Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files in Category:Personal files for speedy deletion
- File:11x15.jpg
- File:1X2A1373.jpg
- File:Cyber Expert Nitin Pandey.jpg
- File:Cyber Nitin with UP Governor.png
- File:Nitin Pandey Cyber Expert.jpg
- File:Nitin Pandey Cyber Security.jpg
- File:Nitin Pandey Cyber Talk.jpg
- File:Sajjan Pandey.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Self-close - hit wrong button on VFC. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Taken from this post from 16th March 2016 (https://www.sohu.com/a/129012046_114731) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Copied without permission from https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_8172919 (post from 8th July 2020) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Evidently not own work but copied from some book (same image can be also found at https://m.baike.so.com/doc/692346-732805.html) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Stolen from https://kknews.cc/zh-my/history/avpyj2x.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=d8ec9c97d5f67d29b3bce4c8928a26da9b58f379-1609981172-0-Ae7gV0CUphm4vIKxE8PqOKQCRLujvzhrnllZDSBcIRDI5xgwLClPHYCf_2rOv8NtEg2Bf6kWKfa1gJ6XkVdwOrGbX1ySSGFNa5MAZrQmvhB6d6cdM94sT9AIp7XBYE9rofqp4zGxXQlOEmDUsxtVptLV8QH_VSxYXnUINWOmXP26-ZdCexAcCqfElIieJH_BDuRL8zzGmCHhjG-G8K2JuVD2slO7arZFfMFzYvArdVWbJsIJhHDth8FyBjGWzeAJG1SMXPqsK8FZ78WTy61HsYPpm6ZvnLtUgnkAccxplunTP8Tmqce6Gmf2jctHWqgHQyr7_ttSXajKRUw6qChxA90 (post from 22nd July 2018) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Theft from https://www.sohu.com/a/227930076_450711 (post from 11th April 2018) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Stolen from this post from 8th May 2019: https://m.ctrip.com/webapp/you/livestream/paipai/detail.html?Id=5257357 Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Copied from Lu Gwei-Djen, Joseph Needham, Phan Chi-Hsing, “The Oldest Representation of a Bombard,” Technology and Culture, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jul., 1988), pp. 598, fig. 4). Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Misappropriated from the article "Revisiting the Dazu “Bombard” and the World’s Earliest Representation of a Gun" published on 6th May 2020 (https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=x-raw-image%3A%2F%2F%2Ffc1cf57e69f05cf13fd72e556f11397f9a8b66b4a4ddd2d3ee5e31d299918905&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fbrill.com%2Fdownloadpdf%2Fjournals%2Fjcmh%2F9%2F1%2Farticle-p99_4.xml&tbnid=8VzwaX71HPxiPM&vet=12ahUKEwjH0NrVx4juAhUQ7qQKHaxsAqgQMygAegQIARAc..i&docid=g7ZgXvbh8M3kxM&w=680&h=634&itg=1&q=dazu%20rock%20carvings%20cannon&ved=2ahUKEwjH0NrVx4juAhUQ7qQKHaxsAqgQMygAegQIARAc)" Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Reinhard Kraasch. ---akko (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gunman Dan (talk · contribs)
[edit]I nominated the set also individually to give precise information on each copyvio. Additional evidence comes from the fact that none of these images have photo metadata. The user seems to be socket puppet of serial copyright violator Qiushufang. I requested a check-user.
- File:Heilongjiang hand cannon.jpg
- File:Yuan cannon 1341.jpg
- File:Gun found in Xanadu (Shangdu) in 1298.jpg
- File:Yuan dynasty cannon 1332.jpg
- File:Yuan cannon 1351.png
- File:Western Xia cannon.jpg
- File:Dazu rock cannon carving ball indentation.png
- File:Dazu rock carving cannon colored.jpg
Gun Powder Ma (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- PS: More background here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 04:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Процесс Чинского, 1908.pdf. It's version in very bad quality Vladis13 (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by Túrelio. ---akko (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
delete Rikoprimawahyudi (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia, was built in 2004-05. The local copy in ru.wiki exists, could be safely deleted rubin16 (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept, mistake nomination: buildings are free, memorials are not. So, no case here. rubin16 (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
erroneously uploaded as a preview for an article, but not yet clear copyrighted. Pls. remove asap Hans.Waizenegger (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
erroneously uploaded as a preview for an article, but not yet clear copyrighted. Pls. remove asap Hans.Waizenegger (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, promotional TheImaCow (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a VOA work. "AP" can be seen bottom right. Cheetahze (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Support I seem to have missed that, and that is my mistake. Apologies. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)- Support per nom. RexSueciae (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support deletion per nom. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom and uploader. MSG17 (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support It's an AP photo Victorgrigas (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
speedy --Achim (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)- speedy per nom. BeŻet (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Missvain (non-admin closure) Dylsss (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.radiomilazzo.it/interviste-corrado-tuccitto-spiritualita-e-musica-in-sicilia-considero-la-tournee-una-missione/ Luca•M 11:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 21:06, 7 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): https://www.radiomilazzo.it/interviste-corrado-tuccitto-spiritualita-e-musica-in-sicilia-considero-la-tournee-una-missione/ --Krdbot 09:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
False license. Article has no indication of it. DemonDays64 (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:12, 9 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: False license. Article has no indication of it. --Krdbot 15:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 01:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
автор этого файла требует удаления данного изображения САНЯГДЗ (talk) 07:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Minorax. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of focus and very likely out of scope. 2001:A61:B34:7801:6BC1:C46F:489E:D97B 16:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of focus and very likely out of scope. 2001:A61:B34:7801:6BC1:C46F:489E:D97B 16:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of focus. 2001:A61:B34:7801:6BC1:C46F:489E:D97B 16:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- speedy: Extremely blurry, nothing to recognize. --Achim (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted album artwork, uploader is not the artist or copyright holder Xfansd (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted album artwork, uploader is not the artist or copyright holder Xfansd (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 00:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Danhudsonn
[edit]- File:Capa do Livro 1 - Détrius (A guerra dos dois mundos).jpg
- File:MAPA DÉTRIUS.jpg
- File:Personagens da história.png
- File:Título da história.jpg
Out of scope, unused image used to promote a book (in the form of an article) at the pt.WP. --SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 01:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 01:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kapil Art and Craft (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, low-quality images, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope.
- File:Profile photo of kapil art and craft.jpg
- File:Diy easy popcorn.jpg
- File:Origami paper strawberry.jpg
- File:Easy origami butterfly.jpg
- File:Origami wallet.jpg
- File:Origami jumping frog.jpg
- File:Easy simple rose for beginners.jpg
- File:Origami paper gift bag.jpg
- File:Lolipop pen.jpg
- File:Wall hanging decor.jpg
- File:Infinity rotating flexagon.jpg
- File:Paper butterfly ring.jpg
- File:Paper playing fish.jpg
- File:Cover photo of kapil art and craft.jpg
- File:Cover photo 3 of kapil art and craft.jpg
- File:Cover photo 2 of kapil art and craft.jpg
- File:Origami paper newspaper pen stand.jpg
- File:Diy paper bow ring.jpg
- File:Rose ring.jpg
- File:Diy rose ring for kids.jpg
- File:Simple paper sword.jpg
- File:Old newspaper bike.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete The uploader states that this image is created by Σταύρος Λιλόγλου (Stavros Liloglou), something that is impossoble since this photo depicts Liloglou and is obviously not a selfie. Futhermore even if we take the uploader statement for granted, then it is Liloglou the one who must give the license to Commons, unless Liloglou is the uploader; but this cannot be, since here the user while revealing his real identity he writes another name. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli minister. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality images of insect outlines, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. Likely only uploaded with the only purpose to place an Amazon link (SPAM).
- File:Fire Brat.jpg
- File:Crown Orb Weaver.jpg
- File:House Fly 2.jpg
- File:ELEPHANT mOSQUITO wiki.jpg
- File:Carpet Beetle.jpg
- File:Flea wiki.jpg
- File:Cockroach wiki.jpg
- File:Army Ant wiki.jpg
- File:Dermestid Beetle wiki.jpg
- File:Licewiki.jpg
- File:Cordylobia anthropophaga.jpg
- File:Scabies Mite Wiki.jpg
- File:Yellow jacket Wasp.jpg
- File:Botfly1.jpg
- File:Yellow Flesh Fly wiki.jpg
- File:Nasute termite.jpg
- File:Tarantula-hawk.jpg
- File:Spider wasp.jpg
- File:Shield Bug.jpg
- File:Jumping Plant Lice.jpg
- File:Ear Wig.jpg
- File:Megarhyssa Macrurus Lunator.jpg
- File:Book Lice.jpg
- File:Bed Bugs.jpg
- File:Pavement ants.jpg
- File:Pine aphids.jpg
- File:Death stalker Scorpion.jpg
- File:Tree hopper.jpg
- File:Tick (Insect).jpg
- File:Social Wasp wiki.pdf
- File:Rhinotermitidae.jpg
- File:Reticulitermes.jpg
- File:Pacific Coast Damp-wood Termite.jpg
- File:Migratory Locusts.jpg
- File:Masotermes.jpg
- File:Macrotermes bellicosus.jpg
- File:Bandwings.jpg
- File:Killer bees.jpg
- File:Kalotermitidae.jpg
- File:Formosan Termite.jpg
- File:Formica Rufa Wiki.jpg
- File:Eastern Subterranean Termite.jpg
- File:Empid Fly.jpg
- File:Dance Fly wiki.jpg
- File:Drywood Termite.jpg
- File:Cone Snail.jpg
- File:Dampwood termite.jpg
- File:Common scorpionfly wiki.jpg
- File:Bull Dog Ant.jpg
- File:Bullet Ant wiki.jpg
- File:Dung-Beetle.jpg
- File:Culex Wiki.jpg
- File:Aedes Mosquito wiki.jpg
- File:Grasshopper dRAWING GUIDE wiki.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Low quality unused personal picture. Lymantria (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The author Cecil Hepworth died in 1953, so not 70 years yet, thus no public domain. 92.213.14.42 22:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvioː screenshot of a webpage CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion, out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Generic file name, similar images appear at Category:Maps of provinces of Nepal. Probably needs salting also. JsfasdF252 (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was overwriten before. I reverted it. GeorgHH • talk 12:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from FB per MD, copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non-notable band. IWI (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unusual representation of the amide linkage, and incorrect that the ends are cationic. Have File:Meta-aramid polymer.svg as high-quality representation of this chemical. DMacks (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Besides the unfavorable illustration, the quality of this file is very low. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE...uploader never placed it in any article, there's no such element, and I can't find an article where it would have use. DMacks (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio and Flickr washing. Low image resolution and missing exifdata. Also according to the image and videos which were uploaded by DrDannielle, seem took screenshots from here SCP-2000 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also:
-
- File:1-6-21 Pres Trump Stop Election Fraud Rally (50807638752).jpg
- File:1-6-21 Pres Trump Stop Election Fraud Rally (50807638817).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710498).jpg
- File:1-6-21 Pres Trump Stop Election Fraud Rally (50807525196).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807568872).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454721).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454796).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710523).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454811).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454826).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710653).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710618).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454916).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454976).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807569187).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710783).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710728).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710768).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807455046).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807455126).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710823).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710893).jpg
- SCP-2000 03:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you're nominating these, please check out the category Category:2021 United States Capitol protests, these aren't the only ones from that Flickr album. Elliot321 (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Small image missing EXIF data, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DroidFuzzing4 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Artwork without obvious educational use.
SCP-2000 05:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Jose Bolivar Abril (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only intended for use on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in June 2016. Out of project scope.
- File:FIGUCOLORS.jpg
- File:El Truski.jpg
- File:ZERO.jpg
- File:PROXIMA PARADA INCERTIDUMBRE.jpg
- File:LORD ANTHONY ROCK.JPG
- File:LA ESCUELA DE LA VIDA.jpg
- File:RELATOS CORTOS DE UN TRANSEÚNTE SOLITARIO.jpg
- File:PECADOS CAPITALES.jpg
- File:BOLIVAR ROCK.JPG
ƏXPLICIT 07:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable individuals. They are a mixture of what appears to be personal photos and professional portraits, the latter of which would also require COM:OTRS permission from the original photographers. In any case, out of project scope.
- File:Amini Cishugi.jpg
- File:Aldor et Kinjaah.jpg
- File:Pic nic at Penial Beach Entebbe.jpg
- File:Campus Life IUEA.jpg
- File:Lionel Ekongo.jpg
- File:Judith Kinjaah.jpg
- File:Kinjaah.jpg
- File:Belamy Paluku.jpg
- File:Sady Masonga.jpg
- File:Mfalme Jeffrey.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 07:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
This is an image of myself. I am the photographer that took the picture. The picture was probably stolen from one of my websites. I never uploaded it here and I do not want it published. 83.5.218.22 09:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per EXIF. --Achim (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:SCOPE. IceWelder [✉] 09:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Highly doubt this is the author's own work [1] Xclusivzik (talk) 09:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Highly doubt this is the author's own work [2] Xclusivzik (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
unused personal picture Lymantria (talk) 09:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Nominating my own file for deletion, just taken of the HHS website when I knew no better. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 10:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Nominating my own file for deletion, uploaded when I knew no better. An image taken off google. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 10:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
An ad. Actually it should be speedy deleted as per criterion G10. jdx Re: 10:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope TheImaCow (talk) 10:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused TheImaCow (talk) 10:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juansvaliente (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown Musical group with no celebrity
Pippobuono (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sti mc of rap (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown musical group
Pippobuono (talk) 10:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanjosegarciaq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsensical screenshots, not in use or categorized, no educational value.
Kissa21782 (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Appears not to have the right licence B****n (talk) 11:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram with non-descriptive name. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Thank you for this notice, I have decided to publish my article without the logo,for now. Can you please delete the logo so that the name Wilhelm Humpert GmbH & Co. KG ist no longer blocked and I can publish my article? Thank you! J.Schmitte — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmitte2020 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no particular educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Commons does not accept files claimed under fair use HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (in Hebrew). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mseriesofficialmusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos and graphics only intended for use on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in December 2020 as misuse of userspace. The contributor was subsequently blocked for self-promotion. Out of project scope.
- File:M-Series Official Music 2048x1152.jpg
- File:M-Series Official Music logo.png
- File:Youtube Video watermark.png
- File:M-Series Official Music Youtube Channel.png
- File:M-Series Official Music.png
ƏXPLICIT 02:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TallonLeePurple (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Exclusive Media.png
- File:Hammer Film Productions 2012.png
- File:Hammer Film Productions 2011.png
- File:Hammer Film Productions.png
- File:Access Entertainment.png
- File:NIF.png
- File:ESINC.png
- File:ESMP.png
- File:Melbourne House Logo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamBoZZ Team (talk · contribs)
[edit]These uploads were used for the speedily deleted article de:RamBoZZ (see discussion). These pictures are all unused, the subject does not appear to be notable yet – hence this is out of COM:SCOPE. The claim of File:Jurypreis.png to be the uploader's work appears questionable.
- File:Jurypreis.png
- File:RamBoZZ Productions Logo.jpg
- File:RamBoZZ Logo.jpg
- File:RamBoZZ Privat.jpg
- File:RamBoZZ.jpg
- File:RamBoZZ und Sascha Huber.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 08:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed. May be public domain but we need info to confirm that
- File:-12 Dance in the Desert.tif
- File:-11 SS Boy on Fire escape.jpg
- File:-10 JIm CRow POster.jpg
- File:-6 Three Women.jpg
- File:Studio 19602.png
- File:-15 The Pack.jpg
- File:-7 Vanity Fair Cover.jpg
- File:-8 Mural DOJ'.jpg
- File:-5 SS CA 1920s.tif
- File:-3 SS Young Man, CA 1920.tif
- File:-2. SS Family Astrakhan 1911 copy.pdf
- File:-1 SS portrait.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Photo from twitter per description, not own work, needs OTRS
- File:JamesonBlake.jpg
- File:VivoreeEsclito.jpg
- File:HesintoHerCast.jpg
- File:FourSisters.jpg
- File:DonBelleWithDirec.jpg
- File:He's Into Her.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masacreneuronal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Paintings of Alicia Nakatsuka (http://www.alicianakatsuka.com/). No permission. Also probably out of scope since they are not used anywhere.
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 17.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 16.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 15.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 13.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 14.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 12.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 11.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 10.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 9.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 8.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 7.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 6.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 5.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 4.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 3.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 2.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-selvatica 1.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-14.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-13.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-07.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-06.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-05.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-04.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-03.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-02.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso-oleo-01.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso 7.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso 4.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso 3.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso 2.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-paradiso 1.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros-de-aceite-y-agua-oleo-03.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 12.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 11.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 10.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 7.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 6.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 5.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 4.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-pajaros de interiores 3.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche de verano alicia-nakatsuka-1.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche de verano 2.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de las flores 5.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de las flores 4.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de las flores 3.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de las flores 1.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de las flores 2.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-10.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-09.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-08.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-07.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-06.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-04.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-noche-de-verano-oleo-02.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-diptico-azul.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-11.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-10.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-09.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-08.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-05.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-07.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-06.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-03.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-04.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-02.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-de-lo-que-no-pudo-ser-instalacion-oleo-01.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 25.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 26.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 23.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 21.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 24.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 19.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 17.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 16.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 15.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 13.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 14.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 12.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 10.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 11.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 9.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 8.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 7.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 4.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 6.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 5.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 2.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 1.jpg
- File:Alicia-nakatsuka-aceite y agua 3.jpg
- File:Alicia Nakatsuka 2020.jpg
- File:Alicia Nakatsuka.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bricot Valentin
[edit]- File:1- Bricot Valentin - 25 years.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 24 year - 1.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 ans.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 3.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 4.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 5.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 6.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 7.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 8.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 9.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 10.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 11.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 12.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 25 year - 13.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 1.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 2.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 3.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 4.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 5.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 6.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 26 year - 7.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 1.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 2.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 4.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 5.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 6.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 7.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 8.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 9.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 10.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 11.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 12.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 13.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 14.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 28 year - 2.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 28 year - 3.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 1.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 2.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 3.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 4.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 5.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 6.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 29 year - 7.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 30 year - 2.jpg
- File:Signature Bricot Valentin.png
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 15.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 27 year - 16.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 30 year - 1.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 30 year - 3.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 30 year - 4.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - 30 year - 5.jpg
Personnal images, out of scope. Used for hosting on fr.wp. --Gyrostat (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Macro Tours, Bricot Valentin.jpg
- File:Etoiles, Bricot Valentin.jpg
- File:Papillon, Bricot Valentin.jpg
- File:Château Chenonceau, Bricot Valentin.jpg
- File:Parlement de Bucarest Bricot.jpg
- File:Pont Bir-Hakeim Bricot.jpg
- File:Centre ville de Tours, France Bricot.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - New-York I 2019.jpg
- File:Bricot Valentin - New-York I 2019 - 2.jpg
Sur demande de l'auteurs lui même ! Merci à vous
--Bricot Valentin (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Those few last files are within scope and have been published under CC-BY-SA 4.0, no reason to delete those. Gyrostat (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
not "Own work" 2003:CD:D72F:400:59E0:D99B:E248:AE9B 19:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep, as uploading account belongs to vivida insurance[3]. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Upload by verified user & below TOO. --Achim (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru at 17:58, 18 Januar 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10): Personal image, not used anywhere --Krdbot 03:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a TV broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation of take your pick. Uploader acknowledges the source as Netflix then claims they have the copyrights to release. Possible screen grab from the Cobra Kai series. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 09:16, 19 Januar 2021 UTC: No license since 11 January 2021 --Krdbot 15:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in the UAE. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.62.200.57 07:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1979 by architect John R. Harris. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, thus permission from him is needed. @Jcb: The building is obviously the subject of this photo, no way to say it is in de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1979 by architect John R. Harris. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, thus permission from him is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Image was published on 21 February 2019 after pixabay changed their license to make their images unfree on January 9, 2019 Leoboudv (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image was also problematic in terms of Freedom of Panorama which does not exist in the United Arab Emirates. --De728631 (talk) 07:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Mongolia, unfortunately rubin16 (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial
[edit]No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject are sculptures by Sergey Eylanbekov. Memorial was dedicated only in 2020.
- File:Another View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower at War at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
- File:Another View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower's Presidency at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
- File:Statue of Ike as a Boy at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
- File:Third View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower at War.jpg
- File:Third View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower's Presidency at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
- File:View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower at War at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
- File:View of Sculpture that Represents Eisenhower's Presidency at Eisenhower Memorial.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Could these pictures be used on Wikipedia under a fair use of copyrighted material? MarylandGeoffrey (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MarylandGeoffrey: Some images could be transferred there under Wikipedia:Fair use but in a reduced quality similar to other files in en:Category:Fair use images of three-dimensional art. Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1962 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of Indonesia lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject is a 1998 sculpture by Robert Graham (1938—2008). Won't be public domain until 2079. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Need source for map shapes or it is probably a copyvio. DemonDays64 (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with no educational use. Dylsss (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: used on personal wiki page. --Amada44 talk to me 14:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with no educational use. reddevil (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44 talk to me 14:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
this image was uploaded by me few years ago, but now i would like to remove it from wiki. reddevil (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
As another user noticed on my talk page heavily stylized first letter (representing a game character) far exceeds simple lettering. Indeed, the logo may be above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 04:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Game characters shapes are hardly eligible for copyright themselves, "stylized letter" is a derivative of that shape.--SirWalter (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per SirWalter. AntisocialRyan (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Simple symbols cannot be subject to copyright. --Dimartz (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is very important. Lucky7Chromebook (talk) 03:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
file may be protected by a copyright Hunges (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 20:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Bild steht auf dem Kopf, wird im Artikel nicht mehr verwendet Michael Löhr Höhr-Grenzhausen (talk) 11:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Wandteller, Red-Dekor mit Vogel, ca 1972.jpg. --Achim (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This image was published on December 8, 2019 but pixabay changed the licenses for their images to an unfree version on January 9, 2019 11 months ago. Leoboudv (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 海防道 Haiphong Road Kowloon Park map sign September 2020 SS2 03.jpg
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The image and its description is spam Sabelöga (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The image is categorized under Category:JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, but clearly comes from Disney's Robin Hood. It's definitely a copyvio until perhaps 2069. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicates the photo was originally posted to Facebook or Instagram. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Note that the Wikipedia bio was created by an editor who has an obvious conflict of interest (I suspect the author is a daughter). There is some relevant discussion on the article's talk page. I also did see that the photo was in use on Facebook but had concluded that it was entirely possible for the editor to have taken the photo, publish it on FB first, and then later upload it to Commons. I did put another photo uploaded by the same editor up for deletion as the claim that they were the author was not credible. Schwede66 00:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Images used in this collage are not free and they are thumbnails from several YouTube videos Tashi (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- All files in this collage are screenshots from CC BY 3.0 YouTube films. Kulawik.pl Napisz do mnie / Write to me 19:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tashi (talk • contribs) 19:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Additional explanation: I talked to @Kulawik.pl: and since English is limited, I will try to explain what he told me. It turned out that those images are taken from the YouTube vidoes, yet the videos are allegedly under CC BY 3.0. I'm not sure but to me, it still can be labeled as copyright infringement but the user told me that the same case was used in this file and it was accepted by the community. @GRuban: , you accepted the said file. Would you mind and take a look at this case? Tashi (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Looking, but I'm not quite sure I understand the question. Is is
- "can YouTube videos be licensed under CreativeCommons Attribution"? If so, the answer is absolutely yes, there's a standardized tag that YouTube uses for that, see Commons:Where_is_the_license_on_various_sites?#YouTube for finding it. Anyway, the video for File:Michele Morrone 2019.jpg, the specific file you link to is still so licensed: you can go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF0_6YcKAd8, click SHOW MORE at the bottom of the description, and still see the "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" text, which is also a link that explains more. There is another step in verifying the license, which is to double check that the YouTube uploader probably owns the video, as there are at least as many shady YouTube users licensing videos they don't own as there are shady Flickr users licensing images they don't own. The YouTube account there seems to be TeleMagazyn which seems to be a Polish magazine, it has a pretty ornate website https://www.telemagazyn.pl/, the channel has 20.2K subscribers, they've got their watermark on the video in the upper right, they've got their logo on the microphone that shows up interviewing the various celebrities, so yes, I believed they owned the video, and had the right to release it, so I stamped the image Commons:License reviewed.
- Is it "are these particular images that made this collage so licensed"? Then the answer is - I don't know, which videos do they come from? I'm guessing under 1% of YouTube videos are licensed CreativeCommons Attribution, and, as above, some of those are licensed by people who don't really have the rights to so license them. That still makes for a lot of correctly videos, of course, we've got lots of good images from YouTube videos. --GRuban (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, I see it now, links to different YouTube videos in the Source line. Well, let me pick one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQuAwiqmXx8 - clicking on SHOW MORE shows that is so licensed, and it's from a channel called the official channel of Zbigniew Stonoga (my Polish isn't great, but I can read that much), it's got 492K subscribers so it's not a fly-by-night outfit, while I don't know who Zbiegniew Stonoga is, the man's head on the channel logo looks an awful lot like the man in the video, so I'm willing to believe it's his video, and am willing to believe he has the right to license it. Do I need to look at the other 7 or however many? --GRuban (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I see no issue, every video is license under CC-BY and they all appear to be the copyright holder. Dylsss (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: CC-BY per valid YT channels. --Masur (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Mis-drawn p-orbitals
[edit]Misleading. p orbitals are not pointy or "propeller-shaped". The 2p orbitals are best drawn as two opposing blob shapes and the higher p orbitals are made up of multiple "blobs". See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Atomic_orbitals_(3D_blue_red) for what appears to be an accurate rendering.
There is some flexibility in how orbitals are rendered as you can choose to draw the surface at different levels or fade it out with transparency, but this does not create a propeller shape.
Edit: In 2016 the description was changed to "Note that this is not an orbital, because there is no radial wavefunction considered. Instead, the radius of the surface is taken as the value of the spherical harmonic function." I don't believe this is accurate either; the spherical harmonic function is defined on the surface of a sphere and is only zero in this case on the equator of that circle, but the radius of this shape, measured from the point in the middle out to the edge, is zero for a large fraction of it.
GKFXtalk 17:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect content does not have COM:EDUSE and should be deleted as quickly as possible. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
(fixing a malformed DR) Achim55 (talk) 08:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Requesting deletion of own photo on Wikipedia as this photo has been downloaded and utilized multiple times without my permission at other sites and their photo source has been from the photo I provided on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlekVT (talk • contribs) 23:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on many pages, given license cannot be revoked. --Achim (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why can't it be revoked? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The license for Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license says
- Why can't it be revoked? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Before uploading files, make sure you understand the license you assign to an image. The language is clear. Twopower332.1938 (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a really important image of Los Angeles illustrating the city across Wikipedia. Mennonot (talk)
Kept: Given license cannot be revoked. --Achim (talk) 12:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is the subject depicted in the photo. Requires COM:OTRS permission from the original photographer. ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Robinsons Galleria 1
[edit]This building was completed in 1990 per w:Robinsons Galleria, and designed by W.V. Coscolluela & Associates. As there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, permission from the architectural firm (preferrably via COM:OTRS) is a must to have these freely-licensed images of the copyrighted architecture hosted here.
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:09921jfOrtigas Avenue EDSA Shrine Robinsons Galeria Mandaluyongfvf 01.jpg
- File:09921jfOrtigas Avenue EDSA Shrine Robinsons Galeria Mandaluyongfvf 02.jpg
- File:09921jfOrtigas Avenue EDSA Shrine Robinsons Galeria Mandaluyongfvf 03.jpg
- File:09921jfOrtigas Avenue EDSA Shrine Robinsons Galeria Mandaluyongfvf 05.jpg
- File:Robinsons Galleria, after 2nd renovation.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Pompeia (wife of Caesar) "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion": Inhibition of Nominator in all FOP cases Philippines our of Delicadeza and Impartiality: Fervent appeal to editors and administrators to Only Put On Hold the FOP Philippines Nominations for Deletions by herein Nominator pending Reply to Emails or Letters to DOJ Secretary or IPO Directors, past and present on Commons FOP uploading vis-à-vis Probable Cause of 2012 Cyber Stalking Crimes on habit or schemes - FOP Philippine Mass Deletions carefully planned since September 2, 2020 by Smart One - Parent and Child with Check User on Hold
- Prefatory: a) when I was practicing law, I usually phone call the LRA Administrator's Legal Office to elevate on Verbal En Consulta - that is oral query to question a Bulacan Register of Deeds' refusal to register my documents; the written Consulta with Reply often takes months; hence, the Register of Deeds, upon my entry in the Primary Entry Book of my Verbal query notes, automatically decides of my Registration; b) in1 985 at a Maritime Law Office, I phone call the Legal Departments of Several Government agencies and I write them on their phone replies to protect our Boss, Law Office from legal attacks by our clients;
- My legal challenge, With All Due Respect to my almost Daily Talk Page Visitor Nominator: why don't you just email your specific FOP Deletions to the DOJ Secretary or IPO Directors, and await the Replies, before your ask for Deletions? While trickles of deletions may not be bad for Commons, they are bad precedents for snakes waiting to bite; meaning therefore, the Smart One and Check-user may use the push button deletion as precedents to Again Again and Again Continue Mass Deletions to the irreparable damage and injury to Commons Wikimedia Foundation ownership of all these photos;
- Legal support of my stance - Nominator must be above suspicion "A judge, like Caesar's wife, must not only be clean but must be above suspicion. The credibility of the judicial system is dependent upon the judges who man it. For a democracy to thrive… every judge must discharge his judicial functions with integrity, impartiality and intellectual honesty ..."
- Pompeia (wife of Caesar) Inhibition (law) out of Delicadeza Judges' inhibition based on Delicadeza All the foregoing notwithstanding, this should be a good occasion as any to draw attention of herein nominator of many FOP deletion to study the appropriate guidelines to try and decide a case fairly and judiciously comes to the fore by way of challenge from herein editor: I always submitted many legal suggestions on FOP nominations, that herein nominator should conduct a careful self-examination; as an editor, a man, subject to the frailties of other men, nominator, should, therefore, exercise great care and caution before pushing the button to edit my talk page and ponder on the the all-important confidence in the impartiality of all editors herein to forestall miscarriage of justice by erasing tons of landmark photos from Commons and preventing future researchers and the youth from learning from Commons photos : irreparable damage and injury to Commons Wikimedia Foundation ownership of all these photos I irrevocable donated for public domain; and without even emailing the IPO Director or DOJ Sec. Ad Cautelam ... this way, nominator avoids being misunderstood, his reputation for probity and objectivity is preserved vis-à-vis the sockpoppet check user of Parent and Child accounts of the Smart One;
- I respectfully copy paste herein as integral part hereof A humble but fervent appeal to Commons editors and administrators to look into the following history: please Keep all the photos nominated by this User on Legal grounds a) probable cause for violation of Philippine Cyberstalking and Cybercrime of 2012 b) a reasonable ground to believe that the Mass Deletions by this Nominator will Erase so many files from the Ownership of Commons resulting to irreparable damage and injury not only to Wikimedia Commons foundation but to the Cultural heritage of the Philippines and Tourism, landmarks and interesting points that are created here for the Next Gen and Millennials
- Keep I register a very strong Legal objection to the Deletion and PREMISES CONSIDERED, * I further object to the deletion on the ground that our Copyright law expressly contains the Extinctive prescription of 4 years unlike 3 years in American Jurisprudence; so from 2016 uploading, any and all photos of Commons can no longer be deleted much less be brought to the Special Court even by the creator artist or assigns of the artist sculptor, Dura lex sed lex; the IPO, DOJ and the Special Court will forthwith throw the case by Motion to Dismiss or Motion to Quash due to Prescription; even Commons lawyers will agree with our Copyright Law proviso on Extinctive prescription read in connection with the Implementing 2019 Circular on Special Courts' creation and jurisdiction over Copyright cases including FOP here; with this I register a very strong Legal objection to the Deletion Judgefloro (talk) 06:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: how many times I will tell you that copyright may subsist in government-commissioned works? For your reference, see COM:Philippines#Government works and COM:Philippines#Commissioned works. There's no need for another query to IPOPHL et cetera: IPOPHL has quoted relevant passages from R.A. 8293 that a government-owned work doesn't necessarily mean it isn't copyrighted. Refer to Section 176.3 of the copyright law. Also, see Sec. 178.4 for rules on commissioned works: unless "there is a written stipulation on the contrary", the due treatment is that the person who created the work owns the commissioned work, while the owner only owns physical ownership. And, Robinsons Galleria isn't a government-commissioned work, it is a shopping mall that is privately-owned. Take note, much of your statement claiming that only Commons admins will take action if the copyright holder sends notice do not comply with COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle: Commons cares for the copyright holders most especially those who designed or created the works that are found in the image (including sculptures and buildings), even if many people do not. Only when FOP is introduced here is when we can now host images of your problematic buildings and sculptures. Per Commons policy on respecting copyrights deletion first is the right approach. Commons already has experienced tremedous loss for deletions of thousands of w:Burj Khalifa photos, see Category:Burj Khalifa-related deletion requests. See also Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/deleted. Category:French FOP cases/deleted alone has more than 2,000 case pages, perhaps including thousands of deleted images. But that is the essence of respecting the copyrights of the creators of these architectural and sculptural works of art, as we should not assume that they will agree to have images of their works licensed freely without their knowledge. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rejoinder: I disagree with the above-submitted discussions and opinions on the following legal grounds: a) the cited deletions in other countries have no application to Philippine FOP; your cited Webinar among others clearly states that everyone may email the IPO director for specific queries; b) I have repeatedly quoted and copy pasted my 2 letters filed with the IPO Director and Directress; I am armed with 2 written evidence; c) in my 1st Query with a top lawyer of the IPO 5 March 2014, 13:28:43, I, as Judge and lawyer formally discussed the FOP Commons Uploading and the Reply, though verbal, but official, was that there is no Copyright Infringement in FOP Commons Uploading, until, until and until a S.C. Case is decided on the matter; what is not prohibited is allowed, so to speak; d) on the other side of the fence, you have cited the Webinar among others, but unlike me, you never presented as Counter-argument against my legal submissions any formal request and letter on your stance; d) it is unfair for us editors to wait and wait as your promised or stated and posted here my handwriting letters to Editors, that IanLopez would file the draft being finalized; but suddenly we editors are now shocked why no such letter was filed or easily emailed; e) in argumentation and debate, your word, their word and my word against others' words; Commons has policies and if you can take a cursory perusual of my Archived talk pages - Archive 1 12 November 2007 to 18 12 05:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC) and User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 1 to User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 6 01:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC) : I usually submit no objection to FOP Deletions; but the Nominators are assorted, editors and admininstrators; f) starting with the Mass Deletions on September 3, 2020 of the Smart One, Parent and Child Check-User on Hold, both flooded my talkpages with deletions requests; g) while your continuous and almost daily visits on my talk pages redound to billboards ads etc, I cannot just copy paste affirmative replies to your requests ... I have to voice my legal opinion; and this is how Commons works; h) in SUM, I suggest that, even if you opine that you do not need to email the IPO Director, it would not be so bad to allow other editors to Nominate FOP Deletions and put them on my Talk Page; there are so many Filipino editors and they are capable also of putting DRs on my talk pages on FOP;
- PREMISES CONSIDERED, I respectfully submit to Commons editors, my above-Legal rejoinder to your opinion and messages, as I humbly submit to the sound discretion of the Commons Community of Editors on whether to delete or not to delete the FOP photos that I repeatedly asked to be Kept Judgefloro (talk) 08:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Robinsons Galleria 2
[edit]This second set of files unambiguously show the billboard advertisements, as 2D graphic works of art. Also fails COM:FOP Philippines, and permission from the graphic artists is a must.
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:09902jfOrtigas Avenue Footbridge Robinsons Galleria Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:09921jfOrtigas Avenue EDSA Shrine Robinsons Galeria Mandaluyongfvf 04.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine and how spam bots are commercials ads in Philippine eye-sores that distract seniors but enhance young ones craving for beautiful skin; - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription; however, the focus is the Mall or building, and may qualify for Philippine De Minis; I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerationsJudgefloro (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1997 by architect Anca Petrescu (1949–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright terms of Romania lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2084 A1Cafel (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1997 by architect Anca Petrescu (1949–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright terms of Romania lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2084 A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- There were many cases of deleting these kind of photos (depicting this building), that it should be speedy deleted by one of admins. Matlin (talk) 15:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- The freedom of panorama exist in Romania provided, that reproduction is not used for commercial purposes! I think Wikimedia has no commercial purpose.--Qasinka (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Imagges on Commons must be free for any use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1997 by architect Anca Petrescu (1949–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright terms of Romania lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2084 A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't think this could have been made as part of anyone's official duties as a US federal employee—it must have been made by the Donald Trump campaign. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. Not conceivably made in the capacity of a government employee. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That's not how it works, folks. He published it to his Twitter account, which is currently under federal public domain laws. That ends at 12 PM EST Jan 20 2021. I also don't see how the text or map violates copyright law. Missvain (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I also don't see anyone proving that it was made by a campaign staffer. It could have been made by the social manager at the White House or a lowly intern or Mike Pompeo for all we know. Prez published it on his PD account, it's PD. Missvain (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: {{PD-USGov}} refers to "original works of the Federal Government", which in turn refers to wikisource:United_States_Code/Title_17/Chapter_1/Sections_105_and_106. Being published on a Twitter feed, no matter whose feed it is, does not make something an original work of the US federal government. Trump publishes tons of content on his twitter every day (well, not for the next ~6 hours)—that doesn't automatically make it PD. For instance, Trump recently posted this photo, but we have no idea who made it. I think the same argument applies to the file under discussion here. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, we can't just download every image from every federal account. I specialize in this work on Commons and devoted part of my work at the Library of Congress to this work (I really don't want to have to link back to the discussions I've had on Commons about this, at this point I can recite the code LOL). But, I also don't see anything about this image (even the de minis flag in the background) that violates copyright due to thresholds of originality. We also have no proof that it wasn't created by someone working at the White House, for the federal government. Heck, it could have been Jared Kushner working at the White House or working at home on his federal laptop - he is an employee of the federal government and works on the campaign. Missvain (talk) 18:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I see two arguments here: either (1) it can't be protected by copyright at all, because it's not original; or (2) it's a work of a federal employee in the course of their official duties. I'm not qualified to weigh in on (1) because I'm not a copyright lawyer, but w:Threshold_of_originality#United_States says that a "minimal degree of creativity" is required to be protected by copyright, and this work seems at least minimally creative. As for the second argument, I agree that we have no real proof either way. If there's a Commons policy that says that we presume works are in the PD when published by official US federal government sources, then I withdraw this nomination. But if there's not such a policy (and it would seem an odd policy to have), I see no reason we should presume this was created in the course of official US federal government business. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- The policy is to not make assumptions like that or require proof of the negative: Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. I think the image is above TOO in the US. Particularly, the photo of the flag is clearly captured as a three-dimensional object (see the various shadows caused by drapery), for which TOO is essentially always passed. Together with the photo, text, and map there is a lot going in this image. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- I see two arguments here: either (1) it can't be protected by copyright at all, because it's not original; or (2) it's a work of a federal employee in the course of their official duties. I'm not qualified to weigh in on (1) because I'm not a copyright lawyer, but w:Threshold_of_originality#United_States says that a "minimal degree of creativity" is required to be protected by copyright, and this work seems at least minimally creative. As for the second argument, I agree that we have no real proof either way. If there's a Commons policy that says that we presume works are in the PD when published by official US federal government sources, then I withdraw this nomination. But if there's not such a policy (and it would seem an odd policy to have), I see no reason we should presume this was created in the course of official US federal government business. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, we can't just download every image from every federal account. I specialize in this work on Commons and devoted part of my work at the Library of Congress to this work (I really don't want to have to link back to the discussions I've had on Commons about this, at this point I can recite the code LOL). But, I also don't see anything about this image (even the de minis flag in the background) that violates copyright due to thresholds of originality. We also have no proof that it wasn't created by someone working at the White House, for the federal government. Heck, it could have been Jared Kushner working at the White House or working at home on his federal laptop - he is an employee of the federal government and works on the campaign. Missvain (talk) 18:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: {{PD-USGov}} refers to "original works of the Federal Government", which in turn refers to wikisource:United_States_Code/Title_17/Chapter_1/Sections_105_and_106. Being published on a Twitter feed, no matter whose feed it is, does not make something an original work of the US federal government. Trump publishes tons of content on his twitter every day (well, not for the next ~6 hours)—that doesn't automatically make it PD. For instance, Trump recently posted this photo, but we have no idea who made it. I think the same argument applies to the file under discussion here. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I also don't see anyone proving that it was made by a campaign staffer. It could have been made by the social manager at the White House or a lowly intern or Mike Pompeo for all we know. Prez published it on his PD account, it's PD. Missvain (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 1) It's well above the ToO. It has a full sentence of text, a map, and a distinctive background, all of which have copyrights. 2) The march was a campaign event, not an official act of the President, so the piece cannot have been created by a Federal employee in the course of their duties. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Denmark, no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Denmark (where this appears to be located, based on the usage) 2601:5CC:C900:880:0:0:0:AE60 06:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Only intended for use on the Italian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in November 2018 as promotional. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 07:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ScarFace1312 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A version of one found here and other places before upload - https://edge.canon.co.in/photo-mentor/eos-ambassadors - the other has FB MD. Think we need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Source and permission is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yashirajordanvelasco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, Copyright:Patricio Crooker per exif
And the painting needs permission from the artist
Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Mali A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
File:National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka - Hairdresser's singboard - Accra city in Ghana - Collected in 1996.jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
File:National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka - Hairdresser's singboard2 - Accra city in Ghana - Collected in 1996.jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST, a red blob drawn drawing of the uploader's fictional nation in an online game is out of scope for Commons. (It's also painted over a copyrighted Google map, but not much of it is visible.) Lord Belbury (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the United States for artworks, whether 2D or 3D. Subject is a 1997 sculpture by en:Leonard Baskin (1922—2000). Won't be public domain until 2071 (2000+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artwork. Subject is a 1994/2002 sculpture by en:Neil Estern (1926—2019). Won't be public domain until 2090 (2019+71). Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Russia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Zamansky
[edit]The building was completed in 1970 by architect Édouard Albert (1910–1968). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright terms of France lasted for 70 years after the creator's death, therefore they can be undeleted in 2039.
- File:Jussieu Tower @ Arènes de Lutèce @ Paris (29883467165).jpg
- File:Jussieu Tower @ Arènes de Lutèce @ Paris (29883469845).jpg
- File:Jussieu Tower @ Paris (29589815250).jpg
- File:JussieuAtNight.jpg
- File:La tour du campus de Jussieu (3675717274).jpg
- File:P1290477 Paris V place Jussieu entree fac rwk.jpg
- vue partielle du batiment et la tour n'est pas le sujet principal de la photo. --Mbzt (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Paris (49531625038).jpg
- File:Paris Place Jussieu dk5061.jpg
- File:Place Jussieu.JPG
- File:Tour Zamansky (39727439970).jpg
- File:Universite-pierre-et-marie-curie---campus-de-jussieu.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artwork from 1962; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Let's expand this to the related Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andrishtarazona. --GRuban (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrishtarazona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of these images of Helen Joseph were posted https://www.montserratspotlight.com/the-untold-story-of-helen-joseph-montserrats-first-and-only-international-pageant-contestant/ on June 7, exactly 2 days before it was uploaded here. One of them is specifically credited "Photo credit: British Pathé" which doesn't seem like our uploader. If it is, they should explain it to Commons:OTRS.
- File:Helen Joseph con su nieto en sus últimos años.png
- File:Miss Montserrat Helen Joseph en Miss Mundo 1964.png
- File:Helen Joseph Miss Montserrat.png
- File:Helen Joseph Miss Montserrat 1964.png
- File:Miss Montserrat 1964.png
GRuban (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Belgium -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 00:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Additionally, the photo is not below the threshold of originality as stated by the licence template. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Restored: as per {{FoP-Belgium}}. Yann (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The statue is now OK, but there is no permission from the photographer. Yann (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- While I requested its COM:UNDEL per FOP, like other non-admins it was invisible to me. Now visible, I concur with Delete - sourced from the web. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This is an image of the signage for a convention. The art is presumably copyrighted. Mo Billings (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Sad, but true. A bit of Googling says the logo/mascot is named Emily Expo, and does not seem to be in any obvious way connected to the Flickr user who took the photograph. --GRuban (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
i do not want this file on here anymore 216.15.72.100 03:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete above COM:TOO--A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
i do not want this file on here anymore 216.15.72.100 03:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep should be below COM:TOO--A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Not seeing how this is in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Spanish newspaper published in 1955, not yet in PD A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Painter died in 1982, so less than 70 years ago; no location mentioned, I presume in Poland; FOP in Poland is exterior only, I presume this painting is inside a church, so no FOP. No OTRS statement mentioned in the file. JopkeB (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- And I wonder if all the paintings in Category:Jan Henryk de Rosen are legally there. JopkeB (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable YouTuber. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Old version of logo TrustNL (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
old version of logo TrustNL (talk) 10:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
old version of logo TrustNL (talk) 10:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Older logos are kept for historical purposes. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This image was published or uploaded on Pixabay in September 2020 but Pixabay made their images unfree on January 9, 2019. The license was already unfree at pixabay after January 9, 2019. Leoboudv (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded the latest version and applied the Pixabay/CC0 license, but didn't realize it was uploaded to Pixabay after 2019. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This image was uploaded or published on 8 June 2019 on pixabay. But pixabay changed their license from a free cc0 license to an unfree license on January 9, 2019 five months earlier. So, this image was not free at upload for Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. "8 de Junho de 2019" is the indicated date of publishing/upload on Pixabay. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
wenig aussagekräftig, wird im Artikel nicht mehr verwendet, schlechte Qualität Michael Löhr Höhr-Grenzhausen (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not a work of US Government. Publication by Califronia Acadmey of Sciences in 1976, Renewal would have been automatic, but I'm not seeing an obvious notice in the first few pages of the scanned PDF.
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20235271248).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20235466458).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20236635109).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20423409685).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20423449105).jpg
- File:Bulletin (1971-) (20429618971).jpg
- File:Bulletin (IA bulletin7477sout).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a U.S. government work, obviously. The publication date listed (1971) is incorrect; the volumes which constitute the main work were published between 1975 and 1978. Assuming the work was not registered at any time, some part of the work is
PD-US-no-noticeand the rest isPD-US-1978-89, although I am not sure when the specific cut-off point would be. The volumes do not have copyright notices; I have not checked for renewal. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Bild wird im Artikel nicht mehr verwendet, wenig Aussagekraft, schlechte Bildqualität Michael Löhr Höhr-Grenzhausen (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
loader says it is subject to copyrights Victuallers (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: looks like a newspaper. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Incertitude concernant la licence libre de cette image. Probable violation de copyright. Bastoche* (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Incertitude concernant la licence libre de cette image. Probable violation de copyright. Bastoche* (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of a Director-General of a government ministry in Israel. This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (such as this one and this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RZuo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: exif shows photo from facebook AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
speedy was declined. I assume because it was 'in use' at the time.
Image was uploaded by a globally blocked sockpuppet. Image was used in an article created by that same globally blocked sockpuppet. The article is now deleted. The wikidata item is now deleted. The person in the image is wearing a hat obscuring the face, therefore we can't even be sure who it is. But, if it is the person it claims to be, the image is most likely a copyright issue. Quakewoody (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
no permission Velocitas (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is taken by a friend of my during afhaal TV in Eindhoven. He gave me permission to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodyveneman (talk • contribs) 14:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Can be deleted, this was an attempt of a new editor to upload an article from pdf. The content has already been transferred to wikitext. Regards, -- hgzh 10:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 09:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de comunicaciones with TeX equivalent:
Con símbolos:
Siendo N2, N1 el número de espiras en el primario y en el secundario respectivamente.
Se llama realcíon de transformacíon a:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in es:b:Electrónica de comunicaciones with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
misspelled, correct spelling is konzentrierteste (German Wiktionary), File with correct spelling already exists, hear . No need for a duplicate, Jeuwre (talk) 22:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; already deleted by Reinhard Kraasch. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
word does not exist, see German Wiktionary: Krankengeld or Duden:Krankengeld Jeuwre (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 10:57, 30 April 2021 UTC: Uploader request, word does not exist --Krdbot 12:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
word does not exist, see German Wiktionary: Krankengeld or Duden:Krankengeld Jeuwre (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 10:57, 30 April 2021 UTC: Uploader request, word does not exist --Krdbot 12:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Crop of photo at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3698969/mediaviewer/rm3134609152/. If you own the rights, please provide the licensing information at COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no EXIF data, all previous uploads deleted as copyvio. Smooth O (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ivandivjak: Please post the original with exif from your camera or follow the instructions at COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: There I re-uploaded the image with EXIF metadata and I replaced it on wikipedia page Economy of Serbia.Is it fine now? Here's the file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BWResidences.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivandivjak (talk • contribs) 22:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Question
[edit]It's my work. How do I revert your deletion process? Do I submit something? Where? Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivandivjak (talk • contribs) 16:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate, redirected to File:BWResidences.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
inflection 'Kurkumas' does not exist, see German Wiktionary: Kurkuma Jeuwre (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 15:39, 2 August 2021 UTC: uploader request --Krdbot 18:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Каталог персональной выставки Иванова-Радкевича Михаила Павловича. ВСЕКОХУДОЖНИК. 1937 г..tif + File:Каталог персональной выставки Иванова-Радкевича Михаила Павловича. ВСЕКОХУДОЖНИК. 1937 г. (оборотная сторона).tif
[edit]Violation of copyright, since the copyright holder is the association of artists "Vsekohudozhnik". — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 11:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Such work is not copyrightable. This is chronological ordered list, there is no copyright of compiler for it. Alex Spade (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like a trivial compilation of text, nothing copyrightable. Wikisaurus (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- The brochure has all the features of a protected work - meaningful author's text and publisher's imprint. — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 21:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- There is no meaningful author's text here, just simple chronological ordered list of artworks. It is not copyrightable. MalemuteD (talk) 05:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The brochure has all the features of a protected work - meaningful author's text and publisher's imprint. — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 21:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Added: There was also a forgery of the licence. Author: "Own work". And this was done in 1937? — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 14:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Scan was made by me in 2017 (Date=2017). The catalog was released in 1937. If the problem is only in the file description, it is easy to fix it. MalemuteD (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Such problems can be easily fixed. Alex Spade (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Ivanov-Radkevich died in 1990, copyright term did not expire yet. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Biathlon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The file is not uploaded by its author, the original image is copyrighted The file is indeed here, and copyrighted to Vladimir Lushnikov (and uploaded by Vladimir Lushnikov as well). OTRS needed. Ymblanter (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Some more details on the situation: Vladimir Lushnikov denied that he has an account in the Russian Wikipedia, the account pretending to be him is a sockpuppet (see here ru:Википедия:Проверка участников/VLu). Biathlon (talk) 14:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Так его спрашивали о Рувики, а не о Коммонс. И насколько можно доверять его ответу? --Venzz (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'll provide some details. There's an ongoing sockpuppet abuse investigation on ru-wiki, involving Sealle and VLu. Details here and here. CU request is also open on commons here. Lesless (admin and member of arbitration committee on ru-wiki), acting on behalf of ru-wiki community, contacted the person stated as the author of the images in question: "Лушников Владимир Александрович" (Lushnikov Vladimir Aleksandrovitch), using contact information provided on site znanie74.ru. He asked whether this user had account on Wikipedia. The answer was: «I don't have an account» («Аккаунта нет»). If that is believed to be correct (and I have no reason not to), then Vladimir Lushnikov did not upload these images. We have all reasons to believe that there's an identity theft going on. Without explicit permission from real Lushnikov, we can't keep these images. --Grebenkov (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Exactly, we need OTRS, and if the permission has not been forthcoming within a week, the image must be deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F6. 2603:301D:22B2:4000:540:EF6A:A7F4:EBA0 08:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)- It's not a copy-right violation. Highly likely that this file was uploaded by real Лушников Владимир, but then his account (which has a name Vlu now) was either bought or received (between friends in real life, for instance) by Sealle. There is no sence for Sealle (who owns Vlu acc now) to upload those photos under a false name. --Devlet Geray (talk) 01:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Devlet Geray, I asked real Lushnikov, he did not have a Wikipedia account. Lesless (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.37.224 14:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work as claimed and missing source.
- File:Oldnewchincross.jpg
- File:Northern Wei cava.jpg
- File:Chinese cavalry Song to Ming.jpg
- File:Chinese brigandine rivets.jpg
- File:Ming helmets.jpg
- File:Barbarian paper armour.jpg
- File:Sleeved Paper armour.jpg
- File:Paper armguard.png
- File:Silk paper armour.png
- File:Ming brigandine armoured cavalry.jpg
- File:Ming lamellar armour.jpg
- File:Pavise wjzy.jpg
- File:Warring States shield.jpg
- File:Ming wolf troops.jpg
- File:Jin shieldsmen.jpg
- File:Ming shields.jpg
- File:Soldiers of Tang.jpg
- File:Chinese shields.jpg
- File:Mohist siege crossbow.jpg
- File:Wubeizhi crossbows with stirrups.jpg
- File:Graduated scaling lug nut.jpg
- File:Han crossbow spanning relief.jpg
- File:Chinese crossbow trigger.jpg
- File:Artillery from ancient times to the medieval world.jpg
- File:Chinese European crossbow triggers.png
- File:Wooden donkey.jpg
- File:Trebuchet ship.jpg
- File:Early 17th century Chinese counterweight trebuchet.jpg
- File:12th century depiction of a counterweight trebuchet, c. 1187.jpg
- File:Wooden flying ladder that avoids thundersticks.jpg
- File:Late 7th century Transoxanian depiction of a traction trebuchet.gif
- File:15th century Arab illustration of fire arrows.jpg
- File:Chinese horse armour and Western Jin mounting stirrup.jpg
- File:Han crossbow arming illustration.jpg
- File:Chinese saddles.jpg
- File:Ming depiction of Xiongnu 02.jpg
- File:Ming depiction of Xiongnu 01.jpg
- File:Ming depiction of Xiongnu 03.jpg
- File:Siege weapon 04.jpg
- File:Siege weapon 05.jpg
- File:Siege weapon 03.jpg
- File:Siege weapon 02.jpg
- File:Siege weapon 01.jpg
- File:Evolution of Chinese spears and long hafted blades.jpg
- File:Tomb honor guard.jpg
- File:Jin cavalry.jpg
- File:Ming flags.jpg
- File:Chinese crossbow trigger mech.jpg
- File:Crossbow trigger mech.jpg
- File:Repeating crossbow WBZ.jpg
- File:Wan ren di.jpg
- File:Connected double bed crossbow.jpg
- File:Twin flying crossbow.jpg
- File:Ming cloud ladder - adds a cannon.png
- File:Modern illustration of the overlook cart.jpg
- File:Overlook cart.jpg
- File:Cloud ladder.jpg
- File:Tangcav.jpg
- File:Jurchen cavalry.jpg
- File:Songsold.jpg
- File:Song Mural.jpg
- File:Song dynasty armour.jpg
- File:Mountain pattern Ming warrior.jpg
— Racconish 💬 22:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Sourcing inadequate: no precise information provided on the book reference or web URL from which the image was taken/scanned (cf. template parameters on what is required for "source"; instead images claimed as own work
File:Tang shieldbearer mural.jpg- File:Jurchen Jin cavalry.jpg
- File:Tang soldiers - Dunhuang mural.jpg
- File:Khitan.jpg
- File:Ming jian sword.jpg
- File:Guandao horsemen.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers wielding pikes and guandaos.jpg
- File:Ming spear cavalry.jpg
- File:Ming swordsmen.jpg
- File:Ming mace and axe cavalry.jpg
- File:Ming spearmen.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers.jpg
- File:Khitans.jpg
- File:Soldiers of Song.jpg
- File:Song flags.jpg
- File:Song soldiers 2.jpg
- File:Song officials and flags.jpg
- File:Song soldiers.jpg
- File:Ming arm guards, thigh armor, and back plate.jpg
- File:Ming helmet, breast plate, and mask.jpg
- File:Ming Dynasty mail armor.jpg
- File:Peerless divine shield.png
- File:Zhu li pai.png
- File:Pavise front and back.png
- File:Mu li pai.png
- File:Cavalry shield.png
- File:Pushing shield.png
- File:Pavise.jpg
- File:Ai pai.png
- File:Rattan shield.png
- File:Hand shield.jpg
- File:Wheelbarrow shield tent.jpg
- File:Wheelbarrow shield.jpg
- File:Wheelbarrow shield wall.jpg
- File:Wheelbarrow shield in action.jpg
- File:Gun rack.jpg
- File:Hu tou mu pai.jpg
- File:Hu tou huo pai(back).jpg
- File:Hu tou huo pai.jpg
- File:Yan wei pai.png
- File:Soldiers of Ming.jpg
- File:Dali Shield.jpg
- File:Ming Chinese shields.jpg
- File:Water Margin shields.jpg
- File:Wu Bei Zhi shield.png
- File:Assault on Dadaejin.jpg
- File:Xuan yuan chong 2.jpg
- File:Breech loading arquebus with bayonet 1606.png
- File:Breech loading arquebus 1598.jpg
- File:Breech loading arquebus with interchangeable barrels 1598.jpg
- File:Barrel holder shield and steel fork 1598.jpg
- File:Arquebus with a rain cover 1598.jpg
- File:Chinese matchlock 1640.jpg
- File:Folangji 1571.png
- File:Fagong 1565.png
- File:Breech loading cannon on a carriage 1571.jpg
- File:Jingal instructions 1598.jpg
- File:Large jingal 1598.jpg
- File:Jingal 1598.jpg
- File:Chinese matchlock 1598.jpg
- File:Invincible divine flying cannon 1584 - naval gun.png
- File:Invincible great general 1571 field artillery.png
- File:Flintlock 1635.jpg
- File:Great divine cannon 1599.png
- File:Fire ox wjzy.jpg
- File:Tangut servants.jpg
- File:Tangut bride.jpg
- File:Soldiers and cavalry of Ming.jpg
- File:Ming artillerymen.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers 05.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers 04.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers 02.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers 01.jpg
- File:Ming soldiers 03.jpg
- File:SONG guards.jpg
- File:Ming lamellar coat cavalry.jpg
- File:Western Wei cavalry 02.jpg
- File:Western Wei cavalry 01.jpg
- File:Wooden parapet wjzy.jpg
- File:Wooden ox wjzy.jpg
- File:Wandering fire cauldron wjzy.jpg
- File:Wall descending windlass cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Wagon and cart for filling in moats wjzy.jpg
- File:Sheep horse wall and barbican wjzy.jpg
- File:Rope ladder wjzy.jpg
- File:Portcullis wjzy.jpg
- File:Plaited gallery wjzy.jpg
- File:Pole hook, axe, bladed lance with pommel, scratch lance, projecting lance with pommel, scratch lance wjzy.jpg
- File:Night prong thunderstick wjzy.jpg
- File:Mining tools wjzy.jpg
- File:Nest cart and watchtower cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Maces wjzy.jpg
- File:Hungry falcon cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Iron plated ram wjzy.jpg
- File:Iron tipped wooden ram and windlass cart.jpg
- File:Hemp cloth curtain and well-sweep for lowering incendiary bundles wjzy.jpg
- File:Head cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Gate blocking knife cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Flying ladders wjzy.jpg
- File:Enemy balcony and rooms on horse face tower and walls wjzy.jpg
- File:Flying hook and wolf's tooth striking board wjzy.jpg
- File:Deerhorn wood, earth stopper, and iron caltrop wjzy.jpg
- File:Drawbridge wjzy.jpg
- File:Crossbow platform wjzy.jpg
- File:Cheval de frise wjzy.jpg
- File:A hoof grasper and iron waterchestnuts wjzy.jpg
- File:Assault cover wjzy.jpg
- File:Wooden screen wjzy.jpg
- File:Fork cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Double hook cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Sky cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Rake cart wjzy.jpg
- File:Scaling ladder wjzy.jpg
- File:Whirlwind trebuchet wjzy.jpg
- File:Four footed seven component trebuchet wjzy.jpg
- File:Five whirlwind trebuchets wjzy.jpg
- File:Wheeled trebuchet wjzy.jpg
- File:Triple bow crossbow wjzy.jpg
- File:Two-bow crossbow wjzy.jpg
- File:Patrol boats.jpg
- File:Covered swoopers.jpg
- File:Wujing Zongyao sea hawk.jpg
- File:Wujing Zongyao warship.jpg
- File:Wujing Zongyao flying barque.jpg
- File:Gong she huo shi liu jian.png
- File:P 20170821 094618 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:P 20170821 094320 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:P 20170821 094549 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:P 20170821 093829 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:P 20170821 094153 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:P 20170821 094018 vHDR Auto.jpg
- File:JXXS Fortified camp.jpg
- File:Wheel mine.jpg
- File:Land mine HLJ.jpg
- File:Fire lance Europe.jpg
- File:Fire Lance Knight.jpg
- File:Seven barreled organ gun.jpg
- File:Shell handgun.jpg
- File:Two barreled automatic fire lance from the Huolongjing.jpg
- File:Multi-barreled fire lances HLJ.jpg
- File:Combat formation.png
- File:Second Power Formation.png
- File:Lesser Third Power Formation.png
- File:Third Power Formation.png
- File:Mandarin Duck Formation layout.png
- File:New mandarin duck formation.jpg
- File:Mandarin Duck Formation.jpg
- File:Secret formation.jpg
- File:First step squad.png
- File:Killer squad.jpg
- File:Imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-5QcrvupY0bVR.jpg
- File:P7472494a875636126.jpg
- File:Koxinga's soldier.jpg
- File:Surrender of Fort Zeelandia.jpg
- File:Koxinga's ships.jpg
File:A Ming junk 1637.jpg16th century- File:Pan Zongyan being overrun.jpg
- File:Nurhaci overruning Ma Lin's camp.jpg
- File:Jurchen cavalry attacking the Ming camp from the rear.jpg
- File:Kang Yingqian being overrun.jpg
- File:Organ gun.jpg
- File:Watermelon bomb.jpg
- File:Fire brick.jpg
File:Oldest depiction of rocket arrows.jpg14th centuryFile:Assault-barrow rocket launcher.jpg17th centuryFile:Wheelbarrow fire engine.jpg17th century- File:Lance rack.jpg
File:Explosive thunder bomb.jpg14th centuryFile:Lance shield.jpg14th centuryFile:Lotus bunch.jpg14th century- File:Yaksha lance.jpg
- File:Spurting tube.jpg
- File:Ten thousand fires.jpg
- File:Taku Composite Metal Cannons.jpg
- File:HLJ bombs.jpg
- File:HLJ bomb.jpg
- File:Poison eruptor.jpg
- File:Heaven eruptor.jpg
- File:Barbarian attacking cannon.jpg
- File:Huolongjing bomb.jpg
- File:Huolongjing Eruptor.jpg
- File:Mianzhoutu - Li Gonglin (李公麟, 1049–1106) 04.jpg
- File:Mianzhoutu - Li Gonglin (李公麟, 1049–1106) 02.jpg
- File:Mianzhoutu - Li Gonglin (李公麟, 1049–1106) 03.jpg
- File:Mianzhoutu - Li Gonglin (李公麟, 1049–1106) 01.jpg
- File:Tang Dunhuang cavalry mural.jpg
- File:Dunhuang Tang mural shieldbearers.jpg
- File:Qing military exercise 1877.jpg
- File:Tang Mural of Zhang Yichao's departure.jpg
- File:Ming coviatice gun.jpg
- File:Manual Fire Arrow.jpg
- File:1649 Korean musketry volley formation -.jpg
- File:1639 Ming musketry volley formation.jpg
- File:1639 Ming crossbow volley formation.jpg
- File:1621 Ming crossbow volley fire formation.jpg
- File:1044 Song dynasty volley fire crossbow formation.jpg
- File:Awe-inspiring long range cannon.png
- File:Greatgeneralcannon.png
- File:Tiger crouching cannon.png
- File:Convocation of eagles chasing hare arrow.png
- File:Fire lance.jpg
- File:Tang general.jpg
Gun Powder Ma (talk) 17:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- PS: Background information here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, previous DR above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep keep the files but fix the descriptions. Bad metadata for clearly PD files is not among list of reasons for deletion. I can help with batch fixes once correct source data is provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarekt (talk • contribs) 19:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Fixing the description is much less work than undeleting. Most of these files are in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- since some Good Samaritans have offered to help, i will go thru the files too, but i dont have time before the end of Feb. Sysops please defer a decision until April.--Roy17 (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- if the picture is used on a page there it is not nice to delete to delete them. Unused pictures could be deleted. I hope someone will come up with a source sometime. Taksen (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
It's been now one month and nothing has been done so far. Roy17 cannot be serious if he wants the project to keep copyright-violating images for three more months time up until he might have time for it. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This DR was not made in good faith. It's a waste of time. No merit for any volunteer to go thru the files because of one sabotager.
Keep all. DR individual files only if there is evidence they are copyvio.--Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete If the user has this many copyright issues then they can't be trusted. Going through each individual image would take forever, and if the commons people can't be bothered then they should be presumptively deleted Wizardman 02:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Most have a source given in the description, the rest of those I looked at were in a similar style and can probably be supposed to be old as well. It is easy to change the source and author fields. I suppose the user can be trusted about the description – and we don't need an ISBN to keep PD images. –LPfi (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: very differnet cases. Please nominate in separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Permission needed for background map
- File:Lu Bu.jpg
- File:Yuan Shu.jpg
- File:Liu Yao.jpg
- File:Yuan Shao.jpg
- File:Dong Zhuo.jpg
- File:Gongsunzan.jpg
- File:Liu Biao.jpg
- File:Liu Bei's Life.jpg
- File:3K Mapa.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and first section above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and other sections of this DR. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp). No indication of where or when these photos was taken, which would maybe lend some credence to the own-work claim. The swords one lacks metadata, the Horsemen have one type of camera, and the one titled "長方盾" has a different camera entirely, which just feels sketchy to me.
- File:Northern Qi Horseman 01.jpg
- File:Northern Qi Horseman 02.jpg
- File:Northern Qi Horseman 03.jpg
- File:Northern Qi Horseman 04.jpg
- File:長方盾.jpg
- File:Qin dynasty sword.jpg
Premeditated Chaos (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and first section above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yilku1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: nothing about images in the law: "Los textos oficiales de carácter legislativo, administrativo o judicial, ni las traducciones oficiales de los mismos, sin perjuicio de la obligación de respetar los textos y citar la fuente."
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion due to the conflicting statements cited by uploader vs. nominator. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Foto-Oficial-Pilar-Mazzetti-MinSa.jpg
- File:Martin Vizcarra (Presidential Portrait) (cropped).jpg
- File:Foto-Oficial-Walter-Martos-MinDef.jpg
- File:President Luis Valdez Farías At Jurament Ceremony at 2020 (Presidential Portrait) (cropped).jpg
- File:Luis Valdez Farías (Presidential Portrait) (cropped).jpg
- File:Mercedes Araoz president of the Council of Ministers with PPK.png
- Delete Legislative Decree 822 does not mention images, only official legislative, administrative or judicial texts and official translations . See Article 9, section b https://www.indecopi.gob.pe/documents/20787/0/DL+822.pdf/f1ed8416-7438-1ff9-eab6-81fa4dcb7505 --Ovruni (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment of User:Ovruni. Uploader did not comment for 8 months. --Elly (talk) 09:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
[6]: 版权所有，未经许可请勿转载 (All rights reserved, please do not reprint without permission). -akko (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment @-akko: If you doubt the copyright of CNS uploaded video, not for a single file, maybe you could talk about it here: w:zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#转载中新社报道影片的问题 ——ClayM300 (talk) 13:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ClayM300 Frist, CC license cann't be undoed. Therefore, {{Comment}} not {{Comments}}. Finally, this is Commons not Chinese Wikipedia, if you have question about copyright please go to COM:VPC. -akko (talk) 13:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Your comment comes very fast. Thanks and I'll ask the problem there. I konw the difference of the wikimidia projects but don't know where to ask. --ClayM300 (talk) 13:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- [7]. -akko (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- @-akko: Thx. You may forget a link you provided before :) --ClayM300 (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- [7]. -akko (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Your comment comes very fast. Thanks and I'll ask the problem there. I konw the difference of the wikimidia projects but don't know where to ask. --ClayM300 (talk) 13:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ClayM300 Frist, CC license cann't be undoed. Therefore, {{Comment}} not {{Comments}}. Finally, this is Commons not Chinese Wikipedia, if you have question about copyright please go to COM:VPC. -akko (talk) 13:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I created a now topic on Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#China_News_Service_(中国新闻社)_published_media. --ClayM300 (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I tend to keep this file now. --ClayM300 (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I did not find a general discussion about these films. Commons:Deletion requests/File:航拍浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场.png concerns a similar situation. The film discussed on that DR has a CC-BY-SA Youtube license. The film of this DR does NOT have this license. Perhaps because the film has a music track, but China News Service does not say the visuals are free to use. Based on this the image must be deleted. --Elly (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Sylvia Young Theatre School - Written Assessment - Amy Winehouse (pages: 2)
[edit]Converted to pdf and merged; see: File:Sylvia Young Theatre School - Written Assessment - Amy Winehouse.pdf. --Dodro (talk) 12:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:REDUNDANT. However, the combined file in PDF is imho copyrighted, as well as these two images. I will nominate it for deletion. All can be undeleted in 2082 as Amy Whinehouse died 2011. --Elly (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
item on wikidata pending deletion deleted. does the image, which displays the business, help the project at all? Quakewoody (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Why image displaying a local business should be deleted? Since it can provide more detail about the business. Or, only the images displaying large company, such as Google, Apple, BMW, can help the project?4datatw2021 (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2021 (GMT)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope, of no educational value. Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. --Elly (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
is this within scope? logo of a company that doesn't say the company name, but does contain it's home page (in print) and a bunch of social media icons that aren't clickable. Quakewoody (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. --Elly (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Une personne est photographiée dans ce fichier et n'a pas donné l'autorisation d'être publié sur wikipédia. 79.83.179.101 14:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination although the person is barely visible. In addition the work shown is copyrighted. The sculptor fr:Aroldo Zavaroni died in 2012. The image can be undeleted in 2083. . --Elly (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
false inflection: the surname Kretschmer istn't inflected with 'Kretschmern' -> word does not exist (see inflection box on the right side of German Wiktionary link) Jeuwre (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep There are a few contexts in which this word is possible in German, for example if you have several people named Kretschmer, you could say that you have received something "von den Kretschmern" (instead of the probably more correct one "von den Kretschmers"), there are also some historical results for this in Google Books e.g. this one where "Kretschmer" apparently is a historical term for a brewer - "von den Kretschmern (Bierbrauern)". Gestumblindi (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Gestumblindi, you're right, Kretschmern is a possible inflection of Kretschmer. Thank you for your input and Sorry! for the inconvenience of my deletion request. --Jeuwre (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Elly (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This is not a British work, but from Austria, therefore Crown Copyright does not apply. Accd. to [8], the artist is Viktor Leyrer, who died in 1961. The artwork is therefore still protected by copyright until the end of 2031. The file should be deleted and can be restored in 2032. Rosenzweig τ 15:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted in 2032. . --Elly (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
low quailty, not in scope and personal photos Encik Tekateki (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Delist --Velma (talk) 08:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Low-res screenshot that appears to be a news photo. Please upload the high-res version if you have it. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition per Personality rights. --Elly (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, logo of non-notable company, and probably above TOO Spicy (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom that it's out of scope. -M.nelson (talk) 20:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Image is not used on projects today. --Elly (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal snap, no obvious encyclopaedic relevance. 2001:A61:B34:7801:6BC1:C46F:489E:D97B 16:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- It is not correct, it is a documentary photograph, street photography in Siberia. This is not a private photo from a family album Rakoon (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Insufficient educational value. And perhaps in conflict with COM:Personality rights. --Elly (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No reasonable educational purpose; out of scope. -M.nelson (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No reasonable educational purpose; out of scope. -M.nelson (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hannse schnölla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:INUSE: ‘’A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough.’’ At this moment the first file is in use on de:Niederösterreich-Radrundfahrt. Therefore it is in scope. The other image is an extended version, so can be kept as well. --Elly (talk) 20:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not take action to convert the image and did not comment. --Elly (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
passer à ma page globale ^^/use my global page ^^ Léo (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Already deleted January 7. --Elly (talk) 20:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Thoughts on {{PD-simple}} or similar? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте. Это товарный знак и логотип, исключительное авторское право на который действовало с 30.10.1974 до 30.10.2014. Подробное описание товарного знака государственной регистрации № 52115 в Федеральной службе по интеллектуальной собственности Российской Федерации здесь: https://www1.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUTM&DocNumber=52115&TypeFile=html. Под какой лицензией файл, на который ранее действовало и сейчас более не действует исключительное авторское право, должен распространяться, не знаю, но возможно, что это {{PD-textlogo}}, так как это две русские буквы «У» и «А» с двумя дугами по бокам, либо {{PD-scan}}, так как в документе по ссылке это отсканированное изображение. --Dmsav (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion, I consider this Template:PD-textlogo. --Elly (talk) 20:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:v:Recherche:Théorie spatiale, et si l'espace était à l'origine des lois de la physique ! and id:wikt:сила with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Can be of educational use if Tex is not available to editor. --Elly (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
No use, writing tag is more easy and accesible --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 08:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Памятник погибшим в Великой Отечественной войне. с. Александровка, Новомаликлинский район, Ульяновская область.jpg
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Either this IS a copyright violation, in which case it should be deleted, or en:File:Toblerone logo.svg is not, and that file should be re-classified as being in the public domain and transferred here. It's probably going to come down to the age of the logo and whether any required "copyright formalities" such as using the © symbol affect its copyright status. My personal hope is that both images are in the public domain, but a deletion DISCUSSION is the closest thing I can find to a "copyright discussion" on the Commons. Davidwr (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - the logo is allowed on the English Wikipedia because we have a fair use exemption there. The mountain would fall under de minimis in this case as it is not the focus of the image. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Ixfd64. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 00:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The mountain shape is a deminimis art IMO. Fma12 (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. The logo from en: could be transferred to Commons imho. --Elly (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Image credited to Edward Aten at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8758280/mediaviewer/rm1034917377/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violation. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artwork from 1962; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- see de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Kirchenfenster_in_Österreich: Die freie Werknutzung an Werken der Baukunst umfasst nach herrschender Rechtsprechung nicht nur Außen-, sondern auch Innenansichten von Bauwerken und dabei sogar die bildliche Widergabe von „Innenteile[n] eines Bauwerks, wie ein Treppenhaus, ein Hof, eine Vorhalle, einzelne Säle und Zimmer, aber auch Portale und Türen“. Auch hinsichtlich Buntglasfenstern vertritt der OGH in seiner Judikatur (4Ob80/94) die Ansicht, diese seien wie Einrichtungsgegenstände („Gegenstände der Innenarchitektur“) zu behandeln, die erlaubterweise photographisch gezeigt werden dürfen. Ebenso wie für andere Einrichtungsgegenstände ist hierfür aber Maßgabe, dass sie nicht isoliert, also ohne Bezugnahme auf den umgebenden Raum, abgebildet werden dürfen. Durch diese Entkontextualisierung würde nämlich die Ausnahme der freien Werknutzung entfallen, weil das gesondertem Urheberrechtsschutz unterliegende Buntglasfenster dadurch nicht mehr in den Kontext des ausnahmsweise frei zweidimensional reproduzierbaren Werks der Baukunst fiele. Der verbietende Hinweis auf Commons ist also insofern falsch, als dass er zu streng ist: Es ist sehr wohl erlaubt, interiors of buildings, including churches, museums and theatres abzubilden, solange dabei nicht so der Fokus auf einen bestimmten Einrichtungsgegenstand gelegt wird, dass dieser aus dem Kontext des ihn umgebenden Gebäudes gerissen wird. Merke hierzu: Treppenhäuser, Türen, Portale etc. werden für sich genommen als „Werke der Baukunst“ betrachtet und dürfen daher auch isoliert gezeigt werden.
- Ausführlicher und in der gleichen Richtung de:Panoramafreiheit.
- btw: There is no need to hide the usage of an image as long as they are disputed. This will lower the threshold to delete something if it is not used anyway. [9]
- Keep - the window is shown in context of the building (it's not my image, I just transferred it to commons) --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep According to judgment 4Ob80/94 of the Austrian Supreme Court of Justice (OGH), works that are themselves components of the structure (such as doors, portals, stairways, windows (including stained glass windows) and even the interior design) are subject to the FOP-exception as long as they are shown in the context of the structure. This picture clearly shows the stained glass window in the context of the building, as even the walls of the church and a column are depicted. Therefor Austrias FOP applies to this picture. Best regards, Plani (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and per COM:FOP Austria. This is valid inside buildings as well. --Elly (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Logo. Seems below COM:TOO US to me, how about Turkey? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: On Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Turkey there appears no TOO. So this logo is copyrighted and has to be deleted. --Elly (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 195.228.33.5 as Logo. This university was founded in 1367. It seems likely to me that this design is old enough to be PD. Any help determining when the current seal/logo was designed? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. The seal is probably very old. In any case the various elements, keys, en:Fleur-de-lis and other shapes are in PD and below TOO, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Hungary#Threshold_of_originality. --Elly (talk) 14:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:FOP Finland applies to buildings only, yet this photo is of a logo at DTM nightclub. Speaking of the logo, COM:TOO Finland also applies. Somehow, threshold of originality is low, yet simple logos fall below that. The lines forming a heart use different hues and brightness of various colors. I am unsure whether that heart-formed lines are one of simple logos, and I'm unsure whether the colors are basic. The logo may also qualify for US copyright per COM:TOO US, but I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 19:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, could you clarify what your deletion rationale is? Are you saying this falls below the threshold of originality for copyright? If so, it sounds like what you want is a license change, not outright deletion of a licensed image. Armadillopteryx (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm saying that the logo may meet or be above the threshold of originality in Finland. And I'm not asking for license change. --George Ho (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC); edited, 19:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, found all-white logo at https://www.dtm.fi/, but even the lines forming a heart... I wouldn't call it below Finland's TOO. George Ho (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really care either way. I uploaded this photo as my own work since I took the photo, but if it does indeed exceed Finland's TOO (I'm not 100% convinced it does), I don't mind simply reuploading as fair-use on enwiki. Armadillopteryx (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- The all-white logo (from the website) is freer than the version with the colored heart. However, I'll have someone make the logo all black for more visibility. George Ho (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really care either way. I uploaded this photo as my own work since I took the photo, but if it does indeed exceed Finland's TOO (I'm not 100% convinced it does), I don't mind simply reuploading as fair-use on enwiki. Armadillopteryx (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The discussion is not clear. But per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Threshold_of_originality it appears this logo is not simple enough to maintain. Therefore deleted per COM:PRP. --Elly (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Also: File:Leyou.jpg
Redundant against File:Leyou Logo.svg; unused. IceWelder [✉] 19:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. --Elly (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Користувач:Rumarev/Оцінка точності побудови геодезичних мереж with TeX equivalent:
Эамінюючи в цій формулі кут В через 180°, отримаємо:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Користувач:Rumarev/Оцінка точності побудови геодезичних мереж with TeX equivalent:
підставляючи (3.7), (3.8) у (3.6), отримаємо:
Тобто
- ,
звідки
Эамінюючи в цьому рівнянні величини δ їх значеннями з виразу:
і поділивши ліву і праву частини рівності на , отримаємо:
- .
Така рівність можлива, якшо:
і тому
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Sin licencia que permita su uso libre. Davidmejoradas (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Source is facebook with no indication of a free license. -M.nelson (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. Obvious copyright violation. --Elly (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Probably copyright violation. Very low res image that is highly unlikely to be own work as stated, but a scan from a printed source like a newspaper or a periodical. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Elly (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
Tabela 3.1. Burimi i lidhur në yll ngarkesë të ekulibruar Parametrat
Për fazaNgarkesa e lidhur në yll Ngarkesa e lidhur në trekëndësh Tensioni i burimit Tensioni i linjës Impedanca e ngarkesës Tensioni i ngarkesës Rrymai e ngarkesës Rrymai e linjës Fuqia e ngarkesës
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
unused formula that can easily be replaced by TeX; no educational value due to missing description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. We shouldn't feel the need to retain images of text (or out-of-scope images in general, really) just on the faint off-chance that someone on a non-Wikimedia site has hotlinked them. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in sq:Qarqet trefazore with TeX equivalent:
_in_1298.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Art.IWMPST6707.jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
_in_1298.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_1298.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_in_1298.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1298.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(20235271248).jpg){kind=link}
_(20235466458).jpg){kind=link}
_(20236635109).jpg){kind=link}
_(20423409685).jpg){kind=link}
_(20423449105).jpg){kind=link}
_(20429618971).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[7]](https://img.vim-cn.com/cf/bf0ef3baa25218e4400305f9f80402317bbf28.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Art.IWMPST6707.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Art.IWMPST6707.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Art.IWMPST6707.jpg){kind=link}
_Art.IWMPST6707.jpg){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 20:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image can be used outside our projects if Tex is not available. --Elly (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ref copyright statement in EXIF data. DRing due to age and for TOO evaluation. Likely above TOO in the US though. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This work of animation exceeds the threshold of originality. The copyright statement in EXIF suggests it might not be available under a free license; license should be confirmed through COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 22:53, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. EXIF data state "Created or modified by R.A. GREGOIRE". Copyrighted GIF. --Elly (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image, a logo of a branch of an Israel government ministry, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted (the blue part, I mean). As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Doesn't exceed COM:TOO Israel. The CC license and Own Work claim aren't valid and should be replaced with {{PD-textlogo}} or similar. -M.nelson (talk) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of M.nelson, below TOO, the blue part are simple geometric lines. Therefore the image can be kept. --Elly (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Both Redundant with File:לוגו זרוע העבודה.png. Unfortunately missed this during the earlier deletion discussion. -M.nelson (talk) 15:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. --Elly (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as no source (No source since). Unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this picture might be taken by the uploader, I see no reason for deletion, it is not a formal pressfoto for instance. Elly (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I closed this myself as nobody cared to comment. --Elly (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as no source (No source since). It have a source: "own work" Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Obviously a pro image so OTRS would be the only other option. --Herby talk thyme 19:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Person with special interest in this kind of equipment. I have no reason to think they did not make these photo's. If this image should be deleted, all uploads should suffer the same fate (Special:ListFiles/Chole_Wu). The person stopped working here by december 2020, so cannot comment. Neither do they work on en wikipedia: en:Special:Contributions/Chole_Wu. Elly (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I closed this myself as nobody cared to comment. --Elly (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation. Rather than speedy, going to DR due to history of cross-wiki usage.
This is a derived work with no source for the underpinning map. The claim of 'own work' is not credible, the underpinning map has visibly fuzzy text, indicating it was captured from somewhere else then edited with an overlay.
Source works noted in the description are all in-copyright and copyrighted. These are based in part on the reconstruction of early Chinese roads and waterways by en:Joseph Needham in Science and Civilisation, Vol. IV, (1954), and the additions of en:Rafe de Crespigny in Generals of the South (1992). The northern and southern routes of the Silk Road in the Western Regions is based on Map 16 in Cambridge History of China, vol. 1, (1986). Boundaries or routes must be presumed to be copyrighted despite being relatively simple, as they are above the "simple graphics", polygons or simple text that would meet COM:TOO. Fæ (talk) 12:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Yug: , could you please comment on this DR, as it is listed on your user page User:Yug/China, with similar maps. Thanks. Elly (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- In general, at least under US law, the copyrightable elements of a map are not the cartographic features themselves but the creative selection, coordination, and/or arrangement of the cartographic features. Courts have repeatedly found that widely-recognized geographic boundaries are not protected by US law.[10] Only the expression of an idea is protected by copyright, not the idea (a cartographic feature) itself (see Mason v. Montgomery Data). There is also no copyright protection for facts, and the time or effort expended to produce the map is also not considered (see Rockford Map Publishers v. Directory Service Company of Colorado). Copying the selection, coordination, and/or arrangement of features can be a copyright violation. I haven't reviewed the claimed sources, so I don't have an opinion on what the actual status of this file is; and this is without comment to the laws of any potential source country. But the presumption that "boundaries or routes must be copyrighted" is unsupported by law. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep Because of real life, I can't check all books that were mentioned in the file description, and I only read few pages of some books (i.e. The Cambridge History of China. Volume 1 p165, Generals of the South The Foundation And Early History Of The Three Kingdoms State Of Wu by Rafe de Crespigny p15 and 中国历史地图集 （精装本）2 第二册（秦汉）p13). Graphic design of these maps in books are clearly different to the file. Thus I would like to presume the source information is real and the file is only based on the fact and data, which is not protected by copyright law, instead of graphic design. SCP-2000 17:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: it seems to be based on File:Longzhong Plan.jpg (I have found reference to it in one of the uploader's files) that is free. As there is no evidence to prove that the image was copied from somewhere, kept. The facts themselves aren't copyrighted and can be used while creating a free own image. --rubin16 (talk) 07:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The underpinning map is unsourced and not own work as claimed. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep Per discussion while this file was created based on File:Han Civilisation.png. SCP-2000 12:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: it seems to be based on File:Longzhong Plan.jpg (I have found reference to it in one of the uploader's files) that is free. As there is no evidence to prove that the image was copied from somewhere, kept. The facts themselves aren't copyrighted and can be used while creating a free own image. --rubin16 (talk) 07:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
