User talk:Mike Peel
|
|
| Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you. If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website. |
Category:Human tracheal bronchi
[edit]Hi. You added a wikidata infobox to Category:Human tracheal bronchi. As I don't know exactly how this works I just want to mention, that Human tracheal bronchi are not equal to all bronchi. It's a special form which only occurs as a variant, where a side-bronchus goes directly from the trachea. Is the bronchus-data-object sort of fallback? Greetings! Hellerhoff (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Hellerhoff: The Infobox was added here because you made this edit on Wikidata, which I've reverted. That item already has topic's main category (P910) linking through to Category:Bronchus (Q7457241), which links to Category:Bronchi. I think a new Wikidata item is probably needed here, since I can't find a direct equivalent to the category - perhaps you could create one? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I'm not very familiar with Wikidata and I'm afraid to bring confusion into it (as I already did?) when making edits I do not understand completely. But maybe I'll find a silent moment to dive deeper into the stuff and then I can do it. Thanks for your work!--Hellerhoff (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Hellerhoff: I've created a new item at Human tracheal bronchi (Q131364127), hope that helps and that you might be able to expand it. Wikidata is structured data about a topic - it's very similar to infoboxes on Wikipedia, you use it to say that the topic has a property with a given value. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I'm not very familiar with Wikidata and I'm afraid to bring confusion into it (as I already did?) when making edits I do not understand completely. But maybe I'll find a silent moment to dive deeper into the stuff and then I can do it. Thanks for your work!--Hellerhoff (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Automatically add Wikidata Infobox to categories?
[edit]Hi Mike, you probably already have a bot to automatically add {{Wikidata Infobox}} I assume? If a category has {{Rijksmonument}} than it should also have the infobox. Can you add the missing template to these periodically? Thanks Multichill (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Just sitelink the categories from Wikidata, and Pi bot should pick it up and add the infoboxes. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ha, that's a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Having the infobox makes it a bit easier to sort it out and obvious that sitelink is still missing. I could easily do it myself, but figured you already have something. Multichill (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The absence of the infobox should be evidence itself that the sitelink is missing? If all the Rijksmonuments are on Wikidata with the relevant property, I do have a script that could sync them using the monument IDs if needed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ha, that's a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Having the infobox makes it a bit easier to sort it out and obvious that sitelink is still missing. I could easily do it myself, but figured you already have something. Multichill (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 9A-KOR, Boeing 737-800 of ETF Airways at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, 2024 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! G-EUYG, Airbus A320 of British Airways at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, 2024 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|