User talk:Lallint

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lallint!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Jules Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 00:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Food court in the Salmon Run Mall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankpods (talk • contribs) 01:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't think you meant to publish that lol Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 16:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because... your moms gaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankpods (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

You're lucky you chose to trout me instead of someone else because they would have taken this a lot more seriously lmao. It's nice that I finally got my very first vandalism userpage edit! Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 18:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Also, why me instead of someone else? Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 18:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Public Square (Watertown, New York) by year

My understanding is that Public Square isn't a city on its own so I rewrote it all as a portion of Watertown which is the city. Naming convention for years is Category:2005 in Public Square (Watertown, New York) not Category:Public Square (Watertown, New York) in 2005. Mind if I move and rename them all? I want to know if we can avoid a CFD discussion for something fairly straightforward. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I am aware of this, and accidentally named Watertown, New York categories as Watertown, New York in ... instead of ... in Watertown, New York and renamed these categories accordingly (which would have been a pain in the ass had I not literally just before found out about HotCat), but I figured that cities are ... in city, and locations are location in .... I'm fine with you renaming these, though. Oopsy daisy if that was some kind of MOS violation. Could you fix up Template:PublicSquareWatertownNewYorkYear as well, then? Because it links itself as a category and creates a loop, and you can't navigate through the public square year articles using it. Thanks for mentioning it instead of doing a CFD discussion, cheers Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I see you already fixed it up. You work fast! Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Myrmecia nigrocincta (Australian Bull Ant).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myrmecia nigrocincta (Australian Bull Ant).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RU_COA_Shehawcow_XII-90.png

• Could you please delete this copyrited picture, which has NOT been published before 1917 or 1927 as it is stated in licence. It is lying. There is no proof that it has been published that time, but it is known that it has NOT been published till nowdays, because this picture is from one of the only not published book is kept in archive. ЩЩЩ (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  I didn't personally delete the files that you uploaded, I only marked them to be deleted. I can't delete files, but that file looks to be just fine to me. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 11:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  Could you please mark this picture to delete, it is not published anywhere, moreover I am the owner of this picture and give this picture only to them who ask me. I do not give permission to publish it here. ЩЩЩ (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  Once again, it is lying that this picture was published before 1917 or 1927 as it is stated in the licence. Lying is a lying, it is already serious problem, which means wikipedia cannot use this image! 18:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC) ЩЩЩ (talk) 18:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  This file has been nominated twice with clear consensus to keep, and every time you are asked to log in to the uploading account you brush it off. Even in the very small chance that you actually own the rights to this image, it was created over 120 years ago, which means that it is valid to store on commons per Template:PD-old-assumed. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

  According to this administrator you can NOT to keep anything from this never published book keeping in the state archive RGIA(РГИА), it can NOT be the source, see his words: "<<Не вижу оснований для вставки изображения. / РГИА - не АИ/ Saramag (обс.) 12:08, 5 февраля 2021 (UTC) >>" ЩЩЩ (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

  You repeatedly saying that you are the owner while also saying someone else is the owner makes it seem like you're desperate to have this image deleted. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

  You did not want to talk with me, I do not want to talk with a persone who couldn't understand what he has been told several times. Take a rest and don't slander any more! ЩЩЩ (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Kids exercising.jpeg

File:Kids exercising.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Midtown Towers (Watertown, New York).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I don't see a better picture in the commons at the moment, but I think that a valuable image should not be so extremely distorted. We'll have to wait a while for a better photo. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Could you specify what kind of distortion? I agree that there is perspective distortion, but I don't really know how to capture this really tall building without pointing the camera up. Using Photoshop just seems to make it have those edges where you have to digitally add in details that don't exist. I'm not that good with Photoshop, but if it would be possible for someone else to somehow "fix" this image if they really think they can then I'd be game, but for now I'm unsure what else to do. I'll try and snap some other pictures tomorrow and, if any of them seem better than this (which I doubt, this one just seems to be the best one, it includes the administrator office, it shows 2 sides of it, it has a good angle for the entrance, I even managed to capture a bird up there which I rarely see at this kind of year) the only issue is the perspective, but I don't know how to fix that), I'll add them to the nomination. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment  Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I tried to improve the perspektive. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

That's much better! I'm wondering whether the building is notable. Lallint, in addition to linking the scope to the category that includes this photo, could you establish how the building is notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

It depends on what the standards for notability are, it's the second tallest skyscraper in Watertown behind the Dulles State Office Building, and it's an apartment building with 150 residents. The Dulles State Office Building was named after Allen Dulles and his brother who were born in Watertown, and is the head-of-state government office building in Watertown, so if this isn't a notable building than the Dulles State Office Building will most certainly be notable. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 15:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• I'd allow it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support. As it is allowed I will say good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

  I've taken more images, review those just to make sure that there are no superior images Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose The perspective is acceptable but the scope is not linked to the category which is imperative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Fixed Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 12:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

• Provisional  Oppose per above. Look at any other nomination on the page in edit mode to see how the linking is one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Fixed Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 12:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now : good spirit welcome to the contest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shark Attack Game, Salmon Run Fair (perspective corrected).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Likely copyvio, only categories are "A"

I see you have tagged several images for speedy deletion with the rationale Likely copyvio, only categories are "A". There are two issues with this: 1) bad categorization has nothing to do with whether an image is a copyvio, and is not a valid reason for deletion; 2) even if you have reasonable grounds for suspicion, COM:CSD#F1 requires evidence of a clear copyright violation. As for the individual images, I have dealt with them in different ways. Some of them are out-of-scope personal photos of non-notable users with no significant Wikimedia contributions, so I have deleted them under COM:CSD#F10. Some of them look potentially suspect (e.g. professional portrait or a photo uploaded by the subject that does not appear to be a selfie), but there's no hard evidence of copyvio so I've tagged them {{No permission since}}. Finally, there are a few I saw no problem with so I removed your tag altogether. Feel free to open a DR on any of them, as long as you present a valid reason for deletion this time. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

New York Civil War regiments

Hi @Lallint: I've noticed that you moved the Category:35th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment to Category:35th New York Infantry Regiment, which is alright with. The only thing what it is, all other 185-something categories in the Category:New York Civil War regiments include the designation "volunteer." So it looks like a good weekend project for you, and please don't forget to move the images as well. Or you can simply restore the status quo. Cheers, --Taterian (talk) 00:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Images of An-225 in Hostomel

Images of US State Department are public domain, Austrian Foreign Ministry and Kyiv city council are freely licensed, as seen in the links (site or flickr), flikcreview and templates. Tm (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Why marking them as missing permission? Tm (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Public Square, Watertown, New York.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Best practices for speedy tagging

Please don't tag LicenseReviewed images for speedy deletion, as with File:Breathe by Rockbitch (circa 2000).webm or File:Music video created for the Discord Hackweek 2019 official contest.webm. COM:CSD#F1 says: "Clear copyright violation. Content is a clear copyright violation, with evidence that no Commons-compatible licensing has been issued by the copyright holder." If a LicenseReviewer has confirmed the validity of the license, then it means that some experienced user has considered the copyright status of the work and does not believe that it is a clear copyvio. If you disagree with their assessment, you should open a COM:DR instead of tagging it for speedy. Additionally, if the source appears to be from some official-looking account (e.g. having lots of followers/subscribers, being linked to from an official website/social media, etc.), then there is enough evidence of a free license that you cannot say it is a clear copyvio, and you must go through COM:DR if you have doubts about the copyright status. The only time a LicenseReviewed file can be speedied is if the given source is obviously from an impersonation/fake/laundering account and you have proof of the laundering in the form of an earlier copy of the file credited to a different author. For a big media property / official account, you don't know what kind of backroom deals took place to allow them to release a video under a free license, so it is best to send it to DR so everyone can discuss whether we should trust that they have secured all necessary rights or if we need to demand proof via COM:VRT.

Additionally, if an admin or other experienced user removes your speedy tag, do not restore it; it is considered forum-shopping (i.e. repeatedly asking different admins until you get one to agree with you). Instead, the rejection is prima facie evidence that your rationale for deletion is controversial (i.e. not a clear copyvio), and if you wish to continue to pursue the deletion you must open a COM:DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dog dressed like Justin Bieber (8106807321).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dog dressed like Justin Bieber (8106807321).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because... I really liked that GIF you made with Bradley Winslow and I thought it was funny

And thank you, random citizen! Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 00:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anibal Maysonet (talk • contribs) 20:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

thanks for the trout Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.160.255.91 (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

... Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.197.208.4 (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Eben Byers Without a jaw.jpg

File:Eben Byers Without a jaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:PD-ribbon

PD-ribbon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 21:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Metal Hegar Sound Being Inserted Into A Male Urethra (cropped).jpg

File:Metal Hegar Sound Being Inserted Into A Male Urethra (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

73.189.126.192 23:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I've trouted you because no one asked — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsMeGabeProductions (talk • contribs) 10:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Flag of the United States (Francis Hopkinson).svg

File:Flag of the United States (Francis Hopkinson).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fran Featherston (talk) 20:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki campus, Greece (2783972365).jpg

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki campus, Greece (2783972365).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 07:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki campus, Greece (2741003801).jpg

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki campus, Greece (2741003801).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 07:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (4398187859).jpg

File:Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (4398187859).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 07:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Template:Switched to speedy

Template:Switched to speedy has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 22:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Updated Composite Sketch of Delphi Double-homicide Suspect.jpg

File:Updated Composite Sketch of Delphi Double-homicide Suspect.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)