Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 2nd, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

chybný obrázek Miloš Křivan (talk) 00:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uplader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't want to upload this file, wrong file JamesFTS (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User accidentally uploaded a PNG version of the file. The newer version can be found [1] here Seloloving (talk) 10:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader here: yup, exactly as Seloloving said. The .png version can be deleted. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar image already Uploaded. Yadhu Krishna BP (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please check threshold of originality for this logo. On a side note: The article in the German WP this was intended for is currently nominated for speedy deletion. 91.34.45.141 13:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko ("Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo"). (non-admin closure) Marbletan (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to reload the file after reprocessing file Basavaraj M (talk) 13:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

........................ Komunistický mezinárodní zkurvysyn (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

................................... Komunistický mezinárodní zkurvysyn (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.......................... Komunistický mezinárodní zkurvysyn (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kindly Delete Gif. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarshThk9644 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALLAN NDEKWE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader is one of the image subjects. Therefore (nearly) impossible that these files are own work. Images are also low-quality and lack exif data.

Njd-de (talk) 21:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Wutsje 00:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from Google Street View. Copyvio. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. You can see the Google watermarks, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from Google Street View. Copyvio. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. You can see the Google watermarks, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LToman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of toys/figurines--see COM:TOYS

Эlcobbola talk 14:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it is no bogus claim - no random internet images either. Me and son of Libuse Niklova, Petr Nikl, famous painter himself, owner of copyright of this image and all other images of Libuse Niklova are running an organization to preserve Libuse Niklova´s legacy. I am the biggest collector of her toys and all these images i have uploaded are mine and showing exhibits from my colection. Here is our website libuseniklova.com. We are making exhibitions of her work in some of the biggest museums in the world, etc... 46.13.34.3 14:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LToman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see COM:TOYS

A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These images are not some random internet images. Me and son of Libuše Niklová, Petr Nikl, famous painter himself, owner of copyrights for these images and all other images of Libuše Niklová are running an organization to preserve Libuse Niklova´s legacy. I am the biggest collector of her toys and all these images i have uploaded are mine and showing exhibits from my collection. Here is our website libuseniklova.com. We are making exhibitions of her work in some of the biggest museums in the world, etc... Do not delete these images please. LToman (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error of upload Topelie (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages. Leyo 08:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages. Leyo 08:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal photo Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused logo Lymantria (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unencyclopedic Darrelljon (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope fake. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't see proof of permission from IMAGO/Colorsport and probably copyvio as the source provided is the right one. Probably some of the other files from the same uploader were already deleted. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:54, 6 September 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: obvious copyright violation, professional agency photo used without permission. should be deleted asap --Krdbot 13:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educational, we don't provide free hosting and this isn't DeviantArt —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. And crop from unknow source, DW, needs source and permission. P 1 9 9   20:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Baja Resolución Machibito (talk) 00:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope due to very low quality. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without any use in Wikipedia or other projects Machibito (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope due to very low quality. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded by a non-contributor. So OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: excluded educational content better hosted elsewhere Headlock0225 (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: excluded educational content better hosted elsewhere Headlock0225 (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Charge overlaps with double bond; better alternatives in Category:Pyrylium ion. Leyo 15:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture was uploaded to use in an an article about a person that was later found to not have any relevance and was deleted. Picture thus also has no relevance and can be deleted.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Dot_Chaffe MRKSLZ (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope anyway. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope anyway. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dthomp57 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused images of non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. Should be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Reserve my opinion. Could it be a case of Cap 528 Sect 71, Copyright Ordinance? N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 14:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not permanent display as required by law. Anyway, there are enough images of buses without or with text-only advertisement in these category. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality picture, also very small 2A00:102A:500E:1D7B:1:0:648E:1E62 04:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: In use on cs:wp. --Achim55 (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bad quality ŠpatnéJméno (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Strakhov (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 17:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. 181.43.7.29 18:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete this is extremely easy to replace. Do you have a good quality camera and an uncut dick? Well there you go. Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. Tiny photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Very bad quality. I'll delete it as copyvio and out of scope. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo is copyrighted as stated at the bottom of the page located at democrats.org. it reads "Copyright © 2022 DNC Services Corporation All rights reserved." Cloudsarepretty (talk) 10:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Certainly below COM:TOO United States. --Rosenzweig τ 10:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep That is a general copyright notice for the website. It doesn't apply to individual images contained on that website, which have their own copyrights. This is very clearly does not meet the United States' threshold of originality. Fry1989 eh? 13:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per 2 users above Andre (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep same as precedent Ternoc (talk) 15:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Same comment. ptjackyll (leave a message) 16:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per above. Below threshold of originality in the United States, the source country. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per U.S. Copyright Office circular 33, p. 4 --RVD3 (talk) 14:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)RVD3[reply]

Kept: below TOO. --Strakhov (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, photo of non-notable person. No useful uploads since 2017. Used only in vanity user page George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality beach portrait, not useful. --Strakhov (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RosaGiulia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality images with no meaningful exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 13:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope and probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably in scope, but unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, smal, blurry, and unused photo of a non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 12:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be copyrighted Baddu676 (talk) 16:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be in the public domain. --Strakhov (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Strakhov (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigt violation 86.32.43.160 17:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Smooth O (talk) 09:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from https://www.johnchikati.com/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; DW of modern artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; modern copyrighted character. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Doll is a standard en:w:Raggedy Ann (1910s US introduction; now out of copyright); little hat and sticker on shoe seem de minimus. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; DW by Flickr photographer, artwork banner is most of the photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the images is from here, and it says "all rights reserved" Mariomassone (talk) 07:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proper source detected, nor metadata or EXIF. Taichi (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upload the file in original size and with metadata. --J3D3 (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Concerns addressed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is a screenshot from the 1995 Nat Geo documentary Yellowstone: Realm of the Coyote Mariomassone (talk) 06:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The buildings is completed in 2009 by AJ Architects. There is no freedom of panorama in Bahrain. Permission from the architectural firm is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Bahrain. These buildings already showed most of the permanent exterior architecture, and they are subject to copyright.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:PACKAGING. SCP-2000 05:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sakshi Telugu newspaper has copyrights of this image, hence not available under CC-BY-SA 106.51.227.208 05:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Корнилов ОВ

[edit]

Paintings without VRT-permission.--Andriy.v (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:YouTube world map.png. Heraldrist (talk) 10:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and out of project scope, promotional SPAM George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Media is taken from internet. It can be found on reditt and twitter. I am pasting one of reditt link here ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 11:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Far out of project scope, minor litigation over rangeland George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, text only George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of the project scope, small and low quality photo of a dog George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lashab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of the project scope, unused photos of a non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morgane Grollier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

outside of the project scope, unused images of unremarkable logos.

George Chernilevsky talk 12:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SarahBarry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and out of project scope, promotional SPAM

George Chernilevsky talk 12:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable text/logo George Chernilevsky talk 12:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pthomaskmadigan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata credits Kenton Rowe, a professional photographer, doesn't match the uploader name (Thomas K. Madigan?).

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikasverma1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused photos of a non-notable person. No useful uploads since 2017

George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willsons78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused images of non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private sketch George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XIARACO-ORM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused poor near duplicates of File:XIARACO.jpg. User page images

George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Si eliminar por favor, muchas gracias. --XIARACO-ORM (discusión) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XIARACO-ORM (talk • contribs) 11:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not contain any object YitzhakNat (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modification of another photo YitzhakNat (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of the project scope. Unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergio Ballón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergio Ballón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Low quality promo images about non-notable company

George Chernilevsky talk 13:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipa Cunha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope clothing store advertisement. Also high probability copyvio

George Chernilevsky talk 13:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 13:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MiguelAvendaño (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ntsika Rise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Small unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ntsika Rise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Private photos of non-notable person, used only in vanity user talk page. No useful contributions in any Wiki-project. 24 subscribers on Youtube

George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable SPAM logo George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable SPAM logo George Chernilevsky talk 14:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecs web-studio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mujeeb1715 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and out of project scope images. Signature or just a test uploads

George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mujeeb1715 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure about the origin of this work, but it's not the uploader's work. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcoslepe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused promo images of non-notable company

George Chernilevsky talk 14:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varun Mahindra Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private self-promo photo George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graziano Vitale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused low quality scetches

George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tarik Ben Mimoun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private logo of non-notable person (small technical service in Tetouan, Morocco)

George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unusable heavy watermarked image George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment according to the Wikipedia page and this document (page 30) "The assets created under a creative commons as part of the R&D for UNBOXED will become a publicly accessible resource for others to use after our programme ends." However, I don't know if this was something that was actually brought into the final projects as all the mentions I can find seem to be about future plans to make content cc and mention of it on the current website. Additionally, without seeing what licences there talking about it's very possible that they would be using NC licences. Cakelot1 (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator and source of image not indicated, therefore license not verifiable MassiveEartha (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lisa Scott copyright holder not acknowledged and source of image not indicated MassiveEartha (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused image of math formula. Could be replaced with TeX if needed George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable User's logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact same re-upload of File:South Asian Language Families.png with no attribution. The uploader is a sock, already blocked on enwiki. Gotitbro (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused personal artwork / logo George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magazine Centrifuge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused non-notable SPAM logo

George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Private photo of non-notable person, used only in vanity user page, abandoned in 2017 George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shathishfrank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private photos also bad photoshoped

George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josekotelchuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused non-notable SPAM logo

George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable SPAM logo George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pangeia Filmes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dabuhot12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. Unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr.mohande3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

outside the scope of the project. Unused images of mathematical formula. Can be created with TeX if needed

George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused personal artwork / logo George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyvio as all uploads of this sock of an :en-blocked sockmaster[3]; see also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Extensive copyvio by sock. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused personal artwork or some sort George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is the only contribution of the user. The metadata give "Copyright holder LEO MARSHALL". Is the user he same person as Leo Marshall? Wouter (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot, thus copyvio. Thsi is declared as "Own Work" and patently cannot be. COM:VRT must be used to prove that it is suitably licenced for onward use here. COM:PCP applies 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Epicurasian

[edit]

Nearly all of these might qualify for CSD G10 as ads for the delivery service (logo card visible in almost all of them), otherwise they can be considered out-of-scope/personal photo hosting. Apart from a couple appearing on an automatically generated user page which seems to aggregate files containing poultry, none of them are in use anywhere.

JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:50, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused personal photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, personal photo of a non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, photo appears to have been originally taken by one David Fell, who has not released this image under an applicable license. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of the project scope, small and inaccurate map George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strmare

[edit]

All of the flags Strmare has uploaded are sourceless. These flags I have nominated are very obviously hoaxes, and only 3 are real ([4], [5] and [6]. An example is File:Flag of Sila Region.svg, which uses a Communist Party of America symbol, which of course, isn't related to the country of Chad at all [7]. Please see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. --Flagvisioner (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would like to add that a while ago, I asked Strmare on his talk page to add sources for the supposed flags he uploads. A week has passed, and multiple files later, they continue to not add any sources. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 20:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete They are all unsourced.
PS1. This user -Strmare- (and their sockpuppets, most obvious one being Han Mi Nyeo), are probably in turn new sockpuppets of Jurisdrew. Awful long-time abuser with multiple sockpuppets. These users have the exact same patterns of editing abuse and the same obsessions.
PS2. How pathetic can it be when a sockpuppet is even editing this page removing or adding content the way they like!
Argean (talk) 20:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strmare

[edit]

Forgot to nominate (or wasn't able to) nominate these files. Again, these files are hoaxes, and are out of scope. Would like to add that the flag of the Cortés department is the flag of San Pedro Sula, according to [8]. Please see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. --Flagvisioner (talk --Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can replace wrong design of the Cortés flag with the correct design. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I would like my nomination of the flag of the department of Cortés withdrawn, as I have corrected it. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 21:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 20:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strmare

[edit]

Per previous nominations. These files are hoaxes. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strmare

[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 112.206.109.175 (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Nothing to do, nominated files are already deleted. --Achim55 (talk) 11:34, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; 2015 artwork, rights retained by artist. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Dolls might or might not be simple/traditional enough not to be copyright, but photo sourced to external source, no evidence uploader has rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems copyrighted (copyright notice in the bottom right corner). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! As I would be the copyright owner indicated, let me find out how to proceed before you delete the file :) TowerDragon (talk)


Kept: Per above and image page info; copyright 1996 - by the uploader, who can relicense as they see fit. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative of a (presumably) copyright work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether board-content is above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure why this was nominated for deletion. Replaced previous version with uncropped original to demonstrate ownership. Brendanghs (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Public signs and historical markers like this are often protected by copyright as explained in COM:CB#Noticeboards and signs. It many cases, it's not only the presence of any images (e.g. logos, seals) on the sign, but also any text that might be on the sign. So, in such cases, there are often two copyrights that need to be considered: one for the sign itself and one for the photo taken of the sign. If you took the photo yourself, then you're the copyright holder of the photo; however, unless you're the copyright holder of the sign, you can't upload your photo to Commons without the COM:CONSENT of the sign's copyright holder. Your photo is considered to be a COM:Derivative work which means you created a work that makes use of someone else's copyrighted work. Commons needs the CONSENT of all copyright holders when it comes to derivative works. Are you able to provide any more information about the marker? The more information you can provide about its en:provenance, the easier it will be to assess its copyright status. It can't simply be assumed to be within the en:public domain or otherwise free from copyright protection just because it's installed in some public location because there is no en:freedom of panorama for signs or plaques in the US per COM:FOP United States. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question A historical marker by the Georgia Historical Society has a restrictive copyright, such that it can be seen in public but not shown on a public website? That doesn't sound likely at all, and in this case, I daresay we should assume it is not true unless shown otherwise. Also in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; DW. (Notes: Full paragraph of text, dated 2007 - automatically under copyright by author per US law. No evidence that the Georgia Historical Society has released nder free license.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (Minecraft) and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright on watermark without authorization Ske (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Restaurant menu, possible use of Commons as personal storage space CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused uncat since 2016; possible DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear notice in front matter giving 1994 date of publication. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ossianstaraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work but 2 are Shot by WilliamK / La Clef Prod. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of company, no free-use, element of spam in pl-wiki. Title of the file means "Downloads (1)". Hoa binh (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is no longer needed. Dimitar999 (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason deletion would be required; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, no licence release ("no proof of industry handout') - source https://twitter.com/modern_railways/status/1524867306496704541?s=21&t=15fcrpDekhY_OTtD7vBpBw Turini2 (talk) 12:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded in August 2017 appears to have been taken from a June 2017 press release: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/james-madisons-montpelier-unveils-groundbreaking-exhibition-the-mere-distinction-of-colour-300468158.html Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information is kind of hard to tease out, and can be better represented in a table. Not used anywhere. HouseBlaster (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It seems obvious to me (blue = Democratic control, red = Republican control, yellow = Whig control, hatched = no one in office due to the seat not yet existing, or the American Civil War). I don't see the harm in keeping this. BD2412 T 17:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information is kind of hard to tease out, and can be better represented in a table. Not used anywhere. HouseBlaster (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It seems obvious to me (blue = Democratic control, red = Republican control, hatched = no one in office due to the seat not yet existing, or the American Civil War). I don't see the harm in keeping this. BD2412 T 17:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author... Xocolatl (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. False claims; no info to determine actual source and status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person died in 1978, looks like paper scan, not Own work. Is it Derivative work? Original date? Author? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 11:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Фотография моего дедушки Федькова Ивана Николаевича, находящаяся в архиве моей семьи Paraponius (talk) 22:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Зачем же вы тогда написали "собственная работа"? Вы отдаете себе отчёт, что это плагиат, нарушение закона? Кто автор фото? Lesless (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Возможно, я что-то неверно написала. Эта фотография находится в архиве моей семьи и была напечатана в книге моего дедушки. Поэтому я выбрала положение "собственная работа". А вот теперь мне хотелось бы узнать у Вас: Вы в своем уме говорить о плагиате? О Нарушениях закона? Об авторе? Мой дедушка умер в 1978 году. Мне тогда было 6 лет. Вы кто такой сам? Я разговариваю здесь с фантомами, которые мифически заботятся об авторских правах. Причем редкая забота проявляется по "картинкам", но не по информации. У меня все права на это фото. Но доказывать я это не буду. Хотите - удаляйте. Я уже поняла, что Википедия нищая по изображениям и богатая по лаже в инфе. Если бы вы, волонтеры, действительно заботились о предоставленном материале, работали с ним и его авторами, все было бы гораздо лучше. А у вас только шаблоны, смысла которых вы далеко не всегда понимаете. Плагиата в фотографии такого рода не бывает. Плагиат может быть только в творчестве. Paraponius (talk) 01:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 07:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 07:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its a public (open access) mural. What's the problem with this image? --Jeb (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Murals are kind of derivative works. Commons required uploaders to obtain the permission from the creator of an artwork. FOP is the exemption of the above permission. Since FOP in the United States excludes 2D artworks, thus permission from the painter is required. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When I took the pictures I asked the artist (pictured in the images) if I had her permission to take photos and upload them to WikiCommons. She said, “Yes.” How might I prove she has given permission? Bridges2Information (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can submit the written permission of the painter to COM:VRT via e-mail. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE. This image focus too much on the Address Downtown Dubai A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE. Image focus too much on the modern skyscrapers, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates' A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this under copyright for toys when you can't see the brand of the doll? Punker1999 (talk) 04:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because being able to see the brand is irrelevant. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture of live person; probably without premission Euro know (talk) 11:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Personality rights is not a valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This advice about comparison shopping it outside COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere, it should be text not a PDF file. Marbletan (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These drawings, published in Germany in 1912, are the work of German artist Ernst Stern, who died in 1954. So they are still protected by copyright in Germany and should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2025.

Rosenzweig τ 22:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of this photograph is to present the sides of a patrimonial building, The Remembrance House, which is now transformed in a theater in Rouyn-Noranda old quarter. Only a part of the artwork is seen here with accent put on the urban context. All three artists are friend of mine and inspiration for figures presented are from my own photographs of shows. Franloup (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's great, but the artists have to give permission to COM:VRT for Commons to be able to host images of their work. Ask them to do that. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that it falls under COM:DM. The statue occupied a notable portion of this image, also the title suggested that the statue is part of the subject. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kuwait A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kuwait A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. This image focus too much on the modern high-rise buildings, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Qatar. Image focus too much on the modern building, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed in 2016 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from his is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed in 2016 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from his is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed in 2016 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from his is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed in 2016 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from his is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Pure question. What do you think is the critical difference between the other photos in Category:Barbie dolls, and this photo that you requested for removal? --Clusternote (talk) 07:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fan art: female sex dolls wearing cosplay costumes. Solomon203 (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran; not enough information to determine the architect or the year it was built. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure whether FOP applies to the source country or not A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure whether FOP exists in the source country or not. Even yes, this is an indoor artwork, so in most cases FOP cannot be applied A1Cafel (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The composer of this former anthem from 1970 died in 2017, so that piece of music is still protected in its source country (Republic of the Congo) and elsewhere. Also, the performance by a not named band/orchestra is most likely also still protected. Rosenzweig τ 21:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork on the Fourth Plinth of Trafalgar Square is temporarily, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtlich geschütztes Photo von "Photographer: Bengt Lange", somit URV von Maria Marleen Müller 79.192.225.91 09:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No apparent copyright notice. See {{PD-US-no notice}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per PD-US-no notice. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No apparent copyright notice. See {{PD-US-no notice}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per PD-US-no notice. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dommage, pour une fois qu'il y a une photo d'une jolie poupée sur Commons... Guil2027 (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect's Jože Plečnik's works are still copyrighted, and there is no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia, sadly (see COM:FOP Slovenia). For undeletion in 2028. — Yerpo Eh? 09:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect's Vinko Glanz's works are still copyrighted, and there is no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia, sadly (see COM:FOP Slovenia). For undeletion in 2048. — Yerpo Eh? 10:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not truly own work, won't be public domain until 2081 bc author died in 2006 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi there, this picture was copied, apparently, from from this twitter post. Also, the source says "own work". I doubt the user is who took the photo. The other possibility is that the user is herself the woman in the picture, en:Delfina Pignatiello (the user is constantly changing the photo in the Spanish version). The user has previously uploaded a lot of photos from social media and several have been delete (see User_talk:PauHofer1). Ni.cero (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF, author and source are not specified. Claimed to be shot in Finland, but the original uploader is not from there. 194.9.27.69 17:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an exhibit in a museum, placed inside. Panorama freedom does not apply to it.

Matlin (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Można skasować moje zdjęcie - nie zależy mi aż tak bardzo na nim. Ryszard 74 (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in Senegal A1Cafel (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, not sure what is expected of me at this point …. And where to respond to :)
If there is a question of ownership - I did take this image myself.
If you could give a little more details, I would be happy to respond. Ewien Btwien (talk) 08:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Btwien, the issue is that you photographed art. The claim is that this art is copyrighted and therefore the photo can't be hosted here. Do you know whether graffiti is in fact copyrighted in Senegal? A1Cafel, why are you presuming it is? In what other countries is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can see some pieces of artworks had an attribution. They are probably legally painted murals, rather than an incidental graffiti. We should respect to the copyright of those potential artists. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Having an attribution doesn't make them not graffiti. How do you know whether these were painted legally or not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting question ... never thought about it this way ... Can ask some of my art friends in Dakar to see what they think - not sure what to say at this point :) Found this piece of info online as an answer to the question if you can photograph graffiti : "This means that although someone can always take a photo of the artwork, the artist (you) must give permission for them to receive income from that photo—also called a “commercial use.” Even so-called “illegal” or unauthorized art—graffiti or street art—is copyrighted from the moment of its creation and the artist must ..." Btwien (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if that's the case, Commons can't host this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete @Btwien: Commons only accepts freely-licensed media, and that includes derivative works of copyrighted public art and architecture in public places. Senegal does not provide commercial FOP, but non-commercial license or mandatory remuneration to public work designers is against COM:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to lack proof of permissible license that it was a work of official U.S. gov't, does not match image on Congress.gov Andre (talk) 19:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • archive of source, doesn't say license, says courtesy of member. Andre (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • * Delete. "Image courtesy of the Member" suggests to me that this is not a work created by the federal government, and we should presume that the photo is copyrighted. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree. Normally, these images are taken by the House photographer, which makes them PD-us by virtue of having been created by a gov't employee, but it is not clear that these were, and it lacks author information. Andre🚐 20:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm pretty sure this version was taken by the House Creative Services, as the background matches several other members of Congress, and the uploader just lazily linked to her twitter instead of the actual site. I can't find it at the moment as I am on mobile, but I'm pretty sure that's the case. Curbon7 (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Found it on archive.org [9]. Curbon7 (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Here's how we can tell on House.gov and Congress.gov[10][11] doesn't say courtesy of the member, says "Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives" - MTG's doesn't Andre🚐 02:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Andrevan, I have no idea the process, but it appears the portraits of many members of Congress state "Image courtesy of the Member". Ex. AOC, Bowman, Franklin. I don't think this means the image is privately taken by the member, as for example, Greene, Bowman, and Franklin's are all at the same photoset; I think "Image courtesy of the Member" means that House Creative Services, who take the Congressional portraits, provides the portraits to the members for official use and these are the images the members forward to Congress.gov. I'm just perusing, as I am not certain, but this should not be a hasty delete. Curbon7 (talk) 03:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      So AOC has her own copyright notice[12] which should cover everything her campaign puts on her website, so she should be good, as does Franklin[13] so he's good. Can't find one for Bowman. Pelosi has a similar release on her site [14] but, for anyone who doesn't have a copyright release on their website, or a notice, if it doesn't say "Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives"[15] or simply blank [16] or Courtesy U.S. Senate Historical Office [17], you can't assume it's a work of the US gov't House photographer. Andre🚐 04:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      This particular photo was likely of a set taken on the 117th Congress orientation day, and several other photos have the relevant metadata that confirms them as Congressional photos. -- see File:Cori Bush 117th U.S Congress.jpg, File:Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis.jpg File:Deborah Ross 117th U.S Congress.jpg, File:Scott Fitzgerald 117th Congress portrait.jpg or File:Jake Auchincloss, 117th Congress portrait.jpg for more examples. The exact same background, date of generation, and photographer name (who is an official House Photographer). If it walks like a duck... "Courtesy of the Member" likely means that the office sent that particular photo to use there, not that it was authored by the member. You could try contacting the House Creative Services e-mail given in the metadata but I doubt that they'd take the time to respond. Connormah (talk | contribs) 20:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Disagree. While the other photos have acceptable permission, the one under discussion does not provide the adequate proof of permission. These photo state HouseCreativeServices@mail.house.gov for the contact information. Additionally, in the following cases, these images are clearly OK because of copyright notices on the house websites: Malliotakis copyright release[18], Ross copyright release[19], Fitzgerald copyright release[20], Auchincloss[21]. Regardless of what "courtesy of the member" may mean, this image doesn't have permission and it can't be assumed. Andre🚐 21:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Whatever. I should have known better than to waste my time here, as always. Connormah (talk | contribs) 05:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Firefangledfeathers, and TE(æ)A,ea.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to lack proof of permissible license that it was a work of official U.S. gov't, does not match image on Congress.gov Andre (talk) 19:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Firefangledfeathers.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the file was nominated for deletion. This cropped version was simply taken from the original uploader. I do not know that they did not provide sufficient information at the time. Therefore, I nominated this for speedy deletion Gag0409 (talk) 06:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gag0409 Thanks, but that is insufficient justification for speedy deletion. I suggest that the closing Admin take this section the preceding paragraph as a "Delete" !vote for the previous section.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I already nominated both. Removing extra heading. Andre🚐 19:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image was transferred from Flickr, but the image contributor on Flickr is Danny Choo. Danny Choo is the creator of Mirai Suenaga, the character in this image, and since Danny Choo published the image under Creative Commons, there are no copyright issues. 冷床系 (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Mirai Suenaga was co-created by Danny Choo and Azami Yuko. We need permission from both creators. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Mirai Suenaga's website states, "We encourage folks to monetise from their creative works of Mirai and Friends - no need to ask us for permission and no need to pay us anything either - we will never come after you like anime publishers do from time to time". While it is true that Mirai Suenaga was created by Danny Choo and Azami Yuko, we don't have to ask permission. 冷床系 (talk) 08:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment We also need the sculptor's (Good Smile Company Inc.[22]) permission. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image was transferred from Flickr, but the image contributor on Flickr is Danny Choo. Danny Choo is the creator of Mirai Suenaga, the character in this image, and since Danny Choo published the image under Creative Commons, there are no copyright issues. 冷床系 (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Mirai Suenaga was co-created by Danny Choo and Azami Yuko. We need permission from both creators. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Mirai Suenaga's website states, "We encourage folks to monetise from their creative works of Mirai and Friends - no need to ask us for permission and no need to pay us anything either - we will never come after you like anime publishers do from time to time". While it is true that Mirai Suenaga was created by Danny Choo and Azami Yuko, we don't have to ask permission. 冷床系 (talk) 08:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this public domain? There is an "all rights reserved" mark in the bottom right, for the sheet design. And then there is a the second layer of copyright by the player who filled in the information. Even if the player were to release their character information as PD, there is no indication the company did this for the sheet form itself. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1) Combination of boilerplate text and simple geometric forms is not eligible for copyright in the first place. 2) Same with character statistics and other derived information. See COM:TO. Presence of «all rights reserved» mark doesn't mean that someone could claim copyright for such works. Kotik Polosatij (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Forms can’t be copyrighted, and this is clearly a form. In addition, none of the text added is creative, most of it being numbers, and what little is at the bottom is also formulaic. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is claimed as "own work" by an employee of AstraZeneca (see w:Talk:AstraZeneca#Update main photo - outdated and w:WP:Help desk#Edit Page Photo) but has been published in https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2021/astrazeneca-unveils-the-discovery-centre-disc-in-cambridge.html#! with copyright asserted ColinFine (talk) 23:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Send permission via COM:VRT —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user is the third times who insert pictures in the category Category:Teatro_Rossini_(Pesaro). I have removed the category and the false GPS coordinates in all photos. But this one is not the Fano's harbour but the Pesaro's harbour. Eventually, the quality in my opinion this is not a photo of this author, but a postcard. Giacomo Alessandroni What's up! 10:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is figure 2 from Aliakbari, M., Gheitasi, M., & Anonby, E. (2015). On Language Distribution in Ilam Province, Iran. Iranian Studies, 48(6), 835-850. doi:10.1080/00210862.2014.913423 (PDF available on Researchgate). As far as I can tell, this is not an open access publication but © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2015. Needs a proper permission from the authors (see COM:VRT for background, instructions and an e-mail template). El Grafo (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El Grafo: Hello, this file was my first experience in uploading a file. Unfortunately, my upload was wrong. This file is not my work. I was sloppy about referencing the source. I apologize for what happened. But I would like this file not to be deleted because it has useful and correct information. What should be done to prevent it from being deleted? Vajd (talk) 14:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Two things: 1. This file was uploaded locally (to another site), but then exported here without license review. It could probably be kept locally on Persian Wikipedia, where it originated. 2. This map is all data, and is thus not copyrightable. Whatever the sources for the language mapping, it is not copyrightable (as data are not copyrightable). As the map’s only arguable creativity is derived from the data, it is not copyrightable. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Imho this map will show an interpretation of the data, selection of colors etc. It should be redrawn based on the original data. --Ellywa (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]