User talk:Erik Wannee

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Erik Wannee!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Erik Wannee!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nu-klok - Sabine Zwikker (verdwenen).jpg was uncategorized on 27 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ambidextrous.jpg was uncategorized on 14 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Red right hand.png was uncategorized on 14 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Wierookbrandervoorstelling.jpg was uncategorized on 23 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jesse van Muylwijck - Signeersessie.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jesse van Muylwijck - Signeersessie.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 18:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where do the parts of the photo montage come from? Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 18:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the photo myself at May, 31, while Jesse was at the signing session of his own cartoon exhibition in the stripmuseum (cartoon museum) in Groningen. I added that information to the upload information, just as I always do as I upload photos. And I gave free permission for republishing. So I don't understand why you think there is author or copyright information missing.

I have edited the photo a little bit on my computer, because on the left side there was half a person and rubbish that I didn't want to be shown on the picture. But I wanted to keep the cartoon on the wall intact. That's why is sticks out of the photo.

I hope I've informed you enough, and you leave the photo where it is. Regards, Erik Wannee (talk) 09:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it looked like you've added the cartoon afterwards. My mistake. Is the cartoon copyrighted? Then probably someone else will come and nominate it for deletion because it is not "de minis" and in a museum there is no FOP and it is possibly not PD-old or a work of Folklore or PD-simple. -- RE rillke questions? 10:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good questions. I did not add the cartoon afterwards, it was really on the photo; it was hanging there behind him at the exhibition. (If needed, I can send you the original photo as evidence.)

The content of the cartoon itself is probably copyrighted, as are most cartoons. But in my opinion this cartoon is in essence not really a cartoon but only an illustration of the environment of the signing session. (There are more visible on the backgound.) It would be principally different if I had photographed cartoons there (without the context of the signing session) and published them.

The resolution of this cartoon image is so poor and distorted (by perspective) that I think it cannot be republiced elsewhere.

Moreover, the author of the cartoons (Jesse) is a friend of mine, and I sometimes supply him with ideas for his cartoons. That was the reason why he invited me to that exhibition. I have told him that I have published this photo on WP, so if he would see it as a copyright violation, he would certainly tell me. (He is a lawyer, you must know...) Cheers, Erik Wannee (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanations. I hope not to discouraged you from submitting photos to commons. Thanks for you contributions. Sincerely -- RE rillke questions? 16:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foto poemabeeld

Hoi Erik, je hebt een tijdje geleden een nieuwe foto gehangen aan File:Cage-With-No-Puma-In-It.jpg. Ik vind het prima dat er een minder bewolkte versie is nu. Maar zou je de desbetreffende gegevens ook willen veranderen? Nu staat het nog op mijn naam en een datum in 2009. Groeten, Apdency (talk) 11:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Apdency, ik heb jouw naam niet helemaal weggehaald, omdat jij immers nog steeds de fotograaf bent van de oorspronkelijke foto die ook in het archief bewaard wordt. Daarom heb ik nu mijn naam er gewoon achter gezet, evenals de datum waarop ik die 'revisie'-foto gemaakt heb. Ik hoop dat het zo een beetje duidelijk is. De licentie heb ik maar gewoon hetzelfde gelaten, want ik weet eerlijk gezegd niet hoe je zo iets zou moeten aanpassen. Groet, Erik Wannee (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wat je bedoelt is me denk ik wel duidelijk. Commons maakt deze handelwijze ook wel mogelijk, maar in feite is er natuurlijk sprake van een geheel nieuw werk. Uit een andere hoek genomen zelfs. Bij 'revisie' denk ik eerder aan een bewerking van het bestaande materiaal. Plaatselijke groet, Apdency (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt. Dus ik had de foto gewoon onder een andere naam moeten plaatsen. Maar het gevolg was dan geweest dat ik op de pagina's waar de foto gebruikt werd, de naam van de foto zou moeten vervangen. En nu hoefde dat niet omdat deze foto onder dezelfde naam blijft. Dat was destijds mijn beweegreden. Dat de foto onder een andere hoek gefotografeerd was (vanaf de andere kant van de heuvel) verandert in dit geval niet zoveel aan de essentie. Het ging mij er bij deze foto gewoon om dat jij de pech had dat het zo bewolkt was, en dat wilde ik oplossen.

Enfin, ik denk dat we allebei vrede kunnen hebben met de huidige situatie, dus laat ik het maar zo. In een volgende situatie zal ik het zeker anders doen. Vriendelijke groet, Erik Wannee (talk) 19:47, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Erik Wannee. You have new messages at Morning Sunshine's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frogs 1 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg

File:Frogs 1 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frogs 2 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg

File:Frogs 2 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knowlester.png

File:Knowlester.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 20:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zie de toepassing van deze ster. Voor Sander, die hem zeer verdiend heeft. Erik Wannee (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb de achtergrond - die van Google was en mogelijk auteursrechtelijk beschermd - nu vervangen door een achtergrond van OpenStreetMap, waarop uitdrukkelijk geen auteursrechten gelden. Erik Wannee (talk) 21:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spa citron.jpg

File:Spa citron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Basvb (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wine bottle cooler # Ice bucket

Bonjour, please note that a wine bottle cooler is a traditionnal (17th/17th-century) cold water recipient and distinct from an ice bucket [1]. Thx for your photographs. --Bohème (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anni Blomqvist

I am right that you found the aquarel of Anni Blomqvist.jpg in a leaflet? How come you then tell you are author and copyright owner? Please explain/correct or nominate for deletion. --LPfi (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was in public space, attached to a tree along the road in front of her former house, together with some explaining text about late mrs. Blomqvist. I cropped it from that leaflet. Erik Wannee (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile I have contacted the web site redaction of Åland.com that writes about Mrs. Blomqvist's house, and probably knows the identity of the artist who made the aquarel. I asked them to bring me in contact with that artist, so that I can apologise and ask for an official written permission to publish the picture. Of course, I will then add the name of that artist to the data about the photograph.

I hope you give me a little time to get this done. Erik Wannee (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. Yes, I wanted to get this sorted out, that's why I wrote here instead of nominating the file for deletion. Good luck! --LPfi (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LPfi, today I received an e-mail from the son in law of the author of the aquarel: Guy Frisk. The author is a very old man who is ill and lives in a nursing home in Åland, so he let his relatives do the conversation. The email that I received says that mr. Frisk gives permission to publish an image of this aquarel on Wikipedia (i.e. Wikimedia Commons, but that might be too complex for him to understand). It is signed by mr. Frisk, and a visiting card of him is attached to the document. My question to you is where I can send this permission letter, or where do I have to upload it. I remember that there must be some mail address, but I cannot find it. Thanks, Erik.

PS Of course I have written the author's name at Anni Blomqvist.jpg. Erik Wannee (talk) 08:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for engaging. It is however not enough to have permission to publish it on Wikipedia, but the image has to be licensed to give anybody the right to use the image as they see fit – as long as they respect the artist's work ("moral rights") and the personality rights of the subject. Somebody with the right to represent the copyright owner (perhaps the son-in-law, perhaps not) needs to follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS, in practice probably by sending e-mail to permissions-sv@wikimedia.org, stating their position (legal caretaker of some sort? or perhaps just confirming the artist himself approves), their choice of licence (the default when uploading is CC-BY-SA 4.0, which should be OK) and the work/filename. --LPfi (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well... how to explain that to a 90 year old sick man in Åland. His intention is clear; I don't want to irritate him with all that legal stuff. I will forward the mail with the permission to the English version of the email address that you gave to me, because it has been written in English. And then we will see what happens. Thank you for helping me. Erik Wannee (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it worked out. The English queue often has significant backlog. I am going to be away from keyboard for a while, but all good to you. --LPfi (talk) 19:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Erik Wannee, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

lichtcorrecties

Ik ben het niet eens met de belichting aanpassing die je hebt toegepast op mijn uploads. De beelden zijn flets en mistig geworden door extra licht toe te voegen. Het is het tegenovergestelde wat de meeste bewerkers doen: Die gaan de bij de level adjustment juist de range verminderen zodat het contrast sterker wordt, door de range voorbij de extremen (de donkerste plek en de meest belicht plek te verwijderen. Door extra licht toe te voegen bij de donkere plekken, ga je de contrasten bij de andere delen van het beeld verminderen en bij fel belichte delen van het beeld is er het gevaar van overbelichting waardoor je daar alle details kwijt ben. Vandaar die fletsheid en mistig aspect van het beeld. Dat weegt niet op tegen het oplichten van donkere delen van het beeld. De realiteit is zo. Schaduwen zijn donker.

Professioneel de belichting aanpassen is lastig en zeer tijdrovend. Dan moet je met filters werken waarbij delen van het beeld apart bewerkt worden. In de schaduwen licht toe voegen en contrast versterken en bij overbelichte delen het beeld donkerder maken en contrast versterken. De grenzen van de filters moeten heel precies getrokken zijn om de manipulatie niet te zien bij de overgangen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

De cruciale test is of je meer of minder details ziet in alle delen van het beeld. Te donker of te licht zijn . smaken. In tegenlicht opnames kan het een wezenlijk deel zijn van het beeld. Het kan zijn dat men een keuze maakt van de donkere delen op te lichten, maar dat men voor lief neemt dat de wolkenpartijen minder getekend en/of onzichtbaar worden. (de lucht een witte massa wordt). Maar altijd zo terughoudend mogelijk zijn en kijken naar het geheel van het beeld.Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Ik heb twee beelden teruggedraaid omdat die te flets en mistig is. File:Aanbouw metro en spoorbrug over de Amstel 1988 1.jpg en File:Wadloper in Nederland in 1987.jpg De anderen zijn kwestie van smaak. Het vorig beeld [oorsprong] heeft meer sfeer dan de huidige File:Station Deurne 2020 6.jpg, en bij soort tegenlicht opnamen is sfeer juist belangrijk. Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Ik merkte dat veel foto's zo donker waren dat veel details grotendeels of geheel weggevallen waren. Ik heb expres geen delen van de foto's bewerkt, maar alle bewerkingen op de hele foto's toegepast, omdat je anders echt aan het interpreteren slaat. Met een gerichte aanpassing in de belichtingscurve meende ik een goede balans te hebben gevonden tussen extra details en goede weergave. Die donkere foto van station Deurne vond ik nogal naargeestig, alsof er een donkere regenwolk boven het hoofd van de fotograaf hing. Door hem wat lichter te maken werd het in mijn ogen veel realistischer. Maar voel je gerust vrij om het terug te draaien hoor! No hard feelings. Erik Wannee (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ik neem aan dat je ook hebt gezien dat ik op sommige foto's de horizon recht gedraaid heb. Een paar foto's waren erg scheef gefotografeerd of ingescand, en dat zag er niet uit, vooral als het water niet horizontaal lag, zoals bij File:Spoorbrug Delfshavense Schie 1987 4.jpg. Erik Wannee (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gravstensgrundet

See: File_talk:Gravstensgrund1.jpg#The location of the grave monument. I only noticed this after asking in the disussion sv:Diskussion:Gravstensgrundet (in Swedish). This requires minor modifications to the description of the images of Gravstensgrundet and to the use of the images in some Wikipedias (I can well take care of fi-wikipedia, as it is my home project and Finnish is my native language, English and Swedish I have only learnt at school). The user in sv-Wikipedia who answered my question can probably confirm this. --Urjanhai (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing me. It is indeed very complex. I only knew that the grave monument that I have photographed, is situated in the Kumlinge area. But I did not know that 'Gravstensgrundet' is not the name of that skerry with the grave stone but the name of the whole group of skerries together. Fortunately there is someone who knows exactly how it is. Erik Wannee (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it was not me but the user who answered my question in sv-Wikipedia. In Wikimedia project finally someone notices. --Urjanhai (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:St Peters Church Riga.JPG. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Hello Erik Wannee, thank you for your intrest in my photograph of St Peters Church. I kindly ask you not to overwrite the pictures I have made available in the Commons, but to upload them again under your user name. This also corresponds to the official recommendation (see link above). The image you uploaded was far too bright, making formost the sky and the coulds appear completely unnatural. When evaluating photos, a correctly set display is very important. You can find tips here: Commons:Quality_images_guidelines#Your_monitor. Kind regards from Germany --J. Lunau (talk) 16:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The church was too dark, because of the backlight. The light circumstances were not good when the photo was made. I tried to correct that, but you are right that the air became too bright then. It would need more sophisticated corrections, but I will not do that. We can better wait until someone is there with a camera when there is less backlight. Erik Wannee (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rolkoffer

Heb je dit gezien? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=690386837&oldid=690369883&diffmode=source

Niet te vroeg juichen hoor, want de familie bezit het auteursrecht wellicht niet, maar een mailtje kan geen kwaad. Vraag vooral naar de eerste publicatiedatum en waarin dat is geweest. Groet, Ellywa (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, nou weet ik helemaal niet meer wat ik nou moet doen. Iemand kan wel zeggen dat ik die foto gerust mag publiceren, maar hij schrijft er niet bij met welk gezag hij dat roept. Vooralsnog ga ik er mijn handen dan toch maar niet aan branden, hoe leuk ik het ook zou vinden als dat plaatje in het artikel over de rolkoffer erbij komt te staan. Want dat zou hem toch postuum wat eer geven van zijn uitvinding die hij tijdens zijn leven niet heeft kunnen krijgen. Erik Wannee (talk) 07:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Begrijpelijk. Ellywa (talk) 08:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

Copyright status: File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huis Rozenhage 1889.jpg

File:Huis Rozenhage 1889.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Komarof (talk) 12:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Luchtfoto Burum-1 en Gebouw A.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luchtfoto Burum-1 en Gebouw A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luchtfoto Burum-1 en Gebouw A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vermeende copyvio

Graag de vermeende copyvio melding uit de afbeeldingen verwijderen. Jef G. viel er over.Rasbak (talk) 18:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Staty av Maria Alexandrovna i Mariehamn (portrait).jpg

And also:

File:Staty av Maria Alexandrovna i Mariehamn (landscape).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:A Moment of Solitude DVIDS47625.jpg

Yours sincerely, Consigned (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Erik Wannee

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jesse van Muylwijck - Signeersessie.jpg

Foto poemabeeld

File:Frogs 1 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg

File:Frogs 2 - Cor Dera (Apeldoorn).jpg

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg

File:Blinddruk Sinterklaas.jpg

File:Knowlester.png

File:Spa citron.jpg

Wine bottle cooler # Ice bucket

Anni Blomqvist

File tagging File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg

Deleted content

lichtcorrecties

Gravstensgrundet

Please do not overwrite files

Rolkoffer

Copyright status: File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

File:Huis Rozenhage 1889.jpg

File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

File tagging File:Luchtfoto Burum-1 en Gebouw A.jpg

Vermeende copyvio

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

User talk:Erik Wannee

Tip: Categorizing images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jesse van Muylwijck - Signeersessie.jpg

Foto poemabeeld

Wine bottle cooler # Ice bucket

Anni Blomqvist

File tagging File:Anni Blomqvist.jpg

Deleted content

lichtcorrecties

Gravstensgrundet

Please do not overwrite files

Rolkoffer

Copyright status: File:Alfred Krupa 1954.png

File tagging File:Luchtfoto Burum-1 en Gebouw A.jpg

Vermeende copyvio

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search