User talk:Bedivere

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bedivere!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Un detalle

[edit]

Hola Bedivere, espero que estés muy bien. ¿Podrías encargarte de esto? Es curioso que un anónimo opte por las groserías y piense que esto es un segundo cuartel de la Wikipedia en español. Gracias. Taichi (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listo @Taichi, abrazo Bedivere (talk) 16:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere:Buenas,esta foto debería ser removida o quedarse? AbchyZa22 (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

[edit]

You comment has been requested at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#DOGE Logo as of November 14, 2024.jpg, due to the deletion of a highly viewed photograph with no subsequent notifications to the uploader. WeatherWriter (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a P.S., you should probably double check that you give users alerts in the future and before speedy deleting a file, you should ensure it does indeed qualify under the SPEEDY criteria. The file which you stated “is definitely copyrightable” and “ as a result this shall remain deleted” has been undeleted with an overwhelming consensus to keep it. Speedy deletion criteria only work when there is absolutely no question that it is 100% copyrightable. If there is even the slightest possibility it is public domain or free-to-use, you should open deletion requests and not speedy delete the file. Anyways, keep up the good work here on the Commons! WeatherWriter (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I guess, for this unrequested lecture. Bedivere (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puedes por favor ayudarme con ésta imagen?, el argumento para su eliminacion es incorrecto, ya que sí está en dominio público. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 14:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo creo que podría no ser una obra del gobierno estadounidense. El sitio web, además de tener una nota clara de "© 2024 Rewards for Justice" (a pesar de pertenecer al departamento de justicia), contiene fotografías cuyo origen podría no ser claro, como es el caso de esta foto. Se ponen fotografías de los criminales para permitir su identificación pero no necesariamente las fotografías son del gobierno. Bedivere (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
El sitio web indica: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this website is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ’s permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate. If a copyright is indicated on a photo, graphic, or any other material, permission to copy these materials must be obtained from the original source. In addition, you should be aware that a criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. 713, prohibits use of the Great Seal of the United States under certain circumstances outlined in that section; therefore, we recommend that you consult with counsel before using the Great Seal in any context." Bedivere (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere Gracias por su ayuda e información. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enhancing999

[edit]

You're an admin. Please don't poke the bear. I'm not going to take you to AN/U on this, but my warning was to all, and I'm left being less than true to my word on the prior post on that page when I fail to propose sanctioning you for this. Puts me in a much weaker position if I need to sanction anyone else. - Jmabel ! talk 22:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry @Jmabel. When I responded that user's message I did not notice you made that warning. When I noticed my mistake, given that it was in a similar sense (asking them to stop editing if it wasn't to request an unblock), I thanked your message. I acknowledge my mistake and in no way I intended to deauthorize you. Bedivere (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puedes ayudarme a dar tu veredicto por favor?, es que varias imágenes de Peso Pluma las mandé a mejorar de calidad ya que las originales están en baja calidad, y se subieron aparte porque ya sabes que aquí en Wikimedia Commons está prohibido sobreescribir la imagen y además varias de ellas van a ilustrar los artículos. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 03:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Aurelio. La verdad no sé qué hacer. A mi parecer, por mala que sea la versión original, debería mantenerse aquella y no una reimaginada por IA. Bedivere (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere Pero la versión original no se está borrando, ahí va a seguir. Pedí que se mejorara la calidad, eso no está prohibido aquí. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 19:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]