User talk:Pippobuono

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pippobuono!

-- 09:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Clocher basilique de la trinité Blois01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arcyon (discuter) 14:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chevet de la basilique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arcyon (discuter) 14:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clocher basilique de la trinité Blois01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arcyon (discuter) 14:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Façade de la basilique depuis le parvis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arcyon (discuter) 14:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression d'images

[edit]

Bonjour Pippobuono.
Je suis désolé mais j'ai demandé la suppression des images représentant en gros plan la basilique Notre-Dame de Blois. Le plus jeune de ses architectes est mort en 1983, et donc le droit à l'image attaché à cette église (même si c'est un monument historique) ne s'éteindra qu'en 2054 .
Cordialement, --Arcyon (discuter) 14:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique de la trinité à blois 019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arcyon (discuter) 15:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neige20120205042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aidelity (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inscription chinoise à Orléans087.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aidelity (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voute du porche de la cathedrale Notre Dame du Puy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akari Fukada (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trinitefoyer01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akari Fukada (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limitation à 50 km-h 032.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akari Fukada (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lis tes ratures DSCI0065.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akari Fukada (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

El Bananero

[edit]

Hola, ya puse mi discusión aquí. Saludos.--LocoWiki (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photos du Cameroun

[edit]

Bonjour et merci beaucoup pour la catégorisation des photos, ce qui a permis de les retrouver.

Ce photographe participe au concours #Wikivillages du Cameroun, mais il débute.

Cordialement,

Ji-Elle (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

[edit]

Hi Pippobuono. You have tagged a bunch of files as speedy with incorrect rationales. Please note that speedy deletion is only for files matching these criteria. "out of COM:EDUSE" is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was just informed of a deletion request for my image of Sketchnote visual vernacular with the rationale of it being "useless." I will request that greater scrutiny be given to this user's deletion requests and their rationale as it begins to look like so e ulterior motive is at play.

Thanks, Agentfin42 aka AgentFin aka GraphiteMind

Sketchnote instructor Contributor to "The Sketchnote Handbook" (translated into German, Russian, French, Chinese, Czech, and Ukrainian) Agentfin42 (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was just informed of a deletion request for my image of Sketchnote visual vernacular with the rationale of it being "useless." I will request that greater scrutiny be given to this user's deletion requests and their rationale as it begins to look like so e ulterior motive is at play.

Thanks, Agentfin42 aka AgentFin aka GraphiteMind

Sketchnote instructor Contributor to "The Sketchnote Handbook" (translated into German, Russian, French, Chinese, Czech, and Ukrainian) Agentfin42 (talk) 20:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Pippobuono, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

kái luồn pà mài

[edit]

Hello, bonjour!

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Small-penis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

75.133.0.128 11:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

1988 in Pakistan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LokoWiki uploads

[edit]

Hi, I don't understand why you tagged these files, there wasn't any reason to do so. There are all of high resolution with consistent EXIF data. See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#user:LokoWiki uploads. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive Deletion Requests

[edit]

"Useless" is not a legitimate reason for a deletion request (opinion vs fact based).

Requesting an examination of user's activities and patterns in deletions as well as contributions to note bias, motive, etc. Agentfin42 (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the category : Category:Human couples

[edit]

Not every pair of man and woman is a couple. Cathy Richards (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Charles_Prast has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Navycrafted (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful images

[edit]

The uploads that were deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Expert19612005 have come back! Maybe they should be deleted again?--BevinKacon (talk) 17:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heidila Güru

[edit]

Hi. Do you remember why you added her to Category:Artists from Turkey? Thx. --E4024 (talk) 03:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Sorry. I don't remember, and by a quick research I find this image is of a Croatian actress... this was may be an hoax at the time, in which I failed Pippobuono (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. The thing is, there is a Facebook page for Heidila Güru and the profile pic is this one... --E4024 (talk) 10:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't think facebook is a reliable source about identity photos ;); and in her imdb page, there is some similarities. So it might be some kind of a pseudonym... Pippobuono (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited the file page of File:Alma Prica.jpg. I have nominated the file for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alma Prica.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem for me. Pippobuono (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the request of removal for TNB Icon V 0.3 Bitmap.png

[edit]

Hello, I have gotten your message about a file I uploaded. I would like to say thank you for bringing this to my attention. This file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons a long time ago and I had completely forgot about it! I give full permission to remove it. Sorry for the inconvenience this might have caused for you.

BuggyIsBack (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Graves by continent

[edit]

Hi. If you make a Category:Graves in Asia, then you must make the other continent cats, "Asia is not special". BTW you also have to learn -or apply- "sorting" (see subcats). Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 15:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also learn to read edit summaries, they keep lots of valuable info. E4024 (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 02:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]