User talk:Jochen Burghardt

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jochen Burghardt!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bildquelle - Link zu Git-Repository

Hallo Jochen,

danke, dass du den LaTeX-Source-Code meiner Bilder direkt in den Artikeln einfügst.

Wenn du das machst, solltest du aber nicht den Link zu dem Git-Repository entfernen. Dort ist auch noch eine Make-Datei und (eventuelle aktuellerer) Source-Code. Außerdem können so an den Bildern interessierte Wiki-Autoren weitere (ähnliche) Bilder finden.

Grüße, --MartinThoma (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, ich sehe gerade, dass du das gar nicht gemacht hast. Damals gab es anscheinend das Repository noch nicht bzw. ich habs damals nicht verlinkt. Du kannst also meinen Beitrag ignorieren. --MartinThoma (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eigentlich sollte von mir nur die Kategorie "Images with LaTeX source code" hinzugefuegt worden sein. Alles andere waere ein Versehen. Gruss - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: Nils von Barth: Svg output from LaTeX source

	Hello, Jochen Burghardt. You have new messages at Nbarth#Svg output from LaTeX source's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Combination of abstract domains.pdf

File:Combination of abstract domains.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rational sequence with 2 accumulation points.pdf

Your image is great but does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Please check it. Regards--Adam majewski (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your hint; I supplemented the license information now. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Glip galli.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Glip galli.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Jochen Burghardt. You have new messages at Jarekt#Copyright_status:_File:Glip_galli.tif's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gießen HeuchelheimerStr102 509.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gießen HeuchelheimerStr102 509.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:HerbertFeigl a07fig01.gif

{{Helpme}} Concerning the license, the source page says: "Creative Commons LicenseAll the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License" It is not clear which version is meant; the link is a dead one. The site's main page http://www.scielo.br repeats: "Creative Commons License All the contents of this site www.scielo.br, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License."

I'm not really sure whether it is ok to use the above cc-by-2.5; I just selected the option from the uploader license menu that seemed weakest. I need some help from a license issues expert.

Hallo Jochen,

auf der Hauptseite der Zeitschrift [1] findet sich die Lösung, sie verwenden die cc-by-4.0. Allerdings denke ich nicht, dass sie diese Lizenz auch für offensichtlich etliche Jahre alte Fotos vergeben können. Zumindest nicht ohne ausdrücklich zu erklären, dass sie an diesem Foto Rechte halten, weil ... [Grund einfügen]. Daher werde ich für das Bild leider Löschantrag stellen müssen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 09:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke fuer die Hilfe! Es waere schade um das Bild - dass Feigl seit 1988 tot und der Fotograph nicht feststellbar ist, genuegt wohl nicht fuer eine Lizensierung? Gruss - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schön wäre es :-) Bilder sind i.d.R. bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Urhebers (hier: Fotografen) geschützt. Und dass die Zeitschrift den Fotografen nicht angibt, heißt für einen Juristen auch keineswegs, dass der nicht feststellbar ist. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Na ja, aber andererseits geht es hier nicht um irgendeine dubiose Blogger-Seite, sondern die Zeitschrift wird von der Uni Sao Paulo herausgegeben, die bestimmt (wie die deutschen Unis auch) eine gute Rechtsabteilung hat und sich auch mit Lizenzfragen auskennt. Da sollte meines Erachtens unsere Default-Vermutung sein, dass sie das Bild nicht ohne Pruefung der Fotographenrechte freigegeben haben. Sonst koennte man ja gar keiner Quelle mehr trauen, oder? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HerbertFeigl a07fig01.gif

File:HerbertFeigl a07fig01.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kufic_Mond_nach_Fabris.jpg

Dear Jochen Burghardt

Wiki Commons invite the contributors for many search words.

Please, is it to simple cancel all. Administrator RussBot for exampel, change wrong to better search words!

I reset to version from RussBot.

Thank you

Sergio Fabris

Dear Sergio Fabris, I didn't understand what you meant by your above message. If you prefer, we may discuss in German. I guess your message is about my removing of categories from files uploaded by you. For the File:Kufic Mond nach Fabris.jpg, where someone reverted my edits, I gave a justification (viz. COM:OVERCAT). You should understand that Categories are not search words; you may place arbitrarily many of the latter in the "description" entry of the "Information" template, but you should adhere to the commons categorization policy (see Commons:Categories) in the choice of a file's categories. Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blackouts

Hi:

May I suggest that to add the Blackout category to events, not to individual images. I reverse your edit on File:Boundery waters Canadian Derecho radar image.png to put it instead to Category:1999 Boundery waters Canadian Derecho for instance.

Pierre cb (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sorry for my imprecise categorization. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:G7 Summit in Williamsburg, VA (1983).jpg

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:G7 Summit in Williamsburg, VA (1983).jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People by name

Bitte entferne nicht massenhaft die Kategorie Category:People by name aus Personen-Kategorien. Jede Personen-Kategorie muss diese Kategorie enthalten. Danke! --NeverDoING (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe sie nur von Seiten aus der Unterkategorie Category:Men by name entfernt. M.E. gilt die Regel COM:OVERCAT auch hier. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Die persönliche Meinung zählt hier aber (leider) nicht. Wenn es einen Konsens geben würde, dann wäre schon längst ein Bot aktiv, der die Kategorien entsprechend löschen würde. Ich kategorisiere schon lange Personen in vielen verschiedenen "Bereichen" und Deine Meinung ist mir dabei noch nie untergekommen. Eher umgekehrt. --NeverDoING (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OVERCAT hab ich mir nicht ausgedacht; es ist nicht nur meine Meinung, sondern "official policy" (Zitat oben auf der Seite) bei Commons. Auch wenn es dir noch nie untergekommen ist. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kenne COM:OVERCAT! Allerdings nützt es nichts, wenn man sich als einzelne Person gegen die üblichen Gepflogenheiten (Standards) stellt. Gibt es andere User, die Deine Bemühungen in diesem Bereich unterstützen und genauso vorgehen? --NeverDoING (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verstehe ich Dich richtig: Du glaubst, die offiziellen Richtlinien seien irrelevant; stattdessen seien irgendwrlche Gepflogenheiten/Standards entscheidend, die nirgendwo nachzulesen sind, die aber Du (im Gegensatz zu mir) trotzdem genau kennst?

Und Du glaubst, zu letzteren gehoere es, ein File mit jeder Kategorie auch in alle ihrer Oberkategorien einzuordnen? Oder in beliebige ihrer Oberkategorien, je nach persoenlichen Gepflogenheiten? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:43, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verdeh mir bitte nicht das Wort im Mund. Welche anderen User kategorisieren Personen so wie Du? Ich sehe in den Kategorien Category:Men by name bzw. Category:Women by name eine andere Sprache. Wer bin ich mir anzumaßen etwas gegen die Gepflogenheiten zu unternehmen ohne die genauen Gründe zu kennen oder mögliche Abhängigkeiten von irgendwelchen Bots? Ich kenne und achte COM:OVERCAT, allerdings ist diese Regel auch manchmal nicht sinnvoll. Wenn in unserem strittigen Fall ein Konsens für Deine Meinung ist habe ich kein Problem damit. Die Realität sieht meines Erachtens nur anders aus.--NeverDoING (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe nichts verdreht, aber das soll jetzt egal sein. Es gab einen Vorschlag von Sep 2014 (Commons talk:Categories/Archive 3#Flat categories), der aber anscheinend nicht weiter diskutiert oder umgesetzt wurde.Vielleicht solltest Du ihn wieder aufgreifen. Wenn es Ausnahmen von COM:OVERCAT gibt (z.B. alle Kategorien, die auf "by name" enden; oder m.E. besser: die auf "(flat list)" enden), sollten sie in einem entsprechenden Abschnitt auf dieser Seite erklaert werden. Schliesslich muessen neue Editoren (und es kommen andauernd neue dazu - "anyone can edit") die Chance haben, sie nachzulesen. Auch unsere ganze Debatte hier (die auch Du vermutlich nicht immer auf's neue fuehren willst) haette mit einem Hinweis auf solch einen Abschnitt schnell beigelegt werden koennen. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:55, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slavist - Linguist

Hi Jochen Burghardt,

Not every slavist is a linguist, even according to Category:Slavists, since many of Category:Slavists by country are not linguists but literary historians or ethnologists, e.g. Matija Murko, Irena Grudzińska-Gross, Mirko Messner, Basil Kerski. Therefore it is necessary to note both "Linguist" and "Slavist", as in the article about Paul Diels. Professors in the German Departments of Slavic Studies are either linguists or literary scholars. Best regards,--Mozel W. (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't understand your examples: en:Matija Murko has neither a "...slavist..." nor a "...linguists..." category. Category:Matija_Murko has Category:Slavists from Slovenia, which is in turn a subcategory of Category:Linguists from Slovenia. So he is neither a slavist nor a linguist according to en.wikipedia, but both a slavist and a linguist according to commons.wikipedia; certainly somebody should fix this inconsistency. I didn't check the remaining examples then.

I am not insisting on every slavist being a linguist in the real world; my edit summary just intended to say that the current categorization at commons.wikipedia implies this. If you are an expert in slavistics/linguistics, please feel free to fix the categorization. As far as I have seen the latter would affect Category:Slavists and many of the Category:Slavists from XXX catgories. Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't have time to fix the current categorization at commons.wikipedia. However, it is illogical that she is the only person in the Category:Slavists from Croatia, whereas of those who are in the Category:Linguists from Croatia 90 percent are slavists. She is primarily a linguist (the most internationally well-known Croatian linguist) and secondarily a slavist. And she of all Croatian linguists is not in the Category:Linguists from Croatia any more. Therefore I would suggest deleting her from the Category:Slavists from Croatia and bringing her back to other Croatian linguists, i.e. into the Category:Linguists from Croatia. Best regards, --Mozel W. (talk) 09:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok for me. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:William_Tetly_(physicist)

Category:William_Tetly_(physicist) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

André Koehne^{TALK TO ME} 06:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing categories

Any particular reason you removed [this category](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bogong_High_Plains_Road_14_Stevage.jpg&diff=0&oldid=183618558) from 20 or so images? Stevage (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All files are additionally in Category:Bogong High Plains, and Category:Bogong High Plains Road doesn't exist (red link). I think, the former is sufficient, and so did the uploader, apparently. Don't you agree? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that you loaded them up in Jan 2016. Why didn't you create the '... Road' category then? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization foundations

Plz, note that categorizations by time and by country is very different by nature and by category-trees. So, do not mix place and time. Possible duplication in these cases is not mistake. Alex Spade (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is that your personal point of view, or do you have a reference to some commons manual page for it? Apparently, COM:OVERCAT doesn't list your exception. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finetti MFO14912.jpg

File:Finetti MFO14912.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eureka Lott 13:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Didoku_puzzles

Didoku puzzles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Achim (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scientists in Spanish Wikipedia

Thank you very much for your contributions with images of scientists in the Wikipedia in Spanish. --PePeEfe (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Почему удалили категорию

Почему удалили категорию Category:Scientists from Tajikistan в File:Раджабова, Мехри.jpg ???. Раджабова, Мехри совмещает преподовательскую работу с научной работой в высшем учебном заведении Таджикистана (кандидат педагогических наук, доцент кафедры в Росийско - Таджикского славянского университета). Просьба отменить удаление категорий Category:Scientists from Tajikistan и в File:Нуралиев, Абдусаттор.JPG и File:Муллоев, Шариф Бакиевич.JPG, которые также являются учеными -- (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English: Sorry, I don't understand Russian or Tajik language. I guess, you asked why I removed Category:Scientists from Tajikistan from File:Раджабова, Мехри.jpg. The reason is the this file is in its subcategory Category:Educationists from Tajikistan. By COMMONS:OVERCAT, the more general category should be removed in this case. The same reason applies to all my reverts of your edits concerning Category:Scientists of Tajikistan.

- Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why the category Category:Scientists from Tajikistan in File:Раджабова, Мехри.jpg has been deleted???. Раджабова, Мехри is both a lecturer and a researcher in a Tajikistan high education institution (she has a PhD degree and is an Associate Professor at the Russian-Tajik Slavic University). Please revert deleting the categories Category:Scientists from Tajikistan also in File:Нуралиев, Абдусаттор.JPG and File:Муллоев, Шариф Бакиевич.JPG, who are also scientists. Regards, Mike (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't claim they aren't scientists. However, I tried to move each of them to the appropriate field of science. Nobody is just a scientist - he/she is a physician, physicist, chemist, educationist, or something like that, and should be categorized in such a category. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Я не утверждаю, что они не ученые. Однако, я пытался поместить их в подходящий раздел науки. Никто не является просто 'учёным', он (она) - врач, физик, химик, педагог и т.п., и должен быть категоризован в соответствующем разделе. См. также COM:OVERCAT и Википедия:Категоризация Regards, Mike (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - Linear motors

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#4RR_categorization_removal_on_Category:Linear_motors_by_Jochen_Burghardt Andy Dingley (talk) 08:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Nawroth

Careful.... You may be an admin and maybe you don't have goats in your part of Europe. But the UK is part of Europe (you know, that little island off the mainland that freed Holland from Nazi occupation) and Christian Nawroth is a cited scientist and notable in his field . Be aware also, that we have a 3rr rule. Trust you will understand my revert until till you have had time to do more background research. P.g.champion (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand your argument about goats and Nazis, but I found a commons policy supporting my opinion: COM:USER#User pages. It clearly says that pages staring with "User:" may not have a category below "Category:Topics". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 02:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you are at the wrong site? Commons is mainly used to hold pictures and other media, rather than encyclopedic text like biographies. I have done a search (as you recommended) for "Christian Nawroth" at English wikipedia, and found him mentioned in several articles (e.g. in en:Buttercups Sanctuary for Goats). As he currently doesn't have an own biography page there (en:Christian Nawroth is still non-existing), you might wish to move the contents of User:ChristianNawroth to there - this is the place where people would expect it. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Sommacal Alfonso

Carissimo signore, credo che Lei di fisica ne capisca ben poco. Gli argomento di fisica sono sempre gli stessi: possono essere espessi in maniera differente anzi, lo sono sempre. Parlare di copiatura è un evidente segno di ignoranza. Rispettosamente--Sommacal alfonso (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand Italian. Could you please write in English, or at least indicate to which file you are referring? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you mean File:Field tube of infinitesimal cross-sectional area..png. You should fix its typo ("crss" --> "cross"), anyway. (It would be helpful if you indicated the meaning of "ds" an "n" in the description.) If you object to the deletion, put a message to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Field tube of infinitesimal cross-sectional area..png; if you fix the typo, I have no problem with keeping the image. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sommacal Alfonso

I am sorry for you not to understain the Italien lenguage. I inform you that the correction requested by you has been incorporaited. You are asched dt forbidden me for my errors in inglies.--Sommacal alfonso (talk) 12:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. Could you have a look whether the categories (in particular, Category:Solenoids) are ok? Could it be added to Category:Differential calculus, too? Maybe you even find more special subcategories for the image? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish tranlations

Hi Jochen!

I adding the Spanish translation to Template:Scienceyear and Template:Scientistsyear. Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overcat?

Concerning your edit: How is it COM:OVERCAT when Geometry images with dihedral symmetry is both in Images with dihedral symmetry and in Geometry? These are the logical parent categories for this one. Watchduck (quack) 10:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow e.g. this path of parent categories:

Apparently, dihedral symmetry is a geometrical property and thus below Category:Geometry, no matter whether the images are geometrical drawings of not (no media of the latter type can be found in Category:Images with dihedral symmetry, anyway). Maybe, for the latter reason, the categrories Category:Geometry images with dihedral symmetry and Category:Images with dihedral symmetry should be joined? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I expected something like that. This is how a computer would make its decisions. As humans who supposedly understand the meaning of these categories we should see that something is wrong here, and try to find a better solution. The crucial point here is that "geometry images" in the category in question refers to images of geometric objects. A polyhedron is a geometric object, a temple roof is not. A possible solution is to have a category Geometric objects (as opposed to Geometric concepts) in Geometry, which becomes the parent of Geometry images with dihedral symmetry.

Images with dihedral symmetry contains both geometric and non-geometric images btw. They are in their proper subcategories like 5-fold dihedral symmetry. Watchduck (quack) 12:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your approach (putting "Category:XXX YYY" below both "Category:XXX" and "Category:YYY") was no less schematic than adhering to COM:OVERCAT. - As for Category:5-fold dihedral symmetry etc., I just had overlooked them; thanks for your hint. - I see your point now in distinguishing geometrical and non-geometrical objects, although my elementary-school math teacher probably would have said that a true geometrical object can exist neither in stone nor on paper (nor as a wikipedia image, if they had been known by then), but only as a Platonic idea. However, I doubt that "concepts" and "objects" can be sharply distinguished in geometry, and I expect that often a "concept" category would appear below an "object" category or/and vice versa. Last not least, there is a huge tree below Category:Geometry, so it would require a huge amount of work to split it apart by the "concept"/"object" distinction, once it is introduced. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations related to earthquake in Otto's Encyclopaedia

Hi. I have noticed that you uploaded File:Illustration9 related to earthquake.jpg, which is a cut-off image from File:Illustrations related to earthquake.jpg. The reason probably was that you wanted to illustrate the article on A. H. Sieberg on German Wikipedia. However, it seems that Sieberg is not the author of the picture no. 9, but the picture no. 4. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your hint. Yes, I wanted to show a picture by A. Sieberg, and chose no.9 since the Author field in File:Illustrations related to earthquake.jpg#Summary says it is by him. At wikisource:cs:Ottův slovník naučný/Zemětřesení, the caption says both "4. Různé druhy zemských vln a jimi vyvolané seismogrammy. Podle A. Sieberga" (I didn't notice that before I read your above post) and "9. Seismografické obrazce (A. Sieberg). A Zemětř. místní, B zemětř. blízké, C zemětř. vzdálené." So both no.4 and no.9 seem to be by A. Sieberg. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see, you are right. Thanks for explanation. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmirnovPortrait.jpg

File:SmirnovPortrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sealle (talk) 05:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About that edit where I reverted myself...

Hi there, about this: I reverted an edit I did, then you reverted me-reverting-myself saying that the guy did write it - [2] - Let me explain: My reasoning was that there is a higher cat for this book Category:Animal and vegetable physiology, considered with reference to natural theology, which has two editions and the writer's name attached. I figured the individual editions then didn't really need to have the writer on it as it would be overcategorising it? (And if it needs writer on all editions, it needs to be added to the 1836 one too.) I was going to revert, but thought I'd see what you think. Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 08:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you are completely right. I failed to check the higher category. - I'll undo my edit again. Sorry for the confusion. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and thank you (It obviously happened to me too LOL)!! -- Deadstar (msg) 10:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

added Category:Chemists from the Soviet Union

Warning! What is this category? Olena Krushynska in 2000 graduated from Kiev University, how can it she be сhemists from the Soviet Union? Soviet Union ceased to exist in 1991!!! And also Ivan Horbachevsky, he did not live in Soviet Union! --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My motivations were these: Olena Krushynska was born in Kiev in 1978, so she came from the Soviet Union. Ivan Horbachevsky died in 1942, when the Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found a fairly detailled biography of Horbachevsky at German wikipedia. You are right: he wasn't in Ukraine after 1922. You are also right with your edit for Category:Moses Gomberg. However, I think Olena Krushynska's birth in the Soviet Union should be reflected by the categorization. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olena Krushynska was born in Soviet Union, but was not Chemists from the Soviet Union. Category:Chemists from the Soviet Union should include those who worked at that time. This may be the case Category:Ukrainian chemists who were born in Soviet Union, Category:Belarusian chemists who were born in Soviet Union and so on. But there are no such categories. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for this interpretation, or is it just your personal opinion? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The same just your personal opinion what, for example, Olena Krushynska is Chemist from the Soviet Union. Though this is obviously not true. And I wrіte But there are no such categories. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chemists from Germany - Foto von Warner

Sie hatten bei dem Bild von Imhausen einen Revert gemacht mit der Begründung: „Imhausen studied chemistry“. In der Category „Chemists from Germany“ taucht nur auf, wer ein Chemiestudium (oder vergleichbare Ausbildung) abgeschlossen hat und danach auch beruflich auf diesem Gebiet tätig ist/war. Auf der Suche nach Frau Prof. Annette Warner (geb. Imhausen) hatte ich die aktuellen websites untereinander verglichen 1) hier speziell 1a)

Akademische Qualifikationsschriften (Stand 2009)

Staatsexamensarbeit: Rechnungen aus dem Niltal -Probleme ägyptischer Mathematik am Beispiel des mathematischen Papyrus Moskau, Universität Mainz 1996. - Supervisors: David E. Rowe (Mainz University), Stephan J. Seidlmayer (Berlin University)
Dissertation: Antike Algorithmen. Eine Untersuchung zu den mittelägyptischen mathematischen Aufgabentexten, Universität Mainz, 2000. - Supervisors: David E. Rowe (Mainz University), Jim Ritter (University of Paris)

2). - Ihre Homepage in der Version von 2009: 3)

Institution *Degree

1999-2000 Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz (History of Mathematics) *2000 PhD (summa cum laude)

1996-1999 Berlin University (Freie Universität) (Egyptology and Assyriology) *Seminar Certificates

1992-1996 Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz and Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg (Egyptology) *1996 Erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien (university degree required for teaching profession)

1989-1996 Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz (mathematics and chemistry) *1992 Zwischenprüfung Chemie (intermediate exam in chemistry) und *1991 Zwischenprüfung Mathematik (intermediate exam in mathematics)

1980-1989 High school *1989 High school degree (Abitur)

Nach ihren eigenen Angaben legte sie 1996 eine „erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien ab“. Titel der Staatsexamensarbeit „Rechnungen aus dem Niltal -Probleme ägyptischer Mathematik am Beispiel des mathematischen Papyrus Moskau“. (Eine Kopie lagert im Zentralarchiv der Uni Heidelberg).

Die Notwendigkeit dieses Ausbildungsabschnitts begründete sie mit „university degree required for teaching profession“ Innerhalb dieses Ausbildungsabschnitts gab es 1992 „eine Zwischenprüfung Chemie“. Gerechnet ab Studienbeginn WS 1989 fand diese Zwischenprüfung nach 4-5 Semestern statt.

In 4 Semestern erreicht ein Student heute nur „Vordiplom-Niveau“, erst nach 6 Semestern Bachelor-Niveau. Daher entferne ich das Bild von Frau Prof Warner wieder aus der Category berühmter Chemiker. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sie haben wohl Recht. Ich hatte nur recht oberflaechlich in dem Artikel das Wort "Chemiestudium" gesehen und daraufhin die Kategorie hinzugefuegt. Da Ihre Loeschung zunaechst ohne Begruendung erfolgte, nahm ich an, Sie haetten das Wort uebersehen. - Mfg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Huxley

he he, how can one born in 1887 be a 19th-century biologist, unless he graduated at 10? :D -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning was "He is a 19th-century biologist since he is a biologist who was born in the 19th century". Did I miss some policy stating that "19th century" should refer to graduation, rather than to birth? However, not every biologist needs to be graduated (in particular, in ancient times and depending on the country, graduation might not have existed). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kotani, Hund, Amaldi, de Boer

File:Kotani, Hund, Amaldi, de Boer.jpg

Kotani, Hund, Amaldi, de Boer

Ich erstellte einen Ausschnitt zum Original (aus Nachlass meines Vaters), wobei ich die Namen aufgrund der handschriftlichen Notizen meines Vaters in den Ausschnitt setzte. --GFHund (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mein Vater übersprang jedoch manche Köpfe, so dass man auch anderer Meinung sein könnte.

Übrigens ist Heisenberg eindeutig zu sehen. Sein Kopf ist links hinter Mott. --GFHund (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es könnte jedoch eine andere Zuordnung möglich sein! Siehe bei meiner Diskussionsseite! --GFHund (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich lud heute einen hochauflösenden Scan nach Wikimedia hoch. Siehe meine Diskussionsseite!--GFHund (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich vermute, dass eventuell die Personen mit der runden Plakette Mitglieder sind, die zum ersten Mal an einer Jahrestagung teilnahmen. Denn im deutschen Artikel zu Herzberg steht bei den Ehrungen, dass er 1951 Mitglied wurde.--GFHund (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fokker

Ich vermute, dass im Bild London 1952 Fokker falsch zugeordnet wurde. Siehe das Foto File:Leiden Kamerlingh-Onnes Lab.jpg aus dem Jahr 1926. Aufgrund des Zeitunterschiedes von 26 Jahren käme eventuell der Kopf mit weißen Haaren und weißem Bart in Frage.--GFHund (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich denke, Fokker ist auf beiden Bildern (File:The Royal Society 1952 London.jpg und File:Leiden Kamerlingh-Onnes Lab.jpg) der mit dem Spitzbart. Bei letzterem Bild ist die Zuordnung, wer zur ersten und wer zur zweiten Reihe gehoert, auf den ersten Blick verwirrend, da links hinter Uhlenbeck (1. Reihe) der Kopf von Niessen (2. Reihe) sichtbar ist, ebenso rechts neben Kramers (1. Reihe) der Kopf von Woltjer (2. Reihe). Ich habe das Bild mal probeweise mit Annotationen nach meinem Verstaendnis der Beschreibung versehen. Das erspart umstaendliche und letztlich doch u.U. missverstaendliche Beschreibungen. Wo Sie anderer Ansicht sind, koennen Sie ja die Annotation loeschen oder editieren. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bei dem Bild von 1926 stimme ich zu 100% mit Ihrer Zuordnung (Kopf <-> Name) überein. Jedoch beim Bild von 1952 (26 Jahre später aufgenommen) bin ich mir noch unschlüssig, denn dort gibt es 2 Köpfe mit einem Spitzbart (schwarz bzw. weiß) und die Notation meines Vaters (der als sehr pingelig galt) ist nicht eindeutig (Kopf senkrecht über Notation) zuzuordnen. Im Wikipedia-Artikel zu Fokker ist ein etwas anders aussehender Mann zu sehen. Da ich überlege, noch fehlende Köpfe aus dem 1952-er Bild zu extrahieren, will ich sicher gehen. Mit einer Lupe konnte ich beim Originalfoto sehen, dass die kleinen Kringel sich auf der Oberfläche des Fotos befinden (sie ist nicht eben). Man könnte die Kringel entfernen und durch die entsprechende Hintergrundfarbe ersetzen. --GFHund (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt verstehe ich. Sie meinen den drei Koepfe weiter rechts (und etwas tiefer) - ich habe ihn im Bild File:The Royal Society 1952 London.jpg mal ebenfalls als "Adriaan Fokker?" annotiert und auch bei meiner urspruenglichen Vermutung die Klammern um das Fragezeichen geloescht. Das Bild en:File:AdriaanFokker.jpg scheint von 1950 zu sein, das ist zeitlich ziemlich dicht, und ich finde, es sieht dem linken Fokker im 1952er-Bild eher aehnlich als dem rechten.

Anhand von Brille und Oberlippenbart dagegen finde ich es schwierig, mich zu entscheiden: auf dem Bild File:Fokker,Adriaan Daniel 1934 London.jpg scheint er eher keine Brille zu tragen und der dunkle Streifen zwischen Oberlippe und Nase koennte auch ein Schatten sein. In der Category:Adriaan Fokker gibt es auch noch ein Video (File:Professor Dr. A.D. Fokker over de anti-lawaai campagne-508958.ogv) von 1935, ohne Brille, aber mit Oberlippenbart. Im Video File:Het Teylers Museum verkeert in financiële nood Weeknummer, 77-17 - Open Beelden - 43160.ogv) spielt bei 1:53min jemand auf der mikrotonalen Fokker-Orgel, das koennte er selbst sein, mit Brille, Oberlippenbart und Kinnbart); es scheint eine Wochenschau aus 1977 (nach Fokkers Tod) zu sein, bestenfalls also eine damailige Archivaufnahme von Fokker. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild File:Fokker,Adriaan Daniel 1934 London.jpg habe ich nach Commons hochgeladen, aber das Original muss ich erst noch suchen.--GFHund (talk) 11:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich fand das Original und machte mit meinem Scanner einen Ausschnitt. Da trägt er eine Brille und hat einen Bart.--GFHund (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ihr neuer Ausschnitt scheint mir im wesentlichen dasselbe Bild zu sein wie File:Fokker,Adriaan Daniel 1934 London.jpg; ich finde es bei beiden schwierig, mich auf Oberlippenbart ja/nein und Brille ja/nein festzulegen. - Unabhaengig davon scheint mir das ganze Bild noch nicht in Commons verfuegbar zu sein; eine Suche nach "1934 London International Conference on Physics" liefert viele Einzelausschnitte (vermutlich alle von Ihnen angefertigt, in Category:Conferences in 1934 scheinen viele davon praesent zu sein), aber nicht das Gruppenfoto selbst. - Vielleicht moegen Sie es noch hochladen? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich fand das Gruppenbild erst heute wieder. Es ist 80 cm breit und müsste zunächst von einem Profi gescannt werden, damit wir bessere und größere Ausschnitte erstellen können. Ich werde in den kommenden Tagen in die Stadt gehen und einen Scan anfertigen lassen.--GFHund (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heute lies ich Scans erstellen und brachte die Konferenzteilnehmer auf 4 Bilder aufgeteilt (wegen der Größe des Oirginalfotos) nach Commons. Zum Beispiel das File:The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg, auf dem Fokker abgebildet ist. Auch andere Nobelpreisträger sind zu sehen. --GFHund (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder sind grosse Klasse! Ich habe sie heute mittag untereinander verlinkt. Mit Ihrem Einverstaendnis wuerde ich demnaechst noch die handschriftlichen Annotationen eintippen, um sie fuer die Suchmaschine zugaenglich zu machen, und Wikipedia-Annotationen in die Bilder einfuegen (dabei wuerde ich mich an Ihren schon frueher erstellten Einzelportraits orientieren). Bei Bedarf wuerde ich fuer einzelne Teilnehmer Kategorien anlegen, vorzugsweise nach dem Schema "VORNAMEN NACHNAME (physicist)". Eventuell waere zusaetzlich ein Scan mittlerer Aufloesung gut, bei der das gesamte Bild in eine Datei passt, so dass man eine Uebersicht ueber das ganze Photo bekommt. Was meinen Sie? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beim Vergleich der vor mehr als 8 Jahren erstellten Dateien mit den heutigen Möglichkeiten, stellte ich fest, dass wir ein Konzept erstellen sollten, was wir in Commons darstellen! Heute wären Bilder mit 100 MB möglich, statt der 1 bis 3 MB von damals. Für die Zuordnung der Köpfe würde die Qualität von damals ausreichen. Für die einzelnen Ausschnitte müssten fast alle Originale neu gescannt werden. Sie könnten bei den bisherigen Fotos, die Sie beim Nachlass meines Vaters finden, mir vorschlagen in welcher Reihenfolge ich neue Scans erstellen lassen sollte.--GFHund (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beim Abtippen der handschriftlichen Annotationen ist mir aufgefallen, dass sich Bild 2 und 3 nicht ueberlappen; es scheint sogar ein kleines Stueck dazwischen zu fehlen. Am besten zu sehen ist das an der gedruckten Bildunterschrift unten (2: "Internatio", 3: "Conference on Physics") und eine Zeile tiefer (2: "", 3: "ndon 1934."), sowie an der Gebaeudeinschrift ganz oben (2: "R ASTRONOMICAL SO", 3: ""). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==> Das ist richtig, weshalb ich das heute reklamierte. Mir wurde sofort die fehlende Mitte gescannt. Ich erstellte dann zu Hause ein Gesamtbild (aus den 5 Teilen), was ich jedoch noch nicht nach Commons hoch lud. Es gab Ärger mit einem Anonymen, der mich als Vandale meldete. --GFHund (talk) 13:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Habe es inzwischen etwas bearbeitet und hoch geladen (File:The Royal Society 1934 London-t.jpg). --GFHund (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sieht gut aus! Ich habe schon mal ueber "other versions" die Bilder untereinander verlinkt. Laden Sie die hochaufgeloeste Mitte auch noch hoch? Wenn Sie wollen, nennen Sie es zunaechst z.B. "...-m.jpg", ich koennte mich um die Umbenennung kuemmern, so dass die Teile nachher "...-1.jpg", "...-2.jpg", "...-3.jpg", "...-4.jpg", "...-5.jpg" heissen. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Mitte ist schwer beschädigt, wegen der Faltung des langen Bildes. Ich versuchte die Schäden etwas zu beheben, so dass nur noch die kaputte Nase im Gesamtbild zu sehen ist. Ich meine, wir sind ein gutes Team. Was die einzelnen Ausschnitte anbelangt, sollten wir uns noch abstimmen. Außerdem besitze ich noch viele Fotos (u.a. Nobelpreisträger), die mithilfe der neuesten Technik noch verbessert werden können. Wir können das in den kommenden Wochen noch klären. --GFHund (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schade, aber zum Glueck ist nur eine Person davon betroffen. Den beschaedigten Namen unter "Ehrenberg" kann man sicher rekonstruieren, ich entziffere "Hli_ilican", wobei eigentlich nur das "can" unzweifelhaft scheint. Photos beruehmter Wissenschaftler auf Commons bereitzustellen, finde ich eine wichtige Aufgabe; ich wuerde gerne an der Aufbereitung Ihrer Sammlung mitarbeiten. Bezueglich "abstimmen" finde ich, die Entscheidung sollte stets letztlich bei Ihnen liegen; ich verstehe meine Aeusserungen hier nur als Vorschlaege, ebenso meine Edits an Ihren Bildbeschreibunsseiten. Ihre umfangreiche Sammlung, soweit sie unterhalb von Category:Friedrich Hund eingeordnet ist, kenne ich ungefaehr. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich besitze nicht nur das Original, sondern noch höhere Auflösungen der Scans, als ich ins Internet stellte. Gut wäre es, wenn wir auch per E-Mail mit einander diskutieren könnten. Meine E-Mailadresse steht auf meiner deutschen Benutzerseite. Denn ich erstellte ein Bild mit den Namen, die in der Mitte unten stehen, was ich Ihnen per E-Mail zusenden könnte. --GFHund (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg

Die Auflösung der vier Teile ist zu klein, um Ausschnitte zu erstellen, weshalb mir bei "...-3" ein Fehler passierte. Ein viel zu kleiner Ausschnitt von Compton rutschte mir dazwischen. Ich weiß jedoch nicht, wie man das korrigieren kann. In meinem Computer habe ich wesentlich höhere Auflösungen (mehr als 100 MB je Teil). Aus denen kann ich neue Ausschnitte für bestimmte Personen erstellen. Gut wäre es jedoch, wenn ich wüsste, für welche Personen neue Ausschnitte gebraucht werden. Außerdem ist mir unklar, wie man bei den neuen Ausschnitten beifügen kann, dass es Ausschnitte aus dem Gesamtbild sind.--GFHund (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ihr Problem mit dem "Dazwischenrutschen von Compton" habe ich nicht verstanden. Ich kenne Ihr Betriebssystem und Ihr Bildbearbeitungsprogramm nicht, mit dem Sie die Ausschnitte erstellen. Aber folgender Weg sollte meines Erachtens immer gangbar sein: Sie kopieren das Gesamtbild und benennen die Kopie so um, dass sie den Auschnitt bezeichnet; dann oeffnen Sie nur diese Kopie mit Ihrem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm und schneiden aus. Die Datei mit dem Gesamtbild kann dabei nicht beschaedigt werden, weil Sie sie ja gar nicht offen haben. Dann laden Sie den Ausschnitt unter seinem neuen Namen nach Commons hoch.

==> Wenn man das Bild in Wikimedia am Bildschirm hat, gibt es links bei den Werkzeugen ein Crop-Tool, mit dem man sehr exakt Ausschnitte erstellen kann. Dieses Tool erledigt ebenfalls alle unten von Ihnen angegebenen Dinge voll automatisch. Meine Frage lautet: Wie kann ich den aus Versehen dazwischen (falsche Taste gedrückt) gerutschten Compton (unten in der Bildgeschichte) wieder entfernen? Mit der von Ihnen vorgeschlagenen Methode habe ich früher gearbeitet (und werde es wohl auch wieder machen, da ich ja die hoch aufgelösten Originale in meinem Computer habe). Nur wusste ich nicht, wie man die Verbindungs-Hinweise einzufügen kann, was das Crop-Tool voll automatisch macht.

Fuer die Kennzeichnung als Ausschnitt aus einem Gesamtbild verwende ich (z.B.) "{{extracted from|The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg}}".

Bei Bedarf koennen Sie auch einen Kommentar einfuegen, z.B. "{{extracted from|The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg|Kommentar zum Bildausschnitt}}".

Beim Foto File:Roman Smoluchowski 1952 London.jpg koennen Sie das "extracted from"-Makro in Aktion sehen. Im Gesamtbild erscheint im Abschnitt "File usage on Commons" ein Link auf jeden seiner Ausschnitte. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt verstehe ich Ihr Problem mit dem Compton-Bild. Ich habe das CropTool noch nie benutzt, habe aber im untersten Bildschirmfoto auf der Seite Commons:CropTool gesehen, dass eine Auswahl zwischen "Overwrite" und "Upload as new file" angeboten wird (oben rechts im Foto). Vermutlich haetten Sie letzteres auswaehlen muessen. - Etwas loeschen aus der Versionsgeschichte koennen, soweit ich weiss, nur Leute mit besonderen Rechten. Sie sollten "{{helpme}}" in einem neuen Abschnitt auf Ihrer Diskussionsseite plazieren, das Problem in Englisch schildern und ein paar Tage abwarten. - Wenn Sie sie nicht mehr brauchen, wuerde ich gerne die beiden obigen Aufrufe von "{{extracted from}}" nach "das sieht dann so aus" wieder entfernen, da sie den Diskussionsfluss stoeren und einen eigentlich unzutreffenden Link von File:The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg nach hier anlegen. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich schrieb in deutscher Sprache ein E-Mail an info-commons@wikimedia.org und anderthalb Stunden später war alles erledigt!--GFHund (talk) 04:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==> Weitere Frage: Wurde das Unterkapitel "Transcript of the annotation" automatisch erstellt, oder haben Sie es eingefügt? Es enthält Fehler! Zum Beispiel im Bild -1 muss es heißen Stückelberg statt Stöckelberg.--GFHund (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, ich habe es jeweils per Hand erstellt und viele Namen teilweise geraten. Danke fuer den Hinweis - kein Wunder, dass ich "Stäckelberg" nicht finden konnte! Ueberhaupt ist mir heute frueh eingefallen, dass ich zuallererst Ihre Einzelausschnitte aus 2010 beruecksichtigen sollte. Ich gebe hier die Dateinamen wieder, die ich gefunden habe:

Vielleicht koennen Sie die Namensliste auch gebrauchen. Ich habe gesehen, dass Sie bei einigen der Bilder schon eine neue, hochaufgeloeste Version hochgeladen haben. Ich werde jetzt zu jedem dieser Einzelausschnitte eine Annaotation in das entsprechende Gesamtbild einfuegen und ggf. den Namen korrigieren. Wenn Sie weitere Korrekturen haben, lassen Sie sie mich wissen, ich trage sie dann so ein, dass die Zeilen alle gleich lang bleiben, und wiederhole ggf. meine Suche nach dem Namen. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bei elf Bildern lud ich bereits eine neue Version hoch, außerdem für Sitte und Frisch, weiter 6 sind in Arbeit.--GFHund (talk) 11:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin mit dem Annotieren soweit fertig. Ein paar Namen konnte ich immer noch nicht zuordnen: Bauer, Bernal, Casinni (o.ae.), Ferguson, Hewlett, Hoffmann, Umeda (o.ae.; ich hatte zuerst "Umerda" gelesen), Wang. Haben Sie dazu Ideen, wer jeweils gemeint sein koennte? - Bei einigen der Zugeordneten habe ich mehr oder weniger starke Zweifel, dass alles korrekt ist (gekennzeichnet durch "(?)" oder "?" hinter dem Link). Meine Schreibfehler sollten jetzt, bis auf die obigen "o.ae."-Unsicherheiten, beseitigt sein. Vielleicht schauen Sie ueberall nochmal kritisch drueber. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich versuche einige Fragen zu klären. Bei dem Teil -1 schrieb mein Vater Rozenthal mit einem h. Es wird wahrscheinlich "Stefan Rozenthal" sein. Es kann auch sein, dass er nach 1934 (vor 1963) seinen Namen änderte, um nicht direkt als Jude aufzufallen. --GFHund (talk) 17:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zum selben Thema gibt es Originale der Veröffentlichungen von Rozenthal bzw. Rozental. Eine wird antiquarisch (Ausgabe 1941) bei Amazon angeboten, eine zweite steht in der Nationalbibliothek. --GFHund (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn Sie die unterschiedlichen Schreibweisen geklaert haben, sollten Sie eine Notiz zum Wikipedia-Artikel hinzufuegen und evtl. auch eine Weiterleitung einrichten. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich fing bereits gestern eine Diskussion hierzu an. Siehe! Es wird mir niemand widersprechen. Das Problem ist mehr, die Artikelersteller zu bewegen. Es gibt wohl Nazis, die ungern in der Vergangenheit rum rühren. Mein Vater kannte Rozenthal aus seiner Leipziger Zeit persönlich. Gegebenenfalls werde ich den deutschen Artikel ergänzen. Sie könnten dies dann im englischen Artikel ebenfalls tun. Ich habe keine Angst vor Nazis. --GFHund (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zwei weitere Bestaetigungen fuer die Schreibweise "Rozenthal" habe ich bei einer Suche nach "Stefan Rozenthal" gefunden und in die deutsche Seite eingearbeitet. In die englische Seite uebernehme ich die Namensproblematik demnaechst. Gut waere natuerlich eine Biographie, in der die Details dazu berichtet werden. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foroa

[3] You are welcome and thanks to you. Since I see you are doing category maintenance, I ask you, please, if you do not mind, to watch the user talk:Foroa, as I did because he was one most efficient and active user but unfortunately he does not contribute more. User:Foroa we miss you :). And spread the voice if you want :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Finite state machine

This all relocated perfect. Thank you.--Allforrous (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jochen Burghardt,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jochen Burghardt,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jochen Burghardt,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Institute of Ultra-Hard Materials NASU

Dear Jochen, I would like to inform you that after your renaming of the aforementioned category all files disappeared from it. Can you return them back? --Vasyatka1 (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vasyatka1: Thanks for the message. This appears to be a bug in the new functionality of the category-move command (description see the message immediately above here). I'll inform Majora about this. Could you tell me a few files names that had belonged to Category:Institute of Ultra-Hard Materials, so that it is possible to trace their disappearance, using the "History" tab? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vasyatka1: I check the way of File:Kiev_Institute_of_Superhard_Materials_(1).jpg from the wikidata box, and found the problem. It wasn't a bug, it was my fault: I'd have to move the content files separately. Now I did that, and all files should be in the right place. Thanks again, and sorry for the confusion. Regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now everything is fine. Thanks. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1961-minivac601-maintenance-manual.pdf

File:1961-minivac601-maintenance-manual.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Engineers are not scientists.

There's a CfD open already at Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2019/12/Category:Engineers. Please make your case there, don't just keep 3RR edit-warring your change in. Nor, despite your claim, does en:Engineer support this. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: I didn't intend to start an edit war, I just expected (for too long time) the issue could be setteled by short-discussion in edit summaries, and I wasn't aware of the CfD (your edit summary didn't provide a link). In response of your above message, I reverted my most recent edit at Template:Engineersyear, and ask for your apologies. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:WHO Covid c -~confirmed,-~deaths32.pdf

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WHO Covid c -~confirmed,-~deaths31.pdf

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WHO Covid c -~confirmed,-~deaths30.pdf

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox

Please don't add this category manually, as you have in quite a few categories today (e.g., [4]). It is automatically added by the infobox itself, and manual duplications will confuse things. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I didn't add that category intentionally. Today, I copied lots of Physician categories to Category:Physicians by name. Possibly, I slipped off in the Cat-A-Lot menu when Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox was adjacent to Category:Physicians by name. Sorry! - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at my Contributions page: it seems I miscategorized almost 400 pages in this way. I'll try to use Cat-A-Lot to revert all of them. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done All the mess should be cleaned up by now. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Keep up the good work! Mike Peel (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:The method of fluxions and infinite series p.20.gif

Copyright status: File:The method of fluxions and infinite series p.20.gif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The method of fluxions and infinite series p.20.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matrix multiplication attribution

Hi, I noticed that the attribution of the Alman-Williams result in File:MatrixMultComplexity svg.svg is to Williams, when Alman would be more consistent with your naming scheme in the previous labels. Was this intentional? If not, is it possible for you to fix it? Thanks! Fawly (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't quite sure which name to use. Then I thought, "Williams" would be better since it would indicate a connection to the 2012 improvement. On the other hand, using "Bini" in 1979 (where the paper was by Bini, Capovani, Romani, Lotti) hides the connection to Romani 1981. I guess, you'd prefer to use the first person in alphabet? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, first person alphabetically is what I thought. But I agree it makes sense to keep track of authors who have improved the exponent multiple times. Would it be possible to use all authors? Squeeze it in somehow? Fawly (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I uploaded a new version, with all authors' names. Hope, it's ok (except for the annotations: commons apparently doesn't support all {{cite}} formats of English wikipedia; I'm still working on this). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Annotations should work now, too. Please complain if you find something weird there. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks great, thanks so much for doing this! Fawly (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Levy-Paluck 2017 hi-res-photo 1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Dylsss (talk) 04:51, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Диалог

Уважаемый Jochen Burghardt, я крайне не согласен с вами на удаление моих загрузок (файлов). Я возражаю.--Мирзанур Камалтдинов Хафизович (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Мирзанур Камалтдинов Хафизович:

You should discuss (in English) at the respective pages (e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:ПОМЕНЯЛИСЬ РОЛЯМИ.png).

Вы должны обсудить (на английском языке) на соответствующих страницах (например, Commons:Deletion requests/File:ПОМЕНЯЛИСЬ РОЛЯМИ.png) - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can use https://www.deepl.com/translator to translate between the languages.

Вы можете использовать https://www.deepl.com/translator для перевода между языками. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mercedes Siles (cropped).jpg

File:Mercedes Siles (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corona Statistiken

Hallo Jochen. Schade, dass du die Corona Statistiken (Infektionen vs Tote) nicht mehr weiter führst. Ich fand sie sehr informativ. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 04:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An mir liegt's nicht. Wie ich unter WHO_Covid_diagram_set im ersten Satz schon geschrieben habe, publiziert die WHO keine Zahlen mahr in ihren Weekly Epidemiological Updates. Gruss - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sammellöschungen

Hi! Sag mal, kannst du nicht alle Dateien mit einem gleichen Löschgrund in einer Gruppe zusammenfassen? Alle deine Löschanträge einzeln zu bestätigen, würde mein Datenvolumen des Handys auffressen. Gruß und guten Rutsch --Mjchael (talk) 16:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war faul und wollte nicht darueber nachdenken, wie das am besten geht, einschliesslich Loeschwarnung auf jeder Seite, Benachrichtigung der Uploader, usw. Ein Klick auf "Suggest for deletion" macht alles auf einmal fuer mich. Wenn es Dich troestet: mehr Massenloeschungsvorschlaege kommen von mir nicht mehr. Gleichfalls guten Rutsch! - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Mjchael (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:KarlHerxheimer 1 (cropped).jpg

File:KarlHerxheimer 1 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Rubin16.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karten-Kategorien

Hi, ich finde es großartig, dass du auch in der Unidentifizierte-Karten-Kategorie aufräumst. Aber könnte ich dich bitten, etwas sorgfältiger und genauer zu kategorisieren, sodass nicht andere Leute später irgendwann hinterhereditieren müssen? Es wäre wünschenswert, wenn z.B. thematische Karten direkt als "<Demographic/Hydrographic/Linguistic> maps of <country>" abgelegt sind; zur Not lege ich solche Kategorien auch extra an. Karten kann man zusätzlich zum gezeigten Ausschnitt auch nach Sprache klassifizieren. Datierte/historische Karten sollten nach Jahrgängen oder Jahrhunderten sortiert werden <2016 maps of Germany> oder <Old maps of Madagascar> und Untergkategorien. Sinnvolle aber noch rote Kategorien (z.B. reine Ortsnamen) sollten m.M.n. beibehalten oder auch neu vergeben werden. Ich finde auch, dass man immer eine "Map of..."-Kategorie behalten sollte, z.B. hier neben dem Raion-Namen auch "Maps of ... Oblast". Category:Maps of the world ist mit 2,5k Karten etwas überfüllt und müsste eigentlich weiter nach Themen/Jahren/Sprachen s.o. sortiert werden. Hmmm... aufmerksam wurde ich, weil das hier keine Karte des Pazifik war. hier oder hier gab es eine Karten-Unterkategorie.
Das sollen bloß Anregungen sein, jeder arbeitet wie er mag und jeder macht auch mal Fehler. Ich selbst lege ein ziemliches Schneckentempo vor. Ich meine bloß, es ist zwar klasse, wenn die Karten erstmal schnell und grob wegsortiert worden sind, doch es heißt auch, dass später wieder jemand hergehen muss, und sich die Dateien ein weiteres Mal vornimmt, um z.B. von "Maps of Germany" nach "Old maps of Saxony" zu verschieben, bis irgendwann endlich "16th-century maps of Dresden" eingetragen wurde.
Trotz meiner Nörgelei natürlich auch Danke und weiter frohes Schaffen! Mit dem besten Gruß, --Enyavar (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ich versuche, nach Ausschnitt, und wo es sich feststellen laesst, nach Jahr und Sprache zu kategorisieren (letzteres habe ich oft vergessen, muss ich gestehen, will mich aber auf Deine Nachricht hin bessern). Auf das Kartenthema habe ich bislang nur ganz selten geachtet, will es aber kuenftig ebenfalls tun, wo es moeglich ist.

Allerdings finde ich es oft schwierig, die Karten "bis ganz nach unten", d.h. in die allergenaueste(n) Kategorie(n), zu schieben, weil mir i.allg. z.B. die Ortskenntnis fehlt (keine Ahnung, wo "Allonne (Deux-Sèvres)" liegt, ob es ein Dorf, eine Stadt, ein Bezirk, oder eine Region in Frankreich ist, bzw. welche oertlichen Untergliederungen es da ueberhaupt gibt). Daher denke ich, eine Arbeitsteilung ist effizienter: ich schiebe soweit hinunter wie mir moeglich (das ist schon oft genug Detektivarbeit) und ueberlasse den lokalen Experten den Rest. Da die Karten auf meiner Watchlist landen, sehe ich oefters, dass tatsaechlich welche von Anderen weiter hinuntergeschoben werden; ich unterstelle, dass das ohne meine Vorarbeit vielleicht nicht passiert waere (nicht alle lokalen Experten klappern saemtliche "Unidentified XXX"-Kategorien ab, vermute ich).

Bei File:CONCACAF Nations League (League A, B. C).png habe ich mich schlicht verguckt und peinlicherweise Kuba mit Indonesien verwechselt. Danke fuer Deine Korrektur!

Als Randbemerkung finde ich uebrigens, dass auf "Old" in Kategorienamen moeglichst verzichtet werden sollte, weil der Begriffsumfang sich im Lauf der Zeit aendert und dann ebenfalls Neukategorisierung noetig macht. Also m.E. besser "16th-century maps of Madagascar", unterhalb von "Maps of Madagascar by century" - diese Struktur kommt ohne "Old" aus und ist einigermassen "zukunftssicher". Viele Gruesse - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you Jochen Burghardt – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 01:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sekazi Mtingwa at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference (cropped).jpg

Copyright status: File:Sekazi Mtingwa at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference (cropped).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sekazi Mtingwa at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foias constant; Plot

Hi Jochen, it seems to me, that your plot [5] used in Foias constant [6] is wrong. There are several lines for initial values from 1 to 1.35. But the divergence behaves differently for initials below and above the constant; in particular they should oscilate in oposite phase. Matrix Computations (talk) 16:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand which lines you referred to. Checking the C and Gnuplot source code (given at File:Foias_5e-2.pdf) again, I still found no errors. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca

Hello Jochen Burghardt, having created Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (Suter) a minute ago, I now noticed you editd this. Before adding those images, I'dd like to read your opinion of what would be the best name for the category. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 03:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruff tuff cream puff: pining Ruff tuff cream puff wo created the category. :-)

It seems to me that the old Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca refers to the 1915 edition at https://archive.org/details/manualofnewzeala00suter , while your new Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (Suter) refers to the 1913 edition at https://archive.org/details/manualofnewzeala00sute . Therefore, I'd suggest to rename the former to Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (1915) and the latter to Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (1913). The inclusion of "Suter" may not be necessary, since it is unlikely (I guess) that another book with the same title appeared in the same year.

(As for my addition of Category:1913 in biology during my recent mass edit, I relied on the existing categorization into Category:1913 books. Today I believe that both yeaars should be changed to 1915.) - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jochen Burghardt.

Done I'dd appreciate if you would take a look at the categories to see if that is what you meant. Lotje (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me; I removed File:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (IA manualofnewzeala00sute).pdf from Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (Suter), and issued a speede-delete request for the latter. - I'd also suggest to dissolve Category:Images from Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca into its parent Category:Manual of the New Zealand mollusca (1915). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but what about the information on the Category:Images from Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca now? Thanks for your help and assistance. Lotje (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd move it to its parent category. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus2 (cropped 4).jpg

Copyright status: File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus2 (cropped 4).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus2 (cropped 4).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Karl Otto Koch.jpg

Copyright status: File:Karl Otto Koch.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Otto Koch.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solvay conference 1951 g.jpg

Hello Jochen Burghardt, wondering if N.P. Allen could be Norman Percy Allen. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is also claimed on the page pt:Norman Percy Allen. I'll try tomorrow to obtain a photo from Google images to compare with the Solvay photo. Thanks for your hint. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alessandro_Cotrufo.jpg

Hello Jochen Burghardt, you nominated this file for deletion saying it's unused selfie; was deleted several times before but its not so, /the file is a portrait image not selfie and the image has not been uploaded before

Which i still dont understand why you nominated it for deletion or is it because the file has the same name as former deleted file, looking forward to a response.

Thanks. QDJ22 (talk) 11:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion is not the same as deletion. You are invited to discuss at the nomination page why you think you image should be kept. Wikipedia editors other than me will eventually make a decision. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have responded at the nomination page but i didnt get any reply QDJ22 (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Тaras Rudyk.jpg

he was never Cardiologists from the Soviet Union. Be nor accurate Albedo (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is a cardiologist who was born and grown up in the Soviet Union. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manneback,Charles 1934 London.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Manneback,Charles 1934 London.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replied at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "The Royal Society 1934 London". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with OTRS

This user's help request has been resolved
If you have more questions, feel free to make another {{helpme}} request.

There is a sophisicated copyright discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "The Royal Society 1934 London". I have suggested (on 7 Aug) to settle it by asking the photo source whether the photographer is known, and to use OTRS for this purpose. I'm not sure whether OTRS is the most appropriate means for this (advice is welcome!). However, in any case, I'd like to learn at least the basic knowledge about OTRS (what is it good for, how to use it, etc.). So can anybody please provide me a link to an appropriate tutorial? Many thanks in advance. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jochen Burghardt: see below. You can just email the photo source and then forward their reply to VRT as proof that the photographer is unknown (and that therefore the files are public domain). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again: Need help with OTRS

This user's help request has been resolved
If you have more questions, feel free to make another {{helpme}} request.

I'd like to learn at least the basic knowledge about OTRS (what is it good for, how to use it, etc.). So can anybody please provide me a link to an appropriate tutorial? Many thanks in advance. (I renewed my request, and simplified it, since it wasn't answered for >1 month.) - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jochen Burghardt: Please read COM:VRT. It can be used as proof of copyright release via an email. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also sorry about the long wait time. After all this system is run by volunteers. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chokin monument (head).jpg

File:Chokin monument (head).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alexander Chursin (economist)

Category:Alexander Chursin (economist) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 11:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus4 (cropped 1).jpg

File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus4 (cropped 1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

95.91.244.1 09:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Julius Taylor in lab.jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:File:Julius Taylor in lab.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: not cc-by-sa

shizhao (talk) 02:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Julius Taylor at Morgan State (cropped).jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:File:Julius Taylor at Morgan State (cropped).jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: not cc-by-sa

shizhao (talk) 02:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Clarence Francis Stephens at Morgan State.jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:File:Clarence Francis Stephens at Morgan State.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: not cc-by-sa

shizhao (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Ronald Mickens at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference.jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:File:Ronald Mickens at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: not cc-by-sa

shizhao (talk) 02:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Ronald E. Mickens (July 1994).jpg

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:File:Ronald E. Mickens (July 1994).jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Not cc-by-sa

shizhao (talk) 02:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jochen Burghardt

Bildquelle - Link zu Git-Repository

Talkback: Nils von Barth: Svg output from LaTeX source

File:Rational sequence with 2 accumulation points.pdf

Copyright status: File:Glip galli.tif

Copyright status: File:Gießen HeuchelheimerStr102 509.jpg

Bots

Blackouts

Slavist - Linguist

Removing categories

Categorization foundations

Scientists in Spanish Wikipedia

Почему удалили категорию

FYI - Linear motors

Christian Nawroth

Sommacal Alfonso

Sommacal Alfonso

Spanish tranlations

Overcat?

Illustrations related to earthquake in Otto's Encyclopaedia

About that edit where I reverted myself...

added Category:Chemists from the Soviet Union

Chemists from Germany - Foto von Warner

Kotani, Hund, Amaldi, de Boer

Fokker

The Royal Society 1934 London-3.jpg

Foroa

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Important message for file movers

Category:Institute of Ultra-Hard Materials NASU

Engineers are not scientists.

Image without license

Copyright status: File:The method of fluxions and infinite series p.20.gif

Matrix multiplication attribution

Notification about possible deletion

Диалог

Corona Statistiken

We need your feedback!

Sammellöschungen

Karten-Kategorien

A barnstar for you!

Copyright status: File:Sekazi Mtingwa at the 2012 Ford Fellows Conference (cropped).jpg

Foias constant; Plot

Copyright status: File:Gedenktafel Tempelhofer Feld (Temph) Geschichtspfad Tempelhofer Feld-Columbia Haus2 (cropped 4).jpg

Copyright status: File:Karl Otto Koch.jpg

File:Alessandro_Cotrufo.jpg

Тaras Rudyk.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Need help with OTRS

Again: Need help with OTRS

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Navigation menu

Search