User talk:Carlos Luis M C da Cruz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Português: Bem-vindo ao Wikimedia Commons, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Primeiros passos

Nossos primeiros passos e nossa FAQ ajudam após o registo. Explicam como colocar a interface do Commons em português, como carregar um arquivo e que licenças usar para carregar arquivos. Você não necessita de habilidades técnicas para contribuir aqui. Seja audaz contribuindo e assuma a boa-fé para com as pessoas. Esta é uma wiki - é realmente fácil.

Ajuda

Mais informação está disponível no Portal comunitário. Se você tiver alguma questão, deixe uma mensagem na Esplanada, na mesa de perguntas (em inglês) ou em #wikimedia-commons, o canal de IRC da Wikimedia. Você pode também contatar um administrador em sua página de discussão. Se você tiver uma pergunta específica sobre o copyright, pergunte em Licenciamento (em inglês).

Como começar no Commons
Cometeu um erro?
  • Você carregou uma imagem com nome errado? Simplesmente carregue a imagem outra vez e marque a velha como esta tag: {{bad name|Nome correto}}
  • Para mais informação veja Propostas para eliminação
(P.S. Você gostaria de responder esta mensagem?)

Patrícia msg 18:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Castelo

[edit]

Boa noite Carlos! a imagem do castelo já está no artigo. A transferência é simplíssima: basta vc copiar a imagem em full size (abra a imagem em outra janela e clique sobre ela novamente: ela abre e logo diminui, então aparece um quadrinho no canto inferior direito, clique nele que ela volta ao tamanho grande, daí clique sobre ela com o botão direito do mouse e salve para seu computador), depois carrega-a no commons clicando em "enviar arquivo", e quando aparecer o quadro descritivo inserir os dados necessários, sempre fazendo um link para o endereço da imagem original e do autor, além de data, permissão, seu nome como carregador e outras infos que vc julgar interessantes.

Vá até a imagem Image:Rathfarnham Castle.jpg e clique em "editar", vc verá a anatomia do quadro descritivo, assim basta copiar o modelo e fazer as adaptações para cada caso. se tiver outras dúvidas dê um grito que lhe dou mais dicas. um abraço! tetraktys 23:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Bom dia Carlos. Gostaria se fosse possível que fosse substituida a fotografia da fachada do Museu de Santa Maria, pois esta foto é antiga e o museu já apresenta uma nova imagem. Obrigado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msmazores2019 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 10:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 11:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Gestão de Categoria

[edit]

Olá Carlos,

Parece-me que uma boa subcategoria será "Churches of Vila do Porto", e talvez outra categoria relacionada com a natureza e ainda outra com artesanato, que acha? Vou ver das convenções de nomenclatura para tais categorias e criar o que for apropriado. Cumprimentos, Patrícia msg 18:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:M ciclismo 5.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--BrokenSphere 18:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Castelo Branco

[edit]

Carlos, obrigado por corrigir a categoria da foto de Castelo Branco! --Fulviusbsas (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Re:Albergaria...you are absolutely right: I made a terrible error in that category, and only noticed it yesterday. I confused the one of the Portuguese settlers of the time, with the name of this parish. I intend to remedy that as soon as possible. Appreciate your assistance, and thanks for compliment. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 07:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the follow-up comments. Just so you know, I am living in the Azores, and am familiar with the place names: I am a GIS technician, Masters in Geography, and working at the Centro de Vulcanologia GIS department in Ponta Delgada for a computer/mapping company. Regarding the village of Vila do Porto, I understand that Category:Vila (Vila do Porto) is not the best option, but trying to keep the parish/municipality categories consist, I thought it would be more appropriate then Category:Vila do Porto (Vila do Porto). I tried a similar name change with the parish of Velas (Category:Velas (Velas)) and others editors suggested not changing it from Category:Velas (town), which in itself is completely incorrect.Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) Maybe[reply]

[1]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:MaryAndHorus.JPG

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MaryAndHorus.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fabuland_3665_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Quinta dos Loridos / Buddha Eden

[edit]

Hello Carlos, categorias criadas e conteúdo organizado. Espero que não te importes, mas fiz eu mesmo a categorização, pois a árvore de categorias de Portugal ainda está muito pobre, e assim aproveitei para criar mais uns raminhos... Então o tio Berardo fez mais uma das suas folies, desta vez no Bombarral? O conteúdo é muito bom, mas o lugar não ajuda nada.. :\ Compara essa secura com o jardim oriental que ele fez no Monte: Monte Palace Tropical Garden. Até dá pena ver essas preciosidades entre pinheiros bravos e coroas-de-henrique que já conheceram melhores dias. :\ Abraços, -- Darwin Ahoy! 11:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rotation of thumbnails

[edit]

Hallo Carlos Luis M C da Cruz, I have reverted your upload at File:Elevador Lacerda.jpg and File:São Tiago -entrance.JPG. Please do not rotate a scaled down size. Instead use RotateLink to request bot help. Sadly it currently needs three days. But the quality is higher!

Anyway: Obrigado, for trying to help! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 01:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Saibo, Thanks for the information, but the subject is too difficult to my eyes: could you, please, help doing the appropriate request? Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 13:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry: you had already fixed it! Many thanks, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 13:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oi Carlos Luis M C da Cruz, yes, it is fixed now.
For future: If there is a image mis-rotated in an article you can go to the file page on Commons and then use the "request rotation" link directly below the image on the file page to order the bot. In general some people here at Commons try to fix all images which have wrong rotation information - so the problem should be gone in some weeks. Just reply here is you want. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Legoland_vikings_river_splash_1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.131.15 21:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clube Naval de Santa Maria

[edit]

Olá Carlos. Criei a categoria "Clube Naval de Santa Maria" e localizou-o na categoria "Vila (Vila do Porto). Espero que ajudei. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criar novas categorias

[edit]

É muito fácil criar novas categorias. Basta no fundo da página escrever o nome da categoria pretendida e gravar. Em seguida clicar no nome da categoria (que estará a vermelho) e editar a nova página colocando as categorias desejadas. No caso da Categoria "Lugar dos Afectos" coloquei "Category:Aveiro, Portugal" e "Category:Amusement parks in Portugal" ambas dentro de duplos parênteses rectos!

Muito obrigado e boas contribuições Joseolgon (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Alfândega do Funchal

[edit]

Olá Carlos! Que obra é essa? -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz. You have new messages at DarwIn's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File source is not properly indicated: File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz. You have new messages at JotaCartas's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Modulex billund.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Modulex billund.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Telegrafo portuguez.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 21:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image rotation

[edit]

In future you can just add the template {{rotate|90}} with the degrees needed to the image and a bot will do it for you. Ww2censor (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]