User talk:HeminKurdistan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HeminKurdistan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non-Iranian rent-a-crowd black people in PMOI rally.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 16:05, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Iraqi Intelligence Service collaboration meeting with People's Mujahedin of Iran during Iran–Iraq War.ogv, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 05:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

People's Mujahedin of Iran and Iraq has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Letter from the People's Mujahedin of Iran to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.149.12.178 05:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please note the file has been nominated again for deletion by another user. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COM:ANU

[edit]

Hi, There is a discussion on COM:AN/U#Concerns with copyrights of multiple political images: HeminKurdistan which concerns you. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saddam and Rajavi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newsreel - State Visit to France of Their Imperial Majesties, 1961.webm has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: G7: Special:Permalink/648724427#Wrong file uploaded)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Iranian Women's Golf Championship.webm

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Iranian Women's Golf Championship.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. I want to upload an image to Wikimedia Commons that the author has posted it on the Web site himself. Is there a suitable copyright tag for this purpose? If yes, can you tell me which one it is? Histo.beh (talk) 20:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you explain more? Maybe I can comment if I know what it is. But generally if that author published it under one of Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses, it is OK. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great_Prophet_III_-_Shahab_missile.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I wanted to let you know that this photo is from 2007 or earlier. It is a generic photo of a Shahab missile and not from Great Prophet III. Streamline8988 (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you! I corrected it. I could not find any photographs from Great Prophet III but it seems like an important exercise (Wikipedia has an article about it). Fars News has deleted content made before 2010 from its website, can you find any free photo from the exercise? HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Aircraft of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Navy

[edit]

Your view would be appreciated here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Aircraft_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Air_Navy Dreddmoto (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will write there. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Major General Ataollah Salehi 2015 visit of Bushehr Naval Base (06).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Major General Ataollah Salehi 2015 visit of Bushehr Naval Base (06).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

استفاده از لینک کوتاه شده

[edit]

سلام؛

ضمن تشکر از مشارکت‌های شما، خواهشمندم از لینک‌های کوتاه شده به عنوان منبع تصاویر استفاده نکنید؛ برای رسیدن به چرایی و راه‌حل جایگزین توصیه می‌کنم مطالب جناب 4nn1l2 در صفحه بحث بنده را مطالعه فرمایید. --Maometto97 (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. ممنون از شما. چشم سعی میکنم لینک اصلی را بگذارم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ممنون از شما؛ و البته نکته قابل عرض دیگه این که معمولا تصاویر از منابع ایرانی بر پایه عکاس رده‌بندی میشه (مثلا اینجا رو ببینید.) و وارد کردن این رده‌ها هنگام بارگذاری عمده بسیار کار رو آسون‌تر میکنه، بسایر ممنون می‌شم اگر هنگام بارگذاری به این مورد هم توجه کنید. (اگر رده عکاسی موجود نبود لطفا آن را تا آبی شدن همه رده‌های بالا بسازید.) --Maometto97 (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

به روی چشم. تشکر از راهنمایی شما HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2005 Iran election registration - Day 4 (57).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2005 Iran election registration - Day 4 (57).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Maometto97 (talk) 10:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:12th Congress of the Liberation Movement of Iran (7).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:12th Congress of the Liberation Movement of Iran (7).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Maometto97 (talk) 21:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Tasnim News Agency - 2019 Armed Forces Parade in Rasht.webm

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tasnim News Agency - 2019 Armed Forces Parade in Rasht.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

تصاویر کنگره حزب اعتماد ملی

[edit]

سلام؛

ضمن عرض خسته نباشید و تشکر بابت مشارکت‌هایتان، در خصوص تصاویر نخستین کنگره حزب اعتماد ملی که از خبرگزاری مهر بارگذاری کرده‌اید، به نظر می‌رسد از تصویر شماره هشت تا چهارده، پیوند اشتباهی به عنوان منبع درج شده‌است. لطفا اصلاح فرمایید. --Maometto97 (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

در خصوص تصاویر ۲۲ تا ۲۸ هم همینطور :) --Maometto97 (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. از توجه شما ممنونم، لینک‌ها را اصلاح کردم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Songs, Poems and Revolutionary Marches of the People's Mujahedin of Iran - Serie 4 (Front Cover).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AttemptedAssassinationofAmericanDiplomat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:PMOIStatement24.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 18:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Militia of Khalq-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Militia of Khalq-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MojahedEnglish-No4.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 07:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massoud Rajavi and Yasser Arafat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ypatch (talk) 07:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recognizing notables

[edit]

Slaw. Can you recognize this faces File:Ceremony honoring artists born in Farvardin, Veteran Artists Institute - 16 April 2017 31.jpg, File:Ceremony honoring artists born in Farvardin, Veteran Artists Institute - 16 April 2017 18.jpg. Ruwaym (talk) 21:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruwaym Hi. The man is Reza Banafshekhah but I don't know the woman. HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Tasnim News Agency Infographic - HDKA terrorists hit by IRGC missiles.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tasnim News Agency Infographic - HDKA terrorists hit by IRGC missiles.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying old 2004 parade

[edit]

Hello, I uploaded some Fars News photos of an old parade from 2004 or earlier here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Military_parades_in_Iran_in_2004 Can you identify when or where it was held? Streamline8988 (talk) 03:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Streamline8988. Hi, it is 6 Mehr 1383 (27 September 2004) at graduation ceremony of Iranian army cadets. Other free pictures from the same event available here: [1] HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!! I responded to you on my talk page by the way. Streamline8988 (talk) 21:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jask Naval Base

[edit]

Dear Hemin, I apologize for being 'harassing bastard' once again, but FYI I moved all photos from Jask Naval Base to Bandar Abbas Naval Base. The reason is that I'm 100% sure it was a wrong identification. Proof: this photo shows this building, and surrounding docks shown on other photos also perfectly fit for Bandar Abbas. On the other hand, nothing fits for Jask. --Orijentolog (talk) 13:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I added the category based on the report by Iranian media. It seems that it was wrong. Thank you for noticing that. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. If you allow me, few more tips:

  • International Conference in Support of the Palestin the Symbol of Resistance has a mistake in naming, Palestin should be Palestine
  • No need that you left empty Wikidata templates for family reunions in this category, such events probably will never have Wikidata item. Not even all famous sport matches have Wikidata items.
  • Instead of inserting description into Great Prophet, I believe it's more useful to put it inside Wikidata (like I did), along with filled properties. In that way Commons' pages look more clear, and huge advantage of properly filled Wikidata is that infobox will automatically translate all to other languages, so even non-English speakers will understand all.
  • If you redirect some category on Commons, and Wikidata item for it exists, also change Commons properly inside Wikidata.
  • It is not common that general categories by year have templates with all years, like Military of Iran by year. If I put it inside Iran by year it will look so huge, like Borj-e Milad! :) But fine, IMHO it can stay for military categories.
  • If you spent precious time for identifying something, I advice you to put it on watchlist that other users don't ruin it. I'm not speaking about vandals and IPs, but experienced users and even admins, who were sometimes trying to "correct" files which I identified.. Personally I have 70,830 files on my watchlist.

Finally, if you wonder why I noticed all of this, you can take a look of histories of Ports and harbours in Iran, People of Iran by city, hundreds of cities, hundreds of years, hundreds of topics by city and province... you'll notice that virtually everything was organized (or checked) by one person. Me! :) So, as an experienced categorist I must say that your work here is truly a perfection, >99,9% correct, and your organization is far above any WikiProject Iran's member (including three admins). A plain fact. I'm proud of you and happy to have you here, so please don't mind if I object or revert something regarding that 0,1%. :) Also, if you in future need some help regarding identifying, reorganization or anything else, I'm really at your service. Take care. --Orijentolog (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Orijentolog For some reason that I don't know, I received no notification for this message so I am replying with delay. I think the typo was because I copy/pasted the name of the files, please feel free to correct any of my spelling mistakes. About MEK defectors category, there are several of these people receiving media coverage in Iran, I created this category to distinguish them from members (I have not yet uploaded files for these people). I am learning to use Wikidata and my edits may not be perfect. Thank you for your advice and kind words. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: yes, I have the same "issue"; recently something changed in general tools so I don't get all notifications.
Regarding that MEK categories, you didn't get me well, I was not speaking about opening categories for such events on Commons. That is totally fine. I was speaking about leaving Wikidata Infobox template inside, despite the fact that probably it will never be opened, and there's no need for such Wikidata item. So it's better to removed it like I did.
You're welcome. And I was serious about help, no taroof, feel free to say in future "boro va sari khar-e hareji" and I'll do it. :) Greetings. --Orijentolog (talk) 13:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Orijentolog I got your meaning now. You are right, maybe they are not such important events. Thank you again, If I had a question, I will not hesitate to ask. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2013 Recommissioning of Bayandor (02).jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2013 Recommissioning of Bayandor (02).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, there is a source listed, but the image is not found at the source. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Red-tailed hawk. There must be a mistake because I can find the image in the source. It is the second image from the right on the top line. Direct URL: [2]. Please check it again. Thanks. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:2014 unveiling of Iranian air defense systems (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 unveiling of Iranian air defense systems (63).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 unveiling of Iranian air defense systems (52).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

حذف پرونده

[edit]

سلام بر شما دوست عزیز. ای کاش به جای درخواست حذف برای این پرونده اندکی بنده را راهنمایی می کردید که باید چه اجازه نامه ای برای این پرونده انتخاب کنم. لطفاً راهنمایی کنید و فوراً درخواست حذف ندهید.--Paraw (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paraw سلام. آپلود لوگوها جز در موارد خاص (مثل لوگوی سازمان‌های ایرانی با بیش از سی سال قدمت) در اینجا امکان‌پذیر نیست. باید در همان ویکی که قصد استفاده از آن وجود دارد آپلود شود. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Watermark removal

[edit]

Hi,

I'm using the GIMP program. I select the place where the watermark is. I align the brightness of the highlighted section with the rest of the image. This fixes most of the space occupied by the watermark. Then you have to retouch the remaining colored part of the mark by copying and patching.

Greetings PawełMM (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your work is really impressing. Keep up the good work! HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

peace be upon you. I was very surprised!. This is the first star I get in the Wikipedia repository. thank you very much. This gave me the energy to double that amount of photos soon. I hope to be able to add 30,000 photos to the stock of this great man-made encyclopedia soon. You are the cause of this good thing. good luck. (Mostafameraji (talk) 16:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Mr. Meraji, thank you for your kindness. 🙏
Please don't mention it, that barnstar was not a match to your precious work. I hope you success and well-being. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Unveiling of Sayyad-4B missile.webm

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Unveiling of Sayyad-4B missile.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

راهنمایی بابت تصاویر حذف شده

[edit]

سلام روز بخیر یک سری از تصاویری که بنده در ویکی مدیا بارگذاری کردم ظاهرا حذف شده برخی از اونها از جمله تصاویر نمایندگان رو خودم گرفتم و برخی دیگر از جمله تصاویر پهپادها هم به کرات در سایت های مختلف استفاده شده با توجه به اینکه تصاویر مختلفی در ویکی پدیا از خبرگزاری های ایرانی مشاهده میشه میخواستم بدونم برای حذف نشدن تصاویر باید چکار کنم؟ Shervin 8564 (talk) 06:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shervin 8564 سلام شروین عزیز. ممنون از عکس‌های شما. حقوق عکسی که شما خودتون گرفته باشید متعلق به شماست و آزاد هستید با هر مجوزی آپلود کنید (ترجیحاً عکس با کیفیت اصلی و با متادیتا باشه). اگر عکسی که مال شماست دیلیت شده، لطفا بفرمایید که درخواست برگرشتش رو بدیم. عکس‌های خبرگزاری‌های ایرانی هم از برخی مثل فارس، تسنیم و مهر آزاد هست (مگر این که عکس مال خودشون نباشه و ازجای دیگه برداشته باشن) ولی از خیلی‌ها مثل ایرنا و ایسنا نمیشه آپلود کرد. کمکی بود بنده در خدمتم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
حیف شد
عکس های مورد نظرم رو تو خبرگزاری های فارس و تسنیم و مهر پیدا نکردم
جاهای دیگه هست ولی ظاهرا امکان آپلود وجود نداره Shervin 8564 (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
از خبرگزاری صداوسیما هم نمیشه آپلود کرد؟
iribnews.ir Shervin 8564 (talk) 07:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shervin 8564 متاسفانه خبرگزاری صدا و سیما لایسنس آزاد نداره و نمیشه. بیشتر سایت‌هایی که میشه ازشون آپلود کرد اینجا هست: . HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
خیلی ممنون بابت راهنمایی
عذر میخوام که خیلی سوال میپرسم
اینکه یک سایت لایسنس آزاد داشته باشه یا خیر رو از کجا میشه فهمید؟ Shervin 8564 (talk) 04:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
خواهش می‌کنم، هر چقدر سوال دارید بنده تا جایی که بلد باشم در خدمت هستم. اینطور در نظر می‌گیریم که همه چیز کپی‌رایت داره مگر این که خلافش ثابت بشه. یعنی اون سایت صریحا انتشار محتوا تحت لایسنس خاصی رو ذکر کرده باشه. مثلا خبرگزاری مهر، زیر صفحاتش مجوز کریتیو کامانز (که آزاد هست) رو ذکر کرده. برخی از سایت‌های دیگه مثل تسنیم، موج، فارس و... هم همین لایسنس رو دارن. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File move

[edit]

Salam HeminKurdistan, just noticed you had moved an untagged file mentioning criterion 3 (obvious errors in the file name). Can you say which part was wrong? Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 05:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. I explained this in File talk:Casualties of Iraqi army in war with Iran.jpg#Wrong title. Also, the source lacks any description of the picture and does not relate it to Operation Mersad. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pirouz the Cheetah in Pardisan Park (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maps on ethnic groups in Iran

[edit]

Hi, Commons is NOT an authorative collection on maps and information. PoV is allowed to exist in uploaded media. Flat-out false maps can be nominated for deletion, for which you need a good rationale and prove that they're not within usage anywhere. Inaccurate maps can be flagged ("Disputed Map") and possibly corrected. I found your sweeping changes these last days surprising and would like to see an explanation of what you hope to achieve, while I get myself an overview of what is all in there. --Enyavar (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I completely agree that different opinions can exist, there is no problem with that. But there is a difference between inconsistent/disputed information and distorting information. Maybe different sources have different opinions, that's OK. Sometimes even sources are clearly wrong (like File:Ethnographic map of Persia in circa 1939 by The Field Museum.jpg which confuses Turks/Azeris with Turkmens and paints them with Gilaks and Mazanderanis in northern Iran as simply 'Turkomans') but that is OK too. However, I think this is not OK to use maps as a colouring book and put them all together here. If every user wants to make a change in a file on their own and upload a new file that suits their taste (without having a source), then use in some Wiki and put it in the same category here, that category will lose its meaning. (For example, compare File:Iran-Ethnicity-2004.PNG with File:Iran-Ethnicity-2022.png and see how much they are different). I have nominated some problematic maps for deletion before and they were deleted. After I saw Category:Inaccurate maps of Shanghai, I thought that such category will be useful to distinguish between maps that have a source and those which are baseless. I hope my intention to organize files in a better way is clear, categorization is one of my favorite edit fields and I have organized many categories before (A recent example is creating Category:Missile vehicles of Iran and all its categories). I don't think that what I do is perfect and I appreciate your input. Please share your opinion with me. Thank you. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I want to mention that File:خريطة إقليم الأحواز.png, File:Map of Rojhalat Kurdistan.jpg, File:ڕۆژھەڵاتی کوردستان2.jpg and File:GA Əyalət Bölgə.jpg, as well as files in Category:Maps of Lakistan are speculated states on real maps. I think they fit the definition written in Category:Fantasy maps: A-Historical Speculations. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for understanding. Fully agreed on bad maps ruining good categories. I have seen hundreds of falsified maps before, and also was aware that ethnic maps of Iran are hotly disputed. When I just noticed that you have moved many maps around and into very different categories, my alarm bells were ringing, especially with a 1:1 recreation of the CIA map (both of them are heavily used in many projects, and semi-protected against vandalism!) suddenly being called just as "inaccurate" as the fakes that were derived from it. To bring everything back together, I renamed "Fictional maps of Iran" into "Disputed maps of Iran" and re-categorized your objections to be included in there. I think that these maps need to be assessed individually: For example, this or this Lakistan map seems to me as a good faith attempt to show the area of the Laki language, and not a speculated state. Meanwhile this one looks like its author wanted to propose a province/state: Could you please check on File:زبان لکی ایران عراق.jpg and File:Laki speakers.jpg? I can file a deletion request against all maps by that uploader, so we get rid of them. They seem unused, except for one in ku:Lekistan, which looks like a bad article (no source, fake map?). I care a lot about maps in general, but I am clueless with regards to Iran, so I thank you in advance for checking the content. --Enyavar (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, putting File:Iran-Ethnicity-2004.PNG in that category was a mistake and I changed it to CIA maps category. I agree that File:Iran- Lak people 1.JPG and File:Zaravayên kurdî yên başûr li parêzgehên loristan, kirmaşan.jpg are not map of fictional states and are linguistic maps, just like File:زبان لکی ایران عراق.jpg and File:Laki speakers.jpg. I did a little search and found a few social media accounts and blogs that advocate creating a new province named Lakestan (nothing seems official or with a support base). But Lakestan is also the name of a village in northwestern Iran that was important during World War I for a conflict that took place near it (fa:رخداد لکستان). Some sources indicate that the people of this Lakestan in northwestern Iran were Lak immigrants from Dagestan (unrelated to Laks in our "Lakestan" category). Kurdish Wikipedia article has no source for that article and only links to a website that does not work anymore. I don't think that those files have any use for Wikis unless there is a serious source for these maps or a proposal is made for such province. I see that this map for example includes Category:Malayer which is known to be a city predominantly inhabited by Lurs. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check?

[edit]

Dear HerminKurdistan, Could you check if I added the correct categories to File:107پیاده روی کربلا.jpg and File:107-پیاده_روی_جاماندگان_اربعین-_اراک.jpg? Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vysotsky. Sure. The first is correct, but the second one is another ritual in Iran (although it is related to Arba'een Pilgrimage). I will try to create a category for it. Thanks, HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Glad you made the new category! Vysotsky (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

[edit]

@HeminKurdistan: I created the Category:Asadollah Lajevardi, hopefully that is correct? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 17:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje Hi. That's perfectly fine. Thank you. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

\

File:2017 Yadman-e-Isar military exhibition in Baharestan (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 07:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2022 IRGC army exercise in Aras region (43).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2022 IRGC army exercise in Aras region (43).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 09:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 Sacred Defence Week parade in Bandar Abbas (58).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 10:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PawełMM Thank you very much. That's great! HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2nd Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (24).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2nd Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (24).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 09:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2nd Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (24).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:3rd Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (22).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as cc-by-nd. Non-derivative restriction is not allowed on Commons.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

MehdiTalk 09:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:3rd Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (25).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as cc-by-nd. Non-derivative restriction is not allowed on Commons.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

MehdiTalk 09:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

request for update

[edit]

Hi dear. Please update the source of all these images. The wrong source has been entered. MehdiTalk 09:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Done. Thank you for noticing that! HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:4th Death anniversary of Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (11).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as cc-by-nd. Non-derivative restriction is not allowed on Commons.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mehdi.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (54).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (54).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 04:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdi سلام مجدد. در مورد تصاویر موزه نهاجا، راستش خودم هم در مورد کپی‌رایت بعضی از تصاویر شک داشتم اما اینور تصور کردم که نمایش یک عکس در یک موزه رو میشه پابلیک کردن مدنظر قانون در نظر گرفت و چون قدمت تصاویر جنگ به حداقل 35 سال میرسه، تصاویر رو میشه در مالکیت عمومی تلقی کرد. البته در صورت حذف هم تصمیم منطق خواهد داشت چون نمیشه ثابت کرد که اون عکس خاص دقیقاً در چه تاریخی در موزه قرار داده شده. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan:سلام. برای تصاویر اشتقاقی و یا تصاویر گرفته شده از روی تصاویر قدیمی واقعا سخت گیری خاصی در انبار وجود دارد. الزام هر عکس قدیمی نمی تواند متعلق به عموم باشد و باید بتوان تاریخ انتشار اولیه آن تصویر و یا فوت عکاس آن پیش از سال 1980 را اثبات کرد. تاریخ انتشار اولیه باید بیش از 30 سال قبل باشد. برای پوستر فیلم های قدیمی و روزنامه ها و نشریات که واضح است و نیازی به اثبات خاصی نیست ولی برای سایر تصاویر این الزام وجود دارد. هرچند ایران به قانون حق تکثیر جهانی پایبند نیست اما در انبار برای جلوگیری از اجحاف در حق دارندگان حق تکثیر ایرانی به این قانون استناد و تاکید شده است. متاسفاه کلاف سردرگمی است که به دلیل خلاء قانونی در قوانین ایران ایجاد شده است. در خود ویکی فارسی نیز هر بحثی در این خصوص کرده ایم به نتیجه واحد و خاصی نرسیده و همیشه این خلاء قانون منجر به عدم جمع بندی صحیح و نیمه کاره ماندن مباحث شده است. نمونه اش این بحث ناتمام و بی نتیجه .--MehdiTalk 22:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (46).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (46).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 04:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (32).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (32).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 05:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (36).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (36).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 05:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (38).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (38).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 05:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Air Force Museum of Iran (45).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Air Force Museum of Iran (45).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 05:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 07:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

بررسی منبع و حق تکثیر یک تصویر

[edit]

سلام. لطفا منبع این تصویر و دارنده حق تکثیر را بازبینی نمایید. این فریم از تصویر در ویدئو اشاره شده توسط شما دیده نشد. با سپاس MehdiTalk 09:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdi سلام و عرض ادب. حق با شماست این تصویر اسکرین‌شات فیلم نیست، از بخش منبع حذفش کردم. به نظرم در انتساب این تصویر به خبرگزاری تسنیم شکی نباشه چون بقیه لینک مطالب این خبرگزاری نشاندهنده اعزام حداقل دو نفر (علی دارا و محمد رنجبر) برای پوشش این مراسم هست. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
متاسفانه بر اساس معیارهای الگوی خود تسنیم و بحث مطرح شده، تایید این تصویر کمی شبهه‌برانگیز و ایجاد کننده حساسیت است. از نظر بنده نیز این تصویر متعلق به تسنیم است اما برای تصاویری از این دست باید تائیدیه سازنده همان الگو و افراد فعال در آن بحث را داشته باشیم تا با بحث های پشت‌بند آن مواجه نشویم. --MehdiTalk 18:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehdi متوجه هستم. یکی از دلایلی که سعی کردم در مورد تصاویر تسنیم مطالب مستند جمع‌آوری کنم همین بود. اونطور که من متوجه شدم بخش‌های مختلف تسنیم در استفاده از تصاویر سیاست‌های متفاوتی دارند که تا حدی بستگی به نظر سردبیر مربوطه داره. مثلاً دبیر گروه دفاعی تسنیم چند وقت پیش در توئیتر نوشته بود که ما اگر تصاویر رو از جای دیگری برداریم به واترمارک دست نمی‌زنیم و انتظار داریم که دیگر رسانه‌ها هم واترمارک تصاویر ما رو بر ندارند. این گروه یک کانال تلگرامی هم داره که دست خودشونه و تصاویر خبرنگاران دفاعی تسنیم رو با چنین واترمارکی منتشر می‌کنه: @tasnim_military. (گاهی این تصاویر در سایت نیستن)
ظاهراً واترمارکی که ما اینجا به عنوان واترمارک تسنیم می‌شناسیم روال کاری گروه عکس خبرگزاری هست. بعضی از دفاتر شهرستان‌ها ظاهراً این استاندارد رو دقیقاً رعایت نمی‌کنند. مثلاً این عکس دفتر هرمزگان واترمارک عجیبی استفاده کرده. یا این عکس از کرمان. نمونه هست که اسم عکاس هم مشخصه ولی در واترمارک ذکر نشده (دفتر رشت) و یک سری هم که کلاً واترمارک ندارند اما عکاس مشخصه. به نظر میرسه بعضی از این عکس‌‌ها با دوربین حرفه‌ای و توسط عکاس حرفه‌ای هم گرفته نشدن (مثلاً خبرنگار محلی که عکاسی هم در حد معمولی بلده با گوشی خودش عکس گرفته) و به دلیل آشنایی کم با نرم‌افزارهای گرافیکی، به همون شکل مورد تأیید سردبیر محلی قرار گرفته و روی خبرگزاری منتشر شده. در این صورت باز هم انتساب اون اثر به خبرگزاری محرز به نظر می‌رسه.
حقیقتش من توافق صریحی در بحث چند سال پیش نمی‌بینیم که حتماً هر چیزی واترمارک نداشت مشکل داره، البته اگر هم چنین چیزی می‌بود قابل تغییره. نمی‌دونم در جریان عکس‌های محمد آگاه هستید یا نه. ظاهراً همون زمان توافقی شده بود که عکس‌هایی که محمد آگاه گرفته مشکل داره و باید پاک بشه چون در سایت‌های مختلفی با لایسنس غیرآزاد منتشر شده. من تعدادی از عکس‌های محمد آگاه رو اینجا پیدا کردم و برای دیلیشن نامزد کردم ولی نظر جمعی این شد که این تصاویر مشکلی ندارند و تصاویر قدیمی هم دوباره آندیلیت شدن. میشه یک بحث جدیدی مطرح کرد و اون جمله رو از لایسنس حذف کرد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
سپاس بسیار از توضیحات جامع شما. به نظرم بد نیست این موارد را در همان زیرصفحه کاربری خود نیز قرار دهید و سپس با بردنش به نظرخواهی، به الگوی مربوط به تسنیم اضافه شوند. در حال حاضر تایید این تصاویر ممکن نیست و حیف است که این تصاویر همینگونه به حال خود رها شوند. یکی از دلایلی که بنده را به سمت رسیدگی تصاویر تسنیم کشانده مشکل هک شدن ماه های اخیر سایت خبرگزاری فارس بوده. متاسفانه تصاویر بیشماری از فارس همچنان تایید نشدند و با توجه به حجم تخریب آرشیوها و از دسترس خارج شدن سایت کوتاه کننده لینک فارس، برخی از تصاویر قابل رسیدگی و تایید نیستند و ممکن است هر لحظه به بهانه در دسترس نبودن منبع و عدم تایید لایسنس تصاویر قدیمی، از انبار حذف شوند. از این جهت بهتر است تمامی تصاویر تسنیم رسیدگی و تعیین و تکلیف شوند تا این داده‌ها و تصاویر بی شمار نیز برای آیندگان محفوظ بمانند. متاسفانه سایت ساجد در سالهای اخیر به راحتی از دسترس خارج شد و تصاویر بسیاری می توانستند در انبار باشند که نیستند و یا بدلیل عدم تایید مجوزها در آینده ممکن است حذف شوند. وقتی این سه هزار و اندی تصویر هرچه زودتر تعیین تکلیف شوند می توان تصاویر و مناسبت های روز را بهتر و با دسته بندی بهتری بارگذاری نمود. --MehdiTalk 21:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehdi دغدغه شما کاملاً بجاست و من هم این نگرانی رو دارم که عکس‌ها در معرض خطر باشند. متأسفانه علاوه بر فارس (که آرشیو قبل از 1392 خودش رو پاک کرده و گنجینه عکس‌های ارزشمندی رو از دست دادیم)، یک سری از لینک‌های تسنیم (عمدتا در سال 2016) هم حذف شده و من به سختی از نسخه‌های زبان اردو و عربی سایت موفق شدم بعضی از عکس‌ها رو پیدا و آپلود کنم. بنابراین زحمات شما در تأیید عکس‌های آزاد ایران بسیار قابل‌تقدیر هست و من به نوبه خودم مجدداً از شما تشکر می‌کنم. عذر هم می‌خوام اگر در آپلود برخی از فایل‌ها بی‌دقتی کردم. به نظر شما بحث تغییر اون جمله در لایسنس تسنیم رو کجا باید پیگیری کنیم؟ در صفحه بحث خود لایسنس یا جای دیگری؟ HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: در حال حاضر برای رسیدن به اطلاعات بهتر در خصوص تصاویر آزاد این خبرگزاری ها درخواستی را در اینجا مطرح و در حال پیگیری هستم. اگر خدا عمری دهد اینها را سروسامان دهیم کار بزرگی‌ست. در مورد نظرسنجی نیز به نظرم بهتر است از این دو کاربر بپرسید (انگلیسی شما بسیار بهتر از دست و پا شکسته بنده است، زحمتش با خودتان) یک نفر user: cezar که این الگو را ساخته است و دیگری user:Ww2censor که این بند را به صفحه مورد نظر افزوده است. هر زمان نظرسنجی آغاز شد من را در جریان قرار دهید. با احترام: --MehdiTalk 06:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Depth 2018

[edit]

سلام. لطفا منبع تصاویر قرار گرفته در Category:Depth 2018 را بررسی فرمائید. ظاهرا اشتباهاتی وجود دارد. به طور مثال این فایل. با سپاس: MehdiTalk 10:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdi سلام. اصلاح شد. تشکر HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Iranian laughing soldiers hugging each other.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic-waveform Hi. What is the problem with this file's license? HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. The PD-Iran template mentions that the author needs to have died before 1980 or 50 years ago. This is not the case here as Dariush Goodarzi died in 1984. So this file can't be public domain. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wait, I guess I missed the second part which mentions that photographic or cinematographic works fall into public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation. Sorry about this. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cryptic-waveform You are right about the photographers date of death. However, if a photograph was published in Iran more than 30 years ago it will fall in public domain regardless of the author's death. Plus, this photograph is a work for hire for Iran's official news agency (IRNA), which owns the rights to it. As a result, any work that belongs to a legal person like IRNA will fall in public domain 30 years after publishing. We can be sure this picture is PD-Iran. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

موزه عبرت

[edit]

سلام. با توجه به اینکه موزه عبرت در سال 1382 افتتاح شده و با فرض آنکه تمامی مجسمه ها یا پیکره‌های به نمایش درآمده در این موزه از ابتدا در این مکان به نمایش درآمدند، نمیتوانیم تصاویر اشتقاقی مرتبط با این پیکره‌ها را تا سال 1412در انبار بارگذاری نمائیم. مگر آنکه سازنده این مجسمه ها یا دارنده حق تکثیرشان به نحوی اجازه نامه مربوطه را ارسال کرده باشد و یا در مکانی اعلام رسمی کرده باشد. با وضعیت موجود مجبور به ثبت درخواست حذف شان هستیم. اگر به مجوزها دسترسی دارید که پیوند دهید در غیر اینصورت لطفا درخواست حذف اینگونه بارگذاری ها را خودتان ثبت کنید، سپاسگزار خواهم بود. با احترام: --MehdiTalk 08:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdi :سلام. ظاهراً موزه در سال 1379 بازگشایی شده (هر چند در اصل مطلب تفاوتی ایجاد نمی‌کنه) و در مورد این که بعضی از مجسمه‌ها خیلی خیلی جدیدتر از این تاریخ هستند هم اطمینان کامل وجود داره (مثل این). در مورد مجسمه‌هایی که مثل این (که قراره شبیه فرد خاصی باشن و جزئیات کار اهمیت داره) به نظرم شکی وجود نداره که اثر هنری محسوب میشن و طبق قانون حقوق مالک حفاظت میشه. اما بعضی از این‌ها به نظر میرسه که حالت مانکن (مشابه ویترین مغازه) دارن و فقط قراره که یک پوز خاصی رو نمایش بدند. در صورتی که این‌ها هم دارای کپی‌رایت تلقی بشن تصاویر منحصربفرد و دارای ارزش آموزشی بالا رو از دست می‌دیم، مثلاً قپانی یا تنها تصویر واضح و باکیفیتی که از دستگاه آپولو داریم (اینجا) یا قفس داغ (این) که متأسفانه بعید می‌دونم هیچ تصویر آزاد دیگری براشون بشه پیدا کرد. تصاویری مثل این که حالت سیلوئت دارن هم می‌تونن دارای کپی‌رایت اشتقاقی تلقی بشن؟ اگر پاسخ این سوال منفیه، به نظر شما میشه راه حلی برای حفظ تصاویر دارای دارای ارزش آموزشی (مثل محو کردن) پیدا کرد؟ HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
من استثنایی در این بین ندیدم ولی تصور میکنم با مات کردن چهره مجسمه مشکل حل شود. فرصت دهید تا پیگیری کنم و پاسخ را خدمت‌تان ارائه خواهم نمود. با احترام: --MehdiTalk 20:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehdi ممنونم. منتظر پاسخ شما هستم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: من سوال را برای پرسیدن آماده و در حال ارسال به Commons:Village pump/Copyright بودم که موردی به ذهنم رسید. این تصاویر با نمایش چهره و بدون مات بودن ارزشمند هستند و بیانگر زجر و شکنجه وارده به فرد قپانی زده هستند. نوشتار مورد نظر بجز ویکی فارسی در هیچ ویکی دیگری ایجاد نشده و شاید در فرهنگ و زبان های دیگر اصطلاح دیگری برای این حالت وجود داشته باشد (نمیدانم) اگر برای ویکی فارسی نیازشان داریم، به نظرم می توانید به صورت استفاده منصفانه در همان ویکی فارسی بارگذاری و به نوشتار مورد نظر اضافه کنید. با استفاده منصفانه نه نیازی به مات کردن داریم و نه سروکله زدن با قوانین حق تکثیر و برخی سختگیری های رایج در انبار. --MehdiTalk 14:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehdi من در ویکی پدیا مشارکتی ندارم و عرضم در مورد استفاده آموزشی بیشتر در چارچوب اهداف کامانز بود (فارغ از صرف استفاده در پروژه‌های دیگه). به نظرم چیزی که در این موزه بخصوص دارای ارزش تاریخی هست همین ابزار شکنجه اصلی (مثل آپولو یا تخت شلاق) هست که متأسفانه عکس بدون مانکن ازشون موجود نیست وگرنه مجسمه‌های زندانی‌ها به خودی خود خیلی مهم نیستند و می‌تونن در موزه دیگری هم جالب باشن. بنابراین چنانچه راهی برای تغییر در تصاویر و حل مشکل اثر اشتقاقی وجود نداشته باشه به نظرم چاره‌ای جز حذف تصاویر وجود نداره. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: بگذارید نظر جناب Hanooz را هم جویا شوم. همکار گرامی لطفا شما هم در این بحث نظرتان را بفرمایید. آیا راهی برای حفظ این تصاویر وجود دارد یا خیر؟ با سپاس --MehdiTalk 16:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
فکر نمی‌کنم به جز محو کردن راهی باشد. تصاویری مثل قفس داغ حتی با محو کردن هم احتمالاً ارزش دانشنامه‌ای خواهند داشت. Hanooz 16:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ Hanooz به نظرتان در این حد محو، کفایت می‌کند؟ @ HeminKurdistan لطفا تصاویری که از نظر شما ارزشمند هستند را برای محو کردن مشخص کنید و مابقی را به حذف ببرید. من هرکدام را که از نظر شما ارزشمند هستند، محو میکنم. --MehdiTalk 17:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
بله. فکر می‌کنم کافی باشد. Hanooz 17:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
تشکر. لطفاً چند روز به من فرصت بدید تا همه تصاویر رو بررسی و جداسازی کنم چون تعداد زیادی از تصاویر هنوز در رده قرار نگرفته. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan خواهش میکنم. پس خبر از شما.--MehdiTalk 18:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Depth 2018 competitions in Noshahr - Openning ceremony (19).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MehdiTalk 09:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, MehdiTalk 16:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Depth 2019

[edit]

سلام. لطفا منبع تصاویر تائید نشده در این رده را یک بار دیگر بررسی کنید. مثلا این و این. با سپاس --MehdiTalk 13:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehdi سلام. لینک‌های مراسم اختتامیه اصلاح شد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

بحث درمورد درخواست حذف پرونده

[edit]

سلام خوبید عزیز دل. سال نو پیشاپیش تبریک بر شما باد.

درمورد درخواست حذف عکس بانک آینده لطفا شرح دهید، دلیل و علت آن چیست و راهکاری باید انجام شود در این خصوص چگونه است.

باتشکر فراوان

Behnam N (talk) 08:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Behnam N سلام و عرض ادب، سال نوی شما هم مبارک. با توجه به این که بانک آینده در سال ۱۳۹۱ تأسیس شده، قانوناً لوگوی این بانک به مدت سی سال دارای کپی‌رایت است یعنی تا حدود نوزده سال دیگه متأسفانه نمیشه اینجا آپلودش کرد. اما در خود ویکی پدیا می‌تونید آپلودش کنید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
چطوری و کجا دقیقا میشه تو خود ویکیپدیا آپلود کرد . من گزینه اونو ندیدم Behnam N (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Behnam N من چون کاربر ویکی‌پدیا نیستم دقیقاً اطلاع ندارم. اما طبعاً عین همین فرم آپلودی که اینجا هست باید اونجا هم باشه. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Funeral of Ebrahim Yazdi (02).jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Modern primat The crop was done to exclude the poster, which made the photograph a derivative work with copyright problem (and eventually deleted). Please revert yourself. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
show me the deleted file please. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Modern primat No file is deleted. I just uploaded this picture. Iranian law does not recognize FOP and this poster is copyrighted (Please see COM:FOP Iran). HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i mean, link to deleted file... not actual file itself. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
wait, i cant understand.... if you cropping a copyrighted image, how a cropped version of it still be free licensed? ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Modern primat This photograph is taken from a poster (=derivative work). The photograph itself is freely licensed, but the poster is protected until 2047 (it has another author, different from the photographer). So the only way to keep this file is to exclude the poster. We can either blur the poster of crop it out. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hmm, interesting.... thank you for information, im gonna revert. good luck!(i should still dont revert this image and mark it with "copyvio", because previous copyvio versions. but, im lazy. and you should still upload it separetly. but again, im not gonna intervene you lol.) ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Modern primat We have an interesting case here, File:Funeral of Ebrahim Yazdi (12).jpg is also a derivative work but the image in the photograph is freely licensed too! So there is no problem with it (otherwise we should have deleted this file because blurring it would made the photograph meaningless). HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the best

[edit]

Happy Nowruz to our commander-in-chief here! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Orijentolog Thank you, Happy Nowruz to you too. I wish you all the best! HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
happy nowruz. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Modern primat Thanks, Happy Nowruz! HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I answered you here. You've pinged me there, but I got no notification! :( I saw it by pure coincidence. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign:fa

[edit]

سلام و عرض ارادت. پیرو این ویرایش، مطالعه این مطلب خالی از لطف نیست. در ضمن بررسی رده Uploaded via Campaign:fa (با 5935 فایل) ممکن است دوباره کاری باشد، اگر فرصت دارید این رده (با 5147 فایل) و این گزارش ربات را بررسی کنید. با احترام: --MehdiTalk 07:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. ممنونم، حتماً. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Your act as tagging this file is violation please do not repat otherwise, I am going to report you of admins this is last warning to youLuckie Luke (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Luckie Luke. A violation of what exactly? You cannot remove the nomination until it is closed by an admin. Report whatever you want. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DR reasons

[edit]

Hi Hemin. Thanks for working hard to maintain Commons. But please don't nominated images for deletion by merely saying "Questionable own work claims." That is too vague and insufficient as a DR, see Commons:Deletion requests#Nomination guidelines #3. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9   15:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

حق نشر مشکوک

[edit]

سلام، لطفا این تصویر رو بررسی کنید، فکر نکنم حق نشر این عکس برای تسنیم باشد.(بیشتر به تصاویر صدا و سیما شباهت داره) ممنون

File:مهرشاد سهیلی.jpg CaesarIran (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CaesarIran سلام. به نظر حق با شماست و منم فکر می‌کنم اسکرین‌شات از برنامه تلویزیون باشه. درخواس حذفش رو ایجاد کردم. ممنون از توجه شما. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

photo, tasmin news

[edit]

hello sir, please edit this file if you want to: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%AB%D8%B3%D9%BE%D8%B4%D9%81%D9%87.jpg

i guess this is proper source: https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1398/10/17/2176622/%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AE-%DB%8C%DA%A9-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%BE-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%B2-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86

thanks. i just saw this file and checked it in google, found proper source. when i see it is from tasnim, i remembered you. so, good luck. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Modern primat Hi, thank you for bringing this to attention. It seems like it is originally from leader.ir published in 2014 ([3]), so Tasnim does not hold the copyright. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thank you so much. then, im gonna mark it as copyvio. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست

[edit]

سلام، لطفا آپلود‌های ایشان را بررسی کنید، سپاس

CaesarIran (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

سلام و احترام
تصاویر بارگذاری شده از سایت خبرگزاری های نامبرده در توضیحات می باشد. و تمام تصاویر با منبع معتبر می باشد. شاید علت درخواست شما عدم تجربه کافی من در نحوه بارگذاری است.
لطفاً مشکل به وجود آمده را ذکر نمایید یا مقاله ارسال‌ نمایید تا بتوانم بارگذاری های بهتری داشته باشم.تشکر
@Mr Vesal 93.110.113.182 17:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr_Vesal سلام و عرض ادب. جهت رعایت روال کامانز لطفاً از خبرگزاری‌هایی فایل آپلود کنید که لایسنس آن‌ها آزاد است (مانند فارس، تسنیم، مهر و...) و درقسمت منابع هم حتماً لینک گالری عکس را قرار بدهید. از توجه شما ممنونم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
سلام و احترام
ممنونم اطلاعی نداشتم از این موضوع...
لینک گالری منظورتون لینک تصویر هست باید در منبع عکس وارد شود یا لینک صفحه مقاله خبرگزاری؟ Mr Vesal (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

بررسی

[edit]

سلام گرامی، لطف می‌کنید این نامزدی حذف را که ایجاد کردم بررسی کنید برخی عکس‌ها منتسب به تسنیم و فارس است که من فکر میکنم اینطور نباشد و خود خبرگزاری از تصاویر متفرقه استفاده کرده. سپاسگزارم

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dicbrat

CaesarIran (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion involving you

[edit]

Hello, I have created a discussion involving one of your edits in a category. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 21:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?

[edit]

Dear HeminKurdistan, Could you give me some advice? When reviewing files from FARS and other press agencies, I often stumble upon dead links. See e.g. this file. I often use a few tricks (use the photo number, use farsnews.ir instead of farsnews.com, use archive.org etc), but with this file all to no avail. The file looks trustworthy, as the original has both "FARS" and the name of the photographer ("Madhi Zere") down left in the photo, but can you think of any way to check the original page at FARS? Vysotsky (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vysotsky. Thank you for your help on reviewing all these files! This is so unfortunate that Fars has removed this gallery and no longer hosts that page (I tried all the ways I knew) but we can be sure it was once published (search for "گزارش تصویری شکست آبرومندانه ترکمنستان مقابل ژاپن" here). The good thing is that the files are still available on Fars News servers, like this one which was used as the lead photograph in that gallery. So we can assume that the URL for other files must be in the form of "https://media.farsnews.ir/Uploaded/Files/Images/1397/10/19/13971019001174636826577?????????_?????_PhotoT.jpg" (Question marks must be replaced with numbers, they seem to be random or at least I cannot figure out a logical pattern. Maybe User:Streamline8988 is able to help on this). One thing that we can do to find the images is to ask someone with knowledge in programming to make a bot that checks all URLs with that address, replacing question marks with all numbers possible. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. It is indeed stupid that Fars have moved these files. It is almost as stupid as the decision made by some Wikimedians to add "License review needed" to well over 60,000 files from Iranian press agencies (currently 60,731 files) - to address a problem with a few hundred files that we could have easily solved in a different way. Anyway, we will have to cope with this problem, even wasting away thousands of hours work. I will make a list of heavily used FARS files that I can't find - perhaps others find a way to track these images down. Vysotsky (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First ones. -- Vysotsky (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I can't help, I don't know the naming pattern for these kinds of Fars photos. In my experience it's very rare for these kinds of galliers to be deleted. Streamline8988 (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan: thanks for helping tracking the photos! Vysotsky (talk) 10:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky You're welcome, I would be happy to help anytime. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks

[edit]

Dear HeminKurdistan, Question: with files like this one: when removing watermark, new version upload as separate file? Vysotsky (talk) 11:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ندا قاسمی

[edit]

درود. چطور می توانم توضیحات را ویراش کنم؟ متاسفانه آشنایی ندارم Bahiraee (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bahiraee سلام. لطفاً عکس‌هایی که در اینترنت پیدا می‌کنید را اینجا آپلود نکنید چون به قوانین کپی‌رایت سختگیری وجود دارد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
من صدف طاهرزاده عکاس این تصویرم. Bahiraee (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bahiraee دوربینی که تصویر با آن گرفته شده چیست؟ لطفاً یک نسخه باکیفیت از این عکس را که متادیتای آن نیز پاک نشده باشد آپلود کنید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
دوربین کنون 80d. متاسفانه عکسی که متادیتای آن باشه رو ندارم. Bahiraee (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shahed 136 operators deletion discussion

[edit]

I edited this NVG myself, why you try to delete it😐 Mahan122 (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my reasons in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shahed 136 operators.svg? HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

بدون عنوان

[edit]
با سلام در خصوص سوال شما درباره بارگزاری 3 تصویر
این تصویر به جهت درج در درفت اولیه (پیشنویس) تست برای ایجاد صفحه بارگزاری شده است
در حال حاضر در حال تهیه پیشنویس اولیه برای ایجاد صفحه به نام مرتضی ترک تبریزی هستیم
ادرس لینک‌های زیر برای مشاهده تصوصیر منتشر شده برای شما ارسال میشود
https://www.eghtesadonline.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%85%D9%87-190/689127-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AC%DB%8C%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AA%DA%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D8%B3%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF
https://w2pshop.ir/product/%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%B9%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%B4-%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%DB%B3%DB%B5/
https://www.eghtesadonline.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-5/228957-%D8%AA%D8%AC%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%84-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D9%81%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D9%85%D9%84%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%87-%D9%BE%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%86%D8%AF-%D8%BA%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%84
این اثر س زیر موجود بوده و برای خبرگزاری اقتصاد آنلاین می‌باشاز آلبوم شخصی ابشان توسط خبرگزاری اقتصاد انلاین با سرپچ در گوگل نمایش داده می‌شود
در صورت نیاز به مستندات بیشتر لطفا به من اطلاع رسانی بفذمایید
با تشکر از شما AlirezaB1402 (talk) 06:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
دیس لایک حمید عباسی آملی (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
سلام این تصویر به جهت درج در درفت اولیه (پیشنویس) تست برای ایجاد صفحه بارگزاری شده است

در حال حاضر در حال تهیه پیشنویس اولیه برای ایجاد صفحه به نام مرتضی ترک تبریزی هستیم ادرس لینک‌های زیر برای مشاهده تصوصیر منتشر شده برای شما ارسال میشود https://www.eghtesadonline.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%85%D9%87-190/689127-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AC%DB%8C%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AA%DA%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D8%B3%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF

https://w2pshop.ir/product/%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%B9%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%B4-%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%DB%B3%DB%B5/

https://www.eghtesadonline.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-5/228957-%D8%AA%D8%AC%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%84-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D9%81%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9-%D9%85%D9%84%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%87-%D9%BE%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%86%D8%AF-%D8%BA%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%84

این اثر س زیر موجود بوده و برای خبرگزاری اقتصاد آنلاین می‌باشاز آلبوم شخصی ابشان توسط خبرگزاری اقتصاد انلاین با سرپچ در گوگل نمایش داده می‌شود در صورت نیاز به مستندات بیشتر لطفا به من اطلاع رسانی بفذمایید با تشکر از شما AlirezaB1402 (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a completed {{Book}} template on the file description page for your upload. It helps automate eventual Index: creation at Wikisource, as well providing additional catalog data on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00. You are right. I will act accordingly. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:1st International Congress for the Women of Influence (50).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arian (talk) 06:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

for neatly removing the first 45 seconds of the original of the video. These scenes are spectacular, but are indeed not from Tasnim. Vysotsky (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky You're welcome. They watermark evidently proved that it was not a work by Tasnim. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map of the R. Mehabad

[edit]

Hi Hemn, you put an (unclear source warning) on my file twice. I don't know exactly what you mean by that. to making this map I have taken the information from a book owned by the General of the Army of the Republic of Mahabad, and I have linked to the website where I read the book as a source. I hope you understand bra Zamand Karim (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zamand, would you please cite the book using en:APA style? HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you restore my edit, I put the source on which I created this map, without saying why? Zamand Karim (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zamand Karim Your link brings no result. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it. Zamand Karim (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zamand Karim I don't see any maps. Which page(s) serve as a basis for the map? HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No page refers to a specific 'map', I created the map according to the text in the book; I haven't only defined the borders of the Republic of Mahabad, also the agreements, wars, conflicts, campaigns and what I have put on the map, I create this map a long time ago, I think the entire map is taken from pages 31-120. Zamand Karim (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original

[edit]

Dear HeminKurdistan, When I was checking licenses, I saw several uploads containing the source information http://fna.ir/4NC26R. Link isn't working, nor is archive.org. Any suggestions? Vysotsky (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found it. You mentioned the other URLs under "Comment". Thanks. Vysotsky (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 13:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Power of faith determines the battle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WeatherWriter (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Hezbollah drill in Aaramta 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

{{User|POS78}}talk 07:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Question

[edit]

As I am no expert in Iranian names, I was triggered by the watermark on this photo: photo by Majid Hamed Haghdoust. We have three Haghdoust photographers at Commons: Majid Haghdoust, Hamed Haghdoust and Ali Hamed Haghdoust. Should they be merged into 1 or 2 Haghdoust photographers? Vysotsky (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Vysotsky, thank you for bringing this into attention. I can confirm that "Ali Hamed Haghdoust" and "Majid Hamed Haghdoust" are two different people (the surname is Hamed Haghdoust and they are likely to be brothers or cousins). This indicates that Majid was born in 1986, and worked for Fars News Agency between 2012 and 2014 based in the city of Tabriz. Since 2014, he is employed by Mehr News Agency and his location of work is Tehran. We also know that (per this this biography) that Ali was born in 1981 and has worked for both above-mentioned agencies (Fact: Both were born in Tabriz and started their professional careers there). I was unable to find a Hamed Haghdoust who is distinctive from the two people (in that case, Hamed would be the first name and Haghdoust the surname), so I think considering the fact images in that category were only published in Fars News Agency, it seems that they have not credited to a full name and the photographer may be either of the two. So that category may need to be deleted (or be used for disambiguation) and the photographs moved to one of the two other categories. I think dates can help us, for example, this photo was taken in 2007 in Tabriz and we know Majid did not work with Fars at the time, so we can assume it was taken by Ali. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for this thorough answer. I will adjust the categories a bit, accordingly. Vysotsky (talk) 10:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست

[edit]

با سلام و احترام خدمت حضرت‌عالی، اگر هم نظر با شما من موافق حذف این پرونده هستم [File:Qajari prince kisses hand of Princess Shahnaz Pahlavi.jpg] 2.147.249.53 11:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One more photo (not) by Maghdoust

[edit]

Dear HeminKurdistan, Could you have a look at this photo? The photograph is used quite often, but can't be found at the given source. Exif data doesn't show Maghdoust as the photographer, but Majid Asgaripour, who made photos for Fars and Mehr. Any clue? Vysotsky (talk) 10:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vysotsky. To the best of my knowledge, there are many instances among photographs published by Iranian news agencies that the name in EXIF does not match with the photographer identified by the agency (maybe because the camera is a property of the agency and they are used by multiple people?). Regarding that photo, I am quite sure that the source is wrong. The URL of the pictures in that set starts from 3073045.jpg and ends to 3073045.jpg and ends with 3073088.jpg, this picture is not among any of them (I checked the direct URLs becasue sometimes certain photographs are removed from the gallery for whatever the reason). I checked other photographs from the same event, there is another gallery on Mehr, two published by Fars 1 2, two by SNN 1 2 and one by Tasnim. I am pretty sure that this picture was not taken during this event. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky Update: I found the source and corrected the file's information. It was actually taken by Majid Asgaripour on the same day, but at a different place. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful. Thanks. Vysotsky (talk) 15:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seyed-Salehi

[edit]

Dear HeminKurdistan, Just a short question. You fairly recently uploaded this file, but I can't find the original. Could you help me out? best regards, Vysotsky (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Vysotsky, I uploaded that file using url2commons, so the URL put there is the direct link given to the tool. I think Mehr News Agency has removed the file from their server since then and I was unable to find an archived version. Also, I found out that the source has removed possibly hundreds of other files that we host :( What can we do now? HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes we're lucky, if archive.org has archived the page in the meantime. See for instance this file, that has been removed by Mehr News from the original page, but was still present at one of the archived versions of that page at archive.org. But in this Seyed-Salehi case I already tried that venue - in vain. The only effective solution is that every new file of which the license has to be checked, is checked within a day - but that's an unrealistic scenario, so we have to think of some other tricks. Vysotsky (talk) 13:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

[edit]

It's pleasant to see you're active again, wish you all the best in 2024. Tanbal nabash. ;) --Orijentolog (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dear Orijentolog, thank you for your kindness. I will try my best to be more active :) HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kursant504 (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

[edit]

Hello. Why did you revert my edit? PMG (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hello PMG. Category:Minelayers of Iran is a child to Category:Military boats of Iran, so every file in the former (which is more specific) will be automatically inside the latter. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added information that this image have connection with Velayat-89 (Q117730399) because it was made during this training. You reverted this because "Category:Minelayers of Iran is a child to Category:Military boats of Iran"? PMG (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PMG I tried to undo this edit. Pardon me if I was mistaken. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hanooz 18:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:And_babies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FeralOink (talk) 14:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find

[edit]

the original source of this file. I do believe the photo was made by Vahid Reza Alaei for Fars (see version 12 May 2018), but the source is not given. Would you know a way to check? (It is by far the best photo of a Toophan 5 missile.) Vysotsky (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky The original URL is this (found by tineye.com at [4] on Jan 12, 2016), but unfortunately it seems to have been removed. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The existence of the names of both Vahid Reza Alaei and Fars on the original photograph, in combination with the fact that there was a Farsnews website in which this photo once appeared, makes it likely that the license is correct. Vysotsky (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
!به پاس زحمات ارزنده‌یتان {{User|POS78}}talk 17:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@POS78 از محبت شما بی‌نهایت سپاسگزارم و من هم متقابلاً از زحمات شما تشکر می‌کنم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست و سؤالات

[edit]

با درودی فراوان. جسارتاً قصد داشتم ۲۴ ویدیو از سعید نوری و حسین نوری (خبرنگاران خبرگزاری مهر در بردسکن و خلیل‌آباد) را بارگذاری کنم ولی به مشکل خوردم. آیا ممکن است شما بارگذاری‌شان کنید؟

  1. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6109272
  2. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6109249
  3. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6108649
  4. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6101438
  5. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6101291
  6. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6099814
  7. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096603
  8. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096210
  9. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6089138
  10. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6088697
  11. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6076095
  12. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6070637
  13. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6070061
  14. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6070056
  15. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6101205
  16. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096518
  17. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096252
  18. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096347
  19. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6096244
  20. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6095408
  21. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6095300
  22. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6094055
  23. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6088644
  24. https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6078301

البته عجله‌ای نیست. دنیایی تشکر.-<-@ {{User|POS78}}talk 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@POS78 سلام. ظاهراً آپلود ویدیو در کامانز دچار مشکل فنی شده! من هم چند بار امتحان کردم و نشد. راستی از بابت الطاف شما بسیار ممنونم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ارادتمندم آقا! جسارتاً اگر وقت کردید ویدیوهای این رده و همچنین این ویدیو را نیز بررسی کنید. ممنونم {{User|POS78}}talk 12:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
درود. خوشبختانه ویدیوهای بالا را آپلود کردم. :) {{User|POS78}}talk 16:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
درودی دوباره خدمتِ دوست گرامی‌ام. جسارتاً هر موقع سرتان خلوت شد این رده را نیز بررسی فرمایید. سپاس بی‌کران. {{User|POS78}}talk 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
سلام. به روی چشم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
سایتان مستدام. :) {{User|POS78}}talk 11:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
عرض ارادت. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
درود. ببخشید بندهٔ کهتر مداوم مزاحم‌تان می‌شوم. لطفاً این دو نگاره (۱ و ۲) را نگاه بیندازید. من زیاد در این مورد سررشته ندارم. می‌توانید یک بررسی‌ای کنید و در صورت رفع نشدن مشکل نظر بر حذف‌شان دهید؟ ممنونم :) {{User|POS78}}talk 10:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:POS78. سلام. مشکل این است که این تصاویر آثار اشتقاقی محسوب می‌شوند (یعنی یک عکس + یک نقاشی/مجسمه که هرکدام خالق خودشان را دارند). چون این نقاشی/مجسمه در یک مکان عمومی قرار گرفته و به نمایش درآمده، اصل دیگری تحت عنوان آزادی پانوراما هم مطرح می‌شود. بدین معنا که اگر یک اثر در یک محیط عمومی قرار داشت، آیا عکاس حق دارد از آن عکسبرداری کند و از حقوق مادی و معنوی عکس خود به طور کامل برخوردار شود (یا آن را با نقاش/مجسمه‌ساز شریک نشود)؟ قوانین کشورهای مختلف در این زمینه متفاوت است. در قانون ایران آزادی پانوراما ذکر نشده و بنابراین به صورت پیشفرض اینطور تصور می‌کنیم که خالق اثری که از آن عکسبرداری شده هم در کپی‌رایت عکس سهیم است. بنابراین اگرچه عکس تسنیم آزاد است، باید از آزاد بودن نقاشی/مجسمه هم اطمینان داشته باشیم. تنها راه این که اثبات شود این عکس آزاد است، این است که ثابت کنیم نقاشی/مجسمه در مالکیت موزه (یک شخصیت حقوقی) بوده و بیش از 30 سال از نمایش آن در موزه می‌گذرد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ممنونم از اطلاعاتی که دادید! :) {{User|POS78}}talk 12:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
درود. یک سؤال دیگر: دیدم این رده را ایجاد کردید. خواستم بدانم من نیز می‌توانم چنین رده‌ای برای خودم ایجاد کنم یا خیر؟ به دو دلیل شک دارم. اولی که می‌خواهم به نام اکانتم باشد. دوم من یک عکاس حرفه‌ای نیستم؛ فقط با موبایلم هزاران عکس از منطقه‌ای که زندگی می‌کنم آپلود کرده‌ام و ثمره آن فهرست آثار ملی شهرستان کاشمر می‌باشد. {{User|POS78}}talk 15:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:POS78. سلام، چرا که نه؟ من برایتان رده‌اش را ساختم: Category:Photographs by User:POS78. نه تنها رده برای عکس کاربران رایج هست بلکه من رده برای عکس آپلودشده توسط کاربر هم دیدم. منتهی رسم است که برای کاربران از هیدن کتگوری استفاده کنیم. ضمناً عکس‌های شما خیلی هم زیباست و من از دیدن آن‌ها لذت بردم. این پروژه بر شانه ما آماتورها و داوطلب‌ها بالا رفته، تنها فرق عکاس حرفه‌ای با شما این است که او شغلش عکاسی است و برای این کار پول می‌گیرد، وگرنه عکس‌های به این خوبی با دوربین گوشی خیلی هم حرفه‌ای است ;) HeminKurdistan (talk) 04:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
دنیایی تشکر از محبتی که بر من دارید.-<-@ 09:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC){{User|POS78}}talk

بررسی یک نظرخواهی حذف

[edit]

سلام، من بخاطر تجربه خوب شما مزاحمتون شدم، بنده یک نظرخواهی در مورد ویدئو گزارشی از سانحه سقوط بالگرد ابراهیم رئیسی ایجاد کردم، لطف کنید آن را بررسی کرده و نظر خود را اعلام کنید. ممنونم. CaesarIran (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CaesarIran سلام. محبت دارید. از دقت نظر شما ممنونم، کاملاً درست فرمودید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, dear license reviewer

[edit]
If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi HeminKurdistan, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! ─ Aafī (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

راهنمایی در مورد تصویر

[edit]

سلام داداش، وقتت بخیر

من سال پیش این عکس پل لالی قدیمی در خوزستان رو از سایت مهر دانلود و اینجا آپلود کردم، ولی شما برچسب مشکل در منبع تصویر رو در صفحه مربوطه قرار دادید. سایت مهر نیوز از زمان آپلود تصویر در ویکی انبار تاکنون تغییر کرده و مثل اینکه عکس‌های قدیمی رو روی صفحات اخبار قدیمی سایتشون آپلود نمی‌کنن. روی تصویری که اینجا آپلود کردم واتر مارک سایت مهر هست و معلومه منبع رو درست معرفی کردم. می‌شه راهنمایی کنی من چطور این درخواست حذف رو رفع کنم و این عکس باقی بمونه؟ Alireza numberone (talk) 22:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alireza numberone سلام.
همونطور که فرمودید قطعاً شکی در این که عکس توسط مهرنیوز منتشر شده وجود ندارد. اما بحث اینجاست که آیا آن عکس را خبرگزاری مهر گرفته یا خیر. از آنجا که آن خبرگزاری نزدیک بیست سال پیش تأسیس شده و آن عکس مربوط به زمان قدیمی‌تری هست، قطعاً خالق آن خبرگزاری مهر نیست و عکس از جای دیگری برداشته شده. اگر بدانیم که حقوق عکس اصلی (که مهر آن را بازنشر کرده) متعلق به چه کسی است و در چه زمانی منتشر شده، می‌توانیم در مورد این که می‌شود آن عکس را آپلود کرد یا نه اظهار نظر کنیم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
وقت بخیر دوست من. این فرض را گرفتید که عکس قدیمی‌تر از زمان تاسیس خبرگزاری مهر است، درحالی که دلیل بر این وجود ندارد. این پل فلزی قدیمی لالی در بالادست سد گتوند بر روی کارون قرار داشت که با آبگیری آن در آبان سال ۱۳۹۱ به زیر آب رفت و بجای آن پل دیگری ساخته شد و آن زمان خبرگزاری مهر یکی از فعال ترین خبرگزاری‌های ایران بود. فکر کنم توافق داشته باشیم بی کیفیت بودن عکس دلیل بر قدمت عکس نیست و تاریخ آن را مشخص نمی‌کند. متاسفانه تصویر پاک شد، آیا کاری برای برگرداندن آن می‌شود کرد؟ Alireza numberone (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alireza numberone دلیل را باید برای تعلق حقوق عکس به خبرگزاری مهر اقامه کرد. اینجا ما با یک فایل سیاه و سفید روبرو هستیم که در یک مطلب قاطی تعداد زیادی عکس دیگر قرار گرفته. اسم عکاس مشخص نیست. حبرگزاری مهر (مانند الباقی خبرگزاری‌های ایرانی) هر روز عکس‌های زیادی را از جاهای مختلف برمی‌دارد، روی آن‌ها واترمارک خودش را می‌زند و منتشر می‌کند. این به معنای این که می‌شود آن عکس را لزوماً با لایسنس کریتیو کامانز درنظر گرفت نیست. اگر عکس متعلق به مهرنیوز بود، می‌شود. اما این نکته باید محرز شود که به نظر من در مورد این عکس به‌خصوص محرز نیست. HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alireza numberone پل قدیمی لالی در سال ۱۳۲۹ ساخته شده. حتماً عکسی از آن تا قبل از سال ۱۳۵۸ در منابع متعددی منتشر شده. به نظرم پیدا کردن عکسی از آن در آرشیو روزنامه‌ها یا کتاب‌های قدیمی بهتر از این باشد که عکس خبرگزاری مهر را آزاد تصور کنیم. HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alireza numberone سلام. لطفاً موقع آپلود عکس از خبرگزاری‌های ایرانی دارای لایسنس آزاد، دقت بفرمائید که خلق اثر توسط همان خبرگزاری مسجل باشد. مثلاً عکسی که توسط خبرگزاری تسنیم تولید شده باشد، معمولاً دارای واترمارک و اسم عکاس است. این در حالی است که همین خبرگزاری عکس‌های زیادی که تولیدات خودش نیست و کپی‌رایت دارد را از جاهای دیگر مثل ایرنا، صداوسیما و... هم برمی‌دارد و منتشر می‌کند که در این صورت می‌بایست از آپلود آن فایل در کامانز خودداری شود. نکته دیگر هم در مورد ادیت عکس است، با توجه به این که فایل اصلی ملاک تشخیص اصالت آن بوده و ارزش آرشیوی دارد، ضمن این که جستجوی آن در موتورهای جستجو راحت‌تر است، ترجیحاً عکس اصلی را آپلود کنید و هر ادیتی که خواستید را روی آن انجام دهید به کمک ابزاری که در داخل کامانز وجود دارد بعداً روی فایل اصلی اوررایت کنید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
سلام دوست گرامی. لطف می‌کنید خواهشا بصورت دقیق ذکر کنید کجا ذکر شده این خبرگزاری‌هایی که تصاویرشان را با لایسنس آزاد منتشر می‌کنند، هر تصویری که مالکیت حقوق کپی رایت آن را داشته باشند و منتشر کنند روی آن واترمارک و یا اسم عکاس اضافه می‌کنند؟ اصلا گذاشتن واترمارک بر روی تصاویر خبرگزاری تسنیم تا چند سال پیش مرسوم نبود و به ندرت انجام می‌شد و خبرگزاری فارس هم اکنون هم بسیاری از تصاویر عکاسانش را بدون واترمارک با لایسنس کرییتیو کامانز ۴ منتشر می‌کند. Alireza numberone (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alireza numberone من تابحال هزاران تصویر از خبرگزاری‌های ایرانی در اینجا آپلود کرده‌ام و بنا به تجربه خدمت شما عرض کردم. خبرگزاری تسنیم هم از روز اول تأسیس خودش واترمارک روی عکس‌هایش می‌گذاشت. (اگر تمایل داشتید این توضیحات را ببینید) خبرگزاری‌های ایرانی کپی‌کار هستند و تصاویر زیادی را از جاهای مختلف برمی‌دارند و منتشر می‌کنند. آپلودکننده باید از آزاد بودن تصاویر اطمینان حاصل کند. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

تائید تصویر

[edit]

سلام. بی زحمت این تصویر را تائید کنید https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85_%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%AA_%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C%D9%85_%D8%B1%D8%A6%DB%8C%D8%B3%DB%8C_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D8%AD%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C%D9%87_%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%AE%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ard1401 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abu al-Qasim, not his father Mirza Isa

[edit]

Regarding this reversal;[5] the sources cited in both images within the category explicitly mention Abu al-Qasim as the author, not Mirza Isa. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iranian Caspian naval exercise 2017 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alireza numberone (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iranian frigate Damavand 2017-07-06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alireza numberone (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion of File:Brigadier General Yahya Saree.jpg

[edit]

Hello, your speedy deletion of the file has been changed to a discussion, please object to my reasoning there. N niyaz (talk) 16:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you listing my files for deletion

[edit]

These are my own photos that you are tagging for deletion. May I know what exactly is the reason? What source do you want me to provide? Some are from my Google Photos archive and some from my blog and some are from CC4.0 sources that I listed properly? What’s the problem? Mrox2 (talk) 09:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]