Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 9th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubling HaokipJames (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 09:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality duplicate File:Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny (Portrait, mid 19th century, Havrylo Vasko).jpg (blurred, cropped). I suggest delete or redirect. Seva Seva (talk) 10:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted as duplicate. --Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 11:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Tanmoy84 (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like some selfpublished essay by a not notable author about whom I failed to find any information. Besides, there is no year of publication, and so it is quite possible that it would be copyrighted in the US. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as an author i dont want to share it for free Kidsbookshatynska (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as an author i dont want to share it for free Kidsbookshatynska (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Hegde Neha (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:P20240222AS-0273 (53555997373).jpg which, although uploaded later, has a more descriptive description. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lower res dupe. The larger res version will be moved to more descriptive name and this name redirected to it. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not uploader's "own work"; watermarked image from alamy repository. RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, blatant false claims, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no one needs this image, it is not used, blatant bad file name (bullying?) Mateus2019 (talk) 06:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as an author i dont want to share it for free Kidsbookshatynska (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image in background is copyright google, see legend vip (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Tiago Machuca (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - No good reason for deletion. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
kept: vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I thought this was uploaded to YouTube under a CC license, but realized it wasn't. (Other videos from the same channel do have CC licenses). Delaywaves   ■talk 18:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is vandalism. Lemkacy (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 14:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (also DW CV). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is vandalism. Lemkacy (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (also DW CV). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is vandalism. Lemkacy (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete and redirect to this, because the background of this image exceeds TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's also a bad quality logo, you can delete it.--Spinoziano (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design of the game map and the icons corresponding to the characters are protected by copyright, and there are exemption exceptions that do not comply with TOO#China. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, unused image, video game screenshot. メイド理世 (talk) 05:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 19:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore PeppeChannel072 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Found on https://www.financialexpress.com/photos/defence-gallery/3238719/g20-summit-2023-leaders-pay-homage-to-gandhiji-pm-hands-presidency-to-brazil-as-summit-concludes-in-pictures/. Unlikely to be uploader's "own work". RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 06:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the images which is part of this collage can be found at https://www.slam.org/collection/objects/19235/. There is an unambiguous claim for copyright made in regards to that image, therefore the claim that the image is in the public domain is mostly likely incorrect. I'd put a CSD on this but it hasn't been actioned after several days so nominating for discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 09:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can be found at https://www.slam.org/collection/objects/19235/. There is an unambiguous claim for copyright made in regards to the image, therefore the claim that the image is in the public domain is mostly likely incorrect. I'd put a CSD on this but it hasn't been actioned after several days so nominating for discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 10:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image take from internet, not a CC image Librero2109 (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surendrakumar1112121 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Punklof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 123456789edits (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BIGUIK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrwolf609 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private artwork with copyrighted characters (Winnie Puuh), no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded for vandalism purposes (en:Special:Contributions/Tsunika), a copyvio Nutshinou Talk! 10:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 13:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helloworld888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

random AI-generated images. No educational value it seems

Nutshinou Talk! 14:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 20:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 20:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of painting by Li Keran (1907-1989), whose works are copyrighted in China. See [1]. 0x0a (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no particular information available to make this an educative photograph. Person not named, no place  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist of this ca. 1924 German political poster is said to be not known. Even if the artist's name was not credited in the original publication, that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2045 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. Rosenzweig τ 15:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist of this 1930 German political poster is said to be not known. Even if the artist's name was not credited in the original publication, that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2051 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. Rosenzweig τ 15:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, and permission. P 1 9 9   17:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is complex enough to be copyrighted. Perhaps cropping it just leaving the letters? Bedivere (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source (link) states the items are "public domain" but it appears to mean it in the sense of "public shere" or "accessible to all", not free of copyright. There is a cc-by-nc license on the page which is incompatible with Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1971 US publication may well be out of copyright, but not cc-by-sa-4.0; insufficient source info to determine actual license status Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused mediocre cat photo; almost all of user's other photos have been deleted as vandalism, insults, copyright violations, &/or DW silliness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry low res unused personal photo. Almost all of user's other photos have been deleted as vandalism, insults, copyright violations, &/or DW silliness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Looney Tunes fandom this work is still copyrighted (link 1, link 2). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

persopnal photo that has no clear educational purpose; unidentified place, focusing on unidentified person  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to reaupload it under my other user with a full name Neeqas (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this your own work? 186.172.63.68 23:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 11:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilaria De Virgiliis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdirisak khalif Isse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by site owner, no use and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HH-Hamouti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HermineGranger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Natiq1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2hal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional flags, no hits on Google Image Search -> no education value and therefore out of scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Silver Fern Sunburn.png.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Purely fictional flags, no encyclopedic use.--A09090091 (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: a ton of self-authored flag proposals for various countries (mostly Australia and New Zealand). All unused and unlikely to be used.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NZ Flag Maven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: as previously, these appear to be original proposals by the uploader, not designs which are under consideration by either nation.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas.rodrigues 52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdyunus24bd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of painting by Chinese artist, Wang Xuetao (1903-1984), whose works are copyrighted in China. See [2]. 0x0a (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: per COM:FOP Hong Kong Thyj (talk) 02:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photoshopped image, not notable, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company owner, no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Canarian Market (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, several promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CaptPonos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This crop serves no educational purpose CeltBrowne (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This crop serves no educational purpose CeltBrowne (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Uploader stated that he is the author, but the metadata show that this is a licensed image (Getty / iStock). Till (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikilo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mikilo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/19550863.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikilo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGE.

SCP-2000 08:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By mistake I uploaded photo captured by someone else आर्या जोशी (talk) 08:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio. Low resolution and missing EXIF data. SCP-2000 08:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-07-14_11-20-01_ILCE-7C_DSCHO2138_DxO_(53148976390).jpg LostplanetKD73 (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Other file deleted by Billinghurst. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-07-15_10-28-21_ILCE-7C_DSCHP2538_DxO_(53148758139).jpg LostplanetKD73 (talk) 16:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Other file deleted by Billinghurst. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet, Logo PeppeChannel072 (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasack estudios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable fictional characters and/or personal artwork. Outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. There is nothing to support the claimed CC 4.0 license. Denniscabrams (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic value, etc. F (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a duplicate LostplanetKD73 (talk) 19:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See exif (Rick Diamond/ImageDirect), unlikely to be own work. XenonX3 (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See exif (author Andrew Goetz), unlikely to be own work. XenonX3 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See exif (copyright holder andrew goetz), unlikey to be own work. XenonX3 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See exif (author Andrew Goetz), unlikely to be own work. XenonX3 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from a book Vcohen (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Navoiy Viloyati in Uzbekistan.svg Vcohen (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Thomas Doerbandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Thomas Doerbandt M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 21:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 21:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pers. rights, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 23:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there such a compound as CuCl4? There is the dianion [CuCl4]2-, but then what is the counterion? This image is used in a declined draft article that provides no further insight. Photos of misidentified and unidentifiable chemical compounds have no educational use, so this is outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Arlo James Barnes 03:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, Delete only the previous logo, the new version satisfies template:PD-textlogo.
Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, at that (you're saying the particular shadow pattern on the flag and the shape of the county are copyrighted, I guess), but the current version is fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. ;) Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revdel'd previous version with non-free us flag with shadow. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 17:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pikachu sillouhette above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Bahasa Indonesia: Saya selaku pemilik fanart ini tidak pernah memberi izin kepada pengunggah untuk mengunggah fanart-ku ke Wikimedia Commons. Lisensi yang digunakan adalah lisensi default dari sumbernya (Pixiv dan DeviantArt) dan bukan Creative Commons. -- Muhammad Mico Andriamin (talk) 10:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
English: I as the owner of this fanart have never given permission to the uploader to upload my fanart to Wikimedia Commons. The license used is the default license from the source (Pixiv and DeviantArt) and not Creative Commons. -- Muhammad Mico Andriamin (talk) 10:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I didn't mean to cause offense. I support a courtesy  deletion for this file if that is your wish. However, you should be aware for your other galleries online that the picture you derived the fanart from, file:R160 E enters 42nd Street.jpg has a 'share alike' provision, which means that any derivative files must use the same license. Arlo James Barnes 13:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for responding! I had a bit of a problem setting the license on Pixiv which I can't set to Creative Commons, unlike DeviantArt which I can set. Do you think it's okay to write the CC license description in the description column of my fanart on Pixiv? So it can be safely here. I'm so happy to see you are Mondragon rifle fan. Muhammad Mico Andriamin (talk) 23:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, linking or otherwise referring to the license and the sourcefile in the description would suffice, I'd think. I certainly haven't explored most of the story of Sunborn's games, but I like the character designs. I found your Pixiv via your Pepper&Carrot fanart, by the way. Arlo James Barnes 00:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I inform you that my fanart has been licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 International and this fanart is  allowed to keep in here. You can check the updates in my DeviantArt and Pixiv. I hope this info would make you happy. Thanks for noticing my fanart!! I also like the GFL's character design, so I made a fanart for my love, Miss Mondo. Oh right, my another fanart is also in Pepper&Carrot's fanart board. Here is my flower for you. Muhammad Mico Andriamin (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per uploader (non-admin closure). Arlo James Barnes 00:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This fanart has been deleted by the owner in their program to abandon their gallery. You can check the posts that linked to this fanart. Gladius Oceanus (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would that make this a courtesy deletion request? Arlo James Barnes 07:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Please do not complicate this request. Gladius Oceanus (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My intention is not to complicate, just to clarify.  Delete per nomination. Arlo James Barnes 02:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Arlo Barnes Thank you. You can check the owner's note in DeviantArt that sent to you. Gladius Oceanus (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: author "ALEXANDER PROBST", no permission

DCB (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.aeroportodinapoli.it/piano-di-sviluppo/, where no free license is stated. 2001:A61:12D6:A001:D137:B6F0:250:47A4 15:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from https://www.aeroportodinapoli.it/piano-di-sviluppo/ likely without authorization to do so, user is not the website owner 2001:A61:12D6:A001:D137:B6F0:250:47A4 15:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educationally useful 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 14:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this photo is fake. It appears to be a digitally altered version of this image to add a beard and smile. The other aspects of the photo (including the background) are identical. Number 57 (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is formerly licensed as public domain on Flickr, but now it was deleted as "fair use". 2001:4452:16B:1900:8801:1EA6:2720:5D9B 15:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Marginal on scope, uploaded by a blocked user with a problematic history, licensing is unclear (might be CC-by 2.0). We don't need this and I see no reason to want it. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --plicit 00:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the meaning is unknown. Thyj (talk) 11:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you make some kind of personality test to accept as users people who may upload such nonsense? DELETE immediately please. 186.172.63.68 23:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copivio. This looks like a still from a movie that is not at least 70 years old. Says it is "own work", which I doubt when it is from a movie. No VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camkocity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless over-the-top advertising, although these images were added to the relevant page by the uploader (en:Camko City) which has since been transformed into a huge web of promotional content

Nutshinou Talk! 12:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okvay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam / advertising (en:User:Okvay/sandbox)

Nutshinou Talk! 12:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aginda01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What? out of scope

Nutshinou Talk! 12:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. All of them of a cut-out image of a dog with poorly drawn legs are identically rubbish and deserve to  get sucked into a black hole. - THV | | U | T - 13:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC); edited: 13:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't really see the point in having this file with two low quality files put together while we have them both on Commons under vector form.😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TAVURADIO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content for a radio that does not satisfy the notability criteria, see fr:Wikipédia:Demande_de_restauration_de_page/Archives75#Tavu_Radio and fr:Wikipédia:Demande_de_restauration_de_page/Archives83#Tavu_Radio. Not within scope.

Nutshinou Talk! 15:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content for a radio that does not satisfy the notability criteria, see fr:Wikipédia:Demande_de_restauration_de_page/Archives75#Tavu_Radio and fr:Wikipédia:Demande_de_restauration_de_page/Archives83#Tavu_Radio. Not within scope. Nutshinou Talk! 15:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dreamers Band (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Seems to be a ascreenshot from a video CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 15:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 15:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 15:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. How can this photo be reusable? It is vague, you see two people from behind, but no one is recognizable. It is not in use. JopkeB (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpanbari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random unused files, the few icons are most likely not own work. File:Neural.png is erroneously in use on a page made by bots due to its generic filename.

Nutshinou Talk! 15:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The museum is in France. The artist Erschuu Orgonbayar, whose artist’s name is OtGO, was born 18 January 1981, not dead yet, let alone for at least 70 years. The exhibition is temporarely. No VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected:

--JopkeB (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Gallery deleted, image of artist cropped to focus on artst with original file revision deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. probably cropped photo from BNI NinjaStrikers «» 16:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that the uploader created this photo. The image is widely used across multiple websites (e.g., https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/news/hareesh-peradi-joins-kamal-haasans-vikram/articleshow/87794993.cms). Archer1234 (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so how do I delete it now Jaggu5239 (talk) 16:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files that are either personal files of non-contributor (see edits of user who uploaded) or copyrighted.

Spinixster (talk) 08:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 03:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prosím o smazání - porušení autorských práv. Já jsem fotografii nahrál. Neuvědomil jsem si to. Vta78 (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vta78 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from book - Copyright Infringement Yann (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prosím o smazání - porušení autorských práv. Já jsem fotografii nahrál. Neuvědomil jsem si to. Vta78 (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vta78 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from book - Copyright Infringement Yann (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prosím o smazání - porušení autorských práv. Já jsem fotografii nahrál. Neuvědomil jsem si to. Vta78 (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vta78 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from book - Copyright Infringement Yann (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prosím o smazání - porušení autorských práv. Já jsem fotografii nahrál. Neuvědomil jsem si to. Vta78 (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vta78 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from book - Copyright Infringement Yann (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded image captured by someone else आर्या जोशी (talk) 08:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perelmangao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. These files have no description, no clue about where the photos were taken, at which occasion, hardly any category (except for "People" which is far to broad). How can they be reusable?

JopkeB (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. How can this be "own work" when the uploader is on the photo? JopkeB (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has marked this image as "Own work" and "creative commons" when the image is taken from a YouTube video by The Game Theorists (https://youtube.com/dgxPlUgIqSA?si=ENTqgp9JYFW6_Txu&t=1491) which is not marked as Creative Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnwkr (talk • contribs) 21:56, 9 March 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - Here's a link that works (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgxPlUgIqSA&t=1492) seeing as the one in the nom doesn't seem to. Obviously copyvio of the Game Theory video and not own work as claimed by uploader. No indication of any release (and it would be very unusual for matpat to do so). Should have just been speedied imo. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 20:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borderline COM:TOO case. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep a few patterned curves do not exceed TOO. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I cannot find an exact match with reverse search, this image looks nearly identical to his official photo (as seen here) and was presumably taken at the same photoshoot. I doubt that this is the uploader's own work, unless they work as a photographer for Jason Palmer. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The official photo was uploaded to Commons by a different user with metadata (File:Jason-Palmer.jpg, has a No permission template already) also has the author as "BOHM" and was taken on the same day. reppoptalk 03:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, @Di (they-them), yes, I am a professional photographer, who has worked for many clients. I give up copyrights on specific photos that the client or their team decides. Photos and copyrights are sold at different market value. If a client won't pay for copyright, they would have to give me credit for the picture, anywhere they use. Ms.Aloisia (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:P20240226AS-0657.jpg which, although uploaded later, has a more descriptive description and more accurate categories. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the other duplicate file is already redirected to this one. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality non-animated gif of common subject only in use on a bot page and an inactive user’s sandbox Dronebogus (talk) 10:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these photographs are Copyrighted, the Creative Commons license is invalid. These photos were all taken by Bernard Thibodeau, and state © HOC-CDC, 2023 Credit: Bernard Thibodeau, House of Commons Photo Services - per image descriptions and file EXIF. The copyright to these photos are held by the Canadian government; or better know as Crown Copyright. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly whom posted these photos on their Flickr are not the photographers or copyright holders and do not have the authority to license these images freely. I find it incredibly unlikely that copyright would have been transferred or cleared in this manner. The Canadian government hardly ever grants such free permissions, being assertive of their copyright and generally only allows non-commercial usage of Crown copyrighted works, which does not align with the Commons policy. So I certainly have my doubts about the conditions of these photos. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/crown-copyright-request.html

PascalHD (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With that being said, If it can be proven that the CC license is valid, I would absolutely support keeping these photos. PascalHD (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Someone with VRTS access should email photoServices@parl.gc.ca to confirm. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason to have somebody with VRTS access do this. VRT users do not actively send out requests for permission, but only process permission statements they receive. Krd 15:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@D. Benjamin Miller, I will reach out tomorrow to see if they can send an email to VRT. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 09:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork, not uploader's own work. Can tell at a glance that it comes from a modern artist. Thyj (talk) 06:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Таблерон (talk) 07:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say that. For example, which flag is being held up? And which one in this edited version you uploaded? Are they the inner and outer of this symbol? Answering questions like this can be the task of an encyclopedia. Arlo James Barnes 07:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep this image, but duplicate image (File:Балтийские марийцы в Эстонии.png) to be deleted--Estopedist1 (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That image is not a duplicate, the flag the person is holding in that image is different. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 21:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   00:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the source document, I see: "© 2024 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved" Erik Wannee (talk) 08:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Copyright © 2022 Formery, Wakefield, Gesson, Toisoul, Lhomond, Gilletta, Lasbleiz, Schubert and Croce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Rasbak (talk) 08:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The source document writes: "© 2024 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated." Erik Wannee (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Rasbak (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY 2.0 license. --P 1 9 9   00:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The source document writes: "© 2024 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated." Erik Wannee (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Rasbak (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY 2.0 license. --P 1 9 9   00:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The source document writes: "© 2024 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated." Erik Wannee (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • see bottom article:

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.Rasbak (talk) 08:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep - Source article has a CC BY 4.0 license. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rasbak; the website is copyrighted, but the article as a CC-BY 4.0 license. --P 1 9 9   00:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Enyavar as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Russian Empire (1867).svg - Not eligible for speedy deletion because format is different, but depreciated by SVG The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph taken in Paris, lifted from p. 152 of Soutine und die Moderne by Sophie Krebs, Henriette Mentha and Nina Zimmer, publihshed in 2008 by Dumont and copyrighted. — Racconish💬 09:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this single contribution of the user own work? No metadata and many hits on Google. Wouter (talk) 10:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: copyright holder "lauris aizupietis", no permission DCB (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: author "Ambrus Marcsi", no permission DCB (talk) 10:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo with Facebook metadata (FBMD string in EXIF data), doubtful that this is own work DCB (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: copyright holder "potakh.com(C)", no permission DCB (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: copyright holder "potakh.com(C)", no permission Iven16535 (talk) 11:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo with very bad quality, doubtful that this is own work DCB (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: author "ERIK WILLIAMSON PHOTOGRAPHY", no permission DCB (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test file for use internally by WikiProject; no longer required Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   00:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test file for use internally by WikiProject; no longer required Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Its use on the talk page is of very little educational value. --P 1 9 9   00:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test file for use internally by WikiProject; no longer required Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Its use on the talk page is of very little educational value. --P 1 9 9   00:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see EXIF: copyright holder "VLADIMIR ANUFRIEV", no permission DCB (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilhelm XV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: (apparently?) Personal fiction.

Enyavar (talk) 11:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: one - in use on userpage of active editor - deleted one per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kacir as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see EXIF, author: Vítězslav Ramba|source= https://museumofbricks.cz/novinky/tpost/tk0h8j0s11-pbh-zakladatele-muzea-lega-miloe-keka Yann (talk) 11:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Found elsewhere on the web without a declared license {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}, e.g. [3], [4], [5]. In the header, the uploader listed "foto Vítězslav Ramba" as the author; the metadata lists "robert.cihar@gmail.com" as the author. So confirmation per VRT is needed. Kacir (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy on Commons is of higher resolution of all copies on the Net, and has EXIF "Author: Robert Cihar". So yes, we need a permission, but the uploader may be able to give that. Yann (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Voldemort271 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history, COM:DW of non free content.

Yann (talk) 11:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the picture is copyrighted see https://sudantribune.net/article280695/ FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are scans or photographs of Thai baht notes and coins, which are not free of copyright.

Paul_012 (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

apologies for these and others: Category:Coin, Category:Coins of Azerbaijan, Category:Coins of Russia, and Category:Banknotes, I was mass uploading images so I can complete it in a certain amont of time.
Also If there is any more critisism be sure to tell.
I wanted to make the baht page as complete as possible for education sake. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename, the correct one has been uploaded Public-Publicity (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Screw Head - Hex (external) + Torx Slot (internal).svg. --P 1 9 9   00:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source unknown ("Image credit: Wikipedia" sic.) vip (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear source of the photos. See monitor moire pattern on all photos (probably photos of the photos on the screen). According to Exif it's impossible to be in one day in villages all over Slovakia.

— Draceane talkcontrib. 18:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are just photographes of the screen, the original copyrihgt holder is Czech television (Česká televize).

Gumruch (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Imagevios. Copyright Czech television. Just re-photographed from the screen.

Gumruch (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HadleyOnFire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus licenses - these are scans of an existing work. An image published in 1947 in US would be PD if copyright notice was not included or not renewed. Picture of the book's copyright page (typically on the back of title page) required to confirm. Currently no COM:EVID regarding status.

Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure how to respond properly in these discussion, so please bear with me. I'm a researched whose dissertation focuses on Sylvester. I've been updating his Wikipedia page as often as possible to try and boost his recognition. The images I posted today are part of that effort.

Regarding the images, you are correct that they are scans. I'm attaching the image of the copyright page, as you requested, but it will not do you much good. thumb Henry Holt released the rights of Moon Gaffney to Sylvester in 1949 under the terms of his contract. I have the letter, but it is not mine to share with you under Georgetown Library's research regulations. In addition, the book was reprinted by Arno Press, and again released to Sylvester in the 1980s (I do not know the exact date of that contract release). Currently, his children own his estate. Would you need something from them to permit the photos to stay? I have been in contact with them, and they would much prefer for Sylvester's work to be getting recognition on Wikipedia than for it to not. Let me know what you need to permit the image to stay and I will see what I can do.

@HadleyOnFire: You can share the copyright transfer with COM:OTRS, as the exchange with volunteers there is kept private. So, what we need is the copyright transfer and a mail from Sylvester's estate releasing the photos under free license. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No emails found at OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HadleyOnFire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Original artists are not provided, so it is not clear whether the covers can be PD-Old.

Gumruch (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, unlikely own work Bedivere (talk) 18:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   01:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is not made by Basta themselves (which would according to stated licence, would also be non-free due to NC-ND restriction). The image is taken by Protection Civile Paris Seine (https://twitter.com/PCParisSeine/status/1246710842441240576), and there's no licence info about it. Stylez995 (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded djvu version of the same file without personal info in metadata. Battlesnake1 (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   01:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Direct upload from this medium article, no clear indication this user is author. OverlordQ (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

28 KB. Please upload as "own work" pictures that are taken by yourself. 186.172.56.215 22:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged copyvio but I believethe logo is below COM:TOO US. Converting to DR. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 23:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: obvious PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9   01:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Souka Kinmei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Souka Kinmei. I believe they should be deleted because these are photographs of copyrighted works in Japan. Per COM:FOP Japan. --IDCM (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC) Added 1 file that I believe should be deleted.--IDCM (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDCM (talk • contribs) 15:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI-generated fantasy, for some reason labelled as a "portrait" of the historical figure of XII century. Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Andrrei
Aclaracion sobre la imagen generada por IA de Benjamín de Tudela
La imagen de Benjamín de Tudela que he subido es una representación artística creada mediante inteligencia artificial. No pretende ser un retrato histórico preciso, sino más bien una interpretación imaginaria del famoso viajero y explorador. Benjamín de Tudela fue un personaje relevante en la historia, y esta imagen busca agregar diversidad al contenido disponible en Wikimedia Commons.
Agradezco su comprensión y consideración.
Clarification on the AI-generated image of Benjamín de Tudela The image of Benjamín de Tudela that I have uploaded is an artistic representation created using artificial intelligence. It is not intended to be an accurate historical portrait, but rather an imaginary interpretation of the famous traveler and explorer. Benjamín de Tudela was a relevant character in history, and this image seeks to add diversity to the content available on Wikimedia Commons. I appreciate his understanding and consideration. Un cordial saludo (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
un dato, en una web de Tudela, ciudad de Benjamín, han usado esta imagen y sin problemas, ya que quería representar a Benjamín antes de su viaje.
One piece of information, on a website from Tudela, Benjamín's city, they have used this image and without problems, since they wanted to represent Benjamín before his trip.
[6]https://ciudadtudela.com/benjamin-de-tudela/
Un cordial saludo (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Andrei
Otra web a adoptado la imagen, sin problemas.
Hello Andrei, Another website has adopted the image, without problems.[7]https://atenas-diariodeabordo.blogspot.com/2024/03/plantin-arias-montano-la-perfeccion-de.html
Un cordial saludo (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per the nominator. As the uploader says, this is an "imaginary interpretation" of the person. Ergo, it's totally worthless when it come having any eductional value. At that point I could upload an image of potato with a face painted on it and call it an imaginary interpretation of Jesus. We have to draw the line somewhere. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hay alguna imagen real de Benjamin de Tudela? o de personajes historicos? Todas imagenes, todas son interpretaciones de artistas de otros siglos, tienen mas valor unas imagenes de hace años todas imaginativas, que esta del siglo XXI? Pero si quieres subir una patata, yo no dire nada, el arte es eso, imaginación.
    Is there any real image of Benjamin de Tudela? or historical figures? All images, all are interpretations of artists from other centuries, some images from years ago, all imaginative, have more value than these from the 21st century? But if you want to raise a potato, I won't say anything, that's what art is, imagination. Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentCOM:INUSE so if it is to be deleted, the use would first need to be removed well before deletion so I'd suggest asking about on the talk page of the page where it's used. Papix made a good point just above but there also is a good case for deleting it. Whether I'd tend toward keep would depends on how the image was created such as whether it was created using some artwork showing the person as base image or even multiple such as training data. Since no info in the comments by the uploader or the file description indicates that this is the case I'm neutral on this and tend toward delete since this seems to be just some random male person image.
Prototyperspective (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
En castellano: COM:INUSE, por lo que si se va a eliminar, primero será necesario eliminar el uso mucho antes de eliminarlo, por lo que sugeriría preguntar en la página de discusión de la página donde se usa. Papix hizo un buen comentario justo arriba, pero también hay buenos argumentos para eliminarlo. Si tendería a conservar dependería de cómo se creó la imagen, por ejemplo, si se creó utilizando alguna obra de arte que muestre a la persona como imagen base o incluso múltiples, como datos de entrenamiento. Dado que no hay información en los comentarios de quien subió el archivo o en la descripción del archivo que indique que este es el caso, soy neutral al respecto y tiendo a eliminarlo, ya que parece ser solo una imagen aleatoria de un hombre.
Respuesta. Que diferencia hay entre una persona aleatoria y un personaje pintado segun la imaginacion del pintor? En todo momento he dicho que es una imagen IA, no lo he ocultado. Como curiosidad la ciudad de Tudela, donde nació este hombre la ha usado sin ningún problema [8]https://ciudadtudela.com/benjamin-de-tudela/ En fin, a ver si nos metemos en el siglo XXI y empezamos a aceptar imagenes IA, de echo en el modulo de subida preguntan si es IA. Si se borra siempre nos quedará su ciudad donde estara la imagen donde la comparte con Commons, por ahora.
Answer. What difference is there between a random person and a character painted according to the painter's imagination? At all times I have said that it is an AI image, I have not hidden it. As a curiosity, the city of Tudela, where this man was born, has used it without any problem [9]https://ciudadtudela.com/benjamin-de-tudela/ Anyway, Let's see if we get into the 21st century and start accepting AI images, in fact in the upload module they ask if it is AI. If it is deleted, we will always have your city where the image will be where you share it with Commons, for now.
Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to use AI for whatever you want. You just cannot pretend this image is portraying Benjamin de Tudela as far as you (as well as anybody else) have no idea what exactly this man looked like. Your fantasizing about his image has zero value whether or not you used AI for its creation. As distinct from this fantasy which is in scope of Commons beacuse its author is notable. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Eres libre de utilizar la IA para lo que quieras. Simplemente no puedes pretender que esta imagen retrata a Benjamín de Tudela, ya que ni tú (ni nadie más) tienes idea de cómo era exactamente este hombre. Tu fantasía sobre su imagen tiene valor cero, hayas usado o no IA para su creación. A diferencia de esta fantasía que está dentro del ámbito de los Comunes porque su autor es notable. Andrei Romanenko (discusión) 23:38, 10 abril 2024 (UTC)
No pretendo demostrar que es una imagen que retrata a este personaje, ni yo, ni todos los dibujos, estatuas que lo representan a lo largo del mundo. Por lo tanto todas las imágenes incluida la mía, segun tu, tienen valor cero y ya no te digo nada del resto de personajes históricos que circulan por las redes o tiene coomons, salvo reyes y personajes importantes que tenían dinero para pagarse un retrato. Te escribo en castellano e ingles por cortesía hacia ti.
Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not intend to demonstrate that it is an image that portrays this character, nor do I, nor all the drawings, statues that represent him throughout the world. Therefore, all the images, including mine, according to you, have zero value and I am not telling you anything about the rest of the historical figures that circulate on the networks or have coomons, except for kings and important figures who had money to pay for a portrait. I am writing to you in Spanish and English out of courtesy to you. Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 09:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment hello, I came across this discussion somewhat by chance, and I find that it is a good example of the ethical questions posed by generative AI.
    I think we should add a text "Artist's impression/AI Image" or something like that, visibly, on the image.
    I'm a little embarrassed by this type of use... yes.. But the image of the potato given above doesn't seem relevant to me in this sort of case. I'm going to play "devil's advocate" as we say in French.
    If we do not accept this type of illustration (with the precautions that I indicate ...and when we have no other images available), we shoul have to take this reasoning a step further, => we would have to remove all the images representing Jesus, Buddha, and a quantity of characters drawn or painted after their death. Yet we also know that the style of the drawing, its codes and symbols tell us something historically and therefore encyclopaedically interesting or even important.
    It is a case of conscience as we will have more and more. I suggest keeping the image with a visible warning on the fact that the character is "imagined", with the help of an AI. Lamiot (talk) 22:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, this reasoning is incorrect. "All the images representing Jesus, Buddha and so on" that are accepted at Commons are either created by notable painters/sculptors or located at notable places. If an unknown painter would try to upload his own personal vision of Jesus or Buddha to Commons, this file will be deleted as being out of scope. Because nobody cares about their style of drawing, codes and symbols - until this author is not acknowledged outside of Wikimedia projects, in the real world, as significant. Same is here: it is not important at all that this image is created with the help of AI. It is important that this image does not represent a vision of an established artist or scholar or expert. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Okay, I'm starting to understand your point of view. Only in commons do they accept world-renowned illustrators, okay, we have to maintain the quality of commons. Could you give me the link to that statement? It's curiosity. Thank you for your time and your willingness to maintain commons with images of world-renowned people. Tell me a recognized image of this character and I will put it in the article. Personally, I know renowned painters who have painted Benjamin and his models, who I also know, and when I see one of those images in Tudela, I don't see Benjamin, I see the model. Waiting for your answer. Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 08:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hola
    Vale, ya empiezo a entender tu punto de vista. Solo en commons aceptan ilustradores reconocidos mundialmente, de acuerdo, hay que mantener la calidad de commons. Me podrias poner el enlace hacia esa afirmacion? es curiosidad. gracias por tu tiempo y tu ánimo de mantener commons con imágenes de gente reconocida mundialmente. Dime una imagen de este personaje reconocida y la pondré en el articulo. Personalmente conozco a pintores reconocidos que han pintado a Benjamin y a sus modelos, que tambien conozco y cuando veo una de esas imagenes por Tudela, no veo a Benjamin, veo al modelo. A la espera de tu respuesta. Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Commons is accepting the images that have educational value, see COM:EDUSE. True portraits of historical figures have educational value: they let us know what historical figures looked like. Fantastic and improbable portraits of historical figures (or of fantastic and improbable figures) created by well-known painters or by some insignificant authors of earlier time also have educational value but of different sort: they let us know how well-known painters (or representatives of a certain art group or style) imagined this or that, and it is valuable information about the painter or art style (though perhaps not about the portrayed person). Fantastic and improbable portraits created nowadays by no-name authors have zero educational value: they bear zero information about the real look of the portrayed person, and the information about personal artistic style of an unknown contemporary author is of no interest for anybody. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Las imágenes creadas por la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) pueden ser una herramienta valiosa para ilustrar artículos de personajes famosos que no tienen una imagen real.
    Aquí están mis argumentos en defensa de su uso:
    Llenar Vacíos Históricos: Para personajes históricos de los que no existen retratos o imágenes, la IA puede generar representaciones basadas en descripciones escritas, proporcionando una imagen visual que puede ayudar a los lectores a conectar mejor con el personaje.
    Imparcialidad: Las imágenes generadas por IA pueden ser más imparciales que las creadas por humanos, ya que la IA no tiene prejuicios ni opiniones personales que puedan influir en la representación.
    Innovación y Creatividad: La IA puede generar imágenes únicas y creativas que pueden captar la atención del lector y hacer que el artículo sea más interesante y atractivo.
    Actualización y Mejora Continua: A medida que la tecnología de la IA mejora, también lo hace la calidad de las imágenes generadas. Esto significa que las imágenes pueden ser actualizadas y mejoradas con el tiempo para reflejar con mayor precisión al personaje.
    Accesibilidad: La creación de imágenes por IA puede ser más accesible, ya que puede permitir a más personas y organizaciones utilizar imágenes de alta calidad en sus artículos.
    Es importante recordar que, aunque las imágenes generadas por IA pueden ser útiles, deben utilizarse con cuidado y siempre deben indicarse como tales para no engañar a los lectores sobre su origen, en este caso siempre se ha dicho que es IA Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 11:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Images created by Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be a valuable tool to illustrate articles about famous people who do not have a real image.
    Here are my arguments in defense of its use:
    Fill Historical Gaps: For historical figures for whom there are no portraits or images, AI can generate representations based on written descriptions, providing a visual image that can help readers better connect with the character.
    Impartiality: AI-generated images can be more impartial than those created by humans, as AI does not have biases or personal opinions that could influence the representation.
    Innovation and Creativity: AI can generate unique and creative images that can capture the reader's attention and make the article more interesting and attractive.
    Continuous Update and Improvement: As AI technology improves, so does the quality of the images generated. This means that images can be updated and improved over time to more accurately reflect the character.
    Accessibility: AI image creation can be more accessible, as it can allow more people and organizations to use high-quality images in their articles.
    It is important to remember that although AI generated images can be useful, they should be used with care and should always be indicated as such so as not to mislead readers about their origin, in this case it has always been said to be AI Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per the nominator. AI can´t reach accuracy beyond reliable sources - what remains is fiction. To look for an AI "prophet" is beyond our project scope. Go to ArtStation - they love this kind of work. Alexpl (talk) 13:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hola Alexpl te traduzco.
    Según el nominador. La IA no puede alcanzar una precisión más allá de fuentes confiables; lo que queda es ficción. Buscar un "profeta" de la IA está más allá del alcance de nuestro proyecto. Vaya a ArtStation: les encanta este tipo de trabajo.
    Ya no es por defender esta imagen en concreto, que si, la idea que defiendo es empezar a usar imágenes de personajes en IA ya que en miles de personajes, sus rostros no son reales, a parte de que muchas imágenes no se pueden subir y no se pueden usar por los permisos. Me gustaría que usuarios como tu, empiecen a abrir la mente a otras formas de edición de imágenes, como la IA. Seguramente esta imagen terminará por borrarse, pero ya te digo que en un futuro muy corto, se aceptaran. Como curiosidad, esta imagen está en una web sobre Tudela ilustrando un articulo sobre la vida de este personaje, donde allí se quedará a pesar de que en commons desaparezca. [10]https://ciudadtudela.com/benjamin-de-tudela/
    It is no longer to defend this specific image, yes, the idea I defend is to start using images of characters in AI since in thousands of characters, their faces are not real, apart from the fact that many images cannot be uploaded and They cannot be used due to permissions. I would like users like you to start opening their minds to other forms of image editing, such as AI. Surely this image will end up being erased, but I already told you that in the very short future, they will be accepted. As a curiosity, this image is on a website about Tudela illustrating an article about the life of this character, where he will remain there even though he disappears in general. [11]https://ciudadtudela.com/benjamin-de-tudela/
    Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 08:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own, fake license, not 07.03.2024, no source, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Werwerton2525#%D0%97%D0%92 Lesless (talk) 09:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD according to PD-RU-exempt-autocam. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work of the Apple clown emoji Di (they-them) (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged by @XenonX3: as Missing Permission. As the image has been on Commons since 2013, is in use in multiple projects, and the uploader appears not to have been active for a decade, I am converting to deletion discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploading comment says that the uploader took the photo with their own camera. What are the arguments for copyvio. Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: pending any reason to suspect there is a license problem. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/mitroviceeveriut AceDouble (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should keep it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. North Mitrovica has an ethnic Serb majority and the town has refused to work with the Republic of Kosovo. This is widely used in Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Verbcatcher (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/ AceDouble (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/leposaviq AceDouble (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, we do not require that an emblem is in official use, if it has ever been in significant use then we should have it. If it is "used by Serbian parallel structures" then we should keep it. w:en:Leposavić says that the locality has "an ethnic Serb majority that functions largely autonomously from the remainder of ethnic Albanian-majority Kosovo", so that the town may use symbols that are not in official use by Kosovan authorities. The symbol is in use by what claims to be the municipality's website.[12]. It is in use in Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Verbcatcher (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/ AceDouble (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. This one cannot be deleted, and has a FOTW source. How does AceDouble think is it unreliable? 170.235.203.18 16:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: kk.rks-gov.net/leposaviq AceDouble (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the related deletion requests, by the same nominator for the same reasons.
Verbcatcher (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per given source, there can't be two systems for one municipality at the same time. These municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo and are bound to Kosovo's legal jurisdiction. AceDouble (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional emblem that has never been adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/ AceDouble (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, renominated for deletion the day after it was kept. If you disagree with the the result of a deletion decision then you should follow Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions – contact the closing admin on their talk page, at User talk:Strakhov. This repeated request offers nothing significantly new; we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo - COM:TOO? It's a complex shape but it's still just a shape. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per COM:PCP. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no creation date of this photo, and any publication date and publicator, in source page as well, so it can't be PD-anon and PD-Poland 178.37.205.142 13:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The image says 1964 and appears to be a passport or visa photo and it meets PD-Poland and anonymous at the same time, like almost every passport/visa image. --RAN (talk) 23:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication date, no publicator, no info that this is passport photo. PD-Poland doesn't apply. 94.40.163.168 20:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like it was pulled out from an ad, unlikely to be their own work. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it again (I'm not the original uploader), I suspect it could well be and maybe gave it too much of the benefit of the doubt last time.
I can't find any definitive evidence that this is the case, but the suspiciously low dimensions are a very common red flag with copyvios (anyone inclined to put that much effort into setting up an image would be unlikely to waste it on such crappy resolution).
OTOH, it could be a museum setup and (ironically) it's harder to judge that from such low resolution. So questionable whether evidence warrants PCP or not. Ubcule (talk) 13:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think we can AGF on this 2007 upload. Uploader has other good contributions. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

protection Sidirdnaxela (talk) 06:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. COM:DW of copyrighted COM:TOYS. This appears to be a custom design by the uploader, per the description and the nonstandard art. The questions are whether it's in scope, and whether it's still a DW because of the body that was painted over. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, still a derivative work of the copyrighted car design by Mattel. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: artwork is out of scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no information available if Santadas kathiababa had a signature or regarding the original source of this signature. Not sure how this is own work if it is dated "before 1905". Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and change the license to {{PD-signature}} --Sreejith K (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sreejithk2000 Could you specify whose signature this is? Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Signature of Santadas Kathiababa --Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The account who uploaded this file is a block-evading sock. What he/she said about the image cannot be taken on trust because they have lied repeatedly.Toddy1 (talk) 19:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Sreejith K. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems highly unlikely that Warner Musc New Zealand has the authority to release this collage of music videos under CC BY. It is most likely an error on their side. Ainali (talk) 12:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per previous decisions and verifications of copyright status of Warner Music NZ CC-BY videos at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dua_Lipa_samples_from_5_songs.webm, File:The_Evolution_of_Charlie_Puth.webm, unchallenged MOTD at File:Ed_Sheeran_pōwhiri_in_New_Zealand.webm. For a more in depth treatment, see the related deletion requests Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Hogwarts_Legacy and more recent duplicate Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hogwarts Legacy – Official 4K Reveal Trailer.webm where an entirely different division of Warner Bros has published promotional video game trailers as CC-BY. Per searches such as [13] for one of the music video excerpts included in this compilation, Warner Chappell Music is the publisher for the work. Dhx1 (talk) 18:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous DR. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S1in0o (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Art made by artist who has passed away in 2019. Not out of copyright

Nutshinou Talk! 13:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: requires VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from Forgemind ArchiMedia Flickr stream

[edit]

All files from Forgemind ArchiMedia Flickr stream should be deleted. There are currently 455 files credited to them, and I have encountered many many more which are not in the category. Too many to list, sorry, is there an automated way to do this?

I would simply draw attention to this gallery of the User's; a compilation of photos from a 2011 architecture conference in Taiwan - none of the images appear to be Forgemind's own work and all are CC-BY-2.0. Every file I looked at, a few dozen so far, has been problematic - from using Boeri's own photo here to using Sousa's own sketch here.

I would also say that any user who was involved in uploading such blatant copyvio work, and all users who went on to add them to various Wikipedia projects, should probably be a bit more careful in the future. --mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment. I think this should be closed as out-of-process and re-nominated more selectively. No deletion tags have been applied to the files and no uploaders have been notified. I don't doubt there are some problems with this Flickr stream, but a lot of the images seem to be Forgemind's own work. For example, Enta Yang seems to be clearly associated with Forgemind and a huge chunk of the photographs have this name in the EXIF data. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close as keep per IronGargoyle. Renominate and apply DR tags and notify uploaders. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I thought this was recorded in the UK; however, it was recorded in the US, so it would be under copyright. InverseHypercube (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; please  Keep. According to Template:PD-US-record, this is in the public domain. InverseHypercube 22:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under new laws that have passed since this was posted in 2011 this song had a copyright restored to it until 2026. We need to delete until then, sadly. SDudley (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2026. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [14]: The image's metadata matches the uploader's previous username, Aileenchiu. 0x0a (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per P199, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely Out of Scope, looks to me a random drawing done on Microsoft paint. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 14:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was not made in Microsoft Paint (who uses MS Paint anymore), and it is based on an Ḥ glyph in Serabit El Khadim's 362 inscription. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Romain_Butin,_Serabit_el-Khadim_inscriptions,_362.jpg
I will fix the quality, but I find your move as completely rash and in bad faith (sorry!). INFIYNJTE (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am really, really sorry that it sought out to you as bad faith and it wasn't my intention. I tried to emphasize that the quality of the vector that is uploaded makes it out of scope. I think I should have approached you on the talk page instead of the immediate deletion request. Really sorry again. Just a thought, considering efficiency, was the new vector truly needed? Perhaps, alternatively, cropping the file you linked in the reply could have sufficed. Your consideration of this suggestion is greatly appreciated.Contributers2020Talk to me here! 19:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vector was made as part of a suite of all the Serabit El-Khadim symbols. Just cropping the sketch it was based on would leave a white background and wouldn't look polished.
I recently improved the quality. Do you have any more suggestions? INFIYNJTE (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE also in scope regardless. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted design. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN, below the ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission from the author of the photo (Jiří Kovanic). Moreover, depicted sculture is not PD-old, because the sculptor Eva Tesařová died in 2004 and it does not seem that the work is permanently exhibited in the public space. Gumruch (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Check user's edits on Wikipedia.Aafī (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fwiw, I did check the users edits elsewhere but couldn't find any. @Spinixster, how is this file a copyright violation? I can't seem to find a copy around on internet. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aafi See w:es:Usuario_discusión:Demoncore777. Spinixster (talk) 01:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spinixster: The discussion doesn't add anything. It is just a warning that the content this user added on es:Say Ocean was copy-pasted and thus a copyright violation. It doesn't say anything about this image. It is good resolution and has meta-data, and I do not find any of its copies on internet. How exactly do you think this image is a copyright violation? Where was this previously published? ─ Aafī (talk) 07:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, it's an image of a seemingly non-notable band, and the fact that the now-deleted article was a copyvio should be a red flag. The original source could have been taken down. Spinixster (talk) 07:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Band is not notable. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sintegrity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Speedy requests converted to DR: Too old for G7, but no objection to courtesy deletion.

1st deletion request

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fairly prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sintegrity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Speed deletion requested by the uploader. Licenses issue. I thought the Flickr profile was good, but after the upload I realized it's all a license washing case.

2nd deletion request

Sintegrity (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I don't see any indication of license landuring. MTur Destinos seems to be a reliable Flickr user. --A1Cafel (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't check all, but at least for most of the "Flavioandre..." and "Flavio Andre...", Metadata says Com autorização de uso pelo criador ao MTUr e associados descritos na autorização. This at least seems incompatible with the license MTur provided to Flickr. -- Gauss (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Files are from the official Flickr account of MTur, which seems to have an agreement with the creators. I don't know what means the information on the exif of the files by Flavio Andre, it could well mean that he authorized MTur to use them as they please, including relicensing - that would be on the contract they signed or otherwise agreed with MTur. In any case, that's MTur responsibility. -- Darwin Ahoy! 22:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. there is no evidence whatsoever that the flickr uploader had permission to publish these files of these different photographers. --Ellywa (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellywa: Why have you reverted the decision of closed DR and deleted dozens of files without any discussion?! -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored files deleted by mistake, see Special:Diff/926142501/937759273 and {{Flickrstream MTur Destinos}}.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sintegrity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Angola the copyright term in Angola is either Life + 45 years after the photographers death or + 70 years after the date of publication in cases of anonymous photographs. In the case of these images specifically, although they were uploaded to Flickr under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license they were taken by an unknown photographer and there's zero evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to them or can release them in the public domain. So the images should be deleted until at least 2085 per the normal term for anonymous works in Angola since they appear to have been taken in 2014. If not until an undetermined date to the unclear years of creation.

3rd deletion request – part I

Adamant1 (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sintegrity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Angola the normal term for photographs is life + 45 years after the photographers death. Although these photographs were uploaded to Flickr under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license there's zero evidence the uploader is the original photographer, that they own the copyright to said images, or that the person who took them has been dead for more then 45 years. So the images should be deleted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

3rd deletion request – part II

Adamant1 (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission would be required from Jessica Wadsworth. --Ellywa (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sintegrity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As Adamant1 alerted me: these photo may not be had taken by the Flickr user.

3rd deletion request – part III

Sintegrity (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7: I think you added the comment to the wrong DR since most, if not all, of these images are from the account of someone named PaulBlake1957, who clearly uploads "found photographs" that they didn't take themselves. Regardless, to answer your question, no one said it isn't the official Flickr Account of SIM USA. I certainly didn't. The question here is if SIM USA owns the copyright to the images uploaded to their Flickr account or not, and I'm of the opinion that they don't. Especially since of their admittance the photographs are either taken by an unknown photographer or a missionary named Jessica Wadsworth. They clearly aren't Jessica Wadsworth and there's a difference between them having photographs taken by her versus owning the copyright to said photographs. Otherwise we would need evidence of the later, which I don't see us having. Otherwise be my guest and provide some. Just playing devils advocate doesn't cut it though. Especially with the photographs from PaulBlake1957's account. Since again, they clearly upload found photographs that they haven't taken themselves and therefore don't own the copyright to. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SIM USA is a missionary work organization. It is more than reasonable that they have permission to upload photographs from their missionaries. Your opinion, if not corroborated by facts, is needless and disposable. Otherwise you’d need evidence of the later, which I don’t see us having – have you tried contacting them instead of letting yourself get carried away by your usual deletionist instincts? Don’t worry, I have already done so on their website and soon we will have a response.
In regards to PaulBlake1957’s uploaded photographs, please mark them as such, because I am not going to check all of nominated photographs, one by one, since you have mixed photographs from two different account, one of them being totally legitimate. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1 (pinging). By the way, does someone oppose removing all the needless almost 400,000 bytes from previous nominations? I can barely edit here. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7: As far as I know all the images that I nominated for deletion in the original request are from SIMUSA. Sintegrity then nominated the other images for deletion in separate DRs. Including this one. So I'm not really sure what your talking about or how it's my problem. The same goes for your insult about my "usual deletionist instincts" or whatever. Since again, I didn't start this DR, Sintegrity did of their own accord after messaging me on my talk page about it and I'm obviously not responsible for their actions. You might not know this for whatever reason, but it's possible to create and vote on separate DRs started by different people having to do with the same uploader.
More to the point, it might be "reasonable" that they have permission to upload photographs from their missionaries, and I disagree that it is, but that doesn't mean they have the permission. Or again, be my guest and provide evidence that they do. I find it hard to believe they would own the copyright to photographs they themselves say are by unknown photographers, that were taken at unknown dates, and are of unknown people. It would be pretty trivial for them to posses random photographs people took while doing missionary work under their remit. Again though, that doesn't mean they would own the copyright to said images. Although I'm more then willing to put my DR on hold for now while we wait to hear back from them about it. But there's no reason not to delete the other images nominated by Sintegrity in the meantime. Especially since they are requesting it themselves. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This DR page is a mess. Consider writing notes on the side of the file names. Which photographs are credit to unknown photographers? Which were uploaded by Paul Blake? RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, it's multiple DRs. The photographs in this one are from to PaulBlake1957's Flickr account and are probably "found photographs" by other people. The ones in the original DR are from SIMUSA and were again taken by unknown photographers. Essentially every image not specifically credited to Jessica Wadsworth in the file name is by an unknown person. It doesn't help that you needlessly collapsed everything though. To the point that it's a mess that's only because you turned it into one. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment In regards to this last DR, opened by Sintegrity, it should be noted that Paul Blake apparently uploads photographs taken by his parents, by himself, and by others, some of the latter likely being already in the public domain while others maybe not. I’d suggest closing this DR because we are not going anywhere with that many files to assess. RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or we could just delete the images since the uploader requested it within the 7 day curtesy window and there's no way to determine which were taken by whom or are in the public domain anyway. We usually respect deletion requests by the uploader within 7 days of them uploading the images anyway though. Otherwise it's just wasting everyone's time nominating the images in smaller batches when they are probably just going to be deleted anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sintegrity nominated them to deletion not because she wanted to remove them from their upload history, but rather because she thought there were copyright issues to them. Anyway, she could simply add {{SD|G7}} to the files. Let’s see what she thinks. RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @RodRabelo7 and @Adamant1. Sorry for all this work and worry besause of a batch. I think these images are important to ilustrate not only the missionary mission, but also (and more important) people from that region of Angola. But if they are not appropriated within the PD rules, I guess we should delete them. Just let me know what I should do. Sintegrity (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RodRabelo7 can try and make an issue out of it, but at least with this DR the images clearly have copyright issues since of their own admission PaulBlake1957 uploads found photographs to their Flickr account sometimes and it's clear which ones he took or not. The other DRs aren't any better either and RodRabelo7's provided absolutely nothing to contradict that. So the DR should just stay open until a administrator deals with them and hopefully deletes the images. There's no reason to not delete the photographs though. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Per this declaration: https://www.flickr.com/photos/oldangolaphotos/29626779256/ the uploader to flickr made scans of old photos. He clearly does not own the copyright, perhaps of photos made by his parents, but it is totally unclear who the photographers might be. Therefore the files must be deleted from Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Adamant1 alerted me: these photo may not be had taken by the Flickr user. Sintegrity (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be above TOO. (For the record, this is a Malaysian company. See w:en:Causeway Link) S5A-0043Talk 00:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the smiley heads are more complex then the Petronas Logo. --Ellywa (talk) 17:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. COM:DW of copyrighted COM:TOYS. Yann (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD if NASA created these. Yann (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still a derivative work of the copyrighted basic lego minifigure design. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt on the own work claim, it might com from the orchestra communicatio, as there is no metadata, and that there is only the french Horn secttion uploaded, and that it has been photographed from a very convenient angle reserved usually for the official photographers CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no hits on TinEye. Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to think this is not the own photo. --Ellywa (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Template talk:PD-Iceland, this is an unneeded duplicate of {{PD-Iceland50}}. Should be deleted and redirected as redundant. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 17:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The baby image looks to me to be above the threshold of originality. This is in use on English Wikipedia, so if the file could be copied locally by someone with that authority before it is deleted here that would be nice. --TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: I consider this logo above the low TOO of Canada and US due to the spiral design. --Ellywa (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]