User talk:Shizhao
|
圖像重新命名
[edit]File:鄭自才與黃文雄.jpg >>>>> File:Cheng Tzu-tsai and Peter Huang 2018-01-13.jpg
File:Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư, University of Tokyo 20140308.jpg >>>>> File:Complete Annals of Great Viet, University of Tokyo 2014-03-08.jpg
你可否轉移以上二個圖像的重新命名?要求你會很難嗎?--馬學良 (talk) 08:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Photos in Flickr Explore has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Prototyperspective (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
[edit]* Happy Holidays! * | |
|
File:Ethyl green (2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 01:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Święto Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego. Warszawa 1966.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Święto Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego. Warszawa 1966.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Święto Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego. Warszawa 1966.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leoboudv (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
File:DH 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Jeju Air HL8088
[edit]Hello, I'm writing about the licence review of the pictures of the Jeju Air's Boeing. I saw on the source that they are licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR, which doesn't seem equivalent to the licence CC-BY-2.0-KR under which they've been uploaded to Commons (and Commons excludes no commercial and no derivate licences). I tried yesterday but couldn't tag this file with "No permission" because of a cascading protection. The text on the source couldn't be selected and/or right clicked, so I couldn't use a translator to check that those particular files were indeed released under CC-BY-2.0-KR. I just wanted to be sure that there weren't any confusion about the licence, because the files are largely used on Wikidata and many Wikipedia entries. Cheers, Gyrostat (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are two licenses on the source page, is cc-by-nc-nd and cc-by. Based on the location of the image and the license, I think this image should be cc-by. I hope I am not wrong. I cannot read Korean. shizhao (talk) 07:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
File:DH 08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
File:GOGU 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
File:GOGU 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
File:GOGU 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
File:DS 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:DS 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Flying Midnight Rainbow 20081013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
翻译通知:Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025
[edit]Shizhao,您好:
因您曾在Wikimedia Commons注册成为中文、简体中文和繁体中文翻译者,现向您发来通知。“Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025”页面现已可供翻译,链接于下:
此页面的重要度为“中”。 翻译这个页面的截止日期是2025-01-31。
对于您的努力我们深表感谢。有了您和其他翻译者的努力,才让Wikimedia Commons得以成为多语言社区。
若要取消订阅或更改翻译通知设置,请访问“特殊:翻译者注册”。
敬请!
Wikimedia Commons翻译协调员示, 15:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Gongguan Station platform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:DX 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:DX 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:NTUH 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:NTUH 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |