User talk:Nuno Tavares
Olá Nuno, edite a imagem Image:Pt-ctb.jpg e coloque o nome da cidade, estado e país a que pertence. Jurema Oliveira 06:45, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Image:Logo ESA.png
[edit]You uploaded the picture Image:Logo ESA.png and stated "The logo may be used together with the wikipedia articles". For an image to be allowed on commons, it has to be free: one should be allowed to use it on non-wikipedia projects, even commercial ones for example. Unless such things are explicitly allowed, sadly, the image has to be deleted. --Conti|✉ 01:50, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
You uploaded this image with the comment Free for any use, provided that author is credited. well then: please credit the author. If you took the image yourself, say so explicitely (and maybe upload it in better quality). If not, please state who created it and where you got it from. -- Duesentrieb 21:39, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Please don't hide your images
[edit]Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 22:26, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry for being impatient - it's just that i have to say that way too often, and that we have litterally thousands of uncategorized images on the commons that are more or less lost to the world... so, keep doing the good work and spread the word... thanks! -- Duesentrieb 00:20, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- OK, i categorized some of your images. The shuttles where easy (Category:Shuttles should not be hard to find?), but the hermes image has no license info (and no other info, either). The seven wonders where a little tricky - i created Category:Seven Wonders of the World for them. But many of your images lack a decent description of what they show. Also, the source/license info is often not sufficient: "from en:wp" is not a good source - who uploaded it there and when? Where did s/he get it from? The original source and author is crucial! Keep in mind that the lokal copy of the image may be deleted after the image has been copied to the commons - that way, all the neccessary info would be lost. Also, if you tag something as PD or copyrighted free use, it is important to give information sufficient to verify that status - that is, give a source and a reason why the image is PD. Thanks. -- Duesentrieb 00:42, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
.gif- templates
[edit]hi nuno. i just saw your animated template (Porto Alegre) could you please explain me, how to make such an animated tmplate? Schaengel89 @me 11:35, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- okay, too late. got it and now i knwo, how to Schaengel89 @me 13:06, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
assuming Public Domain...
[edit]Hi - you uploaded several images saying "imagem taken from de:wp, no license specified, assumind Public Domain" - note that images without a license tag are deleted from the german wikipedia, and it is much safer to assume a copyright violation when no license is given. Assuming public domain does not work because technically, the images cannot be PD unless they are very old, the creator always has to put them under some license. Thus I will tag those images for having no good license.
When copying images from another wikipedia, please always copy all information from that wikipedia (translated or not, as you like), and always link to the original image page and to the user who uploaded the image there, so he can be asked about the license.
If you are not sure about the license, please do not uploade the image! Thanks -- Duesentrieb 23:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I looked some more throu the pictures you uploaded - thanks for all the grate fotos! But I found one that just said "scanned image" - I marked it as a copyright violation. Note that a scan does not give you any rights to an image, the image is not free unless the picture you scanned was under a free license anyway. Also, if you produce someone elses work, always state your source and the creator of the original. Thanks! -- Duesentrieb 23:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hi again - you said:
- I assumed PD because these images can be easily taken by visiting Lisbon, Portugal. So, even if the images get deleted, they can be easily replaced.
- The is absolutely wrong. This argument could be used to declare nearly any image PD. Chossing an angle, cammera setting, time of day, point of view etc makes such a picture a protected work of art, it cannot be assumed to be PD. I have tagged the images in the german wikipedia as missing a license as well.
- I always include the author when porting images here. When the images are obviously violating any copyright (say, professionally edited) I prefer not to uploaded. But you stated interesting points that I'll try to remember next time!
- Yes, most of the images you provided have good licenses and info - thanks for that!
- When porting images here, I set the interwiki to the source, thus not needing a clear statement/link to the original - just follow the interwiki. Does it make sense? :)
- No, this is not good, because images that have been copied to the commons are often deleted from the original wiki (it does not make sense to keep local copies). This way information about the author/uploader/etc will be lost if they have not been copied to the commons.
- You mentioned a scanned image but I couldn't find it on my contributions.. could you please specify?
- I mean Image:Pt-palacio-pena2.jpg - it does not say who the author of the original is or under what license that hardcopy was published. Or did you scan a picture you took yourself? If so, say this explicitely. Also... what does "angeled" mean in this context?
Thanks for your cooperation -- Duesentrieb 10:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
they wont to delete our .gif's!!!
[edit]hi nuno. please take a look here. they started a voting on lang-xx.gif. what do u think? should we defend our work? Schaengel89 @me 15:39, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
I have put the soccer logos up for deletion, because the design is copyrighted either by the individual clubs or the designer that did the original logo. Note that the images on HQFL can not be used freely, see the deletion request for an explanation.
If you are sure the original Logo design is PD (i.e. the copyright has expired and the soccer club has no rights to it), please document this clearly on the image description page and strike the file from the list at the deletion request. Thanks, and sorry... -- Duesentrieb 11:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Electrico28.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 06:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Hermes launch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 01:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Hermes reentry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 01:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
PNG versus JPG
[edit]Hi Nuno. I noticed Image:Pine cone with nuts.png, which you apparently modified with the Gimp. If you still have the original photo as it came out of your camera (probably in JPG format unless your camera is quite fancy!) it would be wonderful if you'd upload it with the name Pine_cone_with_nuts.jpg, then simply revert Image:Pine cone with nuts.jpg to your modified version. That way, people can see how you modified the photograph, and perhaps improve on your work. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 17:59, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Dbenbenn, i don't know what happened to that foto, but something wrong, for sure. The raw JPG photo (from the camera) is about 500KB/600KB, so this one is taking up 2MB i don't know why! I've requested it for deletion, there's no point at keeping it since it's quality will never be better than 500KB... Anyway, I can't save PNG using gimp, not sure what I'm doing wrong... it saves with huge file sizes... and preserves the layers (from a cut/paste op). Have to study it better, though.. -- Nuno Tavares ☜ PT 23:08, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think you were doing anything wrong. PNG just isn't a very good format for photographs. I see that Image:Pine cone with nuts.jpg is still only 280KB. Could you upload the original 500KB version please? dbenbenn | talk 18:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pt-palacio-pena2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 13:36, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Elevador Sta Justa1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Elevador Sta Justa2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 18:27, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Reportagens
[edit]Ó rapaz tás baralhado! Eu nem andei pela tua zona, e claro que se tivesse andado tinha-te lá ido bater à porta! Eu andei mesmo foi mais a sul onde não me calhava nada mal um bikini Viva-a-Wiki-PT... Amanhã vou encher isto de fotos lindas, maravilhosas que tirei a uma das mais de mil igrejas da Misericórdia em Monchique e do castelo de Silves. Inté! Lusitana 14:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Compiler picture
[edit]Re: Image:Nt-compilador.png - you based this on my ideal compiler picture. However, your picture is misleading. If you look at my diagram, I had two seperate front end languages and two seperate target plantforms (thus, there are 4 possibles combinations of front-end-language and target platform). The purpose is to convey the idea that a compiler is supposed to be modular - have seperate front end and back end generators using the same intermediate stages. Your diagram 'squeezes' this into a single linear image, and as a result (in my opinion) it gives a distorted idea of what is going on. Raul654 03:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Fotopages
[edit]Hi, thanks for your message. I have requested (on December 14) that Template:Fotopages is deleted. However, somebody has twice removed the request from Commons:Deletion requests. To add to the confusion, "somebody" did this using the user names "Deniss" and "Dennisss", to impersonate the legitimate User:Denniss. Thuresson 17:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Statue of Zeus.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Statue of Zeus.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Abu badali 16:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Origami
[edit]Disculpa no hablo muy bien el inglés, pero mucho menos el portugués. Me gustaría saber si conoces algún modo de plegar un billete de un dolar para obtener un elefante. Nadir1984 07:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
ESA images
[edit]Please do not upload ESA images. They are all unfree even in you found them on NASA websites. I have thus speedy deleted Image:ISS_Columbus_module.jpg. Arnomane 11:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Surveyor diagram.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Surveyor diagram.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 07:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Carrier Admiral Kuznetsov.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Gaule96.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Angr 12:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Colosseum-2003-07-09.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Colosseum-2003-07-09.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
IPPAR Template sobre Copyright.
[edit]Olá Nuno, uma vez que a criação da página Template:IPPAR foi sua, por favor responda á questão relacionada com esta página: Template talk:IPPAR. Cumprimentos --OsvaldoGago 15:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Reconquista4.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Reconquista4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 15:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Cool Cat. I'm wondering why did you simply remove this pilot-test without waiting for the community opinion. Did I miss something? The problem is that pt:Wikipedia is being use to set homepages for users that don't do anything more than argue, or even nothing more at all. There are *no* internal quarrels. Many users are expressing their feelings against this kind of use of resources and, obviously, FML is the owner of the picture, and one of the most criticized, as you may confirm by reading the whole discussion here. But what really surprises me is how you can cancel a voting based on your own opinion. Please reply, -- Nuno Tavares ☜ PT 16:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- If he uploads his entire family album, I would delete it at an instant. To my knowlege he only has two and only two images on commons. I have kept the two since they are acceptable under Commons:Project scope:
- ... However it is allowed uploading in small quantity images of yourself and others as long they are useful for some Wikimedia project (for example an Wikipedia article, a Wikinews report, in a meta article, on a user-page)...
- My idea of small quantity can be "5" personal images. Even then, I am more than willing to be flexible if I see any potential educational use. Those two images can have encyclopedic usage on articles talking about the matrix on projects that do not allow fair use. I have such a picture myself on my userpage which can also have an encyclopedic value such as an article about cats. You also have such an image on your userpage.
- Harddrives are cheep. 4-5 images per person really doesn't use that much harddrive space. It would use more hard drive space when deleted (we are talking bytes).
- Debates on commons are not required to last a certain time span. They can be closed the second they are engaged at an admins discretion. I just do not see a valid/acceptable reason for deletion at the moment since it is clear image is not a copyvio.
- --Cat out 23:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Us-nasa-columbia.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Us-nasa-columbia.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Superm401 02:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind. I found it. Superm401 02:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Nt-DE_das_FA_e_Estado.png
[edit]Hey there,
you uploaded this image once. I was wondering, could you upload an english version? Would be very helpful for an article I've written which currently has the portuguese version on. Thanks 84.65.112.227 23:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC) (SGGH on wikipedia)
- That was the precise reason I've included the data into the the description (in a hidden manner). You just push it to Excel (or ooCalc) and rebuild the graphs. "Contos" means "thousands of Escudos", and "milhares de" mean "thousands of...". -- Nuno Tavares ☜ PT 15:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:SickGirlInPyjamas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from BryanBot. 08:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Lang-pt.gif
[edit]Hola. Quisiera saber si puedes hacer una imagen gif, de estilo similar al de Lang-pt.gif, pero con las banderas de los países hipanohablantes. Por favor Respóndeme. Saludos! --Germanicus 14:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Zmachine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nt-condado-portucalense.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Nt-condado-portucalense.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 12:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Order-of-the-garter.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Order-of-the-garter.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Valentinian (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Vascodagama.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Vascodagama.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nt-blankpixel.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Nt-blankpixel.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 16:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Reconquista4.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Reconquista4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO2 21:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:ISS Canada Hand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--TheDJ 21:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:F-15 takeoff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
I searched quite a bit for a new .gov or .mil source for this image and could not find one. --carol 09:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Mapagallaecia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
GeorgHH • talk 22:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nt-palaciopena-tritao.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Nt-palaciopena-tritao.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk 23:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Pt-ctb-bordados.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pt-ctb-bordados.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk 23:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Roman Dacia map
[edit]on that map: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:REmpire-Dacia.png Dacia is very large, however, on every other map (on the Roman Dacia wikipedia page), the Province is smaller. what is your source for this?
about Tlatelolco Photo
[edit]Hi WP partner.
I corrected the name of the Temple that you unloaded from Tlatelolco, Mexico. I am uploading many photos but yours is very good. I am going to upload the text (spanish and english) from the self archeological site and the site map and description. There everybody can realise the correct name for that Temple.
Thanks.
Ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Nt-tlatelolco-tlaloc.jpg
Pay attention to copyright | Image:ISS Cupola module.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-TheDJ 11:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Provincia di Roma-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Pegase.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pegase.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Gizmo II ¿Eu? 20:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Pt-ctb-pracavelha.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |
Jodo (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Pt-ctb.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |
Jodo (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Origami-insectes-fleurs.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Origami-insectes-fleurs.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Origami-insectes-fleurs.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jodo (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 21:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Folio05v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio04v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio02r.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio04r.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio02v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio01v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio06v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio01r.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio03r.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio03v.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Folio05r.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Cheatsheet-pt pt.svg was uncategorized on 20 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
You are the uploader of the file above. It does not have a source, so the graph is worthless. Can you add your source?--Antemister (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the source. An additional request (for those who do not speak the portugese language: What means the abbreviation "OFMEU", and, what is "contos"? (i thought this was the portugese currency at that time, but in fact this was the escudo)--Antemister (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Clown_chili_peppers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey hey
[edit]Oi Nuno! Pelo que vejo estás em grande actividade por aqui! Está na hora de eu largar da mão as Odishas e Rozentals da vida e retomar o projecto (tinha parado na pintura de arte antiga e contemporânea portuguesa). Vou começar a carregar o que tenho aqui, fundamentalmente de Loures e da Madeira, mas de alguns outros lados também. Entretanto, estou em contacto com a Câmara Municipal de Loures para saber do interesse deles em carregar aqui o que têm nos arquivos de fotos antigas, e tenho a resposta do Arquivo Municipal de Loures, que está disposto a ceder o que puder em termos de mapas, plantas e documentação, desde que sejam eles a fornecer as imagens (por uma questão de preservar a boa qualidade).Entrei em contacto também com a DRAC, e estou à espera da resposta deles sobre o interesse em participar do projecto, e na melhoria do conteúdo sobre a Madeira em geral. Já tinha mencionado isto de passagem à Lusitana na Esplanada daqui, mas não sei se ela te disse, ou se leu sequer. Presumo que a Wikimedia Portugal concorde com estas iniciativas, não? Se houver algum problema diz-me. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Em relação à DRAC, vou enviar um mail para eles amanhã, mas já falamos por telefone, e possivelmente uma boa parte do contacto será via telefónica. Estou plenamente convencido que há interesse deles em colaborar, mas tenho de saber exactamente o que é necessário, e mostrar o que já existe. Até o momento só falei do nosso interesse na base de dados de fotografias que eles têm de património, tanto móvel como imóvel, a ver se há interesse da parte deles em ceder pelo menos algumas dessas fotos. Eu de vez em quando vou ao site (a esse e ao geral do projecto), mas confesso que não o tenho usado muito. Podes-me dizer que link devo mandar nos emails para informar sobre o projecto? o da Wikimedia-PT, o do projecto em geral, ou os dois?-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ahh, antes que me esqueça, um dia destes (esta semana, talvez) tenciono ir aos arquivos da Casa Pia para saber informação sobre um familiar, já os contactei por telefone mas tenho de ir lá pessoalmente. Tens interesse que fale com eles sobre o projecto também? Muito provavelmente vou estar com os arquivistas, ou quem está encarregado de zelar pela história da instituição.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Eu pensei nas imagens como meio de ilustrar a evolução dos lugares e respectivo património, até porque infelizmente algum já só existe em imagens, e a fazermos a digitalização/carregamento a prioridade seria para o património, de modo a entroncar com o projecto WikiLovesMonuments, a menos que o escopo seja apenas fotos actuais. Em relação ao site, posso enviar as credenciais, apesar de não ser público (presumo que sim, mas achei melhor perguntar)? Outra dúvida que eu tenho, as fotos que vão a concurso são apenas as que forem tiradas ou carregadas em Setembro, pelo que percebi, ou percebi mal?-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Já vi o site (que pareceu-me bastante bom), e realmente está lá com as letras todas, como no outro, que é só em Setembro. Crap. Não tenho paciência de esperar até lá para fazer os carregamentos, vou carregar o que tenho e se alguma das fotos merecer um prémio, fico-me pelos do Commons. ;) -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Bem.. Eu confesso que o meu contexto mental foi sempre (pelo menos até agora) aproveitar a boleia do concurso para promover o máximo possível o património, mas numa perspectiva bem mais alargada que o concurso em si. Na verdade, nem vi ainda o que se ganha naquilo. Mas talvez seja possível a DRAC promover uma iniciativa neste âmbito em Setembro? Um espécie de versão regional do concurso, integrada no concurso e divulgada pela DRAC? Só uma ideia. Com divulgação nos jornais de lá, etc? Bom, vou falar com eles amanhã (por mail e telefone) e vamos ver o que sai daí. Mas já agora, qual é o prémio (se é que existe algum)? -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:44, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ahh, antes que me esqueça, um dia destes (esta semana, talvez) tenciono ir aos arquivos da Casa Pia para saber informação sobre um familiar, já os contactei por telefone mas tenho de ir lá pessoalmente. Tens interesse que fale com eles sobre o projecto também? Muito provavelmente vou estar com os arquivistas, ou quem está encarregado de zelar pela história da instituição.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Correção de Categoria
[edit]Prezado Nuno, Aparentemente induzi-te a erro ao nomear uma foto do Convento de Santa Clara a Nova como "Mosteiro", levando à criação da Categoria "Mosteiro de Santa Clara a Nova". Peço perdão pelo inconveniente e solicito renomeá-la para "Convento" como parece ser o correto. Sds, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
RE: Mensagem
[edit]Por acaso não tinha reparado que não tinha email. Achas que é preciso ajustar alguma coisa no Upload Wizzard ou nas instruções para que procurem o identificador numérico antes de carregarem as imagens? Tenho medo que muitos não se apercebam dessa necessidade. GoEThe (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Que tal assim. GoEThe (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
RE: Psst
[edit]Oi rapaz! Estou à volta com os meus arquivos de fotos. Quando acabar o arquivo, vou para a rua com a máquina fotográfica. hehehe.
- Lê isto se poderes. Dá para rir. Estava a ver que me queriam prender.
- Grande abraço --João Carvalho (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hoje tive a manhã livre e então resolvi queimar umas calorias. Tenciono repetir a proeza. Não vou deixar que alguém me ganhe este concurso.
- Grande abraço --João Carvalho (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Nota: Em lista o link para a página da wiki está errado "(Igreja de Nossa Senhora de Fátima)", para não falar de outros problemas que têm a ver com a péssima informação do IGESPAR.
- Abraços --João Carvalho (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- RE: Sim, o correcto será pt:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário de Fátima.
- O link de "Conjunto de edifícios na Avenida da República" (wlm_id =71715) aponta para o pt:Anexo:Lista de edifícios de arquitetura civil classificados em Portugal o que me parece errado. Lá por não ter artigo, acho que não devia apontar para a lista.
- Quando me refiro a problemas do Igespar refiro-me a coisas como por exemplo:
- aqui que a única indicação da morada é o nome da rua. Devia fazer referência ao nº de polícia (nº da porta). Nem sempre temos à mão forma de localizar pela coordenada.
- [1] tem nome da rua mas nem imagem tem para ajudar, o que nos obriga a fazer pesquisa.
- Abraços --João Carvalho (talk) 10:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Link quebrado ! "79 338944 Évora Horta das Figueiras Chafariz do Rossio de São Brás [1] Chafariz" . O 338944 liga a uma página vazia do IGESPAR. Abraços --João Carvalho (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Link para desambig aqui "167 71120 Porto Muralhas de D. Fernando ou Muralhas Fernandinas (e miradouro) [1] [2] Muralha" .
- Pergunta: Há limite de tamanho das imagens para o upload ? Formato .JPG com cerca de 10 MB . Não estou a conseguir colocar várias no Commons, pois dá sempre a indicação de erro desconhecido. Abraços --João Carvalho (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
"255 72897 Lisboa São Mamede Antiga Fábrica dos Tecidos de Seda ou Fábrica das Sedas [1] Garagem, tem o título errado. Em vez de "antiga fábrica..." devia ser "Garagem Auto-Palace" . Abraço --João Carvalho (talk) 15:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Templates DRAC-RAA e DRAC-RAM
[edit]Viva Nuno, Eu alterei um pouco os Templates IGESPAR e SIPA, não sabendo que os template DRAC-RAA e DRAC-RAM usavam os mesmos critérios. Se não houver problema, poderei também altera-los. As alterações foram: 1-"Type=CMN-Conjuntos Monumento Nacional", deixou de existir, pois não é uma classificação no IGESPAR; 2- "Type=E/A" passou a direccionar correctamente para a "Categoria:Monuments without legal protection in Portugal by name"; 3-A "Categoria:Monuments included in classified sites in Portugal by name" passou a ser carregada com o novo "Type=INC" (para cobrir os monumentos que embora classificados "E/A", estão incluídos em Sítios ou Conjuntos classificados). Abrç --JotaCartas (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
[edit]Oi Nuno,
Não participo activamente na Wikimedia Portugal, porque a minha disponibilidade não é compatível com compromissos, no entanto estou inscrito na WikimediaPT mailing list. Hj li seu mail pedindo colaboração para a validação de imagens, já validei algumas (talvez 50) e nos próximos cinco seis dias posso dispensar 1 a 2 horas diárias.
No entanto reparei que a maior parte das imagens não possuem descrição ou no seu lugar esta a pré-definição
{{WLM-PT}} que eu retiro e coloco mais abaixo. Tento então descrever a imagem mas, monumentos não é de todo a minha especialidade. Alguma sugestão? cumprimentos. Nelson Teixeira (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Anúncio
[edit]Caro Nuno Tavares, já estamos na recta final do Wiki Loves Monuments 2011!
A partir de hoje, a organização do Wiki Loves Monuments alargou o âmbito do concurso de cerca 5000 monumentos (classificados/protegidos) para cerca de 30000, fruto da parceria com o SIPA - Sistema de Informação para o Património Arquitectónico. A densidade de monumentos perto de si agora é bastante superior, pelo que recomendamos que saia de casa sempre com a máquina pois é bem possível cruzar-se com vários imóveis válidos para o concurso. Procure na lista quais calham em caminho! Para mais informações, regulamento e ferramentas de ajuda, consulte o site oficial em http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt |
- Messagem enviada em 09:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC) usando Lucia Bot, se tem alguma dúvida por favor contacte um dos organizadores.
Wiki Loves Monuments + bot
[edit]Olá Nuno. Será possível verificares se um bot pode concorrer ? Que eu saiba o único user que carregou mais fotos do que eu, pelo menos até agora, foi um bot de um usuário alemão. Parece-me que não cumpre as regras pois está a ir buscar fotos a sites com licença livre e não está a carregar fotos tiradas pelo user. (nota: Em como participar no ponto 3 " Procure fotografar vários monumentos, com a máxima resolução possível." Desculpa o incómodo, mas...
- Abraços João Carvalho (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Re:Help
[edit]Done. E apaguei a categoria também (Se quiseres que transforme a cat em redirect, só me avisar que restauro e faço). Bj, Béria Lima msg 10:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Nuno Tavares,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Conhecimento de língua mirandesa
[edit]Viva. Segundo o registo, contribuistes para mwl.wikipedia em algum momento no passado. Na minha opinião, alguma das contribuições que analisei foi linguisticamente relevante. Ultimamente tenho andado a tentar perceber o estado linguístico de mwl.wikipedia. Seria um grande auxílio se pudésseis revelar alguma informação sobre o vosso conhecimento da língua mirandesa. Podeis contactar-me na minha página de discussão. Muito obrigado desde já. Saúde. Garsd (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Template:IPPAR has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
russavia (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Category:Chafariz_no_Largo_do_Carmo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
-- Tuválkin ✉ 10:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Flag of Angola (proposal).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Edifício na Avenida 5 de Outubro has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
-- Tuválkin ✉ 01:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:PortugueseFlag1185.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:PortugueseFlag1185.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Image File:Balanceamento de carga (NAT)
[edit]Oi Nuno Tavares, eu atualizei o arquivo Balanceamento_de_carga_(NAT).jpg, se é okey que pode ser adicionado como uma nova versão.
Aqui está a versão proposta: : Serveur-repartition-de-charge.svg
As minhas desculpas por esta tradução aproximada :) MDDN [Tshaw!] 20:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimmo D.DN (talk • contribs) 20:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Bruce McCandless II during EVA in 1984.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bruce McCandless II during EVA in 1984.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Bandeira da Ordem de Cristo
[edit]Oi Nuno, bom dia. permita-me acrescentar dois detalhes (e um pequeno erro) no logotipo da Cruz da Ordem de Cristo.
1- as "serifas" da cruz têm ângulo "obrigatório" de 45 graus (ESTÁ CORRETO)
2- as faixas das hastes da cruz têm a mesma largura, vermelho-branco-vermelho (ERRADO)
Segundo as orientações do saudoso professor https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Luciano_da_Silva
Isto é, não importando o tamanho das hastes e das serifas... Saudações lusófonas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertolyra (talk • contribs) 15:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Signatures
[edit]Hello! You uploaded this file File:Folio06r.jpg, do you know whose signatures those are? I’m looking for the signature of King João II of Portugal. Robertus Pius (talk) 19:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
ISS insignia
[edit]Hi, we are having a discussion at the Wikipedia ISS talk page [2] about the "ISS insignia.svg" you made. Would you have any more details about its design origin other than the links in the file description? Yours sincerely, Nsae Comp (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)