Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Suku angkola berbeda dengan batak atau batak angkola — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalimuntheilmar (talk • contribs) 02:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done: Page doesn't exist. --Achim (talk) 06:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file but I do not know how to upload it under "trademark or copyrighted logo" standard. Yaham Perera (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: SD:copyvio and upload mistake. --Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
I want to get rid of it Jukr2 (talk) 07:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio : copy of a newspaper - not own work Supertoff (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 09:52, 29 August 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): newspaper --Krdbot 14:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Article du journal Le Moniteur du 8 février 1975 .Synthése du rapport de Raoul Rudeau.jpg
[edit]Copyvio : Copy of a newspaper (february 1975) - Not own work Supertoff (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 09:44, 29 August 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): newspaper --Krdbot 14:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The Joshua Project doesn't allow their images to be used for commercial purposes, so this image should not be on Wikimedia commons. Lugë Ushqimi (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Not on public domain, the author may be unknown but they have 70 years of protection under Brazilian law. Lugë Ushqimi (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Not on public domain, the author may be unknown but they have 70 years of protection under Brazilian law. Lugë Ushqimi (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Not on public domain, the author may be unknown but they have 70 years of protection under Brazilian law. Lugë Ushqimi (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Victuallers (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Test DR by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 20:32, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chicharito JR Presenter (talk · contribs)
[edit]"FBMD" in metadata indicate media downloaded from Facebook.
Ytoyoda (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Linda being alive in 2017 191.119.151.86 00:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete per COM:CSD F10. Selfie of non-contributor. Commons is not a free webhost. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality and not useful portrait of an (apparently) unknown person / Wikimedia edits by this user related only to herself. --Strakhov (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Potentially a CD cover image and therefore a copyright violation? See image search. Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
André Margat died in 1997. Copyright violation.
- File:André Margat Etude d'oiseaux.jpg
- File:André Margat Etude d'un pélican et d'une chouette.jpg
- File:André Margat Homard.jpg
- File:André Margat Nu féminin.jpg
- File:André Margat Deux études d'oiseaux.jpg
- File:André Margat étude d'un paon après encadrement 2.jpg
- File:André Margat étude d'un teckel 001.jpg
- File:André Margat étude d'un rhinocéros couché 001 (2) (1).jpg
- File:André Margat étude d'un chien (recto) 001 (2).jpg
- File:André Margat étude d'une fouine (recto) 001.jpg
- File:André Margat Bouledogue.jpg
- File:André Margat étude de chat 5.jpg
Rehabmamet (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative works. Not own work, original artworks not in the public domain. Copyright owner (artist's inheritors) should send permission to COM:VRT. --Strakhov (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Margaretbrown95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this?
- File:Landmarks 8953.jpg
- File:Meadows Augustus PhotoByMarkMenjivar 01.jpg
- File:Landmarks 8376.jpg
- File:Hunt, Amaphora.jpg
- File:Vermillion - 1989.jpg
- File:The West - Donald Lipski.jpg
- File:Winged Victory - Kiesler.jpg
- File:The Color Inside - James Turrell, 2013.jpg
- File:Monochrome for Austin - Nancy Rubins.jpg
- File:A Mathematical Theory of Communication - Casey Reas, 2014.jpg
- File:AMISTAD AMÉRICA.jpg
- File:ONEEVERYONE - Ann Hamilton, 2017.jpg
- File:(FOREVER FREE) IDEAS, LANGUAGES AND CONVERSATIONS.jpg
- File:Spontaneous future(s), Possible Past (2019).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - these images are all straightforward copyvios. Beyond the FOP issues (they're all in Texas, USA), they're just copied from the Landmarks website. for example. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rhododendrites. --Strakhov (talk) 07:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
advertisement & totally useless --- Nutshinou Talk! 15:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Ella es Nati. Algunos la conocen como negra, gorda, cargosa o mamá del chancho blanco. 191.119.128.214 15:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Selfie, sole upload by Natcaz. --Achim (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: G3 & low quality selfie. --Strakhov (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
screenshot from YouTube Albinfo (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm the uploader. YouTube video which the screenshot is from has been released under a Creative Commons license that meets Wikimedia Commons criteria, so much so that there's even a specific template for this purpose. The license can be checked just by accessing the YouTube video in question (by the way: a link has been provided in the file page) and reading its description. There's plenty of files from YouTube videos on this website as well. At the end let me say that this deletion request as it is appears to be quite ill-founded and hasty. --Lodoik (talk) 13:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep thank you for the details, Lodoik. Sorry, haven't seen the CC-License of the original source. --Albinfo (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 07:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work. All of uploader's other images have made that claim of images of this same subject, but have actually been from various social-media sites. This is same size/resolution and lack of EXIF as would be expected from that sort of source. DMacks (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 07:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: flyer for a campus CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 07:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
La personne sur la photo a demandé la suppression de cette image car elle ne souhaite pas avoir sa tête en publique. HADRISUPERCOOL (talk) 22:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot by Montenegrin TV. No permission from copyright owner. Smooth O (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 08:57, 6 September 2021 UTC: No license since 29 August 2021 --Krdbot 14:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
very poor quality Reda Kerbouche (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
uncategorized photo of an unidentified person, not educationally useful Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation : https://www.loumusique.com/products/cd-papillons Lagribouille (talk) 22:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
screenshot in copyviol, not a free-file — danyele 22:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Victuallers (talk) 17:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
No it is not, it is part of a larger image, look here Category:Tile set of the Mandelbrot set of 2021-08-29 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC), don't know where you got this conclusion --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep see my remarks --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The file is part of a defined set of images which would be incomplete without this one. --De728631 (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP UK, there is no freedom of panorama in the UK for graphic works. ✗plicit 00:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note that I have notified the user who transferred this file from enwiki over increasing cases of no-FOP violations. Lack of "Do not move to Commons" tags doesn't automatically mean these are acceptable here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Habertix (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Blur, unusable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arz (talk • contribs) 06:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
this is a fake symbol, this should be the logo of the Garut regency — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jajang Surahman (talk • contribs) 06:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by JuTa. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AliNitro1990 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
- File:Amir Zobdeh Appreciation Sofilo.jpg
- File:Amir Zobdeh Appreciation 1393.jpg
- File:Amir Zobdeh 2020.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmirSoultan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robjensen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re mostly cropped image. Please reupload images at full resolution directly from your camera.
- File:Elvis job.jpg
- File:Afeezoladipo.jpg
- File:Nagbe.jpg
- File:Abmohammed (cropped).jpg
- File:Abmohammed.jpg
- File:Adegbite.jpg
- File:Razaq.jpg
- File:Ibrahim Danlad 002.jpg
- File:Abdul basit mohammed.jpg
- File:Ngwoke Collins Ejike.jpg
- File:Martins Eyerakpo.jpg
- File:Ejike Collins Ngwoke.jpg
- File:Sabahemmanuel.jpg
- File:Emmanuel mathias.jpeg
- File:Samuel Ononiwu.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robjensen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing EXIF informations on newly created Flickr account, probably COM:LL
Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Krd: you had some dealing with this at File:Ugonau.jpg. Any comment? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robjensen1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Faudsunshine.jpg
- File:Mosesabin.jpg
- File:AkeemTaiwo.jpg
- File:Kehinde Yisa.jpg
- File:Olisa Harold.jpg
- File:Appolinaire Ngueko Tientcheu.jpg
- File:Bolajiskin.jpg
- File:Asante goza.jpg
- File:Samuel Irie.jpg
- File:LAWAL 2.jpg
- File:JAYSAY.jpg
- File:Samps edu love.jpg
- File:Lukenidifion.jpg
- File:Amissah assan.jpg
- File:Enoch Gyimah.jpg
- File:Ackah.jpg
- File:Phiackah.jpg
- File:Samuel Akinbinu 2021.jpg
- File:Stanley bang.jpg
- File:Anourepascal.jpg
- File:Kelvininkoom.jpg
- File:Kakachinda.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Paga.jpg
- File:Liberiajosephaidoo.jpg
- File:Tatenda Mkuruva.jpg
- File:Remy tazifor.jpg
- File:Mutaseidu.jpg
- File:Olusesi Temitope.jpg
- File:Emmanuelnettey.jpg
- File:Kwasiasante.jpg
- File:Seidurashid.jpg
- File:Prince Hadedeji Mayungbe.jpg
- File:Prosperdonkor.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - I have to agree. All of them should be removed. Spiderone (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
unused self-promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
unused self-promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful. Twice-submitted as part of a draft on enwiki as an attempt to self-promote. A S U K I T E 04:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
can't imagine any educational use, due to poor technical quality Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, The image was been taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false claims CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, The image was been taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, The image was been taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, The image was been taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work, The image was been taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Bhavesh lonkalkar.jpg
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
已有File:Pingtung Station.jpg替代，且該替代圖片的圖片解析度也較好。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z7504 (talk • contribs) 73:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The proposed superseding image is taken from a different angle and vantage point and does not replace the usefulness of this image. This is a fine image with educational value. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
I would like to upload a better version JosePER74 (talk) 03:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Then upload a better version. The presence of this image does not preclude you from uploading another image of the same subject. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by هاشم علي22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 14:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
copyvio and obviously not own workː https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/dolan --̴̴ Nutshinou Talk! 14:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Textlogo for Western Provident Association (Non-free at English Wikipedia) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyrighted. This logo would meet COM:TOO UK since it is a very low bar. Yeeno (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The enwiki version has been relicensed to free as it is obviously below COM:TOO US. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Very controversial flag. Therefore, the author had requested deletion SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Per the request of the author, the file needs to be deleted. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, for more information, COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 18:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
maybe copyvio violation. watermark and logo of facebook Reda Kerbouche (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is not Facebook's logo, it's the logo of the uploader's Facebook page. We don't encourage watermarking generally, but there's zero indication that this is a copyvio. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: you can see the symbole of the copyright (Lokmani Mammeri Photography ©) up of the facebook logo. so for me it is a copyvio sorry--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- But why is that a problem? That's who claims to have uploaded it here, and to have then CC licensed it. Most of our content on Commons is copyrighted, it's just not a problem (so long as the rights holder also licenses it). Andy Dingley (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- For me, this kind of photo is a risk for Commons. the user is a new user (maybe he/she uploads it just to test the site) and if it is not a copyvio he/she can come here to say that this photo is his / her property. this photo is part of the WLM contest, and there are a lot of new users who don't upload their photos--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: you can see the symbole of the copyright (Lokmani Mammeri Photography ©) up of the facebook logo. so for me it is a copyvio sorry--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: User clearly asserts that they are the FB user. If the image were downloaded off of FB it wouldn't have camera info in the EXIF, so no further verification is necessary. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized since 2019, no apparent educational value. Same for File:No Es Lo Que Parece 1 (78090627).jpeg and File:No Es Lo Que Parece 3 (78274883).jpeg. Pibwl (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Photos taken in Huelva, in 2014, of obvious educational value (landscape, suset, lakes, beach). Would be much easier and constructive to categorize, instead of nominate to deletion.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per Darwin, but it should be noted the lower half of these is not a true water reflection, but a flipped pixel-wise copy of the upper half. Any encyclopedic reuse would need cropped derivatives. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
blurry Lego man Pibwl (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:TOYS. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
unused, uncat since 2019 artistic photo of not known notability and no apparent educational value. Pibwl (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It is a good artistic photo which is useful for stock; being uncategorized is not a reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted. The eBay source does not actually provide the original full scan with the margins where a copyright notice ordinarily would or would not be. For that reason it's not actually possible to determine that it was published without a copyright status. Most film publicity photos were published with a notice, especially for major studios such as (in this case) Warner Bros. I wasn't able to find a full scan of the original publicity photo so, in the absence of proof that it's public domain, we have to assume it's copyrighted. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Here is a scan of the same image with margins included. There is no copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: Do you have a Reddit or other page referring to that image? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- You mean the Reddit thread where it was originally posted? This is where I found it. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: Thanks. That page reads "Reddit Inc © 2021 . All rights reserved" (not exactly following the formalities). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Umm, why are we concerned with the Reddit copyright notice exactly? Reddit is obviously not a party to the copyright of this image or lack thereof. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: Thanks. That page reads "Reddit Inc © 2021 . All rights reserved" (not exactly following the formalities). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- You mean the Reddit thread where it was originally posted? This is where I found it. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: Do you have a Reddit or other page referring to that image? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: You're right that the Reddit copyright notice for the user-posted content is irrelevant, and I appreciate you for tracking down a full scan. However, the Reddit post provides virtually no information about the provenance of the photo. It's not clear whether the scanned photo represents the photo "as originally published", or if it is a subsequently printed copy. It is also unclear the photo was meaningfully "published" for purposes of US copyright law at or around the time it was taken. It's possible that, for example, it was instead first published much later as previously unreleased "archival" material, in which case the date of first publication would be much later than 1971. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Got it. I thought the margins were the only issue based on the statement that opened this DR. The statement about the auction company always including the back side of image (when there is something printed there) in the file description also seems to be false. It seems to be in reference to a different auction company. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and PRP. @StrangeloveFan101 and InterEdit88: I finally heard from the seller of eBay item 192171204303 in response to my query mentioned at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/08#1971 Kubrick photo. He was not willing to provide any details pertinent to copyright. He did not write that he had a photographic negative, a positive print, identification of a photographer, or a source, other than his digital file. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking deeper into it, Jeff G. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @StrangeloveFan101: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I second StrangeloveFan101's thanks, I appreciate your follow-up with the source. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Brandt Luke Zorn: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I second StrangeloveFan101's thanks, I appreciate your follow-up with the source. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @StrangeloveFan101: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking deeper into it, Jeff G. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Brandt Luke Zorn and Jeff G. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Insufficient evidence of no notice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Derivative of Stanley Kubrick 1971.jpg, which I have also nominated for deletion. Probably copyrighted. The eBay source does not actually provide the original full scan with the margins where a copyright notice ordinarily would or would not be. For that reason it's not actually possible to determine that it was published without a copyright status. Most film publicity photos were published with a notice, especially for major studios such as (in this case) Warner Bros. I wasn't able to find a full scan of the original publicity photo so, in the absence of proof that it's public domain, we have to assume it's copyrighted. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Here is a scan of the same image with margins included. There is no copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanley Kubrick 1971.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Obvious posed photo shoot image. Given all of the copyright violations by n the uploader, claim of iwn work is not credible, Whpq (talk) 23:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note - poster has requested deletion of all their files as they didn't understand when uploading. -- Whpq (talk) 13:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Inaccurate author. I suspect the original is not cc 3, and rights still remain with Toby Philpott. HTGS (talk) 00:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Dronebogus (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (also prank insult with bogus description) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The given source (homepage) cannot verify the free CC-4.0 licensing. As other page cannot either, like 1 and 2. Mosbatho (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The pic is part of the book "Vila Prudente, do Bonde a Burro ao Metrô" published 2010 in São Paulo [1] Nemracc (talk) 13:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
copyvio. logo ArnabSaha (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
unused wikipedia screenshot Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; uncat, unused, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Mathurin Méheut died in 1958. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:6942:4C9E:9155:C24B 15:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted No evident reason why uploader would have authority to license; still under copyright by heirs of artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Mathurin Méheut died in 1958. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:6942:4C9E:9155:C24B 15:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Mathurin Méheut died in 1958. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:6942:4C9E:9155:C24B 15:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Unknown personnel and images unused Encik Tekateki (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Map graph is old and unclear. Mottezen (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- This map is in use in multiple wikis, and even if not, this is still not a reason for deletion. If the map is outdated, feel free to update it by overwriting. pandakekok9 06:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use in multiple projects. (Creation and uploading of better and more up-to-date free licensed maps is always welcome. Note that "outdated" is not by it self a reason for deletion - history as well as current events are both in Commons scope.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Contributers2020 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo's flower goes well above the COM:TOO. Website mentions Copyright © 2021 NBCUniversal Media, LLC. All rights reserved. This means that NBCUniversal Media has the copyright for the logo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether it's above TOO or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There are numerous other logos that are more complex than this that are deemed uncopyrightable by the U.S. Copyright Office. There's also consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg that the peacock part is below the TOO of the United States. I don't believe that changed. --pandakekok9 07:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per previous consensus, which mostly relied on comparison to File:Best Western logo.svg. Besides the BW logo, we have File:Los Angeles Football Club.svg and File:Nikon Logo.svg, which could vaguely be described as "shapes fanning out from a central point". The colors in the NBC logo are just the colors of the rainbow in counterclockwise order from the top. The little notch for the peacock head does not have a distinctive shape and isn't enough to make a difference. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 00:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per above discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hypnôs as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Seti I mummy head profile.png|2= No scaled down dupes
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Why are you following me everywhere? This image has a different description that I uploaded in order to use it on other Wikipedia sites such as Egyptian Wikipedia, for example
--Ahmed88z (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- This image can be found here and was on that site on April 02, 2020 (prior to being posted here). --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This 1942 photo is not own work. Real photographer and his/her death year are needed to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- I agree : should be deleted if no more information is given. Supertoff (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Image of a lawyer. Comparatively low resolution in png format. No usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirafan2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Amira willighagen concert turnhout.jpg
- File:Amira willighagen fanday 2019 with cake.jpg
- File:Amira Willighagen classics 2019.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javidbayati1371 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by امیررضا بهمنی 20200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:LPHM57UJ6BEVLGJT3YP2GSZSJI.jpg
- File:JALWHJSJXVBKZFWRLEGYLHWKOM.png
- File:Edgar-Yoel-Barcenas.jpg
- File:Amirmu.jpg
- File:BB156faW.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehdi.a9674 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Amirkabir.png
- File:Eramstr.png
- File:Nasrblva.png
- File:Lotfalikhan.png
- File:Sardaran.png
- File:Shirazzzz.png
- File:Shiraz m.png
- File:Modares.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly an image from a press conference, a re-coloured version of the image at [2] and [3]. Unlikely to be own work. mattbr 18:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PCP, taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
unused promotional selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
self advertisement, out of scope -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
spam — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielAlba15 (talk • contribs) 2021-08-24T04:56:40 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
self advertisement, out of scope -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
some unused advert, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 20:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: no indication of Creative Commons on the website of the emiter of the diploma http://www.industriepreis.de/2015 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright issues, see Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen). No pleasure in nominating these, but I can't see any way past it. Undelete in 2030.
- File:København 184.jpg
- File:København 189.jpg
- File:København 186.jpg
- File:København 185.jpg
- File:København 188.jpg
- File:København 110.jpg
- File:København 183.jpg
- File:København 187.jpg
- File:København 109.jpg
Andy Dingley (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
picture taken from Instagram with no cc-by-sa licence shown Culex (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This file is redundant. We have File:The gates of Hillsborough Castle.jpg, which is the same picture with the black border trimmed off. I don't think the black border contributes anything to the educational usefulness of the picture. bjh21 (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
No indication this is free or what the source is. FunkMonk (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This logo is obviously below the threshold of originality of the United States, but not in Iran, which seems to have a very low TOO according to COM:TOO Iran. pandakekok9 07:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete there is a larger version available. --RAN (talk) 22:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
To many Indonesians who are victims of police violence, it is destressful and offensive to display this flag. The author had requested deletion of this file. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 16:01, 12 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd --Krdbot 19:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
To many Dutch who are victims of police violence, it is destressful and offensive to display this flag. The author had requested deletion of this file. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 16:02, 12 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd --Krdbot 19:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
To many Pakistanis who are victims of police violence, it is destressful and offensive to display this flag. The author had requested deletion of this file. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 16:02, 12 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd --Krdbot 19:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
To many Turks who are victims of police violence, it is destressful and offensive to display this flag. The author had requested deletion of this file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 2021-08-27T23:25:12 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 16:02, 12 October 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd --Krdbot 19:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Carlos Cardoso
[edit]- File:Carlos Cardoso Poeta 02.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso Poeta 03.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso Poeta 04.jpg
- File:Foto Carlos Cardoso 05.jpg
- File:Foto Carlos Cardoso 06.jpg
- File:Foto Carlos Cardoso 07.jpg
- File:Foto Carlos Cardoso 08.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso 09.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso 10.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso 11.jpg
- File:Carlos Cardoso Poeta.jpg
- File:Carlos Poesia.jpg
- File:Carlos 4.jpg
All these photographs of the Brazilian poet Carlos Cardoso have been uploaded by User:Carlos Cardoso or User:Carlos Cardoso - Poesia (I have just deleted some more pictures of him having the name of photographer in EXIF). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own works, mostly out of scope too. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Rey Rey Rodriguez
[edit]- File:Visual Artist & Photographer Rey Rey Rodriguez on the red carpet.jpg
- File:Choosing a Face for My Audience.jpg
- File:Rey Rey Rodriguez - In Deep Thought.jpg
This guy does not seem to be known enough so that his pictures are probably of no educational value. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Self photo. Uploaded for self-promotion in wikidata. Yahya (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ashfaque Nabi original pic is creation of mine, there's no copyright issue and it's free for anyone without any permission required — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashfaquenabi (talk • contribs) 08:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Ashfaque Nabi.jpg This file is not for self promotion. Your cooperation will be highly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.177.111.30 (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Wikidata item already deleted. So, not used anywhere now. Out of scope. –Yahya (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per F10, out of scope Pahunkat (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Lymantria (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted board of China Airlines. COM:FOP not eligible per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
It list no sources. It is unclear what it claims because the legend is subjective, but any common sense interpretations would suggest that it's wrong (for example, see the discussion page) 200.126.236.69 05:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nomination is true but file is in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation|source=https://www.evangelizacion.org.mx/imagenes/libros/xarq_monterrey.png.pagespeed.ic.Hrt0CMH1PO.png
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 49.147.237.163 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|Wrongly attributed to Wikimedia, very likely that it exceeds the threshold for originality. COM:TOO? COM:SCOPE? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of book cover from 1973, no reason to assume that this is properly licensed. Flickrwashing. Pre-1978 US (simul with Canada counts as US) work, should be discussed. This is a program, not an actual book, so there's a reasonable chance of no notice if someone does the research. Also, there might be rules on whether the cover requires a separate notice from the book, but I'm not too clear on that point. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Precautionary principle. "If someone does the research", okay. And if no one does it? DS (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- PCP does not apply to speedy deletion. I am not !voting to keep, merely bringing it here for discussion. More specifically: PCP means "If after serious attempts to ascertain the copyright status of a work have been made and the results are inconclusive, delete." It does not mean "If we're not sure, delete on sight." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: there are 1330 files by this Flickr Washer. Who is going to bother going through that?. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo is above U.S. threshold of originality, due to the goat in the middle. Don't know about Guatemalan TOO, but probably above there as well. pandakekok9 05:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image from 1977, uploaded to Flickr as Creative Commons in 2017, with no provenance = flickrwashing. No reverse image results. I don't see a legitimate reason not to COM:AGF, the Flickr user looks old enough to have taken it personally and there is no evidence that he didn't. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- The bulk of the Flickr user's uploads are pictures from the 1890s through 1950s, and for all of which he claims to be the photographer. DS (talk) 06:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: this is clearly a Flicker Washing. The Flickr user has an extensive collection of images of Ottawa from all the way back to 1911. All uploads by this Flickr user need to be nominated and then blacklisted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Better version available: File:The Voice of the Valley (1897) - illustration - title page.png ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 06:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
duplicato di File:White Mercedes Gazelle left side.JPG (come da metadati) Pil56 (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Youth Climate Save is not mentioned in en.wiki, uploader js globally locked. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Described as an official photo and claimed as own work. Potentially a personal photo or copyright violation as the uploader is not the copyright holder. Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Stated as own work, but other uploads by this user have been copyright violations or have dubious copyright claims. Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Potentially a personal photo by a user with no constructive edits. No usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1996.
Martin Sg. (talk) 10:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not Candarli. This is Murad I. [See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Murat_H%C3%BCdavendigar.jpg]. Beshogur (talk) 10:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Good point. Per nom. Can you replace/remove the files in the Wikipedia pages @Beshogur: ?--Nanahuatl (talk) 03:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Rename}} of {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Netora (talk) 11:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
unused calligraphy of personal POV Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristian Aldirico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Amistoso en el predio de A.F.A..jpg
- File:Cristian Aldirico durante la charla táctica.jpg
- File:Cristian Aldirico dirige en el actual torneo de Primera B Nacional.jpg
- File:Cristian Aldirico, director técnico de fútbol profesional.jpg
- File:Cristian Alejandro Aldirico.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Presumed-nonfree magazine cover or similar DMacks (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 17:27, 29 August 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gianni Lora Lamia PRIMA RIDOTTA N 37 ANNO 8 - 1989 - COPERTINA.jpg: Presumed-nonfree magazine cover or similar --Krdbot 02:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, I'd meant to click the speedy-delete gadget, not regular-delete. DMacks (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC) Tipu Sultan is a Writer, Producer, DIrector and Actor, and Artist and Philosopher. He wrote, produced, directed and acted in the short film "The Best Dreamers" based partly on his life as a student in the London Metropolitan University in North London, in the UK. He studied English Literature and Philosophy, while at University he was the president of the fencing club and a keen fencer with the foil, he didn't complete his degree, completing 2 years and dropping out there after.
Tipu also wrote, produced, directed and acted in the short film "Orpheus In The Underground" with the Greek myth of Orpheus the Minstrel/Bard set in and transposed to the London Underground. Tipu played the role of Hades the God of the Underground/Underworld.
He also wrote, produced, directed and acted in the short film "Last Train Home" about the eternal battle between 2 supernatural beings; a vampire and a knight battling over a Japanese woman in London set in the London Underground.
Tipu then wrote, produced, directed and acted in "The Men In White" a feature film about a Tae Kwon Do class, unfortunately the film collapsed due to creative differences.
Tipu has written a feature film version of "The Best Dreamers" and is looking to produce, direct and act in it.
Tipu has also written a feature film screenplay titled "Games We Men Play" about 2 Londoners who encounter action, romance and adventure on their days off work. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.96.226.130 (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Per request of the author as the files isn't needed anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by pinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 2021-08-27T23:55:16 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
個人的なファイルであるため。 Kokeroyama (talk) 10:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
個人的なファイルをアップロードしてはいけないという規約はないと思うのですが。あとこれは世界に共有しようと思ったものです。Kyoto-line (talk)
削除方針をご確認ください。また、ScratchのライセンスはCC BY-SA2.0というWikimediaとは違うライセンスになります。つまり、再共有する際のライセンスもCC BY-SA2.0としなければなりません。--Kokeroyama (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
ここで許可されているはずですが？Kyoto-line (talk) なら貴方は、作者の許可を得ていることを示すべきです--Kokeroyama (talk)
CC BY-SA2.0を熟読してないのではないですか？許可云々の前に。Kyoto-line (talk)
Deleted: per nomination: personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not necessarily own work - Non-free at English Wikipedia (w:File:Yves Klein.jpg), attributed to :- http://www.yveskleinarchives.org/documents/bio_content_us.html ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in the United States, and no evidence that the street art is freely usable. Mysterymanblue 04:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted COM:DW of signed contemporary work, apparently mural not (unauthorized) graffiti, no evidence of free license from artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Audio files with unknown copyright status. COM:PCP Encik Tekateki (talk) 04:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Audio files with unknown copyright status. COM:PCP Encik Tekateki (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:PACKAGE King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- There is no copyright infringement (copyvio). A group of objects is located at different angles. Some items are only visible in fragments. In this case, the copyright belongs to the photographer (Kalnroze) who took this photo. The copyright holder of this file, Kalnroze, allows anyone to use it for any purpose. — Art-and-Air (talk) 10:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept; DW art on candy box looks to be 18/19th century. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. Created in 1928, will need a COM:BRAZIL COM:PORTUGAL expert to evaluate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: The association football club in question is Portuguese not Brazilian. As a result, Portuguese legislation should be checked on and not Brazilian one. --Glorious 93 (talk) 18:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, you're right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- also file:International Mathematical Olympiad 2014.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
The painting in the right of the picture is authored by Уладзімір Акулаў d:Q20640013 (born in 1954), as can be seen from here. The permission of the author is needed to use this image under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. Jarash (talk) 12:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, COM:DW of modern artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Jean-Julien Lemordant died in 1968. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:B403:9646:B68A:D32D 13:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Work still under copyright by heirs of artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Jean-Julien Lemordant died in 1968. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:B403:9646:B68A:D32D 13:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Work still under copyright by heirs of artist -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Albert Genta died in 1989. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:6CE5:D3C0:4AA7:4A7A 16:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Georges Manzana-Pissarro died in 1961. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:6CE5:D3C0:4AA7:4A7A 16:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason=Template failure — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanTD (talk • contribs) 2021-08-25T16:24:39 (UTC)
Deleted, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete for now until the Head of Tuva adopts his or her own flag. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Per the request of the author as the author does not need the file anymore. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept; uploaded more than 2 years ago, and in use in multiple projects. (Also note nominator account is not the uploader account.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the file is in the public domain or was first published before 1923. czar 08:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
ReDeleted per nom, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Non free logo for - 81 Produce , Not necessarily own work, and Non-free at English Wikipedia ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect license. Violation COM:FOP Russia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, Maxinvestigator! It was just an occasional reupload while I has been removing a lot of watermarks from images. It's up on you to decide how to deal with this image as I'm not an expert about license thing on Commons, at the moment. — All the best, Pacha Tchernof (talk) 08:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- The notification is sent automatically to everyone who changed the image. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I think based on the scale of the image it could be kept. I believe that protected pieces of the sculpture (something attached to the top) are too small and could be DM here. --rubin16 (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Unclear copyright situation: we have no valid source given (unfortunately) that could give valid information that could verify the free CC license. By now, we just know that the uploader is not the creator of this image and that this image comes from another homepage. Mosbatho (talk) 12:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Why the uploader being the author would be better here? I have uploaded this for my friend, Kris Seklecki. If he had uploaded it from something that looks like his account would have been better? « Saper // @talk » 15:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Saper, do you have the permission of the creator of this file that it can be provided on Commons under a free license? --Mosbatho (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, this photo was provided for Commons to be published under the free license. I have an mail exchange with the author as well as the depicted person. Probably it would have been easier if the photographer itself had uploaded it from personal account. « Saper // @talk » 21:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Saper:
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → 
- @Saper:
- Sure, this photo was provided for Commons to be published under the free license. I have an mail exchange with the author as well as the depicted person. Probably it would have been easier if the photographer itself had uploaded it from personal account. « Saper // @talk » 21:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Saper, do you have the permission of the creator of this file that it can be provided on Commons under a free license? --Mosbatho (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fails COM:EVID. We need the copyright owner to send permission for the file to COM:VRT. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna M. Gewandt (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Ausstellung "Draußen im Dunkeln" Museum Angewandte Kunst.jpg
- File:Dauerpräsentation "Elementarteile. Aus den Sammlungen" Museum Angewandte Kunst.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 06:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kadıköylü as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.yargitaycb.gov.tr/icerik/1232. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
As you can see yargitaycb.gov.tr/icerik/1232 is goverment web site i thought gov sites are copyright free places ZeusAmmon1 (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. @ZeusAmmon1: Per COM:TURKEY, in Turkey only legislation is exempt from copyright. Please separate your signature from your text. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio.--Kadı (talk) 12:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- cc: @Taivo Kadı (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dang Tung Duong
[edit]These file are missing evidence of permission. There is no proof that the author agreed to release them under the given license. --⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 09:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Watermarked with a name different to that of the uploader. Different version of the same image published at [5] before upload. Unlikely to be own work. mattbr 10:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Seems like a professional photo; unlikely the uploader's own work. -M.nelson (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF. SIngle upload. Smooth O (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark credits professional photographer Michael C. Hebert; not the uploader's own work. -M.nelson (talk) 15:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: all 3 user uploads clearly lifted from web. Please provide a link to an older copy from the web. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP per user's other uploads. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly taken from a professional photoshoot for the subject [6] with no notice of compatible licence. Unlikely to therefore be own work. mattbr 06:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Same image is on the artist's website. Uploaded with an 'own work' claim with the username changed to the artist's name, however the uploader has uploaded numberous files with dubious copyright claims. mattbr 06:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm afraid there is simply not enough information for us to be able to keep this photograph. The source is said to be unknown, the author as well, which means that the license tag (a CC license naming the uploader as the author) is completely bogus. The year when this photograph was taken is said to be presumably 1944.
This is not enough. We need clear information why this file is either under a free license or in the public domain. For a photograph from 1944, we cannot simply assume that it must be in the PD because of age, it would have to be at least 120 years old for that. I also don't see any other reason why the file would be in the PD or under a free license, so it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- I would keep the file. Triplec85 (talk) 21:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete --Hokemo TV (talk) 19:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
I own no license --Hokemo TV (talk) 19:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Has not been shown to be PD. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mall vivo melipilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Promo images, available on other sources.
Smooth O (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
his is not the correct logo, it must be removed. The correct logo can be found at www.ieasa.com.ar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7 JfernandezIEASA (talk • contribs) 2021-08-23T22:37:17 (UTC)
- Keep wrong nomination, the logo is correct, as can seen on https://www.ieasa.com.ar/
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I doubt if this is allowed under the (Belgian) copyvio laws. The Banner (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted design of wine label. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I doubt if this is allowed under the (Belgian) copyvio laws. The Banner (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. copyrighted design of wine label. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I doubt if this is allowed under the (Belgian) copyvio laws. The Banner (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. copyrighted design of wine label. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
dcirovic is from serbia, his english is terrible (blesav je celi od a do s), this file is not public domain, must go!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.242.152.165 (talk) 23:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- In use on sr:Hidrološki ciklus. Please provide a reason why it is copyrighted. Not found on the web using google, tiney, yandex, and bing. --Achim (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- There is a person that under various IP addresses persistently vandalizes srwiki. As administrator on that project, I am one of the people who stands in the way of such irrational behaviour. The outcomes are numerous personal threats, attempts to log into my account, vandalizams on my edits on other projects, etc. The overall tone and rational of this delition request fits the bill. --Dcirovic (talk) 14:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 10:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Don-kun as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image from manga/tv series, not just a textlogo. Assuming the SVG itself is entirely the own work of the uploader, it should be discussed whether the amount borrowed from One Piece is copyrightable (Idea–expression distinction). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Adding a few more. I am not suggesting that all of these four should necessarily have the same outcome, but worth discussing together. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- At least all of the images *want to be* the design from One Piece, even if they do so combining slightly different parts - skull and hat - from other sources. And the skull with the strawhat logo from the series is definitly protected by copyright. So it is a bit of a question whether you can breach copyright, if you do it clumsily enough. --Don-kun (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- At this point I haven't decided on File:Strawhat crew jolly roger.svg, but it's a definite Keep from me on the other three. The source of the skull is unrelated to One Piece, so only the hat is left. The shape of the hat doesn't really resemble the official logo, and as for the color, the Vietnamese came up with it first. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
-
GFDL, cc-by-2.5 -
-
CC0 -
_Sri_Lanka.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![12 File:Владимир Косов. "Синопское сражение". 60х100,100х138 х.м.2020 г.jpg](#File:Владимир_Косов._"Синопское_сражение"._60х100,100х138_х.м.2020_г.jpg){kind=link}
![18 File:Барк "Седов".В.Косов 110х70 холст, масло 2014 г.jpg](#File:Барк_"Седов".В.Косов_110х70_холст,_масло_2014_г.jpg){kind=link}
![39 File:Manokwarii.jpg]](#File:Manokwarii.jpg]){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_page_13.jpg){kind=link}
![140 File:"El futuro es tan confuso, como el color de la noche" Por. Cristián H.jpg](#File:"El_futuro_es_tan_confuso,_como_el_color_de_la_noche"_Por._Cristián_H.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
x.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Sri_Lanka.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sri_Lanka.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Sri_Lanka.svg){kind=link}
_Sri_Lanka.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_001_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_IDEAS,_LANGUAGES_AND_CONVERSATIONS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Possible_Past_(2019).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_page_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_page_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_title_page.png){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_page_13.jpg){kind=link}
_-_illustration_-_page_13.jpg){kind=link}
![14:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/29#c-Jochen_Burghardt-2021-08-29T14:15:00.000Z-File:"El_futuro_es_tan_confuso,_como_el_color_de_la_noche"_Por._Cristián_H.jpg){kind=link}
![00:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/29#c-P199-2021-10-17T00:13:00.000Z-File:"El_futuro_es_tan_confuso,_como_el_color_de_la_noche"_Por._Cristián_H.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
x.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
x.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
x.jpg){kind=link}
x.jpg){kind=link}
x.jpg-1){kind=link}
x.jpg){kind=link}
Keep File:Barnstar One Piece.png, File:JR One Piece small.png, File:JR One Piece small2.png. Free images, see also File talk:JR One Piece small.png. --Afnecors (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted Strawhat crew jolly roger.svg. This is clearly a derivitave work imho. Kept the other three, because they are not so clearly derivative works. The bones do not cross behind the scull, and the construction at the bottom (mouth? tongue?) is missing in those 3 images. --Ellywa (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Sufin Siluko Photo.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as both versions (of the same photography, to be sure) appear a bit different and IMO the version requested to be deleted looks slightly better. --. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: the two images are not identical. This one seems indeed better then File:Sufin Siluko Photo.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Sozialarbeiter Gerhard Schönborn im Gespräch mit einer bulgarischen Prostituierten in Berlin Tiergarten.jpg
[edit]
Personality rights. There is no evidence that the depicted persons agreed to the publication. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Das Foto zeigt sehr authentisch, was Herr Schönborn jeden Tag in seinem Beruf in Berlin macht. Und er hat mich gebeten, das zu dokumentieren, u.a. damals für die KNA Bonn. Und dabei ist auch das Bild entstanden, das m.E. sehr gut in den Text passt ...
- LG --2A00:6020:B388:3E00:F5CF:529F:E1A7:91A1 17:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Das Foto ist bereits mit Zustimmung Herrn Schönborns veröffentlicht worden:
https://justament.de/archives/7327 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:6020:B388:3E00:7953:9386:918B:884F (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep: the person dressed in black is not identifiable. RAL2040 (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Note:This user has been blocked indefinitely on deWP, All of this user's accounts behind the IP have been blocked for numerous violations over the years (mostly for spamming his journalistic work that apparently does not get the recognition required to pass for inclusion on deWP). It's not clear that the persons in this picture (or the owner of the car with a readable license plate) have agreed to publication, at least it can't be verified, and encyclopedic usefulness is very limited at best. --Millbart (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: An article about this person is present on de:Wikipedia, de:Gerhard Schönborn, therefore the image is in scope. @Millbart: if the article is deleted from de:WP and from Wikidata the image can be deleted according to the guidelines on Commons. So please nominate the image again in that case. --Ellywa (talk) 10:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
versehentlicher Upload mit falscher Lizenzart (ist nicht das eigene Werk, aber Erlaubnis des Fotografen wurde eingeholt) Hannah Huke (talk) 14:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Dann lade doch einfach die Permisson hoch, dann ist alles klar. Infos dort: Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/Noticeboard#Permission_Review. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- {{copyvio|kein eigenes Bild, versehentlich falsch angegeben, Urheberrechtsverletzung}} Hannah Huke (talk) 22:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
versehentlicher Upload mit falscher Lizenzart (ist nicht das eigene Werk, aber Erlaubnis des Fotografen wurde eingeholt) Hannah Huke (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. Not own image as uploader states. --Ellywa (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. A different version of the same image was published before the image was uploaded and it appears to be from a professional shoot for publicity images. Unlikely to be own work. mattbr 16:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful license. There is no information about first publication of the image in the source (archival). Maxinvestigator (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- This image is from a Hero of the Soviet Union award nomination sheet. All Soviet award nomination sheets (and other documents like death certificates, etc) on Pamyat-naroda are official documents and therefore public domain.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per PlanespotterA320. --Ellywa (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete for now until the Head of Khakassia adopts his or her own flag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 2021-08-27T22:56:11 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete for now until the Head of Komi adopts his or her own flag. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete for now until the Head of Buryatoa adopts his or her own flag. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The image is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong file for valued image candidates Ryse93 (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. this is the nominated file File:1GB DDR1 400Mhz (5).jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
maybe copyvio, small and no EXIF data Reda Kerbouche (talk) 20:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)