Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 35

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Homolego and persistent copyvio

Most of the uploads of User:Homolego from September 2020 were deleted on the grounds of copyvios and lack of permission. They were blocked for a week for on 2nd February, 2023 for copyvio violations. The same day after their block ended, they resumed uploading evident copyvio images and two of them were since deleted for copyvio.[1][2]. All of the remaining images are obvious copyvio.

Their recent unblock request after being unblocked seems like they still don't understand the policy. Suneye1 (talk) 07:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user for 3 months and will delete speedily a lot of logos and other copyrighted uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Kyojo

After the copyvio warning, this user didn't stop posting copyvio photos. Netora (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

 Info: The user only uploaded until 7:00 and the final warning was posted at 18:11. Based on the talk page history it doesn't seem like they ever received a non-final warning. TilmannR (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
... other than the actual deletion warnings for the files they uploaded since yesterday. TilmannR (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
@TilmannR: Before the final warning was posted at 18:11 UTC on the 9th, the user talk page had 4 instances of copyvionote, each of which contains "Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: True. When I wrote my first message, I hadn't perceived those as actual warnings, because I was only looking for manually placed warnings. And in my second message saying "copyvionote" instead of "deletion warnings" would have been more precise. Thank you. TilmannR (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. Vandalism is the one with like 4 different levels of warning, and copyvio apparently goes directly to the final warning. I totally got those confused. TilmannR (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. User is warned, all uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

WhoIsDanielHord

Copyvios after final warning. Belbury (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. 2 weeks block, all uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Revdel request

Please revdel the revisions at Commons talk:Licensing from the one at 01:38, 30 January 2023‎ to the one at 13:57, 7 February 2023‎. This is because they contain the text of the OGL 1.0a, which is copyrighted (the license literally says "The text of the Open Gaming License itself is not Open Game Content. Instructions on using the License are provided within the License itself."). --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

While that seems like a rational conclusion, it also seems extremely weird. When redistributing freely-licensed works intact, how do you also distribute an ARR license page? What is the copyright status of Creative Commons and GFDL license text? Are they explicitly carved out somehow, or do we jave a systemic problem on our hands? Elizium23 (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Great questions. Well: "The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication." (here)
"GNU Free Documentation License [...] Copyright © [...] Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed." (here)
OGL 1.0a: "All Rights Reserved. [...] No terms may be added to or subtracted from this License except as described by the License itself." (here)
And since text on Commons is under CC BY-SA 3.0 per footer on each page, I believe we are not allowed post license text that doesn't allow modification. TilmannR (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, could an admin follow up on this request? Thanks, --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:56, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

User:188.173.117.116

Repeated insertion of false information, especially about logos. Blocked at Romanian Wikipedia also for false information and use of clones.--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. At first 3 days block. Thank you for reverting! Taivo (talk) 09:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: It started again.--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. Now one month block. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Keeps uploading copyrighted pictures as own work after warnings. XenonX3 (talk) 22:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 2 weeks Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

User_talk:尾張の人

The history of my talk page, except for the first edition, is only vandalism by w:ja:LTA:SUMOSONG and its revert. So I request protection of my talk page. 尾張の人 (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Unfortunately, we generally do not protect talk pages for long periods of time, as it denies new and unregistered users the right to contact the owner of the talk page. During a temporary spike in vandalism (e.g. on 9 June 2022‎), we may temporarily protect a talk page for a short period of time. -- King of ♥ 04:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I semi-protected it for one month. In this case, it seems justified. Yann (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

IMO this should be semi-protected, it's getting vandalised in last few days. Page is also highly visible. A09 (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

@A09, ✓ Done Kadı Message 16:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Requesting semi-protection due to vandalism--Trade (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Uploading copyvio--Trade (talk) 19:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

 Not blocked, no uploads after final warning. -- CptViraj (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

User:GAJYO

Although receiving the copyvio warning, this used didn't stop posting the same politicial's Facebook photos without legitimate licensing. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 34#User:Zafkiel Angelos. Netora (talk) 08:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block, all deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

User:猫ウサギ

Although receiving the copyvio warning, this used didn't stop posting copyvio photos. Netora (talk) 13:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 2 weeks Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

They're a possible sock of User:Mar252525 for doing that. See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 103#Multiple suspected users face copyright violations.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 08:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC); edited: 09:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Block for User:Banbanbanbanbanban Shit

Block reason: Inappropriate username. Leonidlednev (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Block for User:Marsel Ziad

Block reason: Spam or advertisement only-account. --Karim talk to me :)..! 08:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 2 weeks, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Block for User:94.140.246.27

Block reason: Vandalism. --Karim talk to me :)..! 08:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 6 months (3rd block). Yann (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Please Semi-Protect File:Google Play 2022 icon.svg

This file is persistently being vandalized by IP users as note here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Google_Play_2022_icon.svg&action=history Megamanfan3 (talk) 13:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for 3 months. Yann (talk) 14:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

143.89.191.90

SCP-2000 05:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year block (3rd block). Vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Six sigma clinics

✓ Done Already blocked by Achim55. Yann (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry/serial copyvio

The following accounts appear to belong to the same person. They keep uploading obvious web downloads/copyvios of Southeast Asian football coaches and switching accounts.

It wouldn't surprise me if there are more related accounts but these were the ones I was able to pull up. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

@Adeletron 3030: That request should be on COM:RFCU. Yann (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
@Yann I thought checkuser was for non-obvious cases, i.e. "Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases"? This seems like a pretty obvious case. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Ah yes, right. All blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Protect Penis tattoo - Genital tattooed like a canvas.jpg

 Not protected, insufficient activity to justify protection. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Annpannman

Even after some copyvio warnings and blocks, this user retarted uploading the copyvio images. Netora (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Third block, no remaining useful contributions, so indef. Yann (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Psiroman142

✓ Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. No need to report it twice. Yann (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Spam-only account. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is warned, all contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

777alucard666

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Jesus Cortez Matias All

Jesus Cortez Matias All (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Spam-only account. --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 10:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Indef. --Achim55 (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Pere prlpz0

Pere prlpz0 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Vandalizing File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg. Marbletan (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked indef, protection of file page raised from semi to full for 3 months. --Achim55 (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

User:MatchJenny

MatchJenny (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Already done by Elcobbola. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Please semi-protect it for an extended period of time because of IP vandalism. Thanks! A09 (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I semi-protected it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

User:César Augusto Ramos

César Augusto Ramos (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

This IP address was just blocked at English Wikipedia following other blocks of IPs in this range over several months there. See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KC626266 for the cases and patterns. THe person was blocked here for adding images of numerous phony flags and then embedding them in articles. This user made three edits here today, to Flags of cities of the United States, characteristic of their interest in flags and in manipulating them. Largoplazo (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Tamiacoco

After copyvio warning, this user didn't stop uploading the same copyvio character's pictures. Netora (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks Herby talk thyme 12:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Please semi-protect both due to constant vandalism by a Lampung XL IP-hopper. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Lampung XL IP-hopper

User: 140.213.0.0/17 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
140.213.230.0/24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
203.78.0.0/17 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
140.213.231.0/16 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Making nonsense deletion requests and vandalizing Indonesia national football team kits. A stretch, I know. But he is just annoying. Flix11 (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. All four blocked (only one by me). Taivo (talk) 06:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Protection request (File:Symbol redirect class.svg)

  • File: File:Symbol redirect class.svg
  • Protection type: Upload, Move
  • Protection level: Sysop
  • Protection duration: Indefinite
  • Rationale: enwiki is getting ready to phase in this icon to a tremendous number of pages, potential high visibility vandalism target. We have uploaded a local shadow copy, but BEANS.... — xaosflux Talk 16:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done DMacks (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

LTA attack to File:Stony Blyden.jpg

Please semi-protect for three months: File:Stony Blyden.jpg.

Rationale: LTA attack from Wikidata, where I am an admin Estopedist1 (talk) 06:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. I no0minated both photos for regular deletion as likely copyvios. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Tech2globecanada07

Continued spam after warning--Trade (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, spam only, file deleted. Yann (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Requesting protection due to vandalism--Trade (talk) 16:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected. Yann (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
RESOLVED:

As mentioned in COM:ANU, EugeneZelenko was banned from speedy deletions and creating DRs for three months--A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

From COM:ANU#Time for a ban on DRs and speedy deletions?, there seems to be a general consensus for a 3-month ban on EugueneZelenko from making DRs or SDs. I'm keeping this as short as possible to prevent myself from adding my personal opinions to this message, but could an admin have a look at this and implement this ban? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

After 72 hours, seriously no response? I should say, though, that I'm a bit disappointed how admins on Commons are essentially shielded from blocks and bans, albeit indirectly. SHB2000 (talk) 09:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
and people here want an "arbcom" run by admins...yeah never gonna works and this might just be Exhibit A.. Stemoc 10:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Well, that's a perfect recipe for losing long-term editors... SHB2000 (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
@Gestumblindi, Yann, Ellywa, and King of Hearts: Can one of the admins in the original discussion weigh in or take action? Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
@Gbawden: If I see this correctly, no technical blocking would be involved for now - as participation in DRs or editing of file description pages except for SDs would still be allowed. So this would basically mean we ask EugeneZelenko "don't make any DRs or SDs for three months from now on", with a block if he doesn't comply? Gestumblindi (talk) 12:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Don't ask him not to do it, tell him not to. And it has to be done by an administrator in their official capacity with a message/warning on his talk page. Otherwise, it's just toothless. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Yes. This has to be a warning, not just a request. It would make sense for the wording of the warning to include the words you put in quotes, Gestumblindi: Do not do a and b for the next three months, and if following that, you continue to engage in the behavior that users have complained about in the other thread (x, y and z), a block will be imposed. I think that's the consensus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • So you want someone to close the other discussion? What does coming here to say "I want someone to close that discussion with a ban on him right now do? You want to start another discussion with support votes for closing that discussion with a ban on him? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • The other discussion hasn't been closed so starting a separate discussion and wanting people to comment here is precisely the wrong way to handle things. There isn't a "general consensus" and coming somewhere new to state that you have one and want another person to close that discussion for you is why you aren't going to get results. A ban on making DRs or SDs does not require a block or protection so why are you here? You aren't proposing blocking him, you aren't proposing protecting any page and since it hasn't been settled, you can't demand someone block him from doing something he hadn't been banned from doing. Feel free to run to another board and be shocked no one is going to comment in a third or fourth place about the same thing as you just jumping with what you want and make more demands on other people. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Do you have any sense of how long it's likely to take for any action to happen? I understand your reaction, but when nothing happens, it's understandable for someone to do something to see if there's a way to get attention to move things along. If you think of things using a customer service model, you'll understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Any other complaint and he would have topic banned before the first vote was published. In this case the discussion sat there for like a week after there was a clear consensus to topic ban him without any action being taken on it. I think that's a reasonable timeframe to bump the discussion to another venue. Otherwise what would have been the alternative? Letting it just be archived without action when there's a clear consensus to topic ban him? Or conversely we could have just made excessively more off-topic comments just to keep it from being archived. Taking it here as the next step in the process due to the fact that no one wants to deal with it in ANU is clearly the better, if not only, option. Although it looks like it's not going to be dealt with here either. If that's the case then the question is, where to next? --Adamant1 (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The truth is that admins aren't always in the right, but they basically get indirect immunity from blocks and bans of any kind because other admins aren't comfortable in doing so. This is very common on Commons, but it certainly isn't the only wiki that has this issue. SHB2000 (talk) 06:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
I can kind of understand it since otherwise a few people with an axe to grind could gang up and get administrators banned just because the admin used their tools in a way they didn't like. Although that can happen anyway and at least in this case another admin supported the topic ban. That said, it's probably reasonable generally to have a fairly high bar when it comes to sanctioning admins though. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
@SHB2000 You have to remember that EugeneZelenko and any admin have two personas - one as a normal editor and the other as as admin when we pick up the mop and do admin tasks. Being admins doesn't make us any different from non admins - we are not royalty and we are as fallible as any commons user. In this instance none of the edits EugeneZelenko made were as an admin. We are not giving him any immunity because he has a 2nd role as an admin Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
I do realise this, speaking as an admin on two other WMF projects. What I'm saying is that those who do happen to hold admin privileges are shielded for the actions they do, even if they weren't made as an admin. Also, who is "we"? SHB2000 (talk) 09:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
When I saw we I mean administrators - admins don't shield other admins if they have done wrong. My personal view is that the lack of a decision may because some people like myself don't think a sanction is warranted - maybe a rap over the knuckles but I am not convinced that topic banning an experienced editor serves a purpose. (and I had the same view with A1Cafel)
FWIW I have also started DR's for photos claimed as own work that later turned out to be PD (thanks to RAN and others) - its not up to the nominating editor to fix the license - that is the responsibility of the uploader. I would rather he nominate a dodgy file than it remain on commons unchecked. As to the not in use, should be svg if useful complaint - these DR's clean up a lot of the junk logos uploaded by editors who think commons is facebook - once again I would rather have a DR opened than doing nothing. Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
He doesn't do due diligence to check whether a deletion request (or apparently, speedy deletion tag) is valid before making it, and the most important issue is that he has so far at least in my experience utterly refused to admit to any mistakes, or even that he ever makes mistakes. Someone engaging in that kind of behavior on Wikivoyage, where I'm an admin/bureaucrat, surely would have been asked to resign as an admin/bureaucrat, which is a couple of steps beyond what's being asked for in this case. However, I credit you for expressing an opinion and not ignoring the thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The most important issue is that he has so far at least in my experience utterly refused to admit to any mistakes. Exactly. Administrators more then anyone else should and need to be willing to admit to their mistakes. Since there's a risk of them causing serious due to a lack of competency or forethought. Personally, the only reason I supported the topic ban was because he doubled down on the mistake multiple times and was generally rather dismissive to people's complaints. Otherwise, I'd probably wouldn't have supported it. I can guarantee there wouldn't have been issue if he had of just been reasonable about it from the start, but if someone is going to refuse to acknowledge they made a mistake and continue doing it then what option is there besides some kind of sanction? When I was blocked by Yann recently I didn't even get a chance to explain myself or admit to the mistake. How long has it been since the ANU complaint was started for EugeneZelenko? like a month? How many chances did Ikan Kekek give him to say he'd use better judgment next time? Plenty. So I don't see what the issue with topic banning him for three months is. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I just closed the discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! --Adamant1 (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please protect it semi for an extended period of time. Page is highly visible (10k visits in 30 days) and some vandalism is going around. Thanks! A09 (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done semi, 3mo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: Thanks! A09 (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Please restore last good revision (lang-barrier) and protect it semi-indef. Thanks! A09 (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

@A09  Half done semi, 3 months. No reason for indef yet. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757 Thanks anyways! A09 (talk) 22:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

This user keeps uploading the same non-free picture over and over again, despite multiple warnings. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done deleted, salted, and blocked 1 week. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Please semi-protect it indef because of persistent IP vandalism. Page was locked multiple times in the past. Thanks! A09 (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done indef semi. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: Thanks! A09 (talk) 16:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Esgaone

Esgaone (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Advertising-only account. See this post and their uploads. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

User:Hamzakhan654

This user is an obvious sock of the already blocked accounts Monojkhansaab908 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log and Kalasa Saab (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. It's all self-promotion of the same individual. The following pages they have created should be deleted:

See also the related report at w:Wikidata:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Report_concerning_Kalasa_Saab. Marbletan (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Is this offensive as prohibited by COM:IU?

User:Foolkyou .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

This user appears to have made some contributions to the Catalan Wikipedia. I suggest that this be initally handled by the admins of that Wikipedia as there is a possibility that this name is non-offensive in Catalonia. There was an example of this some years ago where a user created an account on the English WIkipedia with the name "XXX Kuntz". When an attempt was made to remove that account, he protested stating that his full name was "XXX YYY Kuntz" ("XXX" and "YYY" withheld for privacy reasons). The name "Kuntz" is fairly common in the non-English country from which that editor's grandfatehr had emigrated. Martinvl (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Offensive? As in, "Does it have the capacity to offend"? I'd find this name much less offensive than I would being a wiki editor on a wikipedia (other than en, so they just don't matter) finding that my user page image is up for deletion, and now my account too. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
At moment all his/her uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. In my opinion that's enough. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

User:Confresa Pescado

Multiple account, same Ricardo Diazzz. Continue uploading promotional images with copyright for eswiki articles. Block and delete his uploads. Antawaylla 00:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, please protect

Until 2023-03-31 23:59, as per use in m:Special:CentralNoticeBanners/edit/africanday2023anononly and m:Special:CentralNoticeBanners/edit/africanday2023. Thanks --Base (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

This category has been the subject of repeated IP vandalism over the past few days, so it could benefit from temporary semi-protection. Marbletan (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done semi, 1mo. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Currently a magnet for w:WP:LTA/GRP. TIA, --SHB2000 (talk) 09:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

and File:Franklin, Tasmania banner.jpg too, please. SHB2000 (talk) 10:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Protected for 3 & 6 months respectively Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Protection

Hi! Could you please protect following files: File:UCDM 2023 promo2.png File:UCDM 2023 promo.png File:UCDM 2023 poster.png? These files are used very widely and/or will be used for CentralNotice banner. ValentynNefedov (WMUA) (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Self-promotion using multiple accounts

All of these accounts are clearly the same individual. The only contributions involve promoting themself and books they have written. Marbletan (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked them all indefinitely, mass deleted their uploads and created a sockpuppet category. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

I note that every image uploaded by GWDRotimi13 (talk · contribs) has been a copyright violation (or falsely claiming "own work" for images found online), and the warnings placed on the page over the past couple of weeks seem to have no effect. Three more copyvio images were uploaded today. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Copyvios are deleted, one file is nominated for regular deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Uploading promotional images after being warned --Trade (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Also Jacacademy12 (talk · contribs). Marbletan (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked both indefinitely, partly for spamming and abusing multiple accounts, partly for inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Protection

Please semi-protected my talk page for a long time: frequent vandalism from LTA's. Thanks in advance, --Mtarch11 (talk) 07:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Giorgio Pallavicini (talk · contribs) has been told multiple times not to overwrite files, but is still doing so, e.g. [3][4]. DrKay (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I feel, that Giorgio can change and become a useful user. so I did not block him indefinitely, but for a year (fourth block). Taivo (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

User:LatosTheFifth

Another Jinnifer sock, per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Socks_of_enwiki_user_Jinnifer. Reuploading the same Dracula still as an earlier sock (BerthredSpectra (talk · contribs)) and asking repeated, naive questions on user talk pages. The IP also seems to be a static one. Belbury (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Both blocked by Elcobbola. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

User:ThanhSatDayNe

Continuing to upload copyvio images after a block for same last year. Belbury (talk) 16:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done, deleted and blocked. Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyvio after warning Renvoy (talk) 00:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. All contributions are either deleted or nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Saxena404 (talk · contribs) has been warned here and blocked on en.wikipedia for uploading promotional content. Despite that they uploaded Abhishek Saxena.jpg two days after a file of the same name (presumably the same file?) was speedied per COM:CSD#G10. TilmannR (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. I will delete the file again. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Please consider indefinite ban as nothing really helps to prevent upload of photos with copyvio Renvoy (talk) 08:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I deleted his last remaining uploads as different kind of copyvios and blocked him indefinitely (4th block). Taivo (talk) 08:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Viaan Kapoor

These accounts are clearly all the same person. They are all promoting an individual named Viaan Kapoor cross-wiki. At least 3 of these accounts are blocked on another project for doing so. See w:en:Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Viaankapoor2012. Viaankapoor1995 is the most recent; in addition to blocking the accounts, and I suggest Viaankapoor1995's uploads be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done and thanks for reporting Herby talk thyme 14:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Pages with Craqdi

The files on above pages are still being requested for deletion, but they have been vandalised, including removal of the deletion tag by anonymous users and new users. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done All deleted. Yann (talk) 11:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Please protect it semi indef as IP vandals have spotted this high-vis file. Also, please check metadata as it may be corrupted. Thanks! A09 (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year semi-protection. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks! A09 (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Please semi-protect this file. The previous protection was quite effective, but it expired on 3 March 2023 and there have already been two disruptive edits by IPs. TilmannR (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

 Blocked the IP range instead. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Persistent vandalism by LTA --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done, protected for a year Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Gelvuonas

A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Upload protection for File:Flag of India.svg [upload=sysop]

Excessive vandalism by autoconfirmed users. Leonel Sohns 13:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Report for Dickhead badass

Report reason: username. --Leonidlednev (talk) 19:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

User:Justtoyou

Although receiving the copyvio warning, this used didn't stop posting copyvio photos. Netora (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done 1wk. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Massive uploads for self promotion using multiple sockpuppets

The user Pedro Renteria (talk · contributions · Statistics) is an LTA which only goal has been the attempt to use the Wikimedia projects as a promotion platform for the Mexican filmmakers, Ricardo Tavera and his venture, Glat Entertainment. The most recent user Cinedata21 (talk · contributions · Statistics) has uploaded in less than a month over 30 production stills to promote those films. The sockpuppets have also used some Wikidata entries as galleries to post all of those stills, as it is the case of Osmoniopreda (talk · contributions · Statistics) who also has uploaded tens of such images, all copyrighted by Glat Entertainment. MexTDT (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Osmoniopreda was blocked, but Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Osmoniopreda was kept. See also Glatcineworldtradecenter (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) who requested deletion of Osmoniopreda's images. Yann (talk) 11:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
I’ve found another possible sockpuppet: Thoperetuwntynice (talk · contributions · Statistics)
@MexTDT: Could you please create a request for check user? Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

User:クレイトスⅣ世

After releasing from a short block, this user didn't stop uploading copyvio photo. Netora (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 months. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Hernandofuente

Uploading copyvios after two previous blocks. Belbury (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 Comment Made one DR, others were copyvios and were tagged appropriately. A09 (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done and thanks to both for reporting/actions. 3rd block so 6 months, any future block should be indef. Herby talk thyme 14:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Dr. Nono YesMaybe

Block evasion by Houston,illinois (talk · contribs), with uploads of similar content: blackface, copyvios, content by people called "Barraclough", and claiming family video clips to be historically significant or viral. File:Tribute to Tic Taw.webm ("Rediscovered, High Definition public domain complete print") is a children's video previously uploaded by earlier sock account Palooka2 (talk · contribs).

The master account does not exist on Commons but they've been filed at Category:Sockpuppets of Oatsandcream before. Belbury (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 20:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Online Gabbar

Uploading copyrighted film posters and photos since 2018. Already warned and blocked once. No constructive uploads at all. Belbury (talk) 08:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year block. Everything is deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Excessive vandalism. Leonel Sohns 18:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for 3 months. Yann (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Iamthevilla

User does not appear to have any regard for copyright, has repeatedly uploaded images that are copyright violations. Blaze Wolf (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Iamthevilla. Yann (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Cross-wiki harassment from LTA

179.63.242.182 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) and 152.171.2.76 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) are the long term abuser "George Reeves Person"/Projects (en.wiki page about him), and they've nominated an upload of mine as part of cross-wiki harassment. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Me and Achim blocked both IP-s. The file is speedily kept. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, Taivo. He popped up again as 156.195.185.107 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) (diff). Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. Blocked, edit is hidden. I semi-protected the page indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

DDP DJ Dominic Pewee

Hi. The original account was globally locked for spamming self-promotion. Here's what I found so far:

Already blocked:

No edits on Commons:

Currently not blocked:

Catherine's files can be speedied per COM:F10. Everything else on Commons and Wikidata should already be reverted/deleted. (I didn't check the Wikipedias.) I'm also starting a requests for checkuser to maybe prevent account creation by blocking the IP. TilmannR (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked them all, created sockpuppet category and mass deleted Catherine's all uploads. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Protection type: Semi-protection
  • Proposed protection time span: Forever
  • Reason: Regular vandalism going on for ~2 years.

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Demande de blocage définitif

Bonsoir,

Je souhaite être bloquée définitivement. Merci. Guil2027 (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Protection type: Semi-protection
  • Proposed protection time span: Forever
  • Reason: Regular vandalism.

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for a year. Yann (talk) 20:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Carolina Mahadewi Malin

Continued uploading of copyrighted images after multiple warnings. This user is the latest subject of a long-term sockpuppet investigation on id.wiki. I can agree with the resemblance to Vira Septiani Mawar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, both having three-part user names and uploading low-resolution (i.e. probably copyvio-ed) photos of mosques. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Main account blocked for a week, sock indef. Most copyvios deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Carolina Mahadewi Malin. Yann (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

User:Uirkeaggiihhs

While receiving a copyvio warn, this user uploaded the same copyvio pictures and new copyvio one. Netora (talk) 11:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

User:Ramsal18

After a short block, this user uploaded copyvio TOO logos and photos. Netora (talk) 11:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

There are some Olympic Games logos that need deletion, but as far as I understand COM:TOO Japan and/or COM:TOO China, no logos (other than those of OG and those from UK) should be deleted. A09 (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
My indicating logo is File:ヤマトホールディングスsvg.svg, File:自治医科大学のロゴ.svg posted in November 2022. The latest short block was in August 2022. Netora (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. one month block. Ramsal uploaded a lot of logos surpassing TOO. Even worse, the user claimed often no other source than own work. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Busoul

Despite warnings by User:Dronebogus, Busoul still continues to upload low quality nude-related images. I think (s)he is just "mooning" around, rather than really contributing on Commmons. A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Support ban. User can’t even spell “medical” right when showing their butthole to the world. Dronebogus (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Also calls the glans penis a “glan”. Sigh… Dronebogus (talk) 06:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. One week block. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
I would support a longer block. No useful edit so far. Yann (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Yafie Achmad Raihan

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 months, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Alex Neman

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

I promise I don't want to upload copyrighted logos again. That copyrighted logo was already deleted. Administrators, please don't block my Commons account as I still use this account to upload some images. Alex Neman (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Next time I will upload wordmark only instead. Alex Neman (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hamdsaif

SCP-2000 05:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked indefinitely. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

LTA/sock

Can't exactly recall who/what they are a sock of, but looking at their contributions, very clearly an LTA and is not here to contribute. Magitroopa (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked as vandalism-only accou8nt. I reverted something. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Arfatmia40

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. All uploads of master and two sockpuppets are deleted, the socks are indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo and Jim: Why not block the master?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't know, Jim decided so and I usually do not change decisions of other admins. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Generally, when I do a CU, I block only the puppets and leave the original, oldest, account in place. If the sock puppeteer needs a block, that can be done by any Admin familiar with the account and the reasons for blocking it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 14:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

Hello! Could you please upload protect this file indefinitely? It is used in the interface of the Wikimedia Incubator in a gadget that is enabled for everyone by default. Thanks! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Lots of vandalism going on. 6 months of semi-protection? Thanks. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. As the file is 1052 times used outside Commons, I semi-protected it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Protection for Template:Unsigned2

Just reverted some vandalism there. May need stronger than semi-protection. Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

I blocked the vandal indefinitely, but did not full protect the file. Others can protect, if they want. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Lots of vandalism going on. 6 months of semi-protection? Thanks. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. 1 year semi-protection. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Offensive username

NillKiggers55 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter logIagoQnsi (talk) 02:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Nill indefinitely. The only upload is nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection for User talk:Dragoniez

I'm a jawp sysop. Could I have my user talk page semi-protected indefinitely? It'd been semi-protected for 3 months since last August and it only has vandals' edits in the history, except for reverts and the first revision by a welcome bot. --Dragoniez (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Requesting upload/version revert protection for a month or two on File:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg due to persistent revert wars. Discussion on content of file is ongoing on the talk page. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done indef (I have the feeling this will continue after the RfC). Any admin should feel free to unprotect without consulting me after the RfC if they think everyone will respect its result. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

A possible sock of User:Smash154: they kept ignoring multiple warnings and uploading copyrighted (non-libre) files. Block 'em all and nuke their uploads away this instant. And besides, an abuse filter is needed. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 00:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 06:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
While I was barely getting a headache, so yeah, thank freaking goodness. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 06:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Bookish Worm

A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

and? his previous account has never been blocked on commons and the copyvio's block on enwiki were for article writing, nothing to do with images, you trying to get him blocked here feels more personal than anything else..users here are allowed clean accounts if their previous account hasn't been blocked here (which would make that socking which i assume you should already know about), as it stands, done nothing wrongs thus why no admin has replied to this or taken action.. Stemoc 02:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Please protect Template:Japanmonth2/a etc.

Please protect {{Japanmonth2/a}}, {{Japanmonth2/b}}, and {{Japanmonth2/c}}. The templates are used on too many pages. --トトト (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Mr.Rais

Muhandes (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. All uploads are deleted. No block is needed, because Mr. Rais stopped after you warned him 10 days ago. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: No he didn't. He uploaded again on the 23rd, and he will keep doing it. Muhandes (talk) 17:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
You warned the user on 16th of March and the last upload was on 13th of March. I see no uploads from 23rd. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Possible abuse of multiple accounts

The following three accounts upload copyvio files of certain famous people over and over and one user on fa.wikipedia adds their uploaded files to articles. I suspect that they are connected to each other because usernames are also similar:

I have nominated their files for deletion. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked two last of them. Smmhdi has only one upload from September 2021. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Kiril4966

--Trade (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user (he was not warned in the past). All copyvios are deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Đồ thờ tượng phật Nguyễn Tuấn (talk · contributions · Statistics) continues to upload spam and copyright images of his products even after beind told not do so. I tagged all of his uploads, blocked on viwiki for spam. I suggest nuking and blocking this user. A09 (talk) 14:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. I will delete last remaining uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

KEMONO PANTSU

Account created to vandalize -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indef Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. I reverted the edits and deleted the userpage. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Joe Biden vs Xi Jinping

Inappropriate username. Leonidlednev (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I don't think this violates COM:UPOL, at least to block with no edits. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Agree, I think Biden VS Xi Jinping is neither promotional nor offensive, unless the edits/uploads implies that. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 Not done. At moment block is not justified. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Long-term uploading of copyright violations despite multiple successful deletion requests dating to 2019. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Mohinibarman

Adverting only account. User was warned, but is still continuing to upload advertisements. Marbletan (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Severe vandalism by an IP. CastJared (talk) 13:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked the IP for 3 days. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Neeraj Dheeraj Singh

This user has had dozens of images deleted as copyright violations and was given a "final warning" about it last November. The user is still uploading files that are copied from various sources on the web and are falsely claimed as own work. I've nominated several of them for speedy deletion, but haven't checked them all - I suspect that other remaining files are copyright violations as well. Marbletan (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Last remaining uploads are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

A possible sock of User:Theweeknd69: re-uploading previously deleted files containing copyrighted (non-libre) audio found on recent changes filtered with a tag. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 02:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 02:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Heh, just noticed this too and filed a RFCU at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mar252525. I wasn't planning on blocking before results of the checkuser, but wouldn't object if someone else decided to block. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked StarPlatinum indefinitely, all contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

A user has appeared on the abuse filter log; however, I wonder why all his uploads contain copyrighted (non-libre) audio and are not "own work." - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 14:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 14:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleted all and warned. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I assume it would be poor form for me to protect a file I uploaded, so I'm coming here. I believe the edits to File:A Gatherer of Faggots at Neah Bay.jpg, apparently as an indirect result of the WikiGap campaign, have gotten totally out of hand and amount to some mix of edit-warring and vandalism in the structured data, and I would like to see the file protected. - Jmabel ! talk 15:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I have protected it for 2 weeks, hopefully by then things will calm down. If it continues we can look at what long term protection is most suitable Gbawden (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

RandomUserGuy1738

Abuse filter log included. That file went taken down; withal, most files on their uploads are suspicious. Anyone investigates those files that are copyright infringement or not. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 10:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 11:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Files without license deleted, user warned, the rest is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hotboii2‎. Yann (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

User:猫ウサギ

After releasing from a block, this user didn't stop uploading same actress's copyvio photo. Netora (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 months block (second block), all contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

I propose the following protection:

  • Protection type: Semi-protection
  • Page name: Commons:Template editors
  • Proposed protection time span: Permanently
  • Reason for this request: The page has often been vandalized before by some anonymous users (Revisions), and there is no particular need for anonymous users to edit this page.

--TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Could someone protect File:Hindustani.svg. As indicated at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:भोजपुरी_and_User:लोहरान_:_Massive_re-uploadings_of_files there are at least four different accounts uploading on top of this image which is fairly widely used to replace the actual text with some obscure script. There is about a half dozen images that are being vandalized this way but this one has had all four accounts doing it one after another. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Two weeks full. --Achim55 (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

92.4.173.101 and Hieutrung19

It seems that the following users are connected to each other (either they are socks or used by people connected) because they only upload pictures of one certain person, which are copyright violations. I have nominated some of their uploaded files individually and others here.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Also, it seems like a case of self-promotion as R30591 (talk · contribs) has created pages for the person in several languages of Wikipedia (their copyright violation uploads, which depicted the same guy, were all deleted before). HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Please note that the page created for this guy in fa.wikipedia (the language of where this person belongs to) has been deleted several times for lack of notability. ([5]) This is evidently a self-promotion case. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Could you please create a request for check user? Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry - Larrymoney21 and Larry Ayube

Promotional edits and images uploaded here on Commons. Blocked for sockpuppetry on enwiki. en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Larrymoney21 and repeated self-promotion. -- Whpq (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the sockpuppet indefinitely, but did not block the master, because activity of both is low. All uploads and promotional userpage are already deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

210.141.245.121

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. It seems to be static IP, so I blocked it for 3 months. Vandalistic category deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: They appear to be abusing TPA, and so need it removed.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Google translates his/her words as "Got it" and "understood", so here's no abuse. Taivo (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Requesting long-term protection for Flag of the Delhi Sultanate

I need help to resolve an ongoing hoax about the color of the flag of the Delhi Sultanate (13th-15th century India). Only one historical depiction exists, from the Catalan Atlas of 1375: , as it appears in this plate: : it is grey with a vertical black band ().
BUT, some users have been pushing a green version of the flag [6] for a long time (as you will see in the history of the file) but this is a hoax: the flag is actually grey/greyish as seen from the primary source above (Catalan Atlas), and scholarly sources also describe it a grey/brownish, not green: "....another curious flag found in northern India – a brown or originally sliver flag with a vertical black line – as the flag of the Delhi Sultanate (602-962/1206-1555)." in (2010). "On the Timurid flag". Beiträge zur islamischen Kunst und Archäologie 2: 148..
You will also see that the Catalan Atlas map has plenty of vivid green otherwise, so it is not a question of green color fading....
I have a sense that this has a potential for a lot of edit warring, for a very long time (see history of the file already). Would it be possible to protect or block the file pages concerned? Altogether, there are three of them: the most used , and two others , .
Ideally, it would be great if the previous green versions of the files were deleted too, because these are just fakes, but I don't know if that is possible. Thank you and best regards! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for a year. Users warned. Yann (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Continued copyvio despite warning: H.alyafei111 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

@Ahmed M Farrag: You didn't warn mentioned user as instructed above. Will do this for your this time. A09 (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi @A09, but I did. Should be banned, it's taking hours to tag all their copyvios. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 20:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
As far as I understand notice about ANI thread is not interchangeable with the stop copyvios template. A09 (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I misunderstood. Thanks for stepping in! Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked for a week. All files need review. Yann (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by H.alyafei111‎. Yann (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Please protect this page due to IP and new user vandalism. Wcam (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Semiprotected for 3 months. --Achim55 (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Realilluminatibrother

Repeated vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Indef: Vandalism went on despite given warning. --Achim55 (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Is he probably a sock that is related to User:Oscar Daniel Pérez Aguilar? I've already warned them both and tagged most of their uploads as copyright violations. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 04:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 04:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hydo Rip 2012

Hydo Rip 2012 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

AXXXXK sock self-edited and directed, new user edit page when previous sock created, SPA.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 09:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism (insertion of deliberately false information). Gyrostat (talk) 22:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. All contributions are speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

There they go on the abuse filter log. Another time I filed it before getting a user penalty for copyright infringement. Their uploads will go away. However, I have one more thing, are they likely a sock of User:Derik 2005? - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 07:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 07:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

His taste in music has become worse somehow..I'm starting to think its some form of bot/script and not actual people doing this...we getting 2 a day nowadays...since i have only been following this from this year, not sure who the real master sock is, its not mar252525 but more likely User talk:Lola474747 who is still active and yet our CU has yet to catch it..odd.. Stemoc 08:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
I see that point out there. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 09:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
@Stemoc You may file an RFCU at COM:RFCU.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
nah, already reported 99 files it uploaded for speedy, its obviously the master sock of the Mar252525 account, just wondering how it managed to last nearly 4 months without detection..defintely 2 sets of trolls, the one invested in spanish music is Mar25/Lola47 and the one that loves Taytay and new music is another set thus why CU's never find a link..now we know the master for one, might be a good idea to find the master account for the other one.. Stemoc 12:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
I think we need a filter for audio files uploaded by new accounts Trade (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
And videos you almost forgot too. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 11:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Or one specific to that account's behavior.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Even Mdaniels5757 suggested blocking IP ranges to prevent them from making throwaway accounts. To make matters worse, they'll keep doing it when using proxies or VPNs. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 11:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 00:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked for a day pending investigation. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AA424242. Yann (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
This is definitely a sock, so indef. Yann (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Page: Template:Discussion-notice
  • Reasons for requesting protection: multiple instances of vandalism this year and widely linked on administrative noticeboards; please semi-protect or Template Editor protect.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. In my opinion IP-s have no reasons to edit the file, so I semi-protected it indefinitely. Other admins, feel free to shorten or remove the protection. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Lwj19971027

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. The user has stopped. Uploads are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hejhojlo

✓ Done. I blocked Hejhojlo indefinitely and mass deleted all his uploads. In addition, I declined unblock request of sockmaster, reblocked him indefinitely and mass deleted all his remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Block user

Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

This user Chennai Super Kings Lover uploaded many copyrighted images, block him/her to avoid future vandalism. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 08:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. I wonder what relation this user has with Jharkhand Department of Media and Information (talk · contribs)... Yann (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@Yann: Maybe sock 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

109.52.102.154

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Block is pointless as they change their IP ten times an hour if necessary. --Achim55 (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Range ban? Trade (talk) 16:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Didn't help. Their next was 151.43.129.168 (talk · contributions · Statistics). --Achim55 (talk) 18:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hn53uvsmhw

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

This user Akk7a uploaded many images which is non-commercial. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 07:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, obvious copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Editorfree1011

Editorfree1011 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

The user Editorfree1011 has uploaded numerous images of the former Vietnamese ruling dynasty family under PD-VietnamGov template which is considered copyright violation as the template is strictly meant for governmental documents published by the government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and not for images published in earlier Vietnamese historical eras. Bookish Worm (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent. Yann (talk) 17:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

ChaitanyaJo

Most of ChaitanyaJo's images were deleted as copyright violations, see upload log. They were given the last warning on 17th February.[7]. They uploaded another file recently which was again deleted.[8] Suneye1 (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Phongphanphu

A1Cafel (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a month. Yann (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Warnings

User4edits (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

This user User4edits uploaded copyright images even after warnings. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. No copyvios in current year. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
𝕃𝐖: I notified the user of this discussion on their user talk page, as you should have done per the above. 11 of their last 25 uploads have been deleted as copyright violations. They were warned to immediately stop uploading them in this edit 18:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Illiasou81

Blocked for a week for uploading images without clear permission (low res uploads all sourced to a Google Drive, unclear if they are claiming to be the photographer). Uploaded a hundred more such files from the same source, some apparently reuploads, when that block expired yesterday. Belbury (talk) 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Now indef. --A.Savin 20:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Lorderades

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Qwertyrgajemywjjgwkmhn

FlorianH76 (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

يونس23

Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 04:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One month block, all uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Alexander Kuzmin

✓ Done Warned, file deleted. If you can provide some information, you could fill up a request for check user. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

2A02:ED1:F001:10A6:E0FF:21BE:93CF:E3E7

Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done IP blocked for 3 days, user warned, file deleted. Yann (talk) 07:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Throwaway accounts are sockpuppets who keep uploading copyrighted (non-libre) files and having a possible edit war when abusing the site. Did anyone file at COM:VPP or Phabricator before making an abuse filter? - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 02:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 11:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Both blocked. Yann (talk) 12:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Same as above here. I have one quick question. Are those users a sock of User:Mar252525 or User:Smash154? - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 11:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 22:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

StarDeg

FlorianH76 (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done? Yann warned the user again, so I will not block him at moment. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

GubaRewa

FlorianH76 (talk) 13:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done No recent uploads, so last warning sent. One file deleted. Yann (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Nicat49

FlorianH76 (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi. You are right, I seem to have misunderstood the license. I have 12 years of experience and have never been blocked. I also perform the function of an administrator in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I'll try to be more careful from now on. Regards.--Nicat49 (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file File:Аяз Ниязи оглы Муталибов.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 17:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done File deleted. Nothing else to be done. Yann (talk) 11:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Eddie1488

FlorianH76 (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Both reverted. Block is not needed, because the user has not edited for 2 years. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Sabitha123P

File:Sultan Muhammad V 2017.jpg

I request semiprotection for File:Sultan Muhammad V 2017.jpg. Seems that the sultan has been a subject of repeated attacks from similar IPs both here and in WD. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One month semi-protection. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

StMalabar

FlorianH76 (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, file deleted. Yann (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Thrtgwgewughewogiehjiwgfhogihwgoe

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done VOA, file deleted. Yann (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

105.157.115.123

✓ Done. 3 days block. Thanks for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Ngsharif

User: Ngsharif (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Without any doubt another sockpuppet of long-term abuser User:پارسا_آملی aka Mazandiran, recently blocked as LACIPETO, Lacipetom... the same targeted topics (northern Iran), the same bad English, the same extreme edit warring behavior.

I put this report also on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism but still no reaction there, after 2-3 hours of persistent vandalizing content and spamming various users. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Also, protection for Imam Khomeini Street (Amol) (auto confirmed users only) is needed because knowing his behavioral history, he'll come again with a new sockpuppet either after a month or a year. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Ngsharif indefinitely and fully protected the category for a year. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Misael Cerrato and 190.53.249.0/24

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

 Comment Probably same user as Gvfklgv (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information). Yann (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the user and IP-s. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, but please consider blocking Gvfklgv too.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
I considered and at moment I do not want to block the user. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: See also unactioned Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 98#User:Misael Cerrato.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

2601:C6:D281:6710:198F:8B1D:758E:4E3B

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Busoul

A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. As previous week-long block was obviously too short, I blocked him for a year. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Dodo10807010

After 3 months block, this user uploaded an other actor's copyvio portrait. This user is definitely not willing to be compliant with the commons policies. Netora (talk) 07:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year block (third block). Taivo (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Clhangus

Clhangus (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

AXXXXK sock self-edited and directed, new user edit page when previous sock (Hydo Sarge 2013) edited, SPA.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Hayakawasakuna

While receiving some warnings, this user didn't stop uploading the same unfree or unsourced military images repeatedly.

Finally, this user created the sock and re-uploaded the same copyvio photos.

This user is also maybe a sock. Because this user also have the same trends; 1) lacking of clearly source describing, 2) same military's groups photos (ja:特殊作戦群) 3) uploading same copyvio photo (File:共同演習特殊作戦群IMG 4861.png and File:自由降下訓練を行う特殊作戦群.jpg) Netora (talk) 15:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done All blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Jasleen41

Jasleen41 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

✓ Blocked - FitIndia Talk 15:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Juergen63

A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Despite a lot of deleted uploads and recent warnings, the user still uploaded photos about his low quality penis, so I blocked him indefinitely. I have lost faith, that nothing good will ever come from this account. Taivo (talk) 06:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Please templateeditor protect Commons:Picture of the Year/2022/Candidates (warning, large page), as it controls all the POTY galleries + voting pages and shouldn't be tampered with. It was similarly protected last year, just forgot to ask ahead of time this year. Legoktm (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I fully protected the page indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2022

Please protect Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2022: the banner calling for votes is now visible everywhere, and the page was vandalized. Trizek from FR 10:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Protected so that only auto confirmed users can edit. Let us know if this is not sufficient Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Gelvuonas

A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Mickey Đại Phát

Numerous Flickr washing, final warning placed on Jan 28. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

So that all Flickr images that I uploaded will be deleted? Anyway, some of my files I uploaded are positive, so please re-check it carefully. Thanks. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
@NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh Can you give me an example of what you believe is his flickrwashing? I checked 2 flickr accounts they uploaded from and don't see any obvious signs Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
@Gbawden: This, for example. There are many deletion notices on their talk page as well. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Typically a flickrwashing account has 0 followers. This one has many and is also following other accounts and have been on flickr a while. I am not convinced. Mickey Đại Phát uploaded these in good faith, unless you can prove that the flickraccount belongs to them I don't see what action we can take Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. One week block is enough. Taivo (talk) 05:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Non-free image uploads, sockpuppetry, and vandalism by Themoorishh

Kkloppm is an obvious sockpuppet of Themoorishh, being used to re-upload at least one non-free image. Kkloppm uploaded File:Kkpoo.jpg, which is identical to the image previously uploaded by Themoorishh, Mediump.jpg, that was speedily deleted yesterday (no longer visible, but see talk page notice here). The image is taken from the internet (e.g. this older and larger version) and no evidence of Commons-compatible license has been provided, and of course it's incorrectly attributed as "own work".

Kkloppm also made this vandalizing (and racist) edit on another image. (They also edited the image's Wikidata item to vandalize the title here, evidently while logged out.) Themoorishh has already been banned on the English Wikipedia for disruptive editing. They appear to be currently evading that block with logged-out edits, namely these edits ([9], [10]) where the same IP is adding either Mediump.jpg (Themoorishh's upload) or Kkpoo.jpg (Kkloppm's identical upload) to the same article.

Given this behaviour, I don't think that there's any chance they will be editing productively to Commons or any Wikimedia projects. Please block these two accounts. (And I expect they may create more.) R Prazeres (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Kkloppm indefinitely and deleted both his uploads. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Very dumb, lo-level revert war on File:Flag Map of Morocco with Western Sahara.svg, please protect

See the file history. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done, directed users to talk page —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Mares vulva.jpg

Requesting semi-protection for File:Mares_vulva.jpg due to persistent and extremely weird IP vandalism. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Owcerlay only makes bizarre edits

Indef blocked on two wikis and I have also posted to m:Steward_requests/Global. See Special:Contributions/Owcerlay. —Justin (koavf)TCM 15:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: no edits since warning. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection File:Romanoro Presbyterian and Saint Benedict Church side view.jpg

Hi. This file File:Romanoro Presbyterian and Saint Benedict Church side view.jpg was protected in 2017. Is it possible to unprotect it? Thank you in advance. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@MrKeefeJohn ✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thanks! MrKeefeJohn (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

105.156.225.154

MosAndreas. 13

MosAndreas. 13 - continuously uploads non free images Drakosh (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Uploads are mostly deleted or nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 06:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Linhmieu2000

This user uploaded a lot of copyright violation photos as their own work, Google-Lens found nearly all of their uploads are something on other websites. Lemonaka (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked. All 77 edits are deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection of File:2023 Sudan clashes.svg

Requesting unprotection for this image, which was recently transcluded at Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/zh. I am not sure why this severe level of protection was suddenly enforced, since no significant editing disruption appears to have occurred on the page. As a map of an ongoing, developing conflict, it requires frequent updating and new uploads by users. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure. I've just tried uploading a change, but I can't do it because of severe protection. It should be removed because I expect no one editing it in bad/vulgar way. Also, unpotection should be added because it is added on most conflict maps (e.g. 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine). Berobalkan (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: The file is protected because it is on the Chinese Wikipedia's Main Page. It will be automatically unprotected when it is off the main page. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Инна Геннадьевна

FlorianH76 (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Gazzati

FlorianH76 (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. The only upload is nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Please delete File:Dzasohov Gocha.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

I request the protection of this file because it is constantly under edition war, the constant uploader has been told to provide sources for his edits but he doesn't provide them. Milenioscuro (talk) 03:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year full protection against upload. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

H.alyafei111

Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One month block (second block). Taivo (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Upload protection requested due to continuous edit warring/vandalism. — Ætoms (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done for 1 year as both previous protections (1 + 3 months) were obviously not sufficient. --Achim55 (talk) 18:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Already done by Achim55. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Not withstanding the edit wars that occurred on the file way back on 2013-2014, the Brazilian official government recently released an extremely detailed update on the design of the Coat of Arms on its website . It's the result of an extensive study based on heraldic conventions and the text of the Law n. 5,700/71. The official design (with the minor correction of the colour of the banderole in the compartment to match the aforementioned law) can already be found on .svg format here and a full explanation of the changes can be found here and here.

Could an admin please temporarily unprotect the original file for it to be updated; redirect it to the new one; or maybe even move this outdated file to a new name and move the new file with the official design to the current name ("Coat of arms of Brazil")? Hookko27 (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Inazod

Using Commons to advertise scams. --Trade (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Warned for now. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Block for Hilter Lover

Hilter Lover (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Unacceptable username. Leonidlednev (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely. I think by myself: what if the user will become an administrator – what will other people think? In my opinion this name is not acceptable for administrator, that means, it is not acceptable for other users as well. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Persistent vandalism

i have been working weeks to update the Vermont county election maps with the new standard style accurately depicting Grand Isle but another user is constantly reverting them back to the old style. It's getting really annoying and i can't keep up so could you please put a protection lock for the following files? The Vermont gubernatorial county election maps for the years 1992 through 2022 The us senate county maps 1988 through 2022 The presidential county maps 2000 through 2020 Just make sure they are reverted back please because the vandal might have reverted them back again. Also please note i still need to update all the other maps before the years stated. They are definitely a sock/vandal they made a second account and reverted all the maps i updated again https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lady_Diana_Spencer https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Royal_Consort As you can see on the first contribution page i tried talking to them and gave a warning about this but they didn't communicate and blanked their talk page and preceeded to make another account to revert them all again this happened three times in just a day Putitonamap98 (talk) 04:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate username and has one file that is a dubious copyright violation and likely outside of project scope. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 05:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC); edited: 06:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinite block. The upload is deleted as content intended for vandalism. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User:817yatatsu

suspicious sock of Jpgmgdtpm (talk · contribs). This user uploaded same copyvio wall paintings as Jpgmgdtpm did. Netora (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Both blocked. Yann (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Kbsdg

Another sock of Salebot1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, making the same kinds of uploads (Oggy and the Cockroaches screenshots) and edits (blanking other people's talk pages) as, for example, Salebot9 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. I've seen and deleted the dog from the Apple advert before as well. Belbury (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User is now rapidly nominating many randomly selected uploads for deletion with rationales of "````````", as Salebot6 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log did last year. Belbury (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
+1 C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
+1 Araisyohei (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I support this action. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 14:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Looks like they finally hit an admin's upload, by chance. Thanks for cleaning that mess up, User:Infrogmation. Belbury (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Would be good to bar them from editing their own talk page (they keep blanking it now that they've been banned), so that the users affected by the spurious deletion nominations don't waste time writing any questions there. Belbury (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I count still 30 DRs that have not been reverted or closed: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Kbsdg&namespace=6&tagfilter=&start=&end=&limit=1000 C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done All closed/reverted. We should have a filter preventing vandals creating DRs without at least a few words. Yann (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Sock puppet of User:Hossam ali gad. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by حسام علي على جاد بيطري. --Karim talk to me :)..! 11:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Mdaniels5757. Yann (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Labrynth13

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

I'll leave this for another admin, but I'm not inclined to block now: no edits since April 3rd; you gave {{End of copyvios}} today. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 Not done. No edits since 3rd of April. Your warning is enough. All uploads are already deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

block evasion of MoronPatrol (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, see w:en:Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_MoronPatrol Lemonaka (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

(Re)uploading copyvios after warning. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand why you warned me. All the above photos are owned by me, why are you reporting me? What right do you have to report me? Why do I have to prove my own photos while I created it? I cannot really understand how Wikipedia members work. HUY MARTINÔ (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
@HUY MARTINÔ: If your images are own, please send evidences to permissions-vi@wikimedia.org and I'll help confirm that.
Tiếng Việt: Nếu bạn chắc chắn rằng bạn sở hữu bản quyền hoặc tạo ra các bức hình đó, hãy gửi thư về permissions-vi@wikimedia.org và tôi sẽ chứng thực giúp bạn.
Tryvix1509 (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
After discussing with other user, I would like to withdraw this request, as well as the no permission tag. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protection

Template:Convert has more than 10000 transclusion. However, it is not protected. This is a high-risk template so I hope administrators can protect this. 阿南之人 (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
@CptViraj Oh, Module:Convert, Module:Convert/data and Module:Convert/text is needed too. 阿南之人 (talk) 13:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. 阿南之人 (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Sunshinepestcontrol

Promotional username and uploads. Belbury (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indef Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Dtimko1723

Dtimko1723 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log is a persistent copyright violator. He has had five prior uploads deleted for obvious violation of copyright and his four latest uploads were just nominated for deletion for the same reason. Denniscabrams (talk) 03:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Final warning given. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

User AhmadMulkliffMohdNor

AhmadMulkliffMohdNor (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Uploads modified photos with his face on photos of VIPs. Pierre cb (talk) 12:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done by Jim. Sock of glocked User:Mulkliff. --Achim55 (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Historiador M45s31

This user is uploading images of F. Tales Massei, making them an obvious sock of User:F. Tales Massei (see previous report at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_35#Self-promotion_using_multiple_accounts and Category:Sockpuppets of F. Tales Massei). Cross-wiki self-promotion using multiple accounts. Marbletan (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

@Marbletan, ✓ Done Kadı Message 20:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

is a sockpuppet of AXXXXK (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, confirmed by Checkuser information on English Wikipedia. For more information, please read w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Strange editing behaviour, likely sockpuppetry.
All the uploads maybe suspected as hoax and may need to be deleted. Lemonaka (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

@Lemonaka: Thanks for the report, I made Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kentold and m:srg#Global lock for Kentold for you.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
✓[OK] Locally blocked by CptViraj. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Zaibekhan876

Obvious sock of User:Kalasa Saab who has been blocked for cross-wiki self-promotion of someone named Amir Kalasa using multiple accounts. See Category:Sockpuppets of Kalasa Saab. Marbletan (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Global lock requested. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. I have nominated this account's uploads for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zaibekhan876 per COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
I just noticed that Monojsirkar654 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log is clearly the same individual as well. I would like to add this user to the global lock request, but the Steward requests/Global page on meta is protected and I can't currently edit it. @Tryvix1509: can you add it please? Marbletan (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Added. @Marbletan: You must make 5+ edits in order to get autoconfirmed. Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Flagman97

Flagman97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Repeatedly uploading copyright violations despite multiple warnings. JalenFolf (talk) 00:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Final warning given. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Пожалуйста, заблокируйте участника «Ааааалаалоа»!

В последнее время, участник @Ааааалаалоа стал вандализировать страницу Łajno końskie 400.jpg. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, историю изменений страницы этого файла — там все подробности. Юрина Татьяна (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

English: Please block the user "Ааааалаалоа"!
Recently, user Ааааалаалоа (talk · contribs) has been vandalizing the File:Łajno końskie 400.jpg. Please see the history of changes to this file page - all the details are there.
My comment: Please also protect the file page. Thanks! Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
User already blocked. I decline to protect the file page at this time, as there's no recent vandalism, but I added it to my watchlist for a year. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Malik Nursultan B

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Deleted the file. They have some good edits, so I'm not inclined to jump straight to a block without hearing from them. @Malik Nursultan B: please explain why you did this and if you did this on any other files. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Excessive vandalism. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

The file description has been vandalized by one person in the past thirty days. I'm not sure what short-term protection would achieve here, and I don't see the vandalism as being so typical as to warrant protecting this file for the very long term. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I would rather take the opposite side and preemptively prevent anonymous users to edit this file for the next 6 months. Somebody is obviously targeting it and they're likely coming back. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Semi-protected for one month. Yann (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

User:AAAAaeredtytfguiuholi;

User:AAAAaeredtytfguiuholi; this user has rule-breaking username and has uploaded a rule-breaking file:Tvyfvyvubinop.png. modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely and deleted the file as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Excessive vandalism. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 02:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One month semi-protection. Thank you for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 10:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

User:EMMAMUSCAT

User:EMMAMUSCAT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Muscat his name is against our username policy. should be blocked. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

User:FacebooksTR

User:FacebooksTR is it rule-breaking user name? if it is, please take action. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion this is acceptable username. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

The following users (and two others, which don't have much activity on Commons) were confirmed to be sockpuppets by en:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Culitrum1988/Archive

All of them uploaded content which is out of this project's scope and/or without proper permission. One of them received a final warning months ago [11]. I just realised that they used another account Caodaismview (talk · contribs) (which the enwiki SPI missed because there is no local account [12]). This account also got a final warning [13]. As some of these sockpuppets still continue with the same behaviour [14] I think they should be blocked on Commons as well. Johannnes89 (talk) 11:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann blocked them all. The only upload any of the accounts have that remains is File:Caodaismlogo.jpg. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Repeatedly changes. Please permanently protect this redirect. Evrik (talk) 00:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

@Evrik I'm confused, do you want the redirect File:Atlas.jpg protected, or the target File:Black and white drawing of a man's arm flexing.jpg? It looks like you're the only editor of the redirect. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: , atlas. It's name is too generic. I've pointed it to "name" I want it to remain that way permanently. Evrik (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
@Evrik ✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Iptesh Kumar Meher

Uploading copyvios after a final warning last year. Indef blocked on enwiki for sockpuppetry. Belbury (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Facemen11

A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indef, deleted apparent CSAM, reported to WMF Legal and Oversighters. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Simone Rosso97

A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indef, deleted apparent CSAM, reported to WMF Legal and Oversighters. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

NateHiggersFR

--Leonidlednev (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

sock / block evasion

SpanishEmpireMCDXCII (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

is a sock of blocked

SpanishEmpireBall2009 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log.

Repeated changes of the color of the NATO flag from what NATO specifies. Kwamikagami (talk) 21:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nariman Terano

FlorianH76 (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. No edits during last 3 years. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this image File:Рой Александрович Медведев.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 10:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Requesting long-term protection for Flag of the Timurid Empire

I need help to resolve an ongoing hoax about the flag of the Timurid Empire (14th-15th century). There is no historically known flag of the Timurid Empire, and none in the Catalan Atlas of 1375 contrary to what is sometimes claimed here. BUT, some users have been pushing a red pellets on black background version of the flag [15] for a long time (as you will see in the history of the file Flag of the Timurid Empire) but this is a hoax. The only known Timurid dynastic symbol are the "three annulets", as they appear on Timurid coinage: , hence the stylization that had been provided instead [16]. For reference: (2010). "On the Timurid flag". Beiträge zur islamischen Kunst und Archäologie 2: 144, 149.. There is a lot of edit warring going on (see history of the file). Would it be possible to protect or block the file page concerned: Flag of the Timurid Empire, for one year at least? Thank you and best regards! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done as requested Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
But now a version that totally differs to the original version is the protected one. The file would need to be split in two different files. GPSLeo (talk) 10:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
  • No, it's perfect, the proper file is now protected (the grey one with the three pellets). The black flag with red dots is a hoax, which has been going on for years, but is now in more than a thousand articles: it is impossible to replace it manually... I'm afraid overwriting and keeping it this way is the only solution. Thank you very much. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 10:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
    No, per COM:OW guideline the first overwrite was against the guidelines and should have been uploaded as a new file. If all uses refer to the current version we could keep this version unter the current name but the other version should be separate. GPSLeo (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
@GPSLeo: The original file claiming to be the "Flag of the Timurid Empire" being a hoax, I would argue that it is quintessentially false and misleads users, and therefore should be updated wth a proper image with updated and accurate knowledge of the subject: I trust this is in the spirit of the COM:OW rule about "Files with current data" which allows to modify the file of a map which has false national boundaries for example: "Files with current data: (...) However, files may be identified to reusers as ones where information may be updated – these files can and should be overwritten to reflect new information as necessary. (...) A file named "File:Germany location map.svg" is expected to indicate the current boundaries, and is expected to be updated if, for example, the boundaries changed or errors were observed." So a map with false boundaries can, and should be, overwriten: similarly a national flag with a false design can and should be overwritten. Here, clearly, the claim to be a "Flag of the Timurid Empire" is false and misleading, the file content constitutes a hoax: it seems legitimate to rectify the content in order to have correct information. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

User:NmWTfs85lXusaybq

User:NmWTfs85lXusaybq username is against our username policy. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done One week block for improper speedy DRs. Yann (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
@Yann so, his username is OK? ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 12:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
My account is registered on English Wikipedia. The response from admin there to a report of my username by a sockpuppet is do not contravene enwiki's username policy.
According to Wikipedia:Changing username, usernames are global, and are the same on all Wikimedia projects, since 2014, when Wikimedia implemented single user login. So, I can't choose another username for this project only. Any global change of my username will confuse my collaborators in English Wikipedia.
I'm not sure if I have dealt with Modern primat in my anti-vandalism work before, but I can't understand why he is so aggressive to ask for blocking me indefinitely from the beginning. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
i have no problems with you, you just random internet user for me. if no one else is supporting block, im ok with your username. i just reported you.
tell me, is there any diffrence with your username with this?: Mnw123AsdaA5GybO (which is random username) ? your username could be confusing. @NmWTfs85lXusaybq ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
I can't tell you more, but it's actually a special kind of hash and a commitment to my real-life identity for my collaborators in English Wikipedia. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

User Arianagrandestiddies92

Please block Arianagrandestiddies92 (talk · contribs). Not here. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Already globally locked. GPSLeo (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Obvious sock of User:طاهور الدريبي needs blocking (see deleted upload). * Pppery * it has begun... 15:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Ckwikibn is a sockpuppet of Md Abu Sayeed Hossan confirmed on Bengali Wikipedia, see bn:বিষয়শ্রেণী:ছুন্নত_আলী_মল্লিক-এর_উইকিপিডিয়া_সকপাপেট. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

No action taken here (as I don't see any obvious abuse of multiple accounts on Commons), but I reported to m:SRG for lock evasion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Trade

--VoidWanderer (talk) 15:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

@Trade: Do you have an explanation for this edit? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
When i created Category:Women wearing red lipstick i was specifically looking for photos of red lipstick itself (not being applied), Men wearing red lipstick and artwork depicting red lipstick to uncheck from Cat-a-Lot. I did not expect a category about makeup to contain photos of non-humans so unfortunately i failed to notice it and thus to uncheck it from Cat-a-Lot.
Regardless, i find it difficult to take the characterization of me as a "long-term prankster" serious and i have to question if Void can be said to be acting in good faith here. Trade (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for response. That explanation is satisfactory to me. @VoidWanderer: is there any other evidence of "Long-term vandalism / pranks" (as opposed to mistakes?) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I've noticed a lot of comments on user's page, including those that were just deleted by user Special:Diff/731787983.
But I guess my proposal was way too harsh after I examined those comments closer. --VoidWanderer (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Please remove protection for File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg

Please unprotect File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg. This file was protected because an edit war had broken out as to whether the redirection in the file should point to version of the United Kingdom flag that has a ratio of length to breadth of 5:3 or 2:1. A request was then put in to delete this file and to require that users explicitly point to the 5:3 or the 2:1 ratio variant as appropriate. The consensus reached in this discussion was

  1. For the sake of consistency, keep the file.
  2. Amend the file to point to the 5:3 variant rather than the 2:1 variant as the 5:3 variant is the variant that is used most widely in Wikimedia projects.
  3. Place a message on this page explaining the rationale for choosing the 5:3 variant above the 2:1 variant. The explanation can be seen here

The latter two points were proposed by me for which I have received support. I intend to implement them as soon as the file is unprotected. A few days after making these changes, I intend removing the “Delete” request. Martinvl (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

@Martinvl ✓ Done in part. I will not unprotect the redirect, that will just lead to another edit war. I've closed the DR, changed the redirect target, and added a (slightly modified for typos and clarity) version of the message proposed in the DR. Please let me or another admin know if changes need to be made. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
@User:Mdaniels5757 Thank you. Martinvl (talk) 21:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Is leaving images that are used on ten thousands of Wikimedia project pages vulnerable to vandalism really a good idea? Trade (talk) 22:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
@Trade Didn't realize that image was unprotected. Fixed. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Mario1952

A1Cafel (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. 2 copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 11:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Ayratayrat

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year block (third block). But deletion requests are not necessarily bad, I do not want to close them speedily. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Xuanphuocle

A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One month block. A lot of copyvios are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Mohamad kamal hijazi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

✓ Done. One week block. All uploads are deleted or nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

B18IDH

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. No copyvios after two last warnings. Instead, B18IDH nominated one own copyvio for deletion. Seems like B18IDH got the message. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Phidien110

✓ Done Blocked indef - not here to contribute meaningfully Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Timechampsnovasys (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user and will delete the only upload. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

User:WNrapids

WNrapids (talk · contribs) tried to impersonate WMrapids (talk · contribs) by renaming. This is really a bad username and the trolling behaviour got themself blocked on English Wikipedia. w:User talk:WNrapids#WP:3RR

We may need to block this user unless they change to a appropriate username. Lemonaka (talk) 10:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week for abuse of COM:OVERWRITE for a start. Yann (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Flagman97 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

  • Copyright violations. Non-free content uploaded as “own work”.

Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 months, copyvios deleted. Logos are PD-textlogo through. Yann (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

User:Japs 88

Birdsinthewindow (talk) 01:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done The account has existed for over 10 years and made thousands of edits, so too late to block over username. Maybe try a nicely worded message on their talk page? -- King of ♥ 05:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

B18IDHK2

A1Cafel (talk) 15:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Gridzy

✓ Done Indef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

There is a revert war going on between versions of this flag with a different shade of blue... Needs protection. Sandstein (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Also apparently a sock farm if you consider that on one side of the revert war there are the users SpanishFlag (talk · contribs), SpanishEmpireMCDXCII (talk · contribs), SpanishEmpireMCDXCII (talk · contribs), SpanishEmpireBall2009 (talk · contribs).... All of their contributions are revert-warring about flag colors. Probably a block of the lot of them would also solve the problem. Sandstein (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done, all but 1 of the socks were already blocked, I blocked the remaining one. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Request Semi-protection

Protect this page with semi-protection because of vandalism. and I checked the IP locations, all of them were in Palembang, South Sumatra.

Page want to protect: Persija Jakarta kits PurpleViss (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

The image at File:At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 001 (cropped).jpg is now used on mw:Template:Main page and should be protected similar to the prior main page image at File:Wikimedia Hackathon Prague 2019 - Group Photo - CLK - cropped.jpg. -- BDavis (WMF) (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Mandaji Narsimha Chary 369

Uploading screenshots of the user's own appearances on news footage and websites, after a final warning that these were copyvios and a week-long block earlier this month.

Where their uploads aren't taken from news sources, there looks to be a wider issue of self-promotion and using Commons for unused personal photos of a product they invented. Belbury (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user and mass deleted all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Haha retard (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Only contribution seems fine (as best I can tell as someone who doesn't speak Polish), but username seems disruptive. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the retard indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 06:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

GrygoryZach2077

✓ Done Last warning sent, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if i could consider the posting of leaked non-consenting nudes a copyright issue. Trade (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Wutsje blocked indef. Tryvix1509 (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Socks of Hfive5sgd2

These accounts are all clearly socks of the prolific spammer Hfive5sgd2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log.

Consistent with prior accounts, these accounts are uploading online casino logos and adding them (oddly) to Category:IMG (company). I've been asked to report DUCKs directly here, rather than RFCU. See Category:Sockpuppets of Hfive5sgd2 and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hfive5sgd2 for context/history. Marbletan (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done All blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Here are two more accounts doing the same today. Marbletan (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Again, two new accounts doing the same. Marbletan (talk) 12:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
I guess we're going to do this every day. :) Two more. Thanks in advance. Marbletan (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Please add them here: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hfive5sgd2. Yann (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

My user space

Every so often I get a troll posting on my talk page on commons, is it possible to increase the level of protection so accounts older than 30 days are only able to post to my talk page here? Regards. Govvy (talk) 23:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One year semi-protection. Taivo (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. Govvy (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Ceilidh34dh

A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 09:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Needs protection: 2000+ pages transcluding the template. George Ho (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Is it possible to protect this file File:Flag of Russia (1991–1993).svg from constant changes? Users revert it almost every day. It has been already discussed that there are many historic evidences proving that right flag with "blue" colour as it is now. FlorianH76 (talk) 11:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: One month protection didn't help, so now for 3 months. --Achim55 (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Please block User:Illegitimate Barrister for constant changes of the flag. FlorianH76 (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. It seems to me, that Illegitimate Barrister reverted the file to correct version and current protected version is incorrect. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Techworld12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - Continued spam after warning--Trade (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef., 2nd block. Yann (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Creationinfoways94 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - Continued spam after warning--Trade (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef., spam only. Yann (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Protect User talk:Bilby please, being targeted by a LTA, thanks - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for 2 weeks. Yann (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

same as above, LTA using proxies to evade blocks. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Semi-protected for 2 weeks. Yann (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Chapaevsk-11

FlorianH76 (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done User warned, 2 files deleted. Yann (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

sockpuppetery, ducks: User:Ewimgahead2323 and User:Kiltsearth23

see, User talk:Ewimgahead2323 User talk:Kiltsearth23

uploading spam images, see their deleted files, both accounts uploaded files with the description has this link: [22] ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, all files already deleted. Yann (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
i dont know this user sockpuppet too, but has similar uploads: User:R10workwikiseo ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Uploads copyright music files, they get deleted, more get uploaded, see User talk:Cg4560. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User: 213.129.47.45

✓ Done. Blocked for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Ecomnews.in

Continues to upload spam (promoting a website, ecomnews.in, that matches username) after being previously warned. Marbletan (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:William1230

User:William1230 uploads huge amount of copyvios. see: User talk:William1230 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by William1230 . ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 1 week, files deleted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:Roozone

While receiving copyvio warnings, this user repeatedly uploads same copyvio photos and insufficient posts which are lacking of licensing description. Netora (talk) 23:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Mdaniels5757 for 1 week. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

huge amount of sockpuppetery

see this log in new files section: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:NewFiles?user=&mediatype%5B%5D=ARCHIVE&mediatype%5B%5D=EXECUTABLE&mediatype%5B%5D=OFFICE&mediatype%5B%5D=MULTIMEDIA&mediatype%5B%5D=TEXT&mediatype%5B%5D=UNKNOWN&start=&end=&wpFormIdentifier=specialnewimages&limit=500&offset=20230601131043%7CNetixawanisop.pdf

in that time there is so much spam .pdf files with many diffrent accounts. maybe you should check this. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 14:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Yup, this is a huge mess. There's probably 3500+ spam PDFs uploaded between 10:45 and 13:45 UTC, many of them from unique accounts. This is probably going to need technical intervention; it'll be hell to delete manually.
Amusingly, it looks like Soroka223 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log ran a few test uploads - some of which I tagged for deletion! - before running the big batch upload. Omphalographer (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I think it is not really possible to prevent this without affecting other users. Blocking the IP does not help as the user already had to change the IP for every new created account to bypass the account creation limit. For the cleanup I would wait for the bot tagging them for the missing license, then we have a list of all the files. GPSLeo (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I am deleting them, but there is an issue with VFC. I get We regret the the inconvenience: The Server-API returned an error during executing your requested task. Please check your contributions, whether something went wrong. at every batch. :( Yann (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Worse: it looks as though they've started uploading even more. Another batch started at 17:42 UTC, and appears to be ongoing. Omphalographer (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
@Yann: Can you check the browser console? Tryvix1509 (talk) 04:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
We should block new users from uploading such files, at least temporarily. Yann (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
See Special:AbuseFilter/281. Yann (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
i hope it will work ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, it works. May be it could be improved depending on spammers. Yann (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Just watched the filter tick past 5000 hits a few minutes ago. It's definitely working. Omphalographer (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
I think I got all of them. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Sadly, you did not. There's still a bunch visible here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:NewFiles?mediatype%5b%5d=OFFICE&offset=20230601183000&limit=500 Omphalographer (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

B18IDH (2)

A1Cafel (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

For years, I have been railing against incomplete deletion requests, which are caused by‎ malformed use of {{Delete}} templates and lack of follow-through, and which are populating subcats of Category:Incomplete deletion requests‎. This problem spurred the creation of that category 17:57, 1 February 2007‎ (UTC), 16 years ago, and my tracking of it 18:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC), two years ago. As a precedent, ColorfulSmoke was blocked 17:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC) by Mdaniels5757 with an expiration time of 3 days (account creation blocked) for "Continuing to make malformed deletion requests despite repeated instructions; not responding to concerns on talk page", pursuant to the discussion archived at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 29#ColorfulSmoke and Alex Neman was blocked 16:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC) by Yann with an expiration time of 1 month (account creation blocked) for "Continuing to make malformed deletion requests despite repeated instructions; not responding to concerns on talk page". B18IDH made this edit 02:14, 14 May 2023‎ (UTC), omitting a section on the subpage, transclusion, and notice to the page creator. I warned the user and reminded them of proper procedures after that edit 11:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC). They made this edit shortly before 11:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) (with similar problems). I reported such edits in what became Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 35#B18IDH 11:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC), to no avail. The user is continuing to make malformed deletion requests despite instructions and warning, is not responding to concerns on user talk page (except an attempt to delete the page 21:51, 25 May 2023‎ (UTC)), is uploading copyvios, and is abusing multiple accounts as below. Based on the user's contributions of 26 May 2023, there appear to be hidden entries in the user's block log.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Writing this to extend the archive time. Will request CheckUser, as B18IDH appears to be caught in a hard block (see mw:Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules format: user_blocked is "True for blocked registered users. Also true for edits from blocked IP addresses, even if the editor is a registered user who is not blocked."), and it's unclear whether they are the block target (and this is block evasion) or not (in which case they should either be granted IPBE or blocked anyways for disruptive behavior). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Blocked indef for socking, so this report is moot Apologies for the delay. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Webuniseo

Cross-wiki spammer. Has been blocked on multiple wikis and has been warned here, but is still uploading spam. Marbletan (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done, reporting to SRG. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanhhoat237

A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block and I deleted speedily 2 posters. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

197.35.61.130 (talk contribs WHOIS RBL abusefilter tools guc stalktoy block user block log) - stalking WMF-banned LTA. please block and revert. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for a week. @XXBlackburnXx: Please don't feed LTAs by going on edit war and making comments to them, just report. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
User:CptViraj - can you revert please? XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
I was trying to make him say something stupid so its easier to report lol. I know how he is. im sorry. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Don't feed the troll. Tryvix1509 (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Paf zet

FlorianH76 (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Please delete the files with false licenses. FlorianH76 (talk) 08:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Please delete the user's uploads violating the rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. FlorianH76 (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Block evasion by User:King.godrat

Wikikar2 is uploading many low-quality personal images that also appeared among the deletion alerts on User talk:King.godrat before that user's block. The user has socked before as King.godrat2 (talk · contribs). Belbury (talk) 18:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely and mass deleted all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

VolenTheSucker

LDM2003 (talk) 15:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

huge amount of sockpuppetery

see this log in new files section: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:NewFiles?user=&mediatype%5B%5D=ARCHIVE&mediatype%5B%5D=EXECUTABLE&mediatype%5B%5D=OFFICE&mediatype%5B%5D=MULTIMEDIA&mediatype%5B%5D=TEXT&mediatype%5B%5D=UNKNOWN&start=&end=&wpFormIdentifier=specialnewimages&limit=500&offset=20230601131043%7CNetixawanisop.pdf

in that time there is so much spam .pdf files with many diffrent accounts. maybe you should check this. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 14:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Yup, this is a huge mess. There's probably 3500+ spam PDFs uploaded between 10:45 and 13:45 UTC, many of them from unique accounts. This is probably going to need technical intervention; it'll be hell to delete manually.
Amusingly, it looks like Soroka223 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log ran a few test uploads - some of which I tagged for deletion! - before running the big batch upload. Omphalographer (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I think it is not really possible to prevent this without affecting other users. Blocking the IP does not help as the user already had to change the IP for every new created account to bypass the account creation limit. For the cleanup I would wait for the bot tagging them for the missing license, then we have a list of all the files. GPSLeo (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I am deleting them, but there is an issue with VFC. I get We regret the the inconvenience: The Server-API returned an error during executing your requested task. Please check your contributions, whether something went wrong. at every batch. :( Yann (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Worse: it looks as though they've started uploading even more. Another batch started at 17:42 UTC, and appears to be ongoing. Omphalographer (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
@Yann: Can you check the browser console? Tryvix1509 (talk) 04:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
We should block new users from uploading such files, at least temporarily. Yann (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
See Special:AbuseFilter/281. Yann (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
i hope it will work ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, it works. May be it could be improved depending on spammers. Yann (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Just watched the filter tick past 5000 hits a few minutes ago. It's definitely working. Omphalographer (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
I think I got all of them. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Sadly, you did not. There's still a bunch visible here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:NewFiles?mediatype%5b%5d=OFFICE&offset=20230601183000&limit=500 Omphalographer (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Block evasion of Farhan Rana Rajpoot

Per Special:diff/768994311 at File:Farhan Rana Rajpoot.jpg and this edit on enwiki, I think Special:Contributions/Bulkpile is a block/lock evasion of User:Farhan Rana Rajpoot. MathXplore (talk) 07:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Bulkpile indefinitely and will delete his/her upload as poster. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Block Special:Contributions/39.62.8.150 as well --Trade (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

User:Sahanawaz Hussain keeps edit-warring over the File:Painter Sahanawaz Hussain.jpg, which has been nominated for deletion by two contributors. The user continues edit-warring despite having been warned. I suggest protecting the file page, or alternatively deleting the file per nomination. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

 Half done Not protected, but partially blocked user from editing this page. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: Thanks! Unfortunately, the user continues with removing templates, see here. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
@Jan.Kamenicek ✓ Done Blocked sitewide for 1 month. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

LTA activity

Related to en:wp:LTA/GRP, block & revert please. Can we have an admin monitor user talk ns edits too please? XXBlackburnXx (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked and reverted. -- CptViraj (talk) 18:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

He's back... XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Blocked by Elcobbola /16. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate username in Portuguese (which appears to be their mother tongue). It literally means shaved asshole. If necessary check here and here. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Could mean also shaved butt (a case of recyprochal synecdoche, I’ll have you know), although it’s scarcely any better for the intents and purposes of a username: still inappropriate. -- Tuválkin 17:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
@RodRabelo7@, Tuvalkin: from behaviour, this is likely to be this guy, another sock of User:LeandroTelesRocha1983. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Account is globally locked. Tryvix1509 (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism filter suggestion

Could you please add the following phrases to the filter so as to prevent them from being inserted on Commons?

  • "Mr thongchai phonhan"
  • "Mr. thongchai phonhan"
  • "mr.thongchaiphonhan"
  • "thongchai phonhan"
  • "thongchaiphonhan"
  • "Somsong Phoophom"
  • "somsongphoophom"
  • "นายธงชัย พลหาญ"
  • "นายธงชัยพลหาญ"
  • "ธงชัย พลหาญ"
  • "ธงชัยพลหาญ"
  • "สมทรง ภูพรม"
  • "สมทรงภูพรม"

(Letter case should be made irrelevant.)

The above phrases have been repeatedly added to many pages (see the history of File:Crown Prince's Standard of Thailand.svg and File:Arthur-Pyle King Arthur of Britain.JPG for examples), and this vandalism has been going on since 2020 at least (as seen in the history of File:Emblem of the House of Chakri (variant).svg).

Thank you. -- Miwako Sato (talk) 07:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate usernames

The first user is clearly using a name similar to mine, while the second one is using a name similar to Thooompson, another active contributor. Notice that these users are blocked in the Spanish wiki, and were created as sockpuppets of Ursula Gotemburg, a disruptive user that Thooompson and I deal with. Günther Frager (talk) 00:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Block and delete request

Microshu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

AXXXXK new sock, edit similar for Clhangus (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Clhangus, [23][24] vs Microshu, [25]

And please delete all file when Microshu created.

Above.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

AliMirzaWorldfb (talk · contribs) is a sock of Aliimirzaaworld (talk · contribs) and Aliimirzaaworld (talk · contribs)--Trade (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef on the new one. 1 month on the original. @Trade: You said "Aliimirzaaworld and Aliimirzaaworld", which are the same user. Is there a third? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Alimirxaaworld (talk · contribs) --Trade (talk) 13:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: --Trade (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Indeffed the second sock. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

These accounts are ヤっ太郎 (talk · contribs) sock. See w:ja:Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/ケラ氏 for evidence.--Daraku K. (talk) 08:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Unprotect user page

Can someone please unprotect the page User:Tabercil? Back when I was an administrator I protected it against some vandalism. But I've since lost the admin bit so I can't make any updates to the page. Tabercil (talk) 13:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Mikons3

FlorianH76 (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

SchoolShooter89

Inappropriate username. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Paf zet

FlorianH76 (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Sono io 456

Block evasion of Retto654 (talk · contribs), which is globally blocked. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I deleted all uploads as copyvios and all other edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

GigaN*gga9100

Inappropriate useranme. --Leonidlednev (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done 09:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
@Gbawden: Looks like you have inserted ~~~~~. Tryvix1509 (talk) 09:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Done - not sure why the signature didn't work. thanks @Tryvix1509 Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nbssms3

Continued spam after warning--Trade (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done - blocked indefinitely Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Afgmo

Repeated copyvio PDF uploads after warnings. Omphalographer (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Afgmo was warned not to re-upload deleted content. Now I warned him/her ahain not to upload copyvios. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Шухрат Саъдиев

FlorianH76 (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done File deleted. Nothing really needed at this time. Yann (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Rassya LN22

  • User: Rassya LN22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: Continued copyvio uploading after two blocks for doing so. Continued creation of malformed deletion requests. Continued lack of response to other users' concerns. Continued blanking of user talk page to sweep problems under the rug, rather than archiving.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @Mhhossein, Taivo as blocking Admins.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
I looked the uploads, reviewed a lot of licenses, nominated one upload for regular deletion and at moment I do not want to block Rassya. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Ah I can see the history, Jeff. They have now 3 months to review the guidelines and the warning templates. Thank you Taivo for the review. --Mhhossein talk 18:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
@Mhhossein and @Taivo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

ForzaJuve2019

A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. I will nominate something for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyvios of Jouvence6

This user uploads a lot of images in violation of copyright and does not seem to take into account the numerous warnings posted on his talk page. NB80 (talk) 07:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Ayaz.sheikh.production

Ayaz.sheikh.production (talk · contribs) is evidently a sock of Ayazshaikhmusic (talk · contribs), Ayazsheikhmusic (talk · contribs), Ayazsheikhofficial (talk · contribs) and Muhammad Ayaz Abid (talk · contribs). Please block them all. --NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done and tagged their spam in Wikidata for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

User:Bcxfu75k

After receiving a copyvio warning, this user repeatedly uploaded unfree licensed images from Japanese government websites. Netora (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

@Netora: Please create a deletion request for these files. Yann (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Already removed. File:秋篠宮家のご活動令和4年.png, File:政府広報オンラインビビるとさくらとトモに深掘り!知るトビラ.png, File:横山英幸2023年大阪市市長.png, File:国土交通省INTERVIEW声優井澤詩織1.jpg, File:国土交通省既存住宅の活性化が日本を救うかヒロミインタビュー1.jpg, File:国土交通省INTERVIEWタレント千鳥大悟2.jpg. Netora (talk) 13:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
I am sorry. I thought it was CC-BY 4.0. I will be more careful next time. --Bcxfu75k (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 Not done Accidental upload of non-free content. King of ♥ 22:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets RepublicQZ

Nazar Naymani (talk · contribs)
ZhangaliU (talk · contribs)
RepublicQZ (talk · contribs)
Same uploaded deleted file. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the socks and deleted their files. Last change given to master. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nazar Naymani‎. Yann (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

PXALBERTO

A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done No uploads since the scope warning. We can revisit if they continue. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyvios

FlorianH76 (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Putin

Another Putin, another case of repeated vandalism, another protection request. colt_browning (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

By the way, Zelenskyy's photo is also frequently vandalized, although the last case was some time ago. --colt_browning (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned one user, blocked one user and fully protected the file. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Sahanawaz Hussain

Shreejash Tuladhar

Shreejash Tuladhar has continued to upload images that are clear copyright violation despite a block on June 11 for the same issue.[26] This is now the third time they have uploaded the same file.[27] I feel another, longer block is needed to get them to understand they cannot upload unfree files and cannot ignore the feedback they've already been given. Ravensfire (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Fourth time, actually. I've blocked them for 31 days. I would not be opposed to another admin extending it if they feel that was too light. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

IP exempt request

Hello,

I've media files on a remote computer hosted at Shadow SAS, a provided specialized in VM with decent GPU, useful for gaming or, more relevant here, for photo or video editing purpose. This is currently my main workstation for multimedia purpose. It's also currently my only non-server non-work computer.

When I tried to upload a media on Commons, I've noticed even a small provider can be taken in wider IP range: 85.190.64.0/19 is currently globally blocked under by meta:User:Jon Kolbert with the rationale Open proxy/Webhost. The block doesn't let the opportunity to add a message on their own talk page, so I'm opening here a section from my work computer. I'm not on another hand not willing to transfer non-work-related documents from my personal remote workstation to my work computer.

As such, I'd kindly like to request local IP exempt.

Note: while administrators are exempt from both such global and local blocks, I'm not administrator on Wikimedia Commons anymore, as I didn't ask for right extension at a previous inactivity round, my contributions pattern at that time not justifying to keep the right.

Note: a local IP exempt has the technical capacity to override a global block, so the local IP exempt is here enough. Dereckson (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)