Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/18

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive February 18^th, 2023

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Livioandronico2013 (talk · contribs)

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose any removal of images which meet copyright. This seems a baby=bathwater mass nomination of images, many of which are very useful to their Wikipedia pages. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I file sono semplicemente un'arma che può essere usata contro di noi da un calzino dell'LTA. Commons ha w:WP:ILIKEIT? Ecco come suona questa logica per me. Apparentemente non abbiamo nemmeno w:WP:DENY, o questa sarebbe una slam duck. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio.jpg is just one out of many which are used and seem essential to their pages. Way too many good images to nominate at once, which violate copyright? Randy Kryn (talk) 01:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to 'Strong Opposes' after now seeing the notice for a major image File:Front views of the Venus de Milo.jpg which is used importantly worldwide. This nomination seems to harm Wikipedia, not build it. Certainly a baby=bathwater situation. Randy Kryn (talk)
I found my way to this DR because the tagging of File:Discobolus_in_National_Roman_Museum_Palazzo_Massimo_alle_Terme.JPG showed up on my enwiki watchlist. This is a Quality image of a highly notable statue and a featured picture on one Wikipedia project. Deleting it would harm the project and is unlikely to stop a sock from socking - en:WP:G5 is not a policy on Commons for good reason. This is a misguided nomination that should be withdrawn. Spicy (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We can't punish the uploader, so we punish the images, that doesn't make sense. Why was the person banned from Commons? This would have been better as a question at the Administrators Noticeboard rather than straight to deletion, clogging the queue. --RAN (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep COM:INUSE applies here. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep except where copyvio is an issue. Ewulp (talk) 03:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all images uploaded before he was banned. However, any photos uploaded by block-evading sockpuppets should be deleted, in my opinion, even if they are in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
Keep Strongly against the removal of illustrations. The idea of deletion is a destructive initiative that harms WikiSkydrinker (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep La suppression de ces images qui n'ont aucun problème de licence constituerait un appauvrissement de Wikipédia. L'inflation cette nuit des annonces de suppression dans ma liste de suivi (19) est une catastrophe. Un exemple parmi d'autres : File:Vespa Todi.jpg. La photo a été introduite en 2015 dans fr:Journal intime (film, 1993)#Premier tournage par un contributeur francophone qui a participé à l'élaboration de l'article et non par un quelconque "forcing". De fait il s'agit, dans la Category:Vespa 125, de la seule illustration du modèle utilisé par fr:Nanni Moretti dans le film. L'original est aujourd'hui au fr:Musée national du cinéma#Collections et sa photo absente de la Category:Museo nazionale del Cinema. File:Vespa Todi.jpg est irremplaçable. Mandariine (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It seems the user has been blocked, and even though he tries to cirvumvent the blocking, his past contributions (at least a few random ones checked in above list) are perfectly valid. Romainbehar (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many photos are good and there is no problem with licence. But, as explanied in the request, there is indeed a major issue with photos pushes under IP on the wikis. The uploader make edit wars on IP to force the use of his photos (2 Examples 1 2); this is the only and important activity of the uploader. This is harassment to the other wikimedians and contrary to what has been said, it damages the quality of wiki projects, because others make better choices of image. If the only way to stop that is to delete the photos from Commons, let's delete the photos. Thanks Elizium23 for this request. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. Also, the nominator has apparently withdrawn this request. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per [1], the deletion request was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 07:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Morcheeba live in Prishtina, Kosovo.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Leeturtle (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FFmpreg Logo new.png

Prop used for page vandalism Rebowa3599 (talk) 06:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nez viela.jpg

não era suposto usar aqui Angola.LA (talk) 08:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

não era suposto estar nesta categoria Angola.LA (talk) 08:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Firefox100DarkThemeWin11.png

firefox 87 31.33.248.15 09:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

firefox 67 31.33.248.15 09:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firefox 67 31.33.248.15 09:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Linly The Face Thailand SS2.webp

Very clearly COPVIO - a TV show promo image, not the user's own work 10mmsocket (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fromandroid-b4eb33811d88a17c4d16f54ab032e677.jpg

Blatant copyvio - taken from https://www.idntimes.com/hype/entertainment/eka-yuliana-2/10-potret-lilly-aktris-yang-diharapkan-main-the-gifted-graduation-c1c2-1?page=all 10mmsocket (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thunyaphat Pattarateerachaicharoen.jpg

Blatant COPYVIO - taken from https://www.idntimes.com/hype/entertainment/nawa-maulida-1/10-potret-namfah-thunyapat-c1c2 10mmsocket (talk) 08:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev attended opening of Shamkir-Abbasli-Narimanli highway 10.jpg

Because it is Blurry MOHAJANPRONAB (talk) 11:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 12:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LouiseHarrisEastleighLibDem.jpg

Because it is Blurry Xtrls (talk) 11:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, per Exif data "©Chris Balcombe for Eastleigh Borough Council / Free for all media". That is not a free license that includes commercial use. --Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Talk:Main Page

oumaima hida Im 7201 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Talk:Main Page

Zäitleche Oflaf vun der Jeeërausbildung.pdf Dewilda (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File not used, replaced by a wikitable. Dewilda (talk) 16:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: obviously no valid reason for deletion of the main page discussion. Please file a deletion request for the file you want to nominate. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Habyarimana.jpg

Blatant copyvio 10mmsocket (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio from [2]. --Rosenzweig τ 19:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:036A4555.jpg

Непраильно выбрал фото Apostol2019 (talk) 09:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|причина}} Apostol2019 (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohamed eslam Elgmall 555.jpg

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Witch Island, Maine.png

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Bing" is an insufficient source, and random search-engine hits are typically non-free. @Matthew C Wallace: where did you get this? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very simple. I sought out a simple reasonable photo of what this abandoned, island sanctuary looked like. All I could find was a satellite photo on bing maps. Was unsure how to cite it. Have no problem giving credit. If you must delete, delete. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: bing maps is not permitted under COM:L. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:South Bristol, Maine and Witch Island.png

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Bing" is an insufficient source, and random search-engine hits are typically non-free. @Matthew C Wallace: where did you get this? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very simple. I sought out a simple reasonable photo of what this abandoned, island sanctuary looked like. All I could find was a satellite photo on bing maps. Was unsure how to cite it. Have no problem giving credit. If you must delete, delete. Matthew C Wallace (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons, you either have to be the copyright owner yourself or the image has to have a suitable license and be credited (normally, the URL where it was displayed is linked). Bing uses a restricted copyright, so Commons cannot host this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: bing maps is not permitted under COM:L. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bodo komm.svg

{{duplicate|File:Bodø komm.svg}} This one should be deleted because the name is spelled wrong (Bodo vs Bodø) Jay1279 (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. The template states that this is a copy of a red-linked file. If it's not a red link, just request a filename change! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate processed. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Testbild smiley derletztepanda.png

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 21:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily: test. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lily Gair Wilkinson - Revolutionary Socialism and the Women's Movement.djvu

This file was initially tagged by MarkLSteadman as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: British author who died in 1957 so still copyright in the UK. Converting for undeletion category. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orlando Paride

This content belongs to a globally-locked sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. --Elizium23 (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~. Some of these photos are in use in other Wikis, added by innocent parties such as yours truly on Wikivoyage, and your argument as I understand it is not that these photos are a problem on Commons but that the sockpuppet shouldn't be permitted to add them to other Wikis. So the recourse isn't to delete the photos but to revert the vandalism on other Wikis and remove the sockpuppet from Commons whenever their presence is discovered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:ADVERT this abuser is engaging in self-promotion by force. The IPs are impossible to block. The ranges are in the 11-bit CIDR class: do you realize the collateral damage involved from that? There are acceptable replacements for all of these photos, none of them are unique, they are all heavily-photographed subject matter. If you only knew the pulling-teeth I have to go through to reduce the reference counts to these photos, if you had to endure the vandalism to your home account's contributions, to your user talk page, but you don't, do you? Elizium23 (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a bureaucrat on Wikivoyage, I sure do have to endure vandalism to my home Wiki and my user talk page. I greatly appreciate that you substituted one of the photos on Wikivoyage. If you take the initiative to replace the photos on Wikivoyage, I'm OK with deleting these from Commons. I'll gladly cross out the opposing vote if I can count on your help in replacing any other photos that are visible in Wikivoyage articles, if there are any (I don't care about photos that are just in Wikidata listings). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely will assist in finding and replacing photos as needed. I have already been doing this on other articles. The only time I outright delete a Paride photo is if it is part of a gallery of many similar photos and its representation is unnecessary. There are always suitable replacements for these. Elizium23 (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good. So I've crossed out my opposing vote as promised, although I think the keep arguments below are meritorious. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We don't delete useful images on Commons because somebody is misusing them. I suppose these images are not substandard in any way, but rather among the better images we have of those subjects. COM:ADVERT mostly just says images have to be in scope, and to my understanding no one says these aren't. Of course, if some are redundant and inferior, those could be nominated. –LPfi (talk) 14:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that in the cases of old art, the user has misused the "author" field, inserting their name, while the intention is that "author" and "artist" should be synonymous. These could be corrected. –LPfi (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then we would appreciate a little help in blocking the abusive user so he cannot misuse the photos. So far, metawiki has been insufficient. Elizium23 (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will certainly revert changing photos to worse ones in the articles I monitor, and I hope other Wikipedians do likewise. And really, I think some of the image changes have made the articles worse. I reverted a few now. –LPfi (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium23, I'm glad you thought better of your edit, but I assure you I took note of it and will be closely monitoring Wikivoyage to see if you choose to edit war with admins concerned solely with making sure the content of articles is as good as possible for travelers. All of us understand how frustrating it is to deal with vandalism. I've often been frustrated by periods of defenselessness against vandals. But if you find yourself losing all sense of perspective, take a break and do something offline or at least off-Wiki. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan, I think what happened is that I reversed the sense of what LPfi said. When I saw his edits he had reverted the sockpuppet. I am sorry that admins are "concerned solely with making sure the content of articles is as good as possible for travelers" because on the English Wikipedia, the admins also need to balance the collaborative needs of a community of editors, without which Wikimedia would not exist. So I hope that admins here and elsewhere would consider that editors need to be civil, collegial, and considerate of one another here, and this behavior is not condoned of forcing photos in using sockpuppets and abuse and edit-wars. Elizium23 (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What does what thumbnails we choose to have in our articles have to do with Wikipedia? Nothing, IMO. And this isn't about "forcing photos" onto Wikivoyage. When we see people putting terrible photos in our articles, some of us (certainly including me) revert the edits. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you're not understanding is that this individual hasn't been causing trouble on Wikivoyage, so we're just regarding their contributions as among the images we could choose to use, nothing more nor less. I support and sympathize with any efforts to revert vandalism, but this isn't the vandalism we're seeing at Wikivoyage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Achim (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sorry @Ikan Kekek, Achim55, and LPfi: Italy doesn't have FOP at all, and unless if they're intend to be participating the WLM ({{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}, which in theory can only be used for files that are audited by MiBAC), they can't be freely used. . --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- What does this mean: "Note: Copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the original author (who is defined as the creator or designer) here. On January 1st of the following year (ie. January 1 of the 71st Year), freely licensed images of the author's 3D works such as sculptures, buildings, bridges or monuments are now free and can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The lack of Freedom of Panorama is no longer relevant here for states with no formal FOP since the author's works are now copyright free." Elizium23 (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings like File:Madonna di Senigallia 2020.jpg are of course not affected by FOP. --Achim (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liuxinyu970226, I just read your link. I think it would be much better for Commons to cease allowing the commercial use of our photos than to delete every goddamned photo of Italy. What the hell kind of repository of images would this be with no photos of Italy? I just broached a proposal on Wikivoyage to upload every photo of Italy we want to continue to use locally, declare that commercial use of images on our site is banned and fork away from Wikimedia if you all at Commons are going to follow through with deleting all these images. This is way, way more serious than a question of whether to delete a few dozen images by one controversial user. Do it at the peril of the credibility and usefulness of the entire Wikimedia family of sites. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If you want to argue about FoP, then let's close this DR and make a new one about the files that may be affected. –LPfi (talk) 11:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly urge Commons to start applying very visible templates on some photos that say "Available for non-commercial use only. Anyone choosing to put this to commercial use may face prosecution." That serves the cause of sharing knowledge much better than insisting on deleting most photos from Italy because allowing every damn photo on the site to be used commercially is so goddamned important. Screw that, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't accept media available only for non-commercial use. Wikipedia is available for commercial use, as are many (all?) of the sister projects. Restraining ourselves to media available for commercial use makes things much more straight forward: now I can choose the best image in a category or gallery, without checking licences, and we seldom have to have "requests for licence review" in addition to the deletion requests. We could have a separate repository for media for educational use only, but I don't see that as our mission. –LPfi (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the only way to stop a long-term sockpuppeteer from repeatedly coming back is, to demonstrate that their activities are unwelcome in general and that it is a waste of time to even try to come back. Livio is unwelcome here for all times, period. However the template mentioned sounds like a serious problem, unfortunately. Does this mean Commons has to delete all pictures of Pisa Tower, Pompeji, Colosseum etc.pp. because it's all Cultural Heritage and in Italy images of CH are not allowed to be commercially used without special permission by officials? If so, it's an incredible problem for us and at the very least the Italian Wikimedia chapter should try to do something about it (maybe they do already, I don't know). Once again, I think the photos in this DR have to be deleted merely because of Livio. I sincerely hope we will never have to delete them or any other media due to Italian laws mentioned. --A.Savin 12:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- So if I as professional photographer, or film company, regret having uploaded my works under a free licence, all I have to do is to spam Wikipedia pages to get them deleted? We don't delete files of "good" users just because they changed their mind, why allow it for those not asking kindly? –LPfi (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Per Commons:Deletion policy and COM:ADVERT, advertising or self-promotion is just cause for deletion of media. I would say that Livio does quite well to promote himself over and above anyone else that might have eligible photos. Elizium23 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - The deletion policy refers to COM:ADVERT (which is in a guideline, not policy) and images uploaded for vandalism in the cases where they are not in scope. COM:ADVERT says you should not misuse Commons, but refers to COM:PS for actual policy: for deletion debates, educational use is what matters, not whether somebody is misusing an image. –LPfi (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For the problem with Italian law, Creative Commons has three different licenses which forbid commercial use. Would changing the license for those photos to one of those & adjusting the text in "how to re-use ..." articles on various wikis solve the problem? Pashley (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it's kind of dogmatic for Commons, that only commercial use allowing licenses may be used. I guess, without this rule the main purpose of Commons ("you can take just any picture and use it for just anything you want") is not possible and Commons would be just "yet another picture repository on Internet". --A.Savin 13:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The answer would be to display a template on some of the photos on this site, stating that they cannot be put to commercial use. The rest would be usable for any purpose. That serves that cause of knowledge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- The copyright owner would need to grant permission to change the license, and since the presumed owner is banned, blocked and globally locked, he has no voice for such a concession. Elizium23 (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Let's not handle the Italian FoP and cultural heritage issues in this DR, they are orthogonal to the selection of files and original argument for deletion. Also, the former does not affect photographs of old works (paintings/architecture), the latter is not a copyright restriction, and thus irrelevant according to Commons' current policy. –LPfi (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hate to say that, but if an Italian re-user in Italy risks prosecution by Italian state for commercial usage of (otherwise correctly licensed, not subject to NoFoP or other restrictions) media from Commons, I'm not really sure it's irrelevant according to Commons policy... --A.Savin 17:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, at least the good ones. IMHO, many of the pictures listed are well-executed; some of them are not perfect, but still usable on Wikipedia, so I wonder why they should be deleted. I have inspected them one by one (although I haven't checked if other versions available are better). Since most of them are good, I list here those having some technical problems or imperfections (of which it's more likely that better versions exist):

With blown highlights or with processing artifacts

Not-so-good lighting

Not ideal composition (too tight crop or too many empty space)

--Lion-hearted85 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The time spent hunting down and fighting sockpuppets is very important; It’s so much time wasted for the whole community. We cannot show weakness in front of unfair contributors. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand your point. I agree that it's essential that each member, despite being bold in making decisions, respects each other's work, act fairly and in good faith. I believe that an objective solution (or compromise) can be found through discussion when ideas differ. Secondly, I believe that a contributor should not replace pictures arbitrarily, but only if they believe to make a clear improvement over the older one (and listen to other's opinions). If this is not the case, let's take countermeasures to save everyone's time. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today February 7 the subject continues to replace these images in the Italian Wiki. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today March 27 the subject continues to replace these images in the Italian Wiki, and move others --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

then? --151.57.133.69 09:38, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, starting from the bad quality ones indicated by Lion-hearted85. I replaced the files with better versions already on Commons. Kept the few that have no equivalent uploaded on Commons yet. (Of course, FoP in Italy isn't relevant here) Ruthven (msg) 21:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orlando Paride (talk · contribs)

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ikan Kekek is right --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Support the rights of editors who contribute such beautiful images!"
Elizium23 (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Don't punish the images or our readers. Why was the person banned, who contributes such beautiful images? Maybe it is time to reassess why the person was blocked and allow a start-over. --RAN (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Treating ego-centrism with recognition is like extinguishing fire with gasoline. --A.Savin 17:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aîe aïe aïe ! Des images qui n'enfreignaient aucun droit d'auteur ont donc déjà été supprimées ? Pardon mais c'est une faute : il va falloir les restaurer (voir plus bas). Ne les remettez pas dans les articles où vous préférez voir les vôtres si vous voulez mais laissez-les vivre leur vie sur Commons : on est pas obligé de mettre uniquement vos images dans les articles il y a de la place pour tout le monde. Et donc une personne qui donne généreusement de son temps de son énergie et de son talent pour enrichir notre chère encyclopédie sans jamais enfreindre aucun droit d'auteur et ce malgré l'acharnement qu'elle subit serait égocentrique. Pardon encore mais un tel jugement est inqualifiable. C'est un fôné ? et alors ? faudrait arrêter d'être naïf : depuis plus de vingt ans que Wikipédia existe tout le monde est susceptible d'être le fôné de quelqu'un seuls les plus généreux se font taper sur les doigts les plus tordus ricanent. À ce compte là seule importe la qualité des articles et de leur illustration. La communauté s'est prononcée ici à ce sujet : Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2020/04#Request for comment: Deletion/undeletion of uploads by banned/blocked users : « Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion ». Mandariine (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS : l'auteur de ces multiples requêtes est bloqué indef sur :en
PPS : et comme si ça ne suffisait pas il se fend d'un superbe point Godwin : voir le titre du tableau supra et son commentaire non signé ! chouette !
Vedo ora che l'aggressore a lungo termine sta sollecitando persone (come Mandariine, Randy Kryn, Ewulp, Richard Arthur Norton, Achim55 e SHB2000) a partecipare a queste conversazioni sull'eliminazione. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"non signé", infatti. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 20:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

je n'ai pas besoin qu'on me sollicite pour apprécier ceci à sa juste valeur ! je remets mes ps à leur place : évitez de dénaturer les interventions des autres ! et de procéder à des intimidations ! Mandariine (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Je déplore comme Mandariine ces suppressions... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This entire proposed mass deletion "action" is the opposite of w:WP:DENY and for that reason alone would have been better, not to have been proposed at all. The proposed time cost and effort by volunteers would be a wastful negative effort. Time and effort will be better invested in "positive" contributions elsewhere on these projects. Also, image files should not be deleted as "tangential punishment" for the actions of any User. The files/ images are decoupled from any uploader. They stand on their own inherent value and any added value they may bring to each project. Deletions under this proposal would not benefit any project. Thanks, --
Ooligan (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiRomaWiki (talk · contribs)

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per this 2020 RFC which decided that removing images by banned users does not qualify as a reason for removal. Many of these images are widely used on Wikipedia, which testifies to their quality. Yes, it would be nice if all the banned users went away, and if they read these deletion requests should really tone it down, but that has nothing to do with these images and the 2020 decision. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Randy Kryn, forse hai frainteso il risultato di quella RFC. Fondamentalmente non c'è consenso per entrambi i lati dell'argomentazione: Bloccare/bannare l'evasione/sockpuppetry da solo non è un motivo valido per eliminare i media o rifiutare una richiesta di annullamento dell'eliminazione. Pertanto, non hai un valido motivo (basato solo sull'evasione del divieto) per respingere questa richiesta di annullamento dell'eliminazione.
Proporrei che "l'evasione del divieto" non è il motivo per cui richiedo la cancellazione. Chiedo la cancellazione perché
1. Le immagini vengono abusate e forzate in centinaia di articoli, cross-wiki, per eclissare il lavoro valido e di alta qualità di altri utenti, inclusi partner WMF e musei,
2. Le immagini sono l'"esca" che riporta Orlando, ancora e ancora, ad abusare di noi e di ogni wiki che tocca.
Se fosse solo l'evasione da parte di Orlando di un divieto di caricare semplicemente foto di qualità e offrirle per il nostro uso, non sarei qui a chiedere la cancellazione.

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 17:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forse @Krd commenterebbe gentilmente l'esito della suddetta RFC, in qualità di amministratore di chiusura. Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some of these files are high quality and of use to both Commons and Wikipedia. Block the user and his sockpuppets by all means, but we should keep useful files. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Don't punish the images or our readers. Why was the person banned, who contributes such beautiful images? --RAN (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Treating ego-centrism with recognition is like extinguishing fire with gasoline. --A.Savin 17:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quelle chose étonnante de voir qualifiée d'égocentrique une personne qui donne généreusement de son temps et de son énergie pour enrichir notre chère encyclopédie sans jamais enfreindre aucun droit d'auteur et ce malgré l'acharnement qu'elle subit. C'est un fôné ? et alors ? faudrait arrêter d'être naïf : depuis plus de vingt ans que Wikipédia existe tout le monde est susceptible d'être le fôné de quelqu'un seuls les plus généreux se font taper sur les doigts les plus tordus ricanent. À ce compte là seule importe la qualité des articles et de leur illustration. La communauté s'est prononcée ici à ce sujet : « Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion » et ça a été répété (vous allez rire) à de multiples reprises à Livioandronico himself : les images ne peuvent être supprimées de Commons (sauf violation du droit d'auteur ce qui n'est pas le cas) elles sont données irrévocablement. Des administrateurs qui supprimeraient des images n'enfreignant aucun droit d'auteur se mettraient en faute. Mandariine (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC) NB : l'auteur de ces multiples requêtes est bloqué indef sur :en[reply]
Keep Per Mandariine. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NikonZ7II (talk · contribs)

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some of these files are high quality and of use to both Commons and Wikipedia. Block the user and his sockpuppets by all means, but we should keep useful files. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je crois qu'il y a déjà eu une discussion sur les photos importées par ce contributeur (Tempio di Marte Ultore (Roma) - Laterale.jpg)?? Je suis embarrassée : certaines de ces photos sont d'excellente qualité et je ne vois pas indiqué la preuve qu'elles violent des droits d'auteur. Pierrette13 (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ficaia. COM:INUSE applies. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. Further, the same rationale against deletion as voiced by others at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Livioandronico2013 applies. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the record: RFC<tvar name="1"></tvar> less than 2 years ago --Achim55 (talk) 10:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, these images are fine and populate some major Wikipedia articles. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is the long-term abuse case detailed somewhere? Richard Nevell (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hope that helps, @Richard Nevell. Elizium23 (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ces images d'art et d'architecture de bonne qualité qui n'enfreignent aucun droit d'auteur (licence okki absence de copyvio) et illustrent généreusement les articles de Wikipédia. Voir aussi : Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Livioandronico2013. L'auteur est un fôné ? et alors ? faut arrêter d'être naïf : depuis plus de vingt ans que Wikipédia existe tout le monde est susceptible d'être le fôné de quelqu'un seuls les plus généreux se font taper sur les doigts les plus tordus ricanent. À ce compte là seule importe la qualité des articles et de leur illustration. Ça a été clairement réaffirmé dans ce sondage (merci Achim) : « Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion » et répété (vous allez rire) à de multiples reprises à Livioandronico himself : les images ne peuvent être supprimées de Commons (sauf violation du droit d'auteur ce qui n'est pas le cas) elles sont données irrévocablement. Des administrateurs qui les supprimeraient se mettraient en faute. Mandariine (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC) (message perso : coucou la belle ! alors toi aussi la liste de suivi a été pourrite !)[reply]

Also, there is Michelangelo's David - right view 2.jpg, by another sock of Livio. 83.61.231.21 21:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving aside the reasons for my blocking,which in any case went from 3 months to indefinitely without any discussion,where personal attacks were only if I made them and not if I suffered them. I do not insist on putting up random photos but only when they are obviously better than the previous ones example this one [3] better than this one [4] . Thank you--79.17.63.139 13:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Moreover, he has been blocked indefinitely in the English wiki, and probably now venting his anger here [5]. 5.169.73.61 13:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

Keep the Files. No need to cut off one's nose to spite one's face. If one or more violated copyright, then one or more should be deleted. But not a blanket delete. Vicedomino (talk) 17:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Treating ego-centrism with recognition is like extinguishing fire with gasoline. --A.Savin 17:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Mandariine. A lot of these photos are good and very useful. It would be a lost for Commons. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Somewhere, there needs to be a discussion of what Commons policy is toward the uploads of block-evading sockpuppets. I think it's absurd to just enable them to continue uploading files. Where should we have a policy discussion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek, c'è stata una discussione nell'aprile 2020, ed è stata decisamente inconcludente. Commons:Village pump/Archive/2020/04#Request for comment: Deletion/undeletion of uploads by banned/blocked users.

In breve: Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion. --Krd

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Che peccato! So we put our hands behind our backs and tell people to keep abusing us. How absurd! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek, ho già confermato che questo non è un semplice caso di evasione del divieto, e se non ci fosse altro se non l'evasione dei ban, non avrei proposto la cancellazione di >2.500 fotografie di alta qualità con licenza gratuita.

Il problema in questione riguarda l'abuso cross-wiki, l'autopromozione e questo utente che forza il proprio lavoro a scapito di altri contributori in buona fede. È un'ingiustizia nei confronti di tutti gli altri che producono un lavoro di alta qualità che viene cancellato dalle azioni di questa persona.

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sono francamente sconcertato da alcuni collaboratori che affermano che queste fotografie sono "insostituibili", quando in realtà sono luoghi e opere d'arte molto popolari, con dozzine di fotografie duplicate di alta qualità, spesso nella stessa categoria dallo stesso punto di vista.

Ad esempio, il caso della rara Vespa di un film, questo veicolo è in un museo. Non viene smontato, non viene distrutto, è integro ed esposto; chiunque potrebbe fotografarlo; infatti, chiunque potrebbe fungere da collegamento con questo museo per cercare di procurarsi una fotografia di alta qualità con licenza gratuita dal museo stesso.

Le argomentazioni secondo cui le fotografie sono COM:INUSE (perché un burattino calzino che elude il divieto ha assicurato che siano forzate all'uso) o "insostituibili" sono entrambe argomentazioni vuote e prive di fondamento. Triste a dirsi, ma Wikimedia sarebbe un ambiente migliore, più amichevole e più collegiale con la perdita definitiva di Orlando Paride.

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 21:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I think it's important for block-evading sockpuppets to have all their work reverted/deleted. We have fought hard on this issue at en.wikivoyage and do have that policy. I certainly understand your remarks about alternatives to these images, but the issue of people deciding to use particular images requires specific action in each article, and I don't see where that in particular is relevant to whether the work should be deleted or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tout simplement parce que : « Block/ban evasion/sockpuppetry on its own is not a valid reason to delete media or reject a request for undeletion ». Et sinon reconnaissance éternelle au premier qui ramènera la photo de la vespa de Moretti (je vois qu'on me lit). Pour le moment elle n'est pas sur Commons c'est ballot. On va donc devoir se contenter de la seule photo disponible de ce modèle. Qui reviendra sur Commons lorsque quelqu'un aura ramené celle de Moretti dans les articles concernés. Mais elle ne sera pas supprimée de Commons parce qu'elle n'enfreint aucun droit d'auteur et qu'elle pourra servir pour illustrer une autre page selon le choix d'un autre rédacteur. Ce qui ne vous empêchera pas d'insérer l'une de vos photos : Wikipédia est grande. Mandariine (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'aurais aucune objection à conserver des photos qui sont actuellement irremplaçables, comme l'image Vespa.

En aucun cas je ne souhaite nuire à Wikimedia Commons ou à ses projets frères. Je leur souhaite toujours le meilleur et une ambiance collégiale accueillante pour les contributeurs de bonne foi.

Cela signifie que garder certaines photos d'Orlando serait nécessaire. Jamais dans un million d'années je ne nierais l'apparition de photos sans doublon. Ce n'est pas une pierre d'achoppement pour moi. Je vous remercie pour vos aimables paroles.

Salutations. Elizium23 (talk) 22:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: I understand so, that all their future sock uploads will be eligible for speedy deletion, if they are globally banned (not to be confused with global lock). Given all the LTA and cross-wiki abuse, it's meanwhile perfectly in place, just we need volunteers to launch an RfC on Meta. Regards --A.Savin 01:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Let me know if you'd like me to support a global ban at Meta. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin, could you cite the policy that explains that criterion for speedy deletion? Are you referring to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion? Elizium23 (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A lot of these are excellent images and it would be a loss to Commons and Wikipedia were they to be deleted. Ban the socks, but keep the images. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ANILYONCALIK.jpg

Old image Anilyoncalik (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 23:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Commonists (talk · contribs)

This content belongs to a globally-locked LTA sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigation on Commons, Wikidata, and enwiki. This user, through block evasion on IP addresses, has continued his campaign of forcing his work into every article possible, regardless of quality or worthiness of other files. See this IP and this IP and this IP ad nauseam. The only way to stop this abuse of forcing photos into articles is to delete the photos themselves and to w:WP:DENY recognition to the abusive sockpuppets. The reasoning is thus: the photos existing here are the attractive force which brings Orlando back to edit and abuse dozens of Wiki projects. Let us remove his incentive to abuse us any further.

Elizium23 (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info: Pope Paul III (Titian - National Museum of Capodimonte) – edited.jpg is a derivative version of Pope Paul III (Titian - National Museum of Capodimonte).jpg. 83.61.231.21 14:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Baby/Bathwater. The cure is worse than the disease. I understand the motivation but at least be selective. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been able to replace the picture of Michelangelo's David with another one of the many available. Trying to be more constructive, if the intent of this proposal is to be delivered, is there a bot that could propose a replacement image rather than leave editors scrambling to repair the hole left by deletion? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@John Maynard Friedman, grazie per le tue preoccupazioni. Credo che si potrebbe sviluppare un bot per gestire alcuni casi. Credo che molti, molti casi possano essere gestiti semplicemente attingendo alla cronologia dell'articolo, poiché questo utente spesso sovrascriveva i collegamenti esistenti con i propri. Pertanto, ripristina semplicemente le sue modifiche e avrai le immagini originali, nella maggior parte dei casi.

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 23:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Si, Elizium23, ha raggione. In the case that affected one of my watched articles on en.wiki, the change was made (probably in good faith) five months and over 75 edits ago. And the change replaced a poor image with a good one. So it took time to find the change, evaluate it, find that reversion would not be the best result, then go search for an alternative picture of the same quality. Easy in this case, there are many - but others not so much. Non è facile! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@John Maynard Friedman, sono d'accordo che sia noioso e manuale per gli articoli di Wikipedia in cui la qualità è inferiore. Tuttavia, attualmente sto avendo successo su Wikidata, dove Orlando ha giocato inosservato per alcuni anni, ma per lo più ha sostituito immagini di alta qualità, a volte con licenze ancora più libere, quindi tutto ciò che deve essere fatto è individuare la sua modifica e annullarla.

Non sono sicuro di quanto possa essere potente un bot, ma potrebbero forse proporre immagini alternative nell'articolo Pagine di discussione, basate sull'adiacenza in una categoria di Commons?

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Un certains nombre de ces photos sont de qualité. Je déplore l'attitude du faux-nez, mais de là à tout supprimer, non. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep par Sebring12Hrs. La règle COM:INUSE s'applique ici. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – No valid reason for deletion offered. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. But I would suggest trying to find better images to use instead. Paul August (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If the goal is to punish the editor for using socks to force an inferior image into an article, ban the user and request deletion of the inferior image. Some of these are the only available image and quite a few have been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and are considered Quality images. Ewulp (talk) 03:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some of these files are high quality and of use to both Commons and Wikipedia. Block the user and his sockpuppets by all means, but we should keep useful files. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This entire proposed mass deletion "action" is the opposite of w:WP:DENY and for that reason alone would have been better, not to have been proposed at all. The proposed time cost and effort by volunteers would be a wastful negative effort. Time and effort will be better invested in "positive" contributions elsewhere on these projects. Also, image files should not be deleted as "tangential punishment" for the actions of any User. The files/ images are decoupled from any uploader. They stand on their own inherent value and any added value they may bring to each project. Deletions under this proposal would not benefit any project. Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Compromise? I haven't commented so far, while I understand both a) the importance of discouraging sockpuppetry and b) the bad effects of people fighting to keep their own pics in articles, this proposal clearly isn't succeeding as it is. Commonists (etc) is a good photographer, but no so good that his images of commonly photographed subjects are essential. The images listed above vary from those with many alternatives on Commons that are just as good (eg: File:Diana of Versailles.jpg - there is a Commons category for this statue with 36 images, but he has pushed this into 12 articles on en:wp alone), to those where his photos are the only/much the best image. I would support a selective renomination of dispensible images. Another example is File:Salome with the Baptist's head - Charles Mellin.jpg, used as the lead image at the article on Salome - arguably an eccentric choice. We have another of the painting, but only a 50 kbytes file. Johnbod (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Se Commons Delinker potesse essere sfruttato per recuperare le immagini precedenti dalla cronologia degli articoli, potremmo risolvere la stragrande maggioranza di questi andando allo status quo ante, e quindi potremmo procedere valutando immagini di qualità superiore. Ho recuperato in questo modo oltre 150 contributi in buona fede su Wikidata.

Saluti. Elizium23 (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23 Could you please translate to English your responses here and those above? Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 22:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The picture used on nl.wiktionary was selected by another user on its own merits. Commons should not be used to enforce local policies of some projects. --MarcoSwart (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy delete|G7}} I hereby withdraw this deletion request as a snow keep. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Elizium23 (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meteran listrik Indonesia.jpg

Author request for courtesy deletion, see Special:Diff/721968166/733325885. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: image is COM:INUSE at w:id:Meteran listrik. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: The file is no longer used in the Indonesian Wikipedia or has been replaced with another file. Padliansyah553 (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see. However, it's still useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Initially I uploaded the file but I want to delete it because it contains an address which is private. Is there a sufficiently argumentative policy for removal for this reason? Seriously I haven't fully studied the Commons community policies. Padliansyah553 (talk) 03:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upload a new version, using the button on the file, and then request a rev del of the current version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He has uploaded an updated version with the personal data redacted. I have also made a request to the admins to remove the previous version. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rachmat04, making the request elsewhere when it is open at one venue is not a good idea. We have @Mdaniels5757 here, who is an admin. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, pardon me. I wasn't aware that there is an admin in this discussion. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 19:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete the previous version for privacy concerns. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily revdelled the previous version for privacy reasons; speedy kept the file as a whole. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JenShah.jpg

Found in various places on the Internet discospinster (talk) 20:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sharchoor.png

Because it is Random photo from internet Xtrls (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced screenshot. --Achim55 (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David Dastmalchian.png

Is this a free image? 2600:100C:A208:620D:A417:16B0:EA3B:F5CE 20:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Probably a copyvio, multiple instances found. A09 (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISSA Text Image In New Design.jpg

Complex logo Trade (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, non-notable and out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Insig Office Building Prishtina.jpg

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Kosovo A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Kosovo now has acceptable FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rafiul Islam.jpg

Out of scope Nahid Hossain (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dilma Rousseff President.jpg

Derivative work of this image, not freely licensed. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nishimatsuya Sign - Kitakyushu.jpg

Possible copyright violation. No Freedom of Panorama in Japan Headlock0225 (talk) 06:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:株式上場企業 (2722449689).jpg

Possible copyright violation: no Freedom of Panorama in Japan Headlock0225 (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Алексей Поленков(Веб-дизайнер,основатель).jpg

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 07:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: F10 applies. No good global contributions. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 04:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Korean War Memorial 057 (24673728398).jpg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calvin Horton Vigil (50141030952).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patrizio Rispo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Deadstar as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no permission. Clear watermark in the image, more details needed. -- Deadstar (msg) 13:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amir Locke Protest Minneapolis February 8 (51871080893).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Remembering George Floyd at Chicago and 38th (50024282941).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Central (52090008732).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Central (52090006447).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Bryant (52077454143).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Downtown West (52112661238).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Downtown West (52112869399).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minneapolis neighborhood Longfellow (52202595784).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Face au Louvre (14023204965).jpg

Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ouverture de pensée (9231468522).jpg

Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:هندورابی-7-620x413.jpg

Suspicious own work claim. Watermarked: IranDeserts.com HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Also affected:[reply]

Please consider deleting them too. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:جمام.jpg

out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:North Strand railway bridge 4.jpg

not a free image. Photo is of an advert. Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:North Strand railway bridge 3.jpg

Not a free image. Photo of an advert. Secretlondon (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:War Memorial Korea 20150623 16 (18883014918).jpg

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The notice board, not the warship, is the main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:War Memorial Korea 20150623 15 (18884513769).jpg

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The notice board, not the warship, is the main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:War Memorial Korea 20150623 12 (19073915491).jpg

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rafį Řaħmaŋ Řaįf (রাইফ).jpg

Quién es? 191.125.18.44 23:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Whoever he is, this is not a selfie, so it needs permission from the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Archivo : Bochini chicas mardel.jpg

violación de derechos de autor. El hombre que dice ser "Ricardo Bochini" no es. Tampoco el lugar en Mar del Plate. Eliminación inmediata. Inkmas (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michael Baczor.jpg

There is no good EXIF data available on this file or on Filckr source url and the uploader there is not an established one either. COM:LL. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 07:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotografias de arquivo do ex-governador Amazonino Mendes. (52686845889).jpg

The banner in the photograph is not covered by {{FoP-Brazil}} because it's not permanently located in a public place. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:$10 1964 P.jpg

A 1964 design by a Swiss organization would still be in copyright in Switzerland. As the description notes, it was rejected. The Bank of Canada is a Crown corporation but even if they were the copyright holder, it was not published in 1964 but more recently, and likely after 1972. Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arliss Sturgulewski in 1989.jpg

"This file is in the public domain because the photos in this photostream mostly carry the legend "Public Domain" in their description files in spite of any Flickr licensing to the contrary and were uploaded by an organization which is sponsored by the United States government and has historically served as a repository for works of said government" is not adequate. "All rights reserved" on Flickr, no public domain note in description. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WikiMUC-Schaufenster 2023-02-08 13.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Pakar SEO Terbaik (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please mind your words! This is a photo of the official WikiMUC vitrine (Angertorstrasse 3, 80469 Munich) February 8, 2023 showing Karl Valentin's artwork Computerarchiv-Muenchen.de (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Computerarchiv-Muenchen.de, aren't the photographs in the image copyrighted, and since they're displayed indoors, not covered by Germany's freedom of panorama rules? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All photographs shown in the vitrine are from Wikimedia Commons 88.217.114.72 21:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Then Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Out of the Ashes".pdf

Image is likely public domain but we don't usually keep .pdfs that are just photographs. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We could make an exception if there is no other version of this photo available. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess I'll double check to see if the photograph is public domain before I extract a JPG from that pdf file if the uploader won't do so. Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Uploaded File:OutOfTheAshesDempseyAndCarroll1890s.jpg. It's an American storefront and appears to be public domain by age of the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Now we can Delete this PDF. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JacobRezaei (talk · contribs)

Files obtained from the internet

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Balistrad-1-3-500x500.png

COM:SCOPE Oscar_. (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. @Oscar . were you thinking of something else? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope & in use. --Strakhov (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev inaugurated Gizilhajili-Goranboy-Goran-Rahimli-Veyisli-Gazanbulag-Borsunlu highway 01.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev arrived in Goranboy district for visit 02.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev inaugurated Gizilhajili-Goranboy-Goran-Rahimli-Veyisli-Gazanbulag-Borsunlu highway 04.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev visited Goranboy branch of “Azerkhalcha” OJSC 09.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev inaugurated Goranboy District Central Hospital 04.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 11:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev attended opening of Shamkir-Abbasli-Narimanli highway 15.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 12:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilham Aliyev arrived in Shamkir district for visit 01.jpg

Because it is Nonsense Xtrls (talk) 12:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid reason. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/Antigoni Drisbioti

No exif, uploader has a history of copyvios. Unlikely to be own work, looks like a screenshot. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alan-M-Turing-1951.jpg

Image is still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see the second tag as applicable. The first license doesn't mention a URAA restoration for anonymous works, we have never applied the second one to any of the UK images we have hosted, we always used the 70 year rule from creation. Perhaps we can see the discussion where the consensus was formed. This would affect >1,000 images from 1926 to 1953 from the UK, as well a half dozen, just of Turing. --RAN (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per [6], this is a 1951 photograph by London photographers Elliott & Fry, now at the National Portrait Gallery in London. I'm not sure who the actual photographer was, but the NPG, who apparently took over a lot of Elliott & Fry negatives, perhaps knows. Before you could (perhaps) apply {{PD-UK-unknown}} you would need to do further research (like contacting the NPG) given the fact that the name of the photography studio is known. And then of course there's the URAA as mentioned in the nomination. I don't see why the URAA would not apply to "anonymous" photographs (if this even is one). So the photo is still protected in the US until the end of 2046. The file can be restored in 2072 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} unless someone can find out the actual photographer and that person died before 2001. --Rosenzweig τ 14:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dänische Wiek und Greifswald.png

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Challenged, Keep this is just a regular OpenStreetMap Enyavar (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Keep, OpenStreetMap should be free. I just looked up their license, and as this particular type of license wasn't offered by the Wikimedia upload assistant, I added it manually to the file information (under Licensing). --Ubel (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with OSM license tags. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schmalspur-Dampflok T1 der Lokalbahn Treibach-Glödnitz.jpg

Copyvio - Picture by Austrian photographer Otto Zell (1909–1964), not public domain. No simple photographic picture but a full "Lichtbildwerk" (70 years pma). Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit body ppz1415a.png

Because it is Blurry Xtrls (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was created using 1x1 pixels, it's actually about as sharp of an image as you can possibly get. It's common practice to use pixel art for these basketball kits, you can look at any NBA team's wiki page and see that texts are not always easily readable. 8obis (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit body bcgargzdai2223 a.png

Because it is Blurry Xtrls (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again this is not blurry, you're probably seeing a upscaled version since the image is 38 pixels by 58 pixels. It's intended use is to miminally display jerseys on the wikipedia article for the team as many basketball teams do. 8obis (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christ sculpture.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karl Lagasse and Dauville trophy.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jesus is Lord by Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:One Dollar Bronze by Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elle Fanning with Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sophie Turner with trophy by Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:One dollar blue in the dessert by Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johnny Depp and Karl Lagasse.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"One Dollar in the Cyberspace NFT, projected on Time Square billboards".jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cryptogram One.jpg

The uploader is not the creator of the artwork, nor the photographer, and does not hold the copyright. They simply copied the images from someone's social media, as stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A3d.nftart&diff=1139361326&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A One Dollar Red in the Sky.png

COPYRIGHT VIOLATION. The uploader of the file is not the artist, nor the photographer who took the image. They stated that they simply copied it from social media here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:3d.nftart&diff=next&oldid=1139208018 Netherzone (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alba Frenzel Endoplasmatisches Retikulum 2021.jpg

Die abgebildete Person hat einer Veröffentlichung widersprochen F.Erbacher (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arlissak.jpg

"This file is in the public domain because the photos in this photostream mostly carry the legend "Public Domain" in their description files in spite of any Flickr licensing to the contrary and were uploaded by an organization which is sponsored by the United States government and has historically served as a repository for works of said government" is not adequate. "All rights reserved" on Flickr, no public domain note in description. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikiloveicosincubator.png

Because it is Random photo from internet Xtrls (talk) 10:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xtrls random photo from internet? as the title says wiki-love-icons-incubator/ it is a screenshot taken on the incubator and reported to its Admin's Noticeboard thanks. 💖 Sakura Hana 🌸 (talk) 10:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura emad, please remember to mention that from where the screenshot has been taken. For example, you are not the creator of this screenshot completely because the stuff of which screenshot is taken and interface etc. belong to Wikimedia. Otherwise,

Keep because this is not out of scope. Best, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 08:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The name is also not a descriptive one. I also suggest renaming it to "File:Wiki Love screenshot, Incubator Wiki.png" or similar. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 08:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i see thanks. 💖 Sakura Hana 🌸 (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file was renamed on 3 mars 2023, to File:Wiki Love screenshot, Incubator Wiki.png.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adin Ross getting Pizza bombed.ogg

Although the uploader of the video (LOU WOP) has the video marked under a CC license, the video is actually from Adin Ross's stream and I'm pretty sure his streams are not under a CC license. reppop^talk 06:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with free equivalent from this video. Knightoftheswords281 (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Knightoftheswords281: That's also not by him, it's from Zias's video on the prank. The video is also not marked with a license anyways, so it's still not free. reppop^talk 01:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete then, no known free equi. Knightoftheswords281 (talk) 03:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Address by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy to both Houses of Parliament of the United Kingdom.jpg

Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement A1Cafel (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Declaration between the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the government of Ukraine.jpg

Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement A1Cafel (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Address by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy to both Houses of Parliament of the United Kingdom 2.jpg

Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement A1Cafel (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Address by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy to both Houses of Parliament of the United Kingdom 3.jpg

Per talk page of the {{President.gov.ua}}, the Office of the President of Ukraine switched the license from CC-BY-4.0 to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 on 4 October 2022, thus image published afterwards fails Common's licenseing requirement A1Cafel (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eva Avila in 2022.jpg

the metadata contain a location which could be a privacy violation. Eddyscordo (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2A01:E11:5013:C2E0:3DFD:2F66:34A7:DA2D 14:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We should want to avoid deleting this photo, as it's used in a Wikipedia article about the artist. If that's her home, then yes, exact coordinates should not be provided. If it's not, it probably doesn't matter because wherever it was, she's no longer there. I think the solution in this case would be that if it's important to remove the coordinates, they should be removed and then the relevant edits should be revdeled. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I uploaded a new version without location info in Exif data. Requested hiding file and revisions showing the Exif data here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#File:Eva Avila in 2022.jpg. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done thanks to Túrelio. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The location data is now scrubbed from the file and the Commons history. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rákóczi út from the Astoria, 1969.jpg

Vajszada Károly 1977-ben hunyt el ( https://csemadok.sk/jeles-felvideki-szemelyisegek/vayszada-vajszada-karoly/ ), nem adományozhatta a képeit a Fortepannak, mivel az 2010-ben jött létre. A Fortepan licenc- és szerzőségi kezelése ebben az esetben (is) kétséges. Állításuk szerint nem tudják, mikor született és halt meg ( https://fortepan.444.hu/2014/03/23/vajszada-karoly-egy-rossz-festo-de-megdobbentoen-jo-fenykepesz ). Ugyanitt leírják, hogy "A fotóhagyatékot Zsanda Zsolttól kaptuk kölcsön, akihez az édesapján keresztül jutottak a 6x6-os negatívok." Viszont, hogy milyen jogalapon került ez szabad licenc alá az nem derül ki. Ezek minden bizonnyal árva művek, így nem helyezhető szabad licenc alá. A kép Delete Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jacob Jebsen (1870–1941).jpg

Copyvio painter Sophus Hansen lived from 1871-1959, and is dead less than 70 years, therefore his paintings are still under copyright protection Oursana (talk) 03:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~If the painting was commissioned by BASF for display, then it was made public.~~ Undelete at 70+1. --RAN (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the meaning of "commissioned by BASF for display"? The source of the painting is a dead link. we do not know who commissioned the painting. The painting is copyrighted. Publishing art works has nothing to do with validity of copyright, which we see in museums. --Oursana (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought this was from BASF-USA. --RAN (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mladen Ivanković-Lijanović and Nigel Casey 2011.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MalnadMystries.png

Copyright? I don't think that this book cover is own work. Wouter (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Filip Gilissen Portrait Muhka.jpg

Work is copyright to the artist, per http://ensembles.mhka.be/actors/filip-gilissen?locale=en&mobile=1 Theredproject (talk) 14:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imagen aérea antigua del Colegio Corazón de María (Gijón).jpg

{{copyvio|source=https://recuerdogijon.blogspot.com/search?q=codema}} Torres05 (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KORG Volca Bass - Chaotic (photo by David J).jpg

Stylised/artistic photo imported from Flickr that doesn't really suit Commons' needs. Already have numerous other photos of this subject. Ubcule (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KORG Volca Bass - Electronic music looks like this (photo by David J).jpg

Stylised/artistic photo imported from Flickr that doesn't really suit Commons' needs. Already have numerous other photos of this subject. Ubcule (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KORG Volca Bass & David J - Happy Acid Kid (photo by David J).jpg

Personally-oriented image imported from Flickr, not really suitable for Commons without cropping, and since we already have more appropriate images of the synth, this isn't required. Ubcule (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Couverture DVD Épopée en Amérique.png

Dubious claims of authorship and of copyright ownership. DVD cover. The main illustration is a detail from a painting by Frances Anne Hopkins (1838-1919) and as such in the public domain. The rest of the graphic art of the cover is likely copyrighted by the production company or other copyright owners. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justkeepb (talk · contribs)

Out of scope pictures with suspicious copyright status

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seepelan (talk · contribs)

Files are all out of scope, one is a copyrighted logo and should be uploaded locally, the one from fcf.ir has a fake license and is a copyright violation, and inconstant metadata makes own work claim questionable.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thinlizzy Black Boys.jpg

Copyright violation - This is an album cover from the 1970's. The given source and the author are both google search results. I can see no evidence of this being released under a creative commons licence. 192.76.8.84 20:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evan Tan at Vogue.jpg

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evan at Netflix Tudum in Singapore.jpg

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Basel Musikmuseum.jpg

copyright violation; contemporary photos, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question De minimis? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential deletes from Flickr import by me (Thibaultmol)

So I did a bunch of Flickr imports at some point, I was aware of the guidelines on what images are allowed on Commons. But I'll be honest, in hindsight I didn't fully 'realize' some of them. Some people thankfully helped me with reporting some of the problematic images (mainly streetart and such). I want to help fix this. I've gone through all the images I've uploaded (probably). This is a list of POTENTIAL deletions. Please verify them one by one and don't just actually delete them. I'm listing all the ones that I think MIGHT have to be deleted. But i'm sure there are also many in here that don't need to be deleted. Thank you

Reasons for deletion request --thibaultmol (talk) 10:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio (both text and artwork). Kept some graffiti because of FOP-Germany, and few others for de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bailey, John MLA.jpg

No COM:FOP Australia for a temporary sign. Belbury (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was employed by the NT Parliament to be John Bailey's Electorate Officer, and I worked with him for roughly 6 years until he resigned from the Parliament. The image is of an election poster used in one of John's campaigns. I (personally) took the photo of the poster. The poster was given to me by John, when his resignation from Parliament took effect. The poster has since been destroyed. Gell0011 (talk) 12:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gell0011: but you took a photo of a copyrighted poster. You have no right to license your photo of that graphic artwork and the image must be deleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonegez.jpg

Sattelite picture is not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: mainly because we don't know from which satellite/program the photo comes. Might be coprighted. Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kosin University logo.svg

Likely non-free university logo, no source, not "own work", invalid license. Wcam (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maozedong.jpg

Image still under copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kosovo demo 21 Feb 2008 Belgrade Image 8.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Balistrad logo large.png

COM:SCOPE Oscar_. (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Konsakonsa (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, thus in scope. --Achim55 (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bisa Butler Quilt of Harriet Tubman.png

Non free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image contains copyrighted art by Bisa Butler, photographed in the United States. 19h00s (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taipei skyline cityscape at night with full moon.jpg

Image is oversaturated to an excessive degree and definitely does not seem appropriate, the unrealistically huge moon for starters was obviously edited in. CaoNgo (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: yes, likely photoshopped, but in use. First replace all uses. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taipei skyline cityscape at night with full moon.jpg

Photo is categorized under Category:Flickr files uploaded by Heeheemalu, yet the description page lacks complete information on the alleged Flickr source as well as licensing (if ever it was a freely-licensed photo on Flickr). I also doubt this is Heeheemalu (talk · contribs)'s self-photographed photo; it is too elaborate and "too good to be true". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost certainly a photoshop of this image. It is flipped cropped and saturated, but elements like the diffraction spikes are identical. Tineye suggests the original source of the photo is a stock image, but the relevant urls are dead. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20130228 01 Chicago Tribune Wells St. bridge announcement (8541278708).jpg

Full of most-likely copyrighted images. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Church at Ahmadi.jpg

Old photo, is this Shirazibustan (talk · contribs)'s self-photographed photo? More likely not. It may pass {{PD-Kuwait}} but not PD-US; it may have been under copyright in Kuwait on the COM:URAA date for Kuwaiti works. Additionally, the claimed year 1966 may not be the year when this photo was first published to public. No complete documentation of source of the photo and/or author of the photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have evidence, that the uploader did not take the image, Tineye looked at 25 billion images and found no match on the Internet. --RAN (talk) 23:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You won't find an exact match, the picture has been resting with me for years. Shirazibustan (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The uploader being around 20 in 1966 would not be impossible, they'd be close to 80 if that were the case. Absense evidence of copyvio, I think we can COM:AGF that the uploader took the image. Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in the comments elsewhere, I was 13 years old at the time! Shirazibustan (talk) 09:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info The church is the Ahmadi Tamil Church, which opened in 1976. https://ahmaditamilchurch.com/wp/ Kuwait has no commercial FOP COM:FOP Kuwait and since Kuwait has a copyright term of 50 PMA, ~~Delete~~ since photograph violates architect's copyright. (EDIT: OK, striked delete vote for now. https://www.stpaulskuwait.com/our-history/ This is the Saint Paul's Anglican Church building. "The current building was originally built by the Kuwait Oil Company as part of its commitment to meet the spiritual needs of the workforce, the church was consecrated and dedicated by the then Bishop of Jerusalem Weston Henry Stewart on November 16th, 1956. St. Paul’s Church was chosen as the name for the new church because St. Paul was the only apostle who is named in the New Testament as having spent time in Arabia." )

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maan de Steenwinkel 2022.jpg

Permission unclear. Uploader has another name. Encycloon (talk) 09:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license at source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imagen aérea Educación Infantil CODEMA (Gijón).jpg

{{copyvio|source=https://www.codema.es/landing/}} Torres05 (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this deletion request should be withdrawn as the original copyright holder (the school) authorized the release of the images. Josecurioso (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Josecurioso Where is the permission? I do not se any VRTS tag. Ruthven (msg) 19:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission from copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Les medzi Svätý Jurom a Bielym Krížom.jpg

picture is dark, showing nothing of any value that can be used for the benefiti of the wikipedia / wikimedia. Tomáš Bartovič (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Home Means Nevada" - Regional anthem of Nevada.ogg

The composition of the song in this file is still under copyright and won't be public domain in the US until 2028. Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eva Mayer.jpg

uploader is not claimed copyright owner RoBri (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made this picture with the photographer and I paid for it. I asked her too and I have the right to use this picture in any form. So it is absolutely right to use it on wikipedia. I also taged her with a ©. So there is no need to delete this picture. Frida Fleck (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frida Fleck, in these kinds of cases, for Commons to be sure, the procedure is either for you to upload a scan of the contract you signed and send it privately (not upload it publicly) through the COM:VRT process or for the photographer to affirm permission at COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no VRT, unused, uncat. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ddsealproven.jpg

COM:SCOPE Oscar_. (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat poor res personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Borja Bertrand.jpg

COM:SCOPE Oscar_. (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It may be in scope (Category:YouTube Creator Awards). Strakhov (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Li Min (cropped).jpg

Image still under copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maozedong.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mladen Ivanković-Lijanović (cropped).jpg

I was under the impression that all UK government photographs were under Creative Commons and that the Flickr results were mislabeled, however I was mistaken. I would still like an image to exist under this label (the one with Ambassador Casey can be removed) to give each politician a portrait in Bosnian general election infoboxes. Perhaps from this video, which is marked as being Creative Commons on YouTube? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TNj1yhTdeU Ankeitte (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That video is under Creative Commons license and can be uploaded to Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Munal Chaudhary (talk · contribs)

The file names and in one case metadata suggest that these files are copyvios taken from Facebook, like several other already deleted uploads by this user. So the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 22:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Munal Chaudhary (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from background. Should be removed to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kr1shnamur (talk · contribs)

We have no reason to believe the uploader's claim that each of these is their "own work" ("opera propria"). All four are described as screenshots from the film Nei giardini della mente (In the Mind's Garden). It's not obvious who, or which company or other organization, owns the copyright of this film; but the uploader's self description (whether in Italian or in English) doesn't suggest that they are a film director or cinematographer, or are otherwise related to the film industry.

Hoary (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the owner of the company producing the film (Giotto Srls). Kr1shnamur (talk) 08:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kr1shnamur, please see Commons:Volunteer Response Team. -- Hoary (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Needs VRT permission and it's been long enough for uploader to contact VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elcin Zeynalov.jpg

{{speedy|причина удаления}} Babek1964 (talk) 09:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Страница ссылающаяся на это фото удалена Apostol2019 (talk) 09:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Source does not seem to indicate a free license. --Lymantria (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aragon CD+cover.jpg

Photograph of copyrighted images. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Why do you want to delete the photography? This is photography od my CD (original), I did it myself. The photograph is made specially in such a way that no one can copy it, for example to create a pirate album cover. Jagokogo (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Jagokogo. Sorry for nominating your file to deletion. But I think it’s a derivative work of the art cover of the CD. You would still be able to upload it to English Wikipedia thanks to the fair use policy though, just like the other image on the Patrick Woodroffe article. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Original artist died in 2014, Undelete in 2085. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SENSITIF 3.jpg

No proof that the Convent of Paris agrees to license under CC-BY-SA A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Pendula.jpg

Redundant low-quality image. Superseeded by a better image of the same subject. Kaitu (talk) 11:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This particular image apparently came from Facebook according to Metadata. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National United University logo.svg

Complex logo exceeding COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnXaby3 (talk · contribs)

Uploaded for w:Moe Dalz, no other use.

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment They're all more or less interesting portraits, or in one case, a decent shot of a musician performing. However, who took these photos, and do we have the requisite permissions? At least one has FB in its metadata. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seem like professional photographs, own work claim is questionable. Per Exif copyright holder for one is "APHOTO". HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Metadata shows either Facebook origin or AP. I doubt any of these are own works. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paul BIBAUT.jpg

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Kind of interesting, in my opinion. It would appear to be a man posing behind all the items he's about to take on a camping trip. I think it has value and could be useful. However, the file description should be edited, it needs useful categories and, unfortunately, there is the question of who took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree with Ikan. This could have educational use as showing preparation for camping. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Letters concerning the Spanish nation- written at Madrid during the years 1760 and 1761 Fleuron T144839-2.png

Better version available at File:A thanksgiving sermon preached at the Rolls-Chapel, Dec Fleuron T104217-1.png F (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HenrichRD (talk · contribs)

Bus images taken from www.busandcoachbuyer.com, Logo is only on EN so I assume the lemon image is above TOO (If the logo was fine it would've been uploaded and used years ago?), thanks

–Davey2010^Talk 19:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Logo appears to be above UK ToO and photographs would require VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The English works of Roger Ascham, Preceptor to Queen Elizabeth- Containing, I Fleuron T140587-1.png

Better version at File:The English works of Roger Ascham, Preceptor to Queen Elizabeth- containing, I Fleuron T140586-2.png F (talk) 19:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sefteland (talk · contribs)

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reasonably high quality and no hits on reverse image searches. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Mdaniels5757, I think we can take these as own works even if they don't have EXIF. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fiaz warraich.jpg

No es mi tío. 181.203.46.83 14:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:李華嚴.png

這是一張過去的照片。李華嚴 (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused file, out of scope. Also low resolution and no camera EXIF. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by تاورنیه (talk · contribs)

I tend to believe that the uploader is the photograph of the pictures with +1Mb size, but their other previously deleted uploads and the following that are most certainly copyright violations (such as those with authors in metadata like toptourism.ir, irandeserts.com and Hamed Abedi as the copyright holder) makes me doubt that claim. Also, many of these pictures lack metadata.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Microsoft Clipchamp.svg

I'm pretty sure this is copyrighted, based on the copyright logo on the Clipchamp website. Mondo (talk) 10:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But, isn't that allowed? Other Microsoft logos like Teams and so have the same thing. Minionguyjpro (talk) 13:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it depends on what copyright it has. But I thought that things like Microsoft or Microsoft-owned logos had many of the same copyrights. Atleast I saw multiple which had the same copyright. Minionguyjpro (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, image arguably doesn't meet the threshold of originality MrNoobNub2 (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Doesn't meet COM:TOO US. —holly {chat} 18:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Anthem of the Republic of Kosovo (Instrumental).ogg

Insufficient source. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 07:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added source lol Kxeon (talk) 17:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The version that is uploaded is definitely not the one by the US Navy band (which is the listed source). So if someone wouldn't mind converting the US Navy version to OGG format and uploading it (since that's {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}) and ping me when done, I'll delete the extant file versions as copyvios. —holly {chat} 18:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted performance. --Ellywa (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:تبارنامه مرادعلی پیروی چشناسر.jpg

خود انتشار داده بودم. Firooz Peyravi (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too late to delete on basis of COM:COURTESY, because upload dates from 2020. --Ellywa (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Liberty Monument, Seychelles.jpeg

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The photograph is freely licensed at the source. The photograph, however, is a derivative of the sculpture and, therefore, permission from the sculptor is also required. Unfortunately, we do not have COM:FOP information for Seychelles, so delete per COM:PRP. Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The photograph has a CC-by license at the source. Per SCHEDULE 1 Sections 10, 11 12 and 13 of the Seychelles Copyright Act, "The reproduction, distribution of copies or inclusion in a film or broadcast of an artistic work permanently on view to the public" are "acts not controlled by copyright" (i.e., Seychelles indeed has COM:FOP and additional permission from the sculptor is not needed.) Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, I reviewed the license. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Liberty Monument, Seychelles.jpeg

This file was uploaded on Wikimedia Commons at 6 August 2016. There is no freedom of panorama in Seychelles after 1 August 2014, So this photo cannot be applied freedom of panorama. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: , Why you didn't see the date the photo was uploaded on Wikimedia Commons? Ox1997cow (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Actually it's important not upload into Commons, but publication. Source in Seychelles News Agency still exists and it was published on 29th of June 2014, earlier than 1st of August 2014, and freedom of panorama applies. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please read this: Please do not use this template to any new uploads after 1 August 2014. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The template has incorrect wording and the wording must be changed. New uploads are allowed, if the image is first published before 2014-08-01. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this sentence. Any new uploads, as well as re-uploaded images (like cropped or edited ones), will be subject to deletion as not complying with the restrictive 2014 law. Ox1997cow (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete @Taivo: importation is an action by itself. The file may have been uploaded to Seychelles News Agency before August 2014, but that does not mean we can just import that here. Seychelles News Agency can retain their photo, but we cannot import that photo after August 2016 as importation is a republication of the photo here, and this republication - an action by itself - is now subject to the new, restrictive law. This also applies to Flickr imports as well as Panoramio imports. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Every Commons file is usable for any purpose, including commercial. This applies to Seychelles photos uploaded before 2016. If we cannot upload old photos from Seychelles into Commons, then others cannot upload old photos from Commons into their own computers. This would be nonsense. All others can upload old photos from Seychelles from Commons into their own computers, that means we can upload old photos from Seychelles from everywhere into Commons as well. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo this isn't strictly uploading, but more of importation. Whatever that may be called, importation is still an action by itself and we do not inherit the action done by Seychelles News Agency, since we are separate users from that news agency. Our actions of importing old photos are new actions subject to the restrictive Seychellois law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. There's no difference between uploading and importing. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: we do not inherit Seychelles News Agency's act of uploading their photo on their site, since we are not end-users; we distribute content anew that anyone can freely exploit. In the case of your statement "all others can upload old photos from Seychelles from Commons into their own computers", they can legally do so because they are end-users; they do not redistribute content anew. Redistribution is subject to the current law, not the old law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The law does not consist words "end-user" or "redistribution", that means, there's no legal difference between end-users and redistributors. Taivo (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Does anyone know if the 2014 law was retroactive in scope? If it's not, then the photo should be grandfathered in and would be acceptable. But if it was applied to all extant works, then we would be in violation. —holly {chat} 18:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Our guideline on COM:FOP Seychelles is very clear, 'Not OK for depictions (like photos and videos) of artistic works published on Wikimedia Commons on or after August 1, 2014". If this is reworded after consensus has been found on the text, this photo can be undeleted, but currently we have to rely on the validity of the text on that page. --Ellywa (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:... a Christmas card from H.M. Monitor 16. Inside a list of bombardments, including Gallipoli (2336838561).jpg

File appears to be from late 1917. There is a signature on the doodle but I cannot make it out with the resolution here or at source. It could be public domain but without knowing who the artist of the doodle is, this might have to wait until 2038 when it could be given PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it is printed, and not hand drawn. I would assume it was on all copies of the card distributed. If it was a one-off, hand drawn image, I would agree that it was unpublished, and would fit the 120 year rule. --RAN (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not disputing it was published, I'm just unsure given the signature if we can license it as {{PD-UK-unknown}} Abzeronow (talk) 19:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]