User talk:JalenBarks

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:JalenFolf)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JalenBarks!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatEasternMainline (talk • contribs) 11:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Monstercat logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Monstercat logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 18:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - looks like other website copied commons image

[edit]

Jalen, it looks very likely stadiumguide.com copied the commons File:Khalifa Stadium, Doha, Brazil vs Argentina (2010).jpg, rather than the other way around. http://www.stadiumguide.com/wp-content/uploads/khalifa_top.jpg has fewer pixels (1100 z 640) than the commons version, and its EXIF data shows it was changed using GIMP 2.8.14 on 2017-04-17, whereas the commons version has been in place since 2010. Certainly this is not firm evidence a copyvio took place. Please would you consider removing your speedy delete request. Thanks. Rwendland (talk) 10:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple DRs

[edit]

When you nominate more than two or three files from one source -- gallery, user, or category -- as you did at Commons:Deletion requests/File:DROELOE (42509797734).jpg et seq, please use Visual File Change. It will save you a lot of time as you can nominate files with one click each. It also saves the closing Admin a great deal of time -- two clicks plus one click per file versus 3 clicks per file.

Also, before you nominate files for deletion, I suggest you take a quick look at the uploader's record. Ser Amantio di Nicolao is a user with more than 800,000 edits on Commons. He is, in fact, number one on Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits. I doubt that the subject images are out of scope. Thanks, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Kadı Message 17:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]