Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 9th, 2020


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.faroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.faroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.faroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COMːSCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 out of COM:SCOPE blocked user for one month [1]. - FitIndia Talk 07:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rf/copyright ahuR ☘ 09:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO [3]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i Did not specify the license and now i can't find the edit option to insert the license. BookPecker (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 14:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Image - This one lower quality. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio, no non-free images at Commons. Please upload under "fair use" images directly at the relevant Wikipedia. Ubcule (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Bagoly49 (talk) 17:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was it not deleted? E4024 (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 02:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was it not deleted? E4024 (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright vioalation. --JuTa 02:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scarlettstark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusually positioned atoms on bonds, improved at File:CGS-12066A clear.svg DMacks (talk) 06:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep I have updated the image to the "clear" version. The image is ineligible for copyright and in the public domain; anyone is able to change it, there's no need to create a new file. Gringer (talk) 03:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So now it's just a speediable {{Duplicate}}? the format, orienatation, and other graphical details appear the same. I agree that it's reasonable for third-parties to upload technical improvements to the same name rather than creating a separate file, but that's uploader's choice. DMacks (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 18:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loes2708 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Single topic gallery of images from behind the scenes of a movie. Unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright (no faire use here) Sammyday (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 13:57, 10 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 02:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not belong to user; image is found on multiple Google Image searches to Pinterest, social media and other websites. Livelikemusic (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:44, 10 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.mrporter.com/en-us/journal/fashion/the-unstoppable-rise-of-mr-joe-alwyn-333272 --Krdbot 02:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}}


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{delete}} Robayet1996 (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseph wakko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant copyright violations. This user just take photos from external website and published here without authorization.

T CellsTalk 22:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheep and Goat rearing in Karamoja - Northern Uganda.jpg This one is tagged VOA (maybe Voice of Africa?). --Wikinade (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This photo is used, although uncredited, in a document of 2016 (see pdf here: https://www.ugandainvest.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/uia-Karamoja-profile.pdf). It can't have been taken in December 2018 as indicated by the uploader. --Wikinade (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikinade, these photos look like something that should be deleted asap. Pinging one active admin, User:Fitindia. T CellsTalk 21:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks T Cells for letting me now. I'm part of Wiki Loves Africa jury, and your help is very appreciated (copyvios can't decently be rewarded :'D) --Wikinade (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G11. Blatant copyright violation. - FitIndia Talk 08:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une référence est erronée dans la vidéo mais bien labellisée dans la fiche de description de la vidéo DJAMS79 (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC) in English : I have uploaded a video but I was asked to note all the authors in the description of the file so I did it (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Help_desk#Missing_information_for_an_uploaded_video). But then, I realized that I made a mistake in the video. I am asking to delete this video so I can do another one with the right label of this pictures. I haven't finished yet to note all the sources so I may find other mistakes that I would like to modify. Thanks for your opinion : is it ok or can I leave the video like this ? DJAMS79 (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RyanAtBehringer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission, low resolution.

Cjp24 (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noemi collabora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is a 1987 sculpture from the Italian artist Giuseppe Correale, who is very much alive. As in Italy there is no Freedom of Panorama for artworks, we need a written permission to OTRS in order to publish these files.

Ruthven (msg) 06:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajeevpeshawaria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work - at least one has copyright holder www.Emotion.my in the exif

Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alangarve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused files related to fictional state of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yazdaan ali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francundari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syed Shumail Jalal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajput khushalsing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krish kodia sunilbhai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agathiyarkudilaasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peralta Ramón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shekinah Mukhiya22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parayabrar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 16:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Kagamlik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joyas de la castafiore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yalfelim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Herwit Daya Tani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope. And taken from FB as per EXIF.

P 1 9 9   18:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, missing original author, date, source, and permission. And non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fantasy flag, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disrespect of Lord Krishna 157.33.139.4 18:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - FitIndia Talk 03:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garretgwozdz13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images and fantasy flag, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garretgwozdz13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag and emblem; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 20:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo of non-notable person, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linfoxman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works. Series of tiny, low quality images of head shots of "famous" scientists, some data, some illustrations of quantum physics, not apparently own, and if you look in VFC, pretty obviously not.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused book cover, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Choclaty boy 72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST/COM:ADVERT - unused images of non-notable person intended as self-promotion (see description: "I am a model on instagram so I want a Wikipedia for me")

Эlcobbola talk 19:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeesJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

DW and historical images, missing original authors, dates, and permissions.

P 1 9 9   19:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kissifur Games (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KizunaCorporation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused corporate promotional images, advertising, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, file caption also implies COM:WEBHOST. Chenzw  Talk  04:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

KievanRus233

[edit]

Test files. One even has the description "Just came out with this stupid idea of making fake elections." --Slashme (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination for deletion, appreciate it - From the person who made these files just to fill the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KievanRus233 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 9 June 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Kevin Wendell Jones). Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Kevin Wendell Jones). Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a selfie. No permission from the actual photographer. jdx Re: 13:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant / personal image. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant / personal image. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test sound recordings.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant / personal image. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Also see: COM:CRT/United Kingdom#Freedom of panorama : Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is much broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public) without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way.
The practical effect of the broad Freedom of Panorama provisions in the UK and in other countries with similar laws is that it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public. According to Copinger and Skoane James, "The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment". Again, this is broader than 'public place' which is the wording in many countries. Electron   20:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The photo taken in the UK is only File:Stormtrooper Portrait.jpg. This photo was taken at Star Wars exhibition. Not permanently. FOP-UK does not apply to this. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Js.nerd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused logo of firm (?) that appears non-notable Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gopal Ramasammy-Cook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion

Pippobuono (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anniebisilolo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabian215921 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, probably out of COM:SCOPE (https://twitter.com/MrNoakhali). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - intimate vantage of notable person by uploader all of whose uploads have been unambiguous copyvios generally taken from social media, and copyvios related to this subject matter (cinemania). Image appears to be from this set, which is indeed a source uploader has stolen images from (see deleted contribs). COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quaramo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Non-notable individual. Failed PR attempt at ro:Janina Nectara.

Gikü (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Janina Nectara appears to be somewhat relevant. However, both files are (very likely) copyvios. --Érico (talk) 08:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. लाल सिंह चड्डा (talk) 01:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In use, thus in scope. --Achim (talk) 11:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vinod Kumar Dwivedi is a public figure and the file is in use. So, no reason to delete. --Érico (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused heavily photoshopped image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minhminh6415 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of own work on these images: chart, plates with words on them, Facebook or smaller photos, images with transmission data suggesting prior publication, and software "google".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steeve P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Pita Kalala, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steeve P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of banknotes. Not free per COM:CUR Democratic Republic of the Congo

Эlcobbola talk 19:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steeve P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Invalid OTRS ticket. Paintings are clearly signed by fr:Pita Kalala, who is not the sender of the correspondence. Correspondence, at best, is from the person who photographed the paintings (and who cannot license them as the photos are mere slavish COM:DWs).

Эlcobbola talk 19:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steeve P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various COM:DWs - phone screenshot, photo of postcard, and photo of poster

Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, the only contribution by the user, has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the new one is added MaryamShayan (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

RF/Copyright ahuR ☘ 23:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Additionally, seems to be out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The doc is here to add his own pics only... E4024 (talk) 23:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not WP. E4024 (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real user. E4024 (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. + Photo of a photo. E4024 (talk) 23:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document by Wim van Bussel. No evidence that the uploader is Wim van Bussel. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:PS. Stefan2 (talk) 23:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edison Sanga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies of unclear notability. See COM:PS.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edison Sanga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. Out of project scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Saçmalık Emiryalpi (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Google translates the given reason (in Turkish) as "Because it's nonsense". Well, this Norwegian road sign is certainly not "nonsense", and the {{PD-Statens vegvesen}} license also seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Saçmalık Emiryalpi (talk) 22:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Google translates the given reason (in Turkish) as "Because it's nonsense". Well, this Norwegian road sign is certainly not "nonsense", and the {{PD-Statens vegvesen}} license also seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Logo Emiryalpi (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The logo of the hotel is visible in two places. Not sure whether that's really grounds for deletion, though, because it's not very clear. --Slashme (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and COM:DM (uploader had already removed the DR template from the file description, they shouldn't have done that). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Saçmalık Emiryalpi (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Google translates the given reason (in Turkish) as "Because it's nonsense", don't see anything nonsensical about this image of a clearly identified place. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Özçekim Emiryalpi (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused selfie. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Logo Emiryalpi (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The K-Market logo in this image would fall under COM:DM anyway, and if it were more prominent, it would probably still be a {{PD-textlogo}}; furthermore, Finland has freedom of panorama for buildings (not for sculptures), so even if we had concerns regarding the not very remarkable architecture of this shop, it would be fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Logo Emiryalpi (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be own work. Other 2 uploads by this user have 2 other persons credited in the EXIF data. Unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9   18:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paswodnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like a copied power point presentation, rather than own work. Derivative images, charts, etc. Look carefully at some images for indications where they really came from (labels, overprinting, etc.).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not the 'shield' or 'coat of arms' of the University of Nottingham. This image appears to be a custom-made image that bears no association with the University of Nottingham. As a result, this image should be deleted. The correct coat of arms of the University of Nottingham can be found at: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/brand/services/coat-of-arms.aspx Charliedunning (talk) 00:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep – Coats of arms are their blazon (description) not their exact image. This is a freely created rendition to allow it to be uploaded to Commons. Although blazons are not copyright, renditions are, so the official coat of arms cannot legally be uploaded to Commons without the university declaring it free for commercial reuse. Hence why Nottingham and 30-or-so other universities have free-use non-official coat of arms uploaded to Commons, which meet Commons' purpose of educational imagery (history of universities, etc.). Please read COM:COA before attempting to delete coats of arms; if you're here from Wikipedia, feel free to upload an official rendition to Wikipedia under fair-use (not free-use) which is allowed there but not on Commons, as long as it is used and only used as a lead image in the encyclopedia. Shadowssettle (talk) 09:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: This file is in use on ca:Universitat de Nottingham, en:University of Nottingham, es:Universidad de Nottingham, la:Universitas Nottinghamiensis, and University of Nottingham (Q472316). Under COM:NPOV, a file that's in use on other projects shouldn't be deleted from Commons even if it's inaccurate. Moreover, this seems to me to be an accurate rendition of the shield shown on the University Web page. It's obviously not the same rendition (because that would be a copyright violation), but it's blatantly the same arms. --bjh21 (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. The depiction seems self made by the uploader. Kathisma (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LouGabrielle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wira dwiputra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, everything by user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect stereochemistry. en:BIIB-104 (synonym for PF-04958242) is (S,S) which means cis on the ring; here it is trans. Have File:BIIB-104.svg as replacement DMacks (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Courtnaye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. One has Author MOD/BAE Systmes copyright 2016 in exif. Needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hydraug

[edit]

Following files were uploaded by a new user who seems to have an advertising agenda.

The above are screenshots that contain copyrighted images which are not de minimis.

The above probably as well. --→ «« Man77 »» [de] 13:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NaiPanyakorn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clear COM:DWs - scans of various media

Эlcobbola talk 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NaiPanyakorn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work

Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NaiPanyakorn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old promotional photos; unlikely to be own work.

Paul_012 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, unlikely to be own work. Regasterios (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO. Official logo, so likely not own work. P 1 9 9   15:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لوگوی استاندارد جایگزین شده است Nazargaah (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Joaopaulo21

[edit]

Joaopaulo21 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos (800×600) without metadata, source or author is Jose Ricardo Caixeta. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, educational value is rather weak. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Worldwideteam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

2 copyvios (taken from FB as per EXIF) and 3 unused logos, out of scope and above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   18:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like copyright violation MrJaroslavik (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright permission info on the EXIF data. Probable use of a picture without the permission. The file was used in other websites, such as: http://lavozcasilda.com.ar/nuestro-arbol-el-otro-el-mismo/ Luisalvaz (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://goqnotes.com/62308/10-questions-with-vic-featuring-ashlee-marie-preston/, COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patricialiew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE? (Jacky Liew)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patricialiew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE? (Jacky Liew)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think some images are not only about the food critic (who is well in scope IMHO) but also notable people like Tunku Naquiyuddin. I hope scope and notability are not being confused BTW. E4024 (talk) 05:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete looks like advertising shots for some kind of cook book. See https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truly_Nyonya_Malacca --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 06:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The items depicted do not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:06, 30 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Patricialiew --Krdbot 13:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by מגזין יהלום (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Both images are in use at hewiki. --Érico (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by מגזין יהלום (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work on these certificates and logos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC) הכל אני עשיתי יום טוב!. מגזין יהלום (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person. Used only on deleted spam article. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 02:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:02, 4 Juli 2020 UTC: Cross-wiki spam, Wikidata item was removed --Krdbot 01:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugen Svet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Only used for advertisement: ro:Utilizator:Eugen Svet/Bismobil. May be kept to illustrate showrooms (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ROdoctor) - but in that case any mentions of the company should be removed to prohibit promotion.

Gikü (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Postwar structures and artwork at the Ninth Fort. No FoP in Lithuania (COM:FOP Lithuania), these are all copyrighted.

Buidhe (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused corporate chart, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blechingia

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams created for NationStates online game. --Slashme (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EmperorSeaDaddy

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams, out of scope. --Slashme (talk) 09:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two new diagrams added on 10 July. --Slashme (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arradalagui

[edit]

Files created for a game, out of project scope. --Slashme (talk) 10:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Slashme (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converting CfD by Trade into a DR. Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Lego sculptures of fictional characters

BMacZero (🗩) 04:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: BMacZero (🗩) 04:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if COM:Toys applies here since the bricks themselves are not visible, but certainly the permission of the sculptor/builder is required. – BMacZero (🗩) 04:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego sculptures in the United States. – BMacZero (🗩) 04:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete US & Italian ones Elisfkc (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Elisfkc. Kept the others. Ruthven (msg) 07:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. It was not permanently located, so FoP in Germany does not apply. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego sculptures.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. They were not permanently situated. So, FOP in Canada does not apply. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego sculptures.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These file's description says "The scene was on display during Christmas 2016". They were not permanently situated. So, FOP in UK does not apply.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty file? unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep If you check wikibooks https://ms.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fail:Ruangkosong.jpg you can see that the file is used. The reason it does not show up on global usage is because the local file is not deleted yet. You can of course say well then the file is not in use as long as the local copy excist but it will make it harder to move files to Commons if we delete the file on Commons if wikis are too slow to delete files. --MGA73 (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Update: File is now deleted locally making the version on Commons visibly used. --MGA73 (talk) 20:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination. Good comments, user:MGA73!--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, no author, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Creator namespace is for creators, not celebrities. Achim (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is listed as {{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}} on Flickr, which is not a licence. The file information page on Commons uses {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}, which is not a licence either, and I can't find any such tag on Flickr anyway. Furthermore, flickruser:51514834@N00 probably isn't the copyright holder to the vast majority of the files which he has uploaded. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not likely to be the Flickr user's own work. --King of ♥ 04:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Unclear copyright status of underlying photograph that is the focus of the image. Buidhe (talk) 01:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, unclear copyright status of underlying image Buidhe (talk) 01:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons etc all need a map like this that is accurate, to give people a map that is not accurate is immoral. If they come asking for a map, all we can say is that the map has not yet been produced. Hopefully one day a volunteer user will create a location map of Xinjiang. Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The map has several glaring problems and is not a vital component of any Wikipedia article. Therefore, it ought to be gotten rid of. An actual map may one day be produced. If we ignore the problems, then Wikipedia really is what the primary school teachers say- an unreliable source. Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Geographyinitiative: Could you be more precise about what exactly is inaccurate? पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have read both Commons:Project scope and Commons:Deletion policy and I cannot find "immoral" as a reason for a deletion (and what does "immoral map" mean?). Btw this map is used by many Wikipedia projects. Are they all immoral and rotten and Geographyinitiative wants to bring them on the right track? NNW 07:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: A content dispute is not a valid reason to delete a file per COM:NPOV. --King of ♥ 04:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, uploader may not own the copyright. Non-free logo, too complex for COM:TOO UK. Available at https://codingweek.org/ Verbcatcher (talk) 01:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm owner of this uploaded file and I want to delete this file as it is being misused in another web sites. Sanket Golar (talk) 02:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Licenses are not revocable. --King of ♥ 04:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copiado o duplicado exacto del archivo Combat de Malpelo..jpg Genio540 (talk) 03:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not identical, contrast is slightly different. --King of ♥ 04:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User comments in EXIF data shows lots of trademark, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The trademark signs are mojibake, no other reason given for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.piquerobi.sp.gov.br/ O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is probably the first coauthor, but the book is licenced under CC-BY-NC-SA which is not allowed on Commons. jdx Re: 05:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO the file has no educational value. Out of scope. Basilicofresco (msg) 05:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be more specific: awful gif animation not realistically usable for any educational purpose, used only on the user page of a blocked vandalism-only account. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not looks realistically useful for any educational purpose. OOS Basilicofresco (msg) 06:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically: no identifiable subject, item, action or place. No conceivable purpose. Out of scope. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not selfie, out of COM:SCOPE, https://twitter.com/AbhiSuryawanshi/status/1194835909511929856/photo/1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I took this photo at Abhishek's direction. He was at the school doing Wikipedia projects which we wanted to document in this platform. I changed the license to note me as copyright holder, but this was at his direction. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delivative work of copyrighted image. https://web.archive.org/web/20130425063332/http://watamote.jp/ Onhigan (talk) 07:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is considered to be a textlogo. Or not? See the Comic Party logo example. --Sasuke88 (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Below the threshold of originality in the United States and Japan. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a copyrighted app. Stifle (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: satelite image, most probably screenshot of some application (Google maps?) 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This mistake was inadvertent, its source was corrected.

Since the image requires a satellite map and the range is specified, this image is required in the article.Moh14 (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per same arguments in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kirmit the frog (6549491809).jpg

russavia (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All but the first photo which is  covered by De minimis especially as Kermit is only an incidental tiny onlooker while Martin Dempsey holds forth to impress Ms. P Michelle Obama. Plus Kermit is appearing on stage as an actor in the film about to be shown, rather than being in performance as "Kermit". -- (talk) 18:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The first is certainly not de minimis -- the General is said to be talking to him, so without him the image is meaningless. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of presumably copyrighted TV character; copyright violation/derivative work. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Muppets

Pete F (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the copyrighted character were a German character, I might agree, but since the character is American, with a registered copyright in the USA, I don't think use of the character in Germany can make the image free except, perhaps, in Germany.
More to the point is that you misread the court decision. The suit was brought by the widow of the sculptor against a photographer who had added a Santa Claus suit in post-processing. The suit said nothing about FOP applying to the decorations, only to the statue itself, which all must agree is correct.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 14:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete copyright violations (see COM:TOYS and prior nominations for this category). If somebody sees value in the photos of the man, and wants to crop out the muppet, that would be fine. I'd do it right now, but COM:CropTool is not working.

Pete F (talk) 20:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, these should be speedy deleted per past discussion. -Pete F (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: per previous discussions.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character created by Jim Henson (1936 - 1990).

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist Krautwald died in 2003, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist of sculpture (Krautwald) died in 2003, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be taken from a public place. --King of ♥ 04:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Created 1995. No Permission. Nik Deleter (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is to old and not relevant any more. 79.179.237.219 18:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am represent Nora and this image is not up to date. She will very happy if you can remove this photo. Thank you Galmesika (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Being old and out of date isn't a sufficient justification for deletion. There is no reason that Commons shouldn't host images of an individual at different times in their life. If the nominator would like to upload a properly licensed photo that is more up to date, that would give Wikipedia editors options to choose from. PCock (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le sujet ne désire pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't like it" is no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept. This is not a reason to deleted the file. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For VRTS traceability purpose

[edit]

Ticket#2022060810003439. No action. JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

l'actrice ne souhaite pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept. This is not a reason to deleted a file. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For VRTS traceability purpose

[edit]

Ticket#2022060810003439 . No action JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems the bottom part of this image is corrupted, so I don't think it'll serve much use. NeoMeesje (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Thanks for cropping out the static, I didn't know that cropping could be done on pictures on Commons.
@NeoMeesje: Commons:CropTool is very helpful! Buidhe (talk) 11:10, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant / bad photo. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:47, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong sourced. 103.17.61.218 16:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The source linked stated "ALL MATERIALS CONTAINED IN THIS SITE ARE THE SUBJECT OF COPYRIGHT. MANY ITEMS ARE IN USE UNDER LICENCE. THEREFORE, ON NO ACCOUNT MAY COPIES BE MADE OF TEXT, PHOTOGRAPHS, GRAPHICS OR ANY OTHER MATERIALS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE UNDERSIGNED." -- (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educationally worthless, pornographic file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majkly (talk • contribs) 14:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - Seems pretty decent quality to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. AshFriday (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep illustrative, educational, good quality, no need to appease a censor. -- (talk) 08:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Humans come in a huge variety of shapes, colours, sizes (and states of circumcision), and their genitalia are no different. The first category, which this file is in, contains just 32 videos in Considering there are probably about 2-3 billion adult males in the world, to claim that a handful of videos are representative of their genitalia is nothing short of naive. Perhaps the nomination would prefer to keep just one of these 32 files? In fact, I would consider about 2-3 million different files of human penises to be a much more desirable sample for Commons. In summary, the educational use is that it shows one of many shapes, sizes and colours of human penises in video format. FredWalsh (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Starting dicussion about deleting this gif. Its more likely a pornographic file than useful animation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majkly (talk • contribs) 14:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Discussion about what is pornographic can happen without a deletion request. Illustrative, reasonable quality, in scope. -- (talk) 08:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Humans come in a huge variety of shapes, colours, sizes (and states of circumcision), and their genitalia are no different. The category, which this file is in, contains 937 files and there are just 32 videos in Category:Animations of ejaculation. Considering there are probably about 2-3 billion adult males in the world, to claim that less than 1,000 files and a handful of videos are representative of their genitalia is nothing short of naive. Perhaps the nomination would prefer to keep just one of these 937 files? In fact, I would consider about 2-3 million different files of human penises to be a much more desirable sample for Commons. In summary, the educational use is that it shows one of many shapes, sizes and colours of human penises in video format. FredWalsh (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is modern book. Its text is totally readable and protected with copyright. Book cover is protected with another copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete the photo? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:C1:7716:D40A:441F:A3F9:850D:3CCB (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The photo violates book author's copyright and also cover artist's copyright. OTRS-permission from both is needed to save the photo. Taivo (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Text is probably COM:DM even if legible, but the cover is certainly not. --King of ♥ 04:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 17:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Several hundred icebergs drift down the coast of Labrador and Newfoundland every spring. A hundred thousand tourists travel there, to see the spectacle. Photos of tourists, with icebergs, are, therefore in scope. Tourists with icebergs are part of the yearly spectacle. We have thousands of photos of the Statue of Liberty, and lots of them contain tourists, which is appropriate as it is a tourist destination.
  • I suggest we all set aside the original photographer's intent, when evaluating whether any particular photos is in scope. The first time I really weighed in on the endless debate over which pictures of human sexual organs were in scope was over a decade ago. The nominator claimed: (1) we already had too many dick pics "like this one"; (2) the original photographer was a pervy show-off, and his intent in taking the photo was just to show-off.

    When I checked I found that commons then had less than one hundred photos of human penises. Further, the image in question was unlike the other 96. In it five images were stitched together, showing the sequence of a flaccid penis becoming erect. It was unique.

    The population of Planet Earth is now something like 8 billion humans. One to two billion of those humans are pre-pubescent boys and girls, who deserve neutral and unbiased sex education. So, that image would have been one of our more valuable. Of the remaining 6 to 7 billion humans there would be many women, maybe even another billion from cultures with hangups over sex - who only had sexual relations in the dark. This image would have been one of our most valuable for them, too.

    Just as if the original intent of that photographer had been to show off, and yet his sequence had high educational value, the photo of Geri and the iceberg is in scope, for illustrating the very valuable iceberg watching tourist industry. Geo Swan (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, for the reasons above, in case I wasn't clear. Geo Swan (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Geo Swan. --King of ♥ 04:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por favor, borrenlo ElReySilver (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, no reason given. --King of ♥ 04:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (sculpture; antependium), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no FoP in Greece and this is a postwar memorial, so it is almost certainly protected. Buidhe (talk) 23:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The upper-left corner says 1999. Way too young for copyright expiration. 19:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)



Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of mural by finnish mural painter Tuuli Seppälä. Not in PD, no FOP for artwork in Finland. Htm (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request CocolutoBeans (talk) 23:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, licenses are irrevocable. --King of ♥ 05:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't want the meta data from the image so I would prefer to have it removed Jerstorm22 (talk) 23:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of COM:PENIS. --King of ♥ 05:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly included the meta data from the image file when I didn't want that information attached to the image Jerstorm22 (talk) 23:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of COM:PENIS. --King of ♥ 05:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, unlikely to be own work. Regasterios (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 14:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too scarce description, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The first one isn't a toy, it's a costume. Also they're in Tokyo, and Japanese law is generous on the "utility" aspect of toys, thus images of them are not protected to the extent elsewhere. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it a toy? If so, I add "COM:DW of copyrighted characters" as the reason for this deletion request. Duffy and friends are copyrighted by Disney. [5] --Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - costume may be protected too. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Duffy and friends are copyrighted by Disney. [6]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Duffy is copyrighted by Disney. [7]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Saçmalık Emiryalpi (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image prominently incorporates a non-free book cover.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

primarily incorporates a non-free book cover. Wikimedia is not a place for advertising 76.109.102.245 00:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant / personal image. Eat Your Makeup (talk) 15:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Lithuania, there is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. This sculpture was installed in 1984 by Alfonsas Vincentas Ambraziūnas, who appears to be still alive (website: http://alfonsasambraziunas.lt/ ), so it is certainly still copyrighted.

Buidhe (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am very much not familiar with discussions on Wikipedia so my apologies if I'm doing it wrong.

The law (and the wikipedia translation that is available) specifically says that it is allowed to reproduce works of art (of architecture and sculptures) that are permanent public displays and when it is not used for commercial reasons[1]. Thus, these pictures should be OK.

And no, the author is no longer alive, a.a. Alfonsas Vincentas Ambraziūnas passed away during May of 2020. [2] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.117.23.66 (talk) 10:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be an official portrait, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture (2009), no FoP for sculptures in Russia

Stolbovsky (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veleius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United Kingdom.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then out with it. Veleius (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

RF/copyright ahuR ☘ 18:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

فایل گذاشته شده کپی رایت مناسبی برای عموم دارد و لایق حذف نمی باشد. Amirhosein92 (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the logo does not appear to be below COM:TOO Iran, and it hasn't been released under a free license by the Kheili Sabz Publication. --Ahmadtalk 00:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as these have been blurred out,
Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel, This file has been extracted from another file: PikiWiki Israel 37241 Vintage of Zion.jpg which is free to use. Bar (talk to me) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I know. file: PikiWiki Israel 37241 Vintage of Zion.jpg is OK per De minimis although freedom of panorama in Israel is only for works permanently situated in a public place. But I'm not sure the cropped version is OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free picture (C) Atef Ammari LeFnake (talk) 06:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 speedy: Agree, should we close this one Dyolf77? Moumou82 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free picture (C) Atef Ammari LeFnake (talk) 06:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 speedy: Agree, should we close this one Dyolf77? Moumou82 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo protected by copyright, OTRS or delete. INakeii (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.hepsiburada.com/muslum-gurses-yalan-dunya-pm-music8697406641153 Sakhalinio (talk) 10:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation and no permission was forthcoming. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie stillː copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2000, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mit geweißtem Objekt
            •  KeepIch habe in einem der Bilder das Objekt geweißt, um den Effekt zu sehen. Es ist wird deutlich, dass der Schwerpunkt auf dem Innenraum liegt. Eine weitere Frage stellt sich mir. Wer würde von uns in 50 Jahren das ungeweißte Bild hochladen, damit die Nachwelt auf die Originalansicht blicken kann? --22:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


  •  Keep Kreuze sind als Designobjekt anzusehen, da die Grundform und der Zweck vorgegeben sind, genau wie bei anderen Designobjekten, wie beispielsweise Teewagen, Stühlen, Autos oder auch gewissen Zitronenpressen,wenn auch nicht bei allen... --Smial (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: all but one. --Didym (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused. out of scope. and, face it, kind of small and useless. Quakewoody (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to metadata the image has been uploaded from Facebook. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It infringes on copy rights, it's a stolen picture - I just realized today that I uploaded this as my own as I did not understand, hen I was 11 years old, what wikim,edia commons is fore. Oshondrom (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess it is not free to upload this pic. Sorry if I am wrong. E4024 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems OoS and it is a dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS and dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Mario Gallorini (d. 2013), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I think you can tag this as speedy. The uploader is making a fair use claim, which we can't accept on commons. Mvolz (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I asked to the daughter of Gallorini by e-mail the permission to use the photo on June 8 - 2020. Picture is now in place to show her, that received the link to the page,how the photo will appear, if you can do not delete the photo to allow time for the heir to reply. If her tells me not to use the photo, I will notify you. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattolozzo (talk • contribs) 09:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Non-profit publication permit granted by Gallorini's daughter, Antonella Gallorini, on 10 - June - 2020, after seeing the photo and the terms of use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattolozzo (talk • contribs) 10:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mattolozzo: It doesn't work like thatː as written above Antonella Gallorini must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikimedia,and the operation of the platform is still difficult for me, I know that everything is in place under Italian law, I had direct permission from the heir to use the image but I can't force anyone to send mail and personally I can't find the information to explain well to others how and where to send the email, I'm sorry. So I kindly ask you, if possible, to remove the photo from wikimedia, I would like to do it personally but I don't know how. As it was suggested to me, I will try to upload it again in the future from my pc without going to wikimedia or the heir will do it directly in wikimedia.I thank you for the kind messages of these days and I still ask you kindly, if you can, to remove the photo Mattolozzo (talk) 10:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly copyvio https://www.antibes-juanlespins.com/portraits/florent-marais Matlin (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, possibly not own work (see description). Maybe a personal image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also found https://celebmafia.com/chyler-leigh-2018-san-diego-comic-con-photocall-1517795/. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - Too lazy to go searching now but they also uploaded another image which was uploaded here and was listed on Getty images too, The uploader could very well be the person in the images or they could've simply brought the images who knows, Delete for being a copyvio. –Davey2010Talk 22:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-commercial license at source is incompatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work, but it is a painting (creative work). Needs permission of copyright holder. Gazal world (talk) 18:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The push pin really shows this isn't own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (windows), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pushpin and odd view shows this is copied, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (windows), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe das Foto vom Autor erhalten mit der Erlaubnis, es auf Wikimedia hochzuladen. --Dmertin (talk) 07:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Freigabe nur mit OTRS gültig. --Martin Sg. (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think about it, but Martin seems to be right. Justified deletion request, a pity. --kaʁstn 22:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think about it, but Martin seems to be right. Justified deletion request, a pity. --kaʁstn 22:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The window is only part of the picture; the emphasis lies on the effect of the evening light in the room, somewhat akin to the picture of the light effect of the Richter windows in the Dome of Köln. I do not know the legal details, but it seems that such pictures are permitted. --GebhardtF (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The de minimis-rules for Germany are very strict, see COM:DM Germany, therefore not appliable here. Martin Sg. (talk) 10:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is he? Someone in scope? E4024 (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Dir Celestin is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please do not delete it

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (N. Stark born in 1931), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright liegt definitiv vor. Künstler und Stiftung haben der Erstellung des Wikipedia-Eintrags ausdrücklich und schriftlich zugestimmt. Dieses Vorgehen ohne vorherige Nachfrage, ohne Recherche und ohne Kenntnis von Urheber, Autor und Künstler verwundert sehr stark und ist mehr als enttäuschend, wir empfinden es leider als inzwischen symptomatisch für Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulm6166 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schon beim Hochladen der Bilder, liebeR Ulm6166, erfolgt deutlicher Hinweis, dass nur Aufnahmen deren Rechte eindeutig gegeben resp. erklärt, hier möglich sind. Es ist ja sowohl im Interesse des Projektes, als vor allem auch der Urheber abgebildeter Kunstwerke, wenn eine rechtlich einwandfreie Situation gefragt ist. Eine gültige Freigabe kann nur mittels OTRS erfolgten. Danke fürs Berücksichtigen. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Und genau das wurde schon beim Hochladen nicht nur bedacht, sondern auch ausdrücklich so bestätigt (und sogar mit Datum 22.4.2013 vermerkt). Wir sind alle keine Wikipedia-Profis, mag man also nun weiter vorgehen wie belieben. Wir schauen zu und wundern uns, wie sich eine offene Enzyklopädie in etwas anderes entwickelt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulm6166 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Wie geht es nun weiter? Nach nochmaliger Rücksprache mit dem Künstler Nikolaus Stark am 24.6.2019 ist die Verwendung der Bilder nicht nur in Ordnung, sondern sogar gewünscht.

Copyright aller Bilder ist ok! Nicht nur im Blick auf §51 UrhG, sondern dank ausdrücklicher Zustimmung des Urhebers sowie des Fotografen. Mehr geht nicht und ist nach deutschem und europäischem Recht auch nicht erforderlich.

Die Bearbeitung durch den Löschantragsteller aus dem Nicht-EU-Ausland hat nicht nur versehentlich die Rechtslage ignoriert, sondern auch Qualität und Attraktivität des Hauptartikels stark negativ beeinträchtigt. Können Artikel und Bilder durch Copyrightvermerk vor solchen Beeinträchtigungen geschützt werden? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulm6166 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unter OTRS ist beschrieben, wie eine gültige Freigabe zu erfolgen hat; alle informellen Varianten sind hier leider nicht brauchbar. --Martin Sg. (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Und was genau soll hier Schöpfungshöhe haben? Einzig im Bild Nr. 14 sind Kunstgegenstände abgebildet, aber die sind bewusst nicht als Makro aufgenommen sondern sind lediglich Beiwerk einer Innenraumaufnahme und zudem sehr klein. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Die Kirchenfenster natürlich / the stained glass windows. --Martin Sg. (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep was soll dieser Feldzug gegen Kirchenbilder? Wenn es wenigstens eindeutig wäre - ist es aber beileibe nicht. Nach geltender Rechtssprechung ist etwas Beiwerk, wenn es durch etwas anderes ersetzt werden kann, ohne den Gesamtcharakter des Bildes zu ändern. Das ist hier wie auch bei anderen Kirchen der Fall. --Ralf Roletschek 14:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main object of the image is screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; stained glass windows by Christof Grüger who died in 2014 (public domain april 1, 2084); no freedom of panorama. Urheberrechtsverletzung. Glasfenster von Christof Grüger, gest. 2014 (gemeinfrei ab 1. April 2084); keine Panoramafreiheit.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like the photograph of a painting. Please provide high resolution picture or OTRS permission to confirm ownership. Sreejith K (talk) 21:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would need permission from the copyright holder indicated. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user suggests he is the person in the photo, need information about the photographer and permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, painting by Brumme who died in 1967, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM. --Didym (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikolai neu ansgar.jpg and File:Nikolai neu torso.jpg: The main object (remnants of a statue) has been created during the build of a late 19th century church in Hamburg, which was completed in 1874. Thus the object is at least 156 years old. The creator is unknown, but it can be assumed, that he died more than 70 years ago. --Dirtsc (talk) 08:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nikolai neu fenster detail.jpg and File:Nikolai neu fenster.jpg: The main object (window) is a work of Elisabeth Coester from 1939 intended for the use in a late 19th century church in Hamburg. Elisabeth Coester died in 1941, 79 years ago. --Dirtsc (talk) 08:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Undid the request for the windows by Coester, added the info of authorship there (and created a category for E. C.). Thanks Dirtsc for the information. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 3 files deleted, 4 kept. --Didym (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these (e.g. File:Uetersen Erlöserkirche Innen W.jpg) are COM:DM. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
stained glass windows! dm not at all, imho. --Martin Sg. (talk) 10:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all except the door handle, probably covered by FOP. --Didym (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a High resolution image. No camera data. May be cropped from original file. So clear copyright violation. Also good chance to get a perfect file of this living person. So suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a High resolution image. No camera data. May be cropped from original file. So clear copyright violation. Also good chance to get a perfect file of this living person. So suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a High resolution image. No camera data. May be cropped from original file. So clear copyright violation. Also good chance to get a perfect file of this living person. So suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"From his FB page" No permission Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright SII per title - and on WP the equivalent image says Shark Island Institute owned image of Executive Director Ian Darling. Photographed as host of Good Pitch in 2016. - Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of some video game, but I'd bet it's copyrighted. The author did not provide any information on what this actually represents. Ostrzyciel (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagery irrelevant to Commons, it's just some user complaining about his spam article being deleted on the Polish Wikipedia. Ostrzyciel (talk) 07:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private picture. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 08:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable individual; failed (self-)promo at ro:Iustin Florea. Gikü (talk) 09:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Ostrzyciel (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Ostrzyciel (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie: not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Vic Gerami's page should not be deleted. He is one of the most high profile gay journalists and activists in the USA. He has written for countless prestigious publications and is noted in the Supreme Court's landmark case that made marriage equality possible, something that was covered by The Wall Street Journal. It is due to his reputation and notoriety that every member of Congress wants to be on his show on KPFK, Pacifica Network. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2605:E000:141E:57D7:3D61:C644:9470:4AB4 (talk) 22:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused fantasy logo Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused fantasy logo Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused self-promotion Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review failed, source site has copyright notice bottom of page. But uploader's name matches with site name, so I do not delete speedily, but give one week for sending permission. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Backgardens: You need to send permission for the photo and/or verification of your account to our volunteer email response team by following the instructions at COM:CONSENT. GMGtalk 13:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

RF/Copyright ahuR ☘ 11:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo protected by copyright, OTRS or delete INakeii (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be deleted. No permission from depicted and photo author has been issued. --WewekYT (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anastasiya.Suprunovska (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not in use. Part of a straightforward PR activity.

Bilderling (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. Designer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Source link is dead, no publication 70+ years ago is offered as required by the license. Also, no PD-US rationale is offered. Buidhe (talk) 13:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Information not satisfactory to say that the image is {{Anonymous-EU}}. No efforts documented to find out the author Martin H. (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On yadvashem.com, this is only credited to Yad Vashem. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

per Pieter Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 20:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status as no publication 70+ years ago is provided, as required by the claimed license. Also needs PD-US rationale. Functioning link to the source [8] Buidhe (talk) 13:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Claimed author death but also that author is unknown. No publication 70+ years ago as is required for anonymous photograph to be PD in the EU. Also needs PD-US rationale. Buidhe (talk) 13:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be own work given low quality and age of image (no later than 1944) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still copyright. I am not sure of the death date, but the photographer was active in postwar Germany: [9] Buidhe (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is Bogner a pseudonym? (If he survived the war, the work is still probably copyright in Germany). PD-US rationale also needed. Buidhe (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisogarci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant and unused. I doubt any of wiki projects will ever use hard-to-update "day-per-day and history-type COVID-19 progress maps" like this, and as of this writing many external sources are not using Wikimedia Commons-provided maps, but rather are producing their own maps, like en:Channel NewsAsia or Earth Shaker Philippines. If a useful progress map is needed, there are .gif type maps that can be used. Or make a gif type map showing day to day (or other day to other day) progress maps. This deletion discussion is also in accordance to, and per precedent with, Category talk:Maps about the COVID-19 pandemic.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS and COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as early as 2016 at http://www.municipiosdeargentina.com/noticias/2016/08/30/5669-se-extiende-la-emergencia-sanitaria-en-santa-rosa Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200123043435/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KkhC-EbTH0 WKetDZ created 2011 is probably not the copyright holder. Besides if 1969 not public domain yet in Nigeria. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 16:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination probably google street view. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. 103.17.61.218 16:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 16:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - had derivative portrait. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 16:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and poorly sourced. 103.17.61.218 17:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 17:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 17:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid source, unlikely own work. 103.17.61.218 17:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a trolling attempt by this IP. It clearly shows that there is nothing against the rules by having this image. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perso info IPBuddy123 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has perso info IPBuddy123 (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the image? There is absolutely no personal information on it. It is a blank form... — Riba (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I guess he means in the EXIF. Also, I doubt that this government form is the own work of the uploader and that he owns a copyright on it as he claims. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Comon banded peacock Biodiversity park, Visakhapatnam.jpg. LamBoet (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, this one was larger than the other one... so I deleted the smaller one. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Кронас as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: repost
Converted to regular DR as image is currently in use on a project. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • A file with the same name was previously uploaded by the same uploader and deleted due to lack of permission. Was a different author credited at that time? The username suggests that the uploader could be the subject of the photo, but the copyright usually belongs to the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right, didn't see that, as this one had a mere G7-tag, which wouldn't allow speedy as it was in use. However, even for the older upload (same image) no hard evidence was provided, just a "no perm" tag. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of sculpture. No FoP per COM:FOP Democratic Republic of the Congo Эlcobbola talk 19:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of sculpture. No FoP per COM:FOP Democratic Republic of the Congo Эlcobbola talk 19:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CSM models are protected with copyright. Per Google search, model author Victor Bobb was active in 1974. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just an advertising; I renamed it but forgot to cancel the old version. Birdie (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conflict between license, which claims author died 70+ years ago, and description which states author is unknown. Anonymous German photographs require publication at least 70 years ago, but no such publication is provided. Source link does not say it is free. Buidhe (talk) 23:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD, not country-specific PD tag, no indiciation of being PD in whatever the country of origin is. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of mural painting by finnish mural artists Arja Kujansuu, Taina Perkiö et al. Unveiled in 2000, not in PD, no FOP for artwork in Finland.. Htm (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of finnish mural artists Silja Selonen, Riikka Kuusiniemi and Päivi Karijärvi, unveiled in 1989. Not in PD, no FOP for artwork in Finland. Htm (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Logo Emiryalpi (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://fr.slideshare.net/efzanoni/histria-de-santa-catarina-parte-3-de-3 Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: I, who made the upload, agree with the deletion of the image, as i didn't contact the original author for the upload, even though it's a remix of the original. Pedro Toniazzo Terres (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original Uploader's request Marvin Lou (talk) 08:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist fa:مائده خانچی (Maadeh Khanchi) is alive; her express permission is required. See COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Emmanuel.tv videos (https://www.youtube.com/user/scoanvideos) are not under CC. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why those three pictures were nominated, whereas all the others in Category:Star Wars droids are identical and have not been nominated? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: I intend to also nominate the rest files, that Yuraily Lic missed, do you have a reason why I shouldn't do so? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Star Wars droids. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Commons:Derivative_works#If_I_take_a_photograph_of_a_kid_who_is_holding_a_stuffed_Winnie_the_Pooh_toy,_does_Disney_own_the_copyright_in_the_photo_since_they_own_the_Pooh_design? "Fan images" appear in several SW articles, including w:Captain Phasma and w:Kylo Ren, and there are many images of cosplayers in use elsewhere.TAnthony (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the en:R2D2 character and its likeness have their own copyright, Delete all except File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0149).jpg as the prominent aspect of these photos are the R2-D2 droids. Absent a legal opinion that File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0149).jpg infringes, I would say "keep". For all deletions, transwiki to projects that currently use it under the local fair-use policy. Davidwr (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

(Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gen Con Indy 2008) --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuraily Lic: I would intend to nominate all the rest files of this category plus its 3 subcategories. Do you oppose me? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject died in 1944, the author is unknown, it is unclear if the photo is already in PD or not. Delete as per COM:PRP. jdx Re: 12:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the user made the recording, and the recording is of a spiritual, they're singing an arrangement by en:Moses Hogan which is unfortunately still under copyright as he died in 2003. The arrangement won't go into the public domain until 2073. Mvolz (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person pictured can't be the cameraman. Besides if 1999 no reason to be public domùain yet in Argentina. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is not the slightest evidence that the image is copyrighted. The license next to the video (which is not published anywhere else) is clear about it: "allows reuse". The notion that you are copyrighted is plain and simple speculation, without reasonable doubt.--FelipeRev (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. Every work by an human is copyrighted by default and the contrary is the exception. That Oscar Castillo is not the cameraman is a fact and not a speculation so he has not the right to license a work made by someone else. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it's obvious that cameraman is paid by Castillo and he/she is employed of him, so the copyright is owned by Castillo Ezarateesteban 12:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree with Ezarate and FelipeRev.--Faustino Sojo (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebrug (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works... several cameras, some odd sizes, one apparently historic photo, and so on. All same topic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "All same topic", yes. A famous Turkish family dedicated to the art and industry of wine making. The historical photo may be deleted, if not accepted as taken from the family album, but the use of different cameras does not per se show lack of own work. I used some 5 or 6 mobile phones for my uploads in Commons. No small resolution, no CR violation. Please do not delete any of these images without showing that they have been in the net before being uploaded here. I will categorize them accordingly. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 04:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not looks realistically useful for any educational purpose. OOS Basilicofresco (msg) 06:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I like it. It shows the dynamic of conducting. -- Kürschner (talk) 06:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - useless.  MaxxL - talk 15:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner claimed that the svg format of their logo shall not be released. Makhoms (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9   20:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner claimed that the svg format of their logo shall not be released. Makhoms (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9   20:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image can be found on external sources: https://pixabay.com/photos/burning-money-dollars-cash-flame-2113914/ NeoMeesje (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CC0 per {{Pixabay}} if pixabay is the original source. --Didym (talk) 23:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: impossible to determine if Pixabay is the original source - too many copies on the internet already. --P 1 9 9   21:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/Bad Quality Lasunncty (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Somaliland location map.svg. --P 1 9 9   21:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Logo Emiryalpi (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:View_of_Dhaka_(1885).jpg Dead.rabbit (talk) 07:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://floripacentro.com.br/40-anos-depois-a-novembrada-na-visao-de-jorge-bornhausen-figueiredo-causou-o-lamentavel-episodio/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Romania.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here at Commons there is a bunch of guys that make a title of glory from making deletion requests. This files do not affect someone’s commercial rights. I don’t think anyone has made a complaint. It’s the same for the files which represent the dinosaurs in the museum, that museum allows photography. What is revolting is that Wikimedia does not raise a finger to protect the rights of its contributors. My photos with historical monuments, most of them unique in the internet, are stolen permanently and used in the newspapers, in commercial sites, without crediting the author and the complaints to the judicial system were treated in a mockery kind of way. In Romania the law is stupid and the laws are made by politicians, many of them more stupid than the law itself. Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbhiSuryawanshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not selfies, out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel , Please share why you think it is out of scope. --AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AbhiSuryawanshi: Hi. I'm afraid it's up to you to explain why these holiday images of yourself are usefull. Please read carefully COM:SCOPE#PARTYPICS. Besides {{Own}} supposes that "you personally created the entire original image by yourself". --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, all the files are in use in another Wikimedia project (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#in_use) --AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 23:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Using them in a photo album just to make them INUSE doesn't make them in scope. Kept 1 that is in scope IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'utilisateur a uploadé une de mes images déjà présente sur Wikimédia Commons. Navigator84 (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Navigator84: Pouvez-vous nous montrer un lien à l'image que vous avez uploadé? Stifle (talk) 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

La voici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chang%27an_CS95_01_China_2017-03-19.jpg Navigator84 (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, please use File:Chang'an CS95 01 China 2017-03-19.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 10:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'utilisateur a uploadé une image déjà présente sur Wikimédia Commons. Navigator84 (talk) 07:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, please use File:Changan CS75.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 10:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licensing information. The subject has been dead since 1942, so the image is highly unlikely to be "own work" by the uploader. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License tag requires publication of the underlying image at least 70 years ago, but no such publication is given. Copyright was also restored under URAA unless it was seized by the Alien Property Custodian. Buidhe (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is obviously from the same photo session as File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1969-054-16, Reinhard Heydrich.jpg, so we know the photographer is Heinrich Hoffmann, who died in 1957. Hoffmann's works are in the PD in the US, but not in Germany, where they enter the PD in 2028. The file can be restored then. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author, no source, no copyright info, wrong template Dd1495 (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 08:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is claimed to be PD-US but no US publication is given. Also, no PD-Lithuania rationale is offered. Kept by banned user INeverCry. Buidhe (talk) 07:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the file is public accordint the the Copyright Law of the Republic of Lithuania. See Article no.22, 24. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liutaurasu (talk • contribs) 10:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Liutaurasu (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. No information when photo was first published. From Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Lithuania: "In the case of anonymous and pseudonymous works, the term of protection of the authors' economic rights shall run for 70 years after the work is lawfully made available to the public." Thuresson (talk) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, uploader has chosen not to respond. Thuresson (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not selfie, out of COM:SCOPE, https://twitter.com/AbhiSuryawanshi/status/1204586934296690689/photo/1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, file is in use in another Wikimedia project (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#in_use) --AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 00:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: is used now a little bit. --rubin16 (talk) 11:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://diplomatique.org.br/descobrindo-um-passado-que-atravessa-o-presente/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. Yann (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/US holocaust memorial museum images (link is in the file description). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What is the right license? Yann (talk) 20:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One could write a rationale using {{PD-because}}, maybe "because USHMM says so" would be simplest. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
December 1941 shootings at Liepaja
Keep. This is part of a series of images taken of the December 1941 massacres in Liepaja, which apart from the obvious historical value of the images, include the image at right. One Carl Strott, an SS man, is customarily supposed to have been the photographer, but sources differ on this. I would say that if the Bundesarchiv has concluded that one of the images from the series is in the public domain, that should be good enough for the rest of them. Mtsmallwood (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But has "the Bundesarchiv concluded" that? --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Here's the explanation that the project gives: Commons:Bundesarchiv Nie rozumiem dlaczego ktos chce wymazac to zdjecie. Ludobujstwo Zydow nie mozna zapomniec. Porque quieren sacar esa foto, no podemos olvidar la masacre de los Judios. Yesterday the Jews, today the Dafur Christians/animist and tomorrow you and me. KEEP THE PHOTO.Please,

With some denying the Holocaust, even by a head of state as recently as Sept.2009 during the opening of the new session of the United Nations, it is important to keep as much documentation of the horror on the Internet available for the World to see. It would serve the public interest better if this item is left on Wiki.

Kept, sources state the image is PD and I see no reason to doubt it. Kameraad Pjotr 20:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be PD because USHMM said so, but actually there is no photograph 19121 on their servers: [10] nor could the photograph be located by searching Liepaja. Unclear copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I have not been able to find this image on the USHMM web site, although I found this film from the same Gestapo source, with no indication of a Commons compatible license. It is referenced here to USHMM, but with credits to the Bunderarchiv and Carl Strott. It is available on the Bundesarchiv website, with an attribution to Carl Strott, based on which I doubt we can consider it PD. Nevertheless, the image is notoriously part of evidences presented at the Nuremberg trials [11] [12] [13]. This raises the interesting question of the copyright status of the evidence presented at the Nuremberg trials, discussed here. There seems to be a distinction to make between 'English' and Russian and evidence and the photograph seeo be part of the Russian evidence (hence the credit here to Novosti Press Agency. — Racconish💬 21:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • For what it is worth: this picture is also archived as "Yad Vashem Photo Archives 85DO2." As the site reads: "The photographs were discovered by David Zivcon, a Jew who worked as an electrician in the SD Headquarters in Liepaja. A few weeks, or even months, after the massacre, he was called to fix something in Strott's home and he noticed rolls of negatives in an open draw. He took them, made copies with the help of a friend, and later returned them to the apartment under the pretext that there were electrical problems. He put his copies in a box and buried them in a stable. After the liberation he handed them over to a Soviet Intelligence Officer. The copies were then used as evidence in the Nuremburg Trials." Maybe it helps for the discussion.Jeff5102 (talk) 10:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I think we had a really thoughtful discussion here that proves that image couldn't be in PD yet. --rubin16 (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an Unión Cívica Radical website. No free license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. Designer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep False, it is part of a facsimile of a media outlet (Diario Río Negro). The source says it with extreme clarity.--FelipeRev (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Víctor Sodero Nievas 1991.png: poster as a whole has a standard 70 year copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The poster as a whole has a standard 70 year copyright. --rubin16 (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. Designer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep False, it is part of a facsimile of a media outlet (Diario Río Negro). The source says it with extreme clarity.--FelipeRev (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Víctor Sodero Nievas 1991.png: poster as a whole has a standard 70 year copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The poster as a whole has a standard 70 year copyright. --rubin16 (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]