User talk:Netora
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:IODATA NAS LANDISK HDL-F250.jpg was uncategorized on 21 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Duggan-Mayor Ota Toyota City-Sister Cities Japan meeting-2132 (38363392962).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Duggan-Mayor Ota Toyota City-Sister Cities Japan meeting-2132 (38363392962).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Duggan-Mayor Ota Toyota City-Sister Cities Japan meeting-2132 (38363392962).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Thuresson (talk) 02:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Cyber-shot cellphone "W61S" (2008).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Cyber-shot cellphone "W61S" (2008).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Cyber-shot cellphone "W61S" (2008).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deletion of Why does a man rape book's photo
[edit]Hello Ju,
You mentioned that File:New cover of Why does a man rape.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation.
It was the new cover of this book and it was changed after around three months of its release. It was made by Shrishti Prabhakar, who works as a senior graphic designer in the Invincible Publishers, the publisher of this book.
I want to add the same photo again and will put it make it available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Looking forward to your available response. Rajveer90 (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I didnt done that, it was User:Netora who marked it as copyright violation. About the image: You claimed it was your own work, which is obviously not the case. regards --JuTa 19:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you for the response.
I will upload again. And make it available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication and will provide all the required details.
Thank you Ju Rajveer90 (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
william menezes freitas book
[edit]hi i posted the photo because i am the author of the book and i was making an autobiography so i thought that wikipedia deleted the covers when didnt aprove my article. so thanks Williamw39 (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry for uploading a copyright poster of Iron Man.
[edit]To Netora
I want to apologize to you.
I'm very sorry for the Iron Man poster. I didn't know that it was forbidden to upload copyright images on the talk pages. I'll stop it right away. Please forgive me it won't happen again give me a second chance please. CrosswalkX (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. Just be careful of what your uploading any of the media files in the future DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Netora, why do you want to duplicate-delete the higher-resolution-version of this image in favor of the lower-resolution-version? --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio, that request is my mistaken. The larger one(File:Argiope gallicus.jpg) should be kept. Thanks for correcting me. --Netora (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- No problem. There might have been a legitimate reason for that, as sometimes the version with higher pixel-count is just "blown-up" and has worse quality. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
ファイル:サンタ山本杏奈.jpg
[edit]ファイル:サンタ山本杏奈.jpg この写真は自分自身で撮影してtwitter(neir_kan)の自分自身のアカウントに投稿したものですので削除対象を解除していただきたいです。 Kan1995 (talk) 03:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Nambu-Line-Mark.jpg
[edit]File:Nambu-Line-Mark.jpgの写真はWikipedia上で公開されている他の多くの鉄道車両のマーク同様、私自身が撮影し、著作権フリーの状態で公開したものです。これが著作権侵害だと仰る理由を明示し、逆に他のマークや画像が著作権侵害に当てはまっていない理由をお教え下さい。--MaedaAkihiko (talk) 11:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
尚、参考に貼られたhttps://www.jreast.co.jp/hachioji/info/20140724/20140724_info_02.pdf はJR東日本が公共の鉄道車両の外観に用いるデザインの一部であり、下段の帯部分のロゴマークは既に南武線のページで掲載・使用されています。下の帯部のロゴマークが可で、上の扉間ロゴマークが不可とされる理由をお教え下さい。--MaedaAkihiko (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
当該データの編集を行う前に、まずこちらに返信を行って下さい。こちらは質問を投げ掛けていますが、貴方はそれを無視し、無言で差し戻すのは不誠実な行為です。--MaedaAkihiko (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- @MaedaAkihiko: MaedaAkihikoさん、こんばんわ。まずMaedaAkihikoさんが投稿された画像についてですが、投稿された画像は明らかに車両ではなくロゴを示すことを目的に撮影されたものと解釈しています。
- * MaedaAkihikoさんが撮影された場合であっても(COM:DW)、主題となっているロゴ自体のライセンスがコモンズで受け入れ可能なものとは確認できていません。(なお、ウィキペディア日本語版とコモンズでは受け入れ可能なライセンスは異なります。例:ja:File:Tokai Train Headmark.jpg, ja:File:JR EC Tc204-3108.jpg)
- * 車両を撮影した際の写り込みなどロゴそのものを主題としない場合は、ロゴに関する問題は生じないと解することもできますが(COM:DM, [1])、ご投稿された画像はロゴ以外のものは全く映っておらずこちらの適用も困難と考え、即時削除タグをつけました。
- 上記に関してご投稿された画像は問題がないのであれば除去いたします。(コモンズの管理者によって問題がないと判断された場合も除去され即時削除は差し戻されます) -- Netora (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
それでは、既に多くのページで適用されているCategory:Logos of trains of Japan等の画像群はどう対応されるのでしょうか?いずれも車両マーク自体を示す目的で撮影された画像のみが集約されています。「車体が全く写っておらず」とは仰いましたが、明らかに背景は無塗装ステンレス車両の車体です。ステンレス地の車体が背景ではNG。何かしらの塗装やラインカラーが写っていれば、マークを示す目的で撮影された写真でもOKという事でしょうか?--MaedaAkihiko (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
コモンズのカテゴリーの一つである「Logos of trains of Japan」の中には、基本的に車両のマークをメインで示す画像が紐付いています。まずはこれらの画像と当該画像の差は何であるかを明示して頂けなければ納得は出来ません。 --MaedaAkihiko (talk) 14:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- @MaedaAkihiko: 問題は車体の材質だとか塗装の有無ではなく、投稿においてロゴが主題かどうか、そのロゴがコモンズで受け入れ可能かどうかが判断基準です。ですからご指摘のカテゴリには同様に判断すれば問題のある投稿もあるでしょうが、それが故にあなたの投稿もコモンズで受け入れ可能であるという根拠にはなりません。またこのカテゴリへの投稿には受け入れ可能と判断されるものもあります。例えばCOM:TOOを見ていただくとわかりますが独創性がないと判断される場合は、コモンズで受け入れ可能です(例:File:Keio_Liner_logo.svg)。逆にFile:Nambulogo1.jpgはファイル名にlogoとあることや写真の構図からロゴを示すことが主題であり、側面のロゴデザインは独創性を有しているため、こちらは問題のある投稿と言えるでしょう。
- 今回のSDタグ付与はたまたま私が(新着投稿から)発見したために付記したに過ぎず、当然ながら私が上記カテゴリのすべての投稿に対しライセンスレビューや対処を行う責任や義務を有しているわけではありません。既存の投稿とは独立に改めて上記に提起しました事項について、問題がないのであればその根拠を示していただきますようよろしくお願いします。(追伸:カテゴリのリンク記述が誤っており私の会話ページが上記カテゴリに含まれてしまったため記述を修正しました) --Netora (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
受け入れ可能の判断基準および、フォント形状が特殊な京王ライナーのロゴには独創性が無いと仰る基準が全く不可解ですが、タイトルにlogo等と含まない・ロゴ単体で写したもので無ければひとまず問題が無い旨は理解しました。他の前列には触れず場当たり的に削除対応されるのは全く腑に落ちませんが、この画像に関しては後日ロゴ単体ではなく、車体前部を主とした画像をアップロードさせて頂きますので、この画像は削除して頂いて構いません。MaedaAkihiko (talk) 15:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- @MaedaAkihiko: 今回投稿された画像はコモンズでの受け入れは困難と考えます。ローカル・アップロードを検討ください。--Netora (talk) 15:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Please consider undeleting the image files of Keiji Uematsu
[edit]Netoraさんの母語で書かせていただきます。 私TAQUEDAは、植松奎二氏のWikipediaページの編集者の一人という立場です。 COM:FOPというのは、屋外に恒常的に設置された作品に関するルールでしょうか? もし、そうであれば、今回削除された23点の画像のうち該当するのは、 File:KU2000 FloatingForm-Red 615cm Kirishima.jpg だけになります。 他に2点屋外作品がありますが、いずれも展覧会終了後に分解・撤去されており、写真しか残っていません。 また、3Dアートワークではない、植松氏の制作スタジオの写真が3点削除されているのは、過誤ではないでしょうか。 いずれにしても作品の画像は全て、作者の植松氏自身が撮影したものを、CC BY-SA 4.0のライセンス付きでウィキメディア・コモンズにアップロードされたという情報を知っていますので、著作権侵害問題はクリアされるものと信じています。 23点の画像ファイルは、復活させていただくよう、私からもお願いします。 ありがとうございました。--TAQUEDA, Atsuo (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- TAQUEDAさん、こんにちは。ご呈示の削除依頼に関してはFoPも事由としてありますが商業作家である制作者本人の許諾に関してもに明白な許諾を要すると考え提起をしたものです。コモンズはご承知の通り、自由にユーザ名を設定して登録できますので植松氏のユーザ名であっても本人であることを示す材料としては不十分だと考えています。写真がすでに植松氏のウェブサイトやSNS等にCCライセンス付きで公開がなされていればこのような検証は容易ですが、これらファイルには出典もなかったと記憶しています。すでに別のファイルでVRT手続を取られているようですが、当該ファイルにも同様の手続き(植松氏自身の許諾声明をVRTチームへ送信)することを検討いただければと思います。既に削除されたファイルであってもVRT手続きによって許諾が確認できれば復帰されます。--Netora (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Netoraさん、こんにちは。さっそくコメントを返していただき、ありがとうございます。
植松氏の23点の画像の出典は、氏のPCのハードディスクです……。それらのファイルについてVRTの手続きをとってもらうことを、すでに検討しましたが、Wikimedia Commonsの管理人のJimさんからは、以下のようなコメントをもらいました。
It is fairly common for fans of notable artists to open an account on Commons using the artist's name. We have no way here of knowing that User:Keijiuematsukunst23.5 is actually Keiji Uematsu.
すなわち、植松氏の「本人証明」がなければ、VRTに許諾申請を行なっても通りません、ということです。現在、私の方からinfo@wikimedia.orgにEメイルを送って、本人証明の方法を教えてもらおうとしているところです。Netoraさんがご存知であるのならば、ここで教えていただいても結構です。どうかよろしく、お願いします。--TAQUEDA, Atsuo (talk) 01:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- TAQUEDAさん、こんばんわ。植松氏について詳しく存じ上げませんが、通常は植松氏の公開された連絡先(メールアドレス)から送信することが証明の手段になります。VRTといっても一般のボランティアの方が担当されているので、VRT権限を持つ利用者の中から日本語話者の方などに相談して過去の事例などを伺うとよいのではないかと思います。--Netora (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Dshine.png is not a copyright violation
[edit]Thank you for helping find copyright violations on Wikimedia Commons. You tagged File:Dshine.png for speedy deletion as a copyright violation but it is not eligible for copyright protection since it does not meet the threshold of originality according to Japan's copyright laws. MorganKevinJ(talk) 17:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletions
[edit]Hi. If a file has a nomination for deletion, please do not add a speedy delete request over the top. You can make any comment into the DR. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth
If, on the other hand, a speedy deletion is justified (as in this edit) please notify the uploader / page creator. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:防衛装備庁.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Notifications
[edit]Thank you for help with patrolling uploads! Please notify users about problems with their files. Help:Gadget-UserMessages is very helpful for this purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Kadı Message 08:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Kozakai Yurie.jpg について
[edit]こちらは一度著作権上の問題があるとのことで削除されたファイルでございますが、原典に添付されたURLを確認したところ、権利者から表記通りのライセンスで提供することに同意していることが証明されておりますので「即時削除」の必要性は無いものと考えられます。--イトユラ (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- ご連絡ありがとうございます。即時削除を取り下げ、Template:LicenseReviewを貼り付けさせてもらいました。 Netora (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
CHIBA_file.jpg
[edit]「著作権を侵害している疑いのあるファイルをアップロードしている」との事でしたが — Preceding unsigned comment added by ムタさん (talk • contribs) 01:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC) 本人から「Wikipediaに俺じゃない別人が出てくる、どんな写真でもいいから変更してほしい」と頼まれました。 ムタさん (talk) 01:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
日本学士院の画像について
[edit]こんにちは。突然失礼します。User talk:バリスターズを見ました。私がアップロードした日本学士院ホームページからの画像についてGJSTU-2.0でないので削除のテンプレートを貼られたとのことでしたが、このサイトについてを見ると「当ホームページのコンテンツを利用する場合は、「文部科学省ウェブサイト利用規約」に従って、御利用ください。」となっています。また、文部科学省ウェブサイト利用規約を見ると、http://www.japan-acad.go.jp/ (日本学士院)はGJSTU-2.0であるようです(英語版にも記載あり)。よって、削除は不適当と考えます。 バリスターズ (talk) 22:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- 英語版含め文科省側のウェブサイトにGJSTU-2.0が学士院サイトに適用の旨の記載があったため、存続票としました。お手数おかけしました。 Netora (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
How do you like wednesday? Logo.svg
[edit]File:How do you like wednesday? Logo.svgについて、CSD G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus)の理由で即時削除の対象とされております。以前削除された「How do you like wednesday Logo.png」については書道作品と見做され削除されていますが、実際には書道作品ではなくロゴとして製作されたものであり、後にフォントとして公開されたものでもあります。 書道作品のような思想や感情を創造的な方法で表現した作品ではないと判断できるため、即時削除は不当と考えます。 七厩拓 (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Patroller!
[edit]
Hi Netora,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. Kadı Message 01:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Regarding File:ShinEi2021.png
[edit]There are some few concerns regarding the current logo used for Shin-Ei Animation since 2021. The logo has been introduced in time for their 45th anniversary in 2021 and since that year it has been used across the company, replacing the big "A" with the smiley face logo used since their inception. However, I’m concerned if the image violates several licensing concerns and is there any way to figure things out? VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 15:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)