User talk:Rmhermen
The best way to contact me is on my english Wikipedia page.
Image:Map of Michigan highlighting the Cabinet counties.svg
[edit]Would it be possible to darken the lines between the adjacent counties shown in red. It is very hard to see how many counties are in the red blocks. User:Rmhermen 22:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sure! Is the new version of Image:Map of Michigan highlighting the Cabinet counties.svg what you were thinking of? (You'll probably have to use Shift+reload to see the new version.) User:dbenbenn 05:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
City locator maps of BC-white area
[edit]Re City locator maps of BC: if you refer to the white area ar the north-west of the maps, that's the southern part of Alaska, with the city of Juneau; it's a strip that runs down the coast of BC, and is US territory.Qyd (talk)19:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I uploaded a contour map with sharper coastlines if you need it: Image:BC-outline.png Qyd (talk)05:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Category:Police of Spain has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
It is not an image but I don't find templates for category deletions. -- Error 02:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Deprecated License
[edit]
It has been found that Image:Flathead Indians.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Filnik 09:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 21:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Dull Knife.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
2011 Sendai earthquake rename
[edit]Just to let you know: your proposal at Category talk:2011 Sendai earthquake#Rename has come up again at Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/04/Category:2011 Sendai earthquake damage. --Closeapple (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
By popular demand, error reporting is here! I'm just letting you know personally since you've been involved in one of the threads related to errors encountered in the NARA catalog. If you can add error reports to that page from now on, we'll have an easier time relaying them to the NARA digital description staff, and we'll be able to track our progress. Let me know if you have any problems using the page; I already added one report as an example. Providing corrections for mistakes in the online catalog is one of the best ways we can show demonstrable benefits to the institution, and you'll be helping all the other users of the archives, so it's really useful. Thanks! Dominic (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Hair pipe
[edit]I think we should rename it in hair pipes, categories should always be plural?! --16:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose so. Rmhermen (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done --Kürschner (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your error report!
[edit] |
On behalf of the US National Archives, I'd like to thank you for reporting the error you found in their catalog records; your report is now archived. The change has been applied to NARA's catalog by a staff member (see [1], [2], [3], [4]), and I have updated the Commons image descriptions accordingly. Work like yours is valuable because you are helping to improve the quality of NARA's metadata for all its users, and, by adding value back to NARA's holdings, we can demonstrate the usefulness to them and others of contributing content to Commons. Thanks! Dominic (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
At WikiProject Michigan on En Wikipedia, we have discussed this and think it is probably Fort Michilimackinac on the Lower Peninsula. Do you remember what fort it was? Rmhermen (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- It turns out to be Fort William Historical Park in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Please don't edit war -- discussion is much easier.
As I said in my edit comment,Category:United States lightship Nantucket (LV-112) is not valid for this image because this is not LV-112. It is, as it says in the image description, WLV-612, which is a very different vessel. LV-112 has never been at Manhattan and does not look like this -- I know LV-112 very well, because I see her almost every day from a distance of twenty feet or so.
Among the most obvious differences are the mast and deckhouse arrangements. On 112, the foremast is in the middle of the forward deckhouse and the after mast is forward of the after deckhouse. There is a third deckhouse between the other two. As shown in the subject image, on 612, the forward mast is forward of the single deckhouse and the after mast is aft of it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware that we have made conflicting edits. Sorry about that. Rmhermen (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
|
Category:St._Claire_(ship,_1910) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Canoe1967 (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for noticing and fixing my typo in File:North Country National Scenic Trail Sign Copper Falls State Park August 2012.jpg! Royalbroil 02:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC) |
Unfortunately, I don't have any information about this ship. Thanks for interest :) Andrzej Otrębski (talk) 08:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Yarn swifts
[edit]Hallo,
What do you mean with yarn swifts? I never heard this expression before and I can't find it in the textile definitions of Centexbel. I see on the pictures mostly spinning wheels and that written in the text too.
Gerrit41 (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- The swift (specific kinds of yarn winders) is the cage-like device that yarn is wound onto from the spinning wheel's bobbin to make it into skeins of yarn. There are three broad types of yarn winders: ball winder, Turkish drop spindles and nostepindes make balls of yarn, swifts (umbrella swifts, squirrel cage swifts, clock reels) make skeins, and the handheld yarn winders called a niddy noddy or kniddy-knoddy which also produce skeins but with no mechanical parts. See the English Wikipedia article: [5] Rmhermen (talk) 04:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Can you also explain the differences between the swifts and the weasels and reels?
Gerrit41 (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Category:South Manitou Island Lighthouse
[edit]I see you have just added Category:Lighthouses in Michigan to this and 13 others.
Please note that all of these are in Category:Lighthouses on the National Register of Historic Places in Michigan, which is itself in Category:Lighthouses in Michigan.
It's over-categorization to add the second category. I have removed them all from Category:Lighthouses in Michigan. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- No it isn't. There probably isn't any lighthouse not on that register (and there is nothing special about it that should outrank other methods) It is unhelpful to hide them under multiple levels of naming. Many of the ones I didn't do were already in both categories. When I look at lighthouses in Michigan that is what I should find - not have to navigate through multiple alternate naming subcats systems. Right now I have to find some in Lighthouses, some in National register, some in by county. Rmhermen (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but you're wrong. I agree that doing as policy requires can be a royal nuisance. The category system, as we define it, inevitably does just what you complain about -- it makes it necessary to visit several cats to see all of the images that relate to a particular general subject. Nonetheless, the policy is clear -- it even has its own illustration.
- The best solution in this case is a gallery such as Lighthouses in Maine.
- I don't understand your final comment -- all lighthouses in Michigan should be in either Category:Lighthouses in Michigan or Category:Lighthouses on the National Register of Historic Places in Michigan. If that is not true, then it needs to be fixed.
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Rmhermen⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Rmhermen,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Mahir256 (talk) 04:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Sasquatch has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
MB298 (talk) 01:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Milwaukee Clipper
[edit]Since the Milwaukee Clipper appears to be permanently docked in Muskegon Lake at Muskegon, I put the parent category in Category:Muskegon Lake at Muskegon, Michigan. It is redundant to put separate images in a category such as Category:Muskegon, Michigan. Xnatedawgx (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not all images show the boat at that location. The location is not a condition of the boat but of each image. Rmhermen (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Muskegon area lighthouses
[edit]It is redundant to put these images in subcategories that are covered in the parent category. Xnatedawgx (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- You added those categories after my edits, not before. Rmhermen (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Category:INS_Chennai_(D-65) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Elisfkc (talk) 03:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:7 Iris Astronomical Symbol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 22:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Navy of Uganda has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Papal insignia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)