User talk:Johnbod

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:Johnbod/Archive 1, to 2018

Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:China ceramics red plate.JPG. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

This is not a "minor" crop and the file is in use, please upload as a new file per COM:OVERWRITE.--Bidgee (talk) 05:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A crop that is thought to improve the image is not against the guidelines. However once contested, splitting has to be used. The crop tool makes it easier. --Fæ (talk) 07:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, well it's a crap image anyway, which I have replaced at all the major articles using it. Johnbod (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hedwig-glas (cropped).jpeg

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hedwig-glas (cropped).jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guan ware

[edit]

Hi John,

Unless specified, any ceramics produced in the imperial kiln is a Guan ware. Therefore I removed Category:Stoneware of the Song dynasty in Category:Guan ware. Feel free to create Category:Guan ware of the Song dynasty if necessary. -Mys_721tx (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is complete nonsense, in English! Guan ware is a very specific type - others would be "imperial wares". You can't import Chinese terms straight into English. This page may help you with appropriate term in Chinese. Johnbod (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Per the article en:Guan ware, The Asian sources ([1], [2], [3], [4]) use Guan ware as "the literally translated sense to cover any 'official' wares ordered by the Imperial court". In those sources, when discussing the crackling ceramics produced by the one of the five famous kilns, "Guan ware" is specified as Song Guan ware, and the later imitations Guan-type ware.
  2. Apart from the issues of translation, File:Chinese ceramics in V&A DSCF3471 13.jpg is made during Yuan dynasty, and the various artifacts under Category:Imitations of Guan ware are from Ming and Qing dynasties.
The second point of my argument can also be made for Category:Ge ware. Therefore I believe it is better to leave the period on individual file instead of the whole category. -Mys_721tx (talk) 00:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The sources in English use "Guan ware" as Guan ware does - I'm not sure what you're trying to say here (Note also some Ming Jun ware was stamped with "Guan"). The dates are always rather a matter of estimation, and the situation is complicated by later imitations, and inconsistent terminology, but there is no doubt that both Ge and Guan ware can essentially be described as Song stoneware, and it is best to categorize them accordingly. Settting-up a sub-cat for Ge-type ware (in the sense of later porcelain imitations), as I did for Guan in 2016, was a good idea, so thanks for that. Johnbod (talk) 00:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Jun ware example is exactly the point I want to make: In Asian sources, the discussion of Guan ware in its stricter sense is always accompanied by a qualifier, i.e. Song (dynasty) Guan ware. In its stricter sense, only the ceramics produced by the imperial kiln in Kaifeng during Northern Song dynasty and the two imperial kilns in Hangzhou during Southern Song dynasty are considered Guan ware. In its boarder sense, anything that came out of the imperial kilns is considered a Guan ware. The Ru ware, Jun ware, and later Jingdezhen ware produced by the imperial kilns have all been considered Guan ware. I agree that it would be less ambiguous to refer Guan ware in its broader sense as imperial wares. -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No one in English ever uses "Guan ware" for all imperial wares. The word is not translated and has a specific meaning in English and other Western languages. You can't expect Commons or other English sources to follow the literal Chinese meaning. I absolutely DON'T "agree that it would be less ambiguous to refer Guan ware in its broader sense as imperial wares" - this would go against all established use of terminology in Western languages, and be hoplelessly confusing. What you call it in Chinese-language labels is a different matter. By all means add a note in Chinese explaining the issue if you like, and give it a different name in Chinese. Johnbod (talk) 02:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I was agreeing to is your initial proposal that 官窑 in its borader sense should be refered to as imperial ware and 官窑 in its stricter sense as Guan ware. I fail to see the reason of your objection.
Additionally, at least three non-Asian authors have used "Guan ware" as wares from different kilns. There is another that Google does not give enough preview and is omitted.
  1. Valenstein 1988 p. 109
  2. Clunas 2004 p. 102
  3. Charles 2001 pp. 124-132
-Mys_721tx (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but this is all "Guan ware", of that particular stoneware type. If you want a category for all imperial wares, it should be called that or "Official wares", not Guan. In fact this is probably a bad idea, as what is and is not imperial/official ware gets far too uncertain and complicated. Better to stick to more certain terms like "Jingdezhen ware". Johnbod (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Johnbod,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]

Hi Johnbod!

You are receiving this message because you have previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in India. We would be very delighted if you would do so again this year, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes.

You can find more details in this page. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India team)--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Johnbod,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for uploading The Mouse Catchers MET DP169146 (cropped).jpg that was selected as Picture of the month on the Neapolitan Wikisource. 
Ruthven (msg) 12:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie! Johnbod (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:HCA 363 (cropped).jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HCA 363 (cropped).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Killarnee (T•1•2) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:HCA 363 (cropped).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HCA 363 (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

--Killarnee (T•1•2) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iznic ceramics in the gulbenkian museum : overcat

[edit]

Hi Johnbod, I think your last categorization in these files are overcategorization because there is allready a category "Iznic ceramics in the Gulbenkian museum" which is itself in the category "Iznic ceramics"? Faithfully yours.--Faqscl (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably - I found them in the "stone-paste" category & have now made the main category "Iznic ceramics" a sub-cat of that. Johnbod (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]
Welcome to
Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
­ India

Hello Johnbod!

From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Early heads up

[edit]

You may be interested in User talk:Fæ/Städel museum. It's very, very slow, and may take 3 months to finish uploading the archives. However the photographs are extremely good research quality, showing fine detail that may have been hard to see in any earlier versions for the artworks. --Fæ (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Food time!

[edit]
Wiki Loves Food 2021
­ India

Hello Johnbod!

Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!

-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking me using speedy deletion

[edit]

User Outlander07 coming in ip as logged out editing is attacking me using speedy deletion tag, which is by nin sense reasons please help Noncreativephotographer (talk) 12:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ip attacks and vandalism pls help

[edit]

User: 2409:4073:2194:1e76:1cdf:1186:8afb:1e1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This ip series containing 2409:4073:29a:7f69:688e:de91:73dc:34df,2409:4073:31a:3ff7:2dbf:2f29:7aa6:340a,2409:4073:4e8a:294c:8e8:eed3:6030:e63 attacking my photos and vandalising the photos , he into destruptive speedy deletion edit war and vandalising the article.Already admis have warned him not to do but constantly attacking [5][6]. I suspect Outlander07 is involved in this ip vandalism and logged out editing as is evident from the team play in deleting thiyya/ezhava community photos without any claims.[7]. I am requesting to block the ip series to prevent vandalism and to open a investigation upon this including suspected nair caste vandal Outlander07 Noncreativephotographer (talk)

Noncreativephotographer (talk) 07:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]
Welcome to
Wiki Loves Monuments 2021
­ India

Hello Johnbod!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Engravings_by_Master_E._S._(inferior_image_quality)

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Engravings_by_Master_E._S._(inferior_image_quality) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]

Hello Johnbod!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 13th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2022. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]

Hello Johnbod!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 14th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2023. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action soon!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Game tokens → Game pieces

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/06/Category:Game tokens . —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cave_18,_Pandavleni

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Cave 18, Pandavleni has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2409:40C2:605D:36C1:D5E5:415B:C2E7:8FA9 14:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johnbod&oldid=944226968"