User talk:Krd/archive/2024
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Du hast die Datei BraunshardtAirfieldAerialPhoto.jpg gelöscht mit dem Hinweis, dass keine Lizenz angegeben wurde. Das ist so nicht richtig: Das unbearbeitete Luftbild stammt aus dem Geoportal Hessen, Hist. DOP 1952-67. Die dort veröffentlichtenn Daten sind Open Data, Lizenztext s. hier. Demnach gibt es hinsichtlich der Nutzung keine Einschränkungen. Für die Modifikationen hatte ich die Lizenz CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed mit meinem Klarnamen als Urheber angegeben. Falls formale Fehler vorliegen sollten, hatte ich hier um Überprüfung, d.h., Hilfestellung und um einen Verzicht auf voreilige Löschung gebeten. Stattdessen hast du die Datei einfach gelöscht, was ja viel bequemer ist, als sich mit einer Überrüfung meines Lizenztextes auseinanderzusetzen. Deine Pauschal-Hinweise auf : COM:L and: COM:VRT sind im Übrigen nicht hilfreich und bewirken nur eine Demotivierung von Usern, die sich einige Mühe Verbesserung von Beitrage gemacht, aber deiner Meinung nach offensichtlich die komplexen Vorgaben für Lizenztexte nicht verstanden haben. Exilsaarländer (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist jetzt wiederhergestellt. Krd 08:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
PeerBot user rights
I just noticed you removed bot user rights for my bot PeerBot. Could you please restore those user rights? I am still using the bot and still developing the search engine. Mitar (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think you haven't edited any project for at least a year. What exactly are you developing? If there si no strong reason, please try to implement this without apihighlimis. --Krd 10:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can see the project here (there is also a demo). Currently I am working on other features not directly related to Wikipedia search (like authentication) so I was not actively running the bot. Also because of this issue I am waiting for fixes to dumps before I rerun things again. But I would love it once I cycle back to this the bot would have user rights. Mitar (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please request when you cycle back to this the bot. Krd 06:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can see the project here (there is also a demo). Currently I am working on other features not directly related to Wikipedia search (like authentication) so I was not actively running the bot. Also because of this issue I am waiting for fixes to dumps before I rerun things again. But I would love it once I cycle back to this the bot would have user rights. Mitar (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
Jeff G. is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Please undelete
File:BSicon dBHF3.svg: Its license should be {{PD-shape}}, like 99.9% of all files named BSicon_*.svg
. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Krd 14:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Пряма дія logo.png
Hello! Could you please restore this file? I have permission to use it from its creator, but haven't had time to download it. NachtReisender (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- COM:VRT Krd 18:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
This deleted file was from a paper published (here) under CC-BY-4. Chhandama (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. --Krd 17:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
my request for bot
Hello Krd, for Commons:Bots/Requests/Gzen92Bot-5, I can rename categories but not files ("cantmovefile" / "You do not have permission to move files."). Thanks, Gzen92 (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please try now. --Krd 17:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The ticket was already added to the source image File:DD2023 (3411).jpg, can you restore it? – Gumruch (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 17:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete
Hello, I want to report this file where is a picture of me with my name, surname and place where I am from. The picture was posted by my friend for a joke on the page about my place. Since some admin from Serbia deleted all nonsense he wrote on the page when I reported, I thought that was all, but today I saw my picture. I asked the same admin to delete the picture as well, but he told me to contact you because this is on Commons.I would really appreciate it if you could delete it, thanks a lot. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aleksa_Micic_The_Frog_of_the_village_Doljevac.jpg#filehistory 93.87.220.11 23:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done. --Krd 15:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
FYI
There's a comment from the proposer here about a stale bot request: Commons talk:Bots/Requests/AMwikicommonsdeletebot. However you'd like to address it, can you zap the {{Edit request}} when you're done? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thx! --Krd 09:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Undelete
Could you please undelete File:Girl in Ethiopia.jpg, based on the information added after it was tagged? - 4ing (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 20:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
ZynceW
Hello sir, could you block temporarily this user ZynceW. He uploads File:Аслан Абакаров.jpg every time. Ricco Baroni (talk) 08:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- What does "all the time" exactly mean. Has that happened more than two times? --Krd 09:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Image was deleted! [1]
Hi krd. The author sent the permission mail to "permissions-zh-hans@wikimedia.org" on Dec. 29, 2023, and hasn't received any response to ask for further documents. We thought that we had been permitted. But why has the image been deleted? If it was the responsibility of the ZH permission department to deal so slowly that it took over a month, how can we request our image back? Hotbb.sis (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please stay patient until it is processed, or please consider to send the permission in English if able. Krd 14:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I didn’t see the description page of this file, but I think it’s in the public domain. According to the filename, it’s a self-portrait by Gyula Derkovits (Q904179) († 1934). Its copyright protection expired in Hungary in 1985 (50 years pma at the time) and while restored in 1999 (when 70 years pma protection was made retroactive), expired again in 2005. Unless it has never been published between 1921 and 1989, it has not been URAA-restored (it wasn’t protected on 1 January 1996), so it’s in the public domain in the US as well. (See details on the copyright law history of Hungary at Template:PD-HU-unknown/doc.) Unless you believe it’s an unpublished work according to US law, please restore it. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 09:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I converted this to a regular deletion request. Please comment there. Thx! --Krd 17:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Build RUWV logo.png
Hello! You deleted this file File:Build RUWV logo.png with comment: No permission since 20 January 2024.
This file was created by @User:Kylaix (he and I are administrators of Russian Wikiversity) and uploaded to Commons. This file is designed as a sort of logo or small image for Wikiversity courses.
The following assertion is true (from Commons:But it's my own work!):
- The file is my own work, and it has not been previously published on another website.
Please, could you explain - how User:Kylaix can approve that he is author of this file? -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- File restored. --Krd 16:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Schaust du ...
... bitte mal dort?! Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Erl., danke für den Hinweis. --Krd 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Bot request
Hi there. Would it be possible to have a bot implement Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#no_include_categories_for_DR by, say, once an hour putting noinclude tags around any categories in DRs? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I think it is, but please give me a week or so to sort that out. --Krd 05:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: Are there any test cases? Krd 04:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Here are a few. I'll add more as I nominate stuff for deletion:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heart 833472.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tposter.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Jackson (01).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blue men of the Minch.webp
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selon une étude de la Direction de l'animation de la recherche des études et des statistiques (Dares), en France en 2002, plus de la moitié des emplois féminins sont concentrés dans 10 familles professionnelles sur 84.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seminar on Text and Data Mining and Artificial Intelligence 01.jpg
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Test run looks good to me. Krd 13:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! I closed the discussion at village pump. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do in order for the bot to start running this task. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Will go live now. If there is anything, please let me know. --Krd 05:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! I closed the discussion at village pump. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do in order for the bot to start running this task. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Test run looks good to me. Krd 13:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Here are a few. I'll add more as I nominate stuff for deletion:
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: Are there any test cases? Krd 04:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Gelöschte Dateien
Hallo Krd, du hast gleichzeitig eine Reihe von Dateien gelöscht, als letzte diese [2]
- Ich war eigentlich der Meinung, wahrscheinlich irre ich mich (?), dass ich eine formgerechte Freigabe des Erben geschickt habe. Ehe ich den Herren noch einmal behellige, und es womöglich wieder schief geht, kannst du mehr feststellen als "No ticket permission since 30 December 2023"? Danke, schönes Wochenende. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Ich hab Dir gerade nochmal die letzte Mails dazu weitergeschickt. Darauf fehlt noch eine Antwort. Krd 12:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, does this VRT ticket (from File:Kenneth Koma (cropped).jpg) cover File:Kenneth Koma.jpg and File:Kenneth Koma and Festus Mogae.jpg? Joofjoof (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sadly it doesn't. Krd 05:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Steward elections
Hi Krd, the steward elections have started and there were comments about a low voter turnout in the questions to the candidates. I must say I also wasn't made aware other than because I had watchlisted the talk page of a steward who then received a question regarding the Steward elections there. Other events and elections are usually made visible pretty good like at the watchlist or with a banner that appears quite often not just once a day. But every time one opens the watchlist. I then requested advice in Meta, but was told its the projects work to make the elections known. In view of the low voter turnout, I suggest we make it a bit more visible. Like make it visible 5-10 times per cycle/day than only once a day, or have it announced like the sysop elections at the watchlist. Currently the announcements disappears really quick in my experience. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly is your request or suggestion? Krd 13:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I thought we could make the elections a bit more visible for the commons community and hoped you might know more about how to do that.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please put this to Commons:Village pump. Krd 09:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I thought we could make the elections a bit more visible for the commons community and hoped you might know more about how to do that.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
My images have been deleted!
Hello, About the some photos: Baloch_Chapi.png, Balochi-do_chapi.png, Irani_girl_playing_Ghaychak.jpg, لباس_مردانه_بلوچی.jpg, زن_بلوچ.jpg, لباس_مردانه_بلوچ.jpg, لباس-بلوچی_زنانه.png Could you give me reasons how they violate copyright? As the three are all our own works, they don't violate copyright at all. You don't give any reasons of deletion. Please restore the images that mentioned above. If you have any other inquiry about the copyright of the three photos, please let me know. Best Regards. Balash-Vologases (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for my mistake typing
- / As they are all our own works,/ Balash-Vologases (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Πέτρος Φιλιππίδης
Παρακαλώ 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petros_Philippidis.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Petros_Philippidis#/media/File:Petros_Philippidis,_Orpheas_Avgoustidis,_Giannis_Bezos_201702.jpg 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F 10:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Παρακαλώ 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petros_Philippidis.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petros_Philippidis,_Orpheas_Avgoustidis,_Giannis_Bezos_201702.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a reason. Krd 10:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή Πέτρος Φιλιππίδης 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F 10:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Γιατί? Krd 10:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Λάθος 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή File:Petros Philippidis.jpg - Wikimedia Commons File:Petros Philippidis, Orpheas Avgoustidis, Giannis Bezos 201702.jpg - Wikimedia Commons 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F 10:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a reason for deletion. Krd 10:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Λάθος 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή File:Petros Philippidis.jpg - Wikimedia Commons File:Petros Philippidis, Orpheas Avgoustidis, Giannis Bezos 201702.jpg - Wikimedia Commons 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F 10:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Γιατί? Krd 10:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- 2 φωτός Υποψηφιότητα για διαγραφή Πέτρος Φιλιππίδης 2A02:586:CC3E:FA74:47B:95ED:4612:900F 10:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Why the hell are you deleting my own works? You delete your profile
You keep deleting my own works. You should not be here. HK108 (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your continued contributions in cleaning up "no permission" media. 0x0a (talk) 05:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC) |
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you have any objection to me performing the user's request? If not, I'm more than happy to do it, but I wanted to check before I did that. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can do it if you can confirm by own investigation that the images are PD, without relying on the uploaders claims. Krd 11:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Krd,
ist das der richtige Weg, um zu überprüfen, ob das Ticket ausreichend alles für das Bild beschreibt?
Danke für Hilfe, Conny (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nein. Die Datei wird automatisch wiederhergestellt wenn das Ticket erfolgreich erledigt ist. Krd 18:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dankeschön. Conny (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Dieter Stanfel
Servus. Eben sehe ich File:Dieter_Stanfel_a.jpg entfernt, auf Commons von Krd gelöscht. Grund: No permission since 11 January 2024 Ich verstehe das Problem nicht. Warum wurde das Bild gelöscht? Dieter Zoubek (talk) 08:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weil der Hochlader die Genehmigung nicht dargelegt hat. --Krd 09:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
IP range block
Moin, kannst du als CU bitte mal prüfen, ob ein Rangeblock möglich ist? Der Vollidiot gibt nicht auf mit pausenlos neuen Accounts und Nonsense-DRs siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=block&user=Achim55 und Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/21. Mit Dank & Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Danke! Ich bin gerade beim Portieren von einem PC auf einen neuen und hab daher IRC noch nicht wieder ans Laufen gebracht. --Achim55 (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Madeline Juno
Könntest du mal schauen an was es hier hakt? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Es hakt quasi immer daran, dass die Einsender der Freigaben uns nicht antworten. Daran können wir nicht viel machen. Krd 12:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- OK, habt ihr bei den Juno-Bildern auch nochmal nachgefragt? Dann hake ich da nach. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotografin hat leider die Emails nicht mehr, dementsprechend auch keine Ticketnummer, hast du die Möglichkeit ihr die Email auch nochmal zukommen zu lassen, die bilder wurden nämlich auch gelöscht jetzt. Die Email ging am 4. Januar 2024 an sie, ansonsten erkenne ich auf dem Screenshot der mir vorliegt nur, welcher Kollege diese geschickt hat, allerdings wohl mit seinem richtigen Namen, den ich als Benutzer nicht finde. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wir können leider sinnvoll nach Datum suchen. Meistens ist es am einfachsten, wenn die Fotografin die Freigabe einfach nochmal sendet. Krd 09:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotografie hat nochmal die Verifizierungsemail weitergeleitet und auf die Rückfrage geantowrtet (Ticket#2024020610011259). Könntest du da mal nachschauen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Das Problem wäre erledigt. Bilder sind verifiziert. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotografie hat nochmal die Verifizierungsemail weitergeleitet und auf die Rückfrage geantowrtet (Ticket#2024020610011259). Könntest du da mal nachschauen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wir können leider sinnvoll nach Datum suchen. Meistens ist es am einfachsten, wenn die Fotografin die Freigabe einfach nochmal sendet. Krd 09:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotografin hat leider die Emails nicht mehr, dementsprechend auch keine Ticketnummer, hast du die Möglichkeit ihr die Email auch nochmal zukommen zu lassen, die bilder wurden nämlich auch gelöscht jetzt. Die Email ging am 4. Januar 2024 an sie, ansonsten erkenne ich auf dem Screenshot der mir vorliegt nur, welcher Kollege diese geschickt hat, allerdings wohl mit seinem richtigen Namen, den ich als Benutzer nicht finde. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, habt ihr bei den Juno-Bildern auch nochmal nachgefragt? Dann hake ich da nach. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Giving a permission to an account to allow it to upload content from their organisation
Hi Krd
I was to you were the person to come and talk to about this. I'm doing some work with some different UN agencies and we have been using VRT to send emails for each batch of files, however we want to scale up sharing content, possibly to 1000s of files. I really don't want to make all that work for VRT volunteers so I wanted to see if you could explain how to get an account approved for uploading content. My understanding is there is a process using an email to approve the account and then a template to add to each of the file, but I can't find this written down anywhere.... Could you explain how it works and help me set it up and then I can document it for others to use.
Thanks
John Cummings (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please draft a template like Template:Kujto.al permission and advise when done. Krd 09:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks very much Krd, you mean like this? User:John_Cummings/Template:FAO_permission. I made a few small adjustments to it, please do correct anything that isn't allowed. Can you tell me what the next steps are? John Cummings (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect. Now we need permission from FAO stating the same as the template, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Krd 12:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Krd is there a proforma or a template for this email? Is there a previous example that I could use? I want to understand what is the correct language for the email before I ask them to send it. Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- COM:CONSENT Krd 06:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Krd but how do I adapt it to something that will accepted for this other usage? Do you have access to any other previous permissions like this that have been given that I can just change the names on? Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't worry too much, just let them send anything and we will follow up with the right question if required. Krd 16:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Krd but how do I adapt it to something that will accepted for this other usage? Do you have access to any other previous permissions like this that have been given that I can just change the names on? Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- COM:CONSENT Krd 06:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Krd is there a proforma or a template for this email? Is there a previous example that I could use? I want to understand what is the correct language for the email before I ask them to send it. Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect. Now we need permission from FAO stating the same as the template, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Krd 12:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks very much Krd, you mean like this? User:John_Cummings/Template:FAO_permission. I made a few small adjustments to it, please do correct anything that isn't allowed. Can you tell me what the next steps are? John Cummings (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
OK thanks Krd, the reason I wanted to get the form agreed was so that I can build instructions for others to follow. But I'll write something up and get some feedback. John Cummings (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Krd, maybe something like this? and then the VRT volunteer would give then a temaplate to add to any of their uploads? I didn't want to include a specific license in the release because it would give flexibility to the account to chose different licenses for different kinds of content.
I hereby affirm that I choose one: [am name] or [represent copyright holder's name], nominate the Wikimedia account [account name] to release [my] [our] work under a Wikimedia compatible license and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. [Sender's name] [Sender's authority (if applicable. E.g. "Copyright holder", "Director", "Appointed representative of", etc.)] [Date]
and then the VRT volunteer could say something like
Thank you for nominating this account to upload content from your organisation. Please add the template {{Example VRT template}} to each of the uploads done with that account to show that they have permission to upload from your organisation. ''Here are further instructions for adding the template to the files. If you do not include the template the content may be nominated for deletion. please remember to only upload content under a Wikimedia Commons compatible license, a full list of licenses and their template are available here. If you have any questions please start a discussion on this page. Thanks again
What do you think? I'd really like to standardise the process so that it can be used more widely.
John Cummings (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't try to standardise the process. Copyright has many aspects, and aach situation is different. Krd 11:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Krd I'm just trying to build a process for other people to be able to do the same thing. This process isn't written down anywhere and I only found out about it through someone I know who hapened to have done it before. Does this example I've created look ok for what I'm trying to do for FAO? John Cummings (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- It looks good for this case. Krd 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Krd I'm just trying to build a process for other people to be able to do the same thing. This process isn't written down anywhere and I only found out about it through someone I know who hapened to have done it before. Does this example I've created look ok for what I'm trying to do for FAO? John Cummings (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Derkovits Gyula magyar festő képei
Kedves Krd!
Több Derkovits Gyula-képet töröltél. Így, bár szeretném, nem tudom beírni hozzájuk a megfelelő licencet.
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Licensing
Úgy gondoltam, hogy mivel a törölt képeknél nem áll módomban licencmódosítást végrehajtani, újra felteszem a Commonsra a már úgyis törölt képeket, de rám szóltak, hogy ezt ne tegyem.
Akkor te meg fogod csinálni a határidő előtt törölt képek esetén a licencmódosítást?
Amennyiben igen, köszönöm. Tegzes (talk) 12:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Which image are you talking about? --Krd 13:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
File:AlburyView.jpg
Are you certain that File:AlburyView.jpg never had a license? It was uploaded at least over 14 years ago via a bot from en.wiki. Bidgee (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have now converted to deletion request, so you can check yourself. Krd 11:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi again. Your input is requested at the subject section. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
You just processed ticket:2024021510000691 for this image, but you didn't change the license. I had the photographer use the release generator, so I know that the GFDL/cc-by-sa-3.0 declaration on the file should have been overridden by something else. Thanks. —holly {chat} 17:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thx. --Krd 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Krd. Could you tell me why this file does not have a "ticket permission"? A research assistant at the Lee_Teng-hui foundation has told me that he had sent a VRT permission to Wikimedia on behalf of the foundation, with the CEO's consent. Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- In nearly all cases the permission sender did not reply to our followup questions. Please encourage them to do so or to send the permission again. Krd 19:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your information. I will ask the sender to send it again. 0x0a (talk) 02:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Dieter Stanfel
Bitte um Info warum du das Bild von Dieter Stanfel gelöscht hast. Das Foto war von seinem Sohn aufgenommen worden. Ich erinnere mich im Moment nur nicht ob es der Sohn (User Der Waldschratt) oder ob ich es hochgeladen hatte. Ja, ich habe die Infos hinsichtlich Urheberrecht etc gelesen. Dieter Zoubek (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- COM:VRT. --Krd 19:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 19:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Böse Fuchs
Hallo Krd. Warum wurden alle mein Bilder von Böse Fuchs gelöscht??? Eine Email mit der Freigabe der Urherberin wurde am 27. Dezember 2023 am permissions-de@wikimedia.org weitergeleitet, sie hat auch eine Bestätigng über den Erhalt der Email bekommen ... stundenlange Arbeit umsonst zerstört, sehr unschön! Bitte um schnelle Klärung & Korrektur. Wäre auch schön wenn nicht dasselbe mit den Bildern hier passiert. Auch hier ging die Email zum Verifizieren bereits am 3. Januar 2024 raus, noch immer sind die Bilder nicht freigegeben. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo ChrisHardy. Die Einsenderin der Freigabe hat leider auf unsere Rückfrage nicht reagiert. Vielleicht kannst Du sie dazu bewegen, das noch zu tun? --Krd 12:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sie hat mir eigentlich auch alles weitergeleitet was von Wiki kam, um welche Art Rückfrage handelt es sich denn, dann werde ich mal nachhaken. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die Korrespondenz in den Tickets ist vertraulich und kann nicht hier öffentlich gemacht werden. Die Antwort-E-Mail liegt der Einsenderin ja vor. Krd 17:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe nochmal Bescheid gegeben, sollte eine Rückmeldung kommen. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die Korrespondenz in den Tickets ist vertraulich und kann nicht hier öffentlich gemacht werden. Die Antwort-E-Mail liegt der Einsenderin ja vor. Krd 17:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sie hat mir eigentlich auch alles weitergeleitet was von Wiki kam, um welche Art Rückfrage handelt es sich denn, dann werde ich mal nachhaken. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die Musikerin hat mir gerade was weitergeleitet, sie hat am 2. Januar 2024 geantwortet und bestätigt, dass sie die Rechte zur Veröffentlichung dieser Bilder hat. Könntest du da nochmal schauen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Welche Ticketnummer? Krd 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- ticket:2023122710006441. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die E-Mail vom 2. Januar haben wir am 3. Januar beantwortet. --Krd 12:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Laut der Musikerin kam nichts mehr, könnte man die Email ihr nochmal zustellen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sehr gern. --Krd 18:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Kurzes Upd, bin noch dran an der Sache. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Die Sängerin hat nun auf die Email reagiert, könntest du da mal nachschauen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wenn sie das getan hat, schauen wir uns das an sobald das Ticket wieder an der Reihe ist. Krd 11:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hat alles funktioniert. Vielen dank für deine Geduld & Mithilfe! Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 10:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wenn sie das getan hat, schauen wir uns das an sobald das Ticket wieder an der Reihe ist. Krd 11:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Die Sängerin hat nun auf die Email reagiert, könntest du da mal nachschauen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kurzes Upd, bin noch dran an der Sache. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sehr gern. --Krd 18:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Laut der Musikerin kam nichts mehr, könnte man die Email ihr nochmal zustellen? Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die E-Mail vom 2. Januar haben wir am 3. Januar beantwortet. --Krd 12:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- ticket:2023122710006441. Gruß. ChrisHardy (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Welche Ticketnummer? Krd 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Flickypedia Backfillr Bot - status check, please?
Hi! I was directed here to ask if you could please take a look at our Bot approval request. We believe we've addressed all of the community feedback now, and we're a bit unclear on how to actually get the Bot approved and active. Can you please help?
Here is the Bot Approval Request: Commons:Bots/Requests/FlickypediaBackfillrBot
Many thanks! Ukglo, flickr.org 🌸 (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 12:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Mark-admin
Just wondering why I'm seeing the "Mark-admin" tag "A" still with my previous username and not this one? ─ Aafī (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Because this is updated by a bot and it doesn't have to happen in realtime. No need to worry. Krd 06:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Weird Tales v01n01-02-title.png was deleted on January 9th because it lacked sufficient licensing. Going by that user's other upload it's just a matter of a confused uploader, and what it really needs is an update like this. It was published in the US in 1923 so there's no way it's still in copyright. If you can undelete I'm happy to fix the info and license templates. Xover (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please update the file page accordingly? Krd 06:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks! Xover (talk) 13:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
New permission to {{Rosavtodor.ru}}. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deletion requests
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ka%E1%B8%8Datuan_M%E1%B8%8Da%C5%8B_in_the_kawi_script.png This is the wrong writing of the Kawi script but I can't correct or write the script correctly because I took this script through a book which I took a photo of and then converted it into png form. I ask that this file be deleted because it can be misleading when used on an article page. Inayubhagya (talk) 03:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of Commons:File:Britcar Trophy Championship winners 2022.jpg
Did you not read this ? I obtained permission to use this photo by the photographer Peter Markwick who I contacted by Flickr and included the email from him about this, as suggested by the original 'mark for deletion' request. J R Spigot (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I would like to inform you that I have placed the ticket in the template. Please confirm further (the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs has not yet placed the license on its website). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please be patient. Ticket processing will take as long as it will take. Krd 16:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"Per nomination"
How can Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interfaz Ms Project Professional 2016.png be "per nomination" when my nomination was just an objection to a speedy deletion request that I stated I believed was incorrect? - Jmabel ! talk 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Of course you are right. I read that wrong. Now corrected. Thank you! Krd 22:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to know how this file did not have any ticket permission? I had been in contact with the uploader and sent them through VRT, where they said that they had to upload it. (I also uploaded a file that had the ticket pending, but it was also deleted). I mainly just want to know what happened to the evidence that they've supplied so that I can figure it out with the uploader.
Thanks. reppoptalk 05:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket sender has chosen not to continue the ticket conversation. Please encourage them to contact VRT again. Krd 10:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've contacted them with that info. reppoptalk 21:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to figure out what I did wrong with this deleted file. I uploaded this file on behalf of the copyright holder, and they sent a permission email in the proper format and last I checked it was received and logged for review. Justinkrivers (talk) 14:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- In nearly all such cases the permission sender did not respond to our followup questions. Please ask them to do so or to send the permission again. Krd 19:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, the following discussions are relevant : [3] and [4]. Cheers, — Racconish 💬 07:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket contains photo permission for several files (not yet completely checked), and is pending for the sender to provide DW information. --Krd 13:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Re: multiple notifications
Fixed, bot will only notify user if they left unsigned comments exactly 3 times everyday (currently it will notify user each time when the number of comments is larger than 3). I cannot understand the second diff, what happened here? Stang★ 04:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thx. I have no idea what happened, but it doesn't look good. Krd 04:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I can't add redirects can you help
hallo, As in general, if you change the name of the page it will redirect, many of the files I uploaded still use the old name. That's my basics, can you help me?
- REDIRECT User:Zulf
to User:Zulf Zulf (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot follow, please say again in different words. Krd 11:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- the easiest way, please make a redirect page because I have changed the name [5] Zulf (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think this has already been done. Krd 12:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- ouh ok,thanks for your time Zulf (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think this has already been done. Krd 12:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- the easiest way, please make a redirect page because I have changed the name [5] Zulf (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Löschung von File:Olga Vladimirovna Shvetsova 1.jpg durch dich
Hallo, Ich würde gerne wissen, warum du File:Olga Vladimirovna Shvetsova 1.jpg gelöscht hast. Ich habe COM:L and COM:VRT gelesen und nach meinem Verständnis wird keine gesonderte Erlaubnis benötigt. Das Bild wurde auf https://www.duma72.ru hochgeladen, der Website der en:Tyumen Oblast Duma. Dort heißt es "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии Creative Common Attribution 3.0". Das Bild ist also lizensiert unter Creative Common Attribution 3.0. Deshalb kann ich die Löschung nicht nachvollziehen und bitte um eine Erklärung. D3rT!m (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo, ich hab das Bild wiederhergestellt, bitte kommentiere gern in dem regulären Löschantrag. --Krd 03:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mache ich. Danke. --D3rT!m (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
noinclude-Tags in Löschanträgen
Hallo Krd,
bei den LAs Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ookage sculpture.jpg und Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ookage sculpture upclose.jpg scheint das Hinzufügen der noinclude-Tags um Kategorien durch den Bot nicht zu funktionieren. Vielleicht, weil die Kategorien mitten im Text stehen statt brav am Ende des LAs oder wenigstens auf einer eigenen Zeile? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ja, ganz genau. Ich ändere das. Krd 07:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete Image
@Krd Please delete image File:Keratuan Darah Putih dalam Aksara Lampung.png, because of an error in the script and I will update it Daeng Hanif (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file is in use, so it cannot be deleted. Please replace it first. Krd 14:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd please delete, because of an error in writing the Lampung script and I will update it, please delete the article to avoid angering Lampung people Daeng Hanif (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I have changed it and removed it from the article on Wikipedia, so please delete it Daeng Hanif (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- You said you will replace it, but instead you removed it. Please advise. (If you choose to continue the edit war at the file page, please expect to be blocked.) Krd 14:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Re-uploading deleted images
Fake license in two photos File:Asan_Adjiumerov.jpg File:Vinyetka_Asan_Adjiumerov.jpg, I set it to normal deletion, but then I saw that it had already been deleted. You deleted it, so you can speed it up. Details and reaction of the uploader on the discussion pages --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Deletion request is ok. --Krd 17:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of files with legitimate-sounding PD tags
Today you acted on a bunch of files tagged a week ago by User:188.170.87.219 as lacking evidence of permission. Several of those have various PD tags supported by links to sources) or have descriptions that similarly demonstrate PD. I undeleted one or two and flipped another few that had not yet been deleted into DRs before I saw the extent of the pattern here. Could you take a look at the others you deleted of Special:DeletedContributions/188.170.87.219 and see if some at worst need a formal DR to clarify? DMacks (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've DRed all of them just to be safe, but of course I don't object if they are speedy kept. Krd 07:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick triage! DMacks (talk) 08:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo
Please bring back , thanks. This is a long-time image. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Why was this deleted? The ticket was awaiting review. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ (обс.) 21:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd: ping. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ (обс.) 06:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- You see the deletion reason when you click on the red link. Krd 08:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I see perfectly, but the ticket was awaiting processing, there was a template about this. This is exactly what confuses me. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ (обс.) 05:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file will be restored as soon as the ticket is confirmed. Krd 06:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks! sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ (обс.) 21:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file will be restored as soon as the ticket is confirmed. Krd 06:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I see perfectly, but the ticket was awaiting processing, there was a template about this. This is exactly what confuses me. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ (обс.) 05:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- You see the deletion reason when you click on the red link. Krd 08:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Query
Hi, could you please confirm that the uploader of File:Dhananjaya Das Kathiababa.jpg is actually copyright holder of this image? (As file description says it was taken in 1980) They send proper permission, identification to VRT and not just a generic email saying "I am copyright holder"? If you see User talk:Bozz aldri, it's full of copyvio notices. I have suspicions that they might be not the actual copyright holder. The uploader might be sock of this LTA en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srabanta Deb. Thanks :) আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the ticket is valid per VRT standard, but please feel free to have it double checked by another VRT member.
- It was never said that the uploader is the copyright holder, but there is permission from the copyright holder.
- VRT members are no notaries, and it cannot be completely ruled out that people succeed with forged permissions. At least there is nothing more that can reasonably by done by the VRT. Krd 08:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Dateien der Benutzerin:Pipilotti Rist
Lieber Krd, darf ich fragen, warum Du alle Dateien, die vom Studio Rist hochgeladen wurden, mit einem „Genehmigung fehlt“ Template versehen hast? Ich habe die Benutzerin beim Upload unterstützt und auch dafür gesorgt, dass die Verifzierung des Kontos aus der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia auf das Commons-Konto übertragen wurde. Die Rechte an den Bildern und den Werken liegen bei Pipilotti Rist. Was genau ist Dein Ansinnen mit dem Template und wie lässt sich Abhilfe schaffen? Es ist absurd, dass nun jedes Bild einzeln genehmigt werden soll. Von wem denn eigentlich? Bitte erkläre mir den Vorgang, da ich zwar einen guten Einblick in das Commons-Handling, Lizenzfragen und zum deutschen Urheberrecht habe (weniger in das schweizerische allerdings), an diesem Punkt jedoch überfragt bin, warum der Upload durch die Künstlerin selbst von einem verifizierten Konto nicht ausreichend ist. Am besten wäre es, wenn sie alle Bilder gesammelt via Permissions dann nochmal freigeben könnte. Aber so oder so wird sehr vielen Leuten grade unnötige Arbeit gemacht und das ist ja etwas, wogegen wir alle eine Abneigung haben. Grizma (talk) 10:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Die Benutzerverifizierung ersetzt keine Bildfreigabe. Darauf wurde in dem Ticket explizit hingewiesen. Krd 10:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Warum? Sie hat das Kunstwerk und die Bilder erstellt, warum muss es nochmal freigegeben werden. Das ist nicht logisch. Was genau ist also der Vorgang: Pipilotti Rist schickt für alle Bilder nochmals eine Freigabe unter dieser Lizenz an Permissions? Der Vorgang ist aus meiner Sicht nicht verständlich. Grizma (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weil so sichergestellt wird, dass alle urheberrechtlichen Aspekte bedacht wurden und kein Missverständnis vorliegt. Zitat aus einer der Bildbeschreibungen: "Courtesy the artist, Hauser&Wirth and Luhring Augustine". Krd 11:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Welches Bild? Bitte Link mitschicken. Grizma (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alles klar, bei Pixelwald, habe es gefunden. Das kläre ich. File:Pixelwald_by_Pipilotti_Rist.jpg Grizma (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Welches Bild? Bitte Link mitschicken. Grizma (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weil so sichergestellt wird, dass alle urheberrechtlichen Aspekte bedacht wurden und kein Missverständnis vorliegt. Zitat aus einer der Bildbeschreibungen: "Courtesy the artist, Hauser&Wirth and Luhring Augustine". Krd 11:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Warum? Sie hat das Kunstwerk und die Bilder erstellt, warum muss es nochmal freigegeben werden. Das ist nicht logisch. Was genau ist also der Vorgang: Pipilotti Rist schickt für alle Bilder nochmals eine Freigabe unter dieser Lizenz an Permissions? Der Vorgang ist aus meiner Sicht nicht verständlich. Grizma (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, you have deleted this file after User:AntiCompositeBot tagged it for having no license. Eventually, the license tag was added by the uploader but without removing the tag. Could you please reconsider the deletion? I noticed this case through this discussion. Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done. (Please feel free to always undo my obvious mistakes without asking.) Krd 17:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Mongol Khagan pictures
Hello. Why have you deleted the pictures of Mongol Khagans? مریم شیرزادی (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Vinitha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— JJMC89 (T·C) 22:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Question
Hi Krd, I am curious as to why you deleted This file? When I had checked the file page (on March 21, if I remember right), the file page had a CC BY-SA 2.0 license and it had a reviewed-by FlickreviewR2 bot template. The source link is Here, and it has the CC-BY-SA-2.0 copyright license. It's very much the same as this image, copyright-wise. Thanks. Bammesk (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- You are right. The image is now restored. Krd 05:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This DR
Dear Krd,
The time may have arrived to deal with this single Deletion Request that grew to a major request. Most of the images have small metadata and I doubt any are own work...but you should decide on your own. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- There are 182 Commons admins, every of which should take care of DRs. Krd 13:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Undeletion
Please see this discussion and share your thoughts. Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_deleted_by_Krd -- Sreejith K (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Robert Burns skull
Hi, two images were deleted on 9 March 2024 relating to the front and back of a cast of Robert Burns skull because there had been "no image release email since 9 February 2024". However I have an email from the image holder on 26th January 2024 confirming they had used the release generator to send this very email. Can these two images be restored please. The image holder's name is and email is here: malcolm.maccallum@ed.ac.uk Stinglehammer (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:Cast of the skull of Scottish poet Robert Burns - front.jpg (Uploaded a work by Malcolm MacCallum, Anatomical Museum of Edinburgh. from Malcolm MacCallum, Anatomical Museum of Edinburgh. with UploadWizard)
- 12:59, 26 January 2024 Stinglehammer talk contribs uploaded File:Cast of the skull of Scottish poet Robert Burns 01.jpg
- Stinglehammer (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- What is the ticket number? Krd 05:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
VRTS regarding File:Emblem of Mikawa, Yamagata (Yellow variant).svg.
Hi, I'm User:OperationSakura6144. I wanna talk about File:Emblem of Mikawa, Yamagata (Yellow variant).svg. 4 days ago, Useer:Eien20 added a "No permission since" template on File:Emblem of Mikawa, Yamagata (Yellow variant).svg. I was in awe, but I answered questions in VRTS, and sent a declaration of consent to confirm copyright ownership by email. After then, your bot User:Krdbot added a VRTS notice regarding File:Emblem of Mikawa, Yamagata (Yellow variant).svg. What are the updates now? Please inform me about that. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- ticket:2024040310005231 is waiting for your reply. Krd 06:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Why do you delete ths image? :user:Igor2 upladed this under CC 4.0 in 2014. I mentioned this also before on my user talk--Elmepi (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted File:PIC18F2550 11104-01.jpg
Why do you delete ths image? Sparkfun released all of its images as CC BY 2.0 as shown in the source for the image (https://www.sparkfun.com/products/retired/11104). I mentioned this also befor on my user talk--Elmepi (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted File:PIC18F2550 11104-03.jpg
Why do you delete ths image? Sparkfun released all of its images as CC BY 2.0 as shown in the source for the image (https://www.sparkfun.com/products/retired/11104). I mentioned this also befor on my user talk--Elmepi (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Why do you delete ths image? Sparkfun released all of its images as CC BY 2.0 „All our images are under a Creative Commons license, which means you are welcome to use any of our photos as long as SparkFun is given credit when you do. “ (https://www.sparkfun.com/brand_assets). I mentioned this also befor on my user talk--Elmepi (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Elmepi (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
deleted a file that I have submitted rights for https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soubor:MAGDALENA_CUBROVA_MALBA.jpg
hello you have deleted a file that I have submmitted the form for. you have deleted it on the day as I have submitted it through the email. I am in contact with the artist and first we were talking about her submitting the rights for the first version of the file, but than we decided to use a photo made in her atelier by myself, therefore I can fill the form of the rights. please let me know what is my next move now, as the form is submitted per instructions from wikipedia, but you deleted the file now. let me know what should I do next, thank you. AnnaMarieDvorakova (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide the ticket number. Krd 11:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Maria Perpétua
Moin Krd, ich kann ja nicht sehen, was das ticket:2024041010011792 enthält, aber da gibt es eine Unstimmingkeit. Du hast File:Retrato de Maria Perpétua 1815.png als copyvio gelöscht. Entweder das ist ein Gemälde/Zeichnung vom Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts, dann ist es keine copyvio, oder es ist aus neuerer Zeit, dann wären File:Retrato de Maria Perpétua.png und File:Retrato em miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg ebenfalls zu löschen, weil sie genau dasselbe Kunstwerk darstellen. Im Übrigen sind die Uploads von einem socking SPA, zwei oder drei Accounts hab ich schon gesperrt. Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 18:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- …oder das Bild könnte eine Weiterbearbeitung des gemeinfreien Werks sein, die Schöpfungshöhe haben könnte und daher selbst geschützt ist, und nur für dieses Bild kommt COM:PCP zum tragen. Krd 18:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Jex Blackmore Ticket#2024040510007235
Hi. Sorry to bother you. I just wanted to check on the Jex Blackmore images that I submitted in case the emails are unclear, but also because a DYK for the Jex Blackmore article has been approved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Jex_Blackmore Decent chance that DYK will use the first image.
Thanks for your time and your consideration. ProfGray (talk) 13:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please ask the email sender to reply to followup questions. Krd 14:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
was sind denn das für Methoden?
Betrifft das Gaffalogo. Wo kann man hier in Widerspruch gehen? Weder hast du auf den Widerspruch auf der Dateiseite reagiert noch auf die Pings auf meiner Disk. Die Datei war ordnungsgemäß als pd-textlogo ohne ausreichende Schöpfungshöhe markiert. Warum dann kein 4 Augenprinzip wenn es Widerspruch gibt? --ɱ 07:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gaffa.png. --Krd 07:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Danke --ɱ 15:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Reinschauen
Hallo Krd, ich bekommen keine Bestätigung fürs Anpingen - könntest Du hier mal reinschauen? Danke --Superbass (talk) 18:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Batman cosplay - Masked Mateo - Photo Jonin.jpg
Hello,
These 2 files [6] [7] were deleted on August 21, 2022. The reason given is as follows: "No ticket permission achieved for more than 30 days".
However, the author of the photograph had assured me that he had sent the requested authorization (between January 4 and 6, 2022) and had received the Ticket#: ticket:2022010410003811.
Would you be so kind as to verify this and, if necessary, restore the file? Many thanks in advance!
Best regards. Guise (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Permission sender did not react to followup questions. --Krd 11:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Sag zählt die Lizenzangabe der Akademie der wissenschaft in Wien nicht, dass diese Datei gelöscht werden soll? ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Natürlich zählt das. Danke für den Hinweis. --Krd 10:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted and pending files
Hi Krd, sorry to bother you,
I imported about 70 photos from the same photographer on 27 March and 3 April, and I'm afraid their validity will expire. The photographer told me that he had sent the declaration of consent.
I went ahead and sent a message to say that the photographer was going to send a message to confirm. He told me it had been done. I've also posted on the Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard to offer my help : Ticket Numbers 2024032710000087 and 2024040310000227
Today I see that several files have been deleted and others are waiting to be validated. I think I've followed the rules diligently and so has the photographer, but there could still be a communication problem.
How can we fix this, please? I've spent a lot of time setting up this partnership.
Best regards. Alacoolwiki (talk) 14:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't post the same this at different places at the same time, unless your intention is to cxause double work. --Krd 14:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Invalid ticket for EDMA?
Hi,
On File:EDMA - La psychanalyse, Le Livre de Poche, 1975.djvu, there is a OTRS ticket since 2010. What suddenly changed that made you delete it yesterday? (I know there was an other ticket for some of the pictures, but AFAIK it has been dealt with on Commons:Deletion requests/File:EDMA - La psychanalyse, Le Livre de Poche, 1975 (page 30 crop).jpg). Ping @Schutz: who dealt with this back then.
PS: I wont restore the book itself for now and until I know more, but I already restored some of the images (like File:EDMA - La psychanalyse, Le Livre de Poche, 1975 (page 14 crop).jpg) which are clearly in the public domain.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's the same issue, the book cannot be free because components of the book are copyrighted and the publisher doesn't have copyright for them. Krd 15:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, but did you see that the copyrighted part was removed from the book? The new blanked version (uploaded on March 25 by Cunegonde1) is (AFAIK) free. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, then it's perhaps my fault. I restored it. Thank you for the notice! --Krd 15:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks and no problem, indeed it's a weird and borderline case. I'll check again each and every image to be sure we didn't miss anything. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, we did some checks and most images are indeed in public domain, there is only 3 uncertain ones that I didn't restored yet (and if we don't find clear origin, I'll ask to remove them from the scan). It was a bit brutal but at least - silver lining - it pushed us to check and improve the files. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking care of this! Krd 06:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, then it's perhaps my fault. I restored it. Thank you for the notice! --Krd 15:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, but did you see that the copyrighted part was removed from the book? The new blanked version (uploaded on March 25 by Cunegonde1) is (AFAIK) free. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, der Hochlader dieses gelöschten Fotos hat mich um Hilfe gebeten: de:Benutzer Diskussion:Ernst A. Chemnitz. Nachdem ich ihm die Lizenzfragen auseinandergesetzt hatte, hat er ein wenig recherchiert, wie man dort nachlesen kann. Urheber des Fotos ist der Dessauer Fotograf Carl Sasse, Lebensdaten: * 22. August 1878 Dessau, gest. 19. April 1945, Dessau. Ist verifiziert durch den Dessauer Stadtarchivar und das Sterbearchiv der Stadt. Demzufolge sollte das Bild gemeinfrei sein. Kannst Du es wiederherstellen und die Angaben zum Urheber und zur Lizenz korrigieren? Das wäre sehr nett. Mautpreller (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Erl. --Krd 05:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: -Krd 05:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Restore files
Could you, please restore those files. I don't understand why you've deleted them. Which license do you need for 1) my own fotos ; 2) for screenshots of wikipedia.
Alex Blokha (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd? Any other information you need to know? Alex Blokha (talk) 20:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- All information is on your talk page. What is your exact question? Krd 04:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please restore next emages, I will crop them , so images wich need licensing will be not in image.
- Alex Blokha (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 05:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- All information is on your talk page. What is your exact question? Krd 04:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Please delete
Hello, can you please delete this file? It has been tagged as "no permission" for over a week. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, because there is a deletion discussion open. Krd 06:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's been 18 days and zero people have participated in the discussion. Plus, the file is very blatantly a copyright infringement. Can't you just treat the discussion as an expired subst:npd? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- There are around 4800 open deletion requests currently, and I think to 80% of them applies what you said. I don't see any reason to skip the natural order and prefer this deletion over the rest. Krd 17:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- So basically, any file that gets nominated for deletion essentially has a free pass to stay on Commons for at least a month, no matter how blatant of a copyright infringement it is. If I put a subst:npd on this file when it was uploaded, it would be gone by now. But because someone happened to nominate it for deletion first, this blatantly copyrighted image gets immunity from deletion and will stay on Commons for over a month. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- There are around 4800 open deletion requests currently, and I think to 80% of them applies what you said. I don't see any reason to skip the natural order and prefer this deletion over the rest. Krd 17:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's been 18 days and zero people have participated in the discussion. Plus, the file is very blatantly a copyright infringement. Can't you just treat the discussion as an expired subst:npd? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
About revert
Please, could you explain it thanks Wilfredor (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket doesn’t apply to the file, does it? Krd 12:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Same author, same situation. All the author's photos apply to that ticket, I simply scan the photos as I have time, it is not necessary to open another OTRS for each photo I upload. Let me know what do you think. Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. The ticket gives permission only for the files mentioned in the ticket. Krd 20:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- The letter attached to the ticket gives permission for all photos by this author. Anything else is mere bureaucracy. Feel free to nominate these photos for deletion so don't just remove the ticket template Wilfredor (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. The ticket gives permission only for the files mentioned in the ticket. Krd 20:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Same author, same situation. All the author's photos apply to that ticket, I simply scan the photos as I have time, it is not necessary to open another OTRS for each photo I upload. Let me know what do you think. Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Regarding File:Neil Doljanchi 2024 622.jpg
"No ticket permission" - can you clarify? Was there no email or was the permission not formatted properly? I asked the photographer (studio) for permission, they verbally agreed and told me they'll send the email with permission for those and other images I uploaded ([8]). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Most likely no e-mail was received. Please ask them again to send it. Krd 05:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I will. IIRC the email that they were going to send was listing "all files in the category", which is now deleted (Category:Neil Konieczny-Moon). If they give permission for the empty category :P will the files be undeleted? Now they cannot see the files if they haven't before. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Things will get sorted if they contact VRT in any reasonable way. Krd 11:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I heard back from the photographer and I am confused. They fwd'd an email to me that they claim they sent to VRT. Everything seems correct. The email was sent on 27th Feb, it lists the category, free licence, etc. They used the email template from Commons:Email templates in Korean. I can fwd'd you the email or paste it here. Can you tell me what's the problem? From where I stand it looks like the email follows our best practices but VRT ignored the email? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- What would you guess how many users does the VRT have who can read Korean? --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, machine translation is pretty functional these days... anyway, shortage of VRT voluneers is an issue that WMF needs to solve with some funding, but in the meantime, I'd appreciate information on what I can do to get the images undeleted. Right now I am reminded of the meme "take my money". As in, "take my permission". I have it, I can wave it, but who can bother to check it? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 11:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide the ticket number? Krd 12:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd Sadly, no. If it was on the image files, well, I cannot view them as I am not an admin. The photographer did not tell me whether they received any reply - I (well, my wife, I don't speak Korean) talked to them and she did not ask nor did they mention it; but they seemed surprised the photos got deleted because they sent the proper email to VRT (that I now have and as I said I can report or fwd it). It is pretty standard (I advised them on how to write it), links to the category, is signed, and is basically the form we ask people to use, with no changes I see except to fill in the required fields. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please ask them to provide the ticket number, or to send the permission again. Krd 04:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will. Is a ticket number issued automatically, and by email? Is it possible for their original email to have been ignored, and can this happen to their new email? I find the lack of transparency in the VRT system troubling. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- When you asked them to send the permission, ask them set set you into CC. So you know if and what they sent and you are in the loop with the conversation. Krd 10:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's the plan. Their previous email that was fwd't to me seems to have all the right headers, so I do not understand what was the problem and how to avoid it again. Even if I am cc-ed on it, I may not be cc-ed on reply from VRT, if any is given. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- When you asked them to send the permission, ask them set set you into CC. So you know if and what they sent and you are in the loop with the conversation. Krd 10:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will. Is a ticket number issued automatically, and by email? Is it possible for their original email to have been ignored, and can this happen to their new email? I find the lack of transparency in the VRT system troubling. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please ask them to provide the ticket number, or to send the permission again. Krd 04:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd Sadly, no. If it was on the image files, well, I cannot view them as I am not an admin. The photographer did not tell me whether they received any reply - I (well, my wife, I don't speak Korean) talked to them and she did not ask nor did they mention it; but they seemed surprised the photos got deleted because they sent the proper email to VRT (that I now have and as I said I can report or fwd it). It is pretty standard (I advised them on how to write it), links to the category, is signed, and is basically the form we ask people to use, with no changes I see except to fill in the required fields. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide the ticket number? Krd 12:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, machine translation is pretty functional these days... anyway, shortage of VRT voluneers is an issue that WMF needs to solve with some funding, but in the meantime, I'd appreciate information on what I can do to get the images undeleted. Right now I am reminded of the meme "take my money". As in, "take my permission". I have it, I can wave it, but who can bother to check it? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 11:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- What would you guess how many users does the VRT have who can read Korean? --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I heard back from the photographer and I am confused. They fwd'd an email to me that they claim they sent to VRT. Everything seems correct. The email was sent on 27th Feb, it lists the category, free licence, etc. They used the email template from Commons:Email templates in Korean. I can fwd'd you the email or paste it here. Can you tell me what's the problem? From where I stand it looks like the email follows our best practices but VRT ignored the email? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Things will get sorted if they contact VRT in any reasonable way. Krd 11:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I will. IIRC the email that they were going to send was listing "all files in the category", which is now deleted (Category:Neil Konieczny-Moon). If they give permission for the empty category :P will the files be undeleted? Now they cannot see the files if they haven't before. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:4th Earl of Bantry.png (No license since 8 March 2024)
- 07:28, 16 March 2024 Krd talk contribs deleted page File:4th Earl of Bantry.png (No license since 8 March 2024) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
I'm not the uploader, but I think the image was probably in the public domain since the subject died on 30 November 1891 and the image would have been created before his death. LeapTorchGear (talk) 20:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a crop of File:Portrait of the 4th Earl of Bantry.png, so perhaps no need to restore it. Krd 08:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, I'm hoping you can help shepherd the VRT ticket (ticket:2024042110003057) for this file you just deleted. VRT's two responses so far seem to be misunderstanding the copyright holder's statements – she is a co-owner releasing on behalf of the company – and I don't want to bother her too much more with this. Thanks in advance. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It appears you are right. Done. --Krd 06:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
October 7 Nova festival video
Hi, I'm writing to you since you've explained the copyright status of the bodycam footage here. Now another deletion request for the same video has been opened, maybe you could leave a note there? Alaexis (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 10:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Sammelticket hinzufügen
Hallo Krd, könntest du eventuell der Datei File:Japan Kyoto, Aoi-matsuri 01.jpg, gemäß der Erläuterung des Hochladers auf User_talk:Mr.Nostalgic#File:Japan_Kyoto,_Aoi-matsuri_01.jpg, das Sammelticket ticket:2022062210006392 hinzufügen? --Túrelio (talk) 07:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Erledigt. --Krd 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Nachtrag zu [Ticket#2024052310008967]
Guten Abend Krd, ist es möglich, File:Entscheidungsbaum geg 2024 02.pdf über [Ticket#2024052310008967] abzuhandeln oder muss ich ein neues Ticket eröffnen? Molgreen (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Ist jetzt erledigt. --Krd 17:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Moin Krd, schön, dass dein Bot die Liste generiert, danke! Vielleicht könnte er sich auch noch - wenn es nicht zu aufwendig ist - die in Category:Non-media deletion requests gelisteten Kategorien ansehen. Ich hab da heute etliche unvollständige DRs abgearbeitet, deren ältester von September letzten Jahres war. Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 21:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ich schau es mir mal an, aber nicht kurzfristig. Krd 05:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Ich hab in der Liste jetzt die Beschrönkung auf Dateien rausgenommen. Passt das so? --Krd 10:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sieht prima aus, danke. Der letzte Eintrag scheint ein false positive zu sein. --Achim55 (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das wird sich noch finden. --Krd 11:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sieht prima aus, danke. Der letzte Eintrag scheint ein false positive zu sein. --Achim55 (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Achim55: Ich hab in der Liste jetzt die Beschrönkung auf Dateien rausgenommen. Passt das so? --Krd 10:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Mann in Pink
Hallo KRD, der Mann im pinken Anzug, den du bei der Grimmeverleihung fotografiert hast, könnte de:Wolf Danny Homann sein? [9] [10] Der spielte bei de:Haus Kummerveldt mit und ließ sich mit der Trophäe fotografieren, auch zusammen mit dem Team der Serie [11]. Das wirklich pikante daran wäre allerdings nicht sein Anzug, sondern dass er gar nicht zu den namentlich genannten Preisträgern zählt [12]. Seine Trophäenfotos transportieren damit Fake News. Gruß, Sitacuisses (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Es kann gut sein. Dass die Person kein Preisträger ist, ist für mich plausibel. Hast Du eine Idee, wer das ist? Krd 04:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nein. Gemäß Youtube-Video gehört er ebenfalls zu den Haus-Kummerveldt-Leuten, hielt sich jedoch die meiste Zeit im Hintergrund. Die Produktion kommt ja eher aus der Provinz, als FH-Abschlussarbeit in Verbindung mit Youtubern und regionalen Filmclubs, insofern muss es nicht wundern, wenn auch wenig bekannte Personen dabei sind. Die Serie selbst habe ich nicht gesehen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Which license?
What license do you need for these files?
The first two are screenshots of wikipedia search. As I remember "WikiConf.UA.Bochka" was uploaded with standard cc 4.0 license. Alex Blokha (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Looks like you missed one file here - possibly a script issue, since the filename contains an ampersand. Omphalographer (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sadly that happens all the time. Thx. Krd 19:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
"No license"
File:Wikipe-tan mouttest06.png had a license -- it was right there in the description. Can you undelete it? I would be happy to write the license again multiple times thoughhout the file page if taht helps. JPxG (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done, please provide permission as the source does not exist. Krd 12:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Images from the EDMA
Hi,
Just to let you know that I re-restored the images in the public domain coming from the EDMA book that you re-deleted (see also User_talk:Krd/archive/2024#Invalid_ticket_for_EDMA?). I also removed the permission template which is not really needed it these cases.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. --Krd 06:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Photo of István Lajkó
Dear Krdǃ May I ask why you deleted István Lajkó's photo instead of reading the permission for the entire http://www.lajkoistvan.hu/hu/multimedia/galeria sent by uploading the photo? After a few hours, the template appeared on the image, indicating that the author's consent has been received. I do not consider it acceptable that a licensed uploaded image was deleted only because no one was able to check the permisson and approve it for 30 days. Thank youː Tösö8 (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I do not consider it acceptable that you don't provide a link to the file in question. Krd 11:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Krd! Just after uploading the photo, I immediately sent this statement of the photographer. He has consented to the use of all images in this gallery. If you missed the link to the specific photo, wouldn't it have been easier to ask me to add it? But here it is, please: http://www.lajkoistvan.hu/images/galleries/default/PH1_1166.jpg Would you please restore the photo on the commons? Or what should I do? Thank You: Tösö8 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is the link to the deleted file at Commons? Krd 16:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is, please: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PH1_1166_Lajko.jpg Thank You. Tösö8 (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The permission in in Hungarian language and not processed yet. Image will be restored as soon as it has been processed. Krd 16:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You. Tösö8 (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The permission in in Hungarian language and not processed yet. Image will be restored as soon as it has been processed. Krd 16:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is, please: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PH1_1166_Lajko.jpg Thank You. Tösö8 (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is the link to the deleted file at Commons? Krd 16:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Krd! Just after uploading the photo, I immediately sent this statement of the photographer. He has consented to the use of all images in this gallery. If you missed the link to the specific photo, wouldn't it have been easier to ask me to add it? But here it is, please: http://www.lajkoistvan.hu/images/galleries/default/PH1_1166.jpg Would you please restore the photo on the commons? Or what should I do? Thank You: Tösö8 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
As you deleted the file, may you could close the DR. Regards. Ganímedes (talk) 20:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 06:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Palestinian FoP
Hello. Kindly restore the four remaining files at [13]. I had just rechecked the FoP status of Palestine and found it was OK based on the 1911 copyright law (COM:FOP State of Palestine). Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Since the entry got archived, I'll post the four:
- JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 06:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, You have deleted this file I uploaded a few weeks ago, but for another one which is exactly in the same case (photographer unknown, source indicates that we are free to use the file), someone else suggests to keep it. I'm a newbie and don't known exactly how the delection process works. And I don(t feel at ease with writing in english. Regards. Diabolicum (talk) 06:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly is your request? --Krd 08:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to know why you deleted this file (what means "per nomination" ?) and what happens if, for two similar cases, one pic is deleted and the other one kept ? Diabolicum (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- It was requested that the file is deleted because "No indication at source the photo is copyright free." This was done accordingly. The deletion request for the other mentioned file is not yet decided. --Krd 08:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but I didn't answer to all deletion requests made simultaneously. Diabolicum (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- So, all files in the same situation were kept . Diabolicum (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have reopened the deletion discussion for this file. Please comment there. --Krd 06:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks ! Diabolicum (talk) 07:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have reopened the deletion discussion for this file. Please comment there. --Krd 06:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- So, all files in the same situation were kept . Diabolicum (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but I didn't answer to all deletion requests made simultaneously. Diabolicum (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- It was requested that the file is deleted because "No indication at source the photo is copyright free." This was done accordingly. The deletion request for the other mentioned file is not yet decided. --Krd 08:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to know why you deleted this file (what means "per nomination" ?) and what happens if, for two similar cases, one pic is deleted and the other one kept ? Diabolicum (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, I saw that you had deleted File:Maaike de Groot.jpg for the reason: No ticket permission since May 4, 2024. However, it did have a ticket with permission. I know User:Chescargot had added it. I don't know exactly what number this ticket is under, but I am 100% sure the ticket exists. Could you undo the deletion? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 10:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The file did not contain a ticket with permission, and the relevant ticket is still open. Krd 10:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's strange. I thought User:Chescargot told me it was taken care of. I think something went wrong then. I will send him a message! S. Perquin (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket should be Ticket:2024050410004443 according to the file page, Ellywa said here. S. Perquin (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to correct: The ticket is closed, but without answer. Nevertheless the file did not contain the permission, so this is perhaps incompletely processed. Krd 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- It is not clear to me what has gone wrong, but I re-uploaded the file under Ticket:2024050510002443 Chescargot (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to correct: The ticket is closed, but without answer. Nevertheless the file did not contain the permission, so this is perhaps incompletely processed. Krd 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket should be Ticket:2024050410004443 according to the file page, Ellywa said here. S. Perquin (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's strange. I thought User:Chescargot told me it was taken care of. I think something went wrong then. I will send him a message! S. Perquin (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Я прочитал COM:L и COM:VRT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levikoan (talk • contribs) 08:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Добрый вечер. Вы удалили фото с памятника гроба, котоый был поставлен на еврейском кладбище Варшавы в 1936 году, почти 90 лет назад и в настоящее время разрушен. https://cemetery.jewish.org.pl/id_118667/info/back_1:0/__Fischman.html Гроб был стандартным и такие памятники тогда ставили. Фото памятника сделано мальчиком ARAК, когда ему было 12 лет. Его согласие на использовании фотографии было представлено. Просьба востановитьь фото. С уважением Levikoan
I've read COM:L and COM:VRT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levikoan (talk • contribs) 08:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Good evening. You have removed the photo from the coffin monument, which was placed in the Jewish cemetery in Warsaw in 1936, almost 90 years ago and is now destroyed. https://cemetery.jewish.org.pl/id_118667/info/back_1:0/__Fischman.html The coffin was standard and such monuments were erected then. The photo of the monument was taken by the boy ARAK when he was 12 years old. His consent to the use of the photograph was provided. Please restore the photo. Sincerely Levikoan (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide permission per COM:VRT. --Krd 22:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Pictures are YouTube video screenshots, belong to free content, please restore this delete. Dkzjmg (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why is this free content? --Krd 08:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, it's free to use, and it's also marked with the source and copyright, what's the main reason for the deletion? Dkzjmg (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly do you conclude from that it is free to use? Krd 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your processing, I re-query the relevant specifications, the original uploaded pictures do not conform to the rules, I will come back again. Retired (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly do you conclude from that it is free to use? Krd 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, it's free to use, and it's also marked with the source and copyright, what's the main reason for the deletion? Dkzjmg (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The file was deleted, because the author (Hajdu, Kitti) did not sent her permission since 3 May. I think that the re-uploaded file by @Idihnab2024: has the same issue, so it would be necessary to discuss the problem whether the permission was not sent, or sent just not attached to the file. (https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vita:T%C3%B3th_Tibor_(szoci%C3%A1lpolitikus)&diff=prev&oldid=27101802). JSoos (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The permission ticket is still waiting to be processed. Krd 10:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The e-mail was sent from hajdu.kitti@nszi.gov.hu to permissions-hu@wikimedia.org for file: (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr-Toth-Tibor-NSZI-foigazgato-PPKE-2024.jpg). I hope, this is sufficient to be accepted. Idihnab2024 (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Files by Pranayraj (Wikimedian in Residence)
Hello, Pranay is working as a Wikimedian in Residence for the Government of Telangana, India. He had submitted a VRTS request, for which he received 2 mails confirming the process. You can find the mails here. But unfortunately, the files uploaded were deleted. Please go through and help us in restoring them. iMahesh (talk) 00:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- What is the ticket number? Krd 04:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's 202403281000. iMahesh (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- That is not a valid ticket number. Krd 07:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, ticket number is ticket:2024032810007211 and this is the our Template:DLC-Telangana.-- Pranayraj (Wikimedian in Residence) (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The files have been deleted before the ticket was approved. --Krd 08:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the files are now restored. Krd 08:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The files have been deleted before the ticket was approved. --Krd 08:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, ticket number is ticket:2024032810007211 and this is the our Template:DLC-Telangana.-- Pranayraj (Wikimedian in Residence) (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- That is not a valid ticket number. Krd 07:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's 202403281000. iMahesh (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Fotos in Category:Hermine Hackl
Hallo Krd, kannst du mir bitte die beiden Fotos löschen. ich habe das mit der Userin telefonisch geklärt, sie bekommt da keine Freigabe der Fotografin, da kein Kontakt mehr besteht. danke --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 14:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 15:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
this file was deleted even though the author contacted VRT on my behalf (original uploader). on the deletion log is says that there was no ticket permission despite the creator have done that. Juwan (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide the ticket number the permission sender got. Krd 04:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Dimash's Stranger concert in Almaty 2022.jpg
Dear @Krd! On 30 May You putted a template to this photo. I don't understand why, because there was written "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). On same day I supplemented the Source line with "Own work", and I asked You at my account. It seems You didn't read it, that's why I repeat here my question:
"Dear @Krd! This photo made I myself at the concert in Almaty. There is written: "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). What's the problem with it? Whose and what consent should I get? What kind of website should I link to? Thank You,"
And may I ask, how long will it take to process of permisson of István Lajkó's photo - over 30 days?
I wait your answers. Thank You
Tösö8 (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is that the photo depicts the stage scene and requires permission from the copyright holder of that. Krd 18:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- You say it not seriously, are you? Tösö8 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- They're only 3 led-walls and a snapshot from the concert. Tösö8 (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- You say it not seriously, are you? Tösö8 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Last year, the file was deleted after someone removed the licensing templates from the file description; you restored it after I raised the issue. This seems to have happened again. Now, the image probably has to be considered URAA restored, so I'm not going to ask that it be restored, but could you check to see if the licence tags were removed in bad faith, and if so, whether the remover also committed such vandalism to other file pages which may have also been deleted as a result? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
PS Could you also check the contributions of the person who removed the tags the first time, as I remember that it also led to several other files being deleted out of process. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image is now restored again. I agree that the taggings of this user are controversial, but it appears to be impossible to check all of them. In any case more care has to be taken with deletion of files tagged by them. Krd 22:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
CU statistics
Hi Krd. While I appreciate that I'm not forgotten (;-)) I would like to ask you to remove me from these stats as I'm not a CU anymore since March. Trijnsteltalk 13:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. (Please consider to come back!) Krd 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
It's been a while, but I don't see why it was deleted? Is it because I didn't choose the Licensing Properly? My friend who made literally gave me permission to upload it. To be fair, at the time it was my first time uploading something to commons. Can you please restore it? Ironzombie39 (talk) 16:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikiversity logos
Hello, Krd. I have a word for you about File:Medical Fac ruWV main.png. There are the same discussions at the
This file was created by User:Kylaix (administrator of Russian Wikiversity) specifically for Wikiversity. This file is designed for Wikiversity courses and it is not used outside of Wikiversity. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
P.S. Please, restore also files:
- File:Math RUWV logo.png (see history of deleting and restoring of this file);
- File:Med RUWV logo.png (see history);
- File:Journal RUWV logo.png. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 16:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 04:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Can you please restore this file and File:Alice Munro 2006 (cropped).jpg? There was explicit permission for the image in the source link. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think it hasn't. What is the source of the image, and why is it free? Krd 06:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image is sourced from vimeo.com/220684517, which states it is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see this license at the source. Can you be more specific where it is said to be under that license? Krd 07:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Try clicking "More" directly beneath the title. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's nearly perfectly hidden. Done. --Krd 05:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Try clicking "More" directly beneath the title. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see this license at the source. Can you be more specific where it is said to be under that license? Krd 07:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image is sourced from vimeo.com/220684517, which states it is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Karten wirklich ohne Lizenzinformation?
Hallo, gestern wurde eine Vielzahl von Karten (größtenteils Gemarkungsgrenzen und Einzugsgebiete unterfränkischer Gemeinden) entfernt, was einen großen Informationsverlust darstellt. Als Grund angegeben ist "No license since 25 March 2024", was für mich jedoch nicht nachvollziehbar ist, da in der Google-Suche nach den Karten noch Lizenzinformationen zu finden sind. Ich könnte mir lediglich vorstellen, dass die Lizenzinformationen durch Vandalismus entfernt wurden. Ich bitte um Prüfung und ggf. Wiederherstellung.
Es handelt sich – sofern ich alle gefunden habe – um folgende Dateien (sorry für die lange Liste):
- File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Adelsberg 300.png
- File:Altbessingen 500.png
- File:Altenbuch.png
- File:Altfeld 500.png
- File:Altfeld1.png
- File:Altlandkreis mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Ansbach 300.png
- File:Ansbach5.png
- File:Arnstein 500.png
- File:Arnstein mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Aschenroth 300.png
- File:Aschfeld 500.png
- File:Aura im Sinngrund 500.png
- File:Bergrothenfels 500.png
- File:Bettelmannsgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Billingshausen 300.png
- File:Binsbach 300.png
- File:Binsfeld 500.png
- File:Birkenfeld 500.png
- File:Birkenfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Birkenfeld.png
- File:Birkenfeld1.png
- File:Bischbrunn 300.png
- File:Bischbrunn mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Bischbrunn.png
- File:Bischbrunn5.png
- File:Bischbrunner Forst 500.png
- File:Bischbrunner Forst5.png
- File:Böser Wiesengraben 1.jpg
- File:Böttigheim5.png
- File:Breitenbrunn5.png
- File:Büchold 500.png
- File:Bühler 500.png
- File:Burgjoß 500.png
- File:Burgsinn 500.png
- File:Bürstadt.jpg
- File:Duttenbrunn 500.png
- File:Eichenfürst.png
- File:Einzuggebiet des Istelgrunds.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Bodenwiesengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Buchenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet des Ziegelbachs.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Erlenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Esselbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Faulbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Fränkbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Gehägsgraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Glasbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Grummibach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Hartgraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Haslochbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Heinrichsbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Kahl.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Karbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Klimbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Klinggraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Lohr.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Mehlengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Meisenbrünnlein.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Rohrwiesenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Silberlochbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Steinbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Steinmarker Bach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Stelzengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Welzbach (Kembach), Kembach (Main, Urphar).jpg
- File:Erlach 300.png
- File:Erlenbach bei Marktheidenfeld 500.png
- File:Erlenbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Erlenbach.png
- File:Erlenbach5.png
- File:Esselbach 500.png
- File:Esselbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Esselbach.png
- File:Esselbach5.png
- File:Eußenheim 500.png
- File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Faulbach.png
- File:Faulbach5.png
- File:Fellen 500.png
- File:Fellen mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Forst Aura 500.png
- File:Forst Lohrerstraße 500.png
- File:Frammersbach 500.png
- File:Frammersbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Frammersbacher Forst 500.png
- File:Fürstlich Löwensteinscher Park 500.png
- File:Fürstlich Löwensteinscher Park5.png
- File:Gainfurter Markung 300.png
- File:Gambach 300.png
- File:Gänheim 500.png
- File:Gemarkung Aschenroth.png
- File:Gemarkung Englmannsberg.png
- File:Gemarkung Forst Lohrerstraße.png
- File:Gemarkung Haurain.png
- File:Gemarkung Hausen.png
- File:Gemarkung Herrnwald.png
- File:Gemarkung Heßdorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Heßlar.png
- File:Gemarkung Heugrumbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Himmelstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Hofstetten.png
- File:Gemarkung Höllrich.png
- File:Gemarkung Homburg am Main.png
- File:Gemarkung Hundsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Karbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Karlburg.png
- File:Gemarkung Karlstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Karsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Kredenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Kreuzwertheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Krommenthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Langenprozelten.png
- File:Gemarkung Langenprozeltener Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Laudenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Lengfurt.png
- File:Gemarkung Lohr.png
- File:Gemarkung Marienbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Marktheidenfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Massenbuch.png
- File:Gemarkung Michelau an der Saale.png
- File:Gemarkung Michelrieth.png
- File:Gemarkung Mittelsinn.png
- File:Gemarkung Müdesheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Mühlbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Münster.png
- File:Gemarkung Neubessingen.png
- File:Gemarkung Neuendorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Neuhütten.png
- File:Gemarkung Neustadt am Main.png
- File:Gemarkung Oberndorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Obersfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Obersinn.png
- File:Gemarkung Oberwittbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Partenstein.png
- File:Gemarkung Partensteiner Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Pflochsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rechtenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rengersbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Rettersheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Retzbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Retzstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Reuchelheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Rieneck.png
- File:Gemarkung Roden.png
- File:Gemarkung Rodenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rothenberg.png
- File:Gemarkung Rothenfels.png
- File:Gemarkung Röttbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Ruppertshütten.png
- File:Gemarkung Ruppertshüttener Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Sachsenheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Sackenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Schaippach.png
- File:Gemarkung Schollbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Schonderfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Schwebenried.png
- File:Gemarkung Seifriedsburg neu.png
- File:Gemarkung Seifriedsburg.png
- File:Gemarkung Sendelbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Stadelhofen.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinmark.png
- File:Gemarkung Stetten.png
- File:Gemarkung Thüngen.png
- File:Gemarkung Tiefenthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Trennfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Unterwittbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Urspringen.png
- File:Gemarkung Waldzell.png
- File:Gemarkung Weickersgrüben.png
- File:Gemarkung Wernfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Weyersfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Wiebelbach.png
- File:Gemarkung WIesenfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Wiesthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Windheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Wolfsmünster.png
- File:Gemarkung Wombach.png
- File:Gemarkung Zellingen.png
- File:Gemarkung Zimmern.png
- File:Gemeinde Reisbach.png
- File:Gemünden 500.png
- File:Gemünden mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Gemünden mit seinen Gemarkungen.png
- File:Glasofen 300.png
- File:Glasofen5.png
- File:Gössenheim 300.png
- File:Gössenheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Gräfendorf 500.png
- File:Gräfendorf mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Grundgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Güßgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Habichsthal 500.png
- File:Hafenlohr 500.png
- File:Hafenlohr mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Hafenlohr mit Gemarkungen1.png
- File:Hafenlohr5.png
- File:Hafenlohrtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Halsbach 500.png
- File:Halsheim 500.png
- File:Harrbach 300.png
- File:Haselbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Hasloch 500.png
- File:Hasloch mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Hasloch.png
- File:Hasloch5.png
- File:Hasselberg 300.png
- File:Hasselberg5.png
- File:Helmstadt.png
- File:Helmstadt5.png
- File:Heubrunnenbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Hoher Berg5.png
- File:Holzkirchen.png
- File:Holzkirchen5.png
- File:Holzkirchhausen5.png
- File:Homburg5.png
- File:Hubertusgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Karbach Gemarkung.png
- File:Karbach1.jpg
- File:Karlstadt mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Karsbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Kettlichsgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Krebsbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Kredenbach5.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim5.png
- File:Lautergrund Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Leitenbach (Aalbach) Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Lengfurt5.png
- File:Lengfurt5a.png
- File:Lohr mit seinen Stadtteilen.png
- File:Marienbrunn5.png
- File:Marktheidenfeld.png
- File:Marktheidenfeld5.png
- File:Michelrieth5.png
- File:Neubrunn.png
- File:Neubrunn5.png
- File:Neuenbuch5.png
- File:Neustadt mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Oberaltenbuch5.png
- File:Oberndorf5.png
- File:Oberwittbach5.png
- File:Rechtenbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Remlingen5.png
- File:Rettersheim5.png
- File:Roden mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Roden.png
- File:Roden5.png
- File:Rond-point de Berkane, Maroc.png
- File:Rothenfels mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Röttbach5.png
- File:Schollbrunn5.png
- File:Stadt Marktheidenfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Stadtprozelten.png
- File:Stadtprozelten5.png
- File:Steinfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Stelzengraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Tiefenthal5.png
- File:Triefenstein mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Triefenstein.png
- File:Uettingen5.png
- File:Unteraltenbuch5.png
- File:Unterwittbach5.png
- File:Urspringen5.png
- File:Weidigsbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Welzbach (Tauber) - im oberen Bereich Altbach genannt - Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Wiebelbach5.png
- File:Wiesthal mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Windheim5.png
- File:Wüstenzell5.png
- File:Zellergraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Zellingen mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Ziegelbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Zimmern5.png
Vaionaut (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Die Beispiele, die ich jetzt nochmal geprüft habe, sollen alle "Eigenes Werk" und "CC-by-sa-4.0" sein. Das trifft sicher nicht zu. Krd 16:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Es gibt zahlreiche Beispiele, in denen nichts von OSM steht. Hast Du eine Liste der Dateien, die von OSM stammen? --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: You tagged these as dw_no_source but some appear to be valid OpenSteetMap files. Please advise. --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea who could sort all this out. Krd 04:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Vaionaut: Here is one example I checked: File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg is derived from opentopomap.org. The file description claimed this to be the own work by the uploader (by using {{Self}}) and granted a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} which doesn't match {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} used by OpenTopoMap. Neither OpenTopoMap (for the map style) nor OpenStreetMap were credited. Mass-uploading such maps without proper credit and licenses is a disaster waiting to happen. How to fix this? We could temporarily restore the whole lot but then we need a volunteer who goes through all these files within a reasonable time frame, fixes the credits and adds links to the original maps. Is anyone willing to do this? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Finally
Hopefully, if the recently introduced Commons:Wikimedia VRTS release generator is made prominently visible to uploaders, it will help reduce some of the repetition. Atsme Talk 📧 12:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The release generator exists for quite some time, and I think it's a draw of problems solved vs. new problems created. If you have any suggestions, please consider discuss on VRT wiki first. --Krd 05:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of my images
Hello,
I have just seen that you deleted at least four of my images, without asking. Why did you do that? I thought that I was about to receive permissions, but even if I asked no one answered, I can't do more with ressources that I have now. Please share news with me soon, and try to restore the pictures.
Thanks for the future help. Scomari (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of the United Arab Republic (Alternate History).png
It's been a while, but I don't see why it was deleted? Is it because I didn't choose the Licensing Properly? My friend who made literally gave me permission to upload it. To be fair, at the time it was my first time uploading something to commons. Can you please restore it? If not, explain why? Ironzombie39 (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted without any warning
My picture is one of the deleted ones (Gayskinheadskissing, now leads to this list), but I have not gotten any info about that the permission I had given needed to be updated, not anywhere. It is a pity it gets removed without warning, especially as it was widely used with my full rights given. I would like to get info about how to reverse this, as the rights were supposed to be forever. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.235.2.61 (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ehsan Sehgal
Hi Krd, in 2020 the files in this category were listed for deletion and kept, based on the fact that an article about this person exists - even in two languages, ur and arz. Please note Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Ehsan Sehgal. Now an anonymous user on my talk page told me a second deletion request has been closed (by you) with deletion. Indeed, you closed the DR, based on the comments of the user, that the person would be not notable, in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Moona Sehgal. The same nominator omitted two images in the list, one of them is currently in use. What do you think? Would it be appropriate to undelete these images, because the person is in scope on Commons. And what about the user? Do we take action or warn if somebody renominates with a false statement? Hope to hear from you, Regards, Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn‘t aware of the pre story. I‘m not opposed to undeletion of the files, but I cannot handle it now. If you like, please feel free to do. Krd 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will handle this. Ellywa (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
speedy no licence in this format
- speedy no licence in this format, please delete this horror, thanks,
PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The deletion request is declined. The original file was freely licensed, so is the crop. No reason for deletion. --Krd 06:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe Lizenz für diese Datei (vom 1. September 2023) gegeben, letzte Version passt gar nicht für diesen Namen (Aquarium of Rhodes), User Minorax war absolut nicht aufmerksam, lieber diese Datei überhaupt zu entfernen, passt gar nicht,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wie gesagt: Nein. Die Lizenz erlaubt Zuschnitte. Krd 06:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe Lizenz für diese Datei (vom 1. September 2023) gegeben, letzte Version passt gar nicht für diesen Namen (Aquarium of Rhodes), User Minorax war absolut nicht aufmerksam, lieber diese Datei überhaupt zu entfernen, passt gar nicht,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hast Du Zuschnitt mit griechischen Flagge vom 8. April überhaupt gesehen? Aus welchen Gründen wurde diese Flagge entfernt? Es gab keine Gründe für diese barbarische Tat von einem User,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Darf man die Datei auf Grund der Bitte des Authors entfernen?--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Man darf, aber man muss nicht. Hier wird das Zustand nach Löschdiskussion beibehalten. Krd 07:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Darf man die Datei auf Grund der Bitte des Authors entfernen?--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Es war ein grober Fehler vom User Minorax, er hat wohl nicht gemerkt, dass Zuschnitt von mir schon durchgeführt worden war, dabei ließ ich aber die Diskussion FOP of Greece weiter stehen. Solle es nicht genügend sein, mach noch kleiner, wie du willst, aber behalte dann Sony DSC-WX350 3 : 4, denn die Datei geht auf die Seite Category:Resilient Lady (ship, 2022) in Rhodes, sonst wird sie herausragen. Flag of Greece sollte auch kein Problem sein, das umstrittene Gebäude wurde schon wesentlich entfernt. Gut, lass ohne Flagge auf dem Dach, aber mach richtige Größe 3 (Höhe) mal 4 (Breite).--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sprich bitte mit Minorax. Krd 09:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted this because it was tagged with "no permission", but I don't any evidence that it is not "own work": 4,288 × 2,848 ordinary picture with similar subject of other works by this user. Could you please restore it. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Done. --Krd 08:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary restore request of deleted files
- File:Yokohama 00027.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00023.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00028.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00066.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00065.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00064.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00063.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00062.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00061.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00060.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00059.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00058.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00057.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00056.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00054.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00055.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00053.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00051.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00052.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00050.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00049.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00048.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00046.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00047.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00045.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00044.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00043.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00042.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00041.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00040.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00039.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00038.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00037.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00036.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00035.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00034.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00033.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00032.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00031.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00030.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00029.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00027.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00026.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00025.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00024.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00022.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00023.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00021.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00019.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00020.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00018.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00017.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00016.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00014.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00015.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00013.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00012.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00011.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00010.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00009.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00008.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00007.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00006.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00004.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00005.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00001.jpg
- File:Yokohama 00002.jpg
Hi, I read COM:L / COM:VRT and understand why you deleted my uploaded files as I shown above, but I had already been deleted the original files after uploaded to wiki. So, would you temporarily restore the deleted files for the sake of me to save the files again? Those files are important for me because they contain the precious info of my schools. Regards, Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk)Keio Cheer Unicorns — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk • contribs) 14:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but no. That are too many files. Krd 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I share your sense of despair that so many files were suddenly deleted! Best, Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- It may be out of line to mention this on a public page like this, but if you are an administrator who can delete images at will, could you please delete ALL the rest images I have uploaded as well? I am a newbie to Wikimedia Commons from Japan and did not even know how to delete my account. Thank you in advance. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Images are deleted only with a valid reason. Please provide one. Krd 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- As with any website that shares the principles and values of the rule of law, just at the request of the author, content uploaded by the author can be removed as it is part of their own digital copyright. I have now confirmed that all content I have uploaded has been removed in accordance with this policy. Thank you to all others who have been involved in this process! I regret your response to this incident. In order to prevent a repeat of this tragedy in the future, I would like to request that Wikimedia Commons (1) warn users in advance before deleting content, given that user-uploaded content is part of their digital assets, and (2) users should be able to delete their accounts in the same manner as other websites. That is all. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 01:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Images are deleted only with a valid reason. Please provide one. Krd 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- It may be out of line to mention this on a public page like this, but if you are an administrator who can delete images at will, could you please delete ALL the rest images I have uploaded as well? I am a newbie to Wikimedia Commons from Japan and did not even know how to delete my account. Thank you in advance. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I share your sense of despair that so many files were suddenly deleted! Best, Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikiversity logos
Hello. I have the same request as in the previous case, see diff.
Please, restore these files:
- File:Journal RUWV logo.png,
- File:Robo RUWV logo.png. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the first one per the precedent. Please consider to document in the file pages why these are no copyright violations.
- Regarding the second file, please contact the admin who deleted it. --Krd 14:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Last year, the file was deleted after someone removed the licensing templates from the file description; you restored it after I raised the issue. This seems to have happened again. Now, the image probably has to be considered URAA restored, so I'm not going to ask that it be restored, but could you check to see if the licence tags were removed in bad faith, and if so, whether the remover also committed such vandalism to other file pages which may have also been deleted as a result? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
PS Could you also check the contributions of the person who removed the tags the first time, as I remember that it also led to several other files being deleted out of process. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image is now restored again. I agree that the taggings of this user are controversial, but it appears to be impossible to check all of them. In any case more care has to be taken with deletion of files tagged by them. Krd 22:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The portrait uploaded by the author has been removed
The portrait of a sculptor Nina Niss-Goldman by Alexander Ibragimov (File:Portrait of the Sculptor Nina Niss-Goldman by Alexander Ibragimov (1988).jpg) with the motivation "No permission since 23 June 2024" has been removed. Please, note that this portrait was uploaded many years ago by the author Alexander Ibragimov himself. This portrait can still be found on the author's web page https://www.instagram.com/p/COPk1WHByiF/. Thank you for your kind attention. Wavepainter (talk) 09:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:VRT Krd 10:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please restore this file? Because as far as I know, this file actually has a free license. I will check and keep you informed. Atakhanli (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The file has no clear source and no permission. To get it restored, please provide more details.
- As far as I remember, that file was taken from the military parade news from president.az website. That site has a free license. If you restore it, I will clarify this issue and make the appropriate corrections. If it's not what I said, I'll let you know then — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atakhanli (talk • contribs) 07:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- The file is restored, please go ahead. Krd 08:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd Thank you. This file is cut from another file. Please restore this as well. For me to view the original file.
- File:HikmatMirzayev.jpg Atakhanli (talk) 10:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- The original file has the same license information. Krd 10:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I know. But I need to see the original file so I can find that photo on that site Atakhanli (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Check now. Krd 12:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I'm sorry to bother you. I looked at the photos on that site. Unfortunately, this photo is not available on that site. Thank you. Atakhanli (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted them. --Krd 16:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I'm sorry to bother you. I looked at the photos on that site. Unfortunately, this photo is not available on that site. Thank you. Atakhanli (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Check now. Krd 12:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd I know. But I need to see the original file so I can find that photo on that site Atakhanli (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- The original file has the same license information. Krd 10:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
this file was deleted even though the author contacted VRT on my behalf (original uploader). on the deletion log is says that there was no ticket permission despite the creator have done that. Juwan (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide the ticket number the permission sender got. Krd 04:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Dimash's Stranger concert in Almaty 2022.jpg
Dear @Krd! On 30 May You putted a template to this photo. I don't understand why, because there was written "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). On same day I supplemented the Source line with "Own work", and I asked You at my account. It seems You didn't read it, that's why I repeat here my question:
"Dear @Krd! This photo made I myself at the concert in Almaty. There is written: "A feltöltő saját munkája" (in English: The uploader's own work). What's the problem with it? Whose and what consent should I get? What kind of website should I link to? Thank You,"
And may I ask, how long will it take to process of permisson of István Lajkó's photo - over 30 days?
I wait your answers. Thank You
Tösö8 (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is that the photo depicts the stage scene and requires permission from the copyright holder of that. Krd 18:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- You say it not seriously, are you? Tösö8 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- They're only 3 led-walls and a snapshot from the concert. Tösö8 (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- You say it not seriously, are you? Tösö8 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Finally
Hopefully, if the recently introduced Commons:Wikimedia VRTS release generator is made prominently visible to uploaders, it will help reduce some of the repetition. Atsme Talk 📧 12:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
VRT response
Hi, I have seen that you have been removing the {{Permission pending}} template off the images in Category:Barba_(WikiProject_LGBT). However, the author sent a VRT ticket reaffirming the release of all the images under the mentioned license. In order to avoid problems in the future, it would be nice to have all the images marked with a VRT template as in File:Barba-wikiproyecto-lgbt.svg. If you do not think that is necessary, could you please reply to this comment on my talk page to serve as proof in case they are nominated for deletion in the future? Thanks in advance. Nacaru (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- These are all derivatives of a single design, so it should be sufficient when the original has permission, and is mentioned as the source of the rest. We can also tag them all, if the permission sender in the ticket provides a list of the files his permission applies to. Krd 06:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, I don't think he provided a list but he provided the category in which they're all in. I still have to upload more designs, so we thought this approach would be easier. By the way: the problems already arrived 🥲. Nacaru (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- What is your proposal how we should handle it? Krd 08:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, I don't think he provided a list but he provided the category in which they're all in. I still have to upload more designs, so we thought this approach would be easier. By the way: the problems already arrived 🥲. Nacaru (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I never understood the double standard of the deletion criteria
Hi Krd,
You once have targeted my uploaded files many deletions like here.
As I told you in your archived talk page, I understand that you took this action just because you found my uploaded contents to be unoriginal and suitable for the criteria for immediate deletion.
However, when I referred to another user page taking the same action as yours, someone like the Wikimedia administrator said that there should be enough time to discuss whether the deletion request was appropriate.
Wikimedia requires a multi-person discussion, but there does not seem to be any discussion when deleting my contents.
What do you think about this? I am sorry to bother you, but I would appreciate it if you could take sensible approach. 😌🤍
Regards, Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 16:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Archive DR logs with other number systems
Because of this bug with the Commons mobile app, users who don't have our normal Arabic 0-9 as their native number system, are adding their deletion requests to the logs written with their number system. That's why we got pages like Commons:Deletion requests/২০২৩/০৬/০৮ and Commons:Deletion requests/۲۰۲۳/۰۹/۱۶ among others. This should be the full list. Can you make Krdbot archive these anyway and then delete the empty logs? Jonteemil (talk) 22:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it makes sense developing this for a temporary workaround for a bug. Krd 10:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as workaround I tried moving one of the logs to the correct number system and Krdbot did archive it. I saw that you deleted the then empty log, so I guess you already know that. However I noticed only on of the DRs was properly moved, see Special:Diff/901402364. Jonteemil (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly was done incorrectly? Krd 08:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- There were two DRs that should've been archived, see also edit comment by Krdbot, but as you can see in the diff, only one was archived. Jonteemil (talk) 10:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The other one already was in the archive page, so it didn't get added a second time. to avoid dupes. Krd 10:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't catch that. Well then, good! Jonteemil (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have now moved each log with the incorrect numbers to Arabic numbers so they can be redeleted when your bot has archived them.Jonteemil (talk) 11:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect, thank you very much! Krd 11:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have now moved each log with the incorrect numbers to Arabic numbers so they can be redeleted when your bot has archived them.Jonteemil (talk) 11:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't catch that. Well then, good! Jonteemil (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The other one already was in the archive page, so it didn't get added a second time. to avoid dupes. Krd 10:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- There were two DRs that should've been archived, see also edit comment by Krdbot, but as you can see in the diff, only one was archived. Jonteemil (talk) 10:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- What exactly was done incorrectly? Krd 08:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as workaround I tried moving one of the logs to the correct number system and Krdbot did archive it. I saw that you deleted the then empty log, so I guess you already know that. However I noticed only on of the DRs was properly moved, see Special:Diff/901402364. Jonteemil (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I added a license info (Template:soccer.ru) to that file and thought it wouldn't be deleted. Can you restore it? Илья Яковлев (talk) 14:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Why does Template:soccer.ru apply to this file? What is the exact source? Krd 15:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Soccer.ru, it was mentioned in the description. It can be unavailable now because website decided to delete all photogalleries from it but I think it should be archived. Илья Яковлев (talk) 19:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- There was no mention of soccer.ru in the file page. The source was: http://www.soccer0100.com/galery/877198/photo/553618 --Krd 04:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's in fact soccer.ru, they just used another domain name for some reasons. Proof. Also for example there's the photo with soccer0100.com mention in the source which apparently was taken from soccer.ru. Илья Яковлев (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the image, please participate in the deletion discussion. Krd 14:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Илья Яковлев (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the image, please participate in the deletion discussion. Krd 14:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's in fact soccer.ru, they just used another domain name for some reasons. Proof. Also for example there's the photo with soccer0100.com mention in the source which apparently was taken from soccer.ru. Илья Яковлев (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- There was no mention of soccer.ru in the file page. The source was: http://www.soccer0100.com/galery/877198/photo/553618 --Krd 04:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Soccer.ru, it was mentioned in the description. It can be unavailable now because website decided to delete all photogalleries from it but I think it should be archived. Илья Яковлев (talk) 19:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, should this work be attributed to Caroline Coon, the artist? 0x0a (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- The painter in mentioned in the description. There was no explicit choice of an attribution, but all permisison senders always are explicitly encouraged to check all information. Krd 16:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I‘d like to confirm the arribution requirement with the sender. Is the sender Caroline Coon or her agent, Stephen Friedman Gallery? 0x0a (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- VRT cannot disclose content of the private communication. What is the reason for your doubt? Krd 04:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Double checked with the permission sender, no change required. --Krd 05:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- VRT cannot disclose content of the private communication. What is the reason for your doubt? Krd 04:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I‘d like to confirm the arribution requirement with the sender. Is the sender Caroline Coon or her agent, Stephen Friedman Gallery? 0x0a (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of Poland_regions_travel_map_revised_(Edited).png
File:Poland regions travel map revised (Edited).png was deleted as "No license since 29 June 2024". However, I assume it is based on the SVG version of File:Poland regions travel map revised.png (or …revised1.svg), which doesn't seem more problematic than most self-created maps at Wikimedia Commons.
The Wikivoyage community doesn't seem to have been alerted on the deletion threat. If the problem lies in the later edits, I assume that could be sorted out by the community. If the problem is in the base map (by some definition), perhaps an ordinary DR would be warranted.
Anyway, the deletion of a region map causes severe disruption on Wikivoyage, and I think the Wikivoyage community would be entitled to a notice and a grace period, to be able to create a replacement map before the deletion.
(Yes, I know the Commons policies.)
–LPfi (talk) 07:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- What is your exact request? Can the SVG version be used for the article? Krd 08:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to know what permission was missing. Knowing that, I can either try to fix the permission or try to get somebody to create a replacement map. A temporary undeletion would be helpful, but I assume I also need a more specific deletion rationale. –LPfi (talk) 07:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- The SVG version can be used, and a new PNG version created from it. But without the file description I don't know how to find that SVG version, and I would assume that the the SVG version has the same permission problem. –LPfi (talk) 07:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the file, please comment in the deletion request. --Krd 08:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. –LPfi (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the file, please comment in the deletion request. --Krd 08:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- The SVG version can be used, and a new PNG version created from it. But without the file description I don't know how to find that SVG version, and I would assume that the the SVG version has the same permission problem. –LPfi (talk) 07:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to know what permission was missing. Knowing that, I can either try to fix the permission or try to get somebody to create a replacement map. A temporary undeletion would be helpful, but I assume I also need a more specific deletion rationale. –LPfi (talk) 07:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Hellenic Seaplanes CEO Nicolas Charalambous.jpg
Hi Krd. Would you mind taking a look at File:Hellenic Seaplanes CEO Nicolas Charalambous.jpg? You might've already deleted the same file as File:Nicolas Charalambous - Hellenic Seaplanes.png about two weeks ago and this one was uploaded a few days after that. Do you think this should be tagged with {{Npd}} even if it's not the same file given all of the image notifications found on the uploader's user talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the same image so it should be tagged. Krd 04:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Request to restore "fishbowl" image, Braver Angels
Greetings. I've read Com:L and Com:VRT.
I just emailed back, within our June email thread, to request restoration of one image. Two images were discussed in that thread, but I believe you only had objections to one image.
The image to restore is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Red_Blue_Workshop_Wellesley_fishbowl.jpg This image does have permission from the photographer and, afaik, no other copyright problems.
Thanks for your consideration. ProfGray (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't try to contact me at different venues at the same time, as this double my work and your waiting time. --Krd 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
File:L'Alba dei nobili a Lierna Lago di Como.jpg No license since 27 June 2024
You deleted this file. This file is clearly tagged as {{PD-Art|PD-old-70}} so why did you delete it? It is sourced and as you can see on Category:Vittore Grubicy de Dragon, it's very public domain. Multichill (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the note. I have restored the file. Krd 04:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, Krd, how are you? Please reconsider, that file is an upload of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson, an inveterate hoaxer. Nothing that person says or claims can be trusted. The image has no source or attribution, it may or may not be by Grubicy de Dragon, and so may or may not be in the public domain. On past experience, the title and date are very likely to be invented. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Please advise. --Krd 10:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Krd and User:Justlettersandnumbers: In this case we seem to have a source at https://www.museofattori.livorno.it/le-opere/catalogo/la-vela/ which actually includes the images. Looks like it's a triptych: La vela a Lierna (Q121545709), Alba di lavoro (Q121546724) & Alba di signori (Q121546448). Multichill (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice research, Multichill, thank you! So the painting actually is by Grubicy de Dragon and should presumably be kept, with a corrected title and file description. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Krd and User:Justlettersandnumbers: In this case we seem to have a source at https://www.museofattori.livorno.it/le-opere/catalogo/la-vela/ which actually includes the images. Looks like it's a triptych: La vela a Lierna (Q121545709), Alba di lavoro (Q121546724) & Alba di signori (Q121546448). Multichill (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Please advise. --Krd 10:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, Krd, how are you? Please reconsider, that file is an upload of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson, an inveterate hoaxer. Nothing that person says or claims can be trusted. The image has no source or attribution, it may or may not be by Grubicy de Dragon, and so may or may not be in the public domain. On past experience, the title and date are very likely to be invented. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Please restore File:Камбаров Илья Скульптура Сермяжная Русь 1905 год ЕМИИ.jpg. There is no copyright violation, the artwork in question is dated 1905, more than 100 years ago, so it is public domain. --ssr (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Who is the sculptor, and in which year did they die? --Krd 07:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- w:ru:Камбаров, Илья Алексеевич, death year 1958. --ssr (talk) 08:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- So is the sculpture in the public domain? I don't think so. Krd 08:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am asking on behalf of the uploader, user:IvanA. He doesn't speak English. But he has good knowledge on laws. I am awaiting now more details from him. Thank you for collaboration! --ssr (talk) 08:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- So is the sculpture in the public domain? I don't think so. Krd 08:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- w:ru:Камбаров, Илья Алексеевич, death year 1958. --ssr (talk) 08:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Judi Benavente File
Good afternoon Mr Kird.
Can you explain the reason for delete the photo of Spanish model and influencer Judit Benavente?
This picture have a free license and was upload by the photographer in 2012.
The file its use for only biography purpose.
Can you restore the file?
Regards
George Barahoma GEORGEB1989 (talk) 10:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
You closed this discussion as "Kept: in use". However, I don't see anywhere this image is being intentionally used in content pages - four of the references are on talk pages, including at least one where the user intended it as an example of a red link; a fifth is in a page of test cases for a Lua module which doesn't appear to even render the image anywhere. As far as I'm aware, none of these should count as "in use" for the purposes of deletion discussions. Omphalographer (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're right, I should have looked deeper into the user page uses. Sorry. Now deleted. Krd 07:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Photo confirmation
Can you please check and explain what's wrong with the confirmation, that was sent by email. The photographer already confirmed the photo based on free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dainius_Babilas.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidas (talk • contribs) 08:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the photo / Sorry
I'm very sorry for my misunderstanding, but I don't understand why the message sent by photographer was not sufficient regarding this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dainius_Babilas.jpg. Also I don't understand, why contacting you here means "contacting you at different venues at the same time". I can not enter to see the details without VRTS account. It's just written that I should "contact the user who added this template to the page". That's what I'm doing. If you could explain me somehow, it could help. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidas (talk • contribs) 11:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket is from today. What if you just stay patient for a day or two and give the permission sender time to respond to followup questions? Krd 11:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted file was reuploaded
Hello, this file was previously deleted after being tagged as "no permission." As you can see, a different editor reuploaded the same file, again with no permission. Is there any way you could remove the reupload and its crop? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Already deleted again. --Krd 04:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 05:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm angry with myself. I was told that the license was wrong and meant to do it the next day. I didn't set an alarm or anything and forgot, probably because I'm in the middle of some horrible chemotherapy, but that's not really an excuse. Anyway, I'm trying to upload it using [14] and although it worked before, it's failed three times today with the message "An exception occurred: UnpickleableExceptionWrapper: b"TaskError('Upload failed!')"" I added the below, is there a problem with the text that would cause the failure?
|description= Man wearing animated steampunk hat at Papplewick Pumping Station Steampunk Weekend July 2024 |date= July 2024 |source= own work |author= Doug Weller |permission=
The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification.
Please check the source to verify that this is correct. In particular, note that publication on the Internet, like publication by any other means, does not in itself imply permission to redistribute. Files without valid permission should be tagged with {{subst:npd}}. Usage notes:
|
I did of course read the links you point to at the top of your page. Thanks, Doug Weller (talk) 08:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the file, please check the license. Get well soon! --Krd 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sadly there's no way out, just a question of how long. I'm fine with that. Doug Weller (talk) 09:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, amazingly fast! Doug Weller (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Request for admin on Beta Commons wiki
Hello, can you give admin on the Beta Commons wiki? I want to test out some i18n stuff on the Mediawiki protection messages. Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 06:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It appears your account is blocked at beta, is that correct? Krd 07:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was indefblocked by the abuse filter because I was trying out some stuff with Help:Tabular Data and that happened to contain links. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 15:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)- Done --Krd 18:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was indefblocked by the abuse filter because I was trying out some stuff with Help:Tabular Data and that happened to contain links. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, this file had a permission from the original author (not me) sent by email on July 1 to permissions-uk@wikimedia.org (in Ukrainian). Could you please clarify why it was deleted? TheLotCarmen (talk) 18:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- The file will be restored as soon as the permission is processed. Krd 04:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Beshterek-Zuisky pipes.webp
Hello. I've reviewed COM:VRT and COM:L and it's still unclear to me why the file was deleted. The file was released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International by its original owner, and the copyright notice is visible at the bottom of each of the organization's webpages, "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" ("All site materials are available under the license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International"). The message also includes a link to the Creative Commons page for the BY 4.0 deed. I had also archived the site here for future reference: https://archive.md/mHfOX. If there was some discussion that explains the reason for removal, could you please direct me to it? Thanks. Primium (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- The file is now restored. Krd 19:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Thank you! Primium (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Quick discussion closure
Hi! I think this discussion went to closure mightily fast. Could you at least comment on the issue or on the VRT ticket (2024072910005722) now received? Thanks in advance. Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- The VRT ticket is for one file only, and the likelyness that it will be successful is at the lower end. It's safe to asssume that the files are all copyvios. Krd 17:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- What is safe? I've invited Estrellato to this discussion, and as a local administrator at svwp he has been acting quite responsibly regarding administrative issues during the past couple of years. He is free to disclose his civilian identity (which I know), and I find it quite unreasonable to
presumeassume he's been acting in bad faith. Yours truly. Paracel63 (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)- Also, the music in the file that was kept is copyrighted too, so in either way the sound have to be deleted. // Kakan spelar (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I can only second what Paracel63 said. It really feels like you assumed I acted in bad faith. "Safe to say they were all copyvios" is a ignorant statement. it has already been confirmed at Undeletion requests that this was not the case.
- Music can be muted, if it is copyrighted. Expect an email from Cosmico Jr (who filmed the video and gave me permission) shortly. Estrellato (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It appears the file has already been restored. Does your claim also apply to the other files? Krd 03:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It applies to those listed at Undeletion requests, for various reasons mentioned there but mostly simply because it is own work. Basically the last 9 files listed in the discussion.
- Some of the other pictures was taken by a close friend of mine (Angel Arce), who gave me permission to upload them, he already does for luchawiki.org. But I will just ask him to reupload them himself instead of going through the VRT process for those. Only three pixtures were screenshots taken from non CC videos due to a missunderstanding on my part. All of those, I marked as G7 as soon as I realized I had been wrong. Assume good faith. It was never my intention to bend the rules. / Estrellato (talk) 06:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It appears you have already created several undeletion requests. Please advise what you request me to do. Krd 07:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Undelete every file that I've submitted, except for maybe the escudos because the discussion is still ongoing. There is no evidence of copyright infringement. See also this: https://www.facebook.com/audacion/posts/pfbid02vcHR5e6WkdeageeQ9ncq6S6WnYsrKWZBn4o3VcKWtKAUc3wnMQnjsoz1ZaYvwMmal
- I don't care about outing my real name. The LTAs know already. Estrellato (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have reopened the deletion request. Krd 06:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that. Please read my arguments and take them into account. I admit to making a mistake uploading 3 screenshots from YouTube due to being misinformed by another user (who had no intent to mislead, it was a simple misunderstanding.) See sv:Användardiskussion:Estrellato, and use translation software for further explaination. Those files should obviously stay deleted. But I will stand by that all the last 9 files (now restored) in the first deletion request are completely my own work, and I have made everything I can to prove so, including writing on said album in my Facebook profile that I am Estrellato and I give permission to use everything from that album for public domain. Since I lost access to my original phone and computer where the media was originally stored, there is not much else I can do. Estrellato (talk) 13:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Like Thanks about connecting Facebook and Wikipedia account identities, which I think is the way to go. Paracel63 (talk) 22:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that. Please read my arguments and take them into account. I admit to making a mistake uploading 3 screenshots from YouTube due to being misinformed by another user (who had no intent to mislead, it was a simple misunderstanding.) See sv:Användardiskussion:Estrellato, and use translation software for further explaination. Those files should obviously stay deleted. But I will stand by that all the last 9 files (now restored) in the first deletion request are completely my own work, and I have made everything I can to prove so, including writing on said album in my Facebook profile that I am Estrellato and I give permission to use everything from that album for public domain. Since I lost access to my original phone and computer where the media was originally stored, there is not much else I can do. Estrellato (talk) 13:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have reopened the deletion request. Krd 06:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- It appears you have already created several undeletion requests. Please advise what you request me to do. Krd 07:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It appears the file has already been restored. Does your claim also apply to the other files? Krd 03:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the music in the file that was kept is copyrighted too, so in either way the sound have to be deleted. // Kakan spelar (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- What is safe? I've invited Estrellato to this discussion, and as a local administrator at svwp he has been acting quite responsibly regarding administrative issues during the past couple of years. He is free to disclose his civilian identity (which I know), and I find it quite unreasonable to
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 00:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Krd since you locked this bot request flag page, I answer here. Today I have updated my bot script, and I have done one test run for Westende (Q1244401). This resulted in the following updates of SDC as documented by the bot request, and the property representation type (P12692):
Please confirm that the updates have been done according as to the specifications, and please consider to grant User:GeertivpBot a bot flag for doing likewise for other media files that are properly registered in any Wikidata Item. Thanks for your collaboration. I have updated the source code in case you would like to verify how it works. You might investigate procedure add_missing_sdc_depicts(). --Geert Van Pamel 20:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please comment at the bot request page now. Krd 06:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Help needed.
Can you take a look at Com:AN/B? It's a mess needing a mop.
All the Best -- Chuck Talk 00:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea what exactly you mean. Krd 04:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- It was dealt with by Taivo. No longer an issue.
- All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Romi Meitei.jpg
Hi Krd. You deleted a file with the same name as File:Romi Meitei.jpg on July 18, 2024. Can you check whether this is the same file? FWIW, I only came across this because the same file was uploaded by the same uploader locally to English Wikipedia as en:File:Romi Meitei.jpg, but there was no copyright license provided for the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- It is the same file. Krd 06:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking on this. The file was deleted by Yann per NETCOPYVIO. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Ultrararere34
Hello. The two files of Ultrararere34 that you deleted have been reuploaded by Cero9e under new names. Since the former is a sock, one can assume that also the latter is I guess. Jonteemil (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is not quite clear, and I think at least the current deletion reason is wrong. Still under investigation. Krd 14:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Drapeaux
Bonjour, j'ai une question, pourquoi supprimez-vous les drapeaux que j'ai publié, j'ai pourtant ajouter les licences. Cordialement, Al-Hilali Z (talk) 09:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Please undelete
Category:C (number), as it’s not empty anymore. (Its page contents need to be changed to match, but it’s better to retain past history.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted, please fix. Krd 06:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, fixed. But the same issue affects other cats, too:
- Category:D (number)
- Category:L (number) (deleted by Hystrix)
- Category:M (number)
- Category:X (number) (deleted by Taivo)
- (These cats were created by mistake for Roman numerals, by the way.) Appreciate your help. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also undeleted, please clean up. Krd 11:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thanks! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also undeleted, please clean up. Krd 11:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, fixed. But the same issue affects other cats, too:
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you deleted this file and has now been reploaded. Is the license on Flickr incorrect or why does it need further permission? Jonteemil (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- The file itself says "2023", so invalid license and no reason to assume PD. Krd 11:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. Jonteemil (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello Krd, I am unable to understand why File:Manipur-prior-to-1894.png has been deleted. It was an OpenStreetMap section, annotated by me. What permissions are needed? -- ̴̃ Kautilya3 (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have restored the file. I think the no-permission tagging has been a mistake. --Krd 07:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi again. Thanks for closing it, but I do see one Neutral. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thx for the note, I've corrected it. Krd 13:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks for the correction. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
DR
Thanks for catching my error. *facepalm*. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. There was no error, at least not yours. There file was deleted at that time. If have restored it now because it is disputed, see above. Krd 13:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of File:أطفال قتلى في هجوم حزب الله.jpg
Hi Krd. What kind of permission was missing for this file? Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- COM:VRT --Krd 14:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I am aware of the VRT process. The question is why there was a need for a ticket and what permission was missing? File upload doesn't require VRT unless it was present somewhere else before it was uploaded to Commons or someone claims that the file has their copyright. I have seen none of such cases for the above file. Could you please explain why it required VRT permission in this case? Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- It was dsaid the the file is present on social media, e.g. at https://x.com/AdityaRajKaul/status/1817248271947235731, so ticket permission is missing. --Krd 06:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please check the prior discussion here. In short, a copy on X was done after upload to Commons and when the image got attention AdityaRajKaul has deleted the file which he didn't properly attribute to where he took it from. When users upload files to Commons and then someone takes those files from them VRT is not required. So please undelete the file. Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have undeleted the file and reopened the deletion request, please comment there. Krd 13:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Such comment was already done on that page on August 6. Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have undeleted the file and reopened the deletion request, please comment there. Krd 13:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please check the prior discussion here. In short, a copy on X was done after upload to Commons and when the image got attention AdityaRajKaul has deleted the file which he didn't properly attribute to where he took it from. When users upload files to Commons and then someone takes those files from them VRT is not required. So please undelete the file. Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was dsaid the the file is present on social media, e.g. at https://x.com/AdityaRajKaul/status/1817248271947235731, so ticket permission is missing. --Krd 06:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I am aware of the VRT process. The question is why there was a need for a ticket and what permission was missing? File upload doesn't require VRT unless it was present somewhere else before it was uploaded to Commons or someone claims that the file has their copyright. I have seen none of such cases for the above file. Could you please explain why it required VRT permission in this case? Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Section resolved|--Krd 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have any other reason to delete the file or you can close the request as kept? Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I won't close the request at all, but leave it open for another admin to evaluate. Krd 15:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I won't close the request at all, but leave it open for another admin to evaluate. Krd 15:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have any other reason to delete the file or you can close the request as kept? Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, I nominated this file for deletion because I noticed there are versions, like for example one published in Bild (link), with different crops that show bystanders walking in the top of the frame that are not in the version here at Commons. These are clearly edited derivatives, and certainly not the photographer's doing. I've raised this both at the deletion request here and at Oleg Yunakov's talk page here, but Oleg's response has been to ignore and revert me. They seem pretty intent on not addressing this, they've threatened requests for deadminship for baseless deletion (diff). Could you please talk to them? RAN1 (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, and I think you are right, but as we are able to have this closed by an uninvolved admin, I think we should proceed this way. Krd 04:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of File:Jesse Ruderman (3 Nov 2023).jpg
You deleted File:Jesse Ruderman (3 Nov 2023).jpg with the message "No ticket permission since 31 July 2024". The photographer emailed permissions-commons@ in early August and the page was updated to reflect that the Wikimedia foundation had received and verified the email (confirming that the image was licensed under CC BY-SA). I thought that meant everything was resolved, so the deletion surprised me. Did you delete the image for some other reason? Jruderman (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket is incomplete, the sender said they arrange the release but they didn't. --Krd 06:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, on the closing all files were deleted except for File:Argentina seleccion 1991.jpg. I guess it was a glitch on the script. Günther Frager (talk) 18:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo, danke, aber kein Hinweis nötig, das fällt am nächsten Tag über eine Wartungsseite auf. Krd 04:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Löschung von File:William Tucker, Eve, 2001.jpg
Hallo Krd, ich habe eine Kopie der Email von William Tucker, die er an permissions-commons@wikipedia.org am 6.8.24 gesendet hat. Es stand soweit ich mich erinnern kann auch eine Notiz, dass die Email eingegangen ist und bearbeitet wird. Wo lag das Problem? Ich kann die Email gerne an dich weiterleiten, um die Löschung rückgängig zu machen und das Ticket einzutragen. Vielen Dank für jegliche Lösungshinweise und Hilfe! Ulicaa (talk) 12:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wir haben eine Freigabe direkt durch jemanden erhalten, der leider nicht auf unsere Rückfrage reagiert hat. Es möchte bitte die Freigabe erneut senden. --Krd 12:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank! Dann werde ich versuchen, das mit Herrn Tucker so zu kommunizieren. Ulicaa (talk) 12:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Krd,
da wurde behauptet, die Datei habe keine Quelle (war mir leider durchgerutscht). Hatte sie aber durchaus, nämlich {{Own}}, was mir angesichts des etwas schiefen Fotos durchaus glaubwürdig zu sein scheint. Urheberrechtliche Bedenken sehe ich bei einem Buchdeckel, der nur aus Schrift und Farbe besteht, auch nicht. Die Datei wurde in az.wp auch verwendet, vgl. [15]. Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung. Danke. --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Erl. Hättest Du natürlich gern selbst machen können. Krd 07:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kaum war die Datei wieder da, fällt mir auf, dass die Datei offensichtlich (Metadaten) von Facebook ist :-( Habe sie daher wieder gelöscht. Sorry für den Aufwand. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Вітання! Не розумію, чому цей файл видалено? Це ж селфі. Авторка сама себе сфотографувала. Будь ласка, відновіть очевидний селфі-портрет. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Фото Логойда Л.jpg --Krd 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Karten wirklich ohne Lizenzinformation?
Hallo, gestern wurde eine Vielzahl von Karten (größtenteils Gemarkungsgrenzen und Einzugsgebiete unterfränkischer Gemeinden) entfernt, was einen großen Informationsverlust darstellt. Als Grund angegeben ist "No license since 25 March 2024", was für mich jedoch nicht nachvollziehbar ist, da in der Google-Suche nach den Karten noch Lizenzinformationen zu finden sind. Ich könnte mir lediglich vorstellen, dass die Lizenzinformationen durch Vandalismus entfernt wurden. Ich bitte um Prüfung und ggf. Wiederherstellung.
Es handelt sich – sofern ich alle gefunden habe – um folgende Dateien (sorry für die lange Liste):
- File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Adelsberg 300.png
- File:Altbessingen 500.png
- File:Altenbuch.png
- File:Altfeld 500.png
- File:Altfeld1.png
- File:Altlandkreis mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Ansbach 300.png
- File:Ansbach5.png
- File:Arnstein 500.png
- File:Arnstein mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Aschenroth 300.png
- File:Aschfeld 500.png
- File:Aura im Sinngrund 500.png
- File:Bergrothenfels 500.png
- File:Bettelmannsgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Billingshausen 300.png
- File:Binsbach 300.png
- File:Binsfeld 500.png
- File:Birkenfeld 500.png
- File:Birkenfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Birkenfeld.png
- File:Birkenfeld1.png
- File:Bischbrunn 300.png
- File:Bischbrunn mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Bischbrunn.png
- File:Bischbrunn5.png
- File:Bischbrunner Forst 500.png
- File:Bischbrunner Forst5.png
- File:Böser Wiesengraben 1.jpg
- File:Böttigheim5.png
- File:Breitenbrunn5.png
- File:Büchold 500.png
- File:Bühler 500.png
- File:Burgjoß 500.png
- File:Burgsinn 500.png
- File:Bürstadt.jpg
- File:Duttenbrunn 500.png
- File:Eichenfürst.png
- File:Einzuggebiet des Istelgrunds.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Bodenwiesengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Buchenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet des Ziegelbachs.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Erlenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Esselbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Faulbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Fränkbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Gehägsgraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Glasbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Grummibach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Hartgraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Haslochbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Heinrichsbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Kahl.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Karbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Klimbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Klinggraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Lohr.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Mehlengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Meisenbrünnlein.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Rohrwiesenbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Silberlochbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Steinbach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Steinmarker Bach.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Stelzengraben.jpg
- File:Einzugsgebiet Welzbach (Kembach), Kembach (Main, Urphar).jpg
- File:Erlach 300.png
- File:Erlenbach bei Marktheidenfeld 500.png
- File:Erlenbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Erlenbach.png
- File:Erlenbach5.png
- File:Esselbach 500.png
- File:Esselbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Esselbach.png
- File:Esselbach5.png
- File:Eußenheim 500.png
- File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Faulbach.png
- File:Faulbach5.png
- File:Fellen 500.png
- File:Fellen mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Forst Aura 500.png
- File:Forst Lohrerstraße 500.png
- File:Frammersbach 500.png
- File:Frammersbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Frammersbacher Forst 500.png
- File:Fürstlich Löwensteinscher Park 500.png
- File:Fürstlich Löwensteinscher Park5.png
- File:Gainfurter Markung 300.png
- File:Gambach 300.png
- File:Gänheim 500.png
- File:Gemarkung Aschenroth.png
- File:Gemarkung Englmannsberg.png
- File:Gemarkung Forst Lohrerstraße.png
- File:Gemarkung Haurain.png
- File:Gemarkung Hausen.png
- File:Gemarkung Herrnwald.png
- File:Gemarkung Heßdorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Heßlar.png
- File:Gemarkung Heugrumbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Himmelstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Hofstetten.png
- File:Gemarkung Höllrich.png
- File:Gemarkung Homburg am Main.png
- File:Gemarkung Hundsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Karbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Karlburg.png
- File:Gemarkung Karlstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Karsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Kredenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Kreuzwertheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Krommenthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Langenprozelten.png
- File:Gemarkung Langenprozeltener Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Laudenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Lengfurt.png
- File:Gemarkung Lohr.png
- File:Gemarkung Marienbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Marktheidenfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Massenbuch.png
- File:Gemarkung Michelau an der Saale.png
- File:Gemarkung Michelrieth.png
- File:Gemarkung Mittelsinn.png
- File:Gemarkung Müdesheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Mühlbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Münster.png
- File:Gemarkung Neubessingen.png
- File:Gemarkung Neuendorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Neuhütten.png
- File:Gemarkung Neustadt am Main.png
- File:Gemarkung Oberndorf.png
- File:Gemarkung Obersfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Obersinn.png
- File:Gemarkung Oberwittbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Partenstein.png
- File:Gemarkung Partensteiner Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Pflochsbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rechtenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rengersbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Rettersheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Retzbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Retzstadt.png
- File:Gemarkung Reuchelheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Rieneck.png
- File:Gemarkung Roden.png
- File:Gemarkung Rodenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Rothenberg.png
- File:Gemarkung Rothenfels.png
- File:Gemarkung Röttbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Ruppertshütten.png
- File:Gemarkung Ruppertshüttener Forst.png
- File:Gemarkung Sachsenheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Sackenbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Schaippach.png
- File:Gemarkung Schollbrunn.png
- File:Gemarkung Schonderfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Schwebenried.png
- File:Gemarkung Seifriedsburg neu.png
- File:Gemarkung Seifriedsburg.png
- File:Gemarkung Sendelbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Stadelhofen.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Steinmark.png
- File:Gemarkung Stetten.png
- File:Gemarkung Thüngen.png
- File:Gemarkung Tiefenthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Trennfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Unterwittbach.png
- File:Gemarkung Urspringen.png
- File:Gemarkung Waldzell.png
- File:Gemarkung Weickersgrüben.png
- File:Gemarkung Wernfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Weyersfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Wiebelbach.png
- File:Gemarkung WIesenfeld.png
- File:Gemarkung Wiesthal.png
- File:Gemarkung Windheim.png
- File:Gemarkung Wolfsmünster.png
- File:Gemarkung Wombach.png
- File:Gemarkung Zellingen.png
- File:Gemarkung Zimmern.png
- File:Gemeinde Reisbach.png
- File:Gemünden 500.png
- File:Gemünden mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Gemünden mit seinen Gemarkungen.png
- File:Glasofen 300.png
- File:Glasofen5.png
- File:Gössenheim 300.png
- File:Gössenheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Gräfendorf 500.png
- File:Gräfendorf mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Grundgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Güßgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Habichsthal 500.png
- File:Hafenlohr 500.png
- File:Hafenlohr mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Hafenlohr mit Gemarkungen1.png
- File:Hafenlohr5.png
- File:Hafenlohrtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Halsbach 500.png
- File:Halsheim 500.png
- File:Harrbach 300.png
- File:Haselbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Hasloch 500.png
- File:Hasloch mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Hasloch.png
- File:Hasloch5.png
- File:Hasselberg 300.png
- File:Hasselberg5.png
- File:Helmstadt.png
- File:Helmstadt5.png
- File:Heubrunnenbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Hoher Berg5.png
- File:Holzkirchen.png
- File:Holzkirchen5.png
- File:Holzkirchhausen5.png
- File:Homburg5.png
- File:Hubertusgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Karbach Gemarkung.png
- File:Karbach1.jpg
- File:Karlstadt mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Karsbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Kettlichsgraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Krebsbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Kredenbach5.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim.png
- File:Kreuzwertheim5.png
- File:Lautergrund Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Leitenbach (Aalbach) Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Lengfurt5.png
- File:Lengfurt5a.png
- File:Lohr mit seinen Stadtteilen.png
- File:Marienbrunn5.png
- File:Marktheidenfeld.png
- File:Marktheidenfeld5.png
- File:Michelrieth5.png
- File:Neubrunn.png
- File:Neubrunn5.png
- File:Neuenbuch5.png
- File:Neustadt mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Oberaltenbuch5.png
- File:Oberndorf5.png
- File:Oberwittbach5.png
- File:Rechtenbach mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Remlingen5.png
- File:Rettersheim5.png
- File:Roden mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Roden.png
- File:Roden5.png
- File:Rond-point de Berkane, Maroc.png
- File:Rothenfels mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Röttbach5.png
- File:Schollbrunn5.png
- File:Stadt Marktheidenfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Stadtprozelten.png
- File:Stadtprozelten5.png
- File:Steinfeld mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Stelzengraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Tiefenthal5.png
- File:Triefenstein mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Triefenstein.png
- File:Uettingen5.png
- File:Unteraltenbuch5.png
- File:Unterwittbach5.png
- File:Urspringen5.png
- File:Weidigsbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Welzbach (Tauber) - im oberen Bereich Altbach genannt - Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Wiebelbach5.png
- File:Wiesthal mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Windheim5.png
- File:Wüstenzell5.png
- File:Zellergraben Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Zellingen mit Gemarkungen.png
- File:Ziegelbach Einzugsgebiet.jpg
- File:Zimmern5.png
Vaionaut (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Die Beispiele, die ich jetzt nochmal geprüft habe, sollen alle "Eigenes Werk" und "CC-by-sa-4.0" sein. Das trifft sicher nicht zu. Krd 16:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Es gibt zahlreiche Beispiele, in denen nichts von OSM steht. Hast Du eine Liste der Dateien, die von OSM stammen? --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: You tagged these as dw_no_source but some appear to be valid OpenSteetMap files. Please advise. --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea who could sort all this out. Krd 04:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
@Vaionaut: Here is one example I checked: File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg is derived from opentopomap.org. The file description claimed this to be the own work by the uploader (by using {{Self}}) and granted a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} which doesn't match {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} used by OpenTopoMap. Neither OpenTopoMap (for the map style) nor OpenStreetMap were credited. Mass-uploading such maps without proper credit and licenses is a disaster waiting to happen. How to fix this? We could temporarily restore the whole lot but then we need a volunteer who goes through all these files within a reasonable time frame, fixes the credits and adds links to the original maps. Is anyone willing to do this? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Photos of Dilaver Najafov
Hallo,
First of all, thank you for adding ticket permission to the photo by Dilaver Najafov[16]. Highly appreciated.
My question is can we create template like this one and while uploading photos by Dilaver Najafov from the pages he mentioned in permission e-mail, add it as a license? We can put the links from Najafov's letter (where he uploaded his photos) bellow like on template above.
Vielen dank, Interfase (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are welcome to prepare such template! But please note that the ticket is not yet complete and up to now only applies to one file. I don't know yet which exact files the photographer intends to release, so we (perhaps you) have to discuss with them what exactly the template should point out. Can you arrange this accordingly? Krd 17:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for quick response.
- Yes, I have already discussed it with Najafov via Facebook. He agreed to publish all photos made by him that were uploaded by him into his facebook page[17], instagram page[18], Union of Azerbaijan Photographers[19] and into the web-site of Ministry of Youth and Sports of Azerbaijan[20] (he is actually the official photographer of this ministry).
- As he informed me he already mentioned that information and gave the url links of those web-sites in his permission e-mail yesterday [Ticket#: 2024082610003915]. I think that based on this information we can apply this ticket to all his photos from those pages he mentioned in his permission letter as well.
- Best wishes, Interfase (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Please let me know when the template is prepared. --Krd 17:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Template is ready[21]. I will wait when ticket is to be complete. Thanks you for support. Danke schön! Interfase (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Krd 03:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Danke, Krd. Also thanks for this clarification[22]. I think that this is correct wording. So, can I place this template to another photos by Najafov taken from the mentioned sources myself? Interfase (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes please. Krd 05:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Danke, Krd. Also thanks for this clarification[22]. I think that this is correct wording. So, can I place this template to another photos by Najafov taken from the mentioned sources myself? Interfase (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Krd 03:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Template is ready[21]. I will wait when ticket is to be complete. Thanks you for support. Danke schön! Interfase (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Please let me know when the template is prepared. --Krd 17:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Jan A. Czochralski - zdjęcie
Jestem zaskoczony usunięciem zdjęcia: Jan Antoni Czochralski Spełniłem wymagane warunki: dostarczyłem do Wikimedia oficjalne pozwolenie ze strony autorki zdjęcia na publikację. Mam jeszcze nadzieję na cofnięcie tej decyzji. 74Ryszard (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Wasn't able to answer the deletion request because of my phone's technical issues, which has 2FA tied to my account. The deleter's rationale is actually faulty in light of Polish law (see COM:FOP Poland). That is, so long as you do not actually start producing poster copies from that, it is alright. See also Template:FoP-Poland. COM:POSTER says posters are copyrighted as a rule, but publicly displayed poster, as this one was, are specifically exempt. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 19:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- An election poster is not "permanently exhibited". Krd 07:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Regarding the recent deletion of this image, ticket: 2024080710007242 applies to this photo as well, as Professor Valentin Ivănescu granted permission for its use. Could this file be restored, or should I reupload it? Additionally, is it possible to create a custom Creative Commons license tag for the photos from his collection? Although the copyright for the photos has expired under Romanian law (1956), since the photos come from his personal collection, I believe he retains some control over their publication. Therefore, I think applying a CC BY 4.0 license would be appropriate.
Thank you, Kataadj (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The file is now restored. --Krd 09:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I also created the template. Kataadj (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why, what for? I think that the template is wrong as the files are PD anyway, and the ticket covers two files only, so no template is required. If I'm mistaken, please advise. Krd 12:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- While the photos are in the public domain, scans of the physical photographs come from a private collection (in this case, Valentin Ivănescu's). Doesn’t the owner who created the photo scans control the publication rights? The collector agrees to the publication but with the condition that they are attributed to his collection. That’s why I created the template. Kataadj (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Per common understanding the creation of the scan does not create copyright, so the images are still in the public domain. Krd 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the clarification. In this case, the email sent by Professor Ivănescu was not necessary, if I understand correctly. I will make a request to delete the template. Kataadj (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Per common understanding the creation of the scan does not create copyright, so the images are still in the public domain. Krd 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- While the photos are in the public domain, scans of the physical photographs come from a private collection (in this case, Valentin Ivănescu's). Doesn’t the owner who created the photo scans control the publication rights? The collector agrees to the publication but with the condition that they are attributed to his collection. That’s why I created the template. Kataadj (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why, what for? I think that the template is wrong as the files are PD anyway, and the ticket covers two files only, so no template is required. If I'm mistaken, please advise. Krd 12:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I also created the template. Kataadj (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I just nominated File:Emily Willis in B&W.jpg for deletion, but I see you have already deleted a file by the same name from the same uploader. Can you check if it is the same image? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 04:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Same file. --Krd 07:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
RESTORE
Please restore my image as I have applied the license MP1999talk 11:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 11:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Unless I'm reading it wrong I think you made a mistake and kept the wrong image in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Reliefs in Feodosia. File:2015. Феодосия 044.jpg can probably be kept as "PD-RusEmpire" but it looks like you kept the next file down, File:2015. Феодосия 090.jpg instead when it should have been deleted. Adamant1 (talk) 04:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, corrected, please check. --Krd 04:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks correct now. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of Category:Coeligena inca
I asked to delete this redirection in order to rename main page Category:Coeligena torquata inca with the full species name accepted by major taxonomies and other wikis. Don´t understand why did you revert my solicitation. Hector Bottai (talk) 13:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Your request had the wrong template and was incomprehensible. Are you going to move the files and subcategories to the new category? --Krd 13:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- yes Hector Bottai (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please go ahead. Krd 19:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 12:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please go ahead. Krd 19:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- yes Hector Bottai (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
VRT permissions
Hello Krd, last weekend you dropped {{No permission}} templates on two photos from third parties that I uploaded/transferred from Flickr. Since there's no clear discussion page/link given in the dropped template, I drop in here on your talk page. It concerns these two photos File:National Archives of Georgia (december 2007).jpg and File:Tbilisi - corner Pekini and Kazbegi (december 2007).jpg. Can you tell me why you thought the permissions are missing? I see the Flickr license to be eligible to transfer both photos to Commons - which I did via the Share images from Flickr button in the upload page of Commons which has an automatic check. Also the Flickr bot check was positively accepted on both photos. So I am a bit confused here. To me it looks very similar to dozens of my own photos that I transferred myself from Flickr, or the hundreds of my photos that others transferred from my Flickr to Commons. If you still see ground to have photos in this situation deleted for lack of (VRT) permission then I am very much interested, because I have tried to get a range of my photos deleted from Commons that others uploaded, but failed to have that arranged as the CC license was in place. Again, I am curious which ground you see in this case. Thanks. --Labrang (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Freedom of panorama for the depicted posters. Krd 12:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, so what do you want with the template? That someone from the party organization will submit an email of consent? Such as indicated in this page? That is no big deal. You may smell I know people. However, I wonder why you opted for this unclear template that suggests there is something wrong with the license, with a very restricted timeframe, rather than using the regular deletion nomination. Labrang (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to hear that this is no big deal. Please arrange it. Krd 17:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, so what do you want with the template? That someone from the party organization will submit an email of consent? Such as indicated in this page? That is no big deal. You may smell I know people. However, I wonder why you opted for this unclear template that suggests there is something wrong with the license, with a very restricted timeframe, rather than using the regular deletion nomination. Labrang (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
The mentioned photo was taken for me at a sports competition. Copyright belongs to me. Please help to restore the image. Cavid Süleymanlı (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Question about Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Elaha Qarlugh and a related unblock request at User talk:Cyber.Eyes.2005
Hello, the user that you CU-blocked at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Elaha Qarlugh, also known as Cyber.Eyes.2005 in enwiki/simplewiki, has been active since April 2024. Relevant discussion can be seen at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_39#Cyber.Eyes.2005, but there are no comments from the local CUs. In addition, their unblock request has been reviewed by user:Taivo (non-CU admin, please see special:diff/824703446 for their comments). Does the Commons CU team recognize and authorize the return of the user, and is this OK for you? In general, only CUs are allowed to reverse CU-blocks (w:WP:CUBL), and I thought the local CUs should be informed about this case. I look forward to hearing from you. MathXplore (talk) 02:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please also see Special:CentralAuth/Nima_Lhamo and Special:CentralAuth/Tsillganishkutz (CU-blocked users) for further details. MathXplore (talk) 04:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I see, Cyber.Eyes.2005 was never blocked at Commons so Taivo's answer to the user is correct. I haven't read the whole story yet, but I don't see any reason to block them now. Is there any current abuse by the user? Krd 07:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, one of their file submissions is marked for deletion (Special:Diff/919505526). At enwiki, Special:CentralAuth/Nima_Lhamo and Special:CentralAuth/Tsillganishkutz are confirmed to Cyber.Eyes.2005. Please see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005/Archive#19_February_2023 and w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005/Archive#14_February_2023 for enwiki CU results. This means that Cyber.Eyes.2005 was blocked at Commons with different accounts, and that is why they were requesting an unblock. MathXplore (talk) 07:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The mentioned investigations are one and a half year old. I don't know why Cyber.Eyes.2005 was never blocked at Commons, but it appears to be fact that they were never blocked. Perhaps this was a mistake, but I see no reason to now reinstate a block that actually never was made, after such long time with no actual gross misbehaviour. Is there any current abuse? Krd 07:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Except for the file deletion I mentioned above, I see no other issues. Thank you for your feedback. MathXplore (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The mentioned investigations are one and a half year old. I don't know why Cyber.Eyes.2005 was never blocked at Commons, but it appears to be fact that they were never blocked. Perhaps this was a mistake, but I see no reason to now reinstate a block that actually never was made, after such long time with no actual gross misbehaviour. Is there any current abuse? Krd 07:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, one of their file submissions is marked for deletion (Special:Diff/919505526). At enwiki, Special:CentralAuth/Nima_Lhamo and Special:CentralAuth/Tsillganishkutz are confirmed to Cyber.Eyes.2005. Please see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005/Archive#19_February_2023 and w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005/Archive#14_February_2023 for enwiki CU results. This means that Cyber.Eyes.2005 was blocked at Commons with different accounts, and that is why they were requesting an unblock. MathXplore (talk) 07:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I see, Cyber.Eyes.2005 was never blocked at Commons so Taivo's answer to the user is correct. I haven't read the whole story yet, but I don't see any reason to block them now. Is there any current abuse by the user? Krd 07:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleting derivative works - File:Spieloberflächen.jpg
Hello Krd,
several of my pictures were tagged als derivative work 7 days ago. Most of the taggs were correct and i've read the COM:L and COM:VRT. So this should not happen again.
The File:Spieloberflächen.jpg was the only one, in my opinion wasn't tagged correct. I also checked this on the german page for copyright questions. The answer was, for surfaces like tables and walls, the copyright is not applied. I also added an information to the source information of the picture. So, I did the foto by myself and uploaded it by myself. This foto should have been ok. See also https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen
Is the a possibility to revive the picture? I also could reupload the picture, but this seemed useless to me without clarifying the topic.
Regards Plexi83 (talk) 22:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist wiederhergestellt. --Krd 03:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Local upload of Astana file
I asked for temporary restoration of File:Central Downtown Astana 2.jpg, for potential local upload, but it seems I wasn't fast enough. I just now noticed the message of 17th September on it having been restored. Could you please re-restore it? Sorry for the inconvenience. –LPfi (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 05:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Now locally uploaded at en-voy. –LPfi (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Would you mind taking a look at the file for File:Shibu Chacko.jpg, The email is in a queue awaiting processing. For an update on the issue Since you're the VRT member who verified the licensing. Monophile (talk) 09:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Permission sender got followup question they need to answer. --Krd 12:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Fuengirola - Monumento Juan Gómez González, 'Juanito' 2.jpg
Hi Krd. Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Zarateman#Casa modernista de Guadix because I think I might've been incorrect and File:Fuengirola - Monumento Juan Gómez González, 'Juanito' 2.jpg could be OK based on {{FoP-Spain}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please comment on the deletion request. --Krd 14:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Bauhinia blakeana, watercolour painting by Mark Isaac-Williams.jpg
Hi Krd. Would you mind taking a look at the file description for File:Bauhinia blakeana, watercolour painting by Mark Isaac-Williams.jpg? Since you're the VRT member who verified the license, you should be able to see whether it's the uploaders "own work". If it's not, the perhaps the file's description should be changed to reflect the email sent to VRT. The photographed work is a painting by en:Mark Isaac-Williams; so, if the uploader is Issac-William, they essentially created an auto-biography about themselves on English Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- The ticket contains permission from Issac-William. VRT cannot comment on if the uploader is the ticket sender. --Krd 14:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, I saw you closed the above DR, but the uploader said that the statue is located in Geneva, Switzerland, which is covered by {{FoP-Switzerland}}. Any reason why these files are not covered by Swiss FOP? A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't see that. Now corrected. Thx! Krd 07:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed the file was removed because no permission was given. I can confirm it was sent into permissions on 27/08/2024 at 02:48 GMT. Can you verify this was recieved? CQuick (talk) 20:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- No. Please have it sent again. --Krd 04:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's it sent in again. Can you please restore the image. Thank you. CQuick (talk) 11:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- If is was sent again, is will be processed at it's turn. There is no jumping the queue. Krd 16:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's it sent in again. Can you please restore the image. Thank you. CQuick (talk) 11:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi again. Would you please look into the subject section? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 18:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Gelöschte Fotos von Gonfaloni
File:Livo-TN-Gonfalone.jpg, File:Breguzzo-Gonfalone.jpg etc.
bitte mal erklären,
- warum die einfach ohne Diskussion gelöscht werden
- auf welcher rechtlichen Grundlage wer genau ein Urheberrecht/Diritto d'autore/Copyright haben soll
Aus meiner Sicht eindeutig Schutzrechtsberühmung Sukaq (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
ich warte immer noch auf eine Erklärung, warum ohne Diskussion über 60 meiner Fotos gelöscht werden. Keiner der Beteiligten in diesem Verfahren konnte mir bisher darlegen, warum die Gonfaloni einem urheberrechtlichem Schutz unterliegen sollen.--Sukaq (talk) 13:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Idea for abuse filter
Hello Krd, I had an idea for an abuse filter to help stop self promotional content. Where would the best place be to discuss this? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good question. If the discussion should be kept confidental, I think you can contact an admin directly who is involved with abuse filters. Krd 04:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you recommend any admin in particular? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, sorry. Krd 05:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you recommend any admin in particular? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! It was reported on my talk page User_talk:MGA73#Vandalism-related_help that some users vandalize and mass tag files with no permission. This user mass tagged and you deleted at least some of the files. I checked a few and they were from YouTube. Some are no longer available but some are still there. I think that for example File:DoMixi1989.jpg and File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png looks good. I have not checked the other files. And there may be files marked by other users. --MGA73 (talk) 15:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- This File:Jun Vũ in Chọn Đâu Cho Đúng (2).png was even reviewed by a license reviewer. So it should at least have been changed to a DR. --MGA73 (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo, thank you for the heads up. I have restored two more files, but the rest doesn't look really good to me. If this oocurs again in any way, please let me know. Krd 19:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, this is obviously a case of vandalism. They tagged the files as NPD today yet the date in the template is September 12th, see Special:Diff/926462275, so that the files could be deleted in a blink of an eye, before anyone could do anything. A lot of those files you deleted have valid licenses and don't need permission because they are own work, screenshots from YouTube video by legitimate copyright holders e.g. File:NGỌC TRINH VÀ SIÊU MẪU VÕ HOÀNG YẾN KHOE VẺ RẠNG RỠ TẠI HẬU TRƯỜNG VIFW SS18.webm, files already reviewed by a license reviewer e.g. File:Sơn Tùng M-TP hát Chín bậc tình yêu tại đêm nhạc An Thuyên 27s.jpg (if there's something wrong, it'd be better to bring it to DR instead of tagging it as NPD), photos taken by a photographer in Flickr and freely licensed e.g. File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg. There are several that indeed violate copyright and these should be deleted but these are only several among hundreds of correctly licensed files. Please look more into this case because too many files were wrongly deleted, compared to only a few correctly deleted. Even if some files may need permission, the uploaders should be able to have 7 days to resolve the issue. While in this situation, they have barely have anytime. For example File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg, the moment the file was tagges NPD was 04:15, and then it was deleted at 06:22, so that was... less than 3 hours. Băng Tỏa 20:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree. It appears all images are already restored. Thanks to MGA73 for their work. Krd 03:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
image deleted with reference to fop
Could you please email me or otherwise send me that image? Or tell me what was pictured in it? I have no clue what it contained and would like to see it to understand more properly why it was deleted. Gryllida (talk) 02:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The image prominently contains advert poster. Krd 03:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Deletion requests/File:Domenica Sportiva Ugo Frigerio.jpg
I'm talking about this discussion. Please, let me understand: Zio Nicco says this file has no permission. I know that this printed work has permission. And now? I would like to know what rules govern these discussions. Thank you, Sentruper (talk) 15:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- COM:VRT --Krd 06:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Monument to Crazy Horse
Hallo, darf ich bitte wissen, warum die Fotos/Bilder vom Denkmal an Crazy Horse ständig gelöscht werden? Das wär der richtige Tribut an die Indianer, die irgendwie immer wieder diskriminiert werden, letztendlich auch von uns als Wikipedia. Luensu1959 (talk) 07:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Ohne Links auf die Bilder habe ich keine Idee, wovon Du sprichst. Krd 08:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://lij.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monumento_a-o_Cav%C3%A0llo_M%C3%A0tto
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Horse_Memorial
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Horse_Memorial Luensu1959 (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Das Denkmal ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und Bilder davon können auf Commons nicht verwendet werden. Bitte direkt in die Wikipedia hochladen. Krd 12:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
VRT question
Hi, Krd! I know you do most of the heavy lifting on VRT (while I do very little), but could I ask you to glance briefly at this? It looks as if permission has been accepted without any verification of any kind, and that makes me uncomfortable. Am I wrong? Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, but why don't you contact the processing VRT user directly, perhaps in private? Krd 08:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Was this image indeed deleted for reasons not affecting [23] and [24]? Somehow cannot believe it, since the del reason was "no permission"... BasileusAutokratorPL (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- No. And I think nobody said that. --Krd 11:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
admin's help
Hi Krd, I notice that you are an active administrator, so I would like to ask for your help. Namely, I recently left a message on Vilage pump, but unfortunately no one responded. I need a person with admin rights who can create certain pages. The syntax is there, just need to do the move from my namespace to main. My understanding is that only admins can do this, so if you have some time please look at my request at Vilage pump. MikyM (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please try: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard Krd 12:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I did but the same, no one responded. Maybe no admin saw it? Do you have any more specific suggestions?--MikyM (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- It appears is has just been done by another admin. Krd 14:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I did but the same, no one responded. Maybe no admin saw it? Do you have any more specific suggestions?--MikyM (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyvios
Hi. This file should also be deleted, because the main file was deleted. Also talk page. Gadir (talk) 09:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Already done. --Krd 12:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Cave_in_Lamegua 1-6
Hallo Krd, hatte Aba Ribeiro Alfred Neumann nicht mehr mit eMail kontaktiert, um die Urheberrechtsverhältnisse der Bilder zu klären? AFAIK ist nur das Bild auf dem Aba selbst zu sehen ist, von seinem Cousin Mikhael Ribeiro, die anderen sind von Aba selbst und müssen daher nicht gelöscht werden, selbst wenn von Mikhael die Genehmigung noch immer fehlt. Schönen Gruß, JPF (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Bitte gib einen gültigen Link auf eins der Bilder an. Krd 11:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Cave_in_Lamegua 1.jpg. Die anderen Bilder haben austeigende Nummern. Nur auf einem ist AFAIR ein Mann zu sehen, Aba Ribeiro, der Fotograf der anderen Bilder. JPF (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Erl. Krd 05:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Danke. JPF (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Erl. Krd 05:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- File:Cave_in_Lamegua 1.jpg. Die anderen Bilder haben austeigende Nummern. Nur auf einem ist AFAIR ein Mann zu sehen, Aba Ribeiro, der Fotograf der anderen Bilder. JPF (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Krd, Du hast u.a. File:Επισκοπή 3.jpg mit dem Kommentar No license since 21 September 2024 und viele weitere Dateien gelöscht. Wie ist das denn zu verstehen?
Diese und alle anderen betroffenden Dateien des Users hatten samt und sonders eine Lizenz. Deinen Löschgrund kann ich also nicht nachvollziehen.
Der antragstellende User (Εὐθυμένης (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) ) hatte wiederum per Baustein bemängelt: File has no source. Alle Dateien waren aber source={{own}}-Dateien. Auch diesen Löschgrund kann ich also nicht nachvollziehen.
Ich habe den User auf seiner Disk. aufgefordert, die Löschbausteine zu entfernen - Fehlanzeige.
Ich habe das Ganze auf Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_39#User:Εὐθυμένης angesprochen - ohne Reaktion.
Das Ergebnis ist jetzt, dass haufenweise korrekt lizenzierte Bilder gelöscht wurden. Ich finde das sehr unzufriedenstellend. Kannst Du in der Sache bitte weiterhelfen? Viele Grüße, Emha (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ich kann der Erklärung, die der Benutzer auf seiner Disk zu den genannten Beispielen angegeben hat, soweit nachvollziehen. "no source" ist hier vielleicht falsch, richtig wäre, das per Löschantrag zu klären. Ich sage ihm das jetzt.
- Gibt es Dateien, die noch besonders zu prüfen wären? --Krd 13:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Die betroffenen User war m.E. alle unbescholten. Ich weiß nicht, was Εὐθυμένης (der ja kein Neuling ist) hier geritten hat, aber ich ziehe die Löschung aller seiner per Massenlöschanträge betroffenen Dateien in Zweifel, weil schlicht der Löschgrund komplett inkorrekt ist.
- Hätte er - wie ich ihn gebeten habe - die Anträge zurück gezogen, könnte man ganz in Ruhe darüber sprechen. So ist jetzt halt erstmal viel bzw. alles weg und er selbst kann seine Edits nicht mehr rückgängig machen. Danke für Deine Ansprache! Was machen wir, wenn er keinen regulären Löschantrag stellt? Emha (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- User talk:Myhersonissos war nicht unbescholten (aber auch kein schwerer Fall). Leider ist das Kind im Brunnen, alle gelöschten Dateien einzeln durchzugehen ist eine Aufgabe für Tage und Wochen. Wenn Du einzelne Dateien hast, die man zweifelsfrei klären könnte, könnte man schauen, dann auch die anderen Uploads dieser jeweiligen Benutzer. Wirklich alles durchzusehen zöge wohl leider zu viel Kapazitäten von anderen Aufgaben ab.
- Εὐθυμένης war in meinem Gedächtnis ein vertrauenswürdiger Mitarbeiter, bei dessen Anträgen nach nicht in vollem Detailgrad hinschauen musste. Das trifft wohl jetzt, vorsichtig formuliert, nicht mehr ganz zu. Sollten die Anträge in der Schlagzahl weiter kommen und nicht sinnvoll zusammengefasst werden, würde mich das stören. Krd 14:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ich hatte gar nicht realisiert, dass Du hier auch Admin bist. Falls Du Dateien findest, die Du bereit wärst wiederherzustellen, mach das bitte gern ohne zu fragen! Krd 14:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Du hast mich damals vorgeschlagen und bist nach der Wahl mein Mentor gewesen ;-)
Natürlich ist mein Adminlevel ein komplett anderes als Deins, aber ich versuche nach wie vor - auch in Kombination als Support-Teammitglied - meinen kleinen Teil dazu beizutragen, dass hier auf Commons alles gut läuft.
Der User hat Dir geantwortet. Ich finde, er windet sich raus und er geht gar nicht auf die no source-Fälle ein... - Danke für die Ermutigung, dann werde ich mir mal anschauen, wo sich das m. E. eindeutig lohnt. Was ich halt immer so schlimm finde: wenn dieser Bilder einmal gelöscht vom Delinker-Bot aus den Artikeln entfernt wurden, bringt sie niemand wieder zurück, selbst wenn sie hier wieder hergestellt wurden, oder?
- Viele Grüße, Emha (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Der Dateientlinkerbot ändert auch zurück, wenn es noch geht. Je länger es her ist, desto größer die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Konflikten. Wenn mehrere Bilder in einem Artikel betroffen sind, kommt es manchmal auch auf die Reihenfolge der Wiederherstellung an. Es ist halt kompliziert.
- Das Commonsdelinker stellt nicht wieder her, und verlinkt auch leider das Bild nicht in der Zusammenfassung, was die Sache anstrengend macht. Immerhin hat er aber auch ein Log: https://commons-delinquent.toolforge.org/index.php Krd 05:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Du hast mich damals vorgeschlagen und bist nach der Wahl mein Mentor gewesen ;-)
- Ich hatte gar nicht realisiert, dass Du hier auch Admin bist. Falls Du Dateien findest, die Du bereit wärst wiederherzustellen, mach das bitte gern ohne zu fragen! Krd 14:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Stijn van Cauter
Moin, Du hast eine Reihe Dateien von van Cauter gelöscht. Die Lizenz war für diese Dateien eigentlich mit dieser Diskussion geklärt. Da ich Commons nicht bespiele und van Cauter hier auch keine regelmäßige Nutzung vorweist, ist die Lösch-Androhung an mir sowie ihm vorbeigegangen (User talk:Svc nulll). Den Verlust der Dateien versteh ich nach der bestehenden Diskussion mit Behalten-Entscheidung nicht. Und ehrlicherweise ermüdet mich dieser bürokratische Akt in englischer Sprache. Gibt es etwas das ich tun kann um die Datein zu retten, war das ein Fehler, oder sollte ich die Dateien jetzt abschreiben? gefolgt von einem kleinen warum - das aber wirklich nur wenn Du Dich dazu motiviert fühlst? Commons:Lizenzen gibt da nämlich nach der bestehenden Diskussion keine Auskunft drüber warum es zur LÖschung kommt obwohl van Cauter beim Commons:Support-Team vorstellig war. Und seine Arbeit in der Diskussion offen gelegt hat. Danke. Fraoch (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo. Ich hab die Dateien wiederhergestellt, die in dem Löschantrag behalten wurden. Krd 07:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Danke Fraoch (talk) 07:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Uploading images
Hello, i would like to ask. Is image from https://www.freepik.com/ allowed to be uploaded in Commons? I have seen some people are uploading it here. Unrelaxing (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think it isn't. Krd 05:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Hórreos en O Grove
Hola KRD. Soy de O Grove (Pontevedra) y conozco Combarro. Esa foto no pertenece a O Grove, con toda seguridad. No se que prueba quieres que lo demuestre. En todo caso, la misma foto no puede pertenecer a O Grove y a Combarro, distantes unos 25 km. Pedro Lameiro (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Photo descriptions and names can be changed. Being incorrect is no reason for deletion. Krd 14:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Entiendo. Pedro --Lameiro (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Moscow, Idaho.svg
Is there any chance that you could upload File:Flag of Moscow, Idaho.svg to English Wikipedia under fair use? Batrachoseps (talk) 16:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, sorry. But I can undelete it for you for 24 hours to do it. Please report when ready. Krd 17:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll do that. Batrachoseps (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Are you going to undelete it? Batrachoseps (talk) 19:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, please report when finished. Krd 07:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded it to w:File:Flag of Moscow, Idaho (en).svg. Batrachoseps (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, please report when finished. Krd 07:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
What happened to my video?
@Krd you deleted my video of a spider eating a termite. Why did you do that? And please bring it bake because I’m soon! Good day! Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deletion requests
Hallo krd, ich habe gesehen, dass du einige meiner gemeldeten Daten zu deletion requests verschoben hast. Habe ich da was falsch gemacht? Für mich ist commons leider ein Buch mit sechs Siegeln. Für Hilfe bin ich dankbar. --Känguru1890 (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ich verstehe die Frage nicht ganz. Wenn Commons leider ein Buch mit sechs Siegeln ist, auf welcher Basis markierst Du dann Dateien als unzureichend lizensiert? Krd 14:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- In diesem Sinne: was spricht dagegen, File:Goldmedaille Rolf Lukaschewski I.jpg wieder herzustellen? Emha (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Das dürfte ein geschütztes Design sein, oder? Krd 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Da dürftest Du Recht haben und gilt dann für File:Goldmedaille Rolf Lukaschewski II.jpg umso mehr.
- Jedoch nicht für File:Diethelm Blecking.jpg, File:Buckhofblecking1.jpg und File:Adelheidvsaldern 2023.png Da sehe ich keinerlei Grund für "no permission". Und es gibt leider noch mehr --Emha (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jo. :-( Krd 17:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Das dürfte ein geschütztes Design sein, oder? Krd 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ich habe mal gefragt, welche Vorlage ich verwenden soll. Man hat mich auf no permission verwiesen und die habe ich dann über Monate verwendet. Daher verstehe ich nicht ganz, warum es jetzt auf einmal ein Problem sein ist. (es sind eben nur sechs Siegel, da ich davon ausging das mit den no permission verstanden zu haben) --Känguru1890 (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Warum ist denn für die genannten Dateien keine ausreichende Berechtigung vorhanden? Krd 18:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Braucht es nicht immer so eine Supportbestätigung, dass der Fotograf zugestimmt hat? Die meisten user laden einfach ein Foto hoch. Da kann ich nicht erkennen, ob die Person auf dem Bild oder der Fotograf dem Hochladen zugestimmt. Auch sind einige Fotos anscheinend bei internen Veranstaltungen aufgenommen. Ich dachte, da braucht man eine explizite Einwilligung. --Känguru1890 (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Es ist kompliziert, und deine Frage vermischt bereits völlig unterschiedliche Aspekte. Die Vorlage "no permission" soll verwendet werden, wenn die Angaben in der Dateiseite zweifelsfrei nicht zutreffen und auch eine Freigabe erforderlich ist. Die hier angesprochenen Dateien würde ich als Grenzfälle ansehen. Krd 07:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Welche Aspekte vermische ich? Warum sind es Grenzfälle? Wie soll ich es in Zukunft handhaben? --Känguru1890 (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wir können da gern ausführlich drüber reden, allerdings bitte nicht heute. Im Zweifel bitte gern per Commons:Deletion requests. Krd 08:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Klar, schreib mir einfach, wenn du Zeit hast. Gerne auch auf meiner Disk oder per Wikimail. --Känguru1890 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wir können da gern ausführlich drüber reden, allerdings bitte nicht heute. Im Zweifel bitte gern per Commons:Deletion requests. Krd 08:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Welche Aspekte vermische ich? Warum sind es Grenzfälle? Wie soll ich es in Zukunft handhaben? --Känguru1890 (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Es ist kompliziert, und deine Frage vermischt bereits völlig unterschiedliche Aspekte. Die Vorlage "no permission" soll verwendet werden, wenn die Angaben in der Dateiseite zweifelsfrei nicht zutreffen und auch eine Freigabe erforderlich ist. Die hier angesprochenen Dateien würde ich als Grenzfälle ansehen. Krd 07:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Braucht es nicht immer so eine Supportbestätigung, dass der Fotograf zugestimmt hat? Die meisten user laden einfach ein Foto hoch. Da kann ich nicht erkennen, ob die Person auf dem Bild oder der Fotograf dem Hochladen zugestimmt. Auch sind einige Fotos anscheinend bei internen Veranstaltungen aufgenommen. Ich dachte, da braucht man eine explizite Einwilligung. --Känguru1890 (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Warum ist denn für die genannten Dateien keine ausreichende Berechtigung vorhanden? Krd 18:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- In diesem Sinne: was spricht dagegen, File:Goldmedaille Rolf Lukaschewski I.jpg wieder herzustellen? Emha (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Why did you delete File:Benin UNESCO à la Porte du non-retour à Ouidah.jpg, File:Benin UNESCO à la Porte du non-retour.jpg, and File:Door of No Return Sign Ouidah (218406275).jpg?
According to User:The Squirrel Conspiracy's decision in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Door of No Return, Ouidah, those three files were supposed to be kept, yet you cited that thread when deleting them. Now, it would certainly appear that you need to undelete them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Answered in the DR. --Krd 11:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Reinstatement of image for which Commons permission now exists
Please revert this edit and reinstate this image: Runnicles, Lehman and WSoS Committee interview panel 24AUG2024.jpg
This was due to oversight. The photographer Alberto Massimo has now emailed Wikimedia Commons assigning permissions under CC 4.0. Ticket#2024102610006481
The process has been complicated by the fact I cannot see any details about the image because it is deleted. I hope all the data I uploaded with it has not been deleted too. Chrisdevelop (talk) 22:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Please delete
Hi, thanks for closing Commons:Deletion_requests/File:AIK_RAMZ_THE_POETOFPAIN_IMG_jpg.jpg. Could you delete the page uploader created at File:AIK_RAMZ_THE_POETOFPAIN_IMG_jpg.jpg as well please, user was trying to "fix" it I think and then didn't know what to do so put a deletion template on it. -- Deadstar (msg) 21:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is done. --Krd 08:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Banner Página Wiki Mais Diversidade 2024.png
Hi Krd! Could you take a look at the deletion of the files "File:Banner Página Wiki Mais Diversidade 2024.png" and " File:Banner Página Wiki Mais Mulheres 2024.png"? I made the necessary changes, but they were still deleted. Could you please check? Noaquico (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I have restored the files and converted to regular deletion requests. Please comment there. --Krd 07:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Could you also convert the files: ""File:Folheto do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png", "File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png", "File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia para professores universitários.png", "File:Curadores do evento Mais Povos Originários em Teoria da História na Wiki.png", "File:Webinar Mais Povos Originários.png", "File:Facilitadores da editatona Mais Pretas em Teoria da História na Wiki.png", "File:Webinar Mais Pretas.png" and "File:Webinar Povos Originários.png"? Noaquico (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 17:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Could you also convert the files: ""File:Folheto do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png", "File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png", "File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia para professores universitários.png", "File:Curadores do evento Mais Povos Originários em Teoria da História na Wiki.png", "File:Webinar Mais Povos Originários.png", "File:Facilitadores da editatona Mais Pretas em Teoria da História na Wiki.png", "File:Webinar Mais Pretas.png" and "File:Webinar Povos Originários.png"? Noaquico (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
userright mistake
Hello Krd, When you gave me Account Creator, you accidentally set LR to expire in a week, not Account creator. Can you please fix this? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 23:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. Sorry for the trouble. Krd 06:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted images
Hi Krd,
I noticed that you've deleted the images File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 01.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 13.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 14.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 16.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 17.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 18.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 19.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 21.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 22.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 23.jpg, File:Fiesta Patronal de la Virgen de la Candelaria - Molinos (Salta, Argentina) - 24.jpg. Please note that these images had the necessary permissions as outlined in Ticket #2024092310000289.
Is it possible to restore them?
Thank you. Ucriesidelplata (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 14:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
How is this possible
Hi Krd, How does something like File:Notario Roberto Garzón Jímenez.jpg happen, where a new user was able to overwrite a file? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea. Krd 05:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think there is a bug in Special:Abusefilter/290, or the bug in one of the parameters got fixed. Who should I talk to about getting it fixed? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it's af290 then it works as designed, i.e. overwriting of own uploads is explicitly allowed, which makes sense to me. Krd 16:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think there is a bug in Special:Abusefilter/290, or the bug in one of the parameters got fixed. Who should I talk to about getting it fixed? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello Krd,
The photo of Ilya Anisimov was created in 1896, which was 128 years ago.
Ilya Anisimov’s friend in Moskow - I. Kurbanov was photographer and creator of Ilya Anisimov.jpg
Ilya Anisimov’s friend, the photographer I. Kurbanov had died in 1905, in Moscow, Russian empire.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ilya_Anisimov.jpg
This information was provided by Ilya Anisimov’s granddaughter, Margarita Anisimova.
On 10/16, Ilya Anisimov’s granddaughter, Margarita Anisimova sent an email to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)
I would like to ask you to keep this image under licensing: pd-old-70
Thank you!
Boxes12 (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The permisison was refused in the ticket because the facts appear a little bit different than pointed out here. The ticket is currently waiting for another VRT user for a second opinion. Krd 16:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your reply, Krd,
- Since I started work on the Ilya Anisimov article; I only heard from Margarita Anisimova and her extended family explanation that I described above.
- I am afraid that Margarita Anisimova’s respectful age did not allow her to fully realize the seriousness of Commons Wikimedia’s requirements and that she might skip the importance of details.
- Best wishes,
- Boxes12 (talk) 17:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Krdbot no longer closing DRs?
Hi Krd:
I know Krdbot is supposed to automatically close deletion requests for deleted files if someone has not done so. However, the bot doesn't seem to have done this in a while. For example, the bot hasn't closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:March 2, 2012 Henryville, Indiana Tornado.jpg even though you deleted File:March 2, 2012 Henryville, Indiana Tornado.jpg almost 24 hours ago. Has this functionality been discontinued? Ixfd64 (talk) 05:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The task is not discontinued, but it appears it does not always work. Additional examples welcome.
- Regarding this file, I think it's better to restore it and wait for the DR to be closed by another admin. Krd 06:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
"Deleted: per nomination" as a (non-)explanation
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vu Hoang My in Miss Sport at Miss World 2012.jpg: GoogleLens and TinEye did not yield an earlier prepublication of this shot, so what is really the deletion reason? I feel like you give the deletion reason as "Deleted: per nomination" too often when that doesn't really explain the deletion reason or is actually misleading. Here's another example: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dedo pene gallery 04.jpg. You gave the same closing message, but what part of the deletion requester's reason did you actually think was a deletion reason? It's not a gallery of penises, and being photographed in 2012 rather than 2021 is not a deletion reason by itself, is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The first one was not deleted by me, I closed the DR afterwards as the file was already deleted.
- The second one was deleted because of unknown author and no permission. Krd 11:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt reply. That's a good and clear explanation for the second one. But is it that you don't know why the first one was deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- See File:Vu Hoang My in Miss Sport at Miss World 2012.jpg. The file was deleted by Yann as Netcopyvio. I have no reason to doubt that, and there is no point in keeping the DR open when the file is deleted for that reason. Of course Yann could be mistaken, so feel free to ask them. Krd 11:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I'm fine with that, but next time, could you post "Deleted by Yann as a netcopyvio"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think I'm not going to blame others for minor mistakes, and perhaps it's also too expensive to do so, so I'd rather just leave more of such requests open. Krd 17:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- This just costs you a few seconds to check on what reason the deleter gave. I'm happy files are getting deleted when they should be; I just like clear explanations of why. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think I'm not going to blame others for minor mistakes, and perhaps it's also too expensive to do so, so I'd rather just leave more of such requests open. Krd 17:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I'm fine with that, but next time, could you post "Deleted by Yann as a netcopyvio"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- See File:Vu Hoang My in Miss Sport at Miss World 2012.jpg. The file was deleted by Yann as Netcopyvio. I have no reason to doubt that, and there is no point in keeping the DR open when the file is deleted for that reason. Of course Yann could be mistaken, so feel free to ask them. Krd 11:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt reply. That's a good and clear explanation for the second one. But is it that you don't know why the first one was deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unrelated to the above discussions, I came to say the same thing. "Per discussion" is fine when it's uncontroversial, but when a variety of arguments are presented it's just not enough. e.g. here (tried to ask for clarification). — Rhododendrites talk | 16:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see what could be ambiguous in the mentioned closure. There are founded arguments to keep, and no strong argument to delete (e.g. missing permission). Also the file has been kept before. What else could be said? Krd 16:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think you are referring to a different discussion? The entire discussion is about COM:SCOPE. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion is about scope, and there are reasonable voices to keep this file, and no strong arguments to delete it, so the only possible result is the obvious, i.e. keep per discussion. Am I mistaken? Krd 17:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that you find some arguments strong and some arguments weak, but you've not provided any information at all as to why you see some arguments as strong and some arguments weak. For a controversial discussion, I'd expect a closing statement to be clear about why they came to a particular conclusion when clearly several other experienced users did not. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Noted. Krd 18:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that you find some arguments strong and some arguments weak, but you've not provided any information at all as to why you see some arguments as strong and some arguments weak. For a controversial discussion, I'd expect a closing statement to be clear about why they came to a particular conclusion when clearly several other experienced users did not. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion is about scope, and there are reasonable voices to keep this file, and no strong arguments to delete it, so the only possible result is the obvious, i.e. keep per discussion. Am I mistaken? Krd 17:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think you are referring to a different discussion? The entire discussion is about COM:SCOPE. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see what could be ambiguous in the mentioned closure. There are founded arguments to keep, and no strong argument to delete (e.g. missing permission). Also the file has been kept before. What else could be said? Krd 16:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Your thoughts requested at Administrators/Nominations
Hello Krd, Would you be willing to weigh in on the Users who have been nominated for the mop at com:Administrators/Nominations? Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I didn‘t check in detail, but my first impression is that this is a page to nominate others in order to draw attention to oneself. I may well be completely mistaken, but at least this is my impression. No offense. Krd 17:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- None taken,
- this page was created by Roy Zhou as a result of the most recent non-admin deletion usergroup discussion at the village pump, to help encourage people to go through RFA. If you look at the contribs, I was nominated by Iwquarhashimi after I nominated him, (I did not ask for this, and I am considering declining the nomination) as I think he would be a good admin. The goal is to let people know "Hey, users a,b,c and d all think you should file a RFA", to help get more admins on commons, and start to close the admin gap. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Isn‘t the user talk page the right venue for that? Krd 18:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I‘m not sure we have an admin gap. But we have a general maintenance gap. The best way to draw attention to oneself is to comment on non-obvious deletion requests. Krd 18:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- the page isn't for users who want to be admins, the page is for convincing people who aren't seeking the mop that they have support to request the mop. Sorry if I haven't been super clear about why I asked for your thoughts on the users nominated. No one has added themselves, they were added by someone else. If you have any feedback you would like to give me, I'm all ears. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think this should be on the user talk pages on by e-mail. Krd 06:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- the page isn't for users who want to be admins, the page is for convincing people who aren't seeking the mop that they have support to request the mop. Sorry if I haven't been super clear about why I asked for your thoughts on the users nominated. No one has added themselves, they were added by someone else. If you have any feedback you would like to give me, I'm all ears. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I‘m not sure we have an admin gap. But we have a general maintenance gap. The best way to draw attention to oneself is to comment on non-obvious deletion requests. Krd 18:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Isn‘t the user talk page the right venue for that? Krd 18:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted this file which was tagged by an IP, which is blocked for a year. Could you please check before deleting such files? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Will do. Krd 08:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Request for removal of rights.
Hello Krd, Please remove my account creator permission. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- It will expire in a few days and does no harm. Can we keep it simple, or do you need it removed? Krd 22:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I can wait for them to be removed. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 22:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
FoP
Hi. You guys sometimes go overboard with FoP. Based on the law of the 21st century you deleted a postcard of 1938. --Obivan Kenobi (talk) 08:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Who is the architect who created the building, and when did they die? Krd 12:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- A law can only be applied to an act that occurs after the law was adopted. The postcard is therefore not subject to the law. However, it is not a big deal (deletion), let it stay as it is. The image is available here under a free license. Just wanted to draw attention. --Obivan Kenobi (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% sure, but I think this kind of law will be retroactive. Please feel free to open a disucssion at COM:VP or similar. Krd 15:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- A law can only be applied to an act that occurs after the law was adopted. The postcard is therefore not subject to the law. However, it is not a big deal (deletion), let it stay as it is. The image is available here under a free license. Just wanted to draw attention. --Obivan Kenobi (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Removing VRT Ticket from two images
Hello,
Could you please look agian to 1 and 2, the photographer has a ticket for all the works he puts in his category. Ticket number: 2024071410002913. Michel Bakni (talk) 09:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- The procedure is invalid, the ticket permission is added by the VRT user after check, not by the uploader. Krd 12:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Ticket permission added by non-VRT member
Dear Krd! I have seen that the Krdbot you are running shows the files I have added since September 2022 as "Ticket permission added by non-VRT member", which has not yet been checked by a VRT member.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Krdbot/af69/2022
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Krdbot/af69
In 2023, c:User:Ameisenigel checked the VRT ticket of my photos uploaded to c:Category:Photographs by Imre Vizler, for which I thank him! Now Tanbiruzzaman has drawn my attention to the fact that many of my uploaded photos do not have validated ticket numbers.
Please advise me what is the correct procedure for uploading, what to write in the Permission box (without VRT members having to look for the permission number given), and where to ask for occasional or possibly batch verification?
I don't want to burden only one VRT member with the task of assigning a permission number to many new images, because I plan to upload continuous these images to the Hungarian wikipedia aricles.
Thank you very much for your help! Bizottmány (talk) 09:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for asking! The correct way is to create a template per the examples in Category:Custom license tags with ticket permission and let the VRT user confirm this, so that it can be used a license template. Krd 10:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Krd! Thank you very much for your help! Please check and correct what I did, because this is a completely new thing for me. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Imre_Vizler%27s_photographs_license Hi! Bizottmány (talk) 13:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- That looks perfect, thank you! Please proceed the same way for other cases. Krd 14:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Krd! Thank you very much for your help! Please check and correct what I did, because this is a completely new thing for me. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Imre_Vizler%27s_photographs_license Hi! Bizottmány (talk) 13:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
I am very happy, thank you for the approval! I would also like to ask if all the files in the Krdbot lists cited above are now covered by this template registry, or do they still need to be checked by someone else? --Bizottmány (talk) 15:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- For the files relating to the mentioned ticket: They existing files are good, but it would be even better if we could replace the old license and ticket tags by the new template if that is easily achievable. For future uploads please use the new template only.
- For files related to different tickets, please create new templates, one for each ticket, as the case may be. The templates should be approved by a VRT user before they are used. Krd 15:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Oh. I see the Vizler photos are off the list! Thank you very much! What will be the new template in this case? What should I write in the Permission field? Sorry for being so clueless! --Bizottmány (talk) 15:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC) Is it OK to do it like I did in File:Fraknói Vilmos sírja, 2005.jpg? --Bizottmány (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- That‘s ok. You can leave out the „template:“, and you can also remove the additional license if you like. Krd 16:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Krd! Thank you very much for your help! Bizottmány (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Re-uploading of images missing sources
Hi Krd! I'm writing to you to understand how to behave in cases like that of the user LUCA ZANINI who, after having had several of his images deleted as dw-nsd, has now re-uploaded them almost entirely, without providing the requested information and without proving the license compatibility. Can we treat them as COM:SPEEDY or are there other procedures? Thanks in advance :) Arrow303 (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, speedy will be ok if there is no sufficient information. Krd 09:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Please block an IP
Hello, can you block Special:Contributions/115.166.46.99? I reported them at COM:ANV but there's no answer and the vandalism is growing. --Tmv (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 11:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Revive time
I think you need to revive the deleted Vietnamese artists photos with @MGA73. Even only me just cannot revive it. Thanks. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Which exact files do you think of? Krd 19:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think some photos that you have deleted it before. Photos of the artists like Tran Thanh, Suboi, Karik, Phung Khanh Linh, etc. So much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Everything I'm aware of and is possible has already been done. If there is something more, please provide links. Krd 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, I have links for you: File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21.png (screenshot from a CC YouTube video) and File:Tóc Tiên, Trấn Thành và Dương Anh Vũ tại Siêu trí tuệ Việt Nam.jpg (own work). Please restore these. Thanks in advance. Băng Tỏa 17:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Everything I'm aware of and is possible has already been done. If there is something more, please provide links. Krd 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think some photos that you have deleted it before. Photos of the artists like Tran Thanh, Suboi, Karik, Phung Khanh Linh, etc. So much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Here's another list:
Thanks a lot in advance. Băng Tỏa 18:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 21:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted it as "No ticket permission since 28 August 2024", but I don't think a permission is needed here. Could you please undelete it? Yann (talk) 08:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done, DR open again, please continue. Krd 08:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 21:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Augusto Caminito pictures
Hi there. You cancelled all pictures of Augusto and Augusto and his daughter that I uploaded beginning of October. I’m acting on behalf of Ambra Caminito daughter of Augusto and all pictures used belong to her. Please clarify what we should be doing to upload them again and not see them removed. Please be simple and consider again that they are all personal pictures taken either from Ambra’s mother or from Ambra herself Calundri (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Korean TV logos
I notice that you deleted a large number of Korean TV logos back in January 2024. (see history here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Munhwa_Broadcasting_Corporation&action=history). These were deleted as no permission, but many seem to have had {{PD-textlogo}} tags and I believe they do fall under COM:TOO South Korea. Do you mind if I undelete them? Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 08:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Warum wurde diese Datei gelöscht? Die Datei ist CC2.0 wie es aus der Quelle [25] hervor geht. --Elmepi (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Die Dateien sind nun wiederhergestellt. --Krd 15:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für's rasche Wiederherstellen! --15:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC) Elmepi (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg
I think you misread Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg, which determined that this photo should have been kept. You deleted it as "no permission since." Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The file had no license, and deletion was requested by Yann. Suggest to ask hem. I don't see which license to apply. Krd 06:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Read the thread again. What did Yann say? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Negative. Please ask Yann to read the deleted file history, as the issue is there. Krd 07:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Yann concluded the thread by posting the following: "Kept: No reason to doubt own work." The only file history I can see shows the following:
- You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. The deletion and move log for this page are provided here for convenience: ::::06:22, 11 November 2024 Krd talk contribs deleted page File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg (content was: "{{No license since|month=September|day=19|year=2024}} == {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description=Sinti Mausoleum in Osendorf |Source={{own}} |Date=2014-09-08 |Author= Plupp |Permission= |other_versions= }} Category:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf") (thank) (global usage; delinker log) ::::06:20, 11 November 2024 Krd talk contribs undeleted page File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg (7 revisions and 1 file) (thank) (global usage; delinker log) ::::04:09, 27 September 2024 Krd talk contribs deleted page File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg (No license since 19 September 2024) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
- Yann's name doesn't appear once. If he has something to say, since I pinged him, he should say it here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ordinary subject, 2,074 × 2,923 pixels, EXIF data from a Motorola smartphone, so I maintain my closure. I don't see any reason to doubt own work. Surely, the uploader can add a license. Yann (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann tagged it as no license, the uploaded added no license, so the file got deleted for having no license. Krd 09:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK. @Plupp: You didn't provide a license for this file. It could be undeleted if you specify a license. Yann (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Krd, you should update deletion request threads when you delete a file the same day another admin rules that it should be kept. I feel like you are sometimes pretty lax in how you deal with deletion requests. I've called you on some "per nomination" deletions that were actually for another reason, and you just did it again, but I don't feel like spending the time to track it down right now (I probably will send you the link later). I appreciate the work you do, but I don't think more clarity is too much to ask for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The file wasn't deleted the same day but a week later, complete within the no-licence process, because it didn't have any license for more than 7 days. Perhaps you could say the DR shouldn't have been closed as kept when the file wasn't licensed, but at least I am not going to say that, as it is a discussion that leads to nothing productive. Krd 11:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I misread the history. 04:09, 27 September 2024 Krd talk contribs deleted page File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg (No license since 19 September 2024) (thank) (global usage; delinker log). But how was there no license since the very day the DR thread was closed as keep? There had been a license until that ruling? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- No. The DR was "kept for the permission argument but except that is has no license", and the deleted a week later for still no license. A reasonable solution. Krd 11:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- But not explained to anyone until now. And we both know that's not how the DR ruling was phrased at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't say you're wrong, anyway the issue, if it is one, is not solvable. Krd 12:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Similar situations can be handled differently in the future, though. Meanwhile, I hope Plupp provides a license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- As of today (and as far as I know it has in the past) there is ilicense associated with it:
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sinti-Mausoleum_Osendorf.jpg
- "Diese Datei ist lizenziert unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung 4.0 international“." Plupp (talk) 14:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Similar situations can be handled differently in the future, though. Meanwhile, I hope Plupp provides a license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't say you're wrong, anyway the issue, if it is one, is not solvable. Krd 12:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- But not explained to anyone until now. And we both know that's not how the DR ruling was phrased at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- No. The DR was "kept for the permission argument but except that is has no license", and the deleted a week later for still no license. A reasonable solution. Krd 11:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I misread the history. 04:09, 27 September 2024 Krd talk contribs deleted page File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg (No license since 19 September 2024) (thank) (global usage; delinker log). But how was there no license since the very day the DR thread was closed as keep? There had been a license until that ruling? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The file wasn't deleted the same day but a week later, complete within the no-licence process, because it didn't have any license for more than 7 days. Perhaps you could say the DR shouldn't have been closed as kept when the file wasn't licensed, but at least I am not going to say that, as it is a discussion that leads to nothing productive. Krd 11:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Krd, you should update deletion request threads when you delete a file the same day another admin rules that it should be kept. I feel like you are sometimes pretty lax in how you deal with deletion requests. I've called you on some "per nomination" deletions that were actually for another reason, and you just did it again, but I don't feel like spending the time to track it down right now (I probably will send you the link later). I appreciate the work you do, but I don't think more clarity is too much to ask for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK. @Plupp: You didn't provide a license for this file. It could be undeleted if you specify a license. Yann (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann tagged it as no license, the uploaded added no license, so the file got deleted for having no license. Krd 09:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ordinary subject, 2,074 × 2,923 pixels, EXIF data from a Motorola smartphone, so I maintain my closure. I don't see any reason to doubt own work. Surely, the uploader can add a license. Yann (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Negative. Please ask Yann to read the deleted file history, as the issue is there. Krd 07:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Read the thread again. What did Yann say? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Circumhorizontal arc Costa Rica
Hi, i am a costa rican editor, i noticed that you deleted my photo from a circumhorizontal arc, marking it as if I did not have permission, but I took the photo myself, could you undelete that photo? Thanks. Saprissa40
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Frans Veldman haptonomy founder.jpg
Hi, this file was deleted on May 28th, 'No ticket permission since 27 April 2024' - however, on April 27th, the person that authored that image sent a permission e-mail to permissions-commons@wikipedia.org - could you verify with the e-mail log and undelete the image ? Thanks.
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: I agree to publish Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:49:03 +0200 From: jozien wijnakker <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.nl> To: permissions-commons@wikipedia.org Dear Madam / Sir, I hereby affirm that I, Jozien Wijnakker, the creator of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frans_Veldman_haptonomy_founder.jpg, and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. etc. etc.
Tertius3 (talk) Tertius3 (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Most likely the send got a followup question they didn't answer. Please encourage them to do, or to send the permission again. Krd 10:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
(СС) and (C)
Hi. The website of the Parliament of Uzbekistan has both Creative Commons and Copyright licenses. If I upload a photo from this website, will there be problems with Copyright? I talked to the administrators of this website, they don't want to remove Copyright. Best regards. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 10:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, good question. At first, the "© 2024" is no problem, as the images are copyrighted even with CC. The question is if there is an unresolved contradiction in the explicit "All rights reserved" and the CC license. I personally think that the CC license wins, but I'm not a lawyer, and I cannot say there will be no problems. At least I can say that I wouldn't delete such uploads without further arguments. Krd 11:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
I saw this file File:Knitr hex logo.svg was deleted some time ago but the source, specifically the Github folder it was included in was licensed with a CC 1.0 license. Would it be appropiate to restore or reupload the image? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Krd 06:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Template:GL workshop
Kdr, Last couple days me and User:Kontributor 2K are chasing all over Template:Image generation code to see what changed that would cause sudden influx of files in Category:Pages with script errors, all calling {{Image generation|gw}} or some alias of it. It looks like that although Template:GL workshop is not used anymore that template's language subtemplates still are. Can you restore the Template:GL workshop or figure out how Template:Image generation is calling it? Jarekt (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. (Please feel free to do that yourself.) Krd 16:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I finally figured out how Template:Image generation was calling Template:GL workshop and fixed it. So I redeleted the template. Case closed. --Jarekt (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)