User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Again

Hi: Remember this one? I found This SPA, created years ago. The blocked one try to use that picture in this article, where it has a special interest (You can find here at least four attempts to upload pictures for that same person.) Not sure if there is a problem with this picture, too. The original was used on this website. Thanks in advance. Rastamby (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Actually this account is older, so I blocked them both indef. for abusing multiple accounts. File deleted. Yann (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This account is linked. Idk if it's a puppet, but they're editing the same articles on SP:WP. And the images uploaded have the same problems. Please, check it. I appreciate your help. A clear example, and another one, both from today (Well, not sure about the last one).--Rastamby (talk) 01:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rastamby: I blocked this one because of the copyright violations. In such a case, just create a mass deletion request like Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Guishín Pastofrio. All files from this account are suspicious. Yann (talk) 16:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: : There's another (potentially) problematic account, and you already leave a warning on its user page. I'm fully aware these last days I've become an annoyance, so this will be my last direct request for a time. (Those are all accounts with editions motivated by recent election. Kind of SPAs...). What worries me are the images, flags, shields, and other stuff alike. Maybe some are valid, but what about this one, for example? (Not an official or real "symbol", but that doesn't matter now.)

I truly appreciate your help. Thanks for your time.--Rastamby (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rastamby: Hi, File:BanderaCoalicionRepublicana.svg may be OK with {{PD-textlogo}}. Like you said, I already warned this user. I tagged one more file. Some are waiting for a permission. Nothing more can be done without a request for check user. Yann (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann:  :This aforementioned user was blocked again. --Rastamby (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. You were the admin blocking him. I failed to notice it, before leaving the last message. Probably he'll be fired from SP:WP.--Rastamby (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mixtape Madness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixtape_Madness https://www.youtube.com/@MixtapeMadnessOfficial

Are the CCBY videos from this channel safe to upload here? Trade (talk) 22:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Hi, Good question. I am not sure, as it seems that this channel publishes videos made by others. I think it is better to ask for more opinions on COM:VPC. Yann (talk) 11:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block Exemption

Hi Yann, Can you advise me the IP Block Exemption right exists in commons like it does on enwiki? If it does how would I go about requesting it.

I have the right on enwiki and it's a pain that I have to turn my VPN off every time I want to edit commons. TarnishedPathtalk 13:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath: OK, granted for 6 months. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, thanks. TarnishedPathtalk 01:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ps, I don't really know my way around commons as well as I do around en.wiki. Is there a page which details useful scripts (which aren't in gadgets) to add to my common.js? Stuff like displaying strike throughs for blocked editors, displaying editor information on their user pages (rights, edits, etc.). TarnishedPathtalk 01:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TarnishedPath: Sorry, I don't know any page which lists all scripts. There are pages by content (audio, video, etc.). Yann (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yann You had put a copyright warning on my talk page. I think it was a mistake, all the images I uploaded are not copyrighted. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PerspicazHistorian: Hi, Yes, many of your uploads are copyright violations, and were deleted as such. For the files which may be in the public domain, you didn't provide the proper date, source, author, and license. Please do it, or they might be deleted. If you don't know the details, please ask on COM:VPC. Do not upload files from the Internet without a proof that there is a free license, or that the files are in the public domain. If you do, you might be blocked. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay, i am still learning please don't block me. Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files from Flickr in the name of MEA

Hello @Yann I just noticed that SantaClaraCOLOMBO and AlexisCdR have uploaded a few images here. The source they have mentioned reads Indian Ministry of External Affairs. From what I know, Indian govt doesn't release any files on flickr. Modi previously used Flickr but that too was in his personal capacity. Also all works of Govt of India are GODL. But these uploads are under different licenses. If flickr is an incorrect source plz let me know, I will try to find these images on PIB website and fix the file description so that we can keep it here. If not I will nominate them for SD. Please confirm so that I can proceed. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 10:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta: Indeed, these files are not under a free license, so Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SantaClaraCOLOMBO. Yann (talk) 10:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Independant WHO

Salut Yann, pourrais-tu jeter un oeil à cette proposition de suppression : Commons:Deletion requests/File:20110426-IWHO-22.jpg ? Independant WHO, "Manifestation le jour anniversaire de Tchernobyl près de l'OMS à Genève pour demander l'amendement de l'accord OMS-AIEA. Portraits de liquidateurs." MHM (talk) 13:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MHM55: Bonjour Michel,
J'ai flouté les 2 portraits les plus proches. Le reste devrait être de minimis. Yann (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading Image

Hello, Yann!

I want to consult if can upload a picture without a VRT? I want to upload a picture on the infobox of Bini (group) as Creative Commons Attributio-ShareAlike 4.0. I actually DM on their Twitter account where the picture was uploaded, however, the author on pinned post stated that

Guys, wag na kayo magpaalam. bahala na kayo kung ano man gawin nyo sa mga pics. wag nyo lang ibebenta o LALAGYAN NG WATERMARK!

Translation into English:

Guys, no need to ask for permission. Do whatever you want with the photos, just don't sell them or put a watermark on them!

[1]

The author giving others the freedom to use their photos without needing to ask for permission. What do you think? Royiswariii Talk! 03:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii: Hi, If you are not the photographer, a formal written permission is needed. The copyright holder should send it via COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, The author replied to me on Twitter (X) said that I can use the picture whenever I want. However, the copyright holder seems not responding to me, I gave a instructions how will they file via VRT. There's a proof via DM that they agreed on CC-BY-SA 4.0. Is it okay I can submit it on behalf on the copyright holder and send this proof of conversation that they agreed on the licensing? Thanks. Royiswariii Talk! 03:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"don't sell them" = NC. Not okay for uploading. Bedivere (talk) 04:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: As mentioned by Bedivere above, there is some doubt about what the author agrees, that's why a formal written permission for a free license via COM:VRT is needed. Yann (talk) 09:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image of magazine front page

I have uploaded the File:The front page of the first issue of the Icelandic Magazine Neisti.jpg and got a message that it might get deleted. I tried to follow the way the file:Klassekampen no 1 1969.jpg was uploaded as these are both of front pages of magazines. I find it very difficult to understand what permissions or licenses are needed Masae (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Masae: Hi, The copyright of a 1969 work lasts at least until 2040, if it is a collective or anonymous work, or longer otherwise. I think that the publisher should send a permission for this file. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Yann. There is however a problem with getting a permission from the publisher as the organisation was dissolved in 1985 Masae (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Masae: Ah yes, this makes things more difficult. However copyright doesn't cease to exist when the copyright holder disappears. Whoever took over the assets is the new copyright holder. The file could be an {{Orphan work}}. Yann (talk) 15:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TVPSICH38

Hi, I've removed the personal attack against you by the above user. They did something similar at en.wiki, for which I've indeffed them and rev/deleted the attack. You might want to consider doing the same here. Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Great, thanks. I blocked this account indef. Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

elimination of flag, coat of arms and anthem of the districts of Bogotá

Kind regards,

first I would like to apologize for uploading images without specifying the license. I had taken all the photographs from the websites of the mayors of the districts of Bogotá. Now I would like to ask you for advice on uploading those symbols again, as I feel it is important that they are not forgotten and that their existence is known.

SUMAPAZ

Starting with the town of Sumapaz, they have the 3 symbols, flag, shield and anthem as seen in those images and the official YouTube channel of the mayor's office of that area

https://youtu.be/5p4Yb0huqhY?feature=shared (the hymn of the press office of the mayor's office)

https://www.integracionsocial.gov.co/index.php/noticias/97-noticias-lgbti/4545-la-localidad-de-sumapaz-recibio-la-bandera-del-orgullo-lgbti (flag and shield)

https://x.com/ssaldarriagar?mx=2 (the most detailed shield)

For the flag I tried to reconstruct it with the few photos that there are, making the flag myself but removing the background of the shield and uploading it, but I didn't know the copyright for that one and the same as the flag since it had the shield

USME

Now with the anthem and flags of Usme, first I looked for local agreements and found the lyrics of the anthem (the flag but later I will talk about it), but the "music" was not on the page, so I went to YouTube and found it as the following video:

https://youtu.be/vVR0QeHD584?si=dfl5-tMqozRA1kXz (hymn of usme)

For the flag, it was in the same local act, where there was an image about the creator of the flag (R.I.P), description and meaning of each color but it was a "screenshot" where I could find the closest thing to the original photo, but I didn't do it anyway but it was an institutional symbol and I didn't know how to upload it.

https://x.com/patrimoniousmek/status/1319122456490078210 (screenshot)

https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=152184&dt=S (the local agreement where the flag and the anthem are made official)

CIUDAD BOLIVAR

For the flag, coat of arms and anthem of "Ciudad Bolivar" it was a little more complex because it was not on the official website of the mayor's office, but I managed to find the local agreement where it also institutionalizes the flag, coat of arms and anthem of that area

https://issuu.com/cljciudadbolivar/docs/acuerdo_local_023_de_2008 (local agreement)

but there was no link to listen to the anthem, which I also searched for on YouTube, which was the following:

https://youtu.be/RnjapcXsqFE?si=M3PpYDYRQFxXeZ4A

BOSA (Bogotá)

I am still researching the symbols, based on the images of the JAL of Bosa, where it is most likely that it is not two-color but three-color, in addition I have already asked the mayor of that area (being one of the few who have responded and their email for citizen attention works) but I also wanted to ask, in case you send me the files, how do I upload them and with what license?

KENNEDY (Bogotá)

I based Kennedy's flag on what was on the mayor's page in the human government of Bogotá and I found the lyrics of the anthem in passing

https://web.archive.org/web/20130626175855/http://www.kennedy.gov.co/index.php/disfrutando-mi-localidad/zonas-comerciales

and I took the anthem from the official account of the mayor of that area:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85fpuYX8uYY

FONTIBÓN (Bogotá)

I found the shield and the anthem in the following video: Himno de Fontibon (1:37) but they are still institutional symbols approved in Local Decree 4 of 2009 Local Mayor's Office of Fontibón but with the same thing, I don't know what the use license is like in that case

SUBA (Bogotá)

on the flag was taken from that page Suba (Distrito Capital, Colombia)

I also found the anthem but I have a question since the car has that:

℗ Jorge Humberto Producciones

Released on: 2022-04-15

Auto-generated by YouTube.

but at the same time it is a local symbol, it cannot have copyright, I don't understand what to do in that case

Himno De Suba - YouTube

song by the composer of suba anthem

USAQUEN (bogotá)

I made the flag and I also took the anthem from the official channel of the Usaquen mayor's office.

Himno de Usaquén - Subtitulado

approved in Local Agreement 8 of 2015 Local Administrative Board of Usaquén

TUNJUELITO (bogotá)

Likewise, the anthem was also taken from the official channel of the Tunjuelito mayor's office.

Tunjuelito - HIMNO ALCALDÍA LOCAL DE TUNJUELITO

Before finishing, again I apologize for the images, all those I took from the official page of each district but I understand that it also has its copyright and it is not fair to take away the credit from the people who took the time to do that

I will be attentive to your comments PatojuanC (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PatojuanC: Hi, For these files, either the license is wrong, or there is no source to sustain your claim, or both. By default, everything is under a copyright until 80 years after the author's death (PD-Colombia). There is no exception for anthems and official symbols. In addition, even if the original symbol is in the public domain, a new rendering may be under a copyright. Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Colombia and COM:DW. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, in these cases I must speak with the entities to be able to upload those symbols, correct? PatojuanC (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PatojuanC: Yes, a permission from the copyright holder is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure in English (COM:VRT/es in Spanish). Yann (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

some undeleted files

Hi. These have been undeleted but still have missing permission. Please advise.

--Krd 04:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for the report. Yann (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

some more

Hi.

Where did you find that ticket? It is invalid and cannot be used as permission for these files. --Krd 07:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: Here is the permission: Category talk:Alar Kotli. There have been several undeletion requests about this. Yann (talk) 09:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Permissions belong into file pages, not Categories nor Category talk pages. The ticket has never been accepted, but I now think it can be considered valid. I will clean this up. Krd 10:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see: Template:Alar Kotli-permission Sadly none of the examples I look into is licensed as cc-by-sa-4.0. I think it's still invalid. Suggestions? Krd 10:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: Sorry, I am not sure what you mean: is the ticket invalid, or the license doesn't match the permission? I don't have access to the ticket myself. The template says Images of buildings designed by Alar Kotli (1904–1963) may be shared under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licence. Yann (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
…and the files in the category are under different licenses, but not under cc-by-sa-4.0. Krd 10:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps @Kruusamägi: can advise? Krd 10:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that permission letter, there is a digitally signed document from the daughter of that architect (Alar Kotli, 1904–1963). CC BY-SA 4.0 is brought out as an example of a license that could be used, but the permission does not limit the selection of licenses to just that. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So what exactly is granted? Can you modify Template:Alar Kotli-permission accordingly? Krd 05:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now the text in the template should represent the meaning of the permission accordingly. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Krd 07:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

Hi @Yann Why did you delete File:Allama Prabhu.png?

PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That too without notice? are you not abusing you powers? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PerspicazHistorian: That's not your work, and a clear copyright violation. Yann (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How and when did you prove it? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I edited it myself and its my own work. Can you even find one similar image on whole internet? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PerspicazHistorian: Please read COM:DW, and stop claiming such files as own works, or you will be blocked. Yann (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but i added new creative content to it. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PerspicazHistorian: This is NOT your work, so you are not allowed to add a Creative Commons license. If it is in the public domain, you must provide the proper source, date, author, and license. And you got a notice for this file. Read your talk page messages before complaining here. Yann (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not my own work even after changing and editing the image? PerspicazHistorian (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PerspicazHistorian: No. Please read COM:DW. Yann (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another user's page blanked by non-admin

Hi Yann,

Ping also @The Squirrel Conspiracy, A.Savin, and Aafi: ArionStar's user page has been blanked by RodRabelo7, without redirect. All the Revision history has disappeared. Is there any reason to delete this page at the moment? COM:MOVE says: "The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right." There may be a risk that the history gets lost, in case that the User talk:ArionStar/Archive 2 gets blanked too, and then nominated for deletion per {{Empty page}} or similar template for speedy deletion. Moreover, User talk:ArionStar/Archive 1 is now an orphan page, right? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin, thanks for the ping. Although I would be okay editors helping others in archive content from talk-pages, it doesn't seem appropriate to use the move function to entirely move a talk-page, leaving behind no history at that place. I have reverted this move and left a note on RodRabelo7's talk page. COM:MOVE doesn't apply here. However, a general advise is Archive rather than delete. Regards, Aafi (talk) 04:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Aafi, for the maintenance work and enlightening message. The same performer is indef blocked on Wikipedia, maybe not a coincidence. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This file had a commons license. Why was it deleted? Pirhayati (talk) 07:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pirhayati: Hi, Only the copyright holder can give a license, so the license here is not valid. There is no evidence at the source that it was released under a free license. Yann (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright-holder has given the license in https://t.me/naserzeraatiketabsoti. What is wrong with it? Pirhayati (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pirhayati: The permission should be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please see COM:VRT for the detailed procedure. Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It says that you don't need to contact the team when the photo is published in social media with a description or comment indicating that it is published under a free license. Pirhayati (talk) 13:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
؟؟ Pirhayati (talk) 09:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Demand to unblock

Good evening Yann, As I can see you have blocked me. The photographs I upload to Commons are mine, either photos taken by me or from public domains, for example,

https://etakitto.eus/albisteak/kontxa-laspiur-zabalari-omenaldi-herrikoia-egingo-diote-barixakuan-ipuruako-merkatu-plazan As you can see in this link, it belongs to CC (Creative Commons) Wikimaribarre (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikimaribarre: Hi, I don't see any evidence of a free license at this link. For all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission for a free license via COM:VRT is necessary. You will be unblock when this is done. Yann (talk) 18:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the page there's clearly a "Creative Commons" logo on the right side of the red banner and it seems to exist on other pages. So the website is clearly CC licensed. I can see why someone would miss it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah right, I didn't see it. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it all

Hi Yann. I must admit that my way to proceed has not been the right one. And besides, some time ago I had a discussion in the Spanish-speaking community associated with an article I wrote about a person. In the end, I myself asked for that article to be deleted. My relationship with that person has caused me a lot of trouble, as regards an eventual conflict of interest; and there were some related photographs. So, I'm going to ask myself to delete all the pictures uploaded by me in this whole category. I wouldn't like to be blocked in a community where I have always taken part with a lot of enthusiasm. Greetings, Fadesga (talk) 11:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 12:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New adventures of Arion

I'd say it was the right move to reinstate Arion's block. He's now recommenced his old ways by writing a one-sentence "article" and then showing up at WP:ITN/C and ask others to do the job for him. He hasn't changed a bit. --Cart (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025!

-- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holydaysǃ

and thanks to your contribution to Commons.


Happy Holydays and Happy New Year 2025!
Terragio67

Terragio67 (talk) 09:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! (2024)

Happy holidays, Yann!

Hey Yann, wishing you an epic Christmas and an awesome New Year!

Massive thanks for all the dedication and effort you've poured into making Wikimedia Commons what it is today. Wherever you are in the world, kick back and enjoy the festive vibes!

Greetings from Queensland :).

--SHB2000 on 11:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for 2025!

  * Happy Holidays, Yann! *  
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2025!

Pierre André (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ahmed_al-Sharaa

Hi

There, there are lots of false free files. And I have tagged the last. Panam2014 (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another request. Panam2014 (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Can you close Commons:Deletion requests/File:O0699128015366697400.jpg as delete since you deleted similar images from the same user and newspaper yesterday? Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:გიორგი ახლოური.png

Um...

I mean, Merry Christmas, my friend, but did you read my remark in that thread? Ikan Kekek (talk) Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Hi, Yes, I saw your remark, but this is very unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you had read what I said, you would have seen that I agree it's not own work, and that I gave a reason supported by COM:DR instead of one contrary to COM:DR. And I also wrote that '"Deleted per nomination" or "Already deleted by X" are likely (though careless) closing remarks.' No point in arguing further, as I support the deletion, but it bugs me when closing admins don't take policy guidelines seriously, and at least some admins just don't seem to care and even get mad when I push back on this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays
Yann!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2025!
-- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artistic Femininity GIF.gif

Hi. Your name has come up in this thread, and I think you should address the discussion. An indefinite ban is very harsh and begs the question of why it wasn't preceded by a much shorter block, if that was even necessary, and deleting 9 files that were kept in a deletion request thread for a reason other than copyright violation or the like is really questionable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Hi, I reduced the block, but most of their uploads are vanity nudity pictures without educational value. Files like File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 4.jpg looks like a joke. And I would delete that one too. Yann (talk) 09:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is that one that was the subject of a successful deletion request? I would say that Croatie has been agenda-driven, hasn't shown willingness to compromise that I've seen, and that not all her uploads have been good though many have been, but on Wikivoyage, we never start with an indefinite block unless we're dealing with a spambot, vandalism-only account, block-evader or someone obviously not there to improve a travel guide. Otherwise, we have a system of increasing blocks. Does Commons not have that? Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's the case for copyright violations. For out of scope content, indefinite blocks will be much faster. I would be lenient for people providing useful educational content but have difficulties understanding copyright, while much more drastic for people uploading vanity and out of scope content, like in this case. Yann (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, and not what I would have expected. I'd expect harsher treatment of people who upload only crappy nudes or a bunch of stolen porn, not some of the best ones that they photographed, along with others that are not as good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, Taivo agrees here that a block was necessary. Yann (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but not an indefinite one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, what about those 9
files that were kept per a deletion request? Have you restored them yet? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

   * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)   [reply]

"Semi"automated edits

I just wanted to state for the record I have never once made any edits that were automated here (or at any other WMF site; "semi" or otherwise). I have made many similar edits across pages but I wrote each one by hand in my browser (and my carpal tunnel can attest to that). I believe it was in bad faith that you evaluated my edits as such without a shred of such evidence. If someone wants to discuss my edits, I am open to that as with any other person's. It is quite foolish to evaluate someone as using automation when the very failings used to measure such point to human failings such as my inability to respond immediately, etc. I was never even asked one thing that I could respond to before being blocked. —Uzume (talk) 22:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio or not?

Hi

The file have been tagged but the uploader clains it is his own work. What should we do? Panam2014 (talk) 22:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Hi, It has already been been tagged as "no permission". So unless a source is found on the Internet, I would wait for a few days, allowing for the uploader to respond. It will be deleted after a week if no answer. Yann (talk) 10:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wesołych Świąt


Happy Holydays and Happy New Year 2025!
Tournasol7

--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brochure de présentation de l'Eau vive.jpg

Bonjour @Yann La licence du fichier est "domaine public". La "brochure" (c'est en fait un dépliant) date de 1949. C'est le même type de licence que File:Dépliant Eau vive août 1952.jpg en application des règles indiquées ci-dessous : P.S : J'ai mal nommé le fichier. C'est plutôt : Dépliant présentation Eau vive 1949.jpg qui conviendrait comme titre. Cdt. Biriwiki (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-France}} Category:1949 works in France Biriwiki (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Biriwiki: Vous n'avez pas ajouté la licence. Je l'ai fait pour vous pour cette fois. Merci d'ajouter des catégories. Yann (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!


RodRabelo7 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays 2024/2025!

One of the Three Wise Men/Kings/Magi with his camel, detail of the nativity scene in the Saint Peter and Paul church, Weil der Stadt ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Joyeux Noël!
Bonne année!
✴

Hello Yann,
thank you very much for your great contributions to Wikimedia Commons! All the best,
Aristeas (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

question

Hi Yann, Thanks for your reaction about the picture that I uploaded. This is a picture of my grandfather which I found in an old family-picture-album. It was taken in 1918. You asked me to tag it. But can you please be a bit more speficic about where and what to tag. There is so much informatin about licensing that I really get confused with all the rules and regulations. Looking forward to your reaction, Best regards, Anneloes AnnaVeld1960 (talk) 11:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AnnaVeld1960: Hi, I added a license for you. Please add categories. Yann (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann,
Thanks for adding a license for me. You asked me to add categories. I didn’t know what you meant so I have watched https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Tag_categories , but that didn’t help me. Can you give a suggestion which tag I could or should add? Best regards. AnnaVeld1960 (talk) 19:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AnnaVeld1960: I added 2 categories, and created Category:Willem Maas Geesteranus. Yann (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Carriers of the New Black Plague.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carriers of the New Black Plague.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=976520113"