Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 25th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate|File:Gérard - Louis XVIII of France in Coronation Robes.jpg}} StellarHalo (talk) 04:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|File:Marie-Louise-de-Parme-PECHEUX.jpg}} StellarHalo (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|File:Marie-Louise-de-Parme-PECHEUX.jpg}} StellarHalo (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nie chce go jednak udostępniać wszystkim. Photographybymusic (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nie podoba mi sie Photographybymusic (talk) 09:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nie chce by moje zdjęcie było udostępnione dla wszystkich. Photographybymusic (talk) 08:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 15:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The title is misspelled; it should be reuploaded and renamed. Americaneditor23 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Americaneditor23, go to File:Redbank Creek Panaramic .jpg, click on top on 'More' → 'Move' and enter a better file name. --Achim (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is already a "no source tag" but I am not sure if those tags always serve. As the file is used it is not a bad idea, I hope, to open a DR. E4024 (talk) 03:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 11:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there a deleted file re-uploaded case here or everything OK? Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Theresa Greenfield.jpg E4024 (talk) 02:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what picture was deleted for copyright violation back in July, but the current picture is clearly labeled as Public Domain on Theresa Greenfield's own flickr page. Furthermore, the fact that the new picture is Public Domain, and the link to the flickr page confirming that fact, are clearly indicated on the commons page for this picture. Other than confusing this picture with a previous picture with the same name that apparently had a copyright issue, is there any reason to delete this picture? Sheldrake (talk) 04:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr files are reviewed by volunteers; and I see many Flickr files being deleted here. --E4024 (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded new versions of the photo and ran {{Flickrreview}}. I think the license is fine, though it's from the candidate's own Flickr page and the metadata credits a professional photographer. If we want to be nitpicky, we'd assume that the copyright belongs to the photographer and we'd demand to see evidence that the copyright was transferred to the candidate, but I don't think that's a particularly great use of our time and energy. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close as kept, Flickr license seems ok, per above & request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not requiered anymore Nuje98 (talk) 17:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fue una broma de mal gusto, lo lamento. History TT (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G/ and copyvio-suspicion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imágen de https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6035910/mediaviewer/rm2419940608 Geom (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 16:36, 25 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 20:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tem erro Antony1864 (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a copyright violation since this is a (German) company logo Ferdinand0101 (talk) 16:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidently made the page. It should have been a "Category" not a "Template". I created the relevant template. Caddyshack01 (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 18:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader never said he was the author and in fact implied it was someone else's work. Copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader never said he was the author and in fact implied it was someone else's work. Copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Todd Beeton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata credits Adam Hunger. If this is your work, please submit you copyright statement to COM:OTRS.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 최안철 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File descriptions state that these are pictorials for a mini-album by rapper Repeat. This same photo in a smaller resolution was published on Newstown two days prior to the Commons upload date. COM:OTRS required.

ƏXPLICIT 02:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed B. Morgan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures taken of a Google Images search result. One isn't cropped far enough to omit the "Images may be subject to copyright" disclaimer.

ƏXPLICIT 03:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's "own work", but a painting by Deane Keller (1901-1992). Source: https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/9272. No evidence of free license --Animalparty (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless OTRS. --Achim (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 05:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 05:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 05:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The videos are marked as CC-BY licence. However, I believe that it is possible that this is a case of licence laundering. Having asked on VPC I have received that answer as well. Sorry for uploading these, it was an honest error.

Gone Postal ( ) 06:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & COM:PCP. If the license is valid, proceed to COM:UDR to request for undeletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIf Data. Photos from same photo session can be found on different sources on-line: https://www.novosti.rs/crna-gora/vesti/910647/mutno-poslovanje-rudnika-boksita-kandidat-poslanika-maksim-vucinic-burazerskim-biznis-projektima-vladajuce-strukture and https://www.facebook.com/vucinicmaksim/ Same goes for File:Maksim Vučinič (cropped).jpg Smooth O (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons scope: distortion & blurring makes image of no educational value MPF (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 13:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; out of focus, through-window shot Mindmatrix 13:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the description: "Teqball own the copyright of the picture." Tomcsy (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Some4real (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A case of COM:SPAM

QTHCCAN (talk) 14:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Jianhui67 TC 03:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glim040 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://shashatainment.com/kuenstler/christian-schiffer 91.34.47.8 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ProyectoEscudos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr Srimanta Kumar Pal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an "own work" and not used either. E4024 (talk) 19:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only used for an experiment/vandalism article Jan Myšák (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, advertisement Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All rights reserved of Flickr [1]. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure, replaced by File:Thailandamide B.svg. Wostr (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arputhavarnam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 04:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted all except -arputham.jpg as it is in use. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guinwinch25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by accident. Image is actually courtesy of Romanian Air Force and does not indicate public domain Wolcott (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dachaimakc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 14:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two photos of two different individuals, insufficient author information for each, no COM:OTRS permission. ƏXPLICIT 03:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 15:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Not a selfie per F10, but too blurry and no idea where this is so no EDUSE Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover under copyright Bahnmoeller (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this file is not original / this and cover of academic research and uploader of this file take picture without permission. However, the title page does not appear to be eligible for copyright. AFBorchert (talk) 09:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected: File:Calibration Line Iran part1.jpg. --Achim (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept / deleted: Kept File:Dissertation H. Zomorrodian.png, deleted Calibration_Line_Iran_part1.jpg. Simple title pages are not eligible for copyright. The first one is a clear case in that regard (just a typical title page with author, title, publisher etc., no creative work); will change the license to PD-text. The other file, however, contains elaborate logos on the page which are prominent, probably copyrighted and not de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I see that this is apparently licensed I cannot access the website (server not found). Equally per the watermark http://www.news.cn/ is very clearly copyrighted Herby talk thyme 12:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a reporter working at www.news.cn and being the owner of the photo i took this photo with my camera this photo will also come under my own work i grant full rights to wikipedia to use this photo in several pages freely without any objections and i release it under free license since its my own work.. xiexie..:):) and I would also like to note that this image has been taken solely by me 7 years before and the copyright license has been expired now.. its free of use...Dominicoz (talk) 08:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry the watermark has to be there it represents my company but i can assure you that its free of use and license expired work of mine to be used in all pages of wikipedia and i grant full rights to wikipedia and wikicommons to use this work of mine freely as per their need.. many thanks... Dominicoz (talk) 10:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

notification sent to wikicommons..thanks..Dominicoz (talk) 12:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

source website http://leeminnews-wax-statue-cc-by-sa-4.0.cn does not exist shizhao (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please go through the previous its already been solved in this page...Eventhough the server down since its old and works rarely...As a reporter working at www.news.cn and being the owner of the photo i took this photo with my camera this photo will also come under my own work i grant full rights to wikipedia to use this photo in several pages freely without any objections and i release it under free license since its my own work.. xiexie..:):) and I would also like to note that this image has been taken solely by me 7 years before and the copyright license has been expired now.. its free of use... xiexie..:):)Dominicoz (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

its also taken at madame tussads global so the above mentioned wont be applicable for this. we are also a global chinese news channel and iam being a reporter of that channel and creator of the photo so i have released it under free worldwide rights license to wikipedia and wikimedia commons to use in all pages freely. xie xie regards :):)Dominicoz (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received in our mail ticket id id=2020093010005581 please use it for further reference xie xie Dominicoz (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ticket id=2020093010005581 confirmed otrs our company mail recieved this mail for the photo and granted permission to use it in all wikicommons and wikipedia pages freely. whats wrong in placing the ticket id for evryone's reference I dont know why you are so keen on disrupting my legit own work. there is no need of placing a deletion tag since I already received a otrs. I being a reporter Iam going to raise a complain against Verbcatcher from my newscn company and for your notice this discussion is already closed since our company received the otrs through mail.Dominicoz (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after accepting and processing the OTRS-ticket the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality JPG structure, replaced by File:Photodeoxytridachione.svg. Wostr (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure, replaced by File:Indanomycin.svg. Wostr (talk) 21:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now there are many more images of higher quality of Bernardine Evaristo available on Wikimedia which are also of higher educational value. The subject (British writer Bernardine Evaristo) is unhappy with this particular photograph: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernardine_Evaristo_2019.jpg She has asked me via email whether I could take down this picture. I want her request to be honoured because the picture was uploaded without her consent. And because it is not a picture that represents her well. UKLonWikiLa (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Si l'auteur de la photographie en demande la suppression, cela semble légitime, --Pierrette13 (talk) 07:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 14:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. 1981 monument. See w:en:Mother Motherland, Kiev.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, they can be deleted, if there is FOP problem. Btw, should all the pictures of the Motherland monument in Kiev be deleted? ---Kulmalukko (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 002.jpg may fall under {{PD-RU-exempt}} as contains COA of Soviet Union (and it is main object of the photo).--Anatoliy (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama. See also w:Mother Motherland, Kiev.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments McZusatz (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.

Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044.

Josve05a (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Ukraine - monument designed by Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974

INeverCry 08:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--- Deleted: per INeverCry. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright expires in 2081

Off-shell (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine).

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. (Built in 1981.)

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

O co dokładnie chodzi? Fafik Napisz coś® 17:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This statue is protected by copyright law, until the designer has been dead for 70 years. --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, i understand. Fafik Napisz coś® 09:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. (The designer died 9 years ago.)

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC) Please do not delete. Photos are copyright. No violations. DENAMAX (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.

Off-shell (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.

Off-shell (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.--- FitIndia Talk 10:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.

Off-shell (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absolutely no any indication of a compatible free license on the website: [2]. VLu (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm aware, CC licenses aren't revocable. At the very least, it means that all the material on digital.gov.ru, which was published on or before October 19, 2019, is covered under the license CC BY 3.0.
@Krassotkin: Извините, что беспокою, но не могли бы Вы, как официальный представитель сообщества Википедия, попросить администрацию digital.gov.ru (бывший сайт minsvyaz.ru) вернуть прежнюю лицензию CC BY 3.0 на свой сайт?
К сожалению, это напоминает ту ситуацию, которая произошла с сайтом kremlin.ru во время ЧМ-2018, только в данном случае российский правительственный сайт вообще стал полностью несвободным.--Russian Rocky (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Напишите им сами, что, мол, при изменении сайта потеряли свободную лицензию и теперь Википедия не может освещать их замечательную деятельность. Если не получится, напишите премьеру, что у них там бардак творится, и каждый министр что хочет, то и творит, и премьера не слушается. Только вежливо. У меня там нет близких знакомых, поэтому разницы нет кто писать будет. Можете меня в копию этой переписки ставить, посмотрю, может что подскажу походу. Если не получится, тогда уже будем через знакомых действовать. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Please see the license for the domain minsvyaz.ru (at the bottom of page) as indicated in the template. You link to another domain: digital.gov.ru - this is the site of the new ministry, which included the previous one. But CC-licenses cannot be revoked. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Sealle (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source link leads to copyrighted page Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reverse search of tineye and google does not give any results. I am going to assume good faith here. --Amada44  talk to me 13:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reverse search of tineye and google does not give any results. I am going to assume good faith here. --Amada44  talk to me 13:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reverse search of tineye and google does not give any results. I am going to assume good faith here. --Amada44  talk to me 13:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Portrait with no identification. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: name is in author field. would need OTRS to stay. --Amada44  talk to me 14:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: seems to be a screenshot of the website maxspeed.ir CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 14:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF Emperork (talk) 17:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 14:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? Seriously? This is obviously a professional photo studio image and not a selfie. 91.34.47.8 18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, needs OTRS permission. --Amada44  talk to me 14:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't own this photo. It's a copyright violation. And I want it removed. ShahsawarBalti (talk) 21:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 14:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want it removed. Uploaded mistakenly. ShahsawarBalti (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image was uploaded by a different user. --Amada44  talk to me 14:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded it mistakenly. Want it removed ShahsawarBalti (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License is not revocable. Image has been on commons for 6 years. --Amada44  talk to me 14:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded mistakenly. Want it removed ShahsawarBalti (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image is in use. License is not revocable. --Amada44  talk to me 14:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded mistakenly. want it removed ShahsawarBalti (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License is not revocable. Image has been on commons for 6 years. --Amada44  talk to me 14:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PORQUE LE PUSE PROPAGANDA Y QUIERO QUITARLA PENSADOR DAVID (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the description: "Copyright belongs to the International Federation of Teqball." Tomcsy (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 03:51, 9 Oktober 2020 UTC: No permission since 1 October 2020 --Krdbot 14:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antony brownie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like a series of posed PR shots that are unlikely to be the uploader's own work.

Nathan2055talk - contribs 02:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I agree that these files are unlikely to be won work - 2 files have different EXIF data, 2 don't have them at all. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above TOO of Finland Minoraxtalk 04:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the real purpose of this deletion request? shikoshibtalk 05:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission is needed from Supercell. --Minoraxtalk 06:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But... It is my own work! What the heck?! I can make a video where i'm making this logo. shikoshibtalk 02:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is definitely not your own work. The real copyright holder of this file is Supercell, see [3]. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can make a video where i'm making this logo, if you don't trust me. shikoshibtalk 00:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a derivative work of a logo published by Supercell, you making it into an svg file and uploading it here doesn't make it your own work. --Minoraxtalk 04:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عدم رعایت کپی رایت MohammadJarrari (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 speedy: Not own work: [4], [5] --Achim (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Otto Bauriedl (1881-1961). Not free in Europe Mutter Erde (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Otto Bauriedl (1881-1961). Not free in Europe Mutter Erde (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single item gallery E4024 (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work: a photograph of a photograph. Mr. Littlehand is not the creator of the original of Fender. No evidence of free license. --Animalparty (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: picture from Depositphoto https://fr.depositphotos.com/123597004/stock-photo-newspaper-concept-3d-illustration.html CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF uploaded as "own work" (but not so old to assume PD-Egypt as we did with the other "own works" of the occasional uploader). E4024 (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein eigenes Werk - no own work GerritR (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work. Probably taken from TV Mutter Erde (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can't find evidence of CC licensing in source Jumpytoo (talk) 05:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 08:35, 18 November 2020 UTC: No permission since 10 November 2020 --Krdbot 14:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22regards%22,_october_1951.png Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe (impossible de vérifier, référence incomplète) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To Droit de retrait 03:, could you clarify your point? the photograph is licensed PD-Italy, so I am not sure which "autorisation du photographe" (who BTW is unknown, as his/her name was not published in the magazine) are you talking about. The image is it is just a normal photograph documenting the behind the scenes of a charity concert held for the Italian television in Turin, Italy, it was published in 1972 by the Italian magazine Radiocorriere, and its copyright term has expired in 1993 (so doesn't even falls under URAA copyright restoration). --Cavarrone (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Given the nominator's lack of response/clarification about his DR reasoning, I'm formalizing my vote. The deletion's rationale (and the nominator as well) seems to ignore the license provided (either the nominator didn't noticed the type of license, or more likely don't know how PD-ITALY works). As said in the comment above, this is a normal photograph created in Italy, first published in Italy, and whose copyright expired before URAA, so PD-Italy applies not differently from the thousands of PD-Italy photographs listed in Radiocorriere and in other Italy-related Category:Images from magazines or Category:Images from newspapers subcategories. --Cavarrone (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 15:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined. (Undelete in 2022?)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn The cutoff is 1926, which these are before. Detagged and changed license. Happy Public Domain Day people. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free artwork, no FoP in Russia for non-architectural works. Sealle (talk) 07:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Sealle (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

 Keep Copyright tag corrected. No notice, as indicated in file note, and per statement on page 5/82, "Entire contents of this publication available for reproduction in whole or in part". — WFinch (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Copyright tag corrected. Copyright notice appears, copyright was registered but not renewed. This is the original 1940 edition of a book in the WPA American Guide Series. — WFinch (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Copyright tag corrected. Copyright notice appears, but copyright was not renewed. — WFinch (talk) 13:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Copyright tag corrected. No notice, as indicated in file note. — WFinch (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Copyright tag corrected. Copyright notice appears, but copyright was not renewed. — WFinch (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works form 1925 onward, Not PD-US government. Delete unless evidence of PD-Status or non-renewal determined definitively. (Some of these can be undeleted as the copyrights expire in 2021,2022,2023 etc...)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorʻs request Mychele Trempetich (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Afkomstig van dot.asahi.com, ©PIXTA. Geen toestemming voor vrij gebruik. トトト (talk) 07:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on random sampling, more than one of these appears to have been removed / or is unavailable from IA source. Delete ALL on precuationary principle unless someone can come up with a way of automatically checking if the relevant files are (or are not present on IA), as reviewing these manually for each file would drain volunteer effort on Commons.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks too broad. The first sample I took of forestryidentifi1094559646, is available at IA, and is explicitly approved for unlimited public distribution on the OMB form, itself therefore a Federal declaration. -- (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks . Eslewhere (and you were pinged) someone else has queried the logic of assuming 'student' work is automatically PD-US-Gov. If these are kept, then someone should at least remove those that aren't by US military personell or Civilian Fedral Employees I think.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: unmanageable nomination. These need to be examined individually. --ƏXPLICIT 07:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://brandfinance.com/images/upload/global_500_2016_website.pdf (page 12). This file is not clearly above COM:TOO US, so I have converted it to a DR. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The letter M pushed this over TOO IMO. --Minoraxtalk 05:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pereira2017. --Minoraxtalk 05:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I see the M as above the threshold of originality, unless you can point to something that would suggest that putting Kermit's collar on a letter is only a slight variation of that letter. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently files from this year have been removed from or are absent from IA in relation to this year. Delete all on precuationary principle unless someone is able to ask IA for an explanation. It's not worth trying to check indvidually for over 450 files indvidually....

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks . Eslewhere (and you were pinged) someone else has queried the logic of assuming 'student' work is automatically PD-US-Gov. If these are kept, then someone should at least remove those that aren't by US military personell or Cvilian Fedral Employees I think.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: unmanageable request. Requires diligent individuals reviews. --ƏXPLICIT 12:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work" (as the user claims all their uploads) but taken from a book; therefore we need some more information to fix the wrong license. User:Planespotter, any ideas? E4024 (talk) 14:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no publication data, no evidence, that the photographer is 70 years dead. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of privacy 47.8.6.116 11:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

because of privacy 47.15.213.129 12:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of low res COA without clear purpose. --P 1 9 9   22:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Swapnil EP (talk) 06:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a random sampling 2020 works in this collection, A number seem to absent on IA. Delete on precautionary principle unless someone is prepared to do more digging into why these were removed , or are absent at the stated source.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks . Eslewhere someone else has queried the logic of assuming 'student' work is automatically PD-US-Gov. If these are kept on principle, then someone should at least remove those that aren't by US military personnel or Civilian Federal Employees I think.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oops. I didn't upload this. Geo Swan (talk) 02:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't why the document was brought here. That particular thesis was not by a Federal employee, or active Military personnel, but by a Police employee at Yale. The rights statemtent in the metadata also stated "Copyright is reserved by the copyright owner.". Attending a particular school doesn't make your thesis public domain. Do you have any more evidence as to why the presence of a classification note would indicate an official status for the document, given that most recent NPS thesis have a standard metadata cover sheet (which includes the classification note) without necessarily being offical DoD documents? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No indication that authors (all different) are employees of Federal Government, and statements of copyright being held by author led to COM:PRP. I wouldn't oppose Individual Undeletion Requests, but please do not Undel or ReNominate all these together, and please have a compelling argument absent speculation on any Undel Request. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the Mandarin Chinese Wikipedia, where the user's sole contribution triggered the spam filter and was reverted by another editor one minute later. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 02:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intrusive lower edge shading associated with watermark and covering part of subject makes image unusable, out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Someone at COM:GL might be able to fix this. --Minoraxtalk 04:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, low-res, no obvious use Weirpwoer (talk) 11:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file at IA to verify license or sourcing ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can a thesis by a student in the naval academy be assumed to be licensed as a US government publication? I highly doubt it. Surely that is still copyright to the student unless we consider the work to be that of a government employee. Ww2censor (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is an excellent point. The No file at IA, seems to be a technical issue, so per User:Fæ elsewhere isn't necessarily indcative of itself that the file is problematic. However, if it can't be treated as PD-US-Gov , per the reasoning that being at the NPS doesn't make it a Government or US navy work, then there are at leaat 15,000 files on Commons that need re-lincensing or removed fairly quickly. (see : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Documents_from_the_US_Naval_Postgraduate_School_Library and related categories). A lot of the Thesis appear to be by militray personell (presumably being "sponspered" at the NPS) , Would the fact that they are being sponsored by the US Army, Navy etc make the work a US Gov work? This needs a definitive decision.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@: ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 00:25, 25 May 2021, by Ellin Beltz. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still photo that appeared in Fox Sports video. Extremely unlikely to be licensed under Creative Commons. Gildir (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In reality the video description (available from the link provided in the image description) reports correctly the Creative Commons license so it seems all ok. In fact -even if it seems a strange choiche from a broadcasting company- a lot of videos from official Fox Sports YouTube channel have a Creative Commons license. --Civitas13 (talk) 05:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Civitas13. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. NATO website is obviously not part of the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed at IA indicating a possible issue ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn pending someone else confirming or checking the torrent link, I can't due to firewall issues.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   14:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File apparently removed at IA, indciating a possible issue ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw pending someone else checking the torrent link, I can't due to firewall issues. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently deleted at IAShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Technical problem at IA? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio utilizzare la foto per partecipare al concorso Wiki loves monument Giambattista Lazazzera (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Sergie Rose (talk) 06:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete screenshot or online grab.--RZuo (talk) 11:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since) A.Savin 11:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a simple voice recording below the Originality threshold. --A.Savin 11:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As per Article 1304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Objects of related rights are: ... 2) phonograms, i.e. any solely sound recordings of performances or other sounds or representations thereof... The complexity of the original work or it's public domain status is not specified and does not affect the related rights of the performing artist. Sealle (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per A.Savin. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since) A.Savin 11:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a simple voice recording below the Originality threshold. --A.Savin 11:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As per Article 1304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Objects of related rights are: ... 2) phonograms, i.e. any solely sound recordings of performances or other sounds or representations thereof... The complexity of the original work or it's public domain status is not specified and does not affect the related rights of the performing artist. Sealle (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As per Savin. There is not a poem or a song. There is voice announcement, recorded in public transport. Just a Russian phrase made up of simple Russian words. --Alex Florstein (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per A.Savin. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since) A.Savin 11:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a simple voice recording below the Originality threshold. --A.Savin 11:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As per Article 1304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Objects of related rights are: ... 2) phonograms, i.e. any solely sound recordings of performances or other sounds or representations thereof... The complexity of the original work or it's public domain status is not specified and does not affect the related rights of the performing artist. Sealle (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per A.Savin. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as Dw no source since (dw no source since) A.Savin 11:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a simple voice recording below the Originality threshold. --A.Savin 11:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As per Article 1304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Objects of related rights are: ... 2) phonograms, i.e. any solely sound recordings of performances or other sounds or representations thereof... The complexity of the original work or it's public domain status is not specified and does not affect the related rights of the performing artist. Sealle (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per A.Savin. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also: File:Kazan Metro voice message in train 08-2016 sample.ogg

Copyright and performer's related rights statuses are to be clarified. Sealle (talk) 07:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete This has minimal copyright protection. The information about the stop and that the doors are closing is definitely in public domain, however, this particular recording of this particular person announcing that is copyrighted. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 07:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Simple voice recording of a few words, clearly below the Originalty threshold. --A.Savin 11:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As per Article 1304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Objects of related rights are: ... 2) phonograms, i.e. any solely sound recordings of performances or other sounds or representations thereof... The complexity of the original work or it's public domain status is not specified and does not affect the related rights of the performing artist. Sealle (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6 work , Not US Government... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Juandev as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The author is Frantiska Süssera and we dont have the permission to use it. This probably fits COM:FOP Czech Republic. VLu (talk) 09:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

imagevio delete. Does not fit to Freedom of Panorama exclusion as it was not taken at the public place. --Juandev (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The author František Václav Süsser died in 1956, undelete in 2027. —Gumruch (talk) 21:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Just a note, which I don't know whether it is related, but the person, who removed the file from speedy deletion and opened this process is blocked for sockpuppetry.Juandev (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Question So are we going to keep this file till 2027? Juandev (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Juandev: Please correct the confusing description first, then we can resolve the copyright. It is a work of Sylva Lacinová, a work of "Frantiska Süssera" (a transgender transformation of František Václav Süsser?), and at the same time a work of Art Jarka? If it is a photograph of a painting, the source or location are completely missing. Where did you come up with that distorted painter's name? --ŠJů (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no information about the painting's location, so, can't apply FoP. --rubin16 (talk) 10:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Book renewals are easy to search at Stanford. For pre-1964 books, seems reasonable to ask to do a search there. Periodicals can be checked at UPenn. Ones found should be deleted of course, otherwise a DR seems excessive -- it's a mass deletion of likely PD material. I checked the first eight on the above list and found no mention of them. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claimed that this image appeared in the public domain source the Jewish Encyclopedia but I have been unable to find the image itself, just entries describing the artifact the image depicts. Furthermore, if you look the image up in the archaeological database Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss-Slaby (German Wikipedia link) by going to the database's web site http://db.edcs.eu and plugging in the inscription's catalog number "EDCS-28300234" the entry that comes up includes a link to what appears to be the exact same image accompanied by a copyright notice. truthious andersnatch 10:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will find it there. Olevy 11:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The image also appears with a copyright notice in that page, which says that it is from a 1940s work called the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, not the 1900s work the Jewish Encyclopedia which you inserted the licensing template {{JewishEncyclopedia}} for when you uploaded it. --truthious andersnatch 13:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that Olevy normally edits in a language other than English, so I want to be sure to point out that I slightly misworded my statement above: the page linked to at jewishencyclopedia.com does not technically say that this image comes from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia; it just presents it next to text and page images from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. HathiTrust does have copies of the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia volumes; see here for example. You need to have an institutional HathiTrust account to view the pages directly because the volumes are marked as copyrighted but if you cut and paste sentences from jewishencyclopedia.com you can verify that you get search hits inside them.
I am noticing that jewishencyclopedia.com will not allow the viewing of any page before the first one in any volume, so I would hazard to guess that the web site is misrepresenting its ownership of the content as well as the content itself. However, that still leaves the EDCS database and HathiTrust who both consider this Commons image to be copyrighted. --truthious andersnatch 17:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hathi Trust link, confirming public domain. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can agree with that. Whatever reason EDCS, jewishencyclopedia.com, and HathiTrust had for marking versions of this image as copyrighted, it does seem that there is a public domain version too.--truthious andersnatch 02:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am not understanding what is written above but I still see this foreword to the Jewish Encyclopedia (not necessarily "Universal") : "This website contains the complete contents of the 12-volume Jewish Encyclopedia, which was originally published between 1901-1906. The Jewish Encyclopedia, which recently became part of the public domain, contains over 15,000 articles and illustrations. This online version contains the unedited contents of the original encyclopedia. Since the original work was completed almost 100 years ago, it does not cover a significant portion of modern Jewish History (e.g., the creation of Israel, the Holocaust, etc.). However, it does contain an incredible amount of information that is remarkably relevant today." Olevy 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the website does say that, but it shows words and images from a different book—Oui, le website dit cela, mais il montre des mots et des images d'un livre différent. --truthious andersnatch 20:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Olevy, frankly I would ignore this user, they have a pathological obsession with removing historic Jewish content from Wiki sites and nothing short of mailing out a copy of the encyclopedia is going to convince them (probably not even that). Ivar the Boneful (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Finally linking to a copy of the image that did not say "copyright" at the bottom definitely has helped to persuade me.—Enfin, un lien vers une copie de l'image qui ne disait pas «copyright» en bas a définitivement aidé à me convaincre.
Admin, please close this discussion as keep. Or I think you can close it early, Ivar the Boneful, if you want to; just read the instructions to make sure because things work differently here from Wikipedia. --truthious andersnatch 02:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/6, Not PD -US government, Delete unless evidence of PD status, or non renewal can be definitely determined. (Undelete in 2023 or so?)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is not by Koloman Moser. It was made by de:Madame d’Ora (Atelier d’Ora/Benda), who died in 1963. You can see the image with the logo on https://artinwords.de/madame-dora-pionierin-der-portraetfotografie-in-wien-und-paris/. The photo is copyrighted in Austria. Papergirl (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 10:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/1925 work, Not PD-US Government. Delete unless evidence of PD-status or Non-renewal determined. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --rubin16 (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925/26 work, Not US Government, Delete unless evidence of PD stats or non-renewal determined. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --rubin16 (talk) 11:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1925 works, Not PD-US Government works. Delete unless evidence of PD-Status or non renewal determined definitively...

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-manageable request, please, review those that have renewal, for example, and nominate only them. It is not possible just to review each file everywhere. --rubin16 (talk) 11:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elson Junior literature books 1 and 2

[edit]

Not a government work but copyrighted and renewed due December 31, 1959. [6] Can be undeleted in 2026.

De728631 (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images are from here, not from SpaceX's Flickr site, the given licence is outdated and no more feasible. At the given PDF source is stated, that "Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) is the owner of the copyright in this work, and no portion hereof is to be copied, reproduced, or disseminated without the prior written consent of SpaceX" and "© Space Exploration Technologies Corp. All rights reserved." See also this deletion request.

Ras67 (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we have OTRS ticket now. --rubin16 (talk) 11:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work is not by a US national, or servering miltary/federal employee ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removed or seemingly absent at IA source given, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited." appears sufficient. The torrent is still publicly available, which includes the PDF. Not displaying at IA may be a technical issue, rather than anything related to copyright. -- (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was definitely removed, though two previous versions of the PDF still appear in the history folder. I noted the difference between the two versions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:A BLOCKCHAIN TESTBED FOR DOD APPLICATIONS (IA ablockchaintestb1094560460).pdf, and I bet the same thing happened here. Someone probably made a mistake in uploading these to IA and then tried to fix it by adding a more explicit copyright notice before deciding to remove the files altogether. The fact that the description page is still there means it wasn't a takedown (compare to this).
  • However, in this particular case, I don't think it's an issue. Referring to the canonical URL from the PDF, the notice there explicitly disclaims copyright protection (as should be the case since the author is employed by DHS). Compare that to the blockchain PDF I mentioned (the author of that is a civilian). Seems like the removal from IA was an overbroad batch action that doesn't necessarily reflect the copyright situation. The copies we have should be examined individually to determine whether the author is a government employee and therefore PD-USGov (check the title page, page iii on the copies I looked at). The NPS Archive (follow the hdl.handle.net links) has rights information as well. clpo13(talk) 16:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The earliest trace of the same image I could found comes from here (which probably not the original source), never stated any license. JasonHK (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map of Belarus contains the name of neighbouring country Lithuania as it's region (Litva), authenticity is very doubtfull. No permisions from the authors. Ke an (talk) 17:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What "countries" are you talking about in terms of IX century? It is genuinely extremely funny :) Shake my head :) 172.58.191.48 19:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The map name says "Гістарычныя вобласці Беларусі" (Historical regions of Belarus). It is more than obvious that Lithuania (Літва) never was and is not neither a part of Belarus, nor historical region. This map is a FALSIFICATION. -- Ke an (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Are the publications cited in this image description also asserted to be false, or do they actually exist? Are there any digitised version of this publication which can be used to show truth or falsehood here? Nick Moyes (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Any sources would be appreciated. So far no one can confirm it was prepared by the Belarussian Academy of Sciences as it was claimed by the user [[User:|Vadzim]]. The title claims it is a map of the Historical regions, but actually none of the regions have borders. Second problem - map contains a hodgepodge of the names - for example the ancient tribe w:Krivichs (Крывія) which inhabited the territory of present day Belarus in ca 6th century, then the next overlay follows denoting lands of w:Polotsk (Полаччынка) principality, which was overlayed by the geographical name w:White Ruthenia (Белая Русь). It is very unlikely professional scientists would make anything like this. -- Ke an (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Žemėpatis (talk) 00:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the map is used, so, it can't be deleted for possible inaccuracies. These issues should be solved in the relevant Wikimedia projects. --rubin16 (talk) 11:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work, looks to be a scan or drawing taken from somewhere but the source is not identified. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author of the this image. It is the photo of my grandfather. No any copyright or licensing is violated here. Thanks. Nurezi7BB 08:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly recognized cyrillic letter yery as digraph. Szczecinolog (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: F1. Copyrighted Capcom logo + file is lacking source.. Converting to DR as the file is not clearly above COM:TOO US AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: borderline but I think it is creative enough. --rubin16 (talk) 11:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misuse of name/Nazi sign. My name is Eugen Tokarew and I was often asked during job interviews if I had something to do with the entry (imperial eagle/Nazi sign). I am tired of being associated with a Nazi sign and distance myself explicitly from this political attitude. At the moment I'm looking for a job and I have the impression that I'm disadvantaged because of this symbol. Therefore I explicitly ask you to either delete the entry or my name. Many thanks and best regards Eugene Tokarew 91.60.251.169 20:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Datei wird vielfach in mehreren Wikis verwendet und hat innerhalb der Wikimedia nur dokumentarischen Charakter. Sie wurde mit allen nötigen Hinweisen versehen. Nicht löschen.--GerritR (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I have replaced your name with "the original uploader" in the image's description, I hope it helps a little bit. --rubin16 (talk) 11:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]