Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/02/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Brak zgody na wolną licencję. To nie jest twórczość własna Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Takie rzeczy to na {{Speedy}} prosimy. DR, gdy jest wątpliwość wymagajace wyjaśnienia.
Deleted: definitely not Own work. Speedy. --Ankry (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo Attanomy (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I took it myself on 14:33, 3 October 2015 as can be seen in the Exif of this file. Many of my pictures have been used in over 110 publications, it may be you saw it there. On https://pbase.com/dosseman/izmirhellenistic you can see many other pictures I took that day.
- I do not like to be made out for an infringer of copyright by people who themselves remain anonymous, nor bother to indicate what is their source. As for your chosen name, I advice you to take some spelling lessons. Dosseman (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- El creador ha enviado la licencia y confirmado, a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Ticket#: 2022022310004523 Fran.ziro (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Ticket:2022022310004523. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
ex boyfriend is blocking my data 64.90.146.13 20:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Similar to payment card, the design (like the background photo) of this meal card belongs the school, so the photo of this meal card is not ok to be uploaded to commons unless an authorization letter from the background photo's creator (photographer) is received by VRT. Stang★ 15:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded from "Wechat official account" per upload comment, low resolution image Stang★ 17:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
http://www.malone-rock.ir/ 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, I created this DR mistakenly; it should have been a speedy deletion request. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 110.54.228.233 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted promotional poster, originally posted on Twitter.|source=https://twitter.com/WWENXT/status/1486151625903378434/photo/1. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 19:08, 23 February 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 02:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
AP files uploaded by 突撃二号
[edit]I used an AP file by mistake. --突撃二号 (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7 and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/&oldid=631780283 . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Dignus est intrare (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as personal photo by non-contributors. --Jaqen (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
EXIF credits the photo to Lennard Laar, which does not match the uploader name who is claiming it as their own work. Needs evidence of permission that this image was released under a free licence. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 07:32, 24 February 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Achterlichten TRALERT.jpg: EXIF credits the photo to Lennard Laar, which does not match the uploader name who is claiming it as their own work. Needs evidence of permission that this image was released under a free licence. --Krdbot 14:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kamya Punjabi.jpg, this is a social media photo that the press reprinted (https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/celebs/bollywood/these-breathtaking-pictures-of-bikini-clad-amyra-dastur-from-her-beach-vacation-will-make-you-go-wow/articleshow/85801497.cms?picid=85801859) Lord Belbury (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Beyond Commons:Project scope.as it is just a series of selfies of a non-notable person.
- File:Resim155.jpg
- File:Resim17.jpg
- File:Resim16.jpg
- File:Resim14.jpg
- File:Resim12.jpg
- File:Resim10.jpg
SVTCobra 13:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Resimler1.jpg is probably related and uploaded by an alternate account. --SVTCobra 06:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy - per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Autopropaganda (ver: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mustafa9hussam) 191.119.23.34 22:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 14:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 14:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 14:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arsalan razban (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:Arsalan razban 7.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban 6.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban 5.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban 4.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban 3.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban 2.jpg
- File:Arsalan razban.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope,Vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete COM:PORN- Delete - Other than a porn site I don't see where else this could ever be used. No educational use. –Davey2010Talk 17:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope,Vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN
- Delete - Other than a porn site I don't see where else this could ever be used. No educational use. –Davey2010Talk 17:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope,Vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cangsieuphxcap (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshot and promotional corporate images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And likely not own works, but all screengrabs.
- File:Screenshot20156.png
- File:Backtest.png
- File:So sánh tỷ trọng nhóm ngành.png
- File:So sánh tỷ trọng ngành.png
- File:VN30 EQ.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jordan AccuPOS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, or FB code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader.
- File:Pano of Baltimore.jpg
- File:Sagamore Collage.jpg
- File:Sagamore pendry.jpg
- File:Sagamore Pendry Hotel.jpg
- File:Baltimore Weather.jpg
- File:Baltimorewashingtonmonument.jpg
- File:Baltimore Inner Harbor Skyline Panorama.jpg
- File:BaltimorePano.jpg
- File:Federal Hill Park.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Silva&Silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images from "The Voice".
- File:The voice.jpg
- File:Jazz e blues de Rio das Ostras.jpg
- File:Gabriel Silva e Lulu Santos.jpg
- File:Ddia de Rock.jpg
- File:Aniversario de Rio das Ostras.jpg
- File:Banda Enigma.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barayan Band (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional images of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Médias du Sud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Bandeau de réception Pyrénées-Orientales.jpg
- File:Bandeau réception TVSud Montpellier.jpg
- File:Bandeau de réception TVSud Camargue-Cévennes.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 20:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Canticum Novum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos and promotional corporate image, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Where is the evidence that this is released under a free license? I see a watermarked version at https://www.elheraldo.hn/honduras/dialogo-estancado-jorge-calix-luis-redondo-presidencia-congreso-nacional-honduras-BAEH1510331 C.Fred (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:14, 3 March 2022 UTC: No permission since 23 February 2022 --Krdbot 08:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This is a hoax image. Actual hydrotarsus beetles (images available in this open-access article https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-3113.2003.00226.x) look nothing whatsoever like these. Thereppy (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also if you zoom in a bit you can see that the insect legs were photoshopped onto some marbles, creating gaps in the marbles' shadows. Thereppy (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, awkward geometry, replaced by File:2-hydroxymethylpyridine.svg. Leyo 11:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, not drawn according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:2,6-diaminopyridine.svg. Leyo 12:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The derivative work (screenshot) comes from the official clips channel of the OfflineTV podcast, which has a CC Attribution license for the video in question. However, the clip itself is a derivative work from the original video linked in the video description, which itself does not display any such CC license. Pilaz (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 16chseld 118 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text diagrams that should be in wiki-markup if needed, and low-res diagram without context, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without meaningful edits.
- File:Reading and Writing Formulas.png
- File:Balancing Equation.png
- File:Balancing Equations.png
- File:Chemical Equations.png
- File:Chemical Equation.png
- File:Example of a Chemical formula.jpg
- File:There are 3 parts of a Chemical Formula.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, available on other websites, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Éric Zemmour 10-2021.jpg. The EXIF data indicates the same device was used for this picture. Totodu74 (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per the aforementioned nomination: dubious authorship claim from a banned user, no permission from the actual rightsholder. ›› Fugitron - 10:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete file uploaded by a fr-WP bannished felon-user JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with Totodu74's argumentation.--Lefringant (talk) 11:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As Totodu74's argumentation. Apollofox (talk) 11:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons. Culex (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons.--Panam2014 (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons. Locpac (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Dubious authorship claim from a user banned for severe political POV-pushing. No permission from rightsholder. --Eunostos (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons. ----d-n-f (talk) 16:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep The photograph has a pending VRTS ticket. I suggest to wait for it to be confirmed of not --Ruthven (msg) 15:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment For those who don’t speak French and want more context, see en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-02-27/Special report. --Thibaut (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)- Delete for the same reasons. Caocoa (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --MakhzenHuman (talk) 18:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete with all the fuss about this case, the VRTS ticket would have been received by now. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Foto teste, sem importância, que deve ser descartada de imediato Raphaelkruno (talk) 01:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Imagem teste, deve ser excluída de imediato Raphaelkruno (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
imagem teste, deve ser excluída de imediato Raphaelkruno (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
I said that this file is my own work and it is not PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 00:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Mentiroso! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.63.235 (talk) 01:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
I made a mistake about the copyright of this file, and I will upload another file to replace it. PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 01:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted today by Billinghurst as out of scope. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved. 191.126.14.85 03:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete. This work is licensed based on the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.2.0) as permitted on this page（Japanese）〈English version is here〉. The terms of use are compatible with Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International.--へええ (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC) ※fixed some--へええ (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Free licensed. --Laftp (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Faisal Hossain (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It is grainy, the ISO is too high. But it's not that bad. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as per Asclepias. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Rock Paper Shotgun is a British video game website and this logo definitely exceeds the threshold originality according to COM:TOO UK. Please also note that this particular logo is also non-free on English Wikipedia. Kirilloparma (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, logo of a UK company that is too complex for the threshold of originality in the UK, see COM:TOO UK. Needs evidence a free license from the company, sent to VRT. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Uni Baggage LTD T/A My Baggage permit the use of the File:My Baggage Logo.png to be used on wikipedia.org and wikimedia.org under a free license. This can be verified by contacting My Baggage directly. Digitalubmaster (talk) 10:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please confirm the license by email, following the guidelines at Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Ideally the email should be sent from a 'My Baggage' email address. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Ticket:2022040410006901. Yann (talk) 17:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Son una empresa de distribución de ropa y complementos infantiles con el catálogo B2B online mas grande de España. Logo 191.116.63.235 00:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete copyright violation - elephant image will be copyright of Tumodakids--Headlock0225 (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trainsandotherthings as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Corporate logo, clearly not user's own work. Could be PD if displayed publicly before 1978. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore 2603:6080:9D08:1989:EDD0:6866:63B2:41AE 01:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't comply with such requests when made by IPs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted phone screenshot, not an Image of Kenya as the description claims. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with the deletion, this was just used as a demonstration to the community on how to upload an image. Leonard Kisuu (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore 2603:6080:9D08:1989:EDD0:6866:63B2:41AE 01:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't comply with such requests when made by IPs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore Cam200 (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of poor compositional, unhelpful image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
no existe mapa falso por vandalismo Joseperuano (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Low-quality unused map with no clear context; does not seem to be educationally usable. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore 2603:6080:9D08:1989:70FE:9CA1:2D2:F7CD 02:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't comply with such requests when made by IPs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore Cam200 (talk) 04:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal and poor compositional image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore 2603:6080:9D08:1989:70FE:9CA1:2D2:F7CD 02:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't comply with such requests when made by IPs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore Cam200 (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of poor compositional image without context. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore 2603:6080:9D08:1989:70FE:9CA1:2D2:F7CD 02:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't comply with such requests when made by IPs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo anymore Cam200 (talk) 04:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of poor compositional, unhelpful image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is the person depicted in this photo. Requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer. ✗plicit 02:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mauricioherreratv (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader is the person depicted in these photos. Requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer(s).
✗plicit 02:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the person depicted in this photo. Requires COM:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗plicit 02:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of permission and doubtful scope. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michaelzhangcn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author is zh:马程, is living
shizhao (talk) 03:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect attribution. This is not Ollantaytambo; it is Machu Picchu. 174.16.35.149 04:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I agree for delition.
- Thank you for the comment, I will try to change the file.
- Leon Petrosyan 178.66.66.121 09:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Personal/promotional image unlikely to be educationally usable; uploader also appears to be depicted so no evidence of photographer's permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING: This is actually unclear is the Threshold of Originality is unclear in Indonesia 180.214.232.23 04:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio? Taken from a website here: https://www.jatkoaika.com/LIIGA/Kuvakooste/Ilves-Tappara/Tappara-tasoitti-Areenan-avausviikonlopun-voitot-murskajaisilla/237483 .There is no proof that this photo was published with open content license or that the uploader is the author. Needs permission. Htm (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio? Taken from a website here: https://www.jatkoaika.com/LIIGA/Kuvakooste/Tappara-Ilves/Ilves-alisti-Tapparaa-uuden-kotiareenan-avajaiskoitoksessa/237462 .There is no proof that this photo was published with open content license or that the uploader is the author. Needs permission. Htm (talk) 05:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Taken from photo bank of www.visittampere.fi. Accoding to their instructions here https://visittampere.fi/en/professionals/photo-bank-and-materials/ , photos are not open contet, at least NC and ND and should be used only in connection of marketing city of Tampere or related business. Htm (talk) 05:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
File:United_States_flag_icon.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 06:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete by uploader's courtesy; file is unused and pretty much a duplicate, having lots of (used) alternatives. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Found here https://www.mup.com.au/authors/andrew-fowler and widely available on the web. Think we need oTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 07:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes I'm uploader and subject, photographer is club official Vahidin Helja, regards Cengiceldin (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Cengiceldin: if it was photographed by Vahidin Helja then it is not your own work, and you can't give permission on behalf of someone else. Please have Vahidin Helja send permission to VRT. MKFI (talk) 07:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - permission is needed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Matt Wishart / Daylon Barr Photography Copyright holder Worldwide Copyright ©2022 Daylon Barr Photography". EXIF also has a long "Usage terms" section:
| Usage terms |
|---|
| "All photographs appearing in this Web Site are the exclusive property of Daylon Barr Photography and are protected under United States and International Copyright laws©2022. The photographs may NOT be downloaded, reproduced, copied, stored, manipulated, projected, used or altered in ANY way, including without limitation any digitalization or synthesizing of the images alone or with any other material by use of computer or other electronic means or any other method or means now or hereafter known without the written permission of Daylon Barr Photography and payment of a fee or arrangement thereof. No images are within Public Domain. Use of any image as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of Copyright Laws." |
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
This video was removed from YouTube within a year after its upload over here, so the licence cannot be verified. Also the archived source shows only "This video is not avalailable". De728631 (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo and associated graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 07:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo for a Ukrainian band ru:Knell claimed as own work but missing VRT permission. Above the threshold of originality. mattbr 07:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Can't find anything on TOO at COM:Ukraine, but this doesn't even meet COM:TOO US. No permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unclear resolution 2600:100C:A210:CFE:E558:FFF7:9A04:AF93 08:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Good enough, no reason for delation, KEEP! -- Kürschner (talk) 08:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "Unclear resolution" isn't a valid reason to delete an image. See Commons:Deletion policy. -- Ies (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted modern architecture; Slovenia doesn't have Commons-compatible Freedom of Panorama, unfortunately. — Yerpo Eh? 08:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
per COM:FOP Japan. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Netora (talk) 08:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
あまり法律関係に詳しくないですが、これは公園にあり、なおかつ隣接している道路からも見えるようになっています。そして恒久的に設置されている物なので、記述してある著作権法46条に反しているというご指摘は該当しないのではないかと思うのですが… --Homare21 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- 著作権法46条では屋外美術の複製を非商用目的に限って許容しています([2])。一方コモンズで受け入れ可能なファイル(COM:L/ja)は商用利用も含めフリーなファイルのため、46条に基づいて複製した作品を保持することはできません。日本語版ウィキペディアのja:Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針もお読みください。 Netora (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete This signboard is copyrighted. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map draft for File:Final Dispersal Map.jpg, unused. (Not an exemplary map where documentation of the mapmaking process could be considered educational) Enyavar (talk) 09:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Appeal to cancel speedy deletion. i'am a student and representative from Universitas Nasional had not any other file photo imaage, so its decided to use youtube footage to be use and here is the footage lodge as Library_UNAS.jpg in commons.wikimedia,org CreativeUniqueMind (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
evidently GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal drawing of unclear subject, out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, copyvio [3] Oesterreicher12 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of this license at the source, clearly says ARR at the bottom Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
face not clear Nova89 (talk) 10:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Face is clear, but it's been Flickrwashed from her Instragram feed, per the identical copy you uploaded being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kamya Punjabi.jpg. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Ymblanter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lovely1973 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed as own work. Majority have no meaningful exif while File:Ray Moor broadcasting mic 25.jpg clearly says (c) in exif. I think we need OTRS. Some might be PD but we have no source to confirm
- File:Dangerfield's, New York City.jpg
- File:Ray Moor broadcasting mic 25.jpg
- File:Jean Haines, You and Your Dog.png
- File:Peter Pike Apr 2006.jpg
- File:Rev Carl Conner.png
- File:Kapono body arriving at Arlington.jpg
- File:IsraDiva Live.png
- File:Superintendent David Price of Raleigh County Schools.jpg
- File:Erica Gifford Mugshot.jpg
- File:Gary Farnsworth, NY Times.jpg
- File:Al(bert) Lightfoot Signature.png
- File:Reverend Albert Lightfoot in 1986.jpg
- File:Signature of Alan Flores.png
- File:Lou Carroll campaign logo.png
- File:LouCarroll1.png
- File:Evangelist Shane Roark.jpg
- File:Bob Dunn with monkeys in the 80s or 90s.jpg
- File:Bob Dunn and a chimp.jpg
- File:Bob Dunn and Bubbles in 1980s.jpg
- File:Billy Bolen.jpg
- File:Joey Blake playing bass in 2021.png
- File:Newisle skyline.png
- File:Damron performs, 2021.png
- File:Judge Donnie Hoover.jpg
- File:Stone and friend.jpg
- File:Steve Cross in 2015.png
- File:Fraulein Tracy publicity photo 3.png
- File:Fraulein Tracy publicity photo 2.png
- File:Fraulein Tracy publicity photo.jpg
- File:Douglas M. Levison, Flower Power Creative.png
- File:Jimmy D. Smith.png
- File:Rosslyn, The Rose City, seal 2.jpg
- File:Rosslyn, The Rose City, seal.jpg
- File:St Clair City skyline.png
- File:Jonesburg flag.png
- File:Jonesburg skyline in 2004.webp
- File:Paulo Cruz, Los Pinos 2012.jpg
- File:Melvin Ross signature.png
- File:Melvin Ross portrait, 1970.jpg
- File:Anne Mays at the White House 2013 (cropped).png
- File:Jon Wagner (cropped).png
Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vanessacanoba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Diverse collection of images, several of which have Facebook metadata (and File:Beatriz Silva Comisión en el Parlament.jpg appears on Silva's Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2287157654702504). File:Beatriz SIlva.jpg exists at https://socialistes.barcelona/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/bea-silva.jpg being the regular thumbnail size used on that site, and dated two years before upload to Commons.
- File:Beatriz Silva Comisión en el Parlament.jpg
- File:Beatriz Silva, periodista y diputada.jpg
- File:Beatriz Silva en el Parlament de les Dones.png
- File:Beatriz Silva periodista.jpg
- File:Beatriz Silva entrevista al vipresidente de Chilé Enrique Krauss.jpg
- File:Beatriz Silva diputada al Parlament de Catalunya.jpg
- File:Beatriz SIlva.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vanessacanoba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per above nomination, these also look like social media photos used without evidence of permission. File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.jpg appears at https://www.elnacional.cat/enblau/ca/televisio/debat-tve-polemica-catala-castella_579084_102.html credited to "Sònia Guerra López, Twitter", File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.Promete.Cargo.jpg appears at the same resolution at https://twitter.com/gpscongreso/status/1224700580028993537
- File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.AraSi.jpg
- File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.Feminista.jpg
- File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.PSC.jpg
- File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.Promete.Cargo.jpg
- File:Sonia.Guerra.Lopez.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
for privacy purpose. Suriya iyer (talk) 16:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Only two uploads from this editor. The first appears to be a copyrighted poster. Both are small and the second has no EXIF. The uploader claims "own work", but if so these should be larger and have EXIF.
- File:کتاب سیزده برداشت از شاهنامه اثر احمدرضا سالم.jpg
- File:احمدرضا سالم شاهنامه پژوه و ایران شناس.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image with FB code in EXIF data. Added duplicate file:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo obviously not own work, above COM:TOO, missing permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of some sort. Permission is missing. Lymantria (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arifahmed78 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo and photos of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: 3 pics and 3 different cameras.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. One used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Photo avec copyright incrusté / Photo with inlaid copyright Malvoört (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- OUI comme toutes mes photos sur wikipédia #YanRB (talk) 00:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - 1/ even with a cc-by-sa-4.0 license the image is still copyrighted 2/ watermark are discouraged but not prohibited 3/ copyright symbols are not prohibited. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo of nondescript cloth, no context, no educational use, out of scope. And likely not own work but screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asociación Musical Almenara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value Pugilist (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The two photos can be find elsewhere on the internet (1 in larger resolution). The other two are derivatives of lots of logos and need proper attribution.
- File:Camellia Resort, Puri.jpg
- File:Camellia Heritage, Shantiniketan.jpg
- File:Diploma Placement.jpg
- File:Placement Companies.png
Basvb (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]User is uploading files which can be found elsewhere online.
- File:Camellia Airways.jpg
- File:Royal Oak, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Club Agora, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Bluezz, Camellia Group.jpg
- File:Calcutta Retro, Camellia Group.jpg
Basvb (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Successmania17 (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mrousseaux (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused DW banners and personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Banner ILO.jpg
- File:Forum Panafricain.png
- File:Forum-Panafricain1.jpg
- File:Photo atelier Lomé.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Only promotion or vandalism cross-wiki --Emolga826 (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Copy of the equally irredentist File:ZanddynastyTrial - Copy.png, but leaving out todays borders, resulting in a mixup between actual modern borders and the highly exaggerated ones of the Zand. Enyavar (talk) 17:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The photo literally is a promotion of a youtube channel, (or a video looking the photo title "Top trampas y trucos para craftman") -Emolga826 (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete On top of the exact same issues that surround this case, it includes a screenchot of Minecraft in a way which is clearly far from a de minimis case. Sr. Knowthing (talk) 02:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The photo are using only for make promotion an unconstructive edition on other wikies, the uploader are globally blocked now --Emolga826 (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)}}
- Speedy delete The uploader of this picture is a puppet of a globally locked account for spamming. It doesn't have any use aside from being promotional imagery. Sr. Knowthing (talk) 02:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
This is not an "Own work" Malvoört (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, bad quality exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality COM:PENIS Dronebogus (talk) 20:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, exhibitionism and meh quality Dronebogus (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality COM:PENIS Dronebogus (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, exhibitionism and meh quality Dronebogus (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused text image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Coolviddude (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
- File:Helen of Harmonyx preparing to pull out the earth saving trash bags!.jpg
- File:HOH Shero Costume ??.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh boy what a smorgasbord of new NOT INSTAGRAM violations. Personal crap, no educational use. Dronebogus (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Adelheid (Müllekoven)
[edit]copyvio; contemp.artworks; no fop / Urheberrechtsverletzung, zeitgenössische Kunstwerke; keine Panoramafreiheit.
- File:Troisdorf-Müllekoven St. Adelheidis Altar 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Müllekoven St. Adelheidis Altarraum 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Müllekoven St. Adelheidis Kirchenraum Marienstatue 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Müllekoven St. Adelheidis Orgelempore 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Müllekoven St. Adelheidis Taufkapelle 20220223.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 23:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Hippolytus (Troisdorf)
[edit]copyvio; contemp.artworks; no fop / Urheberrechtsverletzung, zeitgenössische Kunstwerke; keine Panoramafreiheit.
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Altarraum Südwand Blick zur Apsis.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Fenster Nordwand 2. Pfeiler.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Fenster Südwand 1. Pfeiler.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Fenster Südwand 2. Pfeiler.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Kirchenraum Nordwand Blick zur Apsis.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Kirchenraum Südwand Blick zur Orgel.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Südwand 3. Pfeiler.jpg
- File:Troisdorf St. Hippolytus Südwand 4. Pfeiler.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Exhibitionism, bad COM:PENIS photo Dronebogus (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I feel the same. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Image under copyright due to URAA. Also, it's possible that the copyright holder still be alive, so this may be a false PD-claim 79.145.162.217 16:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.145.162.217 as no permission (no permission since). Converting to DR as what this image needs is not VRT permission, but for its true creation date to be uncovered. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep, a source of Pinterest explains that the image was taken during the canonization of Pope Pius X, which happened on September 3, 1954
--193.146.182.201 11:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.145.162.217 as no permission (no permission since). Converting to DR as what this image needs is not VRT permission, but for its true creation date to be uncovered. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I found that this photo was taken in the same date as this (see the vestments of Pope Pius XII). Also, I think that it's possibly those pictures were taken from the coronation of Pius XII (see the similar vestments here). 79.145.162.217 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
PD-Italy applies only to photographs. This is a painting and these works are protected during 70 years after the death of the author, probably, the author still be alive because the date of the portrait is 1974 79.145.162.217 16:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 12:09, 25 April 2022 UTC: Mass deletion of uploads by LTA A1cb3 --Krdbot 18:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader admits here that this file is not his own work. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And likely not own work: small DW/crop from an unknown source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Indeed found on Google Images. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
photo de la biographie d'Emma Martin-laval 191.126.6.193 01:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason. A09090091 (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted - No valid reason to keep. --191.126.3.145 20:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Es conocida esta persona? 191.126.14.85 03:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Borrado por un mandamás de Commons.--191.126.3.145 20:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Muago (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept, in use, duplicate merged. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The text has nothing related to the media file. It's just states "Thanks for Watching " and "This video from Wikipedia". Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The subtitles contains the opinion of the user and has nothing related to the content of the media which contain the trumpet solo plays. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The subtitles with draft timings from TimedText preview page state twice in Italian: "hey, you, user reading these subtitles know that i love you". Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Mal Nombrado Companhia Custom Circus (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 01:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Credit on source: DLR (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) -> this license is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons
Contradiction: The license PD-DLR is irrelevant. The image is over 100 years old and the author is unknown. This work is in the public domain because its copyright has expired.
Michael (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. For Commons, 120 years are needed for {{PD-old-assumed}}, so the file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 01:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused, unusable 'meme' document CzarJobKhaya (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 16:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 02:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Violación de Copyright de grupo político CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination, copyvio of political party logo, needs permission at the very least. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- This was uploaded be the presidential candidate Gustavo Petro. What more clearance do you need? 66.44.127.45 20:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- A permission to use the image by Petro or his party, or a release under a Creative Commons license. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- This was uploaded be the presidential candidate Gustavo Petro. What more clearance do you need? 66.44.127.45 20:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Luis Sierra — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2800:484:3A95:8990:C59D:8DA4:1E96:7621 (talk) 12:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 02:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Nonsence. Many times repeated word "TAKK TAKK TAKK" (I suppose, it's "Thanks" in Swedish). Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I think it's supposed to correspond to the typing sounds you hear in the audio file. Still nonsense though. --Rosenzweig τ 19:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Abuse: this is a curse word in French. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: nonsense content. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Look like a texting of TimedText namespace. In the audio there is a lot of sounds, but the anonymous user decided to use draft timings from TimeText preview page to write about "Loud crunches". Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unrelated to the media text (via Google Translator): "1) God give us your face 2) What do you mean by your intention? 3) And they are not laughing, my friend" Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
The subtitles says on the 20th sec that there is no sound. Misuse. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 11:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, does not make sense when the video is only 13 seconds long. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
I am the person shown on this picture and want it deleted 2A02:8109:9CC0:67DC:600B:C6DF:F52C:2B05 19:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I understand this to be a photograph of your involvement at a public meeting for the foundation of a new political party (See https://www.klimaliste-berlin.de/kandidierende/raphaela-reif). As such, what would be the basis for deleting this? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- This picture was taken in Germany. For the law in Germany see Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany: Publishing and commercial use of a picture of a person in a public space requires consent, unless it is in the sphere of an event of public relevance. So the rule is: there should be consent, which obviously is not the case. The exception might be/This might be overruled if this is an event of public relevance. So the question is: Is a public meeting for the foundation of this new political party an event of public relevance? I think: yes. --JopkeB (talk) 06:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As uploader The foundation of a political party is clearly a event of public relevance and this photographer is a professional photographer that takes hundreds of image of events, demonstrations and protests related with climate change related and has published in several german publications. Tm (talk) 02:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Candidate in a German state election speaking at a party convention. --Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res text diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Knowit logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 20:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused math equation, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
out-of-scope unused logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
redundant with Category:Grunwaldzkie housing estate in Bielsko-Biała — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaj777 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: category redirect. --Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Timings incorrect; the subtitles do not appear in the play. And also, creating the subtitles for the one word pronunciation file which is used in Wiktionaries is a bit doubtful and distracting for the article's readers and pronunciation' listeners. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Visiting the website provided by the uploader, it is clear that the author is not Rappler. Rappler attributes the photo to the Archdiocese of Capiz. Even if Rappler is the author, there is no indication on the Rappler ToS that it uses a compatible copyright license. FyzixFighter (talk) 03:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Update: I found some better information on the actual potential source of the image - see this tweet, which attributes the image to Joy Barza of the Archdiocese of Capiz. This aligns with the metadata in the image, which indicates that this is a clear copyright violation (sorry I missed that originally). --FyzixFighter (talk) 13:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope image uploaded from https://www.deviantart.com/regicollis/art/United-Socialist-Council-Republics-of-America-479693947 Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Anna Fisher - 1979.jpg, being the same photo, but where somebody has taken a photo of that image on a computer screen. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Artist was Spanish (Life+70), died in 1965. Will be out of copyright in 2036. Should be deleted and added to Category:Undelete in 2036. grendel|khan 21:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- This works qualifies for {{PD-1996}} MrChrisWin (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @MrChrisWin: Can you be more specific? This seems similar to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:José_Gutiérrez_Solana, which are also uploads you made; it wasn't in the public domain in Spain in 1996. In fact, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Spain, for authors who died before 7 December 1987, it's Life+80, so it should be Category:Undelete in 2046, not 2036. This was first published in 1929, so it'll be in the public domain in the United States 95 years after publication (per COM:HIRTLE), so 2024. (At that point, you can upload it to the English Wikipedia, but not Commons; see en:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights.) Am I missing something? grendel|khan 07:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert on public domain. If you say the work doesn't qualify for public domain then sure mark for delete. MrChrisWin (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @MrChrisWin: Can you be more specific? This seems similar to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:José_Gutiérrez_Solana, which are also uploads you made; it wasn't in the public domain in Spain in 1996. In fact, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Spain, for authors who died before 7 December 1987, it's Life+80, so it should be Category:Undelete in 2046, not 2036. This was first published in 1929, so it'll be in the public domain in the United States 95 years after publication (per COM:HIRTLE), so 2024. (At that point, you can upload it to the English Wikipedia, but not Commons; see en:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights.) Am I missing something? grendel|khan 07:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but actually, Spain has 80 years pma for authors who died before 7 December 1987, so restore the file in 2046. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.145.162.217 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The author died in 1976, so it's currently copyrighted until 70 pma years have been passed Does this count as a "simple photograph" for {{PD-Italy}}? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The correct license is PD-Italy. Italy only grants 20 years protection for portrait photography and doesn't follow the pma rule used in other EU countries. --RAN (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: was renamed and redirected, both renamed file and redirect now deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; contemp.artworks; no fop / Urheberrechtsverletzung, zeitgenössische Kunstwerke; keine Panoramafreiheit.
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Chorfenster 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Langhaus 1 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Langhaus 2 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Langhaus 3 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Nebeneingang 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Taufkapelle 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Sakramentshaus 20220223.jpg
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Taufkapelle 20220223.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 23:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Langhaus 3 20220223.jpg
- Vor 1950 https://www.glasmalerei-ev.de/pages/b6450/b6450.shtml Glewe (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (well, the one file that hadn't already been deleted by request of the uploader). The two "Taufkapelle" windows are by de:Anja Quaschinski, who is alive, the window in File:Troisdorf-Bergheim St. Lambertus Fenster Langhaus 3 20220223.jpg from 1950 is by an unknown artist, the other windows are by de:Hermann Gottfried, who died in 2015. So the file showing the 1950 window by an unknown artist can be restored in 2071 with {{PD-old-assumed}}, the files showing Gottfried windows can be restored in 2086, and the files showing windows by Anja Quaschinski can be restored 70 years after her death – which is probably still some years away, she was born in 1961. --Rosenzweig τ 16:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
This is 2013 sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist seems to be Geneviève Labrousse (born 1942), who as of 2022-07-18 is apparently alive. --Rosenzweig τ 13:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
This is 2013 sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist seems to be Geneviève Labrousse (born 1942), who as of 2022-07-18 is apparently alive. --Rosenzweig τ 13:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. And too blurry to be usable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MutiaraUchida (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal drawings, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Songs and non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Bought Somo.wav
- File:Whole Lotta (Prod. By DreBeatz91 & Waw*Mart).wav
- File:Hen N' Taco.wav
- File:Waw Mart Logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
14 full-length music tracks by Waw*Mart. A press release about his work doesn't mention him taking the unusual step of releasing his work into the public domain like this, so this may be Waw*Mart himself or a fan not realising the consequences of what they're doing by uploading it as CC-Attribution.
- File:Mona Lisa.wav
- File:Tha's On Errthang.wav
- File:- And Away We Go - by Waw*Mart from Promotional Album Waw Mart 2.wav
- File:Comma, After, Comma.wav
- File:ButterFly by Waw*Mart from Promotional Album Waw Mart 2.wav
- File:I'm The King by Waw*Mart from Promotional Album Waw Mart 2.wav
- File:HYPERVETILATE.wav
- File:Alone In Love.wav
- File:Holly Molly (Accapella).wav
- File:Holly Molly.wav
- File:The Train.wav
- File:All ‘Um.wav
- File:01 whip it ( radio ).wav
- File:Own love Her.wav
Lord Belbury (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Photo of Dr. Kathryn Dorsey Huff.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
En tant qu'auteur de l'image, je ne souhaite plus qu'elle soit disponible gratuitement. J'estime avoir fait une erreur en postant ma photo sur cette plateforme et souhaite la retirer rapidement. Elie Razafindraibe (talk) 18:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not over 3 years after uploading. --Rosenzweig τ 07:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishnuambady (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
out of focus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 14:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Self-nominated file, this file was uploaded by the nominator. At the time of its uploading, I was running a test only later to realise it was actually uploaded. I would be glad if it is deleted since it goes against the Wikimedia commons copyright rules. Thank you. Sorry for the inconvenience Ampimd (talk) 23:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Self-nominated file, this file was uploaded by the nominator. At the time of its uploading, I was running a test only later to realise it was actually uploaded. I would be glad if it is deleted since it goes against the Wikimedia commons copyright rules. Thank you. Sorry for the inconvenience. Ampimd (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely {{Own}} work. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Bad composition, comes across as exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN. Educational does not mean exhibitionist. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Obvious amator. Best alternatives. Commons isn't a porn blog : COM:NUDE. ~ FAP (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No deletion reason applies in this case. COM:SCOPE, COM:PORN -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 15:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Baq quality, unused, we have better ones, e. g. file:Erect penis uncut.jpg. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Self-shot amateur picture. Florent Pécassou (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep not censored; nominator is engaged in mass deletion of sexual content, including longstanding items, without regard for commons policy Lx 121 (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- aw. --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Amateur is no reason to delete, nor is better alternatives. Not a porn blog? Well, it's not, but we don't just host porn. Try watching new uploads and see how pathetically small the # of sex images is. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Apparently this was originally kept when the number of penis images was “pathetically small”. Oh how simple those times were, COM:PENIS, bad quality]. Dronebogus (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN. Hard to imagine there was ever a time when we weren't drowning in phallus... Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
A version of the photo that appears at https://news.stonybrook.edu/oncampus/seawolves-dominate-at-wolfstock-2011-2/. Clearly not taken in 2017 as claimed by uploader and likely from the university's Flickr stream. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Low-res photos with incomplete source info from a user with a history of copyvio. Unlikely to be own work.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a my photo not used in any page; and an old version contains a no longer existing website in its description (meteopine.altervista.org): this make that website still appear on Google results Lorenzomercurio (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
unusable due to poor description: en:Henry Wise lists 4 different people named "Henry A. Wise", so the name is very common and it is impossible to guess who is depicted here. - Moreover, the entries in fields "Source" and "Permission" are dubious. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
no permission Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused, spam CzarJobKhaya (talk) 19:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused tiny promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Indonesia 180.214.232.23 04:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Which part of the building interior is copyrighted? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Keeping, no es architectura. Tubo industrial. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.133.220 (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The image does not appear to show any copyrighted design. --RAN (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation; artist died in 1974; no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2045. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stemoc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: semi-blacklisted Flickr user, images of celebs from events on their stream is not owned by them Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have checked the source on Flickr, which the license said Some rights reserved, and when I clicked on the link, it say CC BY 2.0. Does that not mean it is okay to use, as long as your give appropriate credit? Aviator006 (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm the person who originally uploaded the file onto Commons. I also assumed that given the source on Flickr is an Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license, it would be appropriate to upload as long I gave credit. Could someone please enlighten me on what this deletion rationale means? Cinccino (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- If you go through the Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users, the flickr account for 'landrovermena' has been blacklisted due to improper licensing, so every image pertaining to image of their Products is deemed to be owned and licensed by them such as this image for example but if the image has an exif which credits some photographer, it means they don't actually own rights to those image, we have been having issues with this since 2012, i don't agree with it but we have come to the conclusion that we will allow images taken at events for the vehicles specifically but if the exif data of any of the image shows it was taken by some known/established photographer, then we do not allow that image.... Stemoc 05:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm the person who originally uploaded the file onto Commons. I also assumed that given the source on Flickr is an Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license, it would be appropriate to upload as long I gave credit. Could someone please enlighten me on what this deletion rationale means? Cinccino (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Prof. Pimpim
[edit]- File:Cica_caca_fufu_fifi_hehe_nesze_ez_tuti_jó.jpg
- File:Hahaaaaaaaa miafasz.jpg
- File:Fibonaccsiga.jpg
All this files are of bad quality, uncategorized, with meaningless descriptions, maybe copyvio (photo of screen is not usually indication of own work), and first one is interrupted upload. - Gabuxae (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Newmanmanii (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with FB code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused tiny crop from unknown source, maybe old enough, but not usable. Identification is very questionable too. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. A Google Images search suggests it was taken from genealogy web site geni.com, where it was uploaded sveral years ago without a source and closer description. --Rosenzweig τ 13:22, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Misterdcnow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Visual characteristics suggest screengrabs.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 12:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
No source, and probably a copyright violation. There's no sign of either this picture or a CC BY-SA 4.0 licence at the claimed source, https://rg.ru/2021/10/15/patriarh-kirill-nagradil-viacheslava-butusova-cerkovnym-ordenom.html. The resolution and the file name suggest that it's a news-agency picture taken from the Web, but I've not managed to find it elsewhere. bjh21 (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: [4] from 2021-10-15, two months before it was uploaded here. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
No FOP for sculpture works in Russia. Needs license from the author of the original work. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Добрый день, крепкого здоровья!
- Недостаточно хорошо зная вики-версию английского языка, не сумел понять, чем руководствовался инициатор выставления фото на удаление. Сравнение этого фото с другими
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Памятник_Сергею_Павловичу_Королеву_на_Аллее_космонавтов_в_Москве.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Памятник_С.П.Королёву_-_panoramio.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Королев_-_panoramio_(1).jpg
- и наличие категорий
- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Категория:Памятники_Королёву
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Monuments_and_memorials_to_Serhiy_Korolyov
- лишь увеличило недоумение - т.к. аналогичные файлы по каким-то причинам не выставлялись этим участником на удаление... AlexChirkin (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Понимаю вас и объясню.
- Почему есть категория? Потому что памятники Королёву есть в разных странах.
- Почему не годятся файлы из России? Потому что в России каждый памятник Королёву охраняется авторским правом. Фотограф не может распоряжаться своей фотокопией, сделанной с такого памятника, если не получил разрешение от скульптора. В таком случае говорят, что в России «нет свободы панорамы» для скульптуры. Это означает, что если вы вышли на улицу и видите вокруг себя широкую панораму зданий, построек, памятников, скульптур, картин — у вас нет свободы воспроизводить всё это.
- Специально подчеркну, что в России есть свобода по архитектуре. Вы можете свободно воспроизводить фотокопии зданий. Архитекторы ничего не возразят, потому что у архитекторов нет авторского права. А вот по скульптуре нету свободы. Нельзя свободно воспроизводить фотокопии памятников. Скульпторы возражают, потому что у них есть авторские права.
- Почему же другие изображения не удалены? Теперь мы можем сделать вывод об этом. Одна причина в том, что эти памятники находятся в тех странах, где можно свободно фотокопировать скульптуру. А другая причина в том, что эти фотографии ещё никто не выставлял для удаления.
- Итак, вывод. В России есть авторское право. Скульптор владеет правом на свои произведения. Фотограф должен уважать права скульптора и получать от него разрешение. В некоторых других странах дело обстоит иначе. Поэтому памятники из некоторых других стран свободны, а памятники из России охраняются копирайтом. Поэтому в данном случае, для обсуждаемого сейчас памятника, нужно разрешение от тех, кто владеет авторскими правами на памятник.
- Я стараюсь подробно рассказать, однако у вас, может быть, остались вопросы. Давайте их обсудим. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but this is actually a monument to V.N. Chelomei. The sculptor seems to be Andrei Zabaluev, who is apparently alive. --Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trainsandotherthings as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Corporate logo, clearly not user's own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- See the equivalent file on enWiki for reference: [5]. It is hosted there under fair use. I concede a plausible argument could be made for TOO; I think it's on the borderline. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Text and simple geometric shapes. --RAN (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below US TOO. --Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, low-quality image of the ground. BrightRaven (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
File:This is an image (Image) of Stefan Birtz Link (the person who created User’;’UniversalHumanTranscendence) 10D76286-A534-415A-8513-2A0583A093AE.jpg
[edit]Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Сад ім. Т.Г. Шевченка. Пам'ятник Т.Г. Шевченку..JPG was deleted Andrei (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Ukraine. The artist Matvey Manizer (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Monument of Shevchenko (Kharkiv)) died in 1966, so the file can be restored in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 20:06, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use at marjorie-wiki.de, so probably not out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source and author are named as "Theju", that doesn't seem right. --Rosenzweig τ 20:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Either COM:DW, missing essential info and permission, or personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. Also added duplicate image:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: Fictitious US Antarctica Street Sign Enyavar (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: Fictitious US Antarctica Street Sign Enyavar (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: Fictitious US Antarctica Street Sign Enyavar (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I'm Corel Yakobi and I have noticed that this photo of me was uploaded to wikipedia without my permission. I demand its immediate removal, and also the removal of its inaccurate description. I am hopeful you will assist my request as soon as possible. 147.237.70.107 12:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: seems to be a wrongly described personal image of a non-notable person, so out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Extracted File:Martine Neddam à l'ESAA in 2013.jpg focussing on the person and cropping out most of the screenshot already exists. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of a map service (not sure which one), and then painted blue outside of borders. Likely a CopyVio of that webmap service. Unless the "dining" symbols were also added Enyavar (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Italy, an outdoor sign with modern artwork and text would not fall under freedom of panorama. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Retracted, my mistake, I must have somehow misread the location: this is in the Basque country, not Italy. It is unclear what freedom of panorama is allowed there, but {{FoP-Spain}} would allow it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res DWvdiagram without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Graphic claimed as 'own work' incorporating a logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. Is there an educational use for this file? mattbr 21:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Para poder actualizar la imagen del empresario Albasanchez.garcia2 (talk) 11:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, also in use. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
lower resolution copy of File:Fragments de ski type Vis.jpg Enyavar (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both files, as they seem to be not the uploader's own work, but taken from an 1980s publication of archaelogist Grigori M. Burov. --Rosenzweig τ 11:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The image was a selfie taken from the subject's (me, Richard Handley) iPhone, which means I have the copyright on it, and I am uploading it myself. Thank you! Rhandle (talk) 01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhandle Were you holding the phone yourself? This is important for copyright purposes. I refer you to the paragraph above. The picture appears to make it unlikely that you could be holding the phone to take this picture in that it is an unusual pose for a selfie. Timtrent (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. My wife, Marisela Handley, took the photo of me using my iPhone. I will ask her to grant me permission using the appropriate channel described herein: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthandle (talk • contribs) 07:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhandle That will solve the issue perfectly, though COM:OTRS makes the final judgement. Timtrent (talk) 15:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Again, much appreciated! Rhandle (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhandle That will solve the issue perfectly, though COM:OTRS makes the final judgement. Timtrent (talk) 15:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. My wife, Marisela Handley, took the photo of me using my iPhone. I will ask her to grant me permission using the appropriate channel described herein: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthandle (talk • contribs) 07:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhandle Were you holding the phone yourself? This is important for copyright purposes. I refer you to the paragraph above. The picture appears to make it unlikely that you could be holding the phone to take this picture in that it is an unusual pose for a selfie. Timtrent (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Richard Handley London Frightfest Leicester Square.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022022810010963. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Logo for a Philippine television channel missing evidence of permission. There is no threshold of originality guidance for the Philippines, but the work would be above the threshold in some jurisdictions. Likely to be above the US threshold. For public domain / copyright ineligible works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 21:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Is scope? Propaganda comercial? 191.116.63.235 00:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete Derivative work - the painting on the wall and the elephant logo--Headlock0225 (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Looked into it, painting is by Auguste Macke who died in 1914 so in Public Domain so I withdraw my comment about the painting but comment is still relevant about elephant logo. Also tend to agree with nominator as I struggle to see what educational value the image has. Headlock0225 (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: seems to be out of scope. --rubin16 (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of publication or licensing is presented. The image needs some proof. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- See: {{PD-RU-exempt}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inst-Soil (talk • contribs) 11:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Lacks sources, so there's no proof of this position. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: we need a better source for PD-RU-exempt. --rubin16 (talk) 14:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Español: Tumodakids & Tumodabebe proveedores de moda infantil y bebé. Pioneros en la distribución B2B online de roda y complementos al por mayor en España a través de sus plataformas digitales: https://www.tumodakids.com y https://www.tumodabebe.com Por las que han recibido tanto premios como mejor proveedor de moda en la prestigiosa plataforma Proveedores España, así como menciones de Tumodakids en periodicos de primera linea como Diario 16. Con mas de 15 años de experiencia en el sector de la distribución y mas de 25 en marketing, comenzaron esta aventura intentando replicar en España el modelo de distribución digital de moda implantado desde hace décadas en paises como Estados Unidos. A pesar del excepticismo de sus primeros partners que acostumbrados a la venta tradicional en almacén o con representantes, Tumodabebe (que fué el nombre inicial de la empresa el cual combinaron con Tumodakids al poco tiempo para no dar a entender a su target que solo se dirgían al bebé) consiguió convencerles de que el retail actual necesitaba mas servicio, agilidad en las compras, devoluciones inmediatas, resolución de incidencias etc Esto facilitó muy buenas opiniones de Tumodakids, gracias a la seriedad y compromiso con sus partners y clientes siguieron creciendo Pasados los años son una de las empresas con el mayor catálogo de ropa infantil al por mayor, mayoristas de ropa de bebé, calzado al por mayor. Distribuyen sus colecciones en más de 25 paises representando marcas como Pan Con Chocolate, Popys ropa de bebé al por mayor hecha en España, Tony Bambino Calamaro baby Babidú Street Monkey Representan 35 marcas con mas de 25.000 referencias listas para servir a tu tienda. English: Tumodakids & Tumodabebe suppliers of children's and baby fashion. Pioneers in the online B2B distribution of roda and accessories wholesale in Spain through their digital platforms: https://www.tumodakids.com and https://www.tumodabebe.com For which they have received both awards and best fashion supplier on the prestigious Suppliers Spain platform, as well as mentions in leading newspapers such as Diario 16. With more than 15 years of experience in the distribution sector and more than 25 in marketing, they began this adventure trying to replicate in Spain the fashion digital distribution format implemented for decades in countries like the United States. Despite the skepticism of their first partners who were accustomed to traditional sales in stores or with representatives, Tumodabebe (which was the initial name of the company which they combined with Tumodakids after a short time so as not to imply to their target that they were only addressing the baby) managed to convince them that the current customer needed more service, agility in purchases, returns, resolution of incidents, etc. Over the years they are one of the companies with the largest catalog of wholesale children's clothing, baby clothing wholesalers, wholesale footwear. They distribute their collections in more than 25 countries They represent 35 brands with more than 25,000 references ready to serve your store. 191.116.63.235 00:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is a legally established company in Spain for decades. They were among the first children's fashion distributors with a digital model in the presentation of B2B clothing sales
- link to tumodakids & Tumodabebe website: https://www.tumodakids.com y https://www.tumodabebe.com Silvie Meta (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- As demonstrated in the following this company appears in the media and has the awards that are credited in the description.
- It is a pioneer digital B2B distribution company in Spain with this system. I think it is relevant that it appears in Wikidata
- https://diario16.com/empresas-como-tumodakids-han-cambiado-la-distribucion-b2b-de-moda-en-espana/
- https://www.mundiario.com/articulo/empresas/tumodakids-concepto-nuevo-proveedores-ropa-infantil/20200616193218187863.html
- Best supplier award accreditation: https://www.proveedores.com/proveedores/tumodakids-tumodabebe/ Silvie Meta (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete copyright violation. Elephant image will be copyrighted by Tumodakids. --Headlock0225 (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per remark. Permission from the company is required to publish this logo. --Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trainsandotherthings as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Corporate logo, clearly not user's own work. Could be PD if displayed publicly before 1978. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in PD imho, simple text logo below COM:TOO USA. --Ellywa (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Potentially unwanted advertising. This was also previously deleted. Davidng913 (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition, no FoP in the USA per COM:FOP US. --Ellywa (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Potentially unwanted advertising, file was previously deleted but reuploaded. Davidng913 (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not an advertisemen, only a logo. Can be used on the company article. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
descriptions in en-WP are sufficient to not require such a fundamentally flawed map (that demonstrates the plants abundance in the Sahara desert, but only within Algerian borders) Enyavar (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Made redundant by File:International Recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk.svg. -WR 13:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Can be of interest in a historic sense, and is not the same as the other map. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused random photo of nondescript bush, no context or meaningful description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Timtrent (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The correct license is PD-USGov, we store over 1,000 images of Army-Navy-Air Force yearbook images under the same license, the same basic image, facing left or right 45 degrees with a flag behind. --RAN (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for allowing this to remain in the Wikimedia Commons. Rthandle (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be an official US Navy photo. --Rosenzweig τ 08:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "FBMD" in metadata and visual mark in picture King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deletion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
not in focus Periegetes (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Could perhaps still be useful with a location, but there is none in the description, no category, no coordinates. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Used for promo. Out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also unused. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Derivación de la imagen en el poster 191.126.14.85 03:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete. This work is licensed based on the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.2.0) as permitted on this page（Japanese）〈English version is here〉. The terms of use are compatible with Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International.--へええ (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- ※I'm sorry. The link I pasted was incorrect, so I fixed it.--へええ (talk) 08:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Free licensed. --Laftp (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete @Laftp: License laundering per "© Zac, Inc." (Japanese: 株式会社ゼスト), which means the file is not come from the National Police Agency. GJSTU v2.0 is not applicable. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. The image shows a copyright watermark, Zest inc. So this image does not fall under the free licence of npa. In addition deleted two extracted images, File:SOS06-1.jpg and File:SOS06-2.jpg . --Ellywa (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
No permission - copyvio from https://asc-avsv.nl/ as well Hoyanova (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Association has been existing since the 1850s; assuming this logo/CoA has been in use since its founding the copyright would have expired ber Commons:Netherlands 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- The logo is not subjected to copyright, asked association. 8738846729e (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of 1234qwer. --Ellywa (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
USSR is not an author, and Soviet archives is not a copyright holder. No evidence of publication is presented. The image needs some proof. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- {{PD-RU-exempt}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inst-Soil (talk • contribs) 11:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Judicial materials of unknown authorship — that says it all. - Gerarus (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Lacks sources, so there's no proof of this position. If this image is made by detectives, their rights are reserved. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sources have been supplied yet. --Kl833x9 (talk) 18:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- 4 sources are shown now. Thank you! Let us discuss the sources. 1)
sibreal.orgis unavailable. 2)ptiburdukov.rutells that Butyrskaya prison has the copyright for these images, so we heed a license from that prison. 3)famhist.rutells that some «Лайт Телеком» has the copyright for these images, so we heed a license from «Лайт Телеком». 4) The last source tells that these images are the property of «Наука» publishing house, so we heed a license from that publisher. Now, as the sources are shown, we need to gain licenses from those sources, as soon as they are the copyright holders. If these sources are not the copyright holders, we need to gain license from a real copyright holder. By the way, the sources tell us that this image was published in 2007. This means, it is protected by copyright until the 2082 year. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- 4 sources are shown now. Thank you! Let us discuss the sources. 1)
- Sources have been supplied yet. --Kl833x9 (talk) 18:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed an image which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this image must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1938 - in 2059 .. --Ellywa (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-date fork of File:Limited recognition.png; there are better maps available at Category:Maps of Ambazonia Enyavar (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: without additional information this map cannot be understood. It has therefore no educational value and can be considered out of COM:SCOPE. There I decided to delete this map. --Ellywa (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
File:20210128193024!Countries by Corruption Perceptions Index score (2020 - ColorBrewer RdYLGn).png
[edit]Claimed to be a falsification, here; while this one is supposed to be correct. so I see no reason to keep the false one.
The difference lies in the color assigned to Russia. Enyavar (talk) 17:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Update: There are now newer data, so there has been made a new (correct) map based on data for 2021 at File:Map of countries by Corruption Perceptions Index (2021).svg. The same user that falsified this map has uploaded their version at File:Map of countries by Corruption Perceptions Index (2021).png, again changing the color of Russia to a "better" value. I do not know the procedures here at Commons too well, so I do not know if the new problem can be included in this request. I will just make a warning note on the new falsified map and hope someone who knows the ropes round here will take the necessary steps. --TU-nor (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Citing User:Rosenzweig from their talk page: "it's pretty easy to check the facts. The color scheme for the map can be found in the WP articles like de:Korruptionswahrnehmungsindex (which also still has the 2020 map), and the points (linked from the article) are at [6]. Russia has 30 points in 2020, so it should be the same color as Ukraine or Mongolia, but it's not, it has the color for countries with 40 to 49 points. So that is clearly incorrect, and I would delete that, because a file that is objectively incorrect is not educationally useful and therefore not in project scope."
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No educational value due to errors/falsification and therefore out of COM;SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploader claims that it is from the 20th century, however the original source (https://www.pinterest.de/pin/538672805412951009/) does not mention this anywhere. So this is clearly a copyrighted image. There absolutely is no proof that it is licensed under a free license. -- Pofka (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- These are images of the flags of the Commonwealth of the 17th century. See {{PD-BY-exempt}}, {{Polishsymbol}}. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- No, this is a copyrighted brochure or a page from a book/journal. Copyright belongs to somebody who created it and as already mentioned before there is no proof that it was created in the 20th century. -- Pofka (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the background of this image, with colors and birds appear copyrighted, apart from the banners itself, which might be in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from a random copyrighted image. See another nomination: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banners of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth of the 17th.jpg. There absolutely is no proof that it is licensed under a free license. -- Pofka (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- These are image of the flag of the Commonwealth of the 17th century. See {{PD-BY-exempt}}, {{Polishsymbol}} and Category:Flags of Grodno County (1413-1795). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source of this image, https://www.pinterest.de/pin/538672805412951009/, does not show this is published with a free licence. The age of the file is not shown on that source. This banner is probably based on File:Chorągiew grodzieńska.JPG, which is in PD. However, the design of the horse is modern and might be copyrighted. Also other details of the design are different and possibly copyrighted. Therefore I decided to delete this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Just another fake, imaginary flag created by user Лобачев Владимир (violation of COM:NOTHOST rule). This is a continuation of his malicious propaganda activity in Wiki projects. See main nomination here: Commons:Deletion requests/Imaginary flags created and uploaded by Лобачев Владимир in which many users unanimously agreed that Лобачев Владимир's activity is completely malicious. Block him finally. -- Pofka (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Description of banner 1: The coat of arms of the Trakai Voivodeship was the Lithuanian Pogonią in a red field. Based on the color of the banner, the Voivodship parliamentary uniform was created, which was a scarlet robe, green lapels and a white jacket. (Source 1)
- Description of banner 2: The banner of the Trakai Voivodeship with two horns contains the coat of arms of the Grand Duke of Lithuania: an armed man on a horse with a sword, in a red field. (Sourse 2)
.jpg)
.jpg)
-1.svg)
Keep --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment User Dragovit perfectly described in another nomination (see: Commons:Deletion requests/Imaginary flags created and uploaded by Лобачев Владимир) that this flag may belong to a person, but is not an official flag of the voivodeship as it varies from the official state symbols colors. -- Pofka (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is not the flag of the voivodship. This is the banner of the militia of the nobility of the voivodship. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- This is your own fantasy. -- Pofka (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
- The surviving part of the Trakai banner, 1615. National Museum of Lithuania. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Just another fake, imaginary flag created by user Лобачев Владимир (violation of COM:NOTHOST rule). This is a continuation of his malicious propaganda activity in Wiki projects. See main nomination here: Commons:Deletion requests/Imaginary flags created and uploaded by Лобачев Владимир in which many users unanimously agreed that Лобачев Владимир's activity is completely malicious. Block him finally. -- Pofka (talk) 22:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
-
original -
copy
.svg)
- The image is very close to the original and there are no violations of the rules. These are disguised attacks on the participant. Administrators please pay attention to this. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 21:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
MPF (talk) 22:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. This seems a photo of a poster, which is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The coat of arms never became official. It was a proposal by the municipality. Kj1595 (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If it was a genuinely proposed coat of arms, why would this pose a COM:SCOPE problem? Surely that's the sort of thing that might be of educational value should someone want to learn about proposed coats of arms. Mhawk10 (talk) 21:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Kj1595 and Mhawk10: you could rename the file to "propsed Coat of arms" or add your comments to the description. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Копирайт Русской службы Би-би-си (https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-60483790). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep: Russian: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-60483790 — указано, что источник: Kremlin.ru («Источник: Kremlin.ru») — а сайт Kremlin.ru предполагает свободную лицензию. Нужно найти на Kremlin.ru данную карту и верно оформить файл. English: on BBC in the bottom of map «Источник: Kremlin.ru» is noted. So it's need to find on Kremlin.ru (a site with free license, see {{Kremlin.ru}}) this map and update the file. --Brateevsky {talk} 07:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Brateevsky, the website http://www.kremlin.ru/ is published with CC-BY-SA4.0. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context/description, little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant and outdated version of File:SAWETTABUT-WRL-2022.png. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Table tennis player world rankings. I added description and categories. GeorgHH • talk 21:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying it, but graph is still redundant to File:SAWETTABUT-WRL-2022.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:REDUNDANT. --Ellywa (talk) 21:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal/fantasy COA, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted reconstruction uploaded from Facebook. Uploader does not have copyrights to this image and it is not an official symbol/flag of Moldova. -- Pofka (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
-
original -
reconstruction
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_of_Stefan_Birtz_Link_(the_person_who_created_User’;’UniversalHumanTranscendence)_10D76286-A534-415A-8513-2A0583A093AE.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
-1.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=647358237#File:My_Baggage_Logo.png){kind=link}
_Lightfoot_Signature.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chicago_and_North_Western_Transportation_Company_Logo,_August_1941.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_of_Stefan_Birtz_Link_(the_person_who_created_User%E2%80%99;%E2%80%99UniversalHumanTranscendence)_10D76286-A534-415A-8513-2A0583A093AE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_Stefan_Birtz_Link_(the_person_who_created_User%E2%80%99;%E2%80%99UniversalHumanTranscendence)_10D76286-A534-415A-8513-2A0583A093AE.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&diff=prev&oldid=540910601){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-1.svg){kind=link}
-1.svg){kind=link}
-1.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- The specified flag-reconstruction does not add anything new to the original flag, only slightly drawing and showing a faded inscription. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- So it includes author's work which does not belong to you as an uploader. Clear copyright infringement. -- Pofka (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If the reconstruction is faithful to the original flag, then the reconstructed design would be non-distinguishable from a design that was first published in 1859 and would therefore not be copyrightable under Moldovan and U.S. law. Does the reconstruction differ from the true original print of the flag to such an extent that the reconstruction satisfies COM:TOO for Moldova? Mhawk10 (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I do not know in which country this image was made. Perhaps Moldovia as suggested above. In Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Moldova it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality to show which images (including text) are not protected by copyright due to their simple design. Therefore it must be assumed this reconstruction of an old flag is copyrighted. Consequently, it must be deleted. @Лобачев Владимир: , as the name of the person who made this reconstruction is known from the source on facebook, you could contact them to ask for permission. Please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have obtained permission to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file, please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
fake coat of arms /rigged coat of arms L-BCHKT (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @L-BCHKT: could you please provice some evidence why this Coat of arms is not correct? And what would you think of File:Blason de la wilaya de Tissemsilt .png (uploaded by the same user). And do you think/have evidence that File:Tissemsilt Coat of Arms (French Algeria).svg , also located in Category:Coats of arms of cities in Tissemsilt Province, is correct? I hope you will have time to look at this. Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file, as the nominator did not respond to my questions. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. @L-BCHKT: , you could consider to add Template:Fact disputed to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. Or you can nominate the image again for deletion of course, with improved motivation. Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
