User talk:CoffeeEngineer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, CoffeeEngineer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, Please create a proper request. Do not add the category. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZIMG 1129AgentSmith.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Areas.jpg

[edit]
Bonjour.
Votre proposition de changer le nom désemparé était, en principe, correcte. Mais l'image a un problème plus sérieux: son lien source est invalide et le champ auteur contient des erreurs, la paternité est donc inconnue. J'ai cherché des mots-clés en espagnol et examiné de nombreuses pages Web et PDF essayant de trouver la vraie source, en vain. En outre, certains sites Web s'appuient sur ce fichier sous Commons, à savoir: «areas.jpg», alors, à mon avis, il est préférable de ne rien faire à ce stade.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

[edit]

Hi CoffeeEngineer, As per Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed? #2 I can only move files from and to the same language, I cannot rename from Danish to English or Danish to French, It has to be Danish to Danish if that makes sense,
Unless you speak Danish then I would advise you stop adding rename requests for that image,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardboard ian curtis (2314288571).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestlers

[edit]

Just want to say that I appreciate your work in uploading the vintage wrestling pics and hope you continue. I've tried to put them in use wherever possible. LM2000 (talk) 07:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LM2000: Hello LM2000, Thank you very much for your message. It is always a pleasure to get an acknowledgement for some work. There is still a lot to upload. I try to do my best. I appreciate that you can help me using this pictures as it is difficult to do both. I hope to get some news soon :-) . Have a nice day, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC) PS: I see that you did some prior and your rework on some images is amazing. I used the Terry Funk one in a Wikipédia article.[reply]

Tes imports sur Commons

[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai l'impression que tes imports sur Commons (qui sont des couvertures ou des articles de magazines qui sont ensuite découpés) sont litigieux et tendent vers le copyvio. Je vais demander à des administrateurs de se pencher dessus et de décider si on a le droit de faire cela ou non. N'y voit rien de personnel.Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Sismarinho: , je vais attendre l'avis des administrateurs et je n'uploaderai rien pour le moment. Au moins on sera clair sur le sujet. Bonne journée.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @Sismarinho: , je ne vous en veux pas, bien au contraire, sinon, j'aurai continué. Après plus de 250 photos, il faut que je fasse le tri. On m'a induit en erreur en me disant que je pouvais. Cordialement, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#CoffeeEngineer[reply]
PS: Existe-t-il un moyen pour qu'on communique par messages ou par chat pour aller plus vite dans la rédaction d'articles ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC) . Merci d'avance pour votre réponse !!![reply]
Je vais installer Discord sur mon ordi alors.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)PS : Pour des photos, il y a Flickr. Et pour les suppression massive il y a un outil (Perform batch task) dans bêta ou préférences (je patrouille un peu sur Commons de temps en temps).--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sismarinho: Avant que je prenne peut-être Discord aussi, pourrai-je avoir votre avis sur les photos de Wrestling News venant de ce magazine qvec cette page (pas présente sur tous les magazines). Serait-ce quand mêle un copyvio ? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/f/fd/20190317142250%21Ivan_Koloff_-_AWA_Wrestling_-_n.59_1971_cover.jpg --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"All photos sent become the property of Champion Sports Publishing Corporation." alors oui j'ai de très gros doutes. Après je ne suis pas une spécialiste en droits d'auteur.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sismarinho: Je réussis à trouver des scans d'autres magazines. Il semble que AWA Wrestling n'avait pas de copyright en 1975 [[http://wrestlingscans.com/magazines/awa/146.pdf scan}} et en général les autres magazines n'en ont pas.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sismarinho: Je les laisse faire, ils ont sûrement raison.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The Crusher vs. Ray Stevens - AWA Wrestling - n.59 1971 Advertising (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Crop or sourced to image since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider creating a mass deletion request when appropriate in the future. -Mys_721tx (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:How mighty mites relax away from mat - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 - cover (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

originally sourced to image that has since been deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 17:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @BevinKacon: , If they are derivative from a deleted work, you can remove it. I am tired of discussing on why we have the right to keep it. Best regards, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

ƏXPLICIT 03:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liste d'upload

[edit]

Bonjour,

Puisque demain on commence un long weekend avec six samedi je te propose (si cela t'intéresse ainsi que la wXw) d'uploader une partie des photos posté sur Flickr par Photos N Effect.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Sismarinho: , J'espère que tu vas bien. Pour le long week-end, ce n'est pas vraiment mon cas, mais je veux bien aider. Y a-t-il des photos à uploader en priorité ? Aussi, on a un jour parlé d'un tchat privé du genre Discord, est-ce qu'il est mis en place ? --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CoffeeEngineer: moi j'ai installé Discord, mon identifiant est Sismarinho Catchopédien#1365. Tu m'ajoute comme ami et on pourra chatter. Enfin pour les photos c'est à voir au cas par cas (il y a déjà les ceintures de champion de la wXw, j'y ai vu Timothy Thatcher) mais je connais pas cette fédération ni ses catcheurs.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sismarinho: Bonjour, j'ai l'impression que Flickr to Commons ne marche pas correctement, voire pas du tout, je réessaierai un autre jour.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sismarinho: Bonjour, invitation envoyée--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Transfering files to Commons

[edit]

Hello!

Please tag the files on Wikipedia with {{subst:Now Commons}} when you transfer them to Commons, for example you transfered File:Mr. 450 with the Westside Mafia.jpg but en:File:Mr. 450 with the Westside Mafia.jpg isn't tagged with {{Now Commons}}.Jonteemil (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jonteemil: , I will do it in the future. Isn't it done automatically ? --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I usually import file using the FileImporter and then it is done automatically. I don't know how Commonshelper works though.Jonteemil (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Héctor López Santillana at the Festival "De 2 a 3 Caídas" 2020.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Joe Weider in 1990 - 24 February 1990.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Joe Weider in 1990 - 24 February 1990.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

sourced to file since deleted as copyvio Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fautes d'orthographe?

[edit]

Bonjour,

Tu as ajouté un certain nombre de fichiers dans Category:Spelling mistakes in French sur lesquels je ne vois pas de faute d'ortographe évidente : [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] etc. Quelles fautes d'ortographe étaient visées ? Place Clichy 12:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Place Clichy: . Ce sont principalement des fautes d'accent. Pour :
  1. [6] : Pot d'échappement, il manque l'accent,
  2. [7] : il manque l'accent circonflexe sur maître,
  3. [8] : accents manquant sur nécessaire, à et compréhension,
  4. [9] : il manque deux accents sur à l'aéroport
  5. [10] : Il manque des accents à république, bâtards et née.
N'hésite pas à revenir vers moi si tu as des questions.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ce sont des inscriptions totalement en majuscule, non ? J'ai moi-même une préférence pour l'usage des accents sur les majuscules, mais je ne pense pas qu'on puisse qualifier leur courante omission comme une faute d'ortographe (ou spelling mistake, selon le nom anglais de cette catégorie). On pourrait plutôt la qualifier de graphie inélégante. Place Clichy 16:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Place Clichy: Je crois que j'ai commencé à les catégoriser de la sorte parce que j'ai vu des exemples similaires dans cette catégorie. Cependant, je comprends ton point de vue pour les majuscules, mais c'est une faute pour moi, surtout avec cet exemple où les accents sont utilisés de façon aléatoire [11]. Est-ce que tu sais si le cas a déjà été discuté ?

restauration d'un fichier supprimé par erreur

[edit]

Bonjour je constate que vous avez supprimé ce fichier par erreur. Il n'ya pas d'infraction au droit d'auteur sur cette image, elle m'appartient. j'aimerais s'il vous plait que vous la restaurez. je vous ai également répondu à propos des autres photos que vous avez soumis à la communauté pour suppression. cordialement Paolaowono (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Paolaowono, Mes demandes sont réfléchies et expliquées. Si c'est la pochette de l'album avec plusieurs chanteurs, il faudra prouver que vous avez le droit d'utiliser ces photos. Pour demander la restauration et la conservation des images, je vous invite à suivre les instructions sur cette page : [12]. Cependant, je ne retirerai pas mes demandes de suppression tant que la situation n'est pas mise au clair. J'espère que j'ai pu répondre à vos questions. Cordialement, --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please fix the license. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, I am trying to clean up the Music category. It might be easier to do it in a bunch for all the musical album category once they are all identified, don't you think? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The files may or may not be in the public domain, so you need to check each time. This one seems to be old, although no date is specified, and it should be mentioned. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanations. I checked, and the singer died in 1947. I will update the information for this one, and check further in the future. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright was certainly not owned by the singer, but by the publisher. OK, I checked Wikipedia, which says that this is from Spain and 1931, so I fixed the license. Yann (talk) 08:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations for 'no proven notability'

[edit]

Please stop nominating files for deletion in the basis of 'no proven notability'. Unlike on Wikipedia, notability is required on Commons. The closet equivalent is 'must be realistically useful for an educational purpose', see COM:EDUSE, which is less rigorous. Pictures of unidentified people in mundane locations do not normally pass this test, unless they are in use in any Wikimedia project, see COM:INUSE. In my view, pictures of established bands will almost always pass COM:EDUSE. However such pictures are often copyright violations, having been uploaded from the Internet by the band's fans. Any high-quality posed pictures of musicians taken from a viewpoint not accessible to an audience member should be regarded as suspect. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 01:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I do not aggree with you on several points. First of all, picture that are copyright violations must not be mixed, as reason for the upload of a picture can be multiple. Then, I do not aggree that all the bands have the same right to upload their picture on Commons. It makes finding useful pictures difficult and can easily be used for advertising. Also, I do that for months and i did not get any message from an administrator. Finally, I do not get how a random picture of a musicians without notability can be COM:EDUSE. I will see how I can ask for the deletion requests for notability. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I apologise for my delay in replying. I am not asserting that we should keep all content from all bands, but that the COM:EDUSE threshold for bands should be low. The precautionary principle does not apply. If a band or a musician is well-established then a photo of them may be useful for an article on the music scene where they are active, or on the venue where they have performed. High quality photos of performers are potentially useful even if the performers are unknowns. EDUSE is not restricted to potential use in Wikipedia, any file which might be used in a student's coursework qualifies.
There is no problem with files that have been uploaded for the purpose of advertising, providing that they are realistically useful for an educational purpose, see COM:SPEEDY#G10. Commons should encourage such files. For example, the Welsh record label Sain uploaded a large number of music clips and album covers which are in Category:Sain (Records) Ltd. The record company's motivation may have been partly promotional, but several of these files are valuable and are in use in Wikipedia articles. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doclys (talk • contribs) 13:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Droits d'auteurs

[edit]

Il est important de respecter les droits d'auteurs. Merci komavo

Votre message est bien compris

[edit]

Salut. Je me suis renseigné surtout sur les droits d'auteurs. Je comprends votre inquiétude il faut que les œuvres soit libre pour que cela soit utilisable par tous. Je m'entretien avec Mr formidable sur d'autres questions liées au droits d'auteurs. Merci beaucoup. Komavo, 10 février 2024.

Bonjour @Komavo: , Désolé de ne pas vous avoir répondu. C'est impoli de ma part. Je vous remercie pour vos derniers messages. Je comprends que vous vouliez conserver les médias du pays et c'est très louable. Je n'ai pas de solution sur où les stocker et les diffuser malheureusement. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Les œuvres sous violation de droit d'auteur

[edit]

Salut. Et merci pour le ménage de suppression des œuvres qui sont sous droit d'auteur. Et ensemble on continue pour l'amélioration de wiki média. J'espère que après les 70 ans ses œuvres servirons d'archives puisse que wikimedia ne vend pas les œuvres mais plus tôt les rendent accessible sous forme d'archives servant de partager la connaissance au monde entier. Merci et bonne journée.

The file opinion de Adze Kossivi Edem wiki love folklore 2023 winner

[edit]

Salut. Cette audio est l'opinion demandé par les organisateurs de wiki love folklore 2023 pour que je le justifie par rapport à l'œuvre rythme et chant beninois. Donc ce audio est ma défense et j'ai juste enregistré sa moi même comme il l'on demander et je l'ai converti en ogg. Rien de plus ce n'est en aucun cas une violation de droit d'auteur. Je suis l'auteur de cette audio où est la violation svp. J'espère qu'il faudra des soutien pour qu'on ne se sent pas stresser car les recherches et les écrits se base sur notre cerveau. . Merci komavo samedi le 24 février 2024 à 8h00 (UTC)

Bonjour @Komavo: , C'est possible de demander à ce qu'il soit à nouveau visible. Il faut le titre du fichier. Les instructions sont ici : [13]. Désolé pour la suppression. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC) PS: N'oubliez pas de signer.[reply]
[edit]

Could you tell me which song is giving away the copyright? 45.6.29.200 13:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear IP address, Could you please tell us who you are and which song you are refering to? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film posters

[edit]

Would you mind just tagging these images as missing permission in the future instead of nominating them for deletion? It is far better that we get proper permission as opposed to the images getting deleted and the uploader giving up Trade (talk) 21:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can. Which banner should I use? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Banner? Trade (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Model

[edit]

A very minor point of usage. You use "model" when I would use "subject" as at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by กวีภัฎ

..."Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10".

A model is a person who is showing or demonstrating something, often but not always clothing. A person who merely appears in an image is the subject of the image, but is not a model. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jameslwoodward, Thank you for the precision, I will change my messages in the future. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~~~~ RadioKAOS (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

National anthem of Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


KonstantinaG07 (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when you tag files with {{No permission since}}, that is enough. Please don't wrap it in a {{Delete}} template. Jonteemil (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonteemil (talk · contribs), Thank you for informing me. I think this is a big issue, as it goes with batch request. Is there a way to avoid the Delete template ? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, stop using it, and fix all the files you mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Edalexanderjr that are now in Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing reason. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar provided by the AjaxQuickDelete gadget per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff_G. (talk · contribs) So, you let me do these edits for months, maybe years, and now you threaten me and you are now telling me there is no automation on Commons, am I right? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first I noticed them. For years, I have been railing against incomplete deletion requests, which are caused by malformed use of {{Delete}} templates and lack of follow-through, and which are populating subcats of Category:Incomplete deletion requests. This problem spurred the creation of that category 17:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC), over 17 years ago, and my tracking of it 18:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC), over three years ago. Where did I write that "there is no automation on Commons"? I fixed the files that you didn't fix.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I get it, but why is there no way to create a batch selection for F10? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No one has yet added it to VFC. You could ask for that at Help talk:VisualFileChange.js. You forgot to ping me.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jeff_G. (talk · contribs), Sorry for not having pinged you. It is my mistake. I followed your advice and asked it to VFC : [14]. Please let me know if my explanation is good. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The preceding also applies to this edit and your associated edits to the file description pages - why not use the "No permission" action of VFC?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff_G. (talk · contribs), because I was told to use the first template before I was using the tool, then I used it there, and had to NoWiki, the request page. This one must have slipped. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please clean up your mess in Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing reason. You do realize that files in the children of Category:Media missing permission get cleaned up by Admins after a week anyway, right?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff_G. (talk · contribs), What is this? Do you think I am a toddler? First you threaten to block me, and now you give me a lesson like to a five years old child? I do not deserve to be talked to like that! I helped to sort out pictures in different categories for years! It is mainly YOUR fault for the current situation, as YOU could have contacted me way prior. I spent hours on Commons, and I have a hard time some address me with so little respect. We are volunteers after all. Now, you can work on it, as I will not do anything more regarding this situation. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#CoffeeEngineer. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How VFC works

[edit]
  • If you want to nominate something for deletion in VFC, select the action "Nominate for deletion" and write a reason, you should not include a {{No permission since}} tag inside the reason.
  • If you want to add {{No permission since}} with VFC, select the action "No license".
  • If you want to create a batch selection for F10, though there isn't a specific action, you can select "prepend text" then write {{SD|F10|reason}}

This should hopefully clear stuff up looking at #Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Negerimusik. I've fixed the issue at Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing reason. If you have any questions let me know. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Woman reading Boxing Illustrated - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 p.40 (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: F1: Derivative of copyvio deleted as a result of DR, follow redlink. Also, was published in Canada, so PD-US never applied.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : RadioKAOS.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 03:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Man reading Boxing Illustrated - Wrestling Revue - October 1973 p.40 (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: F1: Derivative of copyvio deleted as a result of DR, follow redlink. Also, was published in Canada, so PD-US never applied.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : RadioKAOS.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 03:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don Muraco and The Mongolian Stomper - Wrestling Annual - June 1975 cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:40, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]