User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Rename||2}}

[edit]

You put the template like this into a few files like this one File:Photo by Immanuelle of unknown Japanese location-7088.jpg. Is it allowed and normal practice to just put the template there like that to request someone else rename a file? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 00:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle: Welcome back. The above template will put your files under Category:Media renaming requests needing target. There is no formal policy on doing this, but I think it can let those who familiar with the topic can perform the rename. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Immanuelle: yes, that's pretty normal. Given that others have worked out the city & district, you could probably go in with Google Maps or such, work out just where this was, and give it an appropriate file name. - Jmabel ! talk 20:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What was the (talk page stalker) about? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 21:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An acknowledgment that I am commenting in a discussion on someone else's talk page that I wasn't explicitly invited into, and that I'm not really doing so in my capacity as an admin. If User:A1Cafel wanted to delete my comment, that would be his prerogative. - Jmabel ! talk 00:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate every constructive comment. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion requests

[edit]

A1Cafel: I love you for your great pleasure in asking for the deletion requests of images nobody else would care about. Revenge actions, I guess (see here above). --Cayambe (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no any meaning of "revenge" or harming your contributions on Commons, just purely the image is violating the copyright of the creator. Statement like "nobody else would care about" is rejected by COM:PRP. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:SPF 3583 (53804268320).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A1Cafel, I'm writing to ask you for clarification about this license change you made. PD-Italy only applies to non-artistic photographs (and only if prior to 1976, because otherwise the photo would be still copyirighted in the US). Is there any particular reason? Thanks, Arrow303 (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Below COM:TOO Italy--A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could be, although the elephant silhouette is starting to get quite complex, but in any case the template should be {{PD-Textlogo}} {{TOO-Italy}} {{Trademark}}. {{PD-Italy}} is only for photographs produced at least 20 years ago in Italy. Arrow303 (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changed. If you disagree with my TOO judgement, feel free to nominate it for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of upload removal

[edit]

Dear A1Cafel,

The Wikimedia Foundation (“Wikimedia”) has taken down content that you posted at File:George Osborne ready for 2016 Budget.jpg due to Wikimedia’s receipt of a validly formulated notice that your posted content was infringing an existing copyright.

What Can You Do?

You are not obligated to take any action. However, if you feel that your content does not infringe upon any copyrights, you may contest the take down request by submitting a 'counter notice' to Wikimedia. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position, and you may wish to consult with an attorney.

Filing a Counter Notice

If you choose to submit a counter notice, you must send a letter asking Wikimedia to restore your content to legal@wikimedia.org, or to our service processor at the following address: Wikimedia Foundation, c/o CT Corporation System, 818 West Seventh Street, Los Angeles, California, 90017. The letter must comply with DMCA standards, set out in Section (g)(3)(A-D), and must contain the following:

  • A link to where the content was before we took it down and a description of the material that was removed;
  • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that the content was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled;
  • Your name, address, and phone number;
  • If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court for the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; alternatively, if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where the Wikimedia Foundation can be found, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; and finally,
  • Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, Wikimedia must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter notice, and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter notice. The alleged copyright holder will then have fourteen (14) business days to file a lawsuit against you to restrain Wikimedia from reposting the content. If Wikimedia does not receive proper notification that the alleged copyright holder has initiated such a lawsuit against you, we will repost your content within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days.

Miscellaneous

As a matter of policy and under appropriate circumstances, Wikimedia will block the accounts of repeat infringers as provided by Section 512(i)(1)(A) of the DMCA.

If you would like to learn more about Wikimedia’s policies, please refer to the Wikimedia Terms of Use, available at Terms of use, and the Wikimedia Legal Policies, available at m:Legal/Legal_Policies. More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Wikimedia appreciates your support. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this notice.

Sincerely, Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 02:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]