Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Aadrit28 (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Stupid look in his face 174.251.160.124 05:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|肖像権の侵害}} 小林悠平 (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, attack-image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus finals (Norman Seibert) - DSC 2074.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3028.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3033.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3036.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3037.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3038.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3041.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3046.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
File:European Championships 2022-08-21 Senior Men Apparatus final Still rings (Norman Seibert) - DSC 3049.jpg
[edit]Unintended upload Norman.seibert (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
non free logo copied from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxM7JWrqDZx1nDLj9SzDFow?app=desktop&cbrd=1 Hoyanova (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 14:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no indication of a free license on the source site; http://85.158.251.41/wps/portal/muma/!ut/p/c0/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3gTL09fCxNDMwN3Pz8DA0cDEz9j0wAvoxBnA_2CbEdFAO6YdnU!/. --Wutsje 14:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found elsewhere on the net and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
copyvio protected image see https://www.parool.nl/kunst-media/regisseur-jim-taihuttu-over-de-oost-natuurlijk-ga-je-niet-iets-bij-elkaar-fantaseren~b626856f/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F Hoyanova (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 14:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
copyvio see https://bola.okezone.com/read/2023/01/28/49/2754601/gabung-persib-bandung-rezaldi-hehanusa-janjikan-hal-ini Hoyanova (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, source states: Foto: Laman resmi Persib. --Wutsje 14:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found elsewhere on the net and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission no metadata present Hoyanova (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found elsewhere on the net and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission no metadata present Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, found elsewhere on the net and unlikely to be own work. --Wutsje 14:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
This redirect is misleading from now on, and cannot be corrected - see target's tp. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Default Kept: "My suggestion would be to go to COM:HELPDESK and see what people there say" (emphasis mine) was NOT a direction to start a DR request!, Last I checked DR wasn't COM:RFD, Do it properly or leave the damn redirect be. Again for the second time Kontributor: Go to the talkpage and ask. –Davey2010Talk 17:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Vereinte Demokratische Partei Logo 2013.svg}} Sangjinhwa (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted and redirected to duplicate file. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source given no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is definitely not own work, as claimed by the uploader. --Wutsje 17:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission no metadata present Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is definitely not own work, as claimed by the uploader. --Wutsje 17:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Better SVG has been uploaded with more detail Riad Salih (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Here is the link of the new SVG : File:National Emblem of Algeria.svg Riad Salih (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Need to remove metadata and upload better file MRafizeldi (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
I want to delete it because I don't have the copyright of this photograph.Thank you very much Maquineitor23 (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
no source given - metadata missing - user with history of copyright violations BouncyCactus (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 22:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Double with Artist impression of Quaoar and its ring ESA24681885.jpeg Gabon100 (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Gabon100, you referred to the same file. Did you mean File:Artist impression of Quaoar and its ring pillars.jpg? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was indeed a mistake. I should have used Duplicate. Thank you. --Gabon100 (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Disregard the question, I see what is happening. Keeping this file and redirecting lower resolution and unused other file to this one. Next time, please use Template:Duplicate. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Google "G" Logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:Navy celebrates their 44-28 victory over Pittsburgh in the 2015 Military Bowl. (23421080604).jpg, which was uploaded earlier. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete Wrong upload. Per Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#G7: Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. Here the template {{Db-self}} was added on Sunday the 5th of February. Exactly 5 days and 21 hours after upload. Thus the request complies with the policy. G1: Accidental creation -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deletd by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
I fthis is from the film, it certainly isn't {{Own work}} of User:JohnJackMillard. If it osn't, it needs a better description. LPfi (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person, self-promotion (https://www.google.com/search?q=Nadeem_Balloch&oq=Nadeem_Balloch&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2.390438544j0j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) Mateus2019 (talk) 04:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 17:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
This is the same 3D work as that of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Neutrality Arch. Commercial freedom of panorama does not exist in Turkmenistan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Posisble copyvio (no sources given), was uploaded by a new user to vandalize an article Facenapalm (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP under UK Common Law. —DaydreamBelizer (chat) 01:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Didn't scroll down far enough on the licence page, sorry. —DaydreamBelizer (chat) 01:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The map graphics likely passes American threshold of originality, and it isn't trivial or unimportant enough to pass American de minimis. United States freedom of panorama does not cover artistic or pictorial works made by living or recently-deceased artists. Pennsylvania, where this sign is located, is not among states in which state-owned works default to copyright-free licensing, unlike some states like California, Florida, and Massachusetts. There is no indication that this is a pre-1978 pictorial artwork that would make it eligible for either {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete In addition to what's posted above, there's also COM:CB#Noticeboards and signs and COM:FOP US reasons as to why this sign can't be kept. Photos of 3D objects like noticeboards and signs can be derivative works depending upon various factors, but any copyright owned by the photographer wouldn't extend to the photographed object; in other words, there are two copyrights that need to be considered when uploading such a photo to Commons: the copyright of the photo and the copyright of the photographed object.The graphics and, in many cases, prose decriptions found on noticeboards and signs, even publicly displayed ones, are often eligible for copyright protection of their own accord and that copyright would be owned by the creator of the sign or the owner of the sign. Unless it can be shown that this particular sign was installed prior to March 1, 1989, it would considered eligible for copyright protection even if there's no visible copyright notice on the sign itself. This sign looks like it was recently installed and it's also quite complex; so, it seem like it would be hard to keep this per COM:PCP without VRT verification of the sign's copyright holder's COM:CONSENT. Of course, if the reason for uploading the photo was to show everything else but the sign, and the sign just happened to be in the way, then the sign's imagery could be blurred out and the photo could be kept if it's impossible to take a different photo of the same location minus the sign. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Out of scope. Nv8200p (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
"Source Facebook" without URL? means probably a CV Mateus2019 (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
self-promotion Mateus2019 (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
File:David Attenborough warning on extinction crisis - Melbourne climate march for our future - -stopAdani - IMG 3875 (45316572775).jpg
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:VULVA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Although intercourse is in scope, this image is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
These logos fail COM:SCOPE: They are self-made logos for a fictional/fantasy radio station imagined by the uploader/sockpuppets.
- File:85.5 LOGO.png
- File:85.5 R&B FOR THE LA NEW LOGO.png
- File:85.5 THE LA WEBSITE.png
- File:97.5 LOGO.png
- File:JAYLON RADIO.png
- File:RADIO.png
Closeapple (talk) 05:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per own nomination. Some details too much for the basic nomination summary, in case people are interested: 85.5 isn't a valid FM frequency in the United States. The "97.5" and "Radio One" are related logos by the same person, who used the accounts User:855THELA (blocked for sockpuppeting) and User:Jaylon radio (who is blocked on English Wikipedia for having a self-promo username) and User talk:Fredson smith (blocked as sockpuppet). A former website appears to have been https://web.archive.org/web/20210501000000*/https://jaylonradio855.weebly.com/ where you can finds links to a lot of stuff that doesn't seem plausable about the alleged station, and has major grammar errors. Claims are that the callsign is "WCC-FM" (which isn't a real callsign) and the sister station is "KRRL" (which is an iHeartMedia station in L.A.) and that the station is "R&B for Los Angeles" even though it's supposedly in St. Louis, Missouri and that it changes frequency from 88.5 to 97.5, and has non-public Facebook and Twitter handles. And there are likely self-submitted entries at https://www.bbb.org/us/mo/st-louis/profile/radio-stations/855-rb-for-los-angeles-0734-1000017640 and a self-authored press release at https://www.stltoday.com/pr/news/the-old-85-5-r-b-to-new-97-5-r-b-for-los-angeles/image_746bd968-6761-11eb-8503-5cb9017bdf47.html that contains nothing but a headline and logo. (Apparently the St. Louis Post-Dispatch allows this sort of thing now?!) --Closeapple (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Smit is still alive - needs OTRS from artist Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.39.238 14:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Per COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED — BriefEdits (talk) 22:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo without a educational use. Not notable musician. Advertising in description. Drakosh (talk) 09:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Pointless lower quality duplicate of File:NCCemblem1.png. Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Per watermark, missing camera-data and low resolution likely not own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal comic, no context, no educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation; see [4], looks like this image is taken from the subject's instagram. Also no availability of metadata. ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 10:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused Wikipedia screenshot, no context, no educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The designer for this seems to be pretty close to the original character. So I doubt it's fair use or otherwise PD. Adamant1 (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
wall of nonsense, probably spamlinks and, well, BDSM. Retired electrician (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Mały rozmiar, słaba jakość. Pamulab (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:EugeneZelenko. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
I can't verify this license at source Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, non-notable individual: d:Q116671481. Gikü (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Non public-donain architecture, also no fredom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Non public-domain architecture, also no fredom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Non public-domain architecture, also no fredom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Underlying text of these markers is eligible for copyright, marker indicates that this was placed in 2000. Appears to have been placed by the state government of Michigan, and US state governments don't have the automatic PD release like the US federal government does. COM:DW and a lack of freedom of panorama in the US.
Hog Farm (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope per COM:NOTUSED Chiyako92 (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Very low-resolution photograph of an ordinary restaurant/bistro. Unusable, no educational value, out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, also see COM:NOTUSED Chiyako92 (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sudokuhani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused mostly text-only screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:-amyldosis &porphyria &calcium &gout &mucinosis.png
- File:2022-12-02 15 09 21-geno nutrional porokeratosis.png
- File:Nevus &melanoma &lentigo.png
- File:2022-12-01 16 58 36-fungal parasite.png
- File:Pigmentary &acanthoasis.png
- File:-tumours &cyst.png
- File:Content2.png
- File:2022-12-01 13 21 23-eczma urticaria.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted packaging. Sreejith K (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2018. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Чому номінуються лише мої фото? Виглядає як переслідування Nikride (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2018. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2008. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
{{No permission since|month=February|day=9|year=2023}} Olga Rithme (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep In use and passed license review in 2007. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)- Delete The photo was not taken by whoever uploaded it, there is no proof of current permission from the author to use his picture. Olga Rithme (talk) 23:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment No, the photo was copied here from Flickr. I don't understand the basis of your deletion request; could you explain further? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- The photo was removed from Flickr by the author. Can you show me a document written by the author of the picture that allows the user to publish it on Commons ? Olga Rithme (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously not, but why do you think you know better than the license reviewer? The fact that the photo was removed from Flickr means nothing at all in regard to its copyright status. I think this is an unjustified attempt to delete a file that's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- By the way, you don't get two votes, and the idea of a speedy deletion of this file is completely absurd. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- What I think doesn't matter. A message from a bot with a broken link is not a permission from the author of the picture to use it. Commons rules demand a proof that the author gave his permission to another user for publication on Commons. If we don't have the permission, it's a reason to delete the file. Olga Rithme (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Not quite sure why this is nominated. It was uploaded and reviewed by FlickreviewR, just like 4 million other pictures. What is different about this picture than all those other ones?
Husky (talk to me) 11:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was reviewed by Flickerview in 2007, we are in 2023. Again, if you don't have a document written by the author of the picture that prooves he gave you his permission to use his photo, it's a reason to delete the file. If the picture is conserved without his permission, it will be an infringement of Commons rules and of the law. You can choose to disrespect these rules and to ignore the law, that doesn't change the fact that we have no actual permission from the author to use his photo. Now if you are a waterice lover, nothing prevents you from contacting the author to ask his permission and to bring us the proof that he allowed you to publish his work. And others photos without permissions are not a reason to keep this one. It's like if I was saying "4 million people are doing bullshit, so I can do bullshit". Olga Rithme (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- To answer better your question : FlickerviewR is not the author of these 4 millions pictures, it cannot deliver permissions to use pictures in the same way as an author. It just indicates the status of pictures at one moment. That's the difference. I hope it's clearer now. Olga Rithme (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was reviewed by Flickerview in 2007, we are in 2023. Again, if you don't have a document written by the author of the picture that prooves he gave you his permission to use his photo, it's a reason to delete the file. If the picture is conserved without his permission, it will be an infringement of Commons rules and of the law. You can choose to disrespect these rules and to ignore the law, that doesn't change the fact that we have no actual permission from the author to use his photo. Now if you are a waterice lover, nothing prevents you from contacting the author to ask his permission and to bring us the proof that he allowed you to publish his work. And others photos without permissions are not a reason to keep this one. It's like if I was saying "4 million people are doing bullshit, so I can do bullshit". Olga Rithme (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- What's clear is that it had a proper license at the time it was reviewed, and that's all that matters unless you can demonstrate that Michael Wilkes is not a reliable source. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Michael Wilkes is not a source, Michael Wilkes is an author, apparently a photograph. His work is protected by law. I don't contest the fact that the photo was free to use in 2007. In 2023, the licence is no longer available. Good night. Olga Rithme (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- My experience with previous discussions is that if a file had a suitable license when it was uploaded here, no subsequent action by the copyright-holder changes the status of the copy here. Your idea that Creative Commons Copyleft licenses are not perpetual is reasonable, but it's at odds with one of the core policies of this site. Besides, you don't have evidence that the photographer changed the license, only that he took the photo off Flickr at some point. Watch what the closing admin says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Your experience is one thing, the Commons rules are another. This page about Flickrviewer says : "Flickr allows the uploaders to change their licensing at any time, images must be confirmed to have a copyright status acceptable on Commons ".
- This other Commons page says : "In all cases, the person uploading content must provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate either that such content is in the public domain or that the copyright holder has released it under an appropriate license". So it's not to me to bring a proof. Because if I don't have proof that the photographer changed his license, in 2023 we don't have proof that the license is still appropriate. Again, it is not to me to provide proof here. The administrators will decide the fate of this image. As far as I'm concerned, if they decide to keep it, my trust in Commons will be bruised. Olga Rithme (talk) 07:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll be wrong. I'll be interested to see what the closing admin says, and I hope they state their reasoning for keeping or deleting the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I hope they will apply precautionary principle... Olga Rithme (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll be wrong. I'll be interested to see what the closing admin says, and I hope they state their reasoning for keeping or deleting the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- My experience with previous discussions is that if a file had a suitable license when it was uploaded here, no subsequent action by the copyright-holder changes the status of the copy here. Your idea that Creative Commons Copyleft licenses are not perpetual is reasonable, but it's at odds with one of the core policies of this site. Besides, you don't have evidence that the photographer changed the license, only that he took the photo off Flickr at some point. Watch what the closing admin says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- What's clear is that it had a proper license at the time it was reviewed, and that's all that matters unless you can demonstrate that Michael Wilkes is not a reliable source. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No reasonable rationale for deletion has been provided. There is no indication that would allow to doubt the free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then please give me the link showing that the licence stills compatible with Commons in 2023. Olga Rithme (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- [5], [6], [7]. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I was thinking more of a link indicating the current status of the file, but I thought I understood by browsing these texts that the rights granted would in fact be perpetual if the conditions of use of the license are respected, information that I did not have found before. The law therefore seems to be respected in the case of this use. I'm not going to change my vote but I thank you for the links which will have taught me something a priori, and I will try to continue to trust Commons... So it's a victory for icewater lovers. Best wishes. Olga Rithme (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Just a last word on the policy of Commons: I note here that this file which was not uploaded by its author will probably be kept. For my part, I only downloaded 3 files but I am the author of these 3 files. Unfortunately 2 of them are derivative works which I requested to be removed because I did not know that Commons did not accept them by uploading them. I know that Commons aims to facilitate the use of images, but I admit that this situation leaves me a little perplexed, especially with regard to the content that will be kept... However, I am aware that these legal questions are difficult, and it is perhaps thanks to your work that they will evolve. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to answer me. Olga Rithme (talk) 00:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- I was thinking more of a link indicating the current status of the file, but I thought I understood by browsing these texts that the rights granted would in fact be perpetual if the conditions of use of the license are respected, information that I did not have found before. The law therefore seems to be respected in the case of this use. I'm not going to change my vote but I thank you for the links which will have taught me something a priori, and I will try to continue to trust Commons... So it's a victory for icewater lovers. Best wishes. Olga Rithme (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- [5], [6], [7]. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused file 182.1.32.29 13:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - In use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
That is my house. Someone took a picture and published it without my knowledge. Please protect my privacy by deleting the photo. 114.125.234.221 17:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, but it impossible to verify this. If we would handle such anonymous deletion requests, millions of photos could be deleted just because some troll claims that they show “my house”, “my trousers”, “my tree”, “my bird” etc. In addition, in many countries there is not right on your own goods – at least here in Germany, everybody can take a photo of my house and publish it, that’s totally legal. So even if this was a verifiable claim there is no immediate need to delete a file because of such a request. --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability, No encyclopedic use CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused art of uploader himself, looks like out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Al-balooshi law (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files (school certificates, etc.) outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader is globally locked for cross-wiki self-promotion.
- File:وسام رفيع المستوى من حاكم دبى للسيد عبد الحميد غلوم البلوشى.png
- File:شهادة معتمدة من مركز التدريب و الدراسات القضائية للسيد عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.png
- File:شهادة معتمدة من حكومة دبى للسيد عبد الحميد البلوشى.png
- File:شهادة معتمدة للسيد عبد الحميد البلوشى من مركز دبى للاستشارات و التدريب.png
- File:شهادة معتمدة باسم المستشار عبد الحميد البلوشى فى مكافحة غسيل الاموال و الارهاب.png
- File:شهادة تقدير باسم عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.png
- File:شهادة اعداد القادة باسم المستشار عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.png
- File:المستشار عبد الحميد البلوشى فى مكتبه.png
- File:المؤهل الدراسى للسيد عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.png
- File:شهادة اجتياز دبلومة تحليل الخط باسم عبد الحميد البلوشى.png
- File:المستشار عبد الحميد البلوشى22.jpg
- File:مكتب عبد الحميد البلوشى.jpg
- File:المستشار عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.jpg
- File:شهادة معتمدة باسم المستشار عبد الحميد البلوشى فى مكافحة غسيل الاموال و الارهاب.jpg
- File:شهادة معتمدة للسيد عبد الحميد البلوشى من مركز دبى للاستشارات و التدريب.jpg
- File:شهادة معتمدة من حكومة دبى للسيد عبد الحميد البلوشى.jpg
- File:المؤهل الدراسى للسيد عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.jpg
- File:شهادة معتمدة من مركز التدريب و الدراسات القضائية للسيد عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.jpg
- File:وسام رفيع المستوى من حاكم دبى للسيد عبد الحميد غلوم البلوشى.jpg
- File:شهادة اجتياز دبلومة تحليل الخط باسم عبد الحميد البلوشى.jpg
- File:شهادة اعداد القادة باسم المستشار عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.jpg
- File:شهادة تقدير باسم عبد الحميد يوسف البلوشى.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
privacy is not taken into account. the person on the image asked me to remove it. 31.151.251.188 20:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I support a courtesy deletion. Not in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ikan Kekek. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
copy of https://samkev.art/ (see bottom of page) Habertix (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
copie de https://fineartamerica.com/featured/whispers-of-the-night-samuel-huynh.html Habertix (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion policy -- not educationally useful 87.116.163.79 23:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion policy -- not educationally useful 87.116.163.79 23:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion policy -- not educationally useful 87.116.163.79 23:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. On the source page, it says: © Auckland Council 2023 All rights reserved Schwede66 08:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Per Facebook/Instagram-code in metadata probably copied from social media. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Same rationale as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Seraphimsflame, where a very similar photo with the same file name and showing the same person was deleted: There is no indication that this person is notable, therefore it appears to be out of scope. Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploader claims that this is in the public domain because it was both published before 1928 and >70 years have passed since the author's death. However, the author indicates in their description that the book was published in 1966 (the book itself confirms this; see page 40). If the author was alive at the time of publication, then it is impossible for 70 years to have passed since their death (70 years ago was 1953), and 1968 is well after 1928. For these reasons, I am nominating this for deletion as not being in the public domain and lacking a valid license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (foto by FOTO FLAUSEN - Andreas Brandl) M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nicht löschen, der Fotograf hat mir per E-Mail das Einverständnis gegeben, wie in der Beschreibung angegeben. Hier zur Bestätigung: https://i.ibb.co/XZfjrM1/B1-A87-A01-A8-DC-49-A8-B097-8225-EDF0-A1-CB.jpg Glasperlenspieler (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please send permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (foto by FOTO FLAUSEN - Andreas Brandl) M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nicht löschen, der Fotograf hat mir per E-Mail das Einverständnis gegeben, wie in der Beschreibung angegeben. Hier zur Bestätigung: https://i.ibb.co/XZfjrM1/B1-A87-A01-A8-DC-49-A8-B097-8225-EDF0-A1-CB.jpg Glasperlenspieler (talk) 11:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, send permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused and superseded by files in Category:Texas Ranch to Market shields. See previous precedents at Commons:WikiProject Highways/Precedents. Both image sets are PD so no need for attribution.
- File:TexasRM1.png
- File:TexasRM12.png
- File:TexasRM32.png
- File:TexasRM33.png
- File:TexasRM42.png
- File:TexasRM150.png
- File:TexasRM152.png
- File:TexasRM165.png
- File:TexasRM169.png
- File:TexasRM187.png
- File:TexasRM189.png
- File:TexasRM243.png
- File:TexasRM334.png
- File:TexasRM335.png
- File:TexasRM336.png
- File:TexasRM337.png
- File:TexasRM385.png
- File:TexasRM386.png
- File:TexasRM473.png
- File:TexasRM474.png
- File:TexasRM479.png
- File:TexasRM480.png
- File:TexasRM484.png
- File:TexasRM501.png
- File:TexasRM505.png
- File:TexasRM584.png
- File:TexasRM620.png
- File:TexasRM628.png
- File:TexasRM648.png
- File:TexasRM652.png
- File:TexasRM674.png
- File:TexasRM687.png
- File:TexasRM690.png
- File:TexasRM693.png
- File:TexasRM783.png
- File:TexasRM853.png
- File:TexasRM864.png
- File:TexasRM915.png
- File:TexasRM962.png
- File:TexasRM963.png
- File:TexasRM965.png
- File:TexasRM967.png
- File:TexasRM1022.png
- File:TexasRM1024.png
- File:TexasRM1050.png
- File:TexasRM1061.png
- File:TexasRM1077.png
- File:TexasRM1108.png
- File:TexasRM1111.png
- File:TexasRM1165.png
- File:TexasRM1174.png
- File:TexasRM1221.png
- File:TexasRM1222.png
- File:TexasRM1282.png
- File:TexasRM1312.png
- File:TexasRM1319.png
- File:TexasRM1320.png
- File:TexasRM1321.png
- File:TexasRM1323.png
- File:TexasRM1357.png
- File:TexasRM1376.png
- File:TexasRM1431.png
- File:TexasRM1474.png
- File:TexasRM1492.png
- File:TexasRM1526.png
- File:TexasRM1555.png
- File:TexasRM1623.png
- File:TexasRM1631.png
- File:TexasRM1672.png
- File:TexasRM1674.png
- File:TexasRM1675.png
- File:TexasRM1676.png
- File:TexasRM1691.png
- File:TexasRM1723.png
- File:TexasRM1773.png
- File:TexasRM1826.png
- File:TexasRM1832.png
- File:TexasRM1837.png
- File:TexasRM1855.png
- File:TexasRM1865.png
- File:TexasRM1869.png
- File:TexasRM1871.png
- File:TexasRM1888.png
- File:TexasRM1900.png
- File:TexasRM1919.png
- File:TexasRM1964.png
- File:TexasRM1973.png
- File:TexasRM1989.png
- File:TexasRM2023.png
- File:TexasRM2034.png
- File:TexasRM2059.png
- File:TexasRM2083.png
- File:TexasRM2084.png
- File:TexasRM2139.png
- File:TexasRM2147.png
- File:TexasRM2166.png
- File:TexasRM2222.png
- File:TexasRM2233.png
- File:TexasRM2241.png
- File:TexasRM2242.png
- File:TexasRM2243.png
- File:TexasRM2244.png
- File:TexasRM2248.png
- File:TexasRM2277.png
- File:TexasRM2291.png
- File:TexasRM2317.png
- File:TexasRM2322.png
- File:TexasRM2323.png
- File:TexasRM2325.png
- File:TexasRM2329.png
- File:TexasRM2338.png
- File:TexasRM2340.png
- File:TexasRM2341.png
- File:TexasRM2342.png
- File:TexasRM2375.png
- File:TexasRM2381.png
- File:TexasRM2389.png
- File:TexasRM2398.png
- File:TexasRM2400.png
- File:TexasRM2401.png
- File:TexasRM2404.png
- File:TexasRM2424.png
- File:TexasRM2463.png
- File:TexasRM2469.png
- File:TexasRM2545.png
- File:TexasRM2588.png
- File:TexasRM2593.png
- File:TexasRM2594.png
- File:TexasRM2596.png
- File:TexasRM2597.png
- File:TexasRM2600.png
- File:TexasRM2618.png
- File:TexasRM2627.png
- File:TexasRM2630.png
- File:TexasRM2631.png
- File:TexasRM2654.png
- File:TexasRM2690.png
- File:TexasRM2692.png
- File:TexasRM2695.png
- File:TexasRM2699.png
- File:TexasRM2721.png
- File:TexasRM2722.png
- File:TexasRM2748.png
- File:TexasRM2758.png
- File:TexasRM2766.png
- File:TexasRM2768.png
- File:TexasRM2769.png
- File:TexasRM2775.png
- File:TexasRM2804.png
- File:TexasRM2810.png
- File:TexasRM2828.png
- File:TexasRM2831.png
- File:TexasRM2857.png
- File:TexasRM2871.png
- File:TexasRM2886.png
- File:TexasRM2900.png
- File:TexasRM2909.png
- File:TexasRM2970.png
- File:TexasRM2995.png
- File:TexasRM3008.png
- File:TexasRM3014.png
- File:TexasRM3054.png
- File:TexasRM3093.png
- File:TexasRM3130.png
- File:TexasRM3137.png
- File:TexasRM3160.png
- File:TexasRM3166.png
- File:TexasRM3232.png
- File:TexasRM3235.png
- File:TexasRM3237.png
- File:TexasRM3238.png
- File:TexasRM3260.png
- File:TexasRM3296.png
- File:TexasRM3307.png
- File:TexasRM3347.png
- File:TexasRM3348.png
- File:TexasRM3404.png
- File:TexasRM3474.png
Rschen7754 02:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all Imzadi 1979 → 06:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Architectural/engineering mockups are the property of the firm creating them, as these are recent (2011), the licensing of the underlying work is not suitable for Commons. Hog Farm (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Aside from the fact that advertising materials are often outside of project scope, at least parts of this advertisement may be under copyright. Hog Farm (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyright clearly belongs to Arcadia Publishing, not the uploader, therefore the own work claim to publish under CC license is false. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Дима Г as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not sure if own work, the subject has died in 1983. Date is incorrect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Available elsewhere without the w:pointilism demonstrating publication elsehwere prior to Commons upload, which requires COM:VRT evidence of permission. --Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AIpjanov as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from [8] [9]. 2014 upload, no clear evidence that the external links predate Commons. Should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: More complete version here (see top of head) demonstrating publication elsehwere prior to Commons upload, which requires COM:VRT evidence of permission. (Also uploaded as spam per ru:Сорокоумов, Геннадий Львович.). --Эlcobbola talk 20:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Created by a user who is now blocked for trolling. This COM:NCR warning template has only ever been used by its creator, and per the analysis at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Smokey Bear message violation it may not even accurately reflect current US law. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Inaccurate 2600:100C:A21B:9ED1:55B9:69E3:601D:D8ED 08:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ We are working on it to update it just now so please wait some time, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also to my knowledge you must not delete an image here just because it's not correct. It can have historical value or just for discussions.
- Commons is not Wikipedia, not an encyclopedia so we can store inaccurate materials here. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:NPOV, "A file that is in good faith use on another Wikimedia project is, by that very fact, considered useful for an educational purpose and is not liable to deletion on the grounds that it is 'wrong' in some way." As this file is in use on multiple projects, COM:INUSE precludes its deletion for the reason represented. The path to deletion is thus: 1) approach the projects currently using this image and persuade them to discontinue that use and 2) open a DR with a new rationale that the file is not used and that its having been universally removed is evidence of being so flawed as not to be useful for an educational purpose. --Эlcobbola talk 20:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate photo 2600:100C:A21B:9ED1:55B9:69E3:601D:D8ED 08:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: File is in use and request does not identify the purported duplicate. --Эlcobbola talk 20:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
This is my personal photo that was uploaded during a wiki commons tutorial session. I am no longer comfortable having online. Avoka Ayebilla (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: We allow "[t]he uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project" (COM:SCOPE). This exemption for images that would otherwise not be in scope explicitly requires use ("for use")--we are not a host. As the file is not in use, it is not subject to this exemption and is out-of-scope. (Note this is not to be conflated with courtesy deletion.). --Эlcobbola talk 20:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarcoeBattista (talk · contribs)
[edit]These two men were active bicycle racers in the 1930s. While it is possible that the uploader was the actual photographer, as claimed, it is unlikely and requires further explanation.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" author=anonymous, I made the corrections. --RAN (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: That the uploader did not provide an author does not make these photos anonymous. Anonymous, futher, is a specific condition and is not to be conflated with unknown. Unknown, the only state we can infer, requires 120 years to have passed per {{PD-old-assumed}}; any other claims will require evidence. --Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The copihue shape is complex enough to be copyrighted. Also it's not the own work of uploader Bedivere (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have updated the Licensing section to be more in line with other logos of similar complexity and context of use. I consulted with the pact if I could sub go their logo to Wikipedia and they showed no problems.
- Considering how other logos of Chilean political organizations are cataloged on Wikipedia, and adding that both the copihue and the star are patriotic symbols freely used in Chile, this logo should not be subject to copyright.
- I attach examples of Chilean political logos with similar complexity that are not subject to copyright:
- - The Chile Vamos logo and its characteristic star (also used in derivatives such as Vamos por Chile).
- - The star of Renovación Nacional
- - The star and disc of Partido de la Gente
- - The shield with the phalanx of the Christian Democrats
- - The logo of the Humanist party
- - The bullet, with a check and reflection of Lista del Apruebo
- - Finally, the logo of the Acción Popular Independiente, a copihue without copyright.
- With all this information on the table, I ask you to reconcider your deletion request. Fhguiñez (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- The copihue is still a complex shape and may be eligible for copyright. Please remember that the much simpler "Estamos bien en el refugio los 33" paper is copyrighted in Chile. Bedivere (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I ask you to please explain in more detail or attach references. It is not enough to repeat the same statement over and over again.
- The fact that the paper of the miners is copyrighted does not mean that any paper with a similar composition has it, the context in which it was produced is equally or more important. I have listed a long list of logos of the same context as Unidad para Chile (chilean political organizations) and similar complexity that are not copyrighted.
- That gives us a fairly clear jurisprudential framework, which indicates that the logo in question should not be copyrighted either.
- If you do not have any additional information that is relevant to the point of discussion, then it seems prudent to consider this matter clarified. Fhguiñez (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Claro que lo que dije es pertinente al tema discutido; que a tí no te guste el argumento, está bien; que otros logotipos que probablemente igual estarían protegidos no hayan sido borrados, también está bien; lo que se está discutiendo aquí es este logotipo, el de Unidad para Chile. En Chile el umbral de originalidad es bastante bajo, si se considera que el texto de los mineros, que básicamente son unas palabras escritas con plumón y sin la más absoluta intención de originalidad artística, creativa, etc., recibió protección bajo la ley de propiedad intelectual al ser registrada en la institución correspondiente (DPI). Eso permite sugerir que otras creaciones un tantito más creativas que aquella, como el logotipo en discusión, sí pueden estar protegidas por la ley de propiedad intelectual. El diseño del copihue es suficientemente complejo como para ser protegido; las letras, no creo. Podría mantenerse el logotipo si se prescinde del copihue. Bedivere (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- The copihue is still a complex shape and may be eligible for copyright. Please remember that the much simpler "Estamos bien en el refugio los 33" paper is copyrighted in Chile. Bedivere (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
I think it is complex enough to be copyrighted. Wrong license, also. Ñ Bedivere (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- It appears this user is making quite selective delete requests. Despite being shown examples of similar logos that are safely uploaded to the wiki, he continues to persist with his claim of complexity, without giving the corresponding argument. I hope that these requests do not have an ideological bias on the part of Bendivere, so that the spirit of Wikipedia is respected.
- Just like i did with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unidad para Chile.png
- Just like i did with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unidad para Chile.png, I attach examples of Chilean political logos with similar complexity that are not subject to copyright:
- - The Chile Vamos logo and its characteristic star (also used in derivatives such as Vamos por Chile).
- - The star of Renovación Nacional
- - The star and disc of Partido de la Gente
- - The shield with the phalanx of the Christian Democrats
- - The logo of the Humanist party
- - The bullet, with a check and reflection of Lista del Apruebo
- - Finally, the logo of the Acción Popular Independiente, a copihue without copyright.
- I hope that an administrator takes this into consideration and proceeds as the jurisprudence indicates. Fhguiñez (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Fhguiñez Please stop making personal attacks. I will report you.
- Reiterating my comment on another DR: Claro que lo que dije es pertinente al tema discutido; que a tí no te guste el argumento, está bien; que otros logotipos que probablemente igual estarían protegidos no hayan sido borrados, también está bien; lo que se está discutiendo aquí es este logotipo, el de Unidad para Chile. En Chile el umbral de originalidad es bastante bajo, si se considera que el texto de los mineros, que básicamente son unas palabras escritas con plumón y sin la más absoluta intención de originalidad artística, creativa, etc., recibió protección bajo la ley de propiedad intelectual al ser registrada en la institución correspondiente (DPI). Eso permite sugerir que otras creaciones un tantito más creativas que aquella, como el logotipo en discusión, sí pueden estar protegidas por la ley de propiedad intelectual. Bedivere (talk) 01:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Laut Metadaten ist Christine Kuncke die Fotografin, aber es ist nicht ersichtlich, dass ihre Genehmigung vorliegt Barbasca (talk) 01:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: text-only file. MKFI (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment See also the discussion at Village Pump. Monster Iestyn (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This appears to be an unsourced article about a village. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, I am not sure what is in the text but this is unusued and does appear to be out of scope. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deshi Heero (talk · contribs)
[edit]All low resolution, none have camera details, suggesting that they are scraped. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Uploader is globally locked
- File:Zensar Park.png
- File:Vedanta HQ.png
- File:Sun Pharma HQ.png
- File:BYD HQ Shenzhen.png
- File:BYD Shenzhen.png
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deshi Heero (talk · contribs)
[edit]All low resolution, none have camera details, suggesting that they are scraped. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Uploader is globally locked
- File:Asian Paints HQ.png
- File:Aakash Greens Jamshedpur.png
- File:ALL Ennore Chennai plant.png
- File:TVS HQ.png
- File:JSW HQ.png
- File:JSPL HQ.png
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deshi Heero (talk · contribs)
[edit]All low resolution, none have camera details, suggesting that they are scraped. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Uploader is globally locked
- File:L&T HQ.png
- File:ITC Center Kolkata.png
- File:Mahindra plant Pune.png
- File:BOMBAY HOUSE NIGHT.png
- File:Reliance former HQ.png
- File:Mahindra plant.png
- File:Akash Greens3.png
- File:Royal Enfield plant.png
- File:Akash Greens4.png
- File:Bajaj HQ.png
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deshi Heero (talk · contribs)
[edit]All low resolution, none have camera details, suggesting that they are scraped. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Uploader is globally locked
- File:Apollo Tyres factory.png
- File:Bajaj Auto plant.png
- File:ALL tech center.png
- File:ALL Chennai Plant.png
- File:Akash Greens2.png
- File:Akash Greens1.png
- File:BYD HQ.png
- File:Chakan industrial area Pune.png
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
These are not simple logos (even for Italy)
- File:Acustico Baglioni.jpg
- File:Baglioni Assieme 1992.jpg
- File:E tu come stai Baglioni.jpg
- File:Oltre Baglioni.jpg
- File:WorldTour Baglioni.jpg
- File:ConVoi Baglioni.jpg
- File:ClaudioBaglioniConcerto1991.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Multiple martial arts belt icons
[edit]Very bad quality versions that were superseded multiple times. SVG versions are available. Files are not in actual use any more:
- File:(1. Kyu).png
- File:(1. Kyu).gif
- File:(1. Kyu.).png
- File:(1. – 5. Dan).png
- File:(1. – 5. Dan).gif
- File:(1. – 5. Dan.).png
- File:(2. Kyu).png
- File:(2. Kyu).gif
- File:(2. Kyu.).png
- File:(3. Kyu).png
- File:(3. Kyu).gif
- File:(3. Kyu.).png
- File:(4. Kyu).png
- File:(4. Kyu).gif
- File:(4. Kyu.).png
- File:(5. Kyu).png
- File:(5. Kyu).gif
- File:(5. Kyu.).png
- File:(6. – 8. Dan).png
- File:(6. – 8. Dan).gif
- File:(6. – 8. Dan.).png
- File:(9. + 10. Dan).png
- File:(9. + 10. Dan).gif
- File:(9. + 10. Dan.).png
NainDeathlegs (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author Hoyanova (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
no permission given by author (all rights reserved is stated in corrupted metadata onl) Hoyanova (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Murals like this are not covered by FoP in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - cropped and renamed- the non-English may be of relevance hence cropping. –Davey2010Talk 17:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- We do have other examples of the Brick Lane signs in English and Bengali in Category:Brick Lane but I suppose more wouldn't hurt. Abzeronow (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ah so we do, The only image we have of this sign on a white wall is here but not sure if it's the same wall so I'd still say keep on the basis there doesn't appear to be other images of this sign on that wall,
- Ah so we do, The only image we have of this sign on a white wall is here but not sure if it's the same wall so I'd still say keep on the basis there doesn't appear to be other images of this sign on that wall,
- We do have other examples of the Brick Lane signs in English and Bengali in Category:Brick Lane but I suppose more wouldn't hurt. Abzeronow (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've only had 5 and a half hours sleep and been up since 8am so I cannot be bothered to go "Brick Lane" sign hunting today sorry, –Davey2010Talk 18:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted initial version. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
دلایل شخصی Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Some random information board, out of scope. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Promotional B25es (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Product packaging it needs to be evaluated whether this game-cover isn't still in copyright. The Flickr-photographer, who CC-licensed these images, is unlikely the copyright-holder of the package-artwort.-- Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Toys 2009-046-238 (9624388012).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-216 (9621154939).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-197 (9621159407).jpg
- File:Toys 2007-150-662 (15592598345).jpg
- File:Jaren 60 2009-100-227 (15641697932).jpg
- File:Jaren 60 2007-119-178 (15641698212).jpg
- File:Jaren 50 2007-117-024 (15021229643).jpg
- File:Jaren 50 1982-175-006 (15641396065).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-110 (9624419180).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-156 (9621173475).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-157 (9621173221).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-171 (9624402244).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-153 (9624410000).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-162 (9624404370).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-163 (9624404010).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-164 (9621167553).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-165 (9624403260).jpg
- File:Toys 2009-046-219 (9621153773).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-276 (9621253575).jpg
- File:Toys 2009-046-258 (9621256537).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2008-119-028 (9621212329).jpg
- File:Toys 2008-119-011 (9621212971).jpg
- File:Toys 2008-119-014 (9621212671).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-002 (9624445532).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-021 (9624441428).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-070 (9621195019).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-071 (9624430062).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-073 (9624428906).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-074 (9621192791).jpg
- File:Toys 2009-046-075 (9624427714).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-046-173 (9624401512).jpg
- File:Jaren 80 – 2009-086-099 (9624481156).jpg
- File:Jaren 70 – 2007-150-026 (25886447352).jpg
Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Maps from a festival and usage of the Fête de la musique logo CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused low-quality text logo with no educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and rename. Seems to be a notable company (en:Dun & Bradstreet). Based in the US, so this is certainly below the threshold of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused image of, according to uploader, "Yuuiughgh", with fraudulent license and creation calim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
ceci est une insulte au pays libre qui est l'Algérie, cette image porte atteinte au symboles nationaux 105.100.45.8 18:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- L'image concerne le temps quand l'Algérie était sous le gouvernement de la France. Pas de raison pour supprimer l'image. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
This flag does not exist, Algeria has it's official map and it's official Flag Riad Salih (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Question Did you read the previous deletion request for this image? Apparently, this was a flag that existed during colonial times. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- This flag has never existed it's a map of algeria with a french map color there is no source for this flag at all Riad Salih (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: You misinterpret the previous DR. Nobody said this had anything to do with an actual flag that existed. Only that this file of imaginary personal artwork of the uploader is supposed to somehow evoke French Algeria. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then I don't understand why it was kept last time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: You misinterpret the previous DR. Nobody said this had anything to do with an actual flag that existed. Only that this file of imaginary personal artwork of the uploader is supposed to somehow evoke French Algeria. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
This flag has never existed it's a map of algeria with a french map color there is no source for this flag at all Riad Salih (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Riad Salih (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per the previous DR. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why, SHB2000? If this has never been any kind of flag or symbol or whatever, why should it be kept? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps for a similar reason why NC is still represented by the French flag today (though it's more common to see both the French flag represented alongside its regional flag). SHB2000 (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- But this isn't a French flag; it's just a map of Algeria with French colors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Algeria was an integral part of France during colonial times, unlike all of France's other colonies in West and Central Africa, so it made sense for an outline of Algeria to be represented by the French flag (because it was the case during colonial times). SHB2000 (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Algeria as it's known today with it actual map and borders, wasn't the same during the french colonial period, so that flag does not make sense at all. Riad Salih (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Algeria was an integral part of France during colonial times, unlike all of France's other colonies in West and Central Africa, so it made sense for an outline of Algeria to be represented by the French flag (because it was the case during colonial times). SHB2000 (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- But this isn't a French flag; it's just a map of Algeria with French colors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why, SHB2000? If this has never been any kind of flag or symbol or whatever, why should it be kept? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, make-believe flag which trys to assert that one country is property of another. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Non public domain architecture, also no freedom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Just a simple pattern of beams and glass without any substantive architectural details seen. Was previously kept at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Views from the Louvre Pyramid. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope. Invented flag of a non-existant entity not mentioned anywhere B25es (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS vanity fantasy. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyright violation (source is mentioned as Diario El País but no link provided) Scann (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 07:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyright violation (source is mentioned as Diario El País but no link provided) Scann (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 07:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted material 2A01:C22:6EE0:4C00:B5BB:77BF:F640:D524 16:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex TV show logo, rather obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 16:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded by a user who was verified on German WP as a fanclub of the band. Without permission, a fanclub surely does not have the right to upload this file under this license. Squasher (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded by a user who was verified on German WP as a fanclub of the band. Without permission, a fanclub surely does not have the right to upload this file under this license. Squasher (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
no permission, "own work" from some user not enough for a press photo of a band Squasher (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Datei wird nicht länger benötigt und kann gelöscht werden. wurde nur zu Testzwecken verwendet. Reichi89 (talk) 15:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused crop nominated by uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 16:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- je ne pense pas qu'elle devrait être supprimée. c'est une oeuvre artistique musicale d'un article Paolaowono (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Je vous invite à contacter l'Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles en ce qui concerne les pochettes d'album [10].--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Person in this picture has asked via VRTS (Ticket #2023020710007308, last e-mail) to delete this photo from Wikimedia Commons). She has provided more suitable photo to Commons. Htm (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrights violation. Rapsar (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Picture rights and uploader account belongs to Çağrı Mert Bakırcı. --Mavrikant (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep OTRS has been notified via e-mail for copyright permissions. The proper permissions will be given soon. So as of now, please wait for the notice for further action.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JanusMutatio (talk • contribs)
Neutral According to this, pending OTRS ticket. Waiting is the best. Chansey (talk) 12:33, 29 August 2017 (UTC)- Question Is he a notable person? Otherwise it's out of scope. --Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- There's an article on him at trwiki [11] so the picture is potentially in scope. This can kept if OTRS pending is resolved. WJBscribe (talk) 11:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be restored if OTRS comes through. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
im suspucious about license. actually, im sad. we need image of çağrı mert bakırcı, but we cannot afford it... so, i found that image. unfortunantly it has bad license. needs to be deleted. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Same photo (source) as above, but different cutout -> missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio? Wise Mystical Tree avatar doesn't seem to be a free image. Facenapalm (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Low res. Out of scope. Nv8200p (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please ignore this deletion request. Image is being used on Wikipedia. Sorry. Nv8200p (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Person in this picture has asked via VRTS (Ticket #2023020710007308, last e-mail) to delete this photo from Wikimedia Commons. She has provided more suitable photo to Commons. Htm (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal image. --Wdwd (talk) 13:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore 根拠原則 (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Found there as video thumbnail https://military-wiki.com/what-opportunity-for-turkish-altay-mbt/ Shadow4dark (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- This photo taken at 19.01.2021 but this page used this photo at 04.06.2021 so this photo not copyied this site. I requested and taken this photo from original source. Please delete this deletion request. @Shadow4dark Umut NAZLI (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The file has no source or author listed. Without them it cannot be kept on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- You say that there is no source of the photo, but I have shown the source of the photo. what else do i need to do @Jameslwoodward Umut NAZLI (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- One of the earlier versions of the file, not the current version, shows the source as https://www.savunmasanayist.com/fnss-samur-altayi-sirtladi/. That page is clearly marked with "SavunmaSanayiST.com 2022 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- thumb
- I got permission to use the photo from the source @Jameslwoodward Umut NAZLI (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- One of the earlier versions of the file, not the current version, shows the source as https://www.savunmasanayist.com/fnss-samur-altayi-sirtladi/. That page is clearly marked with "SavunmaSanayiST.com 2022 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Such permission must be sent directly from the copyright holder to VRT. We do not accept licenses forwarded by the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: ticket:2022121810004694 is related to this image. Unfortunately no reply came forward after the last response by a VRT team member from 30 December 2022. This photo can be restored as soon Umut NAZLI proceeds as advised in that ticket. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata present, clearly older image that has been copied from some where Hoyanova (talk) 09:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
File:50 Новых Лучших Клипов Ноябрь 2022 Самые Горячие Видео Главные Хиты Страны Сборник 12 (2).ogg
[edit]Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the same as on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDmolt6m2jU CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Je vous invite à contacter l'Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles en ce qui concerne les pochettes d'album [12]. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
It is my personal photo that was uploaded during the time of practice and I am no longer comfortable having it online. Avoka Ayebilla (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Avoka Ayebilla: if you are uncomfortable with this image, why does it remain on your en.wiki user page? Эlcobbola talk 20:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Elcobbola. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Info.apsharma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/incategory:"Exterior of the Reichstag dome"
[edit]The photos of the dome do not appear to be taken from the street level down, but from forbidden areas according to German judicial literature (like within government buildings like the rooftop, from neighboring buildings, or from aerial photography). As these methods are no longer covered by German freedom of panorama, a commercial license clearance from Sir Norman Foster is required.
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the Reichstag dome.
File:Berlin (9608176173) (2).jpg– from a suspected neighboring or nearby building, not de minimis- File:Cupola Reichstag.jpg – from rooftop
- File:Le dôme du Reichstag (Berlin) (9614609883).jpg – aerial
- File:Reichstagskuppel im Reichstagsgebäude. Berlin 2H1A0662WI.jpg – from rooftop
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Erstes Bild: Angesichts der Höhe der Gaslaterne und des Reichstags kann das eigentlich nur aus dem Tierpark auf Straßenhöhe aufgenommen worden sein. C.Suthorn (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Literal Google Translate translation: First picture: In view of the height of the gas lantern and the Reichstag, this can actually only have been taken from the zoo at street level.
- @C.Suthorn: the only question, is that zoo where the photographer took Foster's dome dedicated to public access, with no controlled access requirements like registration, ticket requirement, or anything that controls public access; that is, is that zoo open to the public unregulated? If regulated, then it still fails the German jurisprudence definition of "dedicated to public access". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Google Translate was a bit sloppy. Tierpark is a public park near the actual zoo. With Mapillary you can look at the area. C.Suthorn (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @C.Suthorn: according to LaFrance (2020), German jurisprudence held that parks do not constitute places dedicated for public access. Refer to page 626 of the research work. Accordingly, "public parks in Germany are owned by foundations, leading German courts to conclude that they are not public spaces for purposes of the panorama right. See Domenico Piero Muscillo, Freedom of Panorama (FOP) in France and Germany, DANDI (May 1, 2017), https://www.dandi.media/en/2017/05/freedom-panorama-france-germany/." _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Link yields a 404. Anyway, the thesis that "parks .. not places dedicated for public access" in general is hardly correct and contradicts everyday experience. It may be true in rare instances and, of course, there are completely open parks and parks with a demarcation and entrance doors, though still with free entry and without control. So, any conclusions would have to be taken based on evaluation of the case at hand. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Careful, the Berlin Tiergarten is a public park without any access limitations. All pictures taken in this park fall under freedom of panorama. --Gnom (talk) 08:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Wayback Machine copy is here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Link yields a 404. Anyway, the thesis that "parks .. not places dedicated for public access" in general is hardly correct and contradicts everyday experience. It may be true in rare instances and, of course, there are completely open parks and parks with a demarcation and entrance doors, though still with free entry and without control. So, any conclusions would have to be taken based on evaluation of the case at hand. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @C.Suthorn: according to LaFrance (2020), German jurisprudence held that parks do not constitute places dedicated for public access. Refer to page 626 of the research work. Accordingly, "public parks in Germany are owned by foundations, leading German courts to conclude that they are not public spaces for purposes of the panorama right. See Domenico Piero Muscillo, Freedom of Panorama (FOP) in France and Germany, DANDI (May 1, 2017), https://www.dandi.media/en/2017/05/freedom-panorama-france-germany/." _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- The first image was clearly not taken from the Tiergarten, as it shows the Reichstag's north-west corner and what looks like the roof of the Paul Löbe Haus. I think it was taken from street level, possibly the Willy-Brandt-Straße. The 210mm lens at maximum zoom makes for a misleading perspective. No contest for the other images, you can't get that perspective from a public place. --rimshottalk 00:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Google Translate was a bit sloppy. Tierpark is a public park near the actual zoo. With Mapillary you can look at the area. C.Suthorn (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Weil ich gestern dort vorbeigekommen bin, habe ich zwei Bilder gemacht:
C.Suthorn (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- I do not think that a permission by the architect is required. The Bundestag should also have all distribution rights and could also grant the permission. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Olaf Kosinsky hat doch gute Kontakte zum Bundestag. Der kann bestimmt eine VRT-Permission organisieren. C.Suthorn (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo: will that permission extend to all deleted photos of the dome too, so to undelete them all? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- It depends on what we request and what they give us. It is still possible that they have to say that they did not include such a clause in the contract and they can not give the permission. GPSLeo (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_2074.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3028.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3033.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3036.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3037.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3038.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3041.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3046.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3049.jpg){kind=link}
_로고.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_oil_on_archival_panel..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![74 File:"хаганезука".jpg](#File:"хаганезука".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_7.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_DSC_2074.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_2074.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3028.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3028.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3033.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3033.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3036.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3036.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3037.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3037.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3038.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3038.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3041.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3041.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3046.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3046.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3049.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_DSC_3049.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_%EB%A1%9C%EA%B3%A0.svg){kind=link}
_%EB%A1%9C%EA%B3%A0.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_로고.svg){kind=link}
_로고.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_oil_on_archival_panel..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_oil_on_archival_panel..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_oil_on_archival_panel..jpg){kind=link}
,_oil_on_archival_panel..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![15:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/02/09#c-EugeneZelenko-20230209155500-File:"хаганезука".jpg){kind=link}
![01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/02/09#c-IronGargoyle-20230216012100-File:"хаганезука".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[9]](https://src.kleos.ru/file/specialist/2015/0/0/1724-248x262_00461614.jpeg){kind=link}
,_Chile.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(9614609883).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Low res. Out of scope. Nv8200p (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Why out of scope? This is an excellent illustration of how people lived in 1976 in the USA, including the myth of the intact family, and also a nice example for the popular photographic technique of that time, including the yellowish colours and low sharpness. Therefore the low resolution is not a problem in this case – private photographs of that time were taken mostly with poor cameras, a higher resolution would not reveal additional details. I mean that seriously; social history could use this as a perfect illustration of the daily live of normal people. --Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - very poor quality. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ermes Trismegisto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by living Italian artists. no permission and then there is no FoP in Italy for artworks.
- File:Nidi di Rondine.jpg
- File:Obelisco Verso lo spazio. Tor Bella Monaca - Roma.jpg
- File:GHIACCIO DI FONDO 2000 vetro industriale.jpg
- File:SPECCHI.jpg
- File:ARTURO pietra e fibbra ottica.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_7.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality nocturnal photo of a church; the building is barely distinguishable and we have far better photos of it (including this one which is basically the same but slightly better, and at least it has the belltower illuminated) Syrio posso aiutare? 11:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
_-_16.jpg){kind=link}
_-_7.jpg){kind=link}
- Non cancellare per favore. Questa foto rappresenta il paesaggio reale, che si presenta all'osservatore in quelle condizioni di oscurità, per ora notturna e tempo nuvoloso.
- L'immagine va presa in considerazione per l'atmosfera ripresa che può sembrare irreale, ma in effetti utile a suggerire all'osservatore alcune riflessioni alternative a quelle "en plein air" con luce diurna. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luciobocchi (talk • contribs) 14:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_7.jpg){kind=link}
A 2008 photo, only upload of Fuya1 (talk · contribs). The claimed source is "Zheng Ying", and as per mobile keyboard dictionary the only Chinese word showing "Zheng Ying" is "正赢" ("winning"), which is not a normal attribution tag. Zheng Ying is most likely the name of a person, and if ever, it is very impossible Zheng Ying and Fuya1 are the same person. COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies, even to this more-than-a-decade-old image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Hieroglyphic texts from Egyptian stelae, etc (Vol 1) (1911) (Egypt (IA hieroglyphictext01brit).pdf
[edit]1961 work of UK origins, lifetime of author/editor revising not identified. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The primary contributor/editor is named as T. G. H. James, who was probably Thomas Garnet Henry James (Q2424156). He died in 2009. From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non public domain architecture, also no freedom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Just a simple pattern of beams and glass without any substantive architectural details seen. Was previously kept at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Views from the Louvre Pyramid. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non public domain architecture, also no freedom of panorama in France Miniwark (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Revert to the old version. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Thanks @A1Cafel, the revert is something completely else Miniwark (talk) 12:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP in the UK doesn't cover 2D graphical works like the Magazine covers on the left. Photo will have to be cropped to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - cropped - the grey box are rare things in the UK, Maybe I'm wrong but I didn't think the posters (except the logo) could be copyrighted as they're just text - there's no creativity to them. –Davey2010Talk 17:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clarissa Street E8 (4285924390).jpg, the photographs on the wall are not covered by FOP in the UK. Would need VRT permission to keep the photographs. Photograph would still be useful as a historic document with photos cropped out. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Neutral / 50/50 - The sign can be barely read - it exists but well and truly it may as well not!, Not sure on this one tbh. –Davey2010Talk 17:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Bouncybobs (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Vice Marquee Singapore by Fevarent-25.jpg
- File:Jonas Blue DWP by Fevarent-87.jpg
- File:Jonas Blue DWP by Fevarent-35.jpg
- File:Firebeatz Marquee Singapore by Fevarent-2.jpg
- File:Firebeatz Marquee Singapore by Fevarent.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FOP in the UK doesn't cover 2D graphical works like those on the car. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Vehicles with graphics on the usually fall under fop unless they dominate the photograph a simplified outline of various London landmarks are too simple to fall under copyright the various logos are such a small aspect of the photograph that is should be considered covered by fop. Additionally it is beginning to appear that the nominator has some obsession with my uploads, he seems to be showing disproportionate attention to my uploads looking for any excuse to file a DR, to an extent that it is becoming hard to assume good faith Oxyman (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as DEMINIMIS, The image although shows the taxi - it's not a close-up of it - it's a general street scene so imho keep.
- Oxyman I'll be honest I too keep coming from your talkpage however my aim here to try and keep your images as much as I can (because If I didn't !vote and do the blanking etc they would get deleted so I'm sorry for my part for the "stalking" but I'm doing it for good intentions), –Davey2010Talk 19:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- The car takes a big enough portion in the photograph that it might not be de minimis. And I even checked with an admin about something before I started a DR. I've been merely doing maintenance work on these uploads like adding categories. If someone else wants to do maintenance work on Category:Street signs in London, that would be OK with me. Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- True but imho not enough to rule out DEMINIMIS, I can sympathise with both of you as it's frustrating seeing your files at DR everyday and getting notifications everyday .... but on the other hand as much as I dislike the whole mural copyright thing it exists for a reason and we have to accept it and abide by it and IMHO you're doing a job no one else can be bothered to do (i certainly can't be bothered going through them!), –Davey2010Talk 19:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, you could be right about it being de mimimis (it's a grey area and I'll get better at discerning the boundaries of what is and what isn't with experience) I do like these photographs, and I have learned new things like royal ciphers on postal boxes which is fascinating. I definitely don't want the uploader to feel like I'm singling them out, when that is not my intention. Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- True but imho not enough to rule out DEMINIMIS, I can sympathise with both of you as it's frustrating seeing your files at DR everyday and getting notifications everyday .... but on the other hand as much as I dislike the whole mural copyright thing it exists for a reason and we have to accept it and abide by it and IMHO you're doing a job no one else can be bothered to do (i certainly can't be bothered going through them!), –Davey2010Talk 19:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- The car takes a big enough portion in the photograph that it might not be de minimis. And I even checked with an admin about something before I started a DR. I've been merely doing maintenance work on these uploads like adding categories. If someone else wants to do maintenance work on Category:Street signs in London, that would be OK with me. Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Manishariaty (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works by Amir Mohammad Ghasemizadeh are protected in Iran. Not a single proof of release under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.
- File:Portrait of Omar Khayyam.jpg
- File:Amir Kabir Portrait.jpg
- File:Sculpture of Ferdowsi by Amirmohammad Ghasemizade.jpg
- File:Sohrab-Sepehri-Portraite.jpg
- File:Friedrich Nietzsche Portraite.jpg
- File:Yad-morakabha.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
It seems that the temple in the background was built in 1917. There is no commercial freedom of panorama for statues in the Republic of China, and there is no evidence that the sculptor has been dead for at least 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 22:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The sculpture appears newer than the temple so the artist could have been alive 50 years ago in Taiwan. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep:The temple is a Japanese-style one and thus quite different from many other temples in Taiwan. According to the article, the temple was build in 1917 and the 88 sculptures are all moved from Japan. The temple is the only historical heritage site in the Hualien County assigned by Taiwan's Ministry of Culture. This fact suggests that the sculptures are not that new and thus worth of value. (The article did mentione the local government had tried to clean the temple. But there is no war there for more than 100 years so the opportunity it is broken is quite low.) I thus believe they were made around 1917 or even earlier by native Japanese in Japan.--Wildcursive (talk) 11:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Whether the 50 year pms Taiwan rule of the 70 year pma Japanese rule applies, 1917 is too young to assume that the artist (or artists) has been dead for the required period. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [13]. Yann (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
![[13]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=595835201#File:%E5%A4%A7%E9%BB%91%E6%9D%BE%E5%B0%8F%E5%80%86%E5%8F%A3%E5%85%83%E9%A6%96%E9%A4%A8_Salico_Foods_King_Garden_-_panoramio_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Per discussions at Commons_talk:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan#Freedom of panorama for 2D Works, {{FoP-Taiwan}} isn't suitable for sculptures, the acutal permission from sculpture author should be provided Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP for sculpture in Taiwan. The statue is of Japanese origin. Assuming an approximate date of 1917 for creation of the sculpture, it can be undeleted in 2038 as PD-old-assumed. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
I am the original uploader of this file. I uploaded it when I was new to Wikimedia Commons. I believe this file should be deleted as I do not know enough background information on its year of execution or author to judge if it is under copyright or not. Please delete this file to prevent any possible copyright infringement. ThethPunjabi (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: According to http://www.sikh-heritage.co.uk/Martyrs/ghalugharas/ghalugharas.htm, the artist is Kirpal Singh who died in 1990 according to https://jarnailarts.wordpress.com/kirpal-singh/. Undelete in 2051. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
I am the original uploader of this file. I uploaded it when I was new to Wikimedia Commons. I believe this file should be deleted as I do not know enough background information on its year of execution or author to judge if it is under copyright or not. Please delete this file to prevent any possible copyright infringement. ThethPunjabi (talk) 08:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Painting attributed to Kirpal Singh (1923-1990) at http://www.ramgarhiakom.com/legend.html Undelete in 2051. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Lidewij (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Map of Sarapoera/Saparua from H.Ph.Th. Witkamp. Category:H.Ph.Th. Witkamp. https://www.wiewaswie.nl/nl/detail/46016406 Herman Philip Theodoor Witkamp overleden 90 jaar geleden 11-01-1933
Kept: Map is public domain in the Netherlands and the United States. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work. As the certificates contain sensitive data, it is unlikely to be covered by {{GODL-India}}. Nthep (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @M.alhusayni where & why did you claim it as your own work? Nthep (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The user's nickname and singer's name is the same. The user creating an article in uk-wiki only for PR. And we don't lnow who is the real author of the photo. It looks copyright violating and vioanition of user's naming. Kharkivian (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No EXIF, and this looks like a professional photograph, would need VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Fake data, does not march with the current composition of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, misleading diagram Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, and CC0 is not visible at the source URL. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Ligue 1 (Algeria).png previously deleted this league's logo per the precautionary principle, so I'm bringing this here for deletion along the same lines. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The logo has been redesign by myself and there is no exact source of the work, here is the old version HERE the logo is classed in the public domain in Algeria Riad Salih (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Riad Salih: That would work. In that case, would you please send an email to the Volunteer Response Team so that they can verify you are the copyright holder? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- how to prove it via email? it's a redesign I did myself can you find a simular version online? Riad Salih (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- So, Tineye shows that the internal pattern (the three people and the star) has appeared elsewhere before upload of this file to Wikipedia. Granted, that older version is not the same as the current file, but it may render the current file a COM:DW of that older work, for which itself we lack evidence of permission. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- the link you shared of Tinyeye does not work this work is a redesign of an old Logo already in wikipedia common
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Algerian_Ligue_Professionnelle_1&diff=prev&oldid=1094318448&diffmode=visual#/media/File:Algerian_Ligue_Pro._1.png Riad Salih (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- en:File:Algerian_Ligue_Pro._1.png is claimed under "fair use", which is to say that the file is not in the public domain nor available under a free license. Such files cannot be included on Commons, and (if you look closely at the url) the file that you link to is not actually on Commons. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- so how to fix that brother, can you guide me?
- and the logo is my own design you can't find it anywhere you can try with tinyeye or google photos, you won't find a simular file. Riad Salih (talk) 03:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you are the copyright holder of that first design, please sent an email to the Volunteer Response Team, so that they can verify this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- what to include in the email?
- I send the source file psd file (adobe photoshop extension)? Riad Salih (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you are the copyright holder of that first design, please sent an email to the Volunteer Response Team, so that they can verify this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- en:File:Algerian_Ligue_Pro._1.png is claimed under "fair use", which is to say that the file is not in the public domain nor available under a free license. Such files cannot be included on Commons, and (if you look closely at the url) the file that you link to is not actually on Commons. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- So, Tineye shows that the internal pattern (the three people and the star) has appeared elsewhere before upload of this file to Wikipedia. Granted, that older version is not the same as the current file, but it may render the current file a COM:DW of that older work, for which itself we lack evidence of permission. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- how to prove it via email? it's a redesign I did myself can you find a simular version online? Riad Salih (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Riad Salih: That would work. In that case, would you please send an email to the Volunteer Response Team so that they can verify you are the copyright holder? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio. 186.174.217.124 23:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Duck for a netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Σειρά ενός και πεντήκοντα υπομνηματιστών εις την οκτάτευχον και τα των βασιλείων, επιμέλεια Νικηφόρου Θεοτόκου. Τ.α' (1772).pdf
[edit]Файл заменяется новой версией Uljana1989 (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Presumably the replacement is this? File:Σειρά ενός και πεντήκοντα υπομνηματιστών εις την οκτάτευχον και τα των βασιλείων, επιμέλεια Νικηφόρου Θεοτόκου. Τ.α'.pdf Andy Dingley (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
not free Yona B. (t) 07:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Archivo robado 181.203.234.50 12:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Missing evidence that the uploader is the author and the copyright owner of this logo of a publishing house. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Ha sido actualizado por otro similar pero más exacto Csmm (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
اثر تمرینی و موقتی بوده است. Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
اثر تمرینی و موقتی بوده است. Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
اثر تمرینی و موقتی بوده است. Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
اثر تمرینی و موقتی بوده است. Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
اثر تمرینی و موقتی بوده است. Αφροδίτηη (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Σειρά ενός και πεντήκοντα υπομνηματιστών εις την οκτάτευχον και τα των βασιλείων, επιμέλεια Νικηφόρου Θεοτόκου. Τ. β' (1773).pdf
[edit]Файл заменяется новой версией Uljana1989 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, @Uljana1989: , please provide a link to the new version and explain why this version should be deleted. Then you can nominate the image again so it can be re-evaluated. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 20:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Файл загружен ошибочно Uljana1989 (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, @Uljana1989: , please provide a link to the new version and explain why this version should be deleted. Then you can nominate the image again so it can be re-evaluated. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 20:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Файл загружен ошибочно Uljana1989 (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, @Uljana1989: , please provide a link to the new version and explain why this version should be deleted. Then you can nominate the image again so it can be re-evaluated. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 20:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
It's a football club log - cannot see how {{PD-UA}} can possibly apply Ronhjones (Talk) 17:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep PD-UA: d) symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations?--Чорний Кіт (talk) 03:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep Perhaps PD-UA is not really appropriate here, since that part of nowadays Ukraine used to be a part of Poland at the time. But the club ceased to exist before 1939, more than 70 years have passed since that time, but I'm not sure if that's enough for PD-old.--Piramidion (talk) 22:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per {{PD-UA-exempt}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Piotr Bart as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Licence doesn't apply to the sports logo. Heavily used 2005 upload, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment this club was disbanded in 1945 so PD-old may apply on the definition. The representation is another matter - the drawing looks to be fairly modern so the blazon artist would retain the copyright. Further details on this distinction: Commons:Coats of arms. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per previous DR, "symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations" are in PD per PD-UA-exempt. A football club is such an organization imho. --Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)