. The channel and social media don't allow CC use HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Close request. As nominator, I request to keep the file. I didn't see the license, has a CC license. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Similar photo to Ksara Aramd 15 ZAINEB HACHAMI (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
1) Irrelevante para la wikipedia.
2) Posible vulneración del derecho a la intimidad de las personas por publicar datos personales.
1) Irrelevant to wikipedia.
2) Possible violation of the right to privacy of people since it publishes personal data.
--Macondo (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
This photo is mine and I still don't understand why someone put in doubt my honesty in this upload.
I have the original file (it is with a wider angle). It was shot in 2019/09/17, during my trip to Marrakech.
I shared this as I shared another group of photos on Wikimedia and Wikipedia in 2016, responding positively to an invitation I received from a friend.
If the work I shared here is not worth enough to the eyes of Wikipedia/Wikimedia community, please be free to delete it at once. That's as simple as that. For me, everything is simple if it is well explained and fair.
Thanks for your attention Best regards Jorge Santos (aka JrgSnts photo)--Santosjmr (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Praia do Dólar.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
It is CC-BY-NC 3.0 Rasbak (talk) 11:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, incompatible license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Image:FILE-NAME.JPG
[edit]speedy deletion, is vandelism. Not HRH the Duchess of Brabant. Copyvio- Carolus (talk) 06:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Closing malformed DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
I created file under different username. Now i have svg version with more details. -Estin Giç Giç (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:SSCB Cumhuriyetler.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Originalchampion (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
I made a mistake in uploading the right picture for the article. --Originalchampion (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Not accurate. --Io Herodotus (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason for deletion given. File is in use. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: This request is malformed; it hasn't been added to any daily logs. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The page of the Paper says "Copyright © 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim" [11] Levi bernardo 05:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I see that actually, through the page of the appointment of the parent company, the license appears C. C. A. 3.0 [12] This was just a misunderstanding of Doi's initially reaching where what I said first is mentioned and now I see the other. It is paradoxical. --Levi bernardo 05:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
too dark, not clear Jayashree Subramanian (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Broken unimportant image, there are many similar in the Category:150 years of railway transport in Oryol. — Soul Train (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- By the way, about this category. File:19.10.2018 г. 150 лет депо в ДК ЖД (фото 1)..jpg is a copy of File:19.10.2018 г. 150 лет в ДК ЖД (1 фото).jpg, but first one is broken. Same with the pair File:19.10.2018 Юбилей 150 лет. Дворец культуры жд...jpg / File:19.10.2018 г. 150 лет в ДК ЖД (3 фото).jpg. And I see another pairs in this category. Broken files could be deleted. — Soul Train (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: already redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
File:2019-03-11 Carl C Liebert III - Chief Executive Officer AutoNation Inc Generated Photo.jpg
[edit]Editor Manager,
Please delete this file because the subject not now AutoNation CEO and President as of 7-22-2019.
2019-03-11 Carl C Liebert III - Chief Executive Officer AutoNation Inc Generated Photo.jpg
Regards,
CorporateMapWiki
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Logo is subject to deletion due to zero usage and licensing issues
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The portrait by Gilbert Jackson is not of Edward Coke — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:23C6:5485:8C00:1418:2E76:871E:33C1 (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
please delete this I made a typo and titled the file poorly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangepangolin (talk • contribs) 01:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The Existence of this Flag is Really uncertain.
Only Source comes from a Blogger who makes Fictional flags http://zebratigerfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_03.html
The Real Howland flag is from FOTW https://www.fotw.info/flags/um-hwlnd.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlinxTheKitty (talk • contribs) 02:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Closing malformed DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Howland Island (local).jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heywikiuser (talk • contribs) 08:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Cancellate — Preceding unsigned comment added by User4456 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Closing malformed DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
newer version available — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogifaun (talk • contribs) 19:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Gini index ireland 1995-2016.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
newer version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogifaun (talk • contribs) 19:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: newer version not found. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
please delete, i uploaded a newer version because of a typo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogifaun (talk • contribs) 13:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Income percentiles ireland - relative change - 1995-2016.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Ma page n'est pas acceptée alors inutile de garder cette image. Merci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karinesamson (talk • contribs) 18:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: DW and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
please update the MISC logo as this is an outdated logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miscberhad (talk • contribs) 10:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
newer version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogifaun (talk • contribs) 19:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:S80s20 ireland 2005-2016.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
PLEASE DELETE THIS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssapkota23 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ssapkota23 Which page are you requesting deletion for? File talk:PIYUSH.GIRI.jpg has never existed, and as you uploaded File:PIYUSH.GIRI.jpg, you can request deletion without a discussion, by placing
{{SD|G7}}on the page, as long as it is less than 7 days since upload. ~~ Alex Noble - talk 19:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, made a mistake don't delete picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierrej2019 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Closing withdrawn and malformed DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
{{Db-author}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.A.Farabi (talk • contribs) 00:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Since wiki is deleted the information about the company, please delete the file from the database Jusinjacob (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Since wiki is deleted the information about the company, please delete the file from the database. Jusinjacob (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Requesting for this image to be deleted since it is a wrong upload and doesn't fall within the category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BRAINYWEALTH (talk • contribs) 16:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Plese delate this file - uploaded by mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertDwa (talk • contribs) 13:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Wrong version of files. Please delete if from repository — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawel Garuski (talk • contribs) 08:17, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by user:editor abcdef
[edit]- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog1.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog2.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog3.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog4.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog5.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog6.jpg
- File:Orangemediumsizedspitzdog7.jpg
No real encyclopedic value in any of these images; redundant. Don't think there's going to be any objections. --Editor abcdef (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Probably the uploader/proposer is right, but I have a special sympathy for dogs. (Maybe because I had two and lost both.) I prefer some dogs, like the peaceful one in the pics, to many men. If I were an admin, I would keep these images. I just do not vote because the proposer said "Don't think there's going to be any objections". (In other words, I do not want to be the "objector".) --E4024 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, plenty of better alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
HORACIO J PATRONE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horacio patrone (talk • contribs) 18:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Closing malformed DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake Mainlymazza (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
User:Wikistolife
[edit]elimnare foto poichè errore e volere mettere in altra pagina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikistolife (talk • contribs) 20:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Che foto? File:Stemma familiare.jpg? --Achim (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Closing malformed DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
DW. No original author, source, date, or permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright reasons FUCKWICK2006 (talk) 15:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- This picture was made during days of BritI also ish Somaliland. Who took the picture is unknown. It was taken around 1940's.
- Also Somalia has no copyright law and it's been 80 years since the picture was taken.
- I believe it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlaskaLava (talk • contribs) 15:35, 31. May 2020 (UTC)
- Me too. I also believe this file should "stay" and the nominator with their strange username should "go". Admins? --E4024 (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- When I said "nominator" I was referring to this user. :) Sorry. E4024 (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I also blocked the user with the inappropriate username for violating our username policy. They can create a new account with an appropriate username if they wish. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Two better files of the same theme are avaiable, this file is not needed any more. File:OPPO logo.png File:OPPO logo.svg Larryasou (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
This picture has been completely replaced with 
--OskarsC (talk) 11:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Please delete this picture. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManPhoebe (talk • contribs) 17:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Hallo ich verstehe nicht wieso dieses Bild ein Urheberrchtsverstoß sein soll , es ist mein eigenes Foto das ich hier bei Commons und ebenfalls auf meiner Webseite hochgeladen habe . Ist das vielleicht das Problem ? --Rick-shock (talk) 22:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion given. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
{{Db-author}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.A.Farabi (talk • contribs) 00:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. If you think its use at en:Bangash is wrong, remove it there first and re-tag it again with {{Db-author}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
this image is not belong to any person, who is well known, he is just a small kid who want to create his identity on Wikipedia. I had search hi name on Google and find not abetter record or any achievements Check this Link Below https://www.google.com/search?q=Syed+ali+Naqi+Hasni — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 175.107.221.197 (talk) 09:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
User:Guadalupe Márquez Pizarro
[edit]https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Escudo_de_Villaharta.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guadalupe Márquez Pizarro (talk • contribs) 09:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Closing incomplete DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Please replace the current picture with this one. THIS IS CURRENT Thank you
».jpg){kind=link}
_-_Coart_1992.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_15.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_01.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_03.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_09.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_13.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_auf_einem_Pressefoto_für_die_SWF_Plattenfirma.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ballspielende,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![337 File:Jordan wins BMI Award for "Broken Hallelujah".jpg](#File:Jordan_wins_BMI_Award_for_"Broken_Hallelujah".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(30338325992).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_is_undergoing_builder's_trials_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![566 File:Biserica "Coborârea Sfântului Duh" Adjudeni.jpg](#File:Biserica_"Coborârea_Sfântului_Duh"_Adjudeni.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_with_flags.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![702 File:Léa Garcia como a vilã Rosa da novela "Escrava Isaura" (1976).jpg](#File:Léa_Garcia_como_a_vilã_Rosa_da_novela_"Escrava_Isaura"_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Jinglin,_Danyang,_Jiangsu,_China.jpg){kind=link}
%C2%BB.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%C2%BB.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Coart_1992.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Coart_1992.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Coart_1992.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Coart_1992.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_15.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_15.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_15.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_01.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_01.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_03.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_03.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_09.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_09.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_09.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Clan_part_13.jpg){kind=link}
_Clan_part_13.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_Shotgun.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Shotgun_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Shotgun_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_auf_einem_Pressefoto_f%C3%BCr_die_SWF_Plattenfirma.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_auf_einem_Pressefoto_f%C3%BCr_die_SWF_Plattenfirma.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_auf_einem_Pressefoto_für_die_SWF_Plattenfirma.jpg){kind=link}
_auf_einem_Pressefoto_für_die_SWF_Plattenfirma.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ballspielende,_huile_sur_toile.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Ballspielende,_huile_sur_toile.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Ballspielende,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ballspielende,_huile_sur_toile.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![16:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-P199-2020-05-08T16:15:00.000Z-File:Jordan_wins_BMI_Award_for_"Broken_Hallelujah".jpg){kind=link}
![19:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-Christian_Ferrer-2020-08-03T19:27:00.000Z-File:Jordan_wins_BMI_Award_for_"Broken_Hallelujah".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(30338325992).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(30338325992).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(29824517814).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=418113565&oldid=418110947&diffmode=source){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_is_undergoing_builder%27s_trials_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico.jpg){kind=link}
_is_undergoing_builder%27s_trials_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=409521996&oldid=409521018){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3AKurdish_majority_Turkey-es.svg&type=revision&diff=513356032&oldid=513355235){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![11:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-Kunok_Kipcsak-2020-05-08T11:36:00.000Z-File:Biserica_"Coborârea_Sfântului_Duh"_Adjudeni.jpg){kind=link}
![20:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-Well-Informed_Optimist-2020-11-14T20:06:00.000Z-File:Biserica_"Coborârea_Sfântului_Duh"_Adjudeni.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_with_flags.gif){kind=link}
_with_flags.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_with_flags.gif){kind=link}
_with_flags.gif){kind=link}
..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
@Robvilledan: , @NPPublishing: is the current picture this: File:Andy stanley 2.png?--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Works by Pavel Landgraf
[edit]
Artwork by Pavel Landgraf. Not eligible for CC, as artist only died in 2017. --Kissa21782 (talk) 17:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am not going to rescind this nomination, but I will fill in some information on the 'keep' side:
- Subject's articles have all been deleted, except for enwp. Enwp was not deleted, it was redirected to a tv show. Apparently this subject is part of the cast of a show notable enough for an article, so instead of deleting, it was was redirected. This also means, at least for now, the wikidata item is being kept because the article was not deleted. Which means that the image is still in use. Quakewoody (talk) 00:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 06:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete According to the template {{PD-Algeria}} works must be in the public domain in the United States as well as in their source country, so only works per-1948 works can be uploaded because they also require a US license, which these cannot have. PCP applies.
- File:1968 "Rugs and carpets of Algeria 1" stamp of Algeria.jpg
- File:1968 "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" stamp of Algeria.jpg
- File:1968 "Algerian diaspora" stamp of Algeria.jpg
- File:1962 "Algerian War" stamp of Algeria.png
- File:1968 "World Health Organization" stamp of Algeria.jpg
- File:1968 "Rebab" stamp of Algeria.jpg
- File:1968 "Ouds" stamp of Algeria.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 10:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Probably imported directly from Twitter and Facebook, as FBMD as well as strange transmission codes are seen in suspected metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that he/she has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For the email template, see Commons:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original images overwrite these social media-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.
- File:Djamaâ El Djazaïr 4.jpg
- File:Djamaâ El Djazaïr 3.jpg
- File:Djamaâ El Djazaïr 5.jpg
- File:Djamaâ El Djazaïr 2.jpg
- File:Djamaâ El Djazaïr.jpg
- File:ورقة الاقتراع - الدستور الجزائري 2020.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
I am frankly not sure of a set of books backs is free of rights. Clodion (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- You can see Legifer/avril_2013 : Photo de produits dérivés pour illustrer une série télé ? --Clodion (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep il ne s'agit pas de licences de la série TV et ciné américaine, mais du texte du français Boulle; twenty century fox américain n'est pas cité , et il n'y a pas de nom d'éditeur sur les dos françaisprésentés. La photo illustre uniquement une bibliographie d'auteur français, et pas la page La Planète des singes (série télévisée) Skblzz1 (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:DW, unless the photo is cropped out. — Racconish 💬 11:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am not convince the threshold of originality is met apart from the picture in the top right Keep if a version of this with top right image blurred or cropped is possible, else Delete--ManuRoquette (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: photo at upper right is arguably de minimis, and can be blurred otherwise. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
plik uszkodzony Paterm (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
weapons aren't allowed now all my files have to be deleted :( Parabellum09 (talk) 10:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Faustpatrone.stl. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The low-resolution image is of unknown provenance or age, nor is there any evidence whatsoever from within this book or from any other source that this is an image of Newton Earp. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
{
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a still from a movie from 1959 called Nooi van my Hart. References: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0437364/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbqFTneQKic?t=2283 Watman (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
same image as File:Morisot - Bataille and Wildenstein, cat. 611.png but wrong file name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maltaper (talk • contribs) 06:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
the affair 1973 CejeroC (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this was a self-nomination by the uploader right after the upload, most likely due to error in fileextension. Nevertheless more than likely unfree. Agathoclea (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The poster itself may be free under {{PD-US-no notice}}. Of course, this is assuming the poster is uncropped. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 14:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 10:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:W3C SVG logos
[edit]I might be wrong here but have decided to be bold after all. On https://www.w3.org/2009/08/svg-logos.html it is stated that "For-profit use of these logos REQUIRES permission from W3C. Please send requests to w3t-pr@w3.org." and "For commercial uses, such as selling stickers or t-shirts, you will need the explicit permission of W3C.". This seems to be contradictory to what's stated in {{Noncommercial}}: "Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use."
- File:Anti-.svg
- File:Anti-SVG-edit.svg
- File:Cib-svg (CoreUI Icons v1.0.0).svg
- File:Gnome-vector-author.svg
- File:Gnome-vector-cleanup.svg
- File:Preview svg under linux.png
- File:SVG document with logo.svg
- File:SVG logo (old).svg
- File:Svg logo basic red.svg
- File:SVG logo h.svg
- File:SVG logo.svg
- File:SVG Logo.svg
- File:SVG Simple Icon.svg
- File:OtherEditor logo.svg
- File:OtherTool logo-I.svg
- File:OtherTool logo-V.svg
- File:OtherTool logo.svg
- File:SVG category subtree.svg
- File:Unknown logo-I.svg
- File:Unknown logo-V.svg
- File:Unknown logo.svg
- File:SVG Simple Logo.svg
- File:SVG-edit logo.svg
- File:Svg-edit-logo.png
- File:SVG-W3C-green.svg
- File:Valid SVG 1.0 (green).svg
- File:Valid SVG 1.1 (green).svg
- File:Valid SVG 1.x (green).svg
- File:Invalid SVG 1.1 (red).svg
- File:Invalid SVG 1.1 (pink).svg
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Jonteemil (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: Good point, their license also restricts the extent of derivative works which is too restrictive for commons. On the other hand, PD-textlogo would likely be applicable per COM:TOO US, especially if the SVG symbol is considered derivative of an asterisk.--17jiangz1 (talk) 09:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1: The question is whether it is COM:TOO US per W3C being based in the US or COM:TOO UK per "The SVG logo is based on a design by UK artist Harvey Rayner" (from the link) that applies.Jonteemil (talk) 10:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: Commons:Copyright rules defines country of origin as "defined by the Berne Convention", which per w:Berne Convention#Country of origin is the location first published, and is ambiguous as to how published location is defined with works first available online. This is a complex issue with multiple interpretations: in Kernel v. Mosley, online availability was seen as simultaneous publication everywhere in the world, in which the country with the shortest term of protection is defined as the country of origin. On the other hand, w:Moberg v. 33T LLC saw country of origin as the country the website of publication was associated with, which in this case would be the US. Furthermore, the International Literary and Artistic Association as come to a conclusion seen here that online works are not technically "published", which would make the first material publication of the SVG/W3C logos likely to be in the US by the W3C.
- On the other hand, since the current SVG logo is only "based on" the design by the UK artist, if it is sufficiently different to be a separate derivative copyrightable work, the country of origin would be undeniably the US, and the debate over the country of origin for online works would be moot. But looking at the original contest entry, it seems that the similarity is too close to be considered a derivative. On another point, the Valid SVG logos should be sufficiently derivative from the original submission. --17jiangz1 (talk) 11:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1: The question is whether it is COM:TOO US per W3C being based in the US or COM:TOO UK per "The SVG logo is based on a design by UK artist Harvey Rayner" (from the link) that applies.Jonteemil (talk) 10:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- [13] Here it says "The winning logo will be distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License", which although is more relaxed than the W3C Document License, Commons:Licensing#Well-known_licenses is not compatible with commons either.--17jiangz1 (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- For me, the basic logo is below TOO in the US.
- These derivative files are dramatic and above the TOO; the derivative portion would need a compatible license to stay on Commons.
- These files are close but probably below
- File:SVG category subtree.svg 3 copies + 3 letters in a graph
- File:SVG Simple Logo.svg the positioning of the square has some drama
- The W3C button images are above. The W3C art logo may go beyond text. You might argue the first image is a simple combination of a drop shadow button, some text, and the SVG symbol, but the others have fairly dramatic positioning of the check mark and other elements. They are not the first thing a graphic artist would draw.
- From the Adobe decision, W3C could argue that any SVG files copied from its website are programs and therefore potentially copyrightable even if the image painted on the screen is not.
- Glrx (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Glrx:
- These derivatives, although above TOO, are licensed under Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA:
- I agree that the button images are possibly above TOO US, given the stylised border and unique arrangement of PD elements. Although it seems like being above/below TOO is not necessarily cut and clear, given images like File:I heart my marine.png, File:JeetKuneDo.svg, and File:Avenue of the Saints logo.svg with substantial styling are below TOO US, indicating the buttons might be below TOO. But the AA flight symbol seems conflicting in this regard, as it was ruled above TOO due to minor shading of a PD design. If they are above TOO, PD alternatives could be easily made.
- File:SVG category subtree.svg is derivative by a commons user and released under PD license anyways, so TOO is not applicable here.
- Regarding the copyright of the code itself, looking at the code, there isn't anything substantially creative or novel, nor are there any comments to indicate particular elements of originality, and if other designers were to vectorise the same logo, similar SVG code would result. Also see Help:SVG#Copyright; most past discussions have closed to keep.--17jiangz1 (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1:
- I agree with you.
- I see the button images falling above your three below-TOO examples and below the AA symbol.
- The below TOO images: The I ♡ my marine is a take off of I ♡ NY; it overlaps the I and adds some accents, so I think it is the most original of the three, but it does not seem clever or dramatic. The Yin-Yang symbol is PD, the curved arrows are interesting, but the text adds nothing. Avenue of the Saints is a common tombstone with fleur de lis (a symbol common for New Orleans) and some text; the only thing interesting is the font, but more or less standard characters will not help. (Compare the W3C logo that just suggest a C; take away W3 and it does not look like a C. That shows creativity.)
- On the other hand, the AA symbols are creative. The 1967 and 2013 logos are mostly text, but they have a minimalist figures that cleverly suggest an eagle. That took creativity. The W3C logo only suggests the character C (letters are a small set); the AA logo suggests and eagle (a larger universe).
- Glrx (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1: Who made those? Have the author the legal right to license them under Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA?Jonteemil (talk) 07:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: For the two files with the pencil see the link to the open-source project.--17jiangz1 (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1: Have they the legal right to license them under Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA?Jonteemil (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jonteemil: For the two files with the pencil see the link to the open-source project.--17jiangz1 (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @17jiangz1: Who made those? Have the author the legal right to license them under Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA?Jonteemil (talk) 07:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Harvey Rayner, the artist who made the basic SVG logo, described his logo as:
- My logo in its basic form represents 8 nodes connected by 4 lines rotated about a central point. This is a simple representation of key elements used in all vector graphics.
- See http://web.archive.org/web/20070227045958/http://svglogo.com/finalists.html (cited above).
- Rayner does not describe the image as an abstract "flower-like structure"; those are words used by W3C. His description uses simple geometric shapes.
- The additional outline shadow does not add much.
- So, from the artists own words, the SVG logo is below TOO.
- I've tried looking for more information about fonts not being copyrightable, but I have not found anything clear. To the extent a font is a functional object, it is not subject to copyright. But it seems that artistic characters may be copyrighted. W3C could well have a copyright in the "C".
- Glrx (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Harvey Rayner, the artist who made the basic SVG logo, described his logo as:
- Keep Clearly below US TOO, PD-simple applies. -FASTILY 08:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Can you please prove that it is COM:TOO US that applies before voting.Jonteemil (talk) 08:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, there are plenty of examples in the link you just provided. I'm sure you can use your eyes and look, yes? -FASTILY 08:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
On hold Wait till W3C change the licence of File:SVG_logo.svg to CC-BY-SA
Hi Johannes, Thank you. W3C will agree to change the license for that image to: CC-BY-SA. We will update our W3C page: https://www.w3.org/2009/08/svg-logos.html when the person who owns that page has returned. best, Amy van der Hiel Media Relations Coordinator
- @Fastily: please also check the not ok version:
- Page 3 of https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/american-airlines.pdf
- those two signs https://web.archive.org/web/20190102061605/http://no-solicitors-sign.com/
- w:en:File:Prince_logo.svg
- w:en:File:Disney_Junior.svg
- logo at the end of page1 of http://web.archive.org/web/20180305012819/https://www.ipmall.info/sites/default/files/hosted_resources/CopyrightAppeals/2006/CCC%20Logo.pdf
- I would count them as counterexamples
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is a trademark, so it makes sense that they want to control for-profit use of it under the trademark law. But when we are talking about copyright, this is in public domain, unless something has drastically changed in the past month or so. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yesterday there was a license-change see: https://www.w3.org/2009/08/svg-logos.html#LogoWithoutW3C
SVG Logo alone and with "SVG" (no W3C logo)
At your option, use is governed by either:
- The W3C Document License with the following exceptions:
- Logo size, foreground, and background colors of the technology name MAY be modified without permission.
- When these logos are used on the Web, attribution is REQUIRED using any of the following techniques (possibly in combination):
- The "alt" text of the image must be "W3C SVG Logo", or
- For the SVG version of the logo, using the original metadata provided by W3C in the logo souce code, or
- The logo must link to the W3C Web site using the following URI: <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/>
- In the case of attribution without using a link, the logos MAY link anywhere, but we suggest using <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/>
or
- The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. Attribution of the image should be "W3C SVG Logo.
- @Jonteemil: If you agree I would close it as Keep? (However some license-changes on description-pages might be still necessary.) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I'm all for it! So funny to see that my DR resulted in a license change of the logos of a big organization :). It makes me laugh.Jonteemil (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The last thing to do before closing would be to properly tag it: {{cc-by-4.0|[http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/ W3C]}} and provide the above link to the copyright information- can someone launch a bot for this task? Masur (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I would suggest {{cc-by-4.0|[http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/ W3C SVG Logo]}} since W3C SVG Logo is the suggested attribution, by the author. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 08:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
@JuTa: Please could you restore the files deleted by you with {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}}, because they fall obvious under [14] and NOT [15]. Habitator terrae 🌍 16:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- There was a non-conirmed OTRS received for more than a month. The ticket number was 2020090110005135. Please ask at Commons:OTRS noticeboard was was going on with ta ticket. regards --JuTa 16:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- But the OTRS wasn't needed because it is explicit stated on the website, that this is CC BY-SA 4.0. Habitator terrae 🌍 16:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Again, please ask the OTRS stuff. As soon I get a confirmation from their site for undeletion I will do it. --JuTa 16:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Again, the OTRS isn't needed, it is a case for {{Licensereview}}. But never mind, I do so. Habitator terrae 🌍 18:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Again, please ask the OTRS stuff. As soon I get a confirmation from their site for undeletion I will do it. --JuTa 16:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- But the OTRS wasn't needed because it is explicit stated on the website, that this is CC BY-SA 4.0. Habitator terrae 🌍 16:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @JuTa: Habitator terrae is right. This an obvious case. The OTRS staff has other things to do. Please simply restore the files. Chaddy (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Question Why are we wasting everybody's time here? The licence is clearly displayed on the official site. OTRS volunteers are swamped, and we are asking them to take time to review an image that can be reviewed by a licence reviewer within less than a minute. It is a trivial case! ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- I wanted to restore the 2 files now, but someone else was quicker. I hope the bot will not readd the {{OTRS received}} again. I'm currently busy going through the delinker log... --JuTa 22:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have gone through and passed the licences for those files that I could, as a licence reviewer, pass. There were a few that I believe are not passable by me, and somebody else needs to look closer if they are «SVG Logos and Technology Buttons that include "W3C"» or «SVG Logo alone and with "SVG" (no W3C logo)». And some I got confused, what do we do when we have CC-BY-SA 4.0 and another CC licence, is there a way that CC bump up? Do I record that the additional creativity in the file is under a different CC licence? I am talking about: File:Svg-edit-logo.png, File:SVG-edit logo.svg, File:Preview svg under linux.png, File:Gnome-vector-cleanup.svg, File:Gnome-vector-author.svg, File:Anti-SVG-edit.svg. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- I wanted to restore the 2 files now, but someone else was quicker. I hope the bot will not readd the {{OTRS received}} again. I'm currently busy going through the delinker log... --JuTa 22:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Been over a month with no activity. Any apparent consensus at all? DemonDays64 (talk) 05:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- @DemonDays64: With the license change to CC-BY-SA 4.0, it seems the consensus is Keep. --Gutten på Hemsen (talk) 21:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Agree Keep--Headlock0225 (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Agree
- @DemonDays64: With the license change to CC-BY-SA 4.0, it seems the consensus is
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Klaudija Sedar
[edit]Low resolution, the files probably was sourced from YouTube.
Regasterios (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This YouTube video is also my property. Alojz Jembrih Prvi hrvatski glagolitski i latinični protestantski katekizam. DoncseczII (talk) 07:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
@DoncseczII: nem az teszi hihetővé az állításodat mások számára, hogy félkövérrel kiemeled, hanem az, hogy átállítod a YouTube-licencet. --Regasterios (talk) 20:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Regasterios: átállítom, de mire, ha YouTube linkről van szó? Vagy elég a GNU típusú átállítás. DoncseczII (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
@DoncseczII: félreértettél. Nem itt a Commonsban kell átállítani a licencet, hanem az eredeti forrásban, tehát a YouTube oldalán. Én nem szoktam videókat feltöltögetni, így nem tudom, hogy hol, de valahol kell lennie egy gombnak vagy valaminek, ahol módosítani tudod a licencbeállítást. Példaképpen nézd meg ezt a videót. Ha rákattintasz a videó leírásában a többre, látni fogod, hogy ez a szöveg jelenik meg: Creative Commons Forrásmegjelölés (újbóli használat engedélyezett). Ennek kell látszódnia a te videódban is, de ezt be kell állítani. --Regasterios (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: unless there is reasonable suspicion that the linked YouTube video is not the work of the uploader, COM:AGF. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Willy Balluff lebte bis 1974 siehe http://d-nb.info/gnd/1098216903 Hinweis: es sind weitere Fotografien betroffen, die ebenfalls nicht PD-old-70 sind Goesseln (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete Baluff died in 1974 so not PD. Clear to me - in fact I would have put it on a speedy delete--Headlock0225 (talk) 23:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Varing. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: "File:North America 1748.PNG" is obviously related to File:North America 1713.png, which is dubious too, as it itself states in its description that it is "based on original at http://www.edmaps.com/" (the uploader did not mention a specific page of that website), which is copyrighted and allows only personal and non-commercial educational use (see www.edmaps.com/html/about.html). So, unless it is proven that the original map came from a free source, both "File:North America 1713.png" and "File:North America 1748.PNG" would be copyvios. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:Житомирське герб.jpg
- File:Київ-Лівобережне герб.jpg
- File:Герб Бердичівського Протопресвітерства УГКЦ.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- If these are official depictions, they are not copyrightable per PD-UA-exempt/coats of arms. Kathisma (talk) 21:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: file licenses adjusted. --ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
This has been created by tracing [16]. According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Maps_&_satellite_imagery, "You may not upload copies of copyrighted maps to Commons or trace or even redraw such a map yourself." 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: Good point. What is the strategy in a situation like this, then? Whoever creates the first map of some geographical feature will own the copyright, and others cannot make a map of it? (Because if they do, they have "redrawn" that same map, effectively, and are violating copyright) Huji (talk) 21:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Relate: how do projects like OpenStreetMaps work? After all, they are also providing maps that are mostly identical to other copyrighted maps (of streets, in this case). Huji (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Lastly, since the original was published in Iran and Iran's copyright law only applies to "creative" geographic maps (نقشههای جغرافیایی ابتکاری), I wonder how we should decide if this is a creative map or not. Huji (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I redrew the map. For redrawing this type maps there is a section in here also this map not meeting Commons:Threshold of originality. Yamaha5 (talk) 23:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- In
Support of Huji's reasons--Freshman404Talk 19:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Joel Bergner
[edit]I see license for the photographs, but not for the art. These are all recent works in Washington DC by Joel Bergner.
- File:06.Brookland.12thStreet.NE.WDC.6April2011 (5596781713).jpg
- File:09.Brookland.12thStreet.NE.WDC.6April2011 (5597305655).jpg
- File:12.Brookland.12thStreet.NE.WDC.6April2011 (5597305677).jpg
- File:13.Brookland.12thStreet.NE.WDC.6April2011 (5597324953).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete Yes I would agree see COM:FOP United States--Headlock0225 (talk) 10:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
From a 1970s television series, still copyrighted. GRuban (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
![20:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-GRuban-2020-05-08T20:55:00.000Z-File:Léa_Garcia_como_a_vilã_Rosa_da_novela_"Escrava_Isaura"_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
![01:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/05/08#c-Explicit-2021-01-09T01:26:00.000Z-File:Léa_Garcia_como_a_vilã_Rosa_da_novela_"Escrava_Isaura"_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
Vince Lombardi trophy
[edit]As in U.S. law there is no freedom of panorama for artwork or sculpture, photos of VL trophy only show it as "de minimis". In the files nominated below, the VL trophy is portrayed as the main subject so they infringe the terms of US copyright for this type of artwork.
Files affected:
- File:Lombardi Super Bowl Trophy (11282275436).jpg
- File:Lombardi Super Bowl Trophy (11282301674).jpg
- File:Lombardi Super Bowl Trophy (11282305734).jpg
- File:Lombardi Super Bowl Trophy (11282338723).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (23945663207).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (23945667607).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (23945671477).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (24935972788).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (38094348334).jpg
- File:Pro Football Hall of Fame (38810218621).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fma12 (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative of official Star Wars publicity photograph, copyright Lucasfilm Cnbrb (talk) 09:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 06:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I propose to delete this page. It has nothing to do with the Knights of Malta (this is clear from inspection) nor their colours (black, red and white). It seems to have been created in ignorance, but if it comes up in asearch it will create confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarbaraPG (talk • contribs) 18:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Strong oppose: Not a reason to request deletion. This is an image of the Yosemite Knights K of M Fresno, formerly using that name, but, as it would suggest in both links, a legal situation has resulted in the name change. This image should be COM:RENAME, to reflect the "error", and the description updated to reflect the correct naming. --Lcawte (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 16:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ольга Чикина просила удалить эту ужасную фотографию, и я её понимаю! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexukl (talk • contribs) 04:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No valid reason. If she want to request removing this image, she can request per Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Removal_requests. --SCP-2000 09:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion; unused crop of File:Olga Chikina.jpg, which seems not to be questioned. --A.Savin 16:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Please delete this picture from the interior of the chapel. This is a private chapel and hence we do not wish to have pictures from the inside published on Wiki.
Thanks Markus Hladik, Agrargemeinschaft Alpe Hochälpele — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markus.hladik (talk • contribs) 18:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 16:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NataliyaIv (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://tet.tv/novaya-zhizn-vasiliny-pavlovny
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Catherine Laurence discussion 14:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The fourth image per {{PD-Textlogo}} SCP-2000 06:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Textlogo}}. --A.Savin 16:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:CCAPARICA.png
- File:Pt-Ccaparica1.png
- File:Assembleia municipal ourém.png
- File:CMO-RCouros Cbernardos.gif
- File:CMO-Matas Cercal.gif
- File:CMO-Gondemaria Olival.gif
- File:CMO-Olival.jpg
- File:CMO-Freixianda RFarrio Formigais.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Dear EugeneZelenko, I'm a portuguese Wikipedia editor. Recently I was editing pages in parishes and municipalities and most of them had outdated flags and coat of arms or didn't had any at all. Some of my uploads were made by me, according to heraldic rules of my country, other were made by official sources. I've licensed them with the same licenses of other flags and coats of Portugal. One of the mentioned files (File:Assembleia municipal ourém.png) is a logo of a official institution, that I thought was ok to upload with the license I've choosed. If I didn't put the correct licenses then I'm sorry. If there is nothing I can do, I am sorry as well, that was supposed to help visually some wikipedia articles. Is there a way I can upload this kind of files for exclusive usage of wikipedia? I really don't understand wikimedia, I've read tons of things about how to use it, Well I'm going to stay at Wikipedia. Thanks for your help and greetings from Portugal! Kind regards. Dioluisf (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Portugal to find out status of municipalities symbols. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't found anything about municipalities on that page. If the symbols I've uploaded are not legal to upload how could all the others be uploaded in the past? Dioluisf (talk) 23:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete I have sympathy with you, Dioluisf. Sometimes I feel that Wikimedia Commons does not explain itself to new users well and expects you to have read a whole host material on why your media file may or may not be acceptable to Wikimedia Commons. See if can help guide you through as your files and your comments raise many issues. Firstly one of the major differences between Wikimedia Cpmmons and Wikipedia is the "fair use" of copyrighted material. Wikimedia Commons does not allow the "fair use" of copyrighted material whereas your local Wikipedia project MAY allow it (you will have to check the rules of the Wikipedia project you intend to publish on. This is further explained at Commons:Fair use. Now turning to your flags and coat of arms, we need to establish whether they are copyrighted or in the public domain. This is a complex matter and is explained best at Commons:Coats of arms. I started this message with a stark Delete as you have not provided enough information to ensure the correct license is being used. If you read Commons:Coats of arms then I think you will understand. Having read it, I think you have three alternatives 1) to claim the copyright yourself and add a CC-by-SA license 2) to claim that these are in the public domain (probably because of age) or 3) claim that these are Derivative Works see Commons:Derivative works. By the way, we are not picking on you - it could be that many of the coats of arms and flags in Wikimedia are under the wrong license. There is so much work to do on Commons and despite an army of volunteers, the list grows longer everyday! Greetings from the UK!--Headlock0225 (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi @EugeneZelenko and Headlock0225: I agree that you should Delete File:CMO-RCouros Cbernardos.gif, File:CMO-Matas Cercal.gif, File:CMO-Gondemaria Olival.gif, File:CMO-Freixianda RFarrio Formigais.gif. Also Delete File:CMO-Olival.jpg because I intend to make a svg version totally mine. About File:Assembleia municipal ourém.png, I've cropped the image so that the symbol won't appear, and so it is PD-textlogo. About File:CCAPARICA.png it was made by "Sérgio Horta" and he agreed with the usage of the symbols he created by e-mail to Manuel Anastácio and the text of the e-mail is there in portuguese. File:Pt-Ccaparica1.png is a derivated work from File:CCAPARICA.png. --Dioluisf (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- And I am really sorry for breaking the rules here in commons, I didn't want to, in fact I care and respect wikimedia rules (I am a rollbacker at pt-wiki). Those files were uploaded before I understood the rules, after that I only uploaded images according to rules. Once again, I am extremely sorry and looking forward to solve this deletion request. Kind regards --Dioluisf (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: <. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, it's in fact kharub in English. So, the other category page should be deleted (I mean: Category:Tunisian kharuba coins). Thank you. --DrFO.Tn (talk) 21:09, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- @DrFO.Tn What do you want me to do again? Rename the category? Move the files? What is the name of the new category? --Podzemnik (talk) 04:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Part damaged, replaced with File:PL_Deklaracja,_Konstytucja,_Karta_i_dalej,_I_ed.pdf - --TeresaPelka (talk) 19:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @TeresaPelka What part? SCP-2000 09:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- @@SCP-2000: The reported file is an earlier version of the translation. It may have errors (but no "damage"), but Wikisource users have not agreed to remove this versio and it is still used. TeresaPelka (the alleged translator in this file) was forcing removal text from this file on polish Wikisource but with fail. See also this topic. Matlin (talk) 11:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per above and INUSE. Discussion in the local community will be better than here. SCP-2000 08:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not really in use. Matlin personally keeps the damaged files in a Wikisource list. Wikipedia links to the Polish Wikisource file I provided, https://pl.wikisource.org/wiki/Konstytucja_USA, I ed (first edition). Keeping two copies creates diversification, not practiced in translation: you do not have versions with one and the same translator. --TeresaPelka (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000 Matlin is manipulative, would not be able legally to support own statements: "The file is an earlier version"? "There is no damage"? I am "an alleged translator in the file"? "I was forcing removal"? The experience has been most disgraceful, I would be able to state for myself.
Most importantly: the matter is USA civics, I believe something to deserve respect; the Polish Wikisource refused removal, claiming they did not have material better than my translation. If they still do not, my work remains the best they have, and all their appreciation is to attach damage to it.
I have tried discussion in the "local community"; offered removal of my material altogether; participation of the persons involved in the first edition (easy, to get their nicknames in, like with the other); all was rejected, as if damage could be the very best.
I am the author of the translation and I do not want versions. Please keep the first edition I provided or remove all my material altogether.--TeresaPelka (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
The first edition has no problems at all; the translation is error-free.--TeresaPelka (talk) 20:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)- As I said that before, discussion in the local community (i.e. Polish Wikisource) will be better than here. I don't really care Matlin doing what in the Polish Wikisource and the dispute of the local community. I only care whether this file is in use in other wikis or not. If this file is in use, then that should not be deleted by uploader request, unless this file is removed in the local wiki. SCP-2000 16:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000 Matlin's listing in Polish Wikisource is the only "use". Wikipedia does not follow his listing; it uses the file I have provided.
"Local community" refused removal, saying the Wikimedia Commons should resolve. Now you, as part the Commons, say the "local community" is to do decide. It is absolutely the kind of bureaucratic vicious circle you could experience in communist Poland, and that I grew to hate. Diversification is a lot of trouble to the translator: should I pity my work has been here? Why is there no one to speak Polish in the decision making? --TeresaPelka (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC) - @SCP-2000 You report Chinese and intermediate English, in your profile. As you do not report any ability to evaluate Polish, you might consider the matter without your vote. --TeresaPelka (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @TeresaPelka Per File usage on other wikis, this file is in use in Polish Wikisource. Thus it clearly show that this file is INUSE and should not be deleted. About the local community dispute, you should discuss in local and not here. Thank you. SCP-2000 10:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000 Matlin's listing in Polish Wikisource is the only "use". Wikipedia does not follow his listing; it uses the file I have provided.
- As I said that before, discussion in the local community (i.e. Polish Wikisource) will be better than here. I don't really care Matlin doing what in the Polish Wikisource and the dispute of the local community. I only care whether this file is in use in other wikis or not. If this file is in use, then that should not be deleted by uploader request, unless this file is removed in the local wiki. SCP-2000 16:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Tableau du BEA téléchargé sans son autorisation Salsero35 (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
image publique et sourcée, ne pas supprimer — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEA-SBE (talk • contribs) 14:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Autorisation donnée. Cf https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:BEA-SBE et https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Bureau_d%27enqu%C3%AAtes_et_d%27analyses_pour_la_s%C3%A9curit%C3%A9_de_l%27aviation_civile. Salsero35 (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Please delete File:Bs-Zenica.ogg i.e. redirect it to File:Sh-Zenica.ogg (after renaming File:Hr-Zenica.ogg into File:Sh-Zenica.ogg). Bs-Zenica.ogg has incorrect pronunciation, and Hr-Zenica.ogg has the correct one for all three standards of Serbo-Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian. I'm from this city and I know Hr-Zenica.ogg is the correct way to pronounce it. --Obsuser (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept. The word "Zenica" also exists in the Bosnian language Leonel Sohns (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Both files have correct pronunciation and i not agree. Leonel Sohns (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Leonel Sohns: Please delete it because it is incorrect. --Obsuser (talk) 10:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Obsuser: I listened to both audio files and heard the same pronunciation in both audio files. Leonel Sohns (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have listened to the files several times. Leonel Sohns (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Your hearing is not good then. If you say it is same, delete File:Bs-Zenica.ogg i.e. redirect it to File:Sh-Zenica.ogg (after renaming File:Hr-Zenica.ogg, that has correct pronunciation, into File:Sh-Zenica.ogg). --31.176.149.142 19:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep Not valid reason for deletion. A rename can be do it if necessary, but there's not need to delet. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please explain why to keep something wrong? Then create Rubish: namespace and move it there; File: should contain only usable true files. --Obsuser (talk) 15:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Question So any evidence can demonstrate that pronunciation is correct/incorrect ? --SCP-2000 02:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect pronunciation present. Obsuser (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Fotofilen är nu uppdaterad med korrekt datum för fototillfälle, fotografens namn samt vilka som äger upphovsrätten. En av dom är jag, Kristoffer Luthman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristofferluthman (talk • contribs) 11:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- ok jag tar bort delete nominering. Och jag hoppas ni är medvetna vad det innebär att släppa den bild fri som nu gjort, vem som helst kan använda bilden till vilket ändamål som helst och också modifiera bilden (men fotografen måste alltid anges).Yger (talk) 13:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "Moonica Mac photographed by Jennifer Glantz in Kalmar. Copyright is shared by Jennifer Glantz, Lisa Brolander and Kristoffer Luthman" - We need OTRS permission from all 3 person. Obviously the "own work" statement it's wrong.--Ganímedes (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
,_Jinglin,_Danyang,_Jiangsu,_China.jpg){kind=link}
,_Jinglin,_Danyang,_Jiangsu,_China.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request -Llull juny (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Can I have the first version of this file permanently deleted? Namely this one https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/15/20200215005117%21Tianlu_at_Tomb_of_Xiao_Luan_%28Emperor_Ming_of_Qi%29%2C_Jinglin%2C_Danyang%2C_Jiangsu%2C_China.jpg
It was the first time that I uploaded file to wiki commons. And I did not realize that I should have remove the metadata of the photo. I uploaded a new version where all the meta data are removed. So can I have the first version deleted permanently? Thanks.
Also I suggest wikipedia warn the users whether they wanted to keep meta data during upload.
- Why did you remove the meta info? They didn't contain any personal data or did I miss something? --Achim (talk) 10:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I might be a little bit strict on this but I do think the type of camera is somewhat sensitive. If it is not possible to remove, I am OK to leave it there since it was taken more than 2 years ago. Llull juny (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like it was withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This is an older version of the Pyrus logo Here is the new one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pyrus_logo_late_2019.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suomi omi (talk • contribs) 12:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No vaild reason. The older logo should not be deleted unless violate other policies. If you want to change to another file name, you can follow COM:RENAME to request. SCP-2000 06:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
User:Expandinglight5
[edit]The copyright for this image of the Noguchi Coffee Table (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Noguchi_Table.png) is held by The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum, New York and does not qualify for a CC license. It was incorrectly added to WikiCommons and must be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janiiiiiiiine (talk • contribs) 15:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per Tineye search result, this image is not own work. Based on COM:PCP and COM:EVID, that should be deleted. SCP-2000 12:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also cc @Expandinglight5: SCP-2000 12:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)