Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
pls pgftsgxyhjsgx 45.115.90.57 06:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep No reason for deletion. This nomination seems to be pure vandalism. --Mosbatho (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adella2021 (talk · contribs) and EllaRtvDiamant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope photos of a non-notable individual; tried to self-promo at ro:Iustin Gondos. Adella2021 and EllaRtvDiamant are possible clones.
- Adella2021:
- EllaRtvDiamant:
Gikü (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EllaRtvDiamant. Gikü (talk) 09:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not follow copyright regulations PaulDanielCJ (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by contributor, recent upload. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rossel44 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |1 = „Alle Bilder des Bild-Portals des Erzbistums Köln liegen unter der sogenannten CreativeCommons Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell. […] Klarstellend wird darauf hingewiesen, dass eine kommerzielle Nutzung der Fotos nach der vorgenannten Lizenz nicht gestattet ist.“ |source = https://bilder.erzbistum-koeln.de/agb Raymond 10:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader, User:Erzbistum Köln, is verified on the German Wikipedia: de:Benutzer:Erzbistum Köln. That means they are allowed to publish an image under a free license here, even if it's published as NC on their website. Raymond 10:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Rossel44 (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Als Urherber des Bildes hat das Erzbistum Köln das Portraitfoto von Rainer Maria Kardinal Woelki unter der Lizenz CC BY-SA 4.0 freigegeben. Die Veröffentlichung im o.g. eigenen bisher genutzten Bildportal erlaubt dort aus technischen Gründen keine andere Lizenz (das Portal wird in Kürze abgeschaltet). Das Foto wurde vom Erzbistum bereits unter CC BY-SA im neuen eigenen Media Asset Management veröffentlicht. Als verifizierter User auf Wikipedia haben wir das Bild daher ohne Urheberrechtsverletzung in Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen. Erzbistum Köln (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn, appropriate license by verified account. --Achim (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Ich muss Änderungen vornehmen Birrikar (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept, the nomination is withdrawn (Birrikar nominated the request for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
It does not follow the copyright regulations. 188.27.131.237 09:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deliciouspye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Duck COM:NETCOPYVIO - very low res, no EXIF, uploaded among other copyvios (see deleted contribs) and indeed all user uploads have been copyvios of this person. Quack/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Eldstål at the Asean Games 2014 - Incheon, South Korea.jpg
- File:Junior at the Asean Games 2014 - Incheon, South Korea.jpg
- File:Junior at the Asean Games 2014, Incheon, South Korea.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Nevermind; found it - speedied per F1. --Эlcobbola talk 20:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Not a scan, seemed close to a scan but the metadata says that the camera wasn't a scanning machine. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 12:25, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: author's request on creation day --Krdbot 21:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
upload error Billy0628 (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:35, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Non-free software screenshot --Krdbot 06:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
This picture is on more sites. Etvdv (talk) 03:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete nomination by uploader. Elliot321 (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not a public picture 2A02:1811:B217:C300:191D:88A8:DD3B:A652 14:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete for all the above and also for F10. (When someone OoS gets undressed, does not become in scope suddenly.) --E4024 (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
this picture is for free use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etvdv (talk • contribs) 16:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Closing admin, please keep an eye on trolling also. In case you see around... --E4024 (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Nice picture , let it online — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etvdv (talk • contribs) 16:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
abuse picture sexual intimidation Etvdv (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024 Your ping is so interesting :) (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JcKiteSchool (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used in a promotional article, professional photos, unlikely to be own work
Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gurkenglas0815 (talk · contribs)
[edit]author is Walter Schoenenbroecher, see EXIF, not uploader
- File:Drucker II.jpg
- File:Stukateur.jpg
- File:Seiler.jpg
- File:Schreiner II.jpg
- File:Reetdachdecker.jpg
- File:Posamenten.jpg
- File:Landwirt.jpg
- File:Korbmacher II.jpg
- File:Gerber II.jpg
- File:Besenmacher.jpg
- File:Chocolatier.jpg
shizhao (talk) 08:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history
- File:کوه نور.png
- File:قصر.png
- File:صادرات.png
- File:باران4.png
- File:باران.png
- File:الیزه 1.png
- File:آرمیتاژ.png
- File:الماس.png
4nn1l2 (talk) 09:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots, personal files, out of project COM:SCOPE.
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page 4.png
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page 3.png
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page 3.jpg
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page 2.png
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page.png
- File:Fnur0527@ruriplatfrom.page.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots, personal files, out of project COM:SCOPE.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Files from Emam.com
[edit]com:PCP unreliable source with a history of license laundering (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).
- File:Ali Khamenei Official photo (1989) (cropped).jpg
- File:Ali Khamenei Official photo (1989).jpg
- File:Officials mourning for Ruhollah Khomeini - June 1989.jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (1).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (10).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (11).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (12).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (13).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (14).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (15).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (16).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (17).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (18).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (19).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (2).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (20).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (21).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (22).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (23).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (24).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (25).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (26).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (27).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (28).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (29).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (3).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (30).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (31).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (32).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (33).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (34).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (35).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (36).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (37).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (38).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (4).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (5).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (6).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (7).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (8).jpg
- File:Rouhollah Khomeini in exile, Najaf, Pilgrimage the shrine of Imam Ali (9).jpg
- File:Ruhollah and Ahmad Khomeini visiting Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari (1).jpg
- File:Ruhollah and Ahmad Khomeini visiting Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari (2).jpg
- File:Ruhollah and Ahmad Khomeini visiting Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari (3).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini - Jamaran, 1988.jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini casts his vote for Iranian legislative election, 1988.jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in his home, Najaf -1965.jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Mehrabad (1).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (1).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (10).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (11).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (12).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (13).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (15).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (16).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (18).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (19).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (2).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (21).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (25).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (26).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (27).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (28).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (29).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (3).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (30).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (32).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (33).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (34).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (35).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (36).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (37).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (38).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (4).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (40).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (41).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (42).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (44).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (45).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (46).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (47).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (48).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (49).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (5).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (50).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (51).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (6).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (7).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (8).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (9).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château (cropped).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (2).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (3).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (4).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Banisadr).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Esmaeil Mousavi Zanjani).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Ja'far Sobhani).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Makarem Shirazi).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Mohammad Sadoughi).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution (Cropped on Montazeri ).jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini Meeting members of the Assembly of Experts on the Constitution.jpg
- File:Ruhollah Khomeini reading Qur'an.jpg
- File:Women meeting with Khomeini, 1 April 1979 (cropped-01).jpg
- File:Women meeting with Khomeini, 1 April 1979.jpg
Hanooz 15:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ALEX TUTOR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Milestone Three.edited (1).pdf
- File:Proposal care support(2).pdf
- File:Reflection Journal Task.edited.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history
- File:Kalnoonakkk.jpg
- File:Nohroodii.jpg
- File:Abshardav.jpg
- File:Harzamarz.jpg
- File:Sibdar.jpg
- File:Tabrizi.jpg
- File:Zibaa.jpg
- File:Kooha.jpg
- File:Jadehsom.jpg
- File:Tootderakht.jpg
- File:Dimadar2.jpg
- File:Jadeh.jpg
- File:Chalambeh2.jpg
- File:Azdoor1.jpg
- File:Azdoor.jpg
- File:Roodkhaneh.jpg
- File:Gerdooo.jpg
- File:Koohnavard.jpg
- File:Shabnashterood.jpg
- File:Nandasti.jpg
- File:Kalnoonakk.jpg
- File:Nandastitanoor.jpg
- File:Nandastii.jpg
- File:Kalnoonak.jpg
- File:Shohadayegeranghadr.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ben30ghosh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly taken from FB as per metadata, not own work or needs COM:OTRS. And some illustrations without proper source, author, date, and permission.
- File:Horses of jagannath.jpg
- File:The trinity of balarama subhadra and krishna .jpg
- File:Taladhwaj balaram.jpg
- File:Lady subhadra on her rath.jpg
- File:Kolkata rath yatra.jpg
- File:Chena poda prasad.jpg
- File:Indradyumna and Jagannatha.jpg
- File:Main gate of gundicha.jpg
- File:Lady gundicha.jpg
- File:Balaram's gold ornaments.jpg
- File:Sudarshan mahaprabhu on dwarpadalana.jpg
- File:Sudarshan chakra of jagannath.jpg
- File:Inside garbhgriha of the temple.jpg
- File:Rakhi purnima in puri.jpg
- File:Vimana of sri mandir.jpg
- File:Suna besa 2016.jpg
- File:Sunabesa 2013.jpg
- File:Khichidi bhog.jpg
- File:Anabasara.jpg
- File:Deva snana purima 2016.jpg
- File:Jagannath sringar.jpg
- File:Pattachitra.jpg
- File:Adhara paana.jpg
- File:Jagannath aarti.jpg
- File:Jagannath is worshipped along his siblings .jpg
- File:Jagannath of mahesh.jpg
- File:Gajanan besha.jpg
- File:Jagannath snana yatra.jpg
- File:Chaitanya mahaprabhu.jpg
- File:Kanchi vijay.jpg
- File:Madan mohan.jpg
- File:Golden ornaments of jagannath.jpg
- File:The patitapaban deity in the front door.jpg
- File:Patipabana mahaprabhu.jpg
- File:Lord jagannath riding his chariot.jpg
- File:Balabhadra's pahundi.jpg
- File:Lord balabhadra snana yatra.jpg
- File:Maa bhubaneshwari.jpg
- File:Devi subhdra's shunya pahundi.jpg
- File:Maa subhadra.jpg
- File:The present goddess subhadra .jpg
- File:Goddess subhadra.jpg
- File:Balabhadra mahaprabhu of puri.jpg
- File:Sri jagannath mahaprabhu.jpg
- File:Sunabesha.jpg
- File:LORD BALABHADRA.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The following files have watermarked text that does not match the uploader's username, or each other:
- This casts significant doubt on the authorship of all of this uploader's uploads. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrinaWiki9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work: inconsistent sizes and quality, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, some clearly taken from FB and other sources as per metadata and watermarks.
- File:The Closing Ceremonies of the 2016 Olympiad were held on the deck of the USS Missouri at Pearl Harbor.jpg
- File:Students at the 2018 History Olympiad in front of Charlottenburg Palace, where the Closing Ceremonies were held.jpg
- File:A Medal Ceremony at the 2016 Olympiad in Hawaii.jpg
- File:NHBB Arlington.png
- File:IHO Flags.jpg
- File:IHO History Knockout.jpg
- File:IHO Medals.jpg
- File:IHBB Nanwu H.jpg
- File:IHBB JFLS.jpg
- File:IHBBGuangdong.jpg
- File:Meisha Academy Team B.jpg
- File:IHBBShenzen.jpg
- File:RomeFinals.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Some of these pictures were taken by me directly. For others, I have received express permission to post them as my own. As someone new to the Wikipedia community, I am not sure if there is another way I should upload the pictures that I did not physically take. If so, I would sincerely appreciate some advice. Thank you in advance! BrinaWiki9 (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @BrinaWiki9: please see COM:OTRS to provide proof of permission. What camera did you use to take your own pictures? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted the following files per ticket:2021021710007007:
- De728631 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolegarcia200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Rodrigo Moyano Modelo masculino cochabamba deportista.jpg
- File:Rodrigo Moyano Gimnasia Cochabamba Tierra de campeones 2017.jpg
- File:Rodrigo Moyano RodMobel Cochabamba.jpg
- File:Rodrigo Moyano RodMobel Cochabamba impone moda en cochabamba gimnasia.jpeg
- File:Rodrigo Moyano RodMobel Cochabamba frases.jpg
- File:Rodrigo Moyano RodMobel Cochabamba impone moda en cochabamba.jpg
- File:Hooligans Bar tuvo a Rodrigo Moyano Rodmobel gimnasta cochabamba.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adam El Tayeb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable persons and events, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:وطن علماني.jpg
- File:Samer 'n Moaemen.jpg
- File:الصالون الثقافي للحركة.jpg
- File:الصالون الثقافي لحركة علمانيون.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete without useful data, these are out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Aerial view of Lomaloma.jpg
- File:Toba ko Lomaloma.jpg
- File:View of back road looking south from Serutivau to Naivi.jpg
- File:Eroni Fotofili II's residence.jpg
- File:Jale Fotofili.jpg
- File:Sawana Village and the Toba ko Lomaloma.jpg
- File:Sawana Village with Toba ko Lomaloma in the back ground.jpg
- File:Valenilotu Sawana.jpg
- File:Marika R Tukituku.jpg
- File:Jone Vave.jpg
- File:Jale-Fotofili-300x206.jpg
- File:Sawana Methodist Church.jpg
- File:Sawana Day Festivities 2007.JPG
- File:Bure next to the Naivi Village Green where Ratu Mara was born.jpg
- File:Vale ni lotu - Sawana.jpg
- File:Sawana Village Church.jpg
- File:Sawana Water Supply.jpg
- File:Sawana Village - Naivi village green.JPG
- File:Sawana Village - front looking north.JPG
- File:Sawana Village - front looking south.JPG
- File:Vakananumi - 100 years of the formation of Tovata.JPG
- File:Vakananumi at Lotoa.JPG
- File:Lotoa - residence of the Tui Lau.JPG
- File:Sawana with the Toba of Lomaloma in the foreground.jpg
- File:Sawana Village - main access road.jpg
- File:Sawana Village - Toba ko Lomaloma.jpg
- File:Serutivau.jpg
- File:Sawana Village.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Images are relevant and are correctly licensed and should remain
- I actually think it is his own work and it should remain on the article I strongly appose the deletion of these images.
- User:Maikeli — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.75.18.252 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable persons no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Sawana Water Project.JPG
- File:Sawana Water Project Team.JPG
- File:Sawana Water Supply Project Team.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shabih Sen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on promotional userpage of user without meaningful edits. Userpage was speedily deleted.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos and promotional photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an notable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 00:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not an own work. E4024 (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. Elliot321 (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not an own work. E4024 (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete likely copyvio. Elliot321 (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Cross wiki spam. 37.111.204.114 07:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Not used in any wikiproject 37.111.204.114 07:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Author is Walter Schoenenbroecher, not uploader. see EXIF shizhao (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Fitindia. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
out of the scope, promo text — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused promotional photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small aerial photo, looks like photo of a photo. Original uploader on panoramio just promoted some apartments with several promo images. Smooth O (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. Also likely copyright violation because this photo is not a selfie. jdx Re: 16:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Probable flickrwashing. Photograph at https://www.allmoviesonglyrics.in/2018/04/koi-vi-nahi-lyrics-shirley-setia.html predates the date given @Flickr. Lymantria (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Facebook stuff no merit Broichmore (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabahat Ali Khan (ACTOR) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal promo, not in use and no metadata, no educational value.
Kissa21782 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo of sunset, no context/location, little educational use, out of scope. Superseded by numerous better ones already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Text diagrams, should be in wiki-markup, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE at a userspace draft - wait for the outcome of the MfD you filed there before nominating these. There is no deadline. Elliot321 (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res screenshot, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused banner, no description/location, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete without proper info, it's useless. Elliot321 (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused text image, no description/context, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused image fragment of text, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete useless. Elliot321 (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused process diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny thumbnail, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Elliot321 (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work (see behind). E4024 (talk) 01:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete likely copyvio. Elliot321 (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not an own work. E4024 (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete likely copyvio. Elliot321 (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 1992, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 1992, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2006, there is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Facebook files, permission is needed, also no FoP in Bosnia and Herzegovina (mosque completed in 1997, unlikely to be in PD) A1Cafel (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2005, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Orašje Planje
[edit]The mosque was completed in 2011, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed.
- File:Džamija u punom sjaju - panoramio.jpg
- File:Nova džamija, Orašje Planje - panoramio.jpg
- File:Orasje Planje - panoramio.jpg
- File:Orašje Planje, Bosnia and Herzegovina - panoramio.jpg
- File:Pogled izbliza na novu dzamiju i na pomen šehidima - panoramio.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2001 by Fauzan Noe’man, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from him is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Architect is id:Achmad Noe'man (died 2016) --Smooth O (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- This image is almost 14 years on Commons now (which is no argument at all, I know). So who is the architect, whose rights could be violated here? --j.budissin+/- 09:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Photo of a building is considered as a derivative work, unless FOP exception is granted, permission from the copyright holder is required. Arguments like "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter" violate COM:PCP--A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Şəhidlər Məscidi
[edit]The mosque was completed in the 1990s. There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan, permission from the architect is needed.
- File:657616FB-2C33-4CE0-A97D.jpg
- File:Türk Şəhidlər məscidi (2304x3072) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Şəhidlər Xiyabanı Məscidi.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 01:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work; probably taken from social media (see size and tr code). E4024 (talk) 01:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work; probably taken from social media (see size and tr code). E4024 (talk) 01:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 01:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. (User blocked several times for similar uploads.) E4024 (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. See the uploader's TP please. E4024 (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Very possibly not an own work. Small file, w/o camera EXIF. User generally uploads copyvios. E4024 (talk) 02:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
It's a logo of a club, does not specify authorship. Rosaelisil4 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 14:51, 16 Februar 2021 UTC: No permission since 7 February 2021 --Krdbot 21:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
All are uploaded as "own work" but they appear to be corporate logos, so license is invalid. According to our page on TOO, India's rules are similar to the US; I'd say that Patanjali might be below TOO, but the rest appear to be above TOO, so even if they were correctly licensed they wouldn't be appropriate for Commons.
GeneralNotability (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused logos of questionable notability, very vague categories, out of scope.
- File:Digibox logo.png – Delete per en:Digiboxx, out of scope. Taivo
- File:Quikr logo.png – Keep in scope, simple logo. Taivo
- File:Nearbuy logo.png – Keep in scope, simple logo. Taivo
- File:Bikanervalalogo.png – Delete complex logo. Taivo
- File:Tooter logo.png – Delete complex logo. Taivo
Jianhui67 T★C 12:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I commented all logos. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Digibox, Bikanervala, and Tooter per Jianhui and Taivo. @Fitindia: Did you perhaps miss these? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvios, given uploader's history.
- File:Roposo logo.png
- File:Amara raja.png
- File:Patanjali ayurved.png
- File:Welspun group logo.png
- File:DDnews logo.png
- File:Relianceretaillogo.png
- File:Baidyanathlogo.png
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:PD-KG-exempt
[edit]Bogus PD claims. {{PD-KG-exempt}} applies only to certain exempt works (like symbols, statutory text, etc.), and photographs are not among them. (Note, also, source site of www.gov.kg explicitly says "© 2021, Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. all rights reserved" (© 2021, Кыргыз Республикасынын Өкмөтү. Бардык укуктар корголгон))
- File:Djoomart Otorbaev 2015-03-18 (cropped).jpg
- File:Djoomart Otorbaev 2015-03-18.jpg
- File:Muhammetkaliy Abdulgaziyev.jpg
- File:Muhammetkaliy Abulgaziyev 2016-05-16.jpg
- File:Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Sapar Isakov.jpg
- File:Temir Sariyev 2015-06-08.jpg
- File:Temir Sariyev.png
Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. There is even an appeal to follow them on Facebook. Mosbatho (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Vieille version mal faite. Existe en mieux ici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Assembl%C3%A9e_nationale_hongroise_2018.png Aréat (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo. Too small and blurred to be of any use. Malcolma (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Extremely small at 1 KB with 61 x 46 pixels; one can hardly guess what may be possibly depicted in this blurry sub-thumbnail. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infraction. This media is owned by MULTISHOW and Globosat. Horcoff (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I confirmed the license in the video the print was taken from, and it's CC-BY. The media is indeed owned by MULTISHOW and Globosat, but was licensed under an open license compatible with Commons.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Darwin. Apparently the source video was uploaded under CC-BY to YouTube by the copyright owner (seems to be their official channel). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2000, there is no freedom of panorama in Afghanistan, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Heydar mosque, Baku
[edit]The mosque was completed in 2014. There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan, permission from the architect is needed
- File:Heydar mosque 2016.01.15.jpg
- File:Heyder Mescidi 1.jpg
- File:Heydər məscidi 2016-05-30.jpg
- File:Heydər məscidi 2016.05.30.jpg
- File:Heydər məscidi.JPG
- File:Heydər məscidinin həyəti.JPG
- File:Heydər məscidinin sol tərəfi yaxından.JPG
- File:Heydər məscidinin sol tərəfi.JPG
- File:Heydər məscidinin uzaqdan görünüşü.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in IRAN 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Sorry but no FoP in Iraq and this looks very much like a modern sculpture. E4024 (talk) 13:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sardar Nadir Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
Timtrent (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and files also used for spam. IWI (talk) 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sardar Nadir Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
A very poor quality selfie (?) that doesn't appear to have any COM:EDUSE Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The file is a screenshot of a person shown in a recorded Zoom meeting, which is published in an official Facebook post of the Indonesian embassy in Kiev.
Although the file is a government-published work, and is in local public domain due to item b of Template:PD-IDGov, it is still copyrightable in the U.S. as a personal work (Compare it with a selfie taken by an ordinary citizen then later being used by the government, and a selfie taken and published by a government official).
The file therefore fails the requirement as stated in COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, and may be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi 廣九直通車! The webinar was held by the government itself and was published. Check the original caption on https://www.facebook.com/kbrikyiv/posts/pada-29-mei-2020-kbri-kyiv-telah-menyelenggarakan-webinar-acara-peluncuran-dan-d/3028451693909370/
Pada 29 Mei 2020, KBRI Kyiv telah menyelenggarakan Webinar acara Peluncuran dan Diskusi Buku “Perjalanan Tahun Ketiga Dubes RI di Kyiv: Prof. Dr. Yuddy Chrisnandi, S.H., M.E." Webinar ini dihadiri oleh sekitar 90-an orang partisipan, yang terdiri dari sejumlah Duta Besar dan mantan Konjen, para tokoh politik, pengusaha, akademisi dan tokoh media massa nasional. Narasumber yang hadir juga merupakan para pakar dari berbagai kalangan, antara lain : Letjen TNI (Purn) Sayidiman Suryohadiprojo, mantan gubernur Lemhanas yang pernah menjadi Dubes di Tokyo; Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hamad, Guru Besar Ilmu Komunikasi UI; Prof. Dr. Kadarsyah Suryadi, Rektor ITB 2014 – 2019; Dr. Fadli Zon, Ketua BKSAP DPR RI; Dr. El Amry B. Putera, Rektor Universitas Nasional; Dr. Djasa Pinara Gusti, calon Konhor Ukraina untuk Jawa Barat sekaligus CEO PT Mayaksa Mugi Mulia; dan Januar A Ruswita, Anggota Dewan Redaksi Pikiran Rakyat. Puncak acara adalah peluncuran secara resmi buku “Perjalanan Tahun Ketiga Dubes RI di Kyiv: Prof. Dr. Yuddy Chrisnandi, S.H., M.E.” dalam versi e-book yang dapat diunduh para peserta webinar. Adapun versi cetak buku ini akan terbit pada awal Juni 2020. Penerbitan buku ini merupakan bagian dari pertanggungjawaban Duta Besar RI Kyiv atas amanah yang diberikan Pemerintah dan rakyat Indonesia untuk memajukan kerjasama dengan Ukraina, Georgia dan Republik Armenia untuk sebaik-baiknya kepentingan rakyat Indonesia. which translates to On May 29, 2020, the Indonesian Embassy in Kyiv held a Webinar on the launch and discussion of the book "The Third Year Journey of the Indonesian Ambassador to Kyiv: Prof. Dr. Yuddy Chrisnandi, SH, ME "This webinar was attended by around 90 participants, consisting of a number of Ambassadors and former Consul Generals, political figures, businessmen, academics and national mass media figures. The speakers who attended were also experts from various among others: Lieutenant General TNI (Ret.) Sayidiman Suryohadiprojo, former Governor of Lemhanas who was once the Ambassador to Tokyo; Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hamad, Professor of Communication Studies UI; Prof. Dr. Kadarsyah Suryadi, Rector of ITB 2014 - 2019; Dr Fadli Zon, Chairman of BKSAP DPR RI; Dr. El Amry B. Putera, Chancellor of the National University; Dr. Djasa Pinara Gusti, candidate for Ukraine's Conhor for West Java and CEO of PT Mayaksa Mugi Mulia; and Januar A Ruswita, Member of the Pikiran Rakyat Editorial Board The highlight of the event was the official launch of the book "The Third Year Journey of the Indonesian Ambassador to Kyiv: Prof. Dr. Yuddy Chrisnandi, SH, ME" in an e-book version that can be downloaded by the webinar participants. The printed version of this book will be published in early June 2020. The publication of this book is part of the responsibility of the Ambassador of the Republic of Indonesia to Kyiv for the mandate given by the Government and the people of Indonesia to promote cooperation with Ukraine, Georgia. and the Republic of Armenia in the best interests of the Indonesian people.
- Regardless, thank you for your response! Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 03:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Sorry, but what is the relation between this and FOP? There is no building here, and our main focus is Sayidiman's portrait. Thank you. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 13:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: So this man is sitting down in front of a canvas, instead of an actual indoor environment? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Sorry, do you understand our main focus is Sayidiman's portrait? Our main focus is Sayidiman, and the image would still convey the equal amount of information even if we delete the background. See COM:De minimis. This would fall under case #4 of the De minimis: Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless). Thank you. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 06:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- And I should underline that 廣九直通車's main concern was that the webinar was not recorded by the embassy. In this case, I have proved that the webinar was in fact held by the embassy, and thus falls under PD-IDGov. Thank you. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 07:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- To put it short, 廣九直通車 nominated this for deletion because this file was published by the government, but not created by the government. In this case I have prove that the image is created and published by the government. Thank you. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 07:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Building is not main object of photo, so does not fall under no-FoP. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The file is the crop of File:Sayidiman Suryohadiprojo veteran.jpg, which is published in an official Facebook post of the Indonesian embassy in Kiev.
Although the file is a government-published work, and is in local public domain due to item b of Template:PD-IDGov, it is still copyrightable in the U.S. as a personal work (Compare it with a selfie taken by an ordinary citizen then later being used by the government, and a selfie taken and published by a government official).
The file therefore fails the requirement as stated in COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, and may be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete That said, No FOP in Ukraine. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Building is not main object of photo, so does not fall under no-FoP. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
this is vandalism (see user contribution in russian Wikipedia) Lesless (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The file for vandalism (see contribution in russian Wikipedia) Lesless (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Source: "Se trata de una foto publicada". E4024 (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Publication does not equal a free licence and there is no evidence of such a licence. Neither has the original source been named. --De728631 (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Source: "Es una publicación". E4024 (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Publication does not equal a free licence and there is no evidence for the Creative Commons licence that was applied by the uploader. --De728631 (talk) 13:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The images on the following website are reprinted without permission. http://kokudensouken.d.dooo.jp/P14.html 106.154.118.42 06:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Do we have enough information on COM:TOO to say that this logo isn't copyrighted in Indonesia? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also nominating File:Telkom Indonesia 2013.svg as it has the same issue. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
There is no indication that this file is freely licenced or that the uploader has the right to licence it. FTR, enwiki has it as en:File:Fun Home French cover.jpg fair use Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: File can be restored once we receive OTRS permission. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portr%C3%A4t_Walter_Sch%C3%B6nenbr%C3%B6cher.jpg, no permission shizhao (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Image is not the own work of the uploader. Original source is copyrighted: http://molicentro.com/ Aucahuasi (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from http://molicentro.com/. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Probably cropped from a biographical publication about Josip Kaplan (see e.g. here); not own work, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 08:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, Barbarian (talk) 08:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) Jevgeny Solovjov. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Seems like this screenshot is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unfree screenshot. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, along with the second upload File:DragonesdelaNoches831px.jpg.. Proportions suggest CD cover- then unclear copyright and notability. Pibwl (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c) status, most likely not free. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative, no source. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image missing EXIF data, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The mural is prominent here. There's no commercial FOP in Bulgaria and authorization from the artists for consent of the release of this image under CC/PD licensing is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- While categorized under "graffiti", these appear to be legally painted murals, and the artists' copyright cannot be deprived here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only NC in Bulgaria. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded to Unsplash after the site changed its license from CC-Zero to a more restrictive one: https://unsplash.com/photos/nlbvHB8dVOo Ytoyoda (talk) 04:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a scaled-down duplicate of File:Signature of Elizabeth II.png, but also lacking any indication of sourcing or attribution of source. —RP88 (talk) 09:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused derivative. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
unclear copyright - surely anonymous uploader didn't take the photos. Same for File:Conselho Fiscal.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 09:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
unused logo of not known notability. Pibwl (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Guarda Football Association + PD-Textlogo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
unsed photo of unidentified person with an inscription on a forehead. Pibwl (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
possibly no own work, uploaded by boyfriend (or by someone with his name as username) Velocitas (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: probably from Het Agentschap https://het-agentschap.nl. OTRS needed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained graph. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Test pic. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Watemark leads to website: https://tunera.info/, copyrighted news site. No permission. Smooth O (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, webgrab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Unacceptable derivative work of a non-free book cover. ƏXPLICIT 12:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, book cover def. not free. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused user logo of a non-established contributor. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Test. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
File name is "Alexander's autograph" per Google Translate. Vague subject, low-quality image. ƏXPLICIT 12:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Test. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Tagged as speedy, I am asking for a more thorough review of copyrights applicable here. Please weigh in. Dahn (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Grenada. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
very poor quality image, unlikely to be useful, clearly not taken by teh subject who uploaded it despite claiming own work Praxidicae (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Idk man, the uploader's username is "coolicarlito" so I think they do likely own the rights, but in terms of being within the scope of the project, I must say, I do agree with you.TwinTurbo (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
sym., — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolicarlito (talk • contribs) 23:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Uploaded by cooli. What reason is there to suspect its 'clearly not taken by teh subject'. Do something useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolicarlito (talk • contribs) 23:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Cooli Carlito was deleted, depicted person is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. Do we accept FB files? (No, I am not asking about those FB files which come "with an OTRS permission"; I have seen other FB files kept here. I only do not remember the file names and the closing admins. Anybody can help me?) E4024 (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Files sourced to Facebook are not categorically different from files from any other website. COM:EVID applies: if the source doesn't mention a compatible license, we can't keep the file. [1] doesn't, so we won't. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fma12
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The files come from English Wikipedia where they were first uploaded by either en:User:Silent Wind of Doom or en:User:JohnnySeoul. While the clothes appear to be in the public domain as {{PD-ineligible}}, there is no evidence that the drawings of the clothes are in the public domain.
Stefan4 (talk) 09:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 20:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not public domain in the U.S.A. For Wikipedia only.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The supposed copyright in de US is only imaginary. In line with the WMF point of view, the vast majority of admins does not delete files for 'non-UURA' reasons. --Jcb (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Please provide evidence that image has been published more than 20 years ago.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per COM:L, images must be free in the US and country of origin. Uploader themselves acknowledges these are not free in the US due to URAA by inclusion of {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} template. That template explicitly says "New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted," and these are indeed new files--uploaded 2021 (the template is for the cleanup of old files and is retained to inform that new uploads are not accepted)
Эlcobbola talk 22:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: it has been agreed that the restored copyright in the US shouldn't be the only reason of deletion. This decision was in line with the WMF point of view on the matter. Ruthven (msg) 19:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons is very open, but a possible use in an educational way is the minimum. These images did not cover this minimum requirement. Commons is not a replacement for private web space.
Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of COM:Scope. There are many places for uploading personal fantasy artwork on the internet; Commons is generally not such a place. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Some of the nominated images are so close to the originals that they are outright copyright infringements. Another part pretends to be exactly that, but in the end they are just bad fakes (especially "trading cards"). And other images clearly affect trademark rights. People don't even shy away from forging film posters. And the fourth part is miserable fake portraits of celebrities, some of which are so bad that they aren't even bad caricatures.
Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - There's a grab-bag of problems here, such as the fake images of real people being out of COM:SCOPE and many of the files being substantially similar to copyrighted works. In the future, breaking these mass nominaitons in to smaller batches, each with a specific problem, will make adjudicating them easier. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
There is insufficient information to determine if these files are public domain in the United States. They are sourced to Facebook/Twitter pages which post old photos, or to recently-published articles; no information is available about the original publication. We don't know whether or not they were published in the United States within 30 days of publication in Argentina, and we don't know whether or not there was a copyright notice. All of them were published after January 1, 1928, so we need these details to know whether or not they are copyrighted.
- File:Trabajadores fabrica zapatos pompeya 1943.jpg
- File:Plaza de mayo en rivadavia y sanmartin 1962.jpg
- File:Antonio pujia en su taller.jpg
- File:Casa bixio fotografia.jpg
- File:Ernesto bianco retrato.jpg
- File:Pedro quartucci y elina colomer.jpg
- File:Rubino diazlastra rigoli farias detras de escena.jpg
- File:Vandalismo en paradas colectivos buenos aires.ogg
- File:Pepe biondi y tita merello.jpg
- File:Pepe biondi y luisinabrando.jpg
- File:Pepe biondi y esposa.jpg
- File:Azucena maizani portrait.jpg
- File:Estacion padilla antigua.jpg
- File:Pepe biondi con hija y yerno.jpg
- File:Estacion b mitre 1966.jpg
- File:Av maipu y marconi 1959.jpg
- File:Velez sarsfield al 4300 munro en 1963.jpg
- File:Barreras paso nivel av maipu 1959.jpg
- File:Lluvia en barrio de once 1940s.jpg
- File:Newells equipo vs san lorenzo.jpg
- File:Vias en la boca años 60s.jpg
- File:Funeral carlos gardel en luna park.jpg
- File:Antonio carrizo hablando al aire.jpg
- File:Pintos olmedo biondi rubino y altavista 1970.jpg
- File:Avenida directorio en 1936.jpg
- File:Nat king cole blackie y antoniocarrizo en radio elmundo.jpg
- File:Discepolo retrato.jpg
- File:Chiclana y loria en buenos aires 1947.jpg
- File:Calle santa fe en rosario 1966.jpg
- File:Gente de firmat con muneco de nieve 1954.jpg
- File:Tienda el barato argentino en firmat santa fe.jpg
- File:Lago del parque independencia 1932.jpg
- File:Casa y jardin bajo la nieve en rosario.jpg
- File:Reloj y telefono publico en caseros y la rioja buenos aires.jpg
- File:Trolebus en vias del cruce alberdi rosario 1960s.jpg
- File:Pasajeros descendiendo de tren en rosario norte 1942.jpg
- File:Paso nivel cordoba y riojaneiro rosario 1940.jpg
- File:Muestra postuma schiavioni 1944.jpg
- File:Centro prensa rosario mundial78.jpg
- File:Paso nivel calle cordoba en rosario fc mitre.jpg
- File:Pasajeros en estacion venado tuerto 1947.jpg
- File:Interior estacion rosario central.jpg
- File:Beatriz guido retrato.jpg
- File:Mvl acto en el municipio 25may1944.jpg
- File:Tren en rosario norte 1950s.jpg
- File:Patio de la madera rosario 1960s.jpg
- File:Trolebus en rosario 1965.jpg
- File:Estadio gigante arroyito aerea 1939.jpg
- File:Fanny navarro photo 1941.jpg
- File:Parada colectivos av corrientes y maipu 1961.jpg
- File:Cantinflas en mausoleo carlosgardel 1961.jpg
- File:San lorenzo vs all boys sta rosa gol fischer.jpg
- File:San lorenzo vs velez copa argentina 1970.jpg
- File:All boys de santa rosa equipo 1970.jpg
- File:Chacarita vs godoy cruz cronica partido 1969.jpg
- File:At tucuman vs boca juniors 1969.jpg
- File:Boca vs sarmiento sgo del estero.jpg
- File:Copa argentina savoy vs chacarita.jpg
- File:Chacarita vs boca copa argentina 1969.jpg
- File:Equipo femenino buenos aires lawntennis 1930.jpg
- File:Racing club equipo 1932.jpg
IagoQnsi (talk) 04:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Of course, Keep - I can understand that some users nominate non-PD-URAA images (like it happened in previous DR), but this DR was really unexpected. Some of the images uploaded were taken from the National Archive of Argentina (which has even provided files to the project, per Category:Files provided by Archivo General de la Nación Argentina). Images provided from Facebook or Twitter pages dedicated to historic images of Buenos Aires and Rosario have historic value, like the AGN images have. A similar (but much more specific) DR can be seen here.
- On the other side, this DR seems so absurd that the user even nominate obvious newspaper photographs or chronicles (File:Copa argentina savoy vs chacarita.jpg and File:Chacarita vs godoy cruz cronica partido 1969.jpg), which is clearly showed at the soure page. Other images (File:Racing club equipo 1932.jpg was also taken from a newspaper or magazine. File:Vandalismo en paradas colectivos buenos aires.ogg was a news short film released in 1956 in theaters (as source indicates) with no credits to auhtor/s so what is wrong with the {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} license?
- To finish, I would like to know what is the criteria to establish the copyright status of some images, considering that Category:Works by Annemarie Heinrich (an Argentine photographer died in 2005) has a lot of portraits of artists taken by her (such as File:Laura Hidalgo (Pasea Faerman) por Annemarie Heinrich.jpg to name just an example) which were not published on the media. And I'm not complaining but only citing this case as a reference. Fma12 (talk) 09:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Fma12: I agree that these photos may have historical value; however, we need to have accurate source information to demonstrate that they are public domain.
- Just because the photos are from a newspaper does not mean they are public domain in the United States. If the newspaper was published in the United States within 30 days of its publication in Argentina and included a copyright notice, it would still be copyrighted in the US today. The blog post did not include the entire newspaper, so it is impossible to determine whether it included a copyright notice.
- For the news short film, the source you linked just now is different from the source which you provided when you uploaded it, which did not include any information about the original publication of the video. The {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} license does not work because it was published in 1956, which means its copyright didn't expire in Argentina until 2006. This means that it was in copyright on the URAA date in 1996, which means its copyright doesn't expire in the US until 2051. –IagoQnsi (talk) 01:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Fma12. S5A-0043Talk 10:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
_por_Annemarie_Heinrich.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per above. No actionable evidence presented, just generalized fear, uncertainty and doubt. --RAN (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I made this DR after having spent a lot of time making many other DRs for uploads by Fma12 which were provably not public domain. Or finding uploads by Fma12 which I eventually determined to actually be public domain, but only after much work on my part (for example, the photos in Category:1969 Topps American football cards and several other Topps categories, which are nonsensically tagged {{PD-US-not renewed}} despite being post-1963 – eventually I located images of the backs of the cards, and determined that {{PD-US-defective notice}} could apply). My understanding of Commons is that the burden falls upon the uploader to provide accurate and complete source information which demonstrates that an image is free, not upon everyone else to prove that it is not. –IagoQnsi (talk) 01:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, the sources where the files come from are well documented. This massive DR is meaningless. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Twitter and Facebook pages aren't the original sources of these images. The source is whatever book, newspaper, or newsreel the images were first published in, and those sources aren't appropriately documented here on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Twitter and facebook are not the only sources cited. I gave several examples above.
- ess Fma12 (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The only other specific example I see above is a page on Blogspot, which certainly isn't the original source of the image either. The sort of original source we need is "La Revista, edition of 25 October 1933" -- or whatever. Omphalographer (talk) 03:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Banfield: Most of these photos are sourced to Twitter/Facebook pages (and in most cases, only the URL to the account is provided, not to the specific post which might have more information). These pages are definitely not the original source; the original source is unclear. –IagoQnsi (talk) 01:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Twitter and Facebook pages aren't the original sources of these images. The source is whatever book, newspaper, or newsreel the images were first published in, and those sources aren't appropriately documented here on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This DR should be closed because the argument of bad sources in such wide array of images makes little sense. If there are good arguments for some files (e.g. screenshots of films) a separate DR can be open. I agree with the person that opened the DR that Fma12 on some of their uploads doesn't bother to check the US status of the images, but that is not reason to nominate images that have little chance of being copyrighted in the US. For example, File:Chacarita vs boca copa argentina 1969.jpg was taken from a blogspot, but it had full scans of the news article with date and publisher. The only chances of this particular image being Copyrighted in the US are (1) the Argentine newspaper was also published in the US with additional copyright symbols stamped all around and followed all renewal formalities (2) an unknown US-based magazine published it short afterwards. For (1) there should at least some tangible suspicion that the newspaper was published also in the US. Common sense states that Argentinian daily newspapers were not published simultaneously in the US in the 1960s. After all, we don't expect uploaders to check that a US-magazines from the 1960s was not published simultaneously in the UK. For (2) even if the scan was from the Library of Congress the uploader wouldn't have a chance of finding out that the image was used in another obscure publication (this image is not Maradona holding the World Cup). Other images like File:Chacarita vs godoy cruz cronica partido 1969.jpg, being a news article and not a photograph, is likely to have copyright issues as it has longer protection. Günther Frager (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept – It's clear I was off-base here; will make more specific DRs moving forward. Mea culpa. –IagoQnsi (talk) 21:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, low resolution, no EXIF, found on websites like this one. Jianhui67 T★C 12:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate and scaled down version of File:Yukon Delta.jpg StellarHalo (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
unused, out of scope. Pibwl (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Per description, author is ro:Vasile Varga, d. 2005. Undelete in 2076, I guess? Gikü (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Viktorialand, Antarctica has no such parliament. Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amkgp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from (https://www.arattai.in/) PD-textlogo imo. Jianhui67 T★C 12:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If this is textlogo, then it should be kept. But which letters? Not Latin, not Cyrillic letters. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I would say it looks like 'ai' to me. Jianhui67 T★C 13:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per user:Jianhui67. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused crude drawing, no useful description to imply a purpose congruent with commons, potentially out of scope Timtrent (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no indication of how it could be useful. Not in use anywhere. IWI (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Vanity picture, out of scope for commons Timtrent (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete agree with nom. Only used on the user page of an indefinitely blocked sock of spammer. IWI (talk) 05:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a screeshot from Google Street View, not own work. https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.8581487,5.3703986,3a,82.2y,17.64h,97.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOeUl-A7g2xalVBwFcwOrsg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl Bardenoki (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nahian Hasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and diagram. Diplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
way out of scope, we have plenty of images that can depict jesus on a cross, we do not need a cartoonish line drawing with dubious copyright claims and it's use would be entirely unencyclopedic in any article. Praxidicae (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The usefulness of a child's drawing can hardly be compared to its encyclopedic value. The argument seems irrelevant to me IMHO. Παιδιστί (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, likely advert and doubtful if it's a CC copyright BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
and File:Bremerhavener-Streckennetze Autor Paul Homann.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
low quality Lotje (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by others in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Author request deletion Daniqui04 (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation of TV broadcast Flipwared (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Not used anywhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavanaja (talk • contribs) 12:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Joke image, out of scope. There is another image of the same person, File:Paul New, Cricketer.jpg, which seems fine (if it actually is the person named). kyykaarme (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
bad quality / same picture much better is File:2005-Biel-Bahnhof.jpg. Martin Sg. (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Fabricated image, Yunnan doesn't exist an "independence movement", not to mention a flag. I don't know how this flag image come out, probably somebody's phantasy, it's never ever used in Yunnan history or nowaday. The only independent flag used in Yunnan history is in the Xinhai Revolution, Yunnan local government revolt and use the flag File:Zhongflag.jpg, which is stored in Yunnan Military Academy Museum now. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- If the deletion reason is not suit in commons, I will require to rename the file and clarify the image is not a exist flag.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete this looks to be out of scope, unless there is some educational use. Elliot321 (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This flag is used by the current Yunnan Independence Movement: [2] [3]--Gnivresuiluj (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This flag is designed and used by Yunnanese nationalist overseas in protests against China. It's not a common flag known in Yunnan, but can be considered as a micronation like the Conch Republic. But I agree that the description has to be changed. Examples of usage in protests: https://twitter.com/diantnam/status/1296965428527296512?s=20 https://twitter.com/ZhuXiaRising/status/1312148176984399872?s=19 https://twitter.com/zhuxiarising/status/1310252126308675586?s=12 MoAiSang (talk) 05:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? A fictional declaration in Twitter could be consider as a movement?--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: no educational significance. --Ngguls(UTC) 01:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. FunkMonk (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
File doesn't use in any wiki project. The user who uploads it, opens spam articles on wiki projects. This file was probably uploaded for spam. I suggest it will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
watermarks, sorry Oursana (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
C'est un doublon. Lidine Mia (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Vallée de l'Aba Huab - cercles de fées - Damaraland.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
No evidence found on source website to show that claimed CC-BY-SA licence is accurate. GeoWriter (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Name of the uploader is different from the name of the author, OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The Amsterdam website allows re-use, but does not mention derivatives or commercial use. There is no explicit license mentioned to clarify this. https://www.amsterdam.nl/overdezesite/ Ciell (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also referring to the original: File:Burgemeester halsema5 231118.jpg. Ciell (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: source website clearly says Rechtenvrije foto's (rights-free photos). IMO, that means all rights. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from award. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
That's me, and I don't want this image on Wikipedia anymore. EliasTheHorse (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: shop window for the building feature is the main part, not the poster.--Wpcpey (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:HK TST Peninsula Hotel Hong Kong Salisbury Road shop window Michael Kors Oct-2012.JPG, COM:DM. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: If you want to keep the image, blur the poster. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: shop window for the building feature is the main part, not the poster.--Wpcpey (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Wpcpey, the main topic is shop, not the poster, so DM applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The poster is not DM. It was even used in the Capri Holdings page as an example of Kors - How can it be said to be DM if you're using the poster in an article?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kolorovaný snímek je má práce a nepřeji si, aby byl nadále publikován na Wikipedii. Jonáš Fikar (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, not own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kolorovaný snímek je má práce a nepřeji si, aby byl nadále publikován na Wikipedii. Jonáš Fikar (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: scan, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kolorovaný snímek je má práce a nepřeji si, aby byl nadále publikován na Wikipedii. Jonáš Fikar (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: DW. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Duck copyvio - professionally posed and shot image of notable person, clearly part of this set ([4][5]) and uploader copyvio history (File:Rachel Parris1.jpg) of this subject. Quack/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: the user appears to be the same person as User:Richybenohas, who claimed that the subject (Parris) has asked them to update the image, so I'm guessing it's the agent or photographer or someone professionally associated. (See en:Talk:Rachel Parris#Image and the edit history of en:Rachel Parris.) I can't find this image with a reverse image search. If it's unpublished and has been uploaded by the copyright holder then what makes it a copyvio? If you can answer this question, you might try communicating with the user yourself. I've already pointed them to https://relgen.toolforge.org/. (Please ping me when responding.) Bilorv (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject (Parris). Accordingly, acting under Parris' direction, even if true, is entirely meaningless with respect to copyright. We would require COM:OTRS evidence of the document that transferred rights from the photographer to Parris and that Lidgold is Parris' agent. Given that this uploader demonstrably lied about authorship and breached the purported {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} (the "by" means attribution is required), this is, indeed per the nomination, a COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: "Lied" implies malice and knowledge which that diff doesn't evidence. (For instance, it's not a lie if the person simply doesn't understand U.S. copyright law in the detail you do, or does own copyright as you point out in the comment is possible.) In the first instance you need to talk to the uploader and ask for more information (which you can do simultaneously with a deletion request if you're in such a hurry). Otherwise the person may continue re-uploading, not understand what the issue is and we could lose out on a potentially valuable opportunity for a freely licensed image. At en:Rachel Parris we desperately need a better image of the subject and it seems that is a possible outcome here. Since you've now given me a good explanation, why don't you give this person the same one at one of their talk pages? Bilorv (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader claimed "author=Rhonda Lidgold" when they knew or should have known that to be an untruth. A lie is "to create a false or misleading impression," so I don't know what you're talking about, and I don't think you do either. No knowledge of copyright law is required to understand the necessity of truthful statements. The issues, relevant polices, and venues to seek assistance are clearly referenced on the uploader's talk page. They are welcome to avail themselves. Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- It seems you've decided that both myself and the user in question are stupid, and worked backwards from there. "I don't immediately understand the point being made, so that means the person who said it meant nothing, and is actually just stupid." "The user doesn't understand X, so that means that the user is stupid, rather than the explanation being insufficiently direct or too technically convoluted." Bilorv (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome to that assessment of yourself, but it's your own; I've neither said nor implied anything of the sort, as any intellectually honest onlooker can observe. Verily, my comments are above and speak for themselves. I don't find expectations of truthful statements convoluted. Эlcobbola talk 22:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- It seems you've decided that both myself and the user in question are stupid, and worked backwards from there. "I don't immediately understand the point being made, so that means the person who said it meant nothing, and is actually just stupid." "The user doesn't understand X, so that means that the user is stupid, rather than the explanation being insufficiently direct or too technically convoluted." Bilorv (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader claimed "author=Rhonda Lidgold" when they knew or should have known that to be an untruth. A lie is "to create a false or misleading impression," so I don't know what you're talking about, and I don't think you do either. No knowledge of copyright law is required to understand the necessity of truthful statements. The issues, relevant polices, and venues to seek assistance are clearly referenced on the uploader's talk page. They are welcome to avail themselves. Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: "Lied" implies malice and knowledge which that diff doesn't evidence. (For instance, it's not a lie if the person simply doesn't understand U.S. copyright law in the detail you do, or does own copyright as you point out in the comment is possible.) In the first instance you need to talk to the uploader and ask for more information (which you can do simultaneously with a deletion request if you're in such a hurry). Otherwise the person may continue re-uploading, not understand what the issue is and we could lose out on a potentially valuable opportunity for a freely licensed image. At en:Rachel Parris we desperately need a better image of the subject and it seems that is a possible outcome here. Since you've now given me a good explanation, why don't you give this person the same one at one of their talk pages? Bilorv (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject (Parris). Accordingly, acting under Parris' direction, even if true, is entirely meaningless with respect to copyright. We would require COM:OTRS evidence of the document that transferred rights from the photographer to Parris and that Lidgold is Parris' agent. Given that this uploader demonstrably lied about authorship and breached the purported {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} (the "by" means attribution is required), this is, indeed per the nomination, a COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 17:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is the third different publicity shot of Parris to be uploaded to Commons in the past few days, from the third account (there was also User:Hrmccabe). I've asked the user on their Wikipedia talk page what the deal is: it may be someone acting on behalf of Parris who doesn't understand the OTRS thing and hopes that swapping accounts and photos might just work somehow if they keep trying. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Catching up on this, Lidgold has said "I am acting on behalf of Rachel Parris. I work for her talent agent - Sophie Chapman and she has asked us to update her photo. We own the rights to the photos I have tried to upload." and has since been asked to prove this through https://relgen.toolforge.org. If nothing has come through then it's possible they decided that CC-Attribution was too generous a licence to release a press shot under. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Эlcobbola outlines above the reasons the image is not acceptable and the user Rhonda Lidgold has been given more than enough opportunity to either ask for help or go to OTRS. I had assumed this would be deleted weeks ago. Bilorv (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Bogus self/CC claim on logo. May or may not be below TOO - discussion needed about gradient and elements together. Эlcobbola talk 16:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - gradients in all likelihood pass TOO. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:BBC logos. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Cropped from this image. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, it is clearly the other way around: you cannot crop a picture with a part of face missing (her chin), and obtain a complete face! --Sapphorain (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
@Sapphorain: , Better?.. You can just make a Google Image Search to find full versions of the image. Since we don't know whp the creator is or the creation date, we can't say it's a public domain.--Nanahuatl (talk) 08:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We don't know when it was taken so how do we know the 70+ claim is valid?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Per [6]. Only provide non-commercial use license.
- File:Virus size.png
- File:51639 web T7 microphotography colored.jpg
- File:51640 web T7 caught in the act.jpg
- File:118913 web phage PAK P3.jpg
- File:232757 web prochlorococcus marinus phage P-SSM2 Fd.jpg
- File:238054 web surrogate viruses.jpg
- File:137488 web.jpg
- File:169019 web zika.jpg
- File:252780 web filovirus replcycle.jpg
- File:252781 webflavivirus replcycle.jpg
- File:252779 web coronavirus replcycle.jpg
- File:253143 web Enterovirus E ed.jpg
- File:Cystoviridae virion.jpg
- File:253449 web 2B7 antibody.jpg
- File:254961 web.jpg
- File:254961 web Phi6 virions.jpg
- File:255355 web c.jpg
- File:255355 web Phi6 virions c.jpg
- File:T4 phage SD.jpg
- File:T4 phage EM.jpg
- File:Sphaerolipoviridae virion.png
- File:Lambda virion.jpg
- File:Lambda EM.jpg
- File:T4likevirus EM.jpg
- File:T4likevirus virion.jpg
- File:Hytrosaviridae virion.jpg
- File:Nudivirus virion.jpg
- File:Bromoviridae genome.jpg
- File:Bromoviridae virion.jpg
- File:Tobamovirus virion.jpg
- File:Necrovirus genome.png
- File:Thogotovirus genomes.jpg
- File:Thogotovirus-virion.jpg
- File:Quaranjavirus genomes.jpg
- File:Tombusvirus genome.png
- File:Tombusviridae virion.jpg
- File:Dicistroviridae virion.jpg
- File:Ascoviridae virion.jpg
- File:Iridovirus virion.jpg
- File:Phycodnaviridae virion.jpg
- File:Coccolithovirus virion.jpg
- File:Cafeteria virion.jpg
- File:Mimivirus virion.png
- File:Pegivirus genome.jpg
- File:Pegivirus virion.jpg
- File:ParvoviridaeVirion.jpg
- File:HRPV-1-GenomeMap.jpg
- File:Alphapleolipovirus.jpg
- File:CrAssphage Virion.png
- File:Schizotequattrovirus EM.jpg
- File:Schizot4likevirus virion.jpg
- File:Phikzlikevirus EM.jpg
- File:Phikzlikevirus virion.jpg
- File:P22likevirus virion.jpg
- File:Sinsheimervirus virion.jpg
- File:Levivirus genome.png
- File:Leviviridae virion.png
- File:T7likevirus virion.jpg
- File:T5likevirus virion.jpg
- File:Phi29likevirus virion.jpg
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, on https://viralzone.expasy.org/contact The following information is provided: All pictures in ViralZone are copyright of the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Permission is granted to use the pictures in academic theses or non-commercial powerpoint presentations, provided the source is acknowledged. Plese check the information providedby Philippe Le Mercier, SIB provided at my home page user:Ernsts This is as follows:
Message from Philippe Le Mercier <Philippe.Lemercier(at)sib.swiss> as of 2021-02-01 concerning the ViralZone images:
"As for the images, the license has changed: they are now under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0. It is stated on the home page of ViralZone. This means you no longer have to ask permission to use them in any media, provided you credit the source. Here is an official statement in case you need it:
I hereby grant you permission to use ViralZone graphics in Wikimedia commons. Please cite the source: ViralZone, SIB Swiss Institute of bioinformatics
If you need any other official documents from SIB, you can ask legal(at)sib.swiss or me.
I draw a rabies virion during my thesis and the image went viral, many people around the world used it in their talks/posters/theses. I realized there was a need for free, accurate and beautiful images, I am glad the SIB supported the project and ViralZone was born.
Good luck with Wikipedia commons, it's a huge project.
Sincerely yours,
Philippe
In case of any questions, please contact Phil or me. Please check if the delete request is still justified after considering this. Kind regards, --Ernsts (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Btw, I have asked Philippe to check, if the information provided at https://viralzone.expasy.org/872 needs an update accordingly.
- I'll keep you posted.--Ernsts (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I see there are files noted for deletion that I took from EurekAlert not from ViralZone. Most of them are designated as usage: free. I always copied this into the permission text. Pleas let me know the reason why you have flagged them for deletion! This is to let you know that my work as active wikipedia usersince more than 11 years is in serious danger!
|
The 2019 Cure Award |
--Ernsts (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ernsts EurekAlert: [7]. Also not cc-by-sa license's statement. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also, I think you may need COM:OTRS. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just have a look at ViralZone root bottom right. Additional, I have asked Philippe Le Mercier to check their 872 page. He told me that they have lack of manpower and some of their pages are in fact outdated by almost a year or so. BTW. I don't think that I'll go thru COM:OTRS -- it's ways too complicated for me, sorry. -- Concerning the images that I took from EurekAlert that are also on the delete list. Most of the images I took from there hav Usage restrictions: none — is that not enough? Please note that deleting all the images as requested meen that I had to stop my activities on Wikipedia - after more than 11 years. Kind regards, Yours --Ernsts (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- So what? The website’s non-free copyright notice still remains unchanged. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- How long you contributed has nothing to do with me. I only care about you uploading images that do not comply with our policies. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just have a look at ViralZone root bottom right. Additional, I have asked Philippe Le Mercier to check their 872 page. He told me that they have lack of manpower and some of their pages are in fact outdated by almost a year or so. BTW. I don't think that I'll go thru COM:OTRS -- it's ways too complicated for me, sorry. -- Concerning the images that I took from EurekAlert that are also on the delete list. Most of the images I took from there hav Usage restrictions: none — is that not enough? Please note that deleting all the images as requested meen that I had to stop my activities on Wikipedia - after more than 11 years. Kind regards, Yours --Ernsts (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep ViralZone images as it clearly states here that the license is CC BY on the right side.[8]
- With respect to the EurekAlert, which are these exactly? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- notice ViralZone files now remove {{Delete}}. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally we have OTRS release of these files under a CC BY 4.0 license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Thanks for your help! I'm afraid I did not receive any email reply from Phil concerning their 872 page up to now. Please let me know, if I couold help in any way. E. g. if I should edit the images with copyright notice and replace it wit CreativeCommons Logo. Just in order to avoid further confusion and only in case that this was legel, of course (let me know if there was need for explicite permission by SIB/Phil)! --Ernsts (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Ernsts we have explicit permission from SIB now in the OTRS system so just need an OTRS volunteer to come around. But ｀・ω・´ has withdrawal their deletion request for these. We just need to clarify the other group. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much. As you may have seen, I have taken some further images from ViralaZone. :-) --Ernsts (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Hello, there is another image from ViralZone, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:T7_Cycle.jpg, which seemingly has been uploaded by another user in the past, but had been deleted. I just tried to uploaded this one and was informed about that matter. So please could you either restore it or give me permission to upload it again? Kond regards, --Ernsts (talk) 09:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Ernsts we have explicit permission from SIB now in the OTRS system so just need an OTRS volunteer to come around. But ｀・ω・´ has withdrawal their deletion request for these. We just need to clarify the other group. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Thanks for your help! I'm afraid I did not receive any email reply from Phil concerning their 872 page up to now. Please let me know, if I couold help in any way. E. g. if I should edit the images with copyright notice and replace it wit CreativeCommons Logo. Just in order to avoid further confusion and only in case that this was legel, of course (let me know if there was need for explicite permission by SIB/Phil)! --Ernsts (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
EurekAlert
[edit]I have reached out to the author of this one to clarify.[9]Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:255355_web_c.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks also here for clarifying the status of the EurekAlert images. Please not that I took all frim EurekAlert as provided with the give information and they have the usage restriction note there as also provided with the permission text. Most (ot all) have usage restricions: none. An example for a different text is "File:118913 web phage PAK P3.jpg". Kind regards, --Ernsts (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Okay so the author says [10] is released under a CC BY SA license and the permission has been forwards to OTRS. The open license supposedly applies to all Texas A&M content uploaded at EurekAlert! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Great! Looking forward for the delete requests to be removed. If I can do anything more, please let me know (see above)! --Ernsts (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Are all the Eurek files from Texas A&M User:Ernsts?
- I'm afraid not. They are from different articles, that is from different authors/institutions. However, I took al pictures from EurekAlert as provided in the meta data. So if you need to ask the original authors (not just EurekAlert) then I wouldn't take any further images from there (even if EurekAlert says 'Usage Restriction: None'). BTW You find the EurekAlert files in the list given above easily because the file name ist nnnnnn_web_*.jpg (6 digits, underscore, 'web'. Seems there are no files with suffix *.png). Hope that helps... ~~---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernsts (talk • contribs) 16:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Are all the Eurek files from Texas A&M User:Ernsts?
- Great! Looking forward for the delete requests to be removed. If I can do anything more, please let me know (see above)! --Ernsts (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Okay so the author says [10] is released under a CC BY SA license and the permission has been forwards to OTRS. The open license supposedly applies to all Texas A&M content uploaded at EurekAlert! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021021010004693 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted the permission for these files which came with Ticket:2021021010004693 --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- So, just for doublecheck :-): For instance, file:///51639_web_T7_microphotography_colored.jpg was taken from article https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-01/uota-vci011013.php, the img page is https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/51639.php, which shows "CREDIT
From Hu et. al. 2013. Science Express.
USAGE RESTRICTIONS
None", but nevertheless you still have to ask Hu et al? --Ernsts (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC) - @Doc James: Please note that all EurekAlert images have been dowloaded from those image subpages privided ba EurekAlert for every one of their articles that includes images. The usage permissins are providedby EurekAlert at the bottom of those image subpages and have been copied to the Wikimedia Commons image metadata. However it seems that I just provided the URL of the main article, not that of the image subpage. Please let me know if you like me to change this in the commons image metadata. Thanks --Ernsts (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- The only question is what license does "Usage Restriction = None" turn into to User:Ernsts. I personally think that that would be CC-0 and thus fine here. I guess we can ask EurekAlert. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fine. I also think asking EurekAlert might be the best way to get the issue solved in common.
- Please note that some images dont't hav "Usage Restriction = None" but "Usagee restriction = by Credit" instead (there is another field Credit mentioning the authors, just above "Usage Restriction" See File:238054 web surrogate viruses.jpg). I'll go through the imnages anc check if the URL of the EurekAlert page where I downloaded the image ist provided (i. i. not just the image URL and not the URL of the original article, which I never used for download).
- BTW: And https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/118913.php has CCAL. Might be some images may not be changed, just kept asis and mentioning the authors (as we do). I'll check that and report here.
- --Ernsts (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- The only question is what license does "Usage Restriction = None" turn into to User:Ernsts. I personally think that that would be CC-0 and thus fine here. I guess we can ask EurekAlert. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- So, just for doublecheck :-): For instance, file:///51639_web_T7_microphotography_colored.jpg was taken from article https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-01/uota-vci011013.php, the img page is https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/51639.php, which shows "CREDIT
- @Doc James: Checked now all EurekAlert images. Metadata has been updated with the URL of the EurekAlert Page, where the image, credit and permission can be found, and where the image was downloaded from according to the image (jpg/png) URL provided. For your convenience, data is reported below as announced:
- File:51639 web T7 microphotography colored.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/51639.php Usage Restrictions:None
- File:51640 web T7 caught in the act.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/51640.php?from=229926 Usage Restrictions:None
- File:118913 web phage PAK P3.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/118913.php Usage Restrictions: CCAL
- File:232757 web prochlorococcus marinus phage P-SSM2 Fd.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/232757.php Usage Restrictions:None
- File:238054 web surrogate viruses.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/238054.php Usage Restrictions: Reporters may freely use these materials in news coverage with the appropriate credit information.
- File:137488 web.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/137488.php Usage Restrictions: None
- File:169019 web zika.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/169019.php Usage Restrictions: None
- File:252780 web filovirus replcycle.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/252780.php?from=488621 Usage Restrictions: None
- File:252781 webflavivirus replcycle.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/252781.php?from=488621 Usage Restrictions: None
- File:252779 web coronavirus replcycle.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/252779.php?from=488621 Usage Restrictions: None
- File:253143 web Enterovirus E ed.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/253143.php Usage Restrictions: None
- File:253449 web 2B7 antibody.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/253449.php Usage Restrictions: None
- File:254961 web.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/254961.php Usage Restrictions: Image may only be used with shown credit.
- File:254961 web Phi6 virions.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/254961.php (left part) Usage Restrictions: Image may only be used with shown credit.
- File:255355 web c.jpg https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/255355.php Usage Restrictions: None
- File:255355 web Phi6 virions c.jpg (left part) https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/255355.php Usage Restrictions: None
Hope this may melp! .-) Please let me know if you need any exceeding info. Kind regards --Ernsts (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Agree this sounds like CC-0 and CC-BY to me. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Just Added some information missing in the list (this copied from above the list)--Ernsts (talk) 18:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Agree this sounds like CC-0 and CC-BY to me. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment OTRS agent (verify): I've accepted File:255355_web_c.jpg (again). Even when "Usage Restriction = None" could sounds lice CCBY or CC0, we need an exact license, with all and the number of version, so I think it's not a valid license. As OTRS agent I wouldn't accept such statement. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Hello, copuld you please kindly give me an update about the status of the other erekalert images, (e.g. 51639 web T7 microphotography colored.jpg still has the delete note but has not been deleted). Thanks in advance.--Ernsts (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have emailed EurekAlert! to clarify that they mean "usage restrictions = none" means the image is "CC-0" Ticket#2021021710006884 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Ernsts EurekAlert has confirmed that "none" is the same as CC-0. CC-0 of course does not have "versions" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Does this mean, that at least the images with the "none" entry can be used? Please let me know if could help in any way, e.g. changing current CC-4.0 (or whatever it is) to CC-0. And how about the one with CCAL? (Sorry I'm very gree in uploading images ;-) Did almost all the 11 years just reuse images, esp. when translating articles. --Ernsts (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- My hope is that a current OTRS agent will take care of this. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Does this mean, that at least the images with the "none" entry can be used? Please let me know if could help in any way, e.g. changing current CC-4.0 (or whatever it is) to CC-0. And how about the one with CCAL? (Sorry I'm very gree in uploading images ;-) Did almost all the 11 years just reuse images, esp. when translating articles. --Ernsts (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Ernsts EurekAlert has confirmed that "none" is the same as CC-0. CC-0 of course does not have "versions" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have emailed EurekAlert! to clarify that they mean "usage restrictions = none" means the image is "CC-0" Ticket#2021021710006884 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Doc James: Hello, copuld you please kindly give me an update about the status of the other erekalert images, (e.g. 51639 web T7 microphotography colored.jpg still has the delete note but has not been deleted). Thanks in advance.--Ernsts (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Here it says "As such, if a piece of multimedia appears on EurekAlert!, reporters and editors assume it is cleared for reuse or redistribution without further need to obtain permissions."[12] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Mussklprozz: If I understand User:Doc James right, the delete note can be removed from all files in the list provided above, isn't it? If yes, could you please kindly perform this? Thanks in advance. Regards --Ernsts (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ernsts:
Done Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Danke!--Ernsts (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ernsts:
Kept: ticket:2021020910004221. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Brak informacji o pochodzeniu zdjęcia. Kriis bis (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Need to upload new images per request here Joseagush (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amkgp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from (https://www.adanigreenenergy.com/) Simple fonts and below COM:TOO, but I think this is out of scope as it is unused. Hence, I still support deletion. Jianhui67 T★C 12:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure in scope. en:Adani Green Energy – is it this? Taivo (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination as OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taivo as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Quikr logo.png
Converted to regular DR, as per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). IMO more important is the copypright status of this logo, considering that the uploader is not the source/author. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is textlogo, ineligible for copyright, scope exists per en:Quikr, but we have better version. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2008, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. B&H's FOP is noncommercial, but noncommercial licensing is not allowed on Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate and scaled down version of File:Valencia, Spain.jpg StellarHalo (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose The original file is 160 MB which is huge and generally too large to send anywhere by e-mail. Many e-mail suppliers limit the size of attachments to 10 MB or 25 MB - varies from supplier to supplier (See here). This file is 1.3 MB which is a very convenient size for e-mail, although of course there will be a loss of detail. Martinvl (talk) 12:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)- Delete (and replace where used) The original file can be easily downloaded in reduced size/resolution, see "Other resolutions" under the image. There is no need to host scaled down duplicates on Commons, as the Commons software provides for downloading files in convenient sizes if needed. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
No licensing? On the website there is nothing about it. Copyvio Barbarian (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- support nomination. Vit; talk 18:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
This was originally tagged as a copyright violation. I must contest that: this logo consists of simple shapes and text elements. The threshold of originality is not reached. It shoul be kept as the thousands of other logos on Commons. In addition the speedy nominator missed the OTRS-PERMISSION for this image, see here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:PSV_Eindhoven_-_Philips_Stadion_-_Kleedkamer_Welkom_-_Cropped_Logo.jpg.
2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:DDBC:11C6:FEE9:DF86 12:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Third party logo, not simple (stylised gun element right), UK has Low Threshold of originality, equivalent at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:007 logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Agree. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 14:29, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
This was already deleted once because the gun icon is complex enough to warrant copyright protection, probably in the US per COM:TOO and certainly in the UK where the series comes from. enwiki has the file as fair use Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The COM:TOO UK is very low, and the user directly uploaded this image again without an appropraite undeletion process, which is inappropraite, if that user still do so, we may report them to COM:AN/U. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Category:James Bond logo may need deletion as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: Yep, nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:007 alles oder nichts.svg. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work uploaded by a user who has been warned and blocked in the past for some uploads. E4024 (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- And continues to upload problematic files (see their TP please). --E4024 (talk) 01:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
The person died in 1962 and we have no idea when or if there were any "first publication". I doubt the PD claim is correctly justified. E4024 (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; neither the photos nor the texts are public domain.
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have compared the three front pages of three daily newspapers that have been discontinued for decades with other published front pages of newspapers (Brüsseler Zeitung, Sport, Rhein-Ems-Zeitung, Aargauer Volksblatt). For the time being, this raises a few questions for me. With the help of the answers, I then hope to put the situation in order so that the pictures do not have to be deleted. Thi pictures are not about texts or photographs, but about newspapers.
- - Does a newspaper page that has been compiled daily according to criteria such as existing articles, available space by the editors and the printers reach the level of creation (Schöpfungshöhe) under Swiss law (since the newspapers were produced in Switzerland)? In the case of various similar images, it is explicitly stated that they are "Zeitungsausschnitt, keine Schöpfungshöhe". "(Newspaper clipping, no creative merit. )
- - would the pictures be unproblematic if they were cut off at the bottom - as in certain other cases - and did not show the whole page?
- - In my opinion, the articles can at most be guessed at, rather than really read, which is why I don't see any copyright infringement there - if it is nevertheless an infringement, would it be unproblematic if, of the four formats, the largest one was removed and only the smaller ones were left, in which, even with a good will, nothing more of the text can be guessed at apart from the titles?
- - In the case of the Italian-language newspaper, the rights holder still exists. I can ask for permission there. Is there a standardised procedure?
- - In the case of the two German-language pictures, the rights holder has expired. According to the oral statements of a shareholder of the newspaper, the situation was so desolate when it ceased publication in 1991 that not even the subscriber base could be sold - let alone any copyrights to newspaper articles that had already appeared. The liquidator himself died two years ago and can no longer give any information. How should one proceed with expired rights?
- - Or are these candidates that are problematic on Commons but could exist on de:? Since they illustrate articles on de: could they then be moved to de:? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:200:2E00:B400:4BCD:EA4F:EE26:8544 (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Eruedin (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Malvinero10
[edit]- File:Gustavo Argentino García Cuerva.jpg
- File:CM De la Colina.jpg
- File:MY Palaver.jpg
- File:CP Bolzan.jpg
- File:CP Ardiles.jpg
- File:CP García.jpg
- File:PT Bernhardt.jpg
- File:PT Giménez.jpg
- File:TT Vázquez.jpg
- File:CT Bustos.jpg
They are not in the public domain, because they were uploaded on the website of the Argentine Air Force in the 2000s. Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created, and it was first published at least 20 years ago, Law 11.723, Article 34. --Malvinero10 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Other file added.--Malvinero10 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in the 2000s, there is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Box-shaped small building with traditional minaret architecture. Nothing new. IMHO no copyright is created by making this building. --E4024 (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not just the mosque, the minaret is also part of the building and it deserves copyright protection. Since the building is completed in the 2000s, it is unlikely to be old enough to be in PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- I already said "traditional minaret architecture", did I not? That does not require an architect nor an architectural project. Construction "ustas" (master workers) make these buildings -since centuries- without any architectural formation (I mean a formal education). This is like asking copyright to an igloo. E4024 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please can you explain that why both buildings are already in the public domain, if you think both are traditional minaret architectures? Such made-old buildings are commonly seen in many Asian countries, and IMHO both the tops of them are beyond TOO. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- I already said "traditional minaret architecture", did I not? That does not require an architect nor an architectural project. Construction "ustas" (master workers) make these buildings -since centuries- without any architectural formation (I mean a formal education). This is like asking copyright to an igloo. E4024 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete On the top of the left tower, I can see fairly complexed metal decorates, not simple and, as a part of the key part, violates our COM:DM. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per User:E4024 comment. This mosque is built in 1978, destroyed in 1993 and rebuilt in 2003 (source), but it looks very traditional like most of Bosnian mosques. No architect mention anywhere. --Smooth O (talk) 07:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please, wait for 2074 (2003+71=2074) to see that that is joining BiH public domain, as I said, the top of both towers are fairly complex enough to be copyrighted, they are built exclusiveness. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:FOP Bosnia and Herzegovina. --Ellywa (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:King Fahd Mosque (Sarajevo)
[edit]The mosque was completed in 2000. There is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, permission from the architect is required.
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (1).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (17).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (18).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (19).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (2).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (20).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (3).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (4).JPG
- File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (7).JPG
- File:Sarajevo, Alipašino Polje, mešita, minarety.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: And this one File:King Fahd Mosque Sarajevo (10).JPG is okay? - I don't understand ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 09:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: For handling building's interior, we will consider if the interior shows enough distinctive architecture or not. Ordinary interiors like windows, stairs are not. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- The same I can think for outside too ;-) - it's not enough of explanation only a meaníng from you. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 18:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: For handling building's interior, we will consider if the interior shows enough distinctive architecture or not. Ordinary interiors like windows, stairs are not. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all, include the one @Karl Gruber: pointed (the glass guardrails on the top-right are having very complex and beautiful arcs, IMHO beyond TOO, although someone would against me by DM). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. I could not find the name of the architect or their life/death so it is not possible to determine a date for undeletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Apparently, this version of the diagram is the copyrighted one, not the CC BY-SA 4.0. Since the more open, updated, and continuously maintained map from the community (Forum Diskusi Transportasi Semarang / Transport for Semarang), as seen here, and in fact the map from Trans Semarang itself is kinda outdated, maybe we should remove this map from Commons. FarhanSyafiqF (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image contains a copyright sign at the lower righthand corner, so it is not available in CC-BY-SA and has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amkgp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copier from (https://www.adanipower.com/) Simple fonts and below COM:TOO. Jianhui67 T★C 12:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- There exists en:Adani Power. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO in the USA but also per COM:TOO India. So can be seen as in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 22:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amkgp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from (https://www.adanitransmission.com/) Simple fonts and below COM:TOO, but I think this is out of scope as it is unused. Hence, I still support deletion. Jianhui67 T★C 12:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- There exists en:Adani Transmission Limited. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, I realised that. Jianhui67 T★C 13:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO in the USA but also per COM:TOO India. So can be seen as in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 22:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
