User talk:Sebring12Hrs

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sebring12Hrs!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg

Copyright status: File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pescarolo-17-Spa-1000km-2009.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg

Copyright status: File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (1).jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: je me suis trompé, c'est une photo personelle. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

It still needs a license template. Also you must fill in the author field and the source field. (If you are the author, you may write '{{Own}}' in the source field.) Jcb (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Also don't ever again remove problem tags without resolving problem. As I am not going to babysit problem tags, I have deleted the file. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

File:1 Rue d'Aujou in Figeac.jpg

Hi Sebring12Hrs! How are you? Thank you for nominate my image File:1 Rue d'Aujou in Figeac.jpg. Unfortunately, it's not good picture enough for Quality image. However, if you would like nominate some my pictures, which are good enough, you can found them here. Have a nice day! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Hi ! Sorry for my late response, and for my bad english, I'm french native. I knew that picture was limit because of the overexposed sky. I am a beginner in this project, I usually contribute on the french Wikipedia, but I discover your Albi photos, and I see that you like France and you are a very good photograph. I think it remains some of your pictures that can be promoted as good quality label. I will not nominate all of your pictures, don't worry. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Si tu veux on peux parler français. Je suis polonais, mais j'habite et je travaille à Rodez dans l'Aveyron. Je voudrais te remercier pour la nomination d'une de mes photos, mais malheuresement cet image n'est pas assez bon pour QI. Et je voudrais te dire que si tu a envie nominer mes images tu peut les trouver ici. Bon, il y a des images des pays diferents, mais les plupart est de France. Je serais ravi si tu m'aide les nominé, meme si ce sera une petite aide. Bref, fait comme tu veux :) Je te souhaite bonne journée! Tournasol7 (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ssprmannheim 12:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Pour VI

Ok pour la nomination, seul problème le scope qui doit être lié à la catégorie qui contient l'image. Regarde la correction. D'une façon générale le titre des images est bâti comme un scope potentiel. Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locronan-bâtiment-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immeuble 12 rue de Pontaniou, Brest (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4677.Glocke - Chapelle Saint-Gonéry-Plougrescant- Côtes-d'Armor-Bretagne - Steffen Heilfort.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immeuble 55-57 avenue Kléber, Paris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather than an avenue it looks like a building, could you add a cat about it? --Poco a poco 13:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC) @Poco a poco: It's just an office building in avenue Kléber in Paris. I have Added a description with more information. Sebring12Hrs 18:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)  Support I added the cat myself --Poco a poco 21:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Demande d'aide

Bonsoir Sebring12Hrs! J'ai voulais te demander; est-ce que tu voudrais m'aider un peu avec des nominations des photos pour "images de qualité? Merci pour ta réponse :) Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Salut Tournasol7, je vais voir si j'ai un peu de temps et de motivation demain !! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, ça marche. Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Merci Sebring12Hrs! Ca me va très bien comme ça :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Sebring12Hrs! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- Tournasol7 (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Bonne fêtes à toi aussi ! Merry Christmas ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg

Bonjour Sebring12Hrs, vous avez proposé pour "Florent AUDEBERT" ce fichier:

Il avait fait l'objet d'une destruction le 31 Decembre 2016 , car il est bien établi que les images de la tour avec un éclairage nocturne spécial ne peuvent pas être conservées sur les commons.

Je vous invite à relire la page Deletion requests/File:Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg

Cordialement à vous.--Pierre André ^(talk) 23:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq: Merci pour l'info, je m'en doutais un peu. C'est quand même dommage, car elle est belle cette tour Eiffel ! Il faudrait la mettre sur Wikipédia du coup. Peut-être pourrait-elle être labellisée FP sur Wikipédia. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Tour Eiffel Nov 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.ok. Ce n'est pas un problème bien grave. Bien cordialement. Pierre André ^(talk) 13:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Bonsoir Sebring12Hrs Il est possible de publier des images dans Wikipedia, la procédure n'est pas trop complexe mais les photos doivent comporter la mention " Vous avez la permission de copier, distribuer et/ou modifier ce document selon les termes de la licence de documentation libre GNU, version 1.2 ou plus récente publiée par la Free Software Foundation ; sans sections inaltérables, sans texte de première page de couverture et sans texte de dernière page de couverture." Je ne pense pas qu'elle pourrait être soumises FP. Bien cordialement, Pierre André ^(talk) 20:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Muette - cours Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehof-Parksicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. IMHO a borderline case – too much contrast, harsh sharpening. But in 2007 the dynamic range of most sensors was rather low, so it was not possible to record both highlights and shadows in such a photo in best quality; and the harsh sharpening was often considered good. Therefore IMHO still OK. --Aristeas 10:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Sainte-Thérèse - Flèche Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petit Palais, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I don't think the Library of Congress catalog number is part of the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Agreed. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castel Béranger, entrée du bâtiment arrière.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castel Béranger, échauguette.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 18:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Hérouet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Monpelas, 19 avenue Foch, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

thank you

coucou, merci pour ton intervention pour ma photo: c'est cool . bye --Chatsam (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

@Chatsam: Tout le plaisir est pour moi ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Provinces de France by Armand Guéritte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support it is a Work; the author must be quoted. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope .--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand nu (1907) by Pierre-Auguste Renoir in the Musée d'Orsay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment My immediate question was who the artist was, so I think you should add "anonymous" to your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. I have the same comment about the other Arc de Triomphe nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of Abbaye de Saint-Germain-des-Prés.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre des Champs-Élysées (Champs-Élysées theatre) by Auguste Perret and Antoine Bourdelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Since we don't see the interior, I think you can and should delete information about it from the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I think this is best in scope for the entire exterior, though a very good argument could be made for the usefulness of File:Théâtre Champs Élysées Paris 3.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine Médicis, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Hubert Lyautey in Invalides..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 place de l'Odéon, Paris by Marie-Joseph Peyre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, though the curvature is less apparent than in lesser-quality photos (but maybe that's accurate). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois de Boulogne - grande cascade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois de Boulogne - lac inférieur, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Ville, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument à Léon Gambetta, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Augustin de Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de l'Alma, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison, 12 rue d'Engueysse, Albi..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope The shadow area is a little dark for an illustrative image. -- Jim Evans (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 Comment Yes but the street is very narrow. It's not easy to shoot without any shadow. In addition, The highest part of the building is not very sharp, but I think it's good enough for VI. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexandre Dumas' monument, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 rue d'Aujou, Figeac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lycée Condorcet, 8 rue du Havre, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel des Invalides - the dome, north facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Saint-Jacques, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Bourbon - north facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Our Lady church in Marvejols 25.jpg

Salut! Je voudrais te demander de voter sur cette page. Bien sûr je n'insiste pas pour que te voteras "pour", mais selon votre propre opinion. Je au meme temps je voudrais te remercier pour tout ces nomination des images de qualité. Je te souhaite bonne week-end :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Merci! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 16:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Encore désolé de ne pas avoir voté "pour". Merci pour toutes ces belles photos d'Europe ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Mais c'est pas grave. Tant pis si cette photo n'a pas merité. Et de rien, heureusement on a WikiCommons ou on peux partager nos photos :) Tournasol7 (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de la Sainte-Trinité de Paris, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opéra Garnier - principal facade, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Palais, photomechanical print, Exposition Universal, 1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Yvette Guilbert par Granié

Formellement le tableau est au Louvre, mais exposé à Orsay (il a les deux immatriculations); pour un an encore, il est à Albi où je l'ai rencontré par hasard avec le plus grand plaisir. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Toutes mes excuses ! Bien à toi.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame de Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte-Chapelle - lower chapel, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte-Chapelle - interior, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de la Madeleine, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Louvre - Galerie d'Apollon, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 14 rue du Docteur Léon Deglaire, Montgeron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
67 rue de Courcelles, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Not yet used, but the better of two pictures of 67 Rue de Courcelles -- Spurzem (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. We have repurposed storefronts in New York, too, with old names on them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Joseph-des-Nations (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support used. Shame about the cramped spire.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bibliothèque polonaise de Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Unseful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Aumont, Paris (by Louis Le Vau et François Mansart).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used. But would it not be possible to get a photo without the fence in the foreground? -- Spurzem (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
   Comment I think it's possible. But it's not a museum, but a court. So it would be difficult for a Commoner to take a good picture inside the "garden". --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brazilian Embassy, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I think this is better in scope and shows more detail at review size than its nearest competitor, File:Paris cours albert 1 no34.1.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 place de la Bourse (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the QI proposal ː)

here.

Have a good day, ----Benoît (d) 05:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trullo in Alberobello 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building, 4 via Santa Maria la Nova, Naples.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
104-106 rue de Grenelle, Paris by Contant d'Ivry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Building by Fernand Leroy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis Vuitton Maison Champs Élysées by Charles-Henri Besnard and Louis-Hippolyte Boileau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Usine électrique du quai de Jemmapes by Paul Friesé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bâtiment Octave Gréard, 3 avenue Octave Gréard, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

File:Siège de l'AFP 13 place de la Bourse Paris.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siège de l'Agence France-Presse, 11-15, place de la Bourse, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Pierre Viole, 36, quai de Béthune, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Why the cropped version? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

• It's not better ? I think the other one shows too many elements on the picture for this scope. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorium of Opéra Garnier by Charles Garnier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Question How has the licence been validated @Sebring12Hrs: ? I cannot find anything on the 500px website, but I may be looking in the wrong place. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

• Here [1] The image is public. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2022

• perfect thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Mayenne, Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flemish retable of Église Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois de Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Tough choice, but I think more details are visible at review size in this photo than in File:Interior of Église Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois de Paris 04.JPG and File:Église Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois de Paris @ Paris (31936350170).jpg, at least in the latter case because it's a closer view (in the first link I give, the photo is noticeably unsharp at review size). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble, 31, 33, 35, 39, 41 rue d'Anjou (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulin à grains Barrenques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wieggy 17:30, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of the Panayia Chozoviotissa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used on multiple Wikimedia projects. John Samuel (talk) 06:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Personality rights at FPC

Hi there - you were harsh in describing my argument as 'absolutely ridiculous'. In light of the subsequent discussion, would you like to tone your comment down please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

I deleted it. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Leu-Saint-Gilles (Paris), 57 bis boulevard de Sébastopol (porte de droite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. Too bad the cross above the door is cut off.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:51, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
• Temporary  Oppose. The image shows only one door/entrance of the building. The scope should be modified accordingly, indicating which door is depicted. --Tagooty (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

  You are right. I modified the scope, but I don't know if it's the best we can have for this image. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

  In line with the format followed in VIC, I suggest scope Église Saint-Leu-Saint-Gilles (Paris) - porte de droite, 57 bis boulevard de Sébastopol. Does this look fine? --Tagooty (talk) 03:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

  I think, in french, "57 bis boulevard de Sébastopol" have to be before "(porte de droite)", because "(porte de droite)" brings information about "57 bis boulevard de Sébastopol". (Sorry my english is not perfect at all) --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now, couldn't be more precise... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I've struck my temp oppose. --Tagooty (talk) 02:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 rue de la Paroisse, Versailles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

QI candidates

Hi, if you have a minute, all five of the files at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_26,_2022 are waiting for your response. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, those images aren't in Decline, I'm not the only one able to give an answer. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble Lavirotte - porte d'entrée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used (Tu peux aussi le mettre en Wikidata) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

  What do yo mean ? Je ne sais pas bien me servir de Wikidata. Tu parles de relier la photo à Wikidata ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

• Oui je l'ai fais pour toi, regarde il y a une rubrique pour les portes! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Châsse de saint Potentin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

From Le Louvre website: scope should be Châsse de saint Potentin Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I changed, but shouldn't we add more info in the scope ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

 Support You could add English translation, but not needed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Confiserie Debauve et Gallais, Paris..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Seems best in scope, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think the composition would be better, if there was a bit more space between the building and the border of the picture, but it's good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
94 rue du Bac, ancien commerce d'alimentation, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is the white building above it also the same address? If it is, wouldn't a photo of the entire building be most useful? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

  You are right, I changed the scope. I add the old title [2] --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

• Great.  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainghin en Weppes gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainghin en weppes gare quais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Acquaviva Coppola by Augusto Acquaviva Coppola in Napoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8bis, 10 rue de l'Entrepôt, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Should the word "and" (or "et") appear between the two addresses? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I think it's good like that, but I'm not sure at 100 %. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Oppède-le-Vieux 14 bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 place Champollion, Figeac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope (and only too) Lorax (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel du 120 rue du Bac - porte, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hospice Gantois (bibliothèque).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boulangerie, 155 rue d'Alésia, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Ezarateesteban 23:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Trianon (Paris) - salle de cinéma vue de la scène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
  You are right, now it's done. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy new year

		* Happy New Year 2023, Sebring12Hrs! *
		Happy New Year! Bonne année! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Новим роком!

Best wishes for 2023 and many thanks for your attention to my photos. Velvet (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 rue de la Barre (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 bis rue de Fleurus (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille) - fumoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille) - salon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Préfecture de Lille - salle du conseil général.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), 45 rue de Roubaix (portail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Also a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), 45 rue de Roubaix (façade sur rue).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grands Moulins de Paris de Marquette-lez-Lille (après restauration).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boulangerie, 48 rue Caulaincourt (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), jardin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
109 rue de la Bassée (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), cour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de l'Intendance (Lille), salon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), main façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Question Should the scope be restricted to "façade"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

• The previous nomination, mentionned the facade in the scope, but there are others facade in the court. I think this one is the best to depict the entire building. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

• Front façade? I think the assumption is that the façade is the front of the building, unless otherwise specified. It's literally the building's face! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Ok I will change the scope. But front façade or main façade ? Because the picture depicts a façade facing a courtyard and not a street. So is it frontal facade when it faces the court and not the street ? Anyways, thanks for your reviews. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

• I see. Please describe it as you think best. I'll defer to you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

• I changed the scope to : Hôtel d'Hailly d'Aigremont (Lille), main façade. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Fives, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 4 rue des Petit-Champs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 6 rue Vivienne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Vivienne (Paris), entrée du 5 rue de la Banque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for disturb

Perhaps you might be interested in this discussion [3]. Thank you--109.52.98.243 19:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Very sorry

I'm sorry to bother again but now he did this [4]--109.52.98.243 21:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seconde antichambre du Dauphin du Château de Versailles, cheminée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel du Lombard (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maisons, 25-27 place Louise-de-Bettignies (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 rue des Pyramides (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison, 41 rue de Gand (Lille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Cassini, portail (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question What is special about this entrance please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

  This entrance is a protected part as a national heritage sites in France (monument historique). --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope and useful per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I believe we should have scopes of parts of buildings that have a special significance. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanile Saint-Nicolas de Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puit, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qua;lity --Michielverbeek 13:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portail, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Hériot, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Vifs remercîments!

Merci pour tes nominations sur mes images, surtout pour le label Qualité que je ne fréquente plus beaucoup par manque de temps... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of St. Patrick's Cathedral (Manhattan) 25-08-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison et champs, Boutigny-Prouais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

La rue des Paradoux

Pas de métro pour aujourd'hui à Toulouse, mes secrétaires sont dans les embouteillages une journée noire en perspective. Mais surprise : rayon de soleil inattendu la promotion de la Rue de Paradoux grâce à toi. Merci de soutenir mon moral! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Ah c'était la grève aujourd'hui à Toulouse ? Oui j'ai vu que tu avais quelques photos prises à l'aide du réflexe qui pouvaient tout à fait postuler pour le label image de qualité. Mais du côté image de valeur, pas de promotion pour la rue de la Pleau. Peut-être un problème de scope. À réessayer ultérieurement. J'ai vu qu'il y avait quelques photos d'Albi (musée Toulouse-Lautrec et cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) que tu n'a pas proposé en VI. J'y jetterais peut-être un coup d'œil. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Lille (ancienne chapelle des Carmes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée Paul Dupuy, façade sur rue de la Pleau, Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galerie Argentine (Paris), intérieur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry

The sign File:Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), Fabulous Las Vegas -- 2012 -- 6263.jpg belongs to a sign in Paradise, not in Las Vegas. --XRay 💬 17:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

@XRay: Lol ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

I also had to marvel. Las Vegas is within easy walking distance from there. --XRay 💬 17:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Grand Colbert, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marché couvert Beauvau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annexe du siège central du Crédit lyonnais.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 8-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality now. --MB-one 22:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte des gendarmes (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, Boutigny-Prouais 8-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Rue Montorgueil in Paris. Celebration of June 30, 1878 by Claude Monet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Descent from the Cross - Pietro da Rimini - RF 2287.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Lazare Station by Claude Monet, Musée d'Orsay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Les Mystères de la Passion du Christ (Antonio Campi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Denys-du-Saint-Sacrement, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope of this view and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome) - Facade by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose daytime image is better. No need for night images to have VI scopes. See VI scope guideline "In general, the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture." Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment The systematic denigration of certain competitors poses problems in VI but also in FP. Here the scope is perfectly acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I shall resist responding to a rare insult from our most responsible and fair contributor. If we are to prefer a nighttime image, then the VI guidelines should be changed, They could not be clearer: "In general, the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture." Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Nice photo, but talk about the scope. I think "at night" scopes can be perfectly fine, so since this scope might be usable, it can be perfectly reasonable to support this with a remark that it "could be useful," so I'll do that. But that said, it's not like there is special night illumination on this facade. So let's talk about the wording Charles quotes from above. "The VI for a building scope" seems to me to imply that there should generally be one VI per building. However, another reading is that the overall VI for the building would normally be a daylight picture, but there could be a separate "at night" scope. I would agree that we should have a discussion at Commons talk:Valued image scope, except that such discussions generally get nowhere, as there's a preference to work by custom at VIC, regardless of what policies and guidelines there are. But my friend Archaeodontosaurus, please be respectful. Charles has a valid point, and I don't think his point is ad hominem against either Jebulon, who took the photo, or Sebring12Hrs, who made the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: Absolutely agree. The argument is admissible but the problem is deeper. The propensity to want to set himself up as a perpetual censor: Charles begins to pose problems. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't agree with you on this. I think his arguments are generally valid, and that we've resolved things with discussions every time, but it would really be better to more clearly harmonize Commons guidelines with accepted customs on VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 44 rue du Québec, à Brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 22:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant La Mia Storia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add geo location and category --Michielverbeek 20:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison ancienne à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magasin et restaurant à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment dans la vieille ville de Split 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escalier extérieur de maison à Šibenik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in spite of the too tight crop above -- Spurzem 09:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison à Trogir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Heals building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Hvar, façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison à Komiža.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 24 rue du Québec, Brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6578).jpg

Thank you Gampe (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons dans la vielle ville de Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilastre ancien sur un immeuble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough for a mobile phone. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Trogir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zgrada Šimac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Very good photo. But what makes the image of this half-ruined house encyclopaedically valuable? -- Spurzem (talk) 12:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

It is used in Zgrada Šimac u Trogiru. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment à Šibenik 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting choice of framing, perspective correction needed. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC) I don't know how our colleague imagines a correction of perspective here. We can have different opinions about an image composition like this one; but the image elements are exactly aligned, the exposure is right, the colors are just as good, and the photo is also sharp. Result: good quality -- Spurzem 20:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Island of Hvar

Hello, thank you for nominating my photos from Hvar among the Quality Images. I am going to Stari Grad on the island of Hvar next week again. Do you have any suggestions for what else should be photographed? Gampe (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Gampe: , your welcome ! I went to Croatia last month for holidays, but I don't know Stari Grad. When I visit a new country or city, or place i like to take photos and I like to promote the best pictures of the cities I visit I can found on Commons. You can take the pictures what you want. As far as I'm concerned, I like to take pictures of such underrated buildings of civil architecture. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 William, New York City.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• scope is missing something...Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  I added the city. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Andrea della Valle (Rome) - Façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison de la Tourelle, Le Mans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Better, because no distracting car and the right side of the building is visible. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support More details are readily seen at review size in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Scores:

 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Le Mans Maison de la Tourelle R01.jpg: -2  
 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Le Mans - Maison de la Tourelle 01.jpg: +2 <--

 =>
 File:Le Mans Maison de la Tourelle R01.jpg: Declined
 File:Le Mans - Maison de la Tourelle 01.jpg: Promoted <--

--Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

If you are interested you can find more beautiful photos here

[5]. Thank you,bye. 78.211.40.49 22:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piazza San Bernardo (Rome) - view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (Rome) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël!

✴ Happy Holidays, Sebring12Hrs ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salle à manger du petit appartement de la reine (Versailles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Oh sorry ! Done now. I'm also supprised that "Versailles Palace" isn't mentionned in the category name, instead of "Versailles". That's normal ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment In a usual way, Versailles immediately refers to the castle .--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Wesołych Świąt! Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Thank you very much, happy new year ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison à colombages, 45 rue de Paris, Houdan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, hameau Les Joncs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria in Aracoeli (Rome), Bell tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg

Salut! I'm not sure I understood your feedback about the nom above right. You are asking for a new upload of the file as independent image with the original crop. I will do that tonight when I have access to the RAW files. But, does this have something to do with your vote? In this case I don't understand the correlation. If you oppose just because you don't like the square crop and it has nothing to do with the new version uploaded, fine to me. Thank you very much for all your nominations on QIC! Take care, Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: Even if it is allowed, I find that there are generally too many quality images that are modified when they are offered in FP. When it's just brightness ok, but when it's just a huge crop, it bothers me a little. I would actually have preferred that we loaded a new image. Then you do as you want of course. No worries about the nominations, you always take superb photos, I don't know where you get all this time, but congratulations to you! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 avenue Hoche (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Magny (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Statue du Musée Labit Toulouse

Alors là bravo, Je suis scotché! Merci beaucoup... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

San Lorenzo in lucina

Thanks for the nomination of San Lorenzo.....at least someone is thinking of me. Thanks again.🙂 78.210.181.119 10:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centre de secours Bitche (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: has much experience with Valued Image nominations. I am going to express my opinion but would encourage him to further comment if he wishes.
  

Per COM:VIC, there are three Valued Image nomination cases - new nomination, renomination and MVR - Most Valued Review. MVR applies only when there is an existing image that already has a VI rating based on a defined generic scope (you will see a result statement indicating that it was reviewed and supported for VI as shown in the MVR for "Remote view of Florence Duomo by night".

@Sebring12Hrs: - when I search Commons on the results of the first VI nomination found at "Commons:Valued image candidates/Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole, 24 Rue Chanoinesse, 75004 Paris, 1 May 2018.jpg", I find there was no review on this VI nomination - no support, no oppose; therefore undecided. Probably the personality rights statement based on the people present that made reviewers uncomfortable in expressing an opinion on VI.

You have brought forth another image of the same building but without people. That should take care of the personality issue. IMHO, suggest you remove this MVR and enter this different image as a new VI nomination with the same scope and scope-link as previous. Please add a clear reason in the new VI nom describing what you are doing. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for your review, I will remove this MVR and enter this in a new nominatio as you suggest. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Sant'Atanasio (Rome).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 place Saint-Urcisse, Cahors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If it is a listed building, as a historic monument, it must be stated in the caption...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

   CommentThis building is not listed in Liste des monuments historiques de Cahors. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Pictures of Naples area

Hello! I saw that you added some notes to 3 images from Herculano/Pompeii: File:Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 77-79 HDR.jpg, File:Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 39.jpg and File:Antigua ciudad de Pompeya, Italia, 2023-03-27, DD 185-187 HDR.jpg. I just fixed them, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Very good, thank you ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

QI shall be properly categorized and have an accurate description

I hope all is well with you. I really appreciate your constructive and knowledgeable reviews and nominations. I have noticed that you have nominated a lot of photos from Pompeii. All photo from Pompeii are missing accurate description. The rule for QI is very clear. QI shall be properly categorized and have an accurate description. And the consensus is very clear here as well. Please consider stopping nominating images without an accurate description. Best regards ArildV (talk) 16:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @ArildV: , I will try do edit those images or I will ask to @Poco a poco: . Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

This is starting to look like a witch hunt, ArildV. Sebring12Hrs, there is no need to edit anything anymore. --Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Calling a polite and respectful message a witch hunt is an absurd and offfensive exaggeration Poco a poco. I assumed good faith and that the user had not seen the discussion (as he continued to nominate images without adequate descriptions). Instead of making a big deal out of it, I posted a message here.--ArildV (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 rue Saint-Barthelemy, Cahors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Llez (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'angle des rues Donzelle et Traversière Donzelle, Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons, 38-40 rue du Millial à Lauzerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 1 rue de la Mairie à Lauzerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte et fenêtre d'une maison à Autoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons sur la voie Sainte à Rocamadour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au 49 Grand-Rue à Puy-l'Évêque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 14:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Bonaguil et son village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Laroque-Maynard, Autoire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison à Rocamadour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibliothèque municipale fonds ancien du Pays de Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 46 rue Donzelle, Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 12:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvaire à Rocamadour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Issala (Cahors).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 14:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons anciennes, place des Cornières, Lauzerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Ignazio (Rome) - Front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au bas du château de Bonaguil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very bright foreground but still OK. --MB-one 14:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison en pierres et pans de bois à Autoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Diane (Cahors).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immeuble, 20 place du Martroi, Orléans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au 74 place du Faubourg, Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Jean XXII, from route départementale 620 (Cahors).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

   Comment Done. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Best in scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Jean XXII from rue de la Tour (Cahors).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Roaldès (Cahors).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parvis et escaliers de la cité religieuse de Rocamadour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de l'Hospitalet et cimetière de Rocamadour (vue du nord).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château du Diable, à Cabrerets.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)