User talk:Mbdortmund
Mbdortmund ist am 17. April 2012 gestorben.
Er stieß im Juni 2005 zu uns und für mich zählte er zu den Urgesteinen der Wikipedia. Leider habe ich ihn nur einmal persönlich getroffen, er war jedoch für mich in der Wikipedia und auf Wikimedia Commons immer präsent, auch seine Mitarbeit im Support-Team war für uns alle sehr wichtig. Seine Artikel und Fotos werden bleiben und uns an ihn erinnern. (Raymond)
Kondolenzliste
Todesanzeige in den Ruhr-Nachrichten vom 21. April 2012
Mbdortmund passed away on April 17, 2012. He contributed wonderful articles about literature and culture to the German Wikipedia since 2005, and he was elected administrator on Commons since 2008. Furthermore, he was active in the German OTRS support team. He was respected and regarded for his calm and competent character, his sometimes critical, but always friendly communication style and his high quality contributions. We will deeply miss him. --Elya (talk)
A book of condolence has been opened on the German Wikipedia
|
|
_Underway_on_19_May_1918.jpg){kind=link}
_Champion_guns_crew.jpg){kind=link}
_Ship's_Gunner_and_Gunner's_Mates.jpg){kind=link}
_Moored_in_port.jpg){kind=link}
_postcard.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1908.jpg){kind=link}
_Underway_at_low_speed.jpg){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 0971.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mergozzo-0030.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mergozzo-0030.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
TUSC token ce96c302b9e352f515c21bacab3e3885
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Zeche Zollern
Hallo Mbdortmund! Ich hab in der Category:Zeche Zollern etwas aufgeräumt/strukturiert. Viele Bilder stammen auch von dir, kannst du da mal drüber schauen ob ich alles richtig einsortiert habe? Danke! --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Gefällt mir gut, habe noch eine Kategorie zu den Bahnanlagen ergänzt. OK? --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Prima, vor allem die Türbeschläge/-klinken hatten mir Probleme beim Zuordnen gemacht. Noch eine Kat für die Fördertürme? --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 05:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hab ich auch schon überlegt. Warum nicht? --Mbdortmund (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Prima, vor allem die Türbeschläge/-klinken hatten mir Probleme beim Zuordnen gemacht. Noch eine Kat für die Fördertürme? --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 05:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bei den Fördertürmen war ich mal so frei. @MBDortmund: Siehst Du eine Chance, bei den Bildern, die allesamt auf dieser Koordinate liegen, die Angaben noch nachträglich zu verfeinern? -- smial (talk) 12:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Die Möglichkeit schon. Bin allerdings noch nicht sicher, was die Motivation angeht *g* (immer die Finger in die Wunden ...) --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ach, wenn ich den Wust an ungesichteten Bildern auf meiner Festplatte so sehe, werde ich mich hüten, jemanden zu drängeln. Wenn dafür keine Lust&Zeit ist, dann ist eben keine Lust&Zeit dafür. --smial (talk) 15:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Schon OK, im Moment habe ich angefangen, Geldscheine zu erfassen, Weltkrieg I und drumherum, und Fotos und Postkarten aus der Zeit von einem toten Onkel, der anscheinend irgendswie im Osmanischen Reich unterwegs war, sieht fast gemütlich aus wie ein touristisches Unternehmen, wahrscheinlich haben sie aber doch die Leute umgebracht!? Keine Ahnung. Ich habe neben den Fotos auch zwei arabische Dolche und einige 100 Jahre alte Reiseführer geerbt, Istanbul, Palästina usw., auch einige Reliquien vom Typ "Splitter vom hl. Kreuz", mein Onkel war Elektriker und anscheinend verarschbar, oder hat er beim Kauf gegrinst? Eher nicht. Als alter Knacker war er zu keiner vernünftigen Auskunft mehr fähig, ich glaube, meine Großtante war keine schlaue Wahl für ihn und sie hat er auch nicht glücklich gemacht ... Ach, nebenbei, ich lebe noch! Das ist doch schon mal was! --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ach, wenn ich den Wust an ungesichteten Bildern auf meiner Festplatte so sehe, werde ich mich hüten, jemanden zu drängeln. Wenn dafür keine Lust&Zeit ist, dann ist eben keine Lust&Zeit dafür. --smial (talk) 15:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Die Möglichkeit schon. Bin allerdings noch nicht sicher, was die Motivation angeht *g* (immer die Finger in die Wunden ...) --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Achja, mein Kleinbildkamerakaufprojekt steht, wie Du vllt. gesehen hat, vor neuen Herausforderungen: Canon 5 D Mark III oder Nikon D4 oder D 800 oder dieselbe ohne Tiefpassfilter. Vielleicht kaufe ich die D 800, weil die am "billigsten" ist, obwohl ich das mit der irrén Auflösung zweifelhaft finde. Aber fast 6.000 für das D4-Gehäuse oder das analoge Topmodell von Canon find' ich übertrieben. Die D700 gibbet jetzt billig, aber 12 Megapixel find ich echt Handy und die Canon Mark II hab ich drei Wochen ausprobieren können, die ist nicht übel, aber schlechter als ihr Ruf. Vor allem der Autofokus und die Rauscherei stören. Na, mal sehen, was würdest Du vorschlagen, finanzieren kann ich es, durch meine Krankheit habe ich praktisch null Geld ausgegeben im letzten Jahr. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Die D700 ist super für Action und Schnappschüsse bei wenig Licht, da kommt die D800 nicht mit. Aber für den dokumentarisch tätigen Wikiknipser ist sicherlich die 800 die bessere Wahl. Nur wirst du damit stets unter ISO800, besser unter 400 bleiben wollen nach den ersten Berichten, und um die Auflösung wirklich nutzen zu können, wirst du feststellen, daß man auch schon bei an sich guten Lichtverhältnissen oft schon ein Stativ benötigt - die alte Kleinbildregel 1/Brennweite als "verwackelsichere" Zeit gilt bei dem Ding nicht mehr, denn was bei sechs oder zehn MPixeln noch als ausreichend scharf durchgeht, wischt bei der D800 immer gleich über mehrere Pixelreihen. Ob mit oder ohne Aliasingfilter ist zweischneidig. Theoretisch gibt das Ding ohne Filter schärfere Bilder, Frage ist nur a) welches Zoomobjektiv schafft überhaupt die Auflösung (die meisten nicht) und b) wieviel Zeit möchte man in die Nachbearbeitung stecken, denn WENN es Moirée gibt, dann ist dessen Beseitigung schwierig bis eklig zu machen. -- smial (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC) Das mit dem Überleben lese ich gern und drücke weiterhin alle vorhandenen Daumen
_Underway_on_19_May_1918.jpg){kind=link}
 | File:USS Alabama (BB 8) Underway on 19 May 1918.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Underway_on_19_May_1918.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 06:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
_Underway_on_19_May_1918.jpg){kind=link}
_Champion_guns_crew.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) Champion guns crew.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Champion_guns_crew.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
_-_NH_57495.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 00:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_Champion_guns_crew.jpg){kind=link}
_Ship%27s_Gunner_and_Gunner%27s_Mates.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) Ship's Gunner and Gunner's Mates.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Ship%27s_Gunner_and_Gunner%27s_Mates.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 00:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_Ship's_Gunner_and_Gunner's_Mates.jpg){kind=link}
_Moored_in_port.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) Moored in port.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Moored_in_port.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 01:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_Moored_in_port.jpg){kind=link}
_postcard.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) postcard.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 01:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_postcard.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1908.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) in 1908.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_in_1908.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 02:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_in_1908.jpg){kind=link}
_Underway_at_low_speed.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Alabama (BB 8) Underway at low speed.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Underway_at_low_speed.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 02:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
_Underway_at_low_speed.jpg){kind=link}
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) transferring.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_transferring.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 07:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_transferring.jpg){kind=link}
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Dressed with flags.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 07:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_Dressed_with_flags.jpg){kind=link}
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Fourth of July.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Fourth_of_July.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 07:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_Fourth_of_July.jpg){kind=link}
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) speed trials.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_speed_trials.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 07:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_speed_trials.jpg){kind=link}
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) commissioning.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_commissioning.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 08:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_commissioning.jpg){kind=link}
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) 1920.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_1920.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 08:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_1920.jpg){kind=link}
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Connecticut (BB 18) Crewmen.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_Crewmen.jpg&redirect=no){kind=link}
Reventtalk 08:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
_Crewmen.jpg){kind=link}
| File:USS Indiana bow view.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_-_NH_52644.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 10:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana forecastle.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_-_NH_52653.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 10:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana in summer 1898.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_-_NH_61210.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 10:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana in drydock.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_-_NH_91935.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 11:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
| File:USS Indiana guns.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
_-_NH_93856.jpg){kind=link}
Reventtalk 11:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted content
File:Cover zelter schule der arbeitslosen.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)