User talk:隐世高人

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 隐世高人!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Manchester (LCS 14) completed acceptance trials.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cobatfor (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Tulsa (LCS-16) in acceptance trials.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cobatfor (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Charleston (LCS-18) in acceptance trials - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cobatfor (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Charleston (LCS-18) in acceptance trials - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cobatfor (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voa chinese Yingying Zhang 15Jun19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EyeTripleE (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voa chinese Brendt Christensen 4Jun19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrahMos supersonic cruise missile successfully test-fired from the Integrated Test Range, at Chandipur on 30 September 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gone Postal ( ) 16:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -M.nelson (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PNS Azmat (P1013) commissioning ceremony.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PNS Azmat (P1013) commissioning ceremony.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

-M.nelson (talk) 20:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:PNS Azmat.jpg -M.nelson (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not edit war

[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

Stop reverting category move requests. See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 91#User:隐世高人 as well as Commons:Rename a category and act as appropriate. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20230406.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: F8. 完全相同或縮小的版本)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Tyg728.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:French destroyer Latouche-Treville (D646) transits the North Atlantic Ocean in support of exercise Northern Viking 2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Canada's Offshore Fisheries Science Vessel CCGS Sir John Franklin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Nutshinou Talk! 14:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:A PLAN Shenyang J-15 carrier-based fighter aircraft is taking off from Chinese aircraft carrier PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20231028.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A PLAN Shenyang J-15 carrier-based fighter aircraft is preparing to land on Chinese aircraft carrier PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20230915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Changsha (DDG-173) sail with PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20231028.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20231028.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Shandong (CV-17) 20231106.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Shandong and Z-18 20230424.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Shandong and Z-18 20230915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Shandong and Z-9 20230417.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How and when to move things from one category to a newly started category...

[edit]

To the left of the page, for every category page, there is a button labelled "Nominate category for discussion". When you click on it you open a dialogue box. You can put, in that dialogue box the reasons you think the current content of the old category belongs in a new category. I think this was one of your options when you thought the categorization of Category:Coast Guard of Yemen, and the categories under it, should be reorganized...

Alternately, you can place a {{Move}} template on the existing category.

The terrible problem with what you did -- EMPTYing the category you thought was mis-named is that empty categories are routinely deleted. And that absolutely should never happen with categories that have existed, and been useful. Why? It isn't only WMF people who use our categories. Third parties use them. Third parties bookmark them. If you use one of the STANDARD way to move images from one name to your preferred name, if other people agree your renaming makes sense, (1) a robot actually does the dirty work of moving the images - less work for you; and (2) a category redirect is left behind. This means that third parties, who bookmarked the old category name, don't get a 404.

So, in my opinion, you did this the wrong way. And I strongly encourage you to never do it again. Geo Swan (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for feedback on my advice on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#How and when to move things from one category to a newly started category.... I am letting you know I mentioned you, by name, in that discussion. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also initiated Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/02/Category:Coast Guard of Yemen. Geo Swan (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with @Geo Swan's assessment.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the countries where several coast guard organizations exist in parallel, thus there is a navigational template {{Countries of Asia|prefix=:Category:Coast guard of}} available. (The template works with case-sensitivity). At the same time, the coast guard of Yemen is called Yemen Coast Guard in English. With the combination of the above considerations, I don't think it's necessary to have a discussion here before moving and deleting this category with the original name. 隐世高人 (talk) 17:15 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Coast Guard of Yemen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANS Hangzhou (DDG-136) 20220525.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello 隐世高人.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are claiming here that the files uploaded by me involve copyright violations, but failed to provide any proof of this nor to indicate any of it. And if you're unable to give a discourse to support your allegations here, I would have to consider that you're assuming in bad faith. 隐世高人 (talk) 17:39 11 February 2024 (UTC)
See most of the redlinked file names above.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the statistics on the XTools, the files on the Commons that I uploaded and still exist are 1202, the deleted files are 52, and only 4.3% out of the total number of the files I uploaded. Based on these statistics, I could still consider that you're assuming in bad faith. 隐世高人 (talk) 03:13 13 February 2024 (UTC)
File:PLANS Ningbo (DDG-139) 20230911.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

颐园居 (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How and when to move things from one category to a newly started category...

[edit]

隐世高人 routinely decides, on their sole judgement, that long-standing categories have bad names. While conclusions like that are completely reasonable, I've always thought the next step should be to either (1) initiate a discussion over renaming at cfd, or (2) use a {{Move}} template.

I brought this issue up at the Administrators' noticeboard, here.

They compound the problem with applying {{Speedy}} deletion requests to the long existing categories they just emptied, calling for their deletion because they are empty. Yes, by long-standing convention commons administrators do routinely delete empty categories. But I think this should not be done when someone has disruptively emptied a category that third parties may very well have bookmarked.

You deleted Category:Makut Rajakumarn (FF 433) (ship, 1971) which 隐世高人 recently emptied, and then called for its deletion, because it was now empty.

I am going to ping @User:Jeff G. and @User:Andy Dingley, who voiced opinions at AN.

Oh, they did the same with Category:Coast guards of Pakistan, Category:HTMS_Bhumibol_Adulyadej_(FFG-471), Category:HTMS Taksin (FFG 422), Category:HTMS Naresuan (FFG 421) and possibly other categories, recently.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So where's the discussion of this to be, across the three locations that it's started at?
I would support these renames (from what I've seen) as the pennant number as a disambiguator seems to be our regular practice for military ship naming, without needing the addition of '(ship)' suffices - and often we don't even use the pennant.
So what should have happened here? Same rename, but with the old cat left as a redirect?
Should speedy deletions of cats which have only just been emptied be actioned within hours? Of course not. But I say that all the time, I've said it to that admin more than once, and I already said it re: this particular issue in the earlier thread, before they were deleted. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Geo Swan: I agree that 隐世高人 has engaged in disruptive activity contrary to policy COM:CATRED and must stop forthwith.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]