User talk:J3D3
|
|
File:Mimosa monancistra2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
InverseHypercube 22:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Levy-Jennings SampleChart.png to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Translation
[edit]Hola, may I ask you for some help? The template {{PD-Unicode}} lacks the Spanish version. My knowledge of languages doesn't allow that I add it by myself. Of course it is not at all urgent. Thank you sarang♥사랑 08:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Seems to have been a lot of work (yes, it is a bit complicated with all the parameter possibilities...) but I can see that you fought and won. Thank you for your good solution! sarang♥사랑 17:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, (t) Josve05a (c) 22:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Translation check
[edit]Hola, may I ask you again? You are not asked to do any complicated edit, just look for better expression. I tried to translate everything into Spanish language, but I am not at all sure whether it's correct. When you look at the bottom of the {{Created with Other tool}} documentation (you need to expand the collapsed table!) you can see variations in the chosen language, with different genders in Spain. While I have rather good feelings with "con un otro editor" the expression "con un ignoto editor" might better be replaced by "con un editor ignoto"?
Please don't try to repair something, just tell me where it can be made better. You can answer there at your talk page. Gracias sarang♥사랑 08:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
_____________________________________________________
- Hi Sarang! Look, in Spanish "un" and "otro" (un + otro) don't get along among them; or is one (un) or is other (otro). And, although "ignoto" is a correct Spanish word, it is of little use, and sounds a little weird :D . It is more frequent to say "desconocido" (the Spanish particle "des" fullfils the same function than the English particle "un", in the same way kown = conocido; so un-known = des-conocido). You could instead consider the following expressions:
- {{Tl|Created with Other tool }}: Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
- {{Tl|Created with Other tool | v }}: El código fuente de este SVG es válido. Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
- {{Tl|Created with Other tool | v | vs = fl }}: El código fuente de este SVG es válido. Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
- {{Tl|Image generation | O }}: Este gráfico fue creado con otra herramienta o editor.
- {{Tl|Igen | O | s = c }}: Este escudo de armas fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | s = d }}: Este diagrama fue creado con otro herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | s = e }}: Este emblema fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | n | s = f }}: Esta bandera fue creada con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | n | s = i }}: Este ícono fue creado con otra herramienta o editor.
- {{ Igen | O | > | s = m }}: Este mapa de gran tamaño fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}: Este signo, inválido según el W3C, fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
- {{ Igen | O | 2 | > | s = y }}: Este signo de gran tamaño, inválido según el W3C, fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
And finally
- {{Igen|u|s|>|e=2|s=s}}: Este sello de gran tamaño, inválido según el W3C, fue crado con una herramienta o editor SVG desconocido.
And yes, I know, Spanish is a pain in the a55 for non native speakers (and for natives too :D). If you have to do it, do not hesitate to ask. In what I can help you, you can count on me. A big hug.
J3D3 (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help, now I can repair the boxes that they will not be longer a pain for native speakers! (There is a typo at s=d, "herramienta" needs of course "otra".) "Bandera" had been female in my text, so I wonder why you bolded it. I had not been sure whether it is legal to shorten "otra herramienta o otro editor" to "otra herramienta o editor" - but I believe you. You know it is for all the Spanish world, and not only for Southern America or Argentina (which has its own idiom).
- I think Spanish is a beautiful language, and it's a pity that it is strange to me. sarang♥사랑 07:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- I tried to repair it; would you give it another look, please?
- I added the signature as an example for "not verifyable" and I am sure that my "non W3C-verificable" is very unSpain... sarang♥사랑 08:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
_____________________________________________________
- Hi again Sarang! well about the "a" from "otra bandera", it was just my OCD talkin' :D. Spanish language is pretty messy about gender of words and not allways a word finished with a is female nor finished in e nor o is a male, so once on the work It would have been easier to write a "male" code, and confusions just slips in :D . For example:
- {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}:
- I translated "This W3C-invalid sign..." into "Este signo, inválido...". The English word "sign" can be a lot of things in Spanish from "symbols" (símbolos) to "simptoms" (síntomas); you translated correctly "sign..." into "señal..." like in "señal de tránsito" (traffic sign); but "señal" it's a female word so the correct sentence in Spanish would be:
- {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}: Esta señal, inválida según el W3C, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor.
- You wrote correctly "creada", but in the "male" code slips in the word "inválido".
- It's legal to shorten some sentences in order to not repeat some adverbes nor pronouns. And in some sentences in order to avoid some aliterations and repetition of sounds (that are heard as if it were a stutter), It's almost obligated. For example in the sentence: "otra herramienta o otro editor" the aliteration "o-otro" sounds like you're stuttering. So you can avoid alliteration by changing the logical connector "o" (or) by "u" that fullfills the same function, or bypassing the pronoun "otro". In the daily practice (:D) you tend to shorten the sentences, so It's more natural bypassing some repeated pronouns.
- Otra herramienta o otro editor
sounds like stutter. - Otra herramienta u otro editor
- Otra herramienta o editor
- Finally, the sentence "Esta firma de gran tamaño, non W3C-verificable, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor" It's a quite good translation although "non W3C-verificable" It's very, very unSpanish :D :D :D, You could be write "no verificable según el W3C", or better "inverificable según el W3C", or even betterer "imposible de verificar según el W3C". My personal preference would be:
- {{ Igen | O | -1 | > | s = sig }}: Esta firma de gran tamaño, imposible de verificar según el W3C, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor.
- Thank you for your confidence, and ask what you want when you need to :D, I will do the same when I need some advices about my Deutsche (sincerely my Deutsche Is far, far worse than your Spanish). Big hug. J3D3 (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The female "invalida" had been o.k. but with the changes today I copied it wrong. Now I made the last changes as you advised so friendly, also the imposibles and whether everything is now fine or not I am leaving Wikipedia for vacations. When I am back in 4 weeks my Spanish will be not yet good but much better - but to know all about its complicated grammar and how to create well formed sentences is something for well educated native people. When I am back I will look for the pt translations, they might be also in a wrong state... Always to your service when you have problems with German! sarang♥사랑 18:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hola, I remember your help, and I need your skill again. Now exist categories SVG files without W3C-specification where the W3C-unspecified files are collected - files that are neither valid nor invalid; using the SVG created with ... templates without specifying the W3C-validity causes that categorization.
I expanded the Template:Created with/es to display the fact - pero mi españiol... would you please tell me how to express what now is like "Este gráfico vectorial, inespecificado según el W3C, fue creado con ...". ¿May be "desespecificado" is more Spanish ??
When you look at the bottom of the documentation examples you can see far below how it is displayed.
I did it similar with Created with/pt and will have to ask somebody else. -- sarang♥사랑 16:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hola, now I took "sin especificar", because I had been told that it's good. Thank you, the problem is solved -- sarang♥사랑 16:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 |
File:Barkleyanthus salicifolius.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
|
File:Mimosa monacistra Benth.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpg
[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:CC-AR-GPCba
[edit]Vos creaste Template:CC-AR-GPCba diciendo que los contenidos de http://www.cba.gov.ar/ tienen una licencia CC-BY 2.5 AR. En que parte de la pagina dice eso? --Yilku1 (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
File:M13B.svg
[edit]Hello, This nice schematic diagram certailny is a phage of order en:Tubulavirales (de:Tubulavirales), but according to 2020's https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339882046_Taxonomy_of_prokaryotic_viruses_2018-2019_update_from_the_ICTV_Bacterial_and_Archaeal_Viruses_Subcommittee it appears to be more likely a member of the new family Plectroviridae, than of legacy Inoiridae, as the ref tells: "The phages belonging to the rearranged family Inoviridae infect Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and virions appear as long and flexible filaments. The members of the new family Plectroviridae, previously classified as members of the family Inoviridae, infect cell-wall-less bacteria and exhibit the morphology of rigid rods"
The img here is more rodlike than properly filamentous. Please compare with ViralZone's https://viralzone.expasy.org/113 — which they use also for Vespertiliovirus (member of new Plectroviridae), which likely is an error the other way round.
Please could you kindly double check and update the image text if neccessary? Best regards --Ernsts (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:CisteNO.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:ActivacionExtrinseca.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 13:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:AIR Synthetase.svg is disputed
[edit]
| Dispute notification | The chemical structure File:AIR Synthetase.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi J3D3
Thanks very much for updating your drawing so quickly. I've removed the "disputed" tag and also now placed the file in en:5-Aminoimidazole ribotide. I was writing some biochemistry for that article when I noticed the problem yesterday. One very minor point. As an organic chemist by (ex)profession, I much prefer equations like your drawing to start and finish with the actual neutral materials involved. As your drawing stands, it has P-O- ions and so does not correspond to the named compounds. While that dianion may indeed be what the enzyme binds during the reaction, I think it would be better to show P-OH groups instead, corresponding to the named FGAM and AIR. I hope you wouldn't mind making that additional change now. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind, I've created a file for the neutral version and uploaded it as File:AIR Synthetase neutral.svg. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
-Hydroxycytidine.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Regards, Marbletan (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Roxana Kreimer Sala.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taichi (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Buenas tardes, marco al borrado el archivo porque tengo amplias dudas de que usted haya tomado la foto ante la clara ausencia de metadatos en dicho archivo. Agradecería que no siga subiendo imágenes dudosas, observando su historial lleno de avisos y advertencias. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Si le hacen falta los metadatos, puedo subir la foto original. ¿Si reemplazo la foto actualizandola por la original usted retira la solicitud de borrado? J3D3 (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- La solicitud no puede cerrarse, no soy administrador de Commons, debe hacerlo un administrador. Taichi (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Si le hacen falta los metadatos, puedo subir la foto original. ¿Si reemplazo la foto actualizandola por la original usted retira la solicitud de borrado? J3D3 (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Aristolochene synthase.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DMacks (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, DMacks (talk) 04:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Grammostola porteri.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
