User talk:Érico

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is Érico's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Érico.

Talk page guidelines

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • No personal attacks
  • Don't bite the newcomers!



Arquivo
Archive
   


User

[edit]

Hello Érico: There is a young contributor: User talk:Juniorian. He seems to be of portuges tongue and he seems not to be common with the intention of wikipedia. Perhaps you could friendly talk to him? Muito obrigado e cumprimentos da Alemanha --DALIBRI (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will try to assist him with our policies and practices. Danke! Érico (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of images

[edit]

Dear Érico, I am contacting you to request your assistance with wiki commons. I have tried to upload several images, but they always get deleted. The last image I uploaded was from www.flickr.com and had no copyright restrictions. The image was of a painting by artist Luc Tuymans. Also, the image is of historically significant artwork, the image is only being used for informational and educational purposes, the image is readily available on the internet, and the image is a low-resolution copy of the original artwork and is unsuitable for commercial use.

The image is meant to be added to the artist's wiki page. Without illustrations of some of the works of the artist, the page poorly documents the work of this artist.

The link to the image was/is:

Luc Tuymans_The Secretary of the State.jpg

What can I do to fix this?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Curatorslog Fair use rationale:

( Curatorslog (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC) )[reply]

File:Keiko Fujimori e Pedro Pablo Kuczynski em dezembro de 2016.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No title

[edit]

Hi. It looks like my portrait image has been flagged for deletion. Please take a look at the image and rethink this. I’m guessing it’s because of the title “me with finger”. It’s not “that” finger. Perfectly harmless.

Jayarwiki (talk) 08:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC) ] jr [ 6 June 2020[reply]

foto has a licence

[edit]

hallo érico, my username is stradiva and I just wanted to tell you, that the fotograph Michael Nier of the foto "luisa celentano" has already given permission for publicate this photo writing to permission@... please check it at common license ...and take back your cancel-proposing, thank you, best regards Stradiva (talk) 19:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stradiva: Hi. I realized now that "Luisa Celentano" can be a relevant public figure. However, the permission has not been assigned and you will need to send it through OTRS. Please note that I'm not referring to this image, but to this one already deleted. Regards, Érico (talk) 08:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SERGIO ROSA JUNIOR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user uploaded five files and you deleted three of them. The deletion log only says “copyright violation”. Can you check the other two files and see if they are OK? Brianjd (talk) 03:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About deleted photos

[edit]

Hello érico, my username is Ethan5979 I will tell you about the image you deleted I just wanted to tell you, that the fotograph Hiro Yoshida of the foto "File:Skating201802cc01.jpg" has already given permission for publicate “https://twitter.com/patinaggio/status/967401339...“ I got permission from the photographer please check it at common license and take back your cancel-proposing, thank you, best regards Ethan5979 --Ethan5979 (talk) 15:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The link you mentioned is not available. I suggest sending the authorization via OTRS. Érico (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thank you for your reply. The photographer sent it to OTRS and got permission. Was there any trouble?--Ethan5979 (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, just wait for an OTRS member to confirm the authorization and restore the file. Érico (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Should the photographer send it back to OTRS? Please tell me the problem with this photo. Deleted due to copyright infringement. The photographer contacted OTRS. And although it was allowed, it was deleted the other day. Thank you for your advice--Ethan5979 (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's what I said above: if the photographer already sent to OTRS the authorization to use his file, just wait for a volunteer to handle the request. Érico (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. By the way, why did you delete the photo? please tell me. Please.--Ethan5979 (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Olá Érico, tudo bem?

Há algum problema em criar categorias para apenas um item aqui no Commons (por exemplo, para pessoas que tem apenas uma foto)? Ou isso não é recomendado? Pergunto porque encontrei algumas categorias assim e, ao mesmo tempo, pretendia criar. Stanglavine (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stanglavine: Olá! Como vai?
Não há problema algum. A meu ver, até ajuda na organização. Eu não costumo fazer isso, normalmente, tão somente por preguiça rsrs. Érico (talk) 02:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Perfeito! Já criei, obrigado! Stanglavine (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Logo do Supremo Tribunal Federal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Joaopaulo1511 (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VDA

[edit]

Érico pode ver o histórico desta imagem File:Pedro-flu-2018.jpg? Claramente o usuário trocou a imagem livre por uma de direitos desconhecidos, muito provável que seja um VDA. Fabiano msg 03:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GRS73: Olá! Deletei todas as versões que constituíam violação dos direitos autorais. Mesmo que não fosse VDA, não era apropriado incluir uma imagem totalmente diferente em uma já utilizada, devendo ser carregadA em um novo arquivo. Enfim, nada que você já não saiba. Abraço! Érico (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outra dúvida

[edit]

Olá Érico, tudo bem?

Queria muito carregar essa imagem para utilizar em um artigo, no Flickr ela está ok com CC BY-SA 2.0, mas a categoria do artista tem um aviso sobre os direitos autorais das obras, pela morte dele ainda ser recente. Verifiquei se poderia ser incluído como liberdade de panorama, mas se entendi direito a Itália é bastante rígida em relação a isso, e o Vaticano utiliza as leis italianas. Porém, vi que foi feito um acordo com o governo italiano para a realização de uma edição do Wiki Loves Monuments, mas eu não consegui entender se o acordo se aplicou apenas para aquele ano, se é permanente, se ainda é válido, enfim, não consegui encontrar uma maneira clara que permita o upload. Será que você conhece alguma outra possibilidade, ou é possível utilizar alguma dessas que citei? Agradeço a ajuda, pois estou perdidíssimo. Abraços! Rafael (stanglavine) msg 14:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stanglavine: Olá!
Sinceramente, não sou especialista neste assunto e poucas vezes carreguei imagens que envolvessem essas políticas.
No entanto, pelo que entendi, o acordo firmado com o governo italiano não seria aplicável pois a) teria que retroceder e incluir imagens diversas (isto é, não relacionadas ao concurso) e b) não sei até que ponto o governo italiano teria competência para substituir as autoridades do Vaticano nesta questão.
Então, fui ver na categoria do artista e achei esta imagem, de uma obra do artista no Vaticano. Já possui sete anos e ninguém questionou... Ainda assim, eu preferiria carregar na ptwiki via URC porque as circunstâncias são mais negativas à hipótese da impossibilidade de carregar aqui. Érico (talk) 14:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sim, no caso dessa imagem ela foi carregada sob aquela condição de "produzida pelo governo dos EUA", que atribui domínio público. Enfim, vou utilizar essa imagem mesmo. Preferia a outra por ser uma imagem melhor, mas essa também não é ruim. Como URC acho complicado devido a existência dessa imagem no Commons. De toda maneira, obrigado pela ajuda :) Rafael (stanglavine) msg 17:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mas isso não importa: tanto as imagens produzidas pelo governo dos EUA quanto a do Flickr, que indicou, estão, teoricamente, adequadas. A questão aqui é a liberdade de panorama. E por que não poderia carregar via URC? Por conta de qual imagem? Érico (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
URC só deve ser utilizado quando não existem imagens equivalentes livres, o que não é o caso, já que existe essa imagem. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 20:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Eu discordo e considero isso um mito mantido e propagado na ptwiki. Ora, se uma imagem não ilustra adequadamente um artigo, uma versão melhor pode ser carregada via URC. O "carregamento mínimo" não significa que nada pode ser carregado. É preciso tão somente justificar a relevância desse carregamento adicional. Érico (talk) 20:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Jen OMalley Dillon (cropped).png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jen OMalley Dillon (cropped).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Angolan Portuguese dialects

[edit]

Dear Érico, kindly delete and set in motion the proper procedure for the deletion of this map, created by user PVZ. The map does not correspond with reality, it was mere thumbsuck on the part of said user and I pointed this out on his discussion page at ptwiki a few years back (he is no longer active). I have removed it wherever it wherever I saw it across all projects, but it keeps popping back up every now and again. Thanks for your assistance. Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 08:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

[edit]

Dear Érico

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:First photo posted to POTUS Biden Administration IG (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gudi129 (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Request for deleting file / Pedido para apagar fotografia

[edit]

Caro Érico. Venho pedir a sua ajuda. Tenho contribuído ao longo dos anos em páginas sobre arte, artistas e arquitetos portugueses. Reformei-me em novembro de 2020 e estou a organizar os meus arquivos de fotografia. Não consigo encontrar o negativo desta fotografia - File:Keil do Amaral 1.jpg . Ao longo dos anos tirei muitas fotos a Keil do Amaral, mas agora tenho a certeza de não ser autor desta fotografia. Peço-lhe o favor de a apagar logo que possível. Muito obrigado. / Dear Érico, I retired in November and have been organizing my photographic files since then. I cannot find the negative of this photo - File:Keil do Amaral 1.jpg . I took many photographs of Keil do Amaral along the years, but now I know this isn’t one of them. I therefore ask you to please delete the image. Many thanks.Manuelvbotelho (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

[edit]

Hello Érico,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4 years ago, you added several files under to category, where prefixes are all "S301China Xinjiang", however by reading China National Highway 301 (Q1893546), the G301 highway is between Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia provinces, and no sections in Xinjiang, so would you please consider re-categorize them? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keiko Fujimori votando no primeiro turno da eleição presidencial de 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Report

[edit]

Hello, please take a look at this report: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason) as these are serious everyday violations of the Commons rules and protection of meaningless names (in this case, Kalumny which translates as Columns). User Kazimier Lachnovič with filemover rights constantly performs violations of the Commons rules, creates instability issues and protects meaningless names, thus creates confusion. His Commons admin rights previously were lifted, but it is clear that it is not enough. -- Pofka (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I previously nominated the image for deletion as out of scope at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Payakh, but it appears a crop of the image File:ชุดเต็ม๑ (cropped).JPG is used in some Wikipedias, so the reason probably doesn't apply. Please consider restoring the image for attribution purposes. Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hebert Neri

[edit]

Hi Érico, can you please see if the deletion nomination request is complete? It asked me to add "delete" to the description, but looks lie a script already did it. Thanks. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, MiguelAlanCS (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 12:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Keiko Fujimori en campaña presidencial (cropped).gif

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Keiko Fujimori en campaña presidencial (cropped).gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Érico, would you mind telling me why this image is tagged as "flickr no source"? I thought it is just a simple crop version of the original file on Flickr. Thanks! Stang 10:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elaine Marshall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Indy beetle (talk) 07:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margaret Thatcher em data desconhecida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Carlos Pesquera in 2016.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

reppoptalk 00:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder, why these files are categorized by you as Category:China National Highway 301? Are you really sure they are about this highway, which isn't located in Xinjiang, but in Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia?! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]