User talk:Janwikifoto

Now maybe this is a unified account. Kanske nu detta är unified.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010 0c176 1866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Smial 13:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Question I find funny that a swedish minister wears a danish order in such a national and official (royal) occasion. Any explanation ?--Jebulon 20:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC) The Swedish orders can only be awarded to foreign nationals and members of the royal family (since 1975), so she has no Swedish.--Ankara 22:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Comment The crop to the right looks a bit unfavourable to me. DerHexer 22:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image file names are not very good

I do not find the names of the files you upload very accurate or revealing. for example Estpresident 1c300 8564.jpg is of Carl bildt. Were I to search for Carl Bilt I would not find this image. Gregors (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A picture can contain more than one person/subject. You need to search on Category. That is what people have told me. But there seems to be no standard on file names. Instead of spending a lot of time on the file name, I have spent some time on Category, and Description. Did this help? --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for this image are "January 18-20, 2011 Toomas Hendrik Ilves in Sweden | Carl Bildt", so by searching for the correct category you get it. Another example is Estpresident 1c300 5549.jpg, there are sooo many people in the picture that it is impossible to name it according to all persons. However, many names are missing from the catogory as well, the question is who should take the time to figure out all the names? --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorier

Hej, jag ser att du bara ha lagt namn på personer på bilderna. Egentligen ska man ange, födelseår, yrke och annan ankytning som t.ex. Category:John Travolta. Egon Eagle (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image in Uppsalatidningen

Hello! Just wanted to let you know that one of your images was re-used in Uppsalatidningen, but that the use does not seem to comply with any of the licenses you specified. See File_talk:Eric_Saade_1c310_7098.jpg. --Bensin (talk) 10:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! But - how should it have been? What is the correct attribution? Hur skulle det ha varit? --Janwikifoto (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, det var lite kul att känna igen bilden och kul att de använde den. Attribueringen såg OK ut, men om jag förstår rätt så ställer både GFDL- och CC-licenserna krav att man på något sätt bifogar eller hänvisar till licensvilkoren:

GFDL: "this License [...] and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document [should be] reproduced in all copies"
cc-by-sa: "For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page."

Det jag främst reagerade på när jag såg bilden var att det inte ens framgick vilken av de två licenserna (eller båda) de ansåg gällde när de återanvände bilden. Ju fler människor som känner till och lär sig de fria licenserna och deras fördelar desto mer material tror jag kommer släppas under dem och desto bättre för oss alla. Men upphovsmän måste kunna lita på att licensvillkoren respekteras och särskilt av etablerade medier. Uppsalatidningen har trots allt en upplaga på över 100 000 exemplar varje vecka och om de bara hade kostat på sig att krafsa dit ett litet "(cc-by-sa)" så hade jag nog inte tänkt mer på saken.

(In short: The attribution seems OK, but the article does not specify under which license they are using the image.) --Bensin (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, intressant! "fria licenserna och deras fördelar.. mer material... kommer släppas". Ok, jag kan tänka mig en del fördelar. Men, det vore intressant att veta vilka fördelar du tänker på! Som annan parentes kommer jag nog att sluta ladda upp med GDFL och bara använda exakt en CC-version, bara för att ha en enda version aktuell. Det verkar tillräckligt svårt att veta hur villkoren för enbart senaste CC-versionen fungerar. --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

En fördel med fria licenser generellt är ju att andra kan återanvända materialet utan att be om lov först. Då får materialet lätt spridning och upphovsmannen får exponering. En annan fördel med just CC är att licensen är flexibel och att man som upphovsman kan specificera ganska precist hur man vill att materialet ska återanvändas. En tredje är att de är lätta att förstå både för upphovsmän och distributörer. --Bensin (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirk Niebel 1c399 0354.jpg

I have problems confirming the source. It seems to me that you are actually the author or copyright-holder. Am I right? -- RE rillke questions? 17:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What problem? Why? How? Was fur probleme? Warum? Wie? I think it is clear from the file description page, but please tell me the problem! Best --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the source section there is the link to http://politik.in2pic.com . When I click on this link, I can't find the photo. That's all. -- RE rillke questions? 21:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that is just a web page that will contain picture references, more pictures, text, and more - in the future. It is _not_ finished yet. However pictures where taken at the Foreign Ministry in Sweden, the press attache of the German Embassy knows me, as well as your german wiki-representative in Sweden, Prolineserver. Pictures taken at about 1.5 m distance. So if you want to use the pictures elsewhere, please make sure to credit "politik.in2pic.com" by a clickable link. I did also do some pic of Guido Westerwelle, and I will keep an eye out for more people. All the best, --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One suggestion: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0|attribution=http://politik.in2pic.com}} . And one note to prevent further confusion: When publishing these photos in the same resolution on your website without a date and a license (or a more restrictive one) and a patroller or similar encounters this, he will probably tag it with no permission until it is verified that you are http://politik.in2pic.com. Usually we would use COM:OTRS in this case.

Thank you for sharing professional photos and releasing them under a free license. -- RE rillke questions? 10:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0|attribution=http://politik.in2pic.com}} - how can I upload by Commonist with this setting? It is impossible to upload each picture separately, that will take too long time. OTRS - I have heard about it, but it becomes too difficult to send an email for each picture. If somebody wants to remove my pictures, then fine for me - it is not my loss. But I was thinking about writing some kind of letter, and put a JPG or so on my own server, with the license permissions and conditions. It seems you know something about licenses Rillke, if you like to write more about licenses then I would like more contact. Some Nobel price winners will come soon as uploads. --Janwikifoto (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Download this license file and replace it in folder Commonist\etc (I recommend a backup of the old file somewhere). Nobody wants to remove your pictures and I am not a lawer. For OTRS, we'll find a simple solution. -- RE rillke questions? 21:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please see the file's page for more info.

Saibo (Δ) 20:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saibo, you have the title Icense Reviewer. Are you an expert in licenses? If so, contact me urgently. Unfortunately, the most serious error in this upload-batch is that they all have the incorrect category "EURion". Since you are some kind of admin, you might want to fix this for all the files. Sorry now it is late night bedtime so no time for this. --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am "license reviewer" and probably soon admin and have a quite good knowledge of licenses. However, the categorizing action is not related to it - I did use the gadget cat-a-lot to remove the wrong Category:EURion easily - glad to help. Why was it included?

You make many valuable photos! :)

If you want to ask me anything regarding licenses and it is urgent please write on my talk or send me an email or contact me in IRC. Or - ask the guys at COM:VPC.

@File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg : I wrote: "Not clear who the photographer is. If you are the photographer please say so by using {{Own}} in source and your username in the author field. If you want to advertise your website only in the auhtor field then use something like {{Own}} by Janwikifoto in source."

Do you understand what I mean? Oh, I just see that Rillke did ask you about the very same thing in the section above. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Category:EURion was there because of previous upload. Commonist is not easy to use.... --Janwikifoto (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aikido_lesneven_2004_a4dn894_9042.jpg

File:Aikido_lesneven_2004_a4dn894_9042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GeorgHH • talk 10:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 11:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EURion.SEK.500.front.jpg

File:EURion.SEK.500.front.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EURion.SEK.100.front.jpg

File:EURion.SEK.100.front.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Janwikifoto. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Per Unckel

Hello, I just commented on one of your photos. The man on the picture is not Per Unckel. Please have a check! Calle Widmann (talk) 20:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefan Lofven.EU-dagen2011 1c379 6412.jpg

File:Stefan Lofven.EU-dagen2011 1c379 6412.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Reckless182 (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg

File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

85.24.184.251 21:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goran Hagglund 0c225 3305.jpg

File:Goran Hagglund 0c225 3305.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

85.24.184.251 21:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Do not violate copyright

Hello Janwikifoto. What image do you refer to? --RanZag (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably referring to the image File:Eric Saade 2011 cropped.jpg. And you are wrong, I in no way violated copyright: I uploaded the image using this Wikimedia automatic tool for derivative works. 'Source' is set automatically by the tool as a link to the original image, and everything else has been set by the tool in accordance with the copyright. --RanZag (talk) 22:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

This week is Image:Charlotte Perrelli 1c310 7029.jpg in Estonian wikipedia on Main page. Thank you for picture and congratulations to Sweden for win in Eurovision! Taivo (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://politik.in2pic.com

Hi! As you can see from messages above, there is an issue with your uploads from http://politik.in2pic.com: you should clarify if you are indeed the author of the website, and perhaps send a ticket to OTRS. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 21:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg

File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg

File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg

File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg

File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg

File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Notice

The following files have been deleted, and I hereby withdraw the below mentioned files from "Creative Commons copyright", and I claim full personal copyright, not allowing any use, on Wikipedia or Wikimedia foundation, or any other "wiki", unless approved by me in writing. Anyone using or uploading the following files without a written permission will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, for copyright violation. The following files may not be stored on wikimedia foundation servers, including so called "restore" which will be treatde as a copyright violation by the wikimedia foundation, as the files should have been deleted and purged.

Stockholm 2013-02-06 Janwikifoto --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg

Today 2014-09-15 the following file has been deleted and removed, so the above withdrawal of creative commons copyright applies for File:Stefan Lofven 1c379 6362.face.jpg and File:Stefan Lofven 1c379 6362.jpg and these files should have been deleted and purged from commons.wikimedia.org. Stockholm 2014-09-15 12:21 CET Janwikifoto --Janwikifoto (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Janwikifoto. You have new messages at Ellin Beltz's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-politik

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-politik has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-bloggers

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-bloggers has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Janwikifoto/template picinfo

User:Janwikifoto/template picinfo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Did you receive my email?

I've answered this not once, but twice now. It also seems that you unilaterally ignored my talk page notice, because if you had read it you would know that I maintain talk page archives. -FASTILY 06:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Gunilla Carlsson.Dirk Niebel 1c399 0350.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gunilla Carlsson.Dirk Niebel 1c399 0350.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Castillo blanco (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to understand what the reason is for deletion request. I also fail to find the deletion request, so I can discuss the DR. Please provide a link to the DR.

Please explain, in detail, what the reason is for the DR. Also explain what is different with the permission in this picture, from a very recent picture

File:Robin_Bengtsson.melodifestival2017.17d801.1370385.jpg

Should the recent picture also be deleted? If not, why not? Both pictures where uploaded the same way, by commonist.

You write "English is not my native language". What is your language, maybe I can communicate in your language?--Janwikifoto (talk) 20:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

email received. Thanks. What you should have done here is put {{Own}} in the permission field- this is supported by the EXIF data that is generated by your camera and is shown on the file page. If you do that in future, this problem shouldn't arise. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I received an email as well. Not sure why you contacted me about this, but @Rodhullandemu: seems incorrect in untagging the file. The EXIF contains a website address and it has not been shown how you as a user are associated with that website. This should go via OTRS. Also you complained that the tagging your did not respond to your 2 June message, but as you can see they have not done a single edit after 1 June. Some of us are on wiki almost daily, some are not. Jcb (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please stop sending emails? Thanks. Jcb (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gunilla Carlsson.Dirk Niebel 1c399 0350.jpg

File:Gunilla Carlsson.Dirk Niebel 1c399 0350.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1460241.jpg

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1460241.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

78.67.206.232 20:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1460243.jpg

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1460243.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

78.67.206.232 20:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1440221.jpg

File:John lundvik.melodifestivalen2018.18d873.1440221.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

78.67.206.232 20:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:John Lundvik.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Following your message you should have used {{subst:OP}} directly on the File description page (not the Talk page). Please wait your permission is received and processed. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. In all other cases, comments are done on the talk page (as I understand it). This was a first for me. --Janwikifoto (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Stefan lofven.riksdagen2018.18d952.1660226.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stefan lofven.riksdagen2018.18d952.1660226.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Following your message there's no evidence at source that image has been published under a Creative Commons license hence the template. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. If you don't mind the reply will stay in your talk page. You have all the instructions above: "Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to COM:OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)." Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT reply here. I ask you. Keep discussion in one page, your page, so it can be followed, by others. --Janwikifoto (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT reply here. I ask you. Keep discussion in one page, your page, so it can be followed, by others. --Janwikifoto (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove problem tags

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

— Racconish ^💬 16:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To settle the problem, reply with a practical suggestion to what should be done. Not a template. If you give practical advice, maybe it can be corrrected. I hope for a constructive reply today! Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "practical solution" was very simple: I raised the files at DR. By the way please avoid renominating for DR a file which is already nominated. — Racconish ^💬 17:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne compreds pas. 'The "practical solution" was very simple: I raised the files at DR.' Ok. But I did that, not you. Or, you mean nominated by raised? Practical solution, means, exactly what "evidence" would you like/accept? That is the practical question. With info about what is needed, how it has to look, maybe it can be fixed. --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply about avoiding to remove problem templates and having a community discussion instead, with no implication on the outcome of the discussion. — Racconish ^💬 17:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon, you did not suggest how to make the license acceptable for the Stefan Lofven picture. Je ne comprends "raised the files at DR". I have a problem understanding you. How can I then fix problems? Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raised at DR (deletion request) means nominated for deletion, which leads to a community discussion, instead of a speedy deletion. I have merely warned you about the fact of removing the template without nominating the file for deletion, not about your opinion. — Racconish ^💬 17:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah now I can understand. Yes, I removed the tags by Partick Rogel, where speedy deletion was not correct. I also told him, that he was free to nominate/raise, for DR. But it is not "good manners", to simply tag NP, which auto-delets after 7 days, like tha case with governement of Chile. Which apparently actually uses Creative Commons licenses. To tag like that, was definetly not correct, and not helpful. --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another time, please do not remove tags unless you are certain to have fixed the problem, but merely nominate the file for deletion and explain there why you disagree. — Racconish ^💬 17:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your messages

Hi. Since I've nominated to deletion the file by you @Racconish: is talking about above you've been very busy the 6 previous days to remove templates by me, send me 11 messages, one e-mail and various notifications or non-notifications like here (which is quite unpolite), suggesting me to learn Spanish... In return I would suggest you to erase me from your watchlist and to concentrate on what it's worth: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stefan lofven.riksdagen2018.18d952.1660226.jpg and, as suggested by your fellow Swedish Wikipedians, to go through OTRS as "you should know this after all the deletion discussions that affected your photos." So it's useless to let me more messages I won't reply to. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:Delete.atest-11.delete.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delete.atest-11.delete.jpg

File:Delete.atest-11.delete.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

melfest 2019

Hi, thank you for adding pictures from this year's Melodifestivalen. Do you have some pictures of Margaret during her rehersal when she was performing? ArturSik (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no pic from Margarets rehjearsal today. Tonight, I get her during the "pre-broadcast" rehearsal, with (mostly) correct stage clothes. Tonight. So pic will be available "late tonight" or early tomorrow. Best Regards --Janwikifoto (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can look at Margaret!. Category:Margaret --Janwikifoto (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your photos of Dolly Style are great. But you havs placed most of them in the wrong category. DollyStyle instead of Dolly Style. Just to let you know.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, should they change name to "Dolly Style", and category to the same? --Janwikifoto (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That issue was solved. Also Ann-Louise Hanson is the correct name, I just let you know so your brilliant images goes into the right category. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Double license headers

Hi! You often add two license headers. I have corrected all occurrences of that. Svensson1 (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but how (what tool) did you use to change that? It happens when I upload by Commonist. I probably do something wrong. --Janwikifoto (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I used AutoWikiBrowser. Svensson1 (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jag såg att det blev lite fel då du skulle korrigera att det var två rubriker. En rubrik måste ligga på en egen rad. Om det finns någon ytterligare text på samma rad som en rubrik, så visas inte rubriken korrekt. Svensson1 (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Va? Klarar inte wiki rubrikerna om de inte sitter på rätt rad? Jag är besviken. Men bra att du påpekade, jag kanske lär mig... --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Author field

I noticed on this image that you often have source/källa and author/skapare set to "http://politik.in2pic.com". Is that your website or a project website? I don't really see what the purpose is for naming that as the source. The link isn't directly leading to the image and the webpage isn't clearly marked for such purposes. If you took the picture yourself I also fail to see why a web-page should be considered author at all. The copyright is personal, maybe stating author as User:Janwikifoto would help some with the deletion requests? Jagulin (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See the USER PAGE, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Janwikifoto. "The verification of the identity of this user account has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. ". You see the user is well known. You can call me on the phone. Who are you? What do you want? Who knows you - personally? Is there a picture of you? Är du svensk? What have you done for wiki media, I mean what have you participated with? (All these can be answered by me, there are references in WMSE). Sorry, I have no time for people who do not wish to find out facts before they post. I suggest you read and re-read, in detail, all posts on my Talk page. Maybe then you will find out what you need. Please do that, before you spend peoples time. Have a nice day! / Jan --Janwikifoto (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just responding to indicate closure. My comment was meant to be helpful, apologies if it came across as anything else. I fully accept your lack of time and have no intention to follow up on this further. To save time for the community overall, however, I think at least an explanatory landing page on politik.in2pic.com and also a search tool could be helpful when using it as a generic source link. When I visit it I only see a file tree and no hint of images. You seem to indicate that OTRS identifies the URL as a proper copyright holder, if so that's fine but note that most users don't have access to OTRS details. Cheers, Jagulin (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Felkoppling?

Hej! Vad är anledning till att du länkat dina bilder till http://politik.in2pic.com, som ju leder till en uppräkning av kontakter med myndigheter och tvistemålsdomar? Källa, Skapare och Tillstånd bör ju leda till just det som rubriken säger. Kan det vara ett misstag eller en felkoppling? Man kan ju inte ge attribution till http://politik.in2pic.com. Exempel: Nooshi Dadgostar /Bästa wp-hälsningar Justeraren (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmie.widar.jan.2022-04-05.1155565.jpg

And also:

File:Widar.andersson.2022-04-05.1155553.light.jpg

Yours sincerely, Janwikifoto (talk) 20:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image attribution

Adding links to the latest discussion and request for undeletion to have as a reference if/when your preferred way of attribution is questioned again. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 08:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Dahlberg?

Hvilken Hans Dahlberg er File:Hans Dahlberg.21f337.1072176 03.jpg? Det er helt klart ikke sv:Hans Dahlberg. Men hvem så? Hjart (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah mage takk! Det har blivit FEJL, ska vara Hans Dahlgren https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Dahlgren. Jag lägger in request namnbyte --Janwikifoto (talk) 13:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eftersom du er File-mover, så....

Need name change. Many files uploaded by me have name "Hans Dahlberg...."-something, error. Should be "Hans_Dahlgren..."-same-something. Example file "Hans Dahlberg.21f337.1072176 03.jpg" ERROR - should be "Hans Dahlgren.21f337.1072176 03.jpg" Correct. In only this example, I have corrected the category and desciption, so all instances of "berg" should be changed to "gren"... Sorry, I was in stress. I applied and got a long time ago FILEMOVER right, and if I had that still, I could have changed the name. See this as an application for FILEMOVER rights. It is much better that the file uploader has the name-change-rights, automatically. Hope for a speedy change! --Janwikifoto (talk) 13:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kommunikatoren2011 1c321 7778

Who is it on the picture? It has been questioned on Swedish wikipedia Ulrika Jonsson for the picture Ulrika Jonsson created from your picture [1]. Do you know whio is who? Or is it as simple that it is Ulricha Johnson? Maundwiki (talk) 23:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Janwikifoto

Quality Image Promotion

Image file names are not very good

Kategorier

Your image in Uppsalatidningen

Autopatrol given

Per Unckel

Re: Do not violate copyright

Thank you

Copyright Notice

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg

RE: Did you receive my email?

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File tagging File:Gunilla Carlsson.Dirk Niebel 1c399 0350.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:Stefan lofven.riksdagen2018.18d952.1660226.jpg

Please do not remove deletion requests

Please do not remove problem tags

Your messages

Image without license

melfest 2019

Double license headers

Author field

Felkoppling?

Image attribution

Hans Dahlberg?

Kommunikatoren2011 1c321 7778

Navigation menu

Search