Commons:Categories for discussion/Archive/2016/07
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Categories for discussion.
You can visit the most recent archive here.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2008 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2009 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2010 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2011 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2012 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2013 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2014 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2015 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2017 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2018 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2019 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2020 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2021 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2022 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2023 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2024 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Archive July 2016
Please merge the Category:Ruas de Curitiba and Category:Streets in Curitiba. Its the same. -- Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Redirected to Category:Streets in Curitiba. --Achim (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Images were removed following Deletion Nomination, no further need for the category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Then discussion shouldn't be necessary and you could tag the category with {{Empty page}} instead of bringing it here. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Done I don't do enough with categories to do tags without checking! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by Jcb 2 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 10:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
This category is currently in Category:People by name. Is that right? I can't figure out the purpose of his category, even after reading en:Leagros Group. Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 19:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- "A Painter" ("Peintre A" in French) appears to be a specific painter in the group, one whose name is not known. Since it's not a real name, I don't think it should be in the people by name category. I think it should go in Category:Anonymous painters or Category:Unidentified painters. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- It is indeed a conventional name for an otherwise unknown painter belonging to the Leagros Group, but the correct English name appears to be "Painter A" (for instance [1]). I will rename the category. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Done. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Name mispelled, correct category already exists Teoamez (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Teoamez: Cases like this don't need discussion here. You can get this category deleted by putting
{{bad name|Estación de Arganzuela-Planetario}}on the category. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb 6 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category Kamil-b (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, request by author. --Achim (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
bitte löschen, die richtige lautet Category:William Wilde Goesseln (talk) 12:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Added {{Bad name}} template to delete file in favour of Category:William Wilde. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Please merge the Category:Józef Bohdan Zaleski and Category:Bohdan Zaleski. Its the same. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- The second one is empty, so I redirected it to the first one. It can be left that way until/unless there's a different person named just Bohdan Zaleski. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- There are indeed two different persons Jozef per d:Q11731676 and d:Q1355484 but no Bohdan. So I think a redirect is ok. --Achim (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Redirected by Auntof6 9 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Single image in this category. Images of Paros are not otherwise categorized by year, or even decade. Is this category necessary? Themightyquill (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: It now has more images, and there are more categories of Paros by year. Maybe it's reasonable to keep this now? --Auntof6 (talk) 09:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the category tree has been built up. I'm not sure it's worth categorizing by year, but I won't push to delete. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Closing as keep. No longer an issue. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Categoria già in uso con nome simile: Category:Internazionale a Ferrara https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Internazionale_a_Ferrara Nicola Quirico (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly, Nicola Quirico, you are nominating a category you created Category:Festival Internazionale Ferrara for deletion, in favour of a pre-existing category Category:Internazionale a Ferrara. If that's the case, you can simply move the one file from your category to the correct category, and add either {{Category redirect|Category:Internazionale a Ferrara}} (to redirect) or {{Bad name|Category:Internazionale a Ferrara}} (to delete) to your category. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- OK, thanks! I've done the category redirect
- If I understand correctly, Nicola Quirico, you are nominating a category you created Category:Festival Internazionale Ferrara for deletion, in favour of a pre-existing category Category:Internazionale a Ferrara. If that's the case, you can simply move the one file from your category to the correct category, and add either {{Category redirect|Category:Internazionale a Ferrara}} (to redirect) or {{Bad name|Category:Internazionale a Ferrara}} (to delete) to your category. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
--Nicola Quirico (talk) 12:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Redirected by User:Nicola Quirico 11 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 18:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Empty category in Polish language, equal to Category:WLs75 Michał Sobkowski (talk) 06:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Empty category, to be deleted Ciacho5 (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Ciacho5: Empty categories don't require discussion. You can just put the {{Empty page}} template on this. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ciacho5, dziękuję for cleaning up and moving its content to other cats. Well, I know there is still some work to be done at Category:Naval mine countermeasures. I was living on a sister of this one for some time when I was young... Best, --Achim (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge into Category:Hyporthodus niveatus? Or vice versa? Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also: Category:Epinephelus nigritus / Category:Hyporthodus nigritus. --Achim (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I left a note on en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes. --Achim (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Copied from en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes --Achim (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC):
- The current name and appropriate category is Category:Hyporthodus niveatus; the relevant references are now in the en:Snowy grouper article. Similarly, Hyporthodus nigritus. -- Olaff (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Content moved and cats redirected. --Achim (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
This category has only one file in it. There are no similar categories in the parent one (for example: Human faces in countries, or Human faces by place, etc). The file should be moved to another category, and this one deleted. Hexafluoride (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Move the file to the two parent categories and delete this category. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Done as Themightyquill suggested. --Achim (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Please merge the Category:Dog waste bins and Category:Dog feces containers. It's the same. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 22:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Arnaud Palastowicz: This can be resolved witbout discussion. You move everything into the category you want to keep, then on the one you're not keeping you either redirect it to the good category or request deletion using the {{Speedy}} template with a reason. I've done this, by redirecting. If you'd rather have the duplicate category deleted, feel free to change the template on it. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Redirected by Auntof6 10 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
I what does it mean if I found a la Calvera skull in trash 107.77.229.124 12:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Inappropriate CfD. Please close. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Out of process scope. --Achim (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category, and all images except cosplay would be copyrighted, so we arent getting any Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Mercurywoodrose: Empty categories don't require discussion here. You can put {{Empty page}} on them, and they usually get deleted pretty quickly. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept: Contains 18 svg files now. --Achim (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category, and all images except cosplay would be copyrighted, so we arent going to get any. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Mercurywoodrose: Empty categories don't require discussion here. You can put {{Empty page}} on them, and they usually get deleted pretty quickly. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept: Contains 1 non-empty subcat. Feel free to start another CfD request if you like naming or structure of these categories to be discussed. --Achim (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
I wanted take photos from Flickr, but they are copyrighted, so this category won't be used. Kamil-b (talk) 18:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Kamil-b: You can take care of this kind of thing by putting {{Empty page}} on the category. The admins usually take care of those pretty quickly. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 08:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
What is the difference between this one and Category:Bandoneons? Shouldn't they be merged somehow? Jwh (talk) 06:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks to Jwh for pointing this out. Category:Bandoneón has to be merged and redirected to Category:Bandoneons. I already did some cleanup as some people didn't know the differences between Bandoneons, Concertinas and Accordions. Two further changes are to be done: Category:Inside of bandoneons should be renamed to Category:Details of bandoneons or (IMO better) merged one level up as there are just 20, maybe 30 images at a whole after merging. And finally there are Category:Bandoneonists and Category:People playing bandoneons which might be merged to Category:Bandoneonists, because we can't decide who is a professional bandoneonist and who is a non-professional guy playing bandoneon. --Achim (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Merged Category:Bandoneón to Category:Bandoneons and left a redirect. Moved Category:Anglo concertina to Category:Anglo concertinas and did some categorising cleanup. --Achim (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
There is a bulk renaming request by User:Smuconlaw regarding this and its subcats. I'd like to hear some other voices on that and move these requests here precautionary.
| List of move requests | |
|---|---|
| {| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" style="border:1px solid #CC9;" class="movecat" | Rename Category:Trash bins in Algeria to Category:Waste containers in Algeria (10 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Algeria;Waste containers in Algeria;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Argentina to Category:Waste containers in Argentina (10 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Argentina;Waste containers in Argentina;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Armenia to Category:Waste containers in Armenia (12 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Armenia;Waste containers in Armenia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Australia to Category:Waste containers in Australia (45 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Australia;Waste containers in Australia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Austria to Category:Waste containers in Austria (15 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Austria;Waste containers in Austria;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Azerbaijan to Category:Waste containers in Azerbaijan (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Azerbaijan;Waste containers in Azerbaijan;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the Basque Country to Category:Waste containers in the Basque Country (24 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the Basque Country;Waste containers in the Basque Country;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Belgium to Category:Waste containers in Belgium (17 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Belgium;Waste containers in Belgium;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Bosnia and Herzegovina to Category:Waste containers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (9 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Bosnia and Herzegovina;Waste containers in Bosnia and Herzegovina;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Brazil to Category:Waste containers in Brazil (13 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Brazil;Waste containers in Brazil;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Bulgaria to Category:Waste containers in Bulgaria (19 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Bulgaria;Waste containers in Bulgaria;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Canada to Category:Waste containers in Canada (8 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Canada;Waste containers in Canada;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Chile to Category:Waste containers in Chile (14 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Chile;Waste containers in Chile;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in China to Category:Waste containers in China (24 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in China;Waste containers in China;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Colombia to Category:Waste containers in Colombia (16 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Colombia;Waste containers in Colombia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Croatia to Category:Waste containers in Croatia (7 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Croatia;Waste containers in Croatia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the Czech Republic to Category:Waste containers in the Czech Republic (18 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the Czech Republic;Waste containers in the Czech Republic;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Denmark to Category:Waste containers in Denmark (17 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Denmark;Waste containers in Denmark;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Estonia to Category:Waste containers in Estonia (32 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Estonia;Waste containers in Estonia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Finland to Category:Waste containers in Finland (47 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Finland;Waste containers in Finland;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in France to Category:Waste containers in France (55 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in France;Waste containers in France;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Georgia to Category:Waste containers in Georgia (3 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Georgia;Waste containers in Georgia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Germany to Category:Waste containers in Germany (142 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Germany;Waste containers in Germany;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Greece to Category:Waste containers in Greece (10 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Greece;Waste containers in Greece;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Hungary to Category:Waste containers in Hungary (205 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Hungary;Waste containers in Hungary;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in India to Category:Waste containers in India (28 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in India;Waste containers in India;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Indonesia to Category:Waste containers in Indonesia (40 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Indonesia;Waste containers in Indonesia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Iran to Category:Waste containers in Iran (9 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Iran;Waste containers in Iran;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Ireland to Category:Waste containers in Ireland (14 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Ireland;Waste containers in Ireland;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Israel to Category:Waste containers in Israel (45 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Israel;Waste containers in Israel;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Italy to Category:Waste containers in Italy (29 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Italy;Waste containers in Italy;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Kazakhstan to Category:Waste containers in Kazakhstan (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Kazakhstan;Waste containers in Kazakhstan;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Kosovo to Category:Waste containers in Kosovo (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Kosovo;Waste containers in Kosovo;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Laos to Category:Waste containers in Laos (3 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Laos;Waste containers in Laos;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Lithuania to Category:Waste containers in Lithuania (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Lithuania;Waste containers in Lithuania;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Luxembourg to Category:Waste containers in Luxembourg (42 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Luxembourg;Waste containers in Luxembourg;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the Republic of Macedonia to Category:Waste containers in the Republic of Macedonia (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the Republic of Macedonia;Waste containers in the Republic of Macedonia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Malaysia to Category:Waste containers in Malaysia (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Malaysia;Waste containers in Malaysia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Malta to Category:Waste containers in Malta (9 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Malta;Waste containers in Malta;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Mexico to Category:Waste containers in Mexico (16 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Mexico;Waste containers in Mexico;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Moldova to Category:Waste containers in Moldova (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Moldova;Waste containers in Moldova;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the Netherlands to Category:Waste containers in the Netherlands (43 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the Netherlands;Waste containers in the Netherlands;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in New Zealand to Category:Waste containers in New Zealand (31 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in New Zealand;Waste containers in New Zealand;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Northern Ireland to Category:Waste containers in Northern Ireland (24 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Northern Ireland;Waste containers in Northern Ireland;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Norway to Category:Waste containers in Norway (32 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Norway;Waste containers in Norway;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Peru to Category:Waste containers in Peru (77 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Peru;Waste containers in Peru;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the Philippines to Category:Waste containers in the Philippines (17 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the Philippines;Waste containers in the Philippines;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Poland to Category:Waste containers in Poland (24 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Poland;Waste containers in Poland;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Portugal to Category:Waste containers in Portugal (50 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Portugal;Waste containers in Portugal;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Romania to Category:Waste containers in Romania (12 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Romania;Waste containers in Romania;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Russia to Category:Waste containers in Russia (79 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Russia;Waste containers in Russia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Serbia to Category:Waste containers in Serbia (3 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Serbia;Waste containers in Serbia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Singapore to Category:Waste containers in Singapore (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Singapore;Waste containers in Singapore;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Slovakia to Category:Waste containers in Slovakia (8 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Slovakia;Waste containers in Slovakia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Slovenia to Category:Waste containers in Slovenia (15 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Slovenia;Waste containers in Slovenia;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in South Africa to Category:Waste containers in South Africa (3 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in South Africa;Waste containers in South Africa;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in South Korea to Category:Waste containers in South Korea (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in South Korea;Waste containers in South Korea;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Spain to Category:Waste containers in Spain (32 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Spain;Waste containers in Spain;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Sri Lanka to Category:Waste containers in Sri Lanka (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Sri Lanka;Waste containers in Sri Lanka;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Sweden to Category:Waste containers in Sweden (63 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Sweden;Waste containers in Sweden;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Switzerland to Category:Waste containers in Switzerland (18 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Switzerland;Waste containers in Switzerland;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Taiwan to Category:Waste containers in Taiwan (43 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Taiwan;Waste containers in Taiwan;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Thailand to Category:Waste containers in Thailand (10 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Thailand;Waste containers in Thailand;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Turkey to Category:Waste containers in Turkey (31 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Turkey;Waste containers in Turkey;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Ukraine to Category:Waste containers in Ukraine (16 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Ukraine;Waste containers in Ukraine;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash containers in the United Kingdom to Category:Waste containers in the United Kingdom (18 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash containers in the United Kingdom;Waste containers in the United Kingdom;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the East Riding of Yorkshire to Category:Litter bins in the East Riding of Yorkshire (249 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the East Riding of Yorkshire;Litter bins in the East Riding of Yorkshire;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Kingston upon Hull to Category:Litter bins in Kingston upon Hull (16 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Kingston upon Hull;Litter bins in Kingston upon Hull;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Hampshire to Category:Litter bins in Hampshire (13 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Hampshire;Litter bins in Hampshire;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins on the Isle of Wight to Category:Litter bins on the Isle of Wight (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins on the Isle of Wight;Litter bins on the Isle of Wight;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Kent to Category:Litter bins in Kent (4 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Kent;Litter bins in Kent;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Lincolnshire to Category:Litter bins in Lincolnshire (7 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Lincolnshire;Litter bins in Lincolnshire;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Rubbish bins in London to Category:Litter bins in London (124 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Rubbish bins in London;Litter bins in London;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in North Yorkshire to Category:Litter bins in North Yorkshire (5 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in North Yorkshire;Litter bins in North Yorkshire;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Somerset to Category:Litter bins in Somerset (4 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Somerset;Litter bins in Somerset;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Warwickshire to Category:Litter bins in Warwickshire (5 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Warwickshire;Litter bins in Warwickshire;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in the West Midlands to Category:Litter bins in the West Midlands (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in the West Midlands;Litter bins in the West Midlands;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash containers in Merseyside to Category:Litter bins in Merseyside (6 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash containers in Merseyside;Litter bins in Merseyside;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash containers in Liverpool to Category:Litter bins in Liverpool (5 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash containers in Liverpool;Litter bins in Liverpool;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Scotland to Category:Litter bins in Scotland (22 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Scotland;Litter bins in Scotland;r; To match sister categories. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Wales (talk) to Category:Litter bins in Wales (16 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Wales;Litter bins in Wales;r; To match sister categories. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Uruguay to Category:Waste containers in Uruguay (15 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Uruguay;Waste containers in Uruguay;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
Rename Category:Trash bins in Vietnam to Category:Waste containers in Vietnam (3 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.Trash bins in Vietnam;Waste containers in Vietnam;r; To match the parent category. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
|} --Achim (talk) 19:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I requested the moves. I believe the requested moves are uncontroversial as they are intended to align the subcategories with the parent category, which is "Category:Waste containers". These category names seem to have been left unchanged from when the parent category used to be "Trash bins". Where there is a special term used in a particular country (e.g., litter bins in the UK and trash cans in the US), these will not be changed. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I see, thank you for your quick reply, SMUconlaw. For the records: I just discovered this stale cfd request. --Achim (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me, given that Category:Sorted waste containers by country should be a sub-category of Category:Waste containers by country not (as it is now) a sub-category of Category:Trash bins by country. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I copied all of the requests to CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 14:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me, given that Category:Sorted waste containers by country should be a sub-category of Category:Waste containers by country not (as it is now) a sub-category of Category:Trash bins by country. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I see, thank you for your quick reply, SMUconlaw. For the records: I just discovered this stale cfd request. --Achim (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: via CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Reasons for discussion request Category for a single portrait by a prolific portraitist. --Gamaliel (talk) 15:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 17:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Category for single portrait by prolific artist. Gamaliel (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 17:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
category for single portrait by prolific artist Gamaliel (talk) 16:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 17:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
category for single portrait by prolific portratist Gamaliel (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 17:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
cat for single portrait by prolific portrait artist Gamaliel (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 17:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
cat for single portrait by prolific portratist Gamaliel (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Gamaliel: This is "categories for discussion". I see that you emptied the categories already, so the only thing left to discuss is whether they should have been emptied: empty cats don't usually require discussion. If you have an empty category you'd like deleted, you can handle that by putting {{Empty page}} on it. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 16:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Redundant with Category:Veerabhadra Temple, Lepakshi ? Themightyquill (talk) 09:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know, but surely this category meant temple instead of template. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's the same, I merged its content to Category:Veerabhadra Temple, Lepakshi. On the fly I moved Category:Virabhadra to Category:Veerabhadra per File:Lepakshi Archaeological Notice.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Merged and deleted per above. --Achim (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Non encyclopedic category Desyman (talk) 08:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, there is one matching File:Umarell Bologna 2015-09-14 11.15.13.jpg only (you removed it), but I tend to say Delete per Commons is no Wiktionary. --Achim (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty, deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic category, propose deletion Desyman (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty, deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
error of unexperienced user ProfessorX (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty, deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
No such airplane exists in the Emirates fleet (see [2]), and these photos are probably photos of A6-EWA, since the registration number is similar. Category should be merged with Category:A6-EWA (aircraft) and files renamed. Conifer (talk) 06:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Category:A6-EWA (aircraft). The two photographs indeed were of A6-EWA,the W does look like an M but is a W and I've since fixed it and change it to the correct category. Bidgee (talk) 08:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not sure about the need for discussion. If doesn't exist should simply be deleted. Put it through speedy deletion asap. Ardfern (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Even the EU accepted that the cheese has two names, the missing one "Hellim" for Turks. So either we should change the name of this cat to Hellim-Haloumi or have a separate Hellim category for the Turkish Cypriot (TRNC) and the Turkish (Turkey) cheese. E4024 (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't like these useless and never ending naming discussions. E4024, are Haloumi and Hellim different things by objective facts or are these two different names of the same thing? --Achim (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- I myself do not like many other things, but you will concede that what we like or not is subjective. As you have said something subjective let me also do so: I do like to discuss these name changes. It shows a level of civility and maturity. Many users of these pages -sometimes including myself- have changed names at times without considering other people's views, simply imposing their choice on others. That I believe is not the right way to do things. Therefore here I am to discuss, and not to impose. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 06:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, category names are supposed to be in English and halloumi is the accepted English name of this type of cheese, haloumi is an accepted variant spelling. I couldn't find hellim in an English dictionary. We don't call French cheese fromage or German cheese Käse, either. Feel free to add a description to the category page (it doesn't have one, currently). --rimshottalk 07:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- E4024, there are some ongoing technical efforts to provide internationalisation on Commons pages. Please be so kind to have a look at this page d:Q549793 on Wikidata. Now change at the topmost line your language to Turkish, Greek, or Bulgarian or whatever, and you will see the page's title changing as well. In a similar way it will work on Commons when the internationalising job will be done completely. Then there's no longer any need of discussing right or wrong or bad or better category names. Until then we should and will keep one category and redirect other matching names there for that's the purpose of redirects. --Achim (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- I was not talking about what the Turkish name is or should be, but what name we should use in English. Have a good weekend. --E4024 (talk) 16:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- E4024, there are some ongoing technical efforts to provide internationalisation on Commons pages. Please be so kind to have a look at this page d:Q549793 on Wikidata. Now change at the topmost line your language to Turkish, Greek, or Bulgarian or whatever, and you will see the page's title changing as well. In a similar way it will work on Commons when the internationalising job will be done completely. Then there's no longer any need of discussing right or wrong or bad or better category names. Until then we should and will keep one category and redirect other matching names there for that's the purpose of redirects. --Achim (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep English wikipedia makes no distinction. The cheese is from Cypress, so it has two local names, but the English name is undoubtedly halloumi. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Per naming shown at d:Q549793 and at Google books I moved Category:Haloumi to Category:Halloumi. Category:Haloumi as well as Category:Hellim now redirect there. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Empty category Reguyla (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 18:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
This category should be renamed to "Created with Paint.NET" to conform with the style of the other categories like "Category:Created with Adobe Photoshop. Category:Created with Scribus, Category:Created with LibreOffice, Category:Created with GIMP, etc. This will add it to the Category:Created with page and make it easier to find AbdealiJK (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Support, the template is also {{Created with Paint.NET}}. --Achim (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Created with Paint.NET leaving a redirect. Fixed cat name at {{Created with Paint.NET}} for automatical categorising. --Achim (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
delete; empty category Partynia (talk) 09:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
I propose renmaing this category to "Messa e processione di San Giovanni, Esino Lario 2016" because a "mass and procession of St John (the Baptist)" is annual and may happen in any part of the world. It's just that it only gets a lot of coverage this year due to its being part of Wikimania 2016. But I hesitate to do an auto-rename due to the large number of files already in this category (and I'm adding to it for now). Deryck Chan (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Two questions. First, do we have media for this event from any other year? Second, shouldn't this category name be in English, per policy? --Auntof6 (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- As part of the events of Wikimania 2016 I would suggest to leave the name in Italian, as it was named in the program. But than it would make more sense to name it "Category:Wikimania 2016 - Messa e processione di San Giovanni". We could than also place it into the "Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist in Esino Lario" (perhaps somebody wants to add images from past or future events. This category should than be placed in Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist. --Wuselig (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree we should keep it in Italian because this category refers specifically to a single event in Italy. I would prefer "Esino Lario 2016" rather than "Wikimania 2016" as disambiguator because the mass is advertised on the Wikimania program, but is organised by the local church in Esino rather than Wikimania. But "Wikimania 2016" is better than no disambiguator. I'm not keen on creating "Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist in Esino Lario" because I see little value in creating a category with only 1 member, considering that "Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist" only has 10 subcats at the moment. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- As part of the events of Wikimania 2016 I would suggest to leave the name in Italian, as it was named in the program. But than it would make more sense to name it "Category:Wikimania 2016 - Messa e processione di San Giovanni". We could than also place it into the "Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist in Esino Lario" (perhaps somebody wants to add images from past or future events. This category should than be placed in Category:Feast of St. John the Baptist. --Wuselig (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- If it's not the name of a particular wikimedia event, I don't see why it should be kept in Italian. It's a mass and procession, that's not a formal title, it's a description of the event. I'd propose Category:2016 mass and procession of St. John in Esino Lario. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am okay with this suggestion too, and the title that User:Wuselig has moved it to. Deryck Chan (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Messa e processione di San Giovanni - Esino Lario 2016 by creator Wuselig 14 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category Partynia (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Oppose: contains 2 images, authority control, wikidata record is d:Q15430512. --Achim (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept. --Achim (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category Partynia (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Partynia: Empty categories don't require discussion here. You can just put {{Empty page}} on them, and an administrator will see it. They usually take care of them pretty quickly. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
empty category Ehrlich91 (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Ehrlich91: Empty categories don't require discussion. You can just put {{Empty page}} on them. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: Thanks for this, I rarely use Commons for deletion or nomination of categories, I forgot how things is done :) --Ehrlich91 (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Auntof6, not to be deleted here, please check the matter before giving such advices. --Achim (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: Thanks for this, I rarely use Commons for deletion or nomination of categories, I forgot how things is done :) --Ehrlich91 (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Made a disambig page listing 4 possible category targets. --Achim (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
delete; empty category Partynia (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- No longer empty.Jmarchn (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- This category is useless. Every dentists´ activities are "Dentistry procedures", which are categorized in the Category:Dentistry. A "pill" as shown in the new Category:Fluoride therapy is not a "procedure". Same for Dental splint as in Category:Dental splint. BTW this kind of splint is not to fix fractures, but for orthodontics. It belongs to Category:Dental materials--Partynia (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
@Partynia:
This category is useless. said you. Certainly, now you are right when your work has been undone everything I had done fulfilling this category 
. (Filling this category with the elements defined as such in the en:Category:Dentistry_procedures).
Every dentists´ activities are "Dentistry procedures", which are categorized in the Category:Dentistry. said you. The last correct phrase is "which I has been categorized...". This is the main disagreement with the common criteria. This category also exist in other 6 wikis. In Commons exists other 14 similar categories (Category:Medical procedures). With your reasoning each urological activity (en:Category:Urologic procedures or Category:Urologic procedures) should be categorized in urology (en:Category:Urology or Category:Urology) !!!.
A "pill" as shown in the new Category:Fluoride therapy is not a "procedure". said you. You are right, now only exists a image with two pills. But Fluoride therapy include dentistry procedures as application of gels/foams, varnish and slow-release devices. In time there may be images of the application of these procedures, that has been considered as procedures. Then Fluoride therapy is categorized in en:Category:Dentistry_procedures.
Last phrase: Same for Dental splint as in Category:Dental splint. BTW this kind of splint is not to fix fractures, but for orthodontics. It belongs to Category:Dental materials. OK.
--Jmarchn (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- It´s an Over-categorization. Category:Medical procedures is also useless. All "procedures" are categorized in the parent category Category:Medical treatments. It´s not user-friendly to create a category with only 1 file. Categories in other wikis have different criteria. Yes there could be other pics about application of gels/foams, varnish and slow-release devices in Fluorid therapy. But wait till there will be any. A pill is no procedure.--Partynia (talk) 05:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
@Partynia:
You say: It´s an Over-categorization. Category:Medical procedures is also useless. All "procedures" are categorized in the parent category Category:Medical treatments..
- I do not agree with the term "useless." The category is useful when it is used for wikipedians or other persons who browse these categories and today expect to find same or similar categories that are in their wikis.
- We agree that this current categorization is not the best (but this is not an over-categorization). And I would use other categorizations as they could be "medical treatments" and "diagnostic procedures". And in the future it would be desirable.
- The "dentistry procedures" category has sense as conceptually distinct to "dentistry" (in this category exists several differentiated subcategories: dentistry diseases, dentists or dental magazines, for example). Surely the term "dentistry treatment" would be better but is not used. In a future, always could include "dentistry diagnostic procedures" with "dentistry treatments" in the "dentistry procedures".
- But this is not the problem. The problem is: "It is useful to undo the work done by other wikipedians (me, for example) can be useful in some other way and no consensus". Please, let me recover the work that I did. There is much work to do for everyone. For example, recently I categorized over 1200 images that was in the Category:Medicine and added the message to categorize ({{Categorise}}).
You say: It´s not user-friendly to create a category with only 1 file. Categories in other wikis have different criteria.
- I can agree or disagree according to utility of that category (of a single file). The categorization criteria of Commons must be different to the wikipedia categorization criteria.
- The main function of Commons is to provide media to wikipedia articles. So an article can contain a single image at the moment, but it is useful to have a category for that single image (in Commons) with a bidirectional link through Wikidata to that article. In this case, a wikipedian, who read an article that has no image, will see appear the link to the Commons category in that article (currently -and recently- this menu-option is active in several wikis), and thus be able to add.
- In a manner contrary, it exists (as you well know) a lot of crowded categories that are perfectly useless to the wikipedias.
--Jmarchn (talk) 17:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
@Jmarchn:
Me too, I categorized about 3000 dentistry files and created al lot of new categories. At the end I saw the category "dentistry procedures" not useful, because you had to categorize there about 1500 files, which are all in other categories. I repeat: It´s not useful to put only a few files there. There had been five (five) files/links in this category, which I could categorize in better (lower) categories. After that you have linked files or cats, which were not on the target. A splint is no procedure, a pill either. Let me do my work in the category dentistry. And do your work in the category medicine. To fulfill this big task you must have in mind a catgorytree. --Partynia (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Partynia:
- OK. You should have simply said: This is my territory. Get out, stranger!.
- Do what you want, the world is wide. Good luck! --Jmarchn (talk) 06:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jmarchn:
- Be nice!! I fulfilled your wish. The category is now filled with procedures.--Partynia (talk) 07:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Done: kept. --Partynia (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Please rename the Category:Illuminated buildings in Udaipar to Category:Illuminated buildings in Udaipur Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Category moved. Deletion requested for old cat. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INC 29 July 2016. --Achim (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
je suis avec toi ma soeur car j ai perdu aussi mon fils en 2014 a l age de 36ans " ina li ALLAH oi ina ila3i raji3oun " 109.27.131.168 19:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 16:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Is this the proper name for this? I've heard all these names be used:
- Groupie (unable to generate Google results, due to the multiple menaings)
- Groufie (427 000 results on Google)
- Wefie (1 700 000 results on Google)
Which one of these is the one we should use? Josve05a (talk) 02:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Category names should be in plural and I think it's helpful to use words actually found in dictionaries. Therefore I propose to Rename to Category:Group selfies. --rimshottalk 08:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agree with Rimshot's suggestion. --Achim (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Category:Group selfies. Let's not use neologisms any more than necessary. Redirect all of the above to that if you want.- Themightyquill (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Group selfies via CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
This category so far has one subcategory, but I don't think it is realistic to expect any more year-based categories for this minor porn actress. It is a case of completely redundant categorisation. FredWalsh (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 21:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
This category so far has one subcategory, but I don't think it is realistic to expect any more year-based categories for this minor porn actress. It is a case of completely redundant categorisation. FredWalsh (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry 21:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Empty category, no use for it 88.64.191.18 16:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Category:Infantry fighting vehicles of Ukraine, which follows the naming convention of Category:Infantry fighting vehicles by country. --rimshottalk 21:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Redirected. --Achim (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Please delete. I created but should not have an apostrophe in it. I'm also going to create a new one called Maps after Ptolemy Geographia which is more accurate. Ndalyrose (talk) 09:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I've created the new more accurate category https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_after_Ptolemy_Geographia and filled it with pretty, pretty pictures :). Would appreciate removal of the incorrect one now so there is no confusion. Thanks. --Ndalyrose (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Empty category. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- I can only guess the image in this category was deleted. Wish there was a way to know. Rmhermen (talk) 06:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- File:INSChennai2015.png was deleted for copyright reasons. I suppose it was the only file in this category. --rimshottalk 17:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: empty. --INeverCry 21:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
This category neets to be merged with Category:Midgley Bridge. It is a misspelling of the correct name of the bridge. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 18:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
"Midgely bridge" has 1690 hits on google, but "Midgley bridge" has 312,000. It's a common misspelling but clearly wrong. I'm going to be bold and redirect this without further discussion. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
All the paintings are copyright violations since the artist died in 1958. Some catalogs said 1919 or 1937, but 1958 is right (see w:de:Otto Herschel for the 1958 reference, and [3] for a second confirmation that 1937 cannot be right since an emigration in 1940 is mentioned). All files should be undeleted in 2029. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- @AndreasPraefcke: There's nothing wrong with the category itself. In case of copyright violations, please nominate the files. If, as a result, the category is emptied, it can be deleted. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Done: empty. --INeverCry 21:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Also affected:
Unclear distinction between En route to Lulusar Lake, Jalkhadh to Lulusar Lake road and Way to Lake Lulusar. FDMS 4 17:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- If it helps, the road seems to be called en:N-15 National Highway on English wikipedia. We could move these categories either to Category:N-15 National Highway (though the highway is significantly longer than the section portrayed in the images), or something like Category:N-15 National Highway between Jalkhadh and Lulusar Lake. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- This seems confusing. Saying "to" sounds like the road is one way. "Lulusar Lake to Jalkhadh road" is also correct, right? Why not just call it Category:N-15 National Highway? Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Please merge and RD to "Category:Gaziosmanpaşa, Ankara" that already exists with the correct name E4024 (talk) 08:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: Merged content to Category:Gaziosmanpaşa, Ankara leaving a redirect. --Achim (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
riferimento toponomastico del quartiere montesacro alto rispetto alla vicinanza a roma 93.63.165.5 09:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
???? Scusa, vuoi spiegare meglio quale è il problema ? --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept without any action. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Wondering if this shouldn't be merged into Category:Hills of Saxony? Jwh (talk) 07:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, please do it. Same discussion as Category:Grasslands of Slovenia.--ProfessorX (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'd also support the merger since it's obviously duplicated and "of" is definitely more common among peers than "in". That said, Category:Hills in Bavaria, and Category:Hills in North Rhine-Westphalia exist. Category:Hills in Berlin too, but "in" seems to be more common for cities. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Done: merged and redirected to Category:Hills of Saxony. --Achim (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The purpose of this category is unclear. Is it supposed to be something like "decontamination of objects"? There is no real theme to the 20 images in the category. I think we should move them back into Category:Decontamination until that category is divided into more reasonable subcategories. We don't use Category:Stuff, so this cat probably should not exist either. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ruff tuff cream puff Merge to Category:Decontamination. I cannot find examples that are similar. I checked Category:Cooking and Category:Painting to see if I could find the equivalent "cooking stuff" and "painting stuff" categories. I think the main concept goes in the main category. There could be a category for "decontamination of people" or "decontamination of clothing" but not for general stuff. I do not have an opinion about the creation of Category:Stuff, although it would be interesting to see Commons divided between stuff and non-stuff. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Category is empty. I don't see any reason to redirect, so I'm just deleting it. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't think a separate category is required for single image. Should be deleted. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed, especially when there is no Category:Naval research ships to necessitate this category. Move the image to Category:Research ships of India and Category:Naval ships of India and delete the category. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Category deletes as per nomination. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that Commons:Category scheme People does currently suggest a minimum of two photos to create a category for a person. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment I did not get the no immediate prospect of expansion. Has the actress either died or retired or for any reason disappeared from the public scene? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Loni Evans has died 01-JAN-2017 as per IMDB nm4132546/. --Archie02 (talk) 14:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept. With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless. --Archie02 (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless. --Archie02 (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless. --Archie02 (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, per Tm and Okki. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept. With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless. --Archie02 (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept. With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless. --Archie02 (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't think this category is needed- if it is meant to contain images of things in or around containers, that could be achieved by adding categories for those things to the images, without the need for a specific category. I have asked the creator for an explanation but s/he seems to communicate only in Japanese, in which I am not fluent. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agree lets delete it. --Jarekt (talk) 10:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: I have emptied the category (moving all images to Category:Shipping containers or other relevant subcategories) and requested speedy deletion. --DAJF (talk) 07:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Category was deleted already in April 2017. --Archie02 (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: If a second file is uploaded, then this category could easily be recreated. In almost six years, only one file has been added to this category (and even that file is already almost nine years old). Can you realistically see another free photo of this minor porn actress being uploaded anytime soon? FredWalsh (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: If a second file is uploaded, then this category could easily be recreated. In seven years since this category was created, only one file has been added to this category (and even that file is almost ten years old). Can you realistically see another free photo of this minor porn actress being uploaded anytime soon? FredWalsh (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept. --Archie02 (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Friday (porn actress) (updated from former Category:Friday (porn star))
[edit]Single item category with no immediate prospect of expansion. FredWalsh (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Categories allow to see easily and directly all present and future medias. Existing categories also make it much easier to categorize future media by neophytes. Okki (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: If a second file is uploaded, then this category could easily be recreated. In eight years since this category was created, only one file has been added to this category (and even that file is almost nine years old). Can you realistically see another free photo of this minor porn actress being uploaded anytime soon? FredWalsh (talk) 00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. However, if kept, cat name should change from "porn star" to "porn actress". --Auntof6 (talk) 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing in policy forbids the existance of an category with a single image, and the files should be categorize to the best of the possibities. If the pretensions of FredWalsh gain traction we will end up with upper categories filled with images that should be in subcategories. The argument that this categories could be deleted and recreated in the future is plainly stupid and mocking of the contributions, work and time of the original creators of this categories and if other images will be uploaded “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future..”Tm (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Former Category:Friday (porn star) was moved into Category:Friday (porn actress) in July 2016, while the deletion discussion remained under original Category:Friday (porn star). --Archie02 (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
With the introduction of Wikidata Infobox, this 2 year old discussion to delete single-item categories meanwhile is pointless.
Kept (under revised category name). --Archie02 (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
The categhory shows only pictures from the user Mark Heffron, seems to have a self-celebratory intent rather than an explanatory one, that should be proper for an encyclopedia. 79.47.29.241 19:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe he should have his own category—a Category:Mark Heffron—under Category:Naturism and Category:Nude men if he's naked in all (or nearly all) the images of him. Perhaps we could split the activities and bundle them with other states: particularly, Category:Nude or partially nude caving and Category:Nude or partially nude rock climbing; and put his images, or category, into these latter two (as of now redlinked) categories instead of (or maybe in addition to) the former two, if all the images of him are of only of caving and rock climbing.199.7.156.128 01:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, he seems to have uploaded 50 files, perhaps all of himself.199.7.156.128 02:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Category was deleted on 18 December 2018. --Archie02 (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
It seems this is very similar to Category:Screenshots of software. I was expecting this category to contain sub-categories like "Category:Screenshots by GNOME Screenshot" or "Category:Screenshots by Scrot", etc. But it actually contains things like Category:Screenshots of Wolfram Alpha - which should actually be under Category:Screenshots of software. So I propose we merge this into Category:Screenshots of software AbdealiJK (talk) 07:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- This naming convention ("X by Y") is standard for metacategories. Not all categories that use it are metacategories, though: sometimes that has to be made clear in comments on the category page. It would be clearer if metacat names were more like "X grouped by Y", but that's not what we have. "Screenshots by software" can be a metacategory (grouped by either software seen in the screenshots or software used to make the screenshots). "Screenshots of software" would not be a metacategory because it doesn't say what the contents might be grouped by. Maybe we don't need a metacategory here, but if it's wanted and you don't like the existing name, we'd need a different name that would work for a metacat. Maybe "Screenshots by software shown"? --Auntof6 (talk) 09:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Do nothing – an experienced Commoner knows what the preposition “by” means in this context. An inexperienced Commoner had to notice {{Metacat}} before starting discussion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Not done: no consensus for any action. --ƏXPLICIT 05:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
should be merged with Category:Grasslands. And Grassland is not "Green spaces in Romania", but anywhere else. Third: Grassland are locations as disambiguated in en:Grassland (disambiguation) ProfessorX (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Then should this be a disambiguation category? It could contain the grasslands category plus red linked categories for the other meanings. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think so, too.--ProfessorX (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- I also support a disambig page. While we're on the subject, would anyone like to comment on Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/02/Category:Grasslands of Slovenia? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think so, too.--ProfessorX (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Done: convert to disambiguation category. --ƏXPLICIT 05:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
This category contains a single category which contains a single file. Nothing else in Kozova Raion is categorized by decade or year, let alone month and year. Sub-category Category:24 September 2011 in Denysiv should also be upmerged, along with Category:24 September 2015 in Ternopil and all the specific day categories in Category:September in Ternopil Oblast. Even categorizing by Oblast month and year is probably unnecessarily specific. Themightyquill (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- In category Category:Ternopil Oblast is more than 20 000 files. And the number of files associated with the area is constantly growing. So categorization for the area for days, months is advisable, because it gives the possibility to see historical events and States of the Ternopil region in the photo. Categorisation process continues for a while in the rubrics will be dozens of files.--Mykola Vasylechko 16:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, 20 000 files in (various subcategories of) Category:Ternopil Oblast but how many in Category:2010 in Ternopil Oblast ? Well under 100. Upmerge to year unless you have a huge number of files in any given year. Otherwise why stop at the Raion level? File:Buchach-Topolkivska-HES-10099921.jpg could accurately (but unhelpfully) put in Category:Buchach HES on 4 September 2010. If we have several photos taken of the same building on the same day, we could create sub-categories for the exact time that each photo was taken so that no category ever has more than one photo. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Микола, please stop creating such by day categories because I would revert them as they are not useful. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Achim, please do not bother me to work! These categories are needed.--Mykola Vasylechko 19:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Микола, in case of a revolution or an unrest it can be useful to have images categorised by location by year by month by day. But if for example a building or a tree is depicted categorising it this way is pure nonsense. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Achim, please do not bother me to work! These categories are needed.--Mykola Vasylechko 19:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Микола, please stop creating such by day categories because I would revert them as they are not useful. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, 20 000 files in (various subcategories of) Category:Ternopil Oblast but how many in Category:2010 in Ternopil Oblast ? Well under 100. Upmerge to year unless you have a huge number of files in any given year. Otherwise why stop at the Raion level? File:Buchach-Topolkivska-HES-10099921.jpg could accurately (but unhelpfully) put in Category:Buchach HES on 4 September 2010. If we have several photos taken of the same building on the same day, we could create sub-categories for the exact time that each photo was taken so that no category ever has more than one photo. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Микола Василечко: If the concerns raised here are not enough to convince you, we can take this to the village pump for further discussion. Would you like to do so, or should I? - Themightyquill (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that this is way too many categories with too few items in each. The whole 20th century would probably be fine with just one category for the century, with nothing for individual years or decades. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like this has already been deleted. @Themightyquill: Abzeronow (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Yes, but all the sub-categories of Category:Days in Ternopil Oblast still exist and should be deleted. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Agree By year or decade would probably be enough. Abzeronow (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Yes, but all the sub-categories of Category:Days in Ternopil Oblast still exist and should be deleted. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Done: already done by Jcb. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
should be merged with category:Костанайская областная универсальная научная библиотека им. Л. Н. Толстого, it is one and the same library Pippobuono (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, after a so long silence, I decided to rename this category to Category:Kostanay Regional Universal Scientific Library Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, and moved in it every file of the two others, which I redirected to this one. Pippobuono (talk) 08:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Done: already done. --ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
should be merged with category:Л.Н.Толстой атындағы Қостанай облыстық әмбебап ғылыми кітапхана, it is one and the same library, but with the title in Russian and in Kazakh Pippobuono (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, after a so long silence, I decided to rename this category to Category:Kostanay Regional Universal Scientific Library Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, and moved in it every file of the two others, which I redirected to this one. Pippobuono (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Problems solved. Cyrillic name is the redirect.--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Category should be renamed to Category:Potd templates by time because the subcategories are by month, not by date. I bring this up for discussion mainly because some processes probably refer to this category, and those processes might need to be changed. Auntof6 (talk) 06:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Auntof6, please fix your suggestion. --Achim (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Thanks for the note. Fixed. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- I seem to have created this one a long time ago. This is just a meta category so I don't really care that much, but if you change it you might want to go for Category:Potd templates by month. Do double check any templates using this one. Is this all really worth the effort? Multichill (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Change it to by month.--Roy17 (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- I seem to have created this one a long time ago. This is just a meta category so I don't really care that much, but if you change it you might want to go for Category:Potd templates by month. Do double check any templates using this one. Is this all really worth the effort? Multichill (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Thanks for the note. Fixed. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also Category:Motd templates by date.--Roy17 (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Agree with renaming both categories to "by month". – BMacZero (🗩) 02:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support renaming .-- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: do you agree with renaming to Category:Potd templates by month?--Roy17 (talk) 11:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, that would be fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
moved to Category:Potd templates by month and Category:Motd templates by month.--Roy17 (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
No need of separate category for single image. Should be deleted. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- The utility of such categories is not how many files it contains bit that it allows cross searching from categories at the same level and searching down from higher level categories, namely Category:Amphibious assault ships by country, sure if your start point is something like Category:Naval ships of India and your focus is on the individual file as it relates to that part of the tree it doesn't look all that useful, but if you're starting from other points in the category tree the greater level of intersecting categories allows it to be reached from more points creates locuses of relevant files from different start points.--KTo288 (talk) 10:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that this category fits into the structure and should be kept, regardless of the image count. – BMacZero (🗩) 02:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
There are thousands of files of the Rijksmuseum as a building. Too many to fit in one category. That's why in 2010 I created a number of subcategories, for example Category:History of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam. By creating this category you reintroduce the problem I had in 2010. You simply can't store all files related to the Rijksmuseum building in one category. That's why I think its better to get rid of this category. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- This is meant to distinguish pictures of the architecture of the different buildings (main building of Cuypers, fragmentengebouw, depots, teekenschool etc), and exhibitions, people and collections. 'History of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam' contains all of that, If we will have too many pictures of the main building in this category, we can add categories like 'Exterior of the West wing of the Rijksmuseum' etc --Hannolans (talk) 20:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that's a good idea. Not many people know what the "West wing of the Rijksmuseum" is. I know that I don't. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Would Category:Exterior of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam be a satisfactory compromise? - Themightyquill (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Probably. What I would like is to have category we can link to from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijksmuseumgebouw that covers the architecture (including the decoration inside and outside) of the main building at the Stadhouderskade in Amsterdam. It should exclude the paintings, exhibitions, people, events and other buildings of the Rijksmuseum. --Hannolans (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: . This doesn't solve the problem. There are also hundreds of images of the exterior of the museum. Some sort of diffusion is necessary. Category:History of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam works fine, I think.
- @Hannolans: The Rijksmuseum is a building. You can link to the main category Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam from Rijksmuseumgebouw. I don't see any problem with that. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- This category also includes the history of the Rijksmuseum in other buildings, see for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_in_the_1840s I just want a category for the main building, built in 1885, with the address Museumstraat 1. --Hannolans (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- yes, but have you seen how many files there are in Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam in the 2000s alone? You could put all of these in a separate category and diffuse it in a similar way, but this way you're only creating a more or less parallel category branch. Also, you say you want to separate the museum building from the museum collection. But how is this possible when the building was built for the collection. Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam by room is full of examples regarding this. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, no I dont want to put everything with a stone in this category, but use it as a meta-category. We mainly have exterior pictures and interior pictures. The Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam by room is about the interior of the main building (except currently one Asian paviljoen room) and that is already a subclass of the Amsterdam Rijksmuseum building. We could split this by room category into the three categories the museum use (HG-xxx rooms for the main building, A-xxx-rooms for the Asian Paviljoen and PH-xxx-rooms for the Philipsvleugel) Another subclass we need is Rijksmuseum Amsterdam exterior as mentioned above. That we can split in eastside, westside, northside and southside overview and some detailed categories if needed for the tiles, doors, towers etc. --Hannolans (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- yes, but have you seen how many files there are in Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam in the 2000s alone? You could put all of these in a separate category and diffuse it in a similar way, but this way you're only creating a more or less parallel category branch. Also, you say you want to separate the museum building from the museum collection. But how is this possible when the building was built for the collection. Category:Rijksmuseum Amsterdam by room is full of examples regarding this. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- This category also includes the history of the Rijksmuseum in other buildings, see for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_in_the_1840s I just want a category for the main building, built in 1885, with the address Museumstraat 1. --Hannolans (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Probably. What I would like is to have category we can link to from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijksmuseumgebouw that covers the architecture (including the decoration inside and outside) of the main building at the Stadhouderskade in Amsterdam. It should exclude the paintings, exhibitions, people, events and other buildings of the Rijksmuseum. --Hannolans (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Would Category:Exterior of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam be a satisfactory compromise? - Themightyquill (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that's a good idea. Not many people know what the "West wing of the Rijksmuseum" is. I know that I don't. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Vincent Steenberg: I really don't understand how you can object to a category full of pictures of the exterior of a single building. That's a perfectly reasonable classification of images, one very common here on commons. There's no absolute need to diffuse a category with hundreds of images, but if someone wanted to, it could be done in many ways (images of the front facade, etc.). None of this would have any impact on the categorization of the museum by year. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- ok, maybe I'm missing the point. Why don't we do this. @Hannolans: you wrote an article about the Rijksmuseum building. By now you probably know more about it that I do. So why don't you deal with the building. Then I will deal with the collection. Like that we're not on each other's hair. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 10:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I altered this category to '- Main Building', that makes it clear that this is about the 'Cuypers cathedral' only. In the 'by room' part it all comes together. I will try to mimic the Louvre categories as can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Exterior_of_the_Palais_du_Louvre --Hannolans (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- ok, maybe I'm missing the point. Why don't we do this. @Hannolans: you wrote an article about the Rijksmuseum building. By now you probably know more about it that I do. So why don't you deal with the building. Then I will deal with the collection. Like that we're not on each other's hair. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 10:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
@Vincent Steenberg and Hannolans: It sounds like we have an agreement. Are we okay to close discussion? - Themightyquill (talk) 18:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I think so, I started also the category Architecture of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam with some specific architectural subcategories. It is an interesting discussion whether to split museums into buildings and the organisation. --Hannolans (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Stale discussion. Seems that OK to close this CFD, user:Themightyquill?--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Issue resolved. -- Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
What is the meaning of this cat? Sanandros (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- I also don't like abbreviations one has to guess their meanings. See it:Motoscafo armato silurante and it:Xª Flottiglia MAS (Regno d'Italia). Category should be renamed as well as Category:M.T.M. of the same tree, which refers to it:Barchino esplosivo. --Achim (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- With the aberration I don't have so much problem cause according to en wp Xa means Decima and MAS means Mezzi d'Assalto. But I have a problem with marines.--Sanandros (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sanandros, das kann ich jetzt nicht so ganz nachvollziehen. Hilft en:Marines bzw. de:Marineinfanterie weiter? Gruß, --Achim (talk) 20:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Ja aber das sind nach en wp eher de:Kampfschwimmer und es ist in der Category:Italian marines commanders drin. Daher frage ich mich was denn die Kriterien sind um in diese Kat zu kommen--Sanandros (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Da hast du recht, jetzt sehe ich's. Aber auf der andern Seite ist unter en:Decima_Flottiglia_MAS#Organization_of_RSI_Xa_MAS auch von 6 Infanteriebattalionen plus 5 Infanteriekompanien die Rede. --Achim (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also löschen wegen Unklahrheit?--Sanandros (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- The meaning is clear: They are the marines who were part of the Xa M.A.S. --Civa61 (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Civa61, that's fine, but it cannot be a subsubcat of Category:Admirals of Italy. --Achim (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- The meaning is clear: They are the marines who were part of the Xa M.A.S. --Civa61 (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also löschen wegen Unklahrheit?--Sanandros (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Da hast du recht, jetzt sehe ich's. Aber auf der andern Seite ist unter en:Decima_Flottiglia_MAS#Organization_of_RSI_Xa_MAS auch von 6 Infanteriebattalionen plus 5 Infanteriekompanien die Rede. --Achim (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Ja aber das sind nach en wp eher de:Kampfschwimmer und es ist in der Category:Italian marines commanders drin. Daher frage ich mich was denn die Kriterien sind um in diese Kat zu kommen--Sanandros (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sanandros, das kann ich jetzt nicht so ganz nachvollziehen. Hilft en:Marines bzw. de:Marineinfanterie weiter? Gruß, --Achim (talk) 20:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- With the aberration I don't have so much problem cause according to en wp Xa means Decima and MAS means Mezzi d'Assalto. But I have a problem with marines.--Sanandros (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Stale discussion. @Sanandros, Achim55, and Civa61: What is situation here? I see that parent category name is Category:Decima Flottiglia MAS. So logical would be to rename the nominated category to Category:Decima Flottiglia MAS marines--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't oppose. --Achim55 (talk) 11:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes we can rename it.--Sanandros (talk) 06:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Xª is the identification number of a military unit. The ordinal number affixed to the Roman numeral (in itself already an ordinal), although an error, was nevertheless used by the builders of the Military Corps. --Civa61 (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes we can rename it.--Sanandros (talk) 06:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Done: no opposition to rename the cat, so I done that.--Sanandros (talk) 21:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC). --Sanandros (talk) 21:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
"Sansiantai Bridge" is obviously problematic for the reasons of category-naming policy, as per discussion at User_talk:Bgag. I suspected that this category may be a self-made name, but Bgag can't confirm that as correct. Not many people know what the "Sansiantai Bridge" is.
According to the Overseas Community Affairs Council report "The First Light of the New Year 迎接2014，全台民眾瘋第一道曙光" quote "Of course, Sanxiantai is worth a visit at other times of year too. The 400 meter-long eight-arched bridge is one of the area’s most famous landmarks, but there are other attractions as well." In my experience and also according to East Coast National Scenic Area is written "eight cross-sea arch bridge" and TAITUNG Taiwan's Treasure is written "eightarch cross-ocean bridge".
Ultimately, my request is: I think this category should be deleted to make way for Category:Eight Cross-sea Arch Bridge (you can also select other categories: Category:Eightarch Cross-ocean Bridge or Category:Eight-arched Bridge) to be moved here.--Liji (talk) 07:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Rename to Sanxiantai Bridge.--Roy17 (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- per Google search, Sanxiantai Bridge is more used name. Any oppose againts renaming to Category:Sanxiantai Bridge?--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
moved.--RZuo (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)