Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ng_Eng_Teng,_NUS_Museum_(113319).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Dorfkirche_(15).jpg){kind=link}
_AN0066977.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![67 File:Robert Kantor - "Line Of Hope" (2008).jpg](#File:Robert_Kantor_-_"Line_Of_Hope"_(2008).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Dornier_328-100_D-COSA.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_03.jpg){kind=link}
_-_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because I Want to Djamaliyev64 (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I have uploaded the wrong file. Requesting you to please delete it.. Nophotos1992 (talk) 07:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I have uploaded the wrong image. Requesting you to please delete it as soon as possible. Nophotos1992 (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file as I have uploaded the wrong file by mistake. Nophotos1991 (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
i need to reupload Dirops850E (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Don't bother to upload photos without permission of the copyright owner. 200.111.227.94 16:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have tagged this as missing evidence of permission, as the photographer name does not match the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and discussion. Either this is a G7 or an F5, but both lead to deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Admins, when you delete a file also delete the broken redirects. 186.172.71.55 08:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nippon510 (talk) 03:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
as contents' maker(=me) request. he wants to delete all of those files JUNE6348 (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
as contents' maker(=me) request. he wants to delete all of those files JUNE6348 (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
as contents' maker(=me) request. he wants to delete all of those files JUNE6348 (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
as contents' maker(=me) request. he wants to delete all of those files JUNE6348 (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I just uploaded a higher quality version of this photo myself in the photo's native JPEG compression format. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Not enough information DuskyintoLight (talk) 05:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adiutor test.png
誤ったファイルの 北陸エリア (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ravenpuff as Speedy (db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7
Converted to regular DR, to allow for discussion, as image is currently in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Sorry, this was my error. I have now substituted it with the correct file name, so this duplicate file can now be deleted (and not redirected, since the title is unsuitable). Thanks! — RAVENPVFF · talk · 12:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DEU MNI POMN ,,,DEAS 149.74.60.204 14:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
POMN AS DE CU MNUT UY 149.74.60.204 14:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked. --Achim55 (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Guliolopez as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader claims "own work". But uploader clearly did not undertake an ordnance survey mapping exercise in the early 1900s. |source=Ordnance Survey Ireland Certainly in the public domain. Please provide source, etc. Yann (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. RE: "Please provide source, etc". As with other uploads from this contributor, the image was taken from an alumni group Facebook post/thread here: thread/img. And uploaded here with a (clearly questionable and almost certainly invalid) "own work" claim. RE: "Certainly in the public domain". Even if the underlying and original map is a 1900 OS map (to the extent that {{OldOS}} could be applied to the base map), I would personally question whether the (granted fairly minimal) highlighting/markup applied to the map can be considered subject to Crown Copyright. Expired or otherwise. Guliolopez (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, the added colors can't get a copyright. So there is no issue in this side. Yann (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I added the source. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
smaller sized duplicate of File:The growth of all tracked objects in space over time (space debris and satellites).png; the uses should replace the file used Prototyperspective (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- @Prototyperspective: It seems to be the same image from the same source, but the version you found is higher resolution. Why didn't you just upload it over the original file? I suggest merging/redirecting one way or the other. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I thought I uploaded it earlier but apparently you did so earlier. I did not know if it was already here so I couldn't upload as new version. Another reason would be the more descriptive title. We could also have two versions where one stays the same and the other gets continuously updated if this chart is ever updated. I suggest redirecting to File:The growth of all tracked objects in space over time (space debris and satellites).png. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirected to the higher resolution version per discussion. --Mike Peel (talk) 20:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
One of the image that is included in the collage (File:Angelaaki.jpg, later renamed File:Angela Aki.jpg) was deleted because of missing permission. Jaqen (talk) 16:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Mess replaced the copyvio image with a new one, so the collage can be kept. --Jaqen (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
To prevent copyright violatons. FamLod0610 (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep, the design is public domain because it is too simple to be copyrightable, it should be tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept, per Verbcatcher. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Flor WMCH (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: empty file page (the file had already been deleted by Mdaniels5757). --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Lizenz kann nicht stimmen. Content + Foto der NZZ ist ziemlich sicher unter Copyright. Filzstift (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Reinhard Kraasch. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete Providing a reason (since you didn't), this is a copyright violation because it can be found elsewhere on the web and is unlikely to be own work (https://docbao.vn/giai-tri/ca-si-jack-roi-cong-ty-quan-ly-ra-mat-mv-moi-tintuc860046) (CSD F1). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gre regiment (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
withdraw proposal
Complete lack of documentation. The page that is supposed to be the source of the photo has nothing about it. They do not confirm that these people are prisoners, nor that they are prisoners at Chelmo, nor any of this. 3colores (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- There are several other sources confirming the photo's subject, including the Florida Center for Instructional Technology's Guide to Teaching the Holocaust, the Museum of the Former German Kulmhof Death Camp in Chełmno on Ner, and Yad Vashem. The most common source provided for the photo is the Main Commission for the Investigation of Nazi War Crimes. The file information should be cleaned up, but the veracity of the photo's subject matter appears to be correct. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- O.k.! You are right! I will change the description and i will withdraw the proposal. Thank you very much!!! 3colores (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by proposer. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
not current Dermot francis (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- And why is that a reason for deletion? The painting of Mona Lisa is also not current. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Useful (whatever I think of the sight) and that is not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy kept: no sensible reason for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 17:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
disgusting 104.173.54.76 21:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. Do you have a deletion reason? I suggest you not look at images and videos that disgust you and don't request deletion of them on that basis, thereby requiring the closing admin to look at them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy kept no valid reasoning whatsoever Dronebogus (talk)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright is active for Singapore 70 years after the author's death. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- OK. Forgot to check the FOP point. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ng_Eng_Teng,_NUS_Museum_(113319).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Ng_Eng_Teng,_NUS_Museum_(113319).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright is active for Singapore 70 years after the author's death. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Ng_Eng_Teng,_NUS_Museum_(113319).jpg){kind=link}
- OK. Forgot to check the FOP point. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Ng_Eng_Teng,_NUS_Museum_(113319).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright is active for Singapore 70 years after the author's death. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- OK. Forgot to check the FOP point. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright is active for Singapore 70 years after the author's death. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- OK. Forgot to check the FOP point. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
only used for hoax article Kusma (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
obviously not self made (Ten Sports HD watermark), copyright violation Kusma (talk) 13:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as a promotional commercial poster. --GMGtalk 10:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
trademark infringement of the word "Flege". The word is owned by Flege FZE worldwide. 83.110.15.7 07:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No, you do not "own" every instance, like this one, where someone has misspelled the German word for "fly" (fliege). Omphalographer (talk) 08:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Its purely misguiding folks as it ranks for the term "Flege". It should be deleted off google search results 83.110.15.7 08:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We are not responsible for Google's search results. --Achim55 (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, sure u might be responsible for ranking directly... but sure can rename the it from "Flege.jpg" to "Fleige.jpg and reapply for indexing" 83.110.15.7 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- And we’re still pandering to IPs, I see. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, this might be easier on you. I respect the German language, you don't need the FULL page as such, just need to remove this redirection https://postimg.cc/8Jz6mbrF.
- Maybe you didn't notice that the file is already renamed to "Volucella inanis, golden brown colored insect.jpg". So we have to care about Google's cache?? --Achim55 (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I added
__NOINDEX__to File:Flege-braun1.JPG. --Achim55 (talk) 08:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)- Wow, I read it now: This is a corparate drone misusing Wikimedia Commons deletion request system to demand we help him (it must be a he…) to
scamimprove the S.E.O. value of his client — even worse than a a random I.P. troll. This person has no interest in cicada photos not in the free sharing thereof. Three wrongly filed D.R.s in as many days not enough for a ban? Apparently not, and we even had an admin going out of their way to help out this vandal I.P., making sure that no instance of "Flege" in Commons infringe on the “owner” of that word. Truelly appalling. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, I read it now: This is a corparate drone misusing Wikimedia Commons deletion request system to demand we help him (it must be a he…) to
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, problem should be solved now. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The word is still there in the page: Flege-braun1.JPG (file redirect). Kindly rename it 5.194.66.243 14:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of this file. Stop it. --Rosenzweig τ 14:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of non free works. Also probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete - ditto to both points - MPF (talk) 23:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)- Delete - Out of scope and clearly not even slightly educationally valuable – due to that it's not needed to debate COM:CREEP and the extent to which printed nonfree images can be used in CCBY images. I don't know why images like that are uploaded, added to cats like "Elon Musk", and accepted in the first place. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This person did not create this, it is just an image of the Creature From the Black Lagoon. The image might be derived from a public domain source, but it is improperly licensed at least. If it is public domain then the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license is invalid anyway. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Title and description seem problematic. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete random low quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete random low-quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 16:52, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete random low-quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete random low quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Golden Child
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:"золотое дитя" - panoramio.jpg
- File:Decoration plaque by Reva 1.JPG
- File:Decoration plaque by Reva 2.JPG
- File:Decoration plaque by Reva 3.JPG
- File:Decoration plaque by Reva.jpg
- File:Golden Child 1.JPG
- File:Golden Child 2.JPG
- File:Golden Child 3.JPG
- File:Golden Child 4.JPG
- File:Golden Child 5.JPG
- File:Golden Child 7.JPG
- File:Golden Child and Passenger terminal of the Port of Odessa.jpg
- File:Morvokzal - panoramio.jpg
- File:Prymors'kyi district, Odessa, Odessa Oblast, Ukraine - panoramio - Дмитрий Ванькевич (27).jpg
- File:The Golden Child (11377955926).jpg
- File:Ukraine, Odessa Sea port, Child.jpg
- File:Золотое дитя.JPG
- File:Золотое дитя.jpg
- File:Монумент на території Морвокзалу в Одесі1.jpg
- File:Одесса. Памятник "Золотое дитя"..JPG
- File:Пам'ятник "Золоте дитя".jpg
- File:Украина, Одесса - Морской вокзал 06.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Dorfkirche_(15).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Dorfkirche_(15).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio? It sounds like the photographs in this image were taken in or after 2016, and this file was apparently photographed indoors, so Germany's Freedom of Panorama may not apply. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Dorfkirche_(15).jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, correct. Sorry, should be deleted. --Subbass1 (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Dorfkirche_(15).jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine - 1995 monument
INeverCry 00:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:2014.06.24.1753.08.Фота0815.jpg
- File:46-115-0027 Пам'ятник Роману Різняку, м. Трускавець IMG 8937.jpg
- File:Inbound4342501869865654549.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Роману Різняку — «Макомацькому», розвіднику УПА DSC 0270.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 01.JPG
- File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 02.JPG
- File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 03.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Шевченку Т.Г. 4.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Шевченку Т.Г., IMG 9572.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:«Жертвам Чернобильскої трагедії».jpg
- File:Пам'ятник "Жертвам Чорнобильської трагедії", м. Маріуполь.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник «Жертвам Чернобильскої трагедії», м. Маріуполь.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:«Ліквідаторам Чорнобиля».jpg
- File:«Орджонікідзевцям, які в ім'я життя пройшли крізь полум'я Чорнобиля».jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак Чорнобильцям 1.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак Чорнобильцям.jpg
- File:Пам`ятний знак «Орджонікідзевцям, які в ім'я життя пройшли крізь полум'я Чорнобиля», який стояв до 2016 року.jpg
- File:Покров памятник чернобыльцам.jpg
- File:Табличка. Пам`ятний знак «Орджонікідзевцям, які в ім'я життя пройшли крізь полум'я Чорнобиля», який стояв до 2016 року.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep These are two monuments. The old one on File:Пам`ятний знак «Орджонікідзевцям, які в ім'я життя пройшли крізь полум'я Чорнобиля», який стояв до 2016 року.jpg and File:Табличка. Пам`ятний знак «Орджонікідзевцям, які в ім'я життя пройшли крізь полум'я Чорнобиля», який стояв до 2016 року.jpg consists of simple geometric shapes and is not copyrightable. The new one is more creative, thus they should be discussed separately — NickK (talk) 04:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 2010 by Ivan Vasilevitsj Brovdi (1939–). There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, permission from the artist is required.
- File:Inbound4083940368724660996.jpg
- File:Mukacheve, Zakarpats'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:P1380210 Пам'ятник Щасливому Сажотрусу.jpg
- File:Sazhotrus.jpg
- File:Зима 2017 року.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Сажотрусу.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Щасливому Сажотрусу DSC 0816.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Щасливому Сажотрусу. Мукачево.jpg
- File:Сажотрус Мукачево Закарпаття.jpg
- File:Сажотрус та кіт в Мукачево.jpg
- File:Щасливий сажотрус, Мукачево.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Archives Strasbourg.jpg
- File:Les Archives de Strasbourg.jpg
- File:Strasbourg ArchivesVille 01.JPG
- File:Strasbourg ArchivesVille 02.JPG
- File:Strasbourg ArchivesVille 03.JPG
- File:Strasbourg ArchivesVille 04.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Twitch
[edit]Not clear that the uploader owns the rights to these files. They say they bought these files from StreamSpell, which appears to be a creative agency that makes assets for streamers. Owning a license to use an asset on your own stream is not the same as owning the copyright to it, and it is uncommon for creative agencies to sell their copyrights.
- File:A Black & White Offline From Streaming Screen.png
- File:A Black & White Overlay Slot.png
- File:A Black & White Streaming "Ending Screen".png
- File:A Black & White Webcam Overlay.png
- File:A Streaming "BRB" (Be Right Back) Screen.png
_Screen.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IagoQnsi (talk) 04:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete yeah they don't own the copyright, just a license to use on a stream. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Strasbourg - Musée d'art moderne et contemporain.jpg
- File:Straßburg 008.jpg
- File:Strasbourg Mam n03.jpg
- File:Strasbourg - View NW on Musée d'Art Moderne.jpg
- File:Strasbourg - View NNW on Museum of Modern Art.jpg
- File:Strasbourg - Pont des Frères Matthis - View North on Musée d'Art Moderne.jpg
- File:Straßburg 003.jpg
- File:Intérieur du musée d'art moderne et contemporain vue Strasbourg.jpg
- File:Musée d'Art Moderne et Contemporain (53029705369).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Stamp with a painting by Lorenzo Gigli (1896-1983). Stamps are not in the public domain in Argentina, and this artwork is still protected there (70 years pma). Günther Frager (talk) 15:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission Theroadislong (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep, permission has been accepted by the VRT. The copyright notice on the original uncropped image does not conflict with the applied licence. Please ask about the VRT ticket on the VRT noticeboard before you nominate a VRT-ticketed file for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
_AN0066977.jpg){kind=link}
_AN0066977.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_AN0066977.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep, permission has been accepted by the VRT. The copyright notice on the original uncropped image does not conflict with the applied licence. Please ask about the VRT ticket on the VRT noticeboard before you nominate a VRT-ticketed file for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
_AN0066977.jpg){kind=link}
photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, permission has been accepted by the VRT. The copyright notice on the original uncropped image does not conflict with the applied licence. Please ask about the VRT ticket on the VRT noticeboard before you nominate a VRT-ticketed file for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
File:De Havilland Canada DHC-8-311 Dash 8, DLT - Deutsche Luftverkehrsgesellschaft AN0198835.jpg
[edit]
photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, permission has been accepted by the VRT. The copyright notice on the original uncropped image does not conflict with the applied licence. Please ask about the VRT ticket on the VRT noticeboard before you nominate a VRT-ticketed file for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep verified custom licence, please withdraw. Ww2censor (talk) 13:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, permission has been accepted by the VRT. The copyright notice on the original uncropped image does not conflict with the applied licence. Please ask about the VRT ticket on the VRT noticeboard before you nominate a VRT-ticketed file for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm with Verbcatcher here. Theroadislong, do you have some specific reason to doubt the VRT ticket? - Jmabel ! talk 21:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, I checked the VRT Ticket and this, along with almost 1000 other files, is a verified custom licence. No reason to believe it is not valid. Theroadislong, please withdraw this nomination and all others based on the same reasoning. Ww2censor (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
A non-selfie cannot be a work *by* the person who is in the image. Also, solely used for disruption/self-promotion on enwiki. DMacks (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Original license is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. — Racconish 💬 04:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Original license is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — Racconish 💬 04:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Original license is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. — Racconish 💬 04:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France. The building already showed most of the permanent exterior architecture, and they are subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in USA, artist Robert Kantor is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 05:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
![05:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/05#c-A1Cafel-20230905055000-File:Robert_Kantor_-_"Line_Of_Hope"_(2008).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
![04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/05#c-Krd-20230912041600-File:Robert_Kantor_-_"Line_Of_Hope"_(2008).jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Obviously not own work but National Geographic's. Source and permission has to be provided. Achim55 (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Obviously not own work but National Geographic's. We need source and permission. Achim55 (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Qatar. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 50 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 13:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot involving some sort of software of a structure. Description is somewhat unhelpful just translating as "Alfaro Rock". Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work. Yann (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW photo of image on cover of match box Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image. Realized I was mistaken in my original assessment here. The original author is not actually USAID, but Eduardo Soteras (AFP, Getty Images). Feel free to delete this when you have the time. XTheBedrockX (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:HK KTD 觀塘 Kwun Tong Lok Wah South Estate shop Kai Bo Food Supermarket June 2021 SS2 03.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
What is the reason that this needs to be deleted? Rjluna2 (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
What is the reason for this page to be deleted? Rjluna2 (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Wilsdorf
[edit]No indication the photo was published before 2018.
— Racconish 💬 10:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://isha.sadhguru.org/global/en/wisdom/quotes/date/may-11-2023 Ђидо (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 19:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
License laundering, certainly not CC0 and unlikely to be PD
- File:True Grit Charles Portis 2022 edition.jpg
- File:Manger l autre-hd-572199-scaled (1).jpg
- File:1953 benoit koenigsmark 1ere-folio.jpg
- File:Anthony Buckeridge - 06 - According to Jennings (v3.0) 0000.jpg
- File:Edition 1951 de 1984.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_0000.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 04:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Improper license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - likely a copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Improper license, meme image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyright violation, it is unlikely that the uploader was the original photographer of the black-and-white photograph in the background.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MJHTrailsolid as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I would say this is below TOO for USA. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Agreed, and COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Original request was based on license in use (self-created vs fair use) with image.MJHTrailsolid (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.172.71.55 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. No evidence provided by tagger. Converting to DR given uploader's history, and it is unclear whether Dirops850E = Donn R. Nottage. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, Donn R. Nottage is identified as the photographer in the metadata. IMDb lists a professional photographer with this name.[1] This is confirmed by an Instagram account which describes him as the "Retired Chief Photographer of the City of Cleveland".[2] This is almost certainly the same person, as this photo was taken at an event in Cleveland. It may have been taken as part of his work for the city. Other uploads by this uploader have been deleted, some on the basis that a different photographer was identified in the metadata.[3] If this account was operated by Nottage then I would have expected more uploads since the account was created in 2016, particularly in view of the many photos in the Instagram account. This all causes significant doubt about the 'own work' claim. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and quit adminship. 186.172.71.55 08:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The claim that this is the uploader's own work is totally implausible. JBW (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:My Parliaчлвent.svg
- File:My Parliam88н.svg
- File:My Parliamудл.svg
- File:My Parliamen799vg.svg
- File:My Parli666ment.svg
- File:My Parliamen7777g.svg
- File:Млслвлвл.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:00000цщчлао.svg
- File:Жжддщ9987.svg
- File:My Parliaэдмау.svg
- File:My Parliэвхвзузц9.svg
- File:67886пррр.svg
- File:My Parlillllgjfj.svg
- File:My Parliam0001.svg
- File:My Parl087.svg
- File:Ffffffff467.svg
- File:My Parl00000.svg
- File:My Parlia0000.svg
- File:My ннннParliament.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:My Parlждисg.svg
- File:My Parliamхщна.svg
- File:My Parliхх0099.svg
- File:My Parliжоав.svg
- File:My Parliзанщи.svg
- File:My Parli000ои.svg
- File:My Parl000001.svg
- File:My Parliamenхххх.svg
- File:My Parliam0000н.svg
- File:My Parliзшнкув8.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed, and not made by the federal government (it's made by the campaign) Bremps... 15:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Source photo is probably PD, but the image of the mug and shirt are not. Bremps... 17:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Deleteagreed. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
please delete Trafficwarriors (talk) 15:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Painting by Argentine artist Lorenzo Gigli (1896-1983). It is still protected by copyright in Argentina (70 years pma). Günther Frager (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
I don't think it's his/her own work. 84.251.181.224 15:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Scan of an Argentine magazine published in Argentina in 1953. The text is an article by Juan José Sebreli (b. 1930) and obviously protected by copyright in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The threshold of originality in Australia is incredibly low, {{PD-textlogo}} can not be applied. ✗plicit 23:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I was under the false impression this was an American Centre. Please delete. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 16:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation, requires evidence of permission from the heirs of the potter Michael Cardew, who died in 1983. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 04:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, requires evidence of permission from the heirs of the potter Seth Cardew, who died in 2016. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 04:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
False claim of ownership, possible Copyvio Dsvyas (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
False claim of ownership, possible Copyvio Dsvyas (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
False claim of ownership, possible Copyvio Dsvyas (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 09:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-Argentina. --RAN (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-Argentina. --RAN (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 09:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-Argentina. --RAN (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-Argentina. Mario Antonio Gargatagli (1908-1999) and Argentina is a 20 year copyright jurisdiction. --RAN (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, not used. Wostr (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, in-image caption that prevents re-use on other Wikipedia projects and overall small resolution. The file was replaced by many alternatives in Category:Resveratrol. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
selfie which is used only in self-promotional wikidata entry; both should be deleted (or moved to facebook) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of a freely licensed video. Closeup of a toddler and a generic photograph of a beach in Australia, seems out of scope. Abzeronow (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Out of scope. As a ton of other files mass-uploaded by the user. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very tiny photo and it's not of someone evidently notable, so it has very low educational potential or historical/critical value. If kept, please rename it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
not needed anymore, author's request. delete all its subpages and redirects too. Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
not needed anymore, author's request. Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
not needed anymore, author's request. Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
not needed anymore, author's request. Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from a live news report, so not own work as the uploader claims. And the TV station is RTV Utrecht (https://rtvutrecht.nl), of which broadcasts are copyrighted. Mondo (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Frame for an ad for a film CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation from https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/wie-is-wie/nieuwsredactie/ulrike-nagel Mondo (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ulrike told me this (and other) pictures made at RTV may be used, providing the name of the photographer is mentioned. That was done. How should/can this be proved?
- Thanks. 84.107.240.96 20:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photographer needs to send the requisite permission. Read COM:VRT. The subject of the photo rarely owns the copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/wie-is-wie/nieuwsredactie/ulrike-nagel - © 2023 RTV Utrecht. --Wutsje 04:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Italy.
- File:Cappella dell'Apocalisse - facciata.jpg
- File:Cappella dell'Apocalisse - Facciata.jpg
- File:Cappella dell'Apocalisse.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It seems that the chapel was a work for hire for the municipality of Albanella[4]. Work for the Italian administration are in the public domain 20 years after creation. Ruthven (msg) 12:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sich Riflemen Monument
[edit]The monument was completed in 1999 by Dmytro Krvavych (1926–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076.
- File:1.Личаківське кладовище (26).JPG
- File:1.Личаківське кладовище Меморіал воїнів УГА.JPG
- File:46-101-3029 UGA.jpg
- File:Lviv Cmentarz Lyczakowsky Memorial UGA DSC 8772 46-101-3029.JPG
- File:Lwow Lyczakow Sicz Riflemen Monument 1.jpg
- File:Lwów - Cmentarz Łyczakowski - Anioł.JPG
- File:Lychakiv Cemetery 18.jpg
- File:Lyczakowski cmentarz obelisk.JPG
- File:Pamjatnyk Sičovym Striľćam u Ľvovi.jpg
- File:Братська могила січових стрільців (скульптура).jpg
- File:Братська могила січових стрільців на Личаківському кладовищі.JPG
- File:Братська могила, пам'ятний знак, м.Львів.jpg
- File:Військовий меморіал — Личаківське військове кладовище 5561 06.JPG
- File:Личакіське кладовище памятник УГА.JPG
- File:Львів Личаківський цвинтар Братська могила січових стрільців 2018.jpg
- File:Львів, Личаківське к-ще, Братська могила січових стрільців.jpg
- File:Меморіал воїнів УГА (Львів).JPG
- File:Меморіал воїнів УГА, 76.jpg
- File:Меморіал воїнів УГА, Личаківський цвинтар.jpg
- File:Меморіал воїнів УГА.JPG
- File:Меморіал воїнам УГА.jpg
- File:Меморіал Українських Січових Стрільців.jpg
- File:Мемориал воинам УГА. Стела.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- If it pleases you --A1 (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- While Russia is destroying Ukrainian heritage, we do the same thing here because of meta:copyright paranoia. Wonderful. I suggest applying for some reward from Russian government? Maybe they'll sponsor a Wikiproject dedicated to enforcing Ukrainian FoP? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration, but copyright is copyright, and Commons must respect it. You can either obtain the permission from the heirs of the sculptor, or just wait until 70 years after the death of the sculptor. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Or Oppose per meta:copyright paranoia and common sense, as I chose to do. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration, but copyright is copyright, and Commons must respect it. You can either obtain the permission from the heirs of the sculptor, or just wait until 70 years after the death of the sculptor. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Contiene marca con el nombre del autor }} Fernando Domínguez Cerejido 09:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Beautiful picture. Author's request is a valid reason during first week after upload; here multiple months have passed. Photographer's name in EXIF is consistent with uploader's username. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Contiene marca con el nombre del autor }} Fernando Domínguez Cerejido 09:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Test image, out of scope N Panama 84534 01:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
_Dornier_328-100_D-COSA.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dornier_328-100_D-COSA.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Functionally a duplicate of File:Cirrus Airlines LCY 200804.jpg, which is at a higher resolution and in the original file format. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_Dornier_328-100_D-COSA.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
_Dornier_328-100_D-COSA.png){kind=link}
personal photo with nonsensical caption, outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission - promo for onion promotion website - comes from https://www.holland-onions.org/gb/about-us/heronion Hoyanova (talk) 06:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
AI generated pictures, out of project - Zafer (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- include
- File:Veera II Virallinen potretti 2059.jpg
- File:Veera II Kruunajaiskuva.jpg
- File:Prinsessa Emilia 2097.webp
Deleted: Whether AI-generated or not, these are unused, out-of scope images of fictional Finnish nobility (not from a notable work of fiction, apparently created by the uploader), so I don't see any possible COM:EDUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
It has watermark, it may be copyright infringement Sudzuki Erina (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The National Gallery of Art uploaded this image as part of its contribution to Wikimedia Commons in 2019. Since then, it has come to the Gallery's attention that this image, while out of copyright, has complex relationships with Native American tribal rights and traditions. The Gallery has taken this image down from its website as it works with Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) to ensure that it respects Native American culture and agency. It asks, in the spirit of respecting indigenous traditions and belief, that this image be deleted until the Gallery has received approval and guidance from the THPOs on its reproduction. Brwz (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The National Gallery of Art, the uploader of the image, requests a courtesy deletion of an image that it uploaded more than 30 days ago by mistake in light of new information that has come to our (the uploader’s) attention that weighs in favor of courtesy deletion. The image does not appear to be used to illustrate any Wikipedia article on the subject. Namely: (1) The image provider has since learned that the copyright term in the artwork depicted in the image likely has not yet expired and, therefore, the image likely still remains under copyright. Moreover, the image provider is not the copyright owner and lacks permission to authorize others to use the image. (2) The artwork depicted in the image is of cultural sensitivity to the officially recognized Native American tribe (Pueblo of Jemez), whose Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) has asked us to: (a) take down the image from all of our own platforms, which we have done, and (b) ask all platforms to whom we have provided the image to also please delete the image. In both cases, the deletion is requested on cultural heritage grounds, consistent with the Creative Commons guidelines that Wikimedia itself observes. Creative Commons has advised that tribal images, such as this one, should not be eligible for CC0 status. See, Towards Better Sharing of Cultural Heritage - An Agenda for Copyright Reform: A Creative Commons Policy Paper [2022-02-09], p. 20. (3) Since learning the above information, the image provider now believes it provided the image to Wikimedia by mistake. Moreover, it further appears that the image could be deleted without significant loss to the overall educational holdings of Wikimedia Commons. The image does not appear in any of the articles or of galleries for either the main Wikipedia article on Jemez Pueblo or the associated pages, including a page on the people and culture of Jemez Pueblo, even though those pages are rich with historical and cultural images and associated image galleries. In fact, one such gallery appears to contain an image of the same subject but “of greater equal or greater” overall educational value and that is currently in the public domain. Thank you. An Indexer (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- A public-domain image on the same subject of ‘equal or greater’ educational value is already in use on Wikipedia at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pueblo_Revolt#/media/File:Kachina_dolls.jpg. The image is used to illustrate Wikipedia’s article on the Pueblo Revolt of 1860: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pueblo_Revolt An Indexer (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I would tend to oppose a courtesy deletion of a useful image. However, copyright could be an issue. An Indexer, please explain why this image is not likely to be in the public domain. When did Patricio Toya die? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Patricio Toya died in 1993, and thus the copyright term would not yet be expired, meaning this image is not likely to be in the public domain. An Indexer (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. So Delete at least for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please let me know what steps are needed next to delete the image file. This process is new to me. An Indexer (talk) 18:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. So
- Patricio Toya died in 1993, and thus the copyright term would not yet be expired, meaning this image is not likely to be in the public domain. An Indexer (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would tend to oppose a courtesy deletion of a useful image. However, copyright could be an issue. An Indexer, please explain why this image is not likely to be in the public domain. When did Patricio Toya die? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of courtesy, CC0 license was set erroneously. --Achim55 (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The National Gallery of Art uploaded this image as part of its contribution to Wikimedia Commons in 2019. Since then, it has come to the Gallery's attention that this image, while out of copyright, has complex relationships with Native American tribal rights and traditions. The Gallery has taken this image down from its website as it works with Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) to ensure that it respects Native American culture and agency. It asks, in the spirit of respecting indigenous traditions and belief, that this image be deleted until the Gallery has received approval and guidance from the THPOs on its reproduction. Brwz (talk) 16:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright does not belong to uploader, it belongs to Pablo Ghaderi (as evidenced by the top-left watermark) Bremps... 16:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused photograph that the uploader wishes to delete. Subject is notable. Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yep, seems notable and uploaded in 2021, so why would it benefit Commons to delete the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that this photo would be beneficial to Commons. I sometimes start a DR when the uploader blanks their file page (I usually revert the blanking like I did in this case). Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that this photo would be beneficial to Commons. I sometimes start a DR when the uploader blanks their file page (I usually revert the blanking like I did in this case). Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
no author no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: can be found on many websites. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Genzano di Roma - Comune di Genzano di Roma - Fontana di San Sebastiano durante l'infiorata.jpg
[edit]
Perché c'è una persona ed io non avevo visto prima della pubblicazione la presenza di questa persona Serenapaliria (talk) 19:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Dubbio veramente ch'è la Sua foto in ogni caso. È preso da Facebook e piccolissimo. Non caricare foto da Facebook; caricare solamente le foto chè Le ha scattato Le stesso. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo by Neilson Barnard/Getty Images [5] HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:Yasmine Pahlavi (cropped).jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete as it's clear copyright violation. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benamar555 (talk · contribs)
[edit]professional quality photos with no exif, uploader claims to be in the photos. Needs permission IMO
Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
上传作者请求删除。 颐园居 (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- 上传了错误版本--颐园居 (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- 作者请求删除--颐园居 (talk) 06:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: too late for a deletion on basis of COM:COURTESY. Please indicate why this image must be deleted, it is very nice. --Ellywa (talk) 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
上传版本出错，作者再次请求删除 颐园居 (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Question What kind of error? It's a beautiful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Ikan. --Sanandros (talk) 22:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. The listed source is The Duke Chronicle, vol. 80, no. 62 (Monday, November 28, 1983); however, I could not find that photo in that issue. The photo is labeled as being from 1986, so it's no wonder it wouldn't be in a 1983 newspaper issue. If the photo is in fact from an issue of The Chronicle from the 1986 football season, then it is a copyright violation, as The Chronicle began including copyright notices with the May 9, 1986 issue. IagoQnsi (talk) 06:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It's probable that I had uploaded this file giving a wrong source (not intentionally, of course). As much time has passed since I uploaded this photo, I dont' even remember where I found the image. It could have been from a Clemson Yearbook, but to be sincere, I don't care. Delete this file if it constitutes a copyvio. Fma12 (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per fma12. --Sanandros (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Mario Schmidt M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value Zafer (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
is this own work? What about the copyright of the image? Wouter (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- The image is US government work, used with permission of the US Department of Agriculture: https://issues.org/usda-pomological-watercolor-collection-gallery/ 2603:6011:1C00:4BC1:883:8C99:9DED:54BF 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment seems that the underlying work is provided by the USDA and should use Template:PD-USGov-USDA.- But the whole of the issue is likely the copyright of Arizona State University. So the issue here lies in if the work done to the artwork is transformative, which it doesn't feel like it is to me, because it is just simple text overlaid on a public domain image. That would be Template:PD-ineligible.
- So at best this work is public domain and the user has falsely applied a Creative Commons license, and at worst it does qualify for copyright for being transformative enough. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per MonkeyBBGB, pls change lincesen afterwards. --Sanandros (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
obvious COPYVIO by single purpose account, not in SCOPE, poor quality, not in use C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value - Zafer (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The reason for removal is copyright infringement. The file is reproduced from a file with an unknown licence published by a Japanese city. See Wayback Machine. And see identical request of File:明石観光素材集画像データsyuzo3.jpg. --Voncercue (talk) 10:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no proof of CC license. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The reason for removal is copyright infringement. The file is reproduced from a file with an unknown licence published by a Japanese city. See Wayback Machine. And see identical request of File:明石観光素材集画像データsyuzo1.jpg. --Voncercue (talk) 10:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no proof of CC license. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character in image, not COM:De minimis. (Oinkers42) (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
-20230905201300-File:WJWTV_1963_(8080807915).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Obviously not de minimus. ClydeFranklin (t/c) 22:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Victor Robertof does not have that copyright license on his site Duffbeerforme (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Victor Robertof and Elina Hsiung both consented to having this image on Wikimedia Commons. Hiphopsavedmylife (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Although the video has CC license, it appears to be using still images that are copyrighted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0KSmg3RcoU
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón (Liga de Campeones de la Concacaf 2021).jpg
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón (entrenamiento).jpg
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón (2021).jpg
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón - Árbitro Fifa.jpg
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón (FIFA).jpg
- File:Juan Gabriel Calderón (Concacaf).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Many of the user's uploads marked "self" turned out to be web downloads or screenshots. The claims aren't credible, especially as they're missing metadata and appear to be really grainy screenshots.
- File:Kenneth Vargas vs Deportivo Saprissa (2022).jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Naranjo (2017).jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Naranjo (2011).jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Naranjo (2016).jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Garabito (2021).jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Garabito - 2021.jpg
- File:Estadio Eliécer Pérez Conejo (césped).jpg
- File:Estadio Eliécer Pérez Conejo (2022).jpg
- File:Estadio Eliécer Pérez Conejo - 2022.jpg
- File:Estadio Piedades de Santa Ana - Panorámica.jpg
- File:Estadio Piedades de Santa Ana (2022).jpg
- File:Lixy Rodríguez 2022.jpg
- File:Estadio Municipal de Ciudad Cortés 2022.jpg
- File:Estadio Comunal de Cariari (Vista desde las alturas).jpg
- File:Estadio Comunal de Cariari (2022).jpg
- File:Douglas Forvis 2022.jpg
- File:Impton Söderlund 2022.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
The YouTube video appears to be CC-BY, but the creator of the video doesn't seem to be the copyright holder of the photo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgHKQIuIEf4
- File:Daniel Chacón (World Cup 2022).jpg
- File:Brandon Aguilera (World Cup 2022).jpg
- File:Brandon Aguilera (JAP VS CRC 2022).jpg
- File:Kendall Waston (Mundial 2022).jpg
- File:Keysher Fuller (JAP VS CRC 2022).jpg
- File:Keysher Fuller (MVP WORLD CUP 2022).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:11, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Possible Flickr washing. The Flickr account was created this month, and all the photos are in the "public domain", and are clearly professionally taken. The user page doesn't help as it is a wall of copyvios.
- File:Anthony Contreras - 7.jpg
- File:Francisco Calvo - 15.jpg
- File:Gerson Torres - 13.jpg
- File:Johan Venegas - 11.jpg
- File:Joel Campbell 12.jpg
- File:Celso Borges - 5.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023090510011928 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Motekov
[edit]- File:Breskovski (1967).jpg
- File:Pamouktchiev (1969).jpg
- File:Mandov (1976).jpg
- File:Pamouktchiev (1968).jpg
- File:Еким Бончев (1934).jpg
- File:Todor G. Nikolov (1982) " Les ammonites de la famille Berriasellidae Spath 1922".jpg
- File:Бакалов, Петър и Николов, Иван (1962) Фосилите на България- Терциерни бозайници.jpg
- File:Breskovski, St.(1966).jpg
- File:Vassil Tzankov (1935).jpg
- File:Tzankov & Breskovski (1985) Geologica Balcanica.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%22_Les_ammonites_de_la_famille_Berriasellidae_Spath_1922%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%91%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F-_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Geologica_Balcanica.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Poor quality photographs of text (Out of scope?). --Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Connor TheWriteGuy Newkirk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Authorship and thus copyright murkiness. According to this draft, File:Emile -4.jpg and File:EmileYX?DANCER.jpg are by Ference Isaacs, File:CROWD - TEACHING - Fairview Grassy Park Heal the Hood janfeb08 277.jpg and File:EmileYX?MC.jpg are by Fabian Petersen, and File:AUTHORYX?.jpg is by Darryl Valentine. Yet somehow they're all Connor TheWriteGuy Newkirk's "own work". If they're indeed by three people, then no more than one of the three can be Connor TheWriteGuy Newkirk.
- File:EmileYX?MC.jpg
- File:EmileYX?DANCER.jpg
- File:CROWD - TEACHING - Fairview Grassy Park Heal the Hood janfeb08 277.jpg
- File:AUTHORYX?.jpg
- File:Emile -4.jpg
Hoary (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there. As per the issues mentioned above, all photographs are owned by Emile YX? Jansen and can be used as pleased by him. He has paid for these photographs and has provided them to me for use on WIkipedia. He also requested that I "give credit" to the photographers mentioned as he too is a creative and would like to give credit where credit is due. I am happy to remove their names under the images should this be an issue. Connor TheWriteGuy Newkirk (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Connor TheWriteGuy Newkirk We need permission for each photo from the person who took the photo or evidence that you own the rights to upload it here. In each case you claimed they are own work which is clearly false. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, need permission via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Functionally a duplicate of File:PARIS CHARLES DE GAULLE JUNE 1999 AIR DOLOMITI FOKKER 100 I-ALPL.jpg, which is at a higher resolution and in the original file format. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) RaveDog (talk) 02:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I don't get what's wrong here. I took this pic on my own. What do I have to change here?--RaveDog (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- AntiCompositeBot, please explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: AntiCompositeBot is a Bot, it won't answer any questions. There was indeed no license when the file was tagged, but that has been rectified now, so this can be closed. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, unclear copyright status Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, Private image collections Chandan155 (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- According to the description, this is a boy/man showing an electric experiment. Therefore this is clearly in scope. (Would be good to know the experiment, though) PaterMcFly (talk) 10:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's that it's a private image collection (of Myself), I forgot my old account email password thus I can't login, I uploaded it way back in time. Is there a way for me to remove it, everytime somebody google's my name this image shows up and I don't like that. Chandan155 (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am not a celebrity or public figure, from that perspective it serves no purpose to be here. Chandan155 (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Is it possible for me to put an "author request" to delete the image, Though I don't have access to my original account. Chandan155 (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- If you don't have access to the original account, that's going to be difficult, I guess. In particular, because you used your real name for the upload. Maybe we can remove that name from the description, that should be enough for google to forget about it. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- The username Itself is my name, and a 0 at the end, If required I can provide an admin with my government issued Id proof to prove that It's really me. Chandan155 (talk) 09:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- In short can I request "Courtesy deletions", For my case, as the images are shown in web search results and I find it violation of privay (due to my own mistake).
- Can I please have this image removed?
- "We do understand that people make mistakes, change their mind or for other personal reasons desire to have their contributions deleted" Chandan155 (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe a Burecrat or Steward could change your name and Admin is for me to low as Admins are not inside the "core" data protection. user:DerHexer maybe you can help. Eventually getting his ID and check it and then move the user name to something else. (btw pls ping me if involment of me is requred)--Sanandros (talk) 22:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- If you don't have access to the original account, that's going to be difficult, I guess. In particular, because you used your real name for the upload. Maybe we can remove that name from the description, that should be enough for google to forget about it. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's that it's a private image collection (of Myself), I forgot my old account email password thus I can't login, I uploaded it way back in time. Is there a way for me to remove it, everytime somebody google's my name this image shows up and I don't like that. Chandan155 (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Useless picture, out of scope, again. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Similar ar File:Metalowy teleskop z dwoma soczewkami i maska druga.jpg pls tell us why it is out of scope. For me that is not a probelm.--Sanandros (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Huge text overwrite, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aqilbahri12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be pre-existing publicity photos that exist on many other websites (eg. https://www.baliscootr.com/assets/honda-scoopy110-pic1.jpg for File:Honda Scoopy.png)
- File:Honda Verza.png
- File:Honda Revo.png
- File:Honda Streetfire.png
- File:Honda Pcx.png
- File:Honda Scoopy.png
- File:Honda Beat.png
- File:Honda Cbr150r.png
- File:Honda Forza.png
- File:Honda Sonic.png
- File:Honda Crf.png
Belbury (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails COM:PS, COM:INUSE, COM:ADVERT. This photo is not being used in any Wiki project and merely highlights an individual's commercial blog post. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Based on a web search, he doesn't seem notable. If he were, none of the rest would matter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
We need Pablo Ghaderi's permission to upload these files here
- File:Ferronedrums1.jpg
- File:FerroneDrums.jpg
- File:AlanclarkJacksonni.jpg
- File:AlanClk.jpg
- File:PhilPalmer1.jpg
- File:PhilPalmer.jpg
- File:Jacksonni.jpg
Bremps... 17:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi bremps, i have the permission of the italian photographer Pablo Ghaderi that said that is an "honor to be part of wiki community" And also "for any question you can write to me on my instagram page or on my e-mail pabloghaderifotografo@gmail.com". Aldjs (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Aldjs: , it does not work this way. We are grateful to Mr. Ghaderi but he must provide Commons with a formal letter of consent according to Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Declaration of consent for all_enquiries. If it does not happen more or less soon, all these files would be inevitably deleted. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, need permission via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Silvia Haneklaus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrights belong to the granting institution.
- File:Visiting Scientist CAS Ewald Schnug 2022.pdf
- File:Denkmalpreis 2014.jpg
- File:CIEC Certificate of Authenticity.pdf
- File:Appointment letter visiting Prof STABFERT.jpg
- File:Cetificate for Dr hc Ewald Schnug.jpg
Bremps... 17:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and mostly out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright held by granting institution, with the fancy border designs and all.
- File:Certificate Distinguished Scientist.jpg
- File:Certificate for the appointment of Silvia Haneklaus "Visiting Professor" at the Institute of Applied Ecology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (signed).jpg
- File:Appointment certificate from CAS for Silvia Haneklaus.jpg
- File:LIAONING Award 2020.pdf
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bremps... 17:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- the pages have been filed with the verbal permisssion of the issuing institutions in China by Prof.Lanzhu Ji.CAS in Shenyang! Barmeise (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, need permission via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Günther Frager (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Saurabhsaha as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|The news paper is copyrighted, and the uploader failsly claimed the file as his own creation. Should be discussed, as it is about the First Assamese Wikipedia Meetup Guwahati. I can't read the text; does it look like it's written by a member of the meetup or by newspaper staff? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Indonesia. 180.243.10.165 00:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- How can that happen, if I upload an image with my own work, is there a regulation regarding the prohibition of freedom of anonymity in Indonesia?
- I think this is excluded because it is only skyscrapers, not the ring 1 area like the presidential palace Baqotun0023 (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (No fault by photographer, but per Indonesia law modern archtecture can be under copyright and photos of such buildings COM:DW; see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Indonesia#Freedom_of_panorama). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The file's description states this is a photograph of a sign posted in en:Manali, Himachal Pradesh. If that's truly the case, then it would seem that COM:FOP India is applicable and the photo needs to be treated as a derivative work not only with the image of en:Gedhun Choekyi Nyima but also for the text on the sign per COM:CB#Noticeboards and signs. Bascially, this means that the license chosen by the file's uploader only applies to the photo, but not the photographed sign, and it's the copyright status of the photographed sign that needs to be assessed. Since the photo bascially appears to be a case of COM:2D copying, no new copyright was likely generated for it so the only thing that matters is the copyright status of the sign itself. If the sign isn't considered to be within the public domain, then the COM:CONSENT of whoever created it would be needed for this to be kept by Commons. If the sign is within the public domain, then perhaps the files licensing could be coverted to PD with {{Licensed art}} used for the photo. This, however, assumes that the person who drew the image and wrote the text are the same person. If they're not, then the sign itself could be considered a COM:DW, which means the consent of both the creator of the text and the creator of the image would be needed. Even if the author/authors of the sign are not known and the work is considered "anonymous", it would still be eligible for copyright protection for 60 years from the year after it was first published. There are two other versions of the file (File:Sign for missing Panchen Lama, Manali. 2010.jpg and File:Sign about Panchen Lama, Manali.jpg that have the same issue. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Low quality photograph. Appears to be same banknote as File:Indonesia 2016 100000r o.jpg. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK quality. One photo shows banknote flat, the other wrinkled, so not duplicates. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Low quality photograph. Appears to be same banknote as File: Indonesia 2016 10000r r.jpg. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK quality. One photo shows banknote flat, the other wrinkled, so not duplicates. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
image contains photographs and/or renderings, and there's no Freedom of Panorama in Indonesia Clarinetguy097 (talk) 03:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The source is not free and stated license is wrong
Converting to DR, all we know is that it comes from Twitter but we don't know which account (could be a government account). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Boston Globe attributes the photo to "CIA/CIA Office of Public Affairs". In addition, personal electronic devices are absolutely prohibited from US intelligence facilities like CIA headquarters where this photo was taken, meaning this is almost unquestionably a government work. - Abovfold (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Great find, Keep. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per the Globe attribution. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Great find,
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete This is logo of British film studio, in the UK TOO is very low. 176.221.124.88 05:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lori155 as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Seems OK. Lori155, could you elaborate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as the image as a proper CCL from the source. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dormant2023 as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Begründung Da es eine moderne Eigeninterpretation ist, muss es zuerst mit Original verglichen werden
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is currently in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. Speedy keep if there are no copyright problems. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Useless picture, out of scope, again. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Can u explain why out of scope? A telescope is fotographed.--Sanandros (talk) 22:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Free licensed; No consensus to delete. (Not good photo quality - if it were in more specific subcategory for type of telescope others might have a chance to compare with other relevant media.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- also file:Logo PT TITIT INDONESIA (PERSERO).png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Uploader is blocked for copyvios. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Pls explain further, yes some countries it would be over threashold.--Sanandros (talk) 22:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Per COM:Indonesia: "Indonesia's threshold of originality is reportedly low". Taivo (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Pls explain further, yes some countries it would be over threashold.--Sanandros (talk) 22:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Wdwd (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Technically, you're probably right, but it would be _very_ strange if they complain that we make free advertisement for them... PaterMcFly (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep So, I don't know. The packaging is only partially visible, and the correct license on Flickr was granted (perhaps mistakenly). The Commons rule cited states that often the issue is not a logo, but a printed photo or drawing on the packaging that illustrates the contents. That's not the case here either, if I understand it correctly. --Mister Pommeroy (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete GlaxoSmithKline is British. Above COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly: ,
Info: Please keep in mind, that your argument is (technically) against the precautionary principle (PCP), which is an offical policy.--Wdwd (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Wdwd: I know. I just think that sometimes, this policy leads to weird debates. We're discussing here about the copyright of a package which the owner (very likely) want's to be made known. It would even be weirder with cigarette packs, because there are strict limits on advertisement for tobacco products in many countries, so "free advertisement" via Wikipedia would be very welcome. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, a lot of weirdness occurs here. But of course the solution for the company would be for someone representing them to contact the COM:VRT with an appropriate licensing release. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Wdwd: I know. I just think that sometimes, this policy leads to weird debates. We're discussing here about the copyright of a package which the owner (very likely) want's to be made known. It would even be weirder with cigarette packs, because there are strict limits on advertisement for tobacco products in many countries, so "free advertisement" via Wikipedia would be very welcome. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Clear COM:DW. (Arguing that copyright holder might like photo is not a reason to violate copyright - If copyright holder gives explicit permission to free license, fine, otherwise on Commons we do our best to follow copyright law, even when it seems rather strange.). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No direct URL to the photo page and the mentioned url (https://boostsmartindustry.nl/) is a copyrighted website. Mondo (talk) 13:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no confirmation of claimed free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a photo of an apparently rather recent (dated 1999, commemorating a visit by the pope) stained glass window in a church in Maribor, Slovenia. A 1999 or later work of art is still protected by copyright in Slovenia, and there is no freedom of panorama there. Therefore the file should be deleted. If someone can find the artist, we can set an undeletion date based on 70 years pma; if not, the file can be restored with {{PD-old-assumed}} 120 + 1 years after 1999, so in 2120. Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Clear DW of modern artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of 2-D work. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Reupload of a file previously deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
False emblem. Source ??? I guess there isn't. Beshogur (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE in many articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Fuente es Wikipedia. Por lo tanto supongo que es de "fair use". Es posible tener archivos de ese tipo en Commons? 186.173.57.151 14:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Estar en uso o no tiene que ver con "scope", cosa que no es el tema aquí. 186.173.57.151 14:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- The source does not make this file above COM:TOO Turkey. If I'm right that it's below COM:TOO Turkey, it is thereby public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Estar en uso o no tiene que ver con "scope", cosa que no es el tema aquí. 186.173.57.151 14:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek; license changed to PD-logo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
While we generally keep PNGs even if a SVG version is later uploaded, there's zero reason to keep a PNG that was created from the SVG, and is incorrectly licensed to boot. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: false license claim; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
clearly a TV screenshot, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
no indication about a free release from the original source; also, no photo in that source... — danyele 16:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
no indication about a free release from the original source — danyele 16:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
no indication about a free release from the original source — danyele 16:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
no indication about a free release from the original source — danyele 16:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, it's a copy of the Segunda Divisão (Portuguese Second Division) football trophy. Copyright for the actual trophy would belong to the Portuguese Football Federation, and this is a derivative work of that trophy. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright – This is the Philip Sheppard and the London Philharmonic Orchestra version, which is copyright Universal Music (1, 2). See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4HDM83Zg5E. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright – This is the Philip Sheppard and the London Philharmonic Orchestra version, which is copyright Universal Music (1, 2). See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUZHc20ua8A. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Drakosh (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. --Komarof (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- agreed Keep MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Could you please tell me how to replace the image with the one I suggested? This is the official logo of the company, current at the moment. it is fashionable to check the link to the official website https://whitebit.com/brand-guideline Karoline Karoline (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- agreed
Kept: per discussion. (Uploading newer logo does not requrie deletion of historic logo). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Autographs are PD, but this is on a photo. That does not make the photo PD. Bremps... 17:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Question Small part of the photo. De minimis? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Karsten11 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio: Scan of a newspaper Yann (talk) 18:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- The newspaper no longer exists. For this reason, permission for publication cannot be requested. The copyright of newspaper publishers is valid for 70 years in Germany. The newspaper is from May 1940 and therefore 83 years old. Bauzentrum-Rüppel (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chainwit. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: cropped variation of image from https://www.oknation.net/post/detail/634f77209e47be6e9087cfdf Yann (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
license laundering SecretName101 (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Copyright violation confirmed from reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The source (City of Boston Archives) states the images are still under copyright (although non-commercial use is allowed). Note that it was taken in 1912, but being in an archive it was probably never published.
- File:Summer Street between Arch and Otis Streets, Boston (Smith Patterson Co. Building).tif
- File:Summer Street between Arch and Otis Streets, Boston.tif
Günther Frager (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching this! I did not see this statement initially that the images are still under copyright. Looks like I missed this info earlier, but I see it now looking back at it. I agree that these two should be deleted as they are still under copyright by the City of Boston Archives. RGKMA (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I just did some more digging and found the same image on Flickr uploaded by Boston City Archives. In the description it lists the image as public domain ("Rights: Public domain") as well as with an Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) license. I will go ahead and update the license on the file page to reflect the CC BY-SA 2.0 license and update the source link. Image is at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cityofbostonarchives/20294395706/in/album-72157640329278684/ RGKMA (talk) 03:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Good detective work by RGKMA, for finding the release in Flickr. The link to their license is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ --RAN (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Creator was Levon Lazarev (1928-2004) and it was installed in Saint Petersburg in 2003. There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia. Günther Frager (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The artist Hester Frood died in 1971 and was based in the UK. We need evidence of permission from her heirs. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Very likely copyvio from the official media of USON Nevers club. For examples : [6], [7], [8].
Same with : File:78291827Uson.jpg - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 22:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, requires permission from the potter Mary Rose Young, who is living. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; artwork rather than simple utilitarian teapot. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Not in use on Wiki, license withdrawn by the author Uzytkownikmm86 (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- license withdrawn by the author: what? Veverve (talk) 23:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Uzytkownikmm86, who is the author? Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. On Commons more than 4 years, far too long for deletion simply by author request without good reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
license withdrawn by the author Uzytkownikmm86 (talk) 22:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment My keep votes have been based on your being the author. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. If you are not the author, we will have another discussion. Who is the author, Uzytkownikmm86? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Uzytkownikmm86 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: license withdrawn by the author, not in used on Wiki
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. A legitimately issued CC license cannot be "withdrawn". Please explain this nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- you're right about an inability to revoke the license. I think the author, who seems to also be the one who made the deletion request, is instead attempting to remove the image from circulation. That is really the only way to combat a CC license. I think that deleting would comply with the author request, but there is no reason to remove it otherwise. Keep MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Same situation with:
Kept: No requirement to delete, no consensus to do so. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Nie w użyciu na Wiki, wycofanie licencji udostępnienia przez autora Uzytkownikmm86 (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Google-translation: "Not in use on Wiki, revocation of sharing license by author." Those are not valid deletion reasons, and this photo could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, requires permission from the heirs of the calligrapher Graily Hewitt, who died in 1952. Exceeds the threshold of originality in the UK, see COM:TOO UK. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The date of the picture in 2022 is after the date of the dead of the model in 1994 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a clear copyright violaton. Used in the cover artwork for albums that were released before the upload to Commons.[9][10] TinEye reports multiple predated matches. Patterning suggests that this file has been copied from halftone printed source. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- HI @CoffeeEngineer @Verbcatcher
- The picture of this singer was taken in the 1980s clearly not in 2022. It is used on album covers after his death on many platforms. It's probably the public domain according to law in Algeria that states works prior to 1987 are free from copyright. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 00:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Riad Salih: thank you for pointing this out, the rules are summarised in COM:ALGERIA and in Template:PD-Algeria-photo-except. However, Cheb Hasni was born in 1968, so he would have been 19 in 1987. He looks older in this photo. Can you find evidence of sufficiently early publication? Discogs suggests that his records released before 1987 did not use this image.[11] Verbcatcher (talk) 00:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer He was killed when he was 26, so he was quite young in the picture. He started his career in 1986 and became famous immediately. If I have some time, I will try to find out the exact date, which could possibly be in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Regards. Riad Salih (talk) 00:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Riad Salih: thank you for pointing this out, the rules are summarised in COM:ALGERIA and in Template:PD-Algeria-photo-except. However, Cheb Hasni was born in 1968, so he would have been 19 in 1987. He looks older in this photo. Can you find evidence of sufficiently early publication? Discogs suggests that his records released before 1987 did not use this image.[11] Verbcatcher (talk) 00:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: False license, false claims. The original photo might or might not be PD by Algeria law, but this photo is clearly not a 2022 work by the uploader with authority to license it under Creative Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Very likely copyvio from the official media of USON Nevers club. For examples : [12], [13], [14].
Same with : File:727272Uson.jpg - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 22:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, license withdrawn by the author Uzytkownikmm86 (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not deletion reasons, might be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: https://polish-catholic.church/portfolio-view/pasterka2017/. --Yann (talk) 15:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
We already have several consensus on deprecation of Nofacebook tags: Commons:Deletion requests/NoFacebook templates, Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Nofacebook, m:Legal/CC BY-SA licenses and social media and several dozens of VP(C)/AN(U/B)... discussions, they show solidarity of Ukraine :P untouchable panoramas where FB users may reverse-blocklist those who tag em. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 Speedy keep This is ridiculous. Deletion of user space pages, except at the user’s request, requires an exceptional reason. And here there isn’t even a good reason.
- This is a long list of legitimate credits, with a perhaps problematic ‘no Facebook’ section buried in the middle, and you simply want to delete the whole thing. Did you make any attempt to discuss this with Shakibul Alam Risvy first? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd Don't you think that, per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No Facebook, any re-creation of nofacebook tags are facing-to-facing COM:CSD#G4? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 There are three problems with applying COM:CSD#G4 to this page:
- G4 applies only to recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus (emphasis added). The offending content on this page was added at 14 September 2016, 05:10:49, long before any such consensus.
- Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Arrhioui.jpg, G4 applies only to identical (not merely similar) content. Is the offending content on this page identical to content previously deleted per community consensus? It’s not identical to {{No Facebook}}, which you refer to (it is in Spanish and English, not German and English; it uses all-bold text with no underlining and it lacks a link to Facebook's licensing terms).
- G4’s description says Page or file matches content … (emphasis added). It does not say contains. As noted above, this page, taken as a whole, doesn’t even come close to matching a ‘no Facebook’ template.
- Also, the previous discussions all seem to involve templates actually transcluded in file descriptions; this page is not used in this way. Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- So under your logical those Nofacebook tags should be restored? If so then why not just ask via COM:DRV or elsewhere? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 Suppose I wrote: For the record, the ‘no Facebook’ templates nominated for deletion consist of the image No Facebook.svg and the text ‘[insert text here]’ (but with the actual text inserted). Would you then ask for this page to be deleted, because I had used it to recreate content deleted per consensus? Or would you realise that context matters here?
- I said above that there is a huge difference between an actual template, used on file descriptions, and a page showing examples of such templates (without endorsing them, I might add). Again, context matters! Brianjd (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- (Not sure whether I could meet (Edit conflict)s when discussing your matters responsed, are you really having interests on editing same times of when I'm editing?)
- Actually for that file (and don't surprise the black-white png one), I'm indeed, and always yes conscientious, considering a 3rd nomination. On context matters, let's just ask Shakibul themselves. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- So under your logical those Nofacebook tags should be restored? If so then why not just ask via COM:DRV or elsewhere? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 There are three problems with applying COM:CSD#G4 to this page:
- @Brianjd Don't you think that, per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No Facebook, any re-creation of nofacebook tags are facing-to-facing COM:CSD#G4? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 19:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
While was kept for once, there are several new concerns populated by VPC that such requirements listed under this credits subpage contain rules violate CC 4.0 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, the sculptor John Maltby died in 2022, and we need evidence of permission from his heirs. Freedom of panorama might apply if this work is 'if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public' in the UK (see COM:FOP UK), but we would need some evidence to support such a claim. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Lacks information needed to determine if permanently situated as stated above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
this is a wrong logo of NIFT, errors are 1. Hindi spelling of Rashtriya is wrong, 2. Spelling of Instititute at the bottom of the circle is wrong, 3. alignment of text/words in the bottom of circle is not proper, 59.145.24.90 05:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 02:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
cut-out from a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_-_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_-_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_-_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_-_03.jpg){kind=link}
_-_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 16:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_04.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2090. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
_-_04.jpg){kind=link}
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- which of plaques not permitted by author(s ? Albedo (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Copy of the photography. PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo is not de minimis and no FoP for photos in Russia. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the author of photocopied work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2021 monument, no FoP for 3D art in Russia. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, requires evidence of permission from the heirs of the potter Michael Cardew, who died in 1983. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the ToO in the UK is low. Undelete in 2073. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, requires evidence of permission from the sculptor Edward Allington, who died in 2017, or from his heirs. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2088. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Eigenes Werk, d. h. selbstgemalt? Oder abfotografiert? Ergo: Copyright? GerritR (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The footer indicated CCTV (China Central Television), not from the CNS (China News Service), thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- CNS, as an official government body, uploaded those under the valid license.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, they are different. It is a case of license landuring. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The footer indicated CCTV (China Central Television), not from the CNS (China News Service), thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- CNS, as an official government body, uploaded those under the valid license.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, they are different. It is a case of license landuring. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- CCTV is an official government body, too.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, they are different. It is a case of license landuring. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The footer indicated CCTV (China Central Television), not from the CNS (China News Service), thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- CNS, as an official government body, uploaded those under the valid license.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, they are different. It is a case of license landuring. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- CCTV is not a governmental organization? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Right. So what's the problem with the license? A1Cafel, please explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Li Qiang en 2022.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xi Jinping Speaks at Jiang Zemin Funeral.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xi Jinping Speaks at G20 Summit in 2022.png. A discussion in Chinese Wikipedia said "中新社视频常会引用第三方画面（有时不会注明出处），甚至整个视频都是由第三方画面构成，这些第三方内容则不能视作自由内容。"(English: China News Service often uses contents by others and sometimes even does not give attribution. Sometimes the whole video is made by third-party contents. These third-party contents cannot be considered as free contents.)--A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- So basically, what it amounts to is that Commons can't host files from China Central Television, I guess. Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Li Qiang en 2022.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xi Jinping Speaks at Jiang Zemin Funeral.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xi Jinping Speaks at G20 Summit in 2022.png. A discussion in Chinese Wikipedia said "中新社视频常会引用第三方画面（有时不会注明出处），甚至整个视频都是由第三方画面构成，这些第三方内容则不能视作自由内容。"(English: China News Service often uses contents by others and sometimes even does not give attribution. Sometimes the whole video is made by third-party contents. These third-party contents cannot be considered as free contents.)--A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Right. So what's the problem with the license? A1Cafel, please explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- CCTV is not a governmental organization? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, they are different. It is a case of license landuring. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File was uploaded by שהם אברהם (talk · contribs) but Rotem516 (talk · contribs) claimed in edit summaries to be the photographer and that it was uploaded without their permission. It is too late for speedy deletion by author request, but the file is unused so complying with the request seems harmless. Scyrme (talk) 20:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is this really an official document of state governing powers? Looks like an office letter, so may be a copyrighted text. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Вы думаете, что КГБ и Генеральная прокуратура — это не государственные органы? ) --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 23:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Не всякое письмо из КГБ попадает под эту льготу. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Это официальный документ на официальном бланке в официальное ведомство ЦК КПСС. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Не всякое письмо из КГБ попадает под эту льготу. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: text only document and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. Can be undeleted when used for instance as raw text for Wikisource. --Ellywa (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}