User talk:J budissin

Image:Lasva_River_Valley.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Lasva_River_Valley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 09:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

warum ich bei einigen Gebäuden die Kategorie Saxony genommen habe

Dies geschah nicht etwa in Unkenntnis der Kategorie:Buildings in Saxony und Unterkategorien, sondern (mit Ausnahme von Marienstern), weil es sich um den Sitz von Institutionen des Freistaats Sachsen handelt. Damit meine ich jetzt das Finanzministerium, das Gesamtministerium und die Landeszentrale für politische Bildung. Als Gebäude sind sie ja sowieso schon in der entsprechenden dresdnerischen Kategorie eingeordnet, deshalb ist deine Einsortierung redundant. Was hältst du von einer eigenen Kat, falls sich jemand für die Gebäude der Institutionen des Freistaats interessiert? --X-Weinzar 13:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Würde ich aus Gründen der Systematik bevorzugen. Im Moment sind die Kategorien ja noch relativ leer, aber was soll in zwei Jahren werden, wenn alle Institutionen sich in der "Mutter"-Kategorie tummeln? Eine Unterkategorie von Buildings würde sich anbieten. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 13:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmh, und wie benennen wir die Kat? "Government Buildings in Saxony"? Konnte auf die Schnelle nichts ähnliches finden, auf Länderebene scheints das noch net zu geben... --X-Weinzar 02:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Economy of Croatia

don't delete Category:Economy of Croatia! --Beyond silence 10:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't delete it. But there are enough subcategories for pictures of Neretva delta. Don't panic ;) Regards, j.budissin^+/- 19:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

geotag

Hi J budissin, klär mich mal bitte auf. Ich will dein Arbeiten mit geotags nachmachen (Apothekenfoto...). Wie komme ich auf die Koordinaten (Parameter für {{Location|51|10|53.58|N|14|25|25.08|E|heading:W}})? Gruß --Hedwig Storch 15:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig;-) Beispielsweise mit diesem Tool. Gruß, --X-Weinzar 17:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo X-Weinzar, danke dir für den Hinweis. Spitze! Davon wußte ich noch nichts. Muß mir den Link gleich auf alle meine disk.seiten kopieren, damit er ja nicht verloren geht. Gruß --Hedwig Storch 18:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language proficiency

Out of curiosity, care to add userboxes to your userpage indicating what languages you are proficient in? Cirt (talk) 01:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. -- j.budissin^+/- 08:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trnovo Administrative Situation.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 22:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahnhof Seitschen.jpg & Sandmann4u

Falls du es noch nicht bemerkt haben solltest: Ich bin sehr gespannt, was der liebe Sandmann hier vorhat. Sollte man vielleicht ein Auge darauf haben... Grüße, FalconL ^?! 13:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Er scheint dein Bennenungsschema umgehen zu wollen, indem er seine modifizierte Version File-Bahnhof_Seitschen.jpg nach Bahnhof_Seitschen.jpg verschieben lässt. Wirklich unverbesserlich! --FalconL ^?! 14:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) Version of the BiH Municipalities Map

Hello! I would really appreciate if you would upload the SVG version of your File:Bosnia and Herzegovina Political.png map, so that it is available for modification and further application etc. Thanks. -- Sebastian Gay (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but there is no svg-Version of this map. Regards, j.budissin^+/- 09:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vitali Klitschko Wahlwerbung Ukraine 1.JPG

File:Vitali Klitschko Wahlwerbung Ukraine 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ST ○ 18:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdammt, wenn ich nicht nur deinen Klarnamen gelesen hätte, sondern auch deinen Benutzernamen, hätte ich dich vorab erst mal angeschrieben. Der Klarname sagte mir aber nichts. Nun denn, jetzt haben wir den Salat. --ST ○ 18:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was heißt Salat? Wenn dieses Bild eine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt, muss es gelöscht werden. Wenn nicht, dann nicht. Gibt es da noch irgendeine Möglichkeit? -- j.budissin^+/- 12:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignorieren wäre die Alternative. Übrigens war mein erstes Bild, das hier auf commons wegen Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht wurde, ein Bild mit einem ukrainischen Wahlplakat mit Wiktor Janukowytsch drauf. --ST ○ 13:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nee, gerade nachgeschaut. Das war im Oktober 2004 in der deWP. --ST ○ 13:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Guten Tag,

wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Dein/Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons)

zum Blick auf den Czorneboh / Ortsrand Pielitz (DE)

- selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2014 >> zum Thema „Ausblicke" verwenden.

>> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu

>> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2014/02/15/blick-auf-den-czorneboh-ortsrand-pielitz-de/

Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben.

Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren im Jahr 2014 laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), ebenfalls zum Thema „Ausblicke".

Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias

fvks (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Name ist drin, sogar alles verlinkt, korrekter geht es ja gar nicht. Schön, dass ihr für meine Bilder Verwendung findet. Grüße nach Görlitz, j.budissin^+/- 23:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Für das tolle Drvar-Foto! Aarp65 (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visegrad Drina Bridge 1.jpg

Excuse me, I would only help and I gave better license: not PD-old, but PD-100, because author of bridge died more as 100 years ago. That picture I found on internet and I did not know, that it exists on Wikipedia aleready, so I uploaded it with one other name and later I saw, that it is already on Wikipedia and that you are author of that picture. Bridge is older as 100 years (bridge is from 16. century) and we can use license, that author died more as 100 years ago: not you, but builder of bridge. I think, that it was not wrong thing. Many luck with Wikipedia, and do not be angry!--Stebunik (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC) File:Visegrad Drina Bridge 1.jpg Mehmed-paša Sokolović: Most na Drini, 16.st. Source:http://turskeserije.forumer.com/topic/2317228/Muhteem-Yzyl-Velianstveno-stoljee-vol-12?page=20--Stebunik (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC) j[reply]

Well, ok, but that's about the author of image. Sure, designer of the bridge died long ago. But at last it was my fotograph you found on the internet. So please, be a little bit much careful the next time. I really didn't want to hurt you, but I usually get angry with people changing my images. However, pozdrav (or whatever language you like) and see you next time! -- j.budissin^+/- 22:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hallo (oder Guten Tag),

wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Dein/Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons)

zum Blick auf die Liebfrauenkirche / Reichenturm, Bautzen (DE)

- selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2015 >> zum Thema „Ausblicke" verwenden.

>> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu

>> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2015/04/03/blick-auf-die-liebfrauenkirche-reichenturm-bautzen-de/

Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben.

Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren vom 23. Mai bis 07. September 2015 laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), dieses Mal zum Thema „Industrie".

Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Agnieszka, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schön, alles in Ordnung. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 00:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks for sharing of your fantastic images of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Much appreciated! BiHVolim (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Prospekt der Sieger 3.JPG

File:Minsk Prospekt der Sieger 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien

Irgendwann stand irgendwo in den Benamsungsrichtlinien mal, dass Weiterleitung von der jeweiligen Sprache auf (engl. ?) Kategorien erlaubt und z.T. erwünscht sind. Das dürfte auch für sorbische Ortsnamen gelten. Das weiteren stand da, dass die Kategorienamen zwar engl. sein sollten, die zugehörigen Galerien aber durchaus in der jeweiligen Sprache angelegt werden können. (vgl. Category:Munich, Category:München und München)

Liebe Grüße --Anika (talk) 09:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Falls sich das auf die zweisprachigen Kategorienamen bezieht, ist das jetzt gut oder schlecht? Ich fände es ja wünschenswert, wenn man in Zukunft irgendwann mal die ganzen Kategorienamen flexibel lokalisieren könnte. Also dass ich mit Interfacesprache Deutsch z.B. keine Namen wie "Timber framed houses in North Rhine-Westphalia" angezeigt bekomme. Was die Galerien angeht: Guter Hinweis, werde ich vereinzelt vielleicht auch machen, trifft aber nicht den Kern der Argumentation. Du musst auch keine Sorge haben, ich werde mich wirklich auf die Gemeinden beschränken, die nun einmal amtlich zwei Namen haben. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 11:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich wollte nur darauf hinweisen, dass du auch Kat-Weiterleitungen von den amtlichen Sorbischen Ortsnamen anlegen könntest.

Mit der Interfacesprache bin ich bei dir.

Ich denke du willst dich auf die Gemeindekategorien (Oberkategorien) beschränken oder willst du auch noch die Unterkategorien (wie "Churches in") verschieben? Das könnte in der Argumentation dann etwas schwierig werden. Liebe Grüße, --Anika (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, aber mit einer Weiterleitung lande ich wieder "bloß" beim deutschen Namen. Es geht ja eben gerade darum, dass die Orte im amtlichen Siedlungsgebiet zwei Namen haben. Und da Commons weder ein deutsches noch ein sorbisches Projekt ist, sollten beide Namen schon in der Kategoriebezeichnung repräsentiert sein. Ich will mich zunächst auf die Ortsteile beschränken, weil es schon auf Gemeindeebene zu den von dir genannten Problemen kommen würde. -- j.budissin^+/- 13:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orte - ja, die meinte ich auch. Ich habe immernoch meine Probleme mit den letzten Gemeindereformen (und die nächste Welle steht ja bevor).

Nebenbei: Die Richtlinien, die ich oben suchte, sind Commons:Language policy und Commons:Naming categories. --Anika (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Gagarin Mosaik.JPG

File:Minsk Gagarin Mosaik.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 19:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Verdun Douaumont Cemetery 2.JPG

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo Most Suade i Olge.JPG

File:Sarajevo Most Suade i Olge.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Přełožowanska zdźělenka: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Witaj J budissin,

dostawaš tutu zdźělenku, dokelž sy so jako přełožowar za hornjoserbsce na Wikimedia Commons zregistrował. Strona Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion steji za přełožowanje k dispoziciji. Móžeš ju tu přełožić:

do hornjoserbsce přełožić

Priorita tuteje strony je srjedźna.

Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

Waša pomoc je jara witana. Přełožowarjo kaž ty pomhaja, zo by Wikimedia Commons kaž woprawdźe wjacerěčne zhromadźenstwo fungowało.

Wulki dźak!

Přełožowanscy koordinatorojo Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Minsk Postamt 1.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarajevo Vijećnica Interior 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uludag.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo Railway Station 2.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarajevo Railway Station 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sarajevo Railway Station 1.JPG

And also:

File:Sarajevo Railway Station 2.JPG

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Přełožowanska zdźělenka: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n

Witaj J budissin,

dostawaš tutu zdźělenku, dokelž sy so jako přełožowar za hornjoserbsce na Wikimedia Commons zregistrował. Strona Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n steji za přełožowanje k dispoziciji. Móžeš ju tu přełožić:

do hornjoserbsce přełožić

Waša pomoc je jara witana. Přełožowarjo kaž ty pomhaja, zo by Wikimedia Commons kaž woprawdźe wjacerěčne zhromadźenstwo fungowało.

Wulki dźak!

Přełožowanscy koordinatorojo Wikimedia Commons‎, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Přełožowanska zdźělenka: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015

Witaj J budissin,

dostawaš tutu zdźělenku, dokelž sy so jako přełožowar za hornjoserbsce na Wikimedia Commons zregistrował. Strona Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 steji za přełožowanje k dispoziciji. Móžeš ju tu přełožić:

do hornjoserbsce přełožić

Waša pomoc je jara witana. Přełožowarjo kaž ty pomhaja, zo by Wikimedia Commons kaž woprawdźe wjacerěčne zhromadźenstwo fungowało.

Wulki dźak!

Přełožowanscy koordinatorojo Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Minsk Gewerkschaftshaus.JPG

File:Minsk Gewerkschaftshaus.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Přełožowanska zdźělenka: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads

Witaj J budissin,

dostawaš tutu zdźělenku, dokelž sy so jako přełožowar za hornjoserbsce na Wikimedia Commons zregistrował. Strona Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads steji za přełožowanje k dispoziciji. Móžeš ju tu přełožić:

do hornjoserbsce přełožić

Priorita tuteje strony je srjedźna.

Waša pomoc je jara witana. Přełožowarjo kaž ty pomhaja, zo by Wikimedia Commons kaž woprawdźe wjacerěčne zhromadźenstwo fungowało.

Wulki dźak!

Přełožowanscy koordinatorojo Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The Sorbian language time zone map File:Casowe pasma.svg ugently needs to be updated.

The Sorbian language time zone map File:Casowe pasma.svg ugently needs to be updated for the Upper Sorbian and Lower Sorbian Wikipedias, because it is "very" obsolete and many changes have occured since you created it in September 2011. Please use the File:World Time Zones Map.png for the latest updates as reference, while keeping the Sorbian place names and explanations in your map.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 23:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Can you update this file, because the more time passes the more obsolete it has become over the years. Many changes have taken place which have become too obvious to ignore. Sorbian Wikipedia readers and users also deserve up to date maps in their language (If I knew Sorbian and how to edit and upload SVG files, I would have done it myself).

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bautzen

Hallo J budissin, wollte dir persönlich für die feinere Kategorisierung der Bautzen Karten von Brück & Sohn danken. Wir haben das für Bautzen im Vorfeld des Uploads versucht so gut wie möglich als Nicht-Bautzener einzusortieren. Du warst ja heute in dem Umfeld richtig fleißig! Herzlichen Dank. -- sk (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bin da zufällig drauf gestoßen und habe einige Kostbarkeiten entdeckt. Ist aber noch einiges zu tun. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 18:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GPS für Bilder

Hallo, vielen Dank für Deine vielen Bilder für die Denkmallisten. Es ist allerdings ein bisschen schade, dass mit Deiner Kamera keine Möglichkeit zu bestehen scheint, den Bildern die GPS-Koordinaten zuzuordnen, so dass die dann auch beim Hochladen auf Commons gleich mit angezeigt werden. Das würde zukünftig gerade bei bisher nicht zuordenbaren Denkmälern das Eintragen von Koordinaten in die Denkmallisten erleichtern. Vielleicht kannst Du mal prüfen, wie man das ermöglichen könnte. Als Technik-Laie würde ich den Kauf einer neuen Kamera empfehlen :-). Danke.--Lguenth1 (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Du bist gut, Kontonummer schick ich dir per Mail ;) Koordinaten müsste ich manuell nachtragen, was einen zusätzlichen Zeitaufwand bedeutet. Manchmal mache ich das, manchmal nicht. Aber wenn du darauf bestehst, gebe ich mir Mühe. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 16:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, ich hab's zufällig gelesen. (Du hattest heute einige meiner Bilder umkategorisiert.) Das mit den Geo-Koordinaten ist gar nicht so schwer. Ich tracke mit einer App auf dem Smartphone. Die Koordinaten verarbeitet dann Lightroom. Ist nicht viel mehr als ein paar Klicks. Es gibt aber auch freie Tools, ich meine, Geosetter müsste eines sein. --XRay ^talk 17:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kenne Geosetter, hab aber kein Smartphone. D.h. das geht nur dann, wenn ich zufällig mal das Tablet mittracken lasse. --j.budissin^+/- 21:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Ich erkenne die Hürde. Meines Wissens nach kann man auch Koordinaten manuell zuordnen, aber das ist vergleichsweise aufwändig. --XRay ^talk 06:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das mache ich auch gelegentlich, aber nur, wenn es sich lohnt. --j.budissin^+/- 09:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Railway station Renovica

Hallo! At 28:58 of the video you can see the railway station Renovica. I think these remains are of the former railway station. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Renovica is also exactly the spot where the picture was taken. Thanks for the movie! --j.budissin^+/- 10:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! There is one more. You were hiking there, Bistrik - Dovlići, at the beginning of the video. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. Actually I've been there yesterday (between Močila and Bistrik). Are you in Sarajevo now? --j.budissin^+/- 20:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. I live in Canada in the Greater Toronto Area. I was last time in Sarajevo in 2013. If I was there now, I would meet you. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 00:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's a pity. But let me know if you have any pictures you're missing, I'll stay here for two more weeks. Regards, j.budissin^+/- 00:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also took lots of pictures when I was there. Still have to post some on Wikimedia. I can't remember if I am missing some of them. Anyway, thank you. Enjoy your time there! --My-wiki-photos (talk) 02:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrik viaduct

Excellent job on taking these pictures. Thank you. It's a sad fact that this bridge/viaduct had existed until 2008. It was literally stolen during the period from March 2, 2008 to August 2, 2009, which can be checked by viewing Google Earth historical imagery. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 18:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, didn't know about that. I presumed that it must have been destroyed at some point during the war, since it was a connection between Sarajevo and Pale. So I could have visited it when I was there in 2007. Sad to hear that. --j.budissin^+/- 18:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that was the work of scrap metal thieves. I have a picture somewhere on my hard drives of a girl on that bridge after the 1992-1995 war, but I can't find it now. Anyway, I have documented Google Earth imagery before and after the bridge had been stolen. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the photo I previously mentioned. I assume it was taken in 2007, the year when I found it on the internet. Some tourists from the Czech Republic posted it. It was just that one small photo taken on the bridge. I digitally removed the girl from the photo. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image. I saw today that we don't have a recent picture of Bistrik station yet. I'll go there tomorrow morning. --j.budissin^+/- 17:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good! I will also publish some Bistrik images I took in 2012. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Bosnian Eastern Railway

I have created a higher resolution version of the updated map, and fixed the inaccuracies on the Ustiprača - Foča - Miljevina branch that exist on the current version used in the article. You are welcome to use this updated version in the article. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnische Ostbahn - Better quality images

I have updated the page replacing two images with their better quality versions, and if you agree, please confirm these updates. Thanks. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@My-wiki-photos: Thank you! I confirmed your changes. --j.budissin^+/- 07:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

Hallo J budissin, besten Dank für deine Arbeit mit den Ansichtskarten von Bautzen. Derbrauni und ich kennen sich in Bautzen nicht so gut aus, weshalb wir nur sehr grob kategorisieren konnten. Haben immer gehofft, dass sich jemand Ortskundiges findet, der das dann feiner kategorisiert. Danke. -- sk (talk) 08:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte ja vor ein paar Monaten schon einmal einen Schwung gemacht und jetzt geht's weiter. Bereite gerade Straßenartikel vor, da muss die Bautzener Kategorie ohnehin mal ein bisschen geordnet werden. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 08:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:UploadStatsBot

Hi, can I please direct your attention to the question at: Village pump#User:UploadStatsBot? It concerns the bot you use. Thanks! --oSeveno (talk) 15:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong category?

[1] I don't think that Ivan tunnel is a part of Bosnian Eastern railway network.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MaGa: No, of course not. I just overlooked it while categorizing. Thanks for the hint! --j.budissin^+/- 16:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, everything is ok. Thank you.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navileiste für den Landkreis Bautzen

Hallo, Julian, ich habe mir die Navileiste endlich noch einmal im Detail angesehen. Das ist doch ziemlich vertrackt. Woran ich dachte, wäre die Nutzung von Autotranslate, aber das müsste/könnte etwas abgewandelt werden, denke ich. Normalerweise wird alles, was für jede Sprache identisch ist, in eine Subvorlage layout eingebaut und das Sprachspezifische in eine eigene Vorlage, die die Layout-Vorlage aufruft und Parameter an diese übergibt. Hier könnte man vermutlich alles, was in der Hauptvorlage ist, in diese Layout-Vorlage verschieben und für die meisten Sprachen einfach eine Weiterleitung auf diese einrichten, nämlich alle, für die die alphabetische Sortierung der Orte identisch ist (genau fenommen würde dann eine Weiterleitung von Englisch völlig ausreichen). Dann müsste man nur noch etwas für Nieder- und Obersorbisch einrichten (und tendenziell andere slawische Sprachen?). Ich hatte auch an Nutzung von {{City}} gedacht, weil ich nicht wusste, dass intern schon auf eine andere Vorlage mit eigener Syntax zugegriffen wird ({{Catnav}}). Aber eventuell wäre es besser, dazu in Commons talk:Templates eine Frage zu anderen Ideen zu stellen. Neben Bautzen würde das doch auch Görlitz und einige brandenburgische Kreise betreffen, oder? — Speravir – 22:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Speravir! Erst einmal vielen Dank für deine Beschäftigung mit der Geschichte. Die abweichende Sortierung bräuchten wir in dem Fall nur für jene Sprachen, in denen sich die Ortsbezeichnungen vom Deutschen unterscheiden, und das sind von der Sache her nur Ober- und Niedersorbisch. Zwar gibt es auch auf Polnisch und Tschechisch abweichende Namen für einige Orte, aber das sind tatsächlich Einzelfälle. Betroffen wären un Wesentlichen die Landkreise Bautzen und Görlitz in Sachsen sowie Spree-Neiße, Oberspreewald-Lausitz und Dahme-Spreewald in Brandenburg. Darüber hinaus gibt es nur ein paar wenige Orte mit sorbischen Namen. Da sich das Problem ja aber perspektivisch nicht nur auf die Lausitz beschränkt, sondern auch für andere zweisprachige Regionen relevant sein könnte (Irland, Wales, Südtirol, Kärnten etc.), wäre es vermutlich nicht schlecht, das nochmal zentral zu diskutieren. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 07:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user category

Du hattest sowas da bei mir reingeschrieben. Was macht das nochmal genau? Und warum steht zwischen Paul und T ein Leerzeichen? --PaulT (talk) 05:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Funktioniert aber und versteckt auch die Kategorie bei neuen Dateien. --PaulT (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, genau darum ging es. Benutzerkategorien sollten versteckt sein, um die Leser nicht zu verwirren. Das Leerzeichen war mein Fehler. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 17:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, hab's berichtigt, funtionierte aber komischerweise trotzdem vorher auch schon. Jetzt fehlen nur noch sechs Dörfer, dann kann ichdie Gemeinde Göda "abhaken", siehe de:Göda#Galerie_aller_Dörfer_der_Gemeinde_Göda. Vielleicht schaffe ich das morgen, wenn sich das Wetter an die Vorhersagen hält. --PaulT (talk) 18:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist wirklich super. Nochmals vielen Dank! --j.budissin^+/- 19:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Göda erledigt. Mache demnächst einige noch etwas besser (wenn ich einen Quadcopter mit 1"-Kamera habe), widme mich aber erst mal noch anderen Orten. Denke, jetzt kommt erst mal die Gemeinde Puschwitz dran. --PaulT (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist für mich ja beinahe ein Heimspiel. Dort haben wir schon Jeßnitz und Puschwitz (allerdings nicht so dolles Wetter), aber Wetro (mit Grube und Deponie) z.B. noch nicht. In Jeßnitz kann ich mir vorstellen, dass ein Luftbild vom Gutshof ganz aussagekräftig wäre. Auf die Quadrokopterbilder bin ich dann natürlich auch gespannt. --j.budissin^+/- 15:42, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Luftbilder Gemeinde Wittichenau

... wieder Arbeit ;-). Es war unerwartet schönes Wetter heute Nachmittag. --PaulT (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Über solcherlei Arbeit freue ich mich doch. --j.budissin^+/- 21:05, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank auch noch für die viele Arbeit bei den Kategorien. Für mich wäre es doch etwas anstrngender, jeweils auch den obersorbischen Namen nach dem Schrägstrich rauszusuchen. Schade, dass man nicht so ohne weiteres Unterkategorien "auf Vorrat" anlegen kann oder sollte. Danke auch für die Unterteilungen in der c:Category:Aerial photographs of Landkreis Bautzen. Gruß, --PaulT (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Früh dran

Neudorf Klösterlich musste ich am frühen Vormittag machen wegen der Sonne und der Gesetze. Ich darf aufgrund der Naturschutzgebiete dort nur östlich fliegen, denn im Norden, Westen und Süden von Neudorf ist "No fly zone". Naja, da habe ich auch den Rest der Gemeinde Wittichenau gleich mit gemacht. Ansonsten habe ich heute "nur" Bilder außerhalb des sorbischen Siedlungsgebietes gemacht (in der Gemeinde Burkau fehlt jetzt nur noch Bocka und Jiedlitz). Aber irgendwann will ich ja doch den kompletten Landkreis BZ abdecken ;-)).--PaulT (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr schön. Keine Sorge, die Ortsteile von Burkau haben auch alle sorbische Namen. Da finde ich schon Arbeit ;) --j.budissin^+/- 16:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ohje, "u" bei Taucher vergessen, und dann copy & paste ... Danke für die Korrekturen. --PaulT (talk) 17:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hrańčik

Da fehlt noch das Einarbeiten des Bildes c:File:Elstra Rehnsdorf Aerial.jpg in den Artikel hsb:Hrańčik;-)). --PaulT (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder

In der Kategorie c:Category:Aerial photographs of Elsterheide sind zu den bisherigen zwei noch 15 weitere dazu gekommen ... Und sehe auch bitte nochmal nach, ob ich da bei der Kategorie c:Category:Sabrodt/Zabrod alles richtig gemacht habe. --PaulT (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Bilder! Fast richtig, nur ist Zabrod (anders als die ganzen Namen auf -icy) ein Singularname, deswegen nicht "su", sondern "je". --j.budissin^+/- 13:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Werde demnächst bei gutem Wetter in Spreetal ein paar Aufnahmen machen. Falls Du Zeit und Lust hast, kannst Du ja schon mal Districts of Spreetal anlegen zusammen mit den ganzen Ortsteilen als zweisprachige Kategorien bei Commons (die es bisher nur als deutsche Kategorien in der Kategorie Spreetal gibt). Vielleicht kannst Du auch schon Zerre als leere Kategorie vorbereiten? Herzliche Grüße, --PaulT (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulT: Alles klar, ist so weit vorbereitet. Zerre mache ich dann, wenn du Bilder davon hast. Schönes Wochenende und maximale Erfolge wünscht --j.budissin^+/- 18:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank. Leider wird es heute doch nichts. Die Beleuchtung für die meisten Orte dort ist vormittags am besten, und nun wird dort heute (entgegen der Vorhersage) doch keine Wolkenlücke werden. Vielleicht klappt es ja morgen oder am nächsten Wochenende. Herzliche Grüße, --PaulT (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heute ging es so einigermaßen. Bitte auch noch die beiden Kategorien c:Category:Spreetal (Siedlung)/Sprjewiny Doł (wjes) und c:Category:Zerre/Drětwja überprüfen sowie den obersorbischen Text ergänzen. Dank & Gruß, --PaulT (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte noch obersorbisch beschriften

Habe noch aus dem einen Zerre-Bild einen Ausschnitt rausgenommen (siehe File:Spreetal Zerre Aerial Pan (cropped).jpg), der das Gelände des ehemaligen Großkraftwerkes Trattendorf darstellt mit dem, was noch übrig und dem, was heute drauf ist. Dazu hatte ich die obersorbische Beschriftung der Ursprungsdatei gelöscht, da sie wohl so für den Ausschnitt nicht mehr stimmt. Füge bitte eine neue ein, falls Du mal Zeit hast. Gruß und Dank, --PaulT (talk) 20:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

... und da Du offenbar aus Grischun zurück bist, bitte noch in de:Neustadt (Spree) überprüfen, ob ich die Orts- bzw. Dorfteile richtig obersorbisch geschrieben habe. Zu Döschko und Hammer kommen demnächst noch Bilder. Sonst natürlich noch, wie immer, vielen Dank für die Beschriftungen, auch wenn Du Bernsdorf und Straßgräbchen weggelassen hast. Ist eben zu weit weg vom Sprachgebiet. --PaulT (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kann ich auch noch machen, sorbische Namen haben sie ja. --j.budissin^+/- 08:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulT: Woher hast du den Namen Starik für Altmühle? --j.budissin^+/- 08:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Habe ich aus Joachim Leopold Haupt & Johann Ernst Schmaler: Volkslieder der Wenden in der Ober- und Nieder-Lausitz. J. M. Gebhardt, 1841. Seite 291. Dort steht es unter 424) (im Kapitel VII von JE Schmaler: Kurze geographisch-statistische Beschreibung der wendischen Lausitzen). Die Altmühle gehörte ja früher zu Mühlrose, das heute im Kreis Görlitz und zu "schlesischen" Zeiten der preußischen OL im Kreis Rothenburg lag. Wobei ich aber ehrlich gesagt auch noch am rätseln bin, wo das Gebäude der Mühle und der Ortsteil sich befinden. Bilder gibt es ja hier unter Category:Alt-Mühle von Mühlrose. --PaulT (talk) 08:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr gut, danke. Den Namen kannte ich noch nicht (allerdings auch auf deutsch nicht). Letzteres würde ich dann auch noch gerne herausfinden, dann kann ich es auf der Karte eintragen. --j.budissin^+/- 09:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulT: Schon gefunden. --j.budissin^+/- 09:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Habe die Karte schon mehrfach gesehen, auch im Buch von Koschke/Menzel über die Geschichte des oberlausitzer Eisens, aber wohl Tomaten auf den Augen gehabt. Dort steht auf Seite 187 was über das Hammerwerk südlich der Spree. Ich war aber irgendwie zu blöd, weiter nördlich nachzusehen. Habe mal noch im Artikel die Lage richtig beschrieben. Ist ja lustig, dass sie da den meisten Teil der Struge in die Vattenfall-Becken ableiten und es dadurch einen zweiten Fluss Struga gibt, während nur der Bach im ursprünglichen Verlauf in die Spree mündet (an der Panzerbrücke). --PaulT (talk) 09:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das Wasser in diesen Becken sieht auch dementsprechend gruslig aus. Das wäre auch noch mal was für ein Luftbild. --j.budissin^+/- 09:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

War schon in Planung, allerdings muss ich auf die Flugverbotszone ED-R76C achten, die auch den Ort durchzieht. Ich habe auch schon an die TÜP-Verwaltung geschrieben, warte aber noch auf Antwort. --PaulT (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ist außerhalb von allen und war ok, siehe File:Spreetal Anlandebecken West Aerial Pan.jpg und weitere. --PaulT (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC) ... und bitte noch nachsehen, ob ich Fehler in der neu angelegten Category:Pannewitz/Banecy gemacht habe. --PaulT (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir. Sieht aus der Luft tatsächlich noch schlimmer aus als vom Ufer. --j.budissin^+/- 21:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte um weitere Cats für Districts of Neschwitz

Falls Du mal Zeit hast: habe Bilder reingestellt, die noch ein paar neue Kategorien brauchen: Holscha/Holešow, Holschdubrau/Holešowska Dubrawka, Kleinholscha/Mały Holešow, Lissahora/Liša Hora, Lomske/Łomsk und Neudorf/Nowa Wjes. Gruß & Dank, --PaulT (talk) 14:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sehr schön. Wieder ein paar bildlose Ortsartikel erlöst. Danke dir! --j.budissin^+/- 14:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry fürs falsch geschriebene Holschdubrau ... und dann auch noch zweimal durch copy & paste. Peinlich bei einem Ort, den ich nun schon mit vielen Studentengenerationen bei Exkursionen besucht habe. --PaulT (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Könnte noch ein paar Cats gebrauchen für Bornitz, Luppedubrau und Neu-Brohna ;-)). Sorry, war sonst heute mehr in Blasewitz und Loschwitz unterwegs. --PaulT (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

... und noch Droben, Grünbusch, Lomske, Luttowitz und Strohschütz. --PaulT (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte noch Category:Kriepitz/Krěpjecy obersorbisch ergänzen. Ansonsten sind diesmal wohl nur die Milstrich-Luftbilder für Dich interessant und vielleicht der Altbergbau (Clara III) im bernsdorfer Zeißholz. --PaulT (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte noch Category:Aerial photographs of Hochkirch obersorbisch ergänzen und eventuell Kategorien für Neuwuischke, Jauernick und Lehn anlegen. --PaulT (talk) 19:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr schön, da sind einige Lieblingsdörfer dabei. Mittlerweile wird die Trockenheit ziemlich auffällig, oder? --j.budissin^+/- 06:27, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, wir nehmen auch nur Flugbereiche, die nicht über brennbaren Feldern und Wäldern liegen. Deshalb sind einige Orte ausgelassen worden oder nicht optimal beleuchtet. Außerdem sind dummerweise Bauarbeiten an der Kirche in Hochkirch, die nun auf vielen der Bilder mit Gerüst drauf ist und mit neu kupferglänzender Turmspitze ohne Patina. Dank für die Ergänzungen. Kannst ja auch gleich noch alle Berge beschriften ;-)). --PaulT (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tagebau Nochten

Hi, ich wollte Dir nur sagen, dass dieses Bild vom Tagebau Nochten einfach richtig gut ist. Große Kunst! Vielen Dank. --Jenom (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, vielen Dank dafür! Da hat aber tatsächlich das Wetter noch seinen Teil beigetragen. Aber ja, es sagt das aus, was ich gesagt haben wollte. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 22:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steindörfel

Oups, das ging ja schnell. Danke fürs Fehler entfernen. Es kommen gleich noch ein paar Weißenberg-Orte: Nostitz, Grube, Maltitz und Wasserkretscham. Gruß und Dank, --PaulT (talk) 16:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatte zufällig gerade meine Beobachtungsliste überflogen und brauchte eine Pause von der eigentlichen Tätigkeit (Fußnoten korrigieren). --j.budissin^+/- 16:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die vier Orte sind jetzt auch noch drin. Was ist eigentlich Trauschwitz? Ist das ein Teil von Nostitz? Es taucht bei Wikipedia als Nachbarort auf im Artikel über Nostitz. Ich kann es aber sonst nirgendwo finden. Auf zwei der Nostitz-Bilder habe ich es vorsichtshalber im Vordergrund mit aufgenommen. --PaulT (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, Trauschwitz gehört quasi zu Nostitz dazu. Man erkennt noch, dass es mal zwei Dörfer waren. --j.budissin^+/- 10:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kolonie Kleinwelka

Hallo J budissin. Danke für die Straße+Hausnummer-Kategorien zu den von mir hochgeladenen Fotos (etwa 20 werden noch folgen). Was m.E. aber falsch ist, sind deine letzten Bearbeitungen, einzelne Fotos in komplette Straßenkategorien zu sortieren. Dieses Foto zum Beispiel ist jetzt nur noch über die Kategorie "Zinzendorfstraße, Kleinwelka" in der Kategorie "Kolonie Kleinwelka". Das stimmt aber aus dem Grund nicht, dass nicht alle Häuser in der Zinzendorfstraße zur Kolonie gehören. Bei anderen Fotos, wie diesem hier ist alles korrekt. Kannst du bitte deine Änderungen noch mal durchsehen? Danke! --Derbrauni (talk) 18:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, da war ich mir auch nicht ganz sicher. Dann machen wir am besten für die anderen Häuser auch noch Kategorien und packen die betreffenden dann in die Kolonie-Kategorie. Eigentlich war das auch der Plan, mir aber für heute zu viel Arbeit. Ich schaue mir das morgen noch mal an. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 19:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Klingt sehr gut, danke dir! --Derbrauni (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Halo J budissin. Zu diesem Revert von dir: Dieses Haus ist über die Kategorie "Kolonie Kleinwelka" bereits in der Kategorie "Cultural Heritage Monuments in Kleinwelka". Um Overcategorization zu vermeiden habe ich diese Änderung vorgenommen. Das trifft auch auf sehr viele andere Änderungen von dir zu (Beispiel) [--Derbrauni (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, Moment. Die Kolonie ist eine Sachgesamtheit, deswegen sind die einzelnen Häuser aber dennoch Einzeldenkmale und gehören als solche in die Kategorie. Haben ja auch alle eigene Einträge in der Denkmalliste. So ist z.B. die Bautzner Stadtbefestigung auch eine Sachgesamtheit, deswegen sind dennoch Lauenturm, Reichenturm, Gerberbastei etc. alles Einzeldenkmale. Das hat mit Overcategorization nichts zu tun. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 18:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Was meinst du mit dem letzten Beispiel? --j.budissin^+/- 18:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wird das so gehandhabt? Wusste ich nicht. Klingt aber irgendwie sinnvoll. Mein Link stimmte nicht ganz, gemeint war eher dieses Beispiel. Also wieder die "doppelte" Einordnung in Cultural heritage monuments in Bautzen-Kleinwelka und Kolonie Kleinwelka. --Derbrauni (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo – Spomenik ubijenoj djeci.jpg

File:Sarajevo – Spomenik ubijenoj djeci.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Memorial to the Murdered Children of Besieged Sarajevo

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 12:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cats erwünscht

Bitte noch gelegentlich Kategorien in Commons schaffen für ein paar Orte in Doberschau-Gaußig: Golenz, Günthersdorf, Katschwitz, Weißnaußlitz und Zockau. Gruß und Dank, --PaulT (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Minsk Nationalbibliothek 1.JPG

And also:

File:Minsk Nationalbibliothek 2.JPG

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder Doberschau-Gaußig

War wieder einigermaßen gutes Wetter, daher sechs neue Orte aus der Gemeinde Doberschau-Gaußig von oben. Bei Cossern habe ich was falsch gemacht: man sieht nicht den Ortskern, weil der hinter Bäumen versteckt ist. Muss ich irgendwann nochmal nachholen, ist aber ohnehin nicht sorbisches Siedlungsgebiet. --PaulT (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, danke! Wie gesagt, so hart an der offiziellen Grenze endet meine Interessenssphäre nun auch nicht ;) --j.budissin^+/- 17:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder und Cat-Wünsche

Bitte noch in den Kategorien Category:Aerial photographs of Kubschütz und Category:Aerial photographs of Großpostwitz die obersorbischen Erklärungen hinzufügen (mache da bestimmt wieder was mit den Fällen falsch) und vielleicht Kategorien zu Eulowitz (na gut, nicht obersorbisch), Klein Kunitz, Großkunitz und Döhlen anlegen. Außerdem sind heute noch Bilder in der Category:Aerial photographs of Neukirch Lausitz dazugekommen, morgen gibt es wahrscheinlich noch ein paar mehr. --PaulT (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mehr Arbeit: c:Category:Aerial photographs of Großdubrau sowie die Bilder darin mit eventuellen Ortsteil-Cats und dann noch die zwei Bilder von Neu-Bornitz. Viel Spaß. --PaulT (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, bei Jetscheba irgendwie in die falsche Richtung geflogen. Naja, wird nachgeholt. Schönes Wochenende. --PaulT (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

und Category:Blaue Adria (Großdubrau). --PaulT (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

und Category:Dahlowitz/Dalicy ;-)). --PaulT (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarajevo Rose

Hi. Please add your comment here: Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Copyright_status_of_"Sarajevo_Roses". I generally agree with your opinion. --Smooth O (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder

... wieder mal ein paar neue Bilder: Neustadt/Spree, Mühlrose und Mulkwitz. Danach war der Wind so stark, dass ich aufgrund der großen Drift keine vernünftige Panoramen mehr hinbekommen habe. Außerdem wurde die Rückkehr zunehmend erschwert. Da habe ich es für heute aufgeben müssen. --PaulT (talk) 17:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schön! Wir waren heute um Göda herum spazieren und ich hatte schon gezweifelt, ob du wohl angesichts des Sturms heute überhaupt unterwegs warst. Umso besser, insbesondere wegen Mühlrose. Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 17:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wieder neue Bilder aus den Gemeinden Kubschütz und Großpostwitz zum Beschriften, und Ergänzen der c:Category:Grubditz/Hruboćicy und c:Category:Scheckwitz/Šekecy. Und dann natürlich noch ggf die vielen Berge und umliegenden Gemeinden ;-)). --PaulT (talk) 17:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

noch mehr Bilder: Rest von Großpostwitz und drei von Kubschütz. Bitte auch die c:Category:Daranitz/Torońca um die obersorbische Beschreibung ergänzen. --PaulT (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulT: Dźakuju! --j.budissin^+/- 20:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte noch Cats um hsb-Texte ergänzen: c:Category:Waditz/Wadecy, c:Category:Canitz-Christina/Konjecy, c:Category:Zieschütz/Cyžecy und c:Category:Kumschütz/Kumšicy. Einige Bilder sind schon drin, mehr zu Kubschütz kommt heute noch. Allerdings war es etwas dunstig, aber ging einigermaßen. Nur die Fernsicht ist nicht so doll. --PaulT (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue c:Category:Aerial photographs of Obergurig/Hornja Hórka bitte noch weiter bearbeiten und Bider darin obersorbisch beschriften. Hoffe, ich habe alle Ortsteile richtig erwischt. Sicher kannst Du da noch ein paar Sachen ergänzen und Orte sowie Berge beschriften, und vielleicht noch das ominöse Kleinboblitz markieren (falls es denn hoffentlich irgendwo mit drauf ist). Habe auch noch die c:Category:Kleindöbschütz/Małe Debsecy angelegt und hoffentlich alles richtig geschrieben. Schöne Ostern, --PaulT (talk) 14:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wieder ein paar neue Bilder, u. a. in c:Category:Aerial photographs of Malschwitz und in c:Category:Aerial photographs of Weißenberg. Bitte auch noch die neuen Kategorien um die obersorbischen Texte ergänzen: c:Category:Buchwalde/Bukojna, c:Category:Doberschütz/Dobrošecy, c:Category:Dubrauke/Dubrawka und c:Category:Cortnitz/Chortnica. Dank & Gruß, --PaulT (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder und Kategorien Landkreis GR

... gibt wieder was zu tun: Category:Aerial photographs of Schleife und Category:Aerial photographs of Trebendorf. Habe noch mehr Bilder, komme aber wahrscheinlich erst morgen dazu. --PaulT (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noch mehr neue Bilder in Category:Aerial photographs of Gablenz (Oberlausitz) und in Category:Aerial photographs of Groß Düben (auch die Kategorien sind neu ... --PaulT (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hab mich auch mal an ein paar Kugelpanoramen gewagt (sorry, oben ist das Fluggerät und deshalb ist der Himmel schwarz ausgeblendet). 360° Luftbildpanorama des Halbendorfer Sees und 360° Luftbildpanorama nahe Kromlau. Musste allerdings die Auflösung etwas runterrechnen, damit Commons die Bilder akzeptiert. Beim Kromlau-Panorama zeigen manche Pano-Viewer noch einen dünnen senkrechten Strich an. Da habe ich beim Runterrechnen nicht aufgepasst und die Breite des Bildes ist ein Pixel schmaler als die doppelte Höhe. Muss ich demnächst nochmal dran feilen. --PaulT (talk) 10:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata

Hallo, wie hast Du das gemacht, in Wikidata einen Datensatz für ein Commons-Objekt (hier: Denkmal/Wegestein Category:Schweinerden, Wegestein nach Cannewitz) anzulegen? --Tommes 13:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Das ist kein Datensatz für das Commonsobjekt, sondern für den Wegestein selbst. Grundsätzlich haben mittlerweile alle gelisteten Kulturdenkmale in Sachsen ein Wikidata-Objekt, u.a. eben denkmalgeschützte Wegsteine. Das kannst du dir über die untenstehende Datenbank-Abfrage mal anschauen. Ich habe sozusagen nur deine neue Commons-Kategorie auf Wikidata mit dem schon bestehenden Objekt verknüpft und auf Commons die Infobox eingefügt. Wenn Kategorie und Objekt auf WD verknüpft sind, macht die Vorlage den Rest alleine.

SPARQL-Abfrage für Wegesteine:

#defaultView:Map
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel ?coordinate WHERE {
  wd:Q93286 wdt:P625 ?Center.
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q22812402 .  # ist ein Wegweiser
  SERVICE wikibase:around {
    ?item wdt:P625 ?coordinate.
    bd:serviceParam wikibase:center ?Center.
    bd:serviceParam wikibase:radius "25". # 25 Kilometer around
  }
  SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "hsb,de,[AUTO_LANGUAGE]". }
  #FILTER(EXISTS { ?place (wdt:P31/wdt:P279*) wd:Q1248784. })
}

Try it!

Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 13:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke sehr. Jetzt hätte ich gern ein praktisches Beispiel. Ich habe soeben Category:Bischofswerda, Am Lutherpark 1 angelegt. Die Cat bzw. das Objekt ist nicht mit einer Wikidata-ID verknüpft. Wenn es schon eine gibt, woher erfahre ich sie und wie verknpfe ich beide? Wenn es noch keine gibt, wie lege ich eine an? --Tommes 05:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tommes: Sorry, hatte das übersehen. Für eingetragene Kulturdenkmale in Sachsen gibt es prinzipiell WD-Objekte. Am einfachsten findest du diese, indem du in der WD-Suche nach der Denkmal-ID suchst. Für den Lutherpark 1 habe ich das jetzt mal gemacht. Dann die Commonskategorie mit dem Objekt verknüpfen: sh. hier. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 12:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2019

Hallo Julian, du lädst ja grad fleißig Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen hoch. September ist ja WLM-Zeit. Willst du deine Fotos noch für den Wettbwerb anmelden? Viele Grüße --Z ^thomas 22:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, ja. Bisher habe ich darauf immer verzichtet, weil ich mir in der Regel relativ wenige Gedanken über die Ästhetik der Bilder mache. Aber ein paar können ja mal teilnehmen. Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 18:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

och, mir gefallen deine Bilder schon. außerdem muss man wlm auch ein bisschen als werbung für die region sehen :-) da kommt die lausitz auch mal mit schönen bildern in das bewusstsein der breiten öffentlichkeit. gruß --Z ^thomas 18:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi J budissin,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi J budissin,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi J budissin,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schnell

Na Du bist ja schnell, danke für die Korrektur. Wir haben mal etwas in Brandenburg "gewildert", weil wir ein paar Ort besuchen wollten, in denen früher mal sehr entfernte Verwandte von mir gewohnt hatten (hauptsächlich in Bagenz und Groß Luja). Habe deshalb dann auch eine neue Cat aufgemacht (Category:Aerial photographs of Spremberg). Die Luftbilder von Bagenz stehen in Category:Aerial photographs of Landkreis Spree-Neiße, da Bagenz ja nicht zu Spremberg gehört. Es geht demnächst weiter mit BZ und GR. Wir waren auf der Rückfahrt nach Sachsen schon beim Flughafen Nardt fragen, wann wir dort fliegen können. Das wird dann demnächst; gestern war noch reger Flugbetrieb mit Segelflugzeugen, so wohl auch am nächsten Wochenende. Aber dann können wir loslegen, wenn das Wetter mitspielt. Waren zuletzt etwas verhindert, weil ich noch unsere einmonatige Rundfahrt über die Inneren Hebriden (und drum herum) zu bearbeiten hatte, siehe Category:User:PaulT/gallery/S2019. Und dann war da noch das Magalithik-Projekt in der Altmark Category:Fotodokumentation von Großsteingräbern in der Altmark September 2019 Aerial. Naja, aber jetzt geht es zu Hause weiter. --PaulT (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, die Hebriden... Du machst mich neidisch. Groß Luja habe ich auf meiner Beobachtungsliste, daher so schnell. Ich würde da dann auch noch niedersorbische Beschreibungen ergänzen und freue mich ansonsten auf frische Bilder aus der Oberlausitz ;) Schöne Grüße, j.budissin^+/- 11:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder

... habe ein paar neue Bilder eingestellt und bitte um obersorbische Texte dazu und eventuelle Berichtigungen in Category:Aerial photographs of Rietschen. Vielleicht kannst Du auch noch die Kategorien Werda und Hammerstadt in Category:Districts of Rietschen ergänzen. Zumindest bei Werda habe ich keine Ahnung, ob es da einen obersorbischen Ortsnamen gibt. Ein anderes Problem ist sicher noch Altliebel, das ja abgerissen wurde, dessen Name aber an Nappatsch weitergegeben wurde. Derzeit ist es nicht unter Districts, sondern unter Rietschen. Morgen kmmen noch ein paar Bilder von Bad Muskau und von Steinbach mit Neiße. Gruß, --PaulT (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt wieder neue Bilder, siehe Category:Aerial photographs of Hohendubrau. --PaulT (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. --PaulT (talk) 15:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear J budissin,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information

That's all right, the bad joke is ended [2]. Ccmpg (talk) 07:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear J budissin,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Bilder

Ein paar weinige neue Bilder für 2020 in Category:Aerial photographs of Quitzdorf am See mit der Bitte um obersorbische Beschriftung. Kannst ja auch noch eine Kategorie für Horscha/Hóršow anlegen (Bilder sind jetzt in Category:Districts of Quitzdorf am See). --PaulT (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Minsk Ghetto Denkmal 1.JPG

And also:

File:Minsk Ghetto Denkmal 2.JPG

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 19479 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 21408 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Skopje – Kamen most 2008-2017.png

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Skopje – Kamen most 2008-2017.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved, regards. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 17051 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 23565 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 26259 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27272 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 19443 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 24218 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 23647 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 20703 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18667 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 16000 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18956 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 13272 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 20903 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 20526 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 23371 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 23072 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 15414 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 16532 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18918 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 19245 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 21078 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 15254 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18788 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 15:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 11779 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 14613 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 22941 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27368 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 37269 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 13:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27121 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 23655 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 28984 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:J budissin/Uploads/BiH, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27718 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Cat

Bitte noch die c:Category:Cossern/Kosarnja obersorbisch beschriften (na gut, der Ort gehört nicht zum offiziellen Gebiet). --PaulT (talk) 11:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Das wird hoffentlich niemandem auffallen ;) --j.budissin^+/- 12:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miltitz

Sorry, habe Datei Nebelschütz_Miltitz_Dorfstr_2.jpg den falschen Dateinamen verpasst, ist eigentlich Dorfstraße 3. weiß aber nicht, ob man es unbedingt ändern muss. --PaulT (talk) 21:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo J_budissin,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sarajevo – City Center.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konjic Gradska džamija.jpg

File:Konjic Gradska džamija.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 01:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zboriste Mosque.jpg

File:Zboriste Mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo J_budissin,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger WLE 2020
Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo – UNITIC towers from Žuta tabija.jpg

File:Sarajevo – UNITIC towers from Žuta tabija.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 13:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Bushaltestelle Werbung.JPG

File:Minsk Bushaltestelle Werbung.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Werbung Brot.JPG

File:Minsk Werbung Brot.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Individual copyright permission

Dear Julian Nyca:

I would like to reprint your image File:Sarajevo Sebilj at Night.JPG by J budissin. My publisher requires that I get permission directly from the photographer. Could I email you a permission form? My email is mchilds@unm.edu

Thank you,

Mark C. Childs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcchilds (talk • contribs) 20:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo J budissin,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo J budissin,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sarajevo Holiday Inn 2.JPG

And also:

File:Sarajevo Holiday Inn.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Minsk Unabhängigkeitsplatz 4.JPG

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo – FK Sarajevo Graffiti.jpg

File:Sarajevo – FK Sarajevo Graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 12:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darjeeling Himalayan Railway (2010) 16.jpg

File:Darjeeling Himalayan Railway (2010) 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sarajevo Parlament.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Kriegsmuseum Statue.JPG

File:Minsk Kriegsmuseum Statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minsk Kriegsmuseum Statue 2.JPG

File:Minsk Kriegsmuseum Statue 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Minsk Palast der Republik.JPG

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]