Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:AN

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES

Note

  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


crosswiki problem

User:Torcida Organizada C18 Chelsea Headhunters copyviol file and crosswiki automatic translation GioviPen GP msg 03:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only one upload. I nominated it for regular deletion as likely copyvio. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

problematic user

Rivermoll (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

User:Rivermoll delete all the files he uploaded (copyviol/no source and wrong licensing, out of scope)
promo only edits for not relevant sicilian male man
ty GioviPen GP msg 04:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiovanniPen: I would suggest making your case about these being out of scope through the normal deletion process. Similarly for copyvios.
This is a new user, and administrative action is not normally how we deal with a few reasonable, if possibly bad, uploads from a new user.
Also: normally if you have a complaint about a user for anything other than vandalism, you should bring it to COM:AN/U, not COM:AN, and you should certainly inform them on their talk page that you have started such a discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 21:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information, sorry: I wasnt sure that this was the right place GioviPen GP msg 11:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shall I reopen the topic in COM:AN/U or since I already made it here it’s ok for this time? GioviPen GP msg 11:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, you should go through the normal deletion process and possibly put a note on the user's talk page explaining what is going on. We don't normally use administrative tools to deal with new users who do not seem to be deliberately malicious. - Jmabel ! talk 17:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User appears to be running a bot, not responding to talk page

Est. 2021 (talk · contribs), see User_talk:Est._2021#Meat-bot_null_edits and edits like this, which will cause no change at all to how pages function or render 99%+ of the time, but will occasionally break pages (e.g. if a description has an equal sign in it). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. A longer block should be applied if the user doesn't respond. Yann (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should consider removing from Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON. RoyZuo (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care of this DR

Can some admin please take care of this DR. I am exhausted by explaining my POV. If the user would care to understand then I would have wanted to resume. But that's not the case here. There might be some shortcoming on my oart regarding the licence but I can't any better explain them the difference between a personal and a govt account on X (Twitter). Some leftover can also be found on my TP. Plz check the archive if the bot does so in the mean time. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 12:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta: You do not have to convince the person whose uploads you want deleted that you are correct. You can just state your case and wait for an admin to evaluate the arguments and close the DR. This DR has not been open even a week, so it would certainly be premature to close it. Unless there is clear consensus, 7 days is a minimum. 3-6 weeks is more common. - Jmabel ! talk 17:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel I think I couldn't explain myself. I didn't ask for a close. I just was fed up of that discussion. I got too much into it that I forgot that I don't need to convince them. Thank you. Also, another DR started in August is now inactive. If you could see that maybe. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not allowed photo

See: File:Markham, Virginia - panoramio.jpg Then click on the source link, which lists an NC license; which I think is not wiki compatible. I'm not sure what to do with this nor where to report it, so I'm reporting here. MisawaSakura (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is fine. The license was reviewed in 2016, and it is irrevocable. Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MisawaSakura: Panoramio changed their licensing policy, but that does not invalidate licenses offered under the old regime. - Jmabel ! talk 17:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

transfer of verification

Dear team, as pointed out by Achim55, please transfer the verification of de:User:CCC-LMU to the Commons project here as well. Many thanks and have a good start to the week! Alex CCC-LMU (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to COM:VRTN. --Achim55 (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp

Commons:Deletion requests File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp seems related to COM:HD#How to change the name of a portrait which most likely is about en:File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp. @Jmabel: Since you're an admin on Commons and Wikipedia, perhaps you can help this person out? The file probably is OK as non-free content, unless en:WP:FREER is an issue or it's a Getty image, but it needs a non-free use rationale and needs to be added to an article to avoid speedy deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. The file in question is now deleted. The DR – it depends, but currently it was convenient to delete the DR as well, because it was not properly filed. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

See File:European Russia location map (2014–2022, Crimea disputed).svg. User:Ecrusized is edit warring against multiple editors despite the file name stating that this includes Crimea marked as disputed (this is also derived from the image without Crimea). Also edit warring on other files. Mellk (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not edit warring with anyone, except you, who is restoring Crimea (internationally recognized Ukrainian territory) on Russian maps. You also do not appear to be providing an edit summary for your reverts. Ecrusized (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You were reverted by NordNordWest, then proceeded to revert two more times despite being told that your reverts were problematic. There is no rule that all maps cannot include disputed territories. Even if there was such a rule, the better approach would be to request deletion, not mass reverting. I will also note that you restored an old version with outdated boundaries (e.g. Moscow). Mellk (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. I kept the file speedily, because it is widely used. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=959841129"