User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hola, Yann. Gracias por notificarme, pero la imagen estaba por todos lados y pensé que no tenía copyright, Y no todas mis imagenes tienen copyright. Algunas de mis imágenes las tomé de sitios de noticias cubanos, como la del tornado de la Habana de 2019, que la tiró una persona y después la mando a redes sociales, posteriormente se hizo pública ya que la persona no puso ningún sistema de copyright a la imagen, y con mi internet no puedo buscar esa imagen. Y como tiene dominio público la subí pero me la borraron, y lo mismo con la de la tromba marina de Caimito. Y el resto las tire desde mi casa. Supercellofphoto (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Supercellofphoto: Hi, Nowadays, almost everything is under a copyright by default. You have to assume that images on social media and the Internet are under a copyright. So do not copyright unless you have a formal written permission for a free license from the copyright holder. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
<Google Transate>Hola, hoy en día, casi todo está protegido por derechos de autor de forma predeterminada. Debes asumir que las imágenes en las redes sociales e Internet están protegidas por derechos de autor. Por lo tanto, no registres tus derechos de autor a menos que tengas un permiso escrito formal para una licencia gratuita del titular de los derechos de autor. Si tienes dicho permiso, consulta COM:VRT/es para conocer el procedimiento. Saludos, Yann (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)</Google Translate>[reply]
Hi Yann, if one has "to assume that images on social media and the Internet are under a copyright" - why did you remove the Copyvio on two pages (PAGE 1 / PAGE 2), containing photos with watermarks from an Internet platform that expressly prohibits the use of its images (§ 12. Propiedad intelectual e industrial)?
The owner of the depicted envelopes is an antiques dealer from Seville, who is also the photographer of the objects and therefore the author of the images. This is decisive for the authorship, not the age of the depicted objects! I might be wrong, but in my opinion this is a copyright violation. Best regards from Germany --EugenioNoel (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@EugenioNoel: These 2 envelopes are obviously in the public domain, and scanning them does not create a new copyright. Yann (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense to me - thank you very much. EugenioNoel (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

logos and trademarks

I used official artworks and made little changes. Gota-47 (talk) 13:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gota-47: So what? This doesn't give you the right to upload them here without the permission from the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the copyright holders are dead (bankrupcy). So... what... Gota-47 (talk) 10:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gota-47: Sadly, even if a copyright holder disappears, be it a person or a company, the copyright doesn't. These may be {{Orphan works}}, but the copyright still exists. On a personal opinion, I think we should accept orphan works, but most other people here disagree. Yann (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot of 2024

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2024? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2025. Warmly, --Ailura (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, prospectprospekt (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Translation notification: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025

Hello Yann,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to French on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium. The deadline for translating this page is 2025-01-31.

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international media campaign running from February 1st to March 31st, and we kindly seek your assistance in translating the project pages into your local language. Your efforts will help make the campaign more accessible and meaningful for local communities. Thank you for your time and invaluable support.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

To unsubscribe or to change your notification preferences for translations, please visit Special:TranslatorSignup.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 15:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, SDudley (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An user have removed a tag for a request for deletion

Hi

The user have removed the tag. So he have not the right because the request is not yet closed. What is the solution? Closing the request in merge? Panam2014 (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in regard of this, he seems to be a sock. Panam2014 (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: Hi, You blocked User:Nepal, And, &, Bhutan as a sock of Jurisdrew. What do you think about Special:Contributions/Freedoxm? Yann (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Panam2014: Flag of Syria (2024-present) is now a redirect to the other file which has the history of both merged. Abzeronow (talk) 23:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IP 81.79.241.255

Special:Contributions/81.79.241.255

I think this user should have been indeffed. They’re clearly a troll/bluenoser and can’t be trusted not to immediately come back after the block expires. Dronebogus (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, IPs are not permanent, so they should not be blocked indefinitely. But otherwise, I agree with a longer block if they come back. Yann (talk) 11:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured media candidates/candidate list

I dont know how to make nominations? Trade (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Please see Commons:Featured media candidates. Yann (talk) 20:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allowed or not

Please advise if these images can be uploaded: https://comalcool.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/qui-a-dit-qu’un-champagne-vert-etait-mauvais/. Thanks. Phsmet (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Phsmet: Who is the photographer? I don't see any free license at this page. So probably no. Yann (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you deleted several images I had uploaded, namely portraits of several members of the Rhode Island General Assembly (examples: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mike_chippendale_portrait.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Victoria_gu_portrait.jpg, a few others).

You cited Commons:COM:NETCOPYVIO, however I am not sure why. All of these images are works of the Rhode Island General Assembly, and I included in the description of all of these images that they were both works of the State of Rhode Island and cited Rhode Island General Law § 38-2-3, which states "all records maintained or kept on file by any public body, whether or not those records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person or entity shall have the right to inspect and/or copy those records at such reasonable time as may be determined by the custodian thereof."

Given that the portraits of these legislators were works created by a public body in the State of Rhode Island, they are public records and are allowed to be copied. I have personally verified this with the Rhode Island Secretary of State's Office and the Rhode Island General Assembly's legal counsel, and I suggest you do the same if you do not think my above explanation is sufficient. I would request that these portraits be un-deleted if possible and restored to the Wikipedia pages they were on. SusImposter49 (talk) 04:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SusImposter49: Hi, I am not sure if these files are in the public domain, which is different than the law you mention, but I restored them and created a regular DR instead. The license you added is wrong, and that's probably why they were nominated for deletion. Please read it, and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#US_States, and correct it. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yann! I'm here to consult if this logo suitable for PD-textlogo? ([1] [2][3][4][5][6]) Royiswariii Talk! 16:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii: We already have File:Placeholder view vector.svg. Yann (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clarify because I don't understand. Royiswariii Talk! 09:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: There is no need to upload it, as we already have it. Yann (talk) 09:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann It seems the logo was previewed as a Placeholder view, I'm talking about this [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] Royiswariii Talk! 09:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: Ah OK. ;o) The first and the last ones: no. For the others, may be, it depends on the country of origin. You better ask on COM:VPC to have others opinions. Yann (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

So that I know better, what information tells you when those old Lithuanian photos were published, thereby enabling you to deduce that their copyright has expired? Thanks. DS (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DS: We usually assume that photographs are published at the time of creation, unless evidence to the contrary. At the time, photographers handling their works to somebody outside of close family constituted publication. Yann (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's interesting. Photos from the era of "only [professionals / super-dedicated hobbyists who did their own developing] had cameras" are assumed to be published? Is there a discussion to this effect somewhere? Approximately when did this era end? DS (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DS: Well, it depends on the country. This is based on US law, but I would say generally until 1945, when cameras became much more common. I think only photographs which the photographer or their heirs donated to an archive, which then published them for the first time should be considered unpublished until recently. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Found photos from the Thomas Hawk collection as example of DR kept based on this assumption. Yann (talk) 19:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, I noticed that the User:Adiiitya has been uploading numerous logos, flags, and insignias to Wikimedia Commons. Many of these appear to be either directly taken from the internet or direct recreations of those files. However, the files are being uploaded with the claim of "own work."

I am concerned about the accuracy of the copyright status and the information provided in the file descriptions. For instance, File:Blue Ensign of British Bihar and Orissa Province.jpg was uploaded with the claim of "Own work". This file seems to derive elements from the British India flag and the Bihar emblem. Additionally, there is uncertainty about whether the province ever officially had a flag of this nature. Could you please review the uploaded files for accuracy and compliance? MaxA-Matrix (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I deleted some files obviously not OK, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Adiiitya for the rest. Yann (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Hello Yann, I hope you are well. On January 16th, you blocked Rogério da Silva Santana vai (referred to as "vai"). It seems he created this account right after his original account, Rogério da Silva Santana viu (referred to as "viu"), was blocked on pt.wiki for vandalism. The "vai" account uploaded a file that "viu" posted on his pt.wiki talk page, which led me to tag it for deletion here and block him from editing that page. The original "viu" account is still active here and has received a few deletion requests since then. I apologize if this message is convoluted, but I believe this is a clear case of block evasion. Thank you in advance. BraunOBruno (talk) 13:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked, out of scope and duplicate files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merci! BraunOBruno (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a {{COM:NETCOPYVIO}}

Hi! I'm not sure if I can list a file for speedy deletion if there is already a deletion discussion (since November!) open about it, so I'm turning to you for help. Could you please take a look at the file since the discussion imo makes it clear that this is a copyvio? - Yupik (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Deleted. Yann (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! - Yupik (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that you have seen the copyright investigations that I added. First off, I acknowledge that all of the pictures that I have added the Copyvio template to are not my work.

Second of all, I request that you delete these photos. I was previously unaware of the uploading rules on Wikimedia and the copyright status on certain images.

Also, I am not too sure what to do about the images from the NPS (Sonoitac, Santa Maria de Magdalena, Cuquiarachi). Most likely they are public domain, but I'd still like to bring that to your attention.

Finally, I will not be uploading many images on Wikimedia anymore. I believe there is a process to upload images that are not your work, so I will use this if needed.

However, one of the main reasons I have a Wiki account was to edit and improve pages relating to Spanish missions, so I have no problem with not being able to upload images on Wikimedia, if it comes to that.

Thank you for your understanding. GoldenArmorYeah (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldenArmorYeah: Hi, Sometimes, it is not possible to find pictures under a free license or in the public domain, but we have to live with that. Yann (talk) 09:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indy Fuel new logo.png and others

Hi Yann,
What is your rationale for concluding that this logo is clearly above COM:TOO United States?
Why did you tag it with {{No permission since|month=January|day=24|year=2025}} and then deleted the file (uploaded half a year ago) yourself in the same minute? As you know, the text in the template says “… the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added …”.
I noticed that this is a common practice of you. --Leyo 23:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Leyo: Hi, Please stay civil, or you might be blocked. This is quite obviously not a simple logo. You can request undeletion, but I will oppose it. Yann (talk) 10:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Вилучення зображень

Більшість моїх завантажень є повністю моїми роботами, які я створив особисто. Які потрібно навести докази, щоб вони не були вилучені? Alterbat (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alterbat: Hi, Many of your uploads are copyright violations, with false claims of own works. How can we trust you? May be you can send some evidence to COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 10:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Я маю всі похідні файли з проєктів своїх гербів, можу підтвердити будь-який
Alterbat (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
я ще не навчився коректно додавати файли на Вікі Alterbat (talk) 10:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Yann I see you nominated almost all of my uploads for deletion. I know I have uploaded most of them as own work. However, that was not intentional. I don't know much about copyright licences. If you could let me know about what changes do I have to make to the respective files, it would be a great help. Adiiitya (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adiiitya: Hi, As I said on your talk page, correct all the files you have uploaded, and then mention that in the deletion requests. Do not add any more files with incorrect information, or copied from the Internet without a permission, or you will be blocked. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have a query. Could you tell me why files like which are in public domain have been nominated for deletion but not the ones like and  ? Adiiitya (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adiiitya: Why would this be in the public domain? It is the same for all 3 files. You have to give evidence. Who made them? From which information? Yann (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If it is the same for all the 3 files, why aren't the other ones nominated for deletion? Adiiitya (talk) 08:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BTW Please check if the edits made at are enough so that I can do the same with the other files. Adiiitya (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adiiitya: Hi, For {{PD-India}} to apply, it should be more than 60 years. Currently it is claimed to be from 2024. Some works by the Indian government are OK with {{GODL-India}}, but, if I remember correctly, insignias are not accepted under this license. Please check COM:India. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the same licence is applied for this file , and it has no issue, right? Adiiitya (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the issue is the same. There is no information or link showing the date of the original insignia. I let a message on the uploader's talk page. Yann (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ThePinkShoes

I’d appreciate if you removed all their vandalistic deletion requests since that was the main reason I reported them. Dronebogus (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Whale tail display.jpg

You closed this, but left the DR for the crop open.

I agree with the nominator that the arguments for both images are similar. The request for the crop is well overdue to be closed anyway. So be consistent: close the request for the crop, or re-open this request. Brianjd (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Closed. Yann (talk) 10:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I uploaded an image of an actress from a movie trailer for "Death on the Nile". The trailer (and the movie) was cinematographed by Haris Zambarloukos, who is credited and had uploaded the trailer to his Vimeo account under a CC BY SA license. However, it was later deleted due to a copyright violation. How is this possible? It was tagged by the cinematographer himself as CC BY SA. Lililolol (talk) 03:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lililolol: I don't think this license is valid. Haris Zambarloukos is the cinematographer, but only the producer could provide a free license. You can ask on COM:VPC if you want more information. Sorry. Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

w8ing for reply

here you gave me the last worning without promply explaining why scrinshots from the site under CC BY 4.0 licensing cant be uploaded and present a copiright violation. Could you kindly provide some comments here as such a request on that page has been ignored. Thanx. Dmitry Plantorama (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shāntián Tàiláng

[12] They immediately imported the issue to meta, and nuisance pinged me there. Message clearly not received. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I've responded. I wish I could say I'm surprised, but I'm not. Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox and Abzeronow: I guess a globally locked is in order then. Yann (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already submitted a global block request [13] Beeblebrox (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hhuu_551

The user is saying that the photographs are his father's. I've pointed him to VRT. Is the block still needed? JayCubby (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby: Let's wait for the permission. He can be unblocked as soon as the permission is validated. Yann (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:J’accuse.jpg

The whole Category:J'accuse...! is categorised as Category:1898 newspapers of France Rathfelder (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=989902070"