User talk:Túrelio/Archive17

Talkpage archive from 2022

Mistake

May these files be deleted please? (File:Barbara Kruger, 2018 (41993553810).jpg & File:Barbara Kruger, 2018 (41993553810) cropped.jpg I thought it was a photo with artist Barbara Kruger, but I was mistaken. The lady with curly red hair is not Kruger. JamesTheLaptop (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

I've deleted the uncropped version. However, as the cropped image is in use on several projects, you should first remove it from its uses. Until that is done, I've tagged the image with a special template and posted the problem on its talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Image mistake

Hi. I made a mistake with these images. I thought they were public domain but it appears they are not. Could you remove them please? Thankks: File:Daniel Lewis Lee.webp and File:Daniel Lewis Lee.jpg. Inexpiable (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done already by DMacks. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sant-Jarnail-aw.jpg

Hi. Thanks for all your work, but does Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sant-Jarnail-aw.jpg have no redeeming value?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 00:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jeff, not being en-native, the meaning of "redeeming value" is not fully clear to me. You probably meant, why this DR was deleted, which is unusual. In this case, the DR was created by C.Fred, who 1 minute later tagged it (the DR itself) for speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Borrado de File:Womeninart portada.png

Buenos días: He recibido un mensaje del borrado del logotipo de mi página por no ser mi propio trabajo. Te indico que ese logotipo lo he realizado yo misma y es de mi propiedad por lo que te pido que lo repongas ya que no tienes razón en tu proceder. Espero que me indique cómo proceder porque no me ha parecido correcta esta acción. Saludos --Womeninart (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)--Womeninart (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Womeninart,

I reply in english, as my spanish is a bit rusty. The image was was deleted 8 months ago! You seem not to have missed it. Anyway, it was deleted as being suspected to be a commercial stock-image, and is found earlier than your upload at here, here and here. Your own work? --Túrelio (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please delete

Hi, can you please delete this image? It's been tagged as "no permission" for almost a month. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 07:17, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of File:The NULL exercise.jpg

Hi. I see you recently deleted File:The NULL exercise.jpg. Can you tell me why? RoySmith (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, sure. It is obviously a screenshot (visible Moiree pattern) und under the assumption that the original was not own work, it's a derivative. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough, thank you. RoySmith (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Mmedstereast and bulk categorisation changes to DRG Class 44 etc

See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Mmedstereast and bulk categorisation changes to DRG Class 44 etc

You speedy deleted a large number of categories here as "empty and reduntant category", despite them only having been emptied shortly beforehand by an editor who was then blocked for it. These deletions were clearly out of process: because this is a common problem, our policy for deleting "empty" categories requires that the admin first check they're properly emptied (these weren't) and that they have been empty for long enough for other editors to react first (these were deleted within a couple of hours, even before the ANU thread was opened)

A number of these are still populated but deleted. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Cleanup

Can I ask you to please restore these. Restoring them would be a lot less effort then re-creating them from scratch. Thankyou Andy Dingley (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Restored all, except 2 which are empty. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Shree Jwala Dal Battalion.svg

Hello!

I marked this file as a duplicate but I actually think that it might not be. The positioning of the white figures aren't exactly the same. I think I noticed that but forgot to remove {{Dupe}}.Jonteemil (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. But, what do you suggest, undeletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess, since it isn't a duplicate it must be deleted through a DR.Jonteemil (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Please delete (again)

Hi, a few days ago I asked you to delete File:Shervin_Aazami.jpg because it had been tagged as "no permission" for almost a month. Well, the exact same user just reuploaded the exact same file (same filename and everything). I've tagged it as "no permission" but is there any way you could just delete it now? If not that's fine, I can just wait the required seven days. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

 Gone and uploader warned. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Copy vio

You just marked thumb|Rohit Sharma as a copy vio. Which website has uploaded this image under copyright license please tell JaggaDaaku (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Not sure whether I understand your question. You claimed this image as own work. But it was prepublished on many websites. For examplae this one credit its to Instagram. So, it is obviously not your own work. --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

If i credit it to Instagram will it solve the problem because no website claims copyright on this image? JaggaDaaku (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

No. Images on Instagram are not free. You need to provide evidence that the image has been released under a free license by its creator. --Túrelio (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

But the link you provided. No website claims copyright on the image. Crediting Instagram as sources with unknown author will help? JaggaDaaku (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

And you mentioned that it is copyrighted. How? Which website has marked it as a copyright? JaggaDaaku (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Every creative work is copyrighted, automatically. It does not need to be written or claimed (that was the case in the U.S. in former times). And no, crediting Instagram doesn't help, as Instagram is not the copyright-holder of the images of their users. --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

svg <-> png

FYI, not certain whether it was intentional, however at File:YLE TV2 Logo 2002-2012 Color.svg you merged png and svg together.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that was more a courtesy-deletion. The uploader asked for deletion, as he/she feared not to have permission. File was unused anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

User page on dead site

Guten tag/nacht, your user page lists a profile on Wikilivres, but sadly, that has been gone for years. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nutzung eines Bildes, dass Sie gemacht haben

Sehr geehrter Túrelio, im Laufe meines Freiwilligendienstes, den ich zurzeit leiste, möchte ich ein Projekt ausarbeiten, dass sich mit der Thematik rund um Zigaretten, der Risiken und Nebenwirkungen und des anfallenden Mülls beschäftigt. Teil des Projekts wird ein Flyer sein, der aufmerksam auf die Schäden von Zigaretten machen soll. Ich habe nun ein sehr krasses Foto von Ihnen auf der Wikipedia Seite gefunden, welches ich gerne für mein Projekt in meinem Flyer verwenden möchte. Sie können sich gerne bei mir melden und ich würde mich sehr freuen. Das Foto würde wahnsinnig gut helfen, Menschen auf die Thematik aufmerksam zu machen. Gerne können Sie sich bei mir über meine emailadresse melden: foej. museum-fedderwardersiel@gmx.de. Ich werde mich freuen von Ihnen zu hören:) Mit freundlichen Grüßen Frau Zoe Spiekermann

Replied per Mail. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

The pictures delating

Hello, sir! I'm wondering, why do you delate the pictures? You said, the quote: “Screenshot from video. It does not say that it is available under a Creative Commons license ”

But what if the person, whose materials I use, allows people use his stuff? So, then it means it fits the Creative Commons license, doesn't it? --Максимумфактов (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Максимумфактов,

I assume you are talking about File:DmitryKuplinov.png, right? Per your own description, it is a screenshot from this Youtube-Video. This video is under the Youtube-standard license, which is not compatible with our license policy. If the video-creator wanted to allow re-use of his video, he could have put it under a CC license, which some Youtubers do. Here is an example for such a CC license Youtube-video. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Daniel Florencio - Still.jpg

Hi! You deleted this image with no warning because it was "taken from the internet" - did you consider that the person who uploaded it is its actual owner (which I know for a fact is the case)? Maybe next time give a warning first so that this can be explained to you before any actions. I've instructed them to reupload it. Cheers and happy editing. Rkieferbaum (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, see User talk:Danielpdarth, no warning? Re-uploading is a bad choice, as it violates our policy and might even result in a block. The correct way to dispute a speedy deletion, as in such a case, is taking it to COM:UDR, where it can be discussed. Sure, uploader may be the owner, whatever that means. The copyright is usually with the photographer. In addition, this image is found also here. All this is the usual circumstancial pattern for a copyvio, not a solid proof, of course. Anyway, if he is indeed the photographer or rightsholder, he will have to sed a confirmation to VRTS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). --Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

"Whatever that means" - maybe google "copyright ownership" if you're going around making claims regarding it, don't you think?

I talked with, yes, the image owner, and they're saying it's not worth the hassle to oppose someone who apparently just made up a rule that images previously uploaded elsewhere can't be included in the commons. Cheers and thank you for your time. Rkieferbaum (talk) 16:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Фото тролза 5265.00

Вы за что удалили фото в 2 Ги это фото я загружал фото мое Cchrx23 (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, what file are you talking about, File:Тролза-5265.00 «Мегаполис».png or File:Тролза-5265.08 «Мегаполис».png? Copyvio-suspicion, as 1st one found here and 2nd one found here.--Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Тролза-5265.00 мегаполис это я его загружал я просто под другим именем в 2 гис Cchrx23 (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Please delete

Hi! Please delete also this file (same file - has been deleted). Thanks. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Email

Hi, can I please contact you privately by email? It is a sensitive topic that I do not wish to say publicly. Aeschylus (talk) 02:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Just use the email-link in the toolbox on my userpage User:Túrelio. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Kim Hyun Soo 김현수.jpg

Hi! You deleted this image with warning Copyright violation: https://post.naver.com/viewer/postView.naver?volumeNo=20572706&memberNo=35214926&searchKeyword=%EA%B9%80%ED%98%84%EC%88%98&searchRank=8) (thank) (global usage; delinker log). Why? This image is so different. Maybe next time give a rational warning first before take any actions. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymxx00 (talk • contribs)

Wow, this was 4 months ago. And it's not your upload. Are you a sockpuppet of User:1smkmeong? The deleted image is just a slightly rotated crop of this image. In addition, the claimed source https://i.mydramalist.com/r5mnj_5c.jpg is also © Copyright 2022. All rights reserved. So, not the slightest evidence for the claimed free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete

07:36, 7 January 2022 you deleted page User:Username (CSD U2 (user page of a non-existent user)).
This test account is needed for a lot of template descriptions. Pls restore, ev. mark it as needed=don't delete, and give it more protection. -- sarang♥사랑 07:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

GeoHack

Hallo Turelio! Leider funktioniert der GeoHack in den Listen der Baudenkmäler nicht mehr. Wenn man den Standort anklickt, kommt eine weiße Seite mit User: The DJ. Da das beim Auffinden von Baudenkmälern sehr wichtig ist, wäre es ganz toll, wenn diese Möglichkeit wieder richtig funktionieren würde. Außerdem steht bei meinem Denkmal in der Hermann-Roth-Straße 22 in Baierbrunn, daß die Löschung dieser Seite seit Oktober 21 zur Diskussion steht. Ich habe damals geantwortet, aber es hat sich nichts mehr getan. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Edelmauswaldgeist,

den LA habe ich in deinem Sinne erledigt. Bzgl. GeoHack bin ich der falsche Ansprechpartner (da keine Ahnung); das könntest du auf Commons:Forum ansprechen, wo sich sicher ein paar Kundige finden werden. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Rotation

I tried to rotate this photo to the correct state, but it didn't work after three tries. Am I doing something wrong?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

You are not the only one to make such an experience. ;-) Not sure what the true reason is, might be a descrepancy between a marker in the JPEG file and how the mediawiki software sees it. I would recommend not to make such rotations manually, but simply to wait til the bot, which is activated by the template, which I put onto the file, has done his job. This works fine at least for JPEG files. Files in TIFF format need to be rotate manually, but they don't produce this problem. --Túrelio (talk) 17:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

No permission

Hello, could you please delete File:Dave+Harden+10.jpg‎ and File:JustinGreywolf Buddy.png? They have been tagged as "no permission" for a week and a half. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

deleted the 1st one, as it has many externals hits. But what was your rationale to tag the 2nd one? I've found no external hits and it might be a sort of family-shot. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

File:David Boyd UNICEF.jpg

Hello, you deleted the file File:David Boyd UNICEF.jpg, with the claim that there is no evidence of the claimed license at the source. The source listed was: [1], that page clearly states: "Geneva Solutions content is licensed under Creative Commons BY 4.0".

Could you please explain why you did this? Bquast (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Actually the terms of use state that "The use of the Website is free of charge and all content is subject to a Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license." This is slightly different from what they write at the article page quoted by Bquast and quite inconsistent on the part of Geneva Solutions. We have to consider though that the image is not Geneva Solutions content, but was provided and/or created by UNICEF according to the caption. So the CC licence only refers to the text of said article and Túrelio's deletion was justified imo. De728631 (talk) 07:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

the problem is the contradictorial evidence:

1) below the article they state: "Geneva Solutions content is licensed under CC-BY .."

2) in the caption at the bottom of the image (i) they credit the image to "UNICEF". So, is the image still "their content"?

3) on their ToU-page[2] they state at "2. Use of the website": a) intended exclusively for personal or professional use for non-commercial purposes. b) Any further or alternative use, particularly the ... its distribution to other systems, is only permitted with our express explicit permission. c) all content is subject to a Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0.

Especially the statements in the ToU are contradictorial. So, we cannot really be sure whether the image is theirs and/or is really CC-licensed without non-commercial restriction, as required by our policy. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

copyright image

Hello, it's my first day here and I wanted to upload a photo on a page about me [angelique houtkamp]. The photo is made by my friend who is not a professional. My friend gave me the photo to use as I see fit. The photo was also used for a book. What do I need to do to use it here? Thanks Angelique 24 jan 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hammier (talk • contribs)

Hi Mrs. Houtkamp,

you are likely not talking about this one File:Portrait of Angelique Houtkamp.png, right? (per The Guardian it's by Christopher Bradford/Courtesy of Ebury Press)

Nowadays any photography is considered having copyright, independant of the profession of the actual photographer. So, the image you are talking about, needs to be considered as copyrighted.

Now, please ask your photographing friend whether he is willing to release said image of you under a free license, which allows - more or less - any kind of use for free. If he agrees, ask him how he wants to be credited (mentioned). The free licenses, we prefer to recommend her on Commons, require all re-users to credit the photographer, as he/she wants to be credited. If he does not want to be credited by his real name, he can invent an artificial name (pseudonym) or an "artist name". If this decision is taken, you can upload said image on Commons, but add to the description the following code {{OTRS pending}} . Thereafter, you need to prepare a permission-text, using either the text in the grey square on Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file or, if you prefer Dutch language, the text in Commons:E-mailsjablonen. You need to customize the text by adding 1) the filename (or complete URL) of the uploaded image, and 2) by adding the precise name of the choosen free license. I, personally, would recommend you to choose either the unported (international) Cc-by-sa-4.0 or one of the following two, Cc-by-sa-3.0-nl or Cc-by-3.0-nl, which are adapted to the laws of The Netherlands, but still valid worldwide. Finally, send the customized permission-text per email to your friend, ask him to date and sign it and to send it (by himself) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (VRTS). Yes, it looks like a bit of a procedure, but remember, releasing a work of art under a license is actually a legal act like making a last will. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the thorough explanation. Hammier (talk) 00:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deletion

Not his own work: File:Rardon1.jpg Please delete this copyright violation, thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 08:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

image removed from wiki "File:Tcganadolu.jpg"

Hi this image is removed for no reason. I personally asked for the photographer to upload it to wikipedia and the owner Tayfun Ozberk uploaded it. You can also see it in the twitter page comment section. In one of the comments he says that it is possible for this petition of Wikipedia upload. Since the owner of the image has its consent. Can you undo this? You can check the comment section here"https://mobile.twitter.com/TayfunOzberk/status/1485889464874545153" if you want the source of the image. Thanks again.

"it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright violation: https://mobile.twitter.com/TayfunOzberk/status/1485889464874545153." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metuboy (talk • contribs)

Hi Metuboy,

if I understand you and the Twitter-post correctly, he gave a sort of permission for "use on Wikipedia", right?

Regrettably, that is not sufficient for uploads to Commons. Per our policy COM:L, we need a release under "free license", such as CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA for example, which allows other to re-use the image for free, provided they credit the photographer, as he/she wants to be credited. So, to get this done, you should contact the photographer, either on Twitter or eventually better per email and ask him, whether he would be willing to give such a release. As a photographer he probably knows what CC (Creative Commons) licenses are. Our policy requires that there is also no restriction for commercial use; so, CC-BY-NC is not acceptable. I am aware that not every photographer will agree to such terms. Alas, it's not my idea, it's our policy and I can't change that.

Now, in case he agrees, you need to go to Commons:Email templates, copy the text in the square with gray background, enter the filename of the image and the choosen license, and send the customized permission-text to the photographer, ask him to read it, and, if he agrees, to date and sign it and to send it directly (by him) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your fast response. I will contact with the photographer again. Metuboy (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Few more violations

Please remove these also

• File:2021 10$largeimg 1224349978.jpg
• File:Punjab-planning-to-set-up-special-courts-for-nris-sukhbir-singh-badal.webp
• File:Asaduddin Owaisi with Akhtarul Iman.jpg
• File:Asaduddin Aimim.jpg

Thanks Run n Fly (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Photo Markus Ibert

Hallo bitte das Photo von https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Markus_Ibert.jpg wieder löschen. War zu schnell..

Beste Grüße Armin Pangerl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armin Pangerl (talk • contribs)

 Done. Bzgl. deiner anderen Uploads bist du dir im klaren, dass dafür die Genehmigung der jeweiligen Fotografen erforderlich ist? --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Lieber Turelio >>Ja, ich arbeite dran...>> Beste Grüße Armin

Prima. Sobald eine Genehmigung an ORTS/VRTS gegangen ist, kannst du auf das betreffende Bild folgenden Baustein (mit den Klammern) setzen: {{OTRS pending}} . --Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Sara Doorsoun-Khajeh

I'm a bit courious. You deleted this category with the cause "(incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved". I don't get it. The category was completely correct. There was absolutely no valide cause for a renaming. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Wie du als Admin selbst aus der Versionsgeschichte hättest ersehen können, wurde die Kat. von User:Gymnicus von Sara Doorsoun-Khajeh nach Sara Doorsoun unbenannt (und ein redir gesetzt), laut Edit-Summary weil letzterer der übliche Name der Person sei (den Interwikis auf die verlinkten WP-Sprachversionen und dem WikiData-Eintrag nach scheint das auch zu stimmen). User:M-B hat darauf einen SLA gesetzt, weil der redir unnötig sei. User:Johnj1995 hat den SLA-Baustein zu {{bad name|Sara Doorsoun}} (ebenfalls SLA) geändert. Ich habe letzteren ausgeführt. Dabei wird vom Skript völlig automatisch die edit-summary "(incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to ..." gesetzt. Letzteres hatte ich dir vor längerer Zeit in einem ähnlichen Fall schon einmal erläutert. Die Umbenennung müsstest du mit User:Gymnicus diskutieren. Wenn ihr euch dann auf den alten Namen einigt, wird halt alles wieder rückgängig gemacht. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Extreme speedy deletion

Hello! You should be aware that you have deleted a lot of images which were uploaded then almost immediately flagged by a bot (whose owner say "I do not delete anythig I just flag them, so people can discuss them, so you have plenty of time to say that you'll send the permission") and almost immediately deleted by you. There is about zero point zero chance for the uploader to do anything. In my specific case the images were part of uploads with VRTS permissions, hundreds of them, so it takes a definite nonzero time to process the VRTS tickets. This immediate bot flag - immediate delete - especially when the bot finds the image of a secondary publiser who published the image of th author giving permissions - doesn't help a lot of people.

Please, if it's possible slow down a little, and do not speedy delete very recent bot flagged images. (Yes, "as an admin" I am quite aware of what I am asking.) Thanks! --grin ✎ 21:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, sure. But could you provide 1 example of the affected files; as I do never delete files with open VRTS note. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

MySmallPP

Thanks for your reversions here. With only the two actions and nothing else, I suspect he is a sock. I have a meeting in five minutes, so I can't run a check now. Since he acted against me, I probably shouldn't block him, but you might.....

Thanks, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jim,

sure it's worth the effort? He had only 2 edit on January 27th and nothing since then. --Túrelio (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Eine Bitte - Aufräumen.

Hallo Túrelio wie geht es dir?

Ich habe da eine Bitte - ist auch nicht eilig.

Die Unterseiten von User:Atamari/BotGallery sind eigentlich nur temporär. Diese können bis einschließlich Dezember 2021 gelöscht werden. Die Links auf diese Seiten werden auch nicht gebraucht. Danke.

--Atamari (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Moin Atamari,

ich schau Anfang der Woche danach. Einen schönen Sonntag --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

So, erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

danke --Atamari (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Sobre Fotografía

Turelio, soy nueva editando Wikipedia tengo dudas. Con relación a la foto de Silvia Núñez, ella me cedió la foto, me puedes decir que procede.

Gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WendyAvilesR (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Multiple images with cc-by license

Hi, I would like you to help me out with this matter: earlier @Caulfield: had opened 3 deletion requests (for the following files: File:AKA 7even during an interview for Radio Bruno in 2022.png, File:Blanco during an interview for Radio Bruno in 2022.png and File:Madame during an interview for Radio Bruno in 2021.png), despite not being aware of the fact that the cc-by license was under the description of each YouTube video as stated by the uploader (Radio Bruno). Could you please solve this issue? Thanks a lot, --France3c0 (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted page

Hi! I have contributed many photos of New York City and created my user page. You deleted it for inappropriate use. I'd like to build it again and need to know what's appropriate, aka what am I allowed to have on my page.

Thank you in advance. --PortableNYCTours.com (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

the problem are not your uploads, which are well in COM:SCOPE, but the content of your userpage per COM:CSD#U3, as it was a bit like an advertisement for PortableNYCTours.com. The purpose of the userpage on Commons is to give other Commons' contributors/users some information about things relevant for your "work" on Commons, i.e. language-capabilities, thematic interests etc. But it should not advertise for things in the real world, especially not commercial ones. So, when you re-create your userpage, please leave out any company-link. Also, your account/username is a bit borderline, per Commons:Username_policy#Inappropriate_usernames. For me it's acceptable, as you have contributed; but overtime others may see this differently. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Nagy László, Csigó foto

Dear Túrelio! Thank you very much for your prompt action! Best regards, --Bizottmány (talk) 08:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Ghislain Champeaux

Hallo, kannst du bitte mit auf Ghislain Champeaux (talk · contribs) gucken? Danke, --Polarlys (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, momentan scheint sie das Hochladen gestoppt zu haben. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Claremont-logo-CMYK-VECTOR-lion+torch-point.png

Hi Túrelio. Is File:Claremont-logo-CMYK-VECTOR-lion+torch-point.png the same as File:CFC-Lion-+-torch-logo.png, which you deleted on February 1, 2022? The same person uploaded both files. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Deleted. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your deletion of Government video.

Hi there! I've just seen that you deleted File:Welsh Devolved Taxes - a Welsh Government video - released 27 Mar 2017.webm stating COM:CSD#G7. It was not my own work, as I noted with link to the Welsh Government's website; it's the Welsh Government's work, and they authorised OGL and CCBYSA on their YouTube videos. Can you explain therefore why you say that they (WG), being the 'Original author or uploader requests deletion' of this video. Did they? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Llywelyn2000,

with your own edit on March 5, 2021 11:00 you had added {{Delete|Self}} to this file. Around 5 hours later, another user converted your deletion-tag into the proper G7-tag (G7 is also valid if you are only the uploader). Further 4 hours later, I then acted on that G7-tag as it was plausible (deletion-request on day of upload). --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Declined CSD on File:Mazen Abbas - CFI.jpg

• File:Mazen Abbas - CFI.jpg

You declined the CSD because, in part, the image has a ticket affirming its status. Of course CFI released it, it's full of metadata keywords which are pure spam...

Extended content

about foreign exchange air canada stock airbnb stock all commodities amc stock AMMAN apple inc apple stock apple stock price asx award winning global financial markets provider axis bank share bank etf bb stock Beirut best apps for traders best broker best broker for trading best brokerage best dividend etf best etf best etf tech best forex broker best forex signals best investment platform for beginners best online brokerage best online cfd trading platform best online forex brokers best online forex trading platform best online stock trader best sp500 etfs best stock broker best stock cfd broker best stock trader app best stock trading apps for beginners best stocks to buy best stocks to invest in best trading app best trading platform best trading platform for beginners best trading platform for stocks best website for forex trading binance biotech etf bond etf brent crude oil trading brokerage trading brokers in jordan BRT buy aapl buy amazon stock buy amzn buy coins buy etf buy foreign currency online buy forex online buy gold buy oil commodity buy shares buy stocks buy stocks online buy tsla buying commodities ccl stock cfd brokers cfd commodities cfd demo account cfd trader cfd trading cfd trading commodities cfd trading online cfds CFI CFI Financial Group cheapest commodities coin gold coins buy coins to buy commodities commodities analysis commodities future trading commodities prices now commodities stock commodities to invest commodities to invest in commodities today commodities trading news commodities website commodity etf commodity exchange commodity live market commodity market commodity price investing commodity prices live commodity prices today commodity rates commodity spread commodity ticker commodity trading commodity trading price commodity trading today cooper trading corn trading credit Credit Financial Invest credit forex ctrader currency trading current commodity prices dax index delta stock demo trading account different commodities disney stock dividend etf djia doge coin dow jones dow jones etf dow jones index dow jones industrial average dow jones live dow stock markets Dubai dubai stock exchange e trade forex economic calendar emerging markets etf energy etfs equity trade etf etf funds etf investing etf list etf portfolio etf stock etf trading etfs share price etfs to buy ethereum exchange traded commodities expertoption facebook stock fb stock financial etf financial invest financial trading ford stock forex forex brokers forex brokers in jordan forex demo account forex exchange forex exchange online forex funding forex jordan forex market forex news forex provider forex signals forex trading forex trading account online forex trading broker forex trading company forex trading in jordan forex trading Jordan forex trading signals free demo trading account free forex free forex signals free trading account future of the dow jones futures on commodities fx online trading fx trading ge stock globally regulated gold price now gold trading google stock growth etf healthcare etf hedging high dividend etf hikma share price home loan how to buy stocks in jordan how to start trading important commodities indices of stock market infosys share price intel stock invest invest in share invest in stocks investing commodity investing commodity live investment broker investment brokerage investment in commodity market ishares etf ita stock JORDAN jordan broker Jordan forex brokers jordan stock exchange jordan trader Larnaca live commodity lloyds share price London margin trading market of stocks metatrader 5 metatrader 5 demo metatrader 5 online microsoft stock most traded commodities mrna stock mt5 nasdaq 100 nasdaq 100 index nasdaq composite nasdaq etf nasdaq index nasdaq stocks natural gas trading new stock nio stock nio stock price nokia stock novavax stock nvidia stock oil commodity oil commodity price oil commodity stock oil trading prices online broker online currency trading online forex broker online forex trading online forex trading platform online forex trading training online fx online share broker online stock trading online stock trading websites online trading platforms pfizer stock pharma etf popular commodities real account real forex real forex brokers real forex traders registered forex brokers rolls royce share price s&p 500 s&p 500 etf s&p etf share market share market basics for beginners share price shares shares trading shiba silver trading small cap etfs sndl stock soybeans trading spce stock spdr etf spdrs spot commodity prices spy etf stock booker stock broker stock brokers in jordan stock futures stock market commodities stock market forecast stock market stock stock market today stock market trading stock prices dow jones stock trading stock trading apps stock trading online forex stock trading platforms stocks stocks in jordan stocks in the dow jones stocks market stocks on dow stocks to buy stocks trading stocks trading app technology etf tesla stock tesla stock price the best cfd trading platform the dow jones companies the stock market top etfs top trading strategies forex trade forex trade fund trade options online trade stocks trade stocks online traded products trading trading app trading central trading in jordan trading oil trading shares trading signals trading stocks for beginners tsla stock price uber stock us commodity us commodity live us commodity market us commodity market live us commodity market live price us commodity prices us market commodity live us oil price live us oil prices today walmart stock what is market capitalisation WTI Crude Oil price wti crude oil trading xrp ripple zoom stock

Also includes their contact info

dubai@cfifinancial.com

https://cfifinancial.com

Credit Financier Invest (DIFC) LTD F003933 N701, Emirates Financial Towers, 800 CFI Group

DUBAI, , 416217 UAE

+971 4 770 6717 +971 4 770 6683

Is commons abandoning the WMF's policy of not accepting advertising? Cabayi (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

You omitted "as it's in use". If an image (not copyvio) is in use on a project, we don't delete it. It's their decision. Apart from that, metadata-content can easily be censored or completely removed. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for deleting my page and with it my image, I'm new and I still don't know how things work Bcn44 (talk) 10:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

File:OGN_Jan_1985.jpg

Hi Turelio,

I am the editor of the magazine, whose wikpedia I just created. You have flagged an image for copyright violation. May I know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawrane (talk • contribs) 14:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hawrane,

how should I know that? You sourced that image to www.ognnews.com and the site is under "all rights reserved". Apart from that, are you really sure you have obtained from the photographers of the 2 photos on that coverpage the permission to release their work under free license, which allow any kind of use? That is not the same as a permission to print it on a magazine page, as the magazine is not under a free license. That's a question for your legal department. If they come to the conclusion that yes, then your magazine resp. the legal department of your magazine needs to issue a formal permission for said coverpage-image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for helping me, it is the first time I upload a photograph on my computer, and it was a bit difficult for me how to do it. Thank you for your help. Joaquín Guardado (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Volkswagen Phaeton 2002.jpg

Hi . Would you mind taking a taking a look at File:Volkswagen Phaeton 2002.jpg? You already deleted it once, but it's been reuploaded by the same person, only this time a license has (sort of been added). The license, however, appear to only allow non-commercial re-use which might make it eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F5. There appears to be a disagreement over the image being discussed at en:User talk:Chaheel Riens#Volkswagen Phaeton main photo. I think this might just be a misunderstanding of c:COM:L by the uploader, but they seem to think the the file is OK for Commons simply because it's being used on other websites. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Image already deleted by my colleague Magog the Ogre. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that. Thanks again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Review request

It would be helpful if you can review the file File:Signature of actor Ayan.png as its unsuitable to be remain in commons. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Claremont Fan Court School logo 2022.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Claremont Fan Court School logo 2022.jpg? I'm not sure why this person keeps uploading this logo even after being advised by you not to do so. They also uploaded File:Claremont Fan Court School Sir Sydney Camm Building.jpg and File:Claremont Fan Court School Mansion.jpg as well. The first one seems OK and the second one is probably OK (but might need VRT verification). Based on the two photos uploaded, it's possible that this is a student, teacher or someone else connected to the school and just thinks they have permission to upload the schools crest/logo. However, such a person should have no problem understanding the notifications and other stuff posted on their user talk page, though, since the school is in the UK. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi :@Túrelio: I'm new relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so I'm not sure the exact protocol for this? Regarding the images for Claremont Fan Court School, I'm just speaking up because of the 7 day notice on images such as the Claremont mansion image. Is there any way I can go through the correct process for those images? I don't really have any connection with the school or that person who uploads the files. I'm hoping that the person who uploaded the pictures can go through the correct procedures. My interest is just to have an image or two on the page and I love history.......1.Could I try reaching out to this person within the 7 days? 2.If I could reach out and do research on this to find the correct clearance would that be all right, even if it would take more than 7 days? 3.Or would it be best to just try to find other images altogether, on my own? Thanks Archivingperson (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Archivingperson,

File:Claremont Fan Court School Mansion.jpg was uploaded by User:Alexthegreat334 and claimed as own work, which is rather unlikely as this and other of his uploads have been found on the internet. So, he likely just copied it. You might try to contact him about the problem and ask him if my suspicion is true or where he found the image. I assume that the school has the copyright. So, it would make sense to contact them, explain that you want to illustrate the Wikipedia-article about the school and are looking for a suitable image, which needs to released under a free license, as the one that is currently mentioned on the image. So, a permission "just for Wikipedia" is not acceptable. If they agree to release either the current image or another image, for which they have the copyright, then ask them to send the confirmation by email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Kit body kor20h.png

File:Kit body kor20h.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive removal of Kosovo

Hello Túrelio, hope you are doing well.

The user TómasdeAquino2 (who is probably the sock of Aquinasthomes1) is removing Kosovo from multiple maps with no reason and under the pretext of "minor fix". I have reverted most of his edits, but if the disruptive editing persists, could something be done about it? Best regards, Ahmet Q. (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, the user TómasdeAquino2 is doing it again [3]. Ahmet Q. (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Undeletion of File:Michael S. Porder.jpg

I noticed you deleted this image on 19 Feb 2022 due to its description: "Photograph of Michael S. Porder. New York City, 1978. Taken by Jerry Soalt".

However, Jerry Soalt was a close friend of Porder, not a professional photographer. This photograph was provided to me by Porder's family when I requested an image for the article. It has been in their private possession for over 40 years and was given to them as a gift.

I kindly request that you undelete the image. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danclopton (talk • contribs) 14:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Danclopton,

in such cases a confirmation needs to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

I kindly request that you undelete the image. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danclopton (talk • contribs) 14:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Danclopton,

in such cases a confirmation needs to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Undeletion of Image of Professor James Dungey

I noticed you deleted this image. I simply cannot begin to understand why - if this picture violates the rules I cannot imagine that there is any picture that does not. This picture was NOT "Taken from" the Space weather journal paper cited as you say - it was placed in that paper by myself - as I am the author of that paper. This picture was sent to me on request by the photographer to allow me to use it in an open access publication and on Wikipedia under a CC-BY licence. How can that possibly violate any copyright? I kindly request that you undelete the image. Thank you. Professor Mike Lockwood FRS - author of the cited open access journal paper that contains the image. MichaelLockwood (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you have no deleted files on Commons. What file exactly are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

The Image that you removed from the James Dungey page saying it was "Taken from" a journal paper that I wrote and is published under a CC-BY licence MichaelLockwood (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The file was names File:Dungey.png and the web page history says you removed it yesterday MichaelLockwood (talk) 09:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok, Professor Lockwood. This image was uploaded by User:Heliophysics who claimed it to be his own work, despite at the same time writing "Image credit: W.J. Hughes". If User:Heliophysics isn't identical to W.J. Hughes, the "own work"-claim is wrong and the claimed self-free license is bogus. 2 days later another user found the image to be published at https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016SW001438 and tagged it as copyvio to be deleted, which I then performed. I did not remove the image from :en-Wikipedia; this is done by a bot. So far, the copyvio appeared to be well founded.

Now, per your statement the image was sent to you by said W.J. Hughes, right? In such cases, our policy requires that the copyright-owner him/herself sends a confirmation to VRTS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org), in which he/she needs to confirm that he/she is the author/photographer/copyright-owner and that he/she wants to release the image under a specified free license, which in this case was the "cc-by-sa-4.0" license. As the image is currently deleted, he/she is not strictly bound to the mentioned license, but can also choose another license compliant to COM:L. It's important to note (and notify the licensor) that a permission merely "for Wikipedia" is not accepted on Commons/Wikipedia.

After studying your above linked Space Weather paper, which is under CC-BY license, I thought about whether the paper's free license does include the said image of Prof. Dungey and would thereby be sufficient. However, as the caption to the image does not expressedly mention the license, personally I would prefer if said Jee Hughes would sent a permission ato VRTS, as mentioned above. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

I did add the CC-BY licence in my edit of the caption but it was straightway removed by someone else who started editing the page immediately. But I apologise, I had forgotten that I had passed the image file to my department colleague "Heliophysics" who to save me time originally set up the page for me to edit. I had already decided that the only solution here was that I had to write to Jeff at Boston University to get him to sign off on it - I had been hoping not to trouble him again (he is a very busy man!) as he took a lot of time and effort getting a high resolution scan of this photo made for me for the Space Weather paper. Thanks for you help. Mike MichaelLockwood (talk) 11:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok. If you can try to ask Jeff Hughes and he sends his permission to VRTS, that would be the best way. If that is impossible to achieve, I could undelete the image and put it into a (so-called) regular deletion-request, not to have it deleted again, but to give time and space for discussion and input by others, which will probably result in the image being kept (accepted). --Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Flickr file

Thanks for checking all the photos I've uploaded from Flickr and deleting the photos that can't be on WikiCommons. I didn't know about the COM:PACKAGING rule.
Ryse93 (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Not just your PoV

I declined the deletion of a redirect in line with policy, and you have then deleted it without consultation. The user should have been directed to create a new file name, not start using old filenames for files that they have used. In fact the user needs to be pointed to be given good direction as they are then also overwriting images with new images of the same subject.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

@billinghurst, what redirect are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:BMW letter combinations

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Túrelio, I know you mean well but please don't do things like this - A) It was empty at the time of CSD'ig. B) I really didn't need to see a red notification telling me you had reverted that edit. As I said I know you mean well but I can see its restoration on my watchlist, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

@Davey2010, I am sorry that you feel hurt by my revert of your >4 months-old edit. Per my edit-summary "as no longer empty" I assumed it to be clear that not the older edit was wrong, but that the circumstances have changed. --Túrelio (talk) 11:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

User:PeaceAndGood

Thank you for deleting a file uploaded by User:PeaceAndGood. All uploads appear to be copyright violations. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright checks

Hi Túrelio, this farm is back with the usual copyright violations. Your tools have proved more useful than mine in the past, so I was wondering if you might take a look? These are a larger set, this set is small and I've handled one already. There's also this account, but so far as I can see it existed just to harass me and didn't actually upload anything new. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

I've started checking and deleting. --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Need assistance with deletion requests

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Indigo_reid,_fall_2015_(19124301900).jpg

Hello, I made a deletion request for a series of images found in the link above. I provided more information on this thread, and have received support from two users. I am the model and artist of the works in these images. Their presence on Commons interfere with my personality rights: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Personality_rights. I hope you can understand and honor my request for deletion. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sema.account (talk • contribs) 16:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Sema.account, per consensus in the DR and per your wish I've deleted all images showing you. Please check if File:Indigo reid, fall 2015 (19125785399).jpg and File:Indigo reid, fall 2015 (19285855866).jpg is acceptable for you or also needs to be deleted. In addition: would it be important for you that you name is removed from the remaining images? --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Indigo reid, fall 2015 (19285855866).jpg

Vielen Dank für das Auswerten und Schließen der LD, aber diese Datei hat noch den "delete"-Aufkleber. Abgesehen davon überlege ich, ob man die behaltenen Dateien auch insgesamt umbenennen sollte. Immerhin ging es der Dame ja auch darum, den Klarnamen möglichst verschwinden zu lassen. De728631 (talk) 22:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Dame oben gefragt, ob die 2 Bilder, wo noch Spuren ihrer Haut sichtbar sind, auch weg sollen. Mal sehen. Gut Nacht. --Túrelio (talk) 23:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Poul Halberg

Hi, given the history of deleted copyright files from the user, I'm unsure how to proceed with File:Poul Halberg 2019.jpg. It features here and I suppose the uploader could theoretically be the photographer named as "Marie Schandorf" in the file description, but...? TherasTaneel (talk) 04:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi TherasTanee,

such cases should be tagged immediately after upload with "no permission", as there is no connection between claimed photographer and uploader visible. Regrettably, this didn't happen in this case, so, the uploader might no longer be around, and the image will likely be deleted. I've emailed the user via his/her :da-account. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

From DE Wiki to Commons

Hi is possible transfer this file on Commons?

• https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:CasaliniDavid.png
• https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Derbi_Vamos_G_Originalzustand.jpg
• https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Derbi_Vamos_M.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.148.94.11 (talk) 07:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

sure. However, the fact that for the 2nd and 3rd image the claimed author-name and uploader-name are not identical might result in a request for a permission, which might not be possible to obtain as the uploader is inactive since 2009. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

The names might not be identical, but there is strong online evidence that they are the same person. In fact File:Yamaha neos mittopcase.jpg had been transfered back in 2008 and identified as such Agathoclea (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Ah, great. Then you should mention this as evidence, just in case. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The impressum at https://rollerchaos.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_44.html uses the same nick as email address. At a minimum that email address of the author of the pictures can be used to confirm the copyright status. Agathoclea (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

File:ZGb Pesaḥ 2-6M.oga

Thanks for dealing with this and a couple of other speedy deletes. :-) Dovi (talk) 21:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Posters of films

@Túrelio: I urge you not to delete the posters of ब्रज भूमि and चिंतामणि सूरदास as they aren't copyright violations. They are not taken from websites but from 2 books. Still if you find them delible, kindly discuss on my talk page instead of instantly deleting them.

I might not answer you immediately because of time difference between our countries but I'll surely answer as soon as I see the message. Yours sincerely अंजना सेठ (talk) 01:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi अंजना सेठ,

as you did not link the image you are refering to, I don't know which files you are talking about. Is it File:Chintamani Surdas 1988.jpg? You sourced it to a book, but I do not see it in that book. Apart from that, the publication in a book has little relevance for us, as a poster from 1988 is surely still in copyright. Remember, copyright usually lasts til 70 years after the death of the artist/creator/photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes sir, that image only and File:Alka Nupur चलचित्र.jpg also. But is it delible? Not fit for Wikimedia Commons? It is published in that book only but that particular page is omitted from preview.अंजना सेठ (talk) 08:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The movie of the 2nd poster is from 1982. So, the poster is likely from the same year. Even if the creator of this poster had died in 1982, it would be copyrighted til end of 2042, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India#Durations. However, the copyright for such kind of works is likely with the movie production company. You might try to research whether it still exists and, in case yes, try to obtain a permission from them. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Producer of 2nd film died in 2018 and he had not produced any film since 2001 but the poster is not copyrighted. 117.225.72.99 09:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

"but the poster is not copyrighted." that is just your claim. Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Poster is published in a book and is taken from there if it had been copyright protected it would not have been published in the book.अंजना सेठ (talk) 09:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Strange logic. Possible explainations: 1) The publisher might have obtained/acquired a permission from the rightsholder. 2) The publisher might have ignored the copyright, as he deems it unlikely to be sued. --Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

It isn't sure that the poster is not copyrighted but it is not sure either that it is copyrighted. So, there should be benefit of doubt. Can you find exactly the same poster anywhere else, if not than it shouldn't be deleted.अंजना सेठ (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Comment I deleted 2 recent posters (from the 1980s) which are obviously under a copyright. @अंजना सेठ: Copyright is automatic when a work is published (which is obviously the case of a poster). Regards, Yann (talk) 09:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Yann: Kindly undo the deletion give me time to provide permission.अंजना सेठ (talk) 09:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

अंजना सेठ, it works not that way. Feel free to obtain a valid permission. Then we can talk about undeletion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

I thank you sir for your cooperation. I am discussing that on User:Yann's talk page. अंजना सेठ (talk) 10:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

File:GAVRILINA.jpg

hello, please explain why you deleted my license file? There is still a free license there --JessePinkman (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok. It's so well hidden that even an admin-colleague was mislead. Undeleted now. --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Dideye Dito

I for one, just discovered this whole wikimedia stuff, and i dont like the notifications. More importantly to me though is the fact you removed my comic. Long story short, i litterally made the comic, let alone that, the site you linked as the copyright owner is mine, which if you noticed, hasn't been updated in years and doesn't even have the specific image you removed. Let alone all that, i never paid for a copyright or anything. ChiserYT (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

well, your first upload was already 10 months ago. Not sure what you mean by "notifications". If you receive an email when something is added to your talkpage, you can change that in the settings for your account. If you refer to the messages on your talkpage, they give you the opportunity to act and try to solve the problem about which you were notified.

WRT "you removed my comic": as you didn't specify the file(s) you are talking about, I can only assume that you meant File:Dideye Dito- Dome.jpg. When a patroler judges a file/image to be possibly a copyvio and an admin thereafter judges this suspicion as probable, this usually results from more than one circumstance. In your "case" it was the external "hit" (found prepublished, though not exact), the rather low resolution and the fact that your other uploads had completely different subjects. In addition, the image contains a credit, which — though hardly legible — doesn't look to be "ChiserYT". Finally, how should anybody know that you are the owner of dideyedito.wordpress.com, which is not under a free license anyway. So, if you want that image be undeleted, I would recommend you to send either a separate permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) or to temporarily upload the image is a markedly higher resolution as a proof that you control the source-code. This temp-upload can thereafter be deleted if you don't it to remain online. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Fragwürdiges VRT-Ticket

Hallo Túrelio,

Du bist mir in der Vergangenheit als zügig und mit nachvollziehbarem Augenmaß bei Bedarf auch löschendem Admin auf Commons aufgefallen, daher wende ich mich mal an Dich. Auch deshalb, weil ich vermute, dass Du wahrscheinlich die feinen Unterschiede zwischen dem Urheberrecht des deutschen Rechtskreises und dem Copyright kennst, und weißt, welches hier Anwendung finden sollte.

Ich habe vorhin bei den VRT-Anfragen eine solche gestellt, und ehrlich gesagt, die Sache irritiert mich einfach ein bisschen. Es ist mir in letzter Zeit häufiger schon aufgefallen, dass Bilder ein VRT-Ticket haben, wo man sich eigentlich nur fragt: Wie kann das sein? Hat da jemand nicht genau hingeguckt? Oder ist es dieser Unterschied zwischen Urheberrecht und Copyright, der da querschießt? Es kann doch nicht angehen, dass ein VRT-Ticket ausgestellt wird für Bilder, wo die Annahme eines Selfies unglaubliche Verrenkungen erfordern würde. Oder dass ein Bild, das der Optik nach vermutlich ein Scan (derivative work) von irgendwoher ist, einem Urheber zugeordnet wird, der überhaupt erst vier Jahre nach Aufnahme geboren wurde.

Wenn's das erste Mal gewesen wäre, hätte ich ja nichts gesagt. Aber ich beobachte das jetzt schon länger, dass ich einfach den Eindruck habe, diese Tickets werden manchmal einfach mit der Gießkanne verteilt, ohne dass irgendjemand sich die Mühe gemacht hätte, genau hinzugucken. Hier z.B. war ein etwas anders gelagerter, aber doch vergleichbarer Fall, der mit einer unbedeutenden Änderung und anscheinend ohne richtiges Lesen meines Beitrags abgebügelt wurde. Dass im Internet das Bild mit dem Namen eines völlig anderen Fotografen zu finden ist, scheint überhaupt keine Rolle zu spielen. Ich versteh's nicht.

Ratlose Grüße, --91.34.44.212 12:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo 91.34.44.212,

ich bin kein VRTS/ORTSler, weshalb es mir etwas schwer fällt, mich hierzu sinnvoll zu äussern. Du kannst grundsätzlich davon ausgehen, dass die Freiwilligen/Ehrenamtler in dieser Benutzergruppe sorgfältig arbeiten. Es dürfte sich dabei natürlich nicht um Juristen handeln, andererseits kann man mit der Zeit auch einiges an Erfahrung gewinnen. Aber, ähnlich wie mir als Admin manchmal auch Fehler unterlaufen, weil ich doch nicht so genau hingeschaut habe, sondern mich vielleicht auf den Anschein verlassen habe, könnte das natürlich auch den VRTS/ORTS-Kollegen mal passieren. Insofern ist es völlig richtig, dass du Ungereimheiten, die dir auffallen, nachgehst bzw. sie auf Commons:VRTN zur Sprache bringst.

Bei File:Otto A. Friedrich.jpeg ist natürlich klar, dass der 1954 geborene Andreas W Friedrich nicht "ca. 1950" dieses Foto geschossen haben kann. Möglicherweise hat er aber das Nutzungsrecht geerbt und kann somit die Genehmigung erteilen. Andererseits wäre es aber enzyklopädischer, wenn der tatsächliche Fotograf genannt würde (sofern er nicht ausdrücklich darauf verzichtet hat). Da es aber ohnehin zu wenige Leute gibt, die diese Arbeit (VRTS) übernehmen, verzichtet man dann vielleicht darauf, nicht zwingend nötige Angaben noch zu erfragen. Das gilt analog für File:Andreas W Friedrich, Keule, 2014.JPG, wo der Abgebildete eher nicht der Fotograf sein dürfte, aber von diesem möglicherweise das Nutzungsrecht erhalten hat. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Danke Dir für Deine ausführliche Antwort. Letzteres wäre dann wohl so ein Fall, der nach meinem Verständnis per Urheberrecht nicht möglich wäre. Greift denn in dem Fall nicht das Recht des Landes, wo das Foto gemacht wurde? Es kann doch nicht sein, dass das Urheberrecht sich in Copyright verwandelt, sobald eine Ländergrenze überschritten wird - ?

Wegen des anderen Falls habe ich nochmal bei dem VRT-Mitarbeiter selbst nachgefragt. Interessiert mich ja nun doch nochmal. --91.34.44.212 14:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Paclitaxel (Taxol).png

I hope you delete the photo as soon as possible, although you have opened a request to delete the photo, no one has voted to delete it but me. To avoid wasting time, I hope you can delete it as soon as possible. Love and cherish. Năm nay lại^{⁂ cô đơn ⁂} 03:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Done by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Atzelberg (File:Atzelberg-Entwurf.jpg)

Guten Tag, mir ist völlig unklar, wieso die Datei "Atzelberg-Entwurf.jpg" ohne jegliche Diskussion so schnell gelöscht wurde. ich hatte mitgeteilt, den Entwurfsverfasser, der ja benannt war, bereits angeschrieben zu haben. Man hätte doch wirklich noch etwas warten können. Gleichwohl: Frohen Sonntag --Friedo (talk) 08:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo FkMohr,

tut mir leid, das habe ich wohl übersehen. Wenn du für den Genehmigungsprozess das Bild online brauchst, kann ich es wiederherstellen. Ansonsten gib mir Bescheid, sobald du ein positives Signal vom Rechteinhaber erhalten hast, dann kann ich es OTRS-pending markieren. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Danke für Dein Verständnis. Ich habe das Bild noch hier, auch eine Version mit der Beschreibung darunter. Ich warte nun ab, was Herr Schreiber antwortet. Friedo (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

@FkMohr: Ich hatte mich auch schon gewundert, weshalb du das Bild so einfach hochgeladen hast. Du musst dir die Genehmigung vorher holen und es muss bei solchen Bildern ausdrücklich erwähnt werden, dass sie vorliegt. Falls der Rechteinhaber etwas dagegen hat, sind wir auf der sicheren Seite, wenn solche Bilder erstmal schnellgelöscht werden, da sich reguläre LDs oft lange hinziehen und der Ärger entsprechend groß werden könnte, wenn ein "geklautes Bild" zu lange online ist. Wenn eins meiner Bilder von außerhalb hier hochgeladen würde ohne mich zu fragen, wäre ich auch nicht begeistert auch wenn mein Name als Urheber genannt würde. --Milseburg (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Dank für den Hinweis. Friedo (talk) 10:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

画像を除去する際の作法について（お願い）

30px|画像を除去する際の作法について。 こんにちは、Túrelioさん。ウィキペディア日本語版の編集にご参加くださいましてありがとうございます。ただ、私がアップロードされた画像を何の説明もなく除去するのは、どうかご遠慮頂けませんでしょうか？もしあなたが苦労してアップロードされた画像を、他の利用者にいきなり除去されたとしたらどう感じるか、どうかご想像ください。

• ウィキペディアで活動する際にはガイドブックが参考になると思います。もしまだなら、是非ご一読ください。
• 各ページにはTalkページが付属しています。ページを編集する前に、そのページのTalkページに必ず目を通してください。疑問点があれば、Talkページで質問してください。
• その画像を本当に除去しなければならないかどうか、中立的な観点から、もう一度お考えください。
• 少なくとも、除去する理由を「編集内容の要約」欄には必ず記入してください。
• できれば不適切な画像を単に除去するのではなく、Talkページに移し、あなたが不適切と考える理由をTalkページで説明するようにしてください。

基本的な決まりとエチケットを守って参加なさる限り、あなたの投稿・編集は歓迎されます。では、今後ともどうぞ宜しくお願い致します。--コンテナ好き (talk) 09:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I don't speak Japanese and you did no specify what image(s) you are talking about. Assuming it might be File:DAIICHImukeisikiisu.jpg: image was sourced to https://tanabejimukiki.co.jp which is not under a free license. In case you had obtained individual permission from the rightsholder, you should have tagged it accordingly (ORTS/VRTS).--Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

MIchael Caruso Musician photo

Profile picture has been there for years. Was uploaded by Fragments owned by Luani Kologi who was the photographer. it was her own work. Please replace photo on his wikipedia page. thank you. Paulhus15 (talk) 15:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Assuming you are talking about File:Michael Anthony Caruso.jpg. As there seems to be need for clarification (per User talk:Fragmentsforart), I will undelete it and put into into a DR to provide a single place for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Do not delete photo

Do not delete photo Mahiro220319.jpg by the reason of copyright violation. Wikipedia user "Montblanc" and Twitter user "extremeparty" are the same person(it's both me). I have checked in "This is my photo" checkbox and it's true. 58.159.48.240 21:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Bride Throwing Fan

I'm discussing this on Arlo Barnes's talk page about naming the title of the "Bride Throwing Fan" category. I don't understand why you delete it.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, it was empty and had been C2-tagged, clearly speedy-material. It can easily be re-created if necessary. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Do not delete my image

My image remove from wikimedia.org could you please guide me . It belong to clothing category. Url for the one I was messaging https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Printed_Shirts.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 49.207.195.178 (talk) 08:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, as you had been notified on your talkpage User talk:Uathayam, this image is clearly an advertisement and thereby not in the COM:SCOPE of Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

It clearly doesnot promote or shows anything to promote or not ad still removed pls check it. 49.207.195.178 09:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi turelio, it was not and ad or promotional things u got completely mistaken. Pls check again and do the needful 49.207.195.178 07:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, per my judgement this image is clearly promotional material. Please request restoration at COM:UR. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Collins Pro Line Fusion.jpg - deleted

Hi,

This picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Collins_Pro_Line_Fusion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 was taken originally by me on behalf of Atlas/Augsburg Air Service to contribute to a) their website (King Air Description) and b) Wikipedia (King Air article (German) for common understanding. From what I can see it was removed. I would like to see it back if any possible. I have sent the written permission for this and other images to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Kind regards, Andreas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Universe59 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas,

wenn du eine Genehmigung an OTRS geschickt hast, müsstest du eine sog. Ticket-Nr. erhalten haben. Poste sie hier bitte (ist nicht geheim), dann kann ich mich darauf beziehen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Bilder von User:Cooleyray [4]

Guten Abend Túrelio,
könntest Du bitte die Bilder von User:Cooleyray überprüfen.
Zum copyright kann ich nichts sagen, aber ich vermute, dass es sich bei den Bildern und deren Einsatz in erster Line um spam handelt, die zu Verkaufsseiten verlinkt.
Dank für Deine Mühe und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Orchi,

hab sie mal gecheckt; ein Teil könnte doch auch copyvio sein, falls er nicht selbst hinter der verlinkten Website steckt. Warten wir mal seine Rückmeldung ab. --Túrelio (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

….vielen Dank. Orchi (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ukraine solidarity protest Hannover 2022-03-13

Bitte aufhören, dieses Kat. zu löschen. Da war eine Friedensdemo und eine Illumination. --AxelHH (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe sie nur 1x gelöscht und natürlich weil sie leer war. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Foto

Visto le numerose foto rimosse, non metterò più foto che trovo su facebook (che sono foto libere di essere prese perchè ho sempre chiesto il permesso all'autore). Alberto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk • contribs)

Translated: Given the numerous photos removed, I will not post more photos that I find on facebook (which are photos free to be taken because I have always asked the author for permission). Alberto. VScode fanboy (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Recently deleted photograph of a museum

I am sorry for the action I did, I didn't notice the (C) symbol. I only noticed the part All rights reserved and only checked the part below the images only, I didn't check the footer of the website properly

Thank you for removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VScode fanboy (talk • contribs) 14:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia really does a good job with post-vetting new uploads.

Now that I said that out loud it sound like I did a test, no, I didn't. I just got into thinking that it was only All rights reserved plus there was no year in the copyright notice. VScode fanboy (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you are talking about File:Ratnapura National Museum.jpg, right? Commons accepts only uploads that are either so old (author died >70 years ago) that they are in the public domain, or that have been released by the author/creator under a free license, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA (for more see COM:L). As of today, everything which shows a minimum of creativity, is copyrighted. Actually, it is not necessary that there is a (C) sign. We require positive evidence for being under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Help to delete my own files Please!

Hello sir, could you help me to delete the files that I uploaded? I'm going to let the respective links ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Documento_de_identidad_colombiano_-_2020_(anverso).jpg ) and ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Documento_de_identidad_colombiano_-_2020_(reverso).jpg ), thank you so much, I really appreciate it!!! RossiLeone (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done now. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:DEM logotipo(2007).png

hello @Túrelio: on Commons:Deletion requests/File:DEM logotipo(2007).png you suggested the exclusion of a file called File:Logo do Democratas Até 2018.png authored by user João Vitor Bachini. However unlike the other files on that discussion on this file’s description the user explained how he digitally made that file from scratch himself based upon the original file in order to provide copyright free material to wikipedia (which is legal). I understand that it was written in portuguese which might not be your native language but you could have investigated the file more thoroughly before nominating it for deletion. Could you revert that action please? Thank you Przelijpdahl (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, File:Logo do Democratas até 2018.png wasn't deleted by me, but by my colleague User:Ellywa. You might contact her. --Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

ok thanks, but please pay more attention next time. This wrongful exclusion caused some damage on a few wikipedia articles. Przelijpdahl (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Photo's speedily deleted due to Copyright

Hello Túrelio,

You flagged 3 of my photo's for Speedy deletion today as there was a copyright in the metadata that doesn't fully tie up to my user name.

I've re uploaded the photo's after removing the copyright from the metadata as they are all my photo's that I took myself.

Is this acceptable or is there a better way?

Many thanks Tom Mrtgpx (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mrtgpx,

no, re-uploading is not the proper procedure (and even might you get blocked). Deletion on Commons/Wikipedia does not really mean that the data are gone, they are just hidden. It takes an admin 2 clicks to undelete. Now, in such cases it is necessary, if you are really the photographer Tom Green, that you confirm towards OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) that you are the photographer Tom Green and that you want to release these images under the choosen free license. Your email will not made public and can be accessed only by the close usergroup of OTRS-volunteers. One volunteer will check your permission and put a "ticket" (an o.k.) on the affected images. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Undelete request

Please consider undeleting Category:Mikoyan aircraft by country of service, and moving it back to its old title, Category:Mikoyan-Gurevich aircraft by country of service. It is no longer empty. Thanks. --R'n'B (talk) 20:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your deletion logs! Kadı Message 13:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Help to rename the dile that I update.

Hello dear Turelio, could you help to rename the dile that I update with a wrong name? This file) but could you change the name to "Nederlandse identiteitskaart 2021-II (Rug)" I really appreciate it!!! RossiLeone (talk) 23:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Borsigallee

Hallo Túrelio, warum hast du meine Verschiebung der Category:Borsigallee (Frankfurt am Main) nach Category:Borsigallee retuniert? Ich hatte festgestellt, dass es keine zweite Borsigallee gibt und daher der Zusatz (Frankfurt am Main) überflüssig ist! --dontworry (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Dontworry,

GeorgDerReisende hatte folgenden Baustein {{bad name|Borsigallee (Frankfurt am Main)}} eingesetzt, den ich dann ausgeführt habe, weil er auf den ersten Blick angemessen schien, da wir bei Straßen-Cats ja normalerweise den Ort in den Namen einfügen. Ich bin diesbzgl. aber kein stakeholder, d.h., wenn ihr euch andersherum einigen könnt, können wir das gerne revertieren. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

G7

Why I want to delete many photos is my problem. What do you understand by author? (G7). --GNC1808 (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

1) Not really. When uploading them, you released them under a specific CC license, which cannot be revoked. 2) Not sure why you ask that. As you mention G7, I will cite the G7-criteria: "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content.". --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete a file

Hello, can you please delete this page Ahmed Alhemyari because It is empty and It doesn't contain any images or files. I don't know if I have used the right way to request deletion or not. Kiro Bassem (talk) 07:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I think you should also delete this image File:Ahmed Alhemyari 2020.jpg because It is personal photo by non-contributor and It has been deleted before File:AhmedAlhemyarii.jpg. Kiro Bassem (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello again, can you please delete this category Category:Ahmed Alhemyari because It is empty as you will see. Kiro Bassem (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Cat deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey, I think this image File:Mirette.jpg2021.jpg is a copyright violation and It should be deleted along with all the images uploaded by this user LilianGeorge1989 not only because It is a copyright violation but It is also a cross-wiki promotion and has been deleted several times, see for example File:Mirette.jpg. Kiro Bassem (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, problem is that this image is currently in use on at least 2 projects. Also, the deletion of File:Mirette.jpg looks a bit out of process to me, as a permission at ORTS was pending. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, can you please delete File:Ahmed Alhemyari 2020.jpg because It is personal photo by non-contributor and It has been deleted before by you as you can see in the discussion above. Kiro Bassem (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

suppression photo Nedjma

Bonjour

Vous avez supprimé la photo de la couverture du roman Nedjma dans l'édition du Point de 1996. C'est un cliché que j'ai réalisé à partir de l'ouvrage que j'ai dans ma bibliothèque, il est utilisé à des fins diverses une multitude de fois sur diverses publications internet. J'ai déjà eu recours a ce type de publication, sur Wikipédia sans difficultés apparentes. Bref je ne comprends pas Pourriez vous me donner les références précises des textes qui interdisent de placer une photo de ce type dans un article Wikipedia; Merci de votre retour--Kantatis2 (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

as my french is rusty, I reply in english. File:Nedjma - Le Point.jpg. is a photo of a book-cover, which is clearly above threshold of originality. Thereby the book-cover artwork is considered to be copyrighted. If you know who created the artwork, you might ask him/her for permission. In case the creator of the artwork is already dead since >70 years, the image could be undeleted. Some wikipedias allow fair-use material, which might explain the experienced tolerance, but Commons does not. --Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

This?

Hi, please can you delete the two earlier versions of this image. Since both the images contain Wikimedia housemark logo, and the WMF Legal didn't allow using it unless the group signed an agreement. That said, the earlier revisions contain parts that are copyrighted, and thus should be revdel-ed. Regards, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 15:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks mate. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 19:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Help to DEL TE MY OWN FILE

Hello!, could you help to del te the dile that I created, I just want to delete properly, I really appreciate it! (this one) RossiLeone (talk) 01:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Next time you can simply tag it with G7-speedy, provided it was uploaded <8 days ago and is unused. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Help request.

Hello, can you delete my user page? Because i want to mirror it from metawiki. Thanks. Veracious (talk) 04:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello you can fix a link from english wikipedia to spanish wiki

Hello you can help me to connect a file from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junta_Transnacional_de_Rankings_de_Boxeo to english file? The file it's this and I hac¡ve a problem when I translated it Logo of TBRB.jpg --Jprietf (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

You still do NOT read what I told you already. en:File:Logo_of_TBRB.jpg is a copyrighted unfree image, which is allowed on :en under fair-use clause, not on Commons and likely not on :es. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Picture of Dani Martinez

Please, do not delete the picture. I am his community manager and we want to have that picture.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huhtiku (talk • contribs) 10:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

No idea what a "community manager" is and why this should be relevant to copyright. The image, which you claimed as own work, was found prepublished on Facebook, where is was sourced to Instagram. No evidence for a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Uploading a photograph from reddit

Hi, sorry to bother you, would you be able to take a look at this discussion about this photograph, the licence of which is granted from the author, yet was uploaded on reddit? BouncyCactus (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

 commented at DR. If you want to be really sure, contact User:Clindberg. However, the DR now needs to be closed/decided by someone other than me. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

 Thank you. :) ---- BouncyCactus (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

On this matter, I talked to the photographer, who uploaded the image under the CC-BY-4.0 license on his website. I updated the file page and I would say the deletion request can now be closed even without further input, if you agree. ---- BouncyCactus (talk) 12:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

DR closed by colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Cremona in Italy.svg vs. Cremona in Italy (2018).svg

Nahmd! Wir haben in Category:SVG locator maps of provinces in Italy (location map scheme) jetzt von jeder italienischer Provinz eine Karte vom Vor-2018-Zustand und eine vom Nach-2018-Zustand. Außer von Cremona, denn da meinte GrandEscogriffe etwas drüberladen zu müssen. Das finde ich nicht sonderlich sinnvoll. Viele Grüße, NNW 19:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi NNW,

ok. Ich kann die dupe-gelöschte Datei wieder herstellen. Dann revertiere du bitte File:Cremona in Italy.svg auf die Originalfassung. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Danke! NNW 19:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I answered on NNW's talk page. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Ukraine photos

full information about this technique that I deleted is a violation of Ukrainian law! Alex long (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

But your photos are from 2020. So, it has nothing to do with the current war-situation. Are you in danger of being identified? --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

this was done in a military unit, therefore this information is confidential Alex long (talk) 10:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Ok. So, the problem is mainly with the description, right? Is any of these images completely "illegal"? --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the description and coordinates of this object are completely illegal.

The photos themselves under military law in Ukraine are also undesirable. Alex long (talk) 11:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Ok. As I would like to consult with a few colleagues first, I entitle you to "correct" the description of those images, in which the description is the main problem. In addition, please list here those images which carry coordinates in their metadata (EXIF). I will then remove it from the metadata or the metadata alltogether. If there is an image, which absolutely must go away (under current military law), list this also here. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Danke!

deleted page File:TemporaireDePagePourAideSVP.png (CSD G7 (author... --  Alain  R 3 4 5 
^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 16:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

About MEHITS logo

Hello,

I'm I was wrong so you have deleted the logo of MEHITS. I know there is a correct way to add logos and please describe me where I was wrong or that the correct way to insert a logo.

--Pivari (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. Apart from very simple text-logos, which are not copyrightable, you need to obtain a permission from the author or rightsholder of the logo, which might not be easy, as our policy requires that the license also needs to allow commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of Links to Non-existant Paraguay Stamp Images

I have been updating the Wikipedia page titled "List of people on the postage stamps of Paraguay" to bring it up-to-date.

I first created the list on Sept. 14, 2013 with names, notabilities and dates. There were some updates by other editors until 2019. On Feb. 4, 2019, a user named Rjmunro modified every entry in the list to include links to Wikipedia Commons, presumably to add pictures of every stamp with a person's image on it. As well all of the Commons pages were created. However, in the succeeding 3 years, there were no images uploaded to populate these pages. On March 8, 2022, you went through all of the Commons pages and deleted them since they were empty.

My question to you is this. Do you believe that I would be justified in deleting all of the links in the Paraguay page to the Commons pages? I feel that these links are now broken and unlikely to ever be populated with images.

Looking forward to hearing from you Bill Blampied (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bill Blampied, if I understand you correctly, your question relates to edits on Wikipedia. As admin on Commons I have no specific authority or expertise for that. Anyway, per Commons:Stamps#Paraguay stamps from Paraguay are copyrighted as other works, so no images of stamps from the recent decades are to be expected, except they would be below threshold of originality. Therefore, to me it seems to be safe to delete these useless links from Wikipedia to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Review of photo

You might like to review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Transfer_of_civilians_from_Irpin_to_Kyiv_due_to_Russian_attacks.jpg . I suspect it may have the same issue |this photo had. Ilenart626 (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Historical works nominated for deletion

Hi, @Túrelio. 5 pictures I uploaded were nominated for deletion, out of which 2 have been deleted by you. The other 3 are historical paintings as you can see from the source link, they are 1-2 centuries old. Can there be any reason that despite being such old works, they may not fall into public domain?

Also, the 2 images which have been deleted belonging to Thakur Kesari Singh Barhath and Thakur Zorawar Singh Barhath, are also both at least 100 years old. They were captured in 1910s. And on the charans.org website, if they had Creative Commons license, they would be in public domain, right? Please enlighten me on this issue. Thanks. Krayon95 (talk) 12:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

the 3 images for which I opened a regular DR, had been tagged for speedy deletion by another editor. I've converted the speedy-request into a regular one, which gives time for discussion and input by others in order to check whether Indian copyright-law might in any way support the copyright-claim by the sources, despite the obvious PD-state of the originals.

File:Thakur Zorawar Singh Barhath.png was claimed to be from 1930 and author unknown, but "licensed" as self-CC, which is contradictory.

File:Thakur Kesari Singh Barhath.jpg, which had been deleted already 3 times by different admins, was similar to the above, though claimed from 1914.

For an image which might be in the public domain due to age, but author allegedly unknown, you cannot claim a CC license and even less a self-license. Solution: you need to make a thorough research for the author/photographer. If really no author or rightsholder can be found, you need to check for the rules for "orphan works" (no author known) in the copyright-law of India, provided the image has been originally created in India. If the image meets the rules for putting such an image into the public domain, it can be uploaded, but be put under PD license. --Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I think the 3 paintings are PD. You can see many other related historical works on Wikipedia: For ex: File:Rao Jodha.jpg

Also check the image on: Category:Rulers of Marwar

About the File:Thakur Kesari Singh Barhath.jpg being deleted 3 times (once accidently nominated for deletion by myself), its due to the improper licensing I chose while uploading. Both the images are indeed PD now. Actually, I was unable to access Wikimedia on desktop for last few months, so I used mobile Commons app where only 4 option of CC licenses were available, adding to the confusion regrading proper licensing.

So, how should I reupload these 2 deleted images? The authorship is unknown as the Barhath family don't have any record of the photographer. This is due to the 1915 seizure of the estate and property of Barhath family by the ruler of Kota State. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

As I mentioned already above, you should first study the provisions/rules in Indian copyright how to deal with "Orphaned works" and/or "unknown author"-works. After doing that you should check whether the law's condition are met for these 2 images. If yes, then take them to COM:UDR and mention there what you found out. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of a photo

Hello, can you see if the photo which is requested to be deleted here should be deleted or not. Kiro Bassem (talk) 23:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Kiro Bassem,

as this case relates to material from US-military, I would prefer it to be decided an US-based editor/admin. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio, can you please delete this category Category:Tati Quebra-Barraco because It is unuseful empty category, thanks. Kiro Bassem (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Suppression d'une categorie

Bonjour Túrelio, vous avez récemment supprimé la page Catégorie : [Trahim|Rachid Trahim] (CSD C2) Pouvez-vous nous donner un peu plus de détails s'il vous plaît pour mieux comprendre la raison, a ton le droit de recréer cette catégorie ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtr2022 (talk • contribs) 07:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Rtr2022,

Category:Rachid Trahim was deleted after being tagged by another editor for being empty. Of course, such a category can easily be recreated if there is content (> 1 item). --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Images Deleted Due to Copyright Violations

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Altay_FTR.jpg. This image I uploaded has been deleted due to copyright violation regulations. This image shows that the website that provided the source since 2015 has been renewed and the link to the source has disappeared. However, the image is clearly the first prototype of the Altay tank provided by Turkish defense company Otokar. Therefore, I am sure that the copyright of that image is clearly in Otokar. If the copyright owner of this image is not clear, I wonder how the image can be uploaded through due process and what license it should be provided with. Gasiseda (talk) 01:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gasiseda,

a possible way to success would be to contact the press or PR department of defense.otokar.com, explain them that you want to illustrate a Wikipedia-article about the company or about this tank, but that using a not self-made image requires that it be released by the photographer or rightsholder under a so-called free license (for details COM:L) and whether they would be willing to release a suitable image under such a license (recommend them this one CC-BY-SA 4.0[5]). --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Bronzefiguren in Wormersdorf

Hallo Túrelio, bei der Durchsicht meiner soeben hochgeladenen Dateien (Bronzefiguren in Wormersdorf) habe ich deine Ergänzungen bemerkt. Vielen Dank dafür! Mit freundlichen Grüßen,--Geyersberg (talk) 09:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. Ich hatte dir auch einen Hinweis auf deiner Disku hinterlassen bzgl. eines unnötig gelöschten Fotos. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Sorry, i didn't notice those file has VRTS-confirmed permission. I will remove tag. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

About the Miguel Hernandez monument photo

Hi! This is my first time doing one of these so i hope i’m doing it properly!

I wanted to answer the question you left in the copyright strike of the photo of the Miguel Hernandez monument, about if the picture is my own work

Yes, yes it is

The article you linked is mine. I’m a university student and my Multimedia Journalism teacher runs the site the article is in.

My teacher is also a Wikipedia mod and for every article we publish she asks us to take a photo ourselves and upload it to Wikimedia Commons, so every featured photo on every article on the site mediomultimedia.es is most likely hosted on Wikimedia, uploaded by the students

But i understand where the confusion stems from, and if you need any proof i can upload a few more photos of the monument i took that day, or I can get my teacher to back me up

Anyway, i hope we can clear up this misunderstanding as easily as posible! Best regards 88.4.165.181 09:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

it would have helped if you had commented while being logged-in or had cited the affected file. Anyway, I've re-checked File:Monumento a Miguel Hernández en el Parque del Oeste en Madrid.png and found that the external site uses our image, not the other way round. When uploading own photographies to Commons, it's also better not to remove the camera-data (metadata, EXIF) from the file. --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I’m sorry for the inconvenience. Like i said, it was my first time doing this and i hadn’t noticed i wasn’t even logged in.

And about the metadata of the photo, i guess it probably got lost when i had to resize the image for the 1060 x 500 requirements of my teacher’s site.

I took the photo, resized it in Photoshop and exported it to a quick png, uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons and then onto the website

Still, I’m glad we could clear this up! And i’ll keep in mind to upload the original image with the metadata intact and resize it later for the website

Thank you! Aibori (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Nakagin Capsule Tower - copyright violation

Hi, The picture you've deleted for copyright violation seems to have been reuploaded. I'm not used to Commons and copyright rules so I leave it to you. Thanks, Ddjahh (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. However, the images are not identical and I wasn't yet able to find an exact source for the latter one. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Help for remove picture's old version

Good afternoon @Túrelio, I hope you'll well.

I'm writing you because some days ago I cross-wiki moved this picture (File:Papa centenario.jpg) from the Wikipedia in Italian. The original uploader (and holder) gave it a GNU Free Documentation License and a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, but there isn't permission for the picture of Pope John Paul II and there isn't also any evidence that the person who took it gave permission. After, I replaced that picture with another alvailable in Commons with a credit ok (File:Pope John Paul II smile.jpg — Gov.pl/CC Attribution 3.0 Poland) because I searched for ask the uploader if could confirm that he have authorisation form the original picture's owner but the last edition was in 2010 ([6]) and I think that it will be better modify the document for replace the picture with a free-equivalent to avoid future crops of the document for use the image, especially if it's really a copyvio. Is any possibility to remove the original from the picture's history to avoid another users could recover it and crop it for use? Or what is the best procedure for cases like this? I hope you can help me with this situation. Best regards and thanks.

Trouble?

Greetings: We have a newish volunteer who seems to have a problem when I pull images out of "no source, no license & no permission", mark them something like "This seems to be old enough to keep" and nominate them for deletion. He doesn't seem to wish to understand that this is a method to save the files and he gets rude to me about what he calls my lack of understanding of copyright and Commons. Recently he's started modifying his user page to include lists of negative interactions with me and other users. On one DN, someone commented that this user has trouble with en:wiki & and perhaps others. I would like to go on record that this situation now is creepy and unwelcome. I have no idea why he's picking at me, nor why he doesn't seem to understand that admins & bureaucrats (like me and Eugene Zelenko whom he also disrespects) work really hard keeping the place tidy and that there is no reason for personal attacks as part of the process. The situation is not fun and I would appreciate some help with it. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ellin,

I'll write him tomorrow morning. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

References

Delete https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg#filehistory

Hi Turelio, sorry for disturbing, I need to delete this old picture : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg#filehistory I'm working for the tournament and we don't want to see this logo (show screenshot)

File:Capture d’écran 2022-04-28 à 11.39.33.png

please can u help me thx Stephane 28/04/2022Steph55337 (talk) 09:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Steph55337,

the old logo is not on Commons, but only on :fr-Wikipedia. So, you need to tag it for deletion on :fr (syntax might be {{Suppression Immédiate|raison de la demande}} ).

However, there is also a "problem" with the new logo File:Capture d’écran 2022-04-28 à 11.39.33.png. As it is a screenshot, you need to provide the source from which the screenshot has been taken and the source of the 2 photos/videos visible in the screenshot. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!

I was wondering why those images were disappearing so fast! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Template:Technique/eo ?

Hallo / Saluton,

du hast 2010 die Vorlage Template:Technique/eo gelöscht, weil sie noch keine Übersetzungen enthielt und die Struktur sich geändert hatte:

(It is only the default with no translation. As the code of the original template has changed significantly it is better to start from the beginning.

Seither hat sich da nichts getan. Wenn ich bereit bin, da etwas Arbeit zu investieren, wäre es dann sinnvoll, die Vorlage auf Basis der englischen Vorlage wieder anzulegen und nach und nach zu übersetzen? Ich verstehe allerdings den Parameter "order" nicht; ich hätte erwartet, dass zum Beispiel im Tschechischen ein Hinweis steht, dass "CH" zwischen "H" und "I eingeordnet wird. Aber bei allen Sprachen, die ich mir angesehen habe steht nur ABCDE. Das würde ich dann so lassen:

| case          = <!-- the prepositions "sur" and "super" are used with the nominative -->
| basic         = {{{adj|}}} {{{noun|}}}
| over          = super {{{adj|}}} {{{noun|}}}
| on            = sur {{{adj|}}} {{{noun|}}}
| mounted       = muntita{{#switch: {{{gender on|}}}|m=|f=|n=|mp=j|fp=j|np=j|#default=}} sur {{{adj|}}} {{{noun|}}}
| order         = {{conj|{{{A|}}}|{{{B|}}}|{{{C|}}}|{{{D|}}}|{{{E|}}}|lang=eo}} {{{over|}}} {{{on|}}} {{{mounted|}}}

Was meinst du? Danke im Voraus und alles Gute -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Renardo la vulpo,

mit Vorlagen bzw. deren Syntax kenne ich mich so gut wie garnicht aus. Wenn dir die gelöschte Vorlage sinnvoll erscheint und du dich daran machen möchtest, stelle ich sie gerne wieder her. Vielleicht findet sich auf COM:Forum jemand, der deine Frage beantworten kann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Danke – ich habe deine Antwort erst heute gesehen, weil du kein {{Ping}} verwendet hast. Ich versuche es mal mit der Vorlage. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 11:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Request

Hi, could you review my speadly deletion request here and take a look at the comment ? Karim185.3 (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of my category

Hi,

Could you please explain why you once again deleted my category FP by SuperJew? We have discussed this previously and I think it is quite clear I wish to keep the category, even if it is currently empty. Could you please undo the deletion? Thank you! --SuperJew (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio and @SuperJew: , please could you explain why this empty category needs to be kept? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Oops, it had been tagged by admin-colleague, whereby I assumed the deletion-message to be overriden. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Now at Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/04/Category:FP by SuperJew. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Peel, as it's a user-category and hardly any "searcher" would be surprised by it being empty, I thought it to be permissible. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Túrelio! --SuperJew (talk) 10:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of Greg2600 photos

A collection of photos uploaded to Flickr by Greg2600 were deleted because of supposed "license laundering". Could this case be reopened? The whole argument of license laundering seems more like an assumption than something that can be confirmed. Who's to say Greg didn't ask the person if he could upload them to Flickr, or a case of Greg2600 having someone to take the pictures for him on his camera/phone/etc. Wouldn't the photos belong to Greg then? These may seem like flimsy arguments, but the idea that Greg2600 was license laundering is too. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 01:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi StrangeloveFan101,

as I wasn't involved in that case (at least don't remember), it might be better to contact either the nominating oder closing admin. A general comment: wrt copyright we usually don't rely on AGF. The nominator's rationale was "Flickr account owner is a subject in these non-selfies and thus is not the author." Such cases are a judgement call. Sure, there are arguments to trust the licensing on Flickr, but there are also arguments against. Flickr-uploaders not so rarely don't know what the are doing when releasing an image under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

NPD question

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Srinda 2022.jpg? Is it that same as File:Srindaa In 2022.jpg which you deleted as a copyvio? All the photos at plumeriamovies.com/chippy-malayalam-movie-stills-and-photos/ look different; so, maybe it's not. The uploader seems to be claiming they're the actress en:Srinda over on en:WP:THQ#It’s Srinda not Srindaa regarding the article Srindaa; so, maybe they are the copyright holder of the photo. If the file is OK as licensed in your opinion, please remove the "npd" template I added. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Marchjuly, the images are totally different. For the mentioned image, neither Google-Images nor TinEye did yield any external hit, so far. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of File:여우자매 새 썸네일.jpg

I upload a picture image of a document with a clear source (a document about the Korean webtoon "여우자매"), why is this a copyright violation? Please don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 구순돌 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi, the source[7], which you provided, clearly states that this image was not released under a free license. Instead, they use it under a fair-use clause. However, fair-use material is not (and legally cannot) be hosted on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Reason for deleting an image

Hello, You have deleted the image, the logo of the Libyan Internal Security Agency, due to suspected copyright infringement.

We inform you that we have the right to use the image, and you can send a message to the official page and the official government website where the image is to make sure that we have the right to use it. The e-mail of the government entity that owns the logo: INFO@ISA.GOV.LY

We hope that before you delete anything, check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asaadele (talk • contribs)

Hi @Asaadele,

I assume you are talking about File:Isagovlylogo.svg, right? Well, you claimed it as own work; but it was found published earlier on a Facebook-site without a free license. I did not doubt that this Facebook-site has some permission to use this logo. However, there is no statement or document that it was released under a so-called free license, as is required per our policy COM:L for uploads to Commons. The "We" in your post is suggesting that you are from the "Libyan Internal Security Agency". If that is the case, then you should simply ask the legal department of your agency to send an official email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org , in which they should state 1) that they are the rights-holder of this image/logo, and 2) that they want to release the uploaded image (File:Isagovlylogo.svg) under the choosen cc-by-sa-4.0 license. After this has happened, our ORTS-volunteers will evaluate and likely confirm the permission and, as a result, the log-image can be restored. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

The government institution has

Send an email now confirming that I have permission to add and modify their image or logo.

Ticket#: 2022051210006681 Asaadele (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Photos of football players from flickr

Hello! You have submitted some photos uploaded by me for deletion, where you noted the absence of rights to use, for example, this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Davide_Calabria_2021.jpg I downloaded from the flickr site. Please tell me how I should label this photo if cc-by-sa-4.0 is not suitable? I just don't really understand the upload rules, just want to help wikipedia Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

before uploading images from Flickr to Commons, you need to check whether they are under a Commons-compatible free license (see COM:L). The above mentioned image is clearly labeled as "All rights reserved" on Flickr. In addition, when uploading images from Flickr, you should check the box "from Flickr" in the upload-process, so that the Flickr-review-bot can check the license. The latter would have saved you from the surprise of having uploaded a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. How can I save the photo data that I uploaded? Only if I ask permission from the author with flickr? And if I get this permission, how can I give it to you? Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand your question "save the photo data". Do you mean, how you could still use/upload the above mentioned unfree photo? If yes, you could contact the Flickr-user/author and ask whether he would be willing the release the image under a free license, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. If he agrees, he could simply change the license on Flickr from ARR to CC... Then you could either re-upload the image or ask me to undelete it and to let the Flickr-review-bot run. The other way would be that the Flickr-user/author sends a permission (again a specific license) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, you got it right. Sorry for my English, I'm just using a translator. Well then, I will try to contact the author. Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Adding Song Sample

Hello Admin,

I have seen many audio samples on Wiki, and wanted to upload one, which I did in the wrong way. I tried to copy/paste the codes from another sample, but I messed up. Please tell me how it's possible to do it.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Song_of_the_Twenty-Ninth_Division.wav - Like this? It says own work, but I am sure it's not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Divimusic (talk • contribs) 06:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Divimusic (talk) 06:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Divimusic,

I have little experience wrt sound-uploads. I had deleted your upload only because it was clearly tagged as fair-use, which is expressedly not allowed on Commons.

A short instruction about copyright for "sounds" is here: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Music. A more detailled one about coypright for the U.S. (which is also relevant for uploads from other countries) is here: Commons:Hirtle chart#Sound recordings.

Wrt your seemingly easy example: the copyright-situation seems to be quite unclear to me and therefore I have opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Song of the Twenty-Ninth Division.wav. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out

not sure what happened... JarrahTree (talk) 10:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Favor?

I've been beating up on this person too much. She created an overly-promotional-sounding article en:Life House, saw her (English Wikipedia) contributions were mostly on that article, so I COI'ed her. She said correctly, that she has 100k contributions to the Italian Wiki, so I struck the COI. Now I see she's been adding images as her own work, though a cursory search doesn't show others.

• File:LH Little Havana - Terras 8.jpg large images with google search
• File:NEW_SoFi_Building_Facade_View.jpg large images with google search

I would copyvio them otherwise. Would you do me a favor and decide what to do about them? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi, she has 100k contribs to WikiData, only 2.4k to :it. Anyway, reason enough to strongly assume AGF. However, the external hits for File:NEW SoFi Building Facade View.jpg are rather convincing; so, I've opened a DR. The situation with the other image is similar, but not identical, as the highest resolution found was 4000x2200, whereas she uploaded 5400x3000. --Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. The Little Havana does have metadata while SoFi does not. Google reports Momondo has a 5400x3000 for Little Havana, but the links don't display that resolution. Little Havana is three story, everything around it appears two story, the photo is from above the rooftop, so, likely a drone. google map Thanks for your time! Cheers Adakiko (talk)

Ontario Party Logo Removed

Okay what's the deal - I don't understand why the Ontario Party logo was removed. Other parties have logos derived from their website, such as the Conservative Party of Canada. Can you please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrickieDickie1 (talk • contribs)

Hi, how about reading what you were told on your talkpage? "This comes from a site that is clearly marked "© Copyright 2021 Ontario Party" and is above the threshold of originality." First you stated www.ontarioparty.ca as source, then it was your own work. If you are associated with this party, ask them for a permission (license), which would need to be send by them directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

restaure illustration after licence update

Hi Túrelio,

You deleted from Commons the illustration https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PB_pollutants_2022_update.png because the licence was not clearly precised. Since this time, A CC BY 4.0 have been added by the authors. https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html We could upload the illustration on a new file, but it seems more accurate to restore the file. Is it possible ? --Thym (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

file undeleted.--Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Danke, und Nachfrage

Moin. Ganz herzlichen Dank für die Bearbeitung meiner mehr als zahlreichen SLA-Anträge !!

Leider schwirrt noch sehr, sehr viel von diesem sinnlosen und die Bearbeitung völlig unnötig erschwerenden Kram herum. Um dich (und andere) nicht zu überlasten meine Frage: Wieviel davon kannst du denn so maximal pro Tag verkraften? Freundliche Grüße und nochmals vielen Dank. --Uli Elch (talk) 10:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Uli,

du beziehst dich auf diese Flugzeug-bezogenen cats, ja? Wenn ich die nicht lösche, macht es halt ein anderer admin-Kollege. Wenn die mal 1 Tag offen bleiben, ist es ja auch kein Drama. copyvio-SLAs haben halt höhere Prio. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die flotte und freundliche Antwort. Noch eine kleine Bitte: Wenn möglich, lasse doch dieses schöne Bild hier oben stehen. Ich kenne es nun schon so lange und empfinde eine gewisse Seelenverwandtschaft ... --Uli Elch (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Request

Regarding the deletion of File:San Martín del Castañar 05 (cropped).JPG, please note [8] :-) --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 10:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok. I wasn't aware of this "conflict". Please try to come to an agreement/consensus with Lojwe. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:20th-century American judges and others

Hey Turelio. I noticed that you deleted a few such categories. I find these redirects helpful as they allow easily to create people's categories based on the categories on en.wiki. I don't think that these redirects hurt anything, so would it be possible to leave them in place? Cheers. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I've restored this one. Before restoring others, could you eventually talk to User:Synthwave.94, who had tagged it for deletion, in order to not create a "conflict" among you two. --Túrelio (talk) 12:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

To close the loop on this, I don't believe we can find a common ground on this issue. Synthwave.94 feels that these redirects "pollute" the category tree and will continue tagging them for removal. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Thats bad. Due to the massive throughput of the speedy-queues, in some time I may have forgotten about this and inadvertently delete again. I found your rationale of correspondence with the associated cat-name on :en convincing. --Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:Unicode 2A00-2AFF Supplemental Mathematical Operators

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Other speedy deletions

Thanks for your careful handling of the speedy deletions. I checked the first 600 photographs in the Category:Other speedy deletions, and these can all be deleted (that is to say: the "Haarlemmermeer" photographs). I need to remove the speedy tag from the letter U onwards (from "Uitbreidingsplan"), so if you could give me a few more days, I will have handled these too. Vysotsky (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Sure. I cannot delete too much per day anyway, and luckily no one else seems to be joining. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:RU_COA_Shehawcow_XII-90.png

• Could you please also delete this copyrited picture, which has NOT been published before 1917 or 1927 as it is stated in the licence. It is lying. There is no proof that it has been published that time, becase it has never published, moreover it is well known that it has NOT been published till nowdays, because this picture is from one of the only NOT published book is kept in archive. This book was made not for publishing actually. 18:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

--ЩЩЩ (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi Túrelio. I mixed the codes of Wikipedia criteria with the ones here :/ All of Virgoikon's uploads should be deleted with F1. Good work :) abc 07:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Hi Túrelio, File:Hon. Mahendra Pal Chaudhry.jpg was incorrectly marked as a copyvio. It is not marked as a third-party image in the source, and Tineye returns no other uses. Joofjoof (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I've restored the image, but put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion.--Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Android Easter eggs.xcf

Hey, I'm not sure why you deleted this image. It is a lossless version of File:Android Easter eggs.jpg, and it is generally a good idea to keep these around to avoid generational loss when editing JPEGs. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi colleague, it had been speedy-tagged (by 3rd party) for "There is a reconvected version (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Android_Easter_eggs.jpg)". Formerly, this file-type was considered problematic. But that seems to have changed in between. Personally, I've never used this format. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Ro-Drobeta-Turnu Severin 2.ogg

Hi. This was already recreated. Perhaps the file can be protected from recreation, and the single-purpose account blocked. Thanks for looking into this. — Biruitorul (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Biruitorul, thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Can you revert my deleted contributions on Wikimedia? That user's requests for speedy deletion with the reason: "requested deletion for wd item" is spam. He himself requested deletion yesterday for all my contributions on Wikidata without even checking them (+30 requests in just few minutes) and now speedy deletion for a reason "requested deletion for wd item." Also, where can I report this user for his non-sense/revengeful aggressive activity against only me? Thanks. --Palaangelino (talk) 03:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Look at this! He even did request deletion for an image that reviewed by a member! What is this non-sense! I request immediate action about this user. I really fed up with all these non-sense actions about my contributions on Wikicommons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia! Sorry. He's been playing with me for 5 days now. Enough is enough. Palaangelino (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Palaangelino,

images may not be suitable for Commons for different reasons; the most important is a missing permission from the author/rightsholder; but also important is being out of scope of Commons. The above mentioned image had been tagged for the latter reason, though this was rejected and the image kept. Many of the recent deletions had the same rationale, which was found applicable by the deleting administrator (different ones). So, I would recommend you to specify which image(s) you are asking to be restored.

With regard to your objection against the user, who tagged the images: this needs to be brought up at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems (COM:AN/U). However, keep in mind 3 things: tagging images for deletion is usually not an unfriendly act directed against the uploader, but the result of an evaluation, which our recent-upload-patrolers do every day. It is also quite normal the patrolers focus on images of a certain thematic area in which they are experienced. So, before bringing up your above mentioned accusation on COM:AN/U, check unsentimentally whether there is really evidence that you are targeted. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

Hello, I hope you are fine. Actually I am in need of some help. I have uploaded some of my own videos quite some time ago. At that time, the videos were not in good quality but now I have uploaded better versions of those videos. Would you please delete my previous videos just like before??? Thank you and have a nice day.😄 অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 03:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

This is the old version of the video File:Bangladesh Navy speed boat HSB-1422.webm

This is the new version of the video with better quality File:Bangladesh Navy speed boat HSB-1422 docking.webm অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks 😊 অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 09:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

These are some of the previous videos which were already replaced by new videos. Can you please delete these videos??? 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 200px 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 09:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

These are the new version videos of those previous videos. 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 100px 200px অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi অপূর্ব রায়-২৩, the proper way would be to tag the old ones with {{duplicate|here the filename of the replacement-video}}. --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Can you please tell me how to do it?? Actually I don't really know these stuff. অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Here is the old video File:BNS Sangram (F113) of UNIFIL Maritime Task Force in Lebanon.webm

And here is the new video File:BNS Sangram (F113) Postbeutelmanöver UNIFIL FusselFred (iPhone Cinematic).webm Can you please show me how to do {{duplicate|here the filename of the replacement-video}}??? অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 10:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

But, I told you already. You have to add the above mentioned string of code to each of the files, which you want to have deleted. Of course, for each individual file you have to replace the placeholder "here the filename of the replacement-video" by the filename of the replacement-video. --

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Duplicate Can you please check this out?? You are truly a person with tolerance and kindness. Thank you for your support. অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Duplicate Hello 😊😊😊 Can you please delete these files as well?? অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 01:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I know you are busy. Can you please check outhttps://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Duplicate?? Again অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Many many thanks for having delete the files under category Category:Colors and patterns of geological formations in Dordogne (Bd Charm-50) as my request. Best regards, --Poudou99 (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. However, I don't think I'll be able to delete them all today. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I understand that this task is a bit tedious.

I thought it was possible to delete the whole category in one command rather files one by one. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done now. --Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup.--Poudou99 (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Verlage von Postkarten

Hallo Túrelio, du hast zweimal die Verlagskategorie von Postkartenverlagen verschoben.

• Category:Lederer & Popper, Prague nach Category:Lederer & Popper
• Category:Ángel Toldrá Viazo, Barcelona nach Category:Ángel Toldrá Viazo

Das ist mir gerade aufgefallen beim COM:WPPC bei der Liste Logos of postcard publishers. Bitte vorher genau schauen, ob die Kategorie irgendwo verlinkt ist und dann auch den Linkfix mit machen. Gibt es eine Regel, dass der Ortsname nicht in der Kategorie mit benannt werden darf? Wäre mir neu. Warum hast du das genau umgenannt? Bei einer Kat findest du ja auch eine Unterkategorie mit dem Stadtnamen, die hätte dann auch mit umbenannt werden sollen.

• Category:Postcards published by Lederer & Popper, Prague‎

Bei ersterer hab ich eine Cat-Weiterleitung eingebaut. Aber bevor ich weiter mache, wollte ich dich natürlich mal fragen, was deine Gründe waren. Beste Grüße --sk (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo sk,

normalerweise mache ich das nicht von mir aus, sondern führe lediglich einen von anderen Benutzern bestellten Auftrag (der Adminrechte erfordert) aus. Deshalb ist es für mich auch kein Problem, auf Wunsch die Ausgangssituation wieder herzustellen. Im Fall von cat:Ángel Toldrá Viazo, Barcelona hatte User:Adamant1 die Kat. als badname markiert. Vielleicht kannst du ihn mal ansprechen, dass ihr euch einigt bzw. er ggf. deine Gründe versteht.

Wenn ich als Benutzer vor einer Kat-Bennennung stehe, schaue ich mir (statt eine Regelseite zu suchen, wenn es sie denn gibt) erstmal an wie es de facto gehandhabt wird. Bzgl. Verlage zeigt Category:Postcards by publisher dass es offenbar munter durcheinander geht. Allerdings scheinen die cats ohne Ort zu überwiegen. Rein von der Logik her würde ich sagen, wenn es gleichnamige, aber nicht identische Verlage an verschiedenen Orten gibt, sollte die cat auch den Ort enthalten. Dasselbe würde gelten, wenn es einen Verlag an verschiedenen Standorten gibt und deren Unterscheidung für die auf Commons vorhandenen Dateien tatsächlich relevant ist. --Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Schau mal in Category:Postcard_publishers_by_name. Es geht dort wirklich wild durch einander. Unser Postkarten-Projekt läuft erst seit 2 Jahren, aber auf eine richtig Regel für die Namen der Kategorien wir uns noch nicht verständigt. IMHO ist der Name mit Ortsangabe besser, weil der vielfach auch auf den Karten mit drauf steht oder sich daraus seine Abkürzung ergibt. (Beispiel: MEB - Category:Max Blegel, Elberfeld). Zum anderen ist nicht immer klar wie die Unternehmen aussahen. Waren es Einmann-Betriebe oder Unternehmen mit mehreren Beschäftigten. Ok, ich klär das mit Adamant1. Danke für die Info. --sk (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Diamonds are Forever, So are Morals.jpg

hie why you deleted page diamonds are forever, so are morale ??? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.19.133.106 (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Next time log-in and provide full filename. The image is a photo of a cover which consists of copyrightable artwork. Even if you legally bought the book by yourself, you need a permission from the artist, who created the cover-artwork. --Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Logo

Hi

The problem is there are no permision and the logos are copyvio from official website. The logo must be deleted.--Panam2014 (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Sure. But the no-perm-template, which you had removed, is also a sure path to deletion. However, it gives the uploader (or others) the chance to provide a permission. 1 week after tagging, the file will be speedied, if no permission provided. Generally: Depending on local legislation, logos sometimes may be below threshold of originality. This may be true for File:Logo-Les-Radicaux-de-Gauche-1568x800.png. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello, I hope you are fine. Can you please help me out by deleting these two videos of me?? https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drone_footage_of_Bangladesh_Navy_warship_commissioning_ceremony.webm https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bangladesh_Force_Marine_Unit_in_South_Sudan.webm

Thank you. অপূর্ব রায়-২৩ (talk) 09:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Fiji Students Association of Wellington 1960

Mate proprietors are not the same as Photographers, the image in question was from 1960 which fulfills

• photo taken or work published prior to 1 January 1972 (50 years ago)
• Released before 1 January 1972 (50 years ago)

--Stemoc 10:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok. I've put it into a DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Images from my own oil paintings

ALL THE IMAGES contributed under my username Fenous are from my own original oil paintings , as published in my book. I am in fact the Artist Raouf Oderuth. Please do not delete my contributions as they are my own creations. Thank you with much appreciation Raouf roderuth@aol.com Fenous (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

then why didn't you use the existing account User:Oderuth or isn't that yours? And what about User:123HSBC, is that also your account? Why three accounts? --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I didn’t think it mattered. I thought my passwords would be better protected Fenous (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Can’t you have different accounts? I find the guidelines confusing and misleading. I know other individuals operate under other several usernames Fenous (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Well, obviously you don't care much about your own copyright as an artist. Reproductions of Raouf Oderuth's works were uploaded by some User:Fenous and User:123HSBC, who claimed them as own work! It just doesn't make any sense. Of course, as an artist you can choose an artist-name/alias. However, it should be the same for online as for the real world. With your current approach, reusers will credit Oderuth's works to Oderuth, Fenous or 123HSBC, depending on which account you used for upload. And yes, one can have more than one account, provided this is openly declared, which is currently not the case for the mentioned 3 accounts.

With regard to "protected passwords", if you want to better secure your user-account against hacking, you might consider to activate the so-called 2-factor-authentification, which is pretty easy, if you use a smartphone. For details see: en:Help:Two-factor authentication.

IMO, the best way to proceed properly here on Commons, would be 1) to verify (Category:Verified accounts) your main-account User:Oderuth by identifying yourself to Commons:VRT, and 2) to upload images of your own artworks only by this account. As images of your artworks are found all over the web, you will still need to confirm (template: Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Email message template for release of rights to a file) the choosen free license to COM:VRT. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, except that with a verified account, I believe that you don't need to confirm any individual licences, as long as you add the template with your verified account and the authorship or copyright ownership is clearly tied to your confirmed identity. –LPfi (talk) 06:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

@LPfi, I also thought so, but was told otherwise not long ago. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

There may be a difference between licensing your own works, and somebody being verified to be authorised to act on behalf of somebody, perhaps for a specific project, for a specific set of images, or for as long as they have a certain position. Anyway, this should be explained somewhere; it cannot be the case that somebody with a verified account uploads images trusting that verification, leaves Commons (or their position) and the files are then deleted because of lack of VRT permission for the individual files. What's the point of the verified account if it isn't trusted to act on behalf of the verified identity? –LPfi (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletions

Hello!

In september of last year I collected all TIFF, DjVU and PDF files that lacked a rendering and had dimensions 0x0 at User:Jonteemil/sandbox2 only to now find out that pretty much all have been deleted, by you. Did I or anyone else tag the files for deletion? Why were they deleted? There must have been a way with which they could've been repaired?Jonteemil (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

usually I perform speedies requested by other users; I hardly would search or tag them by myself. For example, File:CADAL06386408 意中人.djvu and File:NAJDA-185-0184 靖北録1.pdf had been tagged by User:Mitar as "File is corrupted" and then deleted by me. If you have a way to repair any of these files, I'll be glad the undelete them. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I see. @Mitar: were they not repairable? See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2022-03#Files uploaded by Ederporto were files that weren't rendered still were undeleted. Maybe this is a bigger question, should files that don't render on the wikipage be deleted when they might render on the upload.wikimedia.org page?Jonteemil (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I tested all files before marking them for deletion and they were not processed correctly by Wikimedia software nor by any of DJVU viewers I tried (on Linux). Some files I was able to fix and for those I uploaded new versions. For some I found originals which worked. But sadly for some I was unable to fix them so I marked them for deletion. If you are able to fix them, that would be awesome of course. And please tell me later what you did to do so. Mitar (talk) 22:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Example of one I managed to fix File:NAJDA-273-0121 周易古今文全書 今文巻7.pdf. Also see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T290462, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T301291 (and its duplicates). Mitar (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Request

Hi, could you please delete the previous version of our user group logo File:Deoband Community Wikimedia User Group logo.jpg. The previous versions won't be used anywhere and the new logo is released under a compatible licence. Regards, ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 14:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Just regard this as the original uploader's request. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 15:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

All 3 previous versions? --Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

yes, just keep the current one. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 15:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Rather leave it as it is now, I feel. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 15:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I hope to get on my system soon. My laptop got accidentally damaged and the LCD is completely broken. It'd take a month or more to come back. I hope to fix the remaining errors then. I'll remember you only then again. Good night! ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 19:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Oops, sorry to hear that. Good luck. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

deletion of football club logo

Hi. I just wanted to ask, why did you delete the logo of czech football club FC Viktoria Plzeň. For some reason, I couldn't add the only already existing svg identical logo from french Wikipedia to our czech site. I created new file on Wikipedia commons for that purpose and it worked perfectly. Please, tell me, why don't you give us the logo back? And if it isn't possible, couldn't you help us with putting the logo on the site?

Thank you for your attention. Rytíř Brtník z Brtníku (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Rytíř Brtník z Brtníku,

the same logo, File:FCVP official logo.svg, had been uploaded first by another user in 2020 and been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FCVP official logo.svg. You probably didn't know that. But re-uploading a once deleted image is usually a straight way to re-deletion.

Now, this logo is sourced to https://www.fcviktoria.cz/eng/zobraz.asp?t=club-logo, where it is offered for download. However, being offered for download does not automatically mean that it is under a free license, which allows all the uses that are required per our policy COM:L, i.e. re-use, including commercial, and creating derivatives of it. Also, the source-site states © FC VIKTORIA Plzeň.

As the Czech Republic has freedom-of-panorama exception, the easiest way to obtain a legal reproduction of this logo would be to find the logo somewhere permanently installed on public ground and take a photography of it; see File:LogoHerzstiftung s6777.jpg for example. The safest, but likely not easiest way would be to ask the FC Viktoria Plzeň whether they would be willing to release the logo under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your answer. However, you can also download the logo on czech version of the site, which, for whatever reason, contains more information about the usage of logo. https://fcviktoria.cz/ke-stazeni.asp It's written there, that it's free to download and use the logo. My question is - Can I use the svg format when there's only pdf and png formats to download, or am I completely wrong and still can't use any version of the logo? Rytíř Brtník z Brtníku (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

@Rytíř Brtník z Brtníku It is as mentioned by Túrelio. Victoria Plzeň provides logo to be downloaded, but does not specify whyt you can do with the logo. One think is download the logo and use it for personal purpose, the other think is to distribute it a provide it to others. So if you want to create svg out of their PNG, or just draw it by yourselv, still we need to know, undert which conditions they provide their logo and wether it is compatible with free licences which we use on Commons. The reason, why it is on French Wikipedia and not on Commons could be that French community allows certain licensing terms, the international Commons community doesnt allow. Juandev (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey Mr. Marxist Communist

Hey Mr. Marxist Communist, open your eyes and see that the color of the flag and the color of the crown are different. Of course, you, the supporters of the Republic, do not understand the crown and you love your own hammer and sickle. Do not change my user page! Long live the kingdom. Long live the crown. --Fans of Kingdom of France (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

If you do it only one more time based on your personal interest, I will sue you. I am very happy to see a communist up close in court. Long live freedom of speech. --Fans of Kingdom of France (talk) 19:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Dayana Erappa picture

Sir the photo BELONGS to Dayana Erappa, and is from a test shoot she did for a photographer friend. IT IS NOT FROM A PROFESSIONAL SHOOT FOR ANY BRAND, OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. By mutual agreement neither the photographer nor Erappa are holding copyrights on the pic. How it got on the android wallpapers page we have no clue. 223.182.97.2 05:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Alvin James Saldanha

Hi,

please log-in to your user-account before commenting and provide the filename for the affected image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

file Ahmed Sayyad

Hi, you have deleted the file Ahmed Sayyad which I am the author and it is me who provided it as I am UNESCO staff. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by SOZELY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, please sign your comments and provide the precise filename of the affected image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

So, you are likely talking about File:Ahmed Sayyad.jpg, uploaded as "own work" on June 12, 2022. The same image was found prepublished at UNESCO-Twitter on July 29, 2021 without a author-credit, which suggest it may be a UNESCO-image. As you state to be "UNESCO staff", the copyright is probably with UNESCO. So, we need a formal permission from UNESCO to be send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (ORTS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey

Thanks for reverting my changes. I wasn't sure if filing a request for deletion was the right choice. I'll do it this week. Alhen .::··¨ 11:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Urheberrecht vs. Copyright

Hallo Túrelio, ich erlaube mir mal, Dich anzuschreiben (der Einfachheit halber auf Deutsch), weil ich vermute, dass Du Dich mit den feinen Unterschieden zwischen Urheberrecht und Copyright auskennst. Denn ich habe Dich in der Vergangenheit - wo nötig - als zügigen und umsichtigen Löschenden von URV erlebt. Mein Anliegen:

Ich habe vor einigen Tagen auf dem VRT-Noticeboard eine Anfrage gestellt wg. eines Bildes, für das zwar ein VRT-Ticket vorliegt, dessen Hochladender aber ausdrücklich und ganz klar sagt, dass er nicht der Fotograf ist und bislang auch keine Genehmigung des Fotografen vorliegen hat. Da frage ich mich doch: Was um Himmels willen kann dann überhaupt in diesem Ticket bzw. in dem VRT-Schriftverkehr drinstehen?

Aus der Antwort, die ich auf meine Anfrage erhalten habe, kann ich nur schließen, dass der Antwortende vermutlich im angelsächsischen Rechtskreis eher zuhause ist und den Unterschied zwischen Copyright und Urheberrecht nicht gut kennt. Wir haben es hier immerhin mit einem Fotografen zu tun, der die Metadaten des Bildes geradezu gepflastert hat mit seinem Namen und seinen Rechtsansprüchen.

Einen ähnlichen, wenn auch nicht ganz so krassen Fall vermute ich hier. Ich habe da erstmal den Hochladenden angesprochen (auf seiner deutschsprachigen WP-Seite) und warte mal ab, ob er sich meldet.

Danke & Gruß, --217.239.2.67 12:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo 217.239.2.67,

also bei File:Portrait Elke Backes.jpg könntest du Ganimedes, der die OTRS-Bestätigung hinzugefügt hat, mal fragen, ob tatsächlich der Hochlader der Fotograf (oder Rechteinhaber) ist, weil sein Name ja im Autorfeld steht. Hier könnte eventuell vergessen worden sein, den Eintrag zu aktualisieren. Natürlich könnte der tatsächliche Urheber auch bewußt auf seine Namensnennung verzichtet haben. Das müsste dann aber in der Bestätigungsmail stehen.

Das gilt analog für File:VELLO 01.jpg. Auch dort gehört in das Autorfeld der Name des Fotografen, es sei denn er hätte in der Korrespondenz ausdrücklich darauf verzichtet. --Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deine Antwort. Bei dem Bild von Elke Backes habe ich inzwischen die Fotografin herausgekriegt, es handelt sich um eine Fotografin namens Natascha Romboy. Danke für die Anregung, Ganimedes anzusprechen. Ich warte da erst nochmal ein paar Tage ab, ob der Hochladende auf seiner WP-Nutzerseite antwortet.

Bei dem Vello-Bild ist es ja allerdings alles noch viel schlimmer: Da gibt es bislang überhaupt keine Genehmigung des Fotografen. Das hat der Hochladende ja auf seiner deutschsprachigen WP-Seite selber ganz offen zugegeben. Insofern verstehe ich den VRT-Vorgang hier überhaupt nicht. --217.239.2.67 14:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Er hat aber angedeutet, dass der Geschäftsinhaber und der Fotograf sich kennen und dass das vielleicht auf dem "kleinen Dienstweg" gelaufen ist. Dennoch sollte bei OTRS natürlich darauf geachtet werden, dass die Genehmigung tatsächlich vom Fotografen kommt. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hm. Den Hochladenden selber verstehe ich so, dass da bislang gar nichts gelaufen ist und er beim Fotografen überhaupt erstmal anfragen muss.

Ganz persönlich und glaskugelig glaube ich nicht daran, dass er diese Genehmigung überhaupt kriegen wird. Freundschaft hin oder her, ein Fotograf, der so nachdrücklich seinen Namen in die Exifdaten setzt und der immerhin seine Brötchen mit Produktfotografie verdient, der wird doch seine Bilder nicht unter CC-Lizenz veröffentlichen.

Darf ich mal nachfragen, ob Du die VRT-Kommunikation einsehen kannst? Was ist denn da überhaupt gelaufen? Der Hochladende weiß ja offenbar von nichts. Aber wo kommt denn dann die Genehmigung her?

Ich will Dich auch jetzt nicht den gesamten Rest-Abend mit diesem einen Bild beschäftigen. Aber mir sind derartige Fälle in letzter Zeit immer wieder auf Commons begegnet - nicht so krass wie dieser hier, aber doch schon so, dass ich mich immer wieder gefragt habe: Wo bitte kommt denn diese VRT-Genehmigung her? Ich bin da schon häufiger irritiert gewesen, wie wenig die Rechte der Urheber von manchen Zuständigen ernstgenommen werden. Zum Teil erkläre ich es mir, wie gesagt, durch das Missverständnis Copyright vs. Urheberrecht, aber wenigstens nach Hinweis müsste das doch ernstgenommen werden. --217.239.2.67 19:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Da ich nicht zur ORTS/VRTS-Benutzergruppe gehöre, habe ich keinerlei Einblick in die Kommunikation. D.h., wenn ich etwas wissen bzw. überprüfen lassen will, muss ich auch den normalen Weg über das ORTS-Board gehen. Die von der Community vergebenen Administrator-Rechte mögen praktisch zwar "mächtiger" erscheinen, beschränken sich aber letztlich doch auf die eigene Plattform. Die Rechte bzw. Aktivität der ORTSler betrifft dagegen direkt das reale (Urheber)Recht. Zudem sind die ORTSler durch eine Vertraulichkeitsverpflichtung gegenüber der WMF gebunden, was bei Admins, zumindest bislang, nicht der Fall ist.

Hab bei der Bewertung tatsächlicher oder anscheinender Ungereimheiten um eine ORTS/VRTS-Genehmigung immer im Hinterkopf, dass die ORTSler ja auch (unbezahlte) Freiwillige sind und wohl eher selten einen Abschluss in Rechtswissenschaften haben. Dennoch ist es natürlich gut, dass du auffallenden Ungereimheiten nachgehst. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

About File:사쿠라 5.jpg

Hello. I object to the deletion of that file. I sent a DM to the original author's Twitter account, but they said it was the same person as the uploader. So, Please recover this file. Thank you. --양념파닭 (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

the file was uploaded not by you, but by User:Kaming309. It was found prepublished on Twitter. Now, we don't know whether User:Kaming309 is Twitter-user Ka Ming. Anyway, in such a case a valid permission by the photographer or the rightsholder needs to be send to VRTS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). --Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Twitter DM revealed that they are the same person. In addition, the part about VRTS you mentioned should be notified to the user concerned. 양념파닭 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Those images were uploaded by the original author. I've spoken to them about it as I was the one who asked they upload the images. Please restore them, so I can have them confirm they uploaded it. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 13:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

I've instructed the uploader, User_talk:Kaming309#File:사쿠라_5.jpg, to arrange for a permit to be submitted. Thereafter, the file(s) can be restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

[round|triangular] roundabout signs

Saluton, du hast die Kategorien Category:Triangular roundabout signs und Category:Round roundabout signs schnellgelöscht, mit der Begründung C2 (unuseful empty category). Ich finde, dass hier eine kurze Begründung für das unuseful nicht schlecht wäre, denn die Kategorien waren nur deshalb leer, weil Akele201 alle Medien kommentarlos aus diesen Kategorien entfernt hat. Akele201 hat, nebenbei, Anfang Juni eine Vandalismuswarnung auf die Diskussionsseite bekommen.

Die beiden Kategorien sind sicherlich nicht lebenswichtig, aber es gibt nun mal zum Beispiel in Deutschland den Unterschied zwischen dem runden Vorschrifts- und dem dreieckigen Hinweisschild. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 12:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Renardo,

der zitierte Text ist automatisiert an die C2-Begründung leere Kat." geknüpft. D.h., wenn man im Auswahlmenü C2 wählt, setzt das Commons-Skript diesen Text. Ich bin über das "unuseful" auch nicht so glücklich.

Die vorsätzliche Leerung der Kat. ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Wenn du die beiden Kategorien wieder befüllen willst, stelle ich sie gerne wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Túrelio, mir war die Sache aufgefallen, weil eines der betroffenen Bilder von mir ist. Wenn du die Löschung rückgängig machst, befülle ich die Kategorien wieder, soweit ich das anhand der Beitragsliste von Akele201 tun kann. Hoffentlich akzeptiert sie/er es; die Warnung zeigt ja, dass es da schon mal ein Problem gegeben hat. Danke –– Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Renardo la vulpo: ich habe die beiden cats jetzt wieder hergestellt. Es wäre aber sicher nicht schlecht, wenn du Akele201 informierst, dass bzw. warum du das für sinnvoll hältst, und dass ich sie wieder entlöscht habe. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Hi! Why are you reverting my editions for speed deletion if I am the author? I am erasing personal information. Thank you! FML ^hello 20:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Don't worry. I already understand what happened. I added my requests here: Commons:Deletion requests/Some private old photos sent by User:FML. --FML ^hello 20:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

@FML: , you should at first try to remove/replace the uses of these images on other projects, as this is an obstacle for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Vending machines sg again

Hi Túrelio, last year I noted some copyrighted images related to one you had already deleted. I have found another sockpuppet here. Among the presumably stolen images they uploaded was another vending machine image, albeit with one letter different in the file name. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 10:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Deleting of Category:FCE RALn 64 - Interior

Hello!

I am the user who created the category "FCE RALn 64 - Interior", and I was wondering why you deleted it.

I created this category to group photos of the interiors of raln 64 FCE trains (currently there is only one, this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:L%27interno_di_una_delle_RALn_64.jpg), exactly as for the Category:FCE ADe 11–20 - Interior (Main Category is Category:FCE ADe 11–20).

I read that the category was deleted because the name was incorrect, as well as duplicated ((incorrectly named) duplicate). However, to create the category in question, I based myself on this: Category:FCE ADe 11–20 - Interior, also, before I created it, the category in question did not exist.

So I ask if I can recreate the category FCE RALn 64 - Interior, to put inside all the relevant photos (for now there is only this).

Thank you for your attention! VincentLR (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi VincentLR,

the cat had been tagged by User:Arbalete as {{Bad name|Category:FCE RALn 64}} and was empty. That was the reason for its deletion. The mother-category Category:FCE RALn 64 currently has only 10 images. The currently deleted cat would carry only File:L'interno di una delle RALn 64.jpg. Usually, categories shall contain more than 1 item. But, if you think there is a compelling reason to have this category now, you can recreate it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio!

Tanks for your answer!

The category in question was empty, because before the user Arbalete reported it for the deleting, hes removed the only file contained in it, tah is, the below photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:L%27interno_di_una_delle_RALn_64.jpg

This user (Arbalete), often interferes negatively with other members of wikipedia, in fact, he is currently blocked on it.Wikipedia.

I got to talk to other members of wikipedia, and they also spoke badly of Arbalete. VincentLR (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Ist das das gleiche Bild?

Moin!
Du hast das Bild hier letzten Monat wegen URV gelöscht. Ist das Bild hier, hochgeladen von einer augenscheinlichen Socke des anderen Hochladers, eventuell das gleiche Bild? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 10:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sänger,

nein, gleiche Person, aber ganz anderes Foto. Allerdings legen die Metadaten nahe, dass es von Instagram stammen könnte. Auf ihrem Konto habe ich aber nicht gefunden. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

hier ist das Bild in der Collage TV / Event - Moderation: zu sehen. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 12:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Danke. Hab nun einen LA gestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pictures removal

Dear Túrelio, please stop removing our pictures from Wikimedia, we are Primo Toys, the Copyright owners of the picture, and we claimed so on Wikimedia after uploading them. Thank you and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.163.113.100 (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, please comment only when logged-in. Otherwise I don't know what files you are talking about. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, it's Yinglao, you deleted 2 pictures I uploaded yesterday on Wikimedia, but I am the author of the pictures and they have been released on CC 4.0. I uploaded them again, I would appreciate if you do not delete them again, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinglao (talk • contribs)

Hi Yinglao, re-uploading deleted images shouldn't be done. Anyway, let's try to solve the problem:

File:Primo toys founders.jpg: as this image was found prepublished already in 2017[9] and as you sourced it to a copyrighted company-website, a formal permission needs to be send by the true photographer or rightsholder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (ORTS).

File:Cubetto.webp: as this image was found prepublished already in 2016[10] and as you sourced it to a copyrighted company-website, a formal permission needs to be send by the true photographer or rightsholder, as described above. --Túrelio (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, thanks for your help. I just sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org following the suggested template. Hopefully this should resolve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinglao (talk • contribs) 14:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I receuved a positive response from the permissions team, the images are now licensed, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinglao (talk • contribs) 15:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

What re u doing?

Heyy what is ur problem? Pehlivanmeydani (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Lots of website took photo from Wikipedia u have shown reason for deleting, it is nonsence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pehlivanmeydani (talk • contribs) 13:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Offene Punkte Heribert

Hallo Túrelio,

ich kümmere mich drum noch diese Woche und melde mich.

Gruß, Heribert3 (talk) 12:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Bitte um Rat

Hallo Túrelio,

Ich möchte dich mal um Rat fragen, ob du es für sinnvoll hältst, dass ich mich für eine Admin-Kandidatur entscheiden sollte.

Viele Grüße --Uli Elch (talk) 10:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Uli,

ich melde mich morgen dazu. --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

@Uli Elch: sorry, dass es länger gedauert hat. Die Bearbeitung von LA und SLA sind zwar nicht die einzige, aber doch eine der vordringlichen Admin-Aktivitäten, weshalb Erfahrung und Praxis damit üblicherweise ein wichtiges Bewertungskriterium in der RfA ist. Natürlich auch COM:UNDEL und die Anfragen oder Konflikte, die auf den Admin-Boards (COM:AN, COM:ANU und COM:ANV) auftauchen. Nach Überfliegen der Bereiche deiner Edits der letzten 3 Jahre, würde ich dir empfehlen, über ein paar Wochen (oder Monate) reguläre LAs (findest du unter Category:Deletion requests) anzuschauen bzw. zu bearbeiten. Letzteres kann für den LA-schließenden Admin besonders hilfreich sein bei LAs, die entweder nicht ganz klar sind oder wo niemand ein Votum oder eine Meinung abgegeben hat, obwohl sie schon einige Tage alt sind. Analog könntest du es mit COM:UNDEL machen; einerseits kann man aus bereits abgeschlossenen Anträgen sehen, was eine Rolle spielt und wie argumentiert wird, andererseits kannst du durch "Zuarbeiten" (z.B. Vervollständigen der oft recht rudimentären "Anträge" oder Verlinken der relevanten LD-Seite) dem abschließenden Admin die Arbeit erleichtern und den Prozess beschleunigen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Aber - wie soll man als Nicht-Admin einen SLA bearbeiten (und dadurch Erfahrung damit sammeln?) Bei "Empty cat, no longer needed" mag das übersichtlich und auch schnell zu bearbeiten sein, aber mangels Befugnis nicht von mir.

Auch das gründliche Lesen von Commons:Undeletion requests und aktueller Vorgänge vermitteln mir nicht per se brauchbare Erfahrungen, die ich in einer eventuellen Bewerbung zitieren könnte.

Beim Durcharbeiten unerledigter deletion requests fällt auf, dass es davon Tausende mit Kommentar(en) gibt, die jedoch nie von einem Admin entschieden wurden. Beispiele:

* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Alexandre-Gilbert.jpg

* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:QBuzz_U-OV_Mercedes-Benz_Citaro_4011_19-09-2021.jpg

* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:B612_20211215_152641_578.jpg

* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pino_Fiordaliso.png

* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Megamart_Santa_Maria

Mir fällt beim besten Willen nichts ein, was ich dazu (noch) sagen sollte, wenn sich innerhalb eines halben Jahres nicht mal ein einziger Admin dafür interessiert oder zu einer Entscheidung kommt.

Lediglich beim Studium von Commons:Administrators' noticeboard und - in Grenzen - Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism lassen sich gewisse Strukturen erkennen und erlernen, was aber bei Administrators' noticeboard/User problems schon wieder schwerlich der Fall ist.

Auch blieb mir verschlossen, wie ich selbst in solch lange liegen gelassenen Fällen durch "Vervollständigen der oft recht rudimentären "Anträge" zuarbeiten" könnte, wenn das Subjekt selbst zu wirr dafür ist. Daher habe ich schlicht nicht erfasst, wodurch genau, treffend und präzise ich dem "abschließenden Admin die Arbeit erleichtern und den Prozess beschleunigen" könnte. --Uli Elch (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Tanzverbot.jpg

Hi Túrelio, du hast letzten Monat diese Datei von mir schnellgelöscht. Kannst du mir bitte den Link zum YouTube-Video schicken, aus dem mein Screenshot stammt? Timk70 (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, das war aus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3GgKJLOfH0. Ich habe es gerade nochmal geprüft; da gab es keine CC-Lizenz. Anscheinend hält dieser Youtuber das unterschiedlich, mal mit mal ohne--Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Danke. Ich bin mir sicher, dass dieses Video zum Zeitpunkt des Hochladens eine CC-Lizenz hatte, jetzt aber angeblich nicht mehr. Der Youtuber hat die Lizenz also in der Zwischenzeit geändert. Wie geht man hier mit solchen Fällen um? --Timk70 (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Mit der Wayback Machine lässt sich das noch belegen. --Timk70 (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Habs nun wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

If you delete my file one more time

I am going to stab myself in the stomach. Niyibby (talk) 05:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion for copyright violation appeal

Túrelio, I am a novice Wikipedia poster and inadvertently posted a File:1850 Irish Evictions memorial on Fife Coastal Path at Carlin Knowes quarry.jpg which was from my Flickr account and had been saved using the wrong copyright tag. You deleted it and after this I changed the Flickr properties to Public Domain Dedication (CCO) and tried to have the file undeleted by typing the following into the search box:

"Special: Undelete/< File:1850 Irish Evictions memorial on Fife Coastal Path at Carlin Knowes quarry.jpg >"

This didn’t have any affect. Can you help an old man (77+) who isn’t too hot on internet stuff get his photo/article reinstated?

Thanks in anticipation. Petitioner~~~~~ Petitioner (talk) 06:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Petitioner: I've restored the image. I'm 66 :-). --Túrelio (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks for restoring. Petitioner (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Balcons decorats amb teles pel Corpus a València 03.jpg‎

Thank you for your help. We had a Wiki Takes and uploaded many hundreds of photos. In theory uploading the same file twice is impossible but it seems it has happened. My wife told me but we couldn't find any of the duplicated files; we think there are a few (not many) more. Sorry for the inconvinience. B25es (talk) 06:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:Delete2 and included Template:DRbox2

Hi again. Is there something wrong with the subject templates that evidence of their use should be removed like in this edit?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, well, no. I wanted to delete the unnecessary box, but deleted too much. Now corrected. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Broken category redirect

Hello. Category:Organisms with objects is a redirect to Category:Objects with organisms, which you deleted. I'm not sure which one should be the real category, but they are not empty, so one of them should exist as a non-redirect. --R'n'B (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Wow, this was nearly 2 months ago. These are extremely abstract categories; I wonder if anybody will ever search them. But that wasn't the reason for the deletion. I am rather sure it was empty at time of deletion, as I would not delete a non-empty category. Anyway, I've now undeleted the deleted cat and removed the last speedy-tag. As you seem to be interested in these cats, please try to find out which of the 2 constructs is the appropriate one. --Túrelio (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Manuscript

Hi! I'd like to comment on deleted File:James Mace handwriting 1993.jpg. Firstly, this was not a complete work but just an abstract that is published already, it's aim was to show Maces autograph. I represent library that holds this manuscript. We are ok with publishing this piece. What kind of permission should we prepare? Anntinomy (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

@Anntinomy: as James Mace died only in 2004, his works are in copyright til end of 2074. From the description it's a bit unclear to me whether the physical writing is by Mace himself. The reproduction (of the original work) itself is likely w/o copyright, as it's a 2-dimensional work. So, under the assumption that the copyright for this piece was not actively transferred from Mace to someone else, a permission by his heir(s), which would likely be his widow Natalia Dziubenko-Mace, is required. If she is willing to give such a permission, you need to prepare a permission-draft for her. Go to Commons:Email templates. If she is fluent in english, you may use the permission-text in the gray rectangle. If she speaks only Ukrainian, you may use the text in Template:Email templates/Consent/uk. To prepare the permission-text, you need to paste the filename (File:James Mace handwriting 1993.jpg) or the complete URL for the image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:James_Mace_handwriting_1993.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1) and the name of the choosen free license into the text. With regard to the license: you had originally choosen CC-Zero, which is a bit unwise in my opinion. I would recommend to choose our standard license CC-BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en), as it leaves a minimal bit of control over the work, whereas with CC-Zero, all rights are given away, which makes abuse by interested third parties easier. If you get a positive signal from the heir, after your first contact, I can temporarily un-delete the image, so that she/he can see what it looks like. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for detailed answer. I'll work on that -- Anntinomy (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

File Deletion: Xbox Skeleton-Smoke Keychain.jpg

Hello. A photo of mine was deleted by you because it appeared that the photo was taken by someone else. I am the person who took the photo and I wish to allow it to be distributed and used online. I'm not sure if I need to add a copyright license or anything. I just want the photo to be able to be shared and used online (except if someone tries to use it to represent a product they're selling).

File that was deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Xbox_Skeleton-Smoke_Keychain.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 The copyvio message referenced an Imgur album (https://imgur.com/gallery/0wYxqOR). I am the author of this album. I've tried editing the album to add a reference to Wikimedia but I'm not sure how to do that. I uploaded a photo to my Imgur account as an attempt to prove that I am the same person. You can see this verification image here: https://imgur.com/gallery/p12oOX3

X GoTeamScotch x (talk) 02:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)X GoTeamScotch X, July 2nd, 2022

Hi,

seems credible to me. Image restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Question about upload of a logo

Hi! I was trying to link the wikidata entry for L3Harris to its logo. Found that the logo wasn't on wikimedia so went searching for it; long story short, I'm planning to upload the svg to Wikimedia but I saw that a previous version was deleted. My rationale was that it doesn't exceed the threshold of originality given it's text and simple geometric symbols. Do you think that's a safe judgment or it might not pass muster? Thanks in advance. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

I've no idea how the mentioned logo looks like, as you didn't link it. Anyway, if you upload it and put it up for discussion, the worst to happen would be its deletion. In general: logos are often a bit complicated, as the the TOO varies from country to country. So, if the country of origin (of the company) has a high TOO, it might be kept. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

@Túrelio Ahh, sorry. Yeah, it's this one from en.wiki [11]. Thanks, that makes sense; I wasn't sure what the protocol was--on wikipedia it's usually to discuss and check for consensus before making changes and I wasn't sure if putting it up might risk lawsuit. L3Harris is based in the US so it should be ok.

I'm not sure why I didn't see it earlier but I'll ask in the copyright section of the village pump if I have any concerns for other images. If it is a potentially dicey situation (and even if the village pump discussion is mostly positive), might it also be useful to tag certain admins who might want to check it sooner rather than later? Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

As it's on :en not as "fair use", but "non eligible", it should be accepted on Commons. However, I would recommend using the import or export function in order to adopt the :en-history. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

About deleting photo

Greetings! Can you help me? On 21.06.2022 Portrait from

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD,_%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

was deleted because of copyright violatios. How can I reupload it because this is family photo but I can not ask the person to grant me permission because he is not alive.

Previous file name was "File:Valentin Lukin.jpg" with the link:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valentin_Lukin.jpg AlexanderJustus92 (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi AlexanderJustus92,

"family photo": is it your family? "ask the person": this refers to the photographer or to the photographed person?

If the photographer is dead, but not for more than 70 years, his copyright goes usually to his heir(s). So, if you know who is the photographer, you may easily find out, who is his immediate heir (1. spouse, 2. child). This heir could give you the required permission. If that doesn't work, you may consider uploading the image locally (on :ru) under fair-use exemption, if that is possible on :ru Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Löschantrag für Bühnenbilder von Helmut Jürgensːin Category:Set designs by Helmut Jürgens

Hallo Túrelio, für die Dateien in dieser Kategorie wurde ein Löschantrag gestellt. Sie wurden wohl vor ca. 10 Jahren vom Sohn von Helmut Jürgens hochgeladen. Du hast auf dessen Benutzerseite schon mal mit ihm korrespondiert. Vielleicht kannst Du Dir das mal anschauen. Vielen Dank --DALIBRI (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Danke für die Nachricht. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Recht herzlichen Dank. --DALIBRI (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Interior der Kapelle 14 Nothelfer in Honerath

Hallo Túrelio, ich habe damit begonnen, bei der oben genannten Kapelle (Artikel: Bad Münstereifel - Wikipedia), Abbildungen der Figuren in der Kapelle hochzuladen. Ich habe die schriftliche Zustimmung vom 7. Juli 2022 des Urhebers dieser Statuen, Herr Wilfried Beitz in Nitterscheid, dass ich diese Statuen fotografieren und die Abbildungen bei Wikipedia einstellen kann. Schau doch bitte einmal bei den hochgeladenen Abbildungen nach, ob alle Angaben korrekt sind und eventuell noch Ergänzungen wegen des Urheberrechts erforderlich sind. Beste Grüße!--Geyersberg (talk) 06:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Guten Morgen @Geyersberg:

m.E. sollte der Bildhauer in der Beschreibung erwähnt werden. Als ein Beispiel für eine rel. ausgedehnte Art der Zuschreibung findet sich hier: File:MeinKarl2014 Aachen 8344.JPG. Auf jeden Fall würde ich empfehlen den source-Eintrag von "own" in "own photo" zu ändern.(ich habe das bei File:Honerath Kapelle der vierzehn Nothelfer (37).jpg mal gemacht)

Was die Genehmigung angeht, wäre es gut die erwähnte Zustimmung des Bildhauers zusammen mit einer Auflistung aller davon betroffenen Fotos an ORTS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org) zu mailen, damit ein Ticket angelegt wird. Andernfalls ist früher oder später damit zu rechnen, dass irgendjemand einen LA auf die Fotos stellt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Guten Tag Túrelio, ich bedanke mich für deine umgehende und ausführliche Antwort, zugleich auch für die hilfreichen Hinweise. Ich werde entsprechend verfahren. Beste Grüße!--Geyersberg (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Wrong copyrights on image - trying to fix

The original version of this file which I uploaded:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leucocoprinus_straminellus.jpg

Was sourced from here:

https://www.mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=7965774

Which said CC BY 3.0. However following the link to the original upload:

https://mushroomobserver.org/image/show_image/5687?obs=3820

I now see that this page says CC BY-NC-SA 2.5. So I found a new image which definitely is CC BY 4.0, replaced it and updated the licensing info.

https://uk.inaturalist.org/observations/1076270

However the existing file is still there with the option to revert to it and I don't have the ability to delete it. Since you helped before I thought I would draw this to your attention in the hope that you can fix this.

Thanks. Complying with this non-commercial stuff is making this so hard. Damn lawyers... MycoMutant (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. I've rev-deleted the first file-version and processed a LicenseReview-template, so that there is a record for the proper license at the source-site. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Ideas?

Hi @Túrelio: I have been regularly watching the backlog at COM:DR and I passionately feel I should help there. What qualities do you think I should have before going for an RFA? I'm asking you because I have worked on a number of things with you in past. I'd appreciate any ideas. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 15:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

I'll reply tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Alright. Take your time. I'm looking for the best guidance and I've that much patience. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 06:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @TheAafi: sorry that it took more time than originally planned. Now, you have identified already one important area of admin-work, the "regular" DRs. As I recommended some days ago to another questioner, to get some experience in this field, you could go to disputed DRs (such with "hot" pro/con discussion) and either watch or dive into the dispute and voice an opinion (any user is entitled to). You could also take some long-waiting DRs and try to evaluate whether the rationale is solid/valid or if an aspect is missing and then add your comment. In cases, where you think they are actually urgent (copyvio, violation of personality rights) despite being open for too long, you could either notify admins (COM:AN) or add a speedy-tag to the file itself. Admins working on the speedy-queue will still look into the DR (despite the speedy-tag). Participation in DRs is likely the most important area that is looked at in an RfA. Another area to learn about copyright-problems is COM:UDR, where also non-admins can comment or add missing information. The second field of admin-work are user-conflicts, such as those appearing on COM:AN/U, where you are also entitled to comment (or add a relevant point). --Túrelio (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Túrelio. This is fabulous and helpful. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

File:MU KPB 051 Aesop's Fables - Illustrated by Arthur Rackham.pdf

I glanced at the how-to for appealing a deletion and it said to contact the administrator who deleted it. That was you! Using a different document file, en.wikisource has this completed and well linked. I mentioned there of its deletion here at s:en:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#Aesop's_Fables_translated_by_V._S._Vernon-Jones. The reply was that as it was published in 1912, it is in the public domain in the US and is allowed not only on en.wikisource but also here, according to the Berne agreement. I am somewhat interested in its undeletion, but mostly worried about the other versions. At wikisource, the fables will be a monster to remove and even worse to put back, with 200+ fables listed around, etc.

The "other two" that were mentioned at that source link are File:MU KPB 033 Rubiat of Omar Rayyam.pdf and File:MU KPB 034 Parsifal.pdf which you did not delete. If I should talk to that admin, let me know.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi RaboKarbakian,

the first mentioned file was deleted based on "Translator died in 1955. Undelete in 2026". The document itself identifies a "V.S. Vernon Jones" as translator and "Arthur Rackham" as illustrator. The book-pdf also contains an introduction by G.K. Chesterton. The scanned edition was issued in 1917, in London and New York. There is only a WikiData-entry for the translator, which indeed gives 1955 as his deathyear. Per Commons:Hirtle chart the book should be in the PD in the U.S. However, as it was (also) issued in London, U.K.-copyright should also be relevant, IMO. As the file had been tagged as copyrighted til end of 2025 by an U.S.-based admin-colleague, I assume her judgement is trustworthy. However, you might contact her directly at User talk:Ellin Beltz. BTW, the other 2 files had also been "undelete in 2026"-tagged by the same admin. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Heraldry and Vexillology Barnstar.png

Hello Túrelio, thank you for deleting File:Most Improved Editor's Barnstar.png. Could you suppress all uploads except the current version of File:Heraldry and Vexillology Barnstar.png. The current should be the final version (hopefully), thank you. Judekkan (talk) 13:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Battle of the Influencers.jpg

Lieber Túrelio!

Danke für die Bearbeitung dieses Bildes. Gerade hat sich der Uploader auf der Diskussionsseite gemeldet. Dort wird angegeben, dass sie die Urheber seien. Auf der Datei war allerdings kein Vermerk auf VRT. Ich finde, der User hat die Chance verdient, eine entsprechende Bestätigung des Behaupteten zu belegen. Was denkst du? Viele Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Ich habe es vorübergehend wieder hergestellt. Er muss aber aber eine valide Genehmigung beibringen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Sowieso, kommt nichts Verwertbares, so muss das Bild endgültig gelöscht werden. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Falsche Zuordnung

Hallo, ich hoffe dir geht es gut.

Wird so etwas (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gambians,_Farafenni_Gambia_(4064392877).jpg&curid=57680078&diff=674240019&oldid=616077919) von der Admin-Seite sanktioniert? Ich habe es erst mal zurück gesetzt. Atamari (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Atamari,

ja, Danke. Bin derzeit in Urlaub in der Eifel. Ich habe die anderen Edits dieses Benutzers mal geprüft; es war singulär und er scheint vor allem russisch zu sprechen. Es besteht daher die Möglichkeit, dass er sich der Konnotation nicht bewußt war. Ich habe ihn deshalb nicht gesperrt, sondern erst einmal auf den Fehler hingewiesen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Christopher Street Day Koeln 2022 020 part 1 of 2.webm

I explicitly asked in the speedy request to NOT CREATE A REDIRECT SO THAT I CAN UPLOAD THE CORRECT FILE. Never the less you created a redirect and I spent about 5 hours trying to upload the correct file only to get a "A file with this name exists already in the shared file repository" error. It is not possible to upload a new version, if there is no old version, because it is a redirect. C.Suthorn (talk) 14:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh, tut mir leid. Das hab ich wohl übersehen. Nun gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Information boards in Innenräumen

Hallo Turelio, du hast vor einiger Zeit beanstandet, dass ich unter anderem die in Innenräumen des Ökologisch-Botanischen Gartens der Universität Bayreuth aufgenommenen Fotos von Information boards in Wikimedia Commons eingestellt hatte. Nachdem mir die Einrichtung keine Freigabe erteilt hatte, habe ich die betreffenden Dateien wieder entfernt. Jetzt musste ich aber feststellen, dass in Wikimedia Commons sehr viele in Innenräumen aufgenommene Foos von Information boards eingestellt sind, für die ebenfalls keine Freigabe vorliegt. So ist zum Beispiel eine ganze entsprechende Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum vorhanden. Ich wäre dir sehr dankbar, wenn du dazu Stellung nehmen könntest. Gruß --Schubbay (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Translated: Hello Turelio, some time ago you complained that, among other things, I had posted the photos of information boards taken inside the Ecological-Botanical Garden of the University of Bayreuth in Wikimedia Commons. After the institution had not given me approval, I removed the files in question. But now I had to find out that in Wikimedia Commons there are a lot of foos from information boards that were taken indoors, for which there is also no release. For example, there is a whole corresponding Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum. I would be very grateful if you could comment on this. Regards VScode fanboy (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

VScode fanboy, thanks for the translation, but I'm a native German speaker ;-) . --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, darf ich dich nochmals um eine Antwort auf meine Anfrage bitten? --Schubbay (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, leider ist meine Anfrage noch immer nicht beantwortet. Nimm doch bitte jetzt einmal Stellung. Vielen Dank! --Schubbay (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Schubbay,

es tut mir leid dass es mit meiner AW so lange gedauert hat. Auf einem so großen Projekt wie Commons treten natürlich immer wieder Inkonsistenzen auf, wie du sie jetzt beobachtet hast. Das liegt meist einfach daran, dass die Kontrolle der neu hochgeladenen Bilder (recent-upload patroling) aufgrund des Volumens nur recht oberflächlich und auch wohl nicht lückenlos erfolgt.

Konkret: was die Zulässigkeit von Infotafeln aus (Innenräumen von) deutsche Museen angeht, ist wesentlicher Faktor die Schöpfungshöhe des Abgebildeten, die letztlich die Grundvoraussetzung für einen urheberrechtlichen Schutz darstellt (keine Schöpfungshöhe = nicht schutzfähig). Deren Beurteilung ist aus meiner Sicht aber nicht so leicht. Bei dem willkürlich aus der von dir verlinkten Kategorie herausgegriffenen Foto File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (207).jpg finde ich, dass hier Schöpfungshöhe besteht, da der Text über die bloße Angabe des Gemäldes, auf das er sich bezieht, hinausgeht. Das gilt m.E. analog für das (ebenfalls willkürlich herausgegriffene) Foto File:Australischer Regenwald.jpg von dir.

Was tun? Ich könnte auf einige der Infotafel-Bilder aus "Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum" einen Muster-LA stellen, um die Einschätzung der Schöpfungshöhe dieser Art von Bildern auf eine weniger subjetive Basis zu stellen. Wenn dieser LA positiv ausgeht (keine Schöpfungshöhe und Bilder können bleiben), könntest du beginnen, deine Tafelfotos hochzuladen. Alternativ könntest du ein durchschnittliches deiner Tafelfotos hochladen und ich stelle darauf den Muster-LA (unter Verweis auf die Nationalmuseums-Tafeln). --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio

Jetzt muss ich mich entschuldigen, dass meine Antwort so lange gedauert hat. Aber ich war im real life zu stark beschäftigt. Nun zum Sachverhalt. Bevor man einen LA stellt stellt, sollte man User:Mateus 2019, von dem die meisten der in der genannten Kategorie enthaltenen Fotos stammen, bitten zu versuchen, nachträglich eine Genehmigung des Urhebers der Info-Tafeln einzuholen, wie Du es mir seinerzeit auch vorgeschlagen hast. Würdest Du das bitte übernehmen? Vielen Dank. --Schubbay (talk) 16:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio.

nachdem schon wieder fast zwei Wochen vergangen sind, möchte ich dich nochmals an meine Bitte erinnern. Schubbay (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Siehe: User_talk:Mateus2019#Fotos_von_Museums-Infotafeln. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Da hat sich leider seit 26. Mai nichts mehr getan. Könntest du dich freundlicherweise nochmals darum kümmern? Vielen Dank. Schubbay (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Braxton university logo.png

File:Braxton university logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Мельников Мадина (talk) 11:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

File:RSierpinski.jpg

File:RSierpinski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

File:පියා.jpg

File:පියා.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Мельников Мадина (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

File history

Hi Túrelio, Hope you're well my friend, I just wanted to ask are you able to find the history for File:Prince Andrew of Greece in 1913, 1882 Andreas.jpg as I've had a DR notice for this image however I dont know ever remember uploading any Royal images, Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Davey,

on June 27th "Davey2010 moved page File:Prince Andrew of Greece in 1913, 1882 Andreas.jpg to File:Prince Andrew of Greece in 1913.jpg" (edit-summary). That was likely the reason for the notification, when the redirect was nominated for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prince Andrew of Greece in 1913, 1882 Andreas.jpg). --Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Del

Hallo Túrelio,

Bitte lösche meine Fotos auf Commons, es stresst mich sehr, sie online zu haben. Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht, als ich jünger war, und jetzt habe ich keine Macht, ihn zu korrigieren.

Ich hoffe, du verstehst das, Mit freundlichen Grüßen! Dzrtb35355 (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (larva front).png gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Super, merci! Könnt ihr noch:

File:Proserpinus proserpina côté gauche.jpg & File:Proserpinus proserpina dessus.jpg & File:Proserpinus proserpina dessous.jpg

Oder wie beim File:Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (larva right side).png die Metadaten löschen? Wie du willst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzrtb35355 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Danke viel Mal Dzrtb35355 (talk) 01:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Liborio

Hello there!

There is still the picture File:Liborio Barney Bellomo.png, that it's a duplicate from the other one that you deleted. Thanks! Coltsfan (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Logo Radio Royaal 1994.jpg

Dear Túrelio, to my great surprise I saw today that my uploaded image on Wikimedia Commons has been removed. I, Vincent Perquin, designed this logo together with Berry Bodde on 7 March 1994 for Radio Royaal, at Kempenpers BV in Hapert. The image was taken from a USB flash drive. The website you refer to as the source (https://radioroyaal.wixsite.com/radioroyaal/about) has been allowed to use our self-designed logo for their layout. I would like my uploaded image to be restored on Wikimedia Commons, so that it can be used of on the Dutch Wikipedia article about Radio Royaal. If you have any doubts about my statement, please send an email to info@royaalradio.nl or check the website www.royaalradio.nl. Kind regards, Vinquin (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Vinquin: ,

it happens rather rarely that an original artist releases his work. Therefore we assume copyvio in such a scenario. I have now temporarily restored the image. But I would ask you to send a confirmation for the free license for the logo from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (ORTS). Your email to OTRS will not be published and can be accessed only by our OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Dear Túrelio, thank you for your response. I will send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org! Vinquin (talk) 16:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Stochdorphiahaus (AK 541R50 Gebr. Metz) R.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, würdest du bitte diese Datei auf die existierende Weiterleitung File:Stochdorphiahaus (AK 541R50 Gebr. Metz 1952) R.jpg verschieben und diesen Namen anschließend ganz löschen, damit das Durcheinander endlich behoben ist. Danke! Mewa767 (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Drug Dog Field Day 2022.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Drug Dog Field Day 2022.jpg? You just deleted it as a copyvio, but it's been reuploaded. A REFUND request was made for the file, but the file wasn't refunded (at least not yet). Perhaps the uploader isn't aware of how REFUND works and thought it was OK "refund" the file themselves. — Marchjuly (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Good morning, thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

File:AMB dime.jpg

Hello. Could I ask you to consider undeleting File:AMB dime.jpg, please? The image is of far higher resolution than that found at https://armoredmudballs.rocks/, and could therefore only have been uploaded by the copyright holder/photographer. Thus I don't feel there is any copyright violation here on Commons. I'm trying to work with User:RDLittle2000 - a professor emeritus of geology in order to mobilise research information on these geological structures. It would help not to have to send them through OTRS unnecessarily. Many thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I'd like to note that Prof. Richard Little's email address at https://armoredmudballs.rocks/ is RDLittle2000@... so in this case, together with the high-resolution upload, I think we can in fact assume that the Commons user is the same person. De728631 (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok, seems to be convincing. Restored. --15:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks folks - much appreciated. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Technical errors in deleting my own Userpage

Hi, @Túrelio: , How are you? I just mentioned the redirection of my user page @LeonaardoG: for deletion, but it gave an error I authorize you to delete this direction. Please, do it. -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

@Turelio: , Please explain to me if possible the error that happened to me when proposing for deletion. -- Leonaardog (talk) 01:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Duplicated SVG files representing patterns and colors of geological formations of french departments

Hi Túrelio

I’am OK with your actions of creating redirections after removing duplicate files (for example this one: file:E6a4 - D60 (Bd Charm-50).svg redirected to file:E6a - D60 (Bd Charm-50).svg).

However, it would be usefull to keep the description of the original file inside the redirection page because that helps creation of map legends of geological maps for french cities in WP-fr.

I've made a test by adding the previous description in the redirection page: file:E6a4 - D60 (Bd Charm-50).svg, but I don't know that's correct.

You may be wondering why these duplicate files exist. There are two reasons:

1. In a same department there are sometimes geological formations which are almost similar but they are represented by the same color and pattern.
2. In two different departments, it is possible that the same color/pattern is used to represent two different geological formations.

To generate these SVG files, I use the Open Data of the French geology institution (the BRGM). With macros I developed I automatically extract the colors and shapes of the patterns from the legends of the maps and I generate SVG files. But I don't know when there are duplicate files. Poudou99 (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Pudou99,

with regard to your 1st point: I have some doubt, whether this does work. At least on fr:Creil, where File:E6a4 - D60 (Bd Charm-50).svg is used, now simply a red-link is shown instead of the target-image of this redirect.

In order not to loose the original description of the deleted duplicate-file, would it be possible to add this description to the remaining target-file? --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio

It seems the description I've added in the redirection page (file:E6a4 - D60 (Bd Charm-50).svg) does not interfere with the redirection mechanism itself.

Even if the orange square displayed in the legend of the geological map of fr:Creil is not the original one (associated to geological formation "E6a4"), the model {{BD-Charme50 SFGEOL/Box-D60| e6a4}} works without error. That's the main point.

In fact I don't know how many geological formations are represented by the same color/pattern. I retrieve the data from the BRGM Open Data, then I generate automaticaly individual SVG files for each formations. That is the process for one french departement. I've processed about 10 department (on 100) so the number duplicated will certainly increase. --Poudou99 (talk) 01:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Unaddressed copyvio

Hello, File:Camille Vasquez.jpg has been nominated for deletion for well over a month now and the nomination remains uncontested. The Wikipedia articles using the file are comparatively high traffic, so I feel this should be addressed sooner than later. Perhaps you can take a look at it. Thank you. Throast (talk) 17:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Why did you delete this file?

Hello, I'm confused why you deleted File:No 11 Squadron RAAF pilot shaking hands with US Navy Capt John Voorheis during RIMPAC 2022.jpg with the reason of "permission not granted to use this photo"? From memory, it was this image from the US military's DVIDS website, with the image being credited to a US Navy photographer so there should have been no copyright issues. The image remains available on DVIDS. Could you please explain the grounds for deletion here? Did I stuff up the upload details? Thank you, Nick-D (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Nick-D,

you are right. It seems the speedy-request by third party on which I had acted, was in bad-faith. Sorry. Restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Great, thank you. Nick-D (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

File:19yx.svg

File:19yx.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dot YU (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Picture deleted - copyright violation?

Hello, I tried to upload a picture of Elena Holzhausen already twice and both times, it was deleted - the second time by you File:Elena Holzhausen (2017).jpg. A photographer took the picture of her and I am fully allowed to use it. Did I do something wrong concerning providing needed information on this issue? How can I upload the picture permanently? Thank you a lot in advance for your help! Vincent de Beauvais (talk) 15:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 01.08.2022, Vincent de Beauvais

Hi Vincent de Beauvais,

our copyright-policy COM:L requires that uploads to Commons have been released by the author/rightsholder under a so-called free license, which allows other to use the image, even commercially. The most recommended license is Creative Commons CC-BY-SA. If Stephan Doleschal is prepared to release said image under this license, he needs to send a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Help?

Hi, some edit summaries on this file contain personal details such as email. Could you please rev-del it? It is not a best practice to reveal someone's personal details like this. Regards, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 13:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Túrelio, if you check the file again, the email is still visible on the file page. Could that be cleaned up? ─ The Aafī (^talk) 06:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Aircraft on postcards

Hi, today I have noticed that contents of this category have been mass copied to Category:Postcards of aircraft that was previously a Category redirect, by User:Adamant1. I was preparing to discuss that with the user, but you then deleted the original category. My rationale in 2013 was, and remains, that Aircraft on postcards is the most accurate title, since it covers postcards on which aircraft appear, but are not necessarily the main subject. For example, in this postcard file shown:

, a bridge /river /panorama are the primary subjects, and the aircraft are very minor inclusions. It is not therefore a postcard of aircraft, but aircraft on a postcard. At the very least, surely this should be the subject of a CFD, please advise. MTIA, PeterWD (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Three points

1. The general trend with how categories of postcards are named is "Postcards of X." There's many reasons for why that's better then an "X on postcards" structure that I don't really feel like getting into. Except to say that 99% of the categories for postcards are already named "Postcards of X" and it would just be weird to have random exceptions. It would be just as ridiculous to do a CfD for something that is already widely accepted and recommended by Commons:WikiProject Postcards. If anything you should be the one doing the CfD. Although I don't see one going anywhere.

2. The whole things about how "aircraft on postcards" is a better naming scheme for when the postcard isn't the main is a non-issue. As I've said 99% of the categories are already named "Postcards of x" and no one is confused by it. Even in cases where the x isn't the "main subject" of the postcard. To give one example a postcard of a boat going under a bridge can be put in both Category:Postcards of bridges and Category:Postcards of boats perfectly fine. No one is confused by it.

3. This is a general comment, but the whole "X on whatever" naming structure violates basic English sentence structure, which depends on a noun verb writing style. The images are of postcards, not aircraft, and that's we are ultimately categorizing. So the noun would be "postcards" since it is used to identify the class of objects that we are putting in categories. Whereas, "aircraft" is the verb due to being the state the postcard is in. So Category:Postcards of X is just the proper English way to do it. Like look at it this way, does a category like "Men on statues" make sense for images of male statues? No it doesn't. You can't have a category like "Men standing on statues in Oxfordshire" or whatever for statues of standing men in Oxfordshire. It has to follow a "object, class, location" naming scheme to be coherent. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

License review

Hi, can you review these licenses please? Thanks! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@MiguelAlanCS, I'd gladly like to assist on this. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 10:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm having a problem while opening the website, elsaltodiario.com, once it gets ok, I'll have a look around. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 10:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@TheAafi: The digital media is changing the license, but until today they publish all their content with CC.BY 3.0. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@TheAafi: You can see it by scrolling down at the bottom of their main website, but in the Archive.org link. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Alright, @MiguelAlanCS, I checked few files and passed them. I'll check the other files later in the day. I'm feelings sleepy at the moment. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 10:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The problem is "Aviso: esta licencia no afecta al uso de los recursos gráficos (fotografías, imágenes o video)." This is what you get now, when clicking on "Licencia de uso". --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Troll license claims

Hi, a few months ago I uploaded two screenshots for the Pale Moon https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pale_Moon page. A few hours ago, a user "Артём 13327" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:%D0%90%D1%80%D1%82%D1%91%D0%BC_13327&action=edit&redlink=1) tagged both for speedy deletion, and you deleted one of them just minutes ago. I have reason to suspect this "Артём 13327" is one of the myriad of trolls who have come to attack the Pale Moon project in recent years. Please see my notes on the talk page of the other file, the one that I could save: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk%3APale_Moon_29.4.6_on_Windows_7.png#Trolls These notes explain further.

I have seen blaring red warnings that copyright violations result in steep punishments here on the various wiki sites. I have seen zero warnings for trolls who abuse the copyright administration system. I have no desire to be struck with such a punishment for the actions of a troll.

Thank you.

FuzzleSnuz (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi @FuzzleSnuz,

first, you don't get punished that easily here on Commons. In case the copyvio-tagging of the 2 files is found to be unjustified, the warnings can be removed from your talkpage. I admit that I wasn't aware of any prehistory wrt to these files. The tagging of the one which I've deleted, seemed plausible to me due to the "ARR" note in the screenshot plus the "basilisk icon" being likely above COM:TOO. I could temp-undelete this image and put it into a regular DR, which allows a (nearly unlimited time of) discussion. For now, I would recommend to discuss the copyright-state on the mentioned talkpage of the remaining image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Editor1098765

Shouldn't Editor1098765 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) be given a strong warning and if s/he continues, be blocked? A warning hardwired in Ukrainian (uk) or Russian (ru) might help. I don't do much on Commons, so I'm unlikely to follow through the process. This user really does not seem to be willing to learn about image licensing. Boud (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

MD Löschen

Hallo Túrelio,

Könntest du die Metadata löschen von :

File:Proserpinus proserpina côté gauche.jpg & File:Proserpinus proserpina dessus.jpg & File:Proserpinus proserpina dessous.jpg

Wie beim File:Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (larva right side).png Dzrtb35355 (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for your labor! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The deletion of File:Bruce Blakeman Profile Pic.jpg

I wanted to know why File:Bruce Blakeman Profile Pic.jpg was deleted. It is the official government portrait/photo of the politician and is therefore public domain. It should not have been deleted. How can I upload this so it will not be deleted again? -Bigyankeesfan Bigyankeesfan (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bigyankeesfan,

you have sourced this image to www.nassaucountyny.gov, which is not accessible to me, at least currently. In addition, being an "official government portrait" has no relevance for the copyright-status. Depending on legislation, it may simply mean, that media (press) can use such an image. But Wikipedia/Commons is not "media", our policy COM:L requires a relatively broad free license. Eventually you had in mind {{PD-USGov}}, which is valid only for works of the U.S. federal government. There are only very few U.S. states, which have a similar rule, see Category:PD-USGov license tags (non-federal). In addition, if you want to claim such an exception, you need to add the appropriate license-label/tag to the file. --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Daisy Edgar-Jones by Patrick Lovell, July 2021 (cropped).jpg

I had put this image up for deletion as it no longer had the Creative Commons license. I was wondering can the separate image still be used even though the license is gone? Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Btspurplegalaxy, regrettably on Flickr uploaders can change the license for their uploads, even without leaving a trace. Therefore, already years ago, the license of uploads from Flickr to Commons are checked - at the time of upload to Commons - by a bot, which eliminates any possibility of reviewer-mistake/error. So, we are sure that File:Daisy Edgar-Jones by Patrick Lovell, July 2021.jpg at the time of upload to Commons was under a compatible CC-license. Now, CC-licenses, if legitimatly given, are considered unrevocable. So, though Flickr allows change to a more restrictive license, the original license remains valid for all those who had downloaded the image before the change of license. There, the license is also valid for the said crop, as creating crops is permitted by the CC-license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I understand. Thanks for the explanation! Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Bruh what is your problem with Cai Xukun

The gif literally went viral and you just deleted it as you said it was a random gif of an artist, lmao that was basically just saying you don't actually know him so don't delete something if you know absolutely nothing about the context. Plus you're in Germany so I don't know how you came to visit the page but what you could not realise is that it is literally impossible to find the original creator of the gif as first it was created ages ago, second it's been spreading so widely where similar visual media were declared to be created by multiple people. It is in fact not random at all but you would realise as you just did not decide to get to know any information relating to the about the gif in the first place. I had a brief read of your other deletions and some of them just sounded really like nonsense. I'm sorry if I sound angry but I just simply do not get the mindset of you randomly deleting something from other's work when you know zero context about it and allege a copyright violation when there is basically no viable copyright. What I really do recommend you to do is to try to get to know more context of something before making an action, otherwise you're basically just bullying the contributor about something that they could not control, and removing something that viewers would really like to see. Afarensis.ikun (talk) 12:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, seems you are new here. So, for now I will ignore your totally inappropriate ad-hominem rant.

As you could have seen by yourself on your own talkpage, the file had been tagged as suspected copyvio with the above cited, though wrongly credited rationale by another editor, who notified you.

Administrators, as me, are elected to check and perform requested deletions. We don't go around out of boredom looking for something to delete.

Now, you claimed this file as "own work". At the same time you described it as "Dynamic wallpaper meme ..., based on his interview from Idol Producer, 2009." So, where is the source either of this file or of the file/images, which were used to create this GIF-file? --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes I am indeed new here, but anyways I don't think there is any problem that I claimed it as my own work. I've hyperlinked the original show that it was taken from as the primary source. The cut of the clip has basically been circulating around with no origin to be found. I mirrored it and made it a cyclic dynamic wallpaper and uploaded on WallpaperEngine and I'm really just making a gif out of my own wallpaper publish. Lemme know if there are other problems. Afarensis.ikun (talk) 23:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

"I've hyperlinked the original show that it was taken from as the primary source." Nothing of this was in your original description of the file. So, where did you do that? --Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Delete original

Hallo Túrelio,

Es tut mir absolut leid, dass ich dich so sehr belästige, wie ich es tue, ich danke dir für deine Arbeit.

Könntest du bitte noch das Original von File:Proserpinus proserpina dessous.jpg löschen ?

Freundliche Grüsse, Dzrtb35355 (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Kein Problem.  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Quebrada Fiera view and map.jpg

Hello Túrelio,

I noticed you deleted this file because apparently it's a copyright violation, but according to the pdf that you linked in the deletion summary, the paper it comes from is under a CC BY 4.0 license, which is compatible with Commons licensing. Is it possible to undelete it?

Thanks, Magnatyrannus (talk) 13:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Magnatyrannus,

while you are correct with regard to the immediate source of this image, there is still the problem that Google Earth content may not be used for any commercial purpose.[12] This contradicts the CC-BY license claim of the scientific paper. The authors may simply not be aware that a CC-BY license also allows commercial re-use and that thex are inadvertently violating Google license terms. If you prefer a public discussion about the issue, I can undelete the file and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

"suppress-redirect"

Hallo, weisst du wo ich anfragen muss um das "suppress-redirect"-Recht zu bekommen? Jedesmal wenn ich einen Bildnamen ändere, meistens wegen »disambiguation«, muss ich dem Original ein {{Speedy}} mit Erklärung zufügen. Wäre es möglich das zu beheben? Vielen Dank im Voraus! Asav | Talk 15:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

ich war mir nicht einmal bewusst, dass es dafür ein besonderes Recht gibt. Wenn ich eine Datei umbenenne, kann ich bei der entsprechenden Anklick-Box die Anlage eines redirects meistens, aber auch nicht immer (!) unterdrücken. D.h., selbst als Admin geht das nicht immer. Ich würde mich deshalb wundern, wenn es ein generelles Recht dazu gibt. Frag sonst vielleicht mal auf COM:Forum nach. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Danke, werd's mal versuchen! Ist ja ziemlich merkwürdig mit einer Anklick-Box die nur zu gewissen Zeiten (Mondphasen?) funzt! Asav | Talk 15:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Loiret-Secheresse-3aout2022.svg

Hi. You have deleted yesterday the image with the reason that it comes from the site https://www.larep.fr and then is copyrighted by the newspaper. This is false. This map has been in fact drawn up by the prefecture of the Loiret department and not by the newspaper. The represented data are free (open data) since it is simply a representation of the restriction orders by alert zone (the order is public). The original image (https://www.larep.fr/photoSRC/Gw--/carte-prefecture-eau_6260237.jpeg) is nevertheless under copyright but only because it uses BD carto (which is under copyright) for the contours of the department. On the other hand, the map I have drawn up with Qgis is free because it uses the contours of Openstreetmap and public data (the order : https://www.loiret.gouv.fr/content/download/59691/401921/file/recueil-45-2022-191-recueil-des-actes-administratifs-special%20du%202%20ao%C3%BBt%202022%20-%20mesures%20provisoires%20des%20usages%20de%20l'eau.pdf). I have uploaded more than 70,000 images and am very attentive to copyright. In that case, there is no problem. Thanks to restore the file.Roland45 (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

for now I have restored the image. However, you need to integrate your above clarification into the file-description. Otherwise, this may happen again. Also, I don't fully understand why you gave the larep.fr-site as source, if you have drawn the map by yourself, resp. taken from OSM. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I have corrected the description of the file. I had indeed forgotten to give details on the modalities of realization of the map. Bye.Roland45 (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Please explain why you removed it

File:Ninoshima Academy.jpg This photo is licensed under a Creative Commons License and may be used for commercial or non-commercial purposes provided that (1) attribution is acknowledged and (2) all rights reserved. [13]

Please explain why you removed it.

stupid!

JR East E231 (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Hmm, wasn't it you, who wrote this line "description={{ja|1=CC BY-ND 2.1 JPです。}}" when uploading (13:00, 3. Okt. 2015) this image? Anyway, the discrepancy to the CC-BY-SA license-template needs an explaination.--Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Марина Овсянникова.jpg

Hello! What makes you think that this photo was not taken by me?! Do you need to send the original when it was taken? How to make you restore it?! MarinaOv (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Marina,

the image had been tagged by User:Skazi as copyvio-suspected because it had been found all over the web.[14] For example, Die Welt credits it to the depicted lady herself, Marina Owsjannikowa.[15] If you are really Mrs. Marina Ovsyannikova, please send a confirmation that you are the photographer to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Neither your email nor your email-address will be made public; only our OTRS-volunteers have access to it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

File:WENDYYOSHIMURA1976SFphotoNancyWong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests

Torelio, Please go ahead and delete the duplicate that FMSky created from my original file of the 1976 photo of Wendy Yoshimura that that I took in Piedmont, California. Someone else also cropped another one of my photos (of Rev. Jim Jones) that I don't approve. A full frame negative usually gives more information and should be respected. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rev._Jim_Jones,_1977_(cropped)2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy_yoshimura_in_1976_(cropped).jpg Edmunddantes (talk) 23:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Edmunddantes (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Superschnell gelöscht ohne Warnung oder Hinweis

Hallo, das Bild File:Hartmut Wiesner mit Nagel.jpg hattest du gelöscht, ohne dass ich als Urheber und Hochlader irgendeinen Hinweis bekam, das finde ich arg schnell. Ds Bild war 6 Jahre online, da hättest du einen Hinweis auf meine Diskussionsseite geben können dass da ein Problem ist (und: welches überhaupt) ! -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Gerd, sorry, ich war davon ausgegangen, dass der OTRS/VRTS-ler, der die Datei mit "{{SD|F4|2=VRT agent: '''NOT done'''. Insufficient permission. [[Ticket:2022020810010367]]}}" markiert hatte, das getan hatte. Da OTRS-ler verläßlich arbeiten, werden ihre speedies i.a. ohne weitere Rückfrage ausgeführt. Vielleicht kannst du User:Ganimedes einmal selbst kontaktieren oder auf dem OTRS-board nachfragen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die zumindest nachträgliche Info. Aber trotzdem: Neben der Info erwarte ich eigentlich auch etwas Reaktionszeit zwischen Antrag auf Löschung und Löschung selber, mindestens 24 Stunden oder so, der Uploader ist ja nicht ständig online und sollte doch Gelegenheit haben dem Antrag zu widersprechen! -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Das ist schon ein alter Konflikt. Eine Speedy-Markierung wegen copyvio-Verdacht (häufigster Grund) muss im Prinzip sofort/umgehend ausgeführt werden, weil ja — zumindest auf unserer Beurteilungsebene — von einer copyvio ausgegangen wird. D.h., wir würden dann wissentlich ein Werk unter einer freien Lizenz anbieten, das wir selbst für "illegal" halten. Andererseits ist eine Datei-Löschung auf Commons ja nicht zwangsläufig endgültig. Gerade Dateien, für die eine Genehmigung bei OTRS nachgereicht wurde, werden oft zunächst gelöscht und dann wiederhergestellt, wenn OTRS das ok gibt. Ich war bislang allerdings davon ausgegangen, dass OTRS den Einreicher der Genehmigung per Email auch dann benachrichtigt, wenn die Genehmigung endgültig als unzureichend/ungültig eingestuft wurde. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

sock?

this user that you blocked for repeatedly uploading unfree files is back as Hellohiiiii uploading the same unfree files. Praxidicae (talk) 19:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

New account indef'd for SPA. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

file:Gasan_Mamedov_1993.jpg

You have deleted the picture c:file:Gasan_Mamedov_1993.jpg c:user:Túrelio по причине Copyright violation: "Picture from CD booklet Ashgabat - City of Love (1993)") In fact, I am the author of the picture. It was taken in 1992 in Ashgabat and then it was published in CD booklet. Is it possible to fix the mistake? — 93.171.220.148 22:48, 25 August 2022 Tekinka1967

Hi,

assuming that you are User:Tekinka1967, as you were not logged-in. If you are the photographer of the original image (not just of the reproduction from the cover/booklet!), you need to send a confirmation from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), confirming that you are the original photographer and that you want to release the reproduction under the choosen free license. An OTRS-volunteer will then evaluate this permission and eventually contact you, if questions remain, or confirm it, so that the file on Commons can be undeleted. (Your email will not be published, but can only be seen by OTRS-volunteers. I will have no access to it.) --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Files deleted without notification

Hello @Túrelio! It seems you have deleted some files I uploaded without notifying me like File:Marlyn Alonte (18th Congress).jpg, File:Rep. Kristine Singson-Meehan (18th Congress).jpg. May I know why? howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 01:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi howdy.carabao,

I am sorry that you were not notified. This is the job of the user, who tagged the image for speedy deletion, which was my admin-colleague Marcus Cyron. The reason he missed it could be because of that he had tagged a large number of similar images with the identical rationale and might have assumed that they were all from the same uploader. I have now caught up on your notification; see your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Query

Hello, Why did you delete my modification to this file? فاطمة الزهراء (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I assume you are refering to File:رضيع.jpg, right? You had tagged it for speedy-deletion, though there was already an ongoing regular deletion-request. In addition, the rationale of your initial speedy-request isn't suitable for speedy deletion of a file uploaded in 2019. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Care when redirecting

I see you have (quite reasonably) redirected File:Bull Street Birmingham 14-08-83 (209003142).jpg as a duplicate of File:Bull Street Birmingham 14-08-83.jpg. However, you did not preserve the metadata from the redirected file, which, for example, was also in Category:Birmingham City Centre in 1983. Please take care that such metadata - including structured data - is not lost; and restore any that is now only visible to admins. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, ok. Though, not sure whether you meant that by "metadata" in this case. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Open Request

Hello. Can you solve this case of copyright violation? The query was opened a week ago and no sysop has been interested in solving it. The given links prove these logos are a clear violation of copyright, and no one has proven otherwise. Thanks. 2A02:2454:421:900:9CC5:6D69:C5C2:DAFD 23:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Regular DRs shall be open for at least 1 week (except in clear-cut cases). I've commented in the 3 DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Photo Florence Dabin.jpg

Bonjour,

La photo Florence Dabin en 2020.jpg a été supprimé à nouveau par vos soins. Sachez qu'afin de l'utiliser, une extension de droits de 150€ a été payée au photographe, dédiée spécifiquement à un usage Wikipédia. Il a lui même retiré le copyright des méta données de la photo suite à ça. Pourquoi la photo est-elle donc encore supprimée ?

Merci,

Manon Guéry Manong49 (talk) 08:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Manon,

my french is too bad, so I need to write in english (or german if you prefer). The image was deleted primarily as it was sourced to https://www.noisette.fr/, which says "all images © Philippe Noisette, Photographe et Vidéaste". So, there was no evidence of any permission. In addition, it was the same image as the first version, which you had claimed as own work, despite a (C)-note in the EXIF-data. Our policy advises against simple re-upload of an image, which had been deleted.

Finally, you mentioned that you have paid a fee to the photographer to use this image on Wikipedia. You need to know that our licensing-policy (COM:L) does not allow uploads which are under a free license "only for Wikipedia". Uploads needs to be under a free license for anybody to use it (provided the terms are met). So, if the photographer is willing to release this image really under the choosen cc-by-sa-4.0 (or an equivalent license), then he needs to send a confirmation by himself to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or permissions-fr@wikimedia.org (OTRS). For an appropriate wording in French, see Commons:Messages_type#Envoyer_directement_par_email. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Andrii Biletskyi and Category:Andrii Biletśkyi

Hello! There is an official rule in Ukraine for transliteration from Ukrainian into Latin (actually (de facto) into English). According to this rule, the correct transliteration of the Ukrainian surname Білецький is Biletskyi, not Biletśkyi or Biletsky. Therefore, I renamed it back, I also ask you to leave the redirect category (if this does not go against the Rules). Thank you for your attention. Good luck. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 10:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Logo Pyronale 2022 Berlin.jpg

Hi. Is there a deletion discussion on this? Itu (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, no. It had been speedy-tagged as "TV Screenshot" by Conny, which seemed plausible to me. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

удаление фото

14:02, 17 августа 2022 вы удалили страницу File:2016 09 03 KHOLOD 5995-редакт копия.jpg Какая причина? Uthvfyv (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

as explained on User_talk:Buntarion, because it was tagged by User:Drakosh as "(c) Maksim Offo", as noted in its metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Unauthorized publication: Image that should not be published on commons should be deleted

Puteri Indonesia 2006 Winners|200px

this is unauthorized publication, this captured image should not be published here, because the license is not even a free common use, it is just a captured youtube browser image. please deleted this non-free common picture. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source does not hold copyright, therefore CC license does not apply Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Thalialioo (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

UCLA and PD-CAGov

Hi, just a question, are images by UCLA able to use PD-CAGov? Although it's a public university, I can't see anything that suggests that it's a part of California government. Please correct me if I'm wrong about this. Thanks. reppop^talk 04:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Reppop,

yes, after scanning the UCLA article on :en, I see no indication why UCLA-works should fall under CA-state copyright (i.e. PD). --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I asked because of these images: File:Gene D. Block.jpg and File:ChancellorGDB2017.jpg, the former having you reverting a overwrite yourself in 2018. There was also this image, File:Los Angeles Mayors Panel.jpg, which claimed something similar but just said since it was a public university it was free. reppop^talk 16:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

I've deleted the 3rd one and opened as DR, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gene D. Block.jpg, for the other two. Feel free to comment in the DR. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Perrier water bottles

Good day. I see you deleted Category:Perrier water bottles with the comment ""Water bottles" categories are for refillable bottles such as sportspeople might carry." OK. 1) I'm not sure why you didn't propose changing a category used in "Perrier water bottles" or proposing a new name - would "Bottles of Perrier Water" or perhaps "Photographs of bottles of Perrier Water" be more accurate? 2) Category:Water bottles as far as I see does not make that distinction adequately clear. Perhaps at least a hat note about that - possibly this is something different dialects of English define differently? Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, the deletion-rationale/summary wasn't by me but by the tagger User:Auntof6. It looked plausible to me, but I am not a en-native-speaker. I deleted the cat because it was empty. As of yet, the current cat Category:Perrier Water isn't too crowded to make subcategorization indispensable, IMO. Anyway, feel free to create a suitable one. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Maybe Category:Perrier water in bottles (I don't think "water" needs to be capitalized)? It could be a subcategory of Category:Perrier Water and Category:Bottled water by brand. Some files would remain in Category:Perrier Water because not everything there shows bottles. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Auntof6: Yes, Perrier is also widely sold in cans (and for all I know maybe available in other containers), so not all Perrier Water is bottled water. I think the Perrier bottles at least used to be somewhat iconic, so I created a category for images where they are visible. We have categories of other bottled beverages (eg, Category:Coca-Cola bottles). I'd still like to have such a category for Perrier bottles, if you are not strongly opposed. (I rather wish there was discussion of whatever the problem was before it was deleted.) I'm open to suggestions as to best name and categories it should be in. Though I really fail to see any inherent problem with the previous name, and the two previous categories it was in, Category:Perrier Water and Category:Bottled water by brand - it's an intersection of the brand name and bottled water, no? It seems an annoyance to me to include relevant images in two categories, "Perrier Water" and "Bottled water" when we could have a category that includes both. Is there somewhere else we should discuss this? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: How about "Perrier bottles"? That would be similar to Coca-Cola bottles. I'm thinking it would be for any Perrier bottle, whether or not it actually had water in it. Is that consistent with your thinking? -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Hm. There are bottled wine brands with the word "Perrier" in their name (Perrier-Jouët and Laurent Perrier being the most famous), though the water company seems to hold brand on the word "Perrier" by itself. A "Perrier water bottle" as far as I can tell remains one even if emptied. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)

I'm just looking for a way to distinguish bottles that the water is distributed in and bottles that just have the name on them. (There may be no stand-alone water bottles with the name on them, but it's good to be consistent with naming.)

By the way, if it's not too much trouble, and if you don't have a particular reason for not doing it, could you use a standard signature so that the "reply" function can work? Also, a ping would be appreciated. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Just had another idea: how about Category:Perrier bottles (water)? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

pics delete

hi, i would like to delete all my uploaded images. Perencal (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Perencal,

as all your uploads are already from >7 days ago, you need to open a regular deletion-request. However, not as the one you made for File:Muğla 83.jpg, which is incomplete und irregular. On the respective image-page you need to click on "propose deletion" (or what is written there in your language) in the tool-box at the left side of the page. In addition, "user request" is not a valid rationale for images uploaded >7 days ago. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, This pics do not belong to me. I divorced someone. And she want for it to be deleted.--Perencal (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Túrelio, you did not answer me. Look, I told you, I'm divorced. And that woman said delete the pictures or there is law. please i am in trouble, delete the pictures.--Perencal (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Perencal, ok, this is quite unusual, as originally you claimed it to be own work. As there is a theoretical risk that your divorced partner might sue re-users outside of Commons/Wikipedia, we need to have a record of this issue. So, please send an email with a list of all concerned files and the explaination that they will be courtesy-deleted for the reason you provided above, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). They will store this information, but will not make it public (I will have no access to it). They will also send you a ticket number, which I ask you to post here, so that I can mention the ticket at time of deletion.(the ticket-number does not mean access). --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

• File:Arap Devleti ve Sukutu (Das arabische Reich und sein Sturz.pdf <- likely not this one
• File:Menteşe Sancağı Harita.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Tavas 01.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 70.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 198.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 200.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Atatürk.webp <- likely not this one
• File:Konya 111.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:0 88f261 edadaa50 orig.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:0 88f25f fdd113d8 XL.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 64.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Denizli-Kale 001.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 02.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:İzmir 1910.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Mersin 1910.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Kudüs.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Yusuf Ziya Paşa.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Urfa 001.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Mersin 1910.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Elazığ 100.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Konya 181.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:1917-Bentderesi-Ankara.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Sultan Ahmet Meydanı.png <- likely not this one
• File:Van 001.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Bazaar-in-Cairo-Egypt.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Suriye 1910.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Yapışık-İkizleri-Ayırmak-1902.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Refia Sultan.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Urfa Balıklıgöl 1919.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:1909-Moscow.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Sirkeci Garı, eski.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Kız Kulesi 01.jpg <- likely not this one
• File:Muğla 83.jpg
• File:Elazığ 13.jpg
• File:Pertek.jpg
• File:Muğla 70.jpg
• File:Muğla 82.jpg
• File:Muğla 81.jpg
• File:Muğla 80.jpg
• File:Muğla 101.jpg
• File:Muğla 103.png
• File:Muğla 11.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii, Muğla 04.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii, Muğla 05.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii, Muğla 03.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii, Muğla 01.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii.jpg
• File:Sekibaşı Camii, Muğla 02.jpg
• File:Hasan Hayri Kanko-1.jpg
• File:Hasan Hayri Kanko-2.jpg (re-used: [16],[17])
• File:Hasan Hayri Kanko-3.jpg (re-used: [18])
• File:Elazığ 107.jpg
• File:Muğla 65.jpg
• File:Elazığ 108.jpg
• File:Avize Çiçeği.jpg
• File:Elazığ 109.jpg
• File:Telgraf Çiçeği.jpg
• File:Elazığ 199.jpg
• File:Elazığ 4.jpg
• File:Elazığ 3.jpg
• File:Elazığ 2.jpg
• File:Elazığ 103.jpg
• File:Malatya 01.jpg
• File:Elazığ 03.jpg
• File:Elazığ 42.jpg
• File:Elazığ 41.jpg
• File:Elazığ 40.jpg
• File:Elazığ 24.jpg
• File:Elazığ 23.jpg
• File:Elazığ 22.jpg
• File:Elazığ 25.jpg
• File:Elazığ 28.jpg (re-used: [19])
• File:Elazığ 27.jpg
• File:Elazığ 26.jpg
• File:Elazığ 29.jpg
• File:Elazığ 66.jpg (re-used: [20],[21])
• File:Muğla 188.JPG (re-used: [22])
• File:Konya 67.jpg
• File:Elazığ174720.jpg
• File:Elazığ170204.jpg
• File:Elazığ173956.jpg
• File:Elazığ171342.jpg
• File:Elazığ171244.jpg
• File:Elazığ170940.jpg
• File:Elazığ174510.jpg
• File:Elazığ174902.jpg (re-used: [23],[24],[25])
• File:Elazığ174436.jpg
• File:Elazığ171543.jpg
• File:Elazığ170931.jpg
• File:Elazığ174503.jpg
• File:Elazığ170918.jpg
• File:Elazığ170815.jpg
• File:Elazığ171122.jpg
• File:Elazığ173133.jpg
• File:Elazığ 174430.jpg (re-used: [26],[27])
• File:Elazığ170625.jpg
• File:Elazığ.jpg
• File:Elazığ175552.jpg
• File:Elazığ174307.jpg (re-used: [28])
• File:Elazığ174310.jpg
• File:Elazığ173152.jpg
• File:Elazığ172422.jpg
• File:Elazığ174443.jpg
• File:Elazığ 81.jpg
• File:Elazığ 82.jpg (re-used: [29])
• File:Elazığ 83.jpg
• File:Elazığ 84.jpg
• File:Elazığ 85.jpg
• File:Elazığ 86.jpg
• File:Elazığ 87.jpg
• File:Elazığ 88.jpg
• File:Elazığ 89.jpg
• File:Elazığ 90.jpg
• File:Elazığ 91.jpg (re-used: [30])
• File:Elazığ 92.jpg
• File:Elazığ 93.jpg (re-used: [31])
• File:Elazığ 94.jpg (re-used: [32])
• File:Elazığ 95.jpg
• File:Elazığ 96.jpg
• File:Elazığ 97.jpg
• File:Elazığ 98.jpg
• File:Elazığ 99.jpg
• File:Elazığ 11.jpg
• File:Elazığ 14.jpg
• File:Elazığ 15.jpg (re-used: [33],[34],[35])
• File:Elazığ 16.jpg (re-used: [36])
• File:Elazığ 17.jpg
• File:Elazığ 18.jpg
• File:Elazığ 19.jpg
• File:Elazığ 10.jpg
• File:Elazığ 20.jpg
• File:Elazığ 21.jpg (re-used: [37])
• File:Ünye 01.jpg
• File:Essendere 01.jpg
• File:Muğla 100.JPG
• File:Muğla 112.JPG
• File:Muğla 123.JPG
• File:Muğla 122.JPG
• File:Muğla 120.JPG
• File:Nevşehir 03.JPG
• File:Nevşehir 02.JPG
• File:Konya 49.JPG
• File:Konya 46.JPG
• File:Sivas 01.JPG
• File:Konya 193.jpg
• File:Konya 196.jpg
• File:Konya 195.jpg
• File:Konya 194.jpg
• File:Konya 199.jpg (re-used: [38])
• File:Konya 198.jpg
• File:Konya 197.jpg
• File:Muğla 23.JPG
• File:Aydın 01.JPG
• File:Denizli 01.JPG
• File:Muğla 64.jpg
• File:Aksaray 01.JPG
• File:Konya 66.JPG
• File:Konya 65.jpg
• File:Konya 113.JPG
• File:Konya 112.JPG
• File:Konya 111.JPG
• File:Konya 106.JPG
• File:Konya 48.JPG
• File:Konya 109.JPG
• File:Konya 108.JPG
• File:Konya 107.JPG
• File:Konya 105.JPG
• File:Konya 104.JPG
• File:Konya 86.JPG
• File:Konya 103.JPG
• File:Konya 102.JPG
• File:Konya 101.JPG
• File:Konya 100.JPG
• File:Konya 47.JPG
• File:Konya 110.JPG
• File:Konya 84.JPG
• File:Konya 83.JPG
• File:Konya 82.JPG
• File:Konya 81.JPG
• File:Konya 80.JPG
• File:Konya 87.JPG
• File:Konya 89.JPG
• File:Konya 88.JPG
• File:Konya 91.JPG
• File:Konya 90.JPG
• File:Konya 59.JPG
• File:Konya 57.JPG
• File:Konya 58.JPG
• File:Konya 56.JPG
• File:Konya 53.JPG
• File:Konya 52.JPG
• File:Konya 51.JPG
• File:Konya 50.JPG
• File:Konya 07.JPG

...

File:Gopal Italia.jpg

Hi File:Gopal Italia.jpg had more than 1 image in file history. Were all of them copyvios? Venkat TL (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, there were actually only 2 photographies, though one was uploaded in several variations of background. User:LakshayYadav007, who uploaded the one different image, did not provide any source/author information. I found it prepublished on Facebok. So, yes, all are suspected copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for the reply. Venkat TL (talk) 17:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Picture delete tag

They are mainly anonymous woks. which names are not signed of paintings. Mainly they are replicates are old painters like Raja Ravi Varma, Brj Basi, Very few of them are own. These pictures are mainly available in bazars.Baddu676 (talk) 09:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Please, can we have this discussion at one pace, not at two. I had started it on your talkpage, so, it should remain there. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

How can I prove it is ananymous work. The only source is columbia university website. The photos have no date or author signBaddu676 (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Again replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallin

Earlier today, you deleted the creator template for Anders Hallin on the basis that it was not in use by any images. It is in use by three images, and thus I have re-created it. DS (talk) 15:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi DS,

sorry for that. However, at the moment before I deleted it, I had found only 1 link/use and had relied on the tagger's rationale "Added speedy delete. Templated changed to Creator Wikidata entry per discussion that creator templates aren't necessary for creators that only have a single work on Commons". Tell me if you need any code/data out of the deleted version.--Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Kian B 11 May 2022.jpg

https://virgool.io/@Honarmandan_magazine/%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%81%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%88-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D9%81%D9%84%D9%88%D8%A6%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%B1-%D9%88-%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%84-%D9%85%D9%88%D9%81%D9%82-cxhy7uysbiv5

please read the caption under the picture youre trying to remove in the exact link you rely on.

its says: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

stop removing my pic 5.233.159.241 07:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

This was not the case when the image was tagged[39]. So, you obviously have control over this site.

Also, please log-in before commenting. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Undelete Category:Pacific Star (ship, 1981)

Hey, could you please undelete Category: Pacific Star (ship, 1981) since new photos of her have been added here? Angelgreat (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please provide me a copy

Please provide me a copy of File:Flag of Dhaka North City Corporation.svg & File:Flag of Dhaka South City Corporation.svg (most recent version). I will use these on Bengali wikipedia under non-free criteria. My email aftabuzzamangmail.com. Thank you. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Or Yann can you help please? আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Feeling really stupid, forgot to add "ullah" above, my email is aftabuzzamanullahgmail.com. please forward the mail (it should be in your "sent" box). --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Got it. Thank you. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyvio?

Hi, Túlerio. The image File:Raul-do-valle.jpg was taken straight from a website (here) with a clear copyright statement. So this is copyvio, right? But you've marked it as "missing permission". Am I missing something here? Regards. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 18:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Kacamata,

well, "Copyright © 2022" says all and nothing; it's not a full "all rights reserved". As it seems to be an academic site, there is some probability for free licensing, though I didn't find any hint. If a permission isn't provided, no-perm-tagged files will be deleted after 7 days anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I see. You are right. This website belongs to a public university in Brazil. So, in this kind of situations, is it better to tag it as missing permission than as copyvio? Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 19:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

"No permission" gives the uploader (or others) a chance to provide a permission, whereas "copyvio" will be deleted rather instantly. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

What reason is there to use "copyvio" instead of "no permission"? Not talking about copyrighted creative works obviously.--Trade (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted file.

I would like to ask why File:Minna_no_Rhythm_Tengoku.jpg and File:Minna no Rhythm Tengoku multiplayer.jpg have been nominated for speedy deletion. Was it an error? Was it due to copyright issues? Aknip (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

1st: "Cover of a copyrighted Nintendo video game", 2nd: "Screenshot of a copyrighted Nintendo video game." --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

I see. Aknip (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Rectum anatomy en.svg‎‎

Hi, could you please page protect it? There has been constant IP vandalism for over three months. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add the derived from|Rectum_anatomy_de_01.svg template.--Hizbüşşeytan (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Request

Hello @Túrelio: I have seen your copyright claims but I have provided proper linking and credit to the proper owner Can you please remove the copyright claims Thank you 456legend (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi 456legend,

"proper linking and credit" - well, no.

File:Varshini-Telugu-Anchor-VarshiniSounderajan-Shamili.jpg is hardly your own work, as you claim.

File:NC22 Movie Kriti Shetty.jpg - "Bollywoodhungama.com" is not a proper sourcing; you need to provide the exact page, where this image was published.

File:Rashmika-mandanna-sulthan-pre-release37.jpg ctc. - "www.ragalahari.com" is not proper sourcing (see above); in addition, that site is All rights reserved!

You seem to think that it is enough to cite the source from where you took an image. It is not. Commons accepts only images that have been verifiably been released under a free license (see COM:L) by their legal creator/copyright-holder. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Zur Info: Ausstellungsfotos

Hallo, habe mal einen LA auf alle gestellt, sind fast alle Uploads des Benutzers. Siehe Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zewroambi 2006REW. Viele Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 13:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah, Danke. Regulärer LA ist hier vielleicht besser als speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Redirection to duplicate file

Hi Túrelio

The reason why there are so many duplicate files like this one is explained in this discussion.

I'm still looking for a solution to avoid these duplicates, I haven't found it so far. Is there a way for me to delete the duplicate files myself and create the redirects to save you this tedious work? --Poudou99 (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Poudou99,

the creation of redirects from duplicate-deletions is not that tedious, as it is done by a script after the deletion is manually started. Performing deletions by yourself would require administrator-rights.

As you are already >15 years active on Commons, you might consider applying. We are always too few admins. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio

I am very touched by your suggestion to apply to be an admin. I thought about it few times. I have now time to devote to this type of activity in Commons while continuing my uploads and my contributions in WP-fr. So I will take a closer look at the advices and conditions pages for applying. many thanks. --Poudou99 (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Eine Bitte

Lieber Túrelio, der User:Ahoerstemeier ist leider gestern verstorben. Könntest du hier auf Commons bitte seine Seite schützen und alles einrichten, wie es üblicher Weise gemacht wird? Herzlichen Dank! Viele Grüße --Itti (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Geschützt hatte ich seine Seite schon, da ich die Hiobsbotschaft über die Aachener Community früh bekommen hatte. Nun habe ich noch einen Gedenkbaustein eingefügt. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 16:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank, Beste Grüße Itti (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

0x0 file problem

I have an upload problem. It is here: File:Our Forests and Woodlands-1900.pdf. I have uploaded this file 3 times. I should have stopped with the first upload, maybe, I started to wonder if those files are stacking up somewhere and blocking an entrance to some place. It doesn't like that something (a 0x0 file, which it knows as such) is there already.

Maybe you know about what to do with this or who I should ask?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

despite what is said on the file-page, I could download both file-versions; the older having 5 pages, the newer having 389 pages (pdf). I "optimized" the larger version, hoping to solve the problem, but I wasn't allowed to upload it, as size was >100 MB; stupid. So, regrettably I've no idea what to do. May be, you should ask that question to a larger audience, such as COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Hmm, I think the Scan lab at wikisource. As always, thank you for your help!--RaboKarbakian (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Предложения к территории Чувашской АССР.jpg

please delete Ongoingday (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I am a bit hesitant after finding many external re-uses, which might break with deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Предложения по территории Чувашской АССР.jpg Correct boundaries Ongoingday (talk) 09:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Политдонесение Лукашук Щербакову (12.02.1945).djvu

You marked this file for quick deletion. Would you like to tell more specific which of the reasons is applied to this file? As to me, the file is not empty, it is not corrupt and it is in allowed format (djvu). VadimVMog (talk)

Hi, no, User:Vladis13 marked it as such. I only notified you, as he didn't. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

You deleted an image

you deleted a photo "The Official Triplets" that the owner asked me to upload so I could attach it to his wikipedia page. Can you undo that, thanks Alexanderbelice (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Alexanderbelice,

as explained on your User talk:Alexanderbelice#File:The_Official_Triplets.jpg, it was deleted as being suspected a copyvio, as it was taken from www.ronstangelo.com, a website labeled as "COPYRIGHT ST. ANGELO 2022 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED". So, if the "owner" is either really himself the photographer or is sure to possess full rights for this image, he needs to confirm this and the choosen free license per direct email from his official/business email-address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Otherwise, he must ask the photographer to send such a permission directly (not forwarded) to the above mentioned address. Thereafter the image can be restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Amvninja's uploads

Regarding the user whose uploads you've been recently marking as missing evidence of permission, I've noticed that there are multiple accounts uploading related images with the same Amvcity watermark. So I've started a checkuser request at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amvninja if you're interested in having a look. Regards, Marbletan (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Possibly these are different city employees. Next step, after accounts and copyright are sorted out, we need to have a solution for the "watermark" issue. --Túrelio (talk) 19:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Edward Hopper, Ground Swell, 1939, NGA 131206.jpg

That file doesn't qualify for speedy deletion (it's no obvious copyright violation). Please undelete and file a regular deletion request. Multichill (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

You are aware that "New legal claims to copyright brought by Whitney Museum. Previously considered in public domain" came from the uploader (being: Digital Projects Coordinator. National Gallery of Art, Washington) himself? --Túrelio (talk) 20:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I am. I was not aware you deleted more of these. Thanks for undeleting this one. Can you undelete the others too and add them to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edward Hopper, Ground Swell, 1939, NGA 131206.jpg. For all of these {{PD-US-not renewed}} seems to apply. Multichill (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. To have an easy record, I had listed them on the uploader's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Danke

....danke und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

O site da EBC não infringe direitos (File:Pablo Marçal.jpg)

O site ebc.com.br diz: "Reprodução autorizada mediante indicação da fonte."

Portanto é válido para todos os veículos da empresa estatal.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pablo_Mar%C3%A7al.jpg Lucas10530 (talk) 08:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

you need to provide the page where this image is offered. "Agência Brasil" is not sufficient. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg

Hey, I was confused why you speedy deleted File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg. That file was the original version of File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg at the correct scale. File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg is actually an artificial upscale -- you can see it has pixelation artifacts from being upscaled. I had restored that file to the non-upscaled version, but the uploader/photographer disputed my change, which is why I uploaded a separate file. See also the discussion at User talk:IagoQnsi#Please talk to me before you just modify my work. Could you please restore this file? Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 07:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do NOT restore the file, the resize was done by me downsizing it from the original. This user has decided to go renegade and refuses to communicate with me. DO NOT RESTORE THE FILE, thank you. --Don (talk) 07:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

As I was unaware of your dispute, I have now restored the original version of File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg. If anybody wishes to have it deleted for any reason, this needs now to go through a regular DR, not speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

I am nominating BOTH to be deleted, it is better that someone else find a file to replace this. --Don (talk) 07:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright deletion error: File:Alles was tief ist liebt die Maske door GvA.jpg

Hi,

you recently removed a photo showing a work of art made by my mother for being a supposed copy right violation: Alles was tief ist liebt die Maske door GvA.jpg

However: 1) I took the photo myself and hence own the copyright to that. The photo definitely is my own work. 2) As my mother's heir, I now own the copyright to the work of art in question as well (and I have actually owned the original as well for over almost 30 years).

Can you please restore?

Thanks in advance,

The-Real-MCE (talk) 12:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi The-Real-MCE,

wrt "own work": Well, a true reproduction of a 2-dimensional work does not earn own copyright. But that's a minor problem.

wrt "heir": In such cases it is necessary that the copyright-holder sends an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), explains the ownership (as you did above) and confirms the choosen free license for the reproduction of the artwork. Emails to OTRS are not published and can be accessed only by the OTRS-volunteers (I am not one). They will issue a ticket-number, evaluate the permission, eventually ask for more information and finally order undeletion of the image. As you have probably uploaded more reproductions of works of your mother, I would recommend you to include them in the email for this image. --Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I will e-mail permissions-commons@wikimedia.org immediately. The-Real-MCE (talk) 18:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

deletion photo

Please delete this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PapanNamaStasiunLalang.png Fadhil Dimas Nabillah (talk) 01:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Löschdiskussion für "File:Unknown stained glass with Jesus Christ.jpg"

Hallo, ich hatte schon eine Antwort in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unknown stained glass with Jesus Christ.jpg geschrieben (mit dem Tenor, die Datei beizubehalten, weil Urheber bereits 1935 verstorben und Lizenz daher korrekt), dann aber nicht abgespeichert, weil mir währenddessen auffiel, dass sie ein Duplikat von File:Vitrail mort.jpg ist. Man könnte sie also derart behandeln. Wie soll ich Deiner Meinung nach am besten vorgehen: Meine Antwort in die Löschdisk. schreiben mit dem Hinweis auf das Duplikat und dann nichts weiter unternehmen, zusätzlich {{Duplicate}} in die Dateibeschreibung eintragen oder nur {{duplicate}} in die Dateibeschreibung setzen ohne die Löschdisk. zu behelligen? — Speravir – 23:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Ergänzung: File:Unknown stained glass with Jesus Christ.jpg, frisch angelegt, könnte dann auch gelöscht werden und müsste nicht als Weiterleitung erhalten bleiben, wenn nicht dummerweise bei der kürzlichen Splitaktion Dateilinks umgebogen worden wären. Und da fällt mir auf, dass die Date einst kurz Mort.jpg hieß. — Speravir – 23:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt fast alle dieser fehlerhaften Links repariert; in einem Fall wurde es unterbunden, weil Benutzerseite (finn. Wikipedia), in einem zweiten Fall muss noch gesichtet werden. — Speravir – 00:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Túrelio? — Speravir – 21:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

@Speravir, sorry dass ich nicht schneller geantwortet habe, aber irgendwie ist der Ablauf ganz schön komplex. Hinzu kommt noch, dass der hochladende Account Lucienbegule suggeriert der Künstler zu sein, der aber schon 1935 gestorben ist. Das Glasfenster selbst ist also klar PD. Für das Foto davon, das - wie fast alle Uploads von diesem Account - einem Gérald Gambier zugeschrieben wird, liegt aber formell keine Bestätigung vor. "Gérald Gambier" ist (auch) der Name eines Autor, von dem auf der :fr eine Reihe von Schriften erwähnt werden. Der Hochlader erwähnt auf seiner Disku "Gérald Gambier (mon éditeur) et moi,". Es ist also eine andere Person. Und offenbar wurde das Thema Genehmigung dort bereits 2010 angesprochen: fr:Discussion_utilisateur:Lucienbegule#Licence_!. Allerdings sind meine Französischkenntnisse zu eingerostet, um da durchzusteigen. Hinzu kommt, dass der letzte Edit des Hochladers hier und auf der :fr von 2018 ist.

D.h., eine Duplikatlöschung von File:Unknown stained glass with Jesus Christ.jpg zugunsten von File:Vitrail mort.jpg wäre m.E. kein Problem.

Das Faß "Genehmigung für Photo Gérald Gambier einfordern" möchte ich ungern aufmachen. Wenn man 2D akzeptiert, könnte aber PD-Art genügen.--Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Ah, dass Lucienbegule nicht Photo Gérald Gambier ist, war mir noch gar nicht in den Sinn gekommen, dann müsste man, wie Du ja auch selbst andeutest, alle von ihm hochgeladenen Bilder als lizenzlos ansehen. Aah, ich seh grade, dass Du in der Löschdisk. eine entsprechende Antwort gegeben hast. Dann lass ich es erstmal auf sich beruhen und warte auf den entscheidenden Admin. — Speravir – 00:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Permission to cancel file

Hello, I beg to cancel this file, because I have permission to the owner from Flickr, to upload it. he has no problem using his photo, but must use his credit. File:Tanjungbalai roundhouse at 10th May 1980.jpg and File:DSM 28 at Tanjung balai roundhouse.jpg Fadhil Dimas Nabillah (talk) 04:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Fadhil Dimas Nabillah,

in order to understand you correctly, by "to cancel this file" you actually meant to restore it, right? As both are already "canceled" (deleted). Is there any evidence of said permission from the owner? On Flickr it is still "all rights reserved". There are 2 ways the rights-holder can issue a permission: 1) change the license on Flickr to a Commons-compatible one, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA, at least for one day. 2) send (the rightsholder, not you) an individual permission (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA) for the image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

I have evidence of permission to upload, and how do I show the evidence ? Fadhil Dimas Nabillah (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Above I had written already about how the permission should be given. Email-forwarded permissions are not accepted by OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Restore

Hello Túrelio, I hope you're doing great. Kindly restore Category:Ketika Sharma. I can recreate but don't want to do that. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 15:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:NUCOHS (2).png

Hi Túrelio, I've just come across your deletion of File:NUCOHS (2).png. Based on the edits it was used in it is clearly a part of this sockfarm, which tracks with your deletion given they consistently upload copyvios. I cannot see the user who uploaded the file (not an admin), but if they uploaded any others they are going to be copyvios as well. The user should probably also be blocked and tagged, if they are not so far. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Chipmunkdavis,

uploader was User:Portuski, who has 2 deleted uploads and has 1 remaining, File:NUCOHS.png. However, for the latter image I wasn't able to find any webhits via Google-Images, TinEye and Yandex. --Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. The metadata there somewhat speaks for itself. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

OK, I've put into DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:NUCOHS.png. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

On the subject, I've also come across File:DonQuijoteSG.png, another obvious upload from the farm. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

I've included that file in the DR for the other one. --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Logo Socialdemokratern

Hello! You have deleted the file File:Logo_socialdemokraterna_red.svg The file was downloaded from the website of the Swedish Social Democratic Party. (https://www.socialdemokraterna.se/vart-parti/press) It says "Free to download". Please restore it. Best regards / Pegy22  ^message 14:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Pegy22,

this file had been tagged as copyvio for "Logo is not simple enough to fall under PD-Textlogo and should thus be considered copyrighted/non-free unless stated otherwise by the copyright-holder" by another Swedish user.

Wrt your rationale: "Free to download" does not equal "license to freely use it for any purpose and even to create derivative", as required per our policy COM:L. I can put the image into a regular DR, though the result will likely be the same. A better solution would be to contact the party and ask them whether they are willing to release it under a specified Commons-compatible free license (such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please delete

Hello, can you please delete this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katrina_Christiansen.jpg It has been tagged as "no permission" for over a week. Thank you! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please fix (add more) my uploaded files

Hello. I saw at my talk page about "File tagging File...". I did rename from my own work to the company. I've provided source for the images, but You told me that there is no proof. Can you please teach me how can I do this for the next images and please fix File:Beyond LIVE - SUPER JUNIOR-K.R.Y. - The Moment With Us poster.png & File:NCT - Resonance Global Wave poster.png, by adding more proof, so I will learn it next time. Thank You! Nikolai Boyanov (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Nikolai Boyanov,

in general: it is not enough to cite the source of an image, which is not your own work. There needs also be evidence that the photographer/rightsholder has released it under a free license (as per COM:L).

Now, the 1st image was sourced from Twitter. However, content on Twitter is not free per se. Of course, you may contact the Flickr-account and ask them whether they are able to release the image under a free license (such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). They could then either write this on Twitter below the image or send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS).

The 2nd image was already deleted by a colleague. The reason is the same, as you sourced it to Twitter. --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:I with notch

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Daisy Taylor.jpg

Please, check the license again Нейроманьяк (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Ursula Kissel Foto

Hi,

Danke für Ihren Kommentar. Ich habe bereits eine Email Bestätigung des Studios vorliegen, das mir die mündlich erteilte Berechtigung zur Veröffentlichung (ich schrieb in meiner Email explizit von "Rechte abtreten") nochmal bestätigt. Ich werde das demnächst (sobald ich wieder gescheiten IT Zugang habe) über den üblichen Prozess per Email zur Bestätigung schicken. Dies nur zur Info, dass da noch was (hoffentlich ausreichendes) kommt.

Vielen Dank Liebe Grüße Rolf Kissel 2A02:810C:300:1CA4:ACD8:3D6D:C5E5:9732 15:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Redirect undeletion

Hi Túrelio, Could you please undelete:

• File:7.19 (Road sign).svg
• File:7.5.3 (Road sign).svg
• File:7.12 Belarus (Road sign).svg
• File:3.25.2 Belarus (Road sign).svg
• File:Belarus 8.5.gif
• File:4.6 (Road sign).svg
• File:Russian Road Sign 1.34.2-a.svg
• File:1.34.3-b.svg
• File:Russian Road Sign 1.34.3-a.svg
• File:1.34.2-c.svg
• File:Russian Road Sign 1.34.2-b.svg

as Redirects should never be deleted, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Davey,  Done. Of course, before deleting them, I had checked for any existing on-wiki uses. --Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio, Brilliant many thanks, Sadly we don't know if these are being used off-wiki though, Anyway many thanks for undeleting them :), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 00:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright Violation - Constellations Podcast logo

Hello User:Túrelio,

I saw you had removed the Constellations Podcast logo for a copyright violation but why? I only uploaded the logo as the Podcast uses it across all their streaming platforms shown below.

- https://directory.libsyn.com/shows/view/id/constellations - https://www.audible.com/pd/Constellations-a-New-Space-and-Satellite-Innovation-Podcast-Podcast/B08JJN14JM - https://www.iheart.com/podcast/263-constellations-a-ne-29650403/

Any help would be appreciated.

Best, Pacy.johnso (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Pacy.johnso,

apart from the fact that you claimed it as own work, which isn't true, it was not released under the claimed (or any other, as far as I can see) free license by its rightsholder. All uploads to Commons need have been released by their legal copyright-holder under a Commons-compatible license, per COM:L. The circumstance that an image is used by others in the web, does not automatically mean it's free or free enough for our terms. --Túrelio (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

You may wish to contribute to this

Please see This AN/B discussion on a persistent copyvio uploader whose mistaken uploads you have been active in deleting 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

A bit of attention please

See this please; I understand that there may be so much dirty work that you don't have time to observe the quality of the deletions you make, but if an IP only deletes 'fitting' categories because of one of his POVs, you don't have to accommodate him (and displease a user who does a lot of dirty and IMO useful work, just check my contributions. Threecharlie (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Threecharlie,

I am sorry that you feel hurt by that deletion. I deleted the Category:Architecture in Cadeo because it was empty. Although I admit that I hadn't noticed that there had been a conflict about it, I wonder whether this cat is necessary given the few files in Category:Buildings in Cadeo. Anyway, feel free to recreate it. --Túrelio (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

I understood that you did this because it was empty, but you will also understand that if a troll or vandal with a malicious POV empties a category because of his or her particular view of the project, he or she is encouraged to repeat this expedient.--Threecharlie (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Picture of IJsselmeerpolders on De Trekvogel wiki Dutch

I just posted a picture I took myself, on 8 september 2022 while flying from Amsterdam to Geneva, and you just delete it like that! Why?19:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)~ Mathilde2009 (talk) 19:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mathilde2009,

as you were notified on your talkpage, it was found published at https://www.de-trekvogel.nl/images/luchtfoto2022x.jpg and thereby suspected to be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

LucasArts

Hi Túrelio,
you deleted Category:LucasArts after a new user moved it to Category:Lucasarts. The company name is stylized LucasArts though. (Since 2021 it's actually just a Disney brand and no longer a company, see en:Lucasfilm Games for details.) I think the move (and the deletion with it) should be revoked.
Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Grueslayer,

no problem to do this. However, as the "mover" moved several directly related cats in the same manner[40], it might be wise first to talk to him and try to come to a consent. See Category:LucasArts video games. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

that did not go so well: The user continues to edit, but does not react on his talk page. How to proceed? The amount of files and subcategories affected ain't so big, so I could re-move the categories by hand.

Thanks and kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Now I have moved all cats to their old names. Also in WikiDate the object-name was changed. However, though I reverted an IP-edit there, it did not change the object-name itself. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelio! I assume it doesn't matter whether an entry in any WP or in WD is called "LucasArts" or "Lucasfilm Games" as both are correct (LucasArts was the company from 1991 to 2021, Lucasfilm Games was the company from 1982 to 1991 and currently is the label that the new owners still use). The only incorrect version was "Lucasarts" and that's now eliminated again as far as I can see. Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Shiva Amini.jpg

Hi Túrelio,

You deleted File:Shiva Amini.jpg impetuously and without discussing it or creating a discussion topic. The picture I uploaded is a screenshot of media owned by VOA which is legally allowed for us to use in Wikipedia. For example, there are 21,570 other pictures here uploaded on Wikipedia with the same licensing. Can you please either explain your intention or just simply re-upload Shiva Amini's picture? Iranwatcher (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Iranwatcher,

well, the source-video on YT[41] is not under a free license. From regular photographies offered on VOA-channels I know that quite a number is not their own work, but taken from agencies and thereby do not fall under the PD-clause for U.S. Government works. You will not find these images in the linked cat, as they get deleted as soon as they are detected. I can undelete the image, but will put it into a regular DR to have this case evaluated. --Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much Túrelio. I would comment on the deletion page and would do my best to solve its potential issues :) Iranwatcher (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Dear :::::@Túrelio:, would you please restore File:Sima_Sabet_2.jpg as well, since it is similarly a screenshot of a video of an interview owned by VOA which is available here on VOA website. Iranwatcher (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Tanks a lot, have a good day! Iranwatcher (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

thx

hi i just wanted to say thank you for your hard work on wikipedia! danke!!! 2A02:A441:B921:1:85EA:11D3:455E:96E5 17:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Deleting still frame of 1928 movie

Hi Turelio, you just deleted a file I uploaded. It was a still frame of a 1928 film, Storm Over Asia. The movie is in the public domain and so I don't understand why you deleted it. In Wikimedia there are plenty other still frames of movies in the public domain, such as this. Kindly explain me why that particular still frame weren't fit for Wikimedia. Thanks Giray Altay (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Giray Altay,

the source for this image is en:File:Valéry Inkijinoff.jpg, which is clearly labelled as unfree (:en-Wikipedia allows certain unfree material under their fair-use clause). As the current version of the file on :en is from 2021, I assume that its assessment as unfree, is still valid. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

But the assessment of it may be wrong. The uploader might have uploaded it on en:wikipedia just to be safe, or because he/she prefers upload files that way. The still frame is from the 1928 movie, which is in the public domain. In fact, the whole movie is available at Wikipedia! Just check the article. Can I upload the file again?--Giray Altay (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, ok. No, do not upload it again. I will undelete the file and put it into a regular DR, which allows extensive discussion and might then result in a different evaluation-result. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ok, I will reply there.--Giray Altay (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

It's at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Actor Valéry Inkijinoff.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

File:У віры жыцьця (1927).pdf

Hello! Thanks for repairing, but it is not repaired fully yet. This file is not usefull on Wikisource, it does not show pages of the file. Can you help with that? Gleb Leo (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, not sure I can follow. I clicked on the file here on Commons and then on the preview-"browser" at the right side, until page 10 every page was properly shown, though it took some time, as to be expected by such a large file. If you insist on deletion, that's o.k. per G7. But please check again whether it's really not usable. --Túrelio (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

inattentive action

hi. the file named Samsun 19 Mayıs Stadyumu (2017) oturma planı.svg has been processed but there was no attention to detail. the main file of all files in the Category:Samsun 19 Mayıs Stadium (2017) seating diagrams was that file. all file history made over the years has been deleted. if you were going to merge that files, you should have done the opposite. long story short, the file's history should come back. 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I've reversed the dupe-merge. The OptimusPrimeBot, which had duplicate-tagged the "wrong" file, was likely mislead by the upload-date of the latest file-version, which was 1 day newer than the other one. Anyway, thanks for notifying.--Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

thank you. --𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 10:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your posts on my talk page.

I'm bemused that you are complaining about images that I posted 5 years ago after extensive discussions with a number of Wikipedia's so-called copyright experts.
What has changed?
Why is their advice no longer the best advice on the matter?
Pdfpdf (talk) 09:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

the change resulted from adding of {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} by Hekerui, which makes the images being not PD in the U.S. and thereby violating COM:L. I am not Hekerui, but this restriction might by justified considering that the authors died in 2003 (File:1941 Archibald Dargie Elder.jpg) resp. in 1968 (File:1932 Archibald Ernest-Buckmaster Sir-William-Irvine.jpg). If you want a full discussion, I can undelete and open a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation.

I found that copyright issues quickly became tedious, so I just take the advice of "experts".

Merry Christmas! Pdfpdf (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Peugeot logo

The Peugeot logo, isn't fake is real, it used in the 90s.

The logo is not a violation, it was a render maked by me.

Do not consider it as if it were a violation of rights, I did a remake of the logo of the 90s.

In youtube videos the wire lion appears, with a different typeface.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofOGjjNcOao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc4HuFYlKQM

The Peugeot logo was real, not fake, nor is it for profit.

Flexingflex1224 (talk) 22:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

https://freebiesupply.com/logos/peugeot-logo-6/

Isn't fake

Hi,

I don't know why you are talking about "fake". The image was deleted as it is suspected to violate copyright of Peugeot. Even if you remake a work of art created by somebody else, you need a permission, if the original work is still in copyright. "not for profit" is also not a relevant argument on Commons/Wikipedia, as per our policy COM:L all uploads need to be free also for commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Can you inform me about any German copyright register?

Is there any website in Germany dedicated to information about copyright registrations? AnAkemie (talk) 12:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I am not aware of such a register. But you might ask a broader audience at de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen and/or Commons:Forum. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Why was file "T6_promotional_poster.jpg" removed with no reason?

at least you could provide some sort of reason? Eticangaaa (talk) 07:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Eticangaaa,

sorry that I didn't notice that the tagger of File:T6 promotional poster.jpg hadn't notified you. It was deleted as being copyvio-suspected, because it is sourced from Facebook and thereby not free per se. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiederherstellung

Hallo Turelio!Ich bitte um die Wiederherstellung folgender Dateien * File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 10.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 11.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 12.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 13.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 14.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 15.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 16.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 2.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 3.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 4.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 5.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 6.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 7.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 8.jpg
• File:Mdm Tussauds Berlin 9.jpg

Hallo Edeltraud,

wir haben nichts dagegen, wenn du die Fotos von deinem Besuch auf Wikipedia hochlädst. Das kannst du gerne machen.

Beste Grüße,

Stefan Maucher
Product Excellence Supervisor
Madame Tussauds Berlin 

<contact-data censored for privacy>

Sitz & Lieferanschrift:                                                  
Madame Tussauds Deutschland GmbH                     
Unter den Linden 74                                                    
10117 Berlin

Ich hatte schon Minorax darum gebeten, der die Dateien vor der Erlaubnis aus Berlin gelöscht hatte, weil ich das nicht kann. Danke Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 07:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Edelmauswaldgeist,

falls das da oben der komplette Text der Antwort ist, dürfte das nicht ausreichen. Eine Freigabe (nur) "für Wikipedia" wird nicht als ausreichend betrachtet. Das Werk muss unter einer mit COM:L-kompatiblen "freien Lizenz" freigegeben werden, also z.B. (aber nicht ausschließlich) CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA. Du kannst gerne bei OTRS nachfragen, aber ich fürchte die werden dasselbe sagen.

Ich habe mir gerade mal eines der Fotos angeschaut. Da es deine Fotos sind, ist es noch etwas komplexer, weil es hier 2 Urheberrechte gibt. Die Freigabe müsste m.E. ungefähr so lauten: "wir erlauben Ihnen die Veröffentlichung/Verbreitung der aufgelisteten Fotos von unseren Figuren unter der gewählten CC-Lizenz." Stimme das vorsichtshalber mit deinem OTRS-Kontakt ab. Ich hätte in dieser Situation übrigens keinesfalls CC-Zero genommen. Aber das ist deine Entscheidung. Hat das Museum eigentlich nicht verlangt, dass der Bildhauer (falls man das auch hier so nennnt) genannt wird? --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio!

Das Museum hat von mir keinen Namen des Bildhauers verlangt. Außerdem nehme ich immer CC-Zero, weil das mal vor Jahren mein Mentor mir so gesagt hatte. Aber wer ist mein OTRS Kontakt? Ist das dieser Stefan Maucher aus Berlin? Oder dieser Minorax, der nie antwortet. Da immer alles nur in Englisch dasteht, verstehe ich nur die Hälfte. Viele GrüßeEdelmauswaldgeist (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Wenn du die Genehmigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org geschickt hast, müsste eigentlich auf deutsch geantwortet werden. Mit OTRS-Kontakt meinte ich denjenigen, der dir auf deine Email an OTRS geantwortet hat. Normalerweise wird für jeden Genehmigungsprozess zu Beginn eine Vorgangsnummer (ticket #) vergeben und mitgeteilt, die wie eine Akte funktioniert. Und m.W. bearbeitet einen solchen Vorgang auch immer der/dieselbe Mitarbeiter/in. Ich selbst gehöre aber nicht zu dieser Gruppe. Minorax ist ein Admin wie ich. "Stefan Maucher" klingt eher wie die typischen Pseudonyme, die die OTRS-Kollegen im Schriftverkehr benutzen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio! Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe. Ich wußte garnicht, daß man sich da an diese mailadresse wenden kann. Es hat aber jetzt alles super geklappt, und meine Bilder sind wieder hergestellt worden- Liebe GrüßeEdelmauswaldgeist (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright Violation?

Hi Turelio,

I noticed you deleted one of the photos I had uploaded. Did I do something wrong? I thought I correctly labeled it with the CC Share Alike 4.0 license.

Please let me know how to fix this.

thank you Sara RDVCorp (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sara,

you had uploaded File:Dick DeVos, 2021.jpg as own work, but the image was published a year earlier on Facebook, which is not a free source. --Túrelio (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

Thanks for the response and for being thorough in reviewing images. I work for Mr. DeVos and we own the copyright to the image. We were the ones who posted it to his Facebook page, and I disclosed our copyright ownership and conflict of interest when I submitted this image edit request for his Wikipedia article.

Are there other steps I can take to show the image is ours? Thank you. Sara RDVCorp (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sara, though I don't belong to the group of OTRS-volunteers, who process permissions, I know that they usually don't accept an account-verification automatically as a blanket permission. Therefore I would recommend you to send an email-permission for this image (or, if you intend to submit/upload more "company-images", for the whole batch). First you should internally check whether you are allowed to do this or if it's the legal department's job. Also you should clarify, if the photo was taken by a hired photographer, if he/she transferred all rights to the company or to Mr. DeVos. In case he/she didn't, you need to find out, if the photographer wants to be credited (as re-use of CC-licensed images requires to credit the photographer or rightsholder). If you have submitted such a permission to Commons, please jump to Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, copy the text in the square, add the file of the image and the name of the choosen license, put your (or the official's) name and date under it and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (your email will not be published, onbly OTRS-volunteers have access). --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

I really appreciate you taking the time to explain all of that, thank you. I will get started on the process. Sara RDVCorp (talk) 19:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

We have gone through the email-permission process and re-uploaded the photo. I have replied to the original Profile Photo Update Request on the talk page but it has not been addressed yet. Can you help here?

thank you again for all your help on this! Sara RDVCorp (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Election posters

Hi... I am unsure how to proceed. Multiple times files from the Category:Election posters in Denmark have been deleted because there are no FoP, yet most of the current ones are from Flickr, which means they'll just be reuploaded (some of the deleted ones are already back) by some bot or however people do it? TherasTaneel (talk) 06:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi, as opposed to Commons, Flickr doesn't proactively care a bit about whether uploads by their users violate other people's copyright. They want to make money, that's all they care about. Sure, when you file a DMCA-take-down, they do react, as they legally need to. So, as long as these mass-uploads from Flickr are allowed on Commons, I don't see a solution other the patroling and patroling again. :-( --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Ah, I see. So... reuse the deletion requests where reuploaded and either gather the other ones in one big request for the category, or every other individually? Hmm, couldn't one lock a file name preventing an upload to that specific file name until a certain date where it's likely it enters PD? TherasTaneel (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi, re-upload of already deleted (identical) images qualifies for speedy. Collective DRs should made only if the included images are really indentical with regard to their copyright-problem. For example, election-poster without a photography, i.e. merely including text, are likely below threshold of originality and thereby not copyrightable. So, these should not be included. About locking filename: well that doesn't work so well, AFAIK. In addition, it might be easier to leave a (sort of honey-pot) filename (for an image uploaded again and again) open, as it makes its detection easier. You just put it on your watch-list and when it pops up again, blam. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Deleting images in the public domain

Dear Turelio, there is a user on Wikimedia Commons (Tm), who is trying to delete images of personalities, downloaded by me or my brother, that are in the public domain in Portugal, with the false argument "that there is no evidence that it is in public domain" which is false, since the images are dated before July 1, 1970 (deadline for DP in Portugal), Besides, I've already tried to talk to this user, I've already given him other examples of other images, but it's always reverting to my edits in the question ([42]), but it's only deleting images downloaded by me or my brother (which seems to be something personal). I would like to know what I can do?, I asked for your help.
The images in question are:
File:Presidente António José de Almeida.jpg
File:Retrato do Presidente Américo Thomaz.jpg
File:Retrato do Dr. Bernardino Machado.jpg
File:Actor Vasco Santana.jpg
File:Vice-almirante José Mendes Cabeçadas Júnior.jpg
File:Retrato de Dom Manuel Gonçalves Cerejeira.jpg
File:ANTÓNIO ÓSCAR DE FRAGOSO CARMONA (MARECHAL).png
File:O Presidente da República Óscar Carmona, ao lado do presidente do Conselho de Ministros Oliveira Salazar, a bordo do navio «D. Fernando».jpg
File:Presidente da República Bernardino Machado.jpg
(At the time I make this comment, I removed the warning because it is unbreakable, but the user is always reverting my edits, resetting the semi-fast deletion warning and paying for the sources and new information of the images.)
I ask for your help. Best regards Ser.Silv. (talk) 11:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ser.Silv,

sorry for the delay, I was busy. I'll look into that tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok thanks, it was also to inform you that the user in question, stopped putting these files for semi-fast deletion after having communicated this situation.Ser.Silv. (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Por tu diligencia como administrador! Muchas gracias! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Info

Just to say that Meatstick1 is indef blocked on en wp for vandalism... More for information that anything else. Best Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Angel Tsvetkov.jpg

Hello. Its my own picture and i have own copyrights of it.. Can you please undeleted it? Angel.Valeriev.Tsvetkov (talk) 10:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

you wrote in the description that it is from 2022, but it was published at https://www.plovdiv24.bg/novini/plovdiv/Edin-ot-top-hakerite-na-Plovdiv-s-intriguvasht-komentar-po-temata-NAP-liiks-887847 3 years (!) earlier. Who has really shot this image? --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Pfersdorf

Benutzerbeiträge von „Pfersdorf“ – Wikimedia Commons

Die Uploads des Benutzer sollten mal geprüft werden, teils ist die Urheberschaft nicht klar. Atamari (talk) 11:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

File "without author permission"

I'm terribly sorry to bother you. This file of the Safdie Brothers has been marked as missing permission, when it is in fact not. It comes from a CC-BY-SA Vimeo upload published by media group RealTVFilms, who interviewed the people in the file. Because of this, I believe the template added has been an error. May this tag be removed please? JamesTheLaptop (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you make the montage of the 2 screenshots? --Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes. I combined both screenshots. Like I said, they come from CC-BY-SA RealTVFilms videos. JamesTheLaptop (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks so much! JamesTheLaptop (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Flickr review

Hi Túrelio, could you review File:Aisha De Sequeira - Female Leadership - World Economic Forum - India Economic Summit 2010.jpg? The Flickr licence history (under "Additional info") shows that it was originally posted under CC-BY-SA. Joofjoof (talk) 08:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Joofjoof,

do you know what is behind the OTRS-ticket 2008032810015671, which is shown on the page? One might justify the upload under CC-BY-SA per the license-note in the metadata and in the description on the Flickr-page. However, as the upload happened at a time when the license on Flickr had already been changed to non-compatible, this might be a precedent and thereby it might be wise to run this through a regular DR, in order to get a robust decision than just one admin. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice - I will look into the ticket here, and then see how to proceed. Joofjoof (talk) 11:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

FYI, here is the response from VRT.

As for the Flickr licence change, what do you think about asking at Commons:Village pump/Proposals? Joofjoof (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Célia Serber.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you tell whether File:Célia Serber.jpg is the same as File:Célia SERBER.jpg? Both files were uploaded by the same user and the first file might be a re-upload of the second file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes; tagged accordingly. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this Túrelio. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Admiral_Ant%C3%B3nio_Silva_Ribeiro.jpg

Hello,From https://www.defesa.gov.pt/pt/Paginas/avisos_legais.aspx, "uso privado ou informativo e não comercial", means use of the file is allowed for private, informative and non-comercial usage, which I believe falls into what wikipedia content is: informative and non-comercial. Please let me know if this is not the case and file should not be uploaded. Thanks.

Gambiteer (talk) 08:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gambiteer,

per our (and Wikipedia's) policy, COM:L, media uploaded to Commons need to be free also for commercial use. I am aware that this seems to be surprising, however, it was decided so at the start of Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification Túrelio.

Gambiteer (talk) 10:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Hinton, West Virginia.svg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Flag of Hinton, West Virginia.svg? I think it has the same issues that led you to delete File:Flag of Joliet, Illinois.svg earlier today given hintonwva.com. I'm not sure who uploaded the Joliet file. If it was also TheVexillologistofKingwood, then perhaps all of that user's file uploads should be looked at per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of Ravenswood, West Virginia.svg and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2022/09#Municipal flags. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

I've put the flag into a DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Hinton, West Virginia.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this. There's probably more of this user uploads found at en:User:TheVexillologistofKingwood/Vectorized flags that also need to be assessed since many of them, like File:Bicentennial Flag of Preston County, West Virginia.svg, appear to be also uploaded under questionable licensing. This user is also Frank Zigler and that account has also be uploading lots of flag files that probably need to be assessed as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Macron ICM 2022 Paris.webm

Sorry, I'm french and my english is not so good

@Mahagaja: too.

Hello, I think you deleted, in october, File:Macron ICM 2022 Paris.webm from possible user: Remitbuber. This file was again created by Exemplereial (talk · contribs) and used on WP:fr by Heistofr (talk · contribs · count · global contribs).

I think, it must be also deleted. Thanks. HB (talk) 08:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Merci d'avoir notifié. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Files by Kinocine

Hi, Many files by Kinocine were tagged for speedy deletions by Paper9oll, although they have consistent EXIF data. IMO these are invalid. I deleted a few, and then restored them. I also restored a few you deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

delete

please delete File:Halaman by pub2.jpeg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Halaman_by_pub2.jpeg&fileImporterSuccess=1 Fadhil Dimas Nabillah (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Need help for the proof of a possible copyvio

Hi Túrelio

This morning I have determined that user Asv 24 had uploaded several screencopies of Google Street View in 2014. You have deleted those files. This user is used to do CopyVio.

For the other files this user had uploaded [43] it remains this one : File:Muntanya bonica.JPG and I wonder about this photo :

• the file name is not really a relevant name (the user does'nt know the name of the mountain which is in front of him/her)
• Exifs are empty

I found this mountain : it is the Pic de Madaméte in the French Pyrenees mountain range. You can see a photo of this montain here. It's very similar isn't it !

I did not succeed to find a copy of the Asv 24 photo with Google Image. However I am convinced that it is a copyvio. But I don't have enough proofs. I don't know which model I could use for this doubt. Do you have an idea ?

Thx. --Poudou99 (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Poudou99,

using Google-Lens I found at least 2 external hits predating our upload. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot Túrelio for your speedy deletion. Regards. Cquoi (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Könntest du bitte

Hi Túrelio, Codc wurde auf dewiki angegangen. Inkl. eines Fotos. Könntest du bitte meine zwei letzten Bearbeitungen ansehen und entsprechend handeln? Danke dir. Viele Grüße --Itti (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Need restoration of a file

Please restore File:US House 220-0-212 (3V).svg, which was deleted as a duplicate of File:(117th) US House of Representatives.svg. The latter is a continuously changing composition diagram, due to vacancies or special elections. The earlier one is a constant diagram. Due to the death of one representative, I need to upload a newer version that is not same as 220-0-212. That is a part of a series of composition diagrams, all of which are in use, for example File:US House 221-0-212 (2V).svg, File:US House 222-0-212 (1V).svg, etc. I would also request, that if you've deleted any other similar composition diagrams, please consider to restore them and revert any associated renames done on various Wikipedias, as I just did on English Wikipedia. Thank you! —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 13:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

If there is a "This file may have duplicates that should not be deleted" template/category somewhere, please let me know. I'll tag them as such. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 13:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done. You might write that simply into the field "other versions". --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much for the quick response. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 13:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Mareike Morr

Könntest du erklären, was diese Aktion sollte? Das Bild ist noch vorhanden unter File:2017-03-05 Freundeskreis Mädchenchor Hannover im Kloster Walsrode (383)a (cropped).jpg. --AxelHH (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ähem. Dein Diff-Link "diese Aktion" zeigt deine Bearbeitung eines :de-Artikels. Nach Suchen in der Versionsgeschichte habe ich diesen DeLinker-Edit gefunden, der das von mir gelöschte Bild File:Morr.jpg aus dem Artikel entfernt hat, das Benutzer:Eilemarrom dort eingefügt[44] hatte. Auch jetzt bleibt mir verborgen, was du mir eigentlich vorwirfst. --Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Gab es denn das Bild File:Morr.jpg tatsächlich, dass der Benutzer:Eilemarrom dort eingefügt hat und hat er es hochgeladen? Ich habe irrtümlich angenommen, dass das Bild File:2017-03-05 Freundeskreis Mädchenchor Hannover im Kloster Walsrode (383)a (cropped).jpg gelöscht wurde. Irritiert hat mich auch, dass die Bildquelle] nicht erreichbar ist. --AxelHH (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

zu deinen ersten 2 Fragen, siehe: User talk:Eilemarrom. Zur 3. Frage: lange deep-links werden beim einkopieren in das copyvio-Skript manchmal abgeschnitten. Hier ein Thumb davon[]. Es handelt sich um das Hintergrundbild auf Website https://www.mareikemorr.de/. Außerdem können sich manche Links schnell ändern. Es ging ja letztlich nur um einen Hinweis dass es sich nicht um das eigene Werk des Hochladers handelt.--Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

regarding a recent file redirect

Hi, why did you redirect File:Percentage population of Malay in Malaysia by district, 2020.svg‎ to File:Percentage population of Malay in Malaysia by parliament, 2020.svg‎? In Malaysia district boundaries does not necessarily matches with parliamentary boundary, so both versions should be kept. Zh9567 (talk) 14:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi, this was requested[45] by User:Truth and Copyrights and it seemed plausible to me. But I can revert it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Гарик Оганисян.jpg

Hi! Can u, pls, check lic? Нейроманьяк (talk) 12:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

UCs and PD-CAGov

Hi again. I saw you deleted something I put as copyvio (File:Dave Min.jpg) but the user has requested an undeletion request on the image. Was wondering if you help. Not with opposing, just your knowledge as I don't really have that knowledge of the UC and California government situation except from the UCLA thing back in September, which I still can't see that it's a part of the California government. Thanks. reppop^talk 19:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, while I would not hesitate to put it into a regular DR, the uploader has opened a COM:UR-thread, Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Dave_Min.jpg, where my colleague Jim, who is far more experienced in U.S. copyright, has already replied. So, I think we can let that discussion run its course. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

As I see. Thanks! reppop^talk 21:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Baby nursing using nipple guard.jpg

The person pictured in an uploaded image has asked for the image to be deleted from Wikipedia commons. I have tried to do this, but cannot. The page has now been locked. Can you please urgently remove the image. It has been used improperly to support a fake news website. The subject is exercising their rights under GDPR. This is an urgent request. JayneLut (talk) 13:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

It seems my colleague Yann has deleted it already. --Túrelio (talk) 14:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Bismarck-Brunnen Pangani

Bitte das Bild 90 Grad drehen, Danke. Ich hatte zu spät bemerkt, dass das Bild seitlich verdreht war, und daher notwendige Einträge: Beschreibung, Lizenz noch nicht getätigt. Dank für Deine Hilfe. Fibe101 (talk) 20:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Schon passiert; das macht ein Bot. --Túrelio (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyright message on the picture ive upoaded

how can i correct the issue on the picture ive uploaded? Lusia100k (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, if said Agnes Opondo is really the photographer and copyright-holder, you may ask her if she is willing to release her image under a Commons-compatible free license (COM:L), such as CC-BY[46] or CC-BY-SA[47]. If she agrees, she should confirm this per direct email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Otherwise, the image needs to be deleted. Here Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file you find a text-template for the proper wording. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Open deletion requests

Hello Túrelio, firstly thank you for your speedy deletion logs and deletion requests process. Commons:Deletion requests#Lists of requests Here, there has been a lot of request waiting to be closed since June 2020. For example, there are some requests will be closed what I opened since September 2020. As Commons admins, can you reduce these? Of course, you can't do it alone, I think some Commons admins can it together. Sorry if I'm worrying unnecessarily for deletion requests. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello- I am the true.cooyright owner of two images that are currently being reviewed for deletion. I have created this account to get in touch. I have also emailed the team (as requested) about the issue. No one has responded and the images (and identifiable data!) Is still on Wikipedia. When will this be dealt with? The issue is causing me serious distress XXXANONXXX3245 (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, well, I've already removed GPS-data from both images discussed in DRs. As I am not member of the support-team, I cannot answer for them. But, be aware that we are all volunteers and do this work in our spare-time. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Paweł Kowalewski

Moin! Ich bin überrascht, dass die Kategorie leer gewesen ist. Wir haben einige Werke von ihm bzw. über ihn auf Commons, siehe de:Paweł Kowalewski und en:Paweł Kowalewski. Da lohnt doch eine Wiederherstellung, oder? Viele Grüße, NNW 16:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Ich hab sie wiederhergestellt. Leer ist sie aber noch immer. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Eine leere Kat? Das ist doch so 16:49 Uhr. :o) NNW 16:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Jenny Wagner.jpg

Hi Túrelio, you deleted Jenny Wagner.jpg, which I uploaded. I clearly stated that it was my own work and released it. Jenny, shown on the picture, approved the upload. Please restore it. Best regards, Kai Lichtbringender (talk) 13:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Lichtbringender, as the nominator stated, there is no release by Kai König, who is said to be the photographer. In case you are actually Mr. Kai König, which you don't need to say in the public, you should send an email from your official email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) confirming the choosen free license for this image. Your email will be treated confidentially by an OTRS-volunteer, who will evaluate the release and issue an OTRS-ticket, which will allow undeletion of the file. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Picture of Elena Holzhausen

Hallo Túrelio, du hast auf der Seite von Elena Holzhausen das Foto "Elena_Holzhausen_(2017).jpg" gelöscht. Mir wurde allerdings das Foto von Elena Holzhausen für Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt und der Fotograf des Fotos lässt es ihr frei verwenden, die Nutzungsrechte liege bei ihr. Inwiefern verletzt es daher Wikipedias Copyright Bestimmungen? Danke Dir herzlich!

Vincent de Beauvais (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Vincent de Beauvais,

immer wenn der Hochlader nicht der Urheber ist, wird ein Nachweis der behaupteten freien Lizenz verlangt. Das ist kein persönliches Mißtrauen, sondern gilt für alle. Eine solche Klärung, die den ursprünglichen Lizenzgeber zwingt, sich nochmal damit zu beschäftigen, trägt in manchen Fällen sogar neben dazu bei, ein vorher bestehendes Mißverständnis über das Urheberrecht usw. auszuräumen. Eigentlich müsste beim Elena-Holzhausen-Foto der genannte Fotograf Stephan Doleschal die Freigabe erteilen. Wenn sich Frau Holzhausen aber sicher ist, von ihm umfängliche Rechte erhalten zu haben, dann kann auch sie die Freigabe erteilen. Dies ist aber tatsächlich erforderlich. Du kannst ihr das erleichtern, indem du auf Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) gehst und den umrahmten Text kopierst, dann den Dateinamen und den Namen der gewählten Lizenz einträgst und ihr dann alles mailst, mit der Bitte: durchlesen, Datum und Namen daruntersetzen und es selbst (also nicht du) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS) zu mailen. Die Email wird vertraulich behandelt. --Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Anfrage: Verwendung Bild Ignatz Bubis

Sehr geehrter Túrelio, ich möchte Sie darüber informieren, dass wir Ihr Foto von Ignatz Bubis zu den angegebenen Bedingungen in einer Gedenkschrift zu Alfred Delp am Alfred Delp Schulzentrum verwenden würden. Ignatz Bubis hat hier an der Schule 1995 eine Rede gehalten. In einer Collage mit allen anderen Rednern der letzten Alfred-Delp-Tage würden wir Ihr Bild verwenden. Vielen Dank bereits im Voraus. 2001:7C0:0:254:0:0:0:4 13:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Falls die Gedenkschrift auch online verfügbar sein wird, würde ich mich über das Link freuen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Castiglioni family portrait

You recently deleted a photograph that had been used in a number of (inter-wiki) articles about various members of the Castiglioni family (Achille, Livio, Pier Giacomo, and their father Giannino). May I ask you take a minute to review this deletion? I am not knowledgeable about Commons IP issues, and am relatively new to editing Wikipedia, but this seems like it might be an error. The subjects in the photo are all deceased and the claimed date of 1922 makes sense based on the dates of birth of the individuals pictured. Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

I assume you are talking about File:Giannino Castiglioni e i figli Achille, Livio e Pier Giacomo Castiglioni a Lierna Lago di Como.jpg, right? The uploader, which is said to be "a sock of globally-locked Alec Smithson, long-term hoax/nuisance editor", which alone would be a reason for deletion, claims the photographer to be Giannino Castiglioni, who died in 1971, whereby his works are in copyright til end of year 2041. It might be discussed whether this photo is a "simple non-creative photograph", which are protected only for 20 years. However, due to poor definitions, our own Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy#General rules advise against the application of {{PD-Italy}}. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank for your reply, and yes, that is the photograph to which I was referring.

Giannino Castiglioni is pictured in the photograph (as are his wife and children). As he is pictured, it seems unlikely that he also took the photograph. It looks like an early 20th c. studio portrait.

(I'm only trying to write about the subjects and enhance the article with relevant imagery. The Commons IP questions are out of my depth.)

Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Any further thoughts on how this can be resolved in a manner that allows the image to be used? Thank you Cl3phact0 (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I can run the image through a regular DR, in order to allow input from others. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giannino Castiglioni e i figli Achille, Livio e Pier Giacomo Castiglioni a Lierna Lago di Como.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. @User:Justlettersandnumbers, does "Keep PD-Italy" mean that the photo may now be used? Does something further need to be done to restore the photograph to the Livio Castiglioni (as well as the other related articles from which it was recently de-linked)? Cheers Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

PS: Please disregard my last note (except for the "thanks" part). I just noticed that the photograph has already been restored to the article(s)! Thanks again to both. Have a lovely weekend. Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

The image is now in a deletion-discussion, which may end in keep or delete. If kept per PD-Italy, it may be used on some Wikipedias (:it, of course), but not on others (:de, for example). --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Very complex territory this. Please keep me posted and let me know if there is anything I can do. Cheers Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Just put the DR-discussion on your watch-list. Everything relevant will now happen there. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

FREPAP logo

Could you explain why you deleted File:FREPAP Logo.jpg several months ago? What makes it different from other political party logos that are allowed? Jnoubi75 (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, it had been tagged by a patroler as "possible copyright violation because this logo exceeds the threshold of originality and therefore is subject to copyright". In addition, there was no linked source and no evidence for a permission. I am still surprised that this image "survived" more than 1 year. But, as there is no gapless systematic patroling of new uploads, it happens regularly that images slip through the first screening after upload. In addition, to evaluate whether or not a depicted item is above threshold of originality is often a sort of judgement call. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Ronak Kothari.jpg

Hi. Could you please tell me who uploaded File:Ronak Kothari.jpg? Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 13:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Sure, User:सोला का डोला. --Túrelio (talk) 13:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I took his photo from Google, but did mistake in Submitting it. सोला का डोला (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Jiska-classen-36c3-cyberhut.jpg

Hey, this image was a screenshot from a CC-BY-4.0 licensed video, so why did you delete it? If there is a better place for this discussion, let me know. Mømø (talk) 10:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I searched the source-site for the license and I even looked a bit into the video, but didn't find the CC license confirmed. Where did you see it?`--Túrelio (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

It's at the end of the video, timestamp 37:53. Mømø (talk) 14:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Joyca en 2022.jpg

Please reupload the file. It's not a screenshot of a non CC YouTube video... it's both YouTubers that did a YouTube video in their own studio for a unique YouTube channel ! CassiJevenn (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok. I've undeleted the file, but put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joyca en 2022.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Dideye Dito comic jpg removal

Long story short. Dideye Dito is litterally my creation. I own it, and yall decided that I am copyright violating MYSELF. pls just undo it ChiserYT (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

What file are you talking about? File:Dideye Dito- Dome.jpg, which was deleted 10 months ago? If yes: the image was found on a website, which is not under a free license and which has no visible connection to you. So, if you are indeed the creator of that comic/drawing, in such a scenario you need to send a confirmation of the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0) for the image from an email-address linked to the mentioned website to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). An OTRS-volunteer will then either restore the image or order its undeletion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:SARAH MARDINI.jpg

@Túrelio you recently deleted a tagged image, File:SARAH MARDINI.jpg. I included the image license and a link to where it states: Permission for use of Amnesty International Materials: Except where otherwise noted, content in Amnesty International Materials is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. see [48]. I wonder if I can get more clarification from you just to see where did I go wrong. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi FuzzyMagma,

the explaination is already in your own statement: "non-commercial, no derivatives" - each is a no-go for Commons/Wikipedia. Per our policy COM:L, images have to be free also for commercial use and for creating derivative works. --Túrelio (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Otto Moll

Geht die Löschung dieser Datei in Ordnung? Wirkt nämlich irgendwie merkwürdig. Mr. bobby (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, schon von Kollegen Krd erledigt. Möglicherweise wäre das Foto in Ordnung gewesen, aber natürlich nicht mit den Angaben des Hochladers. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Wäre es nicht besser gewesen, die Angaben zu löschen. Das Foto ist doch wichtig.77.180.0.5 23:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Dennoch braucht man dann natürlich eine valide Quelle, die belegt dass das Bild inzwischen PD ist (mal angenommen dies trifft zu). Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, hatte ich vor dem no-source-Markieren danach gesucht, aber nichts zufriedenstellendes gefunden. Ohnehin ist so eine Löschung ja kein endgültiges Urteil. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm still learning the laws of Wikipedia

I accept your warning and I'm apologized to you. I didn't know Wikipedia has strict rules regarding uploading pictures. I'm still new to Wikipedia and learn new things everyday. Sorry for my mistake. I am not abusing, I thought I could upload pictures here freely, to showcase the cultures of various dances I know. Tellisavas (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, no need to apologize to me. Just be a bit more careful with uploads in the future. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

VRT-related question

Hi! I noticed that you recently deleted File:А. М. Капустин.png as copyvio, but we appear have evidence of permission from the copyright holder in Ticket:2022121410010407. Would you be willing to restore the file in light of the permission received? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Biographien

Guten Tag. Beschaeftige mich hier seit Jahren als IP mit verschieden Biographien, vor allem betreffend Zweite Polnische Republik. Bei Bearbeitung der Vermissten Personen baue ich ein Info über den zuletzt bekannten Verbleib der Person ein (weil man soetwas in wikidata nicht einbauen kann oder ich habe keine Ahnung wie man es tut). Solche Infos werden sehr oft von "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt und revertiert. Es gibt Biographien mit sehr seltenen Nachnamen die wirkliche "Einzelstuecke" bei der Wikiprogrammen sind und deswegen existieren keine automatischen Kategorien fuer eben solche seltene Namen. Fuer solche Faelle benutze ich die Schablone "DEFAULTSORT:Nachname, Vorname" damit alles richtig kategorisiert wird ... und hier das naechtste Problem : "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt diese defaultsort Schablone und danach es wird nach dem Vornamen kategorisiert. Wenn er schon so etwas tut dann soll er auch dafuer sorgen das die Dateien (die von ihm revertiert werden) nach dem Nachnamen kategorisiert werden. Da ich systematisch mit Bibliothek und Buch-Quellen arbeite ist wirklich sehr schaedigend wenn ich immer wieder in meiner Arbeit zurueckgeworfen werde. Falls Sie nicht in der Lage sind weiter zuhelfen dann leiten Sie es bitte an jemanden der es kann. Hier einige Beispiele: [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55]. Vielen Dank. Gruesse. 2A01:C22:8448:7100:1C55:E597:187C:264D 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Translated (formatting and links omitted): Good day. I've been dealing with various biographies here for years as an IP, mainly concerning the Second Polish Republic. When processing the missing persons, I include information about the last known whereabouts of the person (because you can't include something like that in wikidata or I have no idea how to do it). Such info is very often removed and reversed by "User:Микола Василечко". There are biographies with very rare surnames that are really "one offs" in the wiki programs and therefore there are no automatic categories for such rare names. For such cases I use the template "DEFAULTSORT:lastname, firstname" so that everything is categorized correctly ... and here the next problem : "User:Микола Василечко"and after that it is categorized by first name . If he is already doing something like this, then he should also ensure that the files (which are reverted by him ) are categorized by last name . Since I work systematically with library and book sources, it is really very damaging when I keep getting thrown back in my work. If you are unable to help further then please forward it to someone who can. Here are some examples: [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] . Thanks very much. Regards. VScode fanboy (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

dj wilman moreno is a well-known dj who helps many djs who are starting out he is a producer and is verified on Spotify his distributor is amuse there you can also verify it Valem41982 (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Túrelio! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

About a speedy deletion

Hi, @Túrelio, you rejected my speedy deletion at Template:NoTOO-Austria. It's not supposed to exist (see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China). Can you explain why you didn't speedy delete the template? --Matr1x-101 {_{user page} - ^{talk with me :)} - _contribs!} 17:47, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Matr1x-101,

the rationale of your speedy was "unused template". However, when I checked the template's uses, I got a long list. Still now, this template is used on nearly 50 pages. I don't know what would happen with these file, if the template is deleted. So, the template should first be removed from the pages/files, which currently use it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Delete previous versions

Hi @Túrelio. Please delete the last two revisions of this File:DCW Movement Charter conversation with Ciell on 15-12-2022.jpg. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 13:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, do you mean the last two or the oldest 2 versions? Technically, the last one cannot be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Túrelio, I don't know how much dumb I can be sometimes. Last two means the previous two - keeping the present one only. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 16:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio, also delete previous revisions of File:Deoband Community Wikimedia logo.svg. It doesn't appear very well and still the earlier versions appear almost everywhere. Rational perhaps, request from DCW key-people, if that works. Best, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 12:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten

Guten Tag Túrelio,
ich wünsche Dir ein frohes und gesegnetes Weihnachtsfest und verbunden mit der Hoffnung von Frieden auf Erden ein gutes neues Jahr 2023.
Danke für alles und beste Grüße. -Orchi (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyright protected image

I see you deleted this and this image. This same editor uploaded one other photo which I'm sure is also a copyright violation. No EXIF data on the blurry photo, which is likely a screengrab from some video I've been unable to locate. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

I've put the file in a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Massive abuse!

Hi Turelio, I have to report massive abuse by User:Dajana L with respect to Coat of Arms of the Government Institute of political science File:Грб Института за политичке студије, Београд.png (uploaded, accorfing to that user, by the former Director of the Institute, that passed away! See here [56] for director Živojin Đurić. In addition, all other hers contributions on Wikimedia Commons were without proper permits or fake(s), as well.109.93.112.71 17:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, due to Christmas I can take are about that only on monday. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

A question about the validity of a license

Merry Christmas, Túrelio
May I ask your advice on extracting free images from this video, under the license attached to the video (YouTube CC-BY); I hesitated because of the sentence written in the description of the video: "© All Rights Reserved. MBC Group"
Note: MBC1 is the first main channel of the MBC Media Group.
Kind Regards,
Masry1973 | مصري1973 (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Puh, that's indeed a bit strange. I've clicked on another video by MBC1; it had only the "All Rights Reserved", but no CC. Anyway, as it seems to be formally o.k. and is on Youtube since 1 year, I would say, upload the intended screenshot, but don't be surprised when it is put into a DR for discussion. Happy holidays. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Threshold of originality

Hey, @Túrelio. Would you mind checking if these two images (1, 2) really meet the threshold of originality? I consider them to be simply textlogos, as the Minerva goddess image is already on public domain. Thank you in advance. RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Obszönität

File:Milton the Dog by Pricasso (the making of).webm

Hier malt einer mit seinem Penis seinen Hund. Das Video gehört gelöscht. Die anderen Bilder, die dieser user hochgeladen hat, dienen ausschließlich der eigenen WErbung. Das gehört auch gelöscht. Echter bull shit. Mr. bobby (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Ich bin da völlig bei dir. Aber das Video ist auf mehreren Projekten in Nutzung, weshalb ein LA kaum Aussicht auf Erfolg hätte. Wenn du es dir antun willst, schau dir den LA gegen des Jimbo-"Portrait" desselben Malers aus 2013 an: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jimmy Wales by Pricasso.jpg. :-( --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Oh, nein. Das möchte ich mir nicht antun. WP mißbraucht für Werbung. Nun gut, die bezahlten Schreiber stellen hier auch seitenlange gut bequellte Darstellungen todlangweiliger Firmen ein. Aber der Pimmelmaler ist das Letzte. Mr. bobby (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey

What gives? What are you deleting stuff that what's more suitable than no images. ObiWanSkywalker86 (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

As I perform hundreths of deletions per day, you need to get more specific, if you want meaningful reply. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Ufa (Bashkortostan).png

https://geraldika.ru/s/18993, http://www.vexillographia.ru/russia/subjects/towns/ufa.htm, https://vector-images.com/image.php?epsid=9529&lang=rus Куку Кукуевичъ (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I do not understand what you want to tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Flag of Ufa Куку Кукуевичъ (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Mother Teresa Image Use

@Túrelio Hi Turelio, I'm notifying you that Girltastic LLC, a non-profit entity, would like to use your image of Mother Teresa on a girl trading card, sold commercially with proceeds being given to four foundations that support girls' education worldwide, where either access to education, or funds are limited. We are pleased to include Mother Teresa in our historical, inspirational women who have had major impacts on mankind and the earth! Thanks so much in advance. Telva Chase (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Telva,

thanks for notifying. In case the "girl trading card" (or a photo of it) will be available online, I would be happy to know the URL/address. --Túrelio (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Turelio. Wikimedia has blocked all replies to you but if they will permit me to provide the URL, I will. Telva Chase (talk) 19:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Litre funéraire

Bonjour Túrelio. Je vois que tu as supprimé la Category:Litre funéraire au motif qu'elle serait mal nommée. En faisant ça tu n'as fait que la moitié du travail car il existe 19 catégories qui étaient rattachées ou sont rattachables à celle-ci et qui maintenant ne forment plus un ensemble cohérent, propre à cet élément architectural typique. Par quoi la remplaces-tu ? Père Igor (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Père Igor,

as I don't have time to dug in this problem at this moment, I've restored the category. Feel free to comment to the rationale/proposobal of the user, who tagged it for deletion[57]. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour Túrelio et bonne année 2023. Finoskov m'a donné l'information : la Category:Litre funéraire a été remplacée par Category:Funeral litres in France. Comme tu as restauré l'ancien nom, peux-tu le supprimer de nouveau en précisant le nom de la nouvelle catégorie, pour éviter de futurs problèmes ? Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, a happy new year also to you. I've created a redirect from the old to the new category, assuming that's what you desired. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)