Commons:Categories for discussion/Archive/2020/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bonjour, je souhaite obtenir les coordonnées de l'auteur des photographies, Olybrius. Voici mes coordonnées toulousemagazine@gmail.com Cordialement, Stéphane Reynier 2A01:CB19:834F:1D00:F044:F19C:BF26:5AE8 18:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: Copied to User talk:Olybrius. No further action required. --Achim (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Nominating for deletion. There was a typo in the title. Iketsi (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Due to typo and new cat. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artist Antin Manastyrsky died in 1969, and his works coryright in Poland, Ukraine and many other contries (+ 70 years after death) RetroRave (talk) 06:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Wrong request. There are other categories in the category. The request must be for files that infringe copyright. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no action.--RZuo (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My bad: Incorrect name spelling. Should be Olav Horve Toba (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse, I am really messing this up: His correct name - and the category - should be Ola Horve. So we need to keep this page and delete the page for Olav Horve. I am very sorry! Thanks for helping me clean up. Toba (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination.-- Túrelio (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

outward. 203.171.101.57 05:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: Nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 10:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Should be deleted. Created in error. Correct category is Category:W. & J. Sloane, which exists. Vzeebjtf (talk) 05:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please delete, there is a typo in the name Judithcomm (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Created it by mistake MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Also, created this by mistake MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Parapeytoiai is mis-spelled, so i had to move Category:Parapeytoiai to Category:Parapeytoia. However, this category should be deleted. TheRealLTG (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Delete - typo error ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This category can be deleted. It has been moved to Category:Polish-Russian plaques in Poland Iketsi (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Delete. It has since been renamed with a more complete name. Iketsi (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Doublon de Category:Villeneuve (Champsaur)‎ ; toutes les photos y ont été transférées Fr.Latreille (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

soon-to-be empty category. all content has been previously deleted. the same treatment has been given the other content from/about this person across other projects. Quakewoody (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • What is it that we are supposed to discuss here? I see that someone has asked the deletion of all files in this cat. As soon as it becomes empty it may be speedy deleted by a simple speedy deletion request. If we are not going to discuss anything about a cat please do not open CfDs. --E4024 (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If they are unnoticed they will be unnoticed all the same. If you notice an empty cat use the speedy deletion request, not occupy here. What is so sophisticated not to understand about this? We have the template SDC2 which reads as "Speedy delete: Unuseful empty category". (So also consider that not all empty cats are unuseful.) --E4024 (talk) 14:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing this unnecessary discussion. As soon as the cat is emptied I myself will ask its speedy deletion. CfD is for "discussing cats" and not for "deletion of empty cats". --E4024 (talk) 14:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Emergenza covid 80.182.46.177 09:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: Nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Can_Sarvan_photo.jpg
File:Denizbozan poster 2008 OTRS.jpg

I came across this on Wikidata - A category for a film maker, containing one image of a person and one image of a movie poster. No mention of either on wikipedia. Her article (in Turkey) was deleted. And very few mentions on the internet. Not even IMDb listings. Do we need to keep the category or the files? Quakewoody (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I realize that this is "Categories for discussion", but can't we delete the images as well? I did include them at the top. That was my reasoning. I even asked Do we need to keep the category or the files.
This question actually pertains to more than just this discussion, as I have other categories nominated where I asked the images also be deleted, but did not nominate them individually. Quakewoody (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Quakewoody: you need to use the standard deletion requests for files, if they are deleted then this will be empty otherwise its unlikely an admin will delete the files since they haven't been tagged for deletion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Files should be nominated for deletion first and this category can be procedurally deleted as empty. --Minoraxtalk 04:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

966+65559659559 181.67.145.208 03:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason given. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Useless category. Solomon203 (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by Taivo as per COM:CSD#C2. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Useless category. Solomon203 (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by Taivo. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Except for a brief period in the colonial days, almost 200 years ago, when there was 26 counties in Western Australia, counties are not a subdivision feature in WA. We have LGAs, which are either Cities, Towns or Shires. Calistemon (talk) 12:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no current status of county in WA - there seems to be no reason to have it as a category JarrahTree (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted by JarrahTree. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

What would possibly go into this category? What is in there, is a miscellaneous set of photos; there was one picture of a Bearded Dragon before I took it out, there's a few random photos of snap dragons, etc. The only collecting feature is that they are somehow identified as dragons. Prosfilaes (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by Túrelio as per COM:CSD#C2. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Naming inconsistent with Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Rename to Category:Politics of New York (state) for consistency. DanielPenfield (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I created the category 10 years ago to fill the needed gap. At the time "New York" categories had not yet been moved from the actual name of the state to the Wikimedia specific neologism "New York (state)". If the New York (state)ers prefer their state to be called that here, I have no objection. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The result was moved, not controversial. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Naming inconsistent with Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Rename to Category:Political campaigns in New York (state) for consistency. DanielPenfield (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The result was moved, not controversial. Please boldly move such New York categories in future unless there is likely to be an exception that may need to be discussed, we have already have consensus for this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

bioteknologi 158.140.187.220 14:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: Obviously nothing to discuss. --Achim (talk) 14:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I unwittingly created a duplicate category. Already existing is the category "The Providence Plantations for 250 Years by Welcome Arnold Greene" which is the exact same subject. Please speedily delete this category. Filetime (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Non notable blogger spamming childhood pictures of self on commons 2409:4042:2506:1CA0:BD34:AD59:7D67:3D2B 04:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This category belongs to me, a globally established user. It consists of photos which were captured during various Wikimedia events and outreach, and I'ld like to keep it. I guess, there's a lot more serious topics and categories to discuss. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 06:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, also referenced on Wikidata.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not new that admins tend to face such IP vandal. There seems no need of discussion here and can be closed as kept. Thanks --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 02:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept per above comments. No valid reason for deletion. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It's empty. Liberaler Humanist (talk) 01:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)  Not done: Never mind, I'll find some use for it. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 01:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Should be deleted - an 'F' was missing and a new 'Category:Skåldalsfjellet' was created ... shark (talk) 18:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Shark: Since you created both categories recently, this shouldn't be controversial, so it doesn't need discussion. I added {{Badname}} to the original category. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! --shark (talk) 09:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

064 061 3435 Kwanele22 (talk) 14:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Closing. Nothing to discuss. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Delete. Incorrect cap. Iketsi (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Iketsi: Since you created this category recently yourself, there's no need for discussion. I just tagged it with {{Badname}}. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Should probably use the same spelling as Category:Odia script. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ISO 15919 and IAST says it’s "Oṛiā", but anyway. You could have just ahead and renamed it, «to match the rest», and nobody would notice. With a CfD on it, it’s gonna take a few years. -- Tuválkin 01:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me just go ahead then. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 01:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Communism is a subclass of socialism. Therefore, this category should be merged to Category:Maps of socialist countries. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


done per User:BMacZero's suggestions.--RZuo (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This must be moved to "Peking duck". No need for a capital d. WP article in English also has this title. E4024 (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The user who opened the cat is not active since five years. I see that their mother tongue is German; they do this frequently, as in German all nouns begin with a capital letter. Indeed there is nothing to discuss here, but as the correct name has been made an RD, we need help from an admin to put this in order. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per nom its not a proper noun and categories usually use English. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

redirected to Category:Peking duck. look at history, actually the uncapitalised version is older and User:FAEP changed it wrongly.--RZuo (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This category is empty, so I tagged it with {{Empty page}}. That was reverted by Billinghurst with the edit summary "exists and part of WD link, best to discuss". It was my understanding that Commons is a media repository and not an encyclopedia, and so we do not keep empty categories as placeholders, even for things whose existence is not in dispute. This category was created over two years ago, so there has been sufficient time to populate it, and yet it is empty. The point of discussion is whether to keep or not. Auntof6 (talk) 08:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The galaxy isn't going anywhere and someone at some point will wish to upload a photograph and it will be categorised. There is no value in deleting a usable and WD linked category. There is no value in this sort of maintenance and tidying, it doesn't simplify anything, it doesn't save space, etc. Nothing to do with being an encyclopaedia or not, this category is part of a framework, used by WD, and will appear as links at linked wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6: how difficult is it to find a free file of a galaxy? nasa, eso, etc. often publish free media. a photo had been present in commons. stop such bureaucracy plz!!--RZuo (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

closed.--RZuo (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please delete. It was created inadvertently while recategorizing. See Category:German-language signs in Austria instead. Iketsi (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, redirects are cheap.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How about delete an obvious misspelling (what would be the use by keeping?) and what's the fuzz with Cfd (no need for that procedure)? @Jeff G.: --03:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateus2019 (talk • contribs) [reply]
@Mateus2019: We should wait at least two weeks after this page was started, and avoid speedily deleting the cat in the meantime.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateus2019 and Jeff G.: Hmm, no answers from you. OK, have fun with that issue but I'm out. --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Nothing but a misspelling. Why should we wait two weeks for that? --PhiH (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should be deleted without leaving a redirect. Redirects should only be used when the category name is likely to be used or looked for in the future. Unnecessary redirects clutter things like the search box dropdown and HotCat's autocomplete. See the essay Commons:Only use category redirects where necessary and {{Badname}}. – BMacZero (🗩) 04:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect name, deleted by Túrelio. --PhiH (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleting - temporary category, currently don't need ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleting - temporary category, currently don't need ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Naming inconsistent with Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Note that until today this category was named Category:Women's suffrage in New York City. DanielPenfield (talk) 13:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created the category to be consistent with the template {{US states}}. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I should add that if changing it back to New York City would work better, that's fine with me since the template will just redirect to the category anyway. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Megalibrarygirl: You've confused {{US states}} for {{US cities}}. {{US states}} checks for the existence of "New York (state)" and "New York" with the specified prefix and suffix--it does not check for the existence of "New York City". See [2]. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DanielPenfield I was super confused about the template! Whatever it takes to bring this mess into alignment is fine with me. I'm working on women's suffrage on Wikipedia, so having organized media on Commons is also important. I've never been much of a cataloger, so this whole enterprise is frustrating! Thanks for helping me learn a little more. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it should be moved back to Category:Women's suffrage in New York City and a category created for the state at Category:Women's suffrage in New York (state) and this title converted into a DAB per Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Restored to Category:Women's suffrage in New York City -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Naming inconsistent with Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:New York. Rename to Category:Elections in New York (state) for consistency. DanielPenfield (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, I say sure, go ahead. I wouldn't have thought this or the related ones even needed discussing. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Moved to Category:Elections in New York (state) -- DanielPenfield (talk) 10:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Per the Wikipedia spelling, I suggest "Mini-DIN" be used. Also, as with other similar categories, this one should be called Category:Mini-DIN connectors. Similarly, Category:Mini DIN pinouts should be renamed to Category:Mini-DIN pinouts. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No opposition. Moved. -- Themightyquill (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artist Antin Manastyrsky died in 1969, and his works coryright in Poland, Ukraine and many other contries (+ 70 years after death) RetroRave (talk) 20:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done: empty cat. --JuTa 06:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Note: For a similar, earlier discussion, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/05/Category:Famous people

Can we rename this to "Category:Vikings by name"? Categorizing people as famous is pretty subjective. Auntof6 (talk) 08:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Moved to Category:Vikings by name -- Themightyquill (talk) 14:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Move to Category:Catwalks (fashion) or Category:Catwalks (fashion shows) to avoid confusion with the two linked pages. Also note that most wikipedia articles disambiguate similarly, and commons should be more careful than wikipedia. Themightyquill (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Moved to Category:Catwalks (fashion) and converted to dab page. Themightyquill (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unexplained move to a German name when, arguably, there should be an English equivalent; See Com:Categories#Category_names. I see nothing wrong wth the parent categories, and although I requested an explanation, I haven't had a timely one. Sadly, its creator seems bent on creating out of lingua franca categories, and although I am fully aware that some words in German do not have exact English equivalents, e.g. zugszwang, that does not excuse a unilateral recategorisation to a version opaque to most users and against guidelines. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't move the category, that is incorrect. I created a category for a topic that didn't have one on its own. The parent category Category:Rail transport traffic control diagrams is a category for different types diagrams. My motivation was to create a separate category for a concept that is definitely notable. That doesn't mean the name is set; if there is an English name I am happy to move it.
Please stop assuming I am "bent on" these categories. You came to my talk page wondering why I chose a German name but right away suggested "undoing all this" which definitely wouldn't solve the problem. It is a little bit weird that you were asking if "Rail transport diagrams" may be a suitable translation first but immediately afterwards you were very sure that these are called "Rail transport traffic control diagrams". I couldn't find any source which uses this name. --PhiH (talk) 06:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The topic itself is notable. No alternative name was proposed during the discussion. --PhiH (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This category is redundant to the cat "Allied Commandants of Berlin". I have emptied this category and suggest deletion. AnhaltER1960 (talk) 10:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No opposition. Redirected. Themightyquill (talk) 11:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The category is empty after having decided on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dunkelberg. Leyo 13:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no need to "discuss" an empty cat. If you see it difficult to be filled again in a reasonable time, you can ask its speedy deletion by adding "{SD|C2}". (The {} signs should be "double".) I personally prefer to wait for some time before requesting the deletion of cats about notable people, because new files can come and the cat -even as empty- fulfills a function of union among three actors: WP, WD and Commons. Thanks for reading. --E4024 (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category marked for speedy deletion. GeorgHHtalk   10:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Not all photographs are taken "in the Netherlands". See explanation below. JopkeB (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Situation

In Commons there are at least 1800 photos of the Nederlandse Heidemaatschappij about forestry. A significant part of it is missing essential information such as location and date, which cannot be found on the website either. These photos were initially placed in the Category: Forestry in the Netherlands, so I assumed that they were taken in the Netherlands. For these photos I have made sub-categories and I am working on re-categorization. During this process, however, I discovered that an unknown number of them, probably many hundreds, were not made in the Netherlands, but during excursions and working visits in other (European?) countries. Indications for this: Some photos contain information boards with foreign texts or show high mountains that do not occur in the flat Netherlands. Many photos also show groups watching demonstrations of forestry. Occasionally there is a Dutch text on a truck or a vehicle that has a Dutch license plate, so I can assume that those photos were taken in the Netherlands. But forests and forest workers in Europe are too similar to determine in which country the other photos were taken. In any case, I saw photos from Sweden, Finland, Germany, France, Poland and English-speaking countries. I have already placed those photos in categories for those countries.

The problem

Of the 800 or so photos that I have categorized into sub-categories "in the Netherlands" so far, a considerable part will not have been taken in the Netherlands but in other European countries. These photos are therefore incorrectly categorized, but it is impossible to determine which photos are involved. In addition, about 1,000 photos are waiting for better categorization, but I'd like to be sure to place them in the right sub-category right away.

My proposal
  1. Keep the current Forestry in the Netherlands category structure for photos that are certain to have been taken in the Netherlands.
  2. Transfer the photos of the Nederlandse Heidemaatschappij that are now there, to the same category structure, still to be made, but with the name "20st-century forestry somewhere in Europe" (or instead of "somewhere": "unidentified countries", which makes it fits better in the Commons structure, but I have little hope that they will ever become "identified") and with a good description at the top. Remarks:
    1. The name can possibly be supplemented with "of the Nederlandse Heidemaatschappij", but this can also be omitted, so that other cases also fit in.
    2. My advice: Do not immediately include these photos in the (not yet existing) (sub-) categories Forestry in Europe, because otherwise pollution will occur there. I think it is better to make a separate structure with a distinctive name for this.
  3. After that, I'll transfer back the photos of which I am sure, to the sub-categories of Forestry in the Netherlands.
  4. And finally I'll start with the rest of the uncategorized photos, which are then in the new main category "20st-century forestry somewhere in Europe" (or something similar).
Requests
  • Suggestions, other approaches, support, constructive criticism, etc. that can lead to a solution for this problem.
  • As soon as there is a solution: Someone who can and wants to transfer the files from the Forestry in the Netherlands category structure to the new categories in an automatic way, for example via a program / bot.

JopkeB (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JopkeB: This makes sense to me. I see that we have Category:Forestry in North America and Category:Forestry in Africa, so I think Category:Forestry in Europe would be reasonable, but Category:Forestry in unidentified countries also works just fine. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Themightyquill: Thanks for your comment and suggestions. I used it to figure out what the best category name would be. JopkeB (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have implemented my proposal, see Category:20th-century forestry in unidentified countries in Europe and its subcategories. JopkeB (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Can this category be deleted? I have split it into two, so that allegorical and mythological paintings aren't mixed in one category. The two subcategories can be moved to the parent category Category:Paintings by Frans Floris. Auntof6 (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Category upmerged into Category:Paintings by Frans FlorisBMacZero (🗩) 16:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Is Category:Vila Nova de Santo André redundant with Category:Santo André (Santiago do Cacém)? Themightyquill (talk) 12:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Santo André" is a parish (in portuguese "freguesia"), while "Vila Nova de Santo André" is a town inside (belonging to) that parish. So, they are diferent entities, the categories are not redundant. GualdimG (talk) 07:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GualdimG. I've set category descriptions that make this clearer. -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request move to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Garuda28 (talk) 00:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Was renamed on 9 December 2020; Wikipedia page has already been moved. Garuda28 (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion is uncontroversial move to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and all other related cats. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 07:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Not seeing why this is PD US Gov, 1973 Thesis. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



 Not done: discussed on DR, kept. --rubin16 (talk) 06:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Post 1925 volumes of this will need to be carefuly examined, due to the IA publication date metadata issue ( On Ocassion they've use the start date of a publication series as opposed to actual publication date which has confused the semi-automated tools using that metadata to make uploads to Commons I think.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



not CFD. Discussion moved to Category talk:The British fern gazette Estopedist1 (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

There was no princely state called as such. There was only one princely state in the disputed territory of Kashmir, called Jammu and Kashmir and nothing else. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: moot. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unneccessary diambiguation page. Category:Aaron Addison Gordon should redirect here, since Category:Aharon David Gordon isn't even spelled the same way. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Aharon Gordon is an alternative spelling of Aaron Gordon. The disambiguation is necessary.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Couple of things:
  • The Commons policy is to follow what is easily understandable to most English readers. It's worth noting that on en-wiki, en:Aaron Gordon points to the basketball player and the Zionist philosopher is at en:A. D. Gordon (thanks for moving the Commons cat btw). If either category should supersede the other, it's the basketball player category.
  • "Aaron Addison Gordon" is not a COMMONNAME for the basketball. The basketball player category should be at either Category:Aaron Gordon or Category:Aaron Gordon (basketball).
My preference is to use Category:Aaron Gordon for the basketball player and the disambiguation page move to Category:Aaron Gordon (disambiguation) Ytoyoda (talk) 20:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need to supersede anything, if there is potential for confusion between the 2 name sin English, as there seems to be, the disambiguation should be kept. Our practice here is different from the one at English Wikipedia. This kind of stuff, for instance: Category:Aaron Gordon (disambiguation) is seldom used here (we generally favour the disambiguation on the terms themselves, since it's much more practical with images).-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This category discussion has been closed.
Consensus No consensus
Actions Keep Category:Aaron Gordon as disambiguation
Participants
Closed by Josh (talk) 07:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

All of the images appear to be for Category:Interest (emotion) but I'm not sure where we should move this to? Category:Interest (fee)? Or maybe if all the images are simply removed it will be deleted as empty? Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia article says it's different than a fee. Category:Interest (payment)? - Themightyquill (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1. I think this category should become a Disambiguation page, because it has more than one meaning.
2. I think Category:Interest (financial) would be a good category name because (financial) interest has two sides: payings (by debtors) and receivings (by creditors), not only payments. And interest is not only about an amount of money to pay/receive, but also about interest rates and doubtless about many more aspects (like interest policy by central banks), still to add.
-JopkeB (talk) 07:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since there were no objections to my proposal in more than 3 months, I close this discussion and make the proposed changes. --JopkeB (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



This category discussion has been closed.
Consensus Resolved by consensus
Actions1) Make a new Category:Interest (financial), 2) make a Disambiguation page of Category:Interest and mention both categories there ✓ Done
Participants
Closed byJopkeB (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"American"? Please use "of the United States". I "also" opened Category:Consuls General of the United States, FYI. E4024 (talk) 01:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

to be renamed to Category:Consuls of the United States?--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

moved as per discussion and convention.--RZuo (talk) 10:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Capitalisation of "Wikimedia" aside, is there really any benefit from having a separate category by usage on specific projects? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done: per DR. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The category does not contain "alphabets", but rather single characters. I suggest the category be moved to Category:SVG Tamil letters and subcategorised under Category:Tamil letters. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Moved to Category:Tamil glyphs in SVG‎ in line with most subcategories in Category:Glyphs of Brahmic scripts in SVG (some still need to be adapted, though). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"Animations" should be plural (and "alphabet" is miscapitalised), but I think this should be called Category:Animations of Kannada letters for unification with other subcategories of Category:Animations of letters. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

stale discussion. Solution per @1234qwer1234qwer4 Estopedist1 (talk) 20:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This category discussion has been closed.
ConsensusRedirect the category
ActionsThe category was already redirected at some point making this CfD totally pointless.
Participants
Closed by--Adamant1 (talk) 05:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]