User talk:Ernsts

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ernsts!

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (`・ω・´) (talk) 08:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Hello, the information I just provided there is copied belo: Hello, on https://viralzone.expasy.org/contact The following information is provided: All pictures in ViralZone are copyright of the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Permission is granted to use the pictures in academic theses or non-commercial powerpoint presentations, provided the source is acknowledged. Plese check the information providedby Philippe Le Mercier, SIB provided at my home page user:Ernsts This is as follows:[reply]

Message from Philippe Le Mercier <Philippe.Lemercier(at)sib.swiss> as of 2021-02-01 concerning the ViralZone images:

"As for the images, the license has changed: they are now under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0. It is stated on the home page of ViralZone. This means you no longer have to ask permission to use them in any media, provided you credit the source. Here is an official statement in case you need it:

I hereby grant you permission to use ViralZone graphics in Wikimedia commons. Please cite the source: ViralZone, SIB Swiss Institute of bioinformatics

If you need any other official documents from SIB, you can ask legal(at)sib.swiss or me.

I draw a rabies virion during my thesis and the image went viral, many people around the world used it in their talks/posters/theses. I realized there was a need for free, accurate and beautiful images, I am glad the SIB supported the project and ViralZone was born.

Good luck with Wikipedia commons, it's a huge project.

Sincerely yours,

Philippe

In case of any questions, please contact Phil or me. Pleas check if the delete reqestis still justified after considering this. Kind reqards, --Ernsts (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks. I‘m afraid SIB's 872 page is outdated, presumably caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Their root pages tells CC 4.0 at the bottom right, you may find the discussion about that matter continued at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ernsts, and User:Doc James has cared about the matter. As a result, the delete request has already been removed from the ViralZone images. The others likely will follow. Regards --Ernsts (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just had a look into the article you mentioned and saw that image '255355 web Phi6 virions c.jpg' is not from ViralZone but from EurekAlert (Usage: free), those delete requests have not yet been deleted. As I understand Doc James at the discussion mentioned above the delete request should bee removed soon. Please refer to the disc there. Regards --Ernsts (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I see all images have removed the delete note as they have passed licence check, regardless if their source is ViralZone or EurekAlert. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ernsts. Therefore the matter appears to be solved.--Ernsts (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:248829 web Siphoviridae infecting bacterial cell.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:248829 web Siphoviridae infecting bacterial cell.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ich habe aus Zeit- und Relevanzgründen die Frage, ob das Bild
Artistic representation of phages of the family Siphoviridae that infect a bacterial cell (IMAGE); CREDIT: Visualization: Barth van Rossum, FMP; USAGE RESTRICTIONS: The image may only be used with appropriate caption and credit.
des EurekAlert-Artikels Light shed on the atomic resolution structure of phage DNA tube in Wikimedia Commons benutzt werden darf (und wenn ja zu welchen Bedingungen) nicht weiter verfolgt. Nachdem es inzwischen gelöscht wurde, verstehe ich das so, dass es in WP keine Möglichkeit gibt, ein Bild unter den bei EurekAlert hier(!) genannten Bedingungen hochzuladen. Sei's drum. Im Übrigen wurde ja für EurekAlert-Bilder mit „USAGE RESTRICTIONS: none“ bereits geklärt, dass diese verwendet werden dürfen. Das reicht mir einstweilen.--Ernsts (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Cambrian-Trilobites-2000px.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Licence of image at source webpage is CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) therefore not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GeoWriter: Am Ende der von Dir angegebenen Webseite steht: "Unless otherwise indicated, text and images on this website have Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licenses." Direkt unter den Bildern steht: Drawings by Alana McGillis. Ich dachte, das wäre ok. Ich sehe jetzt auf Commons:Lizenzen, dass NC "Dieses Symbol bezieht sich auf eine nicht-kommerzielle Lizenz (nicht erlaubt auf Commons)" bedeutet und muss mich wundern. Wikimedia Commons ist doch nicht-kommerziell? Jetzt verstehe ich gar nicht mehr!
Die Androhung einer Sperre meiner Kennung finde ich im Übrigen angesichts von über 1000 (teilweise nach Diskussion) unbeanstandet hochgeladderner Dateien (bei einer zurückgezogenen, weil mir die Klärung zu aufwänig war ) unverhältnismäßig. Eine vorherige Rückfrage wäre der Sache sehr entgegengekommen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen.--Ernsts (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The matter has been clarified by @GeoWriter: .
So it is actually what I feared. As I was not aware of this difference, I had assumed that Wikipedia conversely allows non-commercial use only. In thats case, it would probably have made no difference whether CC-BY-NC-SA or CC-BY-SA was guaranteed in the source. One would not have had to pay any attention to this "small" difference for uploading.
Unfortunately, I have to say that I am somewhat disappointed and misled in my ideas about Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I'll therefore probably not upload foreign images any more. Concerning own images I'll no longer upload these, because I personally can only accept non-commercial use (CC-BY-NC-SA). For foreign images the risk of doing something wrong again is too high for me. The non-licensed uploading of material to the Internet is an absolute no-no for me.
However, I am still considering whether to use images that have already been uploaded in new or newly translated articles could be an option, as well as editing for captions of existing images.

German translation:

Es ist also tatsächlich so, wie von mir befürchtet. Ich war mir dieses Unterschieds nicht bewusst, dann ich war davon ausgegangen, dass Wikipedia umgekehrt nur nicht-gewerbliche Nutzung zulässt. In diesem Fall wäre es wahrscheinlich egal gewesen, ob in der Quelle CC-BY-NC-SA oder CC-BY-SA gewährleistet wird. Für das Hochladen hätte man auf diesen "kleinen" Unterschied nicht achten müssen.
Ich muss leider sagen, dass ich in meinen Vorstellungen von Wikipedia bzw. Wikimedia Commons etwas ettäuscht bin. Ich werde vermutlich daher keine weiteren fremden Bilder hochladen. Eigene Bilder werde ich sowieso nicht mehr hochladen, da ich persönlich nur nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung CC-BY-NC-SA akzeptieren kann. Für fremde Bilder ist mir das Risiko zu hoch, noch einmal etwas falsch zu machen. Das nicht-lizenzierte Hochladen von Material ins Internet ist für mich ein absolutes Tabu.
Ich überlege allerdings noch, ob das Verwenden bereits hochgeladener Bilder in neuen oder neu übersetzen Artikeln eine Option sein könnte, ebenso das Bearbeiten for Captions bereits vorhandener Bilder.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Ernsts (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Cambrian-Trilobites-Elrathia-antiuata.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Licence of image at source webpage is CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) therefore not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See above.--Ernsts (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:41586 2012 Article BFnature11681 Fig1 HTML.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright licence for this image is CC-BY-NC-SA (not CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader) which is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Epithemia turgida 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright licence for this image is CC-BY-ND - see http://nordicmicroalgae.org/copyright-notice (not CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader) which is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Heterocapsa rotundata 5.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright licence for this image is CC-BY-ND - see http://nordicmicroalgae.org/copyright-notice (not CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader) which is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Epithemia adnata 1194440046.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright licence for this image is CC-BY-ND - see http://nordicmicroalgae.org/copyright-notice (not CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader) which is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Epithemia turgida 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The copyright licence for this image is CC-BY-ND - see http://nordicmicroalgae.org/copyright-notice (not CC-BY-SA claimed by uploader) which is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

GeoWriter (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich nehme Bezug auf das bereits hier oben erwähnte.
An einer Diskussion über die Lizenzfragen der gelöschten Bilder habe ich, wie man verstehen wird, kein Interesse. Das gilt auch für küftige Fälle, falls noch weitere auftreten sollten.
Meine Mitarbeit an Wikimedia Commons beschränkt sich seitdem auf das Editieren (Berichtigen und Ergänzen) von Metadaten (wie Legenden) bestehender Bilder.
Eine Ausnahme ist allenfalls das Erstellen von Bilder-Auszügen, aber nur solange, wie dabei keine Probleme gibt. Ich bitte um Verständnis. Mit freundlichen Grüßen.
English translation:
I refer to what has already been mentioned above at this place.
In a discussion about the license questions of the deleted pictures I have, as one will understand, no interest. This is also true for any future cases, should there be any more.
Since then, my participation in Wikimedia Commons is limited to editing (correcting and adding) metadata (e. g. captions) of existing images.
An exception is at most the creation of image extracts, but only as long as there are no problems. I ask for understanding. With kind regards.
--Ernsts (talk) 17:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Frenzel1897-Tafel-V-cropped.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Frenzel1897-Tafel-V-cropped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Bitte schau mal unter commons:File_requests#Images_at_EOL. Ich habe extra nachgefragt und grünes Licht bekommen. Statt wie von mir gewünscht, dass jemand anderes diese Lizenzfragen klärt und den gewünschten Upload macht. Mal abgesehen von der vermutlich ziemlich klaren Fehlinformation zu Fig. 7 of Zarsky2021 (diese Bild ist doch CC-BY-NC, und darf daher, wie ich bereits leidvoll erfahren habe, nicht hochgeladen werden, was sich allerdings meinem Verständnis entzieht)! Aber jetzt zu dem aktuell beanstandeten Bild. Ihr könnt nicht von mir verlangen, dass ich mich mit solchen juristischen Spitzfindigkeiten befasse, wovon ich nichts verstehe. Und dann noch immer die Diskussionen in einer fremden Sprache! Den Support durch die Commons-Administration lässt da sehr zu wünschen übrig. Man kreigt da nur die Templates vor die Füße geworfen. Es tut mir Leid, das alles sagen zu müssen. Es nervt! Wenn auch dieses Bild gelöscht wird, war die ganze Zeit für die Erstellung der Legende wieder umsonst! Kann mann die eigene Wikimedia Common Kennung separat löschen? Nur für den Fall... :-( --Ernsts (talk) 21:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In Fall dieses sehr alten Bildes mit bekanntem Todesdatum des Urhebers musst du dich nicht groß mit der Rechtslage beschäftigen. Du musst das allerdings gut lesbar als Lizenz angeben, wie es jetzt auch gemacht wurde. Unter COM:L sind die erlaubten Lizenzen und die dauer ab wann Inhalte gemeinfrei werden gut und auch auf deutsch erklärt. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Siehe auch die Diskussion unter Commons:Help_desk#c-Jmabel-2022-04-25T23:04:00.000Z-Ernsts-2022-04-25T21:59:00.000Z. Ernsts (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rotavirus genome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Graham Beards (talk) 07:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File is availble now. Solved.--Ernsts (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rotavirus virion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Graham Beards (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File is availble now. Solved.--Ernsts (talk) 15:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Chilomonas@SciELO.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: test, ignore me help=off
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mdaniels5757.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Epsilon15likevirus EM.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, who is named as right holder below, explicitely wrote to VRT that they are *not* the right holders. See Ticket:2021020910004221.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mussklprozz.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]