Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 28
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Semi-protection for File:Omegle.png
Hello,
Could you semi-protect File:Omegle.png, due to frequent vandalism from various IP addresses?
The page has already been semi-protected between 14 April 2019 and 14 April 2020.
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done for 2 years. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Tarun Joga 28
Tarun Joga 28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Uploading copyright violations after final warning. --Bonadea (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Spamming, promotional username. -- CptViraj () 05:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for reporting. Ahmadtalk 05:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Heavily used via {{PD-USGov-EPA}}. Please upload protect (full protection level). And maybe semi-protect or TE-protect the redirects File:Environmental Protection Agency logo.svg and File:Logo of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.svg. pandakekok9 05:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I fully protected it against upload and move and semi-protected it against editing (almost 1500 uses). Taivo (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
@Pandakekok9 and Taivo: While I understand this is a highly visible image, I believe full upload protection is not warranted. There are several issues with the current SVG. Besides color (which I fixed), there are several visible deformities in the seal itself. This precludes the ability of a good-faith user to correct these mistakes in vectorization. Jadebenn (talk) 06:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- To elaborate, I actually extracted a higher quality SVG from the EPA website, only to find that it's now impossible for me to upload it and thereby fix the issues with the current one. I feel as though I'm being punished for my earlier edit to fix the colors, as I do not think it was a coincidence that this protection request was lodged shortly afterwards. I was planning to do more than just change the color, but now that's not an option for me. Jadebenn (talk) 06:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support lowering protection level. File is neither "heavily used across Wikimedia projects (e.g. template icons)", nor "used in a dangerous location (e.g. wiki's main pages)" (Commons:Protection_policy#Upload_protection). This situation is precisely why preemptive protection should be used with extreme caution. The letters especially in our 13-year old file are horribly vectorized, and Jadebenn should indeed be able to help fix this without jumping through beaurocratic hoops. Storkk (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- At moment the file is used more than 2000 times in Commons plus almost 100 times in numeral other projects, so I do not lower the protection level, but if somebody other will do it, then I will not protest. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Most of the uses seem to be through {{PD-USGov-EPA}}, though. For reasons of readability, I had already lodged an edit request to replace its use in that template with File:EPA logo.svg before this seal was upload protected. If my request goes through, I believe the number of uses would fall dramatically. Jadebenn (talk) 09:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: As its replacement in the template by another image has dropped it down to 9 uses on Commons, I do not believe there is any reason to maintain the protection at this point in time. Jadebenn (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done? I unprotected the page. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: As its replacement in the template by another image has dropped it down to 9 uses on Commons, I do not believe there is any reason to maintain the protection at this point in time. Jadebenn (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Most of the uses seem to be through {{PD-USGov-EPA}}, though. For reasons of readability, I had already lodged an edit request to replace its use in that template with File:EPA logo.svg before this seal was upload protected. If my request goes through, I believe the number of uses would fall dramatically. Jadebenn (talk) 09:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- At moment the file is used more than 2000 times in Commons plus almost 100 times in numeral other projects, so I do not lower the protection level, but if somebody other will do it, then I will not protest. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support lowering protection level. File is neither "heavily used across Wikimedia projects (e.g. template icons)", nor "used in a dangerous location (e.g. wiki's main pages)" (Commons:Protection_policy#Upload_protection). This situation is precisely why preemptive protection should be used with extreme caution. The letters especially in our 13-year old file are horribly vectorized, and Jadebenn should indeed be able to help fix this without jumping through beaurocratic hoops. Storkk (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Request Semi-protection for File:Google_Docs_logo.svg
Reason: persistent vandalism. --SCP-2000 09:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done for a week. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Історія України
- Історія України (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Inappropriate username. Misleading username that may give the impression that the account has authority it does not have. Translated as History of Ukraine. --Микола Василечко (talk) 04:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
What is the response to my request? --Микола Василечко (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
What? --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see a problem with the username. It is obviously not related to an organisation and does not pretend to have any Wikimedia authority. However, the account does have a history of copyright infringements, so a short block may be warranted soon. Have you tried to contact them about changing their username or notified them about this discussion? De728631 (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I warned the user not to upload copyvios. Username is acceptable. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
JensiD
- JensiD (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
I request some shorter block for this user as he keeps uploading unfree content. He isn't aware even to messages at his Czech talkpage. I hope he would turn into a good contributor, he has quite good contributions to articles on cswiki. — Draceane talkcontrib. 16:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done They haven't uploaded anything since 1 May, so I left them a final warning. Any new copyvios will result in a block though. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @De728631: OK, thanks for reply. — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
User:Nabibi1506
Nabibi1506 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Repeatedly uploading copyvios after the final warning. --Wcam (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked 1 week. De728631 (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Request editing DR templates to protected images
I have nominated File:CSi Mask box.jpg to DR at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:CSi_Mask_box.jpg but the file is protected due to it being displayed on the main page of zhwiki. I request a {{Delete}} template be added accordingly. Thanks. --Wcam (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I added deletion template. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Request for protection of files used on the main page
- File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-200px-transparent.png
- File:Wikipedia logo letters banner.svg
- File:Zhwp blue banner.png
- File:MP-open-book4.png
- File:Bluebg rounded.png
- File:Wikipedia-logo-blank.svg
These files are used on the main page in Korean Wikipedia or other Wikipedia(More than 1000000 articles). The damage caused when a malicious image is reuploaded is extremely large. --Ikebus (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Edit needed in protected template "Object location"
The last edit in Template:Object location unfortunately broke the display of the documentation due to a syntax error (HTML comment not closed). Could someone please change the line --<noinclude>
to --><noinclude>
Thanks! --Tkarcher (talk) 08:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. --Achim (talk) 11:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
User:Tejastrivoli
Repeated copyright violation after final warning. Uploads same image over and over again. - Whpq (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- The user has not uploaded any files since 4 May, so instead of blocking a protected the filename. De728631 (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Abusing multiple account: Anisahy
- Anisahy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Johnsmithrichest (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Saqibabdurrehman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- MuhammadYassal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Lovelyperson7862 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Reason: New accounts. They upload the same topic and style images between 15 April to 23 April. --SCP-2000 15:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
7 days have passed since the request. No response from administrators. --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- I can't see any links between these accounts. I did delete some images though which were copyvios or unused selfies. De728631 (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Melchman
- Melchman (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Persistent uploading of copyright violations (see talkpage, there's 4 speedy deletion copyvio notices, all of which were deleted). They've been active since 2014 though, and have uploaded constructively before, so a timed block would be preferred. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done All their recent copyvios were uploaded within a short period which is why the speedy deletion notices piled up at their talk page. No uploads have been made since, so there is no need for immediate action. De728631 (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Sock block request
Hi, Could someone block VauxhallMania1999 for being a sock of Astra1999 please,
Please also see the SPI at EN (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Astra1999),
I did originally go to COM:SPI but it wouldn't show on the main case page and didn't know what to do so figured it would just be easier to come here,
Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 16:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Obviously passed the duck test. De728631 (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- De728631 Thank you so much for blocking there and here, You've literally killed 2 birds with 1 stone lol :), Thanks again for your help I greatly appreciate you doing both :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Standuprepublic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Possible violation of username policy: Implies use by multiple individuals, Name of an organisation. While such a name would normally not raise any red flags, the upload of two three images of one of the organisation's founders (as seen here) and the statement of "We actually own the copyright to the image" here are good indicators of a possible username policy violation. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
User:Qiushufang
- Qiushufang (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Yprpyqp (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
(Continued from here.) I would like to bring to notice that most of his remaining uploads are still violating Commons policy. The user has invariably designated himself as the "author" of historic images (e.g.). However, the underlying template clearly informs us that " This field should not be used to specify the name of the person who is the scanner, finder, or uploader of the image – these things do not make that person the author!" The user, though, has given these images consistently a CC licensing that indicates himself as their original creator. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- This still needs to be resolved. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- I added the related account Yprpyqp, which--as evidenced in the previous discussions (here and here)--should be similarly scrutinized. --Cold Season (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see this as an administrator's job, and of course this has nothing to do with "blocks and protections": any user can review these files. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I did the reviews file by file. I found them to be deficient in three related but different ways (hence I gave three different rationales depending on the image). Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see this as an administrator's job, and of course this has nothing to do with "blocks and protections": any user can review these files. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I added the related account Yprpyqp, which--as evidenced in the previous discussions (here and here)--should be similarly scrutinized. --Cold Season (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Abusing multiple accounts: self-promotion
- DumyKlawMichael (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Cdgroupromania (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Ionutmang (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- AndreiMoldovanNew (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Sapio7 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Persistent uploading of promotional images of the same person, namely Romanian singer Claudiu Dumitrache aka Dumy Klaw. User:AndreiMoldovanNew discloses on his user page that he has been paid by Claudiu Dumitrache Group for his contributions to English Wikipedia. See also the related CU archives on meta (m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-07#Deniss94@ro.wikipedia and m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-09#MarikkaBoon@ro.wikipedia) and en.wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndreiMoldovanNew/Archive) for their identification as sock puppets. --Pafsanias (talk) 23:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Persistent uploading of promotional copyvio images. Some should be blocked even without RCU. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done; I blocked all accounts indefinitely. Thanks for reporting. Ahmadtalk 11:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Files
Remove protection on these files, all of them are unnecessarily indef full-protected. Hddty (talk) 08:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ten years ago these files were subject to vandalism and personal attacks, which is why they were protected. I think we might give it try now and remove the protections. De728631 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. In my opinion even semi-protection is not needed, so I fully unprotected the files. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- User: Itssurajrana (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued self-promotional advertising after warning for doing so.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Эlcobbola talk 19:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Эlcobbola: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Abusing multiple accounts: block evasion Максим Огородник - 5
Максим Огородник (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Abusing multiple accounts: block evasion
В.Добрянський (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Володимир Добрянський (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
See old:
- Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 72#Sock puppetry and Copyrights by Максим Огородник
- and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 74#Abusing multiple accounts: block evasion
- and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 74#Abusing multiple accounts:_block evasion Максим Огородник - 3
- and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 74#Abusing multiple accounts: block evasion Максим Огородник - 4a
New account — same edits related files by Максим Огородник. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
14 days have passed since the request. No response from administrators. --Микола Василечко (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Максим Огородник has been blocked since 2018 so how could he have uploaded and edited images until recently? See Special:Contributions/Максим_Огородник. Am I missing something? De728631 (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- This is a special program that stores data from Wikipedia. Here's another: users В.Добрянський and Володимир Добрянський download files by Максим Огородник. In my opinion, this is another puppet show from Максим Огородник by VPN. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done I see, these were uploads made from Wikipedia. Apart from that there is also an unbecoming parallel interest in files uploaded and edited by Максим Огородник. So I have blocked both suspicious accounts. De728631 (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Wrong German translation in {{PD-USGov-NASA-AP}}
The German translation of {{PD-USGov-NASA-AP}} is wrong. Its content is not according to the English original. I have posted a correct German translation here: Template talk:PD-USGov-NASA-AP/de. Please change Template:PD-USGov-NASA-AP/de accordingly. Thanks, Yellowcard (talk) 13:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've added {{Edit request}} to your comment at the talk page. Storkk (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
All uploading same images
- Aashish Kaushik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Subhsankalp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Diksharohilla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
All three users uploading the same images and similar images about one subject (See the logs for File:Aashish Kaushik.jpg (logs), all out of COM:SCOPE and no permission. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 07:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done; thanks. Ahmadtalk 08:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Ahmad! Can we also nuke their contributions? None of them have provided evidence that they are the copyright holder, and have provided some links to the subject (via public and non-public information), indicating a off-wiki connection to the subject. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that there is a risk of copyright violation, but, given that two of them are tagged as no permission and there is a DR open for one, I think there is no other immediate action needed. Ahmadtalk 19:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Ahmad! Can we also nuke their contributions? None of them have provided evidence that they are the copyright holder, and have provided some links to the subject (via public and non-public information), indicating a off-wiki connection to the subject. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
User Kristianmusic
Kristianmusic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Already added deletion_requests for uploaded photos, but he upload new: File:Semey International Airport - PLX.jpg, File:Pavlodar International Airport - PWQ.jpg.
Looks like copyvio: example File:Air Koksheatu at Kokshetau International Airport (KOV).jpg and source — Preceding unsigned comment added by DS28 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I warned the user and will delete the copyvios. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: , Looks like user create new accoounts:
- Kerimovramill (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log),
- Ruslanrubinov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log),
- Maximkavladimir (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log).
- I found them, cause user edit same pages in ru-wiki and add similar photos.--DS28 (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked and tagged them and created sockpuppet category. Now I'll delete the copyvios. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploading copyrighted images after a block
Selenacabello97i (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) uploading copyrighted images after a block. Clearly hasn't learned anything from last time. DalefromCleveland (talk) 01:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done 1 month. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Advertising after warning
Santoouro.ped (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) advertising after warning DalefromCleveland (talk) 03:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Indef as a spam-only account. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Editor persistently uploading the same non-free images
Avishka996 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) uploading copyright violations after last warning. DalefromCleveland (talk) 06:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- More specifically, the editor is uploading the same non-free images under different names. I've warned them about non-free images at en.Wikipedia after one was uploaded here and then used in a draft article but that doesn't seem to have gotten through. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done - Blocked for 3 days as an interim, see if they say anything. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Privacy violation
In a file there is serie of edits, beginning here with the name of a woman that's not on the photograph. The IP-user claims she is the richest woman in Europe (in German) for this edit and all the edits above. Can a moderator hide that? I already gave the user a warning. Regards. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure if a COM:REVDEL is needed. I can't find anything confirming the information claimed by the IP, but that type of information is usually available online. This may mean the claims are not true (and that maybe this is a hoax). Unless I'm missing something, I think revision deletion is not needed. Ahmadtalk 13:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know if this is enough to hide it. On the NL-Wikipedia it would be hidden, I don't know where the 'border' is on Commons, about hiding edits. I think they mean this woman (Team Leader link). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- It could be due to Europe's stricter privacy requirements. It's not something I would revdel on enwiki, and not something I'd revdel on Commons. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know if this is enough to hide it. On the NL-Wikipedia it would be hidden, I don't know where the 'border' is on Commons, about hiding edits. I think they mean this woman (Team Leader link). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Spam-only account: Alkhalidiya
Alkhalidiya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- Uploads continue even after warning. Chenzw Talk 15:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done for now: Deleted and user warned. --Achim (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. The user continued spamming and was blocked. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Similar uploads
- Originformac (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Allanpatryckc (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
new accounts and both have similar uploads --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: It is allowed to use more than one account as long as there is no abuse. By each account there was just one image uploaded. I tagged both of them. IMO there is currently no further action necessary. --Achim (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Block request
Hi, Could an admin block Markfree123 who's a sock of Stan old - Stan is currently blocked for uploading images of his wife which were considered out of scope but he's repeatedly created accounts and repeatedly uploaded images of his wife time and time again so I'm wondering if his stan account should also be indeffed now?,
Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 11:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks King of Hearts much appreciated :), –Davey2010Talk 12:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Request for protection on Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Indonesia
Dear admins, kindly apply semi-protection on that page until the end of this month, as some trolls are vandalizing the page and changing the content. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Semi protected so that only auto confirmed can edit Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Advertising only account
Ch6161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) uploading ads for some no-name model. DalefromCleveland (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree about the advertising - this user is uploading copyvios to put in an article of someone which isn't the same. Have warned them per COM:BP Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
IP harassed Bidgee by marking his files as copyvios even though they are not, and made a legal threat three times (at Bidgee's talk page, DR, another DR) against Bidgee and the community. Such user clearly doesn't belong here. They are also edited via 2001:8004:2721:10BC:7C89:C334:83DE:755C, which is blocked by Gnangarra for the same reason (except the legal threat). pandakekok9 11:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please block 2001:8004:2721:10BC:D4C3:3AF8:7A5:6A07 too. pandakekok9 11:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked both. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Ipv6 blocks of single ip is completely useless. It cycles every couple of minutes on your average computer. I blocked the /64. Multichill (talk) 21:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Sock of Ananislam. pandakekok9 11:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Azzeddine Farhane
- Category:Azzeddine Farhane
- Reasons for protection: Edit war with an IP who keeps adding extensive biography of subject. Has been going on since page creation in December 2019.
- Protection type and proposed protection time span: Semi-protection, 6 months.
B2Belgium (talk) 15:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @B2Belgium: Done Gbawden (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Persistent vandalism, please semi-protect (edit only, no need for upload and move protection). Thanks, pandakekok9 01:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Info It's most likely because of https://twitter.com/jamescharles/status/1261748724461522944?s=21 . --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 05:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I semi-protected the image for a year. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
@Taivo: A very strange phenomenon: While you have indeed protected this file for a year[1][2], IPs are still able to vanalize it! [3][4][5] I wonder if this is a MediaWiki bug. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- What's even more weird is that the history page shows that you added 1132 bytes even though it's just a protection (normally it should show 0). This is definitely a bug. Will be reporting in Phabricator. pandakekok9 01:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo and 4nn1l2: I think I know now why the protection failed. Taivo semi-protected it on 08:02 yesterday, then 4 minutes later deleted the file for revdel (and restored it afterwards). The deletion must have erased the protection too. I still don't have any idea why the history shows that Taivo added 1132 bytes to the wikitext though. But protecting it again should work. And I won't be reporting this to Phabricator for now, as this seems intended (other than the mysterious 1132 bytes) pandakekok9 01:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done protected again thanks to Pandakekok9. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo and 4nn1l2: I think I know now why the protection failed. Taivo semi-protected it on 08:02 yesterday, then 4 minutes later deleted the file for revdel (and restored it afterwards). The deletion must have erased the protection too. I still don't have any idea why the history shows that Taivo added 1132 bytes to the wikitext though. But protecting it again should work. And I won't be reporting this to Phabricator for now, as this seems intended (other than the mysterious 1132 bytes) pandakekok9 01:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Please block it. It's malfunctioning, I'm the operator but currently not able to fix it. -- Rillke(q?) 18:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Storkk (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Sock of TonkarLike. pandakekok9 03:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. I also blocked the master account indefinitely as well, since this isn't the first time they've used sockpuppets abusively, and they've shown no signs of changing their behavior. clpo13(talk) 03:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I also reported them to enwiki's SPI so that they could act as well. pandakekok9 03:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Sock block request
Hi, Could an admin block VauxhallLover1999 who's a sock of Astraboy1999 please, See this image and this image - Both were taken with the exact same mobile phone model and both include coords etc, Only slight difference is they've improved the way they've taken images however nonetheless it's still a sock, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not complaining just getting a better understanding - but just wondering why the sock hasn't been blocked ?, I've pointed out the exact same phone and there are 2 other things making this obvious (which if anyone's missed I'll email them), I appreciate they've not been on since the 11th but not using an account isn't a reason to not block a sock account ? –Davey2010Talk 10:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked indef. De728631 (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks De728631, I absolutely agree with your point below inregards to rangeblocking, FWIW I do have 2-3 of his IPs saved which I'd be more than happy to email if needed, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Can we get a rangeblock for this guy? He's building up quite a sockfarm. De728631 (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked indef. De728631 (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Bidgee serial copyrite violator
Bidgee (talk · contribs) is a serial copyrite violator whoes stealing and uploading as own work! This user needs be blocked! Bidgee stole
and some protectionist called {{user|Nick-D]] invalidily removes copyvio template. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:8004:2720:5cb2:45ce:b4c9:801:ae74 (talk) 07:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- This editor is repeatedly attempting to nominate File:Urbos 3 departing Alinga Street light rail stop.jpg for speedy deletion, and is issuing legal threats [6]. Grateful if the IPs could be blocked and the image protected. I imagine that this forms part of the harassment which has led Bidgee to retire from Commons. Nick-D (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Probably a sock of 2001:8004:2721:10BC:9D3A:3005:6DA6:5AF1. Pinging Taivo, Gnangarra, and Multichill. pandakekok9 08:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done IP blocked and image protected. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Thanks. Please block 2001:8004:2720:5CB2:C0F2:7444:760E:70DB and 2001:8004:2720:5CB2:48BB:46F6:99AA:F908 too. pandakekok9 10:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done 2001:8004:2720:5CB2::/64 --Achim (talk) 10:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks all Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done 2001:8004:2720:5CB2::/64 --Achim (talk) 10:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Thanks. Please block 2001:8004:2720:5CB2:C0F2:7444:760E:70DB and 2001:8004:2720:5CB2:48BB:46F6:99AA:F908 too. pandakekok9 10:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done IP blocked and image protected. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Probably a sock of 2001:8004:2721:10BC:9D3A:3005:6DA6:5AF1. Pinging Taivo, Gnangarra, and Multichill. pandakekok9 08:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Excessive vandalism by troll accounts/IPs. Remove this edit , translates to "He is a Motherfucker prostitute". // Eatcha (talk) 01:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- An this edit, translates to "Your mother's vagina". // Eatcha (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Protected, revdeled, blocked. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Anchuhu
Anchuhu (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
It is a confirmed sock as per en:Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_复旦大学张超. Could you please block?--Roy17 (talk) 21:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
User:L3l4l5926
- L3l4l5926 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Still uploads copyvio images after warnings and blocks. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 3 months - if they continue will support indef block Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Duck sock of TonkarLike. pandakekok9 02:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
This category is indefinitely move protected since 8 May 2020. I think that we should lift this protection. The protection was related to this conflict which is now expected to be resolved through this discussion (see also this discussion where one of the involved editors promised not to continue to move this category without obtaining consensus first). I asked the protecting admin (see [7]) but got no response since more than two weeks. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I simply had not noticed AFBorcherts request through all the other things that poppud up around this time. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for removing the protection. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- unprotected. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for removing the protection. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
NO me permite crear mi pagina . NO he intentado crear pagina antes
ME APARECE ESTE ERROR Y YO NO HE COMETIDO NINGUN ABUSO PORQUE ES LA PRIMERA VEZ QUE INTENTO CREAR MI PAGINA . OJALA PUEDAN AYUDARME . MIL GRACIAS : CRISTINA MICHAUS (MEXICO) Error de permisos Ir a la navegaciónIr a la búsqueda No tienes permiso para crear esta página, por los siguientes motivos:
Esta página ha sido protegida para evitar su edición u otras acciones. Este título ha sido protegido contra creación por INeverCry. El motivo proporcionado es Protection against re-creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CRISTINA MICHAUS (talk • contribs) 05:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Dummy comment for archiving. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Unblock request: Malikxan
This user has requested an ublock. As I voted against in their last request they pinged me. I have been trying to see if they understand what they did wrong. There is a desire to contribute FWIW and a undertaking to upload their own work. Would welcome comments from others Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Good day! The user has been making constructive edits on the Uzbek Wikipedia, and by now fully understands the importance of respecting copyright. I believe we should definitely cut him some slack. Cheers! :) Nataev talk 14:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Let's see how they will respond to my question. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks @4nn1l2: , they still don't seem to get it Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- This is also my idea of the situation. They seem to think that procedure like adding templates and simply reading the rules does the trick, but I haven't seen any reflections on the original copyright issues. So I too asked them a question. De728631 (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Unblocked under some editing restrictions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Sock of TonkarLike. pandakekok9 04:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the user indefinitely and created a sockpuppet category. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Repeated copyvios so many times, and repeated misuse by LTA. Can we salt it if we aren't using it for honeypot? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done To allow only autoconfirmed users. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Spam-only account, promotional username. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I warned the user and deleted the promotional userpage. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded three copyrighted images after being issued a final warning. Passengerpigeon (talk) 07:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- User: Ayus 010 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued advertising in this edit after warning, page blanking, and removing Information template.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Blocked by Herbythyme for 2 weeks, edits are deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Herbythyme and Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Images uploaded by socks
Don't know if this is the correct place. On English Wikipedia, I have run across File:Gloria Swanson parking lot.jpg, which was uploaded in 2012 by User:Candleabracadabra. That user is blocked on Englilsh Wikipedia as a confirmed sock of User:ChildofMidnight. Both the sockpuppet account and sock master account are here on Commons, but not active. Should the image be removed from Commons? Maile66 (talk) 12:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- In the eyes of the Commons community, they haven't abused their multiple accounts here as far as we know, so we wouldn't consider that sockpuppetry. And even if they had committed sockpuppetry, we had a recent RfC proposing to make sockpuppetry on its own a valid reason to delete a file from Commons, but it didn't gain enough consensus. So files uploaded by that user should be deleted only if they are out of project scope, have copyright problems, or the file itself violates any other policies (see our deletion policy). File:Gloria Swanson parking lot.jpg might be the second case, as there's no freedom of panorama in the United States for 2D works, so I'm going to nominate that image for deletion. Thanks, pandakekok9 06:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe {{PD-FLGov}} applies for the plaque, that case the image does not need to be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think a plaque fits in the definition of a "public record"... pandakekok9 12:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Click "Definition of "public record"" on the license. In my opinion plaque is a public record in Florida. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed IMO, the plaque, as a work of a Floridian municipal government, is part of the public record in Florida, and, therefore, in PD per {{PD-FLGov}}. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 02:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Click "Definition of "public record"" on the license. In my opinion plaque is a public record in Florida. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think a plaque fits in the definition of a "public record"... pandakekok9 12:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe {{PD-FLGov}} applies for the plaque, that case the image does not need to be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection
Request unprotection of Jamal al din~commonswiki? Here is the protection summary: 07:35, 31 March 2006 Zscout370 (talk · contribs) protected User:Jamal al din (sockpuppet of banned user [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
.Jonteemil (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done No need to protection after 14 years. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Could you please drop protection to "Allow only autoconfirmed users". Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done, but, if I'm not mistaken, the semi-protection doesn't do anything (unless you are not an autoconfirmed user, which isn't the case). By default, only interface administrators and you can edit your userscripts. Ahmadtalk 23:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not even administrators, nowadays. You would need an Interface administrator for that. I think the problem was that being completely protected prevented Rodhullandemu to edit his own page, not he is no longer an administrator here. Platonides (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Images used on project portals
Please upload and move protect File:Wikimedia Cloud Services logo with text.svg (used on https://www.wikimedia.org), File:Sea and sky light.jpg (used on https://www.wikivoyage.org) and File:Bookshelf-40x201 6.png (used on https://www.wikibooks.org, https://www.wikinews.org, etc.) as they are used on various Wikimedia project portals. Thanks. GreenComputer (talk) 06:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. [Edit, Move and Upload=Allow only template editors and administrators] (indefinite). Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 06:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Any reason their file description pages need to be edit protected as well? There doesn't seem to be much point given that upload and move protection prevent any changes to the images and none of the portal uses link back to the file description pages. Thanks. GreenComputer (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenComputer: If you inspect, you would see that there is a link back to the files, and you never know what abusers is about to do. So, I've edit protected the file. Later, i ended up with decreasing the edit protection level to Allow only autoconfirmed users. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Any reason their file description pages need to be edit protected as well? There doesn't seem to be much point given that upload and move protection prevent any changes to the images and none of the portal uses link back to the file description pages. Thanks. GreenComputer (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
77.252.60.86
- User: 77.252.60.86 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Rasism bahavior and proviting racist propaganda on wiki comons.
Kriestovo Nysian (talk) 20:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. You must give more evidence for that. And don't complain in every venue, choose one! Taivo (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Those accounts are sockpuppets and spam-only accounts. On Wikidata, they have created a lot of spam items. While I see they have provided permissions to some of the files they have uploaded, I think this should be reviewed by an administrator, knowing the real intentions of them. Esteban16 (talk) 19:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Both accounts are globally locked. I deleted multiple uploads speedily, rest are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Spam-only account, promotional username. Please block, thanks. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the user indefinitely and deleted the promotional userpage. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Broken description at File:2009-10 31 BOS-SFO 398 (4096329287).jpg
Please replace "xxxxxxx" by "Dunaliella salina" at File:2009-10 31 BOS-SFO 398 (4096329287).jpg. Courtesy ping Evrik. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- The x's should be replaced with dunaliella. Thanks @ToBeFree: Evrik (talk) 02:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: @Evrik: what would you like xxxxxx replaced with, w:dunaliella salina or Category:Dunaliella ?. Thank you. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done? Taivo (talk) 10:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Taivo, Evrik and Fitindia! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done? Taivo (talk) 10:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
User JakePaulshop has had multiple copyvios
As seen on User talk:JakePaulshop, this user has had over 10 files deleted due to copyright violations and two "last warnings". After both warnings, more violations have been revealed, so it is past time to block this user. Also, this user's remaining uploads do not appear to be constructive to Commons. Arbor to SJ (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked indefinitely. Remaining uploads have been nominated for deletion. clpo13(talk) 22:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Spam-only account, promotional username. Please block, thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked and nuked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Unblock
Can anyone please unblock User:YouTubeReviewBot ? The bug's fixed now. // Eatcha (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- User: Yura Dashevsky (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continues to upload OOS promo materials without evidence of permission after warning about scope.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Continued promotion in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The Neoplan Rider Studios (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Uploading unfree files after warnings. --ManFromNord (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Indefinitely blocked (third block). Taivo (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Edit war on File:Mila Kunis 2018 (cropped 2).jpg
There is an edit war on File:Mila Kunis 2018 (cropped 2).jpg. Is here not a protection necessary? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker Overleg • CA 16:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, and fast, as i reported in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Pcgmrich_is_a_possible_sockpuppet_of_Pcgmsrich_(blocked_for_sockpupettry). Thanks for your report, Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker. P.S. I´am that is why there is a edit war. Tm (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment User:Jdx has blocked this user for cross-wiki vandalism. Thank you for the quick response. But, maybe, as a prevention, this file should be protected as this user seems to use sockpuppets to circunvent this protections and blocks. Tm (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, and fast, as i reported in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Pcgmrich_is_a_possible_sockpuppet_of_Pcgmsrich_(blocked_for_sockpupettry). Thanks for your report, Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker. P.S. I´am that is why there is a edit war. Tm (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done --jdx Re: 17:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
User:Haka-Taka
Haka-Taka (talk · contribs) is just another Category:Sockpuppets of Yahadzija, re-uploading previously delete photos. --Smooth O (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done - thanks, Эlcobbola talk 18:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
There is an edit war on Category:Boeing 747-300 of Varig. Necessary semi-protection. --Karel (talk) 12:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Semi-protected for 6 months due to persistent vandalism. Taivo (talk) 06:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Eliminate a typo on a protected template-page
Hello, could an admin or a template editor please process the request on Template_talk:PD-USGov-POTUS/de. That would be great! I confirm that the requested change is correct. Thank you! --Keks by 19:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
backgarden.org - Please block, OTRS verification needed per COM:UPOL. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Only one upload, not promotional. I nominated it for regular deletion due to copyright problem. Actually Backgarden is not obviously promotional username, so I do not block the user, but if somebody else blocks him/her, I will not protest. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not an unambiguously promotional but COM:Username policy#Organizations says Use of the names of organizations is allowed on Commons only if you verify your account, proving that you are or represent the respective organization. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Username does not match organization exactly and in any case is generic enough that it is unlikely that a reasonable user will see the username User:Backgardens and be confused as to whether they represent the backgarden.org website. The world has many organizations with many names, only in the case of reasonably likely confusion should a username be disallowed without verification IMO. So for example, we wouldn't require you to verify that you represent Viraj academy. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not an unambiguously promotional but COM:Username policy#Organizations says Use of the names of organizations is allowed on Commons only if you verify your account, proving that you are or represent the respective organization. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Let's be a bit more relaxed about usernames. If the account activity is not promotional, the user would have to have a glaringly obvious carpetbagging name (like RijksMuseumImages or SonyFotos) to be a problem. For example, we don't want to block user names like "Tavio" just because tavio.com happens to be owned by an auction site. --Fæ (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The account has uploaded files with backgarden.org as the source in it. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was re-uploaded repeatedly, then which is mostly COM:COPYVIO meme character. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 01:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:42, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Crosswiki vanity spammer, see SUL and all contribs are based on his username. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. Fitindia (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City.tab
Requesting indefinite semi-protection of Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City.tab as a highly visible dataset used at en:New York City#Climate. CaradhrasAiguo (en talk) 18:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
This seems to be attracting a lot of nonsense edits and vandalism lately. Could someone semi-protect please. Normally, I'd do it myself, but... Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Bot of banned sock-puppeteer remains unblocked?
NASAbot (talk · contribs) is a bot openly created by sock-puppeteer I eat bananas 101 (talk · contribs), who was perm-blocked in 2018 per CU. However, his bot was never blocked and as of today has been used to upload an image. How is this acceptable? And regardless of the issue with the bot-operator, its name is illegitimate, as it suggests to be operated by the NASA. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: please delete my image--NASAbot (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Image deleted; bot-account finally blocked by Elcobbola. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Egpdm
Egpdm (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
copyvio after last warning in 2017.--Roy17 (talk) 13:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a month. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
This user's edits all appear to be spam. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
This young fellow -- a minor both (i) according to the birth year he provides and (ii) as I infer from his numerous self-portraits -- made vigorous (if incompetent) attempts to advertise himself at en:Wikipedia. I have just deleted the whole lot. But he has also been active here in Commons, where of course I'm not an admin. I could tag for suggested deletion those files he has uploaded that are obviously surplus to Commons' requirements, but I'd encourage some admin here who's experienced in these matters to consider not only his self-portraits and similar but also his other contributions -- are they really by him? (If I had admin superpowers here, I might "IAR" and simply delete the lot.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- I feel your pain, brother, and were I still an Admin here, they would have been gone by now. Unfortunately, my personality on one occasion seems to trump my vigilance, so there is nothing I can do. Eventually, perhaps... Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Had I investigated a little further, I'd have encountered this request for deletion of eleven files; Fitindia has already deleted one of them. As for my question above, "Are they really by him?", the first file I sleepily chanced on among his list of contributions was this atypical one, and of course all he did was add claims to it, which was innocuous enough. So this entire thread can probably be ignored (though I hope that the request elsewhere can be dealt with expeditiously). -- Hoary (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
User Yprpyqp/Qiushufang
Yprpyqp (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Massive copyvio ([8]). The user received his final warning in December 2018 ([9]), after two copyvio sprees had been identified ([10] [11]).
However, by then he had already changed his identity to Qiushufang (evidence: both users focused on Chinese arms and armour, their edits tie neatly in at places ([12], [13]) and I am not the first one who noticed the similarities ([14])). Qiushufang was finally blocked for massive copyvio in April 2020 and hundreds of his uploads which had been up for years had to be deleted ([15]).
That Yprpyqp/Qiushufang could carry on for so long and escape the notice of most users and admins demonstrates that the ability of Commons to prevent systematic copyright violations is overall rather limited despite assertions to the contrary (my suggestion to improve the whole image review process). Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Khatumo / Maakhir areas
There has been a long-running dispute across multiple-language wikipedias on whether to list disputed areas as part of Somaliland, Puntland, Khatumo, Maakhir or simply as Somalia. The consensus reached in this discussion (User_talk:Lasunncty#Faulty_map) is that disputed areas on this image and this image should be shown rather than plain. Unfortunately, it seems that the dispute, which is long-term on many wikiprojects (check the edit history of any town/city/province in said area), has transferred to Wikimedia commons with reverts/edit warring on both pages. As such, I ask for (at least) semi-protection for File:Somaliland Map1.svg and File:Somaliland location map.svg. The latter should be reverted back to its consensus version, and due to the inevitable protractive and perpetual nature of this dispute, the time span should be indefinite. Thank you. Eve44reelaassss (talk) 12:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Difficult question. Map of current situation file:Somalia map states regions districts.svg looks more like current situation, so I would not revert the file. The editors of the map are established users, so semi-protection does not help and the file must be either fully protected or not protected at all. I'd like to let the situation be like it is, but if somebody else will protect the files, then I'm not against it. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection for List of the Protected Areas in Turkey
Hello! Please protect this page, which is an official list of the protected areas for Turkey, which participates in WLE 2020. Incorrect editing became more frequent with the start of the contest, because of which I ask for semi-protection. Thanks, --Mehman 97 19:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Only auto confirmed users can edit Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Jsnueva1022
- Jsnueva1022 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Still have copyright issue after being notified. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done? Gbawden warned the user second time and after that copyvios stopped. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Михайленко дима
Михайленко дима (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- The user's contribution is copyright violation only. Mithril (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I warned the user, all copyvios are deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. However I don't think one more warning will help since the last two copyvios where used in an article on completely fake dinosaur genus in the Russian wikipedia. I've tried to talk to the user, all was in vain. Mithril (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Theros778
Theros778 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- The user's contribution is copyright violation only. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @O revolucionário aliado: I notified them for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Then, they blanked this section. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked Theros for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked Theros for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm not blocking this user myself as they've called me "arrogant, garbage, uninformed" and I don't want to appear involved. The user has uploaded only blatant COM:NETCOPYVIOs, lied about it, included links on those copyvios to a site they appear to be promoting (COM:SPAM) and, of course, there is the aforementioned personal attack. This seems a case of w:WP:NOTHERE or otherwise a purely disruptive contributor. Эlcobbola talk 21:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for spamming and uploading copyvios too. Most of the users uploads were from this company IG account which they were promoting. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Full protection for translation
Hello! Please protect this page, unfortunately there is a very large number of vandalism and this disturbs the reader. Thanks, --Mehman 97 21:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I semi-protected the file for a year, because next year the topic isn't so important anymore. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Youtube logo.png
File:Youtube logo.png vandalised. plz protect it or block IP.--RZuo (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I semi-protected the logo for a year and cleaned its history. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Protection of Philippine maps
It has come to my attention that sockpuppets have been overwriting images on Philippine maps. Currently there are 17 regions and 81 provinces, but these socks have been uploading maps that show 21-23 regions (depends on what day it is?) and more than 81 provinces. I've already asked for the files that they themselves uploaded to be deleted, but for these files, these were originally created by someone else and our used in a lot of pages elsewhere and has to be semi-protected; I've previously asked someone to block the socks as similar socks have been blocked before so that semi-protection should work once they attempt to vandalize again:
- File:Ph regions and provinces.png
- File:Ph administrative map blank.png
- File:Ph regions and provinces blank.png
- File:Labelled map of the Philippines - Provinces and Regions.png
Howard the Duck (talk) 10:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Semi-protected for 1 month. We'll see if that deters future socks. Please come back here and let us know if it does not. The accounts themselves were CU-blocked. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
JMRAFFi
- JMRAFFi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
User upload copyvio images after warning. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
User:Dienthoaiquangcao62
Dienthoaiquangcao62 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Should be blocked. Obviously a sock of Dienthoaiquangcao82. —Hasley 17:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
WLE pages semi protection
Hi,
Could pleas protect to autoconfirmed only the pages at Category:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Brazil between 1-31 July, the contest is on, so we had already some small vandalisms.
Also for:
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Ireland
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Portugal
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Spain
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Ukraine
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Austria
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Kenya
- Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada
All countries, area running the contest at this moment, thank you.-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: Done for Portugal and Brazil. I think it's better for others to decide about their specific cases, even if IPs are not supposed to touch there by default.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
This file has been recreated for many times. Each time has a different reason that leads to deletion. Requires full protection. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Added to MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Avilaroman
- Avilaroman (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Continue uploading copyvio images after being blocked. --124.217.188.148 11:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 3 months. Lets hope they get the message Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: TRULYESKOH (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username given this log, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: DBOUTLINERS (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username per this log, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Western Wind Vocal Ensemble (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I thought one day and decided, that this is not an acceptable username, so I blocked it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: WingMen TV Show (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I thought one day and decided, that this is not an acceptable username, so I blocked it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: New Milton Town FC (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I thought one day and decided, that this is not an acceptable username, so I blocked it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Parichay Advertising & Marketing Agency (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Wisewatersolutions (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username and deleted userpage, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the user indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Jack Bailey CEO (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Inappropriate username, implies a position of authority here..
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked indef Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: MenopauseTheMusical (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username, blocked on enwiki.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: HughesGC (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username. Continued advertisement and copyvio uploading (in support of advertising related to HughesGC.com) after warning for doing so.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not done User hasn't been active since April, so there's no need to do anything. Please report again should they return with new problematic edits or uploads. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Soydelightfood (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional username. Continued promotion after warning for doing so.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Indeffed. De728631 (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Randomtransmans
- Randomtransmans (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Upload copyvio images despite warnings. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked by Taivo for a week Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
SNAAAAKE!!
- SNAAAAKE!! (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
User still has many uploads with copyright issue after being warned. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, the last warning was issued on 15 June 2019, right? Judging by the upload log, they haven't uploaded anything since June 16, 2019. Although some of those files uploaded on June 16 appear to be problematic and have been deleted (e.g. File:PAX Prime 2012 IMG 0356 (7918963784).jpg), I don't think a block is needed, since it may not (and, most probably, will not) be preventative. Ahmadtalk 06:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, unless I'm missing something it looks like they have no edits in the last five months so I can't see why this report is on this board. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Request for Full protection for File:The British Empire.png
This map is used as the lead image on WP's featured article on the British Empire. Over the last month a number of users have been changing countries around (e.g. Afghanistan, bits of the Carribbean). This has caused confusion among readers of the WP article, leading to a discussion on the article's accuracy[16]. This has happened before - the discussion is here[17] - and the file was protected for a time, but has since lapsed. I'd be grateful if the original version of this map is locked in the stable state it was left in by its original author, who was quite meticulous and whose work does not needs to be overwritten. Wiki-Ed (talk) 20:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I fully protected the file indefinitely against move and upload, semi-protected against editing. Taivo (talk) 06:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks. I have a suspicion - from a message left on my talk page - that confirmed editors may attempt to circumvent this, but let's see. Wiki-Ed (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: TheBellaTwins1445 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued copyvio uploading after four blocks for doing so.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Indef blocked... again Gbawden (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden and Jeff G.: Are you aware that there is an OTRS in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Student during Coronavirus in Mexico.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Yes, but since being unblocked 07:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC), the user has made over 24 uploads that have already been deleted. You could see notifications about them if the user wasn't so fond of blanking their user talk page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden and Jeff G.: Are you aware that there is an OTRS in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Student during Coronavirus in Mexico.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection request
Per this request, I have proposed to integrate {{PD-MacaoGov-text}} and {{PD-MacaoGov/detail}} into {{PD-MacaoGov}}. I therefore request to unprotect {{PD-MacaoGov-text}} and {{PD-MacaoGov}} for dealing with the templates. Many thanks.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JuTa: Notifying protecting administrator.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Malayan Colleges Mindanao, A Mapúa School (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Inappropriate username, possibly operated by multiple people given "us" language in 1st edit.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Fitindia: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
EvanHumphrey12 vandalism
- User: EvanHumphrey12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- See File:Location_map_Fatih.jpg's file history. Block of User:EvanHumphrey12 clearly in order IMO. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Now blocked. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Protection and RevDel of prior images at Location_map_Fatih.jpg
Users uploaded and then are restoring after reversion a pronographic image in place of a map at File:Location_map_Fatih.jpg. Needs revdel for the images and temporary protection for a period of time until this passes. Geoff Who, me? 17:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Already done --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Redzirconstudio (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Inappropriate, promotional username. All attempted edits have been either promotional or complaining about previous attempts being filtered out. May have written en:Draft:Fortune Films as en:Viraj Randika.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection for File:Instagram icon.png
Hello,
Could you semi-protect File:Instagram icon.png, due to frequent errors from various IP addresses?
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Gbawden (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection for File:Mila Kunis 2018 (cropped 2).jpg
Could you unprotect the file called File:Mila Kunis 2018 (cropped 2).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Germagsam221331 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging Elcobbola: Looks like block evasion of CU-blocked User:Germag2213 = User:Pcgmsrich. --Achim (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: Unprotection declined, see history of that file page. --Achim (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Klinikradensaleh2020
- Klinikradensaleh2020 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Promotional username (https://www.klinikradensaleh.net/). See also his edits. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked by Achim. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Jakecortes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
all of these uploads appear to be spam for "partyking dot us", can't imagine they're here for anything but spam. Frood (talk) 01:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked and nuked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Jagannath Sarkar MP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued copyvio uploading after final warning for doing so. Username may also be inappropriate or impersonation of a Member of Parliament.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Fitindia: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Jakecortes1057 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
same as account directly above this (Jakecortes). Frood (talk) 22:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked and nuked. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Promotional account name, adding own website to images. Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for inappropriate username Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Request protection
Request full protection on File:Official portrait of Seema Kennedy crop 2.jpg as being reverted without proper reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I fully protected the file against move and upload for a year. Taivo (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: Iguan9 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Threatened to sockpuppet in this edit.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I deleted his userpage as advertisement. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Jakecortes10
- Jakecortes10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Same stuff, different day. Frood (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the master and 7 sockpuppets indefinitely, deleted all their uploads, tagged them and created a sockpuppet category. Taivo (talk) 06:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Loay Oq
- Loay Oq (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Copyvios after last warning. –User456541 18:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Copyvios have stopped after you warned the user. Thank you for the warning! Taivo (talk) 07:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Spate of vandalism, please semi protect for a few days. Tx. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Over9000edits
- Over9000edits (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- OneToughNerd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
Over9000edits is a confirmed sockmaster at English Wikipedia as can be seen here, and OneToughNerd is blocked as a sockpuppet. Both accounts are currently active on Commons. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Маман Ертай
- Маман Ертай (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
User:Маман Ертай uploaded tons of copyright violations and duplicates of already existing Commons-images. Please, one to check his uploads. --Mosbatho (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done blocked by Elcobbola. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Ałfred Moltke
- Ałfred Moltke (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Obvoious socks of User:A3cb1, please see COM:UDR#File:Porträt des K.K. Franz Joseph I.png. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Vituzzu, Elcobbola, Ruthven, and Guanaco: Please note. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ałfred Moltke and User talk:Jeff G.#Re:User:Ałfred Moltke. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Done by Krd (globally locked). Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 10:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Krd and Ruthven: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Actually, it was just a local block, there seems to have been insufficient justification for a global lock. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done by Wim_b --Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Wim b and Ruthven: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done by Wim_b --Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Gani+Gashi+grup
Gani Gashi grup (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- An obvious sock of Gani Gashi pictor LTA. Please deal with him, for more info other socks see Category:Sockpuppets_of_Gani_Gashi_piktor. They have reuploaded quite a few copyvio photos. And I have created a DR for each of them. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 19:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Ruthven (msg) 10:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Request creation protection on File:Porträt des K.K. Franz Joseph I.png. Created many times by LTA. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
the following file, is only a licensed portrait (PD-Art | PD-old-100) I think protecting it is simply an "absurdity" because it is not a copyviol file, since the portrait has the information in the source, which they can be enough to restore it--Ałfred Moltke (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: How about if we leave it alone and watch it as a honeypot? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm fine with this. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
MOTUINDIA
- MOTUINDIA (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Promotional only account. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 02:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked & nuked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Mulili10
- Mulili10 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Re-created broken audio files after being notified. See the user's log. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a month. --JuTa 10:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- User: 2600:387:6:902:0:0:0:3 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Vandalism, blanking the top part of this page.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Fitindia: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Promotional texts, in multiple languages on one file. (Nauras.siivouspalvelut.jpg)
Please protect File:Nauras.siivouspalvelut.jpg, because of excessive vandalism (promotion, even on the talk page of the file). I wonder if the file should stay on Commons, but that's another issue. Thanks and regards - ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardkiwi (talk • contribs) 21:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- This looks like all the images by YAHYAHAMID666 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) are self promotion/advertising. Probably should just speedy all of them. William Graham (talk) 00:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @William Graham and Richardkiwi: I tagged them and warned the uploader for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Peluches extronidos
- Peluches extronidos (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
SPA promoting their youtube channel. Blocked on es:wp now tries to go on here. Page User:Peluches extronidos created 3 times. --Achim (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked and nuked. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there! Please unprotect this file (File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Ukraine.svg) as I update it regularly. --DenysZ (talk) 16:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- @DenysZ: Sorry, that file has become too famous. It was placed on Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/zh due to serious consideration for placement on the main page of the Chinese-language Wikipedia in this edit 14:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC). It will remain there until an hour or so after it leaves that main page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection of File:Wikibooks text logo.svg
Hello!
I don't think this file, which is only used once, on a Wikipedia user talk page, needs to be protected.Jonteemil (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Many Radiator
- Many Radiator (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
User:Many Radiator, in spite of having two prior blocks on his record for uploading here non-free logo images of radio & television stations and claiming them as his “own work”, continued uploading copyright-infringing images to the Commons. Checking his lengthy Talk page, it’s quite obvious that he does not read the messages and warnings left there, much less respond to them. So, here I am asking for a third and final (permanent) block on his account. ‐‑🌀SilSinnAL982100💬 20:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Most logos are too simple for copyright protection, so they are not copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Request lowering to semi-protection. Since it is duplicate with {{PD-USGov-HHS-NIH}}, I would like to merge them. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Adrignola: as the protecting admin. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Läckö Kinnekulle
- One topic, promotional account that keeps uploading copyrighted material despite warnings to stop on SV.WP. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Now permablocked on sv.wp. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 13:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
A886 road (Scotland), page move
Hi
Can the above page be moved to "A886 road" from "A886 road (Scotland)" to match the Wikipedia page. RegardsLITTLE LUGS (talk) 08:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @LITTLE LUGS: Hello, You're really in the wrong place to ask for this, but our convention is to disambiguate road numbers by country even if there is no other road of the same number anywhere. This is to have a consistent naming scheme and preempt the building of a road with the same number in some other country, which would cause us problems. So I would advise against renaming. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Aars2020 is another sockpuppet of banned user User:Fona2000
Hi. Fyi: User:Aars2020 is a new account uploading copyvios, which is then used by banned user Fona2000 on dawiki. Old pattern, seen before. Regards KnudW (talk) 23:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
vandalism is rampant this year. could u plz semi protect it for an extended period?--RZuo (talk) 19:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I semi-protected it indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
User:CatValentinemai has been blocked once in July. However, the person still upload copyrighted media. I request for another block and all deletion of this person's uploads. --Horus (talk) 11:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 3 months.Hope they get the message Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
User:BloodbornMe
- BloodbornMe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Continuing to upload non-free content after final warning. Frood (talk) 18:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for 2 weeks. --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
User:2mohmmad
- 2mohmmad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): several dozen copyvio warnings, others that should've probably been deleted for copyvio already. Frood (talk) 19:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 2 weeks Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Fpgamall
- Fpgamall (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Using Wikimedia Commons for advertising or promotion. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 03:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked indef by Billinghurst Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Ajai cj rockstar 1998
- Ajai cj rockstar 1998 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) The user uploaded ten film/television screenshots on August 9th and 10th that were tagged and deleted on the 10th. They uploaded five screenshots today, the 11th, with two of them being the exact same as the first ten. Aspects (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Final warning given per policy. @Aspects: You can help by warning them yourself on their Talk page before bringing it here Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
enwiki-confirmed socks
- JosiahMarist2 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Brendancox2 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
In my capacity as an English Wikipedia checkuser, I have, at w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brendancox2, confirmed that these two Commons users are socks of each other on the English Wikipedia (along with DannyKrustoff1 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) , who has not edited Commons). Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 16:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done @L235: Thank you for notifying us. I have blocked both of them indefinitely at Commons as promotion-only accounts. De728631 (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
PhotoBooth11
- PhotoBooth11 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
User keeps on violating COM:OW despite warning. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 86#PhotoBooth11. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- It's been a few days ago since latest overwrite. I told the user to stop or we will block! Hope that helps. --MGA73 (talk) 19:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
@MGA73: This user is an obvious sock of User:JimmyJoe87, a prolific sockpuppeteer also known on other wikis as User:Marquis de la Eirron. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/JimmyJoe87. The tells are the obsessions with pictures of politicians, the copyvios, and lack of respect/understanding of the rules.
- The name is also very similar to a enwiki blocked confirmed sockpuppet called PhotoBooth1111.
- In addition, as I mentioned here [18] another of their confirmed socks on :on enwiki EndofAll2020 replaced the version of the John Nicolson portrait that PhotoBooth11 was trying to delete here on Commons.--Slp1 (talk) 21:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- And of course the reason fo4 all this overwriting is get get his preferred pictures displaying on enwiki, without having to change the image name there. See this confirmed sock on enwiki adding a particular picture of Baroness Uddin [19] which has been reverted. PhotoBooth has been overwriting the picture here to get their preferred picture to show there. Slp1 (talk) 00:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @MGA73 for Slp1. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: I'm not a checkuser anymore (was inactive) so I can't check and be sure. But if its a sockpuppet of a user blocked here on Commons then account should be blocked (any admin can do that). I don't see any bad edits from the user after the warning. And as for the DR you linked to it is not the same photo as on en.wiki. I deleted the file on Commons because I think the file was actually very likely to be a copyvio. --MGA73 (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: You are exactly right it is not the same photo. His whole point was to delete the photo used in the enwiki articles so that he could insert the one he prefers on enwiki with less scrutiny. A variation of the strategy being used here with the overwriting of the Uddin picture (and others.) I don't know how you operate here, but on enwiki we can block if people obvious duck sockpuppets. I am not an admin here so can't do anything. I can file for checkuser if you want, but we are talking about an editor globally locked for crosswiki abuse so I don't know that just because they haven't done anything 'bad' since the warning is a reason not to block.....Slp1 (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: In such cases, it is best to report to m:srg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I already have. My understanding is that they won't block this user because they have not been confirmed as a sockpuppet by any wiki. This incarnation only edits on Commons. Slp1 (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: If it is not confirmed that it is a sockpuppet then I think we should judge user by the edits the user makes. If user makes no more bad edits then why block? --MGA73 (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you look at the evidence, you (or another admin) could confirm that this is another reincarnation of a globally locked abusive user. We block because of the ongoing abuse here and elsewhere elsewhere. Here is more evidence linking this to the main account. From the last 24 hours. I have just blocked yet another obvious sockpuppet on enwiki [20]. Yesterday at 08:56, Photobooth uploaded this picture to Commons. The sock on enwiki added it to the enwiki article 2 mins later.Slp1 (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- A picture was deleted leaving an article without a photo. Then PhotoBooth11 upload a free photo so the article again can have a photo. That looks like a good edit to me. Personally I do no feel like spending too much time finding a reason to block someone who does good edits. I think it's easier to wait and see if user makes bad edits again. Other admins are of course welcome to have a look. --MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- No, there was already a photo in the article. It was switched it for one they liked better. That's fine if you don't want to act now. As you say maybe somebody else will. But it will be important that somebody checks each and every one of their edits, as this is a serial copyright violator along with everything else. I picked, at random, an upload from 11 days ago, [21]. The source and copyright info given is a complete fiction. The link goes nowhere and all the info is copied wholesale from older photo. It has been reverted for other reasons, but as I said you have on your hands a serial sockpuppeteer who has a long, long history of uploading copyright vios. I have done my best to try and help out here, and I will leave you to it. Slp1 (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- A picture was deleted leaving an article without a photo. Then PhotoBooth11 upload a free photo so the article again can have a photo. That looks like a good edit to me. Personally I do no feel like spending too much time finding a reason to block someone who does good edits. I think it's easier to wait and see if user makes bad edits again. Other admins are of course welcome to have a look. --MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you look at the evidence, you (or another admin) could confirm that this is another reincarnation of a globally locked abusive user. We block because of the ongoing abuse here and elsewhere elsewhere. Here is more evidence linking this to the main account. From the last 24 hours. I have just blocked yet another obvious sockpuppet on enwiki [20]. Yesterday at 08:56, Photobooth uploaded this picture to Commons. The sock on enwiki added it to the enwiki article 2 mins later.Slp1 (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: If it is not confirmed that it is a sockpuppet then I think we should judge user by the edits the user makes. If user makes no more bad edits then why block? --MGA73 (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I already have. My understanding is that they won't block this user because they have not been confirmed as a sockpuppet by any wiki. This incarnation only edits on Commons. Slp1 (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: In such cases, it is best to report to m:srg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: You are exactly right it is not the same photo. His whole point was to delete the photo used in the enwiki articles so that he could insert the one he prefers on enwiki with less scrutiny. A variation of the strategy being used here with the overwriting of the Uddin picture (and others.) I don't know how you operate here, but on enwiki we can block if people obvious duck sockpuppets. I am not an admin here so can't do anything. I can file for checkuser if you want, but we are talking about an editor globally locked for crosswiki abuse so I don't know that just because they haven't done anything 'bad' since the warning is a reason not to block.....Slp1 (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Slp1: I'm not a checkuser anymore (was inactive) so I can't check and be sure. But if its a sockpuppet of a user blocked here on Commons then account should be blocked (any admin can do that). I don't see any bad edits from the user after the warning. And as for the DR you linked to it is not the same photo as on en.wiki. I deleted the file on Commons because I think the file was actually very likely to be a copyvio. --MGA73 (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Confirmed that PhotoBooth11 is JimmyJoe87/Marquis de la Eirron. @Slp1: if you get such a ridiculous run-around on an obvious duck in the future, just open an COM:RFCU or, better, contact a CU directly (RfCU is not generally for ducks). Эlcobbola talk 22:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for taking an interest in this, and for your advice for the futureSlp1 (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC).
User:129.132.31.94
129.132.31.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log): Vandalism-only account. Disruptively nominate for deletion. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Deletion requests are closed as kept. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Spam-only account, promotional username. Please block, Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Indefinitely blocked due to bad username. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Not blocked yet... -- CptViraj (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. My mistake. Now blocked. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Not blocked yet... -- CptViraj (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Template:Delete is template-protected. I believe, as User:Tuvalkin said, Template:Delete/layout should have the same protection level as the template (note that the /layout subpage is used in all languages). Since I have opposed the recent changes to the template and reverted them myself, I think it's better if another admin increases the protection level to template-protected (if needed). Thanks. Ahmadtalk 22:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Sinkplil
Hello everyone! I have been harassed by this user on English Wikipedia, for which they were temporarily blocked. Eventually, they were blocked indefinitely for being a sockpuppet. They continue to harass me here on Commons. It's making me extremely uncomfortable and I don't really know what to do. I am an admin and have a conflict of interest. You can see the following:
- My request for support when I began to be harassed for nominating the user as a possible sockpuppet on August 11, 2020
- Blocked by User:Cullen328 for harassment and personal attacks on August 11, 2020
- Blocked for socking by User:Berean Hunter on August 11, 2020
I also believe they are a sock of User:Urbanuntil but no one investigated it and that account is already blocked for being a sock under another account on English Wikipedia. Any help to ensure that this user will leave me alone is welcome. Thanks for your volunteerism. Missvain (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sinkplil's behavior has been bizarre and harassing, in my opinion. I encourage Commons administrators to act to prevent further harassment. Thank you. Cullen328 (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Done Blocked. --MGA73 (talk) 09:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
User:197.159.170.103
Hi, IP-user User:197.159.170.103 puts big text dumps (8k+) on files or talk pages. I gave a vandalism-warning on the talk page, but three minutes later there was one again. Can a moderator take action? Thanks in advance. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done done bij Achim55 - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: Wikisecurityafrica (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued advertising / promotion uploading in support of a now-deleted soammy article on enwiki after warning for doing so. Unacceptable username (implies authority over wiki security in Africa). Uploader is now indefinitely blocked on enwiki. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wikisecurityafrica.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked and nuked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Fitindia and Martin Urbanec: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
user:西原さつき
- 西原さつき (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
they only upload copyvio files. and , they post scribble at them user talk post. --eien20 (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Protection on File:Elon Musk Royal Society.jpg
Requesting temporary upload protection (24-48 hours?) on File:Elon Musk Royal Society.jpg, which is used cross 20 language editions of Wikipedia (primarily infoboxes). I recognize this image hasn't been vandalized yet, but Elon put out a tweet asking people to trash him on Wikipedia, and it's only a matter of time before this is overwritten with something bad that propagates over Wikipedia, Google results, etc. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done sensible request under the circumstances - 2 days and see how it goes. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
User:Milanruzic2
Milanruzic2 (talk · contribs) continues to upload copyrighted images after last warning. --Smooth O (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection Request
All these files are too high protected, even their description page:
- ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Upload=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Please change to
- ([Edit=Allow only template editors and administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Upload=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(or [Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users]). Thank you -- sarang♥사랑 08:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. These were full protected years before we implemented TE. Any objections? GMGtalk 10:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Even years before it should have been editable for autoconfirmeds. There was no reason to inhibit their editing -- sarang♥사랑 17:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Of course some icons need high protection, against move & upload. But I see no use to protect the description pages from editing, such frustrating qualified (but not admin) users, who want to make things better. How about opening all description pages, at least for users qualified as template editors? -- sarang♥사랑 07:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support moving to TE+Admin for edit, move and upload. Not so sure about autoconfirmed though because of wide use elsewhere. Green Giant (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Half support I see move and upload rather in the responsibility for admins – as a template editor I would not decide for myself such an action. On the other hand, edit could also be allowed for autoconfirmeds? Edit can't do any harm. If necessary in special cases, the protection level can then always be upgraded to TEs. -- sarang♥사랑 05:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done this has been here for quite a while and there doesn't seem to be any objection to moving to admin/TE, admin, admin. Though I'm not entirely sure where the protection notice on the file page is exactly coming from. There is no such template in the text of the file description. GMGtalk 12:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: It's MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext. I think it reflects the file's upload protection. Maybe we need to update the text since "can be edited only by..." is inaccurate? Ahmadtalk 13:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: Did we ever amend that bit when we enabled template editor in 2019? GMGtalk 13:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: No, I don't think so. Apparently, it has been updated to support TE-protection as well, but I don't actually know how it works. I just tried protecting File:Test.svg three times (for one minute, but still), and it always showed the same result: full protection. And I don't think a purge was required, since each protection also counts as an edit, and it should automatically purge the page. I don't know if and how the TE-protection template can be invoked, but I think it's possible to correct the text. A quick demo is here (compare). There are some problems with the demo (namely, it should have commas, and "can be uploaded only by..." is confusing), but I just mean to say it's possible. While we're at it, it might be a good idea to add the expiration date as well (I added it to the sandbox, but there might be some tweaks needed here as well). You can test it on any protected file (just transclude the template on a protected file page and see the preview, saving the edit is not needed). Ahmadtalk 15:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: If I'm being totally honest, I don't do very much with back-end stuff, as I don't have any confidence I won't make a mess. Even as a sysop, I still wouldn't really fiddle with the specifics of anything complex enough to require template protection. So I'm not sure I'm very much help other than pointing out that it didn't seem to be working correctly. GMGtalk 17:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: Hmm... Can you please explain what the problem is? I don't mean the technical details, just what you see. Note that it won't show TE-protection padlock, it should just say "can be (edited) moved uploaded only by administrators". But if you see something else, can you please explain the problem briefly?
- And, as for the TE padlock, it's a bit complicated. There are different ways to do it; we can either choose the protection against one specific action (e.g. edit/upload) and show the protection message accordingly, therefore ignore any other possible protection level. Alternatively, we can show different messages (for example, one will say only template editors can edit it, and the other will say only admins can move/re-upload it), but that can get a bit messy, especially because the protection messages aren't really short. One other solution is to merge them all in one message, the text will be like "This page is currently protected, and can be edited only by template editors, moved only by administrators, and re-uploaded only by administrators", but then we'll have to choose one specific padlock icon to show. Ahmadtalk 09:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: The current template on the file description says it may only be edited by administrators. To my mind it should default to the lowest level and say it can only be edited by TE. It's kindof presumed that administrators can edit anything at any lower level of protection. However, it also says this in the banner when I click to edit the description, even though it contradicts the log entry directly below it. I would guess that we can probably skip trying to specify all the protection settings. For example, I would presume that most file movers would know how to check the page logs. GMGtalk 10:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: So how about {{Protectedpagetext/sandbox}}? Note that you should first add it to the wikitext of the page and then get a preview, it won't appear automatically. It only considers the edit protection level, so if a page is not protected against edit but protected against any other kind of actions, it won't show anything. I suppose this can probably be fixed, but it will take some time and it's a bit complicated. Ahmadtalk 12:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: Just offering feedback, not really criticizing. Maybe we could split the difference and say something like "The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. This may also include information for protection setting for actions other than editing." GMGtalk 14:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: So how about {{Protectedpagetext/sandbox}}? Note that you should first add it to the wikitext of the page and then get a preview, it won't appear automatically. It only considers the edit protection level, so if a page is not protected against edit but protected against any other kind of actions, it won't show anything. I suppose this can probably be fixed, but it will take some time and it's a bit complicated. Ahmadtalk 12:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: The current template on the file description says it may only be edited by administrators. To my mind it should default to the lowest level and say it can only be edited by TE. It's kindof presumed that administrators can edit anything at any lower level of protection. However, it also says this in the banner when I click to edit the description, even though it contradicts the log entry directly below it. I would guess that we can probably skip trying to specify all the protection settings. For example, I would presume that most file movers would know how to check the page logs. GMGtalk 10:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: If I'm being totally honest, I don't do very much with back-end stuff, as I don't have any confidence I won't make a mess. Even as a sysop, I still wouldn't really fiddle with the specifics of anything complex enough to require template protection. So I'm not sure I'm very much help other than pointing out that it didn't seem to be working correctly. GMGtalk 17:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: No, I don't think so. Apparently, it has been updated to support TE-protection as well, but I don't actually know how it works. I just tried protecting File:Test.svg three times (for one minute, but still), and it always showed the same result: full protection. And I don't think a purge was required, since each protection also counts as an edit, and it should automatically purge the page. I don't know if and how the TE-protection template can be invoked, but I think it's possible to correct the text. A quick demo is here (compare). There are some problems with the demo (namely, it should have commas, and "can be uploaded only by..." is confusing), but I just mean to say it's possible. While we're at it, it might be a good idea to add the expiration date as well (I added it to the sandbox, but there might be some tweaks needed here as well). You can test it on any protected file (just transclude the template on a protected file page and see the preview, saving the edit is not needed). Ahmadtalk 15:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: Did we ever amend that bit when we enabled template editor in 2019? GMGtalk 13:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: It's MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext. I think it reflects the file's upload protection. Maybe we need to update the text since "can be edited only by..." is inaccurate? Ahmadtalk 13:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
@GreenMeansGo: I appreciate it (I'd of course appreciate it if it was criticism, too!) :-) I agree with a link to the log. However, I'm a bit too sensitive about the details, so I made a new version of {{Protectedpagetext/sandbox}} (thanks to {{Ifor}} from enwiki). This version understands all types of protections, but only returns the template for the lowest protection level. The only exception is when the page is not protected against one action but is protected against another, in which case it'll show the template for the lowest protected level instead of showing nothing at all (of course, it is possible to make it disappear, but I think this way it can be of more use). If we're going to use this version, I think we should also change the messages so that they will be accurate (more or less like this), and if not, we can indeed go with just one specific action (though I personally prefer the former). I'm also not sure if we should reflect the protection expiry date in the message or not, since we want to provide a link to the protection log. Ahmadtalk 22:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Would this maybe need consensus, or maybe at least a notification at VP? GMGtalk 22:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'd say yes, but I thought it would be a good idea to develop it a little bit first. If you think it's good, I can take it to the VP. Ahmadtalk 23:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
LuisAlvarez340
- LuisAlvarez340 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Obvious sock of User:Luis camilo álvarez vega (Category:Sockpuppets of Luis camilo álvarez vega), see also File:Logotipo de Televisión Nacional de Chile (1969-1978).png's history (I realized this just after I performed the move... oops). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Checkuserblock by Elcobbola. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: Cody Maverick (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Uploading copyvios in support of spammy unsourced abandoned userspace draft ru:Участник:Cody Maverick/Черновик.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I'll delete the files. The user has not edited for 3 years, so block is not practical. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: Grande lotus (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Reuploaded a file which had been deleted per consensus Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taurino Araújo, in violation of COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. This is incorrect. The user has not edited for 5½ years. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: Portugalo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Reuploaded a file which had been deleted per consensus Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taurino Araújo, in violation of COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Actually the user has not uploaded a previously deleted file. There is a dispute over should some his uploads be deleted or not. Regular deletion request is created. The user has not edited for a year, so block is not needed at moment. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: DetalheDO (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Reuploaded 11 files which had been deleted per consensus Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taurino Araújo, in violation of COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. This is difficult case. Some of the files (actually most of them) were kept after regular deletion request. You created a new regular deletion request and this was the right decision. The DR should wait at least week before close. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: I'm sorry, I misunderstood. The files were not reuploaded, they were restored. My mistake. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taurino Araújo continues. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Muatsem90
- Muatsem90 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- More copyvios after block. --Minoraxtalk 06:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a month. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: PublicistERMWorldPub (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Uploaded File:EM5.jpg with questionable permission (doesn't look like a selfie) to help promote himself in his autobiography en:Eddie Marrero.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Only one upload. You nominated it for deletion and I thank you for that. No need for block. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Yinyangyo765
- Yinyangyo765 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Still uploading copyvios after block. --Minoraxtalk 16:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a month. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
TATIANA DURAN
User:TATIANA DURAN seems to be a non-contributor, creating a User page for promotion only. User uploaded this photo, which is likely a copyvio (see profile pic on [22]). I don't know if this is the right place to bring this up. Eissink (talk) 01:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC).
- Done Achim55 deleted the user page and left a warning re: scope. I deleted the image. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
sock
- Dienthoaiquangcao63 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Dienthoaiquangcao80 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Socks, see Special:ListUsers/Dienthoaiquangcao --Minoraxtalk 15:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- 1 more popped up without edits, Dienthoaiquangcao65. --Minoraxtalk 13:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Another one, Dienthoaiquangcao66. --Minoraxtalk 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Another one, Dienthoaiquangcao69. --Minoraxtalk 05:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- 1 more popped up without edits, Dienthoaiquangcao65. --Minoraxtalk 13:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Rx 1000
- Rx 1000 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Riya101 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Pkvashisht (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Sockpuppets attempting to promote P and M Movies and Pawan Chawla. CU confirmed on enwiki - w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rx 1000. Cabayi (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked and tagged them all with Pkvashisht as the oldest account as sockmaster. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Request protection
Request upload protection of File:صوره اسراء العبيدي.jpg as being re-created for times. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Another possibility is to watch the filename for quick discovering of sockpuppets. Sometimes sockmasters are not very clever, look file:Johan Archiles.jpg – this has been deleted 21 times and we caught a lot of sockpuppets. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
RISHI ABHRATANU
- RISHI ABHRATANU (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
More OOS files after block. --Minoraxtalk 04:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a month. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Croksy
- Croksy (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Copyvios after warning/block. --Minoraxtalk 05:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 3 months. Let see if they get the message Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
User Wikibot10
Multiple copyright violations and misleading username in violation of COM:IU. O Still Small Voice of Clam 11:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for misleading username. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Cloudboard
- Cloudboard (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Reasons for reporting: Repeated copyvio uploads. Phoenix012087 (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done User warned. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Nfnaeemislam
Nfnaeemislam (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) - using Commons as his personal directory, personal photos only have been uploaded from him. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 18:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done blocked indef due to cross-wiki spam. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Request for protection
Hi! Since May 2020 (when it was uploaded here), File:Charli D'Amelio 3.jpg has regularly been the target of vandalism from IP and new accounts. A semi-protection of a few months would therefore be useful imo. Thanks --Titlutin (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done for three months. Thanks for letting us know. GMGtalk 12:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
File:WhatsApp chatting.jpg
File:WhatsApp chatting.jpg - (apologies if i'm doing this wrong) Persistent IP vandalism. Requesting semiprotection. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done -mattbuck (Talk) 16:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Disney Junior.png
If File:Disney Junior.png is deleted, please protect it. It has been repeatedly uploaded despite being registered by the U.S. Copyright Office (see COM:TOO US). -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Indef full protection, as uploaders have been autoconfirmed. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- User: Prompri (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Making legal threats and gross incompetence in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anime eyes & red happy mouth with teeth.jpg per this edit.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- The user appears to be frustrated by the deletion process and has stated that they will write about their experience on Reddit;[23] "spreading that in larger reddit communities".[24] They have also said that they "should be mailing associated privacy organisations"[25] and they will write to their "appropriate authority in my region".[26] Their intention in writing to their authority is not particularly clear; is it so that legal action can be taken against Wikimedia Commons (in which case it is a legal threat) or is it so that their authority can provide advice to help resolve the situation (in which case there is no threat)? Their tone and actions haven't been particularly helpful in trying to resolve the situation but I would have to assume something that they haven't written in order to see a specific legal threat there. From Hill To Shore (talk) 15:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Their mention of local authorities seems to be a legal threat — the fact that the envolvement of such authorities in this process is likely to be a waste of everybody’s time ties to the other item of the OP: lack of competence. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Here, Prompri accuses User:E4024 of «pretending to be» an admin. Being clueless is not a crime, we all were once new and young; being aggressive against others based on one’s own cluelessness is as bad as being aggressive for any other reason. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
im talking about Privacy related organisation, and i dont know how rules work , but if i get a unfair block i would consult that in reddit, dont quote half-assedly Prompri (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC) YOU GUYS ARE MAKING IT CONFUSING, THE MOMENT HE CALLED ME LESS INTELLIGENT UNCIVILLY, SINCE THEN I SNAPPED, THAT THIS WIKI IS A BS. YOU GUYS ARE MAKING UP THINGS AND STARTED A QUIET NICE DOXXING DRAMA, THAT DOESNT DEFINE AS THREAT. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW FIRST, WHY THEY QUESTIONED ME ABOUT MY INTELLIGENCEPrompri (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC) and the long pages of rules with many articles confuses, i dont know how really things work here, which really confuses and scares me. and now this drama, i dont know what im supposed to do.Prompri (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC) I was clearly asking for help from privacy org, hope with that misconfusions are cleared. I dont see why they went making another drama, with asking for the clarification of it, "this wiki sys. seems rotten", again dont unfairly ban for my opinion, its honest critic and wiki should learn from it mistakes.Prompri (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC) can you define "gross incompetence" i snapped because one of your admin questioned my intelligence, in the very beginning, i dont how experienced staffs failed to manage the situation without apologizing in the beginning, when i mentioned it out. (again, its honest critic) the conversation was civil at first @Jeff G.: if i get banned for letting know about my approaches to privacy org, gone postal should get banned as well for calling me less intelligent first. i said about asking for consultation from privacy org but not from wiki.
im in wikia for several years their customer service is better, im also sysop of several anime wikias. never had such a worst drama @Tuvalkin: mind stop stalking me creepily that dude has block log of sock puppets, he might harm me later, so i was concerned again, why would you say my incompetence is gross Anw, Im thankful to Mr. From Hill To Shore, for listening to me and giving me positive advises. But I do regret when I acted chidishly with other admin, gone postal from snapping. The guy with sock puppet ban was suspicious and deleting my talk discussions, check his contribution log. I had my reasons. take note, i wrote up messed jumbled thoughts, i again apologize for my childishness
- At the DR linked above, Prompri has asked for their account to be deleted along with personal information that may have been revealed in parts of their edit history. Can someone advise the user on how to get their account deleted? From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @From Hill To Shore and Prompri: As stated in w:en:WP:RTV, Due to all contributions being licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL, it is not possible to delete an account. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 15:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Prahlad balaji: As also stated on that page, A courtesy vanishing may be implemented when a user in good standing decides not to return, and for whatever reason wishes to make their contributions harder to find or to remove their association with their edits. When there is no administrative need to retain the information, a permanently departing user may request that a wide range of user pages, and other pages that affect him or her alone, be deleted on departure. Under the provisions of the Creative Commons licence, the user may request a change in how they are credited.[27] The vanishing process appears to support that by disguising the personal information Prompri believes they have revealed in previous edits. My question is, how can Prompri ask for an equivalent process be carried out on Commons to that described in the Wikipedia guideline you linked to? From Hill To Shore (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @From Hill To Shore: I dunno, please ask at help desk. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 17:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Prahlad balaji: As also stated on that page, A courtesy vanishing may be implemented when a user in good standing decides not to return, and for whatever reason wishes to make their contributions harder to find or to remove their association with their edits. When there is no administrative need to retain the information, a permanently departing user may request that a wide range of user pages, and other pages that affect him or her alone, be deleted on departure. Under the provisions of the Creative Commons licence, the user may request a change in how they are credited.[27] The vanishing process appears to support that by disguising the personal information Prompri believes they have revealed in previous edits. My question is, how can Prompri ask for an equivalent process be carried out on Commons to that described in the Wikipedia guideline you linked to? From Hill To Shore (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @From Hill To Shore and Prompri: As stated in w:en:WP:RTV, Due to all contributions being licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL, it is not possible to delete an account. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 15:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Requestupload
Requestupload (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) - either an unauthorized bot, a confusing username, or a misguided editor. In any case it's confusing. Please block. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 06:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Not a bot. He explains on userpage clearly, what he's going to do, and that's not misleading. Only one upload so far. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ok tganks. --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 15:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Request for protection
Hi, there's been a lot of vandalism on File:Louis Tomlinson November 2014.jpg and File:Harry Styles November 2014.jpg recently. File:Simon Cowell in December 2011.jpg is also connected but hasn't had as much activity. Thanks, Aranya (talk) 15:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Protected the first 2 Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:IU Just one contribution to Commons... so far - File:Madden21.webp which was probably intended as part of a reverted unhelpful edit on Wikipedia - see here. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
IP block request
Hi, Could someone block 146.158.191.145 as they're vandalising images - A week ago they'd been adding "Opel Corsa" to Vauxhall Corsa and Holden Corsa images and they also keep adding "Category:Volkswagen Tranporter LT (2nd generation)" (non existent cat) to an image,
Clearly NOTHERE to contribute to Commons. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: reports of clear vandalism belong at COM:ANV, and you neglected to notify the user. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, Not the first time I've confused this board with AIV and probably won't be the last, Yes I neglected to tell them as this wasn't a discussion on their behaviour - It was purely a report, You don't report people you report at AIV ... same applies here.
- Withdrawn on the basis that that IP had stopped before this report. –Davey2010Talk 21:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- User: Cloudboard (talk · contribs)
- Reasons for reporting: Repeated upload of copyrighted material. Serial offender with no regard of Wikimedia Commons copyright and infringement rules. Flagged by admin to no avail. Phoenix012087 (talk) 20:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Final warning given, 1 more copyvio = block for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Request for protection
There has been some unnecessarily overwriting of a file. Pease protect the file Intel logo.svg. Thanks - Premeditated (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- User: 6T&UH(*y6ew7gr39 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: confusing username.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- AGF, @6T&UH(*y6ew7gr39: Your username is really confusing and it does violate our username policy. Please make a request to change your username on this page. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Request for blocking owerwriting a file
There has been some unnecessary overwriting of a file. Please protect the file 50px as it is in the version of 16:57, 2. Sep. 2020.--Fornax (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Indefinitely fully protected. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- User: 171.225.254.147 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Blanked section #IP block request above.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. No edits after you warned him/her. Probably the warning had influence. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
GodsPlan123 (talk · contribs)
This seems to be a long term harassing vandal targeting and threatening Drmies (talk · contribs) here and at Wikiquote, and likely other places, who should be blocked, and the improper upload this user made should be deleted, ASAP. ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 01:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
DSA DANCE ACADEMY (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) promotional username (per COM:IU), also uploaded promotional logos and spammed COM:SANDBOX. Bidgee (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Luisantoniolima21 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) can't stop uploading copyvio images on Commons. Almost all images they uploaded on Commons were deleted for copyvio and the ones still remaining are not "own work" as they claim. They were already warned and they keep their behaviour. Something must be done.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 23:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not done No uploads since the final warning. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
I've 1-day-blocked this this new user for using his 2nd edit to make a legal threat: "... If this is removed, then this free and open educational platform will have to have a chat with our lawyers. ..."[28]. --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Thanks! His message appears to have been about my tagging of his en:Draft:Resurrection Connection as en:WP:CSD#G11 spam, which led to deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yemen. Girl.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yemen. Girl.jpg should be closed without losing time and the file protected against its uploader. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done discussion closed, file watched. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Shaniya689 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) has repeatedly overwritten File:Vidya Balan in 2020.jpg, replacing it with a completely different picture contrary to Commons:Overwriting files. Their motive (to improve en:Vidya Balan) seems to be sincere and they've engaged with me on my user talk page, but I think upload-protecting File:Vidya Balan in 2020.jpg for a few days might be necessary to steer them in the right direction. --bjh21 (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done by Achim55. On my end, I have REVDEL the file as the ones uploaded are of unknown copyright status. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
A former admin protected this to prevent vandalism, however, Martin is not an admin anymore and can't edit it. Protection should be removed or changed. 1989 (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done @1989: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Keeps adding generic SDC, no change after warning on the talkpage. Short warning block might be needed? — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Draceane: Please can you break this down for me (adding generic SDC) because I don't understand that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk • contribs)
- I've tried to explain on his talkpage. — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Joris Darlington Quarshie: OK, I've looked on Special:SuggestedTags and I think that it's not Joris's fault, but the overall concept of the tool is IMO erroneous – it encourages users to use broadly defined terms instead of specific ones. — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The person requests deletion of the files he uploaded. That must be given priority. I guess after that they will leave the place all the same. --E4024 (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I soft-blocked him indefinitely due to inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Request for full protection
- File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg - High-risk file: used over 700000+ times on all Wikimedia projects. Aasim 21:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
This user (Kikiwu1403) always upload copyright violation photo File:MA-tek logo.png, this photo has been speedy delete (before file name is File:閎康-LOGO.png). Please block Kikiwu1403 and protect File:MA-tek logo.png to prevent further uploading of infringing files, thanks, -SecurityXP (talk) 11:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @SecurityXP: I have warned the user about uploading deleted content. Please let us know if they persist Gbawden (talk)
Marcia Beatriz Einsfeld
Still have copyright issue after final warning. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked her for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
S20141095
- S20141095 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Page blanking, remove valid warnings without explanation. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
File protections
Please protect File:Adobe Photoshop CC icon.svg, File:Verified-account.png, and File:New Logo Gmail.svg; good amount of recent test edits, vandalism, and the like. Aranya (talk) 21:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: sorry to bother you again - the disruption on File:New Logo Gmail.svg persists, is a protection warranted? Thanks, Aranya (talk) 15:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Due to excessive vandalism from IP-s I semi-protected the file indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: sorry to bother you again - the disruption on File:New Logo Gmail.svg persists, is a protection warranted? Thanks, Aranya (talk) 15:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Block for User:Itsjagbir
Itsjagbir (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- They have been warned enough by now, already blocked on enwiki for socking. Repeated copyvios + promotional edits around skyroot.in thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. No copyvio uploads in September. The user is warned, hope that helps. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope Uploads and Self promotion
Anish nellickal (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- They have been uploading many out of scope images of their own and their family/coworkers,
- Some files got deleted here, Many needs to be deleted as there are many duplicate files.
- Promotional edits/Self promotional edits/ Use of wikipedia as webhost. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 13:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Thank you for nominating his uploads for deletion and warning him! Nothing else is needed at moment. Taivo (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Promotional usernames
Hello there, I'm here to report a promotional username, User:Korean food promotion institute. As the name suggests it is an organization, which promote the food industry in Korea. A similar articles is available on English wikipedia check here. Thanks. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: User hasn't made any edits nor has triggered any abuse filters. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I need to rename File:Flag of Honduras (darker variant).svg to File:Flag of Honduras.svg per the presidential website. The filename of the latter is still locked since 2014. Is it okay if you can rename it? The talk page of File:Flag of Honduras (darker variant).svg has great detail. This is really starting to get confusing. The file is semi-protected. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Spammer blocked
Just for the record: I have indef-blocked new account Jodogoairportassist (talk · contribs) as spam-only, who even vandalized Commons:Help desk to place his spam. --Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good block. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
File:KELLY MARQUES.jpg
I just uploaded a new version of File:KELLY MARQUES.jpg, with expunged EXIF geolocation, due to privacy/safety concerns. Please hide the original file version and all page versions earlier than 468155774. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: Thank you! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- User: PhuThosBot (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: COM:IU, impersonating a bot; copyvio without license; NOTHERE.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for misleading username. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Meandkancil2020 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Uploading numerous copyright violations and is still doing so despite instructions and final warning. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Info Thread now also now at Vandalism noticeboard due to repeated attempted deletion of this entry. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 16:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
11km.de
- User: 11km.de (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Promotional usernames. --SCP-2000 05:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Subject of caption removal by IP over a few days. Please semi-protect. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I cleaned file history and semi-protected it indefinitely, because if has suffered vandalism from IP-s for many years. CptViraj blocked the last IP and I thank him for that. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User:Lhoussine AIT TAYFST
Lhoussine AIT TAYFST (talk · contribs) continues to upload random copyrighted images after warning, and he should be blocked. --Smooth O (talk) 10:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Protecting WLM-US pages
Hello! Wiki Loves Monuments is live in the U.S. While the main event page has already been protected, I'd like to ask the following two pages also be semi-protected through the month of October as a precaution, as they will be fairly static but high-visibility thanks to CentralNotice.
Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
This photo had escaped a DR by having a COM:DW portion of it blurred off, yet it was now overwritten with an intact version. It should be reverted and removed from history. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I didn't notice that there is a problem with the using the original image(without the watermark and the blurring) from the website, but I still suggest using the new version as a base(the old version is scaled up by the website and contain the VOA watermark).Remitamine (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Remitamine: Thanks for explaining. I re-blurred it (and cropped off a black 2-pixel edge along the right and bottom edges); needs to be revdelled. This kind of images should perhaps be monitored or protected somehow, to prevent this kind of unadverted (or intentional) overwriting. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:36, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done? I deleted Remitamine's uploaded version and will fully protect it against upload. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Legal threat
At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simone 1973 simone (712017813).jpg (which would have been a simple open-and-shut copyvio case if several misguided users hadn’t turn it a debate platform). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Info Meanwhile I found out that the following accounts
- Decogedeonproducoes (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Fcnaveia (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Fcanaveia (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Babilonia2020 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Babilonia2019 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- were all blocked in pt.wp for socking. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- More legal threats by sock Fcanaveia at their user page: «the entire article must be deleted from Wikipedia or it will be deleted from Google by legal means». It is written in English, meaning they are not just addressing the Portuguese Wikipedia community, even though «the article» is mentioned as such. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- One must differ from what a warning is, and what a threat is. Since the article was messed up and writers, and fans, and press officer, and pics were deleted, blocked, we warned that the article could be deleted from Google, since her image is damaged and we were all blocked for no reason, except to try to upload the pics we choose and put them in the place we decide. Socking from Deco Gedeon and Babiloniamay be, because is the same office and maybe tha same IP address. But 'fcsimonenaveia' was blocked because it tried to display a picture with the following: "Whe Simone opens her arms on the stage no one is more powerfull on MPB." A very famous phrase abt her, that was deleted at least three times for no reason! And the fcsimonenaveia finally blocked.
- A very good example of how we´ve been treated is yesterday´s block against me, I deleted the pics (since our discussion here was OK), but he again reverted, than I posted the link of our discussion and Paulo Simões ignored, and finally blocked me. So, if we here discussed and agreed the pics are not authorized, why should I be blocked when I took the article with the pics away? The agreemnt here was not respect by Paulo and he blocked me because of that!
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decogedeonproducoes (talk • contribs) 2020-09-30 14:44:11 (UTC)
- Como já esperávamos, a pg voltou com as fotos não autorizadas, enquanto puder reverter contra, o tal Paulo Simões, reverte. Sempre contra nossas edições, qqr coisa que incluimos é revertida. Pensei que isso fosse vandalismo.
- "we warned that the article could be deleted from Google" – this is problem of Google, Commons does not care about that. "One must differ from what a warning is, and what a threat is." – here's almost no difference and differing is sometimes impossible. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Deco Gedeon wanted, that only fans of Simone can write about her into Wikipedia. Here I laughed thinking, what happens, if only fans of, for example, Al Capone can write articles about Al Capone. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done? Babilonias are not registered users in Commons, so no action against them is possible. I blocked Fcnaveia indefinitely as sockpuppet. Fcanaveia hasn't edited for half of year, so block is not practical. I nominated the last upload of Fcanaveia for regular deletion as copyvio. Also I closed deletion request about photos depicting Simone. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Please provide full protection as the file had re-upload many times with non-free versions. Else, add on title blacklist. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Herbythyme: , could you please look into this request also. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - As a CU, this has been an excellent honeypot. It is well watched, and copyvios are immediately deleted. To protect it would be a net negative. Эlcobbola talk 14:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment looks like there is a sensible reason to leave it unprotected if it's being watched. I confess it's quite useful when people re-upload the same file sometime ... --Herby talk thyme 14:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: , your are correct, I've requested as re-uploaded many times. Yesterday it was deleted, but today again re-uploaded by Redif2. I doubt, they all are same user. @Herbythyme and Elcobbola: , protection request is your call and it's your own decision to accept or decline this request. I truth our community, you no need to support or oppose on my request, make your own decision. Thanks! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I deleted one again a little earlier and wondered about blocking but the images tend to be different ones - can't be sure they are puppets but others can... --Herby talk thyme 10:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Even if not socks, blocking the file name would only cause the copyvio to be uploaded under a different, unwatched file name--making detection, if any, less prompt and less likely. I see no benefit to name protections in these circumstances. Эlcobbola talk 14:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- (And that one, Redif2, was indeed a sock of Jpj232 - sister project edits give the evidence. If this file had been protected, that would not have been caught.) Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks both of you, we can close this request as not done. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 15:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I deleted one again a little earlier and wondered about blocking but the images tend to be different ones - can't be sure they are puppets but others can... --Herby talk thyme 10:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: , your are correct, I've requested as re-uploaded many times. Yesterday it was deleted, but today again re-uploaded by Redif2. I doubt, they all are same user. @Herbythyme and Elcobbola: , protection request is your call and it's your own decision to accept or decline this request. I truth our community, you no need to support or oppose on my request, make your own decision. Thanks! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Just for the record: I've indef-blocked on the spot 李王陈柳 (talk · contribs), after they vandalized 17 high-profile images related to the U.S., including images of late Mrs. Ruth Ginsburg and Mrs. Amy Barrett, by overwriting them with an obscene attack-image.[29] I've restored the vandalized images and deleted the attack-image version. Since the attack picture mentioned Armenia, I suspect a connection with the current acts of war in Nagorno-Karabakh. So there could be more attempts of this kind. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protections
Please semi-protect File:Tiktok logo text.svg, File:Google Forms logo.svg, File:Logo-bw-vertical.png. Test edits or vandalism mostly from IPs. Thanks, Aranya (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Emblems, sock puppet of WPK~commonswiki
Emblems (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) has been blocked in Finnish Wikipedia as a sock puppet of User:WPK~commonswiki (fi:Wikipedia:Ylläpitäjien_ilmoitustaulu/Arkisto_54#Estopyyntö_käyttäjätunnukselle_Emblems). Emblems has uploaded File:Finnish jäger flag.png and is now trying to get all other versions of this flag deleted. This is similar to WPK past behaviour of pushing specific versions of Finnish military heraldry. MKFI (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: During the past 4 days they also edited using 85.76.96.239 and 85.76.39.248. Until now there have been 10 CU requests. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done: Blocked account #27 indef. DRs closed. --Achim (talk) 13:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Uploading copyvios after final warning. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for 3 days. Someone needs to check their earlier uploads Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
This file frequently gets vandalized. If possible, add semi-protection. Thanks. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for 6 months. -- CptViraj (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Its devilrony123
Its devilrony123 (talk · contribs) seems to be only here to upload spam pictures advertising their social media presence. They have already been indefed on enwiki for doing the same thing over there, as well. Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Matej2017
Matej2017 (talk · contribs) is continuously uploading random internet images, even after warning. --Smooth O (talk) 07:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. No copyvios after you warned him. Thank you for that! I nominated his 2 maps for deletion as well as likely copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- User: Dhananjayangovind (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued copyvio uploading after final warning for doing so.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week Gbawden (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
About the user that upload images from https://kakijun.jp/
I would like to request that the user Mikamoto~ruwiki be blocked from editing or uploading images, because, he has been uploading copyrighted images, and will be keep uploading more of those images. I just nominated one of his images for deletion, here is the link, of that image discussion. There you will find more details.
Note: We both are contributors at the Stroke Order Project, and his images do not fit with the project because we have graphic guidelines, to create those images. And he didn't even create a single one. FanNihongo (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism Wiki Loves Monuments Algeria 2020
Hi! Several vandalism in Wiki Loves Monuments Algeria 2020 History, page to protect please, i'm one of oragnizers, Thank you.Great11 (talk) 12:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Page semi-protected (against IP edits) for 3 months. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Protection of files that keep getting overwritten
Sadly some files keep getting overwritten, even with the warning regarding about overwriting of files.
- File:Tang Dynasty circa 700 CE.png
- File:Empire of the Great Qing (orthographic projection).svg
- File:Occupation of Outer Mongolia and Tannu Uriankhai.svg
- File:Qing Empire circa 1820 EN.svg
- File:Decolonization - World Today en.svg
- File:Eurabia map.png
Can upload protection be given to these following files above, due to the history of overwriting? Bidgee (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
MaxxL
- MaxxL (talk • contribs • block log • filter log)
The matter was raised here before but got archived without any admin apport to it (at the same time several admins were busy pillorying Tm for comparatively lesser offenses, if any), but the matter remains unresolved and the user in question is not only left not admin-warned about their conduct but also with the impression they’re in the right, due to the admin-ignored complaint by Evrik. To be clear: This user
- has been ignoring COM:OVERWRITE across many, highly reused files,
- refuses to upload the new images anew instead of overwriting,
- insists on the legitimacy of this course of action,
- confirms that this has been their usual practice for years,
- and seems to be one among several users doing so.
This needs admin-sponsored analysis that may lead to massive file clean-up (with reversions and new uploads), warning and guidance of the envolved editors, and even maybe some cross-project outreach concerning editorial practices affecting Commons file reuse. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Info This is being reposted for the 2nd time. Any admin interested in doing anything at all? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't been following this before I saw this thread go up, but reading through the previous thread, the initial thread, and User talk:MaxxL was pretty shocking. For some examples of what this editor and their friends are doing, look at the histories of File:Wappen von Roetgen.png and File:AUT Groß-Enzersdorf COA.jpg. They're redrawing coats of arms from scratch as vectors (not inherently bad) and then uploading them as new versions across many, many highly used files in a complete disregard for Commons:Overwriting existing files. When someone reverts these changes citing the fact that the new versions are often completely different designs with completely different color schemes than the versions that were overwritten, they're quickly reverted with a statement that the new file is the "official version" and that any complaints must be taken to the "Coat of Arms Workshop" on dewiki instead of Commons. When multiple Commons editors asked them to stop, they threatened to report them as vandals. The work they're doing is fine, vectorizing images is very useful to the community, but it's not fine to upload these new files by overwriting already existing and established files against policy, mandate that issues with what they're doing on Commons be brought up on a separate wiki, and then threaten other editors who ask them to stop violating established policy. Some sort of administrative action should be taken here, or at the very least a comment as to why this isn't considered a violation of Commons:Overwriting existing files, since it certainly seems to be one from what I'm seeing. Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin and Nathan2055: While I share your outrage at what the named user and his friends are doing here, I am curious about your inability or unwillingness to notify him or name his friends. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I used {{User8}} presuming it notifies the user. (I am not curious about your inability or unwillingness to have thought of that, though: I don’t really give a flying fig for any matter raised in this smugly oblique and borderline rude manner: Rank contrarianism and presumption of bad faith are things both Commons and I can live without — too bad you apparently cannot.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Some users opt out of notifications of the mentions of their usernames. "Notify the user(s) concerned" exists above for a good reason, and those who do not follow it are regularly questioned about that on this and other administrative noticeboards. It has been above for over 8 years, since this edit 23:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I used {{User8}} presuming it notifies the user. (I am not curious about your inability or unwillingness to have thought of that, though: I don’t really give a flying fig for any matter raised in this smugly oblique and borderline rude manner: Rank contrarianism and presumption of bad faith are things both Commons and I can live without — too bad you apparently cannot.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin and Nathan2055: While I share your outrage at what the named user and his friends are doing here, I am curious about your inability or unwillingness to notify him or name his friends. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- User1: Mjay-2panaRecords (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- User2: Known as Mjay-2panaRecords (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reason for report: Sock puppetry to continue advertising on Commons after warning on 1st account. Recreated the deleted advert file under different filename for 2nd account. RfCU not needed/made as per {{Duck}}.
Crep1711 (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the self-confessed sockpuppet indefinitely and master for a month. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Many thanks. Crep1711 (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
New socks
- User: Chasetrowash (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- User: Chasetrohandsome (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- User: Chasetroneat (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Looks like a clear-cut case of sockpuppetry to me. It is also very probable that these are related to the Jermboy27 account. Fry1989 eh? 16:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- See also COM:ANV#Chasetrowash. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Crosswiki spammer, only uploads are G10/F10 categories. Indeffed at simple / en for spam.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yep come across this account a time or two now and I agree completely - dealt with and thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Српски Духовници
Српски Духовници (talk · contribs) is probably another Category:Sockpuppets of Миодраг Крагуљ. Similar copyrighted photos are uploaded. --Smooth O (talk) 07:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Sure! I blocked him indefinitely and will delete his uploads. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Unprotect for map update
India location map.svg needs to be updated because the boundary between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh has changed. The file needs to be unprotected for the update. NNW 14:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done for 1 day (semi). --Túrelio (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'm done, too. Can be re-protected. NNW 16:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'm done, too. Can be re-protected. NNW 16:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Socking. Upload Sam Khan picture. Same per blocked User:Digital Ali hamza.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Please semi-protect this, as it was converted into a dab page by discussion (see talk), and someone keeps changing it back without discussion or edit summary. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done To allow only autoconfirmed users (expires 16:23, 16 November 2020). --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Block for Promotional Username
- Vbpurvottar (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- Promotional username promotional uploads. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- @QueerEcofeminist: I notified them for you. Please do that yourself next time. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Kts861A
Kts861A (talk · contribs) continues to upload copyrighted screenshots even after being blocked. --Smooth O (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Smooth O: I notified them for you. Please do that yourself next time. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Trovato187 (talk · contribs) Has repeatedly overwritten a file even after having been warned three times not to do so. The person that is shown on the new photo has asked to remove the upload here. Please block the user and delete the file version [30] (just like the ones before). Thanks, XenonX3 (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- @XenonX3: I notified them for you. Please do that yourself next time. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done, 2 weeks. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Mauydshkkiyh
User: Mauydshkkiyh (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Reason: Continuing to upload images without any information or licence. Doesn't appear to have noticed (or is ignoring) several messages about this on Talk page, including bespoke advice e.g. to use the upload wizard. Now at 72 files and counting as I write... will all be due for deletion in 7 days if nothing changes. A short block may get their attention...? Thanks. Crep1711 (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mauydshkkiyh. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Info They have started unabated for a 2nd day - upload count now at 150 and growing... Final Warning was given yesterday Crep1711 (talk) 07:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: Many thanks. Crep1711 (talk) 07:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Info They have started unabated for a 2nd day - upload count now at 150 and growing... Final Warning was given yesterday Crep1711 (talk) 07:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- User: 102.89.1.149 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Just vandalized this page.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Blocked for 3 days. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Carleton Coon races after Pleistocene.PNG
File:Carleton Coon races after Pleistocene.PNG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Please indef protect or limit to established accounts. This has a history of highly inappropriate sockpuppetry changes for racial/political reasons (e.g. LenguaMapa (talk · contribs · logs · block log)), or to potentially spread disinformation globally across Wikipedias. Refer to File talk:Carleton Coon races after Pleistocene.PNG. Fæ (talk) 09:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done semi-protected, and can be edited only by established registered users. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Block for sockpuppet
Chabhal da boys (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) was blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Jagdeep singh bittu on enwiki following a SPI. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jagdeep singh bittu. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 18:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done Remaining upload deleted (copyvio) and blocked indef. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Whoisi.cc
Take down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hocheecherngmaster (talk • contribs) 13:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, please take down User:Hocheecherngmaster for posting nonsense. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. The user is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Users stealing Japanese train photographs from twitter
- TKM123 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- 京堀伊鐡 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
- つだぬまどうぶつえん (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Incessant copyvio issues, it is probably the work of a sockpuppet. At least last few years, there is an ongoing plagiarisms from Japanese train photographs uploaded to twitter, and victims by identity thieves like a Commons:Deletion requests/impersonation of つだぬまどうぶつえん. I think they should be blocked per Copyright violations and Abusing multiple accounts.--Categorizing (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons/enwiki cross-wiki socking
Hope this is the right noticeboard. Just a heads-up that Safi Bhatti, blocked both here and on enwiki, has been found to be socking. One of their two named socks, Mohananad Bhatti, has edited here, but not caused any disruption. However, I'll note that under the latter account they did upload w:File:Wikipedia-website.png, which shows they've bookmarked User:BevinKacon's Commons userpage, which is at the very least bizarre, and at most rather troubling. (I'll tag that file for CSD in a bit, but holding off so y'all can see.)
SPI with further details is here. Tamzin (they/them) | o toki tawa mi. 21:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tamzin: See also m:srg#Global lock for Safi Bhatti et al. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Block for sockpuppet
Daripulauriau25 (talk · contribs) was reported as a sockpuppet of FishMara on enwiki (w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FishMara). The timings between when this user uploaded the image and when it was added 12 hours later to the now deleted draft by an account which had made no edits since September (w:en:User:Phyu Aung Myint - no local commons account) suspicious. I would have blocked this user on enwiki if they had a local account, as the timings are suspiciously close.
Why I'm reporting the account for a block on commons is because a number of the accounts CU confirmed to FishMara on enwiki in October 2019, were blocked and confirmed here too (see Category:Sockpuppets of Carsson Tan). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 23:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Recommending semi-protection for File:QarabaghWarMap(2020).svg, similar to File:Syrian Civil War map.svg. There has been some edit conflicts, accuracy issues and possible canvassing occurring with the file. Thanks!--WMrapids (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Semi-protection wouldn't prevent upload-warring, as (auto)confirmed is already required to overwrite a file. Looking at the description page history, I don't see any recent non-autoconfirmed edit warring. Therefore, I see no benefit to semi-protection. If counter-productive edit warring does start, feel free to make a new request in that case. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to ask how editors will be able to update the map from now on. Administrators have fully protected the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict map for a month due to vandalism. This map changes daily and sometimes multiple times a day. Will I be able request administrators to change the file here for example? HersiliaAramazd (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Special:Diff/498880428. If any admin wants to change the protection, please feel free to do so. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Gone ahead and marked this map as needing a source for the original work. The underpinning data is huge, a user did not just make this up, it was either imported from somewhere else that has not been declared, or it was carefully traced in fine detail from an image of a map, perhaps a scanned map.
On a technical point, the file includes sodipodi:docname="QarabaghWarMap(2020) (4).svg", but it's unclear how old the first version was and there's no obvious licensing statement inside the code. --Fæ (talk) 19:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
We have had to go to a DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:QarabaghWarMap(2020).svg as it only took 17 minutes for the source tag to be blanked. This DR is significantly different to the recently closed one, as it is purely about verifying copyright of the original work. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
This user has used 2 accounts to repeatedly add captions to images of celebrities, listing their roles in superhero films, even though the images have no connection to the films. He also frequently adds puzzling depiction data to the images. His edits have been reverted by me and other editors and I have repeatedly warned him on his talk page, explaining that captions must relate to what is actually shown in the images. But he persists. I don't know whether a block or a more authoritative warning/explanation from an administrator is called for, but this user just does not seem to get what's going on at Commons. -- WikiPedant (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the Angel indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Enekorga (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Uploading unfree files after warning. 轻语者 (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not done No uploads since the final warning on 20 October 2020, with the exception of File:Txik Txak mapa.svg. I don't see a reason to delete that file. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Gone ahead and marked that map as an unsourced derived work. The SVG is mostly made of an encoded image which has no source. It's surprisingly easy to license wash images using the SVG format, and folks will presume own work claims are valid with no evidence. --Fæ (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I tagged it as {{Fakesvg}} for you, but {{Badsvg}} might be better. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- To be fair, that's probably over-egging the problem. However having spent some time trying to create a version without the embedded image, and being unable to do it without my editor crashing, it's not been possible to create and view just the user added lines and text to see what the difference is.
- If the uploader could do that, to justify keeping a version, that would be super; otherwise we ought to default to the precautionary principle --Fæ (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I tagged it as {{Fakesvg}} for you, but {{Badsvg}} might be better. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Gone ahead and marked that map as an unsourced derived work. The SVG is mostly made of an encoded image which has no source. It's surprisingly easy to license wash images using the SVG format, and folks will presume own work claims are valid with no evidence. --Fæ (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Dixit kalal002
Would someone mind blocking Dixit kalal002. I'm 99% certain this is just the latest sock from Jagdeep singh bittu. Everything they've uploaded (and 99% of everything from prior socks) are copyright infringements, usually Facebook or Instagram. New account day after day after day. Please review and if there are better long-term options out there, I'd love to hear. Given the time it takes to check each image, this is getting tiresome. Ravensfire (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Cannot post a picture to the Commons monthly challenge
I am a registered user, indeed I registered many years ago, though Wiki seems to have forgotten about it, and yet I cannot post a photo on the Commons monthly photo challenge, apparently because it's protected from me. The October challenge ends in 5 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yefims (talk • contribs) 03:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yefims: Hi, and welcome. Which upload URL were you using, and which error message(s) did you receive? Also, what was your old username? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Offensive abuse from User:Anuragjha17
- Anuragjha17 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Reason for report: Personal abuse to me on my talk page see here due to the minor role I had in exposing undisclosed paid editing. Contrastingly, the abuse was left directly below the detailed advice I left for them, after my first dealing with them, as I was genuinely trying to be helpful. Unfortunately their article on Wikipedia has just been deleted and they have chosen to backlash against me.
Although the abuse was left by the above user, the aforementioned advice was with one of their now proven sock puppets:
- WikiSantashines (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Please see the Wikipedia SPI here. These sock puppet accounts are also on Commons along with:
- Notjustadentist (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
They are blocked on Wikipedia which is probably why abuse has come here. Please consider whether this abuse now shows they should be similarly dealt with here? Many thanks. Crep1711 (talk) 06:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done, abusing multiple accounts for personal attacks/copyvio/out of scope files/advertisement. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: Many thanks!! Crep1711 (talk) 07:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
66.112.160.14 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- User continues to add personal opinions to file descriptions after being warned. This has continued from 66.112.160.23 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) (also given multiple warnings). Aranya (talk) 18:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked the IP for a week and reverted recent vandalism. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Waynerootallyn (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) WayneAllynRoot (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Violation of the username policy as it was used for promotional purposes that implies shared use and likely impersonation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8b60:ca00:7144:3892:145f:ed0d (talk • contribs)
- IMO not a big problem. Both accounts have each 1 edit on Commons (in 2008 and 2010). It's rather likely that the depicted person is behind the accounts. Both have email enabled. So, we could ask them for confirmation of identity and of the license of the uploaded images (1 each). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:WayneAllynRoot Head.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- The OP appears not to like en:Wayne Allyn Root. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Dixit kalal12 uploading copyvio images
Please review Dixit kalal12. Moving this to a new section as I don't think they share the same sockmaster as above. All images are copyright violations, blocked previously as Dixit kalal002. They have also used DIXIT KALAL which is still active. Ravensfire (talk) 02:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done - deleted, blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Lunkmoon
Lunkmoon (talk • contribs • block log • filter log) Personal attacks and use of bad language at Elcobbola's talk page.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 02:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Now the user attacked me.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 03:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Me too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked as VOA, I don't know if they are a sock of someone. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @CptViraj: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked as VOA, I don't know if they are a sock of someone. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Me too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
New Jagdeep singh bittu sock
Parmjit pama has continued to upload obvious copyright infringements and is the latest sock of Jagdeep singh bittu. They've uploaded a couple of new images (well, one is for the third time) and need to be blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 01:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I blocked him indefinitely. Uploads are deleted by others. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Suggestions on how best to handle this going forward? This person is sometimes creating multiple socks per day (Ropuinder (talk · contribs) created today and uploading the same images) and it's a pain from time to time. What's the best way here for me to report these obvious socks to get blocked? They obviously don't care about copyright, so warnings are just a waste of bits. Ravensfire (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: Add to m:srg#Global lock for socks of locked Jagdeep singh bittu like I did, or make a new section there. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent - thank you for the advice! Ravensfire (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: You're welcome! Of course, you could also let Martin Urbanec know that this person is evading his lock. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: You could then wait a short while and find they've been quietly locked. Thanks again, Martin Urbanec! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Happy to help! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent - thank you for the advice! Ravensfire (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: Add to m:srg#Global lock for socks of locked Jagdeep singh bittu like I did, or make a new section there. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Suggestions on how best to handle this going forward? This person is sometimes creating multiple socks per day (Ropuinder (talk · contribs) created today and uploading the same images) and it's a pain from time to time. What's the best way here for me to report these obvious socks to get blocked? They obviously don't care about copyright, so warnings are just a waste of bits. Ravensfire (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)