Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 10th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Old photos, clearly not own work

Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeunesse44: Thank you for your email. You would need to prove that you took them yourselves. Please comment here Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on documents and photographs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, record above, and pcp.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeunesse44 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Probable copyvio per previous record.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; user blocked. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo contains copywritten materiel from Atari Plattduetsch (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as nothing copyrightable shown in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo contains copywritten materiel from CBS and Universal not reduced size Plattduetsch (talk) 00:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, nothing copyrightable shown in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ncorrect file upload Cementeɾo (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. The file was incorrectly nominated for speedy deletion couple of times and was even protected to obstacle that. I must again protect the file. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted photo by Hojat Jabari. --Hanooz 13:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by long-term vandal who is probably not the copyright holder. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this image can be found on this website of a non-famous band and typing the person's name on Google Search, a larger version is the third result of the results shown. So that's not likely the uploader's own work. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: obvious copyvio, see also en:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mike Matthews17. --Achim (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted because this a copyright violation. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 10:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:47, 10 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 02:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Nagekhaan (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 16:12, 10 June 2021 UTC: File page with no file uploaded (F7) --Krdbot 02:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image. E4024 (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS pics of a youngster who could well use a short term Commons vacation. E4024 (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetition of deleted OoS files. E4024 (talk) 18:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been uploaded and deleted several previous times. Unused image of non-contributer to Commons. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment simply adding File:Farhan Rana Rajpoot Signature.jpg to the deletion request, it is the uploader's signature -Nutshinou Talk! 19:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted both. Uploader is globally locked. I tagged 4 sockpuppets. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been uploaded and deleted several previous times. Here only to self-promote. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by Fitindia. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online. Caux9 (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise qualité, personnalité non-notoire. Caux9 (talk) 08:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can delete, I put it on Wikicommons. This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online. Caux9 (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Média utilisé nulle part, sans intérêt encyclopédique 2A01:CB05:8915:D300:C07D:1416:154E:6727 12:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Still no valid reason, we have at least one other version of the same image, it appears multiple places on the internet with the family history, and is public domain. --RAN (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This portrait is private BBC440 (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise version du fichier + personnalité non notoire. Je vous remercie par avance. Caux9 (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Média utilisé nulle part, sans intérêt encyclopédique et de caractère privé 2A01:CB05:8915:D300:C07D:1416:154E:6727 12:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-France. Still no valid reason for deletion, we have at least one other version of the image, it appears multiple places on the internet. "It is an anonymous or pseudonymous work (the identity of the author has never been disclosed) or a collective work and more than 70 years have passed since its publication" See: Commons:Publication for the Berne convention definition of publication. --RAN (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I cropped out the frame, no longer 3d. The source mentioned is not wrong, the nominator is removing it from every place on the Internet where he can ask for deletion. He has 6 SPA accounts both adding info and deleting info, all now blocked. --RAN (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. This is now very clearly a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work, so there is no valid copyright on that photo (see: {{PD-Art}}). Since the original piece of artwork has clearly had its copyright expire given its date, this file is perfectly fine to include on commons. (For the former version, I would argue that the inclusion of the frame was de minimus, so I don't see a reason to delete older versions of this file.) Mhawk10 (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. The photo of frame is considered copyrighted (many photos of 3D objects have been deleted, even photos of coins due to the small 3d details), so the version with frame must be deleted. To prevent problems for other users of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 07:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image source is clearly not CC licensed. Rosguill (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:48, 14 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://jp.rizinff.com/_tags/%E6%B8%A1%E9%83%A8%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%97 --Krdbot 14:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image source is clearly not CC licensed Rosguill (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:48, 14 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://jp.rizinff.com/_tags/%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AC%E3%83%99%E3%83%AB%E3%83%BB%E3%82%B3%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B1 --Krdbot 14:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benho80~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal school notes, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsbela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Either DW, missing essential info and permission, or personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. One photo with transmission code in EXIF data, hence not own work. All unused.

P 1 9 9   20:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 02:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 03:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image without educational use, used for vandalism in ruwiki Drakosh (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 06:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SanMyintTunFoodVlogger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on my.wp

Minoraxtalk 08:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaibhav1297 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 09:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by J.I Shahria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 10:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 10:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuperboysOfficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photos of non-notable performers, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jrom86 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising, out of scope. All unused.

P 1 9 9   20:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vi..Cult... (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really bad quality, fantasy flag. Out of scope, not in use. GPinkerton (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution fantasy flag, superseded by much clearer .svg version, preferable in every respect (see File:Anglo-Jamaican flag 3-5.svg) GPinkerton (talk) 05:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy Helleno-British hybrid flags

[edit]

While there are some nice ideas here, all these images are fantasy flags of the user's own creation. None of them is proposed seriously or used by anyone (else). Hosting them here for ever and ever is out of scope and it's difficult to see what purpose any of them could serve. There are also several errors in design (straight lines not straight etc.) that mean the images should really not be used, even for their intended purpose (whatever that was). GPinkerton (talk) 14:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sledge scamlikely (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused, terrible quality photos of computer screens (thus may also be COM:DW).

Эlcobbola talk 15:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complete fantasy, out of scope. Poorly made, with obvious errors: not fit for use. GPinkerton (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of nondescript window, no context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theupafter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photos of non-notable band (?), no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   20:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paperandplanefan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doodle, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dankonikolic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots and personal sketches, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not based on any sources. It is an original research. It is also a low quality map which was haphazardly edited. A2D2 (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose due to spurious claims by the nominee and other annoyances.
First, the multiple maps you're trying to delete should have been nominated together, so we don't waste our time repeating our arguments.
Second, a dead link is not reason for deletion. There's always WayBack etc.
Third, there are no population numbers, so how can they be inflated?
Fourth, irredentism is a political philosophy that has nothing to do with this. People live where they live, and languages are spoken where they're spoken.
Fifth, I don't see much problem with the distribution in the map, which would be the only legitimate argument you make. The distribution is broadly consistent with the (Spanish) map used for years at English WP and with the brand-new maps at Ethnologue. What is the source for your claim that it's grossly inaccurate?
Kwamikagami (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. The map lacks factual accuracy, is of very low quality and sources are not provided. --Gartok~commonswiki (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Commons doesn't need references. P 1 9 9   17:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with poor quality. Not fit for use: obvious visual artefacts. GPinkerton (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value, grabbbed from the web or so Albinfo (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality structure diagram, violates many IUPAC recommendations regarding chemical structure depiction, has File:Sodium perchlorate.png and File:Sodium perchlorate.svg as a replacement. Wostr (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 19:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 06:53, 18 June 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given license template suggests that it only covers Chinese legal statutes, "news of mere facts" (I don't understand this one), and essentially pure data. I don't believe a very graphical logo with clear design intent would fall under these measures. Huntster (t @ c) 03:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, same case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with shenzhou mission patch. Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CNSA copyright. No evidence the agency has released these images under a free license.

Contested speedy deletion: This file should be kept, as the cited article states: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. --Cold Season (talk) 15:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal/unencyclopedic picture - Nutshinou Talk! 10:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 23:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 04:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The letters of word wrong Pansilu Karunagoda (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, no valid reason for deletion, please use {{Rename}} instead.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, photo of Arthur Conan Doyle is not own work. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the Inspiration4 isn't going to the ISS (and isn't able to dock), this category is useless for Commons. Erick Soares3 (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty Cat. --JuTa 19:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not based on any sources. It is an original research. A2D2 (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on two Wikipedias. Commons will not delete a used file simply for being inaccurate, unsourced, or original. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to spurious claims by the nominee and other annoyances.
First, the multiple maps you're trying to delete should have been nominated together, so we don't waste our time repeating our arguments.
Second, a dead link is not reason for deletion. There's always WayBack etc.
Third, there are no population numbers, so how can they be inflated?
Fourth, irredentism is a political philosophy that has nothing to do with this. People live where they live, and languages are spoken where they're spoken.
Fifth, I don't see much problem with the distribution in the map, which would be the only legitimate argument you make. The distribution is broadly consistent with the (Spanish) map used for years at English WP and with the brand-new maps at Ethnologue. What is the source for your claim that it's grossly inaccurate?
Kwamikagami (talk) 00:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. The map lacks factual accuracy and sources are not provided. --Gartok~commonswiki (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. And Commons doesn't need references. P 1 9 9   17:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete unlikely to be the uploader's own work. The map's content is also misleading. The tiny size of the "mixed" areas compared with the swathes of apparently pure Azeri territory is just too much brazen cartographic prestidigitation. It would be funny were it not for the latest (episode in the) war over this issue having been less than a year ago. Some sort of copyright information and attribution is needful, or else the file should be deleted altogether. GPinkerton (talk) 13:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep When someone claims that a certain map is "unlikely to be the uploader's own work", there is better be a good explanation because otherwise it can easily be mistaken for an attack on the uploader's (i.e. mine) honesty or their intellectual capacity to produce a map as simple as this one. It is my own work and it is not any different from dozens of ethnic and linguistics maps of the region available on Commons, including this one and this one. Parishan (talk) 00:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Parishan: my comment is not directed at you; your name isn't even visible in the file's version history, which seems only to go back to 2013, which makes it look very like the cloned copies of this map floating around are older (and therefore like this is copy of them), when in fact this appears to be the original file, but the original version may or may not be visible at any one time. GPinkerton (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. Here is no source and no author. That way we cannot be sure, that the file is free from copyright. Taivo (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Chantellesarah (talk) 23:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chantellesarah It's a test file, my test file as I use it to preview/render graphics. What is nonsense though is your deletion reasoning. Jerm (talk) 23:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as testfile. --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of publication under a free license at source. --Hanooz 20:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of publication under a free license at source. --Hanooz 20:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These have a photograph or drawing as an important point (the others in the category are just text), so I don't think they're immune from copyright. They're past the 1963 date when a copyright has to be registered, and they're clearly not produced by the Federal government, so how are they public domain?

I realize the last 3 were provided to us by a presidential library, so maybe closing admin might decide "they're smarter than we are" and take their word for it that they're public domain, but the first 4 were just photographed by a user. GRuban (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We have two licenses that apply. The image on the button, and the image of the button. The image on the button would be {{PD-US-no notice}}, since there is no visible copyright symbol on the button. After 1977 the symbol was no longer needed. --RAN (talk) 20:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 04:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan language maps

[edit]

Most, if not all, of these files should be deleted. All but one of these will be dishonest manipulations of the original map. All have been subject to long-running edit wars, with versions of each fluctuating endlessly. I assume that whenever a file is protected, this spawns the creation of a new map with more or less red according to political/ethnic/religious/linguistic persuasion. There are now dozens of different versions of this map. The resulting mess is an abuse of Commons. Parishan was the original uploader of the 2006 version and the 2015 version. Perhaps they can advise on which (if any) of the currently available versions or reversions is (closest to) the original, where the image came from originally, and whether they agree that the different variations leave much to be desired. GPinkerton (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. that two of these are indefinitely protected, so I was unable to advertise this deletion proposal on two of the files. GPinkerton (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. also that Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azerilanguage.png already exists (for other reasons) for one of these (the original 2006 file). (Ideally the discussion could be merged somehow?) That request was made Rohalamin, whom I ping here. GPinkerton (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taivo I see you deleted one of these files; could you comment on the others? GPinkerton (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copies, translations and derivative works of map with unknown author and origin. Taivo (talk) 06:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for reopening this Taivo; File:Azerbaijanilanguage2013.png is another one, again described as "own work". I think it's the last one for now ... GPinkerton ({{int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD Iranian currency. --Hanooz 22:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright, source Rohalamin (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hanooz 22:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by long-term vandal who is probably not the copyright holder. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as possible copyvio - like Rory Bridgeman, this image can be found by searching "Ellie Poulakis" in Google Search which may be found on another website. Iggy the Swan (talk) 16:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.instagram.com/epoulakis22/ --Achim (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 06:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by long-term vandal who is probably not the copyright holder. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination especially as she's not famous and does not have any Wikipedia pages. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10161263769314012 --Achim (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those two images were also found on Facebook by using the searching technique Achim55 did last week ([1] and [2] respectively). Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shariful Islam Naik Shariful Islam Naik (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion user talk page. (Non admin close) —MdsShakil (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted material. 4ing (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1965. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer relevant DrShanthi (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed DrShanthi (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EIDCynthia(IGS) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images non libres, autorisation nécessaire

Shev123 (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry failed photo, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Motion blur is expected in low light conditions like concerts.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry failed photo, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Better to have some images from 1999 rather than none. I expect motion blur in low light images from 1999. I could see this as an album cover. --RAN (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from unknown source, missing essential info and permission. P 1 9 9   20:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot, for example see that strange border down right + Looks like an attempt of Flickrwashing, it was suspiciously taken and uploaded to Flickr and uploaded to Commons the same day. Frodar (talk) 13:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It looks to me like an edge of the platform. The image quality looks like Flickrwashing, but I feel its due to the camera quality. I did find it to be taken from meizu m3 note mobile camera as per meta data that makes it of bad quality. I uploaded it after I was informed by my friend Sekhar, who has shared a picture of the vial in Flickr. Also, all the other parameters seems valid. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 13:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete COM:PCP applies, especially where Flickrwashing is suspected Timtrent (talk) 06:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment COM:PCP does not apply here as its suspected without any evidence and there is a separate policy for COM:FLICKRWASHING. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 00:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Its a clear case of COM:FLICKRWASHING and should be deleted. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:GMA Network Center. Undelete / restore when freedom of panorama is officially introduced here, if the photographer (Ramon Fvelasquez) cannot secure a commercial (CC/PD) license negotiation from the architect Roger Villarosa, who is still alive. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 04:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improperly formatted version of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

info page for File:BSicon KRZxlr+rxl.svg but on main namespace, likely accidental - Nutshinou Talk! 19:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 14:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photo uploaded please delete Subodhkumarbthbthbth (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jianhui67 at 10:43, 18 July 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Singh.jpg --Krdbot 13:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photo has been taken on 00:43, 28 March 2010 according to its EXIF, and immediately uploaded to fawiki[3] and then transferred to Commons. There is nothing suspicious here. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, seems not uploader's own work (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:13, 24 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://m.marefa.org/images/6/6f/Au-Mohamed_Khuly.jpg --Krdbot 01:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louison Coste est vidéaste et metteuse en scène chez la compagnie lyrique Les Monts du Reuil. Cette compagnie va produire L'Éclipse totale ou l'Astrologue en 2021 (affiche du spectacle reproduite), mais Anthos11 a-t-il demandé un ticket OTRS témoignant que les droits d'auteur lui ont été concédés ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrite violation of Tiger Electronics. Photo contains copywrite materiel not in public domayn Plattduetsch (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo contains copywritten materiel from Nintendo, CBS, and Coleco Plattduetsch (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing copyrightable shown in this image,  Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work/CC-BY-SA-4.0 as claimed, might be PD due to age, but could not find publication date. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fullkast Media (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out-of-scope logos.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright sign visible on photo. Need OTRS to certify permission. Pierre cb (talk) 03:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark B612 and no META data make it doubtful this is the uploader work. Pierre cb (talk) 03:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title card of a TV program from 1988. TV program still under copyright despite being a former TV program. Also COM:SCREENSHOT. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title card of a TV program from 2020. Copyrighted TV program. English Wikipedia equivalent, w:File:Love Thy Woman-titlecard.jpg, is under fair use licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted interface (interface of w:The Filipino Channel IPTV). Possibly COM:SCREENSHOT. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 bldg by arch. Roger villarosa who is alive.

No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
  • In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
Rejoinder II
the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions
Reason
our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any
I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime
* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
  • Q. What are the elements of the 2012 CybercrIme vis-a-vis Commons Mass Deletions in my Talk page? A. they are: from hacking to attacks online a) using a john or jane doe or anonymous account b) hiding the identity by use of such alternate accounts c) via a habit, scheme or design d) to attempt to delete, erase or in any manner take meta or mass date like photos from any internet site or legitimate forum, device or even media like Commons, Wikipedia, Flickr, phot bucket, Facebook; vide: SECTION 1 (h) Without right refers to either: (i) conduct undertaken without or in excess of authority; or (ii) conduct not covered by established legal defenses, excuses, court orders, justifications, or relevant principles under the law. SEC. 4. Cybercrime Offenses. —(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.


  • Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
  • Intellectual Property Mediation and many other innovations to prevent long court litigations does not make law; as I said only the present not past S. C. ruling on FOP will put finis to all of these pros and cons upon FOP including the finer points of law or grey areas of Copy fair use vio etc. At the very least, an IPO or DOJ not declining to issue Replies to any Letters of ours or yours, will suffice for the moment as Basis of Commons community of editors and admins to create a policy on FOP deletions or undelitions; may I repeat and underscore that even the SC of USA and ours often issue Bad Law or highly divided rulings like 5-4 or here 8-7 not beating the greatest Phil case of Javellana vs. Secretary which made infidels and believers stand weeping or even dancing during the Bagong Lipunan; I admit that there are Commons exact rules like on packaging and the like that does not need debate; for me this is the very beauty fo the Philosopy of Commons or its Founders that pros and cons here make this Commons world better that SC court USA and Phil toss coin decisions, specifically in the 9th Circus Court of California as CA Justice William Bedsworth wroth on me the the 3 elves; I am for inclusion ... thus you see my redundancy and duplicates ... but as I said, I am ahead of your times as I told Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. at 6:00 pm of Dec 24, 1999 Xmas my first Suspension Holiday : he scolded me for being off-tangent, off- topic; I told him that I am not of this world itong mundong mapaghuzga; soon, the Supreme Court will steal my Robes, Gavel and Golden Br. 73 Throne with is mine until age 70 or 2023 ... my names which as you said precedes all the SC Justices your nominated who cannot even hold my 87.55% Bar rating 12th Place Bar 1983, where UP Summa Cum Laude Napoleon Poblador now one to the top lawyers, failed to land in top 20 due to very low grade in Taxation which I topped at 86%; my classmate Ramon Caguioa sat beside us as my name made noises in the Ateneo since I could cite Volumes of the SCRA in exams but not the pages which is the only property of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos during the Arturo M. Tolentino debates; his younger brother Benjamin now Senior and candidate for CJ was nobody in the Ateneo; I say and know the Law, and I do not commit mistake; I am primary authority; but I underscore that I am co-equal with any editor here and I am just putting or sharing this input because of the present most difficult Mass Deletions that we experience, moro moro or moral farce so to speak; I have never contested nor objected to Deletions Request since my pictures are the subject and I stay neutral; that is why I created this Template: "Respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of editors and I have no objection to the Deletion ..." But Commons is facing a Signal No. 500 Mass Deletions ... and I still have no time yet as of this moment to finis my Legal Treatise to answer the Long Lines of Mass Deletions that appears in my Talk Page; one side of the coin like a pro or a coin can create here an alternate account and start the Mass Deletions; of course, the Mass Deletions were started since the editor said it, she or he is smart, and then admitted after being blocked to have done a great wrong... but then stated that a professor advised that the idea of Mass Deletions starting from smart notion could .... and I countered that my Fish Vendor and hired trike driver told me not to take photos of the fishes and the food Isusumbong nila ako kay Mayor; It's A Frank ... for gullibles and moro moro players I cannot like Justice William Bedsworth wait for the Next Mass Deletions to be copy pasted in my Talk Page;

I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative works violations: image files depict billboards and advertisements of Kapuso TV programmes. No evidence of COM:OTRS permission from the graphic artists of the GMA ads.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE file. Unused. Possible DW issue too as source of the image of the television to the right is not indicated. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From its appearance this cannot be considered a simple logo. Logo of a firm from 2008. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Political party logos in Indonesia are usually copyrighted. Multiple identical results via Google Image search. Gervant of Shiganshina (talk) 06:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Richard Kurt Fischer - died in 1999. Uploader is not the copyright-owner and there is no qrs-ticket of the actual copyright owner . Markus Wolter (talk) 06:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. This may be collection of public domain images, but is the combination a new artwork? MKFI (talk) 07:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own error. There is a signature in the bottom-left corner Fraudo182 (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|Wikipedia at 20 Nigeria Instagram Campaign entry Video 36.webm}} NairobiPapel (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|Wikipedia at 20 Nigeria Instagram Campaign entry Video 35.webm}} NairobiPapel (talk) 09:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry selfie of a user with no other contributions, private image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyright infringement. This image is owned by Osprey Publishing part of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and was created by a commissioned artist 86.142.141.57 10:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-sciences/women-science - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Rohalamin has nominated dozens of images for deletion with this exact same poor argument. This is uncalled for and is frankly just disruption, as well as hurting Wikipedia. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Insufficient rationale, especially for an old upload. --King of ♥ 03:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As far as I know even if photographer makes photo of person, his artwork is not free, since if the person is main object of the photo - it has own rights and the photo is not free in default. Moskvichevod (talk) 10:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The subject does not have a claim to copyright on the image. --King of ♥ 03:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright logo, isn't users own work — NZFC(talk) 11:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gearlt as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: it's my own work and i want to delete it because it's not clear and the quality is low. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. I create a regular deletion request, which lasts a week. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Questionable scope due to quality, so following uploader's request. --King of ♥ 03:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Insufficient rationale, especially for an older upload. --King of ♥ 03:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright of child images Rohalamin (talk) 11:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No source images are currently up for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, currency Rohalamin (talk) 11:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: no source is provided Rohalamin (talk) 11:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW without specifying source images. --King of ♥ 03:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Delete as dubious. SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Uploaded in 2005 to Persian WP and has EXIF data indicating an unbranded camera. Cheap digaital cameras of the early 200s had low resolutions - my first camera in 200 was 320*240. I don't think the size suggests a copy in this case, would be different if uploaded today. AlasdairW (talk) 12:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Rohalamin has nominated dozens of images for deletion with this exact same poor argument. This is uncalled for and is frankly just disruption, as well as hurting Wikipedia. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El Grafo: thanks for the ping! --grin 20:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Image is not that small for 2008. Also an aerial photo may reasonably have been cropped by the uploader as we aren't interested in the aircraft wing, engines etc. AlasdairW (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong keep - all of the images uploaded by Civertan are their own so they are free to license it however they want. They usually use the mentioned Civertan license but if they forgot then it's the license they have picked. There is no reason to delete. --grin 20:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Small size and missing EXIF data can be a good indicator that an upload might deserve some scrutiny. But in this case, I also see no reason to doubt the uploader's claim of own work/ownership of copyright. --El Grafo (talk) 08:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Hashmat56 (talk) 21:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the coin may be in PD, tbut we don't have the permission for the photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It has been originally uploaded in the Persian Wikipedia by a user 8 years ago. He has uploaded 13 other files, most of which are small size and it can be concluded that he used a camera with low resolution (probably a phone) back then. Rizorius (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 03:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image loading terminated by software error. Image was reloaded with a different file name: File:Dinkoism in schools.jpg Adakiko (talk) 01:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not flickr user work. From description: "I found this photo among a box of DDR postcards which I bought in Dresden in the 1990s." Matlin (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original photograph. Clear copyright violation of original picture postcard from the early 1960ies. Good chances to get another photo of the photographer and that he is not 70 years or later died. Suggest to delete. Rote4132 (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Racconish. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful or encyclopedic content A09090091 (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's a perfectly fine example of a trash bin in Slovenia, good quality and categorized. No reason to delete, in scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful content A09090091 (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's a perfectly fine example of a toilet in Slovenia, acceptable quality and categorized (Category:Toilets in Slovenia). No reason to delete, in scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jazzresin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ownership of a physical copy does not imply ownership of copyright. Plus all the weird promotional/remote viewing stuff.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete my account and all contributions. Thank you Jazzresin (talk) 07:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Uploader appears to be buying random historical photos then claiming they are of famous people.Geni (talk) 03:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Serious failure of logic and common sense. Anyone can buy up photos of people from the past and claim they're household names and justify this with claims of mystical insights, historical x-ray vision and so on, but it doesn't make it real and doesn't excuse potential copyright. Looks like advertising for some mystagogical money-making scheme. GPinkerton (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I will leave it to others to comment on the unusual claims by the uploader. Limiting this purely to issues of copyright, we have derivative works uploaded where the original copyright status is not identified. The uploader has made the mistake that ownership of the physical image grants all legal rights. Our primary concern is copyright, which is separate to ownership. As the copyright status of the underlying works is unknown, the licences granted by the uploader are unsupported. Also, without understanding what the original work was in each case, it is unclear whether Commons:TOO has been achieved. From Hill To Shore (talk) 16:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The Dougherty image listed above, for example, is labelled "©️the heavenly music corporation", with no evidence of permission for reuse being granted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Unsubstantiated and eccentric claims do not amount to acceptable provenance here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

User geni. Random? Wtf are you talking about Random. You are abusing power. There is NOThING RANDOM about these contributions. I had thought it was anticompositenumber but you were the one to shoot down my last few years of work. Maaaan i have videos demonstrating the transparency overlay confirmation of match facial identification. Who the @#$& are you? I know you now and forever as a subhuman shill troll. You are whats wrong in this world. May the A.I. Of the near future correct your wrong doings and forever isolate you from doing any more harm. Random. You are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 45.59.86.221 (talk) 07:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like my account with you terminated. Please delete me and my contributions. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzresin (talk • contribs) 07:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 17:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jazzresin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yes they are claims. That was my intent. To make my data public. To stake my claims for all to see that hey at least i gave effort to something i believe to be important enough for all people and future people and a.i.


Um.am i at the wrong place to do so? If so i will stop using this site for giving my discoveries to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzresin (talk • contribs) 03:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


So i need a new descriptor to include these ‘potentially significant images of American history and culture’ rather than me ‘claiming photographs be someone famous’ degradation.

Lol. I have an artist mind and sensibility about the natural order of things. I am not prepared to get too dirty in these places of editors, lawyers.. my intent is simply to write in this centralized keeper of information. A free repository of image and information.

Did i fail? No not really. I tried. Smdfh vs. free shrugs. Lol it isnt about me. Sure it be nice to bank upon the nature of these images But no here i am duh at wiki. Giving it away.

You dont want it, Ppffffffffttt. Ok bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzresin (talk • contribs) 03:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close. — Racconish💬 17:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo that contains a complex element (the logo component at the left). Fails Commons' acceptable simplicity standard. Should be transferred under restricted fair use licensing on local Wikipedias if this is the only image available. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 07:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover. MKFI (talk) 07:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted magazine cover
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The photography on the cover is also the own work by the uploader, as stated in the description. The other elements of the cover-page are hardly above COM:TOO.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Da mein Bild, das auf dem Cover abgebildet ist, unter einer freien Lizenz steht, muss das davon abgeleitete Werk, also das Cover, ja ebenfalls unter einer freien Lizenz stehen und darf daher auch hochgeladen werden. Sehe hier keinen Grund für eine Löschung. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Haeferi. Source image (File:Burg Forchtenstein - Burgenland.jpg) is freely licensed. --P 1 9 9   20:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bildmotiv urheberrechtlich geschütz, keine Genehmigung zur Veröffentlichung erhalten (oder kann das Bild bearbeitet werden, das Problem ist nämlich der weiße Transporter rechts im Bild, wenn man das Bild zuschneiden könnte, würde es auch genehmigt werden) Geoprofi Lars (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, upload images with different camera Rohalamin (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, pcp, and COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. @Vahidarbab~commonswiki: Why are larger versions available on the Internet?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9   20:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload other file Sunnyfrzpria (talk) 10:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   19:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, copyright Rohalamin (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you call it dubious without any reasons? I took the picture in 2003 with my analog OLYMPUS camera and then cropped it myself. If you can't contribute to anything else here, just keep being ridiculous. I do not care. --Happolati (talk) 12:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can't you see the reason? watch your mouth what you're saying. It looks you do not read what we send to your talk-page. If you read it, carefully, you will see this line "If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue." Your history shows us you're not in a good standing. e.g. here and here Rohalamin (talk) 10:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Rohalamin has nominated dozens of images for deletion with this exact same poor argument. This is uncalled for and is frankly just disruption, as well as hurting Wikipedia. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Vid}} per nom, pcp, and COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. @Happolati: Why are larger versions available on the Internet?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep per King of Hearts, sorry.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9   20:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Rohalamin has nominated dozens of images for deletion with this exact same poor argument. This is uncalled for and is frankly just disruption, as well as hurting Wikipedia. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Vid}} per nom, pcp, and COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. @Ali1986: Why are larger versions available on the Internet?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep per King of Hearts, sorry.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:King of Hearts. Please don't nominate images just because of small size!. --P 1 9 9   19:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: the image was taken from this file retrived here: https://roma.corriere.it/notizie/politica/21_aprile_10/campidoglio-centrodestra-spunta-carta-simonetta-matone-d0e33c60-995f-11eb-99df-4ccb437fbb81.shtml Bradipo Lento (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Agostino Arrivabene is still alive, copyright i think Geoprofi Lars (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete seems like this is a photo of an image on a computerscreen, in that case it is not pd, not uploaders own work and also copyvio. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(added) This is supposed to be an etching, but the lines in the image look more like lines on a computerscreen. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Agostino Arrivabene is still alive, copyright i think Geoprofi Lars (talk) 12:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete seems like this is a photo of an image on a computerscreen, in that case it is not pd, not uploaders own work and also copyvio. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Agostino Arrivabene is still alive, copyright i think Geoprofi Lars (talk) 12:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete seems like this is a photo of an image on a computerscreen, in that case it is not pd, not uploaders own work and also copyvio. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I'm not entirely sure, I think the image is copyrighted. It looks like the picture has been photographed on a monitor. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 12:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete seems like this is a photo of an image on a computerscreen, in that case it is not pd, not uploaders own work and also copyvio. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mys 721tx as no permission (No permission since) There is permission of this file [4]. However, this file is Out of scope as artwork without educational use. SCP-2000 12:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio:

  • []
  • [5] [6] [7].

Cheep (talk) 12:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because upload wrong photo so I want delete Subodhkumarbthbthbth (talk) 13:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete photo because uploaded wrong photo... Subodhkumarbthbthbth (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 13:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just a low-quality version of File:Cercopithecus lomamiensis MaleP.jpg, and is most probably not own work as claimed. There is no need for this low-quality copyvio, when the original image is published with a CC license. Paranaja (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image of a fantasy flag; the image is full of visual artefacts and unfit for use. GPinkerton (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossibly small resolution, poor quality JPG. (Geometry of the flags has also been ruined by stretching). GPinkerton (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license. The date and author of the image are unknown. Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded by sock of serial copyvio uploader who also has heavy focus on this subject (see this file's deletion history); Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded by yet another sock a mere 4 hours after previous copyvio of this person under this file name was deleted above. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No camera EXIF, appears professionally shot, uploaded by sock of serial copyvio uploader with focus on this subject matter (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oybek Kasimov.jpg, for example). Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnstoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. These were all earlier versions of current diagrams, that were improved by other users' suggestions. I initially left them up so that, if users didn't like the improved version, the earlier versions were still available, but in all these instances, I think we are safe to assume that the more recent version is accepted and these earlier versions can be deleted.Johnstoo (talk) 15:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable whether uploader is copyright holder, see for example https://stpeters-dundee.org.uk/2017/07/10/the-memorial-service-of-gordon-wilson-a-witness-to-different-truths/ and https://theweeflea.com/2017/07/04/gordon-wilson-a-man-of-integrity-and-intelligence/ FDW777 (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Few exif infomations, seems not uploader's own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   19:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif show author is LPhot Stevie Burke, maybe need to verify whether it is the original author. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif info, seems not uploader's own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed as the description says is not an own work, a VTRS ticket will soon fix the issue. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Request undeletion once OTRS has been received. --P 1 9 9   19:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Majority of editor's uploads have been copyright violations masquerading as "own work", no reason why this should be any different despite the source not being obvious. FDW777 (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Majority of editor's uploads have been copyright violations masquerading as "own work", no reason why this should be any different despite the source not being obvious. FDW777 (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file format for a logo; vector and bitmap version available Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 15:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   20:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iramehdi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history

4nn1l2 (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (ridiculous DR: check the description!). --P 1 9 9   20:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (ridiculous DR: check the description!). --P 1 9 9   20:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Savary34 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — Racconish💬 16:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete, I put it on Wikicommons. This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online.--Caux9 (talk) 16:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Savary34 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — Racconish💬 16:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete. This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online. --Caux9 (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not based on any sources. It is an original research. It is also a low quality map. A2D2 (talk) 18:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: File is in use on a Wikipedia. Commons will not delete a used file for being original or of low quality. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 12:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. The map lacks factual accuracy, is of low quality and sources are not provided. --Gartok~commonswiki (talk) 00:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. And Commons doesn't need references. P 1 9 9   17:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unforgivably blocky and pixelated. Unusable, should not be used. Apparently cropped from a larger image by zooming in and screenshotting. Much better alternatives exist, hosting this is out of scope. GPinkerton (talk) 16:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete it. This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online. Caux9 (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader indicates " Directly from the author (photographer) [Direkt von der Urheberin (Fotografin)]" as the source. Unfortunately, further confirmation is needed. This requires OTRS confirmation, see COM:OTRS. Mosbatho (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Having a valid OTRS-ticket makes this DR superfluous. Please, somebody (Admin) to close it. Thank you @User:Mussklprozz. --Mosbatho (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9   20:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person who uses this image on GoogleDrive is most likely not the creator or copyright holder. Already in 2015 parts of the image are available on the internet. I strongly suspect that it is copyvio. Mosbatho (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate and bad version of (cropped) File:Meeting of the Government Cabinet of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic (1919).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 18:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer require this page Doldridge (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work ("Фото с личной страницы Ирины"), spam Lesless (talk) 19:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image with low resolution. Same painting exists with higher quality: File:Sibylle von Sachsen, by Lucas Cranach the elder, Saxony, 1534, oil on red beech wood - Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt - Darmstadt, Germany - DSC01291.jpg Birdie (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, please delete, didnt see it was a duplicate (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_v_Mackensen_ca1915.jpg) FMSky (talk) 22:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9   20:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size Rohalamin (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by P199 at 20:17, 30 July 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tangetikabkaz2.jpg --Krdbot 01:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO PERMISSION WAS GIVEN FOR USE OF THIS PHOTOGRAPH. 2001:569:70D8:2C00:88CE:9FAC:EC5:F5A6 05:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, permission was given by Jesse Grant and the Canadian Film Centre. I tagged it {{Personality}}. Please fix your CAPS LOCK key, it looks like you're shouting.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There have been a couple of photos from the Canadian Film Centre's flickrstream that have received similar ill-informed challenges. One claim asserted that image couldn't be used because it was from a "private event". I replied there that the Canadian Film Centre got to set the rules there, and that mere attendance at one of their events implied an individual had agreed to let the CFC's official photographers circulate, and snap their picture, and do whatever they wanted with them, including publishing them under a free license, on flickr.
{{Flickrreview}} confirmed the free license.
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bryan Atkinson at the CFC 25th Anniversary Celebration in LA.jpg... As per the previous discussion, if 2001:569:70D8:2C00:88CE:9FAC:EC5:F5A6 is Karyn Edwards she should (1) look into requesting courtesy deletion; (2) confirming her identity via OTRS; (3) uploading a more flattering replacement photo if the actual concern is that this photo is unflattering. Geo Swan (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo subject to copyright, source photo unavailable RootsCad (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • RootsCad, it is very odd that you should make a wiki-ID and initiate a deletion discussion as your very first activity. I request you identify your prior activity, your prior wiki-IDs.
  •  Keep I am surprised that the original image was removed from flickr. However, as discussed during the original deletion discussion, the flickrreview robot confirmed it was properly licensed, when it was upoaded. The owners of an images intellectual property rights have no legal procedure for clawing back rights they have released. This means it is totally irrelevant that the original images is no longer available. Geo Swan (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per previous section.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Creative Commons licenses are not revokable so not ofering it any longer at the imitial publication site does not revoke licenses granted before. Also, the photo is used (in userspace) and so its removal should be preceeded with discussing the need of its use at the user page or providing an appropriate replacement. Ankry (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC licenses are not revokable, no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: one of child images is deleted then this should be deleted Rohalamin (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small official pic from internet 94.25.229.243 12:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   20:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:18, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: logo Rohalamin (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's the logo of Kerman TV.

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The government of Buenos Aires may have the right to license this image freely, but this image substantially shows an illuminated advertisment which is certainly not a work of Buenos Aires (but a work of Coca-Cola company). COM:Derivative work of an advertisment screen with showing Coca-Cola ad as a result. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 02:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nationalistic fiction, patently false manipulation of File:Republic of mahabad and iranian azerbaijan 1945 1946.png GPinkerton (talk) 02:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SCP-2000: Perhaps @HistoryofIran: can enlighten us regarding recent file change on what/where "reported to Wikimedia" means. The problems with azbwiki may be beyond reasoning and insoluble on-wiki. GPinkerton (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it was a fruitless effort. Azbwiki is a lost cause, good luck trying to reason with them. The fact that whatever fictional fanmade map can be uploaded and used really says it all about the loopholes in this site. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen (going back quite a while, and still apparently ongoing): meta:Requests for comment/Racism at Azerbaijani Wikipedia, meta:Requests for comment/Do something about azwiki, meta:Requests for comment/Government propaganda on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia, meta:Requests for comment/Sysop abuse on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. GPinkerton (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why Commons should be facilitating this; if they want this stuff they should upload it locally, not here. GPinkerton (talk) 12:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:INUSE It should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope. If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope. There is no reason that the file should be deleted since the file is enough for it to be within in scope, even the accuracy of map is disputed. I recommend raise a local discussion or global RFC instead of nominating for deletion in here. Thank you. SCP-2000 02:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. Either obtain local consensus to remove the image from azbwiki, or get consensus at meta to override the local consensus similar to the RfC threads mentioned. Commons cannot override local usage of a file. --King of ♥ 23:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo of w:GMA News TV does not pass the simplicity of logo. Its equivalent at enwiki, w:File:GMA News TV Logo Vector.svg, is under fair use licensing. Two previous files used on enwiki — w:File:Gmanewstv.jpg and w:File:GMA News TV Logo (2015).png — were also under fair use and are now deleted as unused non-free files. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and comment. --Ellywa (talk) 13:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a 3D object, so (unfortunately) copyrighted. Uploader is a Manhhai (Unserefahne) sock so the license is laundered. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 05:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. A photograph of a coin is considered as a photo of a 3D object, per Commons:Currency. --Ellywa (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisardojm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: license CC-BY-NC https://www.planet.com/gallery/#!/post/sugarcane-deforestation Ras67 (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no direct Wayback snapshot, but you can retrieve this image on the gallery site. Then you have to scroll down to "Sugarcane Deforestation Bolivia January 1, 2017" and click it. In these gallery you can see the licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

Kept: indeed, this image in archive.org shows CC-BY-SA4.0. So image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO says nothing about Dominican Republic, but maybe the logo is considered complex. In scope, article exists. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged logo (cropped bottom part) in order for it to be of any real use. Can be reuploaded here or locally if necessary at a better quality. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tferrero25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, logo of relevant company currently with article on en:WP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Она неправильная. Златоуст статус города получил в 1865 г. когда была образована Уфимская губерния. Оренбургская губерния делилась на уезды: Бирский, Бугульминский, Бузулукский, Верхнеуральский, Мензелинский, Оренбургский, Стерлитамакский, Троицкий, Уфимский, Челябинский[8]. Озеров (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She's wrong. Zlatoust received the status of a city in 1865 when the Ufa province was formed. The Orenburg province was divided into districts: Birsky, Bugulminsky, Buzuluksky, Verkhneuralsky, Menzelinsky, Orenburgsky, Sterlitamaksky, Troitsky, Ufimsky, Chelyabinsky [1].
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Incorrect file does not necessarily have to be deleted. However, this seems to be a scan from a book - notice some faint words in the yellow background on far left and right sides, seemingly the next page on the scanner or an imprint from another page when the book was closed. IMO it is likely not uploader's own work. -M.nelson (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, discussion and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment or explain the copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autorka dzieła ostatecznie nie wyraziła zgody. Celina Strzelecka (talk) 18:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately, the author of the work did not consent
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader request which implies copyright violation. --Ellywa (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autorka dzieła ostatecznie nie wyraziła zgody. Celina Strzelecka (talk) 18:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately, the author of the work did not consent
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader request which implies copyright violation. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autorka dzieła ostatecznie nie wyraziła zgody. Celina Strzelecka (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately, the author of the work did not consent
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader request which implies copyright violation. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aktuell Version 1971 84.177.185.12 19:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9   20:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image of non-notable EP of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image/logo, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a photo of a photo (in other words, not truely own work) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • This photo at a seminar 22-Mar-07 17:57 at the Institute of Mechanics of Moscow State University http://vuz.exponenta.ru/PDF/Pov0307.htm was taken by myself. Then he flipped it vertically so that there was no noticeable small birthmark on the cheek. Solver55 (talk)

The original photo (Minolta camera) has survived, I can send.


Kept: per remark. Assume good faith of uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind -schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. possibly copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich i geschützt sind -schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. possibly copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind -schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. possibly copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. The stamps are too new to be in PD, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Stamps. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind - schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. possibly copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. The stamps are too new to be in PD, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Stamps. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da nicht zweifelsfrei geklärt werden kann ob die Schiff- und Feld-Post der USA - mit verwendeten Briefmarken ggf. nach dem 1. Januar 1978 auch wenn sie nur „Beiwerk“ darstellen – ggf. urheberrechtlich geschützt sind - schlage ich zur „Sicherheit aller“ die Löschung vor. Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. possibly copyright violation, deleted per COM:PRP. The stamps are too new to be in PD, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Stamps. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]