Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

84.241.202.156

MatryoshkaNL (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 3 days by Achim55. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
@Achim55 and AntiCompositeNumber: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Mpadilla0139

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indef, VOA/not here to build a free media repository. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
@AntiCompositeNumber: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

DutchDreamFc

Mindmatrix 16:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Mdaouda2

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. Warning did not help, so I blocked him for a week. Vandalism is reverted by others. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Pedroluisupyd

Pedroluisupyd (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) Only edits are vandalism. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely. Vandalism is reverted by others. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

82.40.130.75

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. IP 1-day-blocked and talkpage protected after more vandalism. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Lanoisseforptrepxe

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely (third block). Thanks to everyone who reverted his edits! Taivo (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Locked.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

EastMedmaps

Ahmetlii (talk) 10:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. No edits since July, block is not needed. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Gökhanseverfb

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 14:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user for a month. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Ensayista Víctor Bustos Sola, 190.139.38.135, and 190.139.211.95

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP-s and semi-protected the target page for a month. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks! What about the named user?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
He's back with File:Ensayista Víctor Bustos Sola.jpg and as 119.160.167.251.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The IP is blocked, spamming has stopped after you warned him. At moment that's all. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: He's back, with a vengeance.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Pinging @Achim55, CptViraj as Admins who have deleted his userpage.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked him for 2 weeks, uploads are deleted by others. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

MANYAM AMARNADH

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

This looks like an editing accident of a beginner to me. More concerning are, however, the copyvios in the uploads. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 Comment No edits after AFBorchert warned him. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

User:Sarah 1985

Sciencia58 (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

User Sarah 1985 was already warned two and a half years ago that it is not allowed to overwrite image files with completely different images. Two years ago, she was warned again. After another violation, her user account was blocked for a week. Now she has become active again and continues exactly the same misconduct. As the photos are on the subject of sexuality and the false images she uploads appear immediately in our articles, which can be very irritating, there is a particular urgency to this matter. Since she or he avoids giving credit to the true author of the photo in this way, it cannot be ruled out that some photographs were published against the will of the woman who was photographed and that personality rights are violated.

The fact that Sarah reverted the latest overwriting shows that she commits the violations deliberately, perhaps out of an inner compulsion, and then reverts it so that no action is taken against her user account. So intent is evident here. This is real vandalism. The effect was also very unpleasant for me personally, because after her renewed vandalism, which caused her wrong photo to appear in an article I had edited, I tried to get rid of it by resetting it. As a result, I now have photos in my list that I don't want in there at all. I don't want those pictures in my files. She didn't reset it immediately, she reset it after 52 minutes. That was a clear provocation. In doing so, she abuses the placating effect of visual sexual stimuli on male adminstrators. I think it is time for a permanent ban, because she is obviously either unwilling or unable to refrain such violations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciencia58 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Has already been indef'd by Gbawden. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
@Sciencia58: Thanks for the report, but please make only one report per behavior.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Morrispedia2

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Jianhui67 T★C 09:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

سمسم الشمري

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Blocked as a sock. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
@CptViraj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

62.88.128.144

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. Low activity vandal, no edits since you warned him/her – and I thank you for that! Taivo (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Lakmi00

 Not done. Actually Lakmi's map is more correct than your version. It should be re-uploaded as separate map, but probably it exists somewhere as separate map. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Xxlfussel

The discussion is closed. As AFBorchert said: Xxlfussel "should consider themselves lucky to have not been indef'd". Sockpuppeting is one of biggest crimes in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  • User: Xxlfussel (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: User is unhappy with the progress of Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Selina Egle at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics. He used sock puppets to manipulate the progress of the discussion in order to imply that there is more than just one voice in support of his position. The sock account was blocked indefinitely, the sock master for 1 month. Nobody else took his position and this discussion felt asleep. In order to push his position forward, he started the similar behaviour against another similar category (edit) which he randomly picked and opened up a similar discussion. I reverted this and redirected it to the current (still unclosed) discussion. I do consider this to be another step of trolling in favour of a single position. A longer block than 1 month should be warranted as well as a permanent topic ban on sports categories.

—DerHexer (Talk) 19:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

I support this. This is so frustrating, a completely destructive behaviour. I'm a Wikimedian now since nearly 16 years, but not often I meet such a destructive person here. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I support this, too. Regardless of their multiple accounts, this user is very destructive and demotivates productive users. --Stepro (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Why should I be dissatisfied with how the discussion went about the category Selina Egle at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics? It is more likely that you are dissatisfied with the course. The discussion is still open and therefore not yet concluded. This discussion is not just about the category Selina Egle at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics, but about the entire category system under the category 2020 Winter Youth Olympics sportspeople. Because the discussion, as I said, is not over yet, I have held back with editing in this category system. In contrast, Marcus Cyrus created the category Barış Oduncu at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics during the ongoing discussion. That is a clear affront to the discussion, and that is why I put the category up for discussion. That's my right isn't it? I also find it very amusing that Marcus Cyrus described me as a “destructive person”. In the discussion above, Marcus Cyrus showed what a destructive user is. --Xxlfussel (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't think that a category discussion where all your arguments were in a way refuted which urged you to use sock puppets to claim that there is more than just your single voice should hinder anyone from creating valid categories (as multiple times explained there with myriads of examples). Certainly, these and many more categories within this logic will be created. This is a community project, please do accept that people create valid categories in another way as you would create them. Without a doubt, this is disruptive behaviour. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
My arguments have been refuted? This is new to me! When should that have happened please? Never! You can see that from the fact that the discussion is still open. I am also the one who wants a compromise to be found. This cannot really be said of other users involved in the discussion. Marcus Cyron sticks to his destructive stance “All participants in the Youth Olympic Games that were photographed should get such a category.” (Link) and definitely wants to enforce it. --Xxlfussel (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Wow, a category for (even by themselves!) notable participants of a notable event. Incredible demand on Commons!</sarcasm>
The discussion is still open because you derailed it plenty of times, get caught up in inconsistencies over and over again, did not understand the explanations how the category system on Commons works (like having categories for images of an event as well as for sorting files by perople), and repeated your lack of understanding numerous times. Certainly, nobody wants to read this discussion. Nobody wants to make a step into the mud you left behind using sock puppets to manipulate the discussion. My summary (in German) of the whole disussion is here. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

I think this is not the right place to discuss the substantive issue again. In my opinion, the discussion is very definitive, there is one individual opinion against all others.
Now an admin should finally formally close this discussion and draw conclusions against the user reported here. --Stepro (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@Stepro: I can only agree with the first part of your last sentence. Then the action had achieved its aim. --Xxlfussel (talk) 22:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Given that Xxlfussel used a sockpuppet to support their stance in that discussion, they should consider themselves lucky to have not been indef'd for this abuse. I cannot close the original CfD as I opened it when the category was write-protected and promised to stay neutral on that matter. But moving on to other categories before the first discussion is closed appears to me disruptive. Xxlfussel, it is time to drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. You had your discussion and you didn't get support for your position (with the exception of your own sock puppet). It is now time to move on. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@AFBorchert: Sorry again that I misswritten your name the other day. Still, a question about your contribution: Which horse cadavers are you talking about? Bye the way I don't see a problem if you close the discussion. You created it but on my behalf and you were not involved in the discussion. But of course that is your decision. --Xxlfussel (talk) 22:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Could an admin please make a decision? --Stepro (talk) 21:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC) --Stepro (talk) 08:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done? I closed the discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Did this also end this discussion and discard the accusation of vandalism? --Xxlfussel (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Schweppsq

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a week, spam is reverted by others. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Despite being the one who gave the second warning to the user, I'd have to disagree to this block as premature. Unless I'm missing something here, like they created a page that is OOS or edited another page and placed their article again (which according to xtools' edit counter, they haven't), the user stopped placing their article when I reverted them. I'd assume good faith and say that they are most likely lost. Hence why I opted to give them another warning and advice instead of reporting them here. I think our interpretations of spam and vandalism is different here. I believe it's unfair to block them under the "spamming" rationale, because I don't think they are promoting. If they are, they wouldn't take a long break after they got reverted on 28 November 2020. I don't think their edits are vandalism either, because there's no malicious intent (it's not like they removed someone's discussion and replaced it with their article).
Now if they had done it again after I warned them, then I'd fully support a block. But that doesn't seem the case here. Blocks should be thought of as a last resort action, especially in the case of newbies. pandakekok9 02:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
@Pandakekok9: I disagree. They were warned 09:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC). They chose to post the same spam promoting this Tom guy and his robotic surgery experience 08:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
That's why I opposed the block, because I reverted them in 23 minutes later and sent a warning two minutes after the revert. And they haven't done anything since the warning. So not only your warning is very late, so is the moot block. As I said before, if they were promoting, they wouldn't limit themselves to that. They will include external links and other promotional stuff. Achim55 would've blocked them right away if they knew Schweppsq was promoting. You told me before to assume good faith on newbies; I ask you to do the same. pandakekok9 08:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

75.118.192.21

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done IP blocked for a day, DRs deleted/reverted. --jdx Re: 11:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
@Jdx: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

"A. Sturdivant" is back

Several users have already been reported and banned for editing photo captions to add obviously fake credits. It seems like the people behind this have created a new set of accounts:

The above are only the ones I found after a cursory search - numerous accounts all adding credits for "A. Sturdivant" and other photographers who did not take the image in question. Reported off-wiki by the photographer of File:Running_Man_Kyle_Cassidy.jpg (which has since been reverted) - apparently, after the caption is edited, a company called "Green Cap Marketing" emails web publishers using the photos asking for royalties. If this is the case, this is even more disturbing than just adding captions for promotional purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marksomnian (talk • contribs) 16:31, 16 December 2020‎ (UTC)

@Marksomnian: See also COM:ANU#Suzane.Rob2020 altering attributions to enable copyfraud and COM:AN#False authorship and subsequent copyright claims.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked and tagged them. Thanks to everyone who reverted their edits! Taivo (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks for these! Can you do Vega.layla (talk · contribs) as well? Seems to be the same batch. Andrew Gray Andrew Gray (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Andrew Gray, Done. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Could you set up an edit filter for the websites and organisation names they are adding? Fences and windows (talk) 23:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
There is one in place now. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Juliengoujon75

User: Juliengoujon75 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user uploaded several copyvio files in October and was warned both here (see his talk page) and on French Wikipedia by myself [1]. Unfortunately, I realized he did it again in November as well as yesterday. Since he doesn't seem to understand warnings, blocking him is the only solution I see. Thanks --Titlutin (talk) 13:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Final warning given. They haven't edited in a few days, so I don't think a short block would be any more useful in getting their attention. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

122.162.122.241

User: 122.162.122.241 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Replaced the content of user talk pages with nonsense content and edit summary.

pandakekok9 08:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week, edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Bglou

User: Bglou (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: spamming of useless files (see User talk:Bglou, full of deletion notifications), upload of logos of existing political parties without proper copyright notice (national rally, EPP, for example).

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done warned. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Simonedsouza7

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done by @Achim, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

MrJaoppaPSY

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Globally locked by MusikAnimal for cross-wiki abuse. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Adamroslan89

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. Only two edits, no edits after warning, so I usually do not block under such circumstances, but this is vandalism in important pages, so I gave a 6 months block. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

2001:E68:4429:33F4:DC05:A91:2195:451B

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Starting with a one week block. Let us know if vandalism continues from this ip. MorganKevinJ(talk) 04:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
@Morgankevinj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

USER/IP

User: USER/IP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: REASON.

176.214.205.132 20:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done Malformed request: who did you want to report? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Media of the day

"Media of the day" The section for compression of videos from (mb to kb) has for about two days now been removed. Please admin bring back the feature. lt gives some of the wikicommon users the opportunity to download videos in compressed form 105.112.105.75 10:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


"Transcode Status" I just found out that the icon to click on is too faint. Please don't blame me for reporting that it was vandalised. How about making it visible enough for all to see. It also applies to some other icons like the "edit icon" is faint too. Thank you and Happy New Year. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 105.112.208.229 (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Sinejaunt

User: Sinejaunt (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Very clearly NOTHERE. He has also been already blocked on en.wiki for the same reason. Nehme1499 (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. If this does not help, then (s)he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Cubaces4ever2

User: Cubaces4ever2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: continous vandalism through suggested edits feature. Based on suggested edits documentation If the user's account is banned by an admin on either the Commons or Wikidata projects, the SE feature will also be disabled for the user. There was previous discussion in AN, but it was closed without any action as there were no specific admin tool request made. Zache (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done? I blocked him/her for a month. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! --Zache (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Rajesh agred

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Globally locked. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

A1d2m3i4n5

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, now they're back as 1313acac (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Also blocked. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

A Complete Idiot

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Indef-blocked as vandalism-only. Possibly a SP of another account. Anyway, thanks for reporting. --Túrelio (talk) 22:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

186.87.111.57 and company

Please deal with 186.87.111.57 and company (like Special:Contributions/190.165.52.187). --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP and semi-protected a lot of files. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

201.184.245.234

User: 201.184.245.234 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandal; please semiprotect the files, see their history

Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Achim (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

68.8.44.230

User: 68.8.44.230 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism in several places, including the COM:AN.

SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 01:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 month block since it is the 3rd block. MorganKevinJ(talk) 01:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

103.42.217.225

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP. Vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

加藤由美子 今来た加藤

User: 加藤由美子 今来た加藤 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: fills in Japanese family name Katō (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15985375) as motive in random photos -- Dehio (talk) 08:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I've reverted all his edits. --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! I started to revert some, but then I had to work and couldn't fix all of them manually. --Dehio (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
@Dehio and Túrelio: They continued, so I reverted 45 more edits.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be a VOA, ✓ Indeffed. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@CptViraj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

49.151.128.197

User: 49.151.128.197 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This is obvious block evasion by My Royal Young. He's using this IP to vandalize on Commons. @Jdx: Can you please block this guy? Thanks.

LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. -- CptViraj (talk) 10:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

2409:4054:211A:D576:0:0:1D78:A0A0

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked. Although for one day only as it is dynamic IP address. --jdx Re: 11:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@Jdx: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Ubistyle

User: Ubistyle (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: He has uploaded lots of files in copyviol, multiple advices, write only. Luca•M 16:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. No activity since 2014, block is not needed. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Tybudd8

User: Tybudd8 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Keeps uploading test files even though the just keep getting deleted.

Slashme (talk) 09:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Latest edit 3 months ago, no entry in filter log. Feel free to tag remaining files for deletion if necessary. --Achim (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

TRANSCODE STATUS

I wish to report this change l noticed on transcode status. The BITRATE displayed for about two days now becomes bigger when one wants to download. Eg 160kbps will become 2 or 4 mb. Please Admin do something about it. The displayed bitrate should not change to higher bitrate. 105.112.112.124 19:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome. While the size of the transcoded file in kB or MB does increase with the bitrate, that size is not reported in the "Transcode status" of any file description page. An enhancement request to show the size, as well as the resolution, was filed almost 8 years ago as phab:T49488. You can get an estimate of the size by multiplying the bitrate by the number of seconds, for example a 102.4 second video transcoded at 160kbps will result in a file that is 16384 kb, 2048 kB, or 2.00 MB in size. For future requests for help, please post to COM:HD.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Fallencow30

User: Fallencow30 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: foul language, irrelevant, troll: c:User_talk:Mrmw#User:Fallencow30 Mrmw (talk) 13:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

I have bad social skills, which is why I am so vulnerable to being blocked, to say the truth. --Fallencow30 (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@Fallencow30: Please try to improve those skills, perhaps with professional help. On wikis, you can use the "Show preview" button. You can also save potentially disruptive comments/changes you wish to make locally, and sleep on them.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I nominated the template for regular deletion. This lasts at least a week. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: I tagged it for speedy deletion as a copyvio of en:Template:Whale.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
This is only for obvious cases. File:Jumping Humpback whale.jpg is situated in Commons and is free. In my opinion no copyright is violated. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: 1868 bytes of wikitext were blatantly copied from en:Template:Whale to Template:Whale in this initial edit without attribution. That's straight-up copyright violation / plagiarism, which should override a DR.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
No, Jeff. Wikipedia is published under free license. Wikipedia does not demand attribution to authors, because articles and also templates have sometimes tens or even hundreds of authors. If such attribution is sometimes needed, then we give one week for removing mistakes. Deletion is for cases, where mistakes cannot be repaired. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hugo Refachinho

User: Hugo Refachinho (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user have been insistently inserting low quality maps in articles referring to the history of Portugal and abuse cross-wiki of multiple accounts to do it (see here and here).

In addition, the editor also uploaded several wrong / exaggerated maps about the Portuguese presence in the Age of Discovery, so I ask that all of these images be eliminated.

I declare that I know the verification and privacy policies and make this request in good faith. Chronus (talk) 13:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. No activity for 2 months. You can nominate all incorrect maps for regular deletion, but only if they are unused. Used maps are ineligible for deletion, even if they are erroneous and misleading. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

GLCEMAIL

User: GLCEMAIL (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: cross-wiki spam/nonsense

Magnus (talk) 07:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. All edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Empresa Norteña Colombiana

User: Empresa Norteña Colombiana (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam bot.

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as inappropriate username rubin16 (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

182.69.157.232

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 10:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
@Rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

110.54.154.103

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked, thanks rubin16 (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
@Rubin16: Thanks, and you're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

119.14.106.102

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Mekatili pini

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

A week's block for a vandalism-only account? Are we Samaritans now? Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Kitabc12345

User: Kitabc12345 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading unfree files after warning. See User talk:Kitabc12345

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@-akko: ✓ Done by User:Gbawden. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

220.75.145.40

Mutter Erde (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mutter Erde: Thanks for reporting this, has been blocked for a day. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I've extended the block to a month as this appears to be a relatively static IP address which has been misused for multiple days in a row. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Another IP

Special:Contributions/220.75.145.233. Thx. --E4024 (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked the range for a month. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

DISMEYCARTOON207

User: DISMEYCARTOON207 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked, still cleaning up. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done All contribs deleted or rolled back as appropriate. The account's been locked by User:Martin Urbanec. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

CPGLCONGO

User: CPGLCONGO (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: I just found out this user uploaded an enormous amount of copyrighted pictures. It's been going on for several months. He was already warned in January 2019, but kept doing it after that. I still haven't checked all his uploads, but I fear all of them have to be deleted. Titlutin (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him/her for a month. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Request to be barred

Here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kit body caninde20t.png. --E4024 (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done It was barred. --Red-back spider (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Main picture for Category:Taekwondo (d:Q36389) vandalised

User: Fəxri Cəfərov (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism: kindly see history of file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COOK_(GBR)_VS_ZHU_(CHN)_BM_-80KGM12.JPG. Starting at 20:06, 4 January 2021 "Fəxri Cəfərov uploaded a new version of File:COOK (GBR) VS ZHU (CHN) BM -80KGM12.JPG. After this, also on 4 January 2021, he/she has changed this file two times again. By replacing the original taekwondo match photo from the 2008 Olympic Games with totally different picture, blurred image of four young men, damage to tens of wikipedia articles about taekwondo has been created. This is serious file change and can be classified as vandalism, as the original file is used as main picture e.g. in Wikidata id for Taekwondo, d:Q36389, through which it is repeated in tens of language versions of wikipedia. It is requested that the file used prior 4 January 2020 is restored, and user is warned about vandalism, possibly also blocked from Commons. Please check also other changes this user has made: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/F%C9%99xri_C%C9%99f%C9%99rov.

Paju~commonswiki (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

After this vandalism, some wikipedia languages have already changed the main picture in their taekwondo article (like ru). But e.g. in ruwikipedia they have not noticed that User:Fəxri Cəfərov has also vandalised file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Taekwondo1.jpg in similar fashion. Please restore original photo file also in this case. --Paju~commonswiki (talk) 03:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@Paju~commonswiki: I reverted their overwrites and warned them.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. You did great! I have to apologize, a bit: There was some challenge of my laptop not updating the latter picture history properly, so I tried to revert it myself. The picture history of File:Taekwondo1.jpg shows now my stupidity... --Paju~commonswiki (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@Paju~commonswiki: You're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I cleaned file history and protected it against upload. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Slazlo22

User: Slazlo22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: The user creates descriptions with obscene words or insults, also whitens pages. Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I am not sure, why the user is here, but he is not building an encyclopedia. He uploaded a lot of files and all they are deleted. He insults Donald Trump and other persons. I blocked him indefinitely. Feel free to change the block, if you consider that appropriate. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Taivo --Wilfredor (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Ravikim musician

User: Ravikim musician (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: nonsense edits. Magnus (talk) 08:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned him. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

2804:D55:52B7:6A00:A9A6:F6AC:ECB4:60C4

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by Jdx, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

197.39.131.244

User: 197.39.131.244 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after warning.

SCP-2000 17:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked in Commons and also globally. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

TVB ISIS Channel

User: TVB ISIS Channel (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading attack image after warning. Seem Vandalism-only account.

SCP-2000 04:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely. All his uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

HoloCockDick

User: HoloCockDick (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Bad username and vandalism files (both copyrighted and useless)

IWI (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Uploads deleted, account is already glocked so no need for local block. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hinduism2020

User: Hinduism2020 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Inserting nonsense description. Vandalism only user. Xiplus (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user for a week. I thank everybody for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 10:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

92.200.206.123

User: 92.200.206.123 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Anonymous began to massively delete image categories, accompanied by the description "simplification of categories". Category Images from Vsemirnaya Illyustratsia (magazine) deleted many times: here and so on. Categories have also been removed: Images from Military Encyclopedia. Vol. 14 (Saint-Petersburg; 1914) here, Russian military personnel of the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878) here etc. vvk121 (talk) 13:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Abcdefghixx

User: Abcdefghixx (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism, remove my upload photos information and delete it without acceptable reason. (see here) and here

Wpcpey (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is warned. If (s)he continues, then (s)he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

105.235.129.145

User: 105.235.129.145 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Removing file captions without any thought today, the same conduct as Special:Contributions/105.235.129.254 yesterday. Possibly more from the same IP range? Please, block the currently active address (ending 145) for a bit and rollback their non-reverted edits.

TFerenczy (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@TFerenczy: Edits rolled back.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done: Blocked 105.235.129.0/24 for 1 week because of ~180 bad faith edits during past days. --Achim (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@Achim: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

THUNDER 2827

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by 4nn1l2, Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sexygogogo888

User: Sexygogogo888 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Inserting nonsense description. Vandalism only user. Xiplus (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Globally locked. Thank you for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

197.39.211.124

User: 197.39.211.124 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Inserting nonsense.

SCP-2000 14:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked 197.39.128.0/17 for 2 weeks. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Ngozikalu811

User: Ngozikalu811 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Longterm abuser, banned many times on Wikidata. All uploads are copyvios. Kam Solusar (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user and will delete his/her copyvios. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

6 New Uaks

User: 6 New Uaks (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Newest sock of Lightning Sabre (the current "UnderArmourKid" LTA), the biggest IPhonehurricane95 copycat. This LTA is currently engaging in cross-wiki vandalism with this account. If a CU sees this report, please block and run a sleeper check.

LightandDark2000 (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre and Jdx: Can you please block this LTA? Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Block request for 6 New Uaks

User: 6 New Uaks (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki vandal, multi-locked. Thanks.

Do not follow (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@LightandDark2000 and Do not follow: ✓ Done, blocked by Achim and locked by DerHexer, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Ichika Kasuga

Ichika Kasuga (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

  • User:Ichika Kasuga re-uploaded a file that was deleted for copyvio.
  • User:Ichika Kasuga has repeatedly blanked out the user's talk page.
  • User:Ichika Kasuga vandalized Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems and changed it to my user name.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Ichika Kasuga has been blocked by the admin Taivo. Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Ichika_Kasuga Thank you, Taivo. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

223.179.240.0/21

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for 2 weeks. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks! It appears from this edit to have been block evasion by Ichika Kasuga.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Nora Lin is me

User: Nora Lin is me (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Copyright violation. Keep doing that after final warning.

AlexLeeCN (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 days. Note that copyvio blocks should be reported on COM:ANB, not here. Jianhui67 T★C 07:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

AcMY01

User: AcMY01 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading unfree files after warning..

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 06:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

2005earlmatthewsaguindan

User: 2005earlmatthewsaguindan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: All the images uploaded are by different modern photographers, a spot check of his contributions indicates some of the mobile edits looking suspect to some extent. Needs a forensic go through.

Broichmore (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Ppppppppppppo00000000

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I decided to block the user indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

105.235.129.44

User: 105.235.129.44 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This IP started today and did a whole list of deletions (of descriptions). Vandalism.

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

75.166.123.235

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Globally blocked by Alaa. Jianhui67 T★C 23:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Alaa, Jianhui67: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

ChrisTheWhaleKing

User: ChrisTheWhaleKing (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: disruptive editor across multiple wikis, fixated on made-up taxonomy 2601:181:301:81A0:5CE0:641B:5E1D:B9F7 14:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

888888881234567tw

User: 888888881234567tw (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only user. Sock of Special:Contributions/8888sexygogogo1111.

Xiplus (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Partially blocked

Better block temporarily but totally: 109.126.196.166 (talk · contribs). --E4024 (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. In my opinion the IP has edited too many files for partial block. And so far all his/her edits are reverted, nothing good is expected there. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@E4024 and Taivo: ✓ Done, 109.126.0.0/16 was blocked for anonymous users for 6 months by AntiCompositeNumber, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

BCNY2011bot

User: BCNY2011bot (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Clearly a vandalism-only account. Cross-wiki and another sock account elsewhere.

IWI (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Now globally locked. IWI (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

JAZDE3UzQ! Qaga6

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Low activity vandal. You warned him/her and that's enough. Next time block. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

105.235.128.0/24

User: ‎105.235.128.0/24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: The same person who uses 105.235.129.0/24 (currently blocked), popped up again and continues to remove file captions. The IP range's abuse goes back to October last year, no helpful contributions since. A longer block may have to be dealt. As a side note, this sort of rapid removal by mobile web IP's should be a separate edit tag (say "caption blanking") or even better, the software shouldn't let you do it so easily.

TFerenczy (talk) 10:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked: for 3 months. Thanks for notifying! --Achim (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

112.213.132.18

User: 112.213.132.18 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Discrimination: [2]

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

André L P de Souza

User: André L P de Souza (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: All the file this user upload seems to be from copyrighted website according to the source given in the name. He has been warned before but continues to upload from those source.

Pierre cb (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Pierre cb: Copyvios are vandalism now?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Not the copyvio themselves, but continuing to upload copyvio files after being warned numerous times. This what is written in the demand. Pierre cb (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@Pierre cb: We have other pages for such reports.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I warned the user. Next time block. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Eryjum

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. You warned the user, vandalism is reverted. Let's try at first without block. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Now globally locked by Matanya due to cross-wiki abuse. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

EduWiki

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

LTA GRP

Users:

Reason for reporting: LTA

DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

+4.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Globally blocked by Martin. Jianhui67 T★C 08:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked them all for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
@Jianhui67 and Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

105.235.139.0/24

User: 105.235.139.0/24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Another IP range available to the long term file caption remover from 105.235.128.0/24 & 105.235.129.0/24.

TFerenczy (talk) 09:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Jdx blocked it for 3 months, all uploads are reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

220.75.145.0/24

User: 220.75.145.0/24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism.

SCP-2000 04:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked by CptViraj. --Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done CptViraj's block expired yesterday. Reblocked for three months. --jdx Re: 12:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

KiKijessup

User: KiKijessup (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Mass uploading potential OOS photos without permission information, all the filenames and descriptions are gibberish.

WhitePhosphorus (talk) 02:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. User is blocked for a month, all uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

A1Cafel

User: A1Cafel (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: The user has tagged hundreds of my uploads as "source missing" for deletion, although all are mention the government institution, which was the source [3]. The files are all PD by Timorese law and tagged as this. The user even tagged insignias of a municispality and of government entities although they are without doubt from government source. As the user got several deletion warnings some days ago, it seems like a revenge on the project to tag as many files as possible. Causing only work to appeal all deletion requests, without any benifit for the project. In German Wikipedia this is called "Projektstörung" (project violation).

JPF (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

This is a good example, how ridiculous this deletion requests are: File:2020-04-28 Solidarity for COVID-19-helpers Timor-Leste.jpg. This is a poster with informations from the government. What else could be the source than government? --JPF (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This is filed in the wrong location, this should be at COM:AN/U, it isn't vandalism. Bidgee (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing as Bidgee. (Good faith mistakes are not vandalism.) E4024 (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
I am not native English speaker, but a "mistake" is maybe one or two times made. Systematic deletion requests on block is vandalism in German Wikipedia. As I mention, "Projektstörung" is a case of vandalism in German view, not a problem between two users. --JPF (talk) 01:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • If this report was placed on perhaps the "wrong" page, that doesn't change the underlying issue. A1Cafel posts a continual stream of deletion requests and speedy deletions, faster than any other editors can review them. As a result, many of their speedy requests are actioned automatically, without any further study. They post enough of them on obvious valid grounds that overall they've become untouchable as "doing useful work here". Yet many of their deletions are without basis: Kamala Harris B0UoxZlN 400x400.jpg is against our long-established practice that we don't delete "superseded" formats. The deletions complained of today, File:2020-04-28 Solidarity for COVID-19-helpers Timor-Leste.jpg, File:Ministério do Petróleo e Minerais.jpg, many others, are factually wrong.
These were done as speedy deletion tags, so there would be no further review before deletion. To simplify their effort in warning the uploader of this very large number of deletions, they bulked together their notification. Yet to dispute these deletions, the uploader has had to go through and convert each one to a separate DR, then hope that other editors might become involved. This is all according to clear policy and practice, yet it's also a massive leveraging of the ease of deletion and difficulty of resisting this, in order to stack the deck against the uploader and in favour os summary deletion.
Why are they for deletion at all? Because they're government-issued images, under a blanket free licence as a result. This is clear and without serious dispute. If it was to be disputed, that would require a DR and not an automatic deletion. The nominator's supposed reason of "no source" is untrue and we need to stop treating speedy deletion requests based on untruths as valid! I can see why such a bulk action would find itself labelled as vandalism.
Here are some further uploads from such a government source: File:George E. Glass and Manuel Heitor wearing mask.jpg, File:Yuri Kim and Etilda Gjonaj wearing masks.jpg. Should these be deleted too? Should these be DR'ed as needing addditional OTRS permission, as for Andrew Hastie Orignal (2)? Should they be tagged for deletion for that other currently fashionable and policy-invalid reason, "small image, no EXIF"? No, because the difference is that these were uploads by A1Cafel. They are tagging other editor's work for summary deletion without discussion, yet uploading images with the same copyright status themselves.
These images could be better described. If they're government-sourced images, they presumably have a source URL and adding that to the file description page would make their recording a lot clearer. A better editor would have discussed that with the uploader, explained the benefits, maybe even helped do some of the legwork themself. A1Cafel prefers to simply schedule automated deletion. They do not (ever!) discuss with other editors. They are aware of this AN posting, but have chosen to ignore it. The sum total of their talk page interactions is in issuing threats to block new editors: User_talk:Valentim0106#You_may_be_blocked_soon. These threats are empty (A1Cafel has no power to block them), deliberately intimidating and were issued at the same time as files were listed for discussion, without even waiting for any other editors to discuss whether the files ought to be deleted, let alone whether an editor's actions are block-worthy!
There is a problem here. Maybe not one of vandalism, as we define that, but certainly one of disruption and bullying of other editors. Commons needs to stop that, although I doubt that anything will come of this; A1Cafel is seen as too "useful" in terms of removing this bothersome content. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
These are tagged precisely as COM:East Timor notes is acceptable. Do you think COM:East Timoris wrong? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
The photos are uploaded under PD-TLGOV. A1Cafel has put a "no-source"-tag on every of these images, he could find, as I didn't add URLs for every one, as I didn't see any doubt on the origin. Especially no doubt on government insignas, municipal logos and imformation posters. Why not tagging ALL images on Commons with "No source". Surely, you will find some, the uploader can not find anymore all requested informations, while rescuing hundred others. Is this worth? --JPF (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Toneshitmesinda

User: Toneshitmesinda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Add nonsense to captions in structured data. Has been doing this for weeks.

Tiger (Talk) 09:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Indef-blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

VanniAnner

User: VanniAnner (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continued vandalism. Despite being warned several times here and in PT.WP to stop uploading files without a proper license or with false copyright information, and having his uploads deleted for those reasons, he ignores those warnings and keeps uploading files with the same problems.

Awikimate (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

138.19.24.64

User: 138.19.24.64 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Still vandalism after block.

SCP-2000 12:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Half done Files that were of concern have been deleted. IP has been warned about removing DR tags. No further action needed at this time. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

IP 220.75.151.235

User: 220.75.151.235 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.75.151.235.

E4024 (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done GMGtalk 03:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Yuqiansierra

User: Yuqiansierra (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: File:Basurian independence movement .gif. Consist delete fictional warning templates and add the nonexistent political propagand.

瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 04:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

And User:Hlonestar might be sockpuppetry, may need CU check.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 04:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked both indefinitely. Also I found another sockpuppet, cleaned history of both affected files and fully protected them for a month. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

84.228.102.142

User: 84.228.102.142 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cyberbullying with a full name in English and Hebrew. Diffs:[4] + [5] + [6]

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP and hided all his/her edits. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

EduWiki

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I added Whoman99, who has been messing with EduWiki's userpage.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/EduWiki Ezarateesteban 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Frankly I don’t care if this user has a farm of sockpuppets or not: The main problem here is that this user is wasting our time with their bizarre edits and risking deletion of donated content by (inadvertently?) gaming the system (example, and another). If the best way to get this user blocked is not by argueing that their actions are deterimental but on the technicality that they use more than one account, well, go ahead, but if so then the system is as rotten as trialling murder boss Capone for mere tax evation. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

139.130.60.66

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Nasty vandalism, I blocked the IP and hided one edit. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo and Materialscientist: It's back as Breathingair45 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Indef. blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo, Materialscientist, and Nat: Now it's abusing TPA.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I deleted the talkpage and reblocked the user without talkpage access. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

2001:14bb:671:6b0f:80cd:def5:e9c5:3f08

User: 2001:14bb:671:6b0f:80cd:def5:e9c5:3f08 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeatedly removing copyvio template from File:You got rickrolled.ogg, obviously uploaded here for vandalism purposes. I'm suspecting this is the same as User:YouGotPrickRolled, who is the original uploader and was just blocked on fiwp for vandalism (spamming this file), and who now carries on removing the template.

Lentokonefani (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 Comment. The file is deleted, both IP and the named user have all their contributions deleted as well. In my opinion at moment nothing should be done. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppets of User:Mazum24

Users: See below:

Reason for reporting: Please see the evidence on [7]. The last account is also behaviorally-identical and has engaging in the same kind of edit-warring on some of the same images. They are all socks of Mazum24. Since this person has engaged in severe edit-warring on both Commons and en.wiki, all accounts should be blocked indefinitely. If a CU could run a Check on the accounts for sleepers, that would be great, since this person is known for creating sock accounts. There are probably more socks on Commons. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Can you please run a check on these accounts? And they should all be indeffed. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Please also block the IP range (all registered to one person, since it's a /64 IPv6 range), since this person is currently using his IPs to continue edit-warring on Commons. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Wowiskwpoopi and Cora-alt indef'ed on Commons by Magog the Ogre; Wowiskwpoopi, Cora-alt, and Isuck14 globally locked; 2601:547:C500:BE0:59E0:0:0:0/64 globally blocked via Meta-Wiki for 6 months by Jon Kolbert. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

107.77.224.153

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done --Minoraxtalk 04:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Minorax: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

MGBtrust

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: All pages deleted and given a final warning as it doesn't look like bad faith but trolling. --Achim (talk) 07:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Achim: They made three more crappy file talk pages.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done: Indeffed because they didn't change their behavior despite 2 warnings. NOTHERE. --Achim (talk) 07:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Achim: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

NgaiHingMansion

User: NgaiHingMansion (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only, see [8].

--Baycrest (Talk) 15:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

+1 i support that. --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 16:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
@Jdx: Thanks! --Baycrest (Talk) 16:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

138.19.24.64

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the report. Blocked for one month. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
@AFBorchert: Thanks, and you're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

DanielPanduroCool

User: DanielPanduroCool (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Keep uploading low-resolution copyvio photos after warning.

Tim Wu (talk) 05:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Daniel for a week. All his uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Ronging rogue

User: Ronging rogue (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account; has overwritten existing files and their most recent uploaded file is clearly unencyclopedic.

Nrco0e (talk) 07:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned him. If he continues, then he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Istarner

User: Istarner (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki harassment. The only upload is a Facebook photo of a Wikipedian, with a clearly offensive name

NickK (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@Benoît Prieur and Leit: I see you are active at the moment, could you please take a look and block this vandal? Thanks — NickK (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, ✓ Done 3 days for the moment. Can be increased if necessary. ----Benoît (d) 14:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Undefinite after analyzing. ----Benoît (d) 14:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

BCuzwhynot

User: BCuzwhynot (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Keeps reverting valid copyvio nominations even after I tried to explain that Commons is only for free images. Also, ??

GhostP. (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 2 weeks. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

FartSniffer7843

User: FartSniffer7843 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki vandalism-only account

Mz7 (talk) 06:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. The only upload is now deleted and in my opinion it was even not vandalistic, simply without any educational value, so this doesn't give us reason for block. Nevertheless I blocked FartSniffer indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

37.205.60.165

User: 37.205.60.165 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent nonsense additions to railway categories. Also active on Wikidata, if anyone has access for blocking there too.

Andy Dingley (talk) 14:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for a month and global blocks requested. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Saraswathi1

User: Saraswathi1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: LTA (Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nsmutte).

DanCherek (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by Vituzzu: Locked globally. --Achim (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Eti15TrSf

User: Eti15TrSf (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeatedly removed encyclopedic information[9][10] on File:Henan Road (M) Station Line 2 Platform 200602.jpg without good reason. Baycrest (Talk) 16:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. @Eti15TrSf: , please do not repeat that. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks! --Baycrest (Talk) 16:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

User:TheSpoonMan2000

TheSpoonMan2000 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

  • VOA. You know, if I were still an Admin, he would have been long gone before any of you would have even noticed. OK, some you win, some you lose. Your loss. I'm better as an Admin than not, perhaps. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Globally locked. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

2402:800:0:0:0:0:0:0/32

User: 2402:800:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Long term vandalism since 2018. Most of edits were vandalism and reverted.

SCP-2000 01:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Edgarstevano

User: Edgarstevano (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading copyrighted material and causing disruptive edits on en:wiki by publishing said copyrighted images. — BriefEdits (talk) 08:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is warned. I deleted the last remaining upload as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

うくすつぬ

User: うくすつぬ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Post a large number of piracy files 126.241.225.176 17:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. All his/her uploads are nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

2806:2F0:4021:E9C9:5C85:AB37:8AFF:7A69

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

2401:E180:0:0:0:0:0:0/32

User: 2401:E180:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism since 2020/11.

SCP-2000 19:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a month. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Pcs34560

User: Pcs34560 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user started to vandalize(erase) his/her image pages since March 7th 2021 10:32(UTC).(It seems s/he wants to stop contributing his/her images to Wikimedia Commons.) We tried to stop him/her vandalizing, but s/he continues and does not reply to our messages. To stop him/her, I guess we need to block him/her shortly(for example a week). Thank you. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 03:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user for a week. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thank you. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 08:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Birmal Hembram

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Globally locked as spam-only account. Taivo (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ruslik0 and Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Kj1595

I am closing this as there is nothing to be accomplished here. This is clearly not a case of vandalism, but a dispute between users. I have seen no evidence that this issue was brought up by the initiator of this discussion with the subjects of it. I strongly suggest that all parties of this discussion read Commons:Dispute resolution and highlight the first point of the first section: Talk to the user directly. Use talk pages, be civil, polite and assume good faith if possible. It is not policy, but sound advice on how to approach any dispute or disagreements. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User: Kj1595 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: On March 12, this guy just moved the historical Albanian flag category, SVG military flags of Albania and the SVG flags of Albania category without apparent reasoning. This is vandalism because every country's flag has a SVG category on their own. One more thing, he even removed the Category:SVG national flags of Albania from File:Flag of Albania (Vertical).svg and File:Nuvola Albanian flag.svg.

SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

It's not vandalism because there is no need for a separate SVG category when 99% of flags related to Albania are in SVG. You posted this as revenge that I nominated, rightfully so, certain files you have uploaded for deletion. Kj1595 (talk) 08:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
No, I did not post this as revenge. That statement you made is delusional to me. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
You absolutely posted this as revenge. I nominated for deletion all the supposed flags Albania used at the Olympics according to you. In fact, you just reuploaded the same file over and over again using different hues of red. Kj1595 (talk) 08:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Go look at the IOC Library website (I sourced them from the flag manuals) and watch the videos/photos of the ceremonies of the Olympics. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
You post the link here. Why do I have to search? You show us the direct source here. Furthermore, how can a country use ten different flags at the Olympics over a span of three decades? There is only one flag that was used and that is the state flag. Camera footage may show different hue of red on the screen and this is only due to the contrast/color recolution of your tv screen. I can't believe I have to explain this. Kj1595 (talk) 08:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Apart from the Albanian flags used in the Olympics, you also tagged the WFB version of the Albanian flag too. I also provided a new link to the Albania article on the new CIA website. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Where is that link? Kj1595 (talk) 08:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Look at the file. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Again, show me the updated WFB link? You are making the claim, show us the proof. If the link is valid, I will revert my change. Kj1595 (talk) 08:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The file contains the link. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, you seem to have this obsession with reuploading country flags using different color hues. It's a total waste of bandwidth in the Commons servers. You are doing more damage than good. Kj1595 (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
You uploaded copyrighted logos too even if they are your own vectorized work. UPDATE: I told the admins that more than 3 copyvios at once (you got 13 copyvios reported to your talkpage) is a no-no. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Not necessarily. It was my own vectorized work. The tag wasn't suitable for Commons but they will be reuploaded to the local server in Wikipedia. Kj1595 (talk) 08:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aman kumar rathor

User: Aman kumar rathor (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: New account that was apparently just created for vanalism on the "photo challange" page

TheRunnerUp (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef'ed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

E4024

NO ACTION NECESSARY:

Requests created by E4024 are totally legitimate. Only files with copyright or scope problems are affected. Regular deletion requests are not speedy deletions and if some files are kept after regular DR, then this is totally normal. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User: E4024 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Keeps requesting to delete files with correct copyright only because he did not like them.

Auréola (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Auréola Could you provide some examples? Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, but it was just check out the user's contributions: a self-portrait of mine, which is important to me and some wiki pages, here and this one. Auréola (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Another one here. The user just wants to make conflicts. Auréola (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

若松慶一郎

User: 若松慶一郎 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user uploads a large number of images picked up on the Internet as "own works".

Daraku K. (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user and deleted all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. The user re-uploaded some posters and other copyvios and I blocked him/her for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 Info After that, we use the following socks to avoid blocks.
See also: ja:Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/若松慶一郎および追認依頼2件.
--Daraku K. (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 Additional Information In addition, User:A good Wikipedian from Osaka writes on its user talk page that slanders a specific user (jawp administrator).(Special:diff/546131751)--Daraku K. (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Anymaladdicted keeps uploading copyrighted images of one person

As title. Please block user. Eissink (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC).

✓ Done. At first I warned Anymal. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

185.173.207.129

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

2804:D55:52C2:FA00:C095:C710:C20F:45A5

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

86.134.122.126

User: 86.134.122.126 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This appears to be an IP sockpuppet of User:Hopeful2014, blocked at Commons and fully banned from Wikipedia. In both cases they have a history for changing East London articles and categories around to fit their own particular view of the city's areas (mainly changing categories and lead "X is an area of Y" sentences), edit warring and socking when challenged on it. Their edits here are restoring February 2020 edits from User:86.152.126.100, which were reverted as vandalism at the time and resulted in a block for that IP. I raised a Wikipedia SPI against the same IP yesterday. (Not sure if this is the correct place to raise a sockpuppet report, COM:SOCK redirects to a checkuser request page, which is not what I'm asking for.)

Lord Belbury (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

2600:1700:9A00:20D0:8129:8EE4:D748:9B9E

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked, thank you rubin16 (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: Thanks, and you're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Popka23

User: Popka23 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User downloads files that are used for vandalism in UkWiki. See him contribution in UkWiki.

Mykola7 (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@JuTa blocked the account rubin16 (talk) 04:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
The requestor likes to get all uploads of him deleted. --JuTa 04:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Voloshinnedor

User: Voloshinnedor (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki vandalism

And delete File:Volishin nedaras.jpg. Thanks. Andriy.v (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Turbo Slayer 2021

User: Turbo Slayer 2021 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism-only account

瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. This is not obvious. He reverted your uploads, but I do not know, who is right and who is wrong. Please discuss this with him at first on his user talkpage, showing differences between your and his map and why your version is better. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: well, I admit some of the edits is not obvious vandalism, but revert to a worse version, I withdraw my request. What he did is just revert the image to an old, out of date version. But some of the edits are obvious vandalism, for example:
  1. File:China Hong Kong location map.svg: w:Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge has opened in 2018, an obvious artificial island has been built at the east of the airport (google map). [User:Nv7801] updated the coastline, but [User:Turbo Slayer 2021] reverted to an old version.
  2. File:Visa policy of Hong Kong.png: Hong Kong government allows PRC passport holder who are in transit through Hong Kong to and from another country or territory may be granted a stay of seven days on each landing without the prior need to obtain an entry permit[11], [User:Whisper of the heart] has uploaded it. Hong Kong government has extended Belarus visa-free access to 30 days [12] in April 2019. [User:Twofortnights] updated it. But [User:Turbo Slayer 2021] reverted all this updates.
  3. File:Visa policy of Russia.png: [User:Turbo Slayer 2021] reverted the updates of electronic visa, thats makes all the electronic visa color gone (I don't know why do this).
I didn't explain all his unconstructive edits, but hope the example above could let admins pay attention to revert-only-account.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
cc @Turbo Slayer 2021: SCP-2000 14:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

2600:1700:6C04:4090:987D:7D21:6A86:CC30

User: 2600:1700:6C04:4090:987D:7D21:6A86:CC30 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Hoax edits to image descriptions and metadata

Also making comparable hoax edits on en.wikipedia; I've reverted the most recent changes there and here, but I'm not active on commons (and it's past my bedtime), so I'd be grateful if someone here could fix what has been done here. -- Finlay McWalter (talk) 23:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Confirmed, blocked /64 for 1 week. --Achim (talk) 07:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Pcs34560

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him for a month (second block). Thank you for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, and you're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Kwhizzzz

User: Kwhizzzz (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Reverting their vandalism at Category:Eddie van Halen is getting dull.

Mo Billings (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC) This is untrue. I was not trying to vandalize it, I have already explained to him that Eddie Van Halen’s death was a blatant hoax created to convince everybody it wasn’t a hoax when in reality it was. --KWHIZZZZ (Talk to the boss dude) 17:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done - LTA sock. Эlcobbola talk 07:28, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Savageformula92

User: Savageformula92 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account

Askeuhd (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Thank you for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 07:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Nk

User: Nk (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Need help! user does fast deletions on all my uploads and uses this tag copyvio But my uploads are not violations!. Shadow4dark (talk) 08:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I was just looking for that page. ;) Mostly Youtube screenshots, copyvio template had been removed by the uploader: [13]. --Спас Колев (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
You did not ewen check my sources. And i lost 1 file by your vandalism. And why you asking speedy deletion and not just deletion discussions? At least i can defend my self there. Shadow4dark (talk) 08:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
@Nk: How is a date a reason for a copyright violation? Please use valid reasons or URLs.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
@Shadow4dark and Jeff G.: I'm sorry for the disturbance, I just found that cc-by could be explicitly declared in YouTube... Jeff G., could you please undelete File:Azis in 2019.png (deleted yesterday on my request but it probably falls in the same category)? --Спас Колев (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
@Nk: I cannot. However, File:Azis in 2019.png was deleted as a copyvio on sight by Admin NahidSultan, probably because source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPzistbvHgM has no publicly visible free license (I see it as "private").   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

SkwidyVard

User: SkwidyVard (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. The user have uploaded two images that have Filipino swear words on them. Also, this user is a possible sockpuppet of longterm en.wiki vandal en:User:Shame on PJ Santos.

-WayKurat (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely. All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Filtruben

User: Filtruben (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Crosswiki harassement. Please block and delete uploaded file.

Andriy.v (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Seewoolf fickt Itti

User: Seewoolf fickt Itti (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: REASON. Sorry for my poor englich!

Gruss Nightflyer (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Almost-empty user talkpage of non-registered user. I deleted it. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Katyuwu

User: Katyuwu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Three new creations, three vandalisms. Fake images for insulting the presidents

Lost in subtitles (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Uploads deleted and final warning given. --Achim (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

174.26.64.227

User: 174.26.64.227 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Strings of nonsense edits. I have rolled them back and warned the user. But he seems to be persisting. -- WikiPedant (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked, edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

India map

49.207.139.82 03:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC) India map is not right, must be corrected one published by Government of India.

Hi, and welcome. Which India map, exactly? What part of it must be corrected?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 Not done per File talk:India location map.svg. --Achim (talk) 08:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Sh!tEater

User: Sh!tEater (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent vandalism to Homo sapiens. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Reverted, indefinitely blocked. I semi-protected target page for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Tm

User: Tm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: He created a lot of redirecting categories to Category:Línea Barca d’Alva-La Fuente de San Esteban\Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca, even after they were been deleted several times. He was told in the Portuguese Wikipedia that those names are not correct, but he insists on creating a lot of redirecting categories with those names. I ask for someone to move the category to Category:Railway line between Barca d'Alva and La Fuente de San Esteban, delete all the incorrect categories and protect them all for avoiding this user creating them all again. Lojwe (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Again, you are the one that is distorting what happened. First it was you started creating several redirects like moving "Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca", (name that is the one in the portuguese Wikipedia and has several sources to back it up) and continued to make several redirects to either names that were incorrect or unsourced. Every one of those created by me redirects are backed up by sources, but you continue with your campaign despite all. First, in the portuguese Wikipedia and several months ago, you tried to say that this line (between Portugal and Spain) was built and paid solely by spanish state and companie, when i provided several spanish and portuguese sources that this line was paid, built, maintained and operated for decades solely by the portuguese state and companies. The portuguese article is clear on itself of what its real story was and its discussion page is elucidative of the problems that this user has in using correctly sources and what they say, like claiming that the construction and operating sindicate was spanish (when it was called the Sindicato Portuense, i.e. from Porto, Portugal) or uusing a newspaper sourced from a blog that had 3 newspapers about this line, where he quoted the wrong newspaper and the wrong year and it was me that had to correct this basic error. Tm (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
There's no sense in what this user says. Even if it would be me who had been doing these incorrect redirecting categories, why is he creating them again and againg when they are being deleted? This user usually reverts what other users do because he thinks he's the only one who's right. I don't want anyone to block him. I just have this problem with him. There's no sense in having all those names redirecting to that category and most of them are not correct or not precise. --Lojwe (talk) 16:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

2804:D55:5294:8D00:95EC:E8D9:FCA8:78FF

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
@Rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Randistan

User: Randistan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Has uploaded images with inappropiate file name and inappropiate depiction, both of which are likely copyright violations as well. User has an inappropiate username as well.

103.217.235.121 11:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked by Elcobbola as a VOA. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

88.236.165.5

User: 88.236.165.5 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism in File:Bartu msx tpc esea 2020.jpg with deletion request.

MAyo (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: 3 days. --Achim (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Wahid Faghir

User: Wahid Faghir (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Notability vandalism

RCRTV 2552 (talk) 12:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. The username is not registered in Commons. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Synthwave.94

User: Synthwave.94 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Disruptive behavior, changing categories inappropriately. As can be seen in its user talk page, different users have had to deal with this problem, the user does not seem to understand or does not want to understand how the categories work. After a reasonable time of warnings, I request an administrative action against this user to stop his vandalized edits --WiloJedi (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

short block for a couple of hours to Synthwave.94 due to edit warring and removing posts of others on this board. Looking deeper in the issue now. rubin16 (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

WiloJedi (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

@WiloJedi: Where do you see vandalism in my actions ? Synthwave.94 (talk) 18:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I have reviewed the issue and communicated it to both users. The short-term block was lifted from @Synthwave.94, @WiloJedi was warned about starting an edit war and both users were advised to discuss issues and comment, not just revert each other. rubin16 (talk) 18:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

190.92.62.216

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for 3 days and also 190.92.62.237 (talk · contribs) for a week due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Kobakovivo

User: Kobakovivo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Nonsense deletion requests like this and this (with the corresponding file). Seems like the kind of problematic user who make random deletion requests.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

sent a warning to the user and will close his/her DRs now. rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, so {{Test2}} or {{Test3}} should be appropriate in such situations?廣九直通車 (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

PEMNCX

User: PEMNCX (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism on Katiebot revoked her talk page also.

Earth and the moon (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Earth and the moon, PEMNCX has been locked globally 2 weeks ago. Anything else to do? --Achim (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
@Achim55: I suspect lock evasion. See also the talk page of Earth and the moon. This request is quit weird for a new account, especially the account Earth and the moon. That account is about 2 days old and new at this wiki, but probably not its owner. Probably a sockpuppet of PEMNCX? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Бурим

User: Бурим (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: New user uploads copyrighted photos of bloggers and meme picture with fake Flickr license and replaces true photos with them on ruwiki, where he has already been blocked for this actions WindEwriX (talk) 07:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned him and will delete all his uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Animo ring

User: Animo ring (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sock of PEMNCX and also a vandalism on aimaabot talk page check her Contributions and block her or his account.

Earth and the moon (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

There is no User:Animo ring but a User:Amino ring who has been locked globally a week ago. And you are suspected to be another sock of them. --Achim (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Josephinefrance

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

seems to stop after your warning,  On hold rubin16 (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: She's back!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Indef. No need for vandal-drama. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Kinu

User: Kinu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Requset for deletion file.

2600:8807:80:C70:A828:BB22:1B88:EA39 15:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Retaliatory report; see contributions. --Kinu (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 Not done. IP/64 blocked for 3 days. --Achim (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Бурим 2

User: Бурим (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Yesterday's warning had no effect on user: Бурим keeps uploading copyvio images of meme pictures and tries to use them on ruwiki, where this user has already been indef-blocked for vandalism. I think, this is vandalism-only account and should be blocked on commons too. WindEwriX (talk) 08:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 days of block (we'll see then). --Ruthven (msg) 08:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Ceha

User: Ceha (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Three reverts (File:Balkans925.png) in span of over 4 years. User that added changes referenced the changes, user Ceha reverts them with reasoning "There is no Bosnia at that time". Same pattern appears here: File:Ex yu fronts 199210.png, File:Srpsko carstvo 1360.png, File:Croatia 1260.png. Also, I noticed referencing series of files (File:Ex yu fronts 199210.png) they uploaded here with a far-right forum hercegbosna.org as a source. They have referenced one post as a "source" and in that post there is some nasty stuff about other people and people of different ethnicity. For the information user has a TBAN on enwiki. Mhare (talk) 10:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Original file https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/2/21/20151127100317%21Balkans925.png does not have any source in Bosnian borders, as Mhare is trying to asume.
File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ex_yu_fronts_199210.png does not have any updates
File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Srpsko_carstvo_1360.png Bosnia recognised Hungarian king as it's sovereign
File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Croatia_1260.png there are sources about Šubić Croatia;
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F5%2F51%2FPSubicDomain.png%2F220px-PSubicDomain.png&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpeoplepill.com%2Fpeople%2Fpaul-i-subic-of-bribir&tbnid=N01IeMXYR278gM&vet=12ahUKEwiO2dnRtY_wAhUEgaQKHdq8AKMQMyhbegUIARCRAQ..i&docid=oM1TH9XE5uDB9M&w=220&h=182&itg=1&q=%C5%A0ubi%C4%87%20croatia&safe=strict&ved=2ahUKEwiO2dnRtY_wAhUEgaQKHdq8AKMQMyhbegUIARCRAQ
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVKxi0wUcAEV_0r.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/hr/e/ee/%C5%A0ubi%C4%87evska_Hrvatska.jpg

As for File:Ex yu fronts 199210.png , there are no errors there, you should be ashamed of your behavior. --Čeha (talk) 13:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Wcr1993

User: Wcr1993 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Removed legitimate FOP templates without giving a reason. [14][15][16][17]

Eti15TrSf (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

This is not vandalism. I guess Wcr1993 simply didn't aware that photos taken in China need to follow FOP requirements and keep the FOP template. You should notify Wcr1993 and wait for his response before reporting vandalism here. Otherwise it is very rude behavior and it is against AGF. Btw, I'd like to point out that Eti15TrSf is a rude and problematic user. He repeatedly reverted my good edits without reasons on many Shanghai Metro articles on zhwp, many of them have been reverted back. And he also made personal attacks to me on enwp, meta and zhwp, see (1)(2) content removed by admin due to personal attacks. Moreover he also made personal attacks on Commons, see (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f). IMO Eti15TrSf usually create more problems than solve. Like this case a simple reminder to Wcr1993 may solve the issue but he chose to report vandalism here. --Baycrest (Talk) 10:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Takeshidjome

This is a heads up that I blocked this user after they reverted all my deletion noms on their photos and then they went as far as to move the DR nomination so that it wouldn't appear anymore. Appears to be a redirect now. I will re-nom all their files Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Thanks. The username also appears to be inappropriate.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Earth and the moon

User: Earth and the moon (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent disruption of deletion discussion and removal of templates; see contributions. Now also disruptively removing this notice.

Kinu (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I deleted speedily their last remaining upload as copyright violation. Somehow I think, that this solves the problem. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, but they appear to be using multiple IPs to remove this section.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Earth and moon re-uploaded deleted image. I re-deleted it and warned them. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Deleted another re-upload. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Now the user is globally locked due to cross-wiki abuse. Indefinitely blocked in en.wiki and Wikinews. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Sahityar Canvas

User: Sahityar Canvas (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after final warning. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 10:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Caidin-Johnsohn29912forrest

User: Caidin-Johnsohn29912forrest (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sockpuppet of a user over on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder)- clearly not here to be constructive, especially given their recent edits on my talk page as well as User talk:TheFallenPower. Also has another sock now at CaidinJohnsohn- block that as well, please.

Magitroopa (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked this and some others by me and @AntiCompositeNumber rubin16 (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

NAKAJURAHAH 2

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by Billinghurst, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Tm

User: Tm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: The user Tm erases my proposals to delete three useless and redundant categories made by him 1, 2 and 3. If he disagress, the procedure says he must replace the speedy deletion's tag with a regular deletion request. I consider what he's doing as vandalism. He also deletes my warning on his user talk page. I don't want anyone to block him, just to stop him from creating all this mess. --Lojwe (talk) 00:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Again, the same person and with the same baseless complain. Did he not learn with or forgot about, just in the last month about the same complain here and or in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, where other user said that "There's nothing wrong with keeping redirection categories where users and readers will find this useful, e.g. Category:Crows". This user is constantly trying to distort " what happened. First it was him that started creating several redirects like moving "Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca", (name that is the one in the portuguese Wikipedia and has several sources to back it up) and continued to make several redirects to either names that were incorrect or unsourced.
Every one of those created by me redirects are backed up by sources, but he continues with his campaign despite all. First, in the portuguese Wikipedia and several months ago, he tried to say that this line (between Portugal and Spain) was built and paid solely by spanish state and companies, when i provided several spanish and portuguese sources that this line was paid, built, maintained and operated for decades solely by the portuguese state and companies. The portuguese article is clear on itself of what its real story was and its discussion page is elucidative of the problems that this user has in using correctly sources and what they say, like claiming that the construction and operating sindicate was spanish (when it was called the Sindicato Portuense, i.e. from Porto, Portugal) or uusing a newspaper sourced from a blog that had 3 newspapers about this line, where he quoted the wrong newspaper and the wrong year and it was me that had to correct this basic error."
Why this obsession of him? I dont know, but he is the one that started and continues with this tug of war of trying to delete this redirects and his third attempt of forum shopping to block me, even after i tried to remember him of previous discussions. Tm (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Again: if you disagree with the speedy deletion, you must replace the speedy deletion's tag with a regular deletion request. Deleting the request is vandalism. --Lojwe (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

  • @Lojwe: This is not appropriate as a vandalism report as it is clearly not vandalism.
  • @Tm: Please follow process, whether you like the process or not. You don't get to ignore our agreed community processes, whether it is annoying to you or not. The discussion will guide future creations or deletions.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 nothing particular to do Users should use agreed community consensus process.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: The user Tm does not want to follow process. He's creating new redirecting categories and deleting the speedy deletion tags, instead of replacing them with a regular deletion request. When an admin deletes one, he creates another one. See: 1, 2....... --Lojwe (talk) 00:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Why do you want delete valid redirects Category:Línea internacional La Fuente de San Esteban-La Fregeneda-Barca d'Alva when even the spanish, in the heritage listing, calls it línea férrea La Fuente de San Esteban-La Fregeneda-Barca de Alba, claiming that this name was "discouraged in the Spanish Wikipedia because it is too long, complicated and can lead readers to error". First ES Wikipedia does not dictate how redirects are made, second, as proven above, claiming that this names can lead to errors are completly wrong and false. This Lojwe as a long story of trying to hide valid names and facts about structures, even when they are backed by dozens of sources and either misread them, cites the wrong source or, when convinient, tries to hide the sourced fact. His continues attempts have several months, either here, in Wikidata or in PT Wikipedia. Tm (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

It has been agreed in Wikipedia to avoid this name because the finally choosen one is clearer. Please, respect decisions. Wikipedia is not yours. You cannot just create a category for every name you find on the Internet. You will find a lot. Are you going to create 40 categories? Please, just be respectful and sensible. This is neither the place nor the way to explain that there are several references with several names. --Lojwe (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

 Comment @Tm: this is NOT the place for the discussion over the naming process. All you are doing is demonstrating is the wrong attitude. Please follow the process of taking it through a deletion discussion. You don't get the choice in the matter. At this stage being argumentative like this lends more weight to the complainant than to you. Please follow the process.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
This user has a long history of disruptive, arrogant and obsessive behaviour. He brings good value here, but his behaviour is not aceptable. He thinks he's the only one who's always right and has an obsessivebly need to impose his point of view. --Lojwe (talk) 00:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
And [[18]] is pretty clear that the only valid reasons to speedy deletion are "Improperly named category" or "Unuseful empty category" and none of this redirects are this two conditions. If this user thinks that this names are invalid why doesnt he nominates them for deletion? What is he afraid?
And if you saw my block logs, you would see almost all of them were reverted as being misused of the blocking tools. If need i can link each and everyone of those and its discussions. But if you are so afraid why dont you nominate them to a regular deletion, What are you afraid of? Tm (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I am not certain that the conversation of "who is the better adult" is a compelling argument. Both of you should reread the guidance, and both follow the process and look to have a harmonious Commons. None of us need the bickering, and we shuold all look to play nicely.

✓ now taken to DRs  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

A politically motivated vandal

User: NickK (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User:NickK is politically motivated by idea of derussification and deoccupation of Crimea![19]

Umberorder (talk) 13:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Umberorder: That looks like protection of the wiki, but has nothing to do with Wikimedia Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Protection of the Tatar wiki by a politically motivated Ukrainian??? -- User:NickK does it just because he hates Russians! Umberorder (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Stewards say that it does have to do with Wikimedia Commons. Thanks. Umberorder (talk) 14:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Umberorder: You had better have proof to back up those personal attacks.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Personal attacks is a VERY bad thing! One who attacks personally could be BANNED!! Please, notice it. Thanks.Umberorder (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: BTW Why do you think that User:NickK is protecting the page? Do you have any proof? Umberorder (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Umberorder: Per m:Special:CentralAuth/Soupspekoe, the person whose edits Nick was reverting is Soupspekoe, a globally locked vandal who has perpetrated abuse over the long term. Also, my username is "Jeff G.", not "Jeff" (an svwiki user who hasn't edited in nearly 10 years).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Conversely, per m:Special:CentralAuth/NickK, NickK holds group memberships on over a dozen wikis, is a checkuser on ukwiki, and is a bureaucrat on uawiki.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: What relation has that politically motivated Ukrainian vandal to the Tatar wiki? Please. Thanks. Umberorder (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I think that it is not a good thing that Ukrainian vandals have so much authority at Wikipæpia! Because the only thing they do here is hating Russians. I even think that all Ukrainian wiki have to be removed and all its users banned forever. It looks like you hate Russians too, by the way: you are not very polite as I see Umberorder (talk) 15:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: You see: I was right: it does have to do with Wikimedia Commons)    Umberorder (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done to initial request. User is in good standing as an administrator at ukWP. Please follow process for discussing individual issues. This is not the way to resolve specific issues.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Umberorder is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 Not done User:NickK is motivated by political idea of deoccupation. He supports freedom of alphabets and panorama! Pinging @Martin Urbanec as locking Steward. Sharpjibes (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Just look at what he is spamming: "Crimean Tatar latin is now officially approved by Ukrainian Government." What do you think, the person that spam such a not useful political stuff can love Mother Russia?? Just listen to what you are saying!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharpjibes (talk • contribs) 08:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Sharpjibes locked by stewards  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec, Masti, and Billinghurst: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Coms225

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done, not blocked. I have left another grumpier final warning. I will just block on the next issue that I see, so just ping me on a revert.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: I think a indef block is warranted now, the user removed this very thread. Bidgee (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Furthermore, it looks very much like a sock evading (Euro2024 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) ) a global block. Bidgee (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism to my user page twice three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen fourteen times. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Bidgee (talk) 05:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by Gnangarra. Bidgee (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

@Gnangarra and Bidgee: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

2001:8003:3C4B:B600:20D5:E499:3206:7723

User: 2001:8003:3C4B:B600:20D5:E499:3206:7723 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after final warning. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 10:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 14:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

78.38.160.158

User: 78.38.160.158 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Pure vandalism. SCP-2000 13:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

107.127.60.56

User: 107.127.60.56 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after final warning.

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 16:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Evilution Behind You

Evilution Behind You (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  User:Wikingеr sockpuppet 66.206.35.106 19:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done, already blocked & locked.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

153.107.40.211

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Captions nuked, IP blocked for a week. --jdx Re: 05:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jdx: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

TheRoyalMonarchy

User: TheRoyalMonarchy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Upload multiple times meaningless screen captures and his photo with different zoom. He adds a multitude of unrelated categories and descriptions to his uploads too. Has been warned previously but continue. Seem to me an account created to vandalize or mass uploading useless images.

Pierre cb (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

After all his uploads have been deleted, this user reuploaded them and recreated his page, further showing than it is an account created for vandalism and should be blocked indefinitely. Pierre cb (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely as self-promotion-only user. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Pcs34560

User: Pcs34560 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user(Pcs34560) has been blocked 2 times(first: since March 21st 2021 until March 28 (a week), second: March 30th 2021 until April 30th 2021(a month)) due to vandalizing his/her image pages. But s/he restarted to continue vandalizing them after his/her block was released. We continued him/her stopping the vandal since this March, but s/he does not reply our messages nor accept to stop it at all. We has the difficulty convincing him/her of our purpose. I request to block him/her 6 months at least and more. I don't prevent from blocking him/her indefinite period. Thank you. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 13:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Pes indefinitely. Pes can request unblock, if (s)he want to do something constructive in Commons. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 10:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

2001:8003:3C4B:B600:B0DF:5E92:9AC6:E5A4

User: 2001:8003:3C4B:B600:B0DF:5E92:9AC6:E5A4 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeated vandalism. Please block the range behind this IP.

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 10:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/2001:8003:3C4B::/48 appears to cover all the abuse in the past two weeks.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done blocked a range for 3 days rubin16 (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Jesus Cortez Matias MX

User: Jesus Cortez Matias MX (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: spam-only account

TFerenczy (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

182.232.58.27

User: 182.232.58.27 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Mass. vandalism, is warned by another user (before)

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done, thanks to AntiCompositeNumber!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hurshch

User: Hurshch (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeatedly uploading G4, F1, and F10 files. Has been given a last warning.

羊羊32521 (talk) 02:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 13:27, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

PHONEPHETHSOULIVONG1980(05*06)

User: PHONEPHETHSOULIVONG1980(05*06) (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continued vandalism after warnings.

{{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked and reverted rubin16 (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Inkify

User: Inkify (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Obvious block evasion by the LTA Mazum24, who is known for cross-wiki edit-warring (particularly on tropical cyclone images) and also cross-wiki socking. This is clearly him, based on the behavior. Same types of poor-quality image uploads, multiple behavioral overlaps on the same images edited by other socks (particularly some Hurricane Eta and Typhoon Surigae images), and also characteristic edit-warring (this time on a Middle East map image). If a CU reviews this report, please run a sleeper check, as this LTA is known for leaving behind sleeper accounts. LightandDark2000 (talk) 04:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Can you please deal with this LTA? He's back. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 04:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

User6239

User: User6239 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Regular upload of fake/usless diagrams on the Category:Election apportionment diagrams category. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely and will delete his/her all uploads. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Kapukingina

User: Kapukingina (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploaded this photo previously uploaded by one of en:User:Shame on PJ Santos sockpuppets. Either way, the username is a play on GMA Network's slogan (Kapuso) and a Filipino swear word.

-WayKurat (talk) 11:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Ceha

User: Ceha (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: File:Hungary 13th cent.png – constant reverts where user changes the map according to his own POV. The borders the users changes are not according to the unsourced picture that user claims is the source (check users summary in the reverts). Please note the user has a TBAN on enwiki for the same reasons along with over 11 blocks he earned on enwiki as well. Mhare (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Mhare (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

User Mhare is constanly reversing map to wrong version, which puts town of Virovitica in Hungary, as is clearly shown as difference to original. --Čeha (talk) 12:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
You are both continuously slow motion edit-warring and therefore repeatedly changing content without an attempt to obtain consensus. This is not acceptable and you both know it is against Commons policies.
  • @Mhare: You are not helping by continuing the edit war cycle, this issue should have been brought to the AN much sooner. That said, thank you for reporting it.
  • @Ceha: You are making a change that contradicts the source you are providing. There is a reason you are topic banned from editing this type of content on enwiki, please do not require us admins on Commons to take similar measures. I am issuing you a single/final warning for edit warring. I am leaving the page unprotected, it shouldn't need to be admin-only because of two disruptive users. If you change the file back without achieving consensus on the talk page, you will be blocked for edit warring.
Let's not meet back here. ~riley (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Riley, there are two things which are wrong with the map.
First one is Požega and Virovitica county in Slavonia, as it's shown in the source. This version would be "the most faitfull" to the provided source.
As for second one, the borders of (southern) Croatia, source should be this map. That border is similar to a 12th century border, as shown in this map.
As for english wikipedia, that ban speaks only about administration on that wiki. This are commons, and I did not break any rule. --Čeha (talk) 00:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes, you did break a rule - edit warring. As stated, if your disruptive behaviour that resulted in a topic ban on enwiki continues here on Commons, you risk meeting similar restrictions or a block. Oddly enough, Ceha, this version that you've linked isn't even the one you were reverting to in the end. I support this version which addresses issue one, however, you are using a different source for the borders of Southern Croatia that contradict the original source. At that point, you are making a major change and overwriting the file. ~riley (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
@Mhare: What is your response to his comments on the issues with the map? ~riley (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
@~riley: , I am sorry for reverting without reaching consensus. This was my second report regarding the same issue as I believe user has the same pattern from en.wiki regarding the POV and pushing it across several files here. I don't really mind the uploads the user makes, but the overwrites of files that are widely used across many projects are little problematic as there was no effort in referencing those changes. Examples are here: File:Balkans925.png, File:Srpsko_carstvo 1360.png, File:Croatia 1260.png. As for the comments they made, I can support this version regarding the file in question. I hope overwriting the files should stop from this point forward, I have no interest in blocking of them. Mhare (talk) 10:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately I have a problem with user Mhare, as you can see, the guy is not interested in wikirules, but in persecuting me. Could you do something about it?
As for, map I agree that it should be https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20200218165936%21Hungary_13th_cent.png , that is the most correct version of the source....
And I uploaded the different file, thanks for guidence :) --Čeha (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  • File has been updated to reflect the version discussed in this chat. Any change that does not align with the source photo should be discussed on the file talk page from hereon and consensus should be achieved before such change is made. Refer to the overwriting rules for when a change requires a different file as its too significant or doesn't match the source. ~riley (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Great, tnx :) --Čeha (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

2405:205:C96F:8FD1:D105:15AF:8288:7C4

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done This is just one address out of 2405:205::/32 and virtually they will never come back. This is one of those problematic mobile ranges and I do not know what to do with it. I used to softblock it, but finally gave up. This is not one vandal, but constant inflow of ordinary morons with smartphones who want to "test edit". --jdx Re: 09:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

DavidJeffersonTuaSinaga

User: DavidJeffersonTuaSinaga (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User has replaced seven photographs by replacing the original black and white photographs with colorized photographs, this is in violation of COM:OVERWRITE. I have reverted the all the colorized photographs with the original black and white photographs and placed a notice on the users' talk page.

-Signaleer (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Comment They edited over an 18-day period in February and hasn't edited since. One copyvio notification on their talk page, but otherwise nothing during the period they were active. Given that they were never notified of COM:OVERWRITE and never revert-warred, I don't see any indication they were acting in bad faith. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Have a look please

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.75.148.4 E4024 (talk) 01:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done An LTA. --jdx Re: 03:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

MD TAUFIQUE Artist

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ indefed rubin16 (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
@Rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

SangeetaMyMagazine

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked already rubin16 (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
@Rubin16 and Pi.1415926535: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

BalloonAlien2021

User: BalloonAlien2021 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeated vandalism after 3rd warning. Removing deletion notices, attacking other users, adding Barney GIF to unrelated categories, etc. Maybe a sock based on this edit.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked, our old friend. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

2601:242:681:8A00:8010:E4AC:C87:15F6

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. Thanks for reporting! -- CptViraj (talk) 03:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
@CptViraj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thipnunkpavis

SCP-2000 17:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done rubin16 (talk) 04:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

90.249.91.111

User: 90.249.91.111 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Harassment

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. --jdx Re: 03:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

105.182.115.183

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks to Minorax.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

2600:1016:B000:0:0:0:0:0/41

User: 2600:1016:B000:0:0:0:0:0/41 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Block evasion, edit-warring, and vandalism by Mazum24. Mazum24 has a known history of abusing this IP range, and most of the recent edits from the past 9 months match his behavior. Similar edits on the same kind of pages (mostly on tropical cyclones). I would appreciate if a CU could take a look at this. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: This is the same guy. Also, I think that there's enough IP socking for a rangeblock on Commons. And almost all of the recent activity is entirely him. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Tlppers

User: Tlppers (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Obvious block evasion and edit-warring by Mazum24. Same kind of edit-warring on the same kind of pages on tropical cyclones (track map images, in this case). The first edits involved starting another image war. If a CU reviews this report, please run a sleeper check, since this LTA has a history of sleeper account creation. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Can you please take a look at this report as well? I'm certain that this is the same LTA. The behavior is identical. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Globally locked. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Reticle Testicle

User: Reticle Testicle (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only account/LTA Arccosecant (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked, reverted. Taivo (talk) 20:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

BellaTube

User: BellaTube (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandal

XenonX3 (talk) 22:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done blocked indef AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

5.191.19.112

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Edits of the IP look like made by bot, so I do not expect anything good from the IP and I blocked it for a month. Thanks for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 09:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, and you're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

142.118.91.254

User: 142.118.91.254 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after final warning. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 09:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Thanks for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 09:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Grap e29912

User: Grap e29912 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only account

-Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Also a sockpuppet of recent accounts including CaidinJohnsohn, Caidin-Johnsohn29912forrest, and Cadinnn Johhnson. Also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder for more information on this user. Magitroopa (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
And another new sock here as well. [34] Magitroopa (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Эlcobbola talk 16:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Misharyalaradamhkbdetc

User: Misharyalaradamhkbdetc (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: appears to be a vandalism-only account, several disrputive edits to Commons:Galleries

Cnbrb (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

@Cnbrb: ✓ Done, thanks to Эlcobbola!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Super Duytuurt

User: Super Duytuurt (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Almost all edits are examples of image-warring. The behavior also resembles that of Mazum24, a cross-wiki edit-warrior, due to similar kinds of reverts on the same track map images. LightandDark2000 (talk) 03:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done? I blocked him/her indefinitely, but did not revert anything. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Aqşin Abbaslı

User: Aqşin Abbaslı (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Copyright violation. Qurren (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Next time block. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

2600:1702:1EC0:3900:1127:90FF:6348:CBEE

User: 2600:1702:1EC0:3900:1127:90FF:6348:CBEE (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam

-Killarnee (C•T•U) 17:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: IP/64 blocked for 1 day and gallery Music protected for 1 week. --Achim (talk) 20:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

107.127.60.27

User: 107.127.60.27 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism after three warnings

Aranya (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Tecno-football académie en cote divoire

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

93.65.54.48

User: 93.65.54.48 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: IP forges signatures of User:Ddgfoto when voting at Com:PC

-Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Katelynnbages

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ blocked rubin16 (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
@rubin16: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

2401:4900:1fe1:37c0:44c6:ef47:3da2:6a46

User: 2401:4900:1fe1:37c0:44c6:ef47:3da2:6a46 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Edits reverted. For now no further action necessary. --Achim (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Kharkivian

User: Kharkivian (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Bulk affixing {{No permission since}} to files uploaded by the authors themselves and the authors granted {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} permissions when uploading

Perohanych (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

@Perohanych: why do you think so? I nominate only those files which hadn't any metadata or author and uploader are different (look at the metadata). --Kharkivian (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Metadata are not necessarily required. For example, in case of File:Олена Литовченко.jpg, File:Постери .jpg the author and the uploader are the same person. --Perohanych (talk) 17:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
In case of that file I have found file here. So, we need author's permission. --Kharkivian (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
In case of File:Постери .jpg in the matada author Voinolovich S and uploader's name is different Ніна Арая (Nina Araia). --Kharkivian (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry for File:Постери .jpg. You are right in this case.
But for File:Олена Литовченко.jpg you are wrong. The author of the page at coollib.net really need author's permission. But File:Олена Литовченко.jpg at Commons has the permission from its author. BTW, probably it was Олена Литовченко herself, who published the page and the photo of herself at coollib.net. It was she who had to ask the permission from the author, Tymur Lytovchenko, her husband. --Perohanych (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't know who is the author. So, we need the author's permission. --Kharkivian (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
The author is specified in the description of the file. In this case the author and the uploader was the same person. --Perohanych (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. I do not see any wrongdoing. The files nominated for deletion are really suspicious. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I have noticed user's nominations long ago, but I thought they are based on some substantial reasons! If he nominates solely because of absence of metadata, it is disruptive editing. Absence of metadata means that the photo was edited and nothing more. Any serious photographer edits his photos, often with saving in different file formats which don't support EXIF. There can be thousands of stolen photos with metadata as well as thousands of own photos without it. If absence of metadata was a substantial reason for doubts, images could be nominated by bot. As long as metadata is not explicitly required from the uploaders, we can't delete images solely because of its absence. I ask administrators to carefully look through files deleted due to Kharkivian's nominations and undelete these ones which lack substantial reasons for doubts. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 13:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

LTA Mazum24 socks

Users:

Same kinds of image-warring, low-quality image uploads, and other edits on images that were edited/uploaded by the sockmaster in the past. The IPs exhibit the same behavior and also geolocate to the general location that this sockmaster's past IPs have operated out of, and he has been abusing those IPs for more than 6 months. Please indef the accounts and block the IPs for a while. Also note that this person has been engaging in Global Lock evasion. If a CU reviews this report, please run a sleeper check. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre and Taivo: This LTA is back. This is definitely him, judging by the behavior. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
9098boik and Timothy Ritter is now blocked. MarioJump83! 03:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

PCOO2010

User: PCOO2010 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User have uploaded two fake versions of Philippine government seals. The uploader's version usually replaces the sealion with a "winged lion". The user is also a possible sockpuppet of en:User:Pcoo1898, who have been caught doing this since October last year.

WayKurat (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: (Re-)Uploads deleted, User:PCOO2010, User:Jose Ruperto Martin Andanar and User:Sec HarryRoque blocked indef for sockpuppetry. For the record: PCOO2010 is indeffed on tl:wp for Entering false information. --Achim (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

2600:1700:B150:A4A0:E9F1:C3CA:42E:E654

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done seems to be too late to block rubin16 (talk) 18:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

72.219.108.67

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done seems to be too late to block rubin16 (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

STARBUCKSALOT

User: STARBUCKSALOT (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Block evasion and cross-wiki vandalism. ›› Fugitron - 07:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

I blocked the user indefinitely. Which block evasion? Taivo (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
The user shares strong similarities with Shame on PJ Santos (account was flagged as a sockpuppet of Kapukingina on en.wiki). ›› Fugitron - 11:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo and Fugitron: Kapukingina (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  is not blocked here yet.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Blocked indef, clear case. --Achim (talk) 11:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Laikeeeeeeeeeee

If you are not familiar with the operation and are reported as vandalism, then I am sorry.
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely due to inappropriate username. It's difficult to remember the username and it's difficult to spot a mistake, if a typing error is made. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

DivinepediaOrgInVedicAtPoBoxIn

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely for not being here for building encyclopedia. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

2A02:810D:4AC0:370:BD71:5437:6DF9:E379

User: 2A02:810D:4AC0:370:BD71:5437:6DF9:E379 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: IP address is bulk flagging my uploads stating a source is not given even though a source clearly is given. IP address has no other history besides this. Not sure if this counts as vandalism.Kylesenior (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Kylesenior (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Anan0214

User: Anan0214 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: 大量上传侵害著作权的图片（原图为“著作权所有”，而上传者全部标为了CC0）
（Warling: I'M CHINESE I CAN'T USE ENGLISH WELL! I HOPE YOU CAN READ IT.）

CreeperDigital1903 (talk) 10:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Upload a large number of pictures that infringe copyright (the original picture is "copyright owned", and all uploaders are marked as CC0)
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Jeff warned the user. At moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

197.246.32.92

✓ Done. Blocked by Ymblanter. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

197.55.107.246

User: 197.55.107.246 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism through the last four days

Aranya (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 1 week. Thanks for reverting their edits! --Achim (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

File:East the water cemetary1.jpg

And here is another vandal submission. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

File:UpDownUpDownUpDownUpDownUpDownUpDown.png

Can someone please remove this shit and block this editor? Thanks! Drmies (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
@Drmies: You seem to be under the misapprehension that I am already an Admin here. Sadly, I am not yet. I plan to reapply in August.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:27, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Jesus Cortez Matias 81

User: Jesus Cortez Matias 81 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: spamming an external link. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely and reverted all his edits. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

119.246.19.202

User: 119.246.19.202 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism/harrassing

Encycloon (talk) 10:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

✓ Blocked and all edits hidden. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Jimbowillpayforthis

Single purpouse account (sock?)

User: Domicwilkins (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: A new user keep editing and tagging my uploads for no valid reason and seem to try to get them deleted. I am not sure what I should do. I have reverted his edits. Please see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Domicwilkins . The account seems to have been created today (25. May 2021) and instantly started to edit my uploads. This does not seem good faith to me. I am happy for any advice and for action against this possible vandalism-only account. It seems that it is a sock account, because shortly after my revet, another account started to threat me (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Landroving_Linguist). It seems the main problem is a picture "Afroasiatic language tree", which is based on an picture from Ecyclopedia Britannica. I am not sure if the claims of the user are true, however, if, I agree to delet the one problematic picture. However, the accusations and threats as well as the use of sock accounts is rather strange and misleading. I am not sure, but someone should check and warn them. HunanZH (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

A third sock is now attacking my uploads, shortly after the other account stopped. See:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ghuaadg441. Someone should block them for disruptive and unconstructive edits.HunanZH (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked Domicwilkins for a week, but it seems like here is no sockpuppetry. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be the other way around? HunanZH uploads files without license. Brittanica.com is copyrighted, see license regulations. Domicwilkins tagged HunanZH's uploads for deletion [37]. --Pp.paul.4 (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Most of Hunan's uploads were good and correctly sourced. I nominated two of his uploads for regular deletion and Hunan changed source. The decision not to block Hunan was correct. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_14&oldid=566469372"