Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 22nd, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license + no sources for description Hedestad (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio + nazi propaganda in the desc. -- Darwin Ahoy! 10:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright from facebook Euro know (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishav2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I'm just going to nominate nearly everything from this user. It's kindof a mess. Most seem to be uploaded as own work, many/most with no meta data. Besides what fairly obviously seems to be screenshots of pornography taken from online, these also include multiple pictures of the same (apparently notable) individual taken over an extended period of time in vastly different settings. That's not definitely damning, but is a pretty common red flag. Some seem to be crops of uploads from other users, with apparently proper licenses, and I've tried to exclude these. Others seem to be crops of an unknown source given their size and dimensions. Some of the older architectural images seem to have some consistency in meta data and may be legitimate, but other architectural images don't follow the same pattern. There's also some audio files that I'm just not really in a place to judge, given that I don't speak the language or read the script.

At the end of the day, it is apparent that some unknown number of these are almost certainly grabbed from online, which begs us to ask for clarification on which is which. Or if none are, and the pattern-following images just happen to be from the same sources that included the original meta data. Not trying to harshly target one user, but once the integrity of the files are seriously called into question, the onus is on the uploader to justify which are legitimate and why we shouldn't toss out the lot as a precautionary measure.


GMGtalk 10:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete 100%, including those uploaded by this uploader not listed here. COM:PCP applies. These uploads bring the project into disrepute. It cannot have been done by accident, and Commons has so many languages available that we have to assume iyt was an informed misdemeanour to upload and claim as own work. Timtrent (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and consensus (other contributions need to be nominated for deletion). — Racconish💬 09:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishav2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rishav2014 applies. These pictures are unlikely to be copyright of the uploader

Timtrent (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Timtrent: Unless I made a mistake, these were excluded originally because they were cropped versions of uploads by other users. GMGtalk 16:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @GreenMeansGo While I am sure you are correct, and I acknowledge the huge amount of work you did to check, I felt these were worthy of community discussion. I nominated them because I am genuinely unsure what their fate shoudl be, in the knowledge that the community knows far better than I do. Timtrent (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Timtrent: Of course no one is obligated to do anything. It's a volunteer project. But if we do want to do something, then we kindof need to make a good faith effort to be sure it's right. Otherwise we're kindof just handing a bundle to someone else and asking them to do it for us. Sometimes that's appropriate. Like you and I are responsible for our own uploads, because others don't necessarily have access to the relevant information. Sometimes it's not, like if we just nominate a bunch of stuff with the expectation that someone else will sort through whether the nomination has any merit.
Sometimes "I'd like for someone to please figure this out" is appropriate for DR, especially when it concerns a language you don't speak or a script you don't read. Other times that may be more appropriate to COM:VPC or COM:HD. GMGtalk 22:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GreenMeansGo Thank you for the extra information.. You have probably worked out that I am by no means a Commons veteran. I arrive here via en WP's Articles for Creation area where I review drafts. Many contain pictures which are copyright problems. Once here I take a look at the uploader's other work.
Since I'm certain that you have far more skill and expertise here than I do, is it your opinion that I should withdraw this nomination? I will take your advice on board with pleasure. Timtrent (talk) 06:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Timtrent: I'm hardly the sharpest crayon in the shed, and I appreciate your willingness to learn and help out. Commons can be daunting to many Wikipedia natives. But when you're trying to attack a crop, you kindof have to attack the original. A crop is a derivative work of the original, and dependent on that original copyright status. So either the original is bad and we need to delete both, or the original is good and we need to delete neither. GMGtalk 11:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @GreenMeansGo This is definitely extra information regardkng cropped files and leaves me thinking 51:49 that I ought to withdraw the nomination. Were you not an admin I would leave it at that. However, I recognise that to be an admin here requires substantially more experience than you suggest you have. This is not a time for your modesty! (and yes, I am aware of the janitorial role, but one requires a skillset to wield a mop and bucket). Being unsure of the protocols, may I state simply that I WITHDRAW THiS NOMINATION? I base that on your advice. Timtrent (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Timtrent: Yes, a nominator can voluntarily withdraw a request so long as it's uncontroversial. The relevant guidance is a little poorly worded. It says that no one else has contributed, but in practice it generally requires that no one else has !voted to delete. GMGtalk 12:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    For the avoidance of doubt, as nominator, I withdraw this nomination. There have been comments, but no opinions expressed in any formal manner in either direction. Thank you @GreenMeansGo for your advice and patience Timtrent (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nominator withdraws the nomination after discussion. --GMGtalk 12:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finngort (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Of the 17 uploads by Finngort most could be immediately be found elsewhere on the web. These are four images for which I didn't find the original copy right away. But as the uploader's claim these all to be their own work does not appear to be trustworthy, these pics should be deleted as well per COM:PRP.

AFBorchert (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by DMacks. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived work of a graphical map which is eligible for copyright; this is not covered by COM:FOP Ireland AFBorchert (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by DMacks at 08:33, 23 June 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gortnahoe tourist site notceboard.jpg: derived work of a graphical map which is eligible for copyright; this is not covered by COM:FOP Ireland --Krdbot 20:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grammatically incorrect AnkyLose (talk) 12:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: requested by uploader. -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:ESC_1967_Map.svg. 1968 requires a different file due to changes in borders (specifically Israeli borders following Six-Day War) Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: but redirected the other. --JuTa 09:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R. Esparza Guzmán Jr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly COM:DW of existing photos with bogus CC claims. Evidence of provenance/actual author permission needed.

Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, these photos are taken over the last 100 years, partly from films. Own scan ≠ own work. Permissions from the original authors needed.

Gumruch (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elsamyy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Concept images of buildings under construction or planned. Some are watermarked. All are suspected copyright violations.

MKFI (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christo35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works by living artist, missing essential info and permission.

P 1 9 9   15:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free operating system desktop.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 00:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Common Edition of Astra Linux is free, only SE is proprietary version. So, no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabio CDs Automotivo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused user logos, possibly intended for self-promo. Out of project scope.

plicit 07:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IamWitchKing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal graphics, not encyclopedic. Out of project scope.

plicit 12:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a screenshot from copyright-protected video game.--Betakiller (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Out of Scope (Not educationally useful), just a selfie and private image. Ibrahim.ID 13:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have created this file and using as a logo for our oncost brand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoguess.82 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 23. Jun. 2021‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:SmokyMatchBox

[edit]

out of COM:SCOPE, also misleading filenames

- Nutshinou Talk! 14:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toolpathsubmanu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BIBLE.Meditation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalijacob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sencillosdelabaja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photo and logo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. Logo above TOO.

P 1 9 9   15:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfredios87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Not own work and above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   15:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   15:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brooke.hess13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Folklorin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo and doodle, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   15:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of nondescript item, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. Unused and unusable. P 1 9 9   15:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SCN07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused corporate promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And likely not own work.

P 1 9 9   15:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable photoshopped version of File:Vista panorámica, Universidad Simón Bolívar.jpg, redundant and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only on promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable YouTube licence. The channel's videos vary widely in quality; some seem like captures of official production videos. All were uploaded between February and April 2021, despite some dating from 2016. Doubtful that these are the uploader's actual own work, and should be treated as licence laundering unless proven otherwise.

Paul_012 (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Greece per COM:FOP Greece. Subject is a 2004 building designed by en:Santiago Calatrava who is still alive. Can be restored 70+1 years after his death.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons-applicable COM:FOP in France per COM:FOP France. Subject is an architectural work by en:Jean-Marie Duthilleul who is still alive. Can be restored 70+1 years after the architect's death.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible derivative work issue: of a copyrighted packaging (a can of milk). COM:OTRS permission from the designer of the packaging for authorization of the image's commercial licensing is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doodle, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res image of unidentified writing, no context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable athlete, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metalextremoorganizacion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE - Nutshinou Talk! 15:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE - Nutshinou Talk! 15:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Digital World Pakistan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, logos, and text table, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StephsTrrs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of nondescript event, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and obviously not own work: https://tineye.com/search/473ea5bf99620ba6486d127855050ebd213f8cb8, 1016 hits on TinEye - Nutshinou Talk! 15:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1chencho1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript sign, no context, little educational use, out of scope. Likely uploaded only for promotional purposes. P 1 9 9   16:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syndicat RIVAGE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, possibly copyrighted by Google - Nutshinou Talk! 16:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, used for vandalism on nl:DaBaby - Nutshinou Talk! 16:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE - Nutshinou Talk! 16:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE - Nutshinou Talk! 16:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with little or no educational value. Out of scope CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - unused non-notable person (article, es:Cecilia Ayala Lucero, was deleted for same) and likely COM:NETCOPYVIO (selfie apparently from social media) Эlcobbola talk 19:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of really low quality. The person depicted can hardly be recognized, because of the low quality and the mask on his face. For these reasons, it is out of COM:SCOPE. Myloufa (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fantasy/hoax flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fantasy/hoax map, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhad zamani Guitarist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality pictures from what look like TV interviews. Seem to be out-of-scope and PCP probably applies here.

Perryprog (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhad zamani Guitarist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused self-promotional photos, not-notable, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Multiservicios saralia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused autopromotion, out of scope.

Pibwl (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable band. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused banner with no encyclopedic value. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable musical group. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with no educational value. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a non-notable musical group. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from tv. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from tv. Rameshe999 (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name Ecummenic (talk) 01:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as redirect.  JGHowes  talk 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely Flickrwashing, see reverse image search. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

National offense to South Korea & defamation of flag 58.234.89.49 04:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do explain your claims with more detail. --Dmthoth (talk) 16:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 22:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image of The Met Museum was inadvertently uploaded - https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/86971 Fuzheado (talk) 05:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a tricky one because it comes down to the Metropolitan (who made these images available originally). The error was theirs in the first place, and I'm sure there is rationale that once a license has been granted by a copyright holder, it is very difficult to rescind without a rock-solid rationale. This is a record shot of an exhibition put on by the Met, the image is commissioned and owned by the Met, so when the Met allowed it to go through with the uploads, they have all the rights to the image, so even if it was an oops, they have had years in which to send in a request for its removal.

The argument with clothing is also that garments are wearable and functional, and also usually made in multiples, making it very difficult for American copyright law to order the takedown of clothing images unless there are other compelling reasons for removal. Hussein Chalayan, despite the artisanal nature of his work, designed these dresses to be reproduced in multiples and to be worn (even if they seem virtually unwearable to most people) so despite it being considered art/described as sculpture, it is not really an unique one of a kind piece. Most significantly, Chalayan presented these collections as READY TO WEAR, which implies that, no matter how intricate, elaborate and complex the garments were, the intention was that multiples would be made available for sale as garments to the general public. American copyright law as it relates to clothing would probably argue that you can't copyright a ready to wear garment (especially as there is no artist's print or imagery on the dress to be copyrighted, it's basically "just" pink net and you can't copyright something as ubquitious as tulle).

If I recall correctly I think there are a number of cases where museums and galleries tried to backtrack on their original agreements, and the case has been made that you can't do that unless there's really strong evidence that the license was not the institution's to grant. I don't think that applies here because this is the Met unintentionally releasing a photograph for which they already own all the rights into the public domain, so the mistake is/was their own. If they personally request a takedown, then fair enough, they can do that, but the mistake was theirs and at the time of upload, a license was present on the image that the Met was fully within its rights to grant. Mabalu (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 22:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental violation of copyright as I accidently uploaded via free work Faren29 (talk) 21:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 08:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 00:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 08:58, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a crop/ worse quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alex_Kovaljov_2.jpg Jan Myšák (talk) 20:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 08:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very obvious copyvio - Nutshinou Talk! 20:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 17:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 17:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (picture is from one of the Shrek movies, don't know which) - Nutshinou Talk! 21:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 17:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused x-ray image. File name suggests that this is a test image. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 17:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It doesn't meet the threshold of originality. So just change the license. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple logo. --plicit 09:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adriano19062009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims. An array of images including portraits, cover art, screenshots, etc.

plicit 10:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Adnan nijhum (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Housekeeping, moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Adnan nijhum (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 08:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Adnan nijhum (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Housekeeping, moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Adnan nijhum (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen\ A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, taken from https://wisden.com/players/blessing-muzarabani Lugnuts (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, in multiple news reports dated before the upload here.[1][2] Other questionable uploads by this contributor. Small file without camera metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" like posters or murals in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was used for a purely advertising article on vi.wiki. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1997. Martin Sg. (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


copyright is held by Liner Kunstmuseum Appenzell / Heinrich Gebert Kulturstiftung Appenzell. Permission to publish the book cover was granted, OTRS was added. KulturpreisträgerAI (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is the subject in the photo. Requires COM:OTRS permission from original photographer. plicit 09:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RTraveler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be https://www.regenerativetravel.com company marketing images. Photographers are not mentioned and dates do not match EXIF dates. File:Playa Viva.jpg EXIF has "Copyright holder ©Kevin Steele / kevsteele.com Image title PlayaViva Treehouse -© Kevin Steele / kevsteele.com. For Playa Viva".

MKFI (talk) 10:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim. Small resolution, no EXIF, likely a screenshot from one of VenonTube's YouTube videos. plicit 10:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstood the term. Thought that taking the screenshot falls under the own-work. My apology. 5IMS7tx (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-original YouTube video. The YouTube channel appears to be a copyvio video generator. Paul_012 (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio? 115.84.96.160 10:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons-applicable COM:FOP in France per COM:FOP France. Subject is a 2017 building designed by en:Jacques Ferrier who is still alive.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per nom. Lack of COM:OTRS permission from Mr. Ferrier, and French FOP prohibits commercial uses of images of protected public works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

claim of uploader's own work is disputed, appears to be derived from image at https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishgovernment/39577448020/ where it is marked as CC BY 2.0 Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's claim of own work is disputed, image appears to be taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishgovernment/51190061823/ where it is marked as CC BY 2.0 Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif, likely taken from http://www.art.cmu.edu/people/devan-shimoyama/ - we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name DiAuras (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please see [[Commons:File renaming] to request renaming. Deletion request is not the place for renaming files. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name DiAuras (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please see [[Commons:File renaming] to request renaming. Deletion request is not the place for renaming files. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name DiAuras (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please see [[Commons:File renaming] to request renaming. Deletion request is not the place for renaming files. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sealandafterfire2.JPG CzarJobKhaya (talk) 14:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! las fotos son de mi facebook pero ya subí los archivos originales. Saludos TitiNicola (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original image with EXIF is uploaded, should be own work--A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! las fotos son de mi facebook pero ya subí los archivos originales. Saludos TitiNicola (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original image with EXIF is uploaded, should be own work--A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! las fotos son de mi facebook pero ya subí los archivos originales. Saludos TitiNicola (talk) 14:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original image with EXIF is uploaded, should be own work--A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! las fotos son de mi facebook pero ya subí los archivos originales. Saludos TitiNicola (talk) 14:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original image with EXIF is uploaded, should be own work--A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! las fotos son de mi facebook pero ya subí los archivos originales. Saludos TitiNicola (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original image with EXIF is uploaded, should be own work--A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This church is located in France, where there’s no Freedom of panorama; its architect is fr:Maurice Novarina, who died in 2002. So publishing a view of the facade of this building will not be allowed before 2073. 37.170.87.4 14:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and add the proper licensing information. There's zero point in deleting just because you don't feel like doing so. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucweb~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: all are low-res screengrabs.

P 1 9 9   15:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama except for buildings in US Ox1997cow (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grafika narusza prawa autorskie Mike210381 (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ant-Man and The Wasp.jpg - ten nie narusza? Sławobóg (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Zgłosiłem ten, a nie tamten i o tym jest dyskusja. Ale tak, też narusza. Mike210381 (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. So I need to remove this photo from Wikipedia Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Three band gig pics of en:Day Wave - gig pics are often difficult, but the quality here is too poor to be of any use. Two of the three certainly, maybe keep the one best of the three. None are even INUSE - the article is unillustrated.


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just found out that this painting is a pretty exact copy of a print by Johannes Molzahn (+1965). Please delete and undelete in 2036. Anvilaquarius (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted clip, used for vandalism on nl:DaBaby Nutshinou Talk! 19:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake. Veljkov94 (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Leon Qafzezi ≠ own work / Facebook ≠ CC Albinfo (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a copyright watermark on this file. This contradicts the CC attribution. Kokonino (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file. There is a better scan (File:Máquina voladora - monòlech-còmich escrit en prosa catalana recordant un monòlech italià (IA mquinavoladoramo15016dura).pdf), from the same source, but it includes 2 pages that are missing in this DjVu file. For that reason, the Internet Archive file was also deleted (replaced by the PDF version). Replacements have been already done in Wikisource and Wikidata. Thanks. - Aleator (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful "own work": small size, no exif data; it would need at least an OTRS ticket. Fma12 (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

создан по ошибке 半島困難 (talk) 08:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aangezien dit bestand een wikipedia pagina moet worden, niet een bestand. Dit is verkeerd geupload. Dutchrain (talk) 08:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Alain Boismery (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Street sign with a logo and text, most likely a copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 11:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Street sign with a logo and text, most likely a copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 11:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, cette photographie est une photographie personnelle de l'utilisateur du Wikipédia en français Elyas2232. Celui-ci est connu pour effectuer de nombreux vandalismes sur les pages traitant des compétitions de football. Cette image n'a aucun intérêt éducatif (cf. Guide de suppression : "les collections d'images privées, par exemple les photos de fêtes privées, les photos de vous-même ou de vos amis, votre collection de photos de vacances, etc."). Vous remerciant d'avance pour cette suppression. Nîmois30 (talk) 12:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvioː image was previously posted on facebook (https://www.facebook.com/epicmiami/photos/151991534836206), there is no OTRS ticket and the earliest archive.org snapshot of the link given on the source is from 2012, which is after the facebook post, meaning that the given source might not own the copyright to this picture - Nutshinou Talk! 14:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Kingofthedead (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears by file size/quality to be copied from internet Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by size and quality appears to be copied from internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[3] Boylarva99 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the artist has given any free license for her works. In order for these to be kept on Commons, she must send a free license using OTRS.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not delete the OTRS mails are in progress --Whp2005 (talk) 21:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission received. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 21:20, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 26 July 2021 --Krdbot 01:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere online using Google Images. --P 1 9 9   18:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a copyright violation as actually has a copyright tag on it! Number 57 (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


@Number 57: Copyright policy says, “Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. However, the permission to reproduce this material does not extend to any material on this site, which is explicitly identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.” [4] - Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 08:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vijethnbharadwaj: Please can you add a valid licensing tag to the file detailing this (see e.g. this image). Having said that, this image is pointless anyway, as there is a much better quality one at File:Wahlergebnisse Indien 2004.svg that should be used in preference to this. Thanks, Number 57 (talk) 08:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: Truly speaking, I do not know how to add a valid licensing tag. Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected to File:Wahlergebnisse Indien 2004.svg as per above. --P 1 9 9   18:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Adnan nijhum

[edit]

All of these are professionally taken photos that have been uploaded as own work. But I do not believe that this user was the original photographer, as these are professionally produced photos. File:Blessing Muzarabani on Facebook.jpg is a copy of [5], and I imagine the rest are just photos found elsewhere on the internet (I cannot find exactly where). --Joseph2302 (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. No EXIF so no proof that the uploader is the author. These are anyway non-educational out of scope vanity images. ̴̴Acabashi (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope. All of them are non-used personal photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image. Uncorrect use of not-free image. Look at https://ifrf.net/ Kursant504 (talk) 10:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image is the logo of the described organization, used with permission, please explain why it should be deleted--Cfffri (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Used with permission"? @Cfffri: you have stated that YOU are the author and copyright holder of the image. Were that true, "the described organization" needs permission from YOU to use the image in any context unless they comply with attribution to you per your license. Your statement indicates that your license claim is fraudulent. If "the described organization" wishes to share their logo under a free license, see COM:VRT for details. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom, false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious own work claim: smaller resolution version has been published before: https://forbes.it/eventi/empower-the-future/speaker/salma-okonkwo/ MKFI (talk) 10:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilavigor: I have restored the deletion rationale. Your edit comment was "i gave the photo to forbes.". If you are the copyright holder, please send an OTRS ticket to verify this. Also, the uploader of the image is User:Ilavigo; if you are the same person please not that using multiple accounts is not generally allowed. MKFI (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no resolving of issues since above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not uploaders own work, taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishgovernment/51190611619/in/album-72157719273755760/ where it is marked as CC BY 2.0 Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Why would you nominate to delete it, instead of notifying the uploader/changing the license yourself? – SmartyPants22 (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @SmartyPants22: The nomination was made because the uploader had made false claims around this (and multiple other images) being their own work. The uploader hadn't acknowledged that Scottish Government had published them as CC BY 2.0- which is ok for use here, the uploader had instead incorrectly labelled them as CC 4.0 . I note that following the nomination for deletion, the uploader has quietly applied corrections to information for this image to acknowledge the actual source and the appropriate licensing. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, issues resolved; fraudulent claims removed in favor of accurate information . -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's claim of own work is disputed, image appears to be taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishgovernment/51190912610/ where it is marked as CC BY 2.0 Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drchriswilliams: , Hi, is it not possible to re-label these correctly rather than deleting them (assuming they are valid, I think CC BY 2.0 is OK)? Not sure how some things work on Commons. Crowsus (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Crowsus: Yes, the nomination was made because the uploader had made claims around this (and multiple other images) being their own work, and also they hadn't acknowledged that Scottish Government had published them as CC BY 2.0, which is ok for use here, but the uploader had also then incorrectly labelled them as CC 4.0 . I note that following the nomination for deletion, the uploader has applied corrections to information for this image to acknowledge the actual source and the appropriate licensing. Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, issues resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The upload user has been advised that the image was to be first cropped before uploaded and was under the impression one could do it at a later stage. KingdomKome (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KingdomKome: Do you want to crop out the other people?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can crop with https://croptool.toolforge.org/ - Jmabel ! talk 02:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept, issue seems resolved, del req notice removed from photo page by nominator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, duplicates found online Madg2011 (talk) 20:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, duplicates found online Madg2011 (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, duplicates found online Madg2011 (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Either request OTRS or delete.--User19004 (talk) 02:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by JuTa. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T273008 : irritates MediaSearch Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T273008 : irritates MediaSearch Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears to be a broken redirect. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at Facebook. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nirmal Dulal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/p/BysbV2rFocu/?utm_medium=copy_link Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Confirmed that the file theft from Instagram. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

versehentlicher Upload, keine Bildrechte vorliegend HenElKl (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading, this is not the actor Brion James NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The person shown may or may not be named Brion James, but it certainly not the well known person of that name who died some 19 years before the photo was taken. As it is, it's just a photo of some guy sitting in a chair - as commons already has many other better photos of sitting men, this has no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading, this is not the actor Brion James NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The person shown may or may not be named Brion James, but it certainly not the well known person of that name who died some 19 years before the photo was taken. As it is, it's just a photo of some guy sitting in a chair - as commons already has many other better photos of sitting men, this has no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible wrong licensing, compar link / Mögliche falsche Lizenzierung, vergleiche Link https://roland-werk.de/fahrradanhaenger/carrie-m-e/ Naronnas (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP, probably a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible wrong licensing, compar link / Mögliche falsche Lizenzierung, vergleiche Link https://roland-werk.de/fahrradanhaenger/carrie-m-e/ Naronnas (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP, probably a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible wrong licensing, compar link / Mögliche falsche Lizenzierung, vergleiche Link https://roland-werk.de/fahrradanhaenger/carrie-m-e/ Naronnas (talk) 08:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP, probably a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at some project page at meta.wikimedia.org. Though I wish they hadn't done this as an image. --Rosenzweig τ 21:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

мистификация дат, названий, см. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fragment_of_the_map_of_South_Ussuri_region,_1870.jpg 半島困難 (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

мистификация дат, названий, см. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fragment_of_the_map_of_South_Ussuri_region,_1870.jpg 半島困難 (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

дубликат более качественного изображения: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Гаральд_Фуругельм_1850-е.jpg 半島困難 (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

near duplicate of File:Yeşil_Çubuk_Parkı_05.jpg. Any good reason to keep both? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near duplicate of File:Yeşil Çubuk Parkı 02.jpg which I just cropped the camera info off. (images taken 1 sec apart) -- Deadstar (msg) 15:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. This is the audio portion of a recording of a public domain composition, but the stereo orchestral recording itself is from the London Symphony Orchestra (a world-famous orchestra with many commercial recordings), with the source citing to a YouTube video posted on a non-official channel with no other indication it was released by the orchestra or its label(s) into the public domain. Morgan Riley (talk) 19:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear copyright violation. Both the recording and composition must be freely usable, and it is highly unlikely that this recording is freely usable.  Mysterymanblue  21:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as both the source and author (if even believable) states, this is own work and a very possible copyvio - Nutshinou Talk! 20:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background might be copyrighted, not sure Trade (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7, and not really in scope. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res image of non-notable persons at nondescript place/building, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Shows people on the campus of the University in 1966, "slice of life" documentation of the era with different fashion and details. Potentially useful for someone interested in the history of University of Nebraska-Lincoln, or just college life in that era in general. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Infrogmation of New Orleans. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama except for buildings in US Ox1997cow (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The photo does not show the complete sculpture, but in context within the garden. It is part of a set on the protest of the Scaffold sculpture. I think the issue is more about the title of the photo than the photo itself. The title I used puts the focus on the sculpture and artist instead of the protest or location. (I did that for search optimization). I would be happy to change the title to make it less sculpture/artist-centric. Myotus (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Myotus. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is a free image. Taken from a government website. Number 57 (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Copyright policy says, "Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. However, the permission to reproduce this material does not extend to any material on this site, which is explicitly identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorization to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned." [6] -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 08:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vijethnbharadwaj: Please can you add a valid licensing tag to the file detailing this (see e.g. this image). Thanks, Number 57 (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And can I suggest you crop the image to get rid of the huge amount of whitespace around the black border. Number 57 (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: Truly speaking, I do not know how to add a valid licensing tag. I will crop this Image so that White space will be removed Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 08:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: Have cropped the image. Now I need your help in changing the license Tag. Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 11:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: Have updated. Please check Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Vijethnbharadwaj: I don't think you can review your own additions. Perhaps ask at the help centre, as it's not something I'm very familiar with. Number 57 (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The source website is from the state UTTARAKHAND, which is not the government. As the image is valid for al states it is safe to assume the original is made by the government of India, so the image can be kept with the licence Template:GODL-India. --Ellywa (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Freaky Fries (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made this picture, and also placed it on other locations, including probably facebook, no need to delete ... Freaky Fries (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Could you provide the link of your account for identity verification? --A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: I already verified my ID when I was a OTRS member. What address do I send it to? Freaky Fries (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Assume good faith, trusted user. --Ellywa (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Freaky Fries (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made this picture, and also placed it on other locations, including probably facebook, no need to delete ... Freaky Fries (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Could you provide the link of your account for identity verification? --A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already verified my ID when I was a OTRS member. What address do I send it to? Freaky Fries (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Question still there. Freaky Fries (talk) 00:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Ping! Freaky Fries (talk) 02:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: assume good faith, trusted user uploaded this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]