User talk:DarwIn/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

colocação de imagem

[edit]

Caro Darwin Estou de volta outra vez e novamente pedindo socorro. Estou tentando carregar um arquivo de imagem ( imagem que está na minha familia ha mais de 100 anos e atualmente em minha posse pessoal), mas na hora de finalizar diz que o mesmo ja foi excluido anteriormente ( O que de fato ocorreu nao sei porque), pede para que eu mude a descrição do arquivo, o que nao posso fazer, pois nao posso mudar o nome da pessoa da foto. Como faço para carrega-la novamente, até porque tenho + ou - 13 imagens em situação semelhante, para + ou - nove paginas que redigi. Consegui até carregar uma outra imagem como teste ( um gato) entao sei que estou fazendo a operação da maneira correta. segue o nome de um dos arquivos que constam como eliminados anteriormente.120px|right|thumb|Barão de Cabo Verde Obrigado Capeto47 (talk) 01:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

colocação de imagens

[edit]

Caro Darwin, a sua interferencia foi de grande valia, pois conseguimos colocar as imagens consoante suas orientações. Informo a seguir os links das paginas carregadas hoje (amanhã carregaremos outras), solicitando a sua gestão para que elas sejam mantidas e não apagadas. Somos muito, muito gratos pela sua preciosa ajuda. http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Navarro_de_Morais_Sales#Biografia, http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lu%C3%ADs_Ant%C3%B4nio_de_Morais_Navarro, http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%A1vio_de_Queir%C3%B3s. Grande abraço. Capeto47 (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alo Darwin, por gentileza, é possivel, por aí, voce colocar a imagem do Brasão na mesma dimensão das demais da pagina http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lu%C3%ADs_Ant%C3%B4nio_de_Morais_Navarro#Biografia? Obrigado Capeto47 (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, já está.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muito obrigado,minha mulher e minha filha afirmam que encontrei um anjo na Communs quando descobri voce...e é a pura verdade! Abraços Capeto47 (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Alo Darwin, mais algumas paginas que receberam imagens, agora faltam no maximo mais 5. http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barr%C3%A2nia

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam%C3%A1sio_Pires_Pimentel

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabo_Verde_(Minas_Gerais)

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzambinho

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joaquim_Leonel_Pereira_de_Magalh%C3%A3es

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venceslau_de_Queir%C3%B3s

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ces%C3%A1rio_Cec%C3%ADlio_de_Assis_Coimbra

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luci_de_Queir%C3%B3s#Biografia Obrigado. 201.93.248.16 19:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Darwin, boa noite. Uma ideia: para o trabalho que, solicitamente, voce fara com as imagens que carreguei, para "adapta-las às normas do Commons", uma das maneiras de respeitar a verificabilidade, facilitando, de certa forma, a sua analise, é cotejar as datas de nascimento e morte dos fotografados (constantes na propria pagina da Wikipedia), com as datas mencionadas no questionario de carregamento. Obrigado Capeto47 (talk) 00:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens sob sua vigilancia

[edit]

Alo Darwin, tudo bem? Voce conseguiu colocar, tambem, as imagens das outras 8 paginas que informei-lhe em 16/02, sob sua vigilancia? Obrigado Capeto47 (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

imagens enviadas por capeto47

[edit]

Ola Darwin, já foi possivel voce adaptar às normas da Commons as 17 imagens (referentes a 10 paginas da Wikipedia), que carreguei? Gostaria, por favor, que você deletasse a imagem do "gato gordo", pois foi apenas um teste que fiz com ela. Grato 189.46.33.242 11:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Capeto47 (talk) 11:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lalala

[edit]

Sumiu de lá mas por aqui continua sempre na ativa. E aí, volta quando? Heheh Ruy Pugliesi 11:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken will be growing teeth and pigs will fly, but I might even attend, thou shall keep a weather eye. ;) -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:57, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Torrejoncillo

[edit]

No problem. I am sure you were in good faith. I apologize for my English. Not as good as I would like it to be. Greetings. --LMLM (talk) 14:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda con traducción

[edit]

¡Hola DarwIn! ya va siendo hora de que se cree una categoría propia para los "montes flordelisados" en català "mont floronat", que es esta figura: File:Escut de Mont-roig del Camp.svg formada por la suma de un monte y una flor de lis. A ver si puedes ayudarme con la traducción del término para crear la categoría, que sería una subcategoría de "fleur-de-lis in heraldry" y "Mountains in heraldry". Creo que debería ser "Mountains flory in heraldry". ¡Saludos y grácias! --Xavigivax (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Xavigivax! I apologize for taking so long to answer this. I've actually researched it back when you posted the message, but forgot to answer you. I couldn't came up with any English native term for that. However, we may tentatively create something as "mounts fleury" or "mounts fleurie", I've seen people have been using "mounts vert" for the green mountains in heraldry, therefore it seems like an obvious designation for that particular charge.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Se lo preguntaré a un experto heraldista americano, a ver si me dice el término correcto en inglés, o el que el crea. Te digo algo. --Xavigivax (talk) 15:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
La respuesta ha sido esta:

That's an interesting charge. I think it may be unique to Spanish heraldry. Anyway, to answer your question it would be blazoned a "mount floriated" or as a "mount flory". In English heraldry anything that terminates in a fleur-de-lis or is decorated by a fleur-de-lis issuing from it may be blazoned as "flory".

¿Qué hacemos? --Xavigivax (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

vote change?

[edit]

hello, was curious why you had changed your vote (without commenting) on the t-shirt thing? Lx 121 (talk) 02:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I changed it because I didn't felt comfortable defending the keeping of stuff which is obviously spam, and with some legitimate copyright concerns. However, I don't care enough about it, nor I believe those copyright concerns are so urgent that I would actually support the deletion, so I've simply withdrawn my keep vote. I really had nothing to say, thus I just struck it.-- Darwin Ahoy! 03:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens da Associação Portuguesa de Plantas Carnívoras

[edit]

Boa tarde DarwIn,

Estou a contacta-lo pois como se deve lembrar alertou-me para duas imagens inseridas por mim, sem ter enviado permissão. Desde já lhe agradeço por me ter chamado a atenção ao mesmo.

A questão que se coloca agora é que já enviei o email com a permissão no dia 04-06-2011 e ainda não retiraram o aviso de apagamento. Até enviei com o email Geral da Associação para evitar confusões. Agradeço que caso esteja algo mal me avise para retificar ou em caso de estar tudo bem que retifique a situação.

Muito obrigado pelo tempo despendido.

Os meus cumprimentos, Sérgio Amorim

Mudança de licença desta imagem[1]

[edit]

Caro DarwIn, eu li a página de discussão [2] e pelos vistos criei uma grande confusão ao mudar a licença, peço imensa desculpa, faça as correções necessárias, eu só queria proteger algumas das minhas imagens que estão ou podem vir a ser usadas comercialmente em livros, algo que eu não quero sem a minha autorização e acordo, por isso mudei a "licença para não comercial". Muito atenciosamente Henrique Matos (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigada.

[edit]

Olá DarwIn,

Estranhamente não estão aqui muitas mensagens de agradecimento. Espero que seja por estar a escrever no local errado e não porque ninguém lhe agradece depois do trabalho estar feito. Vou ter mais cuidado quando colocar mais imagens. Imagens é uma importante parte dos temas. Agora é só perceber bem como isto funciona.

Sobre a página da Associação ainda não percebi o que é preciso. Essa falta de notoriedade. Já li tudo o que aconselham diversas vezes e mesmo assim passa-me ao lado. Parece-me que estou a ler uma carta ao Presidente da República para ir à casa de banho. Toda formal e ninguém percebe nada. Bem mas isso não interessa pois resolve-se tudo!

Por acaso já ando na Wikipédia à muitos anos, mas ficava-me pela inglesa. Vamos la ver se pelo menos ajudamos a tapar a lacuna das plantas carnívoras na Wikipédia portuguesa.

Mas muito obrigado pelo tempo gasto com as minhas imagens. Prometo ter mais atenção para a próxima vez.

Os meus cumprimentos, Sérgio Amorim

Hey!

[edit]

Boas! Claro que sim, seria fenomenal se a DRAC alinhasse connosco. Conseguimos obter a lista, entretanto, mas nunca mais me responderam ao último e-mail. Achas que consegues dar uma mão? Se me pudesses manter em CC nos e-mails era óptimo... já viste como é que está a ficar o site? abraço, -- Nuno Tavares PT 23:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fui confirmar. Afinal nunca cheguei a mandar mail para eles, foi para a outra DRAC :) Vou já enviar de seguida. Em relação à colaboração, vejo que há duas coisas em curso: 1) o Wiki Loves Monuments e 2) uma colaboração a mais longo prazo, essa da BD de fotografias...

Para 1) era o que te pedia para me manteres em CC, e o site é: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt/ - as credenciais são "wlm" e as oito primeiras letras da iniciativa.

Para 2), seria o website da WMP, http://www.wikimedia.pt

Qualquer dúvida, apita.

Em relação à Casa Pia, se achas que pode haver espaço para uma parceria, tens o nosso apoio. Fala pelo menos do projecto, e das nossas iniciativas, e eles que contem connosco se precisarem ajuda. Se houver algo mais concreto, podemos explorar. Eu é que estou muito sobrecarregado com os WLM, mas posso ajudar no que for possível. -- Nuno Tavares PT 00:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: o site só ainda não está publicamente disponível porque ainda não fechámos os patrocínios. -- Nuno Tavares PT 00:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Sim, podes partilhar as credenciais. O âmbito do WLM é: fotos carregadas em Setembro. O que significa que fotos com 30 anos, se nunca foram disponibilizadas numa licença livre em algum outro lugar, são admissíveis para carregamento no Commons (cuja premissa é ter, precisamente, uma licença livre). Posto isto, até tinha a sua graça a DRAC participar com o arquivo eheheh, seria genial! Mas, claro, tem que ser a título individual (ou seja, não pode ser "a DRAC" a participar por ser uma entidade), o que levanta a questão de "como é que o indivíduo licenciará conteúdos da DRAC". É exequível, sim, mas tem que ter a permissão escrita da DRAC. Fiz-me entender?

A DRAC pode ainda participar de outra forma: ao disponibilizar o arquivo numa licença livre, nós estamos prestes a emitir um comunicado de imprensa sobre o WLM, e podemos referir já essa colaboração! Dizer algo do estilo "A DRAC, em sintonia com o WLM, libertou XXX fotos sob licença ...." :-) Seria genial, e daria uma visibilidade à DRAC espectacular. -- Nuno Tavares PT 00:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm sure that File:Nandankanan1.jpg‎ is a jaguar because of the compact and well-muscled shape, and the large rosettes on the fur. File:Nandankanan2.jpg‎ is thinner and the rosettes seems smaller. --Abujoy (talk) 08:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The_Servant_Of_God,_Father_Varghese_Palakkappillil_with_the_Pioneer_Sisters_of_the_Destitute.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trycatch (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you requested the deletion of a file a uploaded for copyrighted violation. It was a file, as I reported, from the Web Gallery of Art site, and I uploaded because in Commons there are hundreds (maybe thoundands) of images from WGA). Maybe I did not write correctly on the Info, so... could you tell me precisely what I have to do ? YukioSanjo (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yukio, if I well recall, it was a sculpture, and {{PD-Art}} only applies to 2D works of art, that's why it was a copyright violation. It is an understandable mistake, I don't think you are a copyright violator, and if you want to remove the automated advice I've sent to your userpage, please do so. But you should verify among your uploads if there is another situation like this one, and send it to speedy delete.-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I will check.
Bye
 YukioSanjo (talk) 13:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir

[edit]

This foto is mine (File:Calderazzo-sesc.jpg)? Why you delete it?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlo Gubachu (talk • contribs)

Olá Carlo. Apaguei a foto porque tinha como autor Cris Godoy, e pelo formato suponho que tenha sido retirada do facebook dessa pessoa sem autorização, além de que carregou outras fotos retiradas de outros sites e com outros autores, suponho que sem autorização também.-- Darwin Ahoy! 03:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caro senhor, a foto de minha pertença e portanto ela é autorizada.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlo Gubachu (talk • contribs)

Rattynana

[edit]

Just saw this [3] - the uploader is a sockpuppet blocked on en.wiki. Dougweller (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dougweller, I've passed your concerns into the Admin Noticeboard. Thanks for the information.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografía de Copiapó

[edit]

Filtro de etiquetas:

Excuse me, but I'm from Copiapó, and actually live to one square away from the monument of Juan Godoy. You can search for many of the existing pictures of the monument and they look pretty much the same. Also, I have never -ever- visited the website you citted before as to assume the picture was taken from there. Then, do you have any certain that the real author of the picture is the owner of such website or at least this was ever authorized to use it?

Again. What does this mean? The picture was also in the article about the University of Atacama (in my city, too), a picture taken several years ago, and present in such article since 2008 or 2009, if not wrong (I was also the one who uploaded, not sure if ussing my current wikipedia account... might have been with the one named Judebc). Now, thanks to you, both articles -and the worst of all, the main one- lacks of the picture.

  • 16:11 21 jun 2011 DarwIn (Discusión | contribuciones) borró «File:Banderacoppo.jpg» ‎ (Copyright violation: Derivative of copyrighted image, already deleted and uploaded again by this user) (global usage; delinker log)

Now, why this? The "escudo" in the middle of the flag I took it from the "escudo" in the website that no one has ereased yet. I made this picture, based in the flag you can find in the city hall, and pictures on Internet. See: [[4]]. I'd like to know the Wikipedia policy regarding this matter, please.

Please, don't act as if your uploads were undeservedly put in question, since you uploaded a lot of blatant copyvios. I will look into those cases you mention and give you an answer, shortly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About case 1: I beg you to not take me for a fool, and do not insult my intelligence. The image that can be seen in File:Dibujo444.jpg is obviously this one. I don't know who is the actual author of that image, but I know it probably is not you, especially after your comment about "many of the existing pictures of the monument and they look pretty much the same". If you can prove the opposite, please do so.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DarwIn: it was not my intention to make you believe so. I won't deny thay only half of the pictures used in the collage were of my authory. The thing is that you said -or apparently so- that the rest of the pictures were copyvios. And regarding the flag of the city, I don't understand what's the problem with making the flag myself, using an authorized picture (the coat of the city). And if so, what especificall license should I use for it. Thanks.

If they were not your work, why have you said it was in the authorship of the file? And why have you done the same for many other files you uploaded, which were others work? You even passed the work of another Commons user as your own. For Christ sake, what was the need for that?
About the collage, you can't keep it here, even if only one of the photos is a copyvio. If you have images taken by you or under a free license, you may make and upload a new one.
About the coat of arms, you cannot grab a coat of arms from the internet, paste it into a blue field and make a flag from it, as it would still be a derivative of the original copyrighted work. You can do one yourself using available free elements or elements designed by you.
About the university picture, if you claim authorship on it, please follow COM:OTRS procedures to properly license it. I would gladly restore it while waiting for the authorisation if you were a trusted user, but unfortunately you have destroyed that trust with your actions.
Finally, why don't you take your camera and pick some photos yourself, instead of stealing other's work? I swear I can't understand why people do that, it's so much more rewarding to publish what really is one's own work.-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licença de imagem

[edit]

Alo Darwin, tudo bem? Por favor, voce poderia, novamente, ajudar-me com relação a licença para a imagem do brasão dos Paes de Barros Penteados que carreguei nas paginas http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%A1vio_de_Queir%C3%B3s e http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venceslau_de_Queir%C3%B3s? Mais uma vez, muito obrigado.Capeto47 (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concratulations

[edit]

Like I said, babel is lame, and the {{Admin}} thingy is a quite distracting. I suggest you to use:

{|
|-
| {{user pt}}{{user en-3}}{{user es-2}}
|-
| {{user gl-2}}{{user fr-2}}{{user ca-1}}
|-
| {{user it-1}}{{user oc-1}}{{user admin|id=[[file:BroomMan.png|40px]]}}
|}

Yuval Y § Chat § 05:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks! I'll have to reform that page, but for now that would do the trick. I've found your time traveller, by the way. ;) -- Darwin Ahoy! 05:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gladly :) And as for the time traveler, it's easy to locate him, and more difficult to understand he's actually 'one of the crowd'... ;) --Yuval Y § Chat § 06:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, btw, you can place the user boxes below - No harm would be done. And you can also add a page like this which would appear when someone edits your talk page. --Yuval Y § Chat § 06:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licença de imagem

[edit]

Acredito haver editado, ontem, a mensagem p/ voce em local inadequado, portanto a estou reenviando. Alo Darwin, tudo bem? Por favor, voce poderia, novamente, ajudar-me com relação a licença para a imagem do brasão dos Paes de Barros Penteados que carreguei nas paginas http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%A1vio_de_Queir%C3%B3s e http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venceslau_de_Queir%C3%B3s? Informou-me a Commons que se não houver esse procedimento a imagem sera apagada apos 7 dias do carregamento. Veja, por gentileza, abaixo, as ponderações deles:File:Brasão dos Paes de Barros Penteados.jpg‪Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‬ | Български | Česky | Deutsch | ‪Deutsch (Sie-Form)‬ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−



Parece haver um problema no que se refere à descrição e / ou licenciamento deste arquivo específico. Verificou-se que você adicionou na descrição da imagem apenas uma predefinição que não é uma licença, embora ela forneça informação útil sobre o arquivo, ela não é uma licença válida. Poderia resolver este problema, adicionando a licença no arquivo acima? Você pode editar a página de descrição e alterar o texto. Carregar uma nova versão do arquivo não muda a descrição do arquivo. Esta página pode lhe dar mais dicas sobre qual licenças escolher. Obrigado.



This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Muito obrigado Capeto47 (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DelReqHandler

[edit]

Hi DarwIn. Have you activated this gadget? If not I recommend doing so. --Leyo 08:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have, and I've been using it, works like a charm. Thanks for the advice, anyway. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 08:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I asked because you missed to close this DR after deleting the file. --Leyo 08:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhhhhhh! No, I didn't exactly missed it, I confused myself with the 2 links for the 2 DRs that were in the DR tag, and apparently followed the wrong one and ended up in the old DR (for the first deletion) - Then I thought that you had simply linked to that DR instead of opening a new one (which would be perfectly fine and logical too), so simply deleted the image. I've closed it now, thanks for noticing it.-- Darwin Ahoy! 08:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licença imagem

[edit]

Bom dia, Darwin! Como sempre você gentilíssimo e prestativo, muito obrigado. Agora estou seguro que a imagem do brasão dos Paes de Barros Penteados não sera apagada pela Commons. Parece-me que voce vetorizou a imagem, os traços ficaram melhor definidos e a cor mais viva - mui grato. Acredito, por alguns de seus trabalhos que tive a oportunidade de apreciar, ser o seu interesse intelectual pelos assuntos Monarquicos e a Nobreza, o que muito apraz-me posto ser Monarquista por tradição famiiar, formação e indole, porem sendo esses fatores consubstanciados à ciencia politica - na qual sou convicto. Por ocasião do plebiscito de 1993, sob a egide de SAIR Dom Bertrand de Orleãs e Bragança, Principe Imperial do Brasil e pelas mãos de meu primo Gustavo Ferreira Cintra do Prado (atual Diretor Secretario Geral da Chefia da Casa Imperial do Brasil, junto à SEU CHEFE SAIR O PRINCIPE DOM LUIZ DE ORLEÃS E BRAGANÇA), fui, em 1991 ou 1992, fundador do CONSELHO PRÓ BRASIL MONARQUICO e a minha mulher, Marilene Pimentel de Oliveira Queiroz, fundadora e Presidente da AÇÃO MONARQUICA FEMININA DO BRASIL. Pelo visto a matéria é de nosso agrado. Quase todos, se não todos, os artigos já escritos (ao redor de 20), por mim nas paginas da Wikipedia referem-se à minha familia e à Monarquia, dois principios que cultuo e procuro mante-los vivos e atuais. Estou, como sempre, prazerosamente, ao seu inteiro dispor e faço questão de salientar os meus agradecimento pela sua preciosa ajuda. Saudações Monarquicas, Flavio Augusto de Oliveira Queiroz Neto.Capeto47 (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map Langalibalele.svg

[edit]

Hi Darwinus

Thanks for your help, sorry it didn't work out. So far the map is only used by the artcile in my Wikipeida development area. I will work on both my new article and th emap simulataneously.

Regards Martinvl (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ficheiro:Brasão dos Paes de Barros Penteados.jpg

[edit]

Bom dia Darwin! Sorry, mas voltou a aparecer a mensagem da Commons notificando que o ficheiro em epigrafe sera apagado apos 7 dias a contar de 21/06 por falta de licença. Eu o utilizei nas seguintes paginas de minha familia: Armando Alvares Pentedo, Yolanda Penteado, Olivia Guedes Penteado, Flavio de Queiros, Venceslau de Queiros, Luci de Queiroz e Damasio Pires Pimentel. Muito obrigado.Capeto47 (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brasão Paes de Barros Pentedos

[edit]

Obrigado pela resposta, Darwin. Curioso... é a 3ª vez que acontece: a 1ª, logo apos voce haver resolvido "o pequeno detalhe tecnico", entrei e estava tudo ok, na 2ª, hoje pela manhã, novamente entrei e la estava o aviso que seria apagado e agora, a 3ª, entrei e esta tudo ok - não consigo entender. De toda forma agradeço muito sua atenção e perdão pela trabalheira. Agora, Marilene e eu vamos, lusitanamente, tomar um quentão e saborear uns acepipes juninos, gostariamos de contar com sua companhia...so que pela rede é impossivel...portanto, tomaremos os primeiros em sua homenagem. Boa noite!Capeto47 (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes borradas

[edit]

no se porque has bloqueado el archivo File:Nuevoescudogironafc.png, PUES SIIIII ESTA CREADO POR MI. EL ARCHIVO File:1aalineaciongirona.JPG es una postal que compre y esta escaneada por mi y ya hace mas de 70 años y el archivo Montilivi.jpg esta sobreescrito porque yo cree el primero hace 1 año y tome esta fotografia hoy mismo desde el mismo lugar y con el estadio remodelado, asi que no me canceles archivos que si son mios propios, GRACIAS— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsolerb‎ (talk • contribs)

Sereno moreno y calmantes montes. No la hagas de jamón porque es de milanesa. File:Montilivi.jpg es una imagen valiosa, así como la nueva, es por eso que separé los archivos. El escudo de Girona FC, mismo que sea tu proprio trabajo, no es un logo libre, por eso es violación de copyright. File:1aalineaciongirona.JPG ha sido borrada (no por mi) porque la cargaste aquí como tu proprio trabajo, lo que no es verdad. Se la quieres de vuelta, tienes que identificar la origen y data de la imagen con mas precisión. El hecho de que has cargado un montón de copyvios no ayuda a tu caso, también.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lo siento.

[edit]

Yo no estoy muy al tanto de tí como usuario, sin embargo yo no deseo ninguna guerra ni mucho menos, peor lo que si me molesta es que instiguen falsos acerca d emi talento como artista, en dado caso que se haga caso de sus publicaciones sin bases ya que al menos trato de demostrar que el trabajo es propio y con esfuerzo, conllevo a la conclusión de que sólo son ataques personales de parte dle usuario Turelio, ya que desde que me encuentro aquí ha seguido mis pasos como si fuese un acosador virtual, si sigue así me temo que tendré que reportar a Turelio por Cyberbullying.

Gracias.

--Neo ender (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About "Freaks cast reparto.jpg"

[edit]

Hi, DarwIn. I left my answer to your comment on my user's talk page. Thanks a lot!! Best. --Correogsk (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the theatrical release poster: the one shown in the English wikipage and the one used in the Spanish page. Thanks!!--Correogsk (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neo ender

[edit]

Hola. Vi que intentaste como yo ayudar a este usuario, por lo que venia a darte un par de explicaciones. Hoy fue bloqueado por un mes debido a que continuaba subiendo imágenes no libres y a sus comentarios hacia varios usuarios, aquí y en es:WP. El problema exacto con sus imágenes es el siguiente: él es artista. Consigue una imagen en internet de algún artista y pinta un cuadro con esa misma imagen. Luego le toma una foto a la imagen y la sube en Commons como trabajo propio. El problema aqui es que, aunque él haya hecho efectivamente el cuadro, la imagen original no es suya, sino una fotografía con derechos de autor. Esta es la causa por la cual se borran los cuadros que sube. También hay que decir que lo intenta desde el año pasado, que en es:WP ya fue bloqueado en otra ocasión y que me ha dicho en su discusión "yo no estoy interesado en amoldar, o vovlerme parte esencial de Wikipedia", por lo que, por triste que sea esta situación, no creo que tenga arreglo. Un saludo. --Andrea (talk) 23:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Andrea! Por alguna razón el no comprendía como funcionan los trabajos derivados, pero yo hay tenido una conversa con el y creo que ahora todo es mas claro para el. El me ha dijo también que se queda muy arrepentido de toda esta confusión y que no quier mas peleas. Yo creo que el reacio un poco como un animal acosado, no comprendía lo que pasaba y por eso fue tan agresivo y petulante. Yo pienso que eso tiene arreglo, si, pero claro que depende de el.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Puede ser, pero no es la primera vez que le pasa. No es novato en este tema y más de una persona trató de ayudarlo por las buenas, así que no lo veo muy justificado. Si no quiere peleas, me parece bien. Mejor que aproveche este tiempo para pensar en lo que Wikipedia significa, en sus objetivos en Commons y en que las políticas son para todos, incluyéndolo a él y a su talento. Además, con una petición de debloqueo como esta poco después de que hablaras con él y le explicaras las cosas, dificilmente pueda creerte que está dispuesto a calmarse o cambiar. Ya veremos que sucede. En es:WP su bloqueo se levanta en una semana si deja de persistir en evadirlo; sino, se va a complicar. Un saludo. --Andrea (talk) 00:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Como puedes ver el retiro por si mismo esa petición de bloqueo, y lo ha hecho después que jo hable con el. Yo creo que este caso tiene solución, sino no tendría investido mi tiempo en ayudar-lo. Su caso ha empezado muy mal, pero no es tarde para que cambie el camino. No me gusta este tipo de bola de nieve en que algunos usuarios se atrapan sin se apercebir. Lo que de otro modo pudiera ser un usuario valioso y de qualidad se torna un monstruo, sin necesidad.-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
De nuevo, eso depende solamente de él y de que comprenda que no hay dos varas de medir. El respeto debe ser el mismo, para todos. Ya veremos si luego del bloqueo reflexiona. Un saludo. --Andrea (talk) 01:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neo ender

[edit]

Early assumption: blocking is only for safeguarding the project, not a form of punishement. So, I think that the project needs at least one month without Neo ender; this is the minimum time for understand and realize if he is truly interested in partecipate on Commons (not only for use it like a personal showcase). If so, after this period he will be here with his in-scope contributions (after reading some policies and guidelines, I hope, in particulary COM:DW). If we unblocking him now or after only one week, I believe that he will return here with the same ideas, and this means a huge waste of time for all. Further, I don't trust in tutoring (unless it's done by more people), it's an high risk. However, if there is consensus in unblocking him or reducing his block, I will not oppose.--Trixt (talk) 23:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I talked with him off-wiki and I know he now understands how COM:DW works. He's much more calmer as well. I will work this out with him a little further, and then ask for an unblock at AN if he wants to come back earlier than the month. I'm pretty sure he will not make the same mistakes again, nevertheless. I'm convinced he was in good faith since the beginning, and tried in his clumsy way to do things right (even bought the Getty image), but his poor knowledge with licensing and a proneness to excessive emotion made this go out of control.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You moved this file because of bad name, but the letters you eliminated in moving the file contained basic information, it was the page of the silhouette in the edition by Bräuning Oktavio 1926. Please revert!--Kresspahl (talk) 11:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not moved by me, I just fed the request to the bot. It was requested by JuTa and moved by Sreejithk2000, see here. You may contact them about that issue.-- Darwin Ahoy! 11:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it again and included the basic file info with regard to the edition of Voß collection...--Kresspahl (talk) 11:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but next time please use the {{rename}} feature, so that the new name can be updated in the projects.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Image

[edit]

Hi DarwIn, I attempted to upload an image that is the logo for a student organization. I was asked by the leadership to upload it, and it is not copyrighted. Did I mark it wrong somehow when I uploaded it? Thank you!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Megchia (talk • contribs)

Yes, logos are generally copyrighted, unless they are very simple, which is not the case of this one. I've restored it now, please follow the OTRS procedures explained in your talk page in order to confirm its free licensing, otherwise it will be deleted again in 7 days. Best regards, -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can i use images uploaded on google earth for wikipedia uploads?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanved (talk • contribs)

Answered at your talk page.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Image

[edit]

The images you just deleted were used on this page: Machecoul. What about all the galleries that are empty now?!

Keckel (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should had thought about that before stealing other's work and uploading as your own. Next time I catch you doing that you will be blocked.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since you deleted all these photos, YOU shall correct this page!
Keckel (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I'll do it. In the Greek calends.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll do it myself! Thank you very much indeed, that was a pleasure!
Keckel (talk) 12:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure. And don't forget: Next time, block.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was so kind of you to destroy all the work I've made for weeks: I f... I thank you very much!...
PS: Some of the images you deleted were actually free... Well done, good work indeed...
Keckel (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded so much robbery that it's only natural that some babies went out with the dirty water. If they are free upload them again with solid proof they are free.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So easy to say this and act like that... You delete and then you tell me to upload again. Very nice, aren't you?
Keckel (talk) 13:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am. Don't you have any shame? Stealing others property and making it pass as your own? How can you even pretend to pose as the offended party? Frankly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia administrators are powerful and almighty, and delete, ordain, control, criticize, without considering contributor's works. And their excuse : they are always right, contributors are always wrong, as usual. You're a perfect example of that. By the way why and how did you come to these images? Some of them were on line for weeks. Readers will be astonished. But Godish almighty powerful administrator is always right, deleting free images without scruples. And afterwards, another administrator will congratulate me because my work is good. Too late, it's deleted! Funny, isn't it? Well never mind, these images were beautiful, but since you swiped them off without warning me before, alea jacta est! I give it up: as usual almighty administrator won! What else could I do anyway?
Keckel (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Free images?! What free images? You have no merit in donating what is not yours, it's pure robbery and it's a actually a crime. If you want to collaborate with this project the very least you have to do is to obey the law - and I mean the real law of your country. Why don't you pick a camera and take some pictures of Machecoul, instead of stealing others photos and uploading as your own? Is that so difficult? And give me a break with that admin winning, ask anyone about what you have done and the answer will be the same.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mensaje automático

[edit]

Nada, disculpa. Pusieron otro mensaje antes del que me pusiste hace días y pensé que el tuyo era nuevo. Ignora este mensaje. Tomalo como un mensaje para saludarte :) Nos vemos. --Andrea (talk) 00:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello! My image hadn't copyright, I made it myself. Morancio (talk) 12:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know that your photo had a free license, but the logo in it is not free. Your photo counts as a derivative, and is therefore not free as well. I'm sorry for having to delete it.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it's your work. Morancio (talk) 12:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please I beg you to delete 8 files i added

[edit]

Hi,

DarwIn, I tried everything, templates, ...

there are 8 files that I want to delete because the title and thumbnail are bad

i posted already 8 other files last week that are good

but the 8 old one, I don't succeed to let delete them by somebody because I don't succeed to put them on a deletion page

can you delete them please,

many thanks

[[5]] [[6]] [[7]] [[8]] [[9]] [[10]] [[11]] [[12]] Donder (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will you upload them under new names, then? They are such a mess that they are best be deleted, indeed.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The new names are already a week there also. See below. Thanks for deleting

[[13]] [[14]] [[15]] [[16]] [[17]] [[18]] [[19]] [[20]]

greetings

Donder (talk) 21:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm glad it is resolved now. :)-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you rename this one please? for the same communities I added the arm of coats but in one of them I forgot to add wapen (wapen means arm of coats) [[21]] changing in [[22]]

Ottergem.gif --> Ottergemwapen.gif many thanks

Donder (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Donder (talk) 23:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you suggested

[edit]

Commons:Village pump/Copyright#I just wrote template:PD-German logos. But I still feel that it is not constructive to open deletion discussion about many logos, just to prevent speedy deletion. There would be also sufficient precedent for a special licence tag for American logos. For most other countries, there may be a lack of case law. But most would still be free because de minimis non curat lex (the courts cannot be bothered with trifles). That is the common-sense approach, may not work in every country (and it certainly does not hold on Commons...) Regards, /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do we have to do?

[edit]

Since I don't know anything about licenses what can I do to help here quickly? OTAVIO1981 (talk) 17:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uma coisa de cada vez! Primeiro vou esvaziar a cat Category:Maps of Brazil e depois faço outra coisa. hehe Minha intenção é ajudar com assuntos gerais e não necessariamente brasileiros. (Depois vou ver como anda o chess por aqui.) OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As minhas primeiras vinte contribuições aqui devem ser apagadas pois existem imagens melhores. Na época que carreguei não tinha nada parecido.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC) P.S.: Se tiver interesse a maioria está em Category:Chess icon.[reply]
Não vejo porque manter uma imagem que nunca será utilizada mas você é quem sabe. Compare a qualidade entre elas File:Chess bgg45.svg e File:Chess bgl44.png.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Teria que pedir o OTRS deste arquivo? OTAVIO1981 (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC) P.S.:Olha o que faz o "cansaço".hehehe[reply]

A substituição do source é neste arquivo onde o usuário colocou um template inexistente mas que indica que ele é o autor. Pelo menos quem lê português pode interpretar isso. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Podia fazer o favor de verificar se estas edições aqui e aqui estão de acordo com a regra da casa? A segunda parece que terá que carregar outra imagem de acordo com a fonte.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arquivo deletado

[edit]

Náo entendi aquela msg na minha página. Diz que um arquivo, nao lembro qual nem posso consultar pois sumiu, foi colocado em eliminação por ser 'violação de coypright'. Só que o artigo já está apagado. Como assim? MachoCarioca (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

É um logo com uma coroa que você carregou aqui como sendo coisa sua, mas não é.-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Como assim "É um logo com uma coroa que você carregou aqui como sendo coisa sua, mas não é." E como pode saber disso? Foi vc que colocou pra eliminação e vc mesmo deletou?? MachoCarioca (talk) 05:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sim, um VDA que você carregou como sendo trabalho seu. Se discorda, já sabe o caminho: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests.-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creio que é voce que tem que comprovar o VDA , não? E aguardar opinião de outros e dar tempo ao carregador de dar alguma explicação, não? Vc acha que é VDA, marca para eliminação e vc mesmo elimina? É assim que funciona? MachoCarioca (talk) 05:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sim, é assim que funciona. A justificação do VDA está no log de eliminação (você já devia saber isso, uma vez que já é veterano no carregamento de VDAs).-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E de onde vc tirou que aquilo é VDA?? Eu vou questionar aos adms do Commons se vc pode fazer isso, eliminar um arquivo que você mesmo coloca para eliminar e eliminar um trabalho próprio porque 'acha' que é VDA, vc mesmo pedindo eliminação, vc mesmo eliminando e nem dando qualquer tempo para que se discuta o assunto .MachoCarioca (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Em VDAs não há espaço para discussão, primeiro elimina depois discute. Quanto aos seus questionamentos, faça o favor.-- Darwin Ahoy! 06:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

_______________________

Alexis_Joveneau

[edit]

19 JUL 2011 Dear Sir You want to delete the file http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Le_P._Alexis_Joveneau_et_l%27enfant_montagnais_%C3%A0_La_Romaine_ann%C3%A9es_1950.jpg that I put on the Wiki article that I have created : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_Joveneau I am not the author of this photography, for it has been sent to me recently by the archivist of the Oblats de Marie-Immaculée of Quebec, Canada (religious order) precisely to illustrate my article of Wikipedia upon Alexis Joveneau. Thanks to remain it on Wiki Commons. Best regards Pierre-Olivier Combelles

Hello Pierre,
No, not at all, I don't want to delete it, quite the opposite. But you need to sent the permission for that image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . You must remember, however, that permission for use in wikipédia only is not enough. Please tell me if I can be of further help.
Best regards,-- Darwin Ahoy! 07:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Já que ganhou estatuto de administrador, talvez queira verificar e apagar todas as imagens listadas.

Abraços. Francisco (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TI-Nspire CX and TI-Nspire CX CAS images

[edit]

Hello. I saw that you deleted the File:TI-Nspire CX.jpg and File:TI-Nspire CX CAS.jpg files. These images are normally copyrighted, but according to the descriptions of File:TI-Nspire.jpg and File:TI-NspireCAS.jpg (on Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons (I'm not sure how to make inter-wiki links...)), Joerg Woerner has allowed "the Wikipedia project" to use the images. I'm not sure if that means Wikipedia or if it means all Wikimedia sites, but if it does mean all Wikimedia sites, I believe that the images should be undeleted (and that Joerg's image usage permission should be included in the descriptions). JosJuice (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JosJuice, we don't accept "Wikipedia only" permissions here. The very fact that someone says that the file is to be used in Wikipedia suggests that they don't want it to be used anywhere else, or that teh license is purely non-commercial, therefore those files are currebtly a copyvio and can't be undeleted. If you get COM:OTRS permission from the copyright holder just tell me and I'll restore them, if the OTRS team had not restored them yet.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Text-logos???

[edit]

Frist of all: You also speak portuguese, and can talk with me in portuguese. But since you started in english... let's go!

Obvious to you, not to me. If you have doubts, place a restore request, don't abuse your tolls (again). Béria Lima msg 18:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See {{Textlogo}}. I opened a DR for the only one that can be (though vaguely) considered not a textlogo, the rest are obviously textlogos, but if you want to open DRs for them, go ahead. What you should not do, in any case, is delete images that are in public domain as those one, based on uninformed requests from users at your home wiki. Please read Commons:Threshold of originality and refrain from trolling ("don't abuse your tolls (again)").-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Primeiramente, obrigado pela preciosa ajuda Vou pedir a autorização por escrito, tenho porém só uma perguntinha: Quais as informações devem constar nesta autorização? Existe algum modelo de autorização? Para onde ele deverá mandar, para o meu e-mail e eu repasso para você, ou ele deve mandar direto para o seu? Grato, --Pastor Montenegro (talk) 18:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin, como pode esta imagem estar em domínio público? Não me parece que ela tem mais de 50 anos. E tem várias desse usuário na mesma situação. ThiagoRuiz (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tnks, vou dar uma vista de olhos no que ele carregou. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vendo melhor, parece que ele só selecionou a permissão errada. Boa parte das fotos foi tirada dois dias antes do upload, e com a mesma câmera. Deve ser own work mesmo. ThiagoRuiz (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hite's Art Work

[edit]

Dear DarwIn,

As I am sure you have noticed, I am having some trouble uploading a picture to go with Robert Hite's page. Could you please advise me on how to do so with out having it deleted? Nearly every artist has some of their work shown on wikipedia. Please help.

Best,

Ph8l (talk) 19:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Ph8l[reply]

Hello, yes, I've noticed, I apologize for not have answered you before, I had it in mind. I'm currently at a meeting, but will check your case ASAP.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ph81, first of all you need a permission from Hite in order to publish his artwork under a free license. Do you have one? -- Darwin Ahoy! 06:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! Estive trabalhando em Courbevoie e não consegui atualizar os dados demográficos do artigo (o último dado é de 1999). Imagino que a predefinição devesse permitir a atualização da tabela. Pelo menos, na versão original Modèle:DemogFR, na qual se baseia a versão espanhola Plantilla:DemogFR (transposta por você para a pt.wiki como Predefinição:DemogFR), está dito que é possível incluir mais três anos na série histórica. Será que estou fazendo alguma coisa errada ou há mesmo algum problema com a predef ? Sds.Yone (discussão) 05h27min de 20 de julho de 2011 (UTC)

Obrigada! Yone (talk) 05:46, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Imaginei que você tivesse transposto da wiki.es (e não da wiki.fr) porque o texto estava todo em castelhano [23]. De todo modo, sou muito grata por sua atenção. Yone (talk) 06:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sem problema, sempre às ordens. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 06:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

??

[edit]

Why [24] ?? The author of this photos is my father, is a provate photos not commercial, i have the intellectual property of this photos.--Midnight bird (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Midnight bird, first of all, we don't allow non-commercial licenses here, and FAL (the license you have placed there) is not a non-commercial license as you seem to believe. However, those photographs seem to be public domain according to the Italian law, because they were created more than 20 years ago (as stated in the tag). If you disagree you should nominate them for deletion, not just return the old tag (unless you really want to release them under FAL, which I doubt, from your comments above).-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell me if you really want to release those images, since PD-Italy is not very secure as a license to keep them.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Les photos de bus et de tram à Angers

[edit]
Bonjour. Je comprends les avertissements, mais malgré les explications fournies sur les sources et les autorisations d'utlisation de photos qui ne sont pas à moi, j'aimerais que tu puisses consulter cette page. C'est la page d'un forum sur les bus angevins (qui contient les photos que j'utilise pour Wikipedia) où j'ai demandé l'autorisation de mise en ligne des images sur Wikipedia. Le principal modérateur a accepté, a condition que le nom de l'auteur de la photo soit clairement mentionné. Ce que je fais habituellement (il se peut que j'ai oublié de le faire dans certains cas, c'est vrai).

Cordialement. --POMPIERS (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Pompiers, il fait que vous envoyez l’évidence de ça permission pour permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, je ne peux faire rien de plus que vous dire les procédures a suivre. Cordialement, -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Método de eliminação

[edit]

Qual o método para eliminar um ficheiro de artigo de um artigo apagado na pt:wiki e que não tem propósito educacional? O ficheiro é este por acaso.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Outro dia por acaso encontrei uma foto do Alexandre Pires com um ilustre desconhecido e mudei as descrições e categorias de modo a adequar a foto ao músico que é conhecido e não ao ator. Mas este sujeito eu nunca ouvi falar, aí fica difícil. Infelizmente, de um modo geral, o escopo fica atrelado a pédia pois se não tem lá, é difícil justificar por aqui neste caso específico.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Não vi, pois já esvaziei a lista de vigiados, mas sei do que se trata. Meus parabéns e siga firme por lá. :) OTAVIO1981 (talk) 18:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DarwIn. Informed by the copyright holder, I reverted your edit in File:USS Forrestal (CV-59), porto di Napoli, estate del 1975.jpg. I explain the reason in the file talk page. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 20:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trixt, as you can see here, the FAL license does not applies in that case. I'll just remove the license and tag it accordingly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Now, my file have the proper license. :) Forgive me, i speak poor english and i didn't realize where was the problem...Thank you. :)--Midnight bird (talk) 23:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also have difficulty in writing in English without the help of an automatic translator. :) But English is much easier to Italian. ;) --Midnight bird (talk) 13:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mais dúvidas

[edit]

Vê se a edição que fiz aqui está nos conformes. Panoramas do Brasil, mesmo que seja óbvio que o editor que carregou não é o autor, podem ficar mas como acertar a questão da licença? Vê esta imagem. Screenshots de programas copyrightados = ER. Tô impressionado com a quantidade de imagens de gente sem notoriedade que tem aqui com artigo na pédia. Vou passar batido nestes, hehehe. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 12:12, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Por gentiliza, vê este caso que está além das minhas capacidades. Tem umas 4 licenças e pelo que percebi a original era para fair use. Obrigado! OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Não esquece de mencionar a Aset ka! hehehe OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mais um caso que me suscita dúvidas: File:6407-peracchi_barcelos2.jpg. O site tem copyright e suponho que tudo que está lá tb. Não diz nada da foto do qual não encontrei outra na net. Neste caso, aquela licença ali na imagem está correta? Porque o site tb não diz que é proibida a reprodução sem autorização explícita.OTAVIO1981 (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Como é que se faz por aqui quando se encontra uma imagem como esta, toda tremida? Abraços! José Luiz disc 14:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DarwIn

[edit]

Tira uma dúvida. Vi que uns logos de clubes do Brasil foram marcados como copyvio e você reverteu baseado que tratava-se de geometria simples e estavam no limiar da originalidade. Bem, enquanto o simbolo do File:Sao Paulo Clube.gif pode ser feito com uma régua existem outros bem elaborados como File:Fluminense logo.gif. Como é possível afirmar que as letras ali, FFC, tratam-se de geometria simples? Desconheço qualquer outra incidência desta geometria simples em qualquer lugar. Se basta competência técnica para elaborar à mão um desenho para ser considerado geometria simples, pelo menos o símbolo do Microsoft Excel poderia ser perfeitamente carregado. Então, eis a dúvida, como atualmente é interpretado o limiar da originalidade? OTAVIO1981 (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tarefa para ti: avisar na pédia que alguns ficheiros como este podem ser econominazados no URC. O escudo do Vasco é largamente baseado em uma versão antiga, anterior a 1941, pode ser carregado também? Ainda não entendi completamente porque letras não são sujeitas a copyright. Por enquanto, vou parar de apagar logos de clubes mas faltou vc explicar aí o logotipo do excel. Abç OTAVIO1981 (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pelo que você está explicando, todos os logos criados a partir de 1941 podem ficar sem problema algum, e boa parte dos que foram criados depois e são baseados em antigos. Tem que melhorar a documentação interna disso pq é deficiente e qualquer um que vier de outro projeto vai querer apagar estes logos. Veja o caso do Vasco aqui. Todos os três logos podem ser mantidos aqui pelo visto. Grato por ter revisado as nomeações, vou ter mais atenção nas próximas vezes. Sds OTAVIO1981 (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quinta dos Loridos / Buddha Eden

[edit]

Prezado DarwIn, Torna-se necessário subdividir a categoria "Category:Bombarral" para acomodar uma série de fotos que estou a lançar, a cobrir a Quinta dos Loridos, onde, por sua vez, se inscreve o chamado "Buddha Eden Garden". Se me criar a(s) subcategoria(s), faço o trabalho braçal de recategorização na sequência. Grato, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ficou perfeito: só tenho a agradecer. Bem hajas, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 16:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 9e43070009716363b05b0a99f86e54a1

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Photos to be deleted

[edit]

Darwin Ahoy! 23:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] File Tagging File:Katia Humala Tasso Belen.jpg‪Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‬ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | ‪Deutsch (Sie-Form)‬ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | Українська | +/−

This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading File:Katia Humala Tasso Belen.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Read this page for more information. Note: If you were too late and the file was already deleted please don't reupload the image but request undeletion here providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded and the above requested information in your request.


- Darwin Ahoy! 23:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Sir I am the author of the file Katia Humala Tasso Belen.jpg. I am the author of the photography. Mrs Humala tasso is my wife. I do not unterstand all this trouble. Please, stop with this. I cannot spend hours trying to contact Wiki permissions and so on. Please do it and replace this file. Idem for the photography of Father Alexis Joveneau with a Montagnais indian child in a hamac. This photography has been sent to my by the director of the Archives Deschâtelets (Ottawa, Canada)precisely in aim to illustrate this article Wiki that I have created. II have no time to seek a so called permission of Wikicommons. Please do it yourself also and replace my photo. Thank you. Sincerely yours; Pierre-Olivier Combelles.

Changing names of images I added

[edit]

Hi,

I added images some days ago, but 4 of them there is a problem with the name.

Can you please change it?

3 images

[edit]

De Graevesmolen Mere vooraanzicht.JPG needs to be changed in De Graevemolen Mere vooraanzicht.JPG

De Graevesmolen Mere zijaanzicht.JPG needs to be changed in De Graevemolen Mere zijaanzicht.JPG

De Graevesmolen Mere rad.JPG needs to be changed in De Graevemolen Mere rad.JPG

[[25]] [[26]] [[27]]

Reason: the name of this mill (molen) is De Graevemolen (not De Graevesmolen).

So just deleting the "s" in that 3 names.

1 image

[edit]

Zwingelmolen Aaigem gebouw.JPG needs to be changed in Zwingelmolen Aaigem.JPG

[[28]]

Reason: it's stupid to put building (gebouw) after it, of course it's a building. It was the first of 30 I uploaded and I saw to late gebouw was still in it.

So just deleting gebouw at the and.

.

[edit]

thanks if you could do that

Klodde (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already took care (see the same request on my talk page). --:bdk: 20:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monumentos

[edit]

Darwin, se tiveres por aí activo, importas-te de ajudar a espalhar a mensagem ao Commonistas tugas sobre o Wiki Loves Monuments? Deves estar mais habituado ao meandros do Commons do que eu e sabes onde eles pairam. Obrigado, GoEThe (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santuário do Bom Jesus do Monte

[edit]

Prezado DarwIn, Estou a tentar dar uma ajeitada no "Santuário do Bom Jesus do Monte" em Braga, e a coisa na pt-Wiki tem mais derivações que Star Trek... Pergunto: seria recomendável aqui no Commons ajeitarmos aquilo, de "Bom Jesus" para "Bom Jesus do Monte" por exemplo, que seria mais correto? Outra pergunta: um dos sub-temas são os jardins do santuário: é possível abrir-lhes sub-categoria própria? Grato, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Favor

[edit]

Olá Darwin. Poderias apagar os ficheiros derivados listados em Special:WhatLinksHere/File:Crew_ncis_2009_09_06_thetvdb.jpg, por favor? Se possível, eliminar também a mensagem MediaWiki:Watchlist/pt (para que os "artigos vigiados" apareçam como "páginas vigiados"). Obrigado. Giro720 (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM

[edit]

DarwIn, como vais? Estamos a contar contigo para o Wiki Loves Monuments Portugal! Por qualquer motivo bizarro, ainda não há uma única imgem da Madeira... :( -- Nuno Tavares PT 21:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template SIPA

[edit]

Viva DarwIn, eu alterei um pouco o template IGESPAR, e como o template SIPA usava os mesmos critérios, alterei-o também. Eu deveria ter discutido aqui primeiro (as minhas desculpas), mas como estava 'com a mão na massa', foi tudo de seguida. As alterações foram: 1-"Type=CMN-Conjuntos Monumento Nacional", deixou de existir, pois não é uma classificação no IGESPAR; 2- "Type=E/A" passou a direccionar correctamente para a "Categoria:Monuments without legal protection in Portugal by name"; 3-A "Categoria:Monuments included in classified sites in Portugal by name" passou a ser carregada com o novo "Type=INC" (para cobrir os monumentos que embora classificados "E/A", estão incluídos em Sítios ou Conjuntos classificados). Espero que esteja de acordo com as alterações. Abrç. --JotaCartas (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ainda IGESPAR e SIPA

[edit]

Olá de novo. Aqui vai uma questão um pouco complicada: Dado que 'praticamente' todos os monumentos da base IGESPAR estão também na base SIPA (atç. que o inverso não é verdadeiro), não poderia ser criado um template conjunto, que evitasse a existência de duas 'caixas' seguidas nas categorias e páginas que os usam? Poderá ser complexo, e eu não me sinto capaz de o fazer, mas pode-se sempre pedir uma ajuda ao Otourly ou/e ao Jean-Frédéric, que creio terem sido os autores iniciais do {{IGESPAR}}. A questão poderá ser alargada a todos os que teem usado/alterado os templates.--JotaCartas (talk) 11:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS:Algo idêntico poderá ser feito com os {{DRAC-RAA}}/{{SIPA}}) e ({{DRAC-RAM}}/{{SIPA}}), embora eu não conheça as bases do património das ilhas, nem saiba se estão online na Web.

E por fim (espero) de novo SIPA

[edit]

Olá de novo. Enquanto a situação se mantem (i.e {{IGESPAR}} e {{SIPA}} separados), quando uma página usar os dois templates, a classificação do SIPA (Type) deverá ser igual à do IGESPAR (prioritária). Quando o {{SIPA}} é o único, e não existe referência no IGESPAR nem na DRAC-RAA nem na DRAC-RAM, deverá ser classificado na "Category:Monuments without legal protection in Portugal by name" se o parâmetro "type" for nulo. Para isso o {{SIPA}} poderá ser alterado para o fazer automaticamente. Nos caso em que a base do SIPA indique que o monumento está incluído em Sitio, Conjunto ou mesmo Zona de protecção, dever-se-a nesse caso colocar parâmetro "type=INC" e será classificado automaticamente na "Category:Monuments included in classified sites in Portugal by name". Quando tiver tempo, de-me a sua opinião. Obrigado. --JotaCartas (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

[edit]

would you mind help with your knowledge here? thanks OTAVIO1981 (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of files

[edit]

What was your idea to get serveral files renamed that I uploaded? There was no need nor reason for such action. Now the original file numbers from the camera are lost. I always use that numbers to identify the photos and to have a relation to the camera raw files. --Eva Kröcher (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures Uploaded through Wikipedia Commons

[edit]

Hello Mr DarwIn,

I am rather curious regarding your actions in uploading my pictures under the 'bogus license' sector, and about the necessity of the changes you made. Due, to personal reasons, I had been unable to attend the debate concerning this deletion either. Thus, would you please enlighten me regarding these deletions? CherryGirl22| 12:45, 5 October 2011 (GMT)

English vs Portuguese

[edit]

Olá Darwin. I hate to bring you into this, but I wanted your opinion, since you were so friendly on the work I did on the Azores material. Recently, some editors associated with the "freguesias-versus-civil parishes" disagreement, and with the WikiLove Monuments in Portugal campaign, have begun to systematically create and/or rename files into Portuguese. I was hoping that you could suggest a course of action. I have been counselled to bring the categorization changes to discussion. Is there an appropriate forum within Commons to debate wholesale changes or actions in violations of the Commons:Language policy? In reverting the category names, the user has suggested that "it is the right name in Portuguese", which goes counter to the English policy guideline. While I have accepted the "freguesia-versus-parish" discussion in the past, it seems that it has embolden this user to go ahead with full Portuguese name usage in the categories, likely supported by other like-minded individuals. My renaming-to-English-attempts have have been reverted and the re-categorized imagery returned to the Portuguese variant. Any suggestions? Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viva DarwIn, este ursinho andou a passear pelo Porto, e já o tinha visto na Cordoaria. Pode-se confirmar que também foi à , mas talvez não tenha podido entrar. heheh. Esta também será possivelmente no Porto, talvez junto às muralhas, mas não sei ao certo. Abraço, --JotaCartas (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

?

[edit]

Tah vivo? Amats (talk) 00:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks

[edit]
* Frohe Weihnacht und einen guten Start ins neue Jahr
* Prettige Kerstdagen en een gelukkig nieuw jaar
* Merry Christmas and a happy New Year
from --Neozoon (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notoriedade de imagens?

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:TallytaCumys01.jpg, acho que a noção de escopo deste usuário é diferente daquela que você me falou sobre o Commons certa vez. Leandro Rocha (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chriskyddwr

[edit]

I am sorry for the lauguage, i was just quite upset, becuase you blocked all my pictures, most of which i took myself. the others, i took from my dad, who took them. how should i reload them, so that as to specifically show that they are mine?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriskyddwr (talk • contribs)

You may start by explaining how come "your" picture of Our Lady of Pompeii ended up in the parish website: http://www.olpparish.com/
Or how "your" picture of St. Mary is a promotional picture from the school official website: http://smhlancers.org/framework.php?module=about
Or why "your" picture of the Reinstein Woods is actually a crop from a photo from the NW State Agency: http://www.dec.ny.gov/education/1837.html
And so on, and so on. Actually, you have not uploaded a single photograph with the slightest hint of having been taken by you.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
well first of all, my dad works at st marys high school (of which the picture is for, the wikipedia page he asked me to work on for him). He took the picture, he is in charge of the website. Keith Kidder, it shows it on the wikipedia page. the our lady of pompeii, my church, i dont actually need, so you can just go and delete it thats fine.
the same can be said about the SCBA logo, where you will find his name on both the wikipedia page that i used it in, and the link which YOU sited as being copyright infringement— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriskyddwr (talk • contribs)
About the St. Mary HS picture, if the case is as you say, you may do one of two things: If you *really* want the deleted image here, someone in charge of the website or the actual author of the photo himself must follow the instructions in COM:OTRS and email the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If your father works there, however, it would be much simpler if you just go there with a camera and take a new photograph of the building, so that it would have EXIF data to support your claims of authorship.
About the logo, the case is not that simple. First of all, we need to know who designed that logo, and if that person authorizes it's publication under a free license. Authorship of the actual photograph of the logo is immaterial in this case, however - All that matters is who actually designed the logo or owns its copyright.
-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Katarighe

[edit]

Hi DarwIn,

A great gift for you!

Just letting you know that I appreciative you of awaring me any copyright violations from me. Later after you warned me 6 months ago, I tried to stop uploading and took myself a look at the welcome page about contribution to the media repository I decided them to upload them on Wikipedia as a fair-use rational. Once I read the welcome page, I contribute photo very good photos but free from copyright. I did this by mistake to avoid myself shame. As you can see, I have made many good contributions to Wikimedia Commons since now such as helping the user to promote a picture into a Quality and Valued picture status back in October I know what I have did is wrong.

I settled here on Wikimedia Commons specifically to promote great quality images into VP, QP and FP status. I actually learned my mistakes earlier in the last six months. I'm also actually active in the English Wikipedia specifically to upload fair-use articles to illustrate the subject on the article. During my time here, I always track down copyright violations and help Wikimedia Commons running smoothly free from trouble. That's what i'm really good at for now. So im only trying to improve here very well. I have been long active in Wikimedia Commons I do understand well about image licenses already but I will be also familiar with more still about copyright. I'm trying to be nice, assume good faith and being honest for this.

I have given you the best gift for awaraing me of this. I appreciate your contributions.

Best Regards :-)

Katarighe (Talk) 00:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Katarighe, I'm very glad that you are now such a valuable contributor to Commons, and an important part of our community. Don't worry about the past, everyone makes mistakes when they are new. I've done mine too, and I'm sure I will still do some mistakes occasionally, even with all the experience I gathered in the past years. We are always learning from each other, that's one of the funniest parts of this! :)
Thank you very much for the gift and keep up the good work!
Best regards,
-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Imaculado_Coração_de_Maria,_Funchal_-_25_Jan_2012_-_SDC15078.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.96.57 19:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
It's really great to see that you are back. Trycatch (talk) 00:50, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Oi Darwin, me tira uma dúvida. Esta imagem, que é da pintura descrita neste artigo da wiki-pt pode ser carregada? Como não sei nada sobre autoria e direitos, não carreguei aqui. Lendo a nossa PID, também não identifiquei qual seria a isenção de doutrina possível pela URC. Enfim, podes me ajudar? Boas! José Luiz disc 23:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning {{Move}} should not be placed in this page. Use it in the appropriate namespace.

--Jimmy44 (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gráficos

[edit]

Gostaria de adicionar alguns gráficos no commons. São estes aqui:

Eles estão no artigo deste site - http://ecologia.ib.usp.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=412 O site não cita qualquer licença, mas enviei um e-mail para o autor da obra e ele me informou que os gráficos podem ser usados para qualquer finalidade desde que cite a fonte. Posso carrega-las no commons? E-mail do autor

Caro Micael

Estes gráficos foram feitos por nós e no nosso entender podem ser empregados da forma que julgar conveniente desde que cite a fonte. Os gráficos também podem ser obtidos no seguinte link http://www.ablimno.org.br/acta/pdf/acta_limnologica_contents1302E_files/Artigo%206_13(2).pdf, uma revista científica brasileira. Caso necessite por escrito de alguma autorização uma opção é solicitá-la ao editor da revista o prof. Antonio Fernando Monteiro Camargo (Dept. de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP) pelo e-mail acta@ablimno.org.br.

Um abraço

inglês

[edit]

They are in the article on this site - http://ecologia.ib.usp.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=412 The site does not mention any license, but I sent an email to the author's work and he informed me that the graphics can be used for any purpose as long as the source is indicated. Can I load them in the commons? Email the author

Dear Michael

These charts were made by us and in our view can be used as it deems appropriate provided that the source is indicated. The graphics can also be obtained at the following link http://www.ablimno.org.br/acta/pdf/acta_limnologica_contents1302E_files/Artigo% 206_13 (2). Pdf, a Brazilian scientific journal. If you need any authorization in writing of an option is to request it to the editor prof. Fernando Camargo Antonio Monteiro (Dept. of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, UNESP) by e-mail acta@ablimno.org.br. Marcelo Pompêo & Viviane Moschini CarlosMicael 106 (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
For you uploads in February, 5th. Why you are not editing wikipedi anymore? Such a lovely project! :) OTAVIO1981 (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Paz, bem e Feliz Páscoa!

Acabo de verificar e a licença me parece correta, mas foi marcada como com problemas. Podes ratificar ou retificar meu licenciamento?

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1987 RCA Dimenisa console TV set.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Christensen (talk) 02:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Human-powered litters has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


(talk) 13:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ermine spots in chevrons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Panthera_pardus_in_heraldry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case my help is needed, please feel free to call me at my Commons talk page

[edit]

--- meta.wikimedia.org/?oldid=2681676#DarwIn

Ok, here I am.

Fala, Darwin! Que acha de se voluntariar novamente ao OTRS? Agora há pouco me contaram que há uma demanda de voluntários para responder às filas de mensagens em português, pois os poucos que existem estão pouco ativos ou inativos. Me perguntaram se eu poderia ajudar, mas eu não tenho tanta experiência com 'permissões' e viajo muito em breve. Decidi convidar quem tem mais competência no assunto que eu. O que me diz?‴ Teles «Talk ˱M @ C S˲» 15:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

[edit]

I know I'm late to the party given that you've already racked up thousands of edits since your return. But my excuse is that you've only just hit my watchlist. So welcome back. --99of9 (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I hope I would be able to dedicate a fair amount of time to Commons again, it has been a tooo long wikibreak. :| -- Darwin Ahoy! 03:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My recent accidental edits need to be reverted!

[edit]

I accidentally removed all of the items from the category Category:Gules_a_lion_Or_in_civic_heraldry using Cat-a-lot. Can you help me revert these edits? I wish I could revert all of these edits at once, but I don't know how to do this yet. Jarble (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DarwIn. You have new messages at Jarble's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

VI

[edit]

The beginnings are always difficult in VI but you're not alone, and you'll always be especially welcome. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind welcome! :) I have a doubt about that process, by the way: What happens when we got a better image for some scope that already has one? Is it demoted? -- Darwin Ahoy! 05:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes VI is a label that is not acquired permanently. A little further down the page selection, you have this case with the "Lake Dera Yunco." The label will move from one image to another. This label was created for illustrators quickly find the best image for a given subject. In the gallery of COMMONS labels are displayed. At the moment many category does not include a lot of pictures but the speed at which develops COMMONS this tool will be indispensable. Scopes are a little difficult to understand at first, but in my eyes this label is the most important of all. For one who has to make the most sense. Back often. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Limpet

[edit]

Viva Darwin, Eu próprio tive algumas duvidas em colocar a tradução, mas basei-me no nome alternativo da infobox do artigo en:Chapel of Nossa Senhora da Lapa (Sernancelhe) na en.WP, mas se achar melhor, o melhor é retira-la. --JotaCartas (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procurei um pouco, e parece que 'limpet' em inglês diz respeito ao marisco 'lapa'. Se assim for, será mesmo melhor retirar a tradução. Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 23:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Viva, já limpei os limpet's todos da Nossa Senhora da Lapa, pois era um verdadeiro disparate.
Quanto às marcas de àgua, é verdadeiramente uma pena. A Torre do Tombo e o Centro Português de Fotografia fazem exactamente o mesmo, ainda que sabendo que não tem quaisquer direitos de autor sobre as fotos. Outro exemplo é a Biblioteca Pública Municipal de Gaia que coloca marcas de água sobre fotos das quais não possuem quaisquer direitos a não ser o serem os possuidores das mesmas.
Alem disso parece-me incorrecto e mesmo ilegal que declarem possuir os direitos de autor sobre fotos ou documentos de autores falecidos à mais de 70 anos, só pelo facto de estarem na posse dos originais - a meu ver, isso não lhe dá quaisquer direitos, pois não se tratam de direitos de posse, mas sim de direitos de autor. (enfim democracia à Portuguesa). Neste aspecto, os americanos dão um bom exemplo (todas as fotos do governo ou de funcionários em serviço são do domínio público). Então, nós, que pagamos com os nossos impostos o trabalho deles ainda temos que lhes pagar os direitos de autor??? — infelizmente temos muito a aprender com os anglo-saxonicos e outros paises nórdicos no que diz respeito aos direitos dos cidadãos.
Um abraço. --JotaCartas (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arquivo Municipal de Lisboa

[edit]

Aproveito para tirar uma dúvida. A fotos no Arquivo Municipal de Lisboa estão todas com marca de água, e assim não me parece possível transferi-las para a Commons. Como arranjou as fotos do Benoliel sem marcas de água? É pena não poder utilizar um manancial tão importante de fotos antigas. Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musschia wollastonii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamaeranthemum beyrichii var. rotundifolium (botanical illustration).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hello,

You should add the geolocalisation at the street level, so that it can be promoted. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it now, many thanks for the note!-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Sobre restablecimiento de imágenes

[edit]

Gracias por restablecer las imágenes al fin alguien con sentido común, cuando creo los colages es por necesito ilustrar algo con varias imágenes me parece fuera de lugar subir una a una además del colage, acá siempre es un problema subir fotos, siempre le colocan una plantilla y nunca no especifican que es lo que hay de malo, por lo general las plantillas engloban un conjunto de falta y uno tiene que estar adivinando, por le escribo a los que colocan la plantilla y no te dice o no saben porque la colocan y los administradores aun peor ya he optado porque no les consulto nada porque nunca responden. Gracias de nuevo eres muy atento, cuando tenga problema te consultare Saludos --Veronidae (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De nada, es un placer poder ayudar. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 01:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hospital Velho (Funchal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Category:ILN 1922

[edit]

Can you please create this with a expanded name? ILN can stand for a lot of things, and it would be a lot clearer if it were expanded out.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I followed the example in Category:Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, which seemed very reasonable to me. Category:The Illustrated London News issues of 1922 besides being horrendously long, it's not more easy than ILN 1922. Actually, it's much worst, as it clutters the category list in HotCat with the almost 80 entries for the issues. I do not agree with using a expanded name here. Anyway, when I have already created 80 of them like that, I'll not change the system. If you really think this is a problem, then put it for discussion at VP or somewhere else and then request a bot to change it. Cheers,-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Olá

[edit]

Olá Darwin. Porque desconfia de gente inclinada para se ver livre de ficheiros fora do escopo? :O Sobre essas imagens, a maioria da que mando para DR (espero ser todas) são de fotos típicas de redes sociais, fotos de perfil, não vejo utilidade nessas imagens, não sendo assim o caso que citou de um babaca qualquer plantado no meio da rua em Jacarutibá do Nordeste... entendo esse ponto. Eu também não te conheço muito, mas já ouvi falar. Abraços.Érico Wouters msg 21:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ainda bem, pensei que tinha visto erros nas imagens que mando para DR, e se tiver por favor me avise. Talvez isso ainda não mudou muito na Wiki-pt, muitas bandas de garagem vão para PE, ESR e afins, é por isso que não anda muito por lá? E sobre ser um turista de ocasião, com o tempo te provarei que não sou um.Érico Wouters msg 21:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Estou curioso para ver as imagens do "Eduzão88"... pelo título das imagens já dá pra saber do que se trata lol. Eu também percebi que aqui não tem muito vandalismo, isso é bom. Se eu tiver qualquer dúvida, já sei onde perguntar.Érico Wouters msg 23:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Claro que o seu é melhor, porque você é um homem de família Smile!Érico Wouters msg 23:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Category:Mirador Boyacá

[edit]

Hola disculpa que te moleste, por estar trabajando con sueño ne equivoque al crear esta categoría y no estoy facultada para corregir el error, puedes tu coregirlo. Gracias --Veronidae (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Liberação

[edit]

Hei Darwin, sabe quem é que está lá no OTRS? Mandei um email tanto pra conta em inglês como em pt. Mas ninguem respondeu até agora. +PrinceWilly 16:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Willy! No ano passado estavam a Beria e o Lestaty, suponho que ainda sejam os mesmos, não? Como o OTRS português normalmente anda ou andava com bastante atraso, eu pessoalmente uso sempre o principal, pois respondem no mesmo dia, ou quase. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 16:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pra informar, fui aprovado como voluntário e estou agora no canal em portugues da OTRS. Boas.+PrinceWilly 17:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Eu ilustrei quase todos os artigos desta categoria com imagens URC como esta. O MachoCarioca me disse que eu provavelmente poderia trazer tudo pra cá como {{PD-Old}}. Confere? José Luiz disc 11:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olá José Luiz. Sim, confere. Essa licença que eles colocaram no site não tem validade, pois mesmo que eles fossem os proprietários do copyright das fotos (que não devem ser), se estas não têm autor declarado podem ser considerados trabalhos anónimos, e como tal em domínio público uma vez que já passaram mais de 70 anos da sua publicação. Pode trazer tudo o que não tiver autor para aqui, usando a {{PD-old-70}}. :) Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 11:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok

[edit]

Vou me inteirar sobre a data para inseri-la na foto. Saudações, Junius (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E como envia as duas para o OTRS? Junius (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pelo que acabei de me informar todas as fotos caíram em domínio público porque o Jornal dos Sports não existe mais. Abriu falência e não circula mais no Rio de Janeiro. Abraços, Junius (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Posso ver no arquivo do jornal mas não me lembro de ter visto nenhuma datação. Junius (talk) 00:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
De acordo com um amigo jornalista que me passou as fotos, elas faziam parte de um arquivo do jornal e nem foram publicadas. Faziam parte apenas de uma caixa de arquivos. Segundo ele são todas dos anos 40 porque aquela arquibancada mostrada nas fotos foi demolida nessa década. Mas é só o que se sabe, não há menção ao nome de quem fotografou nem nada. Como o jornal acabou, o time acabou e o fotógrafo é desconhecido, eu creio que caiu tudo em domínio público. Junius (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta

[edit]

Hola disculpa que te moleste pero me dijiste que cualquier cosa te pidiera ayuda, estoy poniendo un poco de orden en las categoría de imágenes de mi país Venezuela y me he encontrado con que hay cierto numero de categorías vacías, otras repetidas y en estos casos las concentro las imágenes en una sola por lo que queda algunas vacías, en otros caso necesito crear nuevas, es aquí donde viene mi duda como necesito crear nueva que hago las creo o te pido que renombres las que van quedando vacías para no eliminarlas, que opción genera menos problemas. --Veronidae (talk) 12:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permissão de imagens

[edit]

DarwIn, estou conversando com a Valéria Lopes, pedindo autorização. Ela permitindo... utilizo a licença cc-by-sa-3 ou OTRS pending? Nas fotos diz: "Todos os direitos reservados". Não gostaria de ver minhas fotos apagadas ou violando direitos de autor. Eduardo P (talk) 13:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usar o template "PD-old-70" em Portugal

[edit]

Viva Darwin..., uma dúvida: É verdade que fotos que não têm autor declarado podem ser considerados trabalhos anónimos, e como tal em domínio público uma vez que já passaram mais de 70 anos da sua publicação; isto é valido para Portugal? Isto significa que fotos anteriores a 1942 (com autor desconhecido) estão todas no domínio público? - é que procurei informação específica sobre isto e não encontrei. Obrigado desde já. --JotaCartas (talk) 10:43, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pela resposta, mas ... na realidade isto é "areia de mais para a minha camioneta". Estas questões de licenças são efectivamente muito complicadas, e assim fico a aguardar o resultado da sua consulta na "Village pump/Copyright". Obrigado --JotaCartas (talk) 11:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Impaled quarterly has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola presumo que esta imagen es vandalismo señala en la descripción que es un “Resort en Mochima” y Mochima es un parque nacional de Venezuela que nada tiene que ver con el paisaje que se aprecia en la imagen. Tampoco la fuente tiene coherencia. En tus manos dejo el que hacer con esta imagen. De ante mano gracias. :) --Veronidae (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Deleted, copyvio.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jejejeje no interrumpes ahorita encontré esta categoría (Category:Cumananacoa) esta vacía y el nombre esta malo se que hay otra tres más pero no recuerdo donde la busco y te la hago llegar :)--Veronidae (talk) 00:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Esta imagen me parece que es promocional y no se ajusta a commons File:Los telecaster .jpg--Veronidae (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Messier 74 ULX.jpg

[edit]

Hi DarwIn!

"[F]orwarding email communication granting permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" has already been done. I've already received my copy of the forwarding. I do not know how long the volunteers at OTRS will take. I posted to this effect at Fastily and at Commons:Undeletion requests.

In this discussion is "NOAO does not permit commercial use without permission." Permission is included in their email response. My email to them clearly states Public Domain (PD) permission.

I hope this helps. Marshallsumter (talk) 23:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the info. I'll then change the tag to "OTRS-pending". Thank you for your dedication and the work you had to allow this image under a free license.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tem razão. A tal arquibancada de madeira ainda existe mesmo. Mas o campo acabou, virou de futebol soçaite, ou seja, de grama sintética em tamanho menor. Aquilo tudo ali que na época eu frequentei agora está incorporado à Acadêmicos do Salgueiro, uma escola de samba. O que é isso de DR? O que eu escrevo quando passar as fotos para fair-use? O fotógrafo é ignorado, o jornal acabou, a situação é essa mesmo. E eu confirmei que as 3 fotos são da mesma época, anos 70. Abraços, Junius (talk) 00:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pelo que eu entendi o jornal acabou e o meu amigo que foi jornalista lá pegou as fotos para ele. O time também acabou porque a sede foi incorporada pela escola de samba. Ele me disse que caiu tudo em domínio público. As fotos nunca foram publicadas em jornal, estavam só em arquivo, e não estão em nenhum sítio. Tenho que ver como preencho no fair-use. Você não quer me ajudar? Abraços, Junius (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

Quer dizer então que não basta cruzar dois remos com uma âncora, e colocar um círculo contendo uma bandeira do estado de São Paulo ao centro, ornado por algumas cordas e os dizeres "S.C.Corinthians Paulista - 1910" para que seja considerado uma cópia do escudo do pt:Corinthians?

O escudo do Campinense não tem só "algumas letras", tem um desenho especial ao combiná-las, enfim, não vou me estender, nem sei se vc vai pensar no assunto, vê quem quer.

Yanguas (talk) 04:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

[edit]

Hi Darwin. I was hoping you could give me your opinion on User:Gunnex as a potential admin? Also, I was thinking of asking him about this, but Portuguese seems to be his language of choice, along with German, and as I speak English only, I wonder if you might ask him? Now that Fastily is no longer an admin, I'm sure we could use some help, especially with CSD, which looks to be Gunnex's specialty. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 19:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I don't always agree with Gunnex speed deletion marks (generally on text logos, if I well recall, IMO they should be sent to DR if there are doubts), I've total confidence on him, and he's an old and very valuable asset we have at wiki-pt. We have asked him in the past to be admin there, and if I well recall, he always refused. But this is Commons so let's hope he will accept. I'll ask him in no time.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope he agrees, and I appreciate your agreeing to ask him. Another user I had in mind is User:Lobo, who I've seen alot of CSDs from. Thoughts? INeverCry 23:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I don't know Lobo at all, so I can't really help you with that... Gunnex I know for almost 4 years, and he was already a solid rock when I was born to WIkipedia. But if you say Lobo is good, there could be no harm in asking him if he accepts.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Universidade de Évora - Mestres e discípulos notáveis, séc. XVI - séc. XVIII, Maria Luísa Guerra, 2005.jpg : Historique des versions

[edit]

j'ai mis un copivio car le livre date de 2005. mais si le dessin est plus vieux. alors ok --Chatsam (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème. La gravure reproduite dans la couverture du livre est un ex-libris jésuite ou autre décoration jésuite similaire, datant d'avant le milieu du 18ème siècle. Cet ordre était propriétaire de l'Université d'Évora, avant d'être expulsé du Portugal en 1759. Salutations, -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TB

[edit]
Hello, DarwIn. You have new messages at INeverCry's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

[edit]

Viva DarwIn, uma dúvida que tem a ver com um livro online da internet aqui.

  • A página afirma "NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT", possivelmente porque foi publicado em 1922, mas o autor, Jaime Cortesão, morreu em 1960 (há 52 anos) donde, não está no Domínio Público em Portugal - Certo?
  • Assim, não poderia ser carregado na Commons, ou pode?
  • E no caso de poder, não poderá ser usado na pt.WP nem na pt.Wikisource? Obrigado desde já. --JotaCartas (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK .. era o que eu pensava, mas .. na dúvida mais vale perguntar . Obrigado. --JotaCartas (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]

Paz e bem!

Ontem, 28 set., me concedestes uma Tireless Contributor Barnstar,
como faço para por esta condecoração na minha p. de usuário?

Nesta área meus conhecimentos são muito toscos.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:DarwIn/CDLicPortugal - (gralha?)

[edit]

Viva de novo, cá estou eu a incomodar. Nas suas instruções User:DarwIn/CDLicPortugal está indicado nos pontos 5.1.1 e 5.1.2 o template *{{PD-old-auto-1929|ano da publicação ou divulgação}}, mas esse não existe. Penso que que pretendia dizer *{{PD-old-auto-1923|ano da publicação ou divulgação}}. Foi esse que usei nesta foto File:Antomio Jose Almeida 1919.jpg - pode verificar se está tudo Ok. Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 10:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my regard just the posture when it comes to paintings-of-biblical-figures is negligible to other characteristics. Should a Category:Paintings of sitting biblical figures also be started? I personally think not. Classifying bible-related artworks can be enough covering with epoch (Renaissance/Middle Ages/Modern), identity of figure depicted and artist. Paintings-of-standing-biblical-figures may be a bit of an over-classification (and would demand recatting plenty heaps of items). Thanks Orrlingtalk 14:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I absolutely agree with you. I just wanted to get rid of those biblical paintings where generally (IMO) posture is not important at all, that were crowding the "paintings of standing men" category, so I created that pigeon hole for them. Be my guest to just discard that category.
In the same situation are the Greek and Roman mythological paintings and the likes.
Perhaps a different situation would be the portraits of saints (they are portraits, right?) but I don't thing it would be useful to mess them amidst the portraits of ordinary people, since they are generally imaginary or fantasy paintings and not real portraits of existing people. This is not linear, however, since it was usual in the 15th and 16th centuries to portrait the patrons of works of art in the paintings they commended as saints or accompanying figures...-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tell me if you think any special move should be taken with Category:Paintings of Greek mythology and Paintings of Roman mythology you're mentioning, in my view neither one is too crowded and they seem to display the full range of postures from standing (or flying) to dead.. So you wanted to thin and diffuse the Category:Paintings of standing men, that's understandable. - but if you ask me, I don't think this category is too populated, sure not when compared with other overblown cats. It's funny that Category:Portraits of saints is actually not even existing yet (but it's OK as Category:Paintings of saints and Saints in art cover what we need) Orrlingtalk 18:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Paintings of standing men is now OK because I irradiated it yesterday. ;) I believe we both agree on the way things should be done. When a category becomes too populated, and there is an useful way of dividing things, then it should be used. I usually follow that rule when a dead-end category reaches 200 files.
Relating to posture, I really do not understand why this categorization should be useful to any paintings of men which are not portraits. If you ask me, the category Category:Paintings of standing men should be removed altogether and all its files moved up or down on the tree, as applicable.-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The way people are portrayed in the arts ecompasses a variety of positions and postures (as does sex) and readers may practicably be in search of artworks after such particular keys, i.e in which position the figure is shown; most classical portraits were created indeed when the model is seated, when it comes to non-portrait paintings the artist's decision is depending, as I guess, on the narrative or feelings they wish to bring across, so kneeling, recumbent or standing personifications might do play that role also for our end-users looking for a specific impression. This is my hypothesis. Orrlingtalk 19:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I generally don't have a strong position relating to categories created by others, unless they look obviously useless and impractical ("old paintings", "historical maps", "images of the history of ..." comes to mind), therefore if you say that paintings of standing men may have some use, I don't oppose.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, no, please, attract some more views. I will not mind if "Paintings of standing men" will be dismantled (and then the same fate will need to be met by "Paintings of sitting men" also). Of course, like you I believe that some subcategories around here are superfluous. Orrlingtalk 20:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese language request

[edit]

Hi, would you mind answering my question at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Campina_Tropeiros.jpg, as no-one else has (respond there please)? Thanks, Rd232 (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS I notice your user talk page is big, and has content dating back to 2011... you might be interested in User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for quick and easy auto-archiving. Rd232 (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Apologies for missing it, but I have been absorbed by a swamp of "portraits of standing men" (my OCD at work, possibly). Apparently that license is OK.
Regarding User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup, I pondered it before, but I don't want something archiving unresolved cases, so I try to live with this mess meanwhile, hoping that somehow it will become gradually manageable...-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well the standard settings are to archive a section after 31 days without any comment; that seems plenty to me. You can also prevent auto-archiving for some cases by setting a timestamp some way into the future (eg 2015), and removing/editing it when you're happy the thing is done. Alternatively, you could use SpBot instead (it only archives on request): {{Autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} together with {{Section resolved}} makes manual archiving a little easier. Rd232 (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caso de bloqueio?

[edit]

Boas Darwin. Como por aqui liga a questões administrativas, passo-te a bola para ti: JC-Lusitano (talk · contributions · Statistics) persiste em carregar VDA apesar de já ter sido bloqueado. Será caso para pedir outro bloqueio? --Stegop (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CoA of Philip II of Spain (I of Portugal since 1580)

[edit]
Hi DarwIn,
Thank you very much for your interest to my pictures, and for your corrections in the categories of the relief of the CoA of the El Escorial monastery.
If these CoA are not only the "property" of this king, but of some of his followers too (and at least two queens of France...), I think however that the category "CoA of Philip II of Spain" makes sense here, as he was the builder of the monastery. That's why I specified this king.
Anyway, thanks again. --Jebulon (talk) 16:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jebulon, I tried to categorize those COAs based on their basic description, which is the 1580 model which, apparently, was used until as late as 1668. The purpose was not to strip original coats of arms specifically related to one king from their owner, but I might incidentally done so. Please tell me which CoA is that one, or add the proper category yourself. Thank you very much for your observation.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:43, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for answer.
I think you are right (CoA of spanish kings since 1580), but I think I'm not wrong (CoA of Philip II)... This is not incompatible. The sign is the little portuguese escutcheon, in the middle above. As you surely know, Portugal was lost by kings of Spain in 1665 after a lot of military defeats, but inspite of the Treaty of Lisbon of 1668, maybe King Charles II owned those CoA too, until his death and the advent of Anjou-Bourbon family, I don't know... Very interesting !--Jebulon (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, you are not wrong, it should have both categories indeed.
(Comment) We (Portugal) never belonged to Spain. Filipe was a legitimate King of Portugal by blood, and he and his successors always ruled Portugal as a separate Kingdom, with a separate administration. For instance, I don't believe the Filipes ever used those Castillan coats of arms among us. Instead, the normal coat of arms of Portugal was used. The coat of arms of the Filipes as Kings of Portugal, if I'm not wrong, is Portugal without any marshalling. If it was not for the war with England and its alliance, it could have been a very prosperous time for us. The so called "restoration of independence" in 1640 was nothing but a palacian coup d'état by a cadet royal branch against another. That holiday will be celebrated this year for the last time, the 1st December. The large majority of the population today has not the least idea about why it is an holiday, and the only reason it will be missed is because it provided a very nice bridge with the 8 December holiday. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since the beginning of our conversation, I've read and learned a lot about the histories of Spain and Portugal under the reigns of the Filipes, and about these kings I recently saw the sarcophagi in El Escorial... Looks to me like a personal union, something like the double monarchy in Austria-Hungary under Emperor-King Franz-Josef (sorry for the anachronism). Anyway, I thank you very much for all you made me discover those days, I'm very interested both by History and heraldry (look at my picture galleries !) and I'm very happy when I learn something new.


You tell me that the 1st december holiday will be celebrated this year for the last time. Why ?
Btw, don't worry, it is the same in France, almost nobody knows now anything about our national history...--Jebulon (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've never been to El Escorial.. *sigh* Definitively a must go.
Yes, I guess it was a personal union, though I don't believe there ever was a true "Spanish-Portuguese Empire". Both empires remained separated all along, and I'm not aware of any effort to "Hispanize" our possessions.
This is the last year for 1st December (Restoration of Independence) and 5th October (Republic implementation) holidays as part of the Troika economic measures of austerity. It is supposed to be a 5 year suspension, but it is not clear. In any case, at least the 1st December holiday is not expected to return, since it's permanence today is basically indefensible.
I'm also very much motivated by learning, here. Indeed, it's pretty much the biggest attraction of this whole endeavour. It's a joy and a privilege. So I ask you, if you have any doubt about any of my categorizations in heraldry or elsewhere, then please tell me. The exchange of ideas and opinions only makes all this more interesting, and quite often discussion is the best way to learn. -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, of course. El Escorial ? Brrr... Not very sexy! I prefer Versailles ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending

[edit]

Darwin, eu licenciei corretamente os arquivos:?

Não foi vandalismo, foi uma tentativa de licenciamento - e aprendizado.

Ela permitiu o uso da imagem 2 vezes. Ela é advogada. Eu enviei o email ao permission-commons. Eduardo P (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo P (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file of yours @ CSD

[edit]

This file you uploaded - File:Elias Garcia Martinez - Ecce Homo.jpg - was mentioned on my talk by the CSD nominator. I didn't see a bot notice here, so I wanted to make sure you had a chance of responding to the CSD. INeverCry 00:32, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello INeverCry, thank you very much for your care. He is correct, indeed, I miscalculated the protection time in Spain (it's 80 years before 1987).-- Darwin Ahoy! 04:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bandeiras inventadas

[edit]

Boas Darwin.

Não queres dar uma vista de olhos neste pedido: pt:Wikipédia:Pedido de remoção imediata de violação de direitos de autor#Como excluir estas imagens que eu mesmo coloquei no site?

O pior é que muitas daquelas imagens são usadas em montes de artigos.

Abç. --Stegop (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Mas nenhum dos ficheiros estava em uso, talvez alguém consertou isso antes (até porque nem fazia muito sentido alguém querer usar aquilo).-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

[edit]

Hello, can you please add a comment here? There has been nonsense reverts based on an inexistent legal issue concerning public domain images.

Olá, pode por favor comentar este caso. Tem havido reversões sem qualquer sentido com base numa questão legal inexistente em relação a imagens de domínio público. Polyethylen (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, obrigado pela dica. *sigh* -- Darwin Ahoy! 18:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomeações em massa

[edit]

Oi DarwIn!

Bom encontrá-lo por aqui e grato pela dica!OTAVIO1981 (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

آپلود

[edit]

سلام. حتما دیگر آپلود نمیکنم. موفق باشید— Preceding unsigned comment added by امیرحسین نجد (talk • contribs)

خوب، با تشکر از شما. -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

about several problems with images in my articles

[edit]

Hi. I was wondering why several times free CR images were erased from my articles. How to get a permission from the owner? Thanks

--Emifercho88 (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need to contact the owner, following the instructions in COM:OTRS. They have to agree with publishing the images under a free license for we to host them here.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias DarwIn, pero ese autor debe redactar ese permiso? es necesario lo susodicho?

--Emifercho88 (talk) 20:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Es necesario que la prueba de que las imágenes están con una licencia libre con permisión de su autor sea enviada para permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. O puede el mismo la enviar, o el envía a vosotros y vosotros para permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Pienso que todo esto está mejor explicado aquí: COM:OTRS.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and question

[edit]

I made a muckup with the Manti Utah Temple -http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Manti_Utah_Temple_-_Jul_2008.jpg&action=history and saw you have fixed it up - thanks for that - is there anything that I should learn from that? SatuSuro (talk) 05:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SatuSuro, I don't believe it was your fault at all. It's that US copyright thing with statues, which is difficult to understand. For instance, there are a lot of statues in Category:Avard Fairbanks which for unclear motives are left untouched. I suspect it has to do with the year of publication, those published before 1978 without copyright notice are safe to keep. Anyway, don't lose your sleep over it. :)
The only thing you may learn from that, if you don't know already, is that you may salvage those FOP deleted images by cropping them, if they are still usable without the copyrighted part, like this one. In some cases it's not even necessary to crop the whole thing, just the necessary to make it de minimis. -- Darwin Ahoy! 06:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanation - I sometimes do some renames and duplicate operations in trepidation - like I hope its ok feeling - being Australian with a tendency to avoid statues (in the main) I suspect ants arent going to claim intellectual rights from my staring in their faces, just yet... SatuSuro (talk) 06:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to this edit [29], I have added an example of a contemporary coin showing the tressure following the pale. You may also be interested in [30]. DrKiernan (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre instantâneos

[edit]

Prezado DarwIn,

Diga-me uma coisa. Se eu faço instantâneos de um filme que está num canal educativo e cultural público do Youtube, sem nenhuma indicação de Copyright, além de ser bem antigo. Colocar as imagens destes instantâneos no Commons infringe alguma regra ? Grato. --Marcric (talk) 23:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens de cortesia estão em domínio público ?

[edit]

Prezado DarwIn,

Encontrei esta imagem que ilustra características interessantes e específicas de cor e formato dos gazes que escapam desse modelo de foguete.

The launch of a Nike-Apache (14.373 GI) from the Keweenaw Site.

Ela está num site que aparentemente não está mais sendo atualizado. Tentei contato pelo email indicado na página principal, e parece que o servidor de email deles não está ativo.

A imagem está identificada como sendo cortesia do Sr. Roland Bruce Burgan.

É possível colocá-la no commons? caso afirmativo, como devo proceder?

Grato. --Marcric (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coats of arms of Castile and Leon, + ??

[edit]

Hi DarwIn,

Remembering our very interesting conversation, I come back with a new heraldic question.
Strange escutcheon...
Do you think you could help for identification ?
In background, we have Castile-and-Leon, ok. A (royal ?) crown, and a Golden Fleece collar.
But what is this strange blue escutcheon with five golden escutcheons ?
The style of the relief looks 18th-century, but the painting is modern, IMO.
This central escutcheon is not the "Anjou" one (no fleur-de-lys), could it be a part of the Portuguese one, with a mistake in the painting ?
I really dont know...
The pic was taken this summer in the Gardens of the Alcazar of Seville, Spain.
Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol

[edit]

My reply to your VPC post

[edit]

I don't know if you saw this before it got archived: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/10#Ecce Homo by Elías García Martínez. Basically, I think we should have a more explicit statement of permission from them. -- King of 22:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:América Futebol Clube (SP) logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola DarwIn te consulto sobre esta imagen File:Csan-ignacio4.gifque me encontré la cual creo que no se ajusta al proyecto por ser el nombre de un reconocido centro comercial de Caracas--Veronidae (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre instantâneos II

[edit]

Prezado DarwIn,

Solicitei ajuda a algum tempo atrás para resolver essa questão dos instantâneos. aqui:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DarwIn#Sobre_instant.C3.A2neos

Como não obtive resposta, busquei ajuda num fórum, e obtive a resposta aqui:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fastily/Archive_1#About_Still_images

Então, está claro agora que eu deveria ter feito o upload usando a opção de "This file is not my own work." e atribuir a NASA como autora.

Os arquivos excluídos são esses:

O que devo fazer para recuperá-los ?

No aguardo,

Grato. --Marcric (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quinze dias desde o primeiro pedido de ajuda sobre este assunto. Acho que devo buscar outra alternativa... --Marcric (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Com quase um mês desde a minha primeira solicitação, eu desisti de tentar recuperar esses arquivos. --Marcric (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categorias duplicadas

[edit]

Boas Darwin. Como não conheço mais nenhum sysop por aqui, recorro a ti mais uma vez. Podes desenlear esta duplicação de cats: Category:Castle of Evoramonte e Category:Castelo de Evoramonte. Não me perguntes porque é que criei Category:Evoramonte Castle em maio, porque já não me lembro; suponho que foi porque assumi que essa forma era a normalizada/padronizada. Pelo que tenho visto, a norma é que os nomes das categorias sejam em inglês; por exemplo, na Tuquia, nos últimos meses um editor turco(!) tem andado a substituir nomes "aturcalhados" por nomes em inglês. Como não quero entrar em guerras com o Tm (talk · contribs), acho que é melhor ser alguém "com galões" a analisar o assunto. Abç. --Stegop (talk) 03:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

edit

[edit]

Hi DarwIn, why have you removed the source entry from this image? --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paz e bem!

DarwIn:

Esta minha foto foi indicada para eliminação, argumentei que é imagem de uma capela pública (não privada) e, que me consta, as leis brasileiras permitem que se use livremente imagens nesta condição.

como não sei se fiz minha argumentação no espaço correto, estou pedindo a ti que dê uma olhada na discussão e se eu estou correto ou não -- acredito que pelo menos tenhas contato com quem possa me ajudar.

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Pales_edged has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta

[edit]

Hola saludos te escribo por lo siguiente hasta hace unos días en mis preferencias en el apartado de Miembro de los grupos: decía: Usuarios autoconfirmados y Usuarios, ahora pareció las condiciones de Patrulleros y Reversores se de lo que se trata porque en Wikipedia en español soy Verificador y Reversor pero lo que me extraña es que yo no solicite esos flat ni me han notificado que los tengo, ¿Quisiera saber si eso es normal acá es decir uno se los gana al llega un cierto numero de ediciones o periodo de tiempo o esta ocurriendo algo anormal? --Veronidae (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo esta es una de esa imagenes que no es afin al proyecto si la puede borrar Rojo File:Paleta.pdf--Veronidae (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same picture

[edit]

Hi, I saw you deleted a picture I took at the National Gallery of art in DC for copyright violation. It looks a lot like the picture you posted as a copyright violation, but it is in fact a different picture. I had never seen the other picture before so it's not like I tried to recreate it or copy it or anything, in fact it would have been impossible since that picture is dated July 10th 2012 and I took my picture when visiting DC in November 21st 2009. I'm glad there's people making sure that copyrighted works are protected. In this case however, it is not the same picture.

Best regards, Alexandra

Note: replied at User talk:Mahinavai#Re: File:Eliminar.jpg. -- King of 06:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paz e bem!

Esta foto de minha autoria foi proposta para deleção.

Contudo esta imagem é de uma capela pública (não privada) e, que me consta, as leis brasileiras permitem que se use livremente imagens nesta condição.

Estou preocupado, pois não houve menhuma resposta ao meu argumento pela manutenção.

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 04:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you! (tudo bem com você?)

[edit]
last edit 14.10.2012... Gunnex (talk) 22:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imagem nas páginas de Flávio de Queirós e Venceslau de Queirós

[edit]

Caro DarwIn, saudações. Faz tempo que não nos comunicamos, a ultima vez vc, gentilmente, ajudou-me c/ a colocação de fotos. Pela mesma razão volto a solicita-la - carrego a foto do Tte. Cel. Estanislau Jose de Oliveira Queiroz - http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Tte._Cel._Estanislau_Jose_de_Oliveira_Queiroz.jpg - ela aparece como carregada, mas não consigo edita-la nas pags. referenciadas. Mais uma vez conto c/ vc e ja agradeço. Visitando sua pagina Usuário Discução, deparei-me c/ convite Boa estadia na Wikipédia. Saudações, Willy Weazley Expelliarmus! 18h09min de 16 de setembro de 2011 (UTC), constatando vc interessar-se por Monarquia e Nobreza, que é, também, o meu caso. Fui socio fundador, em 1991, do Conselho Pró Brasil Monárquico sob a egide do Chefe da Casa Imperial do Brasil, S.A.I.R. Principe Dom Luiz de Orleans e Bragança, posteriormente fundador e diretor do Brasil Imperial e, igualmente, do Instituto Brasil Imperial. Meu nome é Flavio Augusto de Oliveira Queiroz Neto e caso vc queira conhecer o meu perfil, por favor, clique https://plus.google.com/u/0/118443715309754074425/posts e/ou http://flavioaugustodeoliveiraqueirozneto.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/perfil-genealogico-familiar-pessoal-e.html. Colocando-me ao seu inteiro dispor, "envio o meu muito saudar". Abs. Capeto47 (talk) 07:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC) - Alô DarwIn, finalmente consegui editar a foto nas duas pags., de toda forma, muito obrigado. Reafirmo, realmente, estar ao seu inteiro dispor. Abs. Capeto47 (talk) 13:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(removing automatic copyvio advice) Was copyvio via http://www.flickr.com/photos/estudosdearte/506192213/ (2007) and/or grabbed from internet. Obs.: The file was ajusted + high wiki usage due integration in Institution:Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga.

Museu Nacional do Azulejo

[edit]

Olá DarwIn,

Acabei de remover o redirect da categoria Category:Museu Nacional do Azulejo para Category: Mosteiro da Madre de Deus. Deixei uma explicação na página de discussão. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

[edit]
Feliz Navidad y un Prospero Año Nuevo. Gracias por ser tan atento con cariño Veronidae La Osa Gruñona

--Veronidae (talk) 00:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta

[edit]

Hola DarwIn quisiera saber si con mis facultades de usuario yo estoy fatultada pera usar este (#REDIRECT name of the target page) o como puedo hacer para renombrar archivos y categoria directamente asi como borrar galerías que estan fuera del proposito del proyecto y no estar pidiendo que otros lo hagan creo que puedo colaborar en eso, xo se si es solisitando un flag o por medio de elección.--Veronidae (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unificar categorias

[edit]

Paz e bem!
As categorias
Category:Saint John the Evangelist e
Category:Saint John the Apostle
tratam da mesmíssima pessoa
e deveriam serunificadas.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respondido aqui. --Waldir talk 05:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola DarwIn podrías chequear el estatus de esta imagen File:Diaphanos huberi imagen 01.jpg proviene de este sitio y se me hace que podria se una imagen en derecho. --Veronidae (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Olá, como vai? Já conversamos e me ajudaste no passado. Tenho recebido uma chuva de pedras por ter criado um blog para exemplificar com traduções o trabalho de poetas que biografo. Então colocaram o blog na lista negra do SPAM, o que é um absurdo, pois temos ali a intenção de divulgar conhecimento sobre a poesia do autor. Podemos não ter como provar que o blog é reconhecido internacionalmente. Afinal, quem escreve sobre blogs fora dos blogs? Não estou disposto a lutar pela justiça e para desbloquear o blog, pois estou muito doente. No entanto, gostaria de retirar, sim, o rótulo de SPAM do blog e saber como fazer para continuar inserindo na Wikipédia traduções de poema dos autores (desde que não se viole direitos autorais, claro). Agradeço um retorno, cordialmente --Adrian de Limes (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Oi Darwin! Me tira uma dúvida sobre a lei de CR portuguesa? Os diagramas (e só eles) aqui me parecem documentos oficiais portugueses escaneados (sem portanto nenhum valor "artístico" ou criativo associado). É possível carregá-los aqui? José Luiz disc 22:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Convento das Mercês

[edit]

Bom dia.

Parabéns e obrigado por disponibilizar a imagem e a identificação dos diversos imóveis. Gostava contudo de levantar a questão da identificação do Convento da Encarnação que não poderá estar sequer na imagem, uma vez que ficaria muito mais a sul.

Obrigado,

Melhores Cumprimentos,

Jorge Jesus

Olá Jorge, é bem possível que tenha razão. Ainda não percebi que estrutura é aquela, e é possível que de facto não seja o Convento da Encarnação. Se souber o que é, por favor diga-me.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imagem de conhecida

[edit]

Oi Darwin, eu conheço a pessoa que é autora dessa foto e foi quem a publicou. Ela deve ter errado algo no preenchimento da licença, porém ela é a proprietária dos direitos autorais da foto e queria realmente doar com todos os direitos liberados. Seria útil em artigos ligados ao Carnaval do Recife. Aproveitando, queria tb tirar uma dúvida, o File:O Galo da Madrugada Carnaval do Recife.jpg que foi licenciado pela Agência Brasil está com o link fora do ar. Isso pode de alguma forma comprometer a "verificabilidade" do material, tipo, alguém desconfiando que é falsa a declaração de que aquilo foi postado pela Agência Brasil, e portanto, é um trabalho livre? Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Quintinense,
Em relação ao primeiro caso, a imagem foi carregada sem licença. Pergunte à pessoa sua conhecida que licença ela quer na publicação, que eu restauro e coloco.
No segundo caso, a resposta é sim, pode comprometer. Não seria imediato, até porque isso foi carregado pela Jurema, que tem boa reputação, mas se fosse colocado por alguém com fama de trapaceiro a imagem poderia ser eliminada por precaução, uma vez que a licença e fonte não podiam ser confirmadas. No caso dessa imagem específica eu consegui encontrar o novo link dela lá na Agência Brasil, e fiz a revisão da licença, de modo que ela agora está segura mesmo que o link desapareça. Nesses casos em que o licenciamento provém de um site externo convém sempre pedir revisão da licença com {{Licensereview}}. Coloque essa tag nos ficheiros com esse tipo de licenciamento, com uma fonte que funcione, e logo um administrador ou revisor faz a verificação.-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valeu Darwin, obrigado. Eu tinha pedido à Edilma para ela publicar a foto em domínio público. Basta eu perguntar a ela e dizer aqui, ou ela tem que mandar e-mail ou postar la de novo? Não seria melhor, nesses casos, simplesmente presumir a licença menos livre? Pois na pior hipótese a pessoa está doando pro Commons, ainda que com restrições, não? Não entendi bem como funciona essa {{Licensereview}}. Seria como o OTRS, alguém "de confiança" olha e põe uma tag marcando que ele verificou que a informação é verdadeira, seria isso? Abraço! Leandro Rocha (talk) 05:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Em relação ao {{Licensereview}}, é bem mais simples que o OTRS. Basta colocar essa tag e um link válido para a fonte e licença da imagem, que um administrador ou revisor faz a verificação, e protege a imagem de futuros questionamentos caso esse link desapareça, ou mudem a licença na origem (como a Agência Brasil já fez, inclusive).
Quanto à imagem da sua amiga, basta perguntar a ela que tipo de licença quer. Poderíamos eventualmente presumir qual seria com base em outros carregamentos correctamente licenciados que ela tivesse feito, mas não sei se isso aconteceu. Não se pode simplesmente colocar a licença menos livre, pois já tem acontecido (e não poucas vezes) gente carregar imagens aqui sem colocar licença pensando que isto é para uso não comercial, por isso é necessário realmente algum tipo de confirmação da parte do detentor dos direitos autorais.-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fui confirmar a conversa e ela me confirmou dominio público mesmo. Posso mandar a conversa pro seu e-mail pra vc conferir? Abraço! Leandro Rocha (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Olá Quintinense, restaurei as imagens carregadas por esse utilizador, e reenviei os pedidos de licenciamento. Agora é necessário que ele corrija a situação dentro do prazo. Se ele se atrapalhar com as licenças, basta escrever qual a que quer na página de discussão dele, e você mesmo coloca a licença que ele escolheu. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Falei com ela, o problema é que ela esqueceu a senha da conta:
Leandro Rocha
Mas tem que estar logada com a conta Edilmam rs se não eles não tem como saber que é vc, rsrsrs
10:51
Edilma Maria
sim... foi o q disse anteriormente
10:51
Leandro Rocha
Aahh vc esqueceu a senha?? hauahaauaa
10:52
Edilma Maria
entao acho q vc n entendeu... kkk pq eu disse: n lembro da senha. e ainda fiz uma piadinha... posso até criar outra! rs... aiaiaiai
10:52
Leandro Rocha
aaaaaah ta, lol
10:52
Edilma Maria
é q é tanta coisa q n tenho tempo p mais nada! kkkkk o... prometo dar um jeito
10:53
Leandro Rocha
O fd é provar que a conta nova é a mesma pessoa da conta antiga, a não ser que vc postasse outra foto batida com a mesma máquina.
vou falar com o Darwin e ver o que ele me diz.
Ela acrescentou a licença la, mas como IP.[31] Leandro Rocha (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edilma Maria
sou eu mesma, lembrei a senha. uhuuuuuuuuu.Edilmam (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi Quintinense & Edilma: Parece que já está tudo resolvido em relação a essas 4 imagens, eu acertei as duas que faltavam. Por favor agradeça à Edilma a contribuição a este projecto. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi. Parece que você apagou parte da imagem usando um editor no computador. Porquê isso?--MisterSanderson (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Sanderson. Apaguei porque era tridimensional (parte de um carro encostado à parede, se bem me lembro) e como a foto não é minha, não poderia ficar.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Memorial" drinking fountain

[edit]

Thanks for the heads up. I left a response on my talk page. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I'm not sure they shouldn't be patrolled, however, since my Arabic is extremely limited.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Moçambique

[edit]

"No problemo!" - Já percebi que FOP é FOP e não haverá muito a fazer quanto a isso. A maioria das imagens tinham sido carregadas há já uns meses atrás, e agora evito fazê-lo. Em caso de dúvida eu peço ajuda. Aproveito para lhe dar os parabéns pela fotos antigas carregadas, pois de outro modo os artigos das WP ficavam sem imagens. Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foto de convenção do P.M.D.B.

[edit]

Gostaria de chamar à sua atenção este (repetido) pedido de recuperação de uma imagem. Esta mostrava parte da platéia numa convenção partidária do P.M.D.B., e era a única da respetiva categoria a mostrar apoiantes anónimos, ao invés de manda-chuva. Apesar de eu ter argumentado com esse ponto, a foto foi apagada, tida por irrelevante e sem interesse enciclopédico (contrastando com o modo como fotos semelhantes de outros países são consideradas), e a sua recuperação subsequentemente pedida foi recusada, por «falta de apoio». Estou, pois, agora alertando utilizadores brasileiros do Commons para que manifestem a sua opinião. -- Tuválkin 02:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ora, vc foi mais rápido! :-) -- Tuválkin 03:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eu não sou Brasileiro, né? ;)
Sinceramente não vejo grande utilidade nessa imagem, mas se achares alguma(s) semelhante(s) em outras manifestações, e que tenham utilização, eu argumento para manter.-- Darwin Ahoy! 03:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Estava na dúvida se eras brasileiro ou não, hehe. -- Tuválkin 18:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Não, mas sou da Madeira, que é parecido. ;) -- Darwin Ahoy! 22:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

FYI. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

se han vulnerado mis derechos de imagen y deseo eliminarlas todas soy el autor de las misma

Mozambique FOP

[edit]

Hi, DarwIn, would you be willing to update COM:FOP#Mozambique so that it will be clearer which works are still copyrighted and which ones are already in the public domain? Thank you a lot. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eleassar, I'll do my best, using the known jurisprudence on that issue.-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I hope it is clear enough. Please feel free to suggest corrections or clarifications.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:File:Sugar 5 - spraying

[edit]

Viva, na Category:Luabo estão 21 imagens do mesmo autor. Talvez as possas juntar aa lista para eliminar,se for caso disso. Obrigado --JotaCartas (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Esperemos que essa bendita legislação seja em breve alterada como previsto, para se poder recuperar isso tudo. Quem fez aquilo não sei onde estava com a cabeça. Um país tão pobre com leis de ricos (e de ricos patos-bravos...).-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Grandes fotos da Torre do Tombo! É pena que um país que já tem tão pouco, acabe por ficar só com imagens do tempo do colonialismo e se forem do tempo da 'maria cachucha' (1800...). Abraço. --JotaCartas (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pois, parece bastante estúpido, não é? E ainda mais estúpido parece, se pensarmos que os moçambicanos para fazer postais de Maputo têm de pagar avenças aos antigos colonos por direitos que estes não têm nem nunca tiveram sequer em Portugal. Mas o governo moçambicano está consciente que fez asneira com essa lei, e já foram feitos uma série de estudos com vista a modifica-la (não sei se passa a incluir FOP, mas os 70 anos, por exemplo, devem passar a 50).-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parada das Vacas em Porto Alegre - 2010.jpg

[edit]

Paz, bem e Feliz Natal ! File:Parada das Vacas em Porto Alegre - 2010.jpg Não sei como denunciar esta imagem. Mesmo que a Agência Porto Alegre tenha liberado o uso das imagens, a legislação brasileira prevê "direito de paisagem" de obras artísticas apenas se estiverem expostas permanentemente; a Parada das Vacas foi um evento não permanente, as obras só estiveram expostas durante algumas semanas. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Eugenio, um Feliz Natal também para si! Creio que tem razão quanto à legislação brasileira. Nestes casos o procedimento adequado é enviar a imagem para uma discussão de delecção (DR) como eu fiz, uma vez que não se trata duma violação directa e óbvia de direitos de autor. Existem inclusivamente algumas ferramentas que agilizam este procedimento, na barra da esquerda ("tools"). Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:12, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restauro

[edit]

Olá Darwin, como vai? Poderia por favor verificar isso? Leandro Rocha (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Restaurado.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valeu, Darwin, só tive como ver isso agora. Pode restaurar também essaCommons:Deletion requests/File:Talleres no Nordeste Sevens 2013.jpg? É do mesmo caso. Obrigado desde já. Leandro Rocha (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, restaurado esse também. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Debate closure

[edit]

Good day DarwIn. I wonder if you can clarify the procedure for debate closure? I along with User:JotaCartas and User:Armando Pacheco reached a consensus at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/12/Category:Firefighters of Azores, and was wondering what has to be done to close debate, and get on with the work that was decided. Is it an automatic procedure after a certain time, or do we have to submit a request to an administrator (like yourself)? Can you direct me to the appropriate instructions? Appreciate your input. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Zeorymer, since it seems to be a clear, non controversial consensus, I believe anyone can close it, according with the instructions at Commons:Categories for discussion. You can close it yourself, if you are willing to do it. :) Best regards, -- Darwin Ahoy! 01:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why

[edit]

why u delete my pictures?--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because unless you are a man named Muhammad Zaernia, they are not yours. They are copyrighted to another person, as can be seen here - http://www.shahraraonline.com/broadcast/519/ .-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
he gifted to me that pics.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Even if he gave them to you, you can't put yourself in the authors name. In that case, nevertheless, you need to prove you have permission to publish them under that license to OTRS. Please follow the instructions in your talkpage.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
i prefer they deleted. i have not mood of emailing and following orders. i will upload my own pictures and there is no way to delete them.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then, your choice...-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
can u find a link of published of this pic File:November13,2013 - Muharram 9,1435 Tasu'a - Nishapur 286.JPG in other website.? surely NO! bcz 90% of my uploading is my OWN pictures,--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
im a good user.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe so, but there is a number of questions to solve regarding your uploads of images taken by third parties. Let's try to solve this at your talk page, ok?-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, DarwIn. You have new messages at Павел Игоревич Гончарук's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

The permission information

[edit]

Hi, DarwIn, required authorization was sent by the author and copyright holder Vladimir Bachtov on permissions-ru@wikimedia.org from vladimir@bakhtov.com.ua 5 february 2014 at 16:34 CET. And now we are waiting for answer, thanks.--Павел Игоревич Гончарук (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modelaje,_Modelo.jpg

[edit]

Greetings, I've left you messages on your discussion page not answer me. The Modeling _Modelo.jpg qur image is erased my rpopiedad, upload to commons tried again but it tells me that it is not possible because it was already deleted. I need an answer, do? Jaam0121 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg

[edit]

Paz e bem!
1 Esta imagem foi selecionada para imagem do dia em 28 fev. 2014.

2 Está descrita e categorizada em Ecce homo, mas a cena representada é anterior ao episódio Ecce homo, seria a coroação de espinhos (Jesus Christ being crowned with thorns).

3 Ecce homo é a apresentação que Pôncio Pilatos faz ao povo depois que Jesus é flagelado e coroado de espinhos, a representação é com Jesus em pé, com coroa de espinhos e com manto.

4 A imagem selecionada em português também e denominada de Jesus da cana verde.

5 Passo estas informações pra ti pois como é uma imagem do dia e meu inglês é muito ruim não ouso alterar as informações da mesma.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 12:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to a category

[edit]

Hi DarwIn! I made a mistake when I created 8 six rays argent in heraldry instead of Category:8 six rays argent in heraldry. Please, would you help me to rename it? Thanks in advance!.--Duche de Cleves (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear DarwIn/Archive 4, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Odder. I apologize for not being active here in the project in the last months, I'm planning to return now, if time permits.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DarwIn, I'd like you to check if the super cat Category:Hand-colored photographs is really applicable especially because of the subcats Category:Photochrome pictures. Regards --Oursana (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC) --Oursana (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ratificar que está sob licença correta

[edit]

Paz e bem! Dawinus: Poderias ratificar que fiz o upload com autorização da fonte? Na p. está a licença, mas como pode ser modificada ou retirada do ar gostaria de ratificação. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

O verbete pt:Anexo:Lista de animais que vivem na Europa, editado por você, foi marcado para eliminação por consenso, por ter sido considerado, por algum editor, não condizente com a Wikipédia; isso significa que o verbete talvez não satisfaça os de notoriedade estabelecidos pela comunidade ou se encaixe no descrito em [https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:O_que_a_Wikip%C3%A9dia_n%C3%A3o_%C3%A9

Você poderá seus argumentos na discussão para manter ou eliminar, porém jamais remova o aviso de eliminação que está no verbete, pois seria considerado [72].

Boas contribuições! --MiguelMadeira (discussão) 16h56min de 9 de outubro de 2014 (UTC)

08:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

13:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

05:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Discussão de eliminação

[edit]

Oi, Darwin, td bom? Poderia por favor ver isso? Ah, off, não sei se você viu, mas eu venci a eliminatória interna de samba da Praça Seca pro ano que vem. Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Auto patroller

[edit]

Hello dear DarwIn, can you please grant me the auto patrolller right? i am very familiar with Commons policies and guidelines and i believe that that will especially be useful to me.This right will be useful to automatically marks new pages created by me as patrolled and to reduce the workload of new page patrollers.I also have this right on meta,frwiki, sysop on two wiki and various rights across other projects. Regards and wonderful holiday! --Grind24 (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grind24, I've reviewed your contributions here, and apart from one deleted file I've not seen problems with them. I've also taken into account what Odder said one month ago. Therefore, I granted you autopatroller right. Keep up the good work, and if you have any doubt you can ask me anytime. Have a nice holiday, -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Best Regards and wonderful holiday :) --Grind24 (talk) 08:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again.Kind Regards :)--Grind24 (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

image, basis-group, frolov oleg, russia, orenburg

[edit]

Добрый день. Изображения, которые вы удалили

File:Cam 008.jpg
File:Cam 007.jpg
File:Cam 006.jpg
File:Cam 004.jpg
File:Cam 005.jpg
File:Cam 002.jpg
File:Cam 001.jpg
File:Cam 003.jpg
File:Cam 009.jpg

за нарушение авторских прав, принадлежащих компании "Basis Group" (http://basis-group.pro/) не верно, так как, я являюсь представителем указанной компании, а именно маркетологом.Могу приложить необходимые документы. и имею право размещать эти файлы, так как они находятся в общем доступе и без ограничеий.

Изображения необходимы для статьи-описания строительного проекта компании для жителей области.

Happy new year 2015!

[edit]

Happy New Year 2015 Fuochi d'artificio Happy New Year to you Dear DarwIn/Archive 4 --Grind24 (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my file.

[edit]

Hi,

It seems like you deleted a file I have uploaded. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anjum_Anand_in_Amrithsar,_India.jpg.

I am the owner of the file and I had released the file to the public domain. I have the raw photograph with me if you want me to prove. You should have notified me before deleting. Please undo the deletion. Natasha Jinx (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello anybody there? busy on a deletion spree? Natasha Jinx (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

18:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Need to Hire Heraldry Artist

[edit]

I am looking to hire an artist to create vector coats of arms for me. Please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

-John L.

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Pedido: Eliminação de uma página da Wikipédia

[edit]

Por favor: Existe uma página muito suspeita na Wikipédia: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:P%C3%A1ginas_para_eliminar/Olavo_de_Carvalho

Está escrito:

Votação cancelada.
Motivo: WP:POV - sock puppetry.
Para mais informações, ver Política de eliminação. Leandro Martinez msg 12h50min de 15 de fevereiro de 2011 (UTC)
WP:3 Falha no critério de notoriedade acadêmica. A página em questão não tem terceiras fontes confiáveis. Todas as informações se baseiam no próprio website do biografado.
189.55.131.66 (discussão) 04h14min de 15 de fevereiro de 2011 (UTC)

Objetivamente eu quero uma nova votação, que na verdade nunca aconteceu, porque a votação foi bloqueada, para discutir se o verbete sobre o Olavo de Carvalho deve ser mantido na Wikipédia.

O Olavo de Carvalho não é professor universitário e não possui diploma de Filosofia. As fontes citadas, pelo menos no verbete da Wikipédia em inglês, não são fiáveis. Está escrito na Wikipédia em inglês que o Olavo possui interesse pela psicologia, mas o Olavo criticou uma decisão do Conselho Regional de Psicologia do Paraná. Existem muitos problemas envolvendo o verbete sobre o Olavo de Carvalho na Wikipédia.

Atesto votos de elevada estima e consideração.

Att. 189.13.62.127 22:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding deleted image - Varaha Vadivu

[edit]

Hi Darwin,

This is regarding the image https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:VarahaVadivu.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 I had uploaded which has been deleted. The owner now has emailed the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org releasing the license for the image along with seven other images. Can you please help me how to go about in requesting for reverting the deleted image?

I am new to the Wikipedia editing ways, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amymy/Vadivu is my first attempt to compose a full-fledged page. I am planning to add the remaining seven images to this topic page.

Thank you very much for any help, Amymy (user id)

15:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

15:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Support request with team editing experiment project

[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

15:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

15:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

15:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

19:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Views of Torre de Belém has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JotaCartas (talk) 03:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


Category discussion warning

Category:Crossrails has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Choess (talk) 22:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear DarwIn, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Antigo edifício da Associação Comercial e café Kit-Kat na Entrada da Cidade, 1935.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

I removed {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-old}} or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove {{No license}} tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jarekt, I fixed all the licenses. I would like to remark, however, that none of those files had an "author". They were all produced by a company. According to the Portuguese law, those cases are treated similarly as if they had no known author. I would advice against doing this kind of screening automatically for files related to Portugal, or else a lot of legitimate files could be deleted by the cleaners within just a single week.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing it out. The Creator is labeled as "corporation" and I should not use date of death for corporation the same way I do for regular authors. --Jarekt (talk) 16:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Super Typhoon Haiyan (31W) over the Philippine - November 8, 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nino Marakot (talk) 04:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

help images screenshot pt wikipedia

[edit]

Ciao DarwIn, ti chiamo perché avrei bisogno di un aiuto sul wikipedia portoghese e purtroppo io non parlo portoghese, forse sei la mia unica speranza ma vengo subito al dunque: vorrei pubblicare 2 immagini su un qualsiasi wikipedia e già ho visto che in altre non è possibile per la legislazione invece in altre come enwiki o quella italiana purtroppo non c'è spazio, mi è rimasta quella portoghese e le 2 immagini sono:

purtroppo penso che forse queste 2 immagini per essere pubblicate, come tu già saprai, devono avere le pagine corrispondenti altrimenti diventano immagini orfane e di conseguenza, credo che, vengono cancellate. Quindi devo chiederti anche, purtroppo, se puoi creare anche le 2 pagine corrispondenti... ma credo che non sia obbligatorio farle con molti contenuti ad esempio nel wikipedia francese questa e quest'altra pagina sono molto ristrette, credo che potresti farle simili a queste tanto a me interessa solo le 2 immagini. Pensi di poterci riuscire? Io spero di si Smitersleon (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Fotos

[edit]

Alô DarwIn, boa noite! Vc. poderia, por gentileza, ajudar-me ampliando as fotos dos titulares das paginas (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lu%C3%ADs_Ant%C3%B4nio_de_Morais_Navarro - https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joaquim_Leonel_Pereira_de_Magalh%C3%A3es - https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam%C3%A1sio_Pires_Pimentel), da mesma forma como esta a foto da pag. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%A1vio_de_Queir%C3%B3s Muito obrigado!Capeto47 (talk) 00:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)