Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 31st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbtYubtUkAA5WG_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No camera or other details suggests that this is copied from elsewhere, thus a copyright violation. A prior file by this name has been deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anushka Sen.jpg but there are so many pictures of the lady on the internet that it could be from anywhere. Permission seems to me to be needed, but I did not want to flag this as a permissions request in case the uploader needed more information Timtrent (talk) 07:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, promotional img https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisYqxA5xp92lJNTv7_1LHBmm4KxECYy67KBtPXzgunEjHIc_1HyX8TLTihLMxzflvR-6XuCTg9EB3UYJ_1Y1KIoRYjbc7w7wjgaOxXstrugfdoecP4b5YZtdQTSby4nNEajdvUixLRD5c7B9l1a6faKe4HxsZRKQ#imgrc=Hsn7hR49CMryuM Mateus2019 (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jordans065 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS, many in violation of COM:ADVERT.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious spam/SEO. Speedy deleted as per COM:CSD#G10. --jdx Re: 07:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed, copyright issues. PurpleEquinox (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:16, 31 Januar 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 10:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not educationally useful and a violation of copyright. It is a derivative edit of the album art owned by Apple Corps Ltd. for A Hard Day's Night. {{copyvio|source=https://www.thebeatles.com/album/hard-days-night}} ChainSmoker82 (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 17:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nombre incorrecto Aitorembe (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC) --[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced to a 3rd party website (press release?), dubious self-work claim FASTILY 04:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I believe the uploader. You misread the page description. It's not sourced to a 3rd party website, that's a link that goes to the USAIBC page for that particular year, to explain the context. The source is "own work", by Earl McGehee, which is the name of the uploader. Check his user page, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ejmc. He is a retired and now semi-professional photographer who contributed to us for 9 years (2010-2019), and in his hobby has had his photos published in multiple sources. https://www.ejmnet.com/about.html All his photos, from the last one File:Aerial_Silks_Performance.jpg, taken in 2017, uploaded here with us in 2019, to the first one File:Charadrius vociferus tx3.jpg, both taken and uploaded here in 2010, have his name in the EXIF, which, if he isn't Earl McGehee, would make him a amazingly consistent copyright violator who only uploads images taken by this one person over those 9 years. And, of course, goes to great lengths to pick a consistent user name (you'll notice his user name here is Ejmc, and Earl McGehee's personal website is ejmnet and Earl McGehee's Flickr user name is also ejmc, https://www.flickr.com/photos/ejmc/). This is sufficient evidence. He hasn't edited with us for the last year, so may not answer this deletion request, but it would be a shame to lose his excellent work due to this. --GRuban (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I was not aware Ejmc is Earl McGehee. Thanks for pointing that out. -FASTILY 08:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cwek as no permission (No permission since) Cwek (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Création par erreur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koreller (talk • contribs) 15:59, 31 January 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

celebrity image from Getty Images uploaded without permission or CC licensing, apparently from https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/8777382/killing-eve-jodie-comer-hollywood/ RCraig09 (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mhhossein at 12:44, 3 Februar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: From https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/jodie-comer-attends-the-premiere-of-bbc-america-and-amcs-news-photo/1139806773?adppopup=true --Krdbot 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Celebrity pic uploaded without permission or CC license, apparently a Getty Image posted on Teen Vogue, taken by "RODIN ECKENROTH/FILMMAGIC/GETTY", https://www.teenvogue.com/story/tati-westbrook-returned-to-social-media-and-fans-have-a-theory RCraig09 (talk) 07:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mhhossein at 12:46, 3 Februar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Getty Images photo: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/tati-westbrook-attends-13th-annual-women-in-film-female-oscar-party-picture-id1204758619 --Krdbot 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Supongo que no es libre el uso de este logo. E4024 (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, TV anime caption. The Flickr license is false (flickrwashing). Taichi (talk) 00:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The original author, "fuba recorder" (a Flickr user), uploads a lot of images that appear to be TV screenshots (but, the distorted images). https://www.flickr.com/photos/fuba_recorder/ I think the transfer of images from fuba_recorder's Flickr should be banned.

Relation:

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, TV anime caption. The Flickr license is false (flickrwashing). Taichi (talk) 00:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The original author, "fuba recorder" (a Flickr user), uploads a lot of images that appear to be TV screenshots (but, the distorted images). https://www.flickr.com/photos/fuba_recorder/ I think the transfer of images from fuba_recorder's Flickr should be banned.

Relation:

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks a license for its home country (UK) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: added {{PD-UK-unknown}}. Ruthven (msg) 19:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo with email by a non-editor. Would probably qualify for SD G10 or F10. Per COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo with email by a non-editor. Would probably qualify for SD G10 or F10. Per COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo with email by a non-editor. Would probably qualify for SD G10 or F10. Per COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 00:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, unlike your own work which was taken from Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/GinLeeFansClub/photos/1897573167205088/) 218.103.179.97 01:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: semms to be a WLM permission. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

Same reguest Commons:Deletion requests/File:Язловець - Пам'ятне місце загибелі вістуна УГА Юрія Лапущака - 14096746.jpg (2). See read explanation JWilz12345. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Mass production - typical monument, per NickK & Commons:Deletion requests/File:Кременецька районна державна адміністрація - Кременецька районна рада - Адмінбудинок - 17023233.jpg. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: uploaded in the context of WLM; please check the permission there. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interesting painting, reminds one of Walking Dead; as a modern art work it requires permission of the artist through OTRS. E4024 (talk) 01:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Andorra

A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination (kept one that was de minimis in a panoramic view). Ruthven (msg) 19:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Andorra. COM:FOP Andorra.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: the artwork is barely visible and isn't the main focus of the photograph. Ruthven (msg) 19:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is too small and it white background is too wide. Steam5 (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 19:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Honduras A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Honduras A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Honduras A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor Architect (talk • contribs) 01:16, 31 January 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: WLM. Ruthven (msg) 19:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Later deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Язловець - Пам'ятне місце загибелі вістуна УГА Юрія Лапущака - 14096746.jpg (2).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:15, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-encyclopedic restaurant, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An insignificant person, photos are used for self-promotion. GAndy (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meet COM:TOO China, See Com:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Kitabc12345 Larryasou (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, low resolution and size, missing EXIF NinjaStrikers «» 05:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in public domain in Vietnam. Work is not anonymous and author died 37 years ago, short of the 50 needed to be in public domain. DHN (talk) 05:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated source is missing and there is no way to check that the content of the photocopy wasn't tempered before being uploaded to Commons. Plus uploader of this content was indefinitely blocked due to violations. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It falls under PD-UA-exempt: According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: … (c) official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) … It is Decree of Department of Culture of Ternopil Provincial Government Administration. / Це документ управління культури ОДА, підпадає під виняток із закону про авторське право і суміжні права (п. в ст. 10).--Anatoliy (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can definitely keep, but the problem is that we can't be sure that what was uploaded wasn't made or tempered my the uploader. There is no link to the actual source document to verify... Doctor Architect (talk) 18:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Anatoliy. Ruthven (msg) 19:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Should be de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 19:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) areas located around each atom group. Have File:Ethyl Amine Structural Formula V1.svg among serveral other alternatives in Category:Ethylamine. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 21:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumb-image, which presumably is a part of the content itself, is presumed-nonfree article from a magazine. At best, it's fair-use in the video itself. At the very least, the thumb needs to be replaced. And I can't understand how this image is essential to the video content (fair-use fail even there) DMacks (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why commons chose that thumbnail, that is not the thumbail of the original video uploaded by EFF. If you watch the video, this copyrighted scene comes for a brief moment. I am not sure if that will be called de minimis, however, if that mere scene will lead to deletion, we could block that part. Because it would be rather traggic to lose this video because of a four-second mention of the cover.
Acagastya (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That does sound de minimis, and probably easily blanked out if someone feels it's too much. I have no idea the details of how the thumb is chosen:( DMacks (talk) 06:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be no current ability to control the default thumb (one can select an alternate thumb when embedding in a wiki article, but not what we see here on the image page itself). I guess we really do need to blur/blank it in the video for that reason, even if it's not a DM problem. DMacks (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited the original video, added a <redacted copyright image> on the top of that cover, so it is no longer visible. v2c is converting it, and once it is done, I will download the new one, request deletion, and add upload the ewer version for this file.
Acagastya (talk) 11:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
should be fixed now. Thumbnail sucks -- and I have added a ewer version, so that once we can configure thumbnail, we can restore the previous version. (Could you also delete File:Why Can't You Download Videos on YouTube-temp-123131.webm?) CC@DMacks:
Acagastya (talk) 13:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • temp file deleted; first upload at the nominated filename revdel'ed, leaving the new upload at that location. I think we're all set here...will leave open for a few hr in case anyone else wants to comment. DMacks (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: All right, and thanks! Just to clarify, if in future, we can choose the thumbnail, can we then restore the older revision with a non-problematic thumbnail? Or not?
Acagastya (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea how strictly others check for DM ("any use that could be edited out should be edited out" vs "DM by definition is allowable"). But it's trivial for any admin to undelete the previous version of that file in the future. DMacks (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The issue have been fixed so no longer any reason to delete. --MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos of a non-notable person, out of project scope

Krd 06:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Duplicates of files already uploaded

Matlin (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: most as no duplicates found. deleted and redirected some as duplicates. --JuTa 13:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works of posters in Poland. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by A1Cafel#Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 5 for precedence.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@JWilz12345: thanks for paying attention. I'm  Support; sadly Flickr importer, as far as i remember, doesn't noticed, that these files were removed :-( . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matlin (talk • contribs) 15:11, 27 October 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Same actually @Matlin: . One of the Flickr transfers I made before was actually a questionable file, you may see it at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Balete tree Jed Sazon - Flickr.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Bad imports from Flickr: derrivate works, logos, selfies without educational value, sculptures in country without FOP, etc.

Matlin (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish💬 10:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish💬 17:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish💬 11:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copied by bot and definetly OOS, furthermore watermarked. --62.216.207.11 15:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Out of scope.

— Racconish💬 12:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish💬 19:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 10

[edit]

Out of scope (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from TauchSport Steininger Flickr stream)

— Racconish💬 08:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. A large collection of personal and promotional images. Almost everything is watermarked -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matlin (talk · contribs) 11

[edit]

Sculpture in France, propably not in PD due to anti-FOP law. My error. Please don't kill me XDDD

Matlin (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yuki9717 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Some of these may fall under COM:DM, but there is significant doubt over whether the uploader is the photographer of these images given the inconsistent and small sizes and lack of metadata. --King of ♥ 01:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Celebrity image uploaded without CC license from https://www.blackfilm.com/read/2018/02/exclusive-catching-netflixs-seven-seconds-actress-clare-hope-ashitey/ . . . (This is one of at least three apparent instances of copyright violation by this editor) RCraig09 (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like a picture to put on Clare's wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaitlynneLimberg (talk • contribs) 09:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted by Mhhossein. ~ Nahid Talk 06:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

atteinte aux droits d'auteurs Xuvier (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Minorax. --Jianhui67 TC 08:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

atteinte aux droits d'auteurs Xuvier (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Minorax. --Jianhui67 TC 08:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:NOTUSED and COM:EDUSE. Seems like a personal photo without any use cases. BriefEdits (talk) 22:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The terms restrict the ability to create derivative works: "including the logo and the full text in the lower left corner". Dylsss (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete sad, but commons does not allow CC-ND "not permit distribution of adaptations" licenses.--Jahobr (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appearing in this blog: https://www.pilotmadeleine.de/2017/11/30/marrakech-travel-guide/?lang=en The url dates it to November 2017, as opposed to the date mentioned in the file page (March 2020) Tomer T (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This article dates the photo to at least May 2019 or before, contradicting the date given in file page. Given other questionable upload by the same contributor and numerous other results for this photo in a Google search, this is probably a copyvio. Tomer T (talk) 22:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (and background is probably a copyvio). Tomer T (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Tomer T (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (and background is probably a copyvio). Tomer T (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I already created a new file, File:WP20 ptwiki20 logo bilhao de edicoes 2.svg, which is more up-to-date. I ask for a speedy deletion of this file Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 23:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OMG NO I nominated the wrong file. IGNORE this deletion request. I'll ask for deletion of the right file. Sorry! Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 23:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Processed asa dup. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I already created a new file, File:WP20 ptwiki20 logo bilhao de edicoes 2.svg, which is more up-to-date. I ask for a speedy deletion of this file Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 23:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 12:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: promotional. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it is my master thesis that saved in ASTAN GHODS CENTRAL LIBRARY — Preceding unsigned comment added by معین پورصادق (talk • contribs) 12:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a watermak at the bottom right saying "Le Libéral Presse" (from the media group "Libéral Presse" : https://www.facebook.com/Groupe-Lib%C3%A9ral-Presse-110773454034040/). Furthermore, User:CPGLCONGO uploaded many copyvios (and was blocked for that), so I do not trust this user's claim of being the author. Titlutin (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:15, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:29, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:29, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rubin16 at 13:30, 8 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 31 January 2021 --Krdbot 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio. Licence claims that it was "published before January 1, 1951", but the source for this alleged publication doesn't have proof of such publication. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1943 photograph. Very probably print/published the very same year. Ruthven (msg) 16:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the monument has a WLM permission apparently. Ruthven (msg) 16:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the monument has a WLM permission apparently. Such DRs are distruptive. Ruthven (msg) 16:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion a copyvio. Maybe the individual logos are too simple to cross the threshold of originality. The animation does. While rotating the logo separes into layers, rearranging into the next logo. This looks very original to me. Jahobr (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jahobr:
Bahasa Indonesia: Owh, kalau begitu kenapa gak sekalian tag logo yang ada disana yang juga ada di commons, gak ditag? Kan kata nya "terlalu asli". Ini yang ada di .gif disana yang juga diambil dari originalnya. Sebut saja GMail, Google Kalender, Google Dokumen, Google Drive, dan Google Meet versi icon/versi teks logo. Dan ada juga versi digabungkan atau dijadikan panorma yaitu File:Google Workspace product icons (2020).svg.

English: Oh, if that's the case why don't you just tag the existing logo there which is also in the Commons, not tagged? He said it "very original". This is in the .gif which is also taken from the original. Call it GMail, Google Calendar, Google Dokumen, Google Drive, and Google Meet icon version/text logo version. And there are also versions that are combined or made into a panorm, namely File:Google Workspace product icons (2020).svg.

Fahri talk📬 20:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Putting the logos next to each other is very easy, there is no skill or art in it. The animation is very different. While rotating the logos diassemle into layers, morphing into the next logo. This is not obvious or easy to do and has taken an animator many hours or days of work. This makes it a work of art, and therefore (in my opinion) copyrighted. The ruls for simple logos do not apply here. This animation is not "just a logo". --Jahobr (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jahobr:
Bahasa Indonesia: Hhmmm… yaudahlah serah anda aja, kalau mau anda hapus kek gak apa apa. Soalnya cuman ikut ikutan aja sih :P. Nanti tinggal saya ganti aja deh gambar gif yang di Wikipedia Indo jadi versi SVG

English: Hhmmm ... it's up to you, if you want to delete it's okay. Actually I just followed suit:P. I just need to change the gif image on Indo Wikipedia to the SVG version
Fahri talk📬



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

WIKImaniac 10:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Copyright owned by the sculptor, en:Bernar Venet (1941- ). M.nelson (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Andorra. Modern sculptures, the author is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in IRAN 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4nn1l2, can it pass COM:DM? Small enough, but centered. Dubious case. --Orijentolog (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete @Orijentolog: That part, even very small, is the main topic of this image so against DM. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The file is a derivative work of Maailman kaikki aseettomat rauhantekijät kruunataan jumalan pojiksi, a 1972 sculpture by Heikki W. Virolainen (1936–2004; Q6226040), located in Kerava, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2075-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. ––Apalsola tc 17:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Plaque created after 1991. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. No EXIF data, the description states 2001 and date states 2000. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Maxim75 (talk) 03:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Photo was made with film camera, so no EXIF data scanned from film ;-) . Why my photo was marked for deletion while following is OK? Building on my photo takes less space https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%92%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA,_36._%D0%9C%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%9A%D0%B8%D1%97%D0%B2.JPG[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. An original design of the engraving of the flower on the stone and more. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, its not normal as well. Once this one will be deleted we will delete those as well. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. An original design of the engraving of the flower on the stone and more. Plus sculpture on the back. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. An original design of the engraving of the flower on the stone and more. Plus sculpture on the back. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Another copyright infringement. Architect dies in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ну краще номінувати всі в одній номінації, а не в різних. Щоб у 2047 році було легше відновлювати. Але насправді не всі фото з категорії підпадають під вилучення. У законі є виняток для висвітлення поточних подій. наприклад ось це фото зняте під часу параду до дня незалежності. І воно підпадає під такий виняток.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We will delete those as well, thank you. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please nominate relevant files separately. ƏXPLICIT 13:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3

may fufil COM:SPAM. Files nominated basically depicts the same thing, a road. May also fufil COM:FOP Philippines

List of files

大诺史 (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment More files that I didn't nominate is at Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road (Tarcan-Matangtubig, Baliuag - Inaon, Peñabatan, Balatong, Dulong Malabon-Tibag, Pulilan, Bulacan) - 2019.
These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
As proof of notability I respectfully submit the following DPWH submissions to the public of the cost and descriptions of the project, to wit: P 115 million pesos contract cost [ Phase 1 is P 97 million contract cost Phase 2 is P 251 million pesos contract cost] Phase 3 is P 115 million pesos contract cost Secretary Villar landmark road projects sincerely Judgefloro 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
9.6-kilometer bike-friendly diversion road in Bulacan opens a four-lane road that features bike lanes Photos of the Inauguration, thus landmark notability on Thursday, May 9, 2019 photos of witnesses Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa-Montejo, Rep. Gavini Pancho and DPWH Regional Director Roseller Tolentino sincerely Judgefloro 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I only agree with you to a certain extent. Some of the images uploaded are just taken on the same road but at different points. The distance between these points doesn't really make anything more visible (i.e. distance between photos taken are too close). Hope you understand my POV. 大诺史 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree Although  Keep some of the images of the road since it is pretty notable. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive argument and discussion on notability
Rejoinder
Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road
With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:
Prefatory
First in Philippine History of Road works
Wikimedia Commons Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines and Vide Category:By-pass (roads) all over the world on file hereat Commons, including Category:Roads in the Philippines by provinces Category:Roads in Pampanga Category:Roads in Nueva Ecija Category:Roads in Bulacan Laguna (province), inter alia, name them all, one cannot find -
Category:Cycle lanes in the Philippines Bicycle lanes and/or with Rest area Lay-by or Category:Rest areas in the Philippines
Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;
Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes
Interconnection of 2 Wikipedia articles Philippine highway network Pan-Philippine Highway - Baliuag section and Pulilan Regional Road at Tibag toward North Luzon Expressway Pulilan exit
There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;
Mark Villar
Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads
advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass
I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;
How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas
I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in Barangays Dulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with Barangays Matangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, Bulacan Philippine highway network;
A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing
This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;
Finally, an Impossible made possible
from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation
Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history
IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu City Category:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images. P 1 9 9   13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 7

Nearly duplicated images (sets distinguished by the numbers). No need to keep them all. Probably keeping 2-3 of each set is sufficient.

List of files







(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan Mayor Antonio Sanchez case:
a) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) contains only 139 pictures which covers 6 Barangays of Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang from Masapang Junction; a-1) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road is very notable since the DPWH technically and formally named it so as new access or by-pass road to ease traffic and to allow commuters alternative routes in going to Calauan and Victoria Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road, DPWH;
b) Category:Kanluran, Calauan, Laguna has only 75 pnotos, when this Barangay Kanluran , Calauan, Laguna 14.1487, 121.3108 Calauan,_Laguna is very large enough;
c) Category:Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna has only 108 photos when in fact this Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna is located beteween 2 roads, namely i) the photos about half taken in the Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road and ii) the other half is taken on the Bay–Calauan–San Pablo Road a wikipedia article which is very notable;
d) Category:Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna is also a very large Barangays and only 118 photos were taken to create to researchers what this village is all about;
e) Category:Paliparan, Calauan, Laguna has only 209 photos when List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Paliparan 14.1205, 121.2722 Calauan,_Laguna is very large comparatively;
f) Category:Perez, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Perez, Calauan, Laguna 14.1043, 121.2693 Calauan,_Laguna has only 121 photos, which covers only about 1/4 of the sites covered by 1/4 of the Perez Road;
g) these Kanluran - Balayhangin - Mabacan - Paliparan - Perez Road servicing these 5 Barangays from Calauan Pineaapple is the only New Route being constructed to reach Barangay Limao 14.0940, 121.242 Calauan,_Laguna where one can now reach Hidden Valley Springs Resort a Prime tourist destination where a day tour is 2,750 pesos located here and in Barangays Barangay I 14.0629, 121.2555 Barangay II 14.0697, 121.2449 Barangay III 14.0716, 121.2546 Barangay IV 14.0624, 121.2485 Alaminos, Laguna accessed from a very distant location of Category:Alaminos, Laguna National Highway;
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Additional argument, discussion and submissions on the issue of notablility and sufficiency of the number of photos
Good afternoon from hereat Stormy Jenny Category:Tropical Storm Podul (2019); I respectfully submit the following:
1) Sitios, puroks and villages compose the Category:Barangays of Calauan, Laguna; like before particularly when I was starting here in Commons about 2010 to 2015, I could take specific photos of Health Centers, Barangay Halls, even Chapels and Schools, among other interesting points; I could have taken more tourist spots like falls and Historical markers, but they are too far and I would spend hours to reach them in addition to the long 6 hours to reach Laguna from Bulacan, and 6 hours to be back leaving only 2 hours for photography;
2) The most important problem of my photography is that most of the Barangays are critical or dangerous areas;
3) Hence, I opted to stay inside the vehicle like jeep or tricycle hired to take photos of these Sitios, puroks and villages via Road photography;
4) I beg to disagree on the duplication of photos: because for example, Barangay Mabacan, Calauan is too large a barangay with about 7 Sitios, puroks and villages;
5) The going to or North photos capture only some of the :Sitios, puroks and villages; and the going back or South photos also capture only some of the Sitios, puroks and villages but and but, the scenery is totally different;
6) In Category:Salvacion and San Agustin, Pangasinan 8 December 2015, while I was taking photos while walking when I stepped down of the tricycle, I was locked down in the Barangay Hall and arrested to the Police station; I was asked to sign a waiver that I have no complaint against my detention; I failed to Google this critical area only to have found that Taguinod brothers were shot in Barangay San Agustin;

The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks Category:Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna)

6) The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks;
7) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) Site of the Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder-rape is Km. 74 Brgy. Balayhangin Calauan Laguna 14°7'53"N 121°18'44"E along Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna and List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna and Barangay and Erais Farm 30-hectare farm in Santo Tomas, Calauan, Laguna 14.1711, 121.3367 Calauan, Laguna Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road‎ (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) from Victoria (Masapang) Duck Junction Calauan - Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road Erais Farm Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) People vs. Antonio Sanchez, et al xxx"'The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan. It was here that Luis announced that it’s time for the group to feast on Eileen (the exact words of Luis were “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss”)." xxx " Both vehicles then headed for Erais Farm situated in Barangay Curba, owned by the Mayor." xxx "The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan." 'xxx a dead female loaded inside a Tamaraw van was found in Barangay Mabacan." " a card gambler was able to retrieve a pair of white shorts lying near the national highway in Barangay Balayhangin. In the morning of June 30, 1993, the Mayor, with some companions, jogged towards the direction of Barangay Mabacan and at the same time inquired from residents whether they noticed anything unusual on the night of June 28, 1993. A certain “Mang Torio” told the Mayor that he found a pair of “maong” pants lying at the side of the road but left if there. After inspecting the dirty “maong” pants, the Mayor instructed Mang Torio to keep the pants as the former will send someone back to pick it up."
7a) I respectfully appeal and with due respect submit my humble thoughts and reply on these issues, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: Google Streemaps-like photos. I certainly wouldn't encourage anyone to make photos like these, and some photos are certainly not necessary, but I don't want to make that decision, since we'd keep a sizeable amount. If someone wants to nominate individual photos, feel free to. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 8

COM:ADVERT (advertisements) — COM:NOTUSED no forseeable educational use.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine for the specific events therein mentioned - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription, I have no objection to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerations Judgefloro (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgefloro: see User talk:Clindberg#About Judgefloro's claim of "extinctive prescription" for RA 8293 for my question about the applicability of "extinctive prescription". And no, it is not relevant to Commons — it comes into effect 4 years after the file/s has/have been deleted, because there are no more files that reusers may exploit and potentially infringe creators'/authors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 9

Redundant to both File:0067jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 15.jpg and File:0087jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 03.jpg. Almost duplicate, COM:NOTUSED.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 10

COM:ADVERT, advertising tarpaulin/s, and a random listing. COM:NOTUSED and out of COM:SCOPE.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto;
Off-topic lecture on tarpaulins

when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;

I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
No objection to the deletion of these 2 photos this one is obsolete finished product so to speak hence functus oficio
@Judgefloro: then be more selective in uploading, like what P199 and several other editors have told you. Commons is not a place to host your personal images showing addresses and redundant directional signs, just because these images only served as your guide to not get lost. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This one is the official Category:Mass schedules in the Philippines created on 2014 as sub-category of Category:Mass schedules ; it is very informative and tells the faithful the Category:Schedules in the Philippines hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid this is too redundant already to related images in the category you mentioned. Also this is COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their ligths are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 11

A set of redundant images. See COM:SPAM and COM:NOTUSED. Uploader has been notified to be more selective in their uploads. Only 2 or 3 images for each person or child depicted is enough (those that I didn't nominate).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect ...

Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-a-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community; sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Vide: Category:Groups of children in the Philippines Category:Close-up photographs of children and * Category:Close-up photographs of children eating in the Philippines sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 08:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. These certainly are redundant to the many near-duplicate images already in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 12

Another set of redundant and repetitive images of a same subject - Wish FM Bus parked at a mall in Bulacan. Redundant to both File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.11.jpg and File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.6.jpg. The judge-uploader has been notified several times to be more selective in choosing which images to be uploaded. Uploading redundant images is leaning towards COM:SPAM as treating Commons as a "cloud / webhost" laden with numerous unused images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNU Breakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: the angles may be different, but these images are same to each other: these depict the same subject. There is redundancy. You can only tell it's not redundant if the two subjects are different, either the subjects themselves or the location where the subject is situated. For example, one image depicts the bus in Marilao, and the other image depicts the same bus in Cabanatuan (not the same bus in the same spot of Marilao, but in different angle). If you desire images of the same subject at different angles, perhaps two or three is enough. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Redundancy doesn't make sense when we already have near-duplicate images in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 13

In the Philippines, the Safe Spaces Act prohibits "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent". (See also this explanation.) There's no indication that the subjects consented to having their photos taken or uploaded here.

List of files

Genericusername57 (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I checked two of these images randomly and that was enough to see that this is yet another BS DR motivated likely by nothing else than spite at the uploader’s place at the top of the chart, regardless of value of the rationale stated: Individual privacy laws are a concern for public candid shots, but when faces take up a dozen blurry pixels that concern is misplaced and being misused as a mere prop in the neverending deletionist war.  Keep all, obviously — if there’s anything here that should be deleted, lets have a proper reason. -- Tuválkin 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • My input: upon checking several files, it appears there are no issues regarding consent. In particular, the guy at File:9610Cuisine food of Bulacan Baliuag 35.jpg appears to be smiling at the photographer which means he agreed to be photographed. None of the images I check depict persons that are "topless" (is the biker guy here topless? I don't think so). Meaning to say, it is acceptable to host them here (no topless persons shown, as far as within the scope of my review, as I haven't review all files). File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Province 56.jpg depicts a normal street scene where it is unavoidable to include folks. Lean towards  Keep (but that is per my checking as, I repeat, haven't checked them all). But  Delete File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg as a possible no Philippine FOP violation, and it is accepted here that architecture is a form of artistic work, as long as a degree of hard work is exerted, "irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." (Sec. 172.2 of RA 8293). Undelete it if FOP is introduced here, maybe next year or around Yuletide season, but not as early as month of fall (as it seems involved stakeholders on potential impacts of FOP are yet to be consulted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Isn't the whole point of the law to prevent harassment in public spaces? A quick ctrl+f for "photo" or "video" seems like the part of the law related to media is in relation to the likelihood of the photo being used for harassment. Because it's not like they banned the use of CCTV (in fact they encourage it). And the whole "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent", is that referring to the photos that the victims already possess (like on their phones) or like the photos that others take of them? I recognize that the law is written in a confusing manner, but such a strict interpretation that prevents any persons to appear in videos or photos without explicit consent would mean that news outlets like ANC 247 or Inquirer.net are breaking the law right? — BriefEdits (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept some per discussion above. But deleted many. Some were indeed too personal (like portrait photos of non-notable persons). And as with many of Judgefloro's uploads, they are uncurated: near duplicates, bad compositions, unusable. Also kept File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg because it is a plain box building, nothing really propriety there. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 14

COM:SPAM and fulfill COM:WEBHOSTing. Commons is not a social media platform where dozens of relatively useless images are being dumped hour by hour. Yet another set of contributions by the now blocked uploader, who is suspected to be w:Florentino Floro.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 16

All files in Category:Ants of the Philippines eating Bibingka and Puto Bumbong are leaning towards COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOSTing. Additional contributions by now-blocked uploader. All are COM:NOTUSED.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment there are more such images in most (if not all) of subcats of Category:Ants of the Philippines. Some may be useful, but I cannot review them all as the COM:WEBHOST-type images have intermingled with them. Admins or veteran users' intervention may be needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 18

These images are all near-duplicates of: File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 04.jpg, File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg, File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 13.jpg, and File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 16.jpg, which better show the floodway structure as well as an object attached to it. More COM:WEBHOSTing files.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 20

Violation of Alphabet Inc.'s copyright. While the billboard/announcement may be ineligible for protection as it just contains non-original wording in predictable layout, the map used is not: it is a screenshot of Google Maps. COM:Derivative work as a result.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And just a random sign, not particular useful. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 21

COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOST-ing by now-blocked Judgefloro. The following are unused files that oversaturate Category:School children in Bulacan. Redundant to all other images of similar school children of the very same province that is already "over-covered" here on WikiCommons (as opposed to distant provinces away from Bulacan).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 24

[edit]

Redundant photos to others found at Category:Cutcot Bridge 1 (Pulilan). COM:NOTUSED, COM:WEBHOST content by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-encyclopedic restaurant, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what it is, it matters if it's notable/usable or not... And this one is not.--Nanahuatl (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of different photos. One of them features a screenshot from CNN Indonesia. Plausible that the bottom right photo is also a screenshot. Per derivative work. BriefEdits (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Per file name, upload for the purpose of test. SCP-2000 10:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di polarità and it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di segni with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per la nuova scrittura della formula, io pensavo che potesse essere valida la dichiarazione:
Opera propria Ricavato dal mio testo sulla correlazione visionabile all'indirizzo:
http://www.sonar-info.info/p5/5pagina.html
--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Prego, il piacere è tutto mio. --WIKImaniac 18:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di polarità and it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di segni with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per la nuova scrittura della formula, io pensavo che potesse essere valida la dichiarazione:
Opera propria Ricavato dal mio testo sulla correlazione visionabile all'indirizzo:
http://www.sonar-info.info/p5/5pagina.html
--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 06:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Prego, il piacere è tutto mio. --WIKImaniac 18:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di polarità and it:w:Analisi dinamica delle funzioni di correlazione a coincidenza di segni with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per la nuova scrittura della formula, io pensavo che potesse essere valida la dichiarazione:
Opera propria Ricavato dal mio testo sulla correlazione visionabile all'indirizzo:
http://www.sonar-info.info/p5/5pagina.html
--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Prego, il piacere è tutto mio. --WIKImaniac 18:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in es:Análisis del control metabólico with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image that should not be an image, used on user pages only WIKImaniac 10:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Photolysis
M = Monomer
WIKImaniac 10:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that should not be an image. Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:

Photolysis
M = Monomer
WIKImaniac 10:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 10:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private gif, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://resepindonesia.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Bolang-Baling.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want re upload this file with more information A.bondhan (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   20:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT and COM:NOTUSED - unused image of a store/establishment banner. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These tarpaulins or Address billboards were photographed so as to provide Editors the evidence as to the Correctness of Categorizing via-a-vis the boundaries of Roads and Barangays; noteworthy is the fact that a) Caloocan Roads and Highways are so prolific that often, there are zero road signs when I can base the names of the Categories; hence, I should have uploaded a new version taking from a good photo of a road shot so that in time like at present, the unused category may be a historical remaining proof of the correctness of my Categorizing and b) 18th Sgt. Rivera Street along C-3 Road verily teaches that the photos should be Categorized as Sub-Category of the General C-3 Road; this Road is kilometric; d) the dim or dark Directional road sign was then needed to Identify the specific road or section, since the Junction or Crossing encompasses 3 Main Roads or Highways of thousands in Quezon City Streets or Roads; e) The Billboard Ads blocked my important photo vis-à-vis DPWH Engineering Bridge and Road works: this is an eye-sore and a Legal Nuisance Public Per Se Art. 694: incidentally, when I met my classmate Mayor of Caloocan 1983 seatmate due to alphabetical seating at the Ateneo College of Law in 1981, he listened to my query and complaint against proliferation of Commercial Ads that block the streets and endanger the lives of NLEX road riders; I lament the pathetic blocking of my good photos by these May anking talino na di kayang Tawaran as 1st Honor genius Pinoys; hereby Noted sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT and COM:NOTUSED - unused image of a store/establishment banner. File title is misleading: it just shows a storefront banner outlining the name and address. Commons is not a place to host such promotional and advertising material. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright infringement. Architect died in 1976. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Ukrainian law on FoP has a clause with an exception for "covering the current events". This photo was taken to cover the Category:Euromaidan in Kyiv, February 2014 events.
As a reminder, the law states:

..it shall be permitted without the consent of the author (or other copyright holder) and with mandatory indication of the author's name and of the source of borrowing: ... to reproduce, in order to highlight current events by means of photography or cinematography, to carry out public notification or other public communication of the works seen or heard in the course of such events to the extent justified by the informational purpose

And I also added the architect's name to comply with the law. --Amakuha (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding the architect name. Why did you remove some of the faces on the image, but left other faces such as two people right in the middle? Doctor Architect (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do not recall. --Amakuha (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Ukrainian copyright law has exception for current events. Such works are considered as not violated copyright. --Anatoliy (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image derivative work. And I don't think it is de minimis. (`・ω・´) (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source changed its license. That is not important as CC license are irrevocable. But the source cannot be trusted. It has claimed one of Mehr's works as its own work. See this. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 09:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bears a watermark that reads "sina 新浪乐居" and below it: "house.sina.com.cn". Possibly stolen from this website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is indeed their (uploader's) work, then most likely it was first published there, and COM:OTRS proof of licensing permission is required (as an image previously-published somewhere). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS is needed to restore the image. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless I'm wrong, I believe the photos featured on the cover should be copyrighted images. Per derivative work. BriefEdits (talk) 04:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your suggestion! The photos featured on the cover of Printed Web #2 are indeed copyrighted images. They are also featured in the work Balconism by the Dutch artist Constant Dullaart, which is featured on the cover of this periodical, and properly credited within the printed publication. The image shown here is the cover of the published work. This image of the publication cover, featuring an artist's work, is protected via fair use. User talk:Daysof1971 3 February 2021

 Delete Unfree content. GeorgHHtalk   13:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old Picture, Not Relevant 2A02:2788:228:9B5:FCDB:DE5E:3805:A22 13:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old, Not relevant IAPSS - Conflict Security and Crime Research Committee (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

old, not relevant IAPSS - Conflict Security and Crime Research Committee (talk) 13:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

irrelevant Results 212.224.231.109 08:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, en:Antoine Andary was thrice deleted, he is a non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Eswatini.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedy|soy el propietario de la imagen y deseo que sea borrada}}. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kepaconde (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete The Bulgarian Embassy constitutes sovereign territory of Bulgaria. As such, it is subject to freedom of panorama requirements of Bulgaria. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bulgaria#Freedom_of_panorama, there is no freedom of panorama for artistisic works on display in public spaces such as this. The original artwork is encumbered with rights by the creator of the work, and barring presentation that this artwork is out of copyright, its licensing is incompatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep FoP in Bulgaria is irrelevant because as the article in EnWp reads: "The outdoor bust of Vasil Levski is installed outside the Embassy of Bulgaria (1621 22nd Street NW)". The monument is in front and outside of the embassy, not inside, on Bulgarian territory. Spiritia 17:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep If an American citizen can access the monument without permit from the embassy, it is not considered as been on Bulgarian soil and Bulgarian jurisdictions cannot be applied. --Isip2 westboro (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete FoP in Bulgaria is indeed irrelevant; even if you concede that Bulgarian copyright law applies on the embassy's grounds, Commons:Freedom of panorama#Choice of law would allow us to use US copyright law for photos taken on US soil. However, US freedom of panorama only applies to buildings, not artistic works. Vahurzpu (talk) 04:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Bulgarian noncommercial FOP (which is unacceptable at Commons) is irrelevant, but there is no freedom of panorama for any copyrighted public art in the United States, as Vahurzpu points out. US copyright law applies to the grounds of all foreign embassies in the United States, not the copyright laws of the countries these embassies serve. As Nat pointed out to me at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:US Embassy Athens.jpg, regarding my old UNDEL request of the US embassy in Athens which I later withdrew: The physical premises of a diplomatic or consular mission do not exist in a status of extraterritoriality -- and the land on which the mission sit is still the sovereign territory of the host state. Under the 1961 Vienna Convention and the 1963 Vienna Convention, the premises, persons, documents, etc. of a mission is inviolable, but both conventions do not grant extraterritorial status to the mission. Local laws still apply but they just cannot be enforced on diplomatic missions (the premises, the people, the documents, etc.) and in most cases on consular missions. Unless there is a specific agreement between the two states, Greek copyright law, therefore, applies to the Chancery of the U.S. Embassy in Athens. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. IMHO, Bulgarian law applies, but it doesn't matter, as US law would provide the same result. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata shows that it is copyrighted to the State of Tennessee SecretName101 (talk) 05:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gikü as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from https://vienela.ro/planuim-vacanta-de-anul-acesta-malaga-2019/ without apparent permission
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, per protest by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio The https://vienela.ro/ blog is mine. The blog belongs to me. The pictures proposed for wikipedia also belong to me. EvelinaSas (talk) 09:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per uploader. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a recent upload, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 08:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request: Low Quality. Christopher-Photo (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussions. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use. Black and white, and quite dated. The author himself requested its deletion 3 years ago. Wikisempra (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer want it published. Also Black&White. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author request, within reason. Not in use, no loss for Commons nor a good picture. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files were initially tagged by Elizium23 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) Copyright 2021 Canons Regular, all rights reserved per German law. Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. --Rossel44 (talk) 21:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just accepted the permission with OTRS Ticket:2021030110014251 --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the author of this work? How can one check that {{PD-old}} license tag is valid? 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission for the photograph only, permission for depicted artwork missing Krd 11:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2021012210009837 content permission from the artist. Merged with ticket:2021012710008043 and accepted. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission now available. --Rosenzweig τ 16:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 01:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, either the description or license must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Unused, probably OOS, either description or license must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Honduras A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, art mural is a major component of the photo; unless mural can be shown to be PD/free licensed, photo is DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage. We need to have free licenses for each and every image. E4024 (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, unclear source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is too small and it white background is too wide per CBC Saskatchewan. Steam5 (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license; "source = facebook" . -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted seems enough elements to be DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation to link listed in description. 174.254.192.80 08:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DrKay as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright notice at the source. Not an old image.
Converted to regular DR, as case merits a discussion.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion policy: unclear copyright status with missing legal information (original files used to create the derivative or composite work not identified in the source or on the file page) and not educationally useful (private image collection from self-published source; note that the woman in the picture is not Mary Ann Nichols). DrKay (talk) 21:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This image does not depict the individual it purports to represent. Moreover, the image has been heavily retouched from the original. Furthermore, victorianwhitechapel.tumblr.com is hardly a reputable source to trust for Commons images.--Kieronoldham (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This image is an inaccurate representataion of the person it purports to represent & is missleading.TenthEagle (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation to the website listed in rationale John from Idegon (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 13:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 174.254.192.80 09:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file lacks the information about original author, license and original source. This file is definitely not own work. Kirilloparma (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, either description or license claim must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The editor uploading this claims it as his own work. It is the autograph of Friml (d. 1972) and therefore cannot be the uploader's work, and it is also still therefore subject to copyright. Therefore delete Smerus (talk) 11:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Děkuji za upozornění, upravil jsem autora, doplnil zdroj a licenci. / Thank you for the warning, I edited the author, added the source and license.

--Teoretik (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (`・ω・´) (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted uncat, not used in article space; no evidence of uniqueness or importance compensating for very poor image quality. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fue publicado sin querer, no deseo que la foto este en la pagina. Maria jose sanandres lopez (talk) 13:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, low-res unused personal photo; uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imge appears to be similar to one published on Lib Dem party website, without appropriate evidence of permission for use https://www.libdems.org.uk/willie_rennie Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No FOP for 2D art. --Webfil (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per above; DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, also dubious license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not in the public domain. A correctly tagged non-free version of this photo is hosted on en.wp at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stalwart_Esport_Logo_2020.png and will be used instead of this. Alyo (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiAlyo, i uploaded a logo to wikipedia at first, but later after i was checking Team SoloMid Wikipedia page i found that they had hosted their logo image on wikimedia, and if you use wikipedia image on wikipedia article you don’t get the logo in the search drop down, so that’s why i uploaded it to wikimedia, you can maybe delete the wikipedia one in this case and let this one be on wikimedia.Hums4r (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hums4r, I don't know about the TSM page but in general, the Wikimedia Commons only hosts free images. I don't think this is a free image--it's their logo, so they own it. However, we can still use the image if it's hosted on the en.wikipedia project. Perhaps someone else who knows the policies better than I can tell me if I'm wrong, but it's fine to use this image and I believe that's the more appropriate place to upload the logo. Alyo (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To add, I think this is different from TSM's logo because it's not just "simple geometric shapes". It also has the organization's name on the logo. Again, hopefully someone can correct me if I'm wrong. Alyo (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alyo, indeed other people can give a better opinion on the same i just thought I’d do like TSM, i might be wrong. Let’s wait for a discussion Hums4r (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Doesn't matter who owns it, it's simple enough to host here. See COM:TOO. 1989 (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - It absolutely matters who owns it, as different countries have different TOO. Salwart Esports is an Indian organization, so COM:TOO India is where we want to look. In the conclusion of Robbin Signh's Understanding the Concept of Originality Under Copyright Law in India: India provides a practical approach in the ascertainment of a original work as it does not completely rely on modicum of creativity as developed by the U.S. Courts, in fact, it very well balances the sweat of the brow approach with the creativity element by ensuring that skill and judgement are exercised by the author in the creation of an original work. It seems that India adopts a middle-ground between COM:TOO UK (very strict) and COM:TOO US. This item would lie above the TOO in UK and below the TOO is the US, which is where the TOO India sits. Since we cannot definitively say whether this item would be copyrightable in India, we cannot have it on Commons. Pbrks (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Pbrks -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfpromo, used on cswiki to illustrate an unimportant local figure (already deleted) GeXeS (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, very low res dubious image (possible DW problem as well) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request due to low quality Christopher-Photo (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept per Tm; almost 3 years after upload is too late for uploader request courtesy deletion, photo quality is OK, shows someone who has articles about them in Wikipedias in 6 languages at a different age the the small number of other photos we have. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my own work. Christopher-Photo (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 KB, clear enough. Difficult to understand how it was kept before. 186.172.205.153 02:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a copyrighted book without permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbeitPK (talk • contribs) 18:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Bogus license claim. (Underlying image might or might not be PD, but better info would be needed to make determination.) Not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, the date at the bottom-right is incomplete, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, the license of the source YouTube video is unreliable. The video is a selection of clips from other sources: the video title suggests this, and there are TikTok watermarks at 1:09 and 6:39. The YouTube account does not appear to belong to a major media organisation. Discussed at Commons talk:Village pump/Copyright#Copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copied from TikTok. --Yann (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to come from a fan flickrwashing account. Leoboudv (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a screenshot of something (TV program?). The original author, "fuba recorder" (a Flickr user), uploads a lot of images that appear to be TV screenshots (but, the distorted images). https://www.flickr.com/photos/fuba_recorder/ I think the transfer of images from fuba_recorder's Flickr should be banned.

Relation:

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Flickr account deleted. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I ask for deleting of versions 19.43 and 19.45 30/01/2021 because of problems with anonymization Kalumet (talk) 11:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is it possible to delete only the old versions? But the initial image seems to be OK. So better delete only the new versions? And upload the other image in anonym form to a different name? --Hellerhoff (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That would be okay. I could do it instantly. thx Kalumet (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Old versions deleted. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) Larryasou (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Blurry small image without EXIF. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) claimed own worlk, Larryasou (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Blurry small image without EXIF. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work, missing permission Velocitas (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio. File uploaded by a person who is indefinitely blocked on commons. License claims that it is "public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer", but there is no proof to that asumption. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No eal doubt that it is PD. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description is insufficient. "Time/frequency distribution" is too broad. What kind of visualization is it? What are the white lines? What is the scale? 93.172.61.203 15:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I frankly don't have an opinion on this, as it is obvious: a schematic time-frequency distribution (idealized Wigner function). The stripes are obviously nonvaishing distribution values. I linked standard background material on these distributions and time-frequency analysis. Frankly, yet again, the repetitive vulgarization of an elegant physics structure of the 1930s, here transposed to signal processing, looks quaint in this article. 99.116.28.144 01:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And yet the distribution should be specified, the fact that the Wigner function is used should be mentioned, etc.. In short the plot should be made reproducible by people with some knowledge on the topic and access to scientific libraries. --93.172.61.203 13:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.38.150 15:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated source is missing and there is no way to check that the content of the photocopy wasn't tempered before being uploaded to Commons. Plus uploader of this content was indefinitely blocked due to violations. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It falls under PD-UA-exempt: According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: … (c) official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) … It is Decree of Department of Culture of Ternopil Provincial Government Administration. / Це документ управління культури ОДА, підпадає під виняток із закону про авторське право і суміжні права (п. в ст. 10). Сканування документа не дає якихось додаткових прав.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerns raised on Enwiki by User:Mikenorton: "taken directly from Figure 1. of Jackson and Talbot's 1986 paper "External shapes, strain rates, and dynamics of salt structures ", with a colour wash being the only change made". Paul_012 (talk) 18:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Source URL is not the same image, and likely source of https://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/07/prweb1151814.htm is a PR piece by manufacturer SpaceAge Control. Additionally, there is no EXIF data to corroborate source being NASA. Huntster (t @ c) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I am so tired of these bogus "delete if no EXIF" nominations. There is no Commons policy to support anything of the sort.
The source is given on the description page: https://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/07/prweb1151814.htm It's the first image listed, the image file itself is here: http://www.spaceagecontrol.com/pm/uploads/Main.SubminiatureAirDataBoom/NR03-101100.jpg There is no credible reason to start doubting anything about the bona fides of this file. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Dingley, what are you talking about? The argument is not based on lack of EXIF data, only suggested, since modern NASA photos straight from the source typically have detailed EXIFs. The primary argument is that this image is credited nowhere to NASA, nor can it be found anywhere on the NASA.gov domain (unless I'm critically missing something). It is unreasonable to assume that this is NASA-produced or public domain when there is no evidence to support it. Rather it is most likely to be copyrighted to SpaceAge Control. Huntster (t @ c) 21:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The engineering drawing of the air data probe [2] was deleted some time back, because it was a credible claim that this was the product of SpaceAge Control, who make the booms, and we didn't have any licence from them. But this is different (even if it's included in the same press release). SpaceAge Control don't operate any TriStars, even model ones, but NASA do. So the application photos of the model in flight would be from NASA, not SpaceAge Control. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But that's simply speculation without any evidence. It's not at all unusual for a company to take their own photos. You've made your opinion known, but I still argue that this is not enough to keep. Huntster (t @ c) 00:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There is no substantial doubt that NASA is the author. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is presumably a screenshot from the movie mentioned in the file's name, but there's no indication that this has ever been released under a Commons-friendly license. Source is unclear. Victor Lopes (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be photo from commercial shoot for magazine, uploaded by photographer; photo appears to be a low-resolution scan from a printed magazine (gamut colours), no photographer name, contributors sole upload as driveby. Would need a lot more evidence that this was actually by the original photographer, and not just a fan uploading the scan. David Gerard (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Архів не є органом державної влади, і архіви не підпорядковуються закону про доступ до публічної інформації, тож не бачу підстав вважати цей документ вільним. Anatoliy (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Хіба? 1. Державна архівна служба України (Укрдержархів) є центральним органом виконавчої влади, діяльність якого спрямовується і координується Кабінетом Міністрів України через Міністра юстиції і який реалізує державну політику у сфері архівної справи, діловодства та створення і функціонування державної системи страхового фонду документації. (з ПОЛОЖЕННЯ про Державну архівну службу України). --Микола Василечко (talk) 09:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
А цей лист підпадає під офіційні документи політичного, законодавчого, адміністративного характеру? Під закон про публічну інформацію архіви не підпадають. Мені самому багато раз відмовляли саме з цієї причини.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
То нащо вони Огороднику листи направляють і відповідають на його запити? --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ну листи відправляти ж ніхто не забороняє.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 07:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: comme la loi française n'accepte pas la linerté de panorama ces photos d'oeuvres visibles à Reims ne sont pas sous licence libre.

French FOP concern, should be discussed at DR.
ƏXPLICIT 02:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted all, except File:Sans titre de Emile COMPARD Collège Saint Remi Reims.jpg wich can be considered de minimis. --Elly (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From its appearance the building is recent. Honduras doesn't provide Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama: the law only allows personal use of images of copyrighted architecture exteriors and public sculptures and national monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to eswiki es:Torre Sky, this building was completed in 2009. Honduras doesn't provide Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama: the law only allows personal use of images of copyrighted architecture exteriors and public sculptures and national monuments. Additional permission (preferably via COM:OTRS) from the architect or his heirs, or the architectural firm, is needed to allow the hosting of this Creative Commons or public domain-licensed image of this copyrighted architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gikü as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from https://vienela.ro/planuim-vacanta-de-anul-acesta-malaga-2019/ without apparent permission
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, per protest by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio The https://vienela.ro/ blog is mine. The blog belongs to me. The pictures proposed for wikipedia also belong to me. EvelinaSas (talk) 09:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per remark of uploader. The photo was uploaded on the same day as the photo was taken, so I believe that it is their own image, made with their own equipment. --Elly (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violazione copyright, ad esempio Giorgio Almirante è morto nel 1988 Luigi62 (talk) 10:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Luigi62: , ne sei sicuro?

  1. Nel caso di opere collettive periodiche (riviste, giornali) vale la Legge 22 aprile 1941 n. 633, art. 30': i diritti di utilizzazione economica hanno validità di 70 anni a partire dalla fine dell’anno di pubblicazione dei singoli fascicoli o dei singoli numeri;
  2. la rivista poi rientra tra le opere senza un avviso di copyright pubblicate prima del 1977, che la fa ricadere nel pubblico dominio anche negli Stati Uniti, che comunque non potrebbero rimetterla sotto tutela perché già in pubblico dominio nel paese d'origine ecc. --Xavier121 12:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm that according to Italian law newspapers and journals have a different expiration date for copyright, and also U.S. copyrifght law considers it as in public domain. --.mau. 18:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
  • @Holapaco77: The single chapters are under copyright, if extracted from the book, not the publication itself as it is a collective work. This is established nella sentenza della Cassazione civile Sez. I Sent., 04/02/2016, n. 2197 (rv. 638582) --Ruthven (msg) 12:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ruthven@ if "single chapters are still under copyright", it means that publication of derivative work are not allowed. That doesn't fit in Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. Then, the file has been uploaded under a PD-old license (a deprecated generic model that should not be used for new uploads), and PD-old specifies that the reason is that the "author(s) died more than 70 years ago". --Holapaco77 (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Holopaco77: Not true. We host photos whith copyrighted material is de minimis, but if you publish a zoomed verion of just the copyright material, you've a derivative version that is not publishable on Commons. Why can't we have it for this case? --Ruthven (msg) 21:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and given sources. I put a note on the file page of the document. --Elly (talk) 08:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Revised my decision per Commons:Deletion requests/La Difesa Della Razza. Ellywa (talk) 14:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark image, subject is dim. COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:367Construction of Metro Manila Skyway Stage 13.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These tarpaulins or Address billboards were photographed so as to provide Editors the evidence as to the Correctness of Categorizing via-a-vis the boundaries of Roads and Barangays; noteworthy is the fact that a) Caloocan Roads and Highways are so prolific that often, there are zero road signs when I can base the names of the Categories; hence, I should have uploaded a new version taking from a good photo of a road shot so that in time like at present, the unused category may be a historical remaining proof of the correctness of my Categorizing and b) 18th Sgt. Rivera Street along C-3 Road verily teaches that the photos should be Categorized as Sub-Category of the General C-3 Road; this Road is kilometric; d) the dim or dark Directional road sign was then needed to Identify the specific road or section, since the Junction or Crossing encompasses 3 Main Roads or Highways of thousands in Quezon City Streets or Roads; e) The Billboard Ads blocked my important photo vis-à-vis DPWH Engineering Bridge and Road works: this is an eye-sore and a Legal Nuisance Public Per Se Art. 694: incidentally, when I met my classmate Mayor of Caloocan 1983 seatmate due to alphabetical seating at the Ateneo College of Law in 1981, he listened to my query and complaint against proliferation of Commercial Ads that block the streets and endanger the lives of NLEX road riders; I lament the pathetic blocking of my good photos by these May anking talino na di kayang Tawaran as 1st Honor genius Pinoys; hereby Noted sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comments of Judgefloro explaining the use of these images. --Elly (talk) 08:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly redundant pics depicting an overpass above Bonifacio-C3-Sgt. Rivera segment and the road below it. More useful images (by the same uploader as that of the ff. nominated images) have been moved to Category:Construction of Skyway Stage 3 - Circumferential Road 3 segment and Category:Construction of Skyway Stage 3 - Sergeant Rivera Avenue segment, and some moved to Category:Bonifacio Avenue (Quezon City). May fulfill COM:SPAM, like the case at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These tarpaulins or Address billboards were photographed so as to provide Editors the evidence as to the Correctness of Categorizing via-a-vis the boundaries of Roads and Barangays; noteworthy is the fact that a) Caloocan Roads and Highways are so prolific that often, there are zero road signs when I can base the names of the Categories; hence, I should have uploaded a new version taking from a good photo of a road shot so that in time like at present, the unused category may be a historical remaining proof of the correctness of my Categorizing and b) 18th Sgt. Rivera Street along C-3 Road verily teaches that the photos should be Categorized as Sub-Category of the General C-3 Road; this Road is kilometric; d) the dim or dark Directional road sign was then needed to Identify the specific road or section, since the Junction or Crossing encompasses 3 Main Roads or Highways of thousands in Quezon City Streets or Roads; e) The Billboard Ads blocked my important photo vis-à-vis DPWH Engineering Bridge and Road works: this is an eye-sore and a Legal Nuisance Public Per Se Art. 694: incidentally, when I met my classmate Mayor of Caloocan 1983 seatmate due to alphabetical seating at the Ateneo College of Law in 1981, he listened to my query and complaint against proliferation of Commercial Ads that block the streets and endanger the lives of NLEX road riders; I lament the pathetic blocking of my good photos by these May anking talino na di kayang Tawaran as 1st Honor genius Pinoys;
I am not really in a position to comment on whether all or some of these photos are no longer needed; I defer the matter of deletion or retaining to Commons Engineers, specifically the Mechanical, Structural and even Bridge and Roadworks professionals, since Criminal Law is my expertise, and I am not so familiar with the niceties of the Civil or Architectural elements of Roads and Bridges hereby Noted sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most. Deleted those wich I considered COM:REDUNDANT. Of each series I kept one, choose the version with the best overview, or with the smallest possible size of advertisements. @Judgefloro: , in future, please do not upload redundant images. --Elly (talk) 08:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough evidence to use claimed license. No info on the publication date, place, source and author. But yet it's claimed that it's on public domain in its country of origin where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. The issue is that if the photographer was from Russian Empire and he had repressions against him them the date of PD is 70 years after his rehabilitation. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was taken, which will be 2046.. --Elly (talk) 08:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 15:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Even not on permanent display. --Elly (talk) 08:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of appropriate permission, image appears to already be published on Conseervative party website https://www.scottishconservatives.com Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Uploader did not comment or take action according the VRT procedure. --Elly (talk) 08:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. In addition, such a sticker is not on permanent display. --Elly (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. In addition the subject is not on permanent display. --Elly (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ariadacapo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken off https://www.facebook.com/171312942956407/posts/muuqaalka-caasimada-ee-habeenimo-hargeisa-share/3092338427520496/ , no evidence provided that applied copyright information actually applies
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, due to the fundamental importance of this case. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete It looks like the claim is (a) Somalia has no copyright law, (b) the US has no copyright relations with Somalia, (c) anything published in Somalia is public domain in both Somalia and in the US, and (d) this photo was published in Somalia. I'm not a lawyer, but based on the templates on the page and reading Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Somalia, I'm willing to accept a, b, and c. It is (d) I'm not sure about. The photo, as far as we know, was first published ON FACEBOOK. Facebook's data centers are mostly in the US. They have some in Europe and Asia. Does that count as being published in Somalia? If a Somalian writes a book, and publishes it in Somalia, it's public domain in Somalia and in the US. But if a Somalian writes a book, mails it to Random House, and Random House publishes it in the US, it's copyrighted in the US. This situation would seem to me to be more similar to the latter than the former. --B (talk) 12:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conserve. Even if the picture was published on FB, FB isn't the author from the photo. Your way of thinking seems crazy to me: I take a picture here in France, I post it on FB and the unknown place where the FB server is located decides the rights about the photo. In fact, it's a very good news: France has no FoP but other countries have it so, I've just to post first my photo of recent French buildings on FB then I'll be able to upload it here w/o any problem. Correct? --Birdie (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark of Birdie and PD-Somalia as listed on the file page. --Elly (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson died 26 May 1952 - so still 2 years left. Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be total confusion over the date of death of this illustrator. Please see a more general question on this here. --87.150.13.127 12:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another File:Rumplestiltskin - Anne Anderson.jpg--RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Anne Anderson Sciencia58 (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anne Anderson in the British Library, Anne Anderson in the German Wikipedia. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Anne_Anderson_images. Perhaps a bit COM:PRP as well, because several reliable sources say she died in 1930. Undelete in 2023.. --Elly (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson died 26 May 1952 - so still 2 years left. Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this would affect a whole bunch of images, I asked about this in a more general place. --87.150.13.127 12:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Anne_Anderson_images. Perhaps a bit COM:PRP as well, because several reliable sources say she died in 1930. Undelete in 2023.. --Elly (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson died 26 May 1952 - so still 2 years left. Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Anne_Anderson_images. Perhaps a bit COM:PRP as well, because several reliable sources say she died in 1930. Undelete in 2023.. --Elly (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson died 26 May 1952 - so still 2 years left. Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be total confusion over the date of death of this illustrator. Please see a more general question on this here. --87.150.13.127 12:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Anne_Anderson_images. Perhaps a bit COM:PRP as well, because several reliable sources say she died in 1930. Undelete in 2023.. --Elly (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson died 26 May 1952 - so still 2 years left. Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Anne_Anderson_images. Perhaps a bit COM:PRP as well, because several reliable sources say she died in 1930. Undelete in 2023.. --Elly (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a circa 1970s-dated photo, no indication that it is a pre-1976 shot - a necessary criterion for being covered by the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1985-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably still taken from film Sconosciuta from 2006. --Elly (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1982-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably still taken from film Sconosciuta from 2006. --Elly (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1985-dated photo, inelegible for the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 17:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ruthven. --Elly (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seismic reflection profile cannot be the work of the uploader. The copyright will either rest with the geophysical company that acquired and processed the data or the oil/gas company for which it was acquired Mikenorton (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama for street art in France czar 19:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama for street art in France

czar 19:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 08:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean Galle died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:7D3A:345F:5B23:5EEE 19:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination and undelete in 2034. Artist died in 1963, see fr: Jean Galle (sculpteur). --Elly (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mr. Berg was died in 1950. "Author" on his personal page said that he was born in 1981. Is he author??? Uncle Fred 22:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was taken, which will be 1947+120=2067.. --Elly (talk) 08:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]