This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment I only agree with you to a certain extent. Some of the images uploaded are just taken on the same road but at different points. The distance between these points doesn't really make anything more visible (i.e. distance between photos taken are too close). Hope you understand my POV. 大诺史 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road
With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:
Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;
Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes
There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;
Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads
advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass
I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;
How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas
I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in BarangaysDulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with BarangaysMatangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, BulacanPhilippine highway network;
A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing
This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;
Finally, an Impossible made possible
from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation
Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history
IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu CityCategory:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images. P 1 9 9✉13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan MayorAntonio Sanchez case:
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Additional argument, discussion and submissions on the issue of notablility and sufficiency of the number of photos
1) Sitios, puroks and villages compose the Category:Barangays of Calauan, Laguna; like before particularly when I was starting here in Commons about 2010 to 2015, I could take specific photos of Health Centers, Barangay Halls, even Chapels and Schools, among other interesting points; I could have taken more tourist spots like falls and Historical markers, but they are too far and I would spend hours to reach them in addition to the long 6 hours to reach Laguna from Bulacan, and 6 hours to be back leaving only 2 hours for photography;
2) The most important problem of my photography is that most of the Barangays are critical or dangerous areas;
3) Hence, I opted to stay inside the vehicle like jeep or tricycle hired to take photos of these Sitios, puroks and villages via Road photography;
4) I beg to disagree on the duplication of photos: because for example, Barangay Mabacan, Calauan is too large a barangay with about 7 Sitios, puroks and villages;
5) The going to or North photos capture only some of the :Sitios, puroks and villages; and the going back or South photos also capture only some of the Sitios, puroks and villages but and but, the scenery is totally different;
6) In Category:Salvacion and San Agustin, Pangasinan 8 December 2015, while I was taking photos while walking when I stepped down of the tricycle, I was locked down in the Barangay Hall and arrested to the Police station; I was asked to sign a waiver that I have no complaint against my detention; I failed to Google this critical area only to have found that Taguinod brothers were shot in Barangay San Agustin;
6) The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks;
7) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murderAntonio Sanchez (politician) Site of the Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder-rape is Km. 74 Brgy. Balayhangin Calauan Laguna 14°7'53"N 121°18'44"E along Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria RoadBarangayBalayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna and List of barangays in Laguna (province)BarangayMabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna and Barangay and Erais Farm 30-hectare farm in Santo Tomas, Calauan, Laguna 14.1711, 121.3367 Calauan, Laguna Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) from Victoria (Masapang) Duck Junction Calauan - VictoriaRoad Calauan-Victoria Road Erais Farm Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murderAntonio Sanchez (politician)People vs. Antonio Sanchez, et al xxx"'The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan. It was here that Luis announced that it’s time for the group to feast on Eileen (the exact words of Luis were “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss”)." xxx " Both vehicles then headed for Erais Farm situated in Barangay Curba, owned by the Mayor." xxx "The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan." 'xxx a dead female loaded inside a Tamaraw van was found in Barangay Mabacan." " a card gambler was able to retrieve a pair of white shorts lying near the national highway in Barangay Balayhangin. In the morning of June 30, 1993, the Mayor, with some companions, jogged towards the direction of Barangay Mabacan and at the same time inquired from residents whether they noticed anything unusual on the night of June 28, 1993. A certain “Mang Torio” told the Mayor that he found a pair of “maong” pants lying at the side of the road but left if there. After inspecting the dirty “maong” pants, the Mayor instructed Mang Torio to keep the pants as the former will send someone back to pick it up."
7a) I respectfully appeal and with due respect submit my humble thoughts and reply on these issues, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Google Streemaps-like photos. I certainly wouldn't encourage anyone to make photos like these, and some photos are certainly not necessary, but I don't want to make that decision, since we'd keep a sizeable amount. If someone wants to nominate individual photos, feel free to. --Sebari– aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine for the specific events therein mentioned - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription, I have no objection to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerations Judgefloro (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto;
Off-topic lecture on tarpaulins
when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;
I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their ligths are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A set of redundant images. See COM:SPAM and COM:NOTUSED. Uploader has been notified to be more selective in their uploads. Only 2 or 3 images for each person or child depicted is enough (those that I didn't nominate).
Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-a-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community; sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not redundant at all. Thank you, Judgefloro, for your work and your licensing, and sorry you have to deal with deletionists. -- Tuválkin✉✇20:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JWilz12345: The photograpger/uploader here is a judge. I’m sure he’s thankful for your input about his possible overlook of the laws of his country. Now, where’s that gavel again? -- Tuválkin✉✇04:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: So much for COM:PEOPLE, then; maybe all these could be slapped with a {{Personality}}. If you have concerns about your countryman, then the right place is AN/U, not a DR (nor the VP). Your nomination only claims alledged redundancy, which have been addressed. -- Tuválkin✉✇05:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. These certainly are redundant to the many near-duplicate images already in its category. --P 1 9 9✉20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another set of redundant and repetitive images of a same subject - Wish FM Bus parked at a mall in Bulacan. Redundant to both File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.11.jpg and File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.6.jpg. The judge-uploader has been notified several times to be more selective in choosing which images to be uploaded. Uploading redundant images is leaning towards COM:SPAM as treating Commons as a "cloud / webhost" laden with numerous unused images.
The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNUBreakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: the angles may be different, but these images are same to each other: these depict the same subject. There is redundancy. You can only tell it's not redundant if the two subjects are different, either the subjects themselves or the location where the subject is situated. For example, one image depicts the bus in Marilao, and the other image depicts the same bus in Cabanatuan (not the same bus in the same spot of Marilao, but in different angle). If you desire images of the same subject at different angles, perhaps two or three is enough. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. Redundancy doesn't make sense when we already have near-duplicate images in its category. --P 1 9 9✉20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In the Philippines, the Safe Spaces Act prohibits "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent". (See also this explanation.) There's no indication that the subjects consented to having their photos taken or uploaded here.
I checked two ofthese images randomly and that was enough to see that this is yet another BS DR motivated likely by nothing else than spite at the uploader’s place at the top of the chart, regardless of value of the rationale stated: Individual privacy laws are a concern for public candid shots, but when faces take up a dozen blurry pixels that concern is misplaced and being misused as a mere prop in the neverending deletionist war. Keep all, obviously — if there’s anything here that should be deleted, lets have a proper reason. -- Tuválkin✉✇12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My input: upon checking several files, it appears there are no issues regarding consent. In particular, the guy at File:9610Cuisine food of Bulacan Baliuag 35.jpg appears to be smiling at the photographer which means he agreed to be photographed. None of the images I check depict persons that are "topless" (is the biker guy here topless? I don't think so). Meaning to say, it is acceptable to host them here (no topless persons shown, as far as within the scope of my review, as I haven't review all files). File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Province 56.jpg depicts a normal street scene where it is unavoidable to include folks. Lean towards Keep (but that is per my checking as, I repeat, haven't checked them all). ButDeleteFile:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg as a possible no Philippine FOP violation, and it is accepted here that architecture is a form of artistic work, as long as a degree of hard work is exerted, "irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." (Sec. 172.2 of RA 8293). Undelete it if FOP is introduced here, maybe next year or around Yuletide season, but not as early as month of fall (as it seems involved stakeholders on potential impacts of FOP are yet to be consulted). JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)12:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Isn't the whole point of the law to prevent harassment in public spaces? A quick ctrl+f for "photo" or "video" seems like the part of the law related to media is in relation to the likelihood of the photo being used for harassment. Because it's not like they banned the use of CCTV (in fact they encourage it). And the whole "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent", is that referring to the photos that the victims already possess (like on their phones) or like the photos that others take of them? I recognize that the law is written in a confusing manner, but such a strict interpretation that prevents any persons to appear in videos or photos without explicit consent would mean that news outlets like ANC 247 or Inquirer.net are breaking the law right? — BriefEdits (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kept some per discussion above. But deleted many. Some were indeed too personal (like portrait photos of non-notable persons). And as with many of Judgefloro's uploads, they are uncurated: near duplicates, bad compositions, unusable. Also kept File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg because it is a plain box building, nothing really propriety there. --P 1 9 9✉14:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:SPAM and fulfill COM:WEBHOSTing. Commons is not a social media platform where dozens of relatively useless images are being dumped hour by hour. Yet another set of contributions by the now blocked uploader, who is suspected to be w:Florentino Floro.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Violation of Alphabet Inc.'s copyright. While the billboard/announcement may be ineligible for protection as it just contains non-original wording in predictable layout, the map used is not: it is a screenshot of Google Maps. COM:Derivative work as a result.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOST-ing by now-blocked Judgefloro. The following are unused files that oversaturate Category:School children in Bulacan. Redundant to all other images of similar school children of the very same province that is already "over-covered" here on WikiCommons (as opposed to distant provinces away from Bulacan).
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
